Upload
nuno-rodrigues
View
217
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Lomme Devriendt Et Al Cyberplace and Cyberspace - Two Approaches to Analyzing Digital Intercity Linkages
Citation preview
This article was downloaded by: [b-on: Biblioteca do conhecimento online ISCTE]On: 10 March 2015, At: 12:36Publisher: RoutledgeInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registeredoffice: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Journal of Urban TechnologyPublication details, including instructions for authors andsubscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cjut20
Cyberplace and Cyberspace: TwoApproaches to Analyzing DigitalIntercity LinkagesLomme Devriendt , Ben Derudder & Frank WitloxPublished online: 19 Jan 2009.
To cite this article: Lomme Devriendt , Ben Derudder & Frank Witlox (2008) Cyberplace andCyberspace: Two Approaches to Analyzing Digital Intercity Linkages, Journal of Urban Technology,15:2, 5-32, DOI: 10.1080/10630730802401926
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10630730802401926
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (theContent) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis,our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as tothe accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinionsand views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors,and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Contentshould not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sourcesof information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims,proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoeveror howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to orarising out of the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Anysubstantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing,systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms &Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cjut20http://www.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1080/10630730802401926http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10630730802401926http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditionshttp://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
Cyberplace and Cyberspace: TwoApproaches to Analyzing DigitalIntercity Linkages
Lomme Devriendt, Ben Derudder, and Frank Witlox
FROM the mid-1990s, there has been an enormous growthin the use and diversity of information and communi-cations technologies (ICT), such as global positioningsystems (GPS), virtual reality (VR), voice over Internet protocol
(VoIP), short message service (SMS), and others. The use of
webcam conversation, digital signature, real-time chat, e-mail,
and several other digital communication applications are almost
everyday practices and are indispensable in business transactions.
Traditional activities such as shopping, banking, entertaining, and
working are being progressively supplemented by numerous
e-applications such as e-working, e-shopping, e-banking, and
e-entertainment. Although the effect of this e-volution has to
be put into perspective, most e-applications complement but do
not substitute for traditional activities.
A number of e-products also generate completely new fields
of application. For instance, in order to secure or send information,
we all put information into a digital format. Castells has pointed
out that the world annual production of information in different
forms amounts to 1.5 billion gigabytes of which, in 1999, 93
percent was already produced in digital format. The availability
of this huge volume of digital information enables us to communi-
cate and derive information any time, any place.
Mokhtarian et al.
Weltevreden
Castells 2001
Journal of Urban Technology, Volume 15, Number 2, pages 532.
Copyright # 2008 by The Society of Urban Technology.All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.
ISSN: 1063-0732 paper/ISSN: 1466-1853 onlineDOI: 10.1080/10630730802401926
Cyberplace and Cyberspace 5
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
b-on
: Bib
liote
ca d
o co
nhec
imen
to o
nlin
e IS
CT
E]
at 1
2:36
10
Mar
ch 2
015
The increasing use of the Internet and its applications is also
perceptible in the global interrelationships between cities. Trans-
actions of information, communication, and the facility of other
intercity linkages are altered by new ICT development. Cities
have an important long-term role in the process of globalization
as centers of information exchange. The new digital technology
strengthens this important central coordination and control func-
tion. The mix of central functions applied to societal networks
and material and human resources, when combined with the
ability to communicate or obtain information at high speed,
makes cities into major players in the global economy.
Many research workers studying the various ways in which
cities and their linkages can be understood have based their
approaches on digital intercity networks.1 The aim of this paper
is to gain a comprehensive view of the various methods available
for the analysis of virtual intercity linkages, that is, a linkage
based on ICT and not an undefined relationship. We identify
two methods, the cyberplace (CP) approach and the cyberspace
(CS) approach.
The CP concept investigates virtual intercity links as actual
connections between physical points such as those within the
network of Internet cables and their interconnections. This
approach assumes that the physical infrastructure represents the
digital relationship between places. Most research on digital inter-
city linkages is based on this approach. On the other hand, the CS
concept has to our knowledge not hitherto been employed in the
urban network context (empirical analyses such as those of Hei-
mericks and Van Besselaar draw on the cyberspace approach to
study the international connections of scientific research). This
approach observes intercity linkages starting from the invisible
structure of the virtual world such as Internet hyperlinks, the struc-
ture of search engines, and e-mail traffic. In the cyber world, one
communicates in a new kind of space where rules other than those
of geographical separation apply because of the anticipated con-
trast between physical and virtual distance. In this, we consider
both approaches in the context of our review.2
This paper is organized as follows. The first section presents a
general introduction to the literature on transnational urban net-
works. We then present the analytical framework in which we
deal with the CP and CS approaches. Thirdly, we discuss the ana-
lyses based on both concepts and discuss the outcome. The empiri-
cal analysis based on CP is an additional contribution to existing
studies. The CS analysis, on the other hand, is new in urban
Townsend 2001
Sassen 2002
1A good overview of the literature
on cybercities is compiled by
Graham (2004).
Choi et al. 2006
Gorman and Malecki 2002
Moss and Townsend
Rutherford et al.
2The neglect of the cyberspace
approach compared to the
cyberplace approach for the
empirical analyses of digital
urban linkages could in all
probability be attributed to the
fairly intangible character of the
CS medium in contrast to the
physical CP. Hillis even attributes
this invisibility as the key to
grasping geographys relative
disinterest in communications.
Communication flows are less
studied than other flows in
geography (Hillis, Kellerman).
The confidentiality cited by private
telecoms contributes to this lack of
data and information.
6 Journal of Urban Technology/August 2008
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
b-on
: Bib
liote
ca d
o co
nhec
imen
to o
nlin
e IS
CT
E]
at 1
2:36
10
Mar
ch 2
015
network research. In the concluding section, we summarize our
main findings and propose avenues for further research.
The Position of the Internetwork and Its Applicationswithin Research on Transnational Urban Networks
The contemporary literature on transnational urban networks can
be traced back to two interrelated papers. J. Friedmann was the
sole author of one, and with G. Wolff, was the co-author of
another. Both texts framed the rise of a global urban system in
the context of a major geographical transformation of the capitalist
world economy. This restructuring, most commonly referred to as
the new international division of labor, was premised on the
internationalization of production and the ensuing complexity in
the organizational structures of multinational enterprises
(MNEs). This increased economic-geographical complexity,
Friedmann argues, requires a limited number of control points in
order to function, and a select group of highly interconnected
metropolitan areas were deemed to be such points. The publication
of Saskia Sassens The Global City in 1991 marked a shift of atten-
tion to transnational inter-city flows resulting from the critical ser-
vicing of worldwide production rather than to its formal command
through the corporate headquarters of MNEs. Sassens approach
focuses upon the attraction of advanced producer service firms
(providing professional, financial, and creative services for
businesses) to major cities with their knowledge-rich environ-
ments and specialist markets. In the 1980s and 1990s, many
such service firms followed their global clients to become import-
ant MNEs in their own right. These advanced producer service
firms thereupon created worldwide office networks covering
major cities in most or all world regions, and it is exactly the
myriad of interconnections between service complexes that,
according to Sassen, made way for the formation of transnational
urban networks.
Empirical research on transnational urban networks has long
remained somewhat underdeveloped because of the lack of appro-
priate data, a problem which Short et al. referred to as the dirty
little secret of world cities research. This empirical poverty
can, for instance, clearly be seen in Castells book, which is part
of a trilogy that is above all an attempt to reformulate social
studies for a global age in which networks constitute the new
social morphology of our societies. However, when it comes to
Sassen 1991
Sassen 2001
Castells 1996
Cyberplace and Cyberspace 7
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
b-on
: Bib
liote
ca d
o co
nhec
imen
to o
nlin
e IS
CT
E]
at 1
2:36
10
Mar
ch 2
015
providing a basic cartography of this global network society,
Castells argument falls short of the conceptual shift he advances:
the only actual evidence he comes up with in the chapter on the
space of flows consists of some limited information on inter-
city flows gathered from Federal Express. One can, therefore,
only conclude, as Taylor has recently done, that the evidence
[Castells] marshals is mightily unimpressive. This gap between
theoretical sophistication and evidential poverty was, however,
not a lacuna specific to Castells book: it has been a structural
feature of research on transnational urban networks because data
for assessing such urban networks are in general insufficient or
even totally absent.
The basic reason for this problem of evidence is that standard
data sources are ill-suited for such analyses. To get an evidential
handle on big issues, researchers normally rely on the statistics
that are available, that is to say, already collected. But such collec-
tion is carried out usually by a state agency for the particular needs
of government policy rather than for social science research. The
result is that such data that are available have an attributional bias
(measurements of administrative areas rather than between admin-
istrative areas) and are limited to national territories. Where offi-
cial statistics extend beyond a states boundaries, they will still
use countries as the basic units (e.g., trade data). Thus, there is
no official agency collecting data on, say, the myriad flows
between London and New York. The major result has been that
few of the available data reveal anything about the flows and
interdependencies that are at the heart of this body of literature.
This leads Alderson and Beckfield to note that in the past, rela-
tively few of the empirical global-city network (GCN) studies uti-
lized the sorts of relational data necessary for firmly establishing
such rankings empirically.
These data problems have put researchers to work in recent
years, and we have, therefore, witnessed a proliferation of empirical
studies that explicitly seek to rectify this situation. Researchers have
relied on a wide variety of data, but some information sources have
come to dominate the empirical research, especially information on
corporate organization (e.g., data on ownership links between firms
across space) and information on infrastructure networks (e.g., data
on the volume of air passenger flows across space). The success of
both approaches can, of course, be traced to their commonsensical
appeal: the corporate-organization approach acknowledges that
well-connected cities derive their status in large part from the pre-
sence of key offices of important firms, while the infrastructure
Taylor 2004
Taylor 2004
Knox
Derudder
8 Journal of Urban Technology/August 2008
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
b-on
: Bib
liote
ca d
o co
nhec
imen
to o
nlin
e IS
CT
E]
at 1
2:36
10
Mar
ch 2
015
approach recognizes that well-connected cities are typified by the
presence of vast enabling infrastructures. Put simply: the most
important cities harbor the most important airports, while the exten-
sive fiber backbone networks that support the Internet have equally
been deployed within and between major cities, hence creating a
vast planetary infrastructure network upon which the global
economy has come to depend almost as much as it depends on
physical transport networks.
Table 1 summarizes the approaches developed in the empiri-
cal literature on transnational urban networks through an overview
of some key studies in this research domain. The table acknowl-
edges that the basic bifurcation between corporate organization
and infrastructure needs to be deepened on the basis of the exact
types of firms and infrastructures, and equally shows that all this
is in practice somewhat more complicated because of the presence
of a limited number of studies that make use of other types of data
(e.g., Taylors analysis of non-governmental organizations) and/or that combine indicators from both approaches. In the next
section, we focus on studies that use data on digital connections
between cities for assessing transnational urban networks.
The Cyberplace (CP) and Cyberspace (CS) Approaches
The Cyberplace (CP) ApproachThe cyberplace approach (CP) is an amalgamation of the vital
linkages and essential connections within the virtual network
among the existing infrastructures of satellite, telephone, computer,
TABLE 1A Taxonomy of Empirical Approaches in Empirical
Global-City Network Research
Indicators
Corporate Organization InfrastructureOther and/or a
combinationof indicators
Global servicefirms
Multinationalenterprises
Tele-communications
Airtransportation
Examples Beaverstocket al. (2000)
Alderson andBeckfield (2004)
Malecki (2002) Smith andTimberlake (2001)
Taylor (2005)
Derudder et al.(2003)
Rozenblat andPumain (2007)
Rutherford et al.(2004)
Derudder andWitlox (2005)
Rimmer (1998)
Source: Derudder 2006
Rutherford et al.
Taylor 2005
Beaverstock et al.
Cyberplace and Cyberspace 9
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
b-on
: Bib
liote
ca d
o co
nhec
imen
to o
nlin
e IS
CT
E]
at 1
2:36
10
Mar
ch 2
015
facsimile, credit card, fiber-optic cable, and other information and
telecommunications systems. In general, it can be defined as the
Internets physical fabric. The CP approach makes use of the tan-
gible infrastructure to analyze the virtual transnational linkage of
cities.
Contemporary economic globalization is constituted by
intensive transnational networks of exchange and transaction.
Cities contain the junctions in the exchange of communication
and information. It is, therefore, in a citys interest to have a
well-developed communications network. Several studies have
explored the fundamental connection between telecommunica-
tions growth and economic success. Sommers and Carlson, for
example, document several examples of United States cities in
which large companies demanded a developed telecommunica-
tions infrastructure before they chose an urban area as a site for
operations. The extent and quality of digital telecommunications
infrastructure, through which the virtual exchange and trans-
actions occur, is consequently an important measure of digital
intercity relationships. The access to new technology is of prime
importance in large cities where the largest markets are found
and is of secondary importance in smaller places. Most empirical
studies on digital intercity flows base their analyses on the CP
approach. Gorman and Malecki examine the virtual network of
major United States cities, observing, for example, the most exten-
sive fiber-optic cable networks. Grubesic and OKelly explore the
fiber-optic backbone points of presence (PoPs) and note that these
are generally located in major cities such as Atlanta, Boston,
Chicago, DallasFort Worth, Los Angeles, New York, Philadel-
phia, San Francisco and Washington, D.C.3
To implement the CP approach, the first step is to find appro-
priate data concerning the physical infrastructure that guarantees
the digital accessibility of a place. The majority of CP studies
start from observation of the cable network that supports intercity
digital information flow. CP studies are mostly based on maps and
data that are available on the World Wide Web. Global telecom-
munications companies such as the BT Group, AT&T, or
Verizon give ample treatment to promoting their networks of
cables and satellites in order to demonstrate to potential customers
how extensive and capable these are4 Malecki and Boush even
state that during the last 10 years, telecommunications firms
have spent more money on advertising than on new technology.
The Internet architecture is, however, far more complex. Cable
networks are not the only elements of the infrastructure. The
Gorman and Makecki 2002
Hanley
Graham and Marvin
Hackler
Moss
Walcott and Wheeler
Malecki 1999
Choi et al. 2001
Choi et al. 2006
Gorman and Malecki 2000
Grubesic and OKelly
Malecki and Gorman
Malecki and Boush
Moss and Townsend
Rutherford
Rutherford et al.
Townsend 2000
Townsend 2001
Wheeler and OKelly
Gorman and Malecki 20023A Point of Presence (PoP) is an
access point to the Internetwork.
4These are also used by
Internetwork engineers to
monitor and control traffic flows
and network performance. (Dodge
and Kitchen 2002). Detailed
network monitoring maps and
tools are, however, generally not
made public for reasons of
security and commercial
confidentiality.
10 Journal of Urban Technology/August 2008
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
b-on
: Bib
liote
ca d
o co
nhec
imen
to o
nlin
e IS
CT
E]
at 1
2:36
10
Mar
ch 2
015
goal of this analysis is to broaden the existing CP studies to show
the importance of including the entire Internet infrastructure in
such an analysis. Internet users experience this network of
networks as a seamless, global, and ubiquitous communication
medium directly connecting two points. However, behind the
scenes lie many individual networks, owned and controlled by
different corporate, institutional, and governmental entities, and
joined to each other by various, less-known interconnection
arrangements.
Internet users need interconnection arrangements to commu-
nicate with one another via computers both next door and on the
other side of the globe. The Internet is a network of networks,
owned and organized by different companies. Communication
takes place in a manner similar to air travel, where, as a conse-
quence of the airlines organization, intercity passenger flows
are restricted to specific locations for their connections. Airline
passengers fly from A to B passing through a hub switching
point C. In the telecommunications industry, information trans-
mission is also limited to specific locations that structure the
network. Interconnection is needed because no single network
operator could possibly provide Internet access in every part of
the world. Different Internet service providers (ISPs) regulate
the network around the block and around the world. In order to
provide end users with universal connectivity, ISPs have to inter-
connect with one another to exchange traffic destined for each
others end users.
The exchange of Internet traffic between networks is called
peering. Peering is an interconnection of separate Internet net-
works for exchanging traffic between the customers of each
network.5 A bit flowing from point A on the network of Internet
Service Provider (ISP) A to point B on the network of ISP B has
to change its ISP at an interconnection point C. The physical
points that allow various ISPs to peer are called Internet eXchange
Points (IXPs). ISPs that want to use the IXP to connect to other
ISPs run one or more links from their own routers to the exchange
point and connect them to the IXP routers. An impact of intercon-
nection arrangements (IXPs) can be seen in Figure 1 below.
The early development of the Internet and the deregulation of
the long-distance telecommunications market in North America
resulted in interconnection arrangements between North American
ISPs and other providers that were strongly biased in favor of the
former ISPs. Even now, for example, it is common practice for
Internet users in Spain to communicate with users in Sweden or
Gorman and Malecki 2000
Derudder et al. 2007
5ARPAnet was, for instance, at the
outset in 1969, not an Internet
but a network of computers. At the
time, the U.S. Defense Department
contractors permitted the use of
the ARPAnet by other U.S.
Government agencies to develop
similar networks, and they had to
interconnect and thereby
developed the real Internetwork.
(Chapin and Owens)
Kellerman
Cyberplace and Cyberspace 11
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
b-on
: Bib
liote
ca d
o co
nhec
imen
to o
nlin
e IS
CT
E]
at 1
2:36
10
Mar
ch 2
015
Finland over a path that is led through an IXP in the United States.
(See Figure 1.) Although there exists a direct link, the time cost of
connecting through an exchange point located on the other side of
the world is significantly lower than the cost of a direct connection.
These extreme examples are being slowly reduced by the growth
of interconnection points spurred by the deregulation of the tele-
communications industry.
Figure 2 highlights the establishment of new IXPs (i.e., inter-
connection points) per year in comparison with the total number of
existing European IXPs.
Although the interest for urban scholars is not the physical
pathway but the endpoints of the connectivity package being
delivered, the examples above stress the importance of consider-
ing the entire Internet architecture. A number of cities have, in a
manner similar to the hubs in the airline network, major advantages
in terms of digital accessibility through their function as intercon-
nection points. Direct interconnection through these points avoids
data travel to other cities, and potentially to other continents, to get
from one network to another, thus reducing latency. They present
the ability to switch from a regional to a continental or global
network without first travelling on different regional networks.
Table 2 presents a number of these interconnection points. The
CP approach discussed here is based on such IXPs (results are
FIGURE 1Interconnection Points in the Global Internetwork
Akamai Technologies
European Internet Exchange
Association (Euro-IX)
Townsend 2001
12 Journal of Urban Technology/August 2008
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
b-on
: Bib
liote
ca d
o co
nhec
imen
to o
nlin
e IS
CT
E]
at 1
2:36
10
Mar
ch 2
015
described in the empirical section below). The first goal of the
analysis is to prove the importance of considering the entire Inter-
net infrastructure in a CP approach. The second goal is to introduce
IXPs as important CP components to gain an insight into digital
intercity linkages.
Studies of telecommunications hubs have been performed from
many different perspectives, including the technical architecture
FIGURE 2The Establishment of New IXPs in Comparison to the Total
Number of Existing European IXPs
TABLE 2A Number of Internet Exchange Points
Abbreviation Name Location
AMS-IX Amsterdam Internet Exchange Amsterdam, NetherlandsLINX London Internet Exchange London, United KingdomDE-CIX Deutscher Commercial Internet
ExchangeFrankfurt am Main, Germany
JPNAP Japan Network Access Point Tokyo, JapanNetnod Netnod Internet Exchange i Sverige Stockholm, SwedenESPANIX Spain Internet Exchange Madrid, SpainJPIX Japan Internet Exchange Tokyo, JapanHKIX Hong Kong Internet eXchange Hong Kong, ChinaBIX Budapest Internet Exchange Budapest, HungaryKINX Korea Internet Neutral eXchange Seoul, Korea
Cyberplace and Cyberspace 13
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
b-on
: Bib
liote
ca d
o co
nhec
imen
to o
nlin
e IS
CT
E]
at 1
2:36
10
Mar
ch 2
015
of exchange points, the business and economic models that
underlie peering, transit agreements, and so on. Grubesic and
OKelly analyze the geographical position of PoPs in the
United States in order to examine the digital accessibility of
cities. PoPs give information about the location of the access/switching points per ISP. Thus, while the IXPs do serve for
many ISPs, the PoPs tell something about the switching location
of a single ISP.6 Examining IXPs gives centralized information
about the Internet traffic passing through an exchange point.7
Other researchers note IXPs as important digital points in city
networks but do not give more detail.
The IXP data used here are drawn from the Euro-IX report.
This was compiled by the European Internet Exchange Associ-
ation (Euro-IX) and gives information about the amount of
traffic being transferred in IXPs that are members of the European
Internet Exchange Association.8 A substantial proportion of IXPs
publish traffic statistics on their websites in order to promote their
interconnection point to potential new ISP members. Amsterdam,
ams-ix.net (AMS-IX) for instance, gives information as daily and
yearly traffic load graphs and monthly reports about their traffic
volume, total multicast, IPv6, and broadcast traffic, ISP
members, technical and statistical information, topology, and so
on. The Euro-IX report has accumulated these graphs for cities
in Europe. The results of the empirical analysis based on these
data are described below in the CP approach section of the empiri-
cal analysis.
The Cyberspace (CS) ApproachIn addition to the traditional geographical space wherein the CP is
embedded, we have witnessed the emergence of a new approach
for analyzing digital flows: the CS approach. CS is the virtual
world wherein people communicate with each other using compu-
ter systems. The CS concept makes use of this new space
to analyze digital intercity linkages. Because the functioning
of several communication and information technologies such as
e-mail, web consulting, and video conferencing, are based on
CS, such an approach can give a refined picture of existing
virtual linkages between cities. To introduce this idea, we
discuss the most important features of cyberspace.
Although it is often referred to, cyberspace is quite a difficult
entity to grasp and define. It has been variously described as
follows: a consensual hallucination experienced daily by billions
Kende
Norton
6PoPs are housed in an IXP or in
data centers that are used to house
the server, storage, and network
infrastructure of ISPs.
7For an overview of the
geographical position of switching
facilities in the United States
(2001), see Malecki and McIntee,
and in Europe (2001), see
Kellerman.
Drewe
Gorman and Malecki 2002
Townsend 2001
8On October 2006, Euro-IX had
36 member IXPs from 21
European countries, 7 IXPs from
Japan and the United States, and
four patrons from the switch
vendor community. Although the
Euro-IX report attempts to list all
known IXPs in Europe, it is
expected that a small number of
IXPs may have been left out. The
IXP data do not take into account
the traffic exchanged by privately
interconnected participants whose
traffic does not pass over the IXP
switching fabric (European
Internet Exchange Association).
14 Journal of Urban Technology/August 2008
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
b-on
: Bib
liote
ca d
o co
nhec
imen
to o
nlin
e IS
CT
E]
at 1
2:36
10
Mar
ch 2
015
of legitimate operators, in every nation, by children being taught
mathematical concepts; unthinkable complexity; a parallel
universe; a multi-media skein of digital networks which is infus-
ing rapidly into social, cultural and economic life; a space that is
difficult to comprehend and mentally visualize . . . in which it iseasy to get lost and confused.9
A more concise definition of CS is given by Leadbetter, who
describes this space as an immaterial world of computers and
communications, in which we can work at the touch of a
button. This definition highlights the three most important fea-
tures of cyberspace:
. It is all about computers and virtual communication. CS isthe virtual network wherein computers communicate with
each other.
. CS is an immaterial world in that the physical aspects of thematerial world involving distance do not apply in this new
space.
. In this immaterial world of computers and communication,we work at the touch of a button.
Distance has a diminished importance in the cyber world. A
place in CS is close by when it is just one click away or at the
touch of a button. The need to click a lot to get on to a website that
is actually physically nearby is perceived as its being more remote
and less accessible than a site that, just one click away, is phys-
ically more than thousands of miles away. The time cost is so
small that virtual access is practically invariant with physical
distance. Access in virtual space, therefore, follows logical links
rather than physical paths. The CS approach uses these features
to analyze the virtual linkages of cities.
We discern two types of analysis applicable to the CS
approach: a content-based analysis (CBA) and a structure-based
analysis (SBA). The SBA is based on the CS structure seen as
the hierarchy of websites, connections via hyperlinks, and so
forth. The CBA examines intercity linkages using the information
available on the pages of the World Wide Web.
The most examined SBA, hyperlink analysis, is based on the
logical links that connect websites.10 Park and Thelwall (61)
promote this type of SBA in the belief that with the increasing
importance of the Web for an ever-broader spectrum of human
activities, the structure will reflect more and more the existing
relationships between people, cities, institutions, and so forth.
Gibson
Benedikt
Graham 1998
Dodge and Kitchen 20029This elusiveness has resulted in a
particular wording. Virtually all
cyberterms (even the notion
cyberspace) are described by
standard spatial and territorial
metaphors: e.g., web site, chat
room, mail box, portal site,
teleport, and so on (Adams, Smith
and Timberlake). Kellerman
pointed out that the geographical
language has become a major tool
for the structuring, organization,
and use of cyberspace.
Dodge
Mitchell
10There are in fact two approaches
to hyperlink analysis:
webometrics (e.g., counting
hyperlinks to websites, see for
example Smith and Thelwall,
Thelwall and Vaughan) and
hyperlink network analyses (e.g.,
social network analysis applied on
hyperlink networks; see, for
example, Rogers and Marres,
Krebs, Park and Thelwall). Here
we consider both analyses in
common.
Cyberplace and Cyberspace 15
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
b-on
: Bib
liote
ca d
o co
nhec
imen
to o
nlin
e IS
CT
E]
at 1
2:36
10
Mar
ch 2
015
A hyperlink analysis (i.e., an SBA) is an analytical method for
studying the networked (or connected) structures on the World
Wide Web. A hyperlink transmits the information or contents
of a web page at the touch of a button. It is a technological capa-
bility that enables one website to connect seamlessly with another
and, therefore, functionally brings the two sites closer together.
Putting a hyperlink on your website implies the possibility of a
jump from one location/actor to the other and indicates theimplicit presence of other locations/actors such as firms,people, or information in the immediate vicinity. The use of
hyperlinks in the creation of a web structure belongs to the
designer, who, therefore, controls the potential ways a user can
move through the Web.
Commercial firms are supposed to be cautious in placing
hyperlinks. Any link to an external site is an extra exit route
for visitors. A natural reaction may be to avoid hyperlinks, thus
creating an isolated self-contained structure. Thelwall shows,
however, that 72 out of 232 sites (or 31 percent) of commercial
firms were found to have hyperlinks based on affiliated business
relations. For service reasons, commercial sites offer links to
complementary sites. Their intent is to build a trust-based custo-
mer relationship. Thus, while website creators have complete
freedom, hyperlink structures are designed, sustained, or modi-
fied to reflect relationship choices. Park and Thelwall note that
from these communicative choices and agenda, we can discern
the fingerprints of social relationships between the system com-
ponents (i.e., people, private companies, public organizations,
cities, nation-states, and so on). An example of a hyperlink analy-
sis is given by Heimeriks and Van den Besselaar. They analyze
hyperlink networks on the scientific web in order to study the
development of research fields and the relationship between
research organizations and the relevant institutions in their
environments. Before the digital age, joint papers in journals
and academic contacts at conferences were important measure-
ment tools. Nowadays, the Web gives us additional academic
network information.
Hyperlinks between websites represent not only direct
relationships in the offline world but also other and desired
relationships. Hyperlink analyses can be drawn up for several
layers. The underlying belief for the CS approach is that collabor-
ation and information exchanges between cities are reflected in the
hyperlink networks and/or in the number of hyperlinks to urbancomponents. Whatever the importance of hyperlinks for cities or
Pirolli and Card
Jackson
Siegel
Grossman
Matheison
16 Journal of Urban Technology/August 2008
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
b-on
: Bib
liote
ca d
o co
nhec
imen
to o
nlin
e IS
CT
E]
at 1
2:36
10
Mar
ch 2
015
urban components, we should nevertheless consider that there are
some types of areas of the web for which links are important and
others where they are not, both accounting for a significant pro-
portion of the web.11
To implement the cyberspace approach in this paper, we have
opted to base the empirical analysis on web information, i.e., a
content-based analysis.12 The World Wide Web (WWW) is the
most up-to-date and most global information source. The relation-
ships between cities must be traceable in this large database. To
trace these relationships, we make use of web search engines
that draw on robots or spiders to index the huge amount of infor-
mation. Spiders are computer systems that continuously download
web pages and go through the published information. Depending
on the search engine, all or a part of the published information,
such as key words, links, and so on, is saved in a large database.
The spiders continuously pursue the search drawing on the
saved links. The final search result matching the query (i.e.,
number of presented pages and rank order) depends on the index
decisions. More than 150 criteria exist to determine the relevancy
of pages. PageRank and link popularity are the most important
techniques applied by Google. PageRank is a technique that,
according to the web search engine Google.com, relies on the
uniquely democratic nature of the web by using its vast link
structure as an indicator of an individual pages value. In
essence, Google interprets a hyperlink on a webpage as a vote,
by this page, for the linked page. When the page that casts the
vote is itself important, it weighs more heavily. Using these
and other factors, Google provides its views on a pages relative
importance. So far, we may conclude that the most trafficked
parts of the Web are indexed by search engines. Querying
the number of joint appearances of two city names will give
us the relative proportions of actual intercity linkages according
to the web search engine. For this empirical analysis (results are
described in the second part of the next section), we base our
search on the currently most popular search engine, Google.13
Taken together, of the two possible methods, CP and CS,
that can be applied to analyze the virtual intercity linkages,
one might say that the CP approach analyzes the virtual intercity
linkages via the real world, whereas the CS approach observes
linkages in a parallel world. Although both approaches may
seen similar at first sight, they start from completely different
observations of virtual urban linkages and must, therefore, be
analyzed separately.
Thelwall11According to Park and Thelwall,
little is known about the validity or
correct interpretation of hyperlink
analyses results except from
academic domains; i.e.,
bibliometrics (Tang and
Thelwall).12The above-mentioned structure-
based analysis (SBA) is not
worked out in this paper. An
empirical analysis based on the
SBA-method calls for an extensive,
paper-length discussion, and
hence falls outside the scope of the
present paper.
Brin and Page
Mostafa
Austin
Seopage.nl
Marketshare.hitslink.com13We used
www.googlebattle.com/
godin.php, which enabled us to
query several city pairs at a time.
Cyberplace and Cyberspace 17
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
b-on
: Bib
liote
ca d
o co
nhec
imen
to o
nlin
e IS
CT
E]
at 1
2:36
10
Mar
ch 2
015
Empirical Analyses
The Cyberplace (CP) ApproachFigure 3a shows the upward trend in peak aggregated IXP traffic
(in Gigabits per second, Gbps) per European city (based on the
Euro-IX report). We compare this graph with Figure 3b, which
presents the estimated bandwidth (in Gbps) per city.14 The
digital bandwidth capacity data used in Figure 3b is based on
the European Terrestrial Networks map.15
FIGURE 3aThe Peak Aggregated IXP Traffic (in Gigabits per second)
per European CityFIGURE 3b
The Estimated Bandwidth (in Gigabits per second)per European City
14Information on the amount of
digital traffic through these
infrastructures is generally
unavailable (Kellerman).
Telegeography.com15The European Terrestrial
Networks map illustrates the total
lit bandwidth traversing through
145 European cities (above 0.5
Gbps). The 145 cities exist as the
top 60 European cities, as ranked
by access to lit bandwidth, and 85
other important localities (major
city, capital city, etc.).
(Telegeography.com)
18 Journal of Urban Technology/August 2008
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
b-on
: Bib
liote
ca d
o co
nhec
imen
to o
nlin
e IS
CT
E]
at 1
2:36
10
Mar
ch 2
015
Comparing both graphs gives an idea about the importance of
European cities in the digital city network.16 One major feature is
the divergent trend of the graphs. Whereas the bandwidth
increases gradually per city, the exchange of Internet traffic is
far more skewed towards a limited number of metropolitan
areas, i.e., Amsterdam, London, Frankfurt, Madrid, and Stock-
holm. These cities are responsible for 72.26 percent of the Euro-
pean Internet exchange traffic. Amsterdam is the overall number
one with 28.41 percent of total European IXP traffic. These
cities function as key points in the digital intercity network.
They significantly expand the reach of the virtual network.
A large amount of exchange traffic in a city points to its
important switching function between regional, national, and
global information communication networks. One would therefore
expect a large amount of IXP traffic to correspond to abundant
bandwidth availability.17 An important switching point has to
transfer its traffic to other places such as Frankfurt, London, or
Amsterdam. A city such as Budapest exchanges much traffic but
is less important in terms of bandwidth availability. This probably
results from a high regional exchange of traffic and a lesser global
traffic requirement.18 The IX point located in Budapest boosts the
surrounding region in terms of Internet traffic possibilities. To con-
sider this phenomenon in more detail, we look at Figure 4. This
FIGURE 4The Relationships of Cities in Terms of Equal Service
Providers
16We have to bear in mind that we
compare capacity with real traffic
where the former represents long
haul links and the latter local/
national/international exchange
traffic.
17We expect that a large amount of
bandwidth availability is related
to a high amount of exchange
traffic. The long haul links are
market-based decisions and
probably correspond the need to
exchange a high amount of traffic
(and vice versa).
18As mentioned above, the IX point
exchanges also traffic on the city/
country level and prevent the use
of expensive long haul links to
other cities to switch from local
ISP
Cyberplace and Cyberspace 19
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
b-on
: Bib
liote
ca d
o co
nhec
imen
to o
nlin
e IS
CT
E]
at 1
2:36
10
Mar
ch 2
015
presents the relationships that cities have in terms of equal service
providers.19 The relationship between cities is seen as the number
of ISPs that peer in both cities. This means that service providers
are active in both the cities shown and are consequently more
global in reach. The volume of the nodes is based on the
number of ISPs peered at the IXP.20 The most important exchange
cities also control the most jointly peered ISPs. The big three of
Amsterdam, London, and Frankfurt, with London first, hold
almost all the ISPs that peer in the European Internetwork.
These exchange cities function as global switching points. Cities
such as Lyon, Florence, Budapest, and Ljubljana on the other
hand are more regional exchange points. A small number of
global ISPs link these IXPs with a more global exchange point
such as LyonParis, LjubljanaVienna, and FlorenceMilan.
The difference between more global exchange points such as
Amsterdam, Paris, Zurich, and Stockholm and the regional IXPs
such as Ljubljana, Lisbon, and Florence can be observed by the
number of shared ISPs as compared with their individual ISPs.
The global exchange point of Amsterdam has 80 percent of
its ISPs peering at other ISPs (Stockholm, 83 percent; Zurich, 82
percent; Paris, 90 percent), whereas there are fewer ISPs peering
at other IXPs for Ljubljana (17 percent), Lisbon (16 percent), and
Florence (50 percent). Budapest, as mentioned above, is a more
regional exchange point. Eighty-four percent of the ISPs in Buda-
pest peer only at that city. This difference can also be observed
from the position of the IXPs in Figure 4. Two cities situated
on the edge of this figure are more regional exchange points
linked with one or two more global exchange cities. There are,
furthermore, internal differences between the regional IXPs.
Warsaw and Athens are, for example, less linked to the global
ISP network than Florence or Ljubljana. The three shared ISPs
for Athens are the global service networks of AT&T Global
Network Services, Viatel Global Communications B.V., and
Verizon Business, whereas the shared ISPs for Florence and
Ljubljana are more regional ISPs such as FlorenceMilan with
Telecom Italy. It is interesting to note that Brussels has less
IXP traffic but profits from its geographical position between
the global exchange points of London, Paris, Frankfurt, and
Amsterdam. Brussels is situated at the crossroads of European
and global service providers AT&T, Deutsche Telekom (T-
Online), France Telecom/Opentransit, United Global Com, andKPN Nederland. Building an IXP in such a city boosts its
virtual network reach.
19This figure is based on the peer-
matrix of the Euro-IX report. Only
the relationships of three or more
equal-peered ISPs are drawn.
20Figure 4 is constructed using the
lay-out technique spring-
embedding (UCINET (Borgatti
et al.)).This technique is based on
the concept of a system in which N
cities are connected. According to
the volume and the number of
flows of a city, the intercity links
have different strengths. From the
initial arrangement of the city
locations, the system oscillates
until it stabilizes at a minimum-
energy arrangement resulting in a
dynamically balanced system.
(Castillo and Sim)
20 Journal of Urban Technology/August 2008
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
b-on
: Bib
liote
ca d
o co
nhec
imen
to o
nlin
e IS
CT
E]
at 1
2:36
10
Mar
ch 2
015
The geographical position of Brussels results also in a high
amount of bandwidth availability. (See Figure 3b.) The more
regional exchange cities such as Budapest have low intercity band-
width linkages. A further comparison between bandwidth capacity
and exchange power can be observed in Figure 5. In this figure, we
compare the logarithm of exchange traffic per city with the esti-
mated digital bandwidth capacity.21 Four groups of cities can be
discerned.22 The first group, with the most bandwidth and IXPs,
are Amsterdam, Frankfurt, London, Brussels, Dusseldorf, and
Paris. These centers receive a large amount of traffic from their
feeding cities and transfer it to the global network (and vice
versa). A second group, ranked slightly below, consists of
Zurich, Munich, Madrid, Stockholm, Vienna, and Nurenberg. A
third groupPrague, Malmo, Oslo, Torino, Bratislava, Dublin,
Manchester, Barcelona, and Bilbaois important in terms of
bandwidth but less important in terms of exchange traffic. A
fourth groupBudapest, Helsinki, Gothenburg, Warsaw, Rome,
Tallinn, Lisbon and Bucharestis more important in terms of
IXP traffic than the available bandwidth capacity. These cities
are regional IXP cities.
Increasing the number of clusters to 10 puts the relative
importance of IXP traffic versus bandwidth availability into the
picture. The first group is, for example, split up in three groups:
FIGURE 5The (Logarithm of) Exchange Traffic in Comparison with the
Estimated Digital Bandwidth Capacity per European City
21Note that there is a time
difference between the two
different CP datasets.
Telegeographys data are from
2002 while the IXPs data refer to
2006. However, since there is a
serious lack of data in the
cyberplace literature, we argue
that using (and comparing) these
data sources outweighs the deficits
due to the time difference.22The clusters are based on the
hierarchical Ward and K-means
method.
Cyberplace and Cyberspace 21
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
b-on
: Bib
liote
ca d
o co
nhec
imen
to o
nlin
e IS
CT
E]
at 1
2:36
10
Mar
ch 2
015
(1) Paris and London, which are the leaders in terms of exchange
traffic and digital bandwidth availability; (2) Amsterdam and
Frankfurt, which are foremost in terms of exchange traffic but
less important in terms of bandwidth; and (3) Brussels and Dussel-
dorf, which are important in terms of bandwidth but less important
in terms of exchange traffic. The other groups can be split up simi-
larly.23
The empirical analyses indicate the importance of increasing
the number of structural elements for a CP approach. Combining
IXP data with information about the bandwidth capacity tells us
a lot more than just the cable network information: it gives a
more general picture of the network of intercity flows.
The Cyberspace (CS) ApproachThe content-based analysis was set up in January 2008. We
assembled the city-pair relationships between 40 European
cities.24 For example, searching for (Google) web pages that
jointly mention Amsterdam and Kiev resulted in 596,000
different web pages with data on, for example, the transport,
business, history, and governmental relationships between both
cities. Figure 6 presents the most important of these relationships,
with more than 1 million results in the 40 40 intercity matrix.25
FIGURE 6The Digital Intercity Linkages According to Google.com
(January 9, 2008)
23The variation in IXP-traffic
decreases at the tail of the
distribution (see Figure 3a). This
makes it difficult to make solid
conclusions for cities such as
Tallinn, Lisbon, and Bucharest.
The expansion of IXPs in the
future will probably lead to more
transparency.
24The 40 cities rely on the world
city list of the Globalization and
World Cities (GaWC) Study
Group and Network.
25Figure 6 is constructed using the
lay-out technique spring-
embedding. (Borgatti et al.)
22 Journal of Urban Technology/August 2008
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
b-on
: Bib
liote
ca d
o co
nhec
imen
to o
nlin
e IS
CT
E]
at 1
2:36
10
Mar
ch 2
015
The search was made without any preferences or specific
language choice in Google (http://www.google.com/advanced_search). City names are spelled in English, which is an underesti-
mation of regional city linkages. English is, however, not only the
dominant language on the World Wide Web in and by itself, but
especially for linking. Most web pages have next to their national
language page an international page in English.
The size of the nodes varies according to the total number of
results. Paris, London, and Berlin are the most important cities on
the Web. They have a high number of joint appearances on the
Web and maintain thereupon their important relationships with
almost all European cities. London represents the most dominant
place on the Web. We can also observe some prominent national
connections between cities; for example, HamburgBerlin,
BirminghamManchester, MadridBarcelona. Furthermore, it is
interesting to note the linkages of cities such as Bucharest, Dussel-
dorf, and Bratislava. These places are highly linked with second-
ary centers such as Copenhagen, Dublin, and Lyon. A strong
link between these cities and London does not exist. They are
located outside the strong central network of London, Paris, and
Berlin and can be seen to be less digitally accessible.
In order to compare the differences between two time
periods/search engines, we did two other Google search queriesin April and November 2007, and a Google and AltaVista
search query in November 2007. The continuous update of
search engine databases results in a higher number of related docu-
ments for all city linkages queried in November 2007 with 8.4
percent more linkages found. There existed also a minimal rank
difference with correlation between both searches being 86
percent. To compare the difference between web search engines,
we performed the same analysis based on the AltaVista web
search engine. Here, we also observed a minimal difference.
The CS analysis is the first investigation using the content-
based analysis method. Using a so-called meta-search engine
such as MetaCrawler, MetaFind, or SurfWax or a topic-based
search engine such as, for example, business.com, news.google.
com, or newslink.org, it may be possible to map more detailed
digital intercity linkages. A meta-search engine transmits the
search query simultaneously to several individual search engines
such as Google, AltaVista, or Yahoo and their databases of
web pages. Within a few seconds, the results from all the
search engines queried are presented. A CBA based on this kind
of search engine may, therefore, give more general results.
Internetworldstatistics.com
Cyberplace and Cyberspace 23
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
b-on
: Bib
liote
ca d
o co
nhec
imen
to o
nlin
e IS
CT
E]
at 1
2:36
10
Mar
ch 2
015
Topic-based search engines, in contrast to the meta-search engines,
may give us more accurate and relevant information.26
Discussion and Main Conclusions
This article has provided an overview of the dominant approaches
for understanding intercity links through digital flows. Most ana-
lyses to date on digital intercity relationships are based on what
we have dubbed the CP or cyberplace approach. The World
Wide Web that we have called the CS or cyberspace approach,
however, equally transcribes digital relationships. With the
growing importance of the Web for an ever-broadening spectrum
of human activity, the World Wide Web increasingly contains
digital linkages between people, cities, institutions, and other
entities. Examination of the CP and the CS approaches together
points out the dissimilarity between these methods. Although
both approaches deal with digital intercity relationships, the CP
and CS worlds or layers are derived from completely indepen-
dent observations and must, therefore, be discussed separately.
The CP approach is based on physical layer observations of
cables, servers, interconnection points, and related apparatus.
Although this approach is discussed in the literature at great
length, a comprehensive analysis of the physical digital intercity
flows is indispensable. The analysis presented here points out
the lack of investigation into structural CP elements. The flows
of bits are structured by different corporations and follow routes
other than the direct, predictable connections between end users.
In order to comprehend the cyberplace, it is important to study
the entire Internet architecture. Airline hubs or gateways influence
the way airline companies build up their networks, yet digital
flows are structured by gateways or interconnection points. For
instance, maps showing the network of undersea cables tell us
something about the speed at which digital information is trans-
mitted overseas. Being located at an appropriate place in this
network means that you have the ability to download and upload
information rapidly and to maintain strong digital communications
across oceans. The existence of exchange points forces the import-
ance of these linkages. Digital gateway cities are able to transfer
regional traffic to other interconnection points overseas and to dis-
tribute global traffic in their own region.
A comparison of digital bandwidth capacity with IXP traffic
has led so far to a more refined picture of intercity linkages. We
observed that in the European context, Amsterdam, Frankfurt,
26Additional difficulties of meta-
search engines are the use of
complex search terms based on
Boolean logic (U.C. Berkeley
library) and the information
required (i.e., number of related
documents). These are challenges
for further research.
Park and Thelwall
24 Journal of Urban Technology/August 2008
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
b-on
: Bib
liote
ca d
o co
nhec
imen
to o
nlin
e IS
CT
E]
at 1
2:36
10
Mar
ch 2
015
London, Brussels, Dusseldorf, and Paris share the highest digital
bandwidth capacity. The digital weight of cities such as Paris,
Brussels, Zurich, Munich, and Dusseldorf is, however, overesti-
mated when only bandwidth capacity is observed. Amsterdam,
London, and Frankfurt are far more important in their gateway
functions than Paris, Brussels, and Dusseldorf. A combination of
both CP data sources shows at a glance that Amsterdam,
London, and Frankfurt are the top digital cities in Europe. It is
likely that this hierarchy in digital importance will continue to
shift, categorically and geographically, in the future. Continued
infrastructure investment in cities such as Budapest will increase
the digital possibilities of those regions and create significant
regional gateways. Global gateways such as Amsterdam, Frank-
furt, and London will increasingly serve at the global level.
It is important to note that CP analyses rely on recent data.
The market for interconnection is changing rapidly. In less than
five years, the number of European interconnection points has
more than doubled. The Euro-IX (23) report is the first account
available online concerning European IXPs, and more research
about these data is required. The Internet infrastructure is con-
stantly growing, and although the boom in cable infrastructure is
already past, some regions are just beginning to develop cable
networks based on modern technology. Examination of the
entire Internet architecture will broaden our knowledge of digital
intercity linkages.
The CS approach provides insights into intangible digital
flows, which must be observed in the cyberlayer. Measurement
of hyperlinks, e-mail contacts, or search results gives a notion
of the existing relationships via the digital web. The CS exercise
herein is a first investigation of a content-based analysis on
intercity linkages. The measured relationships engage airline
connections, governmental agreements, family ties, firm
locations, and so on, in several different formats, for example
PDF, TXT, and URL. It is one of the most up-to-date existing
data queries. Although the World Wide Web is constantly chan-
ging, search engines provide daily updates. At the end of
January 2005, the indexed web contained more than 11.5
billion pages.27 Querying this huge amount of information by
web search engines is the most general search on digital
linkages that can be made. It provides information that is not
accessible by a traditional metrical approach.
The content-based analysis (CBA) here shows that Paris,
London, and Berlin collectively have the most important digital
27Indexed means the part of the
Web that is searchable through
search engines. Estimating the
size of the whole Web is quite
difficult, because of its dynamic
nature. Three sources for tracking
the growth of the Internet are
Search Engine Showdown,
Search Engine Watch, and
World Wide Web size.
Gulli and Signorini
Cyberplace and Cyberspace 25
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
b-on
: Bib
liote
ca d
o co
nhec
imen
to o
nlin
e IS
CT
E]
at 1
2:36
10
Mar
ch 2
015
linkages on the Web. The dominance of North-west Europe on the
Web is obvious. Amsterdam, Rome, and Frankfurt are secondary
cities. Looking at the intercity relationships, we observe a number
of strong regional linkages such as LyonParis, Rotterdam
Amsterdam, and MadridBarcelona. However, we have to bear
in mind that the CBA presented also has some shortcomings:
First, in addition to the surface World Wide Web there is also
an immeasurable private web accessible only to banks, firms, and
confidential organizations and a deep web, publicly accessible but
not reachable by search engines.28 Search engines index only a
proportion of current web pages.
Second, the applied search engine in a CBA has a great influ-
ence on the results. Using meta-search engines or topic-based
search engines, for instance, would give more detailed information.
Third, we have to be aware that the CBA herein actually
measures non-digital relationships saved in digital format. Under-
taking a structure-based analysis is a next step in this context.
Hyperlinks represent desired, existing, or obligatory relationships
between website owners that are institutions, organizations, or
firms. The SBA has already been widely examined in bibliometric
studies. The investigation of structural intercity relationships on
the Web is an avenue for further research.
This paper shows that two approaches can be used to measure
digital intercity linkages. Both methods analyze different relation-
ships digitally. The broader exploration of both empirical analyses
will probably cause us to arrive at more refined methods for the
study of digital intercity linkages. In our future research, we
intend to explore new techniques of applying the CS approach,
and we will gather other CP components for this approach.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the editor and the anonymous referees for
their useful comments on an earlier version of this paper. The
usual disclaimers apply. This research work is funded by the
Research FoundationFlanders.
28Private networks account for
around 14 percent of Internet
traffic (McClelland). Besides the
inaccessible private networks,
there are also web pages that are
publicly accessible but not
reachable by search engines (i.e.,
the deep or invisible web). This
part of the web consists of web
pages with no hypertext links to
their content, pages you need to be
registered for and logged-on to
access, documents with a content
that is dynamically generated
(based on constantly changing
databases) and other pages
difficult to index by search
engines.
26 Journal of Urban Technology/August 2008
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
b-on
: Bib
liote
ca d
o co
nhec
imen
to o
nlin
e IS
CT
E]
at 1
2:36
10
Mar
ch 2
015
Bibliography
P. Adams, Cyberspace and Virtual Places, Geographical Review 87 (1997) 155171.
Akamai Technologies. Akamais Technologies: Visualizing the Internet, 2008 Accessed January 21, 2008.
A. Alderson and J. Beckfield, Power and Position in the World City System,American Journal of Sociology 109 (2004) 811851. Quotation from page 814.
D. Austin, How Google Finds Your Needle in the Webs Haystack: As Well See,the Trick Is to Ask the Web Itself to Rank the Importance of Pages. . . 2006 Access April 25, 2007.
J. Beaverstock, R. Smith, P. Taylor, D. Walker, and H. Lorimer, Globalization andWorld Cities: Some Measurement Methodologies, Applied Geography 20 (2000)4363.
M. Benedikt, Introduction, in M. Benedikt, ed., Cyberspace: First Steps (Cam-bridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991). Quotation from page 15.
S. Borgatti, M. Everett, and L. Freeman, Ucinet 6 for Windows: Software for SocialNetwork Analysis (Harvard: Analytic Technologies, 2002).
S. Brin and L. Page, The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web SearchEngine, paper presented at the Seventh International World Wide Web Conference(Brisbane, Australia, 1998).
M. Castells, The Rise of the Network Society (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996). Quotationfrom page 469.
M. Castells, Internet Galaxy (Oxford: Blackwell, 2001).
I. Castillo and T. Sim, A Spring-Embedding Approach for the Facility LayoutProblem, Journal of the Operational Research Society 55 (2003) 7381.
L. Chapin and C. Owens, Interconnection and Peering among Internet ServiceProviders: A Historical Perspective (2005) ,ww.interisle.net. AccessedApril 23, 2007.
J. Choi, B. Chon, G. Barnett, and Y. Choi, World Cities and Internet BackboneNetworks: A Network Approach, paper presented at the Digital Cities Conference(Chicago, 2001).
J. Choi, G. Barnett, and G. Chon, Comparing World City Networks: A NetworkAnalysis of Internet Backbone and Air Transport Intercity Linkages, GlobalNetworks 6 (2006) 8199.
B. Derudder, On Conceptual Confusion in Empirical Analyses of a TransnationalUrban Network, Urban Studies 43 (2006) 20272046.
Cyberplace and Cyberspace 27
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
b-on
: Bib
liote
ca d
o co
nhec
imen
to o
nlin
e IS
CT
E]
at 1
2:36
10
Mar
ch 2
015
B. Derudder and F. Witlox, An Appraisal of the Use of Airline Data in Assessmentsof the World City Network, Urban Studies 42 (2005) 23712388.
B. Derudder, P. Taylor, F. Witlox, and G. Catalano, Hierarchical Tendencies andRegional Patterns in the World City Network: A Global Urban Analysis of 234Cities, Regional Studies 37 (2003) 875886.
B. Derudder, L. Devriendt, and F. Witlox, Flying Where You Dont Want to Go: AnEmpirical Analysis of Hubs in the Global Airline Network, Tijdschrift voor Econ-omische en Sociale Geografie 98 (2007) 307324.
M. Dodge, Accessibility to Information Within the Internet: How Can It BeMeasured and Mapped? paper prepared for the Varenius Meeting (1998) Accessed November 27, 2007
M. Dodge and R. Kitchin, Atlas of Cyberspace (London: Pearson Education, 2001).
M. Dodge and R. Kitchen, New Cartographies to Chart Cyberspace, Geoinfor-matics April/May 2002 (2002) 14. Quotation from page 1.
P. Drewe, The Internet Infrastructure as a Location Factor for the Internet Industry,paper presented at TIC et Reorganisation Spatiale des Activites Economiques (ENS-Bretagne, Brest 2002).
European Internet Exchange Association (Euro-IX), Euro-IX Report (2006) Accessed December 11, 2007.
J. Friedmann, The World City Hypothesis, Development and Change 17 (1986)6383.
J. Friedmann and G. Wolff, World City Formation: An Agenda for Research andAction, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 3 (1982) 309344.
W. Gibson, Neuromancer (London: Harper and Collins, 1984). Quotation frompage 69.
Google, Web Search Engine Google (2007) AccessedNovember 27, 2007.
S. Gorman and E. Malecki, The Networks of the Internet: An Analysis of ProviderNetworks in the USA, Telecommunications Policy 24 (2000) 113134.
S. Gorman and E. Malecki, Fixed and Fluid: Stability and Change in the Geographyof the Internet, Telecommunications Policy 26 (2002) 389413.
S. Graham, The End of Geography or the Explosion of Place? ConceptualizingSpace, Place, and Information Technology, Progress in Human Geography 22(1998) 165185. Quotation from page 165.
S. Graham, ed., The Cybercities Reader (London: Routledge, 2004).
28 Journal of Urban Technology/August 2008
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
b-on
: Bib
liote
ca d
o co
nhec
imen
to o
nlin
e IS
CT
E]
at 1
2:36
10
Mar
ch 2
015
S. Graham and S. Marvin, Splintering Urbanism (London and New York: Routledge,2001).
W. Grossman, Get Linked, Information Age 1 (1997) 2122.
T. Grubesic and M. OKelly, Using Points of Presence to Measure Accessibility tothe Commercial Internet, Professional Geographer 54 (2002) 259278.
A. Gulli and A. Signorini, The Indexable Web is More than 11.5 Billion Pages,WWW 2005 (2005). Accessed January 15, 2008.
D. Hackler, Invisible Infrastructure and the City: The Role of Telecommunicationsin Economic Development, American Behavioral Scientist 46 (2003) 10341055.
R. Hanley, Moving People, Goods and Information in the 21st Century: The Cutting-Edge Infrastructures of Networked Cities (London-New York: Routledge, 2004).
G. Heimeriks and P. Van den Besselaar, Analyzing Hyperlinks Networks: TheMeaning of Hyperlink Based Indicators of Knowledge Production, InternationalJournal of Scientometrics, Informetrics, and Bibliometrics 10 (2006) 117.
K. Hillis, On the Margins: The Invisibility of Communications in Geography,Progress in Human Geography 22 (1998) 543566. Quotation from page 545.
Internet World Statistics (2007) Accessed January11, 2008.
M. Jackson, Assessing the Structure of Communication on the World Wide Web,Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 3 (1997) Accessed February 11, 2008.
A. Kellerman, The Internet on Earth: A Geography of Information (West Sussex,England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2002). Quotation from page 31.
M. Kende, The Digital Handshake: Connecting Internet Backbones, FCC Office ofPlans and Policy Working Paper 32 (2000).
V. Krebs, Working in the Connected World Book Network, International Associ-ation for Human Resource Information Management Journal 4 (2000) 8790.
P. Knox, Globalization and World City Formation, in S. Gravesteijn, ed., TimingGlobal Cities (Netherlands Geographical Studies, 1998).
C. Leadbetter, Living on Thin Air: The New Economy (London: Sphere, 2000).
E. Malecki, The Associational Economy: Firms, Regions, and Innovation, Growthand Change 30 (1999) 308310.
Cyberplace and Cyberspace 29
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
b-on
: Bib
liote
ca d
o co
nhec
imen
to o
nlin
e IS
CT
E]
at 1
2:36
10
Mar
ch 2
015
E. Malecki, The Economic Geography of the Internets Infrastructure, EconomicGeography 78 (2002) 399424.
E. Malecki and C. Boush, Telecommunciations Infrastructure in the SoutheasternUnited States: Urban and Rural Variation, Growth and Change 34 (2003) 109129.
E. Malecki and S. Gorman, Maybe the Death of Distance, but not the End ofGeography: The Internet as a Network, in T. Leinbach and S. Brunn, eds.,Worlds of E-Commerce: Economic, Geographical, and Social Dimensions(Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2001).
E. Malecki and A. McIntee, Making the Connections: Interconnecting the Networksof the Internet, paper presented at the Digital Cities Conference (Chicago, 2001).
Marketshare Hitslink (2007) Accessed January11, 2008.
K. Matheison, Building Effective Marketing Web Sites, EDI Forum: The Journalof Electronic Commerce 11 (1998) 1421.
S. McClelland, PTC 08: International Backbone Traffic Growth NighUnstoppable, Telecommunications Online (2008) Accessed July 15, 2008.
Meta-Search Engines, U.C. Berkeley Library (1999) Accessed April 19, 2007.
W. Mitchell, City of Bits: Space, Place, and the Infobahn (Cambridge, MA: MITPress, 1995).
P. Mokhtarian, I. Salomon, and S. Handy, The Impacts of ICT on Leisure Activitiesand Travel: A Conceptual Exploration, Transportation 33 (2006) 263289.
M. Moss, Technology and Cities, Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development andResearch 3 (1998) 107127.
M. Moss and A. Townsend, The Internet Backbone and the American Metropolis,Information Society 16 (2000) 3547.
J. Mostafa, Seeking Better Web Searches, Scientific American Magazine (February2005) 6674.
W. Norton, A Business Case for Peering in 2004, paper presented at the GigabitPeering Forum IX (New York City, 2004).
H. Park and M. Thelwall, Hyperlink Analysis of the World Wide Web: A Review,Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 8 (2003) Accessed February 20, 2008.
30 Journal of Urban Technology/August 2008
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
b-on
: Bib
liote
ca d
o co
nhec
imen
to o
nlin
e IS
CT
E]
at 1
2:36
10
Mar
ch 2
015
P. Pirolli and S. Card, Information Foraging, Psychological Review 106 (1999)643675.
P. Rimmer, Transport and Telecommunications among World Cities, in F.-C. Loand Y.-M. Yeung, eds., Globalization and the World of Large Cities (Tokyo:United Nations University Press, 1998).
R. Rogers and N. Marres, Landscaping Climate Change: A Mapping Technique forUnderstanding Science and Technology Debates on the World Wide Web, PublicUnderstanding of Science 9 (2000) 141163.
C. Rozenblat and D. Pumain, Firm Linkages, Innovation and the Evolution of UrbanSystems, in P.J. Taylor, B. Derudder, P. Saey and F. Witlox, eds., Cities in Globa-lization: Practices, Policies, and Theories (London-New York: Routledge, 2007).
J. Rutherford, Networks in Cities, Cities in Networks: Territory and GlobalisationIntertwined in Telecommunications Infrastructure Development in Europe, UrbanStudies 42 (2005) 23892406.
J. Rutherford, A. Gillespie, and R. Richardson, The Territoriality of Pan-EuropeanTelecommunications Backbone Networks, Journal of Urban Technology 11 (2004)134.
S. Sassen, The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo (Princeton, NJ: PrincetonUniversity Press, 1991).
S. Sassen, The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo, second edition (Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press, 2001).
S. Sassen, Towards a Sociology of Information Technology, Current Sociology 50(2002) 365388.
Search Engine Showdown (2007) AccessedJanuary 11, 2008.
Search Engine Watch (2007) Accessed January11, 2008.
Seo Pagerank Search (2007) Accessed January 11, 2008.
J. Short, Y. Kim, M. Kuss, and H. Wells, The Dirty Little Secret of World CityResearch, International Journal of Regional and Urban Research 20 (1996) 697717. Quotation from page 697.
D. Siegel, Creating Killer Web Sites (Indianapolis: Hayden Books, 1997).
A. Smith and M. Thelwall, Web Impact Factors for Australasian Universities,Scientometrics 54 (2002) 363380.
Cyberplace and Cyberspace 31
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
b-on
: Bib
liote
ca d
o co
nhec
imen
to o
nlin
e IS
CT
E]
at 1
2:36
10
Mar
ch 2
015
D. Smith and M. Timberlake, World City Networks and Hierarchies, 19771997:An Empirical Analysis of Global Air Travel Links, American Behavioral Scientist44 (2001) 16561678.
P. Sommers and D. Carlson, What the IT Revolution Means for Regional EconomicDevelopment (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metro-politan Policy 2003).
M. Stefik, Internet Dreams: Archetypes, Myths, and Metaphors (Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 1996).
R. Tang and M. Thelwall, U.S. Academic Departmental Web-Site Interlinking in theUnited States: Disciplinary Differences, Library & Information Science Research25 (2003) 437458.
P. Taylor, World City Network: A Global Urban Analysis (London: Routledge,2004).
P. Taylor, New Political Geographies: Global Civil Society and Global Governancethrough World City Networks, Political Geography 24 (2005) 703730.
Telegeography (2007) Accessed January 11, 2007.
M. Thelwall, Commercial Web Site Links, Internet Research-Electronic Network-ing Applications and Policy 11 (2001) 114124.
M. Thelwall and L. Vaughan, Scholarly Use of the Web: What Are the Key Inducersof Links to Journal Web Sites? Journal of the American Society for InformationScience and Technology 54 (2003) 2938.
A. Townsend, The Internet Backbone and the American Metropolis, AcademicSearch Elite 16 (2000) 113.
A. Townsend, Network Cities and the Global Structure of the Internet, AmericanBehavioral Scientist 44 (2001) 16971716. Quotation from page 1704.
S. Walcott and J. Wheeler, Atlanta in the Telecommunications Age: The Fiber-Optic Information Network, Urban Geography 22 (2001) 316339.
J. Weltevreden, Winkelen in het Internettijdperk (Shopping in the Internet Age)(Rotterdam: Nai Uitgevers & Ruimtelijk Planbureau, 2007).
D. Wheeler and M. OKelly, Network Topology and City Accessibility of theCommercial Internet, Professional Geographer 51 (1999) 327339.
World Wide Web Size (2007) Accessed January11, 2008.
32 Journal of Urban Technology/August 2008
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
b-on
: Bib
liote
ca d
o co
nhec
imen
to o
nlin
e IS
CT
E]
at 1
2:36
10
Mar
ch 2
015