Upload
dwight-wilkinson
View
217
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Long-term Survival, Valve Durability, and Reoperation
for Four Aortic Root + Ascending Procedures
Lars G. Svensson, Saila T. Pillai,
Jeevanantham Rajeswaran, Milind Desai, Brian Griffin,
Richard Grimm, Donald F. Hammer, Maran Thamilarasan,
Eric E. Roselli, Gösta B. Pettersson, A. Marc Gillinov,
Jose L. Navia, Nicholas G. Smedira, Joseph F. Sabik III,
Bruce W. Lytle, Eugene H. Blackstone
1. Remodeling / Reimplantation
2. Biological Composite
3. Mechanical Composite 4. Allograft
Free of Complications
%
Years after Operation
Valve-related deathsReop/endo
TEBleeding
Other deaths
St Jude Medical Valve Prosthesis
Zellner et al. 1999
0 126 153 9
100
80
20
60
40 40%
Explant for SVD
%
Age (years)
Pericardial
Allograft
12 years
20 30 40 50 60 70
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
Prosthesis by Age
100
80
60
40
20
%
≥8050s 60s 70s<30 30s 40s
BioprosthesisMechanicalRepairHuman
0
Age (years)
Post-op Complications, BAV =728
%
Death Stroke Renal Failure
LongVent
2.5
1.5
1.0
0.5
0
2.0
MI
0.41%0.27%
20
40
60
80
100
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
%
Years
Bicuspid
Tricuspid
Biologic AVR
Free of Reoperation
Objective• Primary endpoints:
− Complications− Early and late reoperations− Early and late death
• Secondary endpoints• Aortic stenosis or insufficiency• Change in left ventricular mass
index
N 957 Patients• Root Procedure + Ascending Aorta
25% Arch Repair with DHCA• 1/1995 to End 2010
• Excluded− Type A dissection−Active endocarditis−Emergency operations
Procedure
27%
Allograft
25%
16%
32%
CompositeMechanical
CompositeBiologic
Valve Preserv205 Reimplant 56 Remodel
Number of Procedures
Bentall (Bio.)
Allograft
Valve Preserving
1995
Date of Procedure
20
40
50
60
#
01997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011
Bentall (Mech)
Characteristics of Patients
Comorbidities100
80
60
40
20
0LVFCAD
<50%AV Sten. Age
(yr)
%
Valve-PreservingComposite BiologicComposite Mech.Allograft
Comorbidities
60
40
20
0AfibHFHtn Carotid
%
Valve-PreservingComposite BiologicComposite Mech.Allograft
Early Outcomes
Mortality 0.73%
None Valve Preserving
Early Complications
• Valve-preserving −More reoperations for bleeding −Valve dysfunction
• Composite biological−More atrial fibrillation−Deep wound infections− Longer ICU and hospital stay
0 3 6 9 12 15
Years
20
40
60
80
100
Per
cen
t in
Eac
h C
ateg
ory
0
Competing Events after Procedure
Alive with no reoperation
Death before reoperation
1st Operation
Survival
%
Years
20
40
60
80
100
0 3 6 9 12 15
0 3 6 9 12 15
Years
20
40
60
80
100
Su
rviv
al (
%)
0
Survival
Bentall (Mech.)
AllograftValve
Preserving
Bentall (Biologic)
Prevalence of Postoperative Aortic Regurgitation
0 2 4 6 8 10
Years
0
20
40
60
80
100
Per
cen
t in
AR
Gra
de
0
Bentall (Mech.)
Allograft
Valve Preserving
Bentall (Biologic)
Aortic Valve Gradients
Bentall (Mech.)
Allograft
Valve Preserving
Bentall (Biologic)
0 2 4 6 8 105
10
15
20
Mea
n G
rad
ien
t (m
mH
g)
Years
LV Mass Index
0 2 4 6 8 10
110
120
130
140
150
160
Composite Mech.
Allograft
Valve Preserving
Composite Biologic
g•m
-2
Years
Left Atrial Diameter
0 2 4 6 8 10
Years
Bentall (Mech.)Allograft
Valve Preserving
Bentall (Biologic)
4.00
4.25
4.50
4.75
5.00
LA
Dia
met
er (
cm)
3.75
74 Reoperations, 1.5% Mortality
Endocarditis
%
AR / Aneu / ADS
Degeneration
Freedom from First Reoperation
0 3 6 9 12 15
Years
20
40
60
80
100
Fre
e o
f R
eop
erat
ion
(%
)
0
0 3 6 9 12 15
Years
2
4
6
8
10
Reo
ps
(%/y
ear)
0
Hazard
Freedom from First Reoperation
0 3 6 9 12 15
Years
60
70
80
90
100
Fre
e o
f R
eop
(%
)
50
Bentall (Mech.)
Allograft
Valve Preserving
Bentall (Biologic)
Valve Preserving Reoperations
• Reimplantation Trileaflet Valve
Freedom 93% 10 years
• Remodeling Bicuspid Valve
Freedom 71% 10 years, p=0.02
5 Reoperations for Distal Disease
Conclusions
• Valve-Preserving procedures
−Remodeling higher early failure rate−More late aortic regurgitation−Smaller LV mass index over time− Less endocarditis−No warfarin
Conclusions
• Composite biological valve
−Higher death rate over time−More endocarditis
Conclusions
• Composite mechanical valve
− Lowest reoperation rate−Sustained benefit in LV mass index−Anticoagulation is the price
Conclusions
• Allografts
− Low early LV mass index− Low risk of endocarditis−High allograft degeneration
Implications• Reimplantation Excellent for Trileaflet
• Remodeling Fair for BAV
• Mechanical composite Good AS but Coumadin
• Biological Good for Elderly but Flared graft−Valve in Valve TAVR
• Allografts are good for endocarditis