LTE FDD Cluster DT_Analysis Report

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/19/2019 LTE FDD Cluster DT_Analysis Report

    1/23

    LTE FDD Network Planning &

    Optimization System-Demo Cluster Area

    Optimization Report Budi Prasetyo CS NPO  19:55

    1 Overview

    1.1 Test Purposes

    The major purposes of this evaluation are to learn about the present coverage quality andrunning performance of the network in demo areas. On the basis of the network’s actual

    conditions, manage to solve the existing network problems and present suggestions for

    performance optimiation especially the coverage and !" throughput performance.

    1.2 Test Area

    !emo #luster include $ sites , it is an urban area.

    https://plus.google.com/105794217618082308448http://www.ltehandbooks.com/search/label/CS%20NPO?&max-results=6http://www.ltehandbooks.com/2015/11/lte-fdd-network-planning-optimization.htmlhttp://www.ltehandbooks.com/search/label/CS%20NPO?&max-results=6http://www.ltehandbooks.com/2015/11/lte-fdd-network-planning-optimization.htmlhttps://plus.google.com/105794217618082308448

  • 8/19/2019 LTE FDD Cluster DT_Analysis Report

    2/23

     

    2  Test ResultComparison 

    2.1 Test result overview 

    Table %&' test ()* before optimiation overview

    Table %&% test result after optimiation overview

    2.2 RSRP

     ++) !T result before optimiation 

    -igure %&' ++) !T result at &'/ 

  • 8/19/2019 LTE FDD Cluster DT_Analysis Report

    3/23

      ++) !T result after optimiation 

    -igure %&% ++) !T result at &%%

    -igure %&0 ++) #omparison

  • 8/19/2019 LTE FDD Cluster DT_Analysis Report

    4/23

     

    The ++) comparison shows that the percent of ++) poorer than &/1 d2m has decreasefrom 0'.3/4 to %.%54, the coverage become better.

    2.3 SINR

    *6+ !T result before optimiation 

    -igure %&$ *6+ !T result at &'/ 

  • 8/19/2019 LTE FDD Cluster DT_Analysis Report

    5/23

     *6+ !T result after optimiation 

    -igure %&1 *6+ !T result at &%%

    -igure %& *6+ #omparison

  • 8/19/2019 LTE FDD Cluster DT_Analysis Report

    6/23

     

    The *6+ comparison shows that the percent of *6+ poorer than 1 d2 has decrease from

    '0.0%4 to /.7$4, the *6+ become better.

    2.4 MAC DL Throughput

    89# !" Throughput !T result before optimiation 

    -igure %&3 89# !" Throughput at &'/

  • 8/19/2019 LTE FDD Cluster DT_Analysis Report

    7/23

     

    89# !" Throughput !T result after optimiation 

    -igure %&7 89# !" Throughput at &%%

    -igure %&/ 89# !" Throughput #omparison

  • 8/19/2019 LTE FDD Cluster DT_Analysis Report

    8/23

     

    The 89# !" Throughput comparison shows that the percent of 89# !" Throughput less

    than %58bps has decrease from '/.714 to ./4, the !" throughput become better.

    3  Optimization Case

    3.1 Random Access Failure Case Analysis

    9nalying the !T log at &'/, we found that there are random access failure cases.

    -igure 0&' +andom access failure case 

  • 8/19/2019 LTE FDD Cluster DT_Analysis Report

    9/23

     

    #hecking the )+9#: parameters and found that the parameter setting are not reasonable;

    neaby cells shoud not have the same prach#onfig*ndex

  • 8/19/2019 LTE FDD Cluster DT_Analysis Report

    10/23

     

    3.3 Handover Failure Case Analysis

    3.3.1 Handover failure caused by bad SINR

     :ere is one of the handover failure case analysis; => at soruce )#* $0 found )#* $5

    stronge enough and send 8easurement +eport, but => did not receive handover

    command?++# #onnection +econfiguration@ and then call drop.

    -igure 0&% :andover failure case

    The => send the 8easurement +eport when serving cell *6+ become very bad?&1. db@.

  • 8/19/2019 LTE FDD Cluster DT_Analysis Report

    11/23

     

    => campus on a new )#* %0 after call drop. -rom these procedures we can consider this

    handover and call drop are cause by bad *6+.

    Optimiation suggestion; optimiation for *6+.

    3.3.2 Handover failure caused by PCI 10 overshooting

  • 8/19/2019 LTE FDD Cluster DT_Analysis Report

    12/23

     => catch a )#* '5 where is rather far away. )#* '5 is from site oravia+oofA(O111

    => failure handover to )#* %$ because )#* '5 overshooting and no neighbor relationshipfor this two )#*.

  • 8/19/2019 LTE FDD Cluster DT_Analysis Report

    13/23

     

    9nother case is similar caused by )#* '5 overshooting;

    => catch signal from )#* '5 far away.

  • 8/19/2019 LTE FDD Cluster DT_Analysis Report

    14/23

     

    Optimiation suggestion;

    9dd % downtilt for oravia+oofA(O111A%.

    3.3.3 Handover failure caused by PRACH parameter

    -rom section 0.', we know that 155$A' and 155$A% have the same )+9#: setting, this can also

    affect handover. 

    The ()* from >8 show that handover success rate is not good for cell 155$A' and 155$A% 

    ome handover also found related with these two sector during !T.

  • 8/19/2019 LTE FDD Cluster DT_Analysis Report

    15/23

     

    Optimiation suggestion;

    9djust )9+9#: parameter as section 0.'

    3.4 Coverage Case Analysis

    3.4.1 Bolnica_SKP5004_3 adjust tilt from 0to 2

    !owntilt 5 may eaily caused overshooting to other cell, and according to !T result, area close

    to 2olnicaA()155$A0 is not good enough, adjust tilt from 5 to % can enforce the coverage.

    -igure 0&0 coverage analysis case%

  • 8/19/2019 LTE FDD Cluster DT_Analysis Report

    16/23

     

    3.4.2 Divizija_SKO5073_3 adjust tilt from 0to 3

    9ccording to !T result, !iviijaA(O1530A0 is overshooting to site 2olnica.

    -igure 0&$ coverage analysis case0

    3.5 RS Power Optimization

    9fter tilt change, increase the cell + power can enforce the coverage.

    Table 0&% parameters optimiation%

  • 8/19/2019 LTE FDD Cluster DT_Analysis Report

    17/23

    site !D cell na)e para)eter na)e old *alue ne+ *alue

    5$$% -.E1&$$/Bolnica/1 cell0eferenceSinalPo+er 1$, 1',

    5$$% -.E1&$$/Bolnica/( cell0eferenceSinalPo+er 1$, 1',

    5$$% -.E1&$$/Bolnica/' cell0eferenceSinalPo+er 1$, 1',

    5$2' -.E1&$$/Di*i3i4a/1 cell0eferenceSinalPo+er 1$, 1',

    5$2' -.E1&$$/Di*i3i4a/( cell0eferenceSinalPo+er 1$, 1',

    5$2' -.E1&$$/Di*i3i4a/' cell0eferenceSinalPo+er 1$, 1',

    51,9 -.E1&$$/6078/' cell0eferenceSinalPo+er 1$, 1',

    3.6 Handover Optimization

    #omparing the ++) and *6+, most the road ++) is better than &/1 d2m, => can

    easily catch signal from neaby site. Optimie the parameter timeToTrigger from 3?%1ms@

    to ?'5ms@ can make the => fast handover to a stronger neighbor, thus can let the => stay

    at the strongest ++) and *6+ cell.

    Optimiation uggestion;

    site !D para)eter na)e old *alue ne+ *alue co))ent

    5$$% ti)e.o.rier 2 , )easCf!d"5$

    5$2' ti)e.o.rier 2 , )easCf!d"5$

    5151 ti)e.o.rier 2 , )easCf!d"5$

    51,9 ti)e.o.rier 2 , )easCf!d"5$

     

    FDD-FL-PingPong Issue Analysis

     Budi Prasetyo CS NPO  $1:((

      Incident Description (Incident Phenomena)

     

    1 OverviewIn one project, customer found that the user experience is not so good. UE can often

    drop from 4G to 3G and also go back to 4G. It seems there is a 4G/3G ing!ong

    issue.

    https://plus.google.com/105794217618082308448http://www.ltehandbooks.com/search/label/CS%20NPO?&max-results=6http://www.ltehandbooks.com/2015/10/fdd-fl-pingpong-issue-analysis.htmlhttps://plus.google.com/105794217618082308448http://www.ltehandbooks.com/search/label/CS%20NPO?&max-results=6http://www.ltehandbooks.com/2015/10/fdd-fl-pingpong-issue-analysis.html

  • 8/19/2019 LTE FDD Cluster DT_Analysis Report

    18/23

     s discuss +ith custo)er; user e"perience %

  • 8/19/2019 LTE FDD Cluster DT_Analysis Report

    19/23

     *t the same time, &e check the same log for UE 3G signal, &e found that UE catch

    3G signal exactl+ &hen it lost 4G signal. $hat means UE shift from 4G to 3G.

     $his %gure sho& the "-* best (), the legend Invalid  means that UE do not catch

    3G signal. 

  • 8/19/2019 LTE FDD Cluster DT_Analysis Report

    20/23

     

    2.2 Lost 4G issue Analysis

    e analy3ed the lo and found that UE shift fro) %< to '< after t+o )essae:Measurement

    Report  and RRC Connection Release. 

    !n Measurement Report ; UE report -.E ser*in cell 0S0P>9( dB) and U.S neihor cell

    0SCP>2( dB) 

    UE recei#ed RRC Connection Release, this message command UE redirection from 4G

  • 8/19/2019 LTE FDD Cluster DT_Analysis Report

    21/23

    to 3G at *(0 123.

    2.3 Parameters Analysis

    !n -.E radio para)eters tale UeRATMeasurement  for rateasCf!d"1$,$; these t+o

    para)eters:rsrpSr*.rd and rscpSysNr.rd: 

    rsrpSr*.rd:

     solute Decision .hreshold of E>U.0N Ser*in Cell for 0S0P easure)ent dB) 

    rscpSysNr.rd:

     solute Decision .hreshold of U.0N Syste) for 0SCP easure)ent dB) 

    .hese t+o para)eters )eans that +hen -.E ser*in cell 0S0P lo+er than rsrpSr*.rd and

    U.S neihor cell 0SCP is hiher than rscpSysNr.rd; UE +ill hando*er redirection if UE ornet+or? does not support hando*er fro) -.E to U.S 

    e chec? BSE -.E net+or? para)eters; the *alue for these t+o para)eters are: 

    rsrpSr*.rd rscpSysNr.rd

     solute Decision .hreshold of E>U.0N Ser*in Cell for 

    0S0P easure)ent dB)

     solute Decision .hreshold of U.0N

    Syste) for 0SCP easure)ent dB)

    lon:>1%$G>%'HIdefault:>115 lon:>1($G>(%HIdefault:>95

    >9$ >&,

     

    .he thresholds )a?e UE easily shift fro) %< to 'Pon  

    suest chane rsrpSr*.rd fro) >9$ to >11$ and rscpSysNr.rd chane fro) >&, to >9$ 

    Solution

  • 8/19/2019 LTE FDD Cluster DT_Analysis Report

    22/23

     

    3 Re-test After Parameters

    Modification*fter changing parameters in the related sites, &e re!test the same road and found that

    UE sta+ al&a+s in 4G. 

    UE ne*er shift to '< in the sa)e lo +hen +e re>test the sa)e road  

  • 8/19/2019 LTE FDD Cluster DT_Analysis Report

    23/23

     

    Summary and Notes

     

    4 Suggestion!n order to )a?e UE stay in %< loner and not so easily shift to '