Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
MARKETING OF FLOWERS: A CASE STUDY OF BANSPHATAK FLOWER MARKET, VARANASI
Project Report SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE
REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF
Master of
Agri -Business Management (MABM)
Supervisor Submitted By Prof. Rakesh Singh Manish Kumar Paswan
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS
INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES
BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY
VARANASI - 221005
U.P. INDIA
ID.NO. ABM-13195 2015 Enrolment No. 356703
Dedicated
to My Revered Parents
& My Respected Advisor
Dr. Rakesh Singh Deptt. of Agricultural Economics
Professor Institute of Agricultural Science
Banaras Hindu University
Varanasi – 221005 (INDIA)
Ref. No. …………….. Date …………………
CERTIFICATE
To
The Registrar (Academic)
Banaras Hindu University
Varanasi – 221005 (INDIA)
Through: The Head, Deptt. of Agricultural Economics,
Institute of Agricultural Sciences, BHU, Varanasi.
Dear Sir,
This is to certify that the project report entitled “MARKETING OF
FLOWERS: A CASE STUDY OF BANSPHATAK FLOWER MARKET
VARANASI” submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of
MASTER OF AGRI-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, in the Department Of
Agricultural Economics, Institute Of Agricultural Sciences. Banaras Hindu
University is a record of bonafide research carried out by Mr. Manish Kumar Paswan,
Id. No. ABM-13195, under my supervision and no part of the project report has been
submitted for any other degree or diploma.
The assistance and help received during the course of the investigation and
sources of literature have been duly acknowledged.
Thanking You
Forwarded By Yours faithfully,
(Dr. Rakesh Singh)
(Head) Coordinator Chairman of Advisory Committee
MARKETING OF FLOWERS: A CASE STUDY OF
BANSPHATAK FLOWER MARKET, VARANASI
By
Manish Kumar Paswan
Project Report Submitted in partial fulfilment of
the requirement for the degree of
Master of Agribusiness Management
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS
INSTITUTE OF ARRICULTURAL SCIENCES
BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY
VARANASI-221005
I.D. No. ABM-13195 2015 Enrolment No. 356703
PROJECT REPORT APPROVED BY ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Chairman Dr. Rakesh Singh Professor
Department of Agricultural Economics
Institute of Agricultural Sciences, BHU, Varanasi.
Members Dr. O.P. Singh Assistant Professor
Department of Agricultural Economics
Institute of Agricultural Sciences, BHU, Varanasi
Dr. O.P. Mishra Associate Professor
Department of Extension Education
Institute of Agricultural Sciences BHU, Varanasi
External Examiner:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
At the outset, being the student of this great institution. I bow my head with in great reverence to the lotus of Bharatratna Mahamana Pandit Madan Mohan Malaviya Ji, the founder of the Banaras Hindu University whose everlasting desire was to serve the mankind.
I bow my head in great reverence to the omnipotent and omnipresent almighty, for his kindness and true love towards me and to every creature resending on this wonderful planet.
I consider it to be a rare opportunity and sublime privilege to express my profound sense of gratitude and reverence to Dr. Rakesh Singh, Professor and Coordinator, Master of Agribusiness Management, Department of Agricultural Economics and Chairman of my Advisory Committee for his meticulous guidance, indelible inspiration, persistent encouragement, ingenious suggestions, mellifluous nature and indefatigable attitude. I will ever cherish the fatherly affection that he bestowed upon me throughout my tenure as a student under him which helped me to cope with many a trying situation.
I am immensely thankful and indebted to Dr. H.P. Singh, Professor and Head, Department of Agricultural Economics for his cooperation throughout my study period. I immensely would like to give him thanks.
I am immensely thankful and indebted to my advisory committee members Dr. O.P. Singh, Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics and Dr. O.P. Mishra, Associate Professor, Department of Extension Education for their unstinted attention, prudent suggestions and arduous guidance during course of their investigation and preparation of manuscript.
I consider it my privilege in expressing my fidelity to Dr. Chandra Sen, Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Dr. P.S. Badal Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics Dr. V. Kamalvanshi, Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Dr. P. K. Singh, Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics and Mr. Neeraj Singh Assistant Professor, Master of Agribusiness Management for their diligent guidance, erudite suggestions, timely help, constructive criticism, constant and continuous encouragement during the course of investigation.
I am failing short of words in expressing sincere and heartfelt tributes to all the non-teaching staff members of the Department of Agricultural Economics for their various supports during my course of study at BHU.
All the words in lexicon will be futile meaningless if, I fail to express my gratitude towards my parents, Sri. Raj Kumar Paswan and Smt. Kanti Devi for their blessings, sacrifice, affection, moral support and lots of care throughout my life I express my indebtedness and most heartily devotion to them who set the foundation and were always with me during my ups and downs.
It is indeed a great pleasure to acknowledge the love and cooperation by my dear batch mates and friends Abhay, Ashish, Anushka, Ruby, Nitesh, Rohit, Jaypraksh and Surbhi for their caring eyes and helping hands and making the study periods very much memorable.
Last but not least, I bow my head before the feet of almighty “Baba Vishwanath”, “Bajrang Bali” and “Saraswati Maa” seeking their blessings to accomplish the daunting task ahead in my life.
Manish Kumar Paswan Date ........./......../........ I.D. No. 13195 Place ............. Enrolment No. 356703 Master of Agribusiness Management Department of Agricultural Economics Institute of Agricultural Sciences Banaras Hindu University Varanasi 221005.
CONTENTS
Chapters Particulars Page(s)
List of Tables
List of Figures
Chapter I INTRODUCTION 1-7
Chapter II REVIEW OF LITERATURE 8-10
Chapter III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 11-13
Chapter IV DESCRIPTION OF STUDY AREA 14-19
Chapter V RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 20-38
Chapter VI SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION 39-41
BIBLIOGRAPHY 42
APPENDIX i-iii
LIST OF TABLES
Table No. Title of the Table Page No.
Table 4.2.4 Land use pattern in Varanasi district 18
Tables 5.1 Marketing channels of flowers 20
Table 5.1.1 Composition of flowers sold by producers 21
Table 5. 1.2 Composition of flowers sold by retailers 22
Table 5.2.1 Marketing Costs and Marketing Margin of Marigold
(Rs`/100 Pieces)
23
Table 5.2.2 Marketing Efficiency of Marigold 24
Table 5.2.3 Marketing Costs and Marketing Margin of Rose
(Rs`/100 Pieces)
24
Table 5.2.4 Marketing Efficiency of Rose 25
Table 5.2.5 Marketing Costs and Marketing Margin of Neelkanth
(Rs`/100 Pieces)
25
Table 5.2.6 Marketing Efficiency of Neelkanth 26
Table 5.2.7 Marketing Costs and Marketing Margin of Tulsi
(Rs`/100 Pieces)
26
Table 5.2.8 Marketing Efficiency of Tulsi 27
Table 5.2.9 Marketing Costs and Marketing Margin of Madar
(Rs`/100 Pieces)
27
Table 5.2.10 Marketing Efficiency of Madar 28
Table 5.2.11 Marketing Costs and Marketing Margin of Bela
(Rs`/100 Pieces)
28
Table 5.2.12 Marketing Efficiency of Bela 29
Table 5.2.13 Marketing Costs and Marketing Margin of Tangri
(Rs`/100 Pieces)
29
Table 5.2.14 Marketing Efficiency of Tangri 30
Table 5.2.15 Marketing Costs and Marketing Margin of Chinarose
(Rs`/100 Pieces)
30
Table 5.2.16 Marketing Efficiency of Chinarose 31
Table 5.3.1 Constraints faced by Farmers 32
Table 5.3.2 Constraints faced by Retailers 33
Table 5.3.3 Constraints faced by Consumers 34
Table 5.4.1 Perception of the farmers 35
Table 5.4.2 Perception of the Retailers 36
Table 5.4.3 Perception of the Consumers 37
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure No. Title of the Figure Page No.
Figure 5.1.1 Flowers selling by the farmers 21
Figure 5.1.2 Flowers selling by the retailers 22
Figure 5.1.2 Constraints faced by farmers 32
Figure 5.3.2 Constraints faced by retailers 33
Figure 5.3.3 Constraints faced by consumers 34
Figure 5.4.1 Perception of the farmers 35
Figure 5.4.2 Perception of the retailers 37
Figure 5.4.3 Perception of the consumers 38
ABSTRACT
Floriculture is the sunshine industry of India as it offers excellent self
employment and good remuneration for the small and marginal farmers. Flowers have
been considered as the symbol of grace and elegance and a feast for our eyes. They
are used on all religious festival and pious occasions. For the project entitled”
Marketing of flowers: A case study of Bansphatak flower market Varanasi”, Flower
market /mandi Bansphatak Varanasi was selected purposively. Out of 200 Farmers
15% Farmers were randomly selected who visited daily to Bansphatak mandi, and
also selected 10 Retailers and 20 Consumers were selected randomly. Two types of
marketing channel was found in the study area (P-C) and (P-R-C) in which mostly
eight types of flowers were being sold in the mandi like marigold, rose, neelkanth,
tulsi, madar, bela tangari and chinarose. The market efficiency of channel-2 was
higher than channel-1.The marketing cost and margin was higher in channel-2 as
compared to channel-1 and the marketing efficiency of channel-2 was higher than
channel-1 in case of all flowers. Common problem faced by each stakeholders were
transportation, price instability wastage and risk. The perceptions of all stakeholders
for market improvement was also different to each other was difference foe market
improvement 30% farmers were strongly agreed 60% agreed and 10% had no idea. In
case of sitting arrangement 20% respondents were agreed and 80% disagreed. And
related to parking facility 37% of the respondents were strongly agreed and 63%
agreed. In case of storage facility 60% of the respondents were strongly agreed and
37%, 3% were agreed and no idea respectively. And for covered market place 33%
respondents were strongly agreed 60 %, 7% were agreed and no idea respectively.
Chapter-I
INTRODUCTION
Agriculture is the mainstay of the Indian economy and is the principal
means of livelihood for over 60 per cent of the population. GDP was no more than
13.6 per cent during 2013-14 and rise further to just around 14.7 per cent in 2014-15.
Even though, India is primarily an agricultural economy, with almost two-third of its
population make out their existence from farmland. However, challenges before
agriculture has been increasing such as environmental and technological changes,
hike in input price and fluctuation in output prices. These are the fundamental
problems. Therefore, there is need to apply intensive technique and diversification
through horticulture production.
Agriculture production can be classified into three fold such as production of
food-grain crops, commercial/cash crops and horticulture crops. Horticulture
includes vegetables, fruits and flower crop. Production and consumption of
flowers is increasing over the world including India. The development of flower
cultivation brings larger income per unit area to grower than the cultivation of
ordinary crops. The flower crops in the domain of horticulture have drowned
attention of farmers as well as entrepreneurs. In an organized floriculture, farmers
prominently gave place to the cultivation of various flowers.
Floriculture: The fast growing domain
Flowers production, consumption and trade have been growing more folds in
years. There has been tremendous growth in the demand and consumption of
floriculture products in the last two decades. The total area under cultivation of
different flowers was 255 thousand hectares in 2013-14. Floriculture has finally
begun to form an important component of commercial agriculture and with the
increasing awareness of its potential, more and more people are getting associated
with flora business
~ 2 ~
Floriculture is major source of employment and income. There is vast scope
in growing floriculture product in India, because total area under floriculture is very
small. Since two decades there is increasing demand and supply of various types of
flowers.
The climatic conditions of India is quite suitable for growing various types
of flowers in various zones, especially Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh,
West Bengal, Maharashtra, Gujarat, Delhi those are the major developed states as far
as concern to floriculture. India produced 1 7 5 4 . 4 9 thousand MT loose flowers
and 5 4 2 . 5 3 M T of cut flowers in year 2013-14, with area of 255 thousand
hectare. The major flowers grown in India are marigold, aster, roses, tuberose,
gladiolus, jasmine and crossandra in open field while gerbera, carnation, roses,
anthodium, orchids, etc. grown under green-house conditions
Definition of Floriculture
Floriculture is one of the branches of agriculture that is known as horticulture.
The term horticulture is derived from two Latin words “hortus’’ meaning a
garden, and “cultura’’ meaning cultivation of crops within a protected enclose.
Floriculture is a branch of horticulture concerned with the propagation of
ornamental plants with a focus on flowering plants specifically.
Floriculture is the segment of horticulture concerned with commercial
production, marketing and sale of bedding plants, cut flowers, potted flowering plants,
foliage plants, Flower arrangements, and non-commercial home gardening.
At present, fruits, vegetables, flowers and ornamentals are growing not only
within the home grounds, but also in large quantities on a commercial scale.
Floriculture deals with cultivation, marketing and arranging of flowers and foliage
plants.
Flowers are used on all religious festival and occasions generally flowers are
offered by devotees in Temple, Gurudwara, Church and Masjids Flowers are used for
~ 3 ~
floral decoration. Even dried flowers are also used in flower craft or arrangement of
garlands and bouquets are prepared and offered to welcome the dignitaries. When cut
flowers are used for vase decoration they will be a marvellous piece of indoor
decoration.
Concept of Flower
As per nature and form of use, flowers can be classifies in following terms.
Loose Flowers
In India, the use of flowers of all categories was very common f o r
making garlands for worship and bouquets for religious function. Some kinds of
flower plants are discarded after one crop, those flowers are picking up as loose
flowers i.e., marigold, aster, lilies, chrysanthemum, jai-jue, bijali, gladioli, lilies,
lilium, dalia, tuberose etc are called loose flowers, Those are packed in loose (kg)
form. However, the use of these loose flowers is maximized during festive seasons
of Dusshera, Diwali and Ganesha All these flowers are cultivated traditionally.
Cut Flowers
Some flower plants continue in growth. The new shoots, which develop
below the place where the flower stem was cut, eventually form flowers that are cut
and the procedure is repeated until it is determined that would be economic
advantage in replacing the plants. Those flowers picking up with some lengths i.e.
gerbera, carnation, rose, orchids, tuberose etc. are cut flowers, those packing in
bunch or pairs form, apart from them gerbera and carnation produced under
greenhouse only. The production of cut flowers depend upon region and climate,
therefore, it was difficult to make them available throughout the year under open
cultivation, the production of cut flowers tried in all seasons, but it failed the
quality standards. Progressive farmer and entrepreneurs grows cut flowers under
green house. The period between Novembers to May is the best season for export of
cut flowers produced under green house.
~ 4 ~
Properties of Floriculture Marketing
Being produced both by commercial and smallholder farmers flower
marketing is influenced by a number of factors that can be attributed to production,
product, and market characteristics.
Kohl and Uhl (1985) identified these attributes as-
Perishability - as flowers are highly perishable, they start to loose their quality right
after harvest and continued throughout the process until it is consumed. For this
purpose elaborated and extensive marketing channels, facilities and equipment’s are
vital. This behaviour of flowers exposed the commodity not to be held for long
periods and fresh produce from one area is often sent to distant markets without a
firm buyer or price. Prices may be negotiated while the commodities are en route, and
they are frequently diverted from their original destination if a better price can be
found. Sellers might have little market power in determining a price. As a result, a
great deal of trust and informal agreements are involved in marketing fresh flowers.
Price /Quantity Risks - Due to perishable nature and biological nature of production
process there is a difficulty of scheduling the supply of flowers according to market
demand. The flowers are subjected to high price and quantity risks with changing
consumer demands and production conditions. Unusual production or harvesting
weather or a major disease can influence badly the marketing system. While food-
marketing system demands stable price and supply, a number of marketing
arrangements like contract farming provide stability.
Seasonality - flowers have seasonal production directly influencing their marketing.
Normally they have limited period of harvest and more or less a year round
demand. In fact, in some cases the cultural and religious set up of the society also
matter demand to be seasonal. This seasonality also worsened by lack of facilities to
store.
~ 5 ~
Product bulkiness - Since water is the major components of the product, it makes
them bulky and low value per unit that is expensive to transport in fresh form every
time. This, therefore, exposed farmers to loose large amount of product in the farm
unsold. These listed characteristics of the product require a special complex system of
supportive inputs. It demands a regular marketing preparation process like washing,
cooling, proper management from the time of harvest until the produce is put on
display. It is frequently believed a flowers not only remain attractive to the consumer
it must also have a shelf life of few day sifter having purchased by the consumer
(Nonnecke, 1989)
Differentiation: The retailers derive competitive advantage from selling non-
standard products that are not generally available in the market, competing not only
on price, but factors such as reliability, product variety, product quality and speed of
innovation (Dolan and Humphrey, 2000). In the floriculture sector product
differentiation is determined mainly by the number of varieties (Wijnands, van der
Lans and Hoobbs, 2006).
Hence, Super markets and other retailers in the direct sales chain demand
larger varieties of flowers. The auction market, however, can handle a large volume
of one variety.
Vertical integration and innovation: Involvement in direct sales market requires
improved production capability and innovation. Increased competition in the supply
chain through differentiation (for example, increasing number of varieties) and
reliability of supply necessitates own capacity for propagation of varieties. Dolan
and Humphrey (2000) has found a tendency of vertical integration within the chain
as several exporters that had bought most or all their products have begun to acquire
to own their growing capacity
International Scenario and Trade
About 305,105 ha area was under flower production in different countries of
the world, of which the total area in Europe was 44,444 ha, North America 22,388
~ 6 ~
ha, Asia and Pacific 215,386 ha, the Middle East and Africa 2,282 ha and central and
South Africa 17,605 ha. Flowers grown under protected greenhouses in different
countries around the world total 46,008 ha. India has the maximum area under
ornamental crops (88,600 ha) followed by China (59,527 ha), Indonesia (34,000
ha), Japan (21,218 ha), USA (16400 ha), Brazil (10285 ha), Taiwan (9.661 ha),
The Netherlands (8,017 ha), Italy (7.654 ha), the united Kingdom (6,804 ha),
Germany (6,621 ha) and Colombia (4,757 ha).Globally more than 145 countries
are involved in the cultivation of ornamental crops and the area under these crops
is increasing steadily. The production of flower crops has increased significantly
and there is a huge demand for floricultural products in the world, resulting in
growing International Flower Trade. The world consumption of cut flowers and
plants is increasing and there is a steady annual increase of 10 to 15 per cent in all
importing countries. Due to globalization and its effect on income, there is growing
per capita floriculture consumption in most of the countries .In case of developed
countries, the consumption of flowers is closely linked with GNP per capita income
and urban population.
Indian Scenario and Trade
India is bestowed with several agro-climatic zones conducive for production
of sensitive and delicate floriculture products. During the decade after liberalization
floriculture industries took giant steps in the export arena. This era has seen a
dynamic shift from sustenance production to commercial production. As per National
Horticulture Database published by National Horticulture Board, during 2012-13 the
area under floriculture production in India was 232.74 thousand hectares with a
production of 1.729 million tonnes loose flowers and 76.73 million tonnes cut
flowers. Floriculture is now commercially cultivated in several states with West
Bengal (32%), Karnataka (12%) Maharashtra (10%), having gone ahead of other
producing states like Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, Punjab, Haryana, Andhra Pradesh,
Orissa, Jharkhand, Uttar Pradesh and Chhattisgarh. Indian floriculture industry
comprises of flowers such as Rose, Tuberose, Glads, Anthurium, Carnations, and
Marigold etc. Cultivation is undertaken in open farm conditions as well as playhouses
~ 7 ~
and greenhouses. India's total export of floriculture was Rs. 455.90 crores in 2013-14.
The major importing countries were United States, Netherlands, Germany, United
Kingdom, United Arab Emirates, Japan and Canada. There are more than 300 export-
oriented units in India. More than 50% of the floriculture units are based in
Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu. With the technical collaborations from
foreign companies, the Indian floriculture industry is poised to increase its share in
world trade.
Status of Floriculture in Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh is a major state in area and production of flowers in the
country. The area under flower crops was 16,580 ha and the production was
32.16 thousand million tons of loose flowers and 32.16 thousand million
tons of cut flowers during 2013-14. A large number of flowers like jasmine,
tuberose, rose, chinarose chrysanthemum, marigold, crossandra, barleria, lily,
calla, carnation, gerbera and anthodium are commercially cultivated in the state.
Many hi-tech units with export tie-ups are there in the state. There are several
commercial tissue culture laboratories.
Objectives
1. To examine the marketing channels of flowers
2. To examine the marketing costs and marketing efficiency
3. To identify the constraints faced by all stakeholders.
4. To study the perceptions of all stakeholders for market improvement
Chapter-II
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Armitrage et al. (1992) in the book named “Introduction to Floriculture”,
has contributed Specialty Cut Flower. “He studied various reports and reviewed the
production of specialty cut flower. It was concluded that specialty flowers were
economical in field but not in the greenhouse. He studied detailed guidelines
concerning cost of production of field grown specialty flower. According to his
observation, any businessperson has ability to make profit. It is depend upon keeping
cost of production down and factors that affect cost included location, size, and
managerial skill, and market channel, time of year and space utilization. Cut flower
can be profitable if done efficiently
Bose et al. (1999) discussed about various aspects of floriculture in his book
named “Floriculture and Landscaping”. He focused on prospect of floriculture in
India. He mentioned commercial floriculture is an activity, which has assumed same
importance only in the recent times. In most part of country, Flower growing has
carried out on smallholding, only as a part of the regular farming system. According
to his study Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra and
Rajasthan were the leading states in hi-tech floriculture.
Bhattacharji and De (2003) in their book “Advanced Commercial
floriculture” has given information related to traditional and modern floriculture in
India. Recently, Indian Government gives incentives to floriculture industry as the
part of foreign trade policy. According to this policy Pune, Bangalore, Nasik,
Palanpur, Trivandrum, Ooty, Simla and other cities in India have geared-up the
floriculture business. They observed that the highest number of small green house
units for growing flowers was finding in Maharashtra. They mention many problems
had been facing flower industry e.g. lack of basic infrastructure, non-availability of
pesticides, high cost of production, tax burden, import duty, high rate of loyalty, poor
facilities for post harvest handling, poor market information, delay in claiming
subsidies, etc. They observed major constraints faced by traditional flower grower,
~ 9 ~
such as lack of availability of good quality planting material and seeds, lack of
adequate storage facilities and transportation, etc. They suggested, for improvement
of the situation of loose flowers those are to arrange supply of better quality planting
materials and seed, equip the farmers with better growing technology of flowers,
provide financial help to flower growers, provide cheap transport facilities, etc.
Gajanan and Mysoure (2003) in the book named “Advanced commercial
floriculture” have contributed„ Production and marketing research on traditional
flowers‟. In this unit, authors discussed the matter of traditional flower production in
India. The area and production of floriculture crops appears to have increased in
recent decades. It we needed that there has been tremendous increase in area under all
the major flowers. They have classified the flowers in seasonal and perennial flower.
They mentioned that jasmine and rose uses as raw materials for the preparation of
perfumeries and used as raw material in dried flower industry. Authors also comment
on marketing channels of traditional flower. They mentioned after review of the
studies on flower marketing indicate that more than 60 percent of cultivators sold
their flower through commission agents at the market. They remarked the
commission agents play an important role in marketing of the flowers. Farmers prefer
to sale with pre- harvest contractors due to high cost of marketing price, risk in the
market, need for immediate cash, etc
Prasad and Kumar (2005), in their book „Commercial Floriculture‟
have stated Ornamental horticulture more appropriately covers the complete industry
of flowers Floriculture has by far a greater annul growth potential of 25 to 30 per
cent, which is 25 to 30 times more than that of cereals or any other agricultural
produce. India being especially well placed to meet the international demand of cut
flowers that peaks during winter months. They remarked the government has
approved 24 projects with total foreign investment of 847 crore cleared to boost
flower export. The Indian companies almost forced to sell their products in auction
held in Holland.
It was also discussed other aspects of floriculture, which is floriculture as
a career. He remarked, floriculture has a wide and includes a great variety and
~ 10 ~
diversify of job opportunities. In general, ornamental flowers classified variedly. To
the commercial producer or whole-seller or the retailer or flower producer or to the
manufacturer or seller or floriculture supplier it is business and to the homeowner
it is a fascinating hobby. There are many career opportunities i.e. the production of
flowers, the buying and selling of floriculture products, processing of floriculture
products, the landscaping of private and public properties and research, teaching
and extension phases of floriculture, etc.
Sale and Ganvir (2006), in the book named “Advances in ornamental
horticulture” have contributed “Marketing of cut flowers and potted plants in
India. In this contribution, authors discussed marketing aspect of cut flowers.
They focus on export- oriented approach of government. According to author‟s
opinion, in the post liberalization era, floriculture has identified by the government
as one of the major thrust areas for export. They pointed the earnings have
increased, the area has increased, the prices of flowers being remunerative, the
returns in flowers are high. They analyzed various theses on marketing of flowers
and reviewed that the main item in the total cost was the marketing cost. Its share
observed to be 38 and 58 per cent of the total cost (cultivation cost + marketing
cost) during the respective years.
They reviewed marketing channels and identified the four important
types of marketing channels for the cut flower trade. First cultivator–packer-
wholesaler–retailer–consumer, second is cultivator-packer-retailer–consumer, third
is wholesaler–retailer–consumer, and fourth is cultivator-consumer those are various
part of the India.
They analyzed market margins that showed the producer gets only 40 paisa
from the consumer rupee. They recommended the floriculture industry needs
modernization, Government of India can help in creating more facilities in the form
of various infrastructural facilities.
Chapter-III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
MARKETING OF FLOWERS: A CASE STUDY OF BANSPHATAK FLOWERS
MARKET VARANASI METHODOLOGICAL ASPECT HAS BEEN DISCUSSED
UNDER DIFFERENT HEAD.
3.1 Sampling technique
3.2 Survey techniques
3.3 Period of enquiry
3.4 Analytical tools
3.1 SAMPLING TECHNIQUE
Simple random technique was used to select the Farmer, Retailer, and
Consumer who visited daily to the mandi.
3.1.1 Selection of location/mandi
Varanasi district having maximum producers and consumption of flowers was
selected purposively. There are two major flower markets in Varanasi city. Out of that
Bansphatak flowers market being major market was selected purposively.
3.1.2 Selection of stakeholders
On an average 200 flower producer brought their produce to mandi, 30
farmers (15%) were selected randomly, Beside this 10 retailers and 20 consumers
were also selected randomly.
Farmers 30
Retailers 10
Consumers 20
Total 60
~ 12 ~
3.2 SURVEY TECHNIQUE
During the study both primary and secondary data was collected.
3.2.1 Primary data
The Primary data were collected through the schedule which was filled by the
researcher interaction with the stakeholders.
3.2.2 Secondary data
The secondary data was collected through Books. Journal, Articles, Internet,
3.3 PERIOD OF ENQUIRY
The study was undertaken during the year 2015. And all the activities involved
by the stakeholders during the agricultural year 2014-15.
3.4 ANALATICAL TOOLS
3.4.1 Marketing Cost
Marketing cost is the actual expenses incurred in bringing the good and
services from the producer to the consumer. Marketing cost included, handling
charges at local point, assembling charges, transport handling by whole seller and
retailing charge to consumer. These cost are paid by the producer to marketing
function arises.
Formula of Marketing
M.C. =Cf + Cm1 + Cm2 +...................+ Cmi
Where,
C = Cost of Marketing of commodity
Cf = Cost incurred by producer
Cm1 = Cost incurred by middleman
~ 13 ~
3.4.2 Marketing Efficiency
Measure of the availability (to all participants in a market ) of the information
that provides maximum opportunities to buyers and sellers to effect transaction with
minimum transaction cost.
Marketing efficiency of any activity or process is defined as the ratio of output
and input.
Formula of Marketing Efficiency
M.E = V/I – 1
Where,
V = value of produce sold
I = Total marketing cost and margins
3.4.3 Marketing margins
Marketing margins are calculated by small businesses in nearly every industry.
Marketing margins identify the disparity between the cost of purchasing items
wholesale and the income made by selling them.
Absolute margin (Am) = PRi – (Ppi – Cmi)
Where,
PRi = Sale price of the middleman
Ppi = Purchase price of the middleman
Cmi = Marketing cost Incurred by the middleman
Chapter-IV
DESCRIPTION OF STUDY AREA
4.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF VARANASI DISTRICT
Varanasi is a city on the banks of the Ganga in Uttar Pradesh, 320 kilometers
southeast of the state capital, Lucknow. It is holiest of the seven sacred cities
(SaptaPuri) in Hinduism and Jainism. Hindus believe that death at Varanasi
brings salvation. It is one of the oldest continuously inhabited cities in the world and
the oldest in India. Varanasi is the spiritual capital of India. The name
Varanasi possibly originates from the names of the two rivers: Varuna, still flowing in
Varanasi, and Asi, a small stream near Assi Ghat. The old city does lie on the north
shores of Ganga River bounded by its two tributaries Varuna and Asi. The city has
been a cultural center of North India for several thousand years, and has a history that
is older than most of the major world religions. Varanasi is often referred to as “the
city of temples”, “the holy city of India”, “the religious capital of India”, “the city of
lights”,” the city of learning”, and “the oldest living city on earth.”
4.2 HISTORY OF VARANASI
The land of Varanasi (Kashi) has been the ultimate pilgrimage spot for Hindus
for ages. Often referred to as Benares, Varanasi is the oldest living city in the world.
These few lines by Mark Twain say it all: "Benaras is older than history, older than
tradition, older even than legend and looks twice as old as all of them put together".
Hindus believe that one who is graced to die on the land of Varanasi would attain
salvation and freedom from the cycle of birth and re-birth. Abode of Lord Shiva and
Parvati, the origins of Varanasi are yet unknown. Ganges in Varanasi is believed to
have the power to wash away the sins of mortals.
Ganges is said to have its origins in the tresses of Lord Shiva and in Varanasi,
it expands to the mighty river that we know of. The city is a center of learning and
civilization for over 3000 years. With Sarnath, the place where Buddha preached his
first sermon after enlightenment, just 10 km away, Varanasi has been a symbol of
~ 15 ~
Hindu renaissance. Knowledge, philosophy, culture, devotion to Gods, Indian arts and
crafts have all flourished here for centuries.
Vaishnavism and Shaivism have co-existed in Varanasi harmoniously. With a
number of temples, Mrs. Annie Besant chose Varanasi as the home for her
'Theosophical Society' and Pandit Madan Mohan Malviya, to institute 'Benares Hindu
University, the biggest University in Asia. Ayurveda is said to be originated at
Varanasi and is believed to be the basis of modern medical sciences such as Plastic
surgery, Cataract and Calculus operations. Maharshi Patanjali, the preceptor of
Ayurveda and Yoga, was also affiliated with Varanasi, the holy city. Varanasi is also
famous for its trade and commerce, especially for the finest silks and gold and silver
brocades, since the early days.
Varanasi has also been a great center of learning for ages. Varanasi is
associated with promotion of spiritualism, mysticism, Sanskrit, yoga and Hindi
language and honored authors such as the ever-famous novelist Prem Chand and Tulsi
Das, the famous saint-poet who wrote Ram Charit Manas. Aptly called as the cultural
capital of India, Varanasi has provided the right platform for all cultural activities to
flourish. Many exponents of dance and music have come from Varanasi. Ravi
Shankar, the internationally renowned Sitar maestro and Ustad Bismillah Khan, (the
famous Shehnai player) are all sons of the blessed city or have lived here for major
part of their lives.
4.2.1 Geography
The city of Varanasi is located in the middle Ganges valley of North India, in
the Eastern part of the state of Uttar Pradesh, along the left crescent-shaped bank of
the Ganges river. It has the headquarters of Varanasi district. The "Varanasi Urban
Agglomeration" — an agglomeration of seven urban sub-units — covers an area of
112.26 km 2 (approximately 43 mi²). The urban agglomeration is stretched between
82° 56’E - 83° 03’E and 25° 14’N - 25° 23.5’N. Being located in the Indo-Gangetic
Plains of North India, the land is very fertile because low level floods in the Ganges
continually replenish the soil.
~ 16 ~
On a local level, Varanasi is located on a higher ground between rivers
Ganges and Varuna, the mean elevation being 80.71 m. As a result of absence of
tributaries and canals, the main land is continuous and relatively dry. In ancient times,
this geographic situation must have been highly favourable for forming settlements.
But it is difficult to ascertain the original geography of Varanasi because the city's
current location is not exactly the same as the one described in some old texts.
Varanasi is often said to be located between two confluences: one of the
Ganges and Varuna, and other of the Ganges and Assi, (Assi having always been a
rivulet rather than a river.) The distance between these two confluences is around 2.5
miles (4.0 km), and religious Hindus regard a round trip between these two places—a
Pancha-kroshi Yatra (a five mile (8 km) journey) ending with a visit to a Sakshi
Vinayak Temple as a holy ritual.
4.2.2 Climate
Varanasi experiences a humid subtropical climate (Köppen climate
classification Cwa) with large variations between summer and winter temperatures.
Summers are long, from early April to October, with intervening monsoon seasons
and are also extremely hot, even by South Asian standards. The temperature ranges
between 22°C – 46 °C (72°F – 115 °F) in the summers. Winters in Varanasi see very
large diurnal variations, with warm days and downright cold nights. Cold waves from
the Himalayan region cause temperatures to dip across the city in the winter from
December to February and temperatures below 5 °C are not uncommon. The average
annual rainfall is 1,110 mm (44 in). Fog is common in the winters, while hot dry
winds, called loo, blow in the summers.
Through a combination of water pollution, new constructions of upstream
dams, and increase in the local temperature, the water level of the Ganges has recently
gone down significantly, and small islands have become visible in the middle of the
river.
~ 17 ~
4.2.3 Demographics
The population of Varanasi urban agglomeration in 2001 was 1, 371, 749; the
sex ratio was 879 females every 1000 males. As per 2011 census, population stands at
3, 138, 670. However, the area under Varanasi Nagar Nigam has a population of 1,
100, 748 with the sex ratio being 883 females for every 1000 males. The literacy rate
in the urban agglomeration is 77% while that in the municipal corporation area is
78%. Approximately 138, 000 people in the municipal area live in slums.
4.2.4 Economy
4.2.4.1 Weaving
The most extravagant Banarasi saris use silk and gold-wrapped silk yarn with
supplementary weft brocade.Varanasi has several small cottage industries, including
producting of Banarasi saris, which are a regional type of sari made from silk. The
city also produces carpets and handicrafts. According to some writers, Varanasi has a
rather high rate of Child labour given the unorganised nature of small scale industries.
As of 2009, there are an estimated 300,000 weavers in Varansi. Numerous
weavers have lost work or moved elsewhere as saris become less popular in India and
more imported saris impact the market.
Varanasi saris are adorned with intricate designs and zari embellishments
making it popular during traditional functions and weddings. Earlier, the embroidery
on sarees was often done with threads of pure gold. In 2009, weaver associations and
cooperatives together secured Geographical Indication (GI) rights for ‘Banaras
Brocades and Sarees’.
4.2.4.2 Agriculture
Varanasi produces large quantities of langra mangoes, which are variety
developed in the area. Banarasi paan (betel leaf) and khoa (a milk product) are
popular, and the related small-scale industries employ many people.
~ 18 ~
Table 4.2.4 Land use pattern in Varanasi district:
Particulars Area (‘000 ha.)
Total geographical area 152.679
Cultivated area 95.748
Area sown more than once 62.18
Gross cropped area 134.073
Net irrigated area 82.206
Rainfed area 13.542
Cropping Intensity (%) 176
Land under non-agricultural use 2.932
Cultivable waste land 2.56
Barren and uncultivable land 2.151
Source: District Statistical bulletin Varanasi Govt. U.P.
4.2.5 Manufacturing
Indian Railways runs a major diesel locomotive factory in Varanasi, Diesel
Locomotive Works (DLW). BHEL, a large power equipment manufacturer, also runs
a plant here.
According to Macaulay, Varanasi was the "city which, in wealth, population,
dignity and sanctity was among the foremost in Asia". He described the commercial
importance saying "from the looms of Benaras went forth the most delicate silks that
adorned the halls of St. James and of Versailles.
4.2.6 Tourism
Varanasi is a noted centre for silk weaving and brassware. Fine Silks and
Brocaded fabrics, Exquisite Saris, Brassware, Jewellery, Woodcraft, Carpets, Wall
hangings, Lamp shades and masks of Hindu and Buddhist deities are some of
~ 19 ~
Varanasi's shopping attractions. The main shopping areas include the Chowk, Gyan
Vapi, Vishwanath Gali, Thatheri Bazar, Lahurabir, Godoulia or Dashswamedh Gali
and Golghar. Besides the illustrious and fine silks and brocaded fabrics, one can also
buy shawls, carpets, wall hangings, Zari work; stone inlay work, glass beads and
bangles, masks of Hindu and Buddhist deities and lampshades. One can also buy
'kamandalam' or brass water pot from Varanasi, which is often used by saints to carry
water. People buy bottled 'Ganga jal' or jerrycans from the riverbank too for religious
purposes or to be used as Holy Water in various rituals. Besides, people can also take
water of the Ganges themselves from the river. Assi Ghat, a midway point between
Godaulia in the heart of downtown and youth culture of Benares Hindu University is
also a major tourist point.
Keeping apace with the modern world, the ancient city has paved way for
malls and multiplexes. The prominent ones being IP Mall in Sigra and JHV Mall in
the Varanasi Cantonment area.
~ 20 ~
Chapter-V
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Present chapter focuses on the results of the study and the results are presented
under following head.
The whole chapter was divided into following sub heads:
1. Marketing channels of flowers
2. Marketing costs and marketing efficiency
3. Constraints faced by all stakeholders.
4. Perceptions of all stakeholders for market improvement.
5.1 MARKETING CHANNELS OF FLOWERS
Tables 5.1 Marketing channels of flowers
S.No. Marketing channel Volume of flowers
marketing
1. Channels I (Producer/Farmers-- consumer) 25%
2. Channels II(Producer/Farmers –retailer--consumer) 75%
Marketing channel is the path through which product passes from producers to
ultimate consumers. Two marketing channels observed in the market (1) Producers
to consumers (P-C) and (2) producer to retailers to consumers (P-R-C). It in evidence
from the tables 25% flowers were marketed through channel-1 and 75% flowers were
marketed through channel-2.
~ 21 ~
Table 5.1.1 Composition of flowers sold by producers
S.No. Flowers *Respondents (30) *Percentage
1 Marigold 22 73.33
2 Rose 17 56.66
3 Neelkanth 10 33.33
4 Tulsi 3 10
5 Madaar 13 43.33
6 Bela 14 46.33
7 Tangri 8 26.66
8 Chinarose 17 56.66
* It was found that one producer brought more than one flowers. In this tables show
that 73.33% producers sold marigold, 56.66%, 33.33%, 10%, 43.33%, 46.33%,
26.66% and 56.66% rose, neelkanth, tulsi, madar, bela, tangri and chinarose
respectively.
Fig. 5.1.1
0
5
10
15
20
25
Marigold
Rose Neelkanth
Tulsi Madaar Bela Tangri Chinarose
Series1 22 17 10 3 13 14 8 17
Composition of flowers sold by producers
~ 22 ~
There were 8 type of flowers which was studied by researcher in mandi in
which 73.33 % of the farmers were selling the marigold, 56.66% of the farmers were
selling Rose, 33.33% Neelkanth 10%, Tulsi 43.33%, Madar 46.33%, Bela 26.66%,
Tangri 56.66%, Chinarose respectively sold by the farmers.
Table 5. 1.2 Composition of flowers sold by retailers
S.No. Flowers *Respondents (10) Percentage
1 Marigold 9 90
2 Rose 4 40
3 Neelkanth 1 10
4 Tulsi 0 0
5 Madaar 6 60
6 Bela 8 80
7 Tangri 3 30
8 Chinarose 2 20
* It was found that one retailer brought more than one flowers. In this tables show that
90% retailers sold marigold, 40%, 10%, 0%, 60%,80%, 30%, and 20% rose,
neelkanth ,tulsi, madar,bela, tangri and chinarose respectively,
Fig. 5.1.2
This table and bar graph show that 90% of the retailers were selling marigold,
40% rose, 10% neelkanth, 60% madar, 80%bela, 30% tangri, and 20% chinarose
respectively
0123456789
Marigold Rose Neelkanth
Tulsi Madaar Bela Tengri Chinarose
Series1 9 4 1 0 6 8 3 2
Composition of flowers sold by retailers
~ 23 ~
5.2 MARKETING COSTS AND MARKETING EFFICIENCY
Table 5.2.1 Marketing Costs and Marketing Margin of Marigold (Rs`600/100
Pieces)
S.No. Particulars Channel-1 Channel-2
Net price received by farmers 300 300
Marketing cost incurred by farmers
1. Garland making 50 50
2. Loading/unloading charge 40 40
3. Transportation charge 70 70
4. Spoilage and wastage 100 100
5. Storage charge -------
6. Market charge 10 10
7. Others 30 30
Total Marketing Cost 300 300
Consumers Price 600 1000
Margin of Retailers 270
Marketing cost of retailers
1. Labour and weighing charge 20
2. Transportation charge 30
3. Storage charge ----------
4. Spoilage and wastage 50
5. Others 30
Total Marketing Cost 130
In the tables 2.1 show that total cost and total margin of marigold was 300 and
300 through channel-1 and 130 and 270 through channel-2 respectively.
Marketing Efficiency of Marigold
M.E = V/I – 1
Where,
V = Value of produce sold
I = Total marketing cost and margin
~ 24 ~
Table 5.2.2
S.No. Particular Channel-1 Channel-2
1 Value of produce sold 600 1000
2 Total marketing cost 300 130
3 Total market margin 300 270
Marketing Efficiency 1.0016 2.50
This table show that the marketing efficiency of marigold higher in channel-
2(2.50) compare to channel-1(1.0016)
Table 5.2.3 Marketing Costs and Marketing Margin of Rose (Rs`/100 Pieces)
S.No. Particulars Channel-1 Channel-2
Net price received by farmers 900 900
Marketing cost incurred by farmers
1. Garland making 50 50
2. Loading/unloading charge 40 40
3. Transportation charge 70 70
4. Spoilage and wastage 100 100
5. Storage charge -------
6. Market charge 10 10
7. Others 30 30
Total Marketing Cost 300 300
Consumers Price 1200 2000
Margin of Retailers 670
Marketing cost of retailers
1. Labour and weighing charge 20
2. Transportation charge 30
3. Storage charge ----------
4. Spoilage and wastage 50
5. Others 30
Total Marketing Cost 130
In the tables 5.2.3 show that total cost and total margin of rose was 300 and
900 through channel-1and 130 and 670 through channel-2 respectively
~ 25 ~
Marketing Efficiency of Rose
M.E = V/I – 1
Where, V = Value of produce sold; I = Total marketing cost and margin
Table 5.2.4
S.No. Particular Channel-1 Channel-2
1 Value of produce sold 1200 2000
2 Total marketing cost 300 130
3 Total market margin 900 670
Marketing Efficiency 1.00 2.50
This table show that the marketing efficiency of rose higher in channel-2(2.50)
compare to channel-1(1.00).
Table 5.2.5 Marketing Costs and Marketing Margin of Neelkanth (Rs`/100
Pieces)
S.No. Particulars Channel-1 Channel-2
Net price received by farmers 900 900
Marketing cost incurred by farmers
1. Garland making 50 50
2. Loading/unloading charge 40 40
3. Transportation charge 70 70
4. Spoilage and wastage 100 100
5. Storage charge -------
6. Market charge 10 10
7. Others 30 30
Total Marketing Cost 300 300
Consumers Price 1200 2000
Margin of Retailers 670
Marketing cost of retailers
1. Labour and weighing charge 20
2. Transportation charge 30
3. Storage charge ----------
4. Spoilage and wastage 50
5. Others 30
Total Marketing Cost 130
In the tables 5.2.5 show that total cost and total margin of neelkanth was 300
and 900 through channel-1 and 130 and 130 and 670 through channel-2 respectively.
~ 26 ~
Marketing Efficiency of Neelkanth
M.E = V/I – 1
Where, V = Value of produce sold; I = Total marketing cost and margin
Table 5.2.6 Marketing Efficiency of Neelkanth
S.No. Particular Channel-1 Channel-2
1 Value of produce sold 1200 2000
2 Total marketing cost 300 130
3 Total market margin 900 670
Marketing Efficiency 1.00 2.50
This table show that the marketing efficiency of neelkanth higher in channel-2
(2.50) compare to channel-1(1.00).
Table 5.2.7 Marketing Costs and Marketing Margin of Tulsi (Rs`/100 Pieces)
S.No. Particulars Channel-1 Channel-2
Net price received by farmers 600 600
Marketing cost incurred by farmers
1. Garland making 50 50
2. Loading/unloading charge 40 40
3. Transportation charge 70 70
4. Spoilage and wastage 100 100
5. Storage charge -------
6. Market charge 10 10
7. Others 30 30
Total Marketing Cost 300 300
Consumers Price 900 1500
Margin of Retailers 470
Marketing cost of retailers
1. Labour and weighing charge 20
2. Transportation charge 30
3. Storage charge ----------
4. Spoilage and wastage 50
5. Others 30
Total Marketing Cost 130
In the tables 5.2.7 show that total cost and total margin of tulsi was 300 and
600 through channel-1 and 130 and 130 and 470 through channel-2 respectively
~ 27 ~
Marketing Efficiency of Tulsi
M.E = V/I – 1
Where, V = value of produce sold; I = Total marketing cost and margin
Table 5.2.8 Marketing Efficiency of Tulsi
S.No. Particular Channel-1 Channel-2
1 Value of produce sold 900 1500
2 Total marketing cost 300 130
3 Total market margin 600 470
Marketing Efficiency 1.0011 2.50
This table show that the marketing efficiency of tulsi higher in channel-2
(2.50) compare to channel-1(1.0011)
Table 5.2.9 Marketing Costs and Marketing Margin of Madar (Rs`/100 Pieces)
S.No. Particulars Channel-1 Channel-2
Net price received by farmers 200 200
Marketing cost incurred by farmers
1 Garland making 50 50
2. Loading/unloading charge 40 40
3. Transportation charge 70 70
4. Spoilage and wastage 100 100
5. Storage charge -------
6. Market charge 10 10
7. Others 30 30
Total Marketing Cost 300 300
Consumers Price 500 800
Margin of Retailers 170
Marketing cost of retailers
1. Labour and weighing charge 20
2. Transportation charge 30
3. Storage charge ----------
4. Spoilage and wastage 50
5. Others 30
Total Marketing Cost 130
In the tables 5.2.9 show that total cost and total margin of madar was 300 and
200 through channel-1 and 130 and 130 and 170 through channel-2 respectively
~ 28 ~
Marketing Efficiency of Madar
M.E = V/I – 1
Where, V = value of produce sold; I = Total marketing cost and margin
Table 5.2.10 Marketing Efficiency of Madar
S.No. Particular Channel-1 Channel-2
1 Value of produce sold 500 800
2 Total marketing cost 300 130
3 Total market margin 200 170
Marketing Efficiency 1.002 2.67
This table show that the marketing efficiency of madar higher in channel-2
(2.67) compare to channel-1(1.002)
Table 5.2.11 Marketing Costs and Marketing Margin of Bela(Rs`/100 Pieces)
S.No. Particulars Channel-1 Channel-2
Net price received by farmers 300 300
Marketing cost of farmers
Garland making 50 50
2. Loading/unloading charge 40 40
3. Transportation charge 70 70
4. Spoilage and wastage 100 100
5. Storage charge -------
6. Market charge 10 10
7. Others 30 30
Total Marketing Cost 300 300
Consumers Price 600 1000
Margin of Retailers 270
Marketing cost of retailers
1. Labour and weighing charge 20
2. Transportation charge 30
3. Storage charge ----------
4. Spoilage and wastage 50
5. Others 30
Total Marketing Cost 130
In the tables 5.2.11 show that total cost and total margin of bela was 300 and
300 through channel-1 and 130 and 130 and 270 through channel-2 respectively
~ 29 ~
Marketing Efficiency of Bela
M.E = V/I – 1
Where, V = value of produce sold; I = Total marketing cost and margin
Table 5.2.12 Marketing Efficiency of Bela
S.No. Particular Channel-1 Channel-2
1 Value of produce sold 600 1000
2 Total marketing cost 300 130
3 Total market margin 300 270
Marketing Efficiency 2.006 2.50
This table show that the marketing efficiency of bela higher in channel-2(2.50)
compare to channel-1(2.006)
Table 5.2.13 Marketing Costs and Marketing Margin of Tangri (Rs`/100 Pieces)
S.No. Particulars Channel-1 Channel-2
Net price received by farmers 500 500
Marketing cost incurred by farmers
1. Garland making 50 50
2. Loading/unloading charge 40 40
3. Transportation charge 70 70
4. Spoilage and wastage 100 100
5. Storage charge -------
6. Market charge 10 10
7. Others 30 30
Total Marketing Cost 300 300
Consumers Price 800 1500
Margin of Retailers 570
Marketing cost of retailers
1. Labour and weighing charge 20
2. Transportation charge 30
3. Storage charge ----------
4. Spoilage and wastage 50
5. Others 30
Total Marketing Cost 130
In the tables 5.2.13 show that total cost and total margin of tangri was 300 and
500 through channel-1 and 130 and 130 and 570 through channel-2 respectively
~ 30 ~
Marketing Efficiency of Marigold
M.E = V/I – 1
Where, V = value of produce sold; I = Total marketing cost and margin
Table 5.2.14 Marketing Efficiency of Tangri
S.No. Particular Channel-1 Channel-2
1 Value of produce sold 800 1500
2 Total marketing cost 300 130
3 Total market margin 500 570
Marketing Efficiency 2.006 2.14
This table show that the marketing efficiency of tangri higher in channel-2
(2.14) compare to channel-1(2.006)
Table 5.2.15 Marketing Costs and Marketing Margin of Chinarose (Rs`/100
Pieces)
S.No. Particulars Channel-1 Channel-2
Net price received by farmers 500 800
Marketing cost of farmers
1. Garland making 50 50
2. Loading/unloading charge 40 40
3. Transportation charge 70 70
4. Spoilage and wastage 100 100
5. Storage charge -------
6. Market charge 10 10
7. Others 30 30
Total Marketing Cost 300 300
Consumers Price 800 2000
Margin of Retailers 1070
Marketing cost of retailers
1. Labour and weighing charge 20
2. Transportation charge 30
3. Storage charge ----------
4. Spoilage and wastage 50
5. Others 30
Total Marketing Cost 130
In the tables 5.2.15 show that total cost and total margin of rose was 300 and
500 through channel-1 and 130 and 130 and 1070 through channel-2 respectively
~ 31 ~
Marketing Efficiency of Chinarose
M.E = V/I – 1
Where, V = value of produce sold; I = Total marketing cost and margin
Table 2.16 Marketing Efficiency of Chinarose
S.No. Particular Channel-1 Channel-2
1 Value of produce sold 800 2000
2 Total marketing cost 300 130
3 Total market margin 500 1070
Marketing Efficiency 1.001 1.66
This table show that the marketing efficiency of chinarose higher in channel-
2(1.66) compare to channel-1 (1.001).
~ 32 ~
5.3 CONSTRAINTS FACED BY ALL STAKEHOLDERS
Table 5.3.1 Constraints faced by Farmers
S.No. Particular Frequency (N=30) Percentage
1. Unavailability of labour 19 63.33
2 Source of finance 11 36.66
3 Price instability 30 100
4 Wastage and risk 23 76.66
5 Storage 17 56.66
6 Transportation 30 100
It was found that one farmer faced by more than one problem and this tables
show that price instability and transportation reported 100% respondents, wastage and
risk reported by 76.66% , labour by 63.33%,storage by 56.66% and finance by
36.66% respondent respectively.
Fig. 5.3.1
In the fig.3.1 the major problems faced by the farmers had price instability and
transportation reported 100% respondents, wastage and risk reported by 76.66% ,
labour by 63.33%,storage by 56.66% and finance by 36.66% respondent respectively.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Labour Source ofFinance
Priceinstability
Wastageand Risk
Storage Transportation
Series1 19 11 30 23 17 30
Constraints faced by farmers
~ 33 ~
Table 5.3.2 Constraints faced by Retailers
S.No. Particular Frequency (N=10) Percentage
1. Lack of labour 9 90
2 Transportation 7 70
3 Wastage and risk 7 70
4 Price instability 9 90
5 Parking 10 100
It was found that one retailers faced by more than one problem and this tables
show that parking reported 100% respondents, price instability and labour reported by
90% , wastage &risk and transportation by 70% respondent respectively.
Fig. 5.3.2
In the fig.3.2 the major problems faced by the retailers had parking reported
100% respondents, price instability and labour reported by 90% , wastage &risk and
transportation by 70% respondent respectively.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Lack of labour Transportation Wastage andRisk
Price instability Parking
Series1 9 7 7 9 10
Axi
s Ti
tle
Constraints faced by retailers
~ 34 ~
Table 5.3.3 Constraints faced by Consumers
S.No. Particular Frequency (N=20) Percentage
1. Price instability 20 100
2 Lack of market information 12 60
3 Parking 14 70
It was found that one consumers faced by more than one problem and this
tables show that price instability reported 100% respondents, parking by 70% , lack of
market information by 60% respondent respectively.
Fig. 5.3.3
In the fig.3.3 the major problems faced by the consumers had price instability
reported 100% respondents, parking by 70% , lack of market information by 60%
respondent respectively.
0
5
10
15
20
Price instability Lack of marketinformation
Parking
Series1 20 12 14
Axi
s Ti
tle
Constraints faced by Consumers
~ 35 ~
5.4 Perceptions of all stakeholders for market improvement
Table 5.4.1 Perception of the farmers
S.No. Particular Frequency (N=30) Percentage
Str
on
gly
ag
ree
Ag
ree
No
Idea
Dis
ag
ree
Str
on
gly
dis
ag
ree
Str
on
gly
ag
ree
Ag
ree
No
Idea
Dis
ag
ree
Str
on
gly
dis
ag
ree
1 Increase the
market place
9 18 3 0 0 30 60 10 0 0
2 Improved
sitting
arrangement
0 6 0 24 0 0 20 0 80 0
3 Parking
facility
11 19 0 0 0 37 63 0 0 0
4 Storage
facility
18 11 1 0 0 60 37 3 0 0
5 Cover
market place
10 18 3 0 0 33 60 7 0 0
In this tables show that for market improvement 30% farmers were strongly
agreed, 60% agreed and 10% had no idea. In case of sitting arrangement 20%
respondents were agreed and 80% disagreed. And related to parking facility 37%of
the respondents were strongly agreed and 63% agreed. In case of storage facility 60%
of the respondents were strongly agreed and 37%,3% were agreed and no idea
respectively. And for covered market place 33% respondents were strongly agreed
60%,7% were agreed and no idea respectively
Fig. 5.4.1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Stronglyagree
Agree No idea Disagree Stronglydisagree
Increase the market place
Improved sitting arrangement
Parking facility
Storage facility
Covered market place
~ 36 ~
For the market improvement the perception of the farmers had differ to each
others for question of market improvement 30% farmers were strongly agreed, 60%
agreed and 10% had no idea. In case of sitting arrangement 20% respondents were
agreed and 80% disagreed. And related to parking facility 37%of the respondents
were strongly agreed and 63% agreed. In case of storage facility 60% of the
respondents were strongly agreed and 37%,3% were agreed and no idea respectively.
And for covered market place 33% respondents were strongly agreed 60%,7% were
agreed and no idea respectively.
Table 5.4.2 Perception of the Retailers
S.No. Particular Frequency (N=10) Percentage
Str
on
gly
ag
ree
Ag
ree
No
Idea
Dis
ag
ree
Str
on
gly
dis
ag
ree
Str
on
gly
ag
ree
Ag
ree
No
Idea
Dis
ag
ree
Str
on
gly
dis
ag
ree
1 Increase the
market place
2 7 1 0 0 20 70 10 0 0
2 Improved
sitting
arrangement
0 10 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0
3 Parking
facility
8 2 0 0 0 80 20 0 0 0
4 Storage
facility
0 8 0 2 0 0 80 0 20 0
5 Cover
market place
0 10 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0
This tables show that for market improvement 20% retailers were strongly
agreed, 70% agreed and 10% had no idea. In case of sitting arrangement 100%
respondents were agreed. And related to parking facility 80%of the respondents were
strongly agree and 20% agree. In case of storage facility 80% of the respondents were
agreed and 20%diagreed. And for covered market place 100% respondents were
agreed 60%.
~ 37 ~
Fig. 5.4.2
For the market improvement the perception of the Retailers had differs to each
other’s for question of market improvement 20% retailers were strongly agreed, 70%
agreed and 10% had no idea. In case of sitting arrangement 100% respondents were
agreed. And related to parking facility 80%of the respondents were strongly agree and
20% agree. In case of storage facility 80% of the respondents were agreed and
20%diagreed. And for covered market place 100% respondents were agreed 60%.
Table 5.4.3 Perception of the Consumers
S.No. Particular Frequency (N=20) Percentage
Str
on
gly
ag
ree
Ag
ree
No
Idea
Dis
ag
ree
Str
on
gly
dis
ag
ree
Str
on
gly
ag
ree
Ag
ree
No
Idea
Dis
ag
ree
Str
on
gly
dis
ag
ree
1 Increase the
market place
4 16 0 0 0 20 80 0 0 0
2 Improved
sitting
arrangement
0 9 11 0 0 0 45 55 0 0
3 Parking
facility
11 9 0 0 0 55 45 0 0 0
4 Storage
facility
5 12 3 0 0 25 60 15 0 0
5 Cover
market place
12 8 0 0 0 60 40 0 0 0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Stronglyagree
Agree No idea Disagree Stronglydisagree
Increase the market place
Improved sitting arrangement
Parking facility
Storage facility
Covered market place
~ 38 ~
This tables show that market improvement 20% consumers were strongly
agreed and 80% agreed. In case of sitting arrangement 45%% respondents were
agreed and 55% no idea. And related to parking facility 55%of the respondents were
strongly agreed and 45% agree. In case of storage facility 25% of the respondents
were strongly agreed and 60%,15% were agreed and no idea respectively. And for
covered market place 60% respondents were strongly agreed and 40% were agreed.
Fig. 5.4.3
For the market improvement the perception of the consumers had differ to
each others for question of market improvement 20% consumers were strongly agreed
and 80% agreed. In case of sitting arrangement 45%% respondents were agreed and
55% no idea. And related to parking facility 55%of the respondents were strongly
agreed and 45% agree. In case of storage facility 25% of the respondents were
strongly agreed and 60%,15% were agreed and no idea respectively. And for covered
market place 60% respondents were strongly agreed and 40% were agreed.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Stronglyagree
Agree No idea Disagree Stronglydisagree
Increase the market place
Improved sitting arrangement
Parking facility
Storage facility
Covered market place
Chapter-VI
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
Floriculture is the sunshine industry of India as it offers excellent self
employment and good remuneration for the small and marginal farmers. Flowers have
been considered as the symbol of grace and elegance and a feast for our eyes. They
are used on all religious festival and occasions
Generally flowers are offered by devotees in Temple, Gurudwara, Church and
Masjids Flowers are used as a floral decoration. Even dried flowers are also used in
flower craft or arrangement of garlands and bouquets are prepared and offered to
welcome the dignitaries. When cut flowers are used for vase decoration that will be a
marvellous piece of indoor decoration
In India, the area under floriculture is 2.55 lakh hectares with a production of
1754.49 MT of loose flowers & 542.53 MT cut flowers .Floriculture in India is
estimated to cover an area of 3.06 lakh ha with a production of 1840 MT of loose
flowers & 548 MT cut flowers.
The present study was conducted in Varanasi district of Uttar Pradesh with the
different stakeholder’s farmers (30) retailers (10) and consumers (20). Under the
specific objective
To examine the marketing channels of flowers
To examine the marketing costs and marketing efficiency
To identify the constraints faced by all stakeholders.
To study the perceptions of all stakeholders for market improvement
The finding results summarised as below:
Two types of marketing channel was present in the study area (P-C) and (P-R-
C) in which mostly eight types of flowers was sold in the mandi like marigold, rose,
~ 40 ~
neelkanth ,tulsi ,madar, bela tangari and chinarose the market efficiency of channel-2
was higher than channel-1.
In the market, farmers were selling higher 73% marigold, 56.66%, 33.33%,
10%, 43.33%, 46.33%, 26.66%,56.66% rose, neelkanth ,tulsi ,madar, bela tangari and
chinarose respectively
And retailers was sold also higher 90% marigold,
40%,10%,0%,60%,80%,30%,20% rose, neelkanth ,tulsi ,madar, bela tangari and
chinarose respectively.
Marketing cost and market efficiency was vary channel to channel and on
average marketing cost and marketing margin of 100 pieces of garland varied
channel to channel. In case of Marigold marketing cost and marketing margin was
300 &300 through channel-1and 130 & 270 through channel-2 respectively and
marketing efficiency of channel-2(2.50%) was much higher than channel-1(1.001%).
In case of Rose 300 &900 through channel-1and 130 & 670 through channel-2
respectively and marketing efficiency of channel-2(2.50%) was much higher than
channel-1(1.00%).In case of Neelkanth 300 &900 through channel-1and 130 & 670
through channel-2 respectively and marketing efficiency of channel-2(2.50%) was
much higher than channel-1(1.00%).In case of Tulsi 300 &600 through channel-1and
130 & 470 through channel-2 respectively and marketing efficiency of channel-
2(2.50%) was much higher than channel-1(1.0011%). In case of Madar 300 &200
through channel-1and 130 & 170 through channel-2 respectively and marketing
efficiency of channel-2(2.67%) was much higher than channel-1(1.002%).In case of
Bela 300 &300 through channel-1and 130 & 270 through channel-2 respectively and
marketing efficiency of channel-2(2.50%) was higher than channel-1(2.006%).In case
of Tangri 300 &500 through channel-1and 130 & 570 through channel-2 respectively
and marketing efficiency of channel-2(2.14%) was higher than channel-1(2.006%).In
case of Chinarose 300 &500 through channel-1and 130 & 1070 through channel-2
respectively and marketing efficiency of channel-2(1.66%) was higher than channel-
1(1.001%).
~ 41 ~
Marketing constraints faced by stakeholders varied to each others. The major
problems faced by the farmers had price instability and transportation reported 100%
respondents, wastage and risk reported by 76.66%, labour by 63.33%, storage by
56.66% and finance by 36.66% respondent respectively. The major problems faced by
the retailers had parking reported 100% respondents, price instability and labour
reported by 90% , wastage &risk and transportation by 70% respondent respectively.
The major problems faced by the consumers had price instability reported 100%
respondents, parking by 70% , lack of market information by 60% respondent
respectively
The perceptions of all stakeholders for market improvement also varied to
each others the perception of the farmers had differ to each others for question of
market improvement 30% farmers were strongly agree, 60% agree and 10% had no
idea. In case of sitting arrangement 20% respondents were agree and 80% disagree.
and related to parking facility 37%of the respondents were strongly agree and 63%
agree. In case of storage facility 60% of the respondents were strongly agree and
37%,3% were agree and no idea respectively. and for covered market place 33%
respondents were strongly agree ,60%,7% were agree and no idea respectively. The
perception of the Retailers had differ to each others for question of market
improvement 20% retailers were strongly agree, 70% agree and 10% had no idea. In
case of sitting arrangement 100% respondents were agree. and related to parking
facility 80%of the respondents were strongly agree and 20% agree. In case of storage
facility 80% of the respondents were agree and 20%diagree. and for covered market
place 100% respondents were agree 60%.The perception of the consumers had differ
to each other’s for question of market improvement 20% consumers were strongly
agree and 80% agree. In case of sitting arrangement 45%% respondents were agree
and 55% no idea and related to parking facility 55%of the respondents were strongly
agree and 45% agree. In case of storage facility 25% of the respondents were strongly
agree and 60%,15% were agree and no idea respectively. And for covered market
place 60% respondents were strongly agree and 40% were agree.
~ 42 ~
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Armitage, M. J. (1992). “Introduction to Floriculture”, Cosmos, In: Specialty cut
flowers, Varsity Press I Timber Press, Portland, Oregon. pp: 77-81
Ajjan, N. and Selvary, K.N. (1999). An Economic analysis of production and
marketing of cut flower in Nilgiri district, Tamilnadu Plant Horticulture
Technology, Vol.2, No.4, 2002, pp.68-70.
Anonymous (2014). National Horticulture Board, Govt. of India.
Anonymous (2014). Directorate of Horticulture, Govt. of India.
Bhattacharji and Chandra De (2003). “Advanced commercial floriculture Pointer
Publication, Jaipur 302 003 (Rajasthan) India.
Bose, T. K. (1999). “Floriculture and Landscaping”. Naya Prakash Pvt Limited. Calcutta-700 006, India.
Department of Agriculture and Co-operation, (1990). Ministry of Agriculture,
Government of India, New Delhi. DAC Publication.
Prasad, S. and Kumar, U. (2005). Commercial floriculture Agrobis Jaipur 302002
(India).
Sing, D.K. (2008). Development of Floriculture in Uttar Pradesh, Glimpses on Indian
Agriculture (Ed) Volume 2, S.M. Jharwal, Directorate of Economics and
Statistics Department of Agriculture and Co-op, Government of India,
Academic Foundation, New Delhi.
Sale and Ganvir (2006). Marketing of Cut Flowers and Potted Plants in India. Supriyakumar Bhattacharji (Ed) “Advances in ornamental Horticulture Printer Publishers Jaipur 302 003 (Rajasthan) India.
MARKETING OF FLOWERS: A CASE STUDY OF BANSPHATAK
FLOWER MARKET VARANASI
PROFILE OF RESPONDENT
1. Name ......................
2. Age .............. (Year)
3. Gender ...................... (Male-1,female-2))
4. Social category ....................... (1-General,2-OBC,3- SC/ST)
5. Education ............ (Illiterate-1, Literate-2, Upto high
school-3, high school-4,intermediate-5)
6. Income ................ (1-upto 10000, 2- 10000-20000,
3- 20000-30000, 4- more than 30000)
7. Types of flower selling .............................
Flowers Yes No Rs./100
Marigold
Rose
Neelkanth
Tulsi
Madar
Bela
Tangri
Chinarose
8. Market charge of flower per lot ...........................
9. Net price received by farmer ...........................
10. Expenses incurred by retailer ...........................
11. Margin of retailer ...........................
12. Consumer purchasing price ...........................
Marketing cost
Farmers
1. Garland making .......................
2. Loading and unloading charge .......................
3. Transportation charge .......................
4. Storage charge .......................
5. Spoilage and wastage .......................
6. Market charge .......................
7. Others .......................
~ ii ~
Retailers
1. Labour charge and weighing charge ...................
2. Transportation charge ......................
3. Storage charge ......................
4. Spoilage and wastage charge ......................
13. Constraints faced by the stakeholder
Farmers
1. Unavailability of labour ..................
2. Source of finance ..................
3. Price instability ...................
4. Wastage and risk ...................
5. Storage ...................
6. Transportation ....................
Retailer
1. Lack of labour .....................
2. Lack of transportation .....................
3. Wastage and risk ......................
4. Price instability ......................
5. Parking
Customers
1. Price instability .......................
2. Lack of market information ........................
3. Parking .......................
14. Perceptions of stakeholder for market improvement
Farmer
Particular Strongly
Agree
Agree No idea Disagree Strongly
disagree
Increase the market place
Improve sitting
arrangement
Parking facility
Storage facility
Cover the market place
~ iii ~
Retailers
Particular Strongly
Agree
Agree No idea Disagree Strongly
disagree
Increase the market place
Improve sitting
arrangement
Parking facility
Storage facility
Cover the market place
Customers
Particular Strongly
Agree
Agree No idea Disagree Strongly
disagree
Increase the market place
Improve sitting
arrangement
Parking facility
Storage facility
Cover the market place
FOR MARKETINIING PLACE OWNER
1. Number of stakeholder in the market ........................
Registered ..................
Non registered .................
2. Total selling of all type of flowers
a- On season .........................
b- Off season .........................
3. Per day selling of flowers in the market ....................
a- On season .....................
b- Off season ....................
4. Highest selling of flower in the market .......................
5. Lowest selling of flower in the market ........................