27
Marina Milner-Bolotin, Heather Fisher & Alexandra MacDonald Saturday, July 13, 2013 IPTEL Using Technology for Conceptual Learning in Physics Teacher Education Engaging Teacher-Candidates as Learners and Teachers

Marina Milner-Bolotin, Heather Fisher & Alexandra MacDonald Saturday, July 13, 2013 IPTEL Using Technology for Conceptual Learning in Physics Teacher Education

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Marina Milner-Bolotin, Heather Fisher & Alexandra MacDonald Saturday, July 13, 2013 IPTEL Using Technology for Conceptual Learning in Physics Teacher Education

Marina Milner-Bolotin, Heather Fisher & Alexandra MacDonald

Saturday, July 13, 2013

IPTEL

Using Technology for Conceptual Learning in Physics Teacher Education

Engaging Teacher-Candidates as Learners and Teachers

Page 2: Marina Milner-Bolotin, Heather Fisher & Alexandra MacDonald Saturday, July 13, 2013 IPTEL Using Technology for Conceptual Learning in Physics Teacher Education

UBC Teacher Education

Page 3: Marina Milner-Bolotin, Heather Fisher & Alexandra MacDonald Saturday, July 13, 2013 IPTEL Using Technology for Conceptual Learning in Physics Teacher Education

UBC’s Commitment to Teaching: TLEF

TLEF support 2012-2014: $95 000

Page 4: Marina Milner-Bolotin, Heather Fisher & Alexandra MacDonald Saturday, July 13, 2013 IPTEL Using Technology for Conceptual Learning in Physics Teacher Education

Getting to Know Each Other

How important is technology in teacher education?

A. EssentialB. Very ImportantC. ImportantD. Somewhat ImportantE. Irrelevant

Page 5: Marina Milner-Bolotin, Heather Fisher & Alexandra MacDonald Saturday, July 13, 2013 IPTEL Using Technology for Conceptual Learning in Physics Teacher Education

Getting to Know Each Other

In education, is it enough to know how technology works?

A. YesB. No

Page 6: Marina Milner-Bolotin, Heather Fisher & Alexandra MacDonald Saturday, July 13, 2013 IPTEL Using Technology for Conceptual Learning in Physics Teacher Education

Getting to Know Each Other

How important is it for students to be actively engaged?

A. EssentialB. Very ImportantC. ImportantD. Somewhat ImportantE. Irrelevant

Page 7: Marina Milner-Bolotin, Heather Fisher & Alexandra MacDonald Saturday, July 13, 2013 IPTEL Using Technology for Conceptual Learning in Physics Teacher Education

Thinking about Pedagogies

1. What are your reasons for choosing the pedagogies you implement in your classrooms?

2. How do you know your pedagogies are impacting your students?

Page 8: Marina Milner-Bolotin, Heather Fisher & Alexandra MacDonald Saturday, July 13, 2013 IPTEL Using Technology for Conceptual Learning in Physics Teacher Education

Objectives

Model AE in the context of the

course content

Explore a possible mechanism for AE

pedagogy

Investigate the effect of Active Engagement (AE) on teacher-

candidates’ (TCs’) epistemologies

Page 9: Marina Milner-Bolotin, Heather Fisher & Alexandra MacDonald Saturday, July 13, 2013 IPTEL Using Technology for Conceptual Learning in Physics Teacher Education

Navigating the Resource

Page 10: Marina Milner-Bolotin, Heather Fisher & Alexandra MacDonald Saturday, July 13, 2013 IPTEL Using Technology for Conceptual Learning in Physics Teacher Education

Navigating the Resource

Page 11: Marina Milner-Bolotin, Heather Fisher & Alexandra MacDonald Saturday, July 13, 2013 IPTEL Using Technology for Conceptual Learning in Physics Teacher Education

Navigating the Resource

http://scienceres-edcp-educ.sites.olt.ubc.ca/

Page 12: Marina Milner-Bolotin, Heather Fisher & Alexandra MacDonald Saturday, July 13, 2013 IPTEL Using Technology for Conceptual Learning in Physics Teacher Education

Logical reasoning

If m and p are positive integers and (m + p) x m is even, which of the following must be true?

A. If m  is odd, then p  is odd.

B. If m  is odd, then p  is even.

C. If m  is even, then p  is even.

D. If m  is even, then p  is odd.

E. m  must be even.

Page 13: Marina Milner-Bolotin, Heather Fisher & Alexandra MacDonald Saturday, July 13, 2013 IPTEL Using Technology for Conceptual Learning in Physics Teacher Education

Question Title

A. 24 m2

B. 76 m2

C. 100 m2

D. 124 m2

E. Not enough information

What is the area of the figure below?

Question TitleArea

10 m

6 m

4 m10 m

Page 14: Marina Milner-Bolotin, Heather Fisher & Alexandra MacDonald Saturday, July 13, 2013 IPTEL Using Technology for Conceptual Learning in Physics Teacher Education

Comments

Answer: B

Justification: One way to find the area is to imagine a 10 m by 10 m square and subtracting a 4 m by 6 m rectangle.

CommentsSolution

A = 10 m x 10 m – 4 m x 6 m = 76 m2

Alternatively, the shape’s area can be found by dividing it into 2 rectangles and adding the areas together.

10 m

6 m 4 m

4 m

6 m

10 m

Page 15: Marina Milner-Bolotin, Heather Fisher & Alexandra MacDonald Saturday, July 13, 2013 IPTEL Using Technology for Conceptual Learning in Physics Teacher Education

Secondary Physics Methods Course (+ 2-week short practicum)

13 students13 weeks

Enhanced Practicum 3 weeks

Post-Practicum Interviews

(7) Focus Group (1)

Pre-Practicum Interviews (8)

Extended Practicum

10 weeks

Research ProjectT

imel

ine

Page 16: Marina Milner-Bolotin, Heather Fisher & Alexandra MacDonald Saturday, July 13, 2013 IPTEL Using Technology for Conceptual Learning in Physics Teacher Education

TPCK

Koeler & Mishra, 2007

Page 17: Marina Milner-Bolotin, Heather Fisher & Alexandra MacDonald Saturday, July 13, 2013 IPTEL Using Technology for Conceptual Learning in Physics Teacher Education

Pre-Practicum TPCK

“It really opens the door for umm discussions between people. Um regarding a) you know, what is the right answer,

and b) how would you explain that to uh either teacher-candidates or to your potential students.”

Pre-Interview 2

Page 18: Marina Milner-Bolotin, Heather Fisher & Alexandra MacDonald Saturday, July 13, 2013 IPTEL Using Technology for Conceptual Learning in Physics Teacher Education

Pre-Practicum TPCK

“It really opens the door for umm discussions between people. Um regarding a) you know, what is the right answer,

and b) how would you explain that to uh either teacher-candidates or to your potential students.”

Pre-Interview 2, Participant 9

Pedagogical Knowledge

Content Knowledge

Technological Knowledge

Page 19: Marina Milner-Bolotin, Heather Fisher & Alexandra MacDonald Saturday, July 13, 2013 IPTEL Using Technology for Conceptual Learning in Physics Teacher Education

Post-Practicum TPCK

“So, if you set it up in a dynamic where… different types of

people have [different needs], so if you need to talk to someone,

you still get that, if you need silence, you get to think on it on your own, and then people aren’t so stressed… And they actually get to argue and talk back and forth and they’ll remember it

more. So for them, I think they’ll master it more.”

Post-Interview 2, Participant 20

Page 20: Marina Milner-Bolotin, Heather Fisher & Alexandra MacDonald Saturday, July 13, 2013 IPTEL Using Technology for Conceptual Learning in Physics Teacher Education

“So, if you set it up in a dynamic where… different types of

people have [different needs], so if you need to talk to someone,

you still get that, if you need silence, you get to think on it on your own, and then people aren’t so stressed… And they actually get to argue and talk back and forth and they’ll remember it

more. So for them, I think they’ll master it more.”

Post-Interview 2, Participant 20

Pedagogical Knowledge

Content Knowledge

Technological Knowledge

Post-Practicum TPCK

Page 21: Marina Milner-Bolotin, Heather Fisher & Alexandra MacDonald Saturday, July 13, 2013 IPTEL Using Technology for Conceptual Learning in Physics Teacher Education

Modified-TPCK

Milner-Bolotin, Cha, Chachashvili-Bolotin, Raisinghani, 2013

Page 22: Marina Milner-Bolotin, Heather Fisher & Alexandra MacDonald Saturday, July 13, 2013 IPTEL Using Technology for Conceptual Learning in Physics Teacher Education

Emerging Themes

• Student understanding as beyond current classroom context

• Role of TCs previous conceptual understanding

“…physics is…not about applying formulas, and doing math. It is…about gaining an

appreciation of the world around us. And, being able to use your understanding and extrapolate … explain what’s

happening around you. [It] has nothing to do with math

formulas.” Post-interview 1

VALUE OF CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING

Page 23: Marina Milner-Bolotin, Heather Fisher & Alexandra MacDonald Saturday, July 13, 2013 IPTEL Using Technology for Conceptual Learning in Physics Teacher Education

Emerging Themes

• Necessary for conceptual understanding

• Classroom realities are single most limiting factor in application of this value

“… some of the physics 11s who are just doing it to do a science, and are just, ‘Alright, Physics, I’ll try it out.’ Some of them were not as en-engaged, and I think doing

the… voting-style questions helped get them more into it and more involved. So I’d say… it’s

helpful to get those students who hide at the back in these 30

person classes.”

Post-interview 3

ROLE OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

Page 24: Marina Milner-Bolotin, Heather Fisher & Alexandra MacDonald Saturday, July 13, 2013 IPTEL Using Technology for Conceptual Learning in Physics Teacher Education

Emerging Themes

• No purpose without sound pedagogical support

• Conceptual understanding optimal outcome of this pedagogy

• Alternative mechanisms can achieve similar outcome

“It wasn’t just the clickers alone. It was also in…. the presentation of the question. It wasn’t a simple

plug in the answer-type question. It had to be conceptual, in which

you could… , the Bloom’s taxonomy, the higher learning of

students. So, in itself, clickers… is only a tool. But it needs to be

complemented with good conceptual questions in order to

make it work.”

Pre-Interview 5

CLICKERS AS A MECHANISM

Page 25: Marina Milner-Bolotin, Heather Fisher & Alexandra MacDonald Saturday, July 13, 2013 IPTEL Using Technology for Conceptual Learning in Physics Teacher Education

Returning to Objectives

Model AE with the course content

Investigate the effect of Active Engagement (AE) on

teacher-candidates epistemologies

Modeling impacts TCs epistemologies,

regardless of successes/challenges in

practicum

“I’m there as a teacher, (pause) but I’m also there as a student. Conversely, they’re there as a student, but they’re also there as a teacher. That doesn’t mean they’re teaching necessarily, teaching me. They’re teaching each other... You’re always a student-teacher, regardless of whether or not, what your position says.

The-the moment you step out, and you meet someone, you now are both a teacher and a learner.”

Post-Interview 1

Page 26: Marina Milner-Bolotin, Heather Fisher & Alexandra MacDonald Saturday, July 13, 2013 IPTEL Using Technology for Conceptual Learning in Physics Teacher Education

Explore a possible mechanism for AE

pedagogy

Clicker-enhanced pedagogy works as a

mechanism for AE pedagogy in a small

class

“Coming into the program, we were all sort of thought that we were expected to be masters, and if the instructor puts up a clicker question,

you think ‘Jeez, I don’t actually know the answer’ – immediately you think well, we’re all supposed to be masters, I’m probably the only one who

doesn’t know. But uh when the responses come in, you see other people think like you, it’s definitely reassuring.”

Pre-Interview 2

Returning to Objectives

Page 27: Marina Milner-Bolotin, Heather Fisher & Alexandra MacDonald Saturday, July 13, 2013 IPTEL Using Technology for Conceptual Learning in Physics Teacher Education

• Beatty, I., Gerace, W., Leonard, W., & Defresne, R. (2006). Designing Effective Questions for Classroom Response System Teaching. American Journal of Physics, 74(1), 31–39.

• CWSEI Clicker Resource Guide: An Instructors Guide to the Effective Use of Personal Response Systems (Clickers) in Teaching. (2009, June 1).

• Lasry, Nathaniel. (2008). Clickers or Flashcards: Is There Really a Difference? The Physics Teacher, 46(May), 242-244.

• Milner-Bolotin, Marina. (2004). Tips for Using a Peer Response System in the Large Introductory Physics Classroom. The Physics Teacher, 42(8), 47-48.

• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2007). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK): Confronting the wicked problems of teaching with technology. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (Vol. 2007, pp. 2214–2226). Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/24919/

Resources