51
March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

March 30, 2003

A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early

Spring Snowstorm

Page 2: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

Last year’s storm of the century…

The Christmas 2002 Snowstorm

Page 3: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm
Page 4: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm
Page 5: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm
Page 6: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm
Page 7: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

Unfortunately…Not every storm looks like that…

Consider March 30, 2003.

Page 8: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

6-hour Eta forecast pmsl and 850 mb temperature 18z on the 30th.

Page 9: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

12-hour Eta forecast pms and 850 mb temperature 00z on the 31st.

Page 10: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

6-hour Eta forecast 500 mb heights and vorticity 18z on the 30th.

Page 11: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

12-hour Eta forecast 500 mb height and vorticity 00z on the 31st.

Page 12: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

6-hour Eta forecast 300 mb heights and wind speed 18z on the 30th.

Page 13: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

12-hour Eta forecast 300 mb heights and wind speed 00z on the 31st.

Page 14: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

6-hour Eta forecast 700 mb omega (yellow) and frontogenesis (shaded) valid 18 UTC on the 30th.

Page 15: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

6-hour Eta forecast cross-section of frontogenesis and EPV valid 18 UTC on the 30th.

Page 16: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

00-hour Eta cross section of EPV and frontogenesis valid 1800 UTC on the 30th.

Page 17: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm
Page 18: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

6-hour Eta forecast 600 mb theta-e advection (shaded) and 400 mb theta-e advection (green lines) valid at 18z on the 30th.

Page 19: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

6-hour Eta forecast EPV and theta-e advection valid 18z on the 30th.

Page 20: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

Water Vapor Imagery at 1450 UTC on the 30th.

Page 21: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

Water Vapor Imagery at 1651 UTC on the 30th.

Page 22: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

Water Vapor Imagery at 1851 UTC on the 30th.

Page 23: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

Water Vapor Imagery at 2050 UTC on the 30th.

Page 24: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

12-hour Eta 12-hour QPF valid 00z on the 31st.

Page 25: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

Mean SREF QPF from the 21z run on the 29th.

Page 26: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

Individual forecasts of 0.5 inches of precipitation (Eta in green, GFS in brown) from the 09z run on the 30th.

Page 27: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

Probability of greater than 0.25 inches of precipitation from the 09z run of the SREFs.

Page 28: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

6 to 12 inches

4 to 8 inches

1 to 4 inches

Page 29: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

In Summary, This Storm Was Associated With…

• Weak surface cyclogenesis• A high amplitude, open mid-level trough• Coupled jets at 300 mb• Strong low-to-mid-level frontogenesis• Reduced stability above the frontal zone

indicating potential for enhanced banding.• Models in good agreement on the

placement of max qpf over the Poconos/Catskills.

Page 30: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

Eastern U.S. Radar at 0800 UTC on the 30th.

Page 31: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

Eastern U.S. Composite Radar at 1200 UTC on the 30th.

Page 32: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

Eastern U.S. mosaic radar at 16 UTC on the 30th.

Page 33: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

Eastern U.S. mosaic radar at 2000 UTC on the 30th.

Page 34: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

Eastern U.S. mosaic radar at 2200 UTC on the 30th.

Page 35: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

KBGM reflectivity at 1208 UTC on the 30th.

Page 36: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

KBGM reflectivity at 1558 UTC on the 30th.

Page 37: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

KBGM reflectivity at 1957 UTC on the 30th

Page 38: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

KBGM reflectivity at 2200 UTC on the 30th.

Page 39: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

Observed liquid precipitation March 30, 2003

0.40”0.40”

0.20”

0.20”

Page 40: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

1”

1”

4”

4”

6”8”

Observed snowfall 3/30/03

Page 41: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

What verified…

• Maximum snowfall and precipitation occurred over the central southern tier of NY (west of the model forecasts).

• Much less precipitation and snowfall occurred over the Poconos and Catskills than what was forecast.

Page 42: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

A possible source of model error…

Page 43: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

850 mb upper-air plots and Eta 00-hour forecast 12z on the 30th.

Page 44: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

700 mb upper-air plot and 00-hour Eta forecast 12z on the 30th.

Page 45: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

XX

850 mb

700 mb

FrontogenesisFrontogenesis

Max LiftMax Lift

NW SE NW SE

Eta Initialization Observations

Max snowMax snow

Models underestimate the frontogenesis at 700 mb. Maximum lift is shifted to the northwest.

Page 46: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

Another factor to be considered…

Page 47: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

AVP

BGM

CONSIDER SOUNDINGS AT AVP AND BGM

Page 48: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

Eta forecast time-cross section of snow growth area and omega at AVP

Page 49: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

Eta forecast time-section of snow growth area and omega at BGM

Page 50: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

Summary

• Models were indicating a significant snowstorm over the Poconos and Catskill Mountains.

• Large-scale forcing was relatively modest.• Models were basing the high qpf on the placement of

strong low-level frontogenesis.• Models were in good agreement.• Observed snowfall maximum was west of the model

forecasts.• One source of model error may have been poor

initialization of the 700 mb temperature gradient associated with the frontogenesis.

• Another factor was less favorable microphysical environment over the Poconos/Catskills.

Page 51: March 30, 2003 A Poorly Forecast Frontogenetically Forced Early Spring Snowstorm

A WES SIMULATION IS AVAILABLE…

[email protected]