Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Maternity Service Leadership and Delivery -
7KNIM141 Level: 7
Credits: 30
Module leader: Sophie French
Tel: 0207 848 3319
Email: [email protected]
Module deputy: Professor Jane Sandall
Tel: 0207 188 8149/0207 188 3639
Email: [email protected]
Academic support is offered by the module leader and teaching team.
This handbook must be read in conjunction with module information provided on KEATS, the King’s E-Learning and Teaching Service. You will be given access to KEATS on enrolment. Important information relating to assessment and related regulations can be found in the Postgraduate Programme Handbook, available on KEATS and via the Student Services Centre. This handbook can also be provided in alternative formats (such as large print) upon request to [email protected].
2
Contents
Module overview .............................................................................................................. 3
Module aim ................................................................................................................... 3
Learning outcomes ....................................................................................................... 3
Teaching and learning arrangements ......................................................................... 3
Submitting coursework .................................................................................................... 7
Assessment criteria ...................................................................................................... 7
Formative assessment .................................................................................................. 7
Summative assessment ................................................................................................ 7
Submission date for course work: ............................................................................... 8
Results and re-submissions for course work .............................................................. 8
Re-submission date:..................................................................................................... 2
Resubmitted work available for download: ................................................................ 2
Resources and Indicative Reading .............................................................................. 8
E Resources .................................................................................................................. 14
Websites ........................................................................................................................ 14
Module evaluation ........................................................................................................... 15
Timetable ...................................................................................................................... 18
3
Module overview This module forms part of the MSc Advanced Practice (Midwifery). It is a core module and contributes to your programme of study by providing a contemporary review of leadership within the midwifery profession and evaluating how this contributes to the development of maternity services. The module provides an opportunity for you to investigate how leadership approaches influence the development, implementation and evaluation of research, policy and practice in maternity care.
The module can also be taken as a freestanding module. There is also provision for midwifery practitioners who have been previous appointed Supervisors of Midwives (SOMs) to attend a ‘nested’ shortened programme over 4 days to support the role of Professional Midwifery Advocate (PMA). A separate module handbook and e-learning platform is available for colleagues accessing this provision.
Module aim Current maternity service policies state a commitment to high quality, woman-centred care and indicate a need for strong midwifery leadership. This module aims to support the development of these leaders.
Learning outcomes It is intended that this module will enable you to:
1. Demonstrate advanced knowledge and critical understanding of the organisation of maternity care.
2. Critically evaluate the leadership and management skills required to ensure the delivery of high quality midwifery services, including an understanding of leadership and change management theories and how they could be utilized to advance the care of maternity service users.
3. Critically evaluate the evidence base of midwifery and obstetric practice.
4. Demonstrate advanced reflective understanding of maternity policy creation and implementation.
5. Understand professional initiatives to support continuous improvement processes that build personal and professional resilience, enhance quality of care and support preparedness for appraisal and professional revalidation
Teaching and learning arrangements This module will draw on your experience of clinical practice and the evidence used to support professional initiatives. Teaching and learning approaches embrace interactive discussion and reflection and this will be encouraged through peer discussion, student-led seminars, tutorials, self-directed study and keynote lectures. Learning resources to complement sessional topics are available on the KEATS module learning platform and these resources will be added to as material becomes available.
7
Submitting coursework For those enrolled on the module as a core or free-standing unit of study the module is assessed by 3,500 word essay.
Assessment criteria The assessment criteria are outlined in the module assessment rubric available on KEATS. This rubric incorporates generic College assessment criteria for post graduate study and is a useful formative self-assessment tool in the preparation of your work.
Formative assessment To develop your insights in maternity service leadership and delivery you are required to undertake a peer and lecturer reviewed formative case study presentation on the 14/6/18. Your 30-minute presentation will explore issues of leadership and change management around a specific aspect of practice and will include opportunities for you to lead a discussion on the key issues identified.
Summative assessment The summative assignment requires you to produce an essay of 3.500 words. Your assignment is intended to build on your formative presentation and you are encouraged to consolidate your critical evaluation on issues of leadership and change management around a specific aspect of practice. Your work is expected to demonstrate a critical awareness and advanced critical understanding of your chosen area of interest. In order to demonstrate this, you will be expected to access a range of evidence to support your discussion and this may include professional standards, policies, clinical guidance, primary and secondary research. The presentation of material in a logical and systematic format is a useful strategy in academic presentation and the following structure may enable you to consider choices in this regard: Cover sheet
Make sure it is appropriate to the module
Includes a plagiarism disclaimer
Includes a total word count Introduction
Provide an overview of the structure of the essay
Identify the topic under review – provide a rationale
Contextualise the issues under review – Why is it important? Who is involved? How does it link to policy and/or professional priorities?
How does the topic link to international, national and/or local care priorities?
You may wish to present material in a reflective format – justify the benefits of this approach
You may wish to present material using an identified framework – a policy analysis or improvement framework so justify the benefits of this approach
Acknowledge ethical principles – e.g. NMC Code (2015) Main body
Apply theories and models of leadership and change management to the issue
Make links to demonstrate critical awareness of the political and social context of maternity service provision
Use a range of perspectives to critically explore the topic under review – what does it raise for women, midwives, the multi-professional team, policy makers, researchers?
Use a range of sources to critically evaluate policy, professional standards, clinical guidance, improvement/standard setting and research literature
What issues of quality are raised and
Identify gaps in the evidence base
8
Conclusion
Summarise the main points of the discussion
Return to issues raised in the introduction – e.g. what are the international, national and/or local care priorities and how has the critical discussion forwarded the debate?
Identify any recommendations and the feasibility in implementation and evaluation
Comment on personal insights and future development of specific objectives related to leadership role
References
Presented in the Harvard style
Include all sources cited in text
Exclusive of total word count Appendices:
Table, figures, documents to support in text discussion
Acknowledge sources
Exclusive of word count Course work submission details are provided on the KEATS module site and it is advisable to practise uploading your work in advance of the submission deadline. Different versions of your work can be uploaded with the latest version superseding previous versions. In addition to the module workshop discussion do make sure you refer to the section in your programme handbook on plagiarism and how to avoid it. If you have a query about how to refer to a specific piece of work please ask the module leader or a member of library staff for guidance. It is essential that you use your candidate number on all assignments/examinations. Your candidate number, which will begin with Y for the academic year 2017/18, will be available via Student Records on the King’s Intranet approximately one month after you enrol. If you are unable to submit your work by the deadline please refer to the information in your programme handbook on “mitigating circumstances”.
Submission date for course work: Tuesday 17th July 2018 Late submissions will be accepted for 24 hours following the submission date. All work submitted late will be marked as normal but will be capped at 50% which is the pass mark for the module. It is expected that your work will be submitted electronically through TurnItIn, information about how to submit late will be provided on KEATS module sites under assessment information. The external examiner for this module is Andrew Symon. You are not permitted to make direct contact with external examiners, in particular regarding your individual performance in assessments
Results and re-submissions for course work You will receive a provisional (unratified) mark for your coursework 4 weeks following submission Tuesday 14th August 2018 Feedback will include the award of a numerical grade which remains provisional until ratified by the examination boards. As your work will be submitted online you will be able to download marked unratified feedback on coursework from the KEATS module site. It is important to review the grade awarded as well as the feedback as presented using the rubric and individual marker comments. This is designed to support future learning and the feedback you receive on your assignment will guide you towards how to do better next time or how to maintain your existing high standard! The module marking rubric is based on marking criteria as provided in full in your programme
2
handbook and you may find this an important reference point for future consideration. If you do not understand your mark or the feedback you receive please contact Sophie French – on [email protected] The date for the examination boards to which results will be ratified is: 12th September 2018 Your ratified results will be available via your Student Record on the: 19th September 2018
Re-submission date: Tuesday 16th October 2018 If you are unsuccessful, it is recommended that you contact the module leader before submitting your second attempt. This will enable the module leader to provide you with an appropriate level of support as you prepare to re-submit your work.
Resubmitted work available for download: Tuesday 13th November 2018 The date for the examination boards to which results will be ratified is: Wednesday 14th November 2018 Your ratified results will be available via your Student Record on the: Wednesday 21st November 2018
8
Resources and Indicative Reading Below is a list of relevant sources that will inform exploration around the module content. It is a long list and you will be introduced to resources on a sessional basis but browsing through resources is also encouraged on an introductory and consolidation basis. Sessional resources will be signposted in the presentations given on the day.
Alaszewski, A. & Brown, P. (2012) Making Health Policy: A Critical Introduction. Polity Press
Barr J and Dowling L, (2008) Leadership in Healthcare. Sage.
Birthplace in England Collaborative Group (2011) Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. BMJ; 343
Bick D. & Graham I. (2010) Evaluating the Impact of Implementing Evidence Based Practice. Wiley Blackwell, Oxford. Bond M. & Holland S. (2011) Skills for Clinical Supervision for Nurses. Open University Press, Buckingham. Bosenquet N., Ferry J., Lees C. & Thornton J. (2005) Maternity Services in the NHS Available: www.reform.co.uk Brocklehurst et al (2011) Perinatal and Maternal Outcomes by Planned Place of Birth for Healthy Women with Low Risk Pregnancies: the Birthplace in England National Prospective Cohort Study. British Journal of Medicine, 343: d 7400 Available http://www.bmj.com/content/343/bmj.d7400 Bourke G. (2013) Support Overdue: Women’s Experiences of Maternity Services, National Childbirth Trust (NCT). Available http://www.nct.org.uk Care Quality Commission (2017) Maternity Services Survey available www.cqc.org.uk Commission for Healthcare Audit & Inspection (2006) An investigation into 10 maternal deaths at, or following delivery at, Northwick Park Hospital, North West London Hospitals Trust between April 2002 and April 2005. Available: http://webarcive.nationalarchives.gov.uk Davis-Floyd RE, Barclay L, Daviss B-A, Tritten J (Eds) (2009) Birth Models that Work. University of California Press.
Department of Health and Social Care (2016) Improving the safety of maternity care in the NHS Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/improving-the-safety-of-maternity-care-in-the-nhs DH (2012) Compassion in Practice Nursing, Midwifery and Care Staff: Our Vision and Strategy. Available: http://cdn.basw.co.uk/upload/basw_32806-4.pdf DH (2010) Midwifery 2020: Delivering Expectations. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/216029/dh_119470.pdf DH (2007) Implementation Plan for Reducing Health Inequalities in Infant Mortality: A Good Practice Guide. Available: www.dh.gov.uk DH (2007) Maternity Matters: Choice, Access and Continuity of Care in a Safe Service. Available: www.dh.gov.uk
9
DH (2007) Improving the Quality and Outcomes for Maternity Service Users through Effective Commissioning. A self-assessment tool for commissioners. Available: www.dh.gov.uk DH (2005) Improving Working Lives in Midwifery: A Guide for Midwives and Managers. Available: www.dh.gov.uk Downe, S., Byrom, S., Simpson, L. (2011) Essential Midwifery Practice: Expertise Leadership and Collaborative Working. Wiley – Blackwell. Downe S. (Ed) (2004) Normal Childbirth: Evidence and Debate. Churchill Livingstone Press, London.
Duffy K. (2003) Failing Students: A Qualitative Study of Factors that Influence the Decisions Regarding Assessment of Student’s Competence to Practice. NMC, London.
Edwards G. (Ed) (2004) Adverse Outcomes in Maternity Care. Cheshire: Books for Midwives Press Oxford. Fahy K, Foureur M, Hastie C, (2008) Birth Territory and Midwifery Guardianship: Theory for Practice, Education and Research. Books for Midwives.
Foster I. & Lasser J. (2011) Professional Ethics in Midwifery Practice. Jones and Bartlett Publications, London. Frazer D. (Ed) 2000) Professional Studies for Midwifery Practice. Churchill Livingstone, London. Frith L. & Draper H. (Eds) (2004) Ethics and Midwifery. Cheshire: Books for Midwives. Griffiths R., Tengnah C. & Patel C. (2010) Law and Professional Issues in Midwifery. Learning Matters Ltd, Exeter. Hadkin R. (2004) Effective Coaching in Healthcare. Cheshire: Books for Midwives Press. Hadkin R. (2004) Bullying Culture. Cheshire: Books for Midwives. Hatem M, Sandall J, Devane D, Soltani H, Gates S. (2011) Midwife-led versus other models of care for childbearing women.
Hayes J, (2010) The Theory and Practice of Change Management (3rd edition). Palgrave.
Healthcare Commission (2008) Learning from Investigations. London. Available: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk Healthcare for London Working Group (2007) Healthcare for London: A Framework for Action. Available: www.healthcareforlondon.nhs.uk Henderson J, Jomeen J, Redshaw M.(2018) Care and Self-reported Outcomes of Care Experienced by Women with Mental Health Problems in Pregnancy: Findings from a National Survey. Midwifery. 56171-8 Hinton L, Dumelow C, Rowe R, Hollowell J.(2018) Birthplace Choices: What are the Information Needs of Women when Choosing Where to Give Birth in England? A Qualitative Study using Online and Face to Face Focus Groups. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 18(1):12.
10
Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C. Continuous Support for Women during Childbirth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 10
Hodnett ED, Downe S, Walsh D. Alternative Versus Conventional Institutional Settings for Birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 8.
Homer C, Ryan C, Leap N, Foureur M, Teate A, Catling-Paul C, Group Versus Conventional Antenatal Care for Women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 11
Homer C, Brodie P, Leap N, 2008, Midwifery Continuity of Care: A Practical Guide. Churchill/Livingstone/Elsevier
HM Government (2004) Every Child Matters. Change for Children. London: DFES. Johns C. (2002) Guided Reflection Advancing Practice. Blackwell Science, Oxford. Keogh B. (2013) Review into the Quality of Care and Treatment Provided by 14 Hospital Trusts in England: Overview Report. Available: http://www.nhs.uk/nhsengland/bruce-keogh-review/documents/outcomes/keogh-review-final-report.pdf
King’s Fund (2016) User Feedback in Maternity Services, London, Kings Fund King’s Fund (2011) Staffing in Maternity Units, London, King’s Fund King’s Fund (2008) Safer Birth: Everyone’s Business. London: King’s Fund. Kirkham M. & Stapleton H. (2000) Midwives’ Support Needs as Childbirth Changes. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(2), 465-472. Kirkham M (Ed), (2003) Birth Centres: A Social Model of Maternity Care. Books for midwives
Kitzinger S. (2005) The Politics of Birth. Elsevier, London. Lavender T. & Chapple J. (2004) An Exploration of Midwives’ Views of the Current System of Maternity Care in England. Midwifery, 20, 324-334. Levy V. (2006) Protective Steering: A Grounded Theory Study of the Processes by which Midwives Facilitate Informed Choices During Pregnancy. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29(1), 104-112. Magill-Cuerden J. (2007) ‘How to Write in an Academic Way.’ In Meyler E and Trenoweth S (Eds) Succeeding in Nursing and Midwifery Education. John Wiley, Chichester. Magill-Cuerden J. (2007) Showing Respect for Women: Another Skill for Midwives. British Journal of Midwifery, 15(3), 126. Magill-Cuerden J. (2005) How Do Maternity Services Provide Individualised Care? British Journal of Midwifery, 13(5), 480. Mander R. (2004) ‘Where Does the Buck Stop? Accountability in Midwifery.’ In Tilley S, Watson R (Eds) Accountability in Nursing and Midwifery. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford. Mander R. (2001) Supportive Care and Midwifery. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford. Mander R, Murphy-Lawless J, (2013) The Politics of Maternity, Routledge.
11
Mander R. & Fleming V. (Eds) (2002) Failure to Progress. The Contraction of the Midwifery Profession. Routledge, London. McSherry R. & Pearce P. (2001) Clinical Governance A Guide to Implementation for Healthcare Professionals. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford. MBRRACE (2017) Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care Surveillance of maternal deaths in the UK 2013-15 and lessons learned to inform maternity care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2009-13 Available at: https://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/mbrrace-uk/reports MBRRACE-UK Perinatal Mortality Surveillance Enquiry - Term, Singleton, Intrapartum Stillbirth and Intrapartum Related Neonatal Death (2017) Available at: https://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/mbrrace-uk/reports McLeish J, Redshaw M. (2018) A Qualitative Study of Volunteer Doulas Working Alongside Midwives at Births in England: Mothers' and Doulas' Experiences. Midwifery.;56: 53-60 Available on: https://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/publications#a_year_2017 Milner E. & Joyce P. (2005) Lessons in Leadership. Meeting the Challenges of Public Service Management. Routledge, London. National Maternity Review (2016) ‘Better Births: Improving Outcomes of Maternity Services in England. A Five Year Forward View for maternity care, NHS England’.
National Childbirth Trust (2013) Maternity Services Liaison Committees (MLSCs) A Consensus Statement for NCT, RCM and RCOG. Available:http://www.nct.org.uk/sites/default/files/related_documents/MSLC%20document%202013%20web.pdf National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health (2007) Intrapartum Care: Care of Healthy Women and Their Babies during Childbirth. Available: http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/CG55FullGuideline.pdf NHS England (2017) CCG Improvement and Assessment Framework Available at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/ccg-improvement-and-assessment-framework-2017-18.pdf NHS England (2014) NHS Five Year Forward View Available: https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/nhs-five-year-forward-view/ NHS England (2013)How to Ensure the Right People, with the Right Skills, are in the Right Place at the Right Time A Guide to Nursing, Midwifery and Care Staffing Capacity and Capability Available: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/nqb-how-to-guid.pdf National Patient Safety Agency (2004) Making the NHS a Safer Place for Patients. London. Available: www.npsa.org.uk NHS England (2017) A-EQUIP – A Model of Clinical Midwifery Supervision Available: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/a-equip-midwifery-supervision-model.pdf NHS Litigation Authority (2006) CNST Maternity Clinical Risk Management Standards. Available: www.nhsla.com
12
National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (2006) Recorded Delivery – A National Survey of Women’s Experiences of Maternity Care Available: https://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/downloads/files/reports/Maternity-Survey-Report.pdf National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Guidelines available: www.nice.org.uk NMC Rules, Standards and Guidelines available on www.nmc-org.uk Ombudsman Report (2014) Review the implications for Supervision. http://www.ombudsman.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/23484/Midwiferysupervisioand-regulation_-recommendations-for-change.pdf Pedler M. & Abbott C. (2008) Am I doing it right? Facilitating Action Learning for Service Improvement. Leadership in Health Services, 21(3), 185-199. Pollock AM (2005) NHS plc: The Privatization of our Health care
Pope R., Graham L. & Patel S. (2001) Woman Centred Care. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 38,227-238. Public Health England (2013) Nursing and Midwifery Contribution to Public Health Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/210100/NMR_final.pdf Raynor MD, Marshall J E, Sullivan A (Eds) (2005) Decision Making in Midwifery Practice, Elsevier Churchill Livingstone
Royal College of Midwives (RCM) (2012) Midwifery Leadership Competency Framework. Available: http://www.rcm.org.uk/college/your-career/leadership/ RCM/Capsticks (2006) Litigation: a Risk Management Guide for Midwives. London: RCM. RCOG (2016) Each Baby Counts available on www.rcog.org.uk/eachbabycounts RCOG (2011) High Quality Women’s Health Care: A proposal for Change http://www.rcog.org.uk/high-quality-womens-health-care RCOG (2008) Standards for Maternity Care: Report of a working party. Available: www.rcog.org.uk RCOG (2007) Safer Childbirth: Minimum Standards for Service Provision and Care in Labour. Available www.rcog.org.uk RCOG (2005) Improving Patient Safety: Risk Management for Maternity and Gynaecology. Clinical Governance Advice No 2. Available: https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/clinical-governance-advice-2/ Renfrew et al (2012) Preventing Disease and Saving Resources: The Potential Contribution of Increasing Breast Feeding Rates. Available: http://www.unicef.org.uk/Documents/Baby_Friendly/Research/Preventing_disease_sav ing_resources.pdf Sandall J., Manthorpe J., Mansfield A. & Spencer L. (2007) Support Workers in Maternity Services: A national scoping study of NHS Trusts Providing Maternity Care in England 2006. Florence Nightingale School of Nursing & Midwifery, King’s College London. Available: http://www.kcl.ac.uk/sspp/kpi/scwru/people/manthorpe/pubs/2007.aspx
13
Sandall, J., Soltani, H., Gates, S., Shennan, A., & Devane, D. (2015) ‘Midwife-led Continuity Models Versus Other Models of Care for Childbearing Women’. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 9. Art. No.: CD004667.
Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (2008) Infant Feeding Survey. Available: www.sacn.gov.uk Secretary of State for Health (2007) Trust, Assurance & Safety – The Regulation of Health Professionals in the 21st Century. London: The Stationery Office Limited. Available: www.tsoshop.co.uk Shribman S. (2007) Making it Better for Mother and Baby: Clinical Case for Change. London: Department of Health. Available: www.dh.gov.uk Stark S. (2006) Using Action Learning for Professional Development Educational Action Research, 14(1), March, pp. 23–43. The Stationery Office (2013) The Francis Report: The Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Enquiry. Available: http://www.midstaffspublicinquiry.com/report Statutory Instruments (2001) The Nursing & Midwifery Order 2001. London: The Stationery Office Limited. Stewart M (Ed) (2003) Pregnancy, Birth and Maternity Care: Feminist Perspectives. Books for Midwives
Stuart C. (2003) A Model for Developing Skills of Reflection. British Journal of Midwifery, 8(2), 111-117. Stuart C. (2003) Assessment, Supervision and Support in Clinical Practice. A Guide for Nurses, Midwives and Other Health Professionals. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh. Swage T. (2003) Clinical Governance in Healthcare Practice. 2nd ed. London: Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann. Symon A. (2000) Litigation and Defensive Clinical Practice: Quantifying the Problem. Midwifery, 16, 8-14. Symon A. (2007) Risk and Choice in Maternity Care. Elsevier, London. Symon A. (2003) The Changing Medico-legal Climate for Midwives. British Journal of Midwifery, 11(10), 830-832. Symon A. (2001) Obstetric Litigation from A-Z. Quay Books, Salisbury. Thompson F. (2004) Mothers and Midwives. The Ethical Journal. Cheshire: Books for Midwives. Tyler S. (2012) Commissioning Maternity Services: A Resource Pack to Support Clinical Commissioning Groups. Available: http://www.england.nhs.uk/wpcontent/ uploads/2012/07/comm-maternity-services.pdf Wagner M (2001) Fish Can’t See the Water: The Need to Humanize Birth. International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 75: S25-S37.
14
Walsh D. (2011) Evidence and Skills for Normal Labour and Birth: A Guide for Midwives.2nd Ed Routledge Press, London. Walsh D & Byrom S (2009) Midwifery Birth Stories, London, Mark Allen Group Wilson J. & Symon A. (2002) Clinical Risk Management in Midwifery. Books for Midwives Press, Oxford.
E Resources You can access a range of relevant journals, databases and e books via the King’s library services via www.kcl.ac.uk/library/index Key Databases
AMED : Allied and Complementary Medicine
British Nursing Index : Information related to midwifery and community health care - mainly UK journals
CINAHL : Information related to midwifery and allied health care from North America and Europe
Cochrane Library : Evidence-based health care systematic reviews including effectiveness of treatments
Maternity and Infant Care – MIDIRS
PubMed: Biomedicine and Nursing
PsycINFO : Child development, psychological aspects of pregnancy, illness and treatments
Web of Science: Includes Science Citation Index and Social Sciences Citation Index
Websites Association for Improvements in the Maternity Services www.aims.org.uk
Baby Friendly Initiative www.bfi.org.uk
Care Quality Commission http://www.cqc.org.uk/
Department of Health www.dh.gov.uk
Department for education and Science www.dfes.gov.uk
Evidence Based Practice for Midwives www.moocformidwives.com/
International Confederation of Midwives www.internationalmidwives.org
Lancet Maternal and Child Nutrition www.thelancet.com/series/maternal-and-child-nutrition
MIDIRS Informed Choice www.midirs.org
MBRRACE https://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/mbrrace-uk/reports
National Childbirth Trust www.nct.org.uk
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence www.nice.org.uk
National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit https://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/mbrrace-uk
Institute for Innovation and Improvement www.institute.nhs.uk
15
Nursing and Midwifery Council www.nmc-uk.org
Royal College of Midwives www.rcm.org.uk
Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology www.rcog.org.uk
Social Issues Research Centre www.sirc.org
The King’s Fund http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/
World Health Organisation www.who.int
UNICEF - http://www.unicef.org.uk/babyfriendly/
http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/leadership
Module evaluationAt the end of the module you are requested to complete the short online evaluation which will be available on your module KEATS site. Student evaluations are very important to us and are reviewed as part of the Faculty education quality monitoring process.
1
Timetable Please note that sessions may be subject to change, do check KEATS regularly
PMA attendance for the 4 day shortened programme indicated with Asterix
Maternity Service leadership and Delivery: 7KNIM141
Teaching mode Date Type of session Title Time Lecturer Room
University based study
03 May 2018 Group exercises Welcome and getting to know each other 10:00-11:00
Sophie French
Presentation and discussion
Module aims and objectives Overview of the assessment strategy Overview of the A-EQUIP model and PMA portfolio requirements
11:30–13.00
WBW 2/1
Interactive demonstration and discussion
Exploration of professional evidence Consolidation of study skills expertise Introduction to KLASS resources Developing evidence-based questions Database searching
14.00–16.00
University based study
10 May 2018
Presentation and discussion
Perspectives of professional leadership: Leading change in maternity services 10:00-11:30 Prof C Warwick
WBW 2/1
Discussion Reflective discussion 12:00-13:00 Sophie French
Presentation and discussion
Review of theories and models of leadership and change management 14:00-16:00
University based
study
17 May 2018
Presentation and discussion
Maternity policy and leadership 10:00-11:30
Carmel Lloyd, RCM
WBW 2/1
Discussion Working in teams: Reflecting on group dynamics Restorative Clinical Supervision 12:00-13:00 Sophie French
Presentation and discussion
Service user perspectives 14:00-16:00
TBC
2
University based study
24 May 2018
Presentation and discussion
Evaluating risk management approaches 10:00-11:30 Sophie French
WBW 2/1 Working in NICE guideline development
12:00-13:00 Rebecca Latham
Leadership and professional education 14:00- 16.00 Sophie French
University based study
31 May 2018
Presentation and discussion
Working in multi-professional teams
Reflection on one-to-one and group RCS 10:00-11:30 Sophie French
WBW 2/1
Moving evidence into practice 12:00-13:00 Prof Debra Bick
Evaluating the impact of midwifery models of care 14:00-15:30
Hannah Rayment-Jones
Tutorials One-to-one tutorials by appointment X 4 16:00-17:00 Sophie French
University based study
07 June 2018
Presentation and discussion
Leadership, research and setting quality standards
10:00-11:30 Prof Jane Sandall
WBW 2/1
Managing maternity services: Perspectives of a Head of Midwifery implementing policy into practice
13:00-14:00 Lynne
Pacanowski
London Maternity Transformation Project Perspectives of the Regional Maternity LeadA 14:15-16:00 Jess Read
Tutorials Tutorials – by appointment x 4 16:00-17:00 Sophie French
University based
study 14 June 2018
Student led presentations
Student presentations and discussion 10:00-16:00 Students WBW 2/1
University based
study
21 June 2018
Presentation and discussion
Topic TBC 10.00 -11.30 Elsa Montgomery
WBW 2/1
Preparing for summative submission 12.00 – 13.30
Sophie French Evaluation and discussion
Module evaluation
14.30 – 15.30
3
University based study
28 June 2018
Independent
Study
Independent study All day students WBW 2/1
Location Key:
FWB - Franklin-Wilkins Building, Waterloo Campus
WBW – Waterloo Bridge Building, Waterloo Campus
