Upload
vuongdat
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
LPKF (CDAX, Industrial Goods & Services)
A n a l y s t
Marius Fuhrberg [email protected]
+49 40 309537-185
A n a l y s t
Malte [email protected]
+49 40 309537-170
FU L L NO T E Published 29.05.2018 08:15 1
RESEARCH
Hold
EUR 7.60
Price EUR 7.20
Upside 5.6 %
Value Indicators: EUR Share data: Description:
DCF: 7.60
Bloomberg: LPK GR
Reuters: LPKG.DE
ISIN: DE0006450000
Highly specialised machine manufacturer developing laser applications for special purposes
Market Snapshot: EUR m Shareholders: Risk Profile (WRe): 2018e
Market cap: 160.3
No. of shares (m): 22.3
EV: 192.2
Freefloat MC: 110.6
Ø Trad. Vol. (30d): 167.75 th
Freefloat 69.0 %
Joerg Bantleon 20.3 %
Lazard Frères Gestion 5.6 %
Luxempart SA 5.2 %
Beta: 1.2
Price / Book: 2.7 x
Equity Ratio: 48 %
Net Fin. Debt / EBITDA: 2.3 x
Net Debt / EBITDA: 2.3 x
Waiting for technological strength to impact profit; Initiation with Hold
LPKF Laser & Electronics AG (LPKF) is a manufacturer of laser-based machines for micro processing and serves industries as diverse
as semiconductor, automotive, medical devices and consumer electronics. The company offers solutions to replace old mechanical
processes with digital laser-based solutions or to enable new processes with laser technology. The unique combination of expertise in
the areas of laser technology, control software, precision drive technology and materials science secures LPKF’s leading technological
position.
The company holds leading positions in its addressed markets and distributes its products globally (90% export share). Combined
with the variety of industries served, LPKF is geographically well diversified, although there is a strong focus on South Asia, where
the largest players in the electronics and solar industry are located.
However, LPKF seems to be unable to fully exploit its technological and market-leading position. An unsatisfactory margin situation in
some segments remains an issue. Furthermore, as a result of building overcapacities in the LDS technology, LPKF experienced loss-
making years in 2015 and 2016 but returned to profitability in 2017, supported by a comprehensive restructuring programme.
Dr. Goetz Bendele took over as the new CEO in May 2018. For now, he intends to follow the chosen path of streamlining the
organisational structure and focus on more profitable markets and products. The other current members of the board (CFO, COO and
CTO) will leave the company in the course of 2018. A new CFO will be appointed and the management board will then have two
members, reflecting the smaller size of the company and leaner organization.
Waiting for potential to unfold. Initiation with Hold. With its strong competitive position and its excellent technological product mix,
we see huge potential for LPKF which could materialise if the international sales team puts a stronger focus on profitability and higher-
margin markets. Furthermore, we believe that the new technologies LIDE and LTP might offer greater potential than is currently
reflected in our financial model as our assumptions are quite prudent, based on the low visibility of success. Our DCF-based price
target points at EUR 7.60, leaving insufficient upside potential. Thus we are initiating coverage with Hold.
FY End: 31.12. in EUR m
CAGR (17-20e) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e
Sales 6.7 % 129.7 119.7 87.3 91.1 102.1 109.3 117.5 123.8
Change Sales yoy n.a. -7.6 % -27.1 % 4.4 % 12.0 % 7.1 % 7.5 % 5.4 %
Gross profit margin 76.8 % 73.9 % 79.2 % 68.8 % 69.7 % 71.0 % 71.5 % 71.5 %
EBITDA 21.6 % 31.0 20.6 3.4 1.3 11.6 14.0 17.7 20.9
Margin 23.9 % 17.2 % 3.9 % 1.4 % 11.4 % 12.8 % 15.1 % 16.9 %
EBIT 43.3 % 23.2 12.7 -3.7 -6.8 4.0 6.0 9.3 11.6
Margin 17.9 % 10.6 % -4.3 % -7.4 % 3.9 % 5.5 % 7.9 % 9.4 %
Net income 96.6 % 15.1 8.5 -3.5 -8.8 1.1 4.3 6.9 8.7
EPS 98.3 % 0.68 0.38 -0.16 -0.40 0.05 0.19 0.31 0.39
EPS adj. - 0.68 0.38 -0.16 -0.40 0.00 0.19 0.31 0.39
DPS - 0.25 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Dividend Yield 1.5 % n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.
FCFPS 0.58 -0.59 -0.16 -0.08 0.14 0.28 0.18 0.32
FCF / Market cap 3.5 % n.a. n.a. -1.1 % 1.6 % 3.8 % 2.5 % 4.4 %
EV / Sales n.a. n.a. n.a. 2.2 x 2.3 x 1.8 x 1.6 x 1.5 x
EV / EBITDA n.a. n.a. n.a. 152.5 x 19.9 x 13.7 x 10.6 x 8.6 x
EV / EBIT n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 58.6 x 32.0 x 20.3 x 15.5 x
P / E 24.4 x n.a. n.a. n.a. 173.8 x 37.9 x 23.2 x 18.5 x
P / E adj. 24.4 x n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 37.9 x 23.2 x 18.5 x
FCF Potential Yield n.a. n.a. n.a. 0.0 % 4.2 % 6.8 % 8.6 % 10.4 %
Net Debt 11.4 30.5 37.7 40.2 38.0 31.8 27.8 20.7
ROCE (NOPAT) n.a. 10.4 % n.a. n.a. 1.6 % 5.4 % 8.2 % 10.0 % Guidance: 2018: Sales EUR 103m to 108m; EBIT margin of up to 6%; ROCE between 2 and 7%
Rel. Performance vs CDAX:
1 month: -6.1 %
6 months: -16.3 %
Year to date: -21.4 %
Trailing 12 months: -34.9 %
Company events:
31.05.18 AGM
15.08.18 Q2
15.11.18 Q3
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 2
RESEARCH
Sales development in EUR m
Source: Warburg Research
Sales by regions 2017; in %
Source: Warburg Research
EBIT development in EUR m
Source: Warburg Research
Company Background
� Global market leader/top supplier for laser-based processing tools that replace traditional and non-digital processes.
� LPKF is innovation leader and usually the first supplier of new laser-based processing technologies.
� More than 50% of revenues are generated with the development and production of printed circuit boards (segments Development and
Electronics) where the company is global market leader with market shares up to 65%.
� Other customer industries include automotive, consumer electronics, healthcare or solar. The Welding segment delivers solutions for
versatile applications.
Competitive Quality
� LPKF is the technologically leading company in the market for laser applications and is often first supplier of its customers.
� The high innovative strength of the company ensures the market-leading position and gives LPKF a first-mover advantage in new
products.
� The company holds a dominant market-leading position in selected niches (e.g. in development and solar segment) but there is also
some dependency on single customers.
� International service and distribution network leads to close relationships to customers.
EBT development in EUR m
Source: Warburg Research
Sales by segments 2017; in %
Source: Warburg Research
Net income development in EUR m
Source: Warburg Research
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 3
RESEARCH
Summary of Investment Case 4
Company Overview 5
Competitive Quality 6
Technological leadership and innovative strength 7
Market leader in selected niches 7
High quality, longstanding, international brand name 8
Product diversification over different industries 8
Pricing power 9
In a nutshell 9
Analysis of Return on Capital 10
Capital employed 10
High capital intensity 10
Working capital requirements to decrease 11
R&D expenses to remain high 12
Operating profitability 12
Return on capital employed 12
Growth / Financials 14
Historical development 14
Top-line growth drivers 15
General growth drivers 15
Development – the cash cow segment 15
Electronics – mid-term growth opportunities 16
Welding – product standardisation should drive margin up 17
Solar – good prospects for the next three years 18
P&L 21
Other influencing factors 22
Restructuring programme to cut costs 22
Export-driven business model 23
Valuation 25
DCF 25
Peer group valuation 26
Conclusion 27
Company & Products 28
Company structure 28
Share 29
Share price development 29
Shareholder structure 29
History 30
Products 31
Management 35
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 4
RESEARCH
Summary of Investment Case
Investment triggers
� Faster than expected success of new products – The success of LPKF’s new products LIDE and LTP is not visible so far. Even
though we see substantial market potential, it is unclear if or when customers will order these machines. Therefore we assume only
moderate revenue contributions in the near term, which leaves some scope for positive surprise.
� Rather conservative guidance – LPKF’s guidance for group revenues (EUR 103m to 108m vs. WRe EUR 109m) and the EBIT
margin (up to 6% vs. WRe 5.5%) appears rather conservative. Better than anticipated top-line growth would provide upside potential
and, given the good order situation, we would not be surprised if the company reaches the upper end of its guidance or even has to
increase its guidance.
Valuation
� DCF model suggests a fair value of EUR 7.60 per share
� The stock is trading on significant premiums, partly resulting from low comparative values after the recent turnaround, but also on
expected forward multiples, LPKF is still trading at high premiums.
Growth
� Historic growth between 2010 and 2013 was mainly due to the high demand for a single product (LDS used in mobile phone
antennas).
� Future organic growth is primarily driven by large orders in the solar segment in the short term and the success of new products
in the long term.
o Large orders for laser-based solar panel scribers are expected within the next three years.
o The new LIDE technology, which is located in the Electronics segment, offers considerable potential in different fields
of application. However, we expect revenues to gain momentum in the course of 2019 and 2020.
o The new LTP technology, in the solar segment, is another potential future growth driver. While the market potential
with printed glass is immense in the automotive and other industries, we do not see substantial revenue contributions
within the next three years.
� Bottom-line growth should be supported by further concentration on efficient processes and ongoing cost-cutting programme.
On the product side, the company will concentrate on higher-margin products and markets.
Competitive quality
� Technological leadership in laser-based processing tools makes LPKF the first and only supplier of some of their products
� The company’s developments make new products or processing steps possible for customer companies. Although LPKF runs the risk
of being too advanced for its customers, this implies that the company is often the first mover in its markets.
� LPKF is well diversified in terms of industrial sector and geographical location. While there is a slightly stronger focus on the
Asian-Pacific region, where many of the major players in the electronics and solar industry are based, the company is globally active.
LPKF is divided into four segments, which broadly correspond to customer industries. Sales are relatively equally spread across the
segments, which each concentrate on one industrial sector.
� The laser technologies applied by LPKF have several advantages over the traditional mechanical methods. First, the contactless
process results in very low wear and tear of the machines and therefore in longer utilization periods. Second, laser-based processes
pave the way for new technologies (as was the case for LDS) that were not possible before. Third, the digitalisation of LPKF’s
machines simplifies production processes without the necessity of retooling the machines.
Warburg versus consensus
� While we are slightly above consensus in terms of sales for 2018, we are below for 2019 and 2020. On EBIT-level, the situation is
similar, implying that we take a more positive view for the current year but remain rather cautious about future growth rates, probably
owing to lower assumptions about the revenue impact of new products.
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 5
RESEARCH
Company Overview
Source: Warburg Research
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 6
RESEARCH
Competitive Quality
� Company is leading in terms of technology and innovative strength
� Among its customer industries, LPKF holds leading supplier positions
� International distribution network with numerous own companies in core markets
� Broad diversification by region and industry
LPKF Laser & Electronics AG (LPKF) is a manufacturer of laser-based processing tools
and holds leading positions in all active market fields. For future products and markets,
the company is also aiming for market leadership or at least No. 2 in the market.
The company is divided into four segments that provide specialized solutions for different
industries.
The Development segment offers products in the field of research and development to
test new processing and application ideas. Main customers are research laboratories
both in the private and public sector. This is the cash cow of the company with high and
stable margins (21.6% EBIT margin in 2017).
The Electronics segment is active in the production of electronic components, mainly
printed circuit boards (PCBs). Customers are involved in PCB production, assembly and
other parts of the electronic industry. We assume the largest growth opportunities lie in
this segment, depending on the acceptance of new products in the market.
The Welding segment produces solutions for laser-based joining of plastic parts. Such
solutions could be used in many different industries but the majority of customers are
involved in the automotive and consumer electronics sectors. However, margin
development has not been satisfactory so far.
The Solar segment is active in the field of structuring of thin film solar modules. The
business is project-driven and currently based on one large customer (we assume this to
be First Solar). Profitability in the past was quite disappointing but we expect some
improvements in the short term (see Growth/Financials)
Consumer product overview
Source: Warburg Research
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 7
RESEARCH
Competitive advantage lies in unique skill set
Technological leadership and innovative strength
For LPKF, the key to success is to be the technological market leader. To maintain its
technological leadership, the company spends a great deal on R&D. In coming years,
10% of revenues will consistently be invested in development. LPKF is constantly
exploring new ways to use laser applications to replace traditional processes or
products. For customers, the switch to new laser applications can result in higher quality
and lower costs as the accuracy of laser-based processes leads to low failure rates while
costs are saved through faster processing and lower maintenance costs. However, the
company’s main target is to develop industry solutions that become state of the art in a
specific industry or product for at least a certain period of time.
Rather than just responding to customer demand, LPKF is also instrumental in
identifying the opportunities to replace traditional processes with laser and convincing
the customer of the relevant advantages.
While large parts of LPKF’s production process are based on assembling, the
competitive advantage of LPKF is a mixture of different attributes. First, the company has
expertise in the area of laser technology. Uniquely, LPKF combines this expertise
with superior precision drive technology and its own operating software. With its
deep understanding of processed materials, LPKF achieves best-in-class solutions. This
allows the company to develop extremely precise tools that can be flexibly integrated into
production lines. Furthermore nearly all machines can be operated digitally, allowing
customers to change products and applications at the touch of a button. This constitutes
the main advantage of laser-based solutions over traditional production processes.
Traditional methods are often based on mechanical treatment of the product, which
means working with stencils and templates that have to be switched for every new
product. Laser technology is much more flexible as new patterns can be easily applied to
a digital surface with little production interruption when changing products on a line.
Maintaining this competitive advantage requires a high level of investment in research
and development. It must also attract and retain highly qualified personnel in which, it
appears, LPKF has been successful to date.
Market leader in selected niches
LPKF’s customers stem from various different industries such as electronics, solar and
automotive, which means the company faces diverse competitive situations in terms of
peer products and technology.
To maintain its good market position, LPKF continuously monitors and emphasises the
unique advantages of its products for the customer, such as quality and accuracy or
high-speed processing at relatively low cost, depending on the needs of the relevant
industry
LPKF’s development segment supplies high quality and highly specialised products
mainly to laboratories and universities and serves about 60% of the global market in this
sector.
LPKF’s electronics segment mainly supplies mass market products to customers in the
printed circuit board (PCB) and consumer electronics sectors, which means there is a
strong focus on production cost per unit. The market position varies by product, but
LPKF has leading position in most of its addressed markets. We assume the new LIDE
technology offers a great deal of potential. This technique of cutting and drilling ultra-thin
glass creates a large number of new production opportunities. As LPKF is the first
supplier of this technology, we assume a market-leading position from the outset.
Industries that need reliable joining of plastic parts are the target of LPKF’s welding
business. Large orders came from the consumer electronics, automotive and medical
technology industry. As these attractive markets are also targeted by other
manufacturers of laser solutions and alternative technologies, LPKF focuses on highly
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 8
RESEARCH
efficient solutions. With ongoing modularisation, further applications will presumably be
in the area of mass production with a focus on low cost. LPKF is the market leader for
laser-based welding applications in Europe and occupies the second and third position in
the US and the Asian region respectively. The main advantages of laser welding over
traditional processes like ultrasonic welding are:
• No mechanical burden on the parts
• Low heat input
• Contactless and therefore low wear and tear
LPKF’s solar segment is active in the structuring of thin film solar panels. It is market
leader in laser-based scribing of thin film solar modules but faces competition from
alternative technologies. LPKF should achieve technological leadership with its new LTP
technology. This expands the addressed markets to the automotive industry with further
applications likely. As LPKF is the first provider in this field with several patented
processes, this could offer some potential, depending on industry acceptance. The main
advantages of the laser scribers for thin film solar panels over the competitive process
of needle scribing are:
• Faster production speed of the laser tools
• Contactless process which results in low wear and tear
High quality, longstanding, international brand name
LPKF operates in international markets and supplies customers all over the globe. Over
the years, it has established a brand name synonymous with high quality German
engineering products, characterised by reliability, speed and accuracy.
The international sales network keeps the company connected to its customers. LPKF
has a particularly strong presence in Asia to offer proximity to the production facilities of
many of its customers.
Global presence of LPKF
Source: Warburg Research
Product diversification over different industries
The company’s revenue streams are well diversified by customer industry and by the
variety of solutions it offers.
This makes LPKF less vulnerable to sectoral distortions and protects it, to some extent,
from shifts in technology which can lead to sudden losses of whole markets for specific
products as was the case for LDS from 2015 onwards (see Growth / Financials, History).
The technology was used in particular to produce smartphone antennas from 2009
onwards. In peak times, up to 50% of all produced smartphones had LDS antennas.
However, when Apple and Samsung opted for other technologies, LPKF revenues
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 9
RESEARCH
declined dramatically in 2015.
Nevertheless, the company’s earnings are still exposed to cluster risk such as in the
solar business, which primarily serves one big customer, while technology is set to
account for ca. 25% of revenues in 2018e.
To reduce the dependency on single products, customers and markets, LPKF is steadily
developing new technologies or broadening the scope of application for existing
solutions. R&D investment in the last years resulted in the new LIDE and LTP
technology. These developments should help the company to attract new customers and
access new markets. Furthermore the gradual modularisation of the laser welding
solutions allows the products to be offered at lower prices, which broadens the
opportunities for new applications.
Pricing power
The company’s pricing power varies widely according to product group and market.
With a market share of 60% in the development business and a high number of
customers, LPKF has relatively high price-setting power. However in the electronics
business, competing products and technologies lower LPKF’s pricing power, especially
in China.
In the electronics business, large orders from China helped to earn contribution margins
in the past but were not profitable. To improve this situation, LPKF plans to focus on
raising efficiency and entering markets outside China where margins are higher.
The welding business, which has been offering solutions for mass market products in
the automotive and consumer electronics sectors, competes not only with other products
but also alternative technologies, like ultrasonic welding, which weakens the company’s
pricing power. In future, the development of more modular equipment should lead to
greater standardisation and increase the competitiveness of the company’s solutions.
In the solar segment, the company is heavily dependent on orders from one big
customer, which limits LPKF’s pricing power and opportunities to increase profitability.
However strong order growth in this segment in 2018 and 2019 is expected to strengthen
price-setting power while the company also aims to diversify its customer base and
reduce its dependency on its major customer. Furthermore the long-term prospects,
especially in China, are good.
In a nutshell
LPKF is a well-known player in the fields of laser-based production tools with the
following competitive qualities:
� Technology leadership based on a unique skill-set of expertise in laser technology,
precision driving technology and the development of own operating software
� LPKF holds market leading positions in the relevant markets and operates an
international service and distribution network
� Broad diversification of customer industries and solutions reduces dependencies
� The competitive situations in the individual segments show the development business
as a cash-cow and the electronics business with the strongest mid-term growth
opportunities, leaving the welding and solar business with moderate margin and
growth opportunities.
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 10
RESEARCH
Analysis of Return on Capital
� High capital intensity due to PP&E and high stock of inventories
� Working capital requirements are high but decreasing with more effective cash
conversion and focus on inventory efficiency
� Operating profitability to benefit further from efficiency programme
� ROCE rates to exceed WACC from 2018 onwards
Capital employed
High capital intensity
LPKF Laser & Electronics focuses on high quality products in the area of laser
applications. The company needs relatively large facilities to accommodate the size of
some of the machinery it produces. The machinery can also be specified to customer
needs.
The company operates four different production plants, each one mainly responsible
for the production output of a single business segment. The production structure
developed historically and, for now, no consolidation of the facilities is planned as
management believes the loss of expertise would outweigh the gains to be made
through synergies.
However, the current structure gives rise to a high number of tangible assets,
representing EUR 46.5m or 39.8% compared to total assets of EUR 116.6m. Property
represented EUR 38.6m, technical facilities and machines EUR 3.9m and other fixed
assets EUR 4.0m.
While we assume low maintenance capex due to an assembly-based business model,
investments in fixed assets are primarily due to expansion of production capacities via
new buildings rather than additional machines. The largest single investments in the past
were in the new headquarters in Garbsen and the relocation of the welding segment to
the new production site in Fürth/Germany.
Tangible assets dominate the balance sheet (FY 2017)
Source: LPKF, Warburg Research
Intangible assets amount to EUR 15.3m and are largely characterised by capitalised
development costs. LPKF assumes a useful life of three years for its capitalised
Other; 5%Cash; 3%
WC; 39%
Tangible assets; 40%
Intangible assets; 13%
Other; 8%
WC; 10%
Interest bearing debt; 35%
Provisions; 0%
Equity; 47%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
ASSETS LIABILITIES
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 11
RESEARCH
developments, which could lead to hidden reserves as some developments are used for
far longer. As the company was not very active in terms of mergers and acquisitions in
the past, goodwill is a rather minor position. However, the asset side of the balance
sheet is dominated by tangible assets and working capital.
Working capital requirements to decrease
Working capital amounted to a large position of EUR 45m, consisting of inventories
(EUR 25m) and accounts receivable (EUR 20m). Reduced by advance payments and
accounts payable, the company had a net working capital of EUR 33.3m in FY 2017.
This results in a net working capital ratio of currently 32.6%. The company is aiming for a
sustainable ratio of below 35%. The peak of working capital requirements in 2014 was
due to the build-up of overcapacities for the LDS technology, resulting from over
optimistic expectations of future development.
Working capital development
Source: LPKF (historical data), Warburg Research (forecasts)
In our view, there is still room for improvement in terms of lower net working capital. A
receivables collection period of 69 days (2017) compares to a payables period of 12
days and while the inventory turnover of 91 days is quite low considering the company’s
history, it still offers some scope for improvement. However, among other things, the
inventory turnover depends on the current product mix and is therefore difficult to
interpret. Nonetheless, management is focusing on better inventory management with
improved inventory controlling, the appointment of a chief inventory manager, and more
accurate forecasting of requirements for production sites.
Cash conversion cycle
Source: LPKF, Warburg Research
The chart above shows the cash conversion cycle over time. LPKF was able to reduce
the days of inventory turnover in 2016 and 2017 by writing off inventories for the LDS
technology.
Since 2010, the payables collection period has remained consistently below 20 days
while the receivables collection period is far longer ranging from almost 40 days to up to
80 days.
Supported by a restructuring programme, LPKF managed to reduce the number of days
0,0%
10,0%
20,0%
30,0%
40,0%
50,0%
60,0%
0,0
10,0
20,0
30,0
40,0
50,0
60,0
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e
NWC NWC/SALES
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Receivables collection period (DSOs) 56 79 67 37 78 58 80 69
Inventory turnover (days) 84 106 104 88 98 130 100 91
Payables collection period (days) 9 15 19 12 15 10 12 12
Cash conversion cycle (days) 132 169 153 112 162 178 168 139
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 12
RESEARCH
in its cash conversion cycle in 2016 and 2017.
R&D expenses to remain high
In line with the company’s guiding principles, 10% of revenues will continue to be
spent on R&D to secure its technological edge and to maintain its first-mover
advantages in terms of technological shifts towards laser-based applications in industry.
As regards tangible assets, we do not anticipate any major capex requirements in the
short term as, after the recent capacity extension in the solar segment, all production
sites should have enough capacity to cover demand in the mid term.
Operating profitability
LPKF generates gross profit margins of between 70% and 80%. As the business
activities are mainly assembly-based, personnel costs are quite high. In the peak year
2015, the personnel cost ratio was 50.1%. A cost-cutting process over the past two years
reduced this ratio to 41% by 2017 and represented the biggest jobs-cut in the company’s
history. The number of employees was reduced from 795 at the end of 2014 to 683 at
the end of 2017.
Operating expenses are quite high but, historically, the EBITDA margin reached more
than 20%. In 2017, the EBITDA margin was 11.4% compared to 1.4% in 2016. In a
steady state scenario, it is expected to increase further to levels just short of 20%. In the
chart below, 2013 and 2014 must be regarded as a departure from the norm. These
years were a result of the booming LDS technology, which will presumably not recover.
Margin development over time
Source: LPKF (historical data), Warburg Research (forecasts)
Due to constant depreciation rates, the EBIT margin correlates strongly with
development of the EBITDA margin. As depreciation and amortisation lies in a range of
6% to 8%, EBIT margins are correspondingly lower.
After two loss-making years, the company returned to profit in 2017. In the long term,
LPKF is aiming for low double-digit EBIT margins (10-15%). Considering the ongoing
focus on cost efficiency and sustainably lower personnel costs, this seems achievable.
Return on capital employed
One of the company’s own KPI is the return on capital employed (ROCE). According to
the company’s definition, the capital employed is calculated from the balance sheet
minus pension provisions and non-interest balance sheet positions. LPKF aims for a
ROCE rate of 10-15% by 2020.
The capital employed (CE) increased steadily from 2013 to 2015, mainly due to higher
-10%
-05%
00%
05%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e
SALES EBITDA MARGIN EBIT MARGIN
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 13
RESEARCH
debt rates. From 2015 onwards, CE (especially the equity) decreased again in response
to losses, after demand for LDS technology dropped.
As we expect the company to become profitable again in 2017, we assume capital
employed will increase again. As a result of the restructuring measures in FY 16/17, we
expect revenues to grow from EUR 102m in 2017 to EUR 123.8m in 2020 while EBIT
margins should expand to 9.4% in 2020. As a result, ROCE will increase in coming
years, exceeding our calculated WACC from 2019 onwards.
ROCE development
Source: LPKF, Warburg Research
In the table above, we show the ROCE development according to our definition and
LPKF’s definition. LPKF bases its ROCE on EBIT while we apply the NOPAT divided by
the average capital employed. However, based on the LPKF definition, the company is
likely to achieve its ROCE target of 10%-15% as early as in 2019. Another difference is
the WACC calculation. While the company calculates with an actual WACC of 8%, we
apply a long-term WACC of 7.22%, taking into account the expected future
developments and target debt and equity ratios.
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e
Average Capital Employed 87.3 100.1 97.8 93.4 92.0 93.2 94.8
thereof
Equity 66.3 63.5 54.3 54.2 58.8 66.4 75.6
Net financial debt 21.0 36.6 43.5 39.1 33.3 26.8 19.2
NOPAT 9.1 -2.9 -7.9 1.5 5.2 8.3 9.9
EBIT Margin 10.6% -4.3% -7.4% 3.9% 5.5% 7.9% 9.4%
ROCE (WRe) 10.4% -2.9% -8.0% 1.6% 5.7% 8.9% 10.4%
WACC (WRe) 7.22% 7.22% 7.22% 7.22% 7.22% 7.22% 7.22%
LPKF ROCE 11.8% -3.5% -6.8% 4.1% 10-15%
LPKF WACC 8% 8% 8% 8% 8%
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 14
RESEARCH
Growth / Financials
� Loss-making years due to breakdown of former success technology LDS
� Revenue 17-20e CAGR of 7.2% and EBIT 17-20e CAGR of 43.3%
� High short-term top-line growth owing to expectation of strong Solar segment
performance in 18e and 19e
� High EBIT growth in coming years due to low comparable and focus on profitability
Historical development
As previously described, the past decade at LPKF was characterized by the rise and
fall of the LDS technology. From 2009 onwards LPKF generated high revenues in its
electronics business as a result of a broad use of the LDS technology for the production
of smartphone antennas. The technology experienced its breakthrough in 2010, resulting
in a sharp revenue and earnings increase. The years 2011-2013 showed strong growth
driven by increasing demand for LDS-based applications in growing smartphone
markets. As a result, LPKF’s revenues in the electronics segment grew from EUR 51.8m
in 2010 to EUR 75.7m in 2013, which marked a peak and represented nearly 60% of
LPKF’s group revenues.
Electronics share of revenue in % and Group EBIT and revenue in EURm
Source: LPKF; Warburg Research
However, in the years 2014 to 2016, demand for LDS structuring lasers fell dramatically
due to market saturation in the smartphone industry. Furthermore, laser-based machines
have a very low abrasion rate as a result of a contactless process. Therefore
replacement rates are very low and capacities built up in 2010 are still in the market, but
demand is far lower today that at the peak. However, LPKF built up high capacities in
booming times, assuming the growth trend would last much longer. These overcapacities
led to a sharp EBIT decline, resulting in substantial losses in 2015 and 2016.
Even though some applications are still based on LDS, there is no need for new
machines unless the technology becomes standard for a new mass market.
00%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
EBIT Revenue Electronics share of Revenue
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 15
RESEARCH
Top-line growth drivers
General growth drivers
A general growth driver for laser applications is the ongoing miniaturization trend in
consumer electronics. This implies smaller and therefore more accurate processed parts,
which is clearly pointing to laser applications. Combined with decreasing life cycles and
shorter planned obsolescence, replacement rates for electronic consumer products
grow, which will raise demand for processing tools. Furthermore, the ongoing digitization
of production processes is an argument for increasing use of laser-based production
tools. Laser solutions are far more flexible than the technologies they replace. Changes
in the process can be implemented digitally, making the technology suitable for digitized
production lines too.
As already mentioned, LDS technology has been instrumental to LPKF’s development
over the last few years. However, as this technology would seem to have passed its
peak, LPKF has to establish its other technologies to ensure sustainable growth.
Regarding the next three years, we expect some growth in all segments. In the long run,
we assume that the new LIDE technology in the electronics business will be successfully
introduced to the market. This should support our long-term growth expectations.
Development – the cash cow segment
Development: Revenue and EBIT
Source: LPKF / Warburg Research
As the customers of the Development business are mainly private and public research
and development institutions and development departments in companies, growth
in this segment should follow macroeconomic rather than consumer trends. We assume
healthy growth of 5% p.a., supported by the sale of new products and overall
macroeconomic developments. In the past, this segment generated quite stable
revenues between EUR 20m and EUR 25m at high and stable margins. However, new
products are well received by the market which is reflected in outstanding 2017 figures.
Therefore we assume slightly increasing revenues at stable EBIT margins of between
15% and 20%.
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e
Revenue Development EBIT Development margin
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 16
RESEARCH
New technology LIDE as potential future growth driver
Electronics – mid-term growth opportunities
Electronics: Revenue and EBIT
Source: LPKF / Warburg Research
The Electronics segment produces machines primarily for producers of printed circuit
boards (PCBs) and electronic manufacturing services. LPKF’s products are mainly
used to cut, drill or structure these PCBs, which is the base for any further processing
and the electrical function of end-products.
We expect growth in Electronics to stem from two drivers. First, established products,
especially in the fields of cutting and drilling of PCBs, should gain market share. Second,
new technologies should secure long-term growth by creating new markets and
attracting new customers.
Market share gains should especially be realised in the drilling of PCBs, where ESI is the
current market leader with 60-70% market share. However, LPKF claims that its laser-
based technology is superior to ESI’s products in terms of efficiency and total cost of
ownership. However, as envisaged market share gains are not yet visible, we remain
rather cautious and assume low growth rates in the PCB products.
The new LIDE technology is still in its infancy. The technology is developed and ready
to use and we expect first deliveries in 2018 to customers that will test the new
application. However, LIDE has to prove its use in the industries by showing new
applications, better quality or lower costs than old processes.
LIDE is a process that allows companies to work and drill ultra-thin glass without the risk
of micro cracks or damages. Potential fields of use are manifold.
� Replacement of silicon interposers in the huge printed circuit board market with ultra-
thin glass interposers. Up to now this was not possible due to the instability of glass
during mechanical structuring. With LIDE, glass interposers can be structured
contactless and without stressing the material. This makes it possible to use glass in
this environment for the first time. The biggest advantage of using glass in this process
is its better isolation properties, which would make it the preferred method.
� Usage of hardened thin glasses for display technology. Smartphones and other
electronic devices with display interfaces could particularly benefit from this technology.
The next step in the development of electronic devices is expected to be wearables like
wrist devices. These require flexible materials such as flexible glass covers.
� Cover of new sensor and measurement technology. The thinner the glass that covers
-20%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e
Revenue Electronics EBIT Electronicsmargin 0% margin
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 17
RESEARCH
Standardisation to support margins and attract new customers
and protects a sensor, the more accurately it will function. We deem it very likely that
ultra-thin glass could potentially be used in a new generation of high quality sensors.
Expected development global interposer market in USDbn
Source: Markets and Markets; Warburg Research
The huge interposer market is one example of future growth with the LIDE technology.
As the chart above shows, the global revenue with interposers stands at slightly more
than USD 3bn and is expected to grow at a CAGR 17-22 of over 28%. If producers
change their processes and LIDE becomes the new standard in the industry, this
technology could follow a similar path to LDS in the smartphone industry.
Welding – product standardisation should drive margin up
Welding: Revenue and EBIT
Source: LPKF / Warburg Research
For the welding business we assume slightly decreasing revenues in 2018. The years
2016 and 2017 were characterised by large orders from a customer in the consumer
electronics industry. As we do not believe that this customer will expand capacity any
further, even growing demand from other customers, mainly in the automotive industry,
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
2016 2017e 2018e 2019e 2020e 2021e 2022e
market volume
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e
Revenue Welding EBIT Weldingmargin 0% margin
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 18
RESEARCH
Solar scribers to drive top-line growth until 2020
will not completely compensate for the absence of these large orders. However, for 2019
and 2020 we assume stronger double-digit growth again as laser welding is used in an
increasing number of applications. This trend will be supported by ongoing
modularisation and standardisation of LPKF machines. From the customer’s point of
view, this should reduce total cost of ownership, making the technology usable for a
broader range of products and therefore increase the LPKF customer base.
Solar – good prospects for the next three years
Solar: Revenue and EBIT
Source: LPKF / Warburg Research
Over the next three years, we expect some growth especially in the solar segment,
which should generate strong revenues in 2018 and 2019 as large capacity additions are
visible in the solar industry. Revenues in this segment are quite predictable owing to the
advance planning required for solar capacity expansion and new production sites.
However, beyond a three-year period, revenues will be strongly dependent on worldwide
regulatory development and the future energy mix. Nonetheless, experts see a shift
towards solar power generation in future.
-50%
-40%
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e
Revenue Solar EBIT Solar margin 0% margin
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 19
RESEARCH
Development global solar market
Source: Solar Power Europe; Warburg Research
As the chart above shows, the solar market is expected to grow further. Even though
annual growth rates are decreasing, they are still at high levels and should even out at
rates of slightly below 20% from 2019 onwards.
While the solar market is expected to grow steadily, the question as to which technology
will dominate future markets is crucial for LPKF. While the solar scribers are only used in
the production process of thin film solar modules (all process steps in CdTe modules are
laser-based and two of four process steps at CIGS modules), LPKF will only benefit from
growth in this technology.
Thin film solar capacity expansions
Source: Warburg Research
Nevertheless, we believe that thin film technology will grow in step with the solar energy
share of total energy production. To demonstrate the growth of LPKF’s solar segment
over the next three years, the chart above shows the planned capacity additions by large
thin film solar producers that are known to us. Capacities are being built up, especially by
First Solar and CNBM and plants are mainly located in the Asia-Pacific region. While
there is high visibility in First Solar’s project pipeline, capacity additions by other players
beyond 2018 are not yet published. However, LPKF should clearly benefit from these
developments.
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
2016 2017e 2018e 2019e 2020e 2021e
World Total Annual Capacity Additions Annual growth Rate
Company Technology Location Final capacity Construction start
First Solar I CdTe Malaysia 2 GW 2017
First Solar II CdTe USA 0.6 GW 2018
First Solar III CdTe Malaysia 1.2 GW 2018
First Solar IV CdTe Vietnam 1.2 GW 2018
First Solar V CdTe Vietnam 1.2 GW 2019
First Solar VI CdTe USA 1.2 GW 2019
First Solar VII CdTe Malaysia exp. 1.2 GW 2020
CNBM I CdTe China 0.1 GW 2015
CNBM II CdTe China 0.2 GW 2017
CNBM III CdTe China 0.2 GW 2017
CNBM IV CIGS China 1.5 GW 2016
CNBM V CIGS China 1.5 GW 2017
CNBM VI CIGS China 1.5 GW 2016
CNBM VII CIGS China 1.5 GW 2017
Hanergy I CIGS China 0.3 GW
Hanergy II CIGS China 0.3 GW
Hanergy III CIGS China 0.3 GW
Hanergy IV CIGS China 0.6 GW
Manz/Shanghai El. CIGS China 0.3 GW 2018
Manz/Shanghai El. CIGS China 0.05 GW 2018
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 20
RESEARCH
Power mix development
Source: Bloomberg New Energy Finance; Warburg Research
The chart above shows the expected development of the power mix in 2015 and 2040e.
While solar power contributed about 4% of global energy consumption in 2015, it is
expected to contribute 29% by 2040. This is accompanied by massive capacity
additions, which would be beneficial for LPKF as its laser scribing technology is already
established at one of the industry’s largest providers of thin film modules.
Besides the traditional business of laser-based scribing of solar modules, the solar
segment includes some potential from new technologies:
The new LTP (Laser Transfer Printing) technology is also part of the solar segment
(even though the technology is not used primarily in this sector). While the development
process is not yet complete, we see ongoing efforts to finalise the technology. We
believe it will finish this year, which might result in first orders in the course of 2018.
LTP is a digital process of printing functional pastes that could replace screen printing
processes. The biggest advantage of LPKF’s technology is the higher processing speed
than traditional processes. Furthermore, as the whole process is digitized, new printing
patterns and individualization of single products are easy to implement. LPKF’s first
target market for this product is the international vehicle glass market. While the
international automotive market is growing (see chart below), other vehicle glass
applications e.g. aircraft, trains and ships, are also conceivable.
Finally the solar segment is expected to peak in 2018 with revenues up by more than
50%. Capacity additions of LPKF’s customer in the solar industry are expected to peak in
this year as well. This will have a direct impact on LPKF’s revenues. However, as the
company’s biggest customer is expected to finalise its new production lines in 2019 or
2020, we assume decreasing demand for laser scribers in both years. We expect first
orders for the new LTP technology in the course of 2018 but we believe that this will not
offset decreasing revenues with laser scribers, resulting in a drop in segment revenues
after 2018.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2015 2040e
Solar Other energy sources
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 21
RESEARCH
P&L
The table below shows our expectations by segment in the period 2017–2020, based on
the developments described above.
Consolidated Profit & Loss LPKF
in EUR m 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e
Sales 119,7 87,3 91,1 102,1 109,3 117,5 123,8
Cost of sales 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Increase / decrease in inventory 1,4 -0,2 -2,3 -0,7 1,1 1,2 0,6
Own work capitalised 5,3 6,9 4,9 3,6 4,4 4,7 5,0
Total sales 126,5 94,0 93,7 104,9 114,8 123,4 129,4
Material Expenses 38,0 24,9 31,0 33,8 37,2 39,4 40,9
Gross profit 88,5 69,1 62,7 71,1 77,6 84,0 88,5
Personnel expenses 43,4 43,7 43,9 41,9 41,2 42,8 43,5
Other operating income 4,1 7,1 5,8 5,7 4,4 4,7 5,0
Other operating expenses 28,7 29,1 23,3 23,3 26,8 28,2 29,1
Unfrequent items 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
EBITDA 20,6 3,4 1,3 11,6 14,0 17,7 20,9
Depreciation of fixed assets 3,7 4,4 4,3 4,0 4,4 4,7 5,0
EBITA 16,8 -0,9 -3,0 7,6 9,6 13,0 16,0
Amortisation of intangible fixed assets 4,2 2,8 3,7 3,7 3,6 3,8 4,3
Impairment charges and amortisation of goodwill 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
EBIT 12,7 -3,7 -6,8 4,0 6,0 9,3 11,6
Interest income 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Interest expenses 0,8 0,7 0,8 0,9 0,8 0,8 0,8
Financial result -0,8 -0,7 -0,8 -0,9 -0,8 -0,8 -0,8
Recurring pretax income from cont. operations 11,9 -4,4 -7,6 3,0 5,2 8,5 10,8
Extraordinary income/loss 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
EBT 11,9 -4,4 -7,6 3,0 5,2 8,5 10,8
Taxes total 3,4 -0,9 1,2 1,9 1,0 1,6 2,1
Net income from continuing operations 8,5 -3,5 -8,8 1,1 4,3 6,9 8,7
Income from discontinued operations (net of tax) 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Net income before minorities 8,5 -3,5 -8,8 1,1 4,3 6,9 8,7
Minority interest 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
Net income 8,5 -3,5 -8,8 1,1 4,3 6,9 8,7
Estimates for the detailed planning period
Source: Warburg Research
EURm EURm yoy EURm yoy EURm yoy
Revenue 24,4 25,6 5% 26,9 5% 28,2 5%
EBIT 5,27 4,61 -13% 4,84 5% 5,08 5%
Margin 21,6% 18,0% 18,0% 18,0%
Revenue 31,7 32,0 1% 34,5 8% 41,5 20%
EBIT 0,88 0,80 -9% 1,97 146% 4,31 119%
Margin 2,8% 2,5% 5,7% 10,4%
Revenue 25,4 22,9 -10% 28,6 25% 35,7 25%
EBIT 0,63 0,00 -100% 2,29 - 4,29 88%
Margin 2,5% 0,0% 8,0% 12,0%
Revenue 20,6 28,8 40% 27,5 -5% 18,4 -33%
EBIT 1,48 4,30 192% 4,20 -2% 1,95 -54%
Margin 7,2% 14,9% 15,3% 10,6%
Group
Revenue 102,1 109,3 7% 117,5 8% 123,8 5%
Ebit Consolidation -4,3 -4,0 -4,0 -4,0
EBIT 4,0 5,7 45% 9,3 63% 11,6 25%
Margin 3,9% 5,2% 7,9% 9,4%
2019e 2020e
Segments
Group
LPKF
Laser & Electronics
Electronics
Development
Welding
Solar
2017 2018e
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 22
RESEARCH
Guidance rather conservative, dividends to return
As already stated, LPKF returned to profitability in 2017. This was a result of a number of
effects. First, the restructuring programme cut costs, reducing the breakeven threshold.
Second, high revenues and even higher margins were generated especially by the
Development and Solar segments. While these segments generated profit, the other
segments Electronics and Welding rather generated contribution margins at very low
profitability.
Comparing our expectations with the company’s guidance, we regard the guidance for
both revenue and EBIT as rather conservative. In 2018, LPKF is aiming for revenue
between EUR 103 and 108m at an EBIT margin of up to 6%.
We believe that after the experience of the loss-making years, management tends to be
cautious rather than risking a negative surprise.
For the time being, we stick to our estimates, which would presumably result in revenues
at the upper end of the guidance or even an increase in the course of 2018.
As a result of the improving profitability in the next years, the company should
experience strong net income growth until 2020. Regarding the use of the profits, LPKF
had a historical payout ratio between 20% and 37%. The company paid no dividend in
the years 2015 to 2017 as a result of the loss-making years and the merely slightly
positive income in 2017 and will not pay a dividend in 2018. But in the long term, LPKF
aims for payout ratios of between 30% and 50%, which we believe might be the case
from 2019 or 2020 onwards.
Other influencing factors
However, all of LPKF’s revenues depend to a certain extent on production standards in
customer industries. New technologies, like LIDE and LTP, have to prove that they can
and will be used in mass applications. As a result of the low visibility of technology
acceptance in the market and low recurring revenues, long-term expectations are
subject to uncertainties. In accordance with these interdependencies, LPKF has to
orientate its new developments to the needs of the customer industries.
As laser-based processing tools are more expensive than traditional ones, a decision by
customers to invest in LPKF’s products is likely to be based on strong rationale such as
laser being the technological solution to a problem for which there is no other viable
solution and/or the economic advantages offered by laser-based processing, which is
faster, digital, more accurate and generates lower production costs per unit.
The company has good short term visibility and is on the path to growth. As of December
2017, LPKF had a book-to-bill ratio of 1.1, which is just slightly below the German
average in the PCB industry of 1.2. However, we see this number as an indicator of high
demand for LPKF’s products, resulting from good economic conditions in customer
industries. Especially the high demand for laser scribers in the solar segment should
have driven the ratio upwards.
In terms of acquisitions, LPKF was not very active in the past. The company follows a
very opportunistic M&A approach and focuses on its own R&D rather than purchasing
know-how via bigger transactions. As the company returned to profitability in 2017, the
company’s approach to M&A might change in future. Investments in expertise and
technology might be considerable. It remains to be seen whether M&A activities are
included in the strategic orientation of the new CEO Dr. Bendele, who takes office in May
2018.
Restructuring programme to cut costs
In response to the loss-making years 2015 and 2016, LPKF implemented a restructuring
programme in the course of 2016, which included the largest reduction in staff in the
company’s history and targeted a lower break-even point of EUR 90m. In FY16, the
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 23
RESEARCH
Restructuring programme led to turnaround in 2017
number of employees dropped from 778 to 700. In FY17 the number decreased further
to 683. As a result, the personnel cost rate dropped from over 50% to 41% in 2017.
However, this is still much higher than former levels of slightly more than 30% in the
years 2010 to 2013.
Development of employees and personnel cost rate
Source: LPKF; Warburg Research
Even though the cost-cutting programme of 2016 showed the desired effects, the
company implemented a long-term efficiency programme called “Sprint”, to put a
stronger focus on profitability and efficiency and reduce risks from high-flyer products like
LDS, thus avoiding a repeat of the severity of the loss-making years.
Export-driven business model
Exports account for about 90% of revenues owing to the international nature of the
industries served by LPKF. More than 40% of sales are generated in the important Asia
Pacific region, where much of the world’s consumer electronics and solar industry
production is located. The development segment generates sales in all regions.
Regional sales split 2017
Source: LPKF; Warburg Research
With such a high share of exports, the company has high exposure to FX both directly
and indirectly. Around 20% of revenues are invoiced in USD and, according to the
company, between 90% and 100% of outstanding receivables are hedged in order to
reduce exposure to exchange rate fluctuations.
00%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Employees Personnel costrate
Germany10.2%
Rest of Europe20.1%
NAFTA22.5%
Asia Pacific44.8%
Rest of the World2.4%
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 24
RESEARCH
Indirect FX exposure has a bigger impact on the company and is difficult to quantify. But
as LPKF production sites are located in Europe with costs in EUR, exchange rate
changes could result in competitive advantages/disadvantages compared to local
competitors. Due to exchange rate changes, prices of LPKF’s products, invoiced in EUR,
might appear more expensive/cheaper to the customer. Indirect impacts relate mostly to
the Asian region.
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 25
RESEARCH
Valuation
� Valuation reflects moderate growth path and sustainable EBIT margin of 11% in a
steady-state scenario
� DCF model suggests fair value of EUR 7.60 per share
� Company trades on rather high multiples compared to the peer group, also due to the
recent turnaround of LPKF.
Based on the valuation with a classical discounted cash flow model, we initiate coverage
with a Hold rating. The DCF model shows that LPKF is fairly valued with only moderate
upside. However, a closer look at the peer group valuation shows some downside
potential compared to our price target.
DCF
We derive a fair value of EUR 7.60 per share, based on a detailed planning horizon until
2020. The transition period covers the time span until 2030.
Sales are expected to grow steadily. In the detailed planning horizon we see strongly
increasing sales in 2018e, stemming from the high demand for solar scribers and
resulting in top-line growth of 7.1%. High demand for those scribers will keep growth
rates stable at 7.5% in 2019 but will decline in 2020, which will result in an expected
growth rate of 5.4%. As a result of the customer demand-driven business model, visibility
for sales growth after 2020e is quite low. We assume an ongoing growth path at
moderate rates of up to 6.5%. We assumed this growth rate mostly owing to a certain
success of the both new technologies LIDE and LTP. Looking at the history of LDS, we
see that a successful product could lead to clear double-digit growth rates. However, at
this early stage, our assumptions remain moderate and assume neither unbridled
success nor spectacular failure.
Later stage growth depends heavily on products that must be developed in future. We
see quite some potential for LPKF to do so successfully but, for the time being, we
assume a healthy terminal value growth of 2.5%.
Profitability is expected to rise continuously, resulting from the further concentration on
efficient and lean production processes. By following this path, we believe that LPKF will
be able to achieve a sustainable EBIT margin of 11% by 2022 and in a steady state
scenario. Any processes of further standardization of products or unexpected
improvements in competitive situations could mean an earlier increase in
profitability.
Other core assumptions of the model are:
� Sustainable working capital ratio of 30% with ongoing efforts to lower the working
capital requirements in the company.
� Constantly high investment ratio of 7%, owing to high R&D expenses
� A beta of 1.24, reflecting the high cyclicality of the business, the more difficult years in
the past and the high liquidity of the shares, compared to market capitalization.
� WACC of 7.22%.
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 26
RESEARCH
DCF model
Detailed forecast period Transitional period Term. Value
Figures in EUR m 2018e 2019e 2020e 2021e 2022e 2023e 2024e 2025e 2026e 2027e 2028e 2029e 2030e
Sales 109.3 117.5 123.8 131.3 139.8 148.9 157.8 167.3 176.5 185.3 193.7 199.5 204.5
Sales change 7.1 % 7.5 % 5.4 % 6.0 % 6.5 % 6.5 % 6.0 % 6.0 % 5.5 % 5.0 % 4.5 % 3.0 % 2.5 % 2.5 %
EBIT 6.0 9.3 11.6 13.1 15.4 16.4 17.4 18.4 19.4 20.4 21.3 21.9 22.5
EBIT-margin 5.5 % 7.9 % 9.4 % 10.0 % 11.0 % 11.0 % 11.0 % 11.0 % 11.0 % 11.0 % 11.0 % 11.0 % 11.0 %
Tax rate (EBT) 18.2 % 18.9 % 19.4 % 20.0 % 25.0 % 29.0 % 30.0 % 30.0 % 30.0 % 30.0 % 30.0 % 30.0 % 30.0 %
NOPAT 4.9 7.5 9.4 10.5 11.5 11.6 12.2 12.9 13.6 14.3 14.9 15.4 15.7
Depreciation 8.0 8.5 9.3 9.2 9.8 10.4 11.0 11.7 12.4 13.0 13.6 14.0 14.3
in % of Sales 7.3 % 7.2 % 7.5 % 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0 %
Changes in provisions 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Change in Liquidity from
- Working Capital -1.4 3.1 2.4 2.0 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.5 1.7 1.5
- Capex 7.5 8.2 8.5 9.2 9.8 10.4 11.0 11.7 12.4 13.0 13.6 14.0 14.3
Capex in % of Sales 6.9 % 7.0 % 6.9 % 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0 %
Other 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Free Cash Flow (WACC Model)
6.8 4.7 7.8 8.6 9.0 8.9 9.5 10.1 10.9 11.6 12.4 13.6 14.3 15
PV of FCF 6.5 4.2 6.5 6.7 6.5 6.1 6.0 5.9 6.0 6.0 5.9 6.1 5.9 129 share of PVs 8.31 % 29.47 % 62.22 %
Model parameter Valuation (m)
Derivation of WACC: Derivation of Beta: Present values 2030e 78
Terminal Value 129
Debt ratio 20.00 % Financial Strength 1.60 Financial liabilities 41
Cost of debt (after tax) 2.8 % Liquidity (share) 1.10 Pension liabilities 0
Market return 7.00 % Cyclicality 1.40 Hybrid capital 0
Risk free rate 1.50 % Transparency 1.00 Minority interest 0
Others 1.10 Market val. of investments 0
Liquidity 3 No. of shares (m) 22.3
WACC 7.22 % Beta 1.24 Equity Value 169 Value per share (EUR) 7.60
Sensitivity Value per Share (EUR)
Terminal Growth Delta EBIT-margin
Beta WACC 1.75 % 2.00 % 2.25 % 2.50 % 2.75 % 3.00 % 3.25 % Beta WACC -1.5 pp -1.0 pp -0.5 pp +0.0 pp +0.5 pp +1.0 pp +1.5 pp
1.47 8.2 % 5.36 5.52 5.68 5.86 6.05 6.27 6.50 1.47 8.2 % 4.62 5.03 5.44 5.86 6.27 6.69 7.10
1.35 7.7 % 6.02 6.21 6.42 6.65 6.89 7.17 7.48 1.35 7.7 % 5.28 5.74 6.19 6.65 7.10 7.55 8.01
1.30 7.5 % 6.40 6.61 6.84 7.10 7.38 7.70 8.05 1.30 7.5 % 5.67 6.15 6.62 7.10 7.58 8.05 8.53
1.24 7.2 % 6.81 7.05 7.31 7.60 7.93 8.29 8.70 1.24 7.2 % 6.10 6.60 7.10 7.60 8.11 8.61 9.11
1.18 7.0 % 7.26 7.53 7.83 8.17 8.54 8.96 9.44 1.18 7.0 % 6.57 7.10 7.63 8.17 8.70 9.23 9.76
1.13 6.7 % 7.76 8.07 8.41 8.79 9.23 9.72 10.28 1.13 6.7 % 7.11 7.67 8.23 8.79 9.36 9.92 10.48
1.01 6.2 % 8.92 9.33 9.79 10.31 10.91 11.60 12.40 1.01 6.2 % 8.39 9.03 9.67 10.31 10.95 11.59 12.23
� Comparably high mid-term growth rates reflect potential acceptance of new products
Peer group valuation
In addition to our DCF-based valuation, we also derive a fair value indication based on a
peer group of companies in the electronics and processing industry. LPKF is trading at
significant premiums of up to 56%.
LPKF is also trading at premiums to Manz AG and Electro Scientific Industries Inc, which
are presumably the closest peers. Manz is a German-listed company, delivering
production solutions to the industries of thin-film solar, printed circuit boards and other
which are relevant markets for LPKF. Electro Scientific Industries is LPKF’s biggest
competitor when it comes to drilling processes in the PCB sector.
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 27
RESEARCH
Even though LPKF is currently trading at much higher multiples, we have to consider that
2017 was LPKF’s turnaround year. A closer look shows that the company is trading
slightly below median level when it comes to EV/Sales. On profit multiples, LPKF is
trading at high premiums, due to the recent turnaround and therefore a low basis..
Nevertheless, we believe that in a steady state scenario, a premium might be justified
since the company has a broad product diversification and can be considered as
technologically leading with innovative solutions.
Peergroup – Valuation multiples
Source: Warburg Research
Conclusion
We consider LPKF to be a company with exceptional innovative strength and first choice
solutions. This leads to good competitive quality, which is currently not reflected in
profitability. However, as losses occurred due to overstated expectations of the LDS
technology, we believe that management has become more cautious. As the company
has been restructured to make it more flexible and efficient, we believe that margins will
improve substantially.
Our DCF-model points to a fair value of 7.60 per share which indicates that the stock is
currently trading close to its fair value. We acknowledge the high premiums in
comparison with peers but do not assign it much significance in light of the recent
turnaround.
In light of these findings we initiate coverage of LPKF with Hold.
Company LC Price MC EV
in LC in LC m in LC m 18e 19e 20e 18e 19e 20e 18e 19e 20e 18e 19e 20e
Nippon Sharyo Ltd JPY 280.00 41,090.0 89,805.5 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.
Manz AG EUR 35.35 273.8 259.6 90.2 x 15.5 x 11.9 x 0.7 x 0.6 x 0.5 x 15.1 x 7.1 x 5.6 x 53.6 x 10.6 x 6.0 x
Electro Scientific Industries Inc USD 20.34 682.4 571.3 7.8 x 9.4 x 7.7 x 1.6 x 1.7 x 1.5 x 5.9 x 7.0 x 5.9 x n.a. n.a. n.a.
Eo Technics Co Ltd KRW 75900.00 932,099.8 891,504.2 14.5 x 12.0 x 10.2 x 2.0 x 1.7 x 1.5 x 9.4 x 7.9 x 6.9 x 13.8 x 9.5 x 7.4 x
Emerson Electric Co USD 73.25 46,154.1 48,945.1 22.9 x 20.0 x 18.2 x 2.8 x 2.7 x 2.5 x 13.3 x 12.3 x 11.7 x 15.0 x 13.7 x 12.8 x
IPG Photonics Corp USD 248.17 13,325.4 12,197.5 29.1 x 26.0 x 21.1 x 7.6 x 6.8 x 5.2 x 17.4 x 16.0 x n.a. 19.2 x 16.8 x 14.1 x
Coherent Inc USD 173.38 4,312.6 4,423.5 12.1 x 10.5 x n.a. 2.3 x 2.1 x 1.7 x 7.5 x 6.7 x n.a. 9.3 x 7.9 x n.a.
Average 29.4 x 15.6 x 13.8 x 2.8 x 2.6 x 2.2 x 11.4 x 9.5 x 7.5 x 22.2 x 11.7 x 10.1 x
Median 18.7 x 13.8 x 11.9 x 2.1 x 1.9 x 1.6 x 11.4 x 7.5 x 6.4 x 15.0 x 10.6 x 10.1 x
LPKF Laser & Electronics AG EUR 7.13 158.8 201.4 42.4 x 19.0 x 17.8 x 1.9 x 1.7 x 1.5 x 13.3 x 9.4 x 8.9 x 30.9 x 15.4 x 14.1 x
Valuation difference to Average -31% -18% -22% 52% 55% 40% -14% 2% -16% -28% -24% -28%
Valuation difference to median -56% -28% -33% 13% 14% 5% -14% -20% -28% -51% -31% -28%
Fair value per share based on Average 4.95 5.84 5.53 11.82 12.10 10.74 5.87 7.27 5.69 4.58 4.95 4.57
Fair value per share based on median 3.14 5.16 4.78 8.07 8.10 7.49 6.10 5.71 5.10 3.47 4.89 5.13
P / E EV / Sales EV / EBITDA EV / EBIT
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 28
RESEARCH
Company & Products
Company structure
LPKF is a German-based system and processing solutions provider, specialised in laser
applications. The company is headquartered in Garbsen, Germany and the subsidiaries
can be separated into production and service subsidiaries. The production sites are
located in Garbsen, Suhl and Fürth in Germany and Naklo in Slovenia. The different
sites specialise in the products of a specific segment of the company.
Electronics are produced in Garbsen. Development activities are located in Naklo. Solar
products are made in Suhl and welding products in Fürth.
Company structure
Source: LPKF; Warburg Research
The service and distribution companies are mainly located in the core markets of LPKF.
The company has a strong presence in Asia with different companies in China, Japan
and South Korea. Another company is located in the USA to cover the American market.
As stated before, LPKF is present in locations across the globe either with its own
companies, as mentioned, or external distributors in non-core countries (see chart below,
please note that the location in Hong Kong has meanwhile been closed).
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 29
RESEARCH
Global presence
Source: Warburg Research
Share
Share price development
The consistent increase in the share price until 2014 mirrors the company’s strong
growth up to that point. In 2014, results failed to meet expectations owing to a drop in
revenue and the EBIT margin in the biggest segment, electronics, and the share price
decreased in response. In 2015, the company reported its first loss and the share price
declined further. The share price started to climb again in mid-2016 on the strength of
the second quarter performance that year and, ever since, it has been showing a slow
recovery with some ups and downs.
Share price development
Source: Factset, Warburg Research
Shareholder structure
LPKF Group has been a publicly traded company since November 30, 1998 with free
float currently amounting to 69%. Major shareholders include Joerg Bantleon (founder
and chairman of the supervisory board of BANTLEON BANK AG/ BANTLEON AG). He
can be considered as a strategic shareholder. The freefloat amounts to 69%. The largest
institutional investors in the free float are Lazard Frères Gestion and Luxempart SA with
around 5% each.
0
5
10
15
20
25
Okt. 12 Apr. 13 Okt. 13 Apr. 14 Okt. 14 Apr. 15 Okt. 15 Apr. 16 Okt. 16 Apr. 17 Okt. 17
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 30
RESEARCH
Shareholder structure
Source: Warburg Research
History
� 1976 – The company is founded by Jürgen Seebach, Klaus Barke, Klaus Sülter
and Bernd Hildebrandt in Hanover.
� 1979 - Only three years after its foundation, LPKF revenue exceeds D M 1
million.
� 1982 – The company expands in the US market
� 1989 – LPKF enters the field of laser technology and achieves a new degree of
precision.
� 1991 – SolarQuipment GmbH founded; LPKF headquarters relocated to
Garbsen
� 1992 – The US subsidiary is founded; StencilLaser technology is developed.
� 1994 – LPKF Laser & Electronics d.o.o. is founded in Slovenia.
� 1998 – LPKF goes public.
� 1999 – LPKF employs more than 100 people.
� 2000 – The Chinese subsidiary is founded.
� 2001 – Bernd Hildebrandt, founder of LPKF, becomes Chairman of the
company’s Supervisory Board.
� 2006 – LPKF expands its business lines with laser structuring of thin-film solar
modules.
� 2009 – The first breakthrough in LDS technology is achieved and revenue
exceeds the EUR 50m-threshold
� 2012 – LPKF is included in the TecDAX and revenue exceeds EUR 100 million.
� 2013 – Most successful year for the company to date.
� 2016 – The company celebrates its 40th anniversary as an international
corporation with representation in more than 70 countries and introduces two
new product groups: LIDE and LTP.
� 2017 – LPKF becomes profitable again after two loss-making years
Jörg Bantleon20.3%
Lazard Frères Gestion5.6%
Luxempart SA5.2%Free Float
69.0%
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 31
RESEARCH
Products
LPKF’s products can be separated into the four different segments. We briefly describe
the products or product groups in the following section, sorted by the segments.
Rapid PCB Prototyping (Development)
In its development segment, LPKF offers its customers solutions to enable in-house
prototyping for printed circuit board processing. This is a big advantage for companies
that want to test varieties of different substrates or need prototypes within a short period
of time. With LPKF’s products, it is possible to create a prototype within a couple of
minutes rather than waiting multiple days (which is usual for external prototype creation).
Furthermore the higher secrecy is beneficial as the process can be handled in-house.
The product range in the development segment is diverse and offers different solutions
and technologies:
Different types of circuit board plotters can structure PCBs and enable in-house
production of prototypes. With LPKF’s ProtoLaser systems, direct laser circuit structuring
of printed circuit boards is possible. Through-Hole Plating systems adaptable for different
PCB materials offer a possibility to plate circuit boards by galvanic, non-chemical or
mechanical methods. LPKF’s MultiPress is a system to produce multilayer printed circuit
boards. If soldering is necessary; LPKF offers supplies to safely apply PCB solder
masks. For assembly of SMD components, printer, oven and automatic pick-and-place
systems are available. Additionally, LPKF’s product range includes software and various
complementary tools, so that an all-round package is offered.
Laser cut printed circuit board
Source: LPKF, Warburg Research
LIDE (Electronics)
In microsystems technology, glass is very suitable as a substrate material for a variety of
applications. LPKF developed a new technology for improved IC (integrated circuit)
Packaging, called LIDE (laser induced deep etching) which is used in the LPKF Vitirion
5000. By using the LIDE technology it is possible to cut and drill glass without causing
micro cracks or stresses in the glass. The patent is submitted by LPKF.
With LIDE, glass can be used as interposer and smarter chip stacking and sensor
packages can be achieved.
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 32
RESEARCH
LPKF Vitrion 5000 and a glass wafer
Source:LPKF, Warburg Research
SMT-Stencil Laser (Electronics)
Surface-mount technology (SMT) is a method for producing electronic circuits in which
components are placed via solder paste stencil. While the components on the circuit
board are getting smaller and smaller LPKF offers two StencilLaser systems for the
cutting of SMT solder paste stencils. Next to the StencilLaser systems LPKF offers
software for quality check and the control of the laser machines. Up to now LPKF has
installed more than 400 SMT StencilLaser systems globally in companies specialized in
the production of laser stencils (SMD-or QFN- components).
StencilLaser G 6080 and SMT Stencil
Source: LPKF, Warburg Research
PCB Processing (Electronics)
The MicroLine 5000 is a laser drilling and cutting system tailored to the needs of the
flexible circuit industry. The System can process a variety of organic and inorganic
substrates (flexible PCB materials, IC substrates and High Density Interconnect PCBs)
and therefore can be used in many different manufacturing processes. It has the ability
to drill holes down to 20 µm and by using UV wavelength the laser can cut and drill with
high precision and achieves high-quality results. The system is equipped with an
integrated vision system for a fast fiducial recognition to ensure accurate alignment.
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 33
RESEARCH
MicroLine 5000 and 30 µm through hole in FPC substrate
Source:LPKF , Warburg Research
PCB Depaneling (Electronics)
For the depaneling of assembled and unassembled printed circuit boards from a multi-
image board or cutting contours in PCB substrates LPKF offers three different MicroLine
systems. The systems are software-controlled and able to depanel or cut with high
precision and speed. The systems can be integrated into existing manufacturing
execution systems (MESs).
MicroLine 2000 S and minimal cutting channels
Source: LPKF / Warburg Research
LDS Equipment (Electronics)
LPKF developed a laser-based technology for the production of circuit layouts on
complex and three-dimensional carrier structures called MIDs (molded interconnect
devices). A laser beam structures the layout directly into the moulded plastic part. By
using the LDS (laser direct structuring) technology existing plastic components take on
electronic functions in addition to their mechanical tasks. The LDS technology is used in
the automotive, consumer and medical technologies.
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 34
RESEARCH
LPKF Fusion3D 1200 and finger tips for a robot hand
Source: LPKF / Warburg Research
Laser Plastic Welding (Welding)
Laser plastic welding uses focused laser radiation to create a permanent bond between
two layers of plastic a laser transparent, transmissive layer and a laser absorbing layer.
These systems comprise stand-alone systems, systems that can be integrated within
product lines and individually customized systems. LPKF is specialized in the application
areas of medical technology, automotive and consumer and has placed over 200
systems in serial productions so far. One application of this technology in the automotive
industry is to seal sensitive electronic components in its electronic sensor housing.
PowerWeld 9000 (fully integrated system) and example of a backlight
Source: LPKF / Warburg Research
Solar Module Equipment (Solar)
Generation of energy with solar modules is not new, but LPKF offers systems that
enable structuring of thin-film solar cells. These systems work with either laser
structuring or mechanical structuring. LPKF offers two different laser scriber for either
research and development or the processing of thin-film solar modules in CdTe-, aSi/µSi-
and CIGS substrates
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 35
RESEARCH
LPKF Allegro and thin film solar module
Source: LPKF / Warburg Research
Laser Transfer Printing (Solar)
Laser transfer printing (LPT) combines accuracy and flexibility of a laser based printer
and the application options of screen printing. This technology is capable of transferring
even highly filled printing inks with micron range of precision to flat substrates, even in
multi-printing. The ability to use this technology for printing on glass is innovative and
offers opportunity for new areas of application e.g. in the automotive industry.
LTP print head and LTP system for printing on vehicle glass
Source:LPKF / Warburg Research
Management
LPKF’s management currently consists of four people but will be reduced to two in the
course of 2018. The company appointed Kai Bentz as interim spokesman of the
management board in October 2017 while the new CEO Dr. Götz Bendele took the reins
as of May 2018.
Dr. Götz Bendele, the CEO, was previously partner at the technology consulting
company Infosys Limited in the United States. He has held leadership positions in the
semiconductor industry at TSMC and in the consulting industry at McKinsey & Co. We
welcome the appointment of Dr. Bendele based on his combination of relevant industry
contacts and management experience. Götz Bendele holds a PhD in Physics from the
Stony Brook University in New York.
Kai Bentz is the chief financial officer (CFO) but will leave the company at the end of
2018. He has been a member of the board of directors since 2007 and is responsible for
finance, human resources and organization. Before joining LPKF Group in 2002, Kai
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 36
RESEARCH
Bentz worked for a large international accounting and auditing firm and qualified as tax
advisor. Mr. Bentz holds a degree in economics.
Bernd Lange is the chief technology officer (CTO), but will leave the company in the
course of 2018 as the supervisory and management board decided to decrease the
number of members in the management board. He joined LPKF in 2000 and has been a
member of the board of directors since 2004. Prior to LPKF he held several positions in
the fields of electrical engineering and scientific instrumentation in different companies.
Bernd Lange holds a degree in electrical engineering.
Dr. Christian Bieniek is the chief operating officer (COO) of the group but will leave the
company at the same time as Mr. Lange. He was appointed to LPKF’s board of directors
in 2012. Previously, he held several positions in a variety of companies (inter alia head of
operations at MAN). Dr. Christian Bieniek holds a degree in mechanical engineering and
a PhD from the University of Braunschweig.
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 37
RESEARCH
DCF model
Detailed forecast period Transitional period Term. Value
Figures in EUR m 2018e 2019e 2020e 2021e 2022e 2023e 2024e 2025e 2026e 2027e 2028e 2029e 2030e
Sales 109.3 117.5 123.8 131.3 139.8 148.9 157.8 167.3 176.5 185.3 193.7 199.5 204.5
Sales change 7.1 % 7.5 % 5.4 % 6.0 % 6.5 % 6.5 % 6.0 % 6.0 % 5.5 % 5.0 % 4.5 % 3.0 % 2.5 % 2.5 %
EBIT 6.0 9.3 11.6 13.1 15.4 16.4 17.4 18.4 19.4 20.4 21.3 21.9 22.5
EBIT-margin 5.5 % 7.9 % 9.4 % 10.0 % 11.0 % 11.0 % 11.0 % 11.0 % 11.0 % 11.0 % 11.0 % 11.0 % 11.0 %
Tax rate (EBT) 18.2 % 18.9 % 19.4 % 20.0 % 25.0 % 29.0 % 30.0 % 30.0 % 30.0 % 30.0 % 30.0 % 30.0 % 30.0 %
NOPAT 4.9 7.5 9.4 10.5 11.5 11.6 12.2 12.9 13.6 14.3 14.9 15.4 15.7
Depreciation 8.0 8.5 9.3 9.2 9.8 10.4 11.0 11.7 12.4 13.0 13.6 14.0 14.3
in % of Sales 7.3 % 7.2 % 7.5 % 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0 %
Changes in provisions 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Change in Liquidity from
- Working Capital -1.4 3.1 2.4 2.0 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.5 1.7 1.5
- Capex 7.5 8.2 8.5 9.2 9.8 10.4 11.0 11.7 12.4 13.0 13.6 14.0 14.3
Capex in % of Sales 6.9 % 7.0 % 6.9 % 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0 %
Other 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Free Cash Flow (WACC Model)
6.8 4.7 7.8 8.6 9.0 8.9 9.5 10.1 10.9 11.6 12.4 13.6 14.3 15
PV of FCF 6.5 4.2 6.5 6.7 6.5 6.1 6.0 5.9 6.0 6.0 5.9 6.1 5.9 129 share of PVs 8.31 % 29.47 % 62.22 %
Model parameter Valuation (m)
Derivation of WACC: Derivation of Beta: Present values 2030e 78
Terminal Value 129
Debt ratio 20.00 % Financial Strength 1.60 Financial liabilities 41
Cost of debt (after tax) 2.8 % Liquidity (share) 1.10 Pension liabilities 0
Market return 7.00 % Cyclicality 1.40 Hybrid capital 0
Risk free rate 1.50 % Transparency 1.00 Minority interest 0
Others 1.10 Market val. of investments 0
Liquidity 3 No. of shares (m) 22.3
WACC 7.22 % Beta 1.24 Equity Value 169 Value per share (EUR) 7.60
Sensitivity Value per Share (EUR)
Terminal Growth Delta EBIT-margin
Beta WACC 1.75 % 2.00 % 2.25 % 2.50 % 2.75 % 3.00 % 3.25 % Beta WACC -1.5 pp -1.0 pp -0.5 pp +0.0 pp +0.5 pp +1.0 pp +1.5 pp
1.47 8.2 % 5.36 5.52 5.68 5.86 6.05 6.27 6.50 1.47 8.2 % 4.62 5.03 5.44 5.86 6.27 6.69 7.10
1.35 7.7 % 6.02 6.21 6.42 6.65 6.89 7.17 7.48 1.35 7.7 % 5.28 5.74 6.19 6.65 7.10 7.55 8.01
1.30 7.5 % 6.40 6.61 6.84 7.10 7.38 7.70 8.05 1.30 7.5 % 5.67 6.15 6.62 7.10 7.58 8.05 8.53
1.24 7.2 % 6.81 7.05 7.31 7.60 7.93 8.29 8.70 1.24 7.2 % 6.10 6.60 7.10 7.60 8.11 8.61 9.11
1.18 7.0 % 7.26 7.53 7.83 8.17 8.54 8.96 9.44 1.18 7.0 % 6.57 7.10 7.63 8.17 8.70 9.23 9.76
1.13 6.7 % 7.76 8.07 8.41 8.79 9.23 9.72 10.28 1.13 6.7 % 7.11 7.67 8.23 8.79 9.36 9.92 10.48
1.01 6.2 % 8.92 9.33 9.79 10.31 10.91 11.60 12.40 1.01 6.2 % 8.39 9.03 9.67 10.31 10.95 11.59 12.23
� Comparably high mid-term growth rates reflect potential acceptance of new products
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 38
RESEARCH
Valuation
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018e 2019e
Price / Book 5.8 x n.a. n.a. 2.9 x 3.6 x 2.7 x 2.5 x
Book value per share ex intangibles 2.54 2.69 2.24 1.75 1.74 1.92 2.21
EV / Sales n.a. n.a. n.a. 2.2 x 2.3 x 1.8 x 1.6 x
EV / EBITDA n.a. n.a. n.a. 152.5 x 19.9 x 13.7 x 10.6 x
EV / EBIT n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 58.6 x 32.0 x 20.3 x
EV / EBIT adj.* n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 58.6 x 32.0 x 20.3 x
P / FCF 28.8 x n.a. n.a. n.a. 62.9 x 26.1 x 39.6 x
P / E 24.4 x n.a. n.a. n.a. 173.8 x 37.9 x 23.2 x
P / E adj.* 24.4 x n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 37.9 x 23.2 x
Dividend Yield 1.5 % n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.
FCF Potential Yield (on market EV) n.a. n.a. n.a. 0.0 % 4.2 % 6.8 % 8.6 %
*Adjustments made for: -
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 39
RESEARCH
Consolidated profit & loss In EUR m 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e
Sales 129.7 119.7 87.3 91.1 102.1 109.3 117.5 123.8
Change Sales yoy n.a. -7.6 % -27.1 % 4.4 % 12.0 % 7.1 % 7.5 % 5.4 % Increase / decrease in inventory 1.2 1.4 -0.2 -2.3 -0.7 1.1 1.2 0.6
Own work capitalised 3.7 5.3 6.9 4.9 3.6 4.4 4.7 5.0
Total Sales 134.5 126.5 94.0 93.7 104.9 114.8 123.4 129.4
Material expenses 34.9 38.0 24.9 31.0 33.8 37.2 39.4 40.9
Gross profit 99.6 88.5 69.1 62.7 71.1 77.6 84.0 88.5
Gross profit margin 76.8 % 73.9 % 79.2 % 68.8 % 69.7 % 71.0 % 71.5 % 71.5 % Personnel expenses 40.5 43.4 43.7 43.9 41.9 41.2 42.8 43.5
Other operating income 3.9 4.1 7.1 5.8 5.7 4.4 4.7 5.0
Other operating expenses 32.0 28.7 29.1 23.3 23.3 26.8 28.2 29.1
Unfrequent items 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EBITDA 31.0 20.6 3.4 1.3 11.6 14.0 17.7 20.9
Margin 23.9 % 17.2 % 3.9 % 1.4 % 11.4 % 12.8 % 15.1 % 16.9 %
Depreciation of fixed assets 3.2 3.7 4.4 4.3 4.0 4.4 4.7 5.0
EBITA 27.8 16.8 -0.9 -3.0 7.6 9.6 13.0 16.0
Amortisation of intangible assets 4.6 4.2 2.8 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.8 4.3
Goodwill amortisation 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EBIT 23.2 12.7 -3.7 -6.8 4.0 6.0 9.3 11.6
Margin 17.9 % 10.6 % -4.3 % -7.4 % 3.9 % 5.5 % 7.9 % 9.4 %
EBIT adj. 23.2 12.7 -3.7 -6.8 4.0 6.0 9.3 11.6
Interest income 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Interest expenses 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8
Other financial income (loss) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
EBT 22.5 11.9 -4.4 -7.6 3.0 5.2 8.5 10.8
Margin 17.4 % 10.0 % -5.0 % -8.3 % 3.0 % 4.8 % 7.2 % 8.8 % Total taxes 6.8 3.4 -0.9 1.2 1.9 1.0 1.6 2.1
Net income from continuing operations 15.7 8.5 -3.5 -8.8 1.1 4.3 6.9 8.7
Income from discontinued operations (net of tax) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Net income before minorities 15.7 8.5 -3.5 -8.8 1.1 4.3 6.9 8.7
Minority interest 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Net income 15.1 8.5 -3.5 -8.8 1.1 4.3 6.9 8.7
Margin 11.6 % 7.1 % -4.0 % -9.7 % 1.1 % 3.9 % 5.9 % 7.1 %
Number of shares, average 22.3 22.3 22.3 22.3 22.3 22.3 22.3 22.3
EPS 0.68 0.38 -0.16 -0.40 0.05 0.19 0.31 0.39
EPS adj. 0.68 0.38 -0.16 -0.40 0.00 0.19 0.31 0.39
*Adjustments made for:
Guidance: 2018: Sales EUR 103m to 108m; EBIT margin of up to 6%; ROCE between 2 and 7%
Financial Ratios 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e
Total Operating Costs / Sales 79.8 % 88.5 % 103.8 % 101.4 % 91.4 % 92.2 % 89.9 % 87.6 %
Operating Leverage n.a. 5.9 x n.a. 18.4 x n.a. 7.3 x 7.2 x 4.7 x
EBITDA / Interest expenses 42.2 x 26.7 x 4.9 x 1.6 x 12.3 x 17.5 x 22.2 x 26.2 x
Tax rate (EBT) 30.1 % 28.6 % 20.8 % -16.4 % 61.8 % 18.2 % 18.9 % 19.4 %
Dividend Payout Ratio 35.4 % 31.4 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 %
Sales per Employee 172,424 150,628 112,153 130,177 147,923 n.a. n.a. n.a.
Sales, EBITDA in EUR m
Source: Warburg Research
Operating Performance in %
Source: Warburg Research
Performance per Share
Source: Warburg Research
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 40
RESEARCH
Consolidated balance sheet In EUR m 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e
Assets
Goodwill and other intangible assets 7.6 8.5 13.5 15.3 15.4 15.8 16.3 16.4
thereof other intangible assets 3.1 1.8 2.0 1.9 1.8 2.2 2.7 2.8
thereof Goodwill 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Property, plant and equipment 42.8 49.0 50.7 48.3 46.5 45.6 44.9 43.9
Financial assets 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Other long-term assets 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Fixed assets 50.6 57.5 64.2 63.6 62.1 61.6 61.4 60.6
Inventories 31.2 32.2 31.1 25.0 25.5 27.3 29.4 31.0
Accounts receivable 13.0 25.7 13.9 20.0 19.4 16.5 17.7 18.7
Liquid assets 12.6 6.0 3.8 3.6 3.3 10.5 11.5 15.7
Other short-term assets 5.8 6.7 5.9 4.8 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2
Current assets 62.6 70.7 54.6 53.3 54.4 60.5 64.8 71.5
Total Assets 113.2 128.2 118.8 116.9 116.6 122.1 126.2 132.1
Liabilities and shareholders' equity
Subscribed capital 22.3 22.3 22.3 22.3 22.3 22.3 22.3 22.3
Capital reserve 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
Retained earnings 11.1 10.9 10.9 10.9 10.9 15.2 22.1 30.8
Other equity components 29.2 33.9 28.8 19.6 19.5 19.5 19.5 19.5
Shareholders' equity 64.1 68.6 63.5 54.3 54.2 58.5 65.4 74.1
Minority interest 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total equity 64.1 68.6 63.5 54.3 54.2 58.5 65.4 74.1
Provisions 9.0 5.5 3.7 3.7 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 thereof provisions for pensions and similar obligations
0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Financial liabilities (total) 23.8 36.2 41.1 43.5 41.0 42.0 39.0 36.0
thereof short-term financial liabilities 5.9 20.1 15.6 20.9 21.0 21.0 19.5 18.0
Accounts payable 4.4 4.8 2.3 3.1 3.2 3.5 3.7 3.9
Other liabilities 12.0 13.1 8.2 12.4 14.1 14.1 14.1 14.1
Liabilities 49.1 59.7 55.3 62.6 62.3 63.6 60.8 58.0
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity 113.2 128.2 118.8 116.9 116.6 122.1 126.2 132.1
Financial Ratios 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e
Efficiency of Capital Employment
Operating Assets Turnover 1.6 x 1.2 x 1.0 x 1.1 x 1.3 x 1.4 x 1.5 x 1.5 x
Capital Employed Turnover 1.7 x 1.2 x 0.9 x 1.0 x 1.1 x 1.2 x 1.3 x 1.3 x
ROA 29.8 % 14.8 % -5.4 % -13.9 % 1.9 % 6.9 % 11.2 % 14.4 %
Return on Capital
ROCE (NOPAT) n.a. 10.4 % n.a. n.a. 1.6 % 5.4 % 8.2 % 10.0 %
ROE n.a. 12.8 % -5.3 % -15.0 % 2.1 % 7.6 % 11.1 % 12.5 %
Adj. ROE n.a. 12.8 % -5.3 % -15.0 % -0.2 % 7.6 % 11.1 % 12.5 %
Balance sheet quality
Net Debt 11.4 30.5 37.7 40.2 38.0 31.8 27.8 20.7
Net Financial Debt 11.2 30.2 37.3 39.9 37.7 31.5 27.5 20.3
Net Gearing 17.8 % 44.5 % 59.3 % 74.0 % 70.0 % 54.4 % 42.5 % 27.9 %
Net Fin. Debt / EBITDA 36.3 % 146.8 % 1086.2 % 3057.3 % 323.8 % 225.2 % 154.7 % 97.1 %
Book Value / Share 2.9 3.1 2.9 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.9 3.3
Book value per share ex intangibles 2.5 2.7 2.2 1.8 1.7 1.9 2.2 2.6
ROCE Development
Source: Warburg Research
Net debt in EUR m
Source: Warburg Research
Book Value per Share in EUR
Source: Warburg Research
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 41
RESEARCH
Consolidated cash flow statement In EUR m 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e
Net income 15.7 8.5 -3.5 -8.8 1.1 4.3 6.9 8.7
Depreciation of fixed assets 3.2 3.7 4.4 4.3 4.0 4.4 4.7 5.0
Amortisation of goodwill 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Amortisation of intangible assets 4.6 4.2 2.8 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.8 4.3
Increase/decrease in long-term provisions 1.9 -1.2 -1.1 0.1 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
Other non-cash income and expenses 1.3 -0.1 0.1 6.6 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cash Flow before NWC change 26.6 15.1 2.7 5.9 13.1 12.2 15.3 18.0
Increase / decrease in inventory 7.3 -15.1 13.3 -5.9 -0.6 -1.8 -2.1 -1.6
Increase / decrease in accounts receivable 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 2.9 -1.2 -1.0
Increase / decrease in accounts payable -2.1 3.1 -5.7 4.6 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.2
Increase / decrease in other working capital positions
2.4 -1.3 -0.2 1.0 -4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Increase / decrease in working capital (total) 7.5 -13.3 7.4 -0.3 -3.5 1.4 -3.1 -2.4
Net cash provided by operating activities [1] 34.2 1.8 10.1 5.7 9.6 13.6 12.2 15.6
Investments in intangible assets -3.7 -5.2 -7.8 -5.4 -3.8 -4.0 -4.2 -4.5
Investments in property, plant and equipment -17.6 -9.8 -5.9 -2.0 -2.7 -3.5 -4.0 -4.0
Payments for acquisitions 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Financial investments 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Income from asset disposals 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Net cash provided by investing activities [2] -21.3 -14.7 -13.7 -7.5 -6.3 -7.5 -8.2 -8.5
Change in financial liabilities 8.2 12.4 0.2 7.1 -9.8 1.0 -3.0 -3.0
Dividends paid -5.6 -5.6 -2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Purchase of own shares 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Capital measures -4.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Other -0.7 -0.8 -0.7 -0.8 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0
Net cash provided by financing activities [3] -2.8 6.1 -3.2 6.3 -10.8 1.0 -3.0 -3.0
Change in liquid funds [1]+[2]+[3] 10.1 -6.8 -6.8 4.5 -7.4 7.1 1.0 4.1
Effects of exchange-rate changes on cash -0.1 0.3 -0.1 0.0 -0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cash and cash equivalent at end of period 15.0 6.0 -0.9 3.6 -4.0 10.5 11.5 15.7
Financial Ratios 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018e 2019e 2020e
Cash Flow
FCF 12.8 -13.2 -3.6 -1.8 3.1 6.1 4.0 7.1
Free Cash Flow / Sales 9.9 % -11.0 % -4.1 % -2.0 % 3.0 % 5.6 % 3.4 % 5.8 %
Free Cash Flow Potential n.a. 17.2 4.4 0.1 9.8 13.0 16.1 18.8
Free Cash Flow / Net Profit 85.1 % -155.1 % 104.0 % 20.4 % 267.7 % 144.1 % 58.8 % 81.6 %
Interest Received / Avg. Cash n.a. 0.2 % 0.5 % 0.2 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 %
Interest Paid / Avg. Debt n.a. 2.6 % 1.8 % 2.0 % 2.2 % 1.9 % 2.0 % 2.1 %
Management of Funds
Investment ratio 16.5 % 12.5 % 15.7 % 8.2 % 6.4 % 6.9 % 7.0 % 6.9 %
Maint. Capex / Sales n.a. 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 %
Capex / Dep 274.8 % 189.9 % 192.0 % 92.7 % 85.3 % 94.0 % 96.9 % 91.5 %
Avg. Working Capital / Sales n.a. 36.6 % 52.0 % 41.7 % 33.7 % 29.8 % 28.4 % 29.2 %
Trade Debtors / Trade Creditors 297.9 % 532.8 % 608.0 % 651.1 % 601.2 % 471.4 % 478.4 % 479.5 %
Inventory Turnover 1.1 x 1.2 x 0.8 x 1.2 x 1.3 x 1.4 x 1.3 x 1.3 x
Receivables collection period (days) 37 78 58 80 69 55 55 55
Payables payment period (days) 46 46 33 36 35 34 34 35
Cash conversion cycle (Days) 287 301 464 246 202 191 201 209
CAPEX and Cash Flow in EUR m
Source: Warburg Research
Free Cash Flow Generation
Source: Warburg Research
Working Capital
Source: Warburg Research
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 42
RESEARCH
LEGAL DISCLAIMER
This research report (“investment recommendation”) was prepared by the Warburg Research GmbH, a fully owned subsidiary of the M.M.Warburg &
CO (AG & Co.) KGaA and is passed on by the M.M.Warburg & CO (AG & Co.) KGaA. It is intended solely for the recipient and may not be passed on
to another company without their prior consent, regardless of whether the company is part of the same corporation or not. It contains selected
information and does not purport to be complete. The investment recommendation is based on publicly available information and data ("information")
believed to be accurate and complete. Warburg Research GmbH neither examines the information for accuracy and completeness, nor guarantees its
accuracy and completeness. Possible errors or incompleteness of the information do not constitute grounds for liability of M.M.Warburg & CO (AG &
Co.) KGaA or Warburg Research GmbH for damages of any kind whatsoever, and M.M.Warburg & CO (AG & Co.) KGaA and Warburg Research
GmbH are not liable for indirect and/or direct and/or consequential damages. In particular, neither M.M.Warburg & CO (AG & Co.) KGaA nor Warburg
Research GmbH are liable for the statements, plans or other details contained in these investment recommendations concerning the examined
companies, their affiliated companies, strategies, economic situations, market and competitive situations, regulatory environment, etc. Although due
care has been taken in compiling this investment recommendation, it cannot be excluded that it is incomplete or contains errors. M.M.Warburg & CO
(AG & Co.) KGaA and Warburg Research GmbH, their shareholders and employees are not liable for the accuracy and completeness of the
statements, estimations and the conclusions derived from the information contained in this investment recommendation. Provided a investment
recommendation is being transmitted in connection with an existing contractual relationship, i.e. financial advisory or similar services, the liability of
M.M.Warburg & CO (AG & Co.) KGaA and Warburg Research GmbH shall be restricted to gross negligence and wilful misconduct. In case of failure in
essential tasks, M.M.Warburg & CO (AG & Co.) KGaA and Warburg Research GmbH are liable for normal negligence. In any case, the liability of
M.M.Warburg & CO (AG & Co.) KGaA and Warburg Research GmbH is limited to typical, expectable damages. This investment recommendation does
not constitute an offer or a solicitation of an offer for the purchase or sale of any security. Partners, directors or employees of M.M.Warburg & CO (AG
& Co.) KGaA, Warburg Research GmbH or affiliated companies may serve in a position of responsibility, i.e. on the board of directors of companies
mentioned in the report. Opinions expressed in this investment recommendation are subject to change without notice. All rights reserved.
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
This work including all its parts is protected by copyright. Any use beyond the limits provided by copyright law without permission is prohibited and
punishable. This applies, in particular, to reproductions, translations, microfilming, and storage and processing on electronic media of the entire content
or parts thereof.
DISCLOSURE ACCORDING TO §85 OF THE GERMAN SECURITIES TRADING ACT (WHPG), MAR AND MIFID II INCL. COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) 2016/958 AND (EU) 2017/565
The valuation underlying the investment recommendation for the company analysed here is based on generally accepted and widely used methods of
fundamental analysis, such as e.g. DCF Model, Free Cash Flow Potential, Peer Group Comparison or Sum of the Parts Model (see also
http://www.mmwarburg.de/disclaimer/disclaimer.htm#Valuation). The result of this fundamental valuation is modified to take into consideration the
analyst’s assessment as regards the expected development of investor sentiment and its impact on the share price.
Independent of the applied valuation methods, there is the risk that the price target will not be met, for instance because of unforeseen changes in
demand for the company’s products, changes in management, technology, economic development, interest rate development, operating and/or
material costs, competitive pressure, supervisory law, exchange rate, tax rate etc. For investments in foreign markets and instruments there are further
risks, generally based on exchange rate changes or changes in political and social conditions.
This commentary reflects the opinion of the relevant author at the point in time of its compilation. A change in the fundamental factors underlying the
valuation can mean that the valuation is subsequently no longer accurate. Whether, or in what time frame, an update of this commentary follows is not
determined in advance.
Additional internal and organisational arrangements to prevent or to deal with conflicts of interest have been implemented. Among these are the spatial
separation of Warburg Research GmbH from M.M.Warburg & CO (AG & Co.) KGaA and the creation of areas of confidentiality. This prevents the
exchange of information, which could form the basis of conflicts of interest for Warburg Research in terms of the analysed issuers or their financial
instruments.
The analysts of Warburg Research GmbH do not receive a gratuity – directly or indirectly – from the investment banking activities of M.M.Warburg &
CO (AG & Co.) KGaA or of any company within the Warburg-Group.
All prices of financial instruments given in this investment recommendation are the closing prices on the last stock-market trading day before the
publication date stated, unless another point in time is explicitly stated.
M.M.Warburg & CO (AG & Co.) KGaA and Warburg Research GmbH are subject to the supervision of the Federal Financial Supervisory Authority,
BaFin. M.M.Warburg & CO (AG & Co.) KGaA is additionally subject to the supervision of the European Central Bank (ECB).
SOURCES
All data and consensus estimates have been obtained from FactSet except where stated otherwise.
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 43
RESEARCH
Additional information for clients in the United States
1. This research report (the “Report”) is a product of Warburg Research GmbH, Germany, a fully owned subsidiary of M.M.Warburg & CO (AG & Co.)
KGaA, Germany (in the following collectively “Warburg”). Warburg is the employer of the research analyst(s), who have prepared the Report. The
research analyst(s) reside outside the United States and are not associated persons of any U.S. regulated broker-dealer and therefore are not subject
to the supervision of any U.S. regulated broker-dealer.
2. The Report is provided in the United States for distribution solely to "major U.S. institutional investors" under Rule 15a-6 of the U.S. Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.
3. Any recipient of the Report should effect transactions in the securities discussed in the Report only through J.P.P. Euro-Securities, Inc., Delaware.
4. J.P.P. Euro-Securities, Inc. does not accept or receive any compensation of any kind for the dissemination of the research reports from Warburg.
Reference in accordance with section 85 of the German Securities Trading Act (WpHG) and Art. 20 MAR regarding possible
conflicts of interest with companies analysed:
-1- Warburg Research, or an affiliated company, or an employee of one of these companies responsible for the compilation of the research, hold
a share of more than 5% of the equity capital of the analysed company.
-2-
Warburg Research, or an affiliated company, within the last twelve months participated in the management of a consortium for an issue in
the course of a public offering of such financial instruments, which are, or the issuer of which is, the subject of the investment
recommendation.
-3- Companies affiliated with Warburg Research manage financial instruments, which are, or the issuers of which are, subject of the
investment recommendation, in a market based on the provision of buy or sell contracts.
-4-
MMWB, Warburg Research, or an affiliated company, reached an agreement with the issuer to provide investment banking and/or
investment services and the relevant agreement was in force in the last 12 months or there arose for this period, based on the relevant
agreement, the obligation to provide or to receive a service or compensation - provided that this disclosure does not result in the disclosure of
confidential business information.
-5- The company compiling the analysis or an affiliated company had reached an agreement on the compilation of the investment
recommendation with the analysed company.
-6- Companies affiliated with Warburg Research regularly trade financial instruments of the analysed company or derivatives of these.
-6a- Warburg Research, or an affiliated company, holds a net long position of more than 0.5% of the total issued share capital of the analysed
company.
-6b- Warburg Research, or an affiliated company, holds a net short position of more than 0.5% of the total issued share capital of the analysed
company.
-6c- The issuer holds shares of more than 5% of the total issued capital of Warburg Research or an affiliated company.
-7- The company preparing the analysis as well as its affiliated companies and employees have other important interests in relation to the
analysed company, such as, for example, the exercising of mandates at analysed companies.
This report has been made accessible to the company analysed.
Company Disclosure Link to the historical price targets and rating changes (last 12 months)
LPKF 5 http://www.mmwarburg.com/disclaimer/disclaimer_en/DE0006450000.htm
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 44
RESEARCH
INVESTMENT RECOMMENDATION
Investment recommendation: expected direction of the share price development of the financial instrument up to the given price target in the opinion of
the analyst who covers this financial instrument.
-B- Buy: The price of the analysed financial instrument is expected to rise over the next 12 months.
-H- Hold: The price of the analysed financial instrument is expected to remain mostly flat over the next 12
months.
-S- Sell: The price of the analysed financial instrument is expected to fall over the next 12 months.
“-“ Rating suspended: The available information currently does not permit an evaluation of the company.
WARBURG RESEARCH GMBH – ANALYSED RESEARCH UNIVERSE BY RATING
Rating Number of stocks % of Universe
Buy 111 54
Hold 89 43
Sell 5 2
Rating suspended 0 0
Total 205 100
WARBURG RESEARCH GMBH – ANALYSED RESEARCH UNIVERSE BY RATING Q
Q taking into account only those companies which were provided with major investment services in the last twelve months.
Rating Number of stocks % of Universe
Buy 32 73
Hold 12 27
Sell 0 0
Rating suspended 0 0
Total 44 100
PRICE AND RATING HISTORY LPKF AS OF 29.05.2018
Markings in the chart show rating changes by Warburg Research
GmbH in the last 12 months. Every marking details the date and
closing price on the day of the rating change.
LPKF
FU L L NO T E Publ ished 29 .05 .2018 45
RESEARCH
EQUITIES Roland Rapelius +49 40 3282-2673 Head of Equities [email protected] RESEARCH Michael Heider +49 40 309537-280 Jochen Reichert +49 40 309537-130 Head of Research [email protected] Telco, Internet, Media [email protected]
Henner Rüschmeier +49 40 309537-270 J. Moritz Rieser +49 40 309537-260 Head of Research [email protected] Real Estate [email protected]
Lucas Boventer +49 40 309537-290 Arash Roshan Zamir +49 40 309537-155 Renewables, Internet, Media [email protected] Cap. Goods, Renewables [email protected]
Christian Cohrs +49 40 309537-175 Malte Schaumann +49 40 309537-170 Engineering, Logistics [email protected] Technology [email protected]
Felix Ellmann +49 40 309537-120 Patrick Schmidt +49 40 309537-125 Software, IT [email protected] Leisure, Internet [email protected]
Jörg Philipp Frey +49 40 309537-258 Oliver Schwarz +49 40 309537-250 Retail, Consumer Goods [email protected] Chemicals, Agriculture [email protected]
Marius Fuhrberg +49 40 309537-185 Marc-René Tonn +49 40 309537-259 Small Cap Research [email protected] Automobiles, Car Suppliers [email protected]
Ulrich Huwald +49 40 309537-255 Björn Voss +49 40 309537-254 Health Care, Pharma [email protected] Steel, Car Suppliers [email protected]
Thilo Kleibauer +49 40 309537-257 Alexander Wahl +49 40 309537-230 Retail, Consumer Goods [email protected] Car Suppliers, Construction [email protected]
Eggert Kuls +49 40 309537-256 Andreas Wolf +49 40 309537-140 Engineering [email protected] Software, IT [email protected]
Andreas Pläsier +49 40 309537-246 Banks, Financial Services [email protected] INSTITUTIONAL EQUITY SALES Holger Nass +49 40 3282-2669 Michael Kriszun +49 40 3282-2695 Head of Equity Sales, USA [email protected] United Kingdom [email protected]
Klaus Schilling +49 40 3282-2664 Marc Niemann +49 40 3282-2660 Dep. Head of Equity Sales, GER [email protected] Germany [email protected]
Tim Beckmann +49 40 3282-2665 Sanjay Oberoi +49 69 5050-7410 United Kingdom [email protected] United Kingdom [email protected]
Lyubka Bogdanova +49 69 5050-7411 Simon Pallhuber +49 69 5050-7414 United Kingdom, Australia [email protected] Switzerland, France [email protected]
Jens Buchmüller +49 69 5050-7415 Scandinavia, Austria [email protected]
Paul Dontenwill +49 40 3282-2666 Angelika Flegler +49 69 5050-7417 USA, Poland, The Netherlands [email protected] Roadshow/Marketing [email protected]
Matthias Fritsch +49 40 3282-2696 Juliane Willenbruch +49 40 3282-2694 United Kingdom [email protected] Roadshow/Marketing [email protected]
SALES TRADING Oliver Merckel +49 40 3282-2634 Bastian Quast +49 40 3282-2701 Head of Sales Trading [email protected] Sales Trading [email protected] Elyaz Dust +49 40 3282-2702 Jörg Treptow +49 40 3282-2658 Sales Trading [email protected] Sales Trading [email protected] Michael Ilgenstein +49 40 3282-2700 Jan Walter +49 40 3282-2662 Sales Trading [email protected] Sales Trading [email protected] MACRO RESEARCH Carsten Klude +49 40 3282-2572 Dr. Christian Jasperneite +49 40 3282-2439 Macro Research [email protected] Investment Strategy [email protected] Our research can be found under: Warburg Research http://research.mmwarburg.com/en/index.html Thomson Reuters www.thomsonreuters.com Bloomberg MMWA GO Capital IQ www.capitaliq.com FactSet www.factset.com For access please contact:
Andrea Schaper +49 40 3282-2632 Kerstin Muthig +49 40 3282-2703 Sales Assistance [email protected] Sales Assistance [email protected]