mat 3

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

hdruih

Citation preview

IntroductionNo Longer simply the Greek term for good, easy of happy death,[1]euthanasia is now well known as synonymous with mercy killing. Euthanasia or mercy killing or Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS) is the bringing about of the gentle death of a patient in the case of a painful, chronic and incurable disease. In time past there was no need for legislation in the area of euthanasia. If a person got sick, one of two things happened; he either got well, or he died. Today, the medical advances of the last few decades have given the medical profession a two-edged sword; the extension of human life by artificial means and the painlessly termination of life by drugs.[2]This article will define and employ the concept of euthanasia. The object is to explore the interaction and the law. Therefore, euthanasia will be discussed against the background of murder, suicide, constitutional law, standing and judicial decisions. It is necessary to consider how euthanasia is treated by the law today in the view of recent judgement passed by the Supreme Court of India, as well as exploring possible legalization through the existing framework of legal history.An effort has been made to confine discussion to purely legal issue. It must be noted, however, that the literature of euthanasia is composed predominantly of articles concerning relevant religious and moral considerations. It is, therefore, inevitable that some of these non-legal considerations would be discussed. Accordingly, this article does not deal with involuntary euthanasia, rendered over the objection or without the express consent of the patient.Euthanasia: Definition And TypesGenerally, the word euthanasia is defined as the act or practice of painlessly putting to death or withdrawing treatment from a person suffering an incurable disease.[3]From the definition, one can say that euthanasia is an unethical act as much as it is a great sin for those who strongly believe in God. Euthanasia is intentionally killing another person to relieve his or her suffering.[4]It is not the withdrawal or withholding of treatment that results in death, or necessary pain and symptom-relief treatment that might shorten life, if that is the only effective treatment.[5]A discussion on euthanasia is long overdue. A serious debate is necessary on the issue of euthanasia. Euthanasia is one of the most perplexing issues which the courts and legislatures all over the world are facing today.[6]The topic has religious and moral overtones. Human life is inviolable. Life is a gift from God and no one, not even the individual himself has right to take it. But if the life of a person becomes painful, fruitless and full of sufferings, should the person get rid of their life? A solution for such a problem is not just legalizing the mercy killing. It is not desirable or workable as each case has to be judged individually.There are two types of euthanasia: passive euthanasia and active euthanasia. Active euthanasia is defined as taking an immediate action such as using lethal injection to painlessly put a terminally-ill patient to death. Passive euthanasia is withdrawing treatment while the life of the patient is still dependent on it and when it is believed that treatment is more burdensome than beneficial. Passive euthanasia allows the patient to die naturally and is often considered more acceptable.[7]Legal Aspects Of EuthanasiaTo legalize euthanasia would fundamentally change the way we understand ourselves, human life and its meaning. We create our values and find meaning in life by buying into a "shared story" - a societal-cultural paradigm. Humans have always focused that story on the two great events of every person's life, birth and death. In a secular society - even more than in a religious one - that story must encompass and protect the "human spirit."After a very recent Supreme Court of India decision in Aruna case[8], India now joins a handful of nations, including Belgium[9], Luxembourg[10], the Netherlands[11]and Switzerland[12], and the U.S. states of Oregon and Washington[13]in allowing some form of euthanasia. India has no law on the issue, making the guidelines legally binding. As outlined, Passive euthanasia is allowed in exceptional cases after a review by medical experts and ap