17
march 15, 2010 1 COCO magdisk DISK STORAGE IBM 305 RAMAC, 1956 5 MB on 50 24-inch disks 9 Kbits/s transfer rate re 1956, computers had core memory, multi-track mag tape, and drums

March 15, 20101COCO magdisk DISK STORAGE IBM 305 RAMAC, 1956 5 MB on 50 24-inch disks 9 Kbits/s transfer rate Before 1956, computers had core memory, multi-track

  • View
    215

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: March 15, 20101COCO magdisk DISK STORAGE IBM 305 RAMAC, 1956 5 MB on 50 24-inch disks 9 Kbits/s transfer rate Before 1956, computers had core memory, multi-track

march 15, 2010 1COCO magdisk

DISK STORAGE

IBM 305 RAMAC, 1956

5 MB on 50 24-inch disks

9 Kbits/s transfer rate

Before 1956, computers had core memory, multi-track mag tape, and drums.

Page 2: March 15, 20101COCO magdisk DISK STORAGE IBM 305 RAMAC, 1956 5 MB on 50 24-inch disks 9 Kbits/s transfer rate Before 1956, computers had core memory, multi-track

march 15, 2010 2COCO magdisk

Installed size of office suites and disk capacity

Page 3: March 15, 20101COCO magdisk DISK STORAGE IBM 305 RAMAC, 1956 5 MB on 50 24-inch disks 9 Kbits/s transfer rate Before 1956, computers had core memory, multi-track

march 15, 2010 3COCO magdisk

Disk jargon

Latency seek time (to get to track) plus

wait tune (<half a revolution) 2-200 ms

Transfer rate MB/sec without arm movement

hundreds of MB/s

Platter One or two recording surfaces

RPM Revolutions per minute (thousands)

Capacity Gigabytes

Track density

Linear (or recording) density

Page 4: March 15, 20101COCO magdisk DISK STORAGE IBM 305 RAMAC, 1956 5 MB on 50 24-inch disks 9 Kbits/s transfer rate Before 1956, computers had core memory, multi-track

march 15, 2010 4COCO magdisk

Data is recorded on thin layer of magnetic material

Max today:~333 GB per platter120 MB/s transfer rate15,000 rpm(2 ms latency)

Al Hoaglandgn’s former boss

flying read and write head

Page 5: March 15, 20101COCO magdisk DISK STORAGE IBM 305 RAMAC, 1956 5 MB on 50 24-inch disks 9 Kbits/s transfer rate Before 1956, computers had core memory, multi-track

march 15, 2010 5COCO magdisk

Removable “Winchester” disk drive

IBM 30MB 3340

1973

Heads and platters

encased in a

sealed unit

Page 6: March 15, 20101COCO magdisk DISK STORAGE IBM 305 RAMAC, 1956 5 MB on 50 24-inch disks 9 Kbits/s transfer rate Before 1956, computers had core memory, multi-track

march 15, 2010 6COCO magdisk

36 GB 10,000 RPM, 10-platter disk (IBM)

<1 cent per MB

Storage cost1 million percent lessthan 20 years ago(67% per year)

All the heads are mounted on thesame assembly,and move together.

Page 7: March 15, 20101COCO magdisk DISK STORAGE IBM 305 RAMAC, 1956 5 MB on 50 24-inch disks 9 Kbits/s transfer rate Before 1956, computers had core memory, multi-track

march 15, 2010 7COCO magdisk

Longitudinal vs. Perspendicular recording

Page 8: March 15, 20101COCO magdisk DISK STORAGE IBM 305 RAMAC, 1956 5 MB on 50 24-inch disks 9 Kbits/s transfer rate Before 1956, computers had core memory, multi-track

march 15, 2010 8COCO magdisk

Recording Head

Page 9: March 15, 20101COCO magdisk DISK STORAGE IBM 305 RAMAC, 1956 5 MB on 50 24-inch disks 9 Kbits/s transfer rate Before 1956, computers had core memory, multi-track

march 15, 2010 9COCO magdisk

Flying read/write head (air bearing slider)

HGA=Head Gimbal Assemblyhttp://www.hitachigst.com/tech/techlib.nsf/techdocs/AE7AEDB327B2E21186256D330078799B/$file/

Femto_white_paper_FINAL_082505.pdf

Page 10: March 15, 20101COCO magdisk DISK STORAGE IBM 305 RAMAC, 1956 5 MB on 50 24-inch disks 9 Kbits/s transfer rate Before 1956, computers had core memory, multi-track

march 15, 2010 10COCO magdisk

Recording density (Gb/ in2 against year)

Compound Annual Growth Rate

Page 11: March 15, 20101COCO magdisk DISK STORAGE IBM 305 RAMAC, 1956 5 MB on 50 24-inch disks 9 Kbits/s transfer rate Before 1956, computers had core memory, multi-track

march 15, 2010 11COCO magdisk

Kryder’s Law – growth of hard drive capacity

Page 12: March 15, 20101COCO magdisk DISK STORAGE IBM 305 RAMAC, 1956 5 MB on 50 24-inch disks 9 Kbits/s transfer rate Before 1956, computers had core memory, multi-track

march 15, 2010 12COCO magdisk

Working of hard disk

Working of hard disk

Page 13: March 15, 20101COCO magdisk DISK STORAGE IBM 305 RAMAC, 1956 5 MB on 50 24-inch disks 9 Kbits/s transfer rate Before 1956, computers had core memory, multi-track

march 15, 2010 13COCO magdisk

Nomenclature

Page 14: March 15, 20101COCO magdisk DISK STORAGE IBM 305 RAMAC, 1956 5 MB on 50 24-inch disks 9 Kbits/s transfer rate Before 1956, computers had core memory, multi-track

march 15, 2010 14COCO magdisk

DISK GEOMETRY

Tracks and cylinders

Formatting marks the beginning and end of 512-byte sectors

(it takes up to 20%

of capacity)

(there are far more tracks than shown)

Page 15: March 15, 20101COCO magdisk DISK STORAGE IBM 305 RAMAC, 1956 5 MB on 50 24-inch disks 9 Kbits/s transfer rate Before 1956, computers had core memory, multi-track

march 15, 2010 15COCO magdisk

Platter size

Platter diameters:

5.12” old PCs

3.74” current PCs

3.00” 10,000 rpm drives

2.50” 15,000 rpm drives 34MB Microdrive

1.80” PC card

1.30” obsolete PCMCIA

1.00 CompactFlash (cameras, pocket-PCs, …)

Page 16: March 15, 20101COCO magdisk DISK STORAGE IBM 305 RAMAC, 1956 5 MB on 50 24-inch disks 9 Kbits/s transfer rate Before 1956, computers had core memory, multi-track

march 15, 2010 16COCO magdisk

Windows disk organization

Boot Master Record (including Partition Table)

track (cylinder) 0, side (head) 0, sector 1

loads the operating system

File Allocation Table (FAT)

manages free clusters

Root Folder (directories)

Data Area

Page 17: March 15, 20101COCO magdisk DISK STORAGE IBM 305 RAMAC, 1956 5 MB on 50 24-inch disks 9 Kbits/s transfer rate Before 1956, computers had core memory, multi-track

march 15, 2010 17COCO magdisk

Fundamental Principles

Tape, drum and disk storage are based on Faraday’s Law: change in magnetic field induces voltage

Magnetic disk is a direct-access block-storage device.(large capacity, fast transfer, long latency( O/S exploits these characteristics)

Each bit consists of a few hundred magnetic grains.

Access time limited by mechanical motion (head travel to track and rotational speed)

Periphery of disk must not break the sound barrier.

Recording density limited by distance to R/W head.Heads fly a few nanometers above surface.

Sooner or later, solid-state storage will win out.