28
Long Term Recovery Lessons from Ohio: Restoration Intervention vs. Natural Selection Constance Hausman Plant and Restoration Ecologist

Long Term Recovery Lessons from Ohio: Restoration ......Restoration Intervention vs. Natural Selection Constance Hausman Plant and Restoration Ecologist Original design plans 102 years

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Long Term Recovery Lessons from Ohio: Restoration ......Restoration Intervention vs. Natural Selection Constance Hausman Plant and Restoration Ecologist Original design plans 102 years

Long Term Recovery Lessons from Ohio:

Restoration Intervention vs. Natural Selection

Constance HausmanPlant and Restoration Ecologist

Page 2: Long Term Recovery Lessons from Ohio: Restoration ......Restoration Intervention vs. Natural Selection Constance Hausman Plant and Restoration Ecologist Original design plans 102 years

Original design plans

102 years18 Reservations~24,000 acres

Cleveland Metroparks

Page 3: Long Term Recovery Lessons from Ohio: Restoration ......Restoration Intervention vs. Natural Selection Constance Hausman Plant and Restoration Ecologist Original design plans 102 years
Page 4: Long Term Recovery Lessons from Ohio: Restoration ......Restoration Intervention vs. Natural Selection Constance Hausman Plant and Restoration Ecologist Original design plans 102 years

Stressors

Stormwater Urban wildlife

2011

2016New pests / pathogens

Invasive species

Fragmentation

Page 5: Long Term Recovery Lessons from Ohio: Restoration ......Restoration Intervention vs. Natural Selection Constance Hausman Plant and Restoration Ecologist Original design plans 102 years

Restoration Intervention: determined by data

• Plant Community Assessment Program

• 405 total vegetation plots• 2010 (2015)• 2011 (2016) • 2012 (2017) • 2013 (2018)

Page 6: Long Term Recovery Lessons from Ohio: Restoration ......Restoration Intervention vs. Natural Selection Constance Hausman Plant and Restoration Ecologist Original design plans 102 years

Forests

3%

12%

19%

30%

19%7%

4%

1%

1%

2% 1%1%

77% of our acreage covered by forests

Beech Maple Forest

Mixed Forest

Floodplain Forest

Page 7: Long Term Recovery Lessons from Ohio: Restoration ......Restoration Intervention vs. Natural Selection Constance Hausman Plant and Restoration Ecologist Original design plans 102 years

Beech

ALB –Asian longhorned beetle (maples, willows, elm)GM – Gypsy moth (oaks, poplars, willows, beech)EAB – Emerald ash borer (all ashes)DED – Dutch elm disease (American elm)

Forest and Tree Threats (iTree)

Percent Percent

Population Leaf area

• 38 % Maple species 28 %

• 8 % Oak species 6 %

• 7 % American Beech 21 %

• 7 % Ash species 6 %

• 4 % Tulip tree 8 %

Page 8: Long Term Recovery Lessons from Ohio: Restoration ......Restoration Intervention vs. Natural Selection Constance Hausman Plant and Restoration Ecologist Original design plans 102 years

Spatial distribution of ash

Page 9: Long Term Recovery Lessons from Ohio: Restoration ......Restoration Intervention vs. Natural Selection Constance Hausman Plant and Restoration Ecologist Original design plans 102 years
Page 10: Long Term Recovery Lessons from Ohio: Restoration ......Restoration Intervention vs. Natural Selection Constance Hausman Plant and Restoration Ecologist Original design plans 102 years

Woodpecker Damage

1) Size of ash trees (3 DBH categories)Ruler: 4-12”Hugger: 13-20”Tower: >20”

2) # of ash trees 3) Damage/EAB activity

50 meters

90o

trail

Page 11: Long Term Recovery Lessons from Ohio: Restoration ......Restoration Intervention vs. Natural Selection Constance Hausman Plant and Restoration Ecologist Original design plans 102 years

Rulers4-12”

Bar length = # trees

Bar color = damage(light, med, dark)

Page 12: Long Term Recovery Lessons from Ohio: Restoration ......Restoration Intervention vs. Natural Selection Constance Hausman Plant and Restoration Ecologist Original design plans 102 years

Rulers4-12”

Huggers13-20”

Page 13: Long Term Recovery Lessons from Ohio: Restoration ......Restoration Intervention vs. Natural Selection Constance Hausman Plant and Restoration Ecologist Original design plans 102 years

All 3 size

classes

Page 14: Long Term Recovery Lessons from Ohio: Restoration ......Restoration Intervention vs. Natural Selection Constance Hausman Plant and Restoration Ecologist Original design plans 102 years

West Side: Mill Stream Run

Page 15: Long Term Recovery Lessons from Ohio: Restoration ......Restoration Intervention vs. Natural Selection Constance Hausman Plant and Restoration Ecologist Original design plans 102 years

East Side: South Chagrin

Page 16: Long Term Recovery Lessons from Ohio: Restoration ......Restoration Intervention vs. Natural Selection Constance Hausman Plant and Restoration Ecologist Original design plans 102 years

US Forest Service State and Private Forestry

Great Lakes Restoration Initiative

(Emerald Ash Borer Mitigation)

•Priorities• Public Areas • Natural Habitats

invasive species controlplant light gaps create young forest expand forested buffersstabilize stream corridors

Page 17: Long Term Recovery Lessons from Ohio: Restoration ......Restoration Intervention vs. Natural Selection Constance Hausman Plant and Restoration Ecologist Original design plans 102 years

• Large caliper (UTC)• Small caliper (young forest

establishment)• Volunteer vs. Contractor

Page 18: Long Term Recovery Lessons from Ohio: Restoration ......Restoration Intervention vs. Natural Selection Constance Hausman Plant and Restoration Ecologist Original design plans 102 years

Forest Rehabilitation – Reforestation - Stream Restoration Ash Utilization

Page 19: Long Term Recovery Lessons from Ohio: Restoration ......Restoration Intervention vs. Natural Selection Constance Hausman Plant and Restoration Ecologist Original design plans 102 years

Stream restoration using dead ash logs as grade control structures

Stream Bank Stabilization: Live stake installation

Page 20: Long Term Recovery Lessons from Ohio: Restoration ......Restoration Intervention vs. Natural Selection Constance Hausman Plant and Restoration Ecologist Original design plans 102 years

Forest Rehabilitation: invasive shrub controlReforestation: tree plantings

“Planted” dead ash snags: raptor/bird perch

Page 21: Long Term Recovery Lessons from Ohio: Restoration ......Restoration Intervention vs. Natural Selection Constance Hausman Plant and Restoration Ecologist Original design plans 102 years

Natural Selection…

Page 22: Long Term Recovery Lessons from Ohio: Restoration ......Restoration Intervention vs. Natural Selection Constance Hausman Plant and Restoration Ecologist Original design plans 102 years
Page 23: Long Term Recovery Lessons from Ohio: Restoration ......Restoration Intervention vs. Natural Selection Constance Hausman Plant and Restoration Ecologist Original design plans 102 years

2005

2006

2018

Page 24: Long Term Recovery Lessons from Ohio: Restoration ......Restoration Intervention vs. Natural Selection Constance Hausman Plant and Restoration Ecologist Original design plans 102 years
Page 25: Long Term Recovery Lessons from Ohio: Restoration ......Restoration Intervention vs. Natural Selection Constance Hausman Plant and Restoration Ecologist Original design plans 102 years

Light gaps

Downed ash

Native understory

Page 26: Long Term Recovery Lessons from Ohio: Restoration ......Restoration Intervention vs. Natural Selection Constance Hausman Plant and Restoration Ecologist Original design plans 102 years
Page 27: Long Term Recovery Lessons from Ohio: Restoration ......Restoration Intervention vs. Natural Selection Constance Hausman Plant and Restoration Ecologist Original design plans 102 years

Cut Plot 2005 Cut Plot 2009

EAB Eradication Cut Zones – Vegetation Response

Page 28: Long Term Recovery Lessons from Ohio: Restoration ......Restoration Intervention vs. Natural Selection Constance Hausman Plant and Restoration Ecologist Original design plans 102 years

Questions?Field Trip Preview!