26
Managing Indian REITs The Conventional Wisdom International Research Conference II Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) Mumbai | March 20 th 2015 Presenter: Prashant Das, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Real Estate Finance With inputs from Charles Thomas Jr., Ph.D., CPA, CMA Ecole hôteliere de Lausanne, Switzerland Route de Cojonnex 18, 1000 Lausanne 25, Switzerland [email protected] 1 | © Prashant Das, Ph.D. Opinions expressed and errors, if any, are personally of the presenter.

Managing Indian REITs · • IFRS vs. US -GAAP: – BV vs. MV narrower with IFRS? – Improved performance legibility • Growth Potentials ... (2015). The Relationship between Indian

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Managing Indian REITs · • IFRS vs. US -GAAP: – BV vs. MV narrower with IFRS? – Improved performance legibility • Growth Potentials ... (2015). The Relationship between Indian

Managing Indian REITs The Conventional Wisdom

International Research Conference II

Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI)Mumbai | March 20th 2015

Presenter:

Prashant Das, Ph.D.Assistant Professor of Real Estate Finance

With inputs from

Charles Thomas Jr., Ph.D., CPA, CMA

Ecole hôteliere de Lausanne, SwitzerlandRoute de Cojonnex 18, 1000 Lausanne 25, Switzerland

[email protected]

1 | © Prashant Das, Ph.D.

Opinions expressed and errors, if any, are personally of the presenter.

Page 2: Managing Indian REITs · • IFRS vs. US -GAAP: – BV vs. MV narrower with IFRS? – Improved performance legibility • Growth Potentials ... (2015). The Relationship between Indian

Agenda

• The Story of REITs

• I-REITs

• Conventional Wisdom

• Opportunities & Challenges for I-REIT Management

‹#› | © Prashant Das, Ph.D.

Page 3: Managing Indian REITs · • IFRS vs. US -GAAP: – BV vs. MV narrower with IFRS? – Improved performance legibility • Growth Potentials ... (2015). The Relationship between Indian

Buying a Piece of Empire EstateESRT: Market Cap (Jan 2015): $1.87B

© Prashant Das, Ph.D. | EHL Lausanne, Switzerland

Image Source: libertyunyielding.com

Stock Data: Yahoo! Finance

ESRT

S&P 500’

Oct 2013 – Jan 2015

Page 4: Managing Indian REITs · • IFRS vs. US -GAAP: – BV vs. MV narrower with IFRS? – Improved performance legibility • Growth Potentials ... (2015). The Relationship between Indian

ESRT

Institution Name Empire State Realty Trust, Inc.

Total Assets (Mi US$) 2,476,061

Total Liabilities (Mi US$) 1,472,876

Total Equity (Mi US$) 1,003,185

Common Equity (Mi US$) 385,158Common Equity (Mi US$) 385,158

Total Preferred Equity (Mi US$) 0

© Prashant Das, Ph.D. | EHL Lausanne, Switzerland

Page 5: Managing Indian REITs · • IFRS vs. US -GAAP: – BV vs. MV narrower with IFRS? – Improved performance legibility • Growth Potentials ... (2015). The Relationship between Indian

REITs: USA versus India

© Prashant Das, Ph.D.

Source: maxizoo.ieSource: pixshark.com

Investor-centric versus investment-centric

Page 6: Managing Indian REITs · • IFRS vs. US -GAAP: – BV vs. MV narrower with IFRS? – Improved performance legibility • Growth Potentials ... (2015). The Relationship between Indian

Intro. Total (Count) Insider (avg %) Float (Avg %) Inst. Own. (avg %)

USA 1960 186 9 91 76

Netherlands 1969 5 19 81 48

Australia 1971 26 17 83 42

Canada 1993 47 14 86 23

Belgium 1995 11 40 60 11

Turkey 1995 7 67 33 7

Greece 1999 1 64 36 25

Japan 2001 44 10 90 44

Singapore 2002 33 32 68 22

France 2003 18 50 50 29

Evolution of REITs and Their Ownership Structure

© Prashant Das, Ph.D.

France 2003 18 50 50 29

Malaysia 2004 5 46 54 40

Hong Kong 2005 8 43 57 16

Germany 2007 3 20 80 29

Italy 2007 2 54 46 23

UK 2007 32 16 84 60

Spain 2009 4 6 94 65

Finland 2010 1 34 66 8

Mexico 2011 7 12 88 18

UAE 2011 1 0 100 14

Ireland 2013 3 10 90 64

South Africa 2013 14 18 82 43

TOTAL (%) 461 17 83 51

Source: SNL & authors

Page 7: Managing Indian REITs · • IFRS vs. US -GAAP: – BV vs. MV narrower with IFRS? – Improved performance legibility • Growth Potentials ... (2015). The Relationship between Indian

Ownership Structure of Indian Real Estate Companies

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

© Prashant Das, Ph.D.

0

10

20

30

0%

10%

20%

30%

Float Insider Institutional Source: SNL & authors

Page 8: Managing Indian REITs · • IFRS vs. US -GAAP: – BV vs. MV narrower with IFRS? – Improved performance legibility • Growth Potentials ... (2015). The Relationship between Indian

Potential I-REIT Candidates

• Commercial Real Estate in India:

– Large number of properties held by foreign REITs and non-

REITs (Offices, healthcare, and retail)

– Several hundreds are operated by listed companies

(Hotels, apartments, offices, and retail)(Hotels, apartments, offices, and retail)

• Natural targets for conversion to IREITs, alongwith

established RE developers and international funds

© Prashant Das, Ph.D.

Page 9: Managing Indian REITs · • IFRS vs. US -GAAP: – BV vs. MV narrower with IFRS? – Improved performance legibility • Growth Potentials ... (2015). The Relationship between Indian

Structure of I-REITs (REITs in India)

Sponsor

Trust ManagerAppoint & scrutinize

SEBI

liais

on

© Prashant Das, Ph.D.

Auditor

Appraiser

Inv. Banker

Shareholder

Pro

tect

the b

en

efi

ts

Distribute + liaison

Page 10: Managing Indian REITs · • IFRS vs. US -GAAP: – BV vs. MV narrower with IFRS? – Improved performance legibility • Growth Potentials ... (2015). The Relationship between Indian

I-REIT Features

Ownership, Activities & Assets

• Must be publicly traded and listed

• Insider ownership

– sponsor must hold between 25% and 75%

– Responsible management versus entrenchment

• SPV assets must mimic the REITS’• SPV assets must mimic the REITS’

– Taxable REIT subsidiaries?

© Prashant Das, Ph.D.

Page 11: Managing Indian REITs · • IFRS vs. US -GAAP: – BV vs. MV narrower with IFRS? – Improved performance legibility • Growth Potentials ... (2015). The Relationship between Indian

I-REIT Features

External Management• Management vs. Advisory

• Internal advisory is sought after; not management

– Over 60% of REITs globally are internally advised

– Nearly 50% of REITs are internally managed

• External advisors

– Reluctance from sponsors (dilutes control)

– Costly; but bring-in expertise

– Impact on performance: ambiguous

– Prevalent if high corruption and poor property rights(Cashman et al., 2014)

‹#› | © Prashant Das, Ph.D.

Page 12: Managing Indian REITs · • IFRS vs. US -GAAP: – BV vs. MV narrower with IFRS? – Improved performance legibility • Growth Potentials ... (2015). The Relationship between Indian

Are REITs Real Estate?

Stocks are from Mars, Real Estate from Venus

The Nature of REITs

– Stock, commercial RE, or a mixture?– Stock, commercial RE, or a mixture?

– Academic Debate

– Difference of perception before and after the

economic crisis (Das et al., 2015)

‹#› | © Prashant Das, Ph.D.

Page 13: Managing Indian REITs · • IFRS vs. US -GAAP: – BV vs. MV narrower with IFRS? – Improved performance legibility • Growth Potentials ... (2015). The Relationship between Indian

Financing REITs

• Major shift in financing approach

– Rental assets are LT collateral

• Debt contracts are simpler

– Key challenge is availability of equity, not – Key challenge is availability of equity, not

cost of debt (Chinloy, Das & Wiley, 2014)

• 49% cap on leverage

– Majority of capital must come from equity

– Liquidity issues for early I-REITs

‹#› | © Prashant Das, Ph.D.

Page 14: Managing Indian REITs · • IFRS vs. US -GAAP: – BV vs. MV narrower with IFRS? – Improved performance legibility • Growth Potentials ... (2015). The Relationship between Indian

Indian RE Development Firms are

Increasingly More Leveraged:

20

40

60

80

100

%

Debt/Enterprise Value

MIN

Average

MAX

‹#› | © Prashant Das, Ph.D.

0

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

%

Secured Debt / Property Value

MIN

Average

MAX

Source: SNL & authors

Page 15: Managing Indian REITs · • IFRS vs. US -GAAP: – BV vs. MV narrower with IFRS? – Improved performance legibility • Growth Potentials ... (2015). The Relationship between Indian

Preferred Equity is not allowed in I-REIT

10,000.0

100,000.0

Sca

le

Th

ou

sa

nd

s

Preferred Equity RE Developers in India

‹#› | © Prashant Das, Ph.D.

1.0

10.0

100.0

1,000.0

2014Y 2013Y 2012Y 2011Y 2010Y 2009Y 2008Y 2007Y 2006Y 2005Y

Lo

ga

rit

hm

ic S

ca

le

Average

MAX

Source: SNL & authors

Page 16: Managing Indian REITs · • IFRS vs. US -GAAP: – BV vs. MV narrower with IFRS? – Improved performance legibility • Growth Potentials ... (2015). The Relationship between Indian

Creating Shareholder Value

© Prashant Das, Ph.D.

Page 17: Managing Indian REITs · • IFRS vs. US -GAAP: – BV vs. MV narrower with IFRS? – Improved performance legibility • Growth Potentials ... (2015). The Relationship between Indian

Internal Growth

8

10

12

14

16

Dividend Yield of Publicly-Traded RE Developers in India

MIN

© Prashant Das, Ph.D.

0

2

4

6

8

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

%

Average

MAX

Source: SNL & authors

Page 18: Managing Indian REITs · • IFRS vs. US -GAAP: – BV vs. MV narrower with IFRS? – Improved performance legibility • Growth Potentials ... (2015). The Relationship between Indian

Free Cash Flow

20

40

60

80

Free Cash Flow Coverage

© Prashant Das, Ph.D.

Source: SNL & authors

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Mult

iple MIN

Average

MAX

Page 19: Managing Indian REITs · • IFRS vs. US -GAAP: – BV vs. MV narrower with IFRS? – Improved performance legibility • Growth Potentials ... (2015). The Relationship between Indian

External Growth

• Capital Gains

– Is this sustainable Business model for REITs?

– Capital constraints in recycling assets

• Leverage is capped• Leverage is capped

• 90% distribution

• Improve NAV ?

– REITs generate value from Income return (Mühlhofer,

2013)

© Prashant Das, Ph.D.

Page 20: Managing Indian REITs · • IFRS vs. US -GAAP: – BV vs. MV narrower with IFRS? – Improved performance legibility • Growth Potentials ... (2015). The Relationship between Indian

Challenges to REIT Managers in India

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Mult

iple

Price/NAV for Publicly-Traded Real Estate Developers in India, 2006-14

MIN

Average

MAX

© Prashant Das, Ph.D.

0

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

0

20

40

60

80

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Mult

iple

Price/EPS for Publicly-Traded Real Estate Developers in India, 2005-14

MIN

Average

MAX

Source: SNL & authors

Page 21: Managing Indian REITs · • IFRS vs. US -GAAP: – BV vs. MV narrower with IFRS? – Improved performance legibility • Growth Potentials ... (2015). The Relationship between Indian

Opportunities for REIT Managers in India

• Market inefficiency– Real estate in inefficient in general

– Data wizardry may offer an edge: predictability

• IFRS vs. US-GAAP: • IFRS vs. US-GAAP: – BV vs. MV narrower with IFRS?

– Improved performance legibility

• Growth Potentials– Increased appetite for space markets?

– Degrading affordability in asset markets?

‹#› | © Prashant Das, Ph.D.

Page 22: Managing Indian REITs · • IFRS vs. US -GAAP: – BV vs. MV narrower with IFRS? – Improved performance legibility • Growth Potentials ... (2015). The Relationship between Indian

Questions?

Thank you

© Prashant Das, Ph.D.

Page 23: Managing Indian REITs · • IFRS vs. US -GAAP: – BV vs. MV narrower with IFRS? – Improved performance legibility • Growth Potentials ... (2015). The Relationship between Indian

References• Alishayev, B., & Geressy-Nilsen, K. (1. August 2014). Externally Managed REITs More Efficient, Weaker

Alignment. Abgerufen am 7. March 2015 von Fitch Wire: www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/fitchwire/fitchwirearticle/Externally-Managed-REITs?pr_id=843695

• Ambrose, B. W., & Linneman, P. (May 2001). REIT Organizational Structure and Operating Characteristics. Journal of Real Estate Research, 21(3), 141-162.

• Anglin, P., Edelstein, R., & Tsang, D. (2009). How Does Corporate Governance Affect the Quality of Investor Information?: The curious case of REITs. Journal of Real Estate Research, 33(1), 1-35.

• Barr, J. (2012). Skyscraper Height. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 45, 723-753.

• Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York, New York, United States of America: Macmillan.

• Boudry, W. I., Coulson, N. E., Kallberg, J. G., & Liu, C. H. (2012). On the Hybrid Nature of REITs. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 44, 230-249.

• Brennan, T. P., Cannaday, R. E., & Colwell, P. F. (1984). Office Rent in the Chicago CBD. Real Estate Economics, 12(3), 243-261.12(3), 243-261.

• Brockman, P., French, D. W., & Tamm, C. (2014). REIT Organizational Structure, Institutional Ownership, and Stock Performance. Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 20(1), 21-36.

• Brounen, D., & Eichholtz, P. (2003). Property, Common Stock, and Property Shares. Journal of Portfolio Management, 129-137.

• Business Monitor International. (2014). India Real Estate Report. London: Business Monitor International.

• Cannon, S. E., & Vogt, S. C. (1995). REITs and Their Management: An analysis of organizational structure, performance and management compensation. Journal of Real Estate Research, 10(3), 297-317.

• Capozza, D. R., & Seguin, P. J. (2000). Debt, Agency, and Management Contracts in REITs: The external advisor puzzle. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 20(2), 91-116.

• Cashman, G. D., Harrison, D. M., & Seiler, M. J. (2014). Advisor Choice in Asia-Pacific Property Markets. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 48, 271-298.

• Chinloy, P., Das, P. K., & Wiley, J. A. (2014). Houses and Apartments: Similar assets, different financials. Journal of Real Estate Research, 36(4), 409-433.

• Chopin, M. C., Dickens, R. N., & Shelor, R. M. (1995). An Empirical Examination of Compensation of REIT Managers. Journal of Real Estate Research, 10(3), 263-277.

• Clayton, J., & MacKinnon, G. (2001). The Time-Varying Nature of the Link between REIT, Real Estate and Financial Asset Returns. Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 7(1), 43-54.

© Prashant Das, Ph.D.

Page 24: Managing Indian REITs · • IFRS vs. US -GAAP: – BV vs. MV narrower with IFRS? – Improved performance legibility • Growth Potentials ... (2015). The Relationship between Indian

References (cont.)• Clayton, J., & MacKinnon, G. (2003). The Relative Importance of Stock, Bond and Real Estate Factors in

Explaining REIT Returns. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 27(1), 39-60.

• Das, P. (2015). Revisiting the Hotel Capitalization Rate. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 46, 151-160.

• Das, P. K., Freybote, J., & Marcato, G. (2014). An Investigation into Sentiment-Induced Institutional Trading Behavior and Asset Pricing in the REIT Market. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics.

• Das, P., & Ziobrowski, A. (2015). The Relationship between Indian Realty Stocks and Online Searches. Journal of Emerging Market Finance, 14(1), 1-19.

• Das, P., Ziobrowski, A., & Coulson, N. E. (2015). Online Information Search, Market Fundamentals and Apartment Real Estate. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics.

• Deng, Y., Hu, M., & Srinivasan, A. (2014). Information Asymmetry and Organizational Structure: Evidence from REITs. Working Paper.

• Esrig, D., Hudgins, M. C., & Cerreta, L. (2011). Revisiting the Impact of Large Assets on Real Estate Portfolio • Esrig, D., Hudgins, M. C., & Cerreta, L. (2011). Revisiting the Impact of Large Assets on Real Estate Portfolio Returns. Journal of Portfolio Management, 35(5), 125-136.

• Ghosh, C., & Sun, L. (2014). Agency Cost, Dividend Policy and Growth: The special case of REITs. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 48, 660-708.

• Giliberto, S. M. (June 1990). Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts and Real Estate Returns. Journal of Real Estate Research, 52(2), 259-263.

• Gyourko, J., & Sinai, T. (1999). The REIT Vehicle: Its Value Today and in the Future. Journal of Real Estate Research, 18(2), 355-375.

• Han, B. (2006). Insider Ownership and Firm Value: Evidence from Real Estate Investment Trusts. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 32, 471-493.

• Harrison, D. M., Panasian, C. A., & Seiler, M. J. (2010). Further Evidence on the Capital Structure of REITs. Real Estate Economics, 39(1), 133-166.

• Hartzell, J. C., Kallberg, J. G., & Liu, C. H. (2005). The Role of the Underlying Real Asset Market in REIT IPOs. Real Estate Economics, 33(1), 27-50.

• Hoesli, M., & Oikarinen, E. (2012). Are REITs Real Estate? Evidence from international sector level data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 31, 1823-1850.

• Howe, J. S., & Shilling, J. D. (1990). REIT Advisor Performance. Real Estate Economics, 18(4), 479-500.

© Prashant Das, Ph.D.

Page 25: Managing Indian REITs · • IFRS vs. US -GAAP: – BV vs. MV narrower with IFRS? – Improved performance legibility • Growth Potentials ... (2015). The Relationship between Indian

References (cont.)• Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers. American Economic

Review, 76, 323-329.

• Kudus, S. S., & Sing, T. F. (2011). Interest Alignment and Insider Shareholdings in the Emerging Asian REIT

Markets. Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 17(2), 127-138.

• Lee, C.-C., Chien, M.-S., & Lin, T. C. (2012). Dynamic Modelling of Real Estate Investment Trusts and Stock

Markets. Economic Modelling, 29, 395-407.

• Lee, M.-L., Lee, M.-T., & Chiang, K. C. (2008). Real Estate Risk Exposure of Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts.

Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 36, 165-181.

• Ling, D. C., & Naranjo, A. (1999). The Integration of Commercial Real Estate Markets and Stock Markets. Real

Estate Economics, 27(3), 483-515.

Muhlhofer, T. (2013). Why Do REIT Returns Poorly Reflect Property Returns?: Unrealizable appreciation gains due • Muhlhofer, T. (2013). Why Do REIT Returns Poorly Reflect Property Returns?: Unrealizable appreciation gains due

to trading constraints as the solution to the short-term disparity. Real Estate Economics, 41, 814-857.

doi:10.1111/reec.12001

• Myer, F. C., & Webb, J. R. (1994). Retail Stocks, Retail REITs and Retail Real Estate. Journal of Real Estate

Research, 9(1), 65-84.

• Ooi, J. T. (2000). Managerial Opportunism and the Capital Structure Decisions of Property Companies. Journal of

Property Investment & Finance, 18(3), 316-331.

• Ooi, J. T. (December 2009). The Compensation Structure of REIT Managers: Impact on stock valuation and

performance. Journal of Property Research, 26(4), 309-328.

• Ott, S., Riddiough, T. J., & Ha-Chin, Y. (2005). Finance, Investment and Investment Performance: Evidence from

the REIT Sector. Real Estate Economics, 33(1), 203-235.

• Pagliari, J. L., Scherer, K. A., & Monopoli, R. T. (2003). Public versus Private Real Estate Equities. Journal of

Portfolio Management, 101-111.

© Prashant Das, Ph.D.

Page 26: Managing Indian REITs · • IFRS vs. US -GAAP: – BV vs. MV narrower with IFRS? – Improved performance legibility • Growth Potentials ... (2015). The Relationship between Indian

References

• Pagliari, J. L., Scherer, K. A., & Monopoli, R. T. (2005). Public Versus Private Real Estate Equities: A more

refined, long-term comparison. Real Estate Economics, 33(1), 147-187.

• Pai, A., & Geltner, D. (2007). Stocks Are from Mars, Real Estate Is from Venus. Journal of Portfolio Management,

33, 134-144.

• Schleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1986). Large Shareholders and Corporate Control. Journal of Political Economy,

94(3), 461-488.

• Simon, S., & Ng, W. L. (2009). The Effect of the Real Estate Downturn on the Link between REITs and the Stock

Market. Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 15(3), 211-219.

• Striewe, N. C., Rottke, N. B., & Zietz, J. (2013). Corporate Governance and the Leverage of REITs: The impact • Striewe, N. C., Rottke, N. B., & Zietz, J. (2013). Corporate Governance and the Leverage of REITs: The impact

of the advisor structure. Journal of Real Estate Research, 35(1), 103-119.

• Stulz, R. M. (1990). Managerial Discretion and Optimal Financing Policies. Journal of Financial Economics, 14,

501-521.

• Yong, J. L., & Singh, A. (2013). Interest Rate Sensitivities of Externally and Internally Managed Australian REITs.

MODSIM2013, 20th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (S. 1319-1325). Canberra, Australia: The

Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand Inc.

© Prashant Das, Ph.D.