MARCH 16-17, 2011NEW YORK CITY, NY
EVALUATION RESULTS
Michelle BissonnetteU.S. Department of Education
Table of ContentsWho Responded ?ResultsOverall Summit EvaluationEvaluation of SessionsEvaluation of Logistics and SupportEvaluation Comments
WhoResponded?
Participants: Attendees engaged in dialogue at the center tableAttendees: Invited guests in audience observing dialogue and participating in Q&AResponse Rate: Percent of each group who completed an evaluationChart: See accessible version in notes*
Overall Summit Evaluation
(5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree)Chart: See accessible version in notesAverage ScoreParticipants: 4.74Attendees:4.48All:4.61*
Chart1
0.780.76
0.160.19
0.060
00.03
00.02
Participants
Attendees
Sheet1
ParticipantsAttendees
578%76%
416%19%
36%0%
20%3%
10%2%
N/A0%0
(5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree)Chart: See accessible version in notesAverage ScoreParticipants: 4.58Attendees:4.44All:4.51*
Chart1
0.630.66
0.280.26
0.090.03
00.03
00.02
Participants
Attendees
Sheet1
ParticipantsAttendees
563%66%
428%26%
39%3%
20%3%
10%2%
N/A0%0
(5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree)Chart: See accessible version in notesAverage ScoreParticipants:4.31Attendees:4.08All:4.19*
Chart1
0.530.45
0.280.37
0.160.13
00.02
0.030.03
Participants
Attendees
Sheet1
ParticipantsAttendees
553%45%
428%37%
316%13%
20%2%
13%3%
N/A0%0
(5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree)Chart: See accessible version in notesAverage ScoreParticipants:4.03Attendees:3.98All:4.00*
Chart1
0.340.37
0.340.26
0.310.26
00.05
00.03
00.05
Participants
Attendees
Sheet1
ParticipantsAttendees
534%37%
434%26%
331%26%
20%5%
10%3%
N/A0%5%
(5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree)Chart: See accessible version in notesAverage ScoreParticipants:4.31Attendees:4.33All:4.32*
Chart1
0.590.61
0.220.27
0.130.06
0.030
0.030.03
00.02
Participants
Attendees
Sheet1
ParticipantsAttendees
559%61%
422%27%
313%6%
23%0%
13%3%
N/A0%2%
(5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree)Chart: See accessible version in notesAverage ScoreParticipants:4.12Attendees:4.03All: 4.07*
Chart1
0.50.52
0.250.24
0.160.13
0.060.1
0.030.02
N/A0.07
Participants
Attendees
Sheet1
ParticipantsAttendees
550%52%
425%24%
316%13%
26%10%
13%2%
N/A7%
Evaluation of Sessions
(5 = Excellent, 1= Poor)Chart: See accessible version in notesAverage ScoreParticipants:4.58Attendees:4.36All:4.47*
Chart1
0.590.6
0.280.23
00.1
0.060.02
0.060.03
0.080.03
Participants
Attendees
Sheet1
ParticipantsAttendees
559%60%
428%23%
30%10%
26%2%
16%3%
N/A8%3%
(5 = Excellent, 1= Poor)Chart: See accessible version in notesAverage ScoreParticipants:4.43Attendees:4.11All:4.27*
Chart1
0.590.4
0.340.42
0.030.06
0.030.06
00.02
00.03
Participants
Attendees
Sheet1
ParticipantsAttendees
559%40%
434%42%
33%6%
23%6%
10%2%
N/A0%3%
(5 = Excellent , 1= Poor)Chart: See accessible version in notesAverage ScoreParticipants:4.41Attendees:4.13All:4.27*
Chart1
0.50.47
0.440.29
0.030.16
0.030.03
00.02
00.03
Participants
Attendees
Sheet1
ParticipantsAttendees
550%47%
444%29%
33%16%
23%3%
10%2%
N/A0%3%
(5 = Excellent, 1= Poor)Chart: See accessible version in notesAverage ScoreParticipants:4.41Attendees:4.07All: 4.24*
Chart1
0.50.44
0.340.34
0.130.16
0.030.02
00.02
00.03
Participants
Attendees
Sheet1
ParticipantsAttendees
550%44%
434%34%
313%16%
23%2%
10%2%
N/A0%3%
(5 = Excellent, 1= Poor)Chart: See accessible version in notesAverage ScoreParticipants:4.12Attendees:4.19All: 4.15*
Chart1
0.380.45
0.410.37
0.160.11
0.060.02
00.02
00.03
Participants
Attendees
Sheet1
ParticipantsAttendees
538%45%
441%37%
316%11%
26%2%
10%2%
N/A0%3%
(5 = Excellent, 1= Poor)Chart: See accessible version in notesAverage ScoreParticipants:4.59Attendees:4.32All:4.45Chart: See accessible version in notesAverage ScoreParticipant: 4.15Attendee: 3.97All: 4.06*
Chart1
0.630.53
0.340.32
00.06
0.030.05
00.02
00.02
Participants
Attendees
Sheet1
ParticipantsAttendees
563%53%
434%32%
30%6%
23%5%
10%2%
N/A0%2%
Chart1
0.410.32
0.380.4
0.190.21
0.030.03
00.02
00.02
Participants
Attendees
Sheet1
ParticipantsAttendees
541%32%
438%40%
319%21%
23%3%
10%2%
N/A0%2%
(5 = Excellent, 1= Poor)Chart: See accessible version in notesAverage ScoreParticipants:4.22Attendees: 4.42All: 4.32*
Chart1
0.410.39
0.310.27
0.090.05
0.030.02
00
00.27
Participants
Attendees
Sheet1
ParticipantsAttendees
541%39%
431%27%
39%5%
23%2%
10%0%
N/A0%27%
Evaluation of Logistics & Support
(5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree)Chart: See accessible version in notesAverage ScoreParticipants:4.45Attendees:4.05All: 4.25*
Chart1
0.50.44
0.280.24
0.090.15
0.090.05
00.05
00.08
Participants
Attendees
Sheet1
ParticipantsAttendees
550%44%
428%24%
39%15%
29%5%
10%5%
N/A0%8%
(5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree)Chart: See accessible version in notesAverage ScoreParticipants:4.25Attendees:3.98All:4.11*
Chart1
0.470.47
0.310.21
0.130.11
0.090.16
00.02
00.03
Participants
Attendees
Sheet1
ParticipantsAttendees
547%47%
431%21%
313%11%
29%16%
10%2%
N/A0%3%
(5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree)Chart: See accessible version in notesAverage ScoreParticipants:4.60Attendees:4.44All: 4.52*
Chart1
0.630.71
0.310.21
0.060.02
00.02
00.05
00
Participants
Attendees
Sheet1
ParticipantsAttendees
563%71%
431%21%
36%2%
20%2%
10%5%
N/A0%0%
(5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree)Chart: See accessible version in notesAverage ScoreParticipants: 4.50Attendees:4.21All: 4.35*
Chart1
0.530.39
0.190.19
0.090.13
0.030.02
00.02
00.26
Participants
Attendees
Sheet1
ParticipantsAttendees
553%39%
419%19%
39%13%
23%2%
10%2%
N/A0%26%
Evaluation Comments
Tony Mackay brilliant moderator
Rich + very good
Great to have unions and ministers together
Keep questions/comments from observers/audience focused on session topic.
Submit questions from audience in advance.
Include more time for Q&A or vary format of sessions throughout day.
*
More time for discussion and networking
Sessions began to feel a bit redundant
Greater variety of session format: breakouts, mixed seating during meals
Include more teachers at the table.
Extend the summit so there is more time to process and engage.
Video screens and interpreters a must
School leaders/principal representatives what is our role in the summit?
*
Framing document/session
Rapporteurs summaries
Learning from international experiences esp. Hong Kong, Singapore and Finland
Hearing how unions and management work in collaboration
High achieving countries clearly defined systemic change
Hearing about:the common challenges of all education systemssimilar problems from which we can learn and translate solutions for our own unique contexts*
THANK YOU! BRAVO! EXCELLENT! STUNNING!
Please continue this summit in future.
Suggested readings/research for attendees
Materials/logistical information available earlier
A teacher exchange could add a lot to understanding between the countries.
This was an outstanding and historic event that began a very important conversation with the objective to improve teaching and learning.
*
THANK YOU!
*Accessible version of Bar Chart showing the number in attendance who completed evaluationsNumber in Attendance:All: 400Attendees: 325Participants: 75
Completed Evaluations:All: 94 (24%)Attendees: 62 (19%)Participants: 32 (43%)*Accessible version:This bar chart compares the scores of participants and attendees for Item 3A (the summit as a whole was useful and I am glad I attended) on a scale of 5 (strongly agree) to 1 (strongly disagree):
78% of the participants compared to 76% of the attendees scored this item as a 5. 16 % of the participants compared to 19% of the attende
