Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Mark [email protected]
QuadStratEnterpriseManagement Report
Prepared by:
Sample Company
MarkeNtelligywww.entelligy.com214.267.8361
Graham
Table of Contents
QuadStrat Enterprise (Standard Edition)
This Report Contains...
1. METHODOLOGY: How to use the QuadStrat Assessment Report to get the most benefit.
2. QUADRED REPORT CARD™: A 1-page summary that includes your overall Stratigic Performance Index (SPI) and your
perceived capabilities and constraints.
3. DEGREE OF IMPACT RESULTS: Identifies your High-Impact/High Performance ("Green Zone") and High Impact/Low
Performance ("Red Zone") areas.
4. STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE COMPARISONS: A comparison of your organization's performance to the thousands of
organizations in the assessment database.
5. STATEMENT FREQUENCY RESPONSES: Shows the degree of consensus or polarity of responses to each statement.
6. COMMENTS: Provides additional anecdotal or situational information from the respondents.
Page 1 of 31
© 1997-2007 QuadRed, LLCPrepared By:
Sample Company
1.1 1.1.1 Mission 2.1 2.1.1 Structure Alignment 3.1 3.1.1 Values Credibility
1.1.2 Vision
1.1.3 Strategic Advantage
1.2 1.2.1 Customer Profile 2.2 2.2.1 Leveraging Core Competence 3.2 3.2.1 Management Modeling
1.2.2 Market & Competitive Analysis 3.2.2 Empowerment
3.2.3 Coaching
3.2.4 Building Teams
1.3 1.3.1 Finance 2.3 2.3.1 Organization Communication 3.3 3.3.1 Recruitment
1.3.2 Research & Development 2.3.2 Shared Knowledge 3.3.2 Orientation
1.3.3 Production 2.3.3 Required Technology 3.3.3 Training & Development
1.3.4 Marketing 3.3.4 Performance Management
1.3.5 Sales Effectiveness 3.3.5 Reward Systems
1.3.6 Customer Service
1.4 1.4.1 Planning 2.4 2.4.1 Policies & Procedures 3.4 3.4.1 Informal Communication
1.4.2 Resource Alignment 2.4.2 Roles & Responsibilities 3.4.2 Employee Feedback
1.4.3 Execution 2.4.3 Outsourcing & Partners 3.4.3 Ability to Change
the most important High-Impact/Low-Performance areas. 6. Develop and communicate performance improvement plan.3. Identify performance improvement goals. 7. Execute plan.
Assessment and Planning Objectives1. Discuss/debate performance issues that currently impede success. 4. Determine action items, due dates, and metrics for each goal.2. Gain senior management agreement regarding prioritization of 5. Determine and allocate the necessary resources to achieve each goal.
When you completed the QuadRed Assessment, your responses were linked to the categories in the following model:
Leadership
Organization Dynamic Model™ and Report Objectives
1.0 Organization Strategy 2.0 Organization Design 3.0 Organization Culture
Core Competence
Organization Dynamic Model™ - Standard EditionManagement Version
Human ResourceSystems
OrganizationCharacter
Values & Beliefs
Planning & Execution
StructureMission, Vision, & Competitive Advantage
External Assessment
Internal Capabilities
Information, Systems, & Technology
Organization Efficiency
© 1997-2007 QuadRed, LLC
Methodology
Notice: This report reflects the views and opinions of the individuals that have completed this QuadRed assessment. The information contained within this report does not imply, direct, or recommend specific actions to be taken on the part of the assessment respondents or the organization they represent. It is recommended that participants utilize the skills of a certified consultant to facilitate the assessment outcome, debrief, and planning process.
The assessment you completed compared your organization’s performance against the practices of the best-run organizations in the world. Each best practice statement in the assessment was formatted on a 6-point interval scale. Responses could range from “Strongly Agree” to “Strongly Disagree”. Participants could also select a “Don’t Know” or “Not Applicable” response. Responses from all participants have been aggregated, resulting in performance mean scores presented in this report. Mean scores relating to the six-point scale have been converted into percentages. “Don’t Know” or “Not Applicable” responses are not factored into the mean scores. How to use this report:
1. Review the Report Card and the Degree of Impact Quadrants to understand: • How the participants prioritized each of the elements in the assessment. • How they rated the performance of these elements.
2. Review the Strategic Performance Comparison spidergrams to compare your organization’s performance to other organizations that have also completed this assessment.
3. Use the Statement Frequency Responses to see how participants individually rated performance, particularly in the high-impact areas. Is there centrality or polarity?
4. Use the Comments section to obtain more elaboration from the respondents regarding high or low performing areas.
5. Identify and prioritize your key performance improvement opportunities.
6. Develop a performance improvement plan.
7. Execute your plan. (Provide Status updates to your key constituencies, including your employees.)
8. Take the assessment again in approximately 9 to 12 months to determine performance progress in targeted improvement areas. This report is designed to reflect:
1. Priorities: The performance areas the participants have identified as having the greatest impact on the organization’s success. 2. Performance: The participant’s perception of the organization’s current performance. 3. Comparison: How the organization compares to other organizations in the assessment database. 4. Consensus: The level of agreement or disagreement that exists among the participants regarding performance in key areas.
© 1997-2007 QuadRed. LLC
Report Card
QuadStrat Enterprise (Standard Edition)
CapabilitiesOrganization Strategy
Customer Service 71%
Marketing 75%
Organization Design
Required Technology 78%
Roles & Responsibilities 76%
Organization Culture
Values Credibility 75%
Management Modeling 80%
Informal Communication 65%
ConstraintsOrganization Strategy
Finance 50%
Execution 51%
Sales Effectiveness 48%
Vision 53%
Customer Profile 51%
Organization Design
Organization Communication 43%
Policies & Procedures 51%
Organization Culture
Empowerment 54%
Employee Feedback 35%
Building Teams 55%
N/A
Your Prior Year SPI™:
Your Strategic Performance Index™:
QuadRed Benchmark SPI Comparisons
Capabilities and Constraints Definitions
Capabilities are defined as those service categories that are view as “High-Impact” (important to
the customer) and “High-Performing (generally perceived as satisfactory performance).
Constraints are defined as those service categories that are view as “High-Impact” (important to
the customer) and “Low-Performing” (generally perceived as less satisfactory performance).
60
Group Name Participants
4
100%
4Total Distribution: Total Participants:
Percentage:
Management 4
Page 3 of 31
© 1997-2007 QuadRed, LLCPrepared By:
Sample Company
QuadStrat Enterprise (Standard Edition)
Degree Of Impact Results
Organization Strategy
. Category ScoreNo.
Management
. 71%Customer Service1
. 50%Finance2
. 51%Execution3
. 48%Sales Effectiveness4
. 75%Marketing5
. 53%Vision6
. 51%Customer Profile7
. 77%Mission8
. 56%Production9
. 75%Planning10
. 68%Research & Development11
. 49%Market & Competitive Analysis12
. 52%Strategic Advantage13
. 66%Resource Alignment14
Page 4 of 31
© 1997-2007 QuadRed, LLCPrepared By:
Sample Company
QuadStrat Enterprise (Standard Edition)
Degree Of Impact Results
Organization Design
. Category ScoreNo.
Management
. 43%Organization Communication1
. 78%Required Technology2
. 51%Policies & Procedures3
. 76%Roles & Responsibilities4
. 56%Leveraging Core Competence5
. 63%Structure Alignment6
. 41%Shared Knowledge7
. 50%Outsourcing & Partners8
Page 5 of 31
© 1997-2007 QuadRed, LLCPrepared By:
Sample Company
QuadStrat Enterprise (Standard Edition)
Degree Of Impact Results
Organization Culture
. Category ScoreNo.
Management
. 75%Values Credibility1
. 54%Empowerment2
. 80%Management Modeling3
. 35%Employee Feedback4
. 55%Building Teams5
. 65%Informal Communication6
. 72%Training & Development7
. 44%Performance Management8
. 75%Coaching9
. 47%Ability to Change10
. 75%Reward Systems11
. 63%Recruitment12
. 45%Orientation13
Page 6 of 31
© 1997-2007 QuadRed, LLCPrepared By:
Sample Company
QuadStrat Enterprise (Standard Edition)
Performance Comparison
Organization Strategy
.Category Top Mean Btm You
Management
.Customer Service 83% 68% 52% 71%
.Finance 81% 64% 47% 50%
.Execution 84% 67% 48% 51%
.Sales Effectiveness 77% 61% 48% 48%
.Marketing 76% 60% 43% 75%
.Vision 83% 73% 56% 53%
.Customer Profile 74% 62% 51% 51%
.Mission 83% 76% 56% 77%
.Production 79% 64% 47% 56%
.Planning 85% 68% 49% 75%
.Research & Development 77% 61% 42% 68%
.Market & Competitive Analysis 75% 61% 48% 49%
.Strategic Advantage 80% 66% 48% 52%
.Resource Alignment 75% 56% 40% 66%
Page 7 of 31
© 1997-2007 QuadRed, LLCPrepared By:
Sample Company
QuadStrat Enterprise (Standard Edition)
Performance Comparison
Organization Design
.Category Top Mean Btm You
Management
.Organization Communication 86% 68% 49% 43%
.Required Technology 88% 76% 62% 78%
.Policies & Procedures 82% 65% 49% 51%
.Roles & Responsibilities 83% 66% 50% 76%
.Leveraging Core Competence 82% 68% 50% 56%
.Structure Alignment 81% 64% 45% 63%
.Shared Knowledge 81% 62% 48% 41%
.Outsourcing & Partners 84% 70% 58% 50%
Page 8 of 31
© 1997-2007 QuadRed, LLCPrepared By:
Sample Company
QuadStrat Enterprise (Standard Edition)
Performance Comparison
Organization Culture
.Category Top Mean Btm You
Management
.Values Credibility 83% 64% 46% 75%
.Empowerment 85% 69% 53% 54%
.Management Modeling 90% 76% 60% 80%
.Employee Feedback 83% 67% 51% 35%
.Building Teams 83% 68% 52% 55%
.Informal Communication 84% 74% 63% 65%
.Training & Development 81% 66% 50% 72%
.Performance Management 82% 68% 52% 44%
.Coaching 88% 74% 60% 75%
.Ability to Change 82% 64% 48% 47%
.Reward Systems 85% 70% 55% 75%
.Recruitment 80% 66% 53% 63%
.Orientation 78% 63% 48% 45%
Page 9 of 31
© 1997-2007 QuadRed, LLCPrepared By:
Sample Company
Performance Scores
QuadStrat Enterprise (Standard Edition)
.
.
AgreeDisagreeDon't KnowNot Applicable
MissionStd.
Dev.
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE
NA DK 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post.
Score
Mean
Score
Std.
Dev.
Mean
ScoreNo.
1 Our mission statement clearly
explains our company's reason
for being in business.
Management 0% 25% 0% 0% 0% 25% 25% 25% 50% 83% 16 4 . 12Management 77%
2 Our mission statement
explains how our customers
and other stakeholders benefit
from our company.
Management 0% 25% 0% 0% 0% 50% 25% 0% 25% 72% 9 4
3 Our mission statement clearly
explains how our company is
different from our competition.
Management 0% 50% 0% 0% 0% 25% 25% 0% 25% 75% 11 4
.
.
AgreeDisagreeDon't KnowNot Applicable
VisionStd.
Dev.
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE
NA DK 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post.
Score
Mean
Score
Std.
Dev.
Mean
ScoreNo.
4 Our vision statement clearly
explains what our company will
be doing in the future.
Management 0% 25% 0% 0% 50% 25% 0% 0% 0% 56% 9 4 . 11Management 53%
5 Our vision serves the long-term
interest of our customers and
other stakeholders.
Management 0% 25% 0% 25% 25% 25% 0% 0% 0% 50% 16 4
6 Our vision gives us the direction
we need to make good
decisions.
Management 0% 25% 0% 0% 50% 25% 0% 0% 0% 56% 9 4
Page 10 of 31
© 1997-2007 QuadRed, LLCPrepared By:
Sample Company
Performance Scores
QuadStrat Enterprise (Standard Edition)
.
.
AgreeDisagreeDon't KnowNot Applicable
Strategic AdvantageStd.
Dev.
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE
NA DK 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post.
Score
Mean
Score
Std.
Dev.
Mean
ScoreNo.
7 We have effectively established
a clear competitive advantage
in our markets.
Management 0% 0% 0% 50% 50% 0% 0% 0% 0% 42% 9 4 . 16Management 52%
8 Our company's competitive
advantage is clearly understood
by all employees.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 50% 25% 25% 0% 25% 63% 15 4
.
.
AgreeDisagreeDon't KnowNot Applicable
Customer ProfileStd.
Dev.
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE
NA DK 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post.
Score
Mean
Score
Std.
Dev.
Mean
ScoreNo.
9 Our company has clearly
identified the specific features
and benefits our customers
want.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 75% 0% 25% 0% 25% 58% 16 4 . 15Management 51%
10 Our company has clearly
identified why our customers
would NOT purchase our
products or services.
Management 0% 0% 0% 25% 25% 50% 0% 0% 0% 54% 15 4
11 Our customers purchase our
products or services in the
manner they prefer in-person,
internet, phone, etc..
Management 0% 0% 0% 50% 50% 0% 0% 0% 0% 42% 9 4
Page 11 of 31
© 1997-2007 QuadRed, LLCPrepared By:
Sample Company
Performance Scores
QuadStrat Enterprise (Standard Edition)
.
.
AgreeDisagreeDon't KnowNot Applicable
Market & Competitive AnalysisStd.
Dev.
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE
NA DK 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post.
Score
Mean
Score
Std.
Dev.
Mean
ScoreNo.
12 Our company has clearly
identified the key strengths,
weaknesses, and strategies of
our direct competitors.
Management 0% 0% 0% 25% 50% 25% 0% 0% 0% 50% 13 4 . 15Management 49%
13 Our company has thoroughly
assessed the threat of
substitute products or services.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 50% 50% 0% 0% 0% 58% 9 4
14 Our company has analyzed the
outlook for growth in our
primary market.
Management 0% 0% 0% 50% 25% 25% 0% 0% 0% 46% 15 4
15 Our customer base is growing
at a rate that meets or exceeds
industry standards.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 75% 25% 0% 0% 0% 54% 8 4
16 Our company maintains an
ongoing, quantifiable market
evaluation process.
Management 0% 0% 25% 25% 25% 25% 0% 0% 0% 42% 21 4
17 Our company has analyzed
threats and opportunities that
could result from changes in
external demographic,
economic, political, and
technological factors that may
influence our business.
Management 0% 0% 25% 25% 0% 50% 0% 0% 0% 46% 25 4
Page 12 of 31
© 1997-2007 QuadRed, LLCPrepared By:
Sample Company
Performance Scores
QuadStrat Enterprise (Standard Edition)
.
.
AgreeDisagreeDon't KnowNot Applicable
FinanceStd.
Dev.
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE
NA DK 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post.
Score
Mean
Score
Std.
Dev.
Mean
ScoreNo.
18 We have sufficient financial
resources to achieve our goals.
Management 0% 0% 25% 0% 75% 0% 0% 0% 0% 42% 16 4 . 18Management 50%
19 Our company has consistently
achieved our financial goals.
Management 0% 0% 0% 25% 25% 50% 0% 0% 0% 54% 15 4
20 We conduct a "Cost/Benefit"
analysis before we spend
money on any business
opportunity.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 50% 25% 25% 0% 25% 63% 15 4
21 As part of our planning process,
we utilize an "If/Then" thinking
process to anticipate many
different scenarios.
Management 0% 0% 25% 25% 25% 25% 0% 0% 0% 42% 21 4
.
.
AgreeDisagreeDon't KnowNot Applicable
Research & DevelopmentStd.
Dev.
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE
NA DK 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post.
Score
Mean
Score
Std.
Dev.
Mean
ScoreNo.
22 Our company allocates the
necessary resources to support
our research and development
process.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 50% 25% 0% 25% 67% 13 4 . 10Management 68%
23 Our research and development
process is innovative and
creative.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 75% 25% 0% 25% 71% 8 4
Page 13 of 31
© 1997-2007 QuadRed, LLCPrepared By:
Sample Company
Performance Scores
QuadStrat Enterprise (Standard Edition)
.
.
AgreeDisagreeDon't KnowNot Applicable
ProductionStd.
Dev.
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE
NA DK 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post.
Score
Mean
Score
Std.
Dev.
Mean
ScoreNo.
24 Quality is embedded into our
production process.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 50% 25% 0% 25% 67% 13 4 . 15Management 56%
25 Our product or service
production process is cost
efficient.
Management 0% 0% 0% 25% 25% 50% 0% 0% 0% 54% 15 4
26 Our product or service
production process is flexible,
fast, and responsive.
Management 0% 0% 0% 25% 50% 25% 0% 0% 0% 50% 13 4
Page 14 of 31
© 1997-2007 QuadRed, LLCPrepared By:
Sample Company
Performance Scores
QuadStrat Enterprise (Standard Edition)
.
.
AgreeDisagreeDon't KnowNot Applicable
MarketingStd.
Dev.
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE
NA DK 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post.
Score
Mean
Score
Std.
Dev.
Mean
ScoreNo.
27 Our company has a clearly
defined marketing plan.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 75% 25% 0% 25% 71% 8 4 . 15Management 75%
28 Our marketing process
reinforces our brand identity.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 50% 50% 0% 0% 0% 58% 9 4
29 We use a comprehensive
marketing database that
provides us with detailed
customer and market
information.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 0% 75% 0% 75% 75% 16 4
30 Our "Competitive Advantage" is
emphasized in all marketing
efforts.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 50% 25% 75% 83% 13 4
31 Our company consistently
analyzes the
"Return-on-Investment" (ROI)
of our major marketing
campaigns.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 25% 50% 75% 88% 15 4
Page 15 of 31
© 1997-2007 QuadRed, LLCPrepared By:
Sample Company
Performance Scores
QuadStrat Enterprise (Standard Edition)
.
.
AgreeDisagreeDon't KnowNot Applicable
Sales EffectivenessStd.
Dev.
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE
NA DK 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post.
Score
Mean
Score
Std.
Dev.
Mean
ScoreNo.
32 Our sales teams or channels
consistently achieve their goals.
Management 0% 25% 0% 25% 25% 25% 0% 0% 0% 50% 16 4 . 16Management 48%
33 Our salespeople possess the
necessary skills to achieve their
goals.
Management 0% 25% 0% 0% 25% 50% 0% 0% 0% 61% 9 4
34 Our management team
employs a well-defined sales
management process.
Management 0% 25% 25% 50% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 28% 9 4
35 Our company effectively tracks
sales activity from lead
generation through closing.
Management 0% 25% 0% 0% 50% 25% 0% 0% 0% 56% 9 4
Page 16 of 31
© 1997-2007 QuadRed, LLCPrepared By:
Sample Company
Performance Scores
QuadStrat Enterprise (Standard Edition)
.
.
AgreeDisagreeDon't KnowNot Applicable
Customer ServiceStd.
Dev.
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE
NA DK 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post.
Score
Mean
Score
Std.
Dev.
Mean
ScoreNo.
36 Our customer service
standards are clearly defined
and documented.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 25% 25% 25% 50% 75% 21 4 . 24Management 71%
37 We consistently exceed our
customer's expectations.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 25% 50% 0% 50% 71% 15 4
38 Our employees understand and
support our commitment to
customer satisfaction.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 50% 25% 75% 83% 13 4
39 Our company regularly obtains
and evaluates customer
feedback.
Management 0% 0% 25% 25% 0% 25% 25% 0% 25% 50% 30 4
40 Our company enjoys a higher
rate of repeat business and
referrals than our competitors.
Management 0% 25% 0% 25% 0% 0% 0% 50% 50% 78% 38 4
.
.
AgreeDisagreeDon't KnowNot Applicable
PlanningStd.
Dev.
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE
NA DK 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post.
Score
Mean
Score
Std.
Dev.
Mean
ScoreNo.
41 Our company has clearly
defined and prioritized our
strategic goals.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 50% 50% 0% 50% 75% 9 4 . 13Management 75%
42 Our strategic goals and
objectives are measurable.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 50% 25% 0% 25% 67% 13 4
43 At our company, action plans
must clearly specify how and
when each goal will be
achieved.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 50% 25% 75% 83% 13 4
Page 17 of 31
© 1997-2007 QuadRed, LLCPrepared By:
Sample Company
Performance Scores
QuadStrat Enterprise (Standard Edition)
.
.
AgreeDisagreeDon't KnowNot Applicable
Resource AlignmentStd.
Dev.
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE
NA DK 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post.
Score
Mean
Score
Std.
Dev.
Mean
ScoreNo.
44 Our company has allocated the
necessary capital, technology,
and people to achieve our
strategic goals.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 50% 25% 0% 25% 67% 13 4 . 12Management 66%
45 At our company, we evaluate
the capacity and performance
levels of departments or
individuals before increasing
their workload.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 50% 25% 0% 25% 67% 13 4
.
.
AgreeDisagreeDon't KnowNot Applicable
ExecutionStd.
Dev.
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE
NA DK 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post.
Score
Mean
Score
Std.
Dev.
Mean
ScoreNo.
46 We execute our strategic goals. Management 0% 25% 0% 0% 50% 25% 0% 0% 0% 56% 9 4 . 13Management 51%
47 Management routinely reviews
the status of our strategic goals
and objectives.
Management 0% 25% 0% 0% 25% 50% 0% 0% 0% 61% 9 4
48 At our company, there are
consequences when deadlines
are missed.
Management 0% 25% 0% 50% 25% 0% 0% 0% 0% 39% 9 4
Page 18 of 31
© 1997-2007 QuadRed, LLCPrepared By:
Sample Company
Performance Scores
QuadStrat Enterprise (Standard Edition)
.
.
AgreeDisagreeDon't KnowNot Applicable
Structure AlignmentStd.
Dev.
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE
NA DK 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post.
Score
Mean
Score
Std.
Dev.
Mean
ScoreNo.
49 Management has carefully
considered how our
organizational structure
impacts our strategic plan.
Management 0% 0% 0% 25% 25% 50% 0% 0% 0% 54% 15 4 . 18Management 63%
50 Our organizational structure is
not influenced by organizational
politics.
Management 0% 0% 0% 25% 25% 25% 25% 0% 25% 58% 21 4
51 Our ability to quickly modify our
organizational structure is a key
contributor to our success.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 75% 0% 75% 79% 8 4
.
.
AgreeDisagreeDon't KnowNot Applicable
Leveraging Core CompetenceStd.
Dev.
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE
NA DK 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post.
Score
Mean
Score
Std.
Dev.
Mean
ScoreNo.
52 Our company has clearly
identified our corporate core
competencies.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 75% 25% 0% 25% 71% 8 4 . 13Management 56%
53 We leverage our core
competencies to create real
value for our customers.
Management 0% 0% 0% 25% 50% 25% 0% 0% 0% 50% 13 4
54 We leverage our core
competencies to set us apart
from our competitors.
Management 0% 0% 0% 25% 50% 25% 0% 0% 0% 50% 13 4
55 We leverage our core
competencies to capitalize on
new product or service
opportunities.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 75% 25% 0% 0% 0% 54% 8 4
Page 19 of 31
© 1997-2007 QuadRed, LLCPrepared By:
Sample Company
Performance Scores
QuadStrat Enterprise (Standard Edition)
.
.
AgreeDisagreeDon't KnowNot Applicable
Organization CommunicationStd.
Dev.
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE
NA DK 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post.
Score
Mean
Score
Std.
Dev.
Mean
ScoreNo.
56 Our company keeps employees
well informed.
Management 0% 0% 25% 50% 25% 0% 0% 0% 0% 33% 13 4 . 14Management 43%
57 Our company regularly
communicates the status of our
goals and objectives.
Management 0% 0% 0% 25% 50% 25% 0% 0% 0% 50% 13 4
58 At our company, important
information is readily available.
Management 0% 0% 25% 25% 50% 0% 0% 0% 0% 38% 15 4
59 Our company provides our
managers with the information
they need to make informed
decisions.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 75% 25% 0% 0% 0% 54% 8 4
.
.
AgreeDisagreeDon't KnowNot Applicable
Shared KnowledgeStd.
Dev.
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE
NA DK 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post.
Score
Mean
Score
Std.
Dev.
Mean
ScoreNo.
60 Our company uses information
management systems to
support the functions of
analyzing, planning, and
executing.
Management 0% 0% 25% 0% 25% 25% 25% 0% 25% 54% 28 4 . 23Management 41%
61 Our company has a knowledge
management system where
managers from different areas
can share information to
maximize performance.
Management 0% 0% 25% 75% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 29% 8 4
Page 20 of 31
© 1997-2007 QuadRed, LLCPrepared By:
Sample Company
Performance Scores
QuadStrat Enterprise (Standard Edition)
.
.
AgreeDisagreeDon't KnowNot Applicable
Required TechnologyStd.
Dev.
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE
NA DK 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post.
Score
Mean
Score
Std.
Dev.
Mean
ScoreNo.
62 We currently have the
technology we need to achieve
our goals.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 50% 25% 75% 83% 13 4 . 15Management 78%
63 Our company continues to
identify and acquire new
technologies that support our
business.
Management 0% 25% 0% 0% 25% 0% 50% 0% 50% 72% 19 4
.
.
AgreeDisagreeDon't KnowNot Applicable
Policies & ProceduresStd.
Dev.
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE
NA DK 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post.
Score
Mean
Score
Std.
Dev.
Mean
ScoreNo.
64 At our company, policies and
procedures provide clear and
understandable direction.
Management 0% 0% 25% 0% 25% 50% 0% 0% 0% 50% 23 4 . 15Management 51%
65 Our managers ensure we
comply with our policies and
procedures.
Management 0% 0% 0% 25% 50% 25% 0% 0% 0% 50% 13 4
66 Our managers and employees
feel that they can get things
done without a lot of"red tape."
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 75% 25% 0% 0% 0% 54% 8 4
Page 21 of 31
© 1997-2007 QuadRed, LLCPrepared By:
Sample Company
Performance Scores
QuadStrat Enterprise (Standard Edition)
.
.
AgreeDisagreeDon't KnowNot Applicable
Roles & ResponsibilitiesStd.
Dev.
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE
NA DK 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post.
Score
Mean
Score
Std.
Dev.
Mean
ScoreNo.
67 Our employees clearly
understand how their jobs
relate to our company's goals.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 25% 50% 0% 50% 71% 15 4 . 13Management 76%
68 At our company, management
roles are clearly defined.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 50% 50% 0% 50% 75% 9 4
69 At our company, there is no
unnecessary duplication of
individual roles and
responsibilities.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 50% 25% 75% 83% 13 4
.
.
AgreeDisagreeDon't KnowNot Applicable
Outsourcing & PartnersStd.
Dev.
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE
NA DK 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post.
Score
Mean
Score
Std.
Dev.
Mean
ScoreNo.
70 Our company outsources
processes and functions that
do not relate to our corporate
core competencies.
Management 50% 25% 0% 0% 25% 0% 0% 0% 0% 50% 0 4 . 0Management 50%
71 Our company monitors the
performance of our vendors
and strategic partners.
Management 50% 25% 0% 0% 25% 0% 0% 0% 0% 50% 0 4
Page 22 of 31
© 1997-2007 QuadRed, LLCPrepared By:
Sample Company
Performance Scores
QuadStrat Enterprise (Standard Edition)
.
.
AgreeDisagreeDon't KnowNot Applicable
Values CredibilityStd.
Dev.
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE
NA DK 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post.
Score
Mean
Score
Std.
Dev.
Mean
ScoreNo.
72 Our employees clearly
understand and embrace our
company's values and beliefs.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 50% 25% 75% 83% 13 4 . 17Management 75%
73 Our company's business
practices are carefully aligned
with our values and beliefs.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 75% 0% 75% 79% 8 4
74 Our values and beliefs are
reinforced in all internal
communication.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 50% 25% 75% 83% 13 4
75 The daily experiences of our
employees are consistent with
the direction set forth in our
values and beliefs.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 50% 25% 75% 83% 13 4
76 Cynicism is virtually absent in
our company.
Management 0% 0% 0% 25% 50% 25% 0% 0% 0% 50% 13 4
.
.
AgreeDisagreeDon't KnowNot Applicable
Management ModelingStd.
Dev.
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE
NA DK 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post.
Score
Mean
Score
Std.
Dev.
Mean
ScoreNo.
77 Our managers always behave
in a manner that is consistent
with our values and beliefs.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 75% 25% 100% 88% 8 4 . 13Management 80%
78 At our company, employees
have confidence in our senior
leadership.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 75% 25% 100% 88% 8 4
79 Our company's senior leaders
are honest.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 50% 25% 0% 25% 67% 13 4
Page 23 of 31
© 1997-2007 QuadRed, LLCPrepared By:
Sample Company
Performance Scores
QuadStrat Enterprise (Standard Edition)
.
.
AgreeDisagreeDon't KnowNot Applicable
EmpowermentStd.
Dev.
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE
NA DK 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post.
Score
Mean
Score
Std.
Dev.
Mean
ScoreNo.
80 Our managers know when to
personally manage projects
and when to let their staff have
authority and control.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 50% 25% 0% 25% 67% 13 4 . 17Management 54%
81 Employee involvement is
always encouraged.
Management 0% 0% 25% 0% 50% 25% 0% 0% 0% 46% 20 4
82 At our company, authority to
make decisions is given to the
lowest appropriate level.
Management 0% 0% 0% 25% 50% 25% 0% 0% 0% 50% 13 4
.
.
AgreeDisagreeDon't KnowNot Applicable
CoachingStd.
Dev.
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE
NA DK 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post.
Score
Mean
Score
Std.
Dev.
Mean
ScoreNo.
83 At our company, delegation is
viewed as a way to develop and
motivate our employees.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 50% 50% 0% 50% 75% 9 4 . 13Management 75%
84 Our managers understand the
importance of maintaining their
employee's self-esteem.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 50% 25% 0% 25% 67% 13 4
85 Our managers always show
appreciation to employees for
good performance.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 50% 25% 75% 83% 13 4
Page 24 of 31
© 1997-2007 QuadRed, LLCPrepared By:
Sample Company
Performance Scores
QuadStrat Enterprise (Standard Edition)
.
.
AgreeDisagreeDon't KnowNot Applicable
Building TeamsStd.
Dev.
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE
NA DK 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post.
Score
Mean
Score
Std.
Dev.
Mean
ScoreNo.
86 Our company encourages and
fosters good teamwork.
Management 0% 0% 0% 25% 50% 25% 0% 0% 0% 50% 13 4 . 13Management 55%
87 Our managers are effective at
creating employee support and
enthusiasm around company
goals.
Management 0% 0% 0% 25% 50% 0% 25% 0% 25% 54% 20 4
88 At our company, team
performance is rewarded at a
level equal to or greater than
individual performance.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 50% 50% 0% 0% 0% 58% 9 4
89 We effectively bring together
people from various
departments to better achieve
our goals.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 50% 50% 0% 0% 0% 58% 9 4
Page 25 of 31
© 1997-2007 QuadRed, LLCPrepared By:
Sample Company
Performance Scores
QuadStrat Enterprise (Standard Edition)
.
.
AgreeDisagreeDon't KnowNot Applicable
RecruitmentStd.
Dev.
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE
NA DK 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post.
Score
Mean
Score
Std.
Dev.
Mean
ScoreNo.
90 At our company, only
high-caliber candidates are
considered for open positions.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 50% 25% 0% 25% 67% 13 4 . 16Management 63%
91 We only hire individuals who
are compatible with our
company culture.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 50% 25% 25% 0% 25% 63% 15 4
92 Our managers are very good
interviewers.
Management 0% 0% 0% 25% 0% 50% 25% 0% 25% 63% 20 4
93 Our managers are evaluated on
their success at recruiting top
talent.
Management 0% 0% 0% 25% 0% 50% 25% 0% 25% 63% 20 4
.
.
AgreeDisagreeDon't KnowNot Applicable
OrientationStd.
Dev.
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE
NA DK 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post.
Score
Mean
Score
Std.
Dev.
Mean
ScoreNo.
94 Our company provides new
employees with an orientation
program that helps them
understand the company's
mission, vision and values.
Management 0% 0% 0% 50% 25% 25% 0% 0% 0% 46% 15 4 . 14Management 45%
95 Our senior managers
participate in the orientation
program.
Management 0% 0% 0% 50% 25% 25% 0% 0% 0% 46% 15 4
Page 26 of 31
© 1997-2007 QuadRed, LLCPrepared By:
Sample Company
Performance Scores
QuadStrat Enterprise (Standard Edition)
.
.
AgreeDisagreeDon't KnowNot Applicable
Training & DevelopmentStd.
Dev.
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE
NA DK 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post.
Score
Mean
Score
Std.
Dev.
Mean
ScoreNo.
96 Our company invests in
training.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 50% 50% 0% 50% 75% 9 4 . 11Management 72%
97 Our company ensures that all
employees are taught the
necessary skills to do their job.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 50% 25% 0% 25% 67% 13 4
98 Our training programs improve
our company's performance.
Management 0% 25% 0% 0% 25% 25% 25% 0% 25% 67% 16 4
99 Our training programs are well
designed and structured.
Management 0% 25% 0% 0% 0% 25% 50% 0% 50% 78% 9 4
100 Our company provides
management development
training.
Management 0% 25% 0% 0% 0% 25% 50% 0% 50% 78% 9 4
Page 27 of 31
© 1997-2007 QuadRed, LLCPrepared By:
Sample Company
Performance Scores
QuadStrat Enterprise (Standard Edition)
.
.
AgreeDisagreeDon't KnowNot Applicable
Performance ManagementStd.
Dev.
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE
NA DK 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post.
Score
Mean
Score
Std.
Dev.
Mean
ScoreNo.
101 Our company uses a
results-oriented employee
performance review process.
Management 0% 0% 0% 50% 50% 0% 0% 0% 0% 42% 9 4 . 15Management 44%
102 As part of our performance
management process,
managers and employees
agree upon goals.
Management 0% 0% 0% 50% 0% 25% 25% 0% 25% 54% 25 4
103 At our company, people are
held accountable for their work.
Management 0% 0% 25% 50% 25% 0% 0% 0% 0% 33% 13 4
104 Employee goals include clear
steps and timelines.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 75% 25% 0% 0% 0% 54% 8 4
105 Performance appraisals are
conducted more than once a
year.
Management 0% 0% 0% 75% 25% 0% 0% 0% 0% 38% 8 4
Page 28 of 31
© 1997-2007 QuadRed, LLCPrepared By:
Sample Company
Performance Scores
QuadStrat Enterprise (Standard Edition)
.
.
AgreeDisagreeDon't KnowNot Applicable
Reward SystemsStd.
Dev.
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE
NA DK 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post.
Score
Mean
Score
Std.
Dev.
Mean
ScoreNo.
106 Given our business goals, we
are rewarding the appropriate
skills and behaviors.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 50% 50% 0% 50% 75% 9 4 . 13Management 75%
107 Our company rewards
employees fairly.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 25% 25% 25% 50% 75% 21 4
108 Employees in our company feel
that the rewards for achieving
their goals are worthy of the
effort.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 75% 0% 75% 79% 8 4
109 At our company, promotions are
only given to the people that
deserve them.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 25% 50% 0% 50% 71% 15 4
.
.
AgreeDisagreeDon't KnowNot Applicable
Informal CommunicationStd.
Dev.
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE
NA DK 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post.
Score
Mean
Score
Std.
Dev.
Mean
ScoreNo.
110 At our company, ideas and
opinions are exchanged openly
without fear of reprisal.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 50% 50% 0% 0% 0% 58% 9 4 . 13Management 65%
111 Conflict or disagreement is
used productively to achieve
better solutions.
Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 50% 25% 25% 0% 25% 63% 15 4
112 We have an "open door" policy. Management 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 50% 50% 0% 50% 75% 9 4
Page 29 of 31
© 1997-2007 QuadRed, LLCPrepared By:
Sample Company
Performance Scores
QuadStrat Enterprise (Standard Edition)
.
.
AgreeDisagreeDon't KnowNot Applicable
Employee FeedbackStd.
Dev.
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE
NA DK 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post.
Score
Mean
Score
Std.
Dev.
Mean
ScoreNo.
113 Our company solicits employee
opinions.
Management 0% 0% 50% 25% 0% 25% 0% 0% 0% 33% 23 4 . 18Management 35%
114 Our managers take the time to
communicate the results of
employee feedback.
Management 0% 0% 25% 25% 50% 0% 0% 0% 0% 38% 15 4
.
.
AgreeDisagreeDon't KnowNot Applicable
Ability to ChangeStd.
Dev.
FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE
NA DK 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post.
Score
Mean
Score
Std.
Dev.
Mean
ScoreNo.
115 Our company manages change
well.
Management 0% 0% 0% 50% 50% 0% 0% 0% 0% 42% 9 4 . 11Management 47%
116 Our company effectively
explains the reason for change.
Management 0% 0% 0% 25% 50% 25% 0% 0% 0% 50% 13 4
117 When change occurs, our
company carefully explains how
the change will affect
employees.
Management 0% 0% 0% 25% 50% 25% 0% 0% 0% 50% 13 4
Page 30 of 31
© 1997-2007 QuadRed, LLCPrepared By:
Sample Company
QuadStrat Enterprise (Standard Edition)
Comments Section
General CommentsWe need to put some teeth into our Performance Management program. Too many people are not contributing at the level they should be.
This company has a lot more potential. As we have grown, I think we have lost touch with each other. We are all doing our own thing without communicating effectively
with our employees or each other. We need better information systems.
Page 31 of 31
© 1997-2007 QuadRed, LLCPrepared By:
Sample Company