29
This article was downloaded by: [b-on: Biblioteca do conhecimento online ISCTE] On: 10 March 2015, At: 12:36 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Journal of Urban Technology Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cjut20 Cyberplace and Cyberspace: Two Approaches to Analyzing Digital Intercity Linkages Lomme Devriendt , Ben Derudder & Frank Witlox Published online: 19 Jan 2009. To cite this article: Lomme Devriendt , Ben Derudder & Frank Witlox (2008) Cyberplace and Cyberspace: Two Approaches to Analyzing Digital Intercity Linkages, Journal of Urban Technology, 15:2, 5-32, DOI: 10.1080/10630730802401926 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10630730802401926 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content. This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms- and-conditions

Lomme Devriendt Et Al Cyberplace and Cyberspace - Two Approaches to Analyzing Digital Intercity Linkages

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Lomme Devriendt Et Al Cyberplace and Cyberspace - Two Approaches to Analyzing Digital Intercity Linkages

Citation preview

  • This article was downloaded by: [b-on: Biblioteca do conhecimento online ISCTE]On: 10 March 2015, At: 12:36Publisher: RoutledgeInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registeredoffice: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK

    Journal of Urban TechnologyPublication details, including instructions for authors andsubscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cjut20

    Cyberplace and Cyberspace: TwoApproaches to Analyzing DigitalIntercity LinkagesLomme Devriendt , Ben Derudder & Frank WitloxPublished online: 19 Jan 2009.

    To cite this article: Lomme Devriendt , Ben Derudder & Frank Witlox (2008) Cyberplace andCyberspace: Two Approaches to Analyzing Digital Intercity Linkages, Journal of Urban Technology,15:2, 5-32, DOI: 10.1080/10630730802401926

    To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10630730802401926

    PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

    Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (theContent) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis,our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as tothe accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinionsand views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors,and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Contentshould not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sourcesof information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims,proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoeveror howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to orarising out of the use of the Content.

    This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Anysubstantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing,systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms &Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions

    http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cjut20http://www.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1080/10630730802401926http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10630730802401926http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditionshttp://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions

  • Cyberplace and Cyberspace: TwoApproaches to Analyzing DigitalIntercity Linkages

    Lomme Devriendt, Ben Derudder, and Frank Witlox

    FROM the mid-1990s, there has been an enormous growthin the use and diversity of information and communi-cations technologies (ICT), such as global positioningsystems (GPS), virtual reality (VR), voice over Internet protocol

    (VoIP), short message service (SMS), and others. The use of

    webcam conversation, digital signature, real-time chat, e-mail,

    and several other digital communication applications are almost

    everyday practices and are indispensable in business transactions.

    Traditional activities such as shopping, banking, entertaining, and

    working are being progressively supplemented by numerous

    e-applications such as e-working, e-shopping, e-banking, and

    e-entertainment. Although the effect of this e-volution has to

    be put into perspective, most e-applications complement but do

    not substitute for traditional activities.

    A number of e-products also generate completely new fields

    of application. For instance, in order to secure or send information,

    we all put information into a digital format. Castells has pointed

    out that the world annual production of information in different

    forms amounts to 1.5 billion gigabytes of which, in 1999, 93

    percent was already produced in digital format. The availability

    of this huge volume of digital information enables us to communi-

    cate and derive information any time, any place.

    Mokhtarian et al.

    Weltevreden

    Castells 2001

    Journal of Urban Technology, Volume 15, Number 2, pages 532.

    Copyright # 2008 by The Society of Urban Technology.All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.

    ISSN: 1063-0732 paper/ISSN: 1466-1853 onlineDOI: 10.1080/10630730802401926

    Cyberplace and Cyberspace 5

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    by [

    b-on

    : Bib

    liote

    ca d

    o co

    nhec

    imen

    to o

    nlin

    e IS

    CT

    E]

    at 1

    2:36

    10

    Mar

    ch 2

    015

  • The increasing use of the Internet and its applications is also

    perceptible in the global interrelationships between cities. Trans-

    actions of information, communication, and the facility of other

    intercity linkages are altered by new ICT development. Cities

    have an important long-term role in the process of globalization

    as centers of information exchange. The new digital technology

    strengthens this important central coordination and control func-

    tion. The mix of central functions applied to societal networks

    and material and human resources, when combined with the

    ability to communicate or obtain information at high speed,

    makes cities into major players in the global economy.

    Many research workers studying the various ways in which

    cities and their linkages can be understood have based their

    approaches on digital intercity networks.1 The aim of this paper

    is to gain a comprehensive view of the various methods available

    for the analysis of virtual intercity linkages, that is, a linkage

    based on ICT and not an undefined relationship. We identify

    two methods, the cyberplace (CP) approach and the cyberspace

    (CS) approach.

    The CP concept investigates virtual intercity links as actual

    connections between physical points such as those within the

    network of Internet cables and their interconnections. This

    approach assumes that the physical infrastructure represents the

    digital relationship between places. Most research on digital inter-

    city linkages is based on this approach. On the other hand, the CS

    concept has to our knowledge not hitherto been employed in the

    urban network context (empirical analyses such as those of Hei-

    mericks and Van Besselaar draw on the cyberspace approach to

    study the international connections of scientific research). This

    approach observes intercity linkages starting from the invisible

    structure of the virtual world such as Internet hyperlinks, the struc-

    ture of search engines, and e-mail traffic. In the cyber world, one

    communicates in a new kind of space where rules other than those

    of geographical separation apply because of the anticipated con-

    trast between physical and virtual distance. In this, we consider

    both approaches in the context of our review.2

    This paper is organized as follows. The first section presents a

    general introduction to the literature on transnational urban net-

    works. We then present the analytical framework in which we

    deal with the CP and CS approaches. Thirdly, we discuss the ana-

    lyses based on both concepts and discuss the outcome. The empiri-

    cal analysis based on CP is an additional contribution to existing

    studies. The CS analysis, on the other hand, is new in urban

    Townsend 2001

    Sassen 2002

    1A good overview of the literature

    on cybercities is compiled by

    Graham (2004).

    Choi et al. 2006

    Gorman and Malecki 2002

    Moss and Townsend

    Rutherford et al.

    2The neglect of the cyberspace

    approach compared to the

    cyberplace approach for the

    empirical analyses of digital

    urban linkages could in all

    probability be attributed to the

    fairly intangible character of the

    CS medium in contrast to the

    physical CP. Hillis even attributes

    this invisibility as the key to

    grasping geographys relative

    disinterest in communications.

    Communication flows are less

    studied than other flows in

    geography (Hillis, Kellerman).

    The confidentiality cited by private

    telecoms contributes to this lack of

    data and information.

    6 Journal of Urban Technology/August 2008

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    by [

    b-on

    : Bib

    liote

    ca d

    o co

    nhec

    imen

    to o

    nlin

    e IS

    CT

    E]

    at 1

    2:36

    10

    Mar

    ch 2

    015

  • network research. In the concluding section, we summarize our

    main findings and propose avenues for further research.

    The Position of the Internetwork and Its Applicationswithin Research on Transnational Urban Networks

    The contemporary literature on transnational urban networks can

    be traced back to two interrelated papers. J. Friedmann was the

    sole author of one, and with G. Wolff, was the co-author of

    another. Both texts framed the rise of a global urban system in

    the context of a major geographical transformation of the capitalist

    world economy. This restructuring, most commonly referred to as

    the new international division of labor, was premised on the

    internationalization of production and the ensuing complexity in

    the organizational structures of multinational enterprises

    (MNEs). This increased economic-geographical complexity,

    Friedmann argues, requires a limited number of control points in

    order to function, and a select group of highly interconnected

    metropolitan areas were deemed to be such points. The publication

    of Saskia Sassens The Global City in 1991 marked a shift of atten-

    tion to transnational inter-city flows resulting from the critical ser-

    vicing of worldwide production rather than to its formal command

    through the corporate headquarters of MNEs. Sassens approach

    focuses upon the attraction of advanced producer service firms

    (providing professional, financial, and creative services for

    businesses) to major cities with their knowledge-rich environ-

    ments and specialist markets. In the 1980s and 1990s, many

    such service firms followed their global clients to become import-

    ant MNEs in their own right. These advanced producer service

    firms thereupon created worldwide office networks covering

    major cities in most or all world regions, and it is exactly the

    myriad of interconnections between service complexes that,

    according to Sassen, made way for the formation of transnational

    urban networks.

    Empirical research on transnational urban networks has long

    remained somewhat underdeveloped because of the lack of appro-

    priate data, a problem which Short et al. referred to as the dirty

    little secret of world cities research. This empirical poverty

    can, for instance, clearly be seen in Castells book, which is part

    of a trilogy that is above all an attempt to reformulate social

    studies for a global age in which networks constitute the new

    social morphology of our societies. However, when it comes to

    Sassen 1991

    Sassen 2001

    Castells 1996

    Cyberplace and Cyberspace 7

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    by [

    b-on

    : Bib

    liote

    ca d

    o co

    nhec

    imen

    to o

    nlin

    e IS

    CT

    E]

    at 1

    2:36

    10

    Mar

    ch 2

    015

  • providing a basic cartography of this global network society,

    Castells argument falls short of the conceptual shift he advances:

    the only actual evidence he comes up with in the chapter on the

    space of flows consists of some limited information on inter-

    city flows gathered from Federal Express. One can, therefore,

    only conclude, as Taylor has recently done, that the evidence

    [Castells] marshals is mightily unimpressive. This gap between

    theoretical sophistication and evidential poverty was, however,

    not a lacuna specific to Castells book: it has been a structural

    feature of research on transnational urban networks because data

    for assessing such urban networks are in general insufficient or

    even totally absent.

    The basic reason for this problem of evidence is that standard

    data sources are ill-suited for such analyses. To get an evidential

    handle on big issues, researchers normally rely on the statistics

    that are available, that is to say, already collected. But such collec-

    tion is carried out usually by a state agency for the particular needs

    of government policy rather than for social science research. The

    result is that such data that are available have an attributional bias

    (measurements of administrative areas rather than between admin-

    istrative areas) and are limited to national territories. Where offi-

    cial statistics extend beyond a states boundaries, they will still

    use countries as the basic units (e.g., trade data). Thus, there is

    no official agency collecting data on, say, the myriad flows

    between London and New York. The major result has been that

    few of the available data reveal anything about the flows and

    interdependencies that are at the heart of this body of literature.

    This leads Alderson and Beckfield to note that in the past, rela-

    tively few of the empirical global-city network (GCN) studies uti-

    lized the sorts of relational data necessary for firmly establishing

    such rankings empirically.

    These data problems have put researchers to work in recent

    years, and we have, therefore, witnessed a proliferation of empirical

    studies that explicitly seek to rectify this situation. Researchers have

    relied on a wide variety of data, but some information sources have

    come to dominate the empirical research, especially information on

    corporate organization (e.g., data on ownership links between firms

    across space) and information on infrastructure networks (e.g., data

    on the volume of air passenger flows across space). The success of

    both approaches can, of course, be traced to their commonsensical

    appeal: the corporate-organization approach acknowledges that

    well-connected cities derive their status in large part from the pre-

    sence of key offices of important firms, while the infrastructure

    Taylor 2004

    Taylor 2004

    Knox

    Derudder

    8 Journal of Urban Technology/August 2008

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    by [

    b-on

    : Bib

    liote

    ca d

    o co

    nhec

    imen

    to o

    nlin

    e IS

    CT

    E]

    at 1

    2:36

    10

    Mar

    ch 2

    015

  • approach recognizes that well-connected cities are typified by the

    presence of vast enabling infrastructures. Put simply: the most

    important cities harbor the most important airports, while the exten-

    sive fiber backbone networks that support the Internet have equally

    been deployed within and between major cities, hence creating a

    vast planetary infrastructure network upon which the global

    economy has come to depend almost as much as it depends on

    physical transport networks.

    Table 1 summarizes the approaches developed in the empiri-

    cal literature on transnational urban networks through an overview

    of some key studies in this research domain. The table acknowl-

    edges that the basic bifurcation between corporate organization

    and infrastructure needs to be deepened on the basis of the exact

    types of firms and infrastructures, and equally shows that all this

    is in practice somewhat more complicated because of the presence

    of a limited number of studies that make use of other types of data

    (e.g., Taylors analysis of non-governmental organizations) and/or that combine indicators from both approaches. In the next

    section, we focus on studies that use data on digital connections

    between cities for assessing transnational urban networks.

    The Cyberplace (CP) and Cyberspace (CS) Approaches

    The Cyberplace (CP) ApproachThe cyberplace approach (CP) is an amalgamation of the vital

    linkages and essential connections within the virtual network

    among the existing infrastructures of satellite, telephone, computer,

    TABLE 1A Taxonomy of Empirical Approaches in Empirical

    Global-City Network Research

    Indicators

    Corporate Organization InfrastructureOther and/or a

    combinationof indicators

    Global servicefirms

    Multinationalenterprises

    Tele-communications

    Airtransportation

    Examples Beaverstocket al. (2000)

    Alderson andBeckfield (2004)

    Malecki (2002) Smith andTimberlake (2001)

    Taylor (2005)

    Derudder et al.(2003)

    Rozenblat andPumain (2007)

    Rutherford et al.(2004)

    Derudder andWitlox (2005)

    Rimmer (1998)

    Source: Derudder 2006

    Rutherford et al.

    Taylor 2005

    Beaverstock et al.

    Cyberplace and Cyberspace 9

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    by [

    b-on

    : Bib

    liote

    ca d

    o co

    nhec

    imen

    to o

    nlin

    e IS

    CT

    E]

    at 1

    2:36

    10

    Mar

    ch 2

    015

  • facsimile, credit card, fiber-optic cable, and other information and

    telecommunications systems. In general, it can be defined as the

    Internets physical fabric. The CP approach makes use of the tan-

    gible infrastructure to analyze the virtual transnational linkage of

    cities.

    Contemporary economic globalization is constituted by

    intensive transnational networks of exchange and transaction.

    Cities contain the junctions in the exchange of communication

    and information. It is, therefore, in a citys interest to have a

    well-developed communications network. Several studies have

    explored the fundamental connection between telecommunica-

    tions growth and economic success. Sommers and Carlson, for

    example, document several examples of United States cities in

    which large companies demanded a developed telecommunica-

    tions infrastructure before they chose an urban area as a site for

    operations. The extent and quality of digital telecommunications

    infrastructure, through which the virtual exchange and trans-

    actions occur, is consequently an important measure of digital

    intercity relationships. The access to new technology is of prime

    importance in large cities where the largest markets are found

    and is of secondary importance in smaller places. Most empirical

    studies on digital intercity flows base their analyses on the CP

    approach. Gorman and Malecki examine the virtual network of

    major United States cities, observing, for example, the most exten-

    sive fiber-optic cable networks. Grubesic and OKelly explore the

    fiber-optic backbone points of presence (PoPs) and note that these

    are generally located in major cities such as Atlanta, Boston,

    Chicago, DallasFort Worth, Los Angeles, New York, Philadel-

    phia, San Francisco and Washington, D.C.3

    To implement the CP approach, the first step is to find appro-

    priate data concerning the physical infrastructure that guarantees

    the digital accessibility of a place. The majority of CP studies

    start from observation of the cable network that supports intercity

    digital information flow. CP studies are mostly based on maps and

    data that are available on the World Wide Web. Global telecom-

    munications companies such as the BT Group, AT&T, or

    Verizon give ample treatment to promoting their networks of

    cables and satellites in order to demonstrate to potential customers

    how extensive and capable these are4 Malecki and Boush even

    state that during the last 10 years, telecommunications firms

    have spent more money on advertising than on new technology.

    The Internet architecture is, however, far more complex. Cable

    networks are not the only elements of the infrastructure. The

    Gorman and Makecki 2002

    Hanley

    Graham and Marvin

    Hackler

    Moss

    Walcott and Wheeler

    Malecki 1999

    Choi et al. 2001

    Choi et al. 2006

    Gorman and Malecki 2000

    Grubesic and OKelly

    Malecki and Gorman

    Malecki and Boush

    Moss and Townsend

    Rutherford

    Rutherford et al.

    Townsend 2000

    Townsend 2001

    Wheeler and OKelly

    Gorman and Malecki 20023A Point of Presence (PoP) is an

    access point to the Internetwork.

    4These are also used by

    Internetwork engineers to

    monitor and control traffic flows

    and network performance. (Dodge

    and Kitchen 2002). Detailed

    network monitoring maps and

    tools are, however, generally not

    made public for reasons of

    security and commercial

    confidentiality.

    10 Journal of Urban Technology/August 2008

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    by [

    b-on

    : Bib

    liote

    ca d

    o co

    nhec

    imen

    to o

    nlin

    e IS

    CT

    E]

    at 1

    2:36

    10

    Mar

    ch 2

    015

  • goal of this analysis is to broaden the existing CP studies to show

    the importance of including the entire Internet infrastructure in

    such an analysis. Internet users experience this network of

    networks as a seamless, global, and ubiquitous communication

    medium directly connecting two points. However, behind the

    scenes lie many individual networks, owned and controlled by

    different corporate, institutional, and governmental entities, and

    joined to each other by various, less-known interconnection

    arrangements.

    Internet users need interconnection arrangements to commu-

    nicate with one another via computers both next door and on the

    other side of the globe. The Internet is a network of networks,

    owned and organized by different companies. Communication

    takes place in a manner similar to air travel, where, as a conse-

    quence of the airlines organization, intercity passenger flows

    are restricted to specific locations for their connections. Airline

    passengers fly from A to B passing through a hub switching

    point C. In the telecommunications industry, information trans-

    mission is also limited to specific locations that structure the

    network. Interconnection is needed because no single network

    operator could possibly provide Internet access in every part of

    the world. Different Internet service providers (ISPs) regulate

    the network around the block and around the world. In order to

    provide end users with universal connectivity, ISPs have to inter-

    connect with one another to exchange traffic destined for each

    others end users.

    The exchange of Internet traffic between networks is called

    peering. Peering is an interconnection of separate Internet net-

    works for exchanging traffic between the customers of each

    network.5 A bit flowing from point A on the network of Internet

    Service Provider (ISP) A to point B on the network of ISP B has

    to change its ISP at an interconnection point C. The physical

    points that allow various ISPs to peer are called Internet eXchange

    Points (IXPs). ISPs that want to use the IXP to connect to other

    ISPs run one or more links from their own routers to the exchange

    point and connect them to the IXP routers. An impact of intercon-

    nection arrangements (IXPs) can be seen in Figure 1 below.

    The early development of the Internet and the deregulation of

    the long-distance telecommunications market in North America

    resulted in interconnection arrangements between North American

    ISPs and other providers that were strongly biased in favor of the

    former ISPs. Even now, for example, it is common practice for

    Internet users in Spain to communicate with users in Sweden or

    Gorman and Malecki 2000

    Derudder et al. 2007

    5ARPAnet was, for instance, at the

    outset in 1969, not an Internet

    but a network of computers. At the

    time, the U.S. Defense Department

    contractors permitted the use of

    the ARPAnet by other U.S.

    Government agencies to develop

    similar networks, and they had to

    interconnect and thereby

    developed the real Internetwork.

    (Chapin and Owens)

    Kellerman

    Cyberplace and Cyberspace 11

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    by [

    b-on

    : Bib

    liote

    ca d

    o co

    nhec

    imen

    to o

    nlin

    e IS

    CT

    E]

    at 1

    2:36

    10

    Mar

    ch 2

    015

  • Finland over a path that is led through an IXP in the United States.

    (See Figure 1.) Although there exists a direct link, the time cost of

    connecting through an exchange point located on the other side of

    the world is significantly lower than the cost of a direct connection.

    These extreme examples are being slowly reduced by the growth

    of interconnection points spurred by the deregulation of the tele-

    communications industry.

    Figure 2 highlights the establishment of new IXPs (i.e., inter-

    connection points) per year in comparison with the total number of

    existing European IXPs.

    Although the interest for urban scholars is not the physical

    pathway but the endpoints of the connectivity package being

    delivered, the examples above stress the importance of consider-

    ing the entire Internet architecture. A number of cities have, in a

    manner similar to the hubs in the airline network, major advantages

    in terms of digital accessibility through their function as intercon-

    nection points. Direct interconnection through these points avoids

    data travel to other cities, and potentially to other continents, to get

    from one network to another, thus reducing latency. They present

    the ability to switch from a regional to a continental or global

    network without first travelling on different regional networks.

    Table 2 presents a number of these interconnection points. The

    CP approach discussed here is based on such IXPs (results are

    FIGURE 1Interconnection Points in the Global Internetwork

    Akamai Technologies

    European Internet Exchange

    Association (Euro-IX)

    Townsend 2001

    12 Journal of Urban Technology/August 2008

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    by [

    b-on

    : Bib

    liote

    ca d

    o co

    nhec

    imen

    to o

    nlin

    e IS

    CT

    E]

    at 1

    2:36

    10

    Mar

    ch 2

    015

  • described in the empirical section below). The first goal of the

    analysis is to prove the importance of considering the entire Inter-

    net infrastructure in a CP approach. The second goal is to introduce

    IXPs as important CP components to gain an insight into digital

    intercity linkages.

    Studies of telecommunications hubs have been performed from

    many different perspectives, including the technical architecture

    FIGURE 2The Establishment of New IXPs in Comparison to the Total

    Number of Existing European IXPs

    TABLE 2A Number of Internet Exchange Points

    Abbreviation Name Location

    AMS-IX Amsterdam Internet Exchange Amsterdam, NetherlandsLINX London Internet Exchange London, United KingdomDE-CIX Deutscher Commercial Internet

    ExchangeFrankfurt am Main, Germany

    JPNAP Japan Network Access Point Tokyo, JapanNetnod Netnod Internet Exchange i Sverige Stockholm, SwedenESPANIX Spain Internet Exchange Madrid, SpainJPIX Japan Internet Exchange Tokyo, JapanHKIX Hong Kong Internet eXchange Hong Kong, ChinaBIX Budapest Internet Exchange Budapest, HungaryKINX Korea Internet Neutral eXchange Seoul, Korea

    Cyberplace and Cyberspace 13

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    by [

    b-on

    : Bib

    liote

    ca d

    o co

    nhec

    imen

    to o

    nlin

    e IS

    CT

    E]

    at 1

    2:36

    10

    Mar

    ch 2

    015

  • of exchange points, the business and economic models that

    underlie peering, transit agreements, and so on. Grubesic and

    OKelly analyze the geographical position of PoPs in the

    United States in order to examine the digital accessibility of

    cities. PoPs give information about the location of the access/switching points per ISP. Thus, while the IXPs do serve for

    many ISPs, the PoPs tell something about the switching location

    of a single ISP.6 Examining IXPs gives centralized information

    about the Internet traffic passing through an exchange point.7

    Other researchers note IXPs as important digital points in city

    networks but do not give more detail.

    The IXP data used here are drawn from the Euro-IX report.

    This was compiled by the European Internet Exchange Associ-

    ation (Euro-IX) and gives information about the amount of

    traffic being transferred in IXPs that are members of the European

    Internet Exchange Association.8 A substantial proportion of IXPs

    publish traffic statistics on their websites in order to promote their

    interconnection point to potential new ISP members. Amsterdam,

    ams-ix.net (AMS-IX) for instance, gives information as daily and

    yearly traffic load graphs and monthly reports about their traffic

    volume, total multicast, IPv6, and broadcast traffic, ISP

    members, technical and statistical information, topology, and so

    on. The Euro-IX report has accumulated these graphs for cities

    in Europe. The results of the empirical analysis based on these

    data are described below in the CP approach section of the empiri-

    cal analysis.

    The Cyberspace (CS) ApproachIn addition to the traditional geographical space wherein the CP is

    embedded, we have witnessed the emergence of a new approach

    for analyzing digital flows: the CS approach. CS is the virtual

    world wherein people communicate with each other using compu-

    ter systems. The CS concept makes use of this new space

    to analyze digital intercity linkages. Because the functioning

    of several communication and information technologies such as

    e-mail, web consulting, and video conferencing, are based on

    CS, such an approach can give a refined picture of existing

    virtual linkages between cities. To introduce this idea, we

    discuss the most important features of cyberspace.

    Although it is often referred to, cyberspace is quite a difficult

    entity to grasp and define. It has been variously described as

    follows: a consensual hallucination experienced daily by billions

    Kende

    Norton

    6PoPs are housed in an IXP or in

    data centers that are used to house

    the server, storage, and network

    infrastructure of ISPs.

    7For an overview of the

    geographical position of switching

    facilities in the United States

    (2001), see Malecki and McIntee,

    and in Europe (2001), see

    Kellerman.

    Drewe

    Gorman and Malecki 2002

    Townsend 2001

    8On October 2006, Euro-IX had

    36 member IXPs from 21

    European countries, 7 IXPs from

    Japan and the United States, and

    four patrons from the switch

    vendor community. Although the

    Euro-IX report attempts to list all

    known IXPs in Europe, it is

    expected that a small number of

    IXPs may have been left out. The

    IXP data do not take into account

    the traffic exchanged by privately

    interconnected participants whose

    traffic does not pass over the IXP

    switching fabric (European

    Internet Exchange Association).

    14 Journal of Urban Technology/August 2008

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    by [

    b-on

    : Bib

    liote

    ca d

    o co

    nhec

    imen

    to o

    nlin

    e IS

    CT

    E]

    at 1

    2:36

    10

    Mar

    ch 2

    015

  • of legitimate operators, in every nation, by children being taught

    mathematical concepts; unthinkable complexity; a parallel

    universe; a multi-media skein of digital networks which is infus-

    ing rapidly into social, cultural and economic life; a space that is

    difficult to comprehend and mentally visualize . . . in which it iseasy to get lost and confused.9

    A more concise definition of CS is given by Leadbetter, who

    describes this space as an immaterial world of computers and

    communications, in which we can work at the touch of a

    button. This definition highlights the three most important fea-

    tures of cyberspace:

    . It is all about computers and virtual communication. CS isthe virtual network wherein computers communicate with

    each other.

    . CS is an immaterial world in that the physical aspects of thematerial world involving distance do not apply in this new

    space.

    . In this immaterial world of computers and communication,we work at the touch of a button.

    Distance has a diminished importance in the cyber world. A

    place in CS is close by when it is just one click away or at the

    touch of a button. The need to click a lot to get on to a website that

    is actually physically nearby is perceived as its being more remote

    and less accessible than a site that, just one click away, is phys-

    ically more than thousands of miles away. The time cost is so

    small that virtual access is practically invariant with physical

    distance. Access in virtual space, therefore, follows logical links

    rather than physical paths. The CS approach uses these features

    to analyze the virtual linkages of cities.

    We discern two types of analysis applicable to the CS

    approach: a content-based analysis (CBA) and a structure-based

    analysis (SBA). The SBA is based on the CS structure seen as

    the hierarchy of websites, connections via hyperlinks, and so

    forth. The CBA examines intercity linkages using the information

    available on the pages of the World Wide Web.

    The most examined SBA, hyperlink analysis, is based on the

    logical links that connect websites.10 Park and Thelwall (61)

    promote this type of SBA in the belief that with the increasing

    importance of the Web for an ever-broader spectrum of human

    activities, the structure will reflect more and more the existing

    relationships between people, cities, institutions, and so forth.

    Gibson

    Benedikt

    Graham 1998

    Dodge and Kitchen 20029This elusiveness has resulted in a

    particular wording. Virtually all

    cyberterms (even the notion

    cyberspace) are described by

    standard spatial and territorial

    metaphors: e.g., web site, chat

    room, mail box, portal site,

    teleport, and so on (Adams, Smith

    and Timberlake). Kellerman

    pointed out that the geographical

    language has become a major tool

    for the structuring, organization,

    and use of cyberspace.

    Dodge

    Mitchell

    10There are in fact two approaches

    to hyperlink analysis:

    webometrics (e.g., counting

    hyperlinks to websites, see for

    example Smith and Thelwall,

    Thelwall and Vaughan) and

    hyperlink network analyses (e.g.,

    social network analysis applied on

    hyperlink networks; see, for

    example, Rogers and Marres,

    Krebs, Park and Thelwall). Here

    we consider both analyses in

    common.

    Cyberplace and Cyberspace 15

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    by [

    b-on

    : Bib

    liote

    ca d

    o co

    nhec

    imen

    to o

    nlin

    e IS

    CT

    E]

    at 1

    2:36

    10

    Mar

    ch 2

    015

  • A hyperlink analysis (i.e., an SBA) is an analytical method for

    studying the networked (or connected) structures on the World

    Wide Web. A hyperlink transmits the information or contents

    of a web page at the touch of a button. It is a technological capa-

    bility that enables one website to connect seamlessly with another

    and, therefore, functionally brings the two sites closer together.

    Putting a hyperlink on your website implies the possibility of a

    jump from one location/actor to the other and indicates theimplicit presence of other locations/actors such as firms,people, or information in the immediate vicinity. The use of

    hyperlinks in the creation of a web structure belongs to the

    designer, who, therefore, controls the potential ways a user can

    move through the Web.

    Commercial firms are supposed to be cautious in placing

    hyperlinks. Any link to an external site is an extra exit route

    for visitors. A natural reaction may be to avoid hyperlinks, thus

    creating an isolated self-contained structure. Thelwall shows,

    however, that 72 out of 232 sites (or 31 percent) of commercial

    firms were found to have hyperlinks based on affiliated business

    relations. For service reasons, commercial sites offer links to

    complementary sites. Their intent is to build a trust-based custo-

    mer relationship. Thus, while website creators have complete

    freedom, hyperlink structures are designed, sustained, or modi-

    fied to reflect relationship choices. Park and Thelwall note that

    from these communicative choices and agenda, we can discern

    the fingerprints of social relationships between the system com-

    ponents (i.e., people, private companies, public organizations,

    cities, nation-states, and so on). An example of a hyperlink analy-

    sis is given by Heimeriks and Van den Besselaar. They analyze

    hyperlink networks on the scientific web in order to study the

    development of research fields and the relationship between

    research organizations and the relevant institutions in their

    environments. Before the digital age, joint papers in journals

    and academic contacts at conferences were important measure-

    ment tools. Nowadays, the Web gives us additional academic

    network information.

    Hyperlinks between websites represent not only direct

    relationships in the offline world but also other and desired

    relationships. Hyperlink analyses can be drawn up for several

    layers. The underlying belief for the CS approach is that collabor-

    ation and information exchanges between cities are reflected in the

    hyperlink networks and/or in the number of hyperlinks to urbancomponents. Whatever the importance of hyperlinks for cities or

    Pirolli and Card

    Jackson

    Siegel

    Grossman

    Matheison

    16 Journal of Urban Technology/August 2008

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    by [

    b-on

    : Bib

    liote

    ca d

    o co

    nhec

    imen

    to o

    nlin

    e IS

    CT

    E]

    at 1

    2:36

    10

    Mar

    ch 2

    015

  • urban components, we should nevertheless consider that there are

    some types of areas of the web for which links are important and

    others where they are not, both accounting for a significant pro-

    portion of the web.11

    To implement the cyberspace approach in this paper, we have

    opted to base the empirical analysis on web information, i.e., a

    content-based analysis.12 The World Wide Web (WWW) is the

    most up-to-date and most global information source. The relation-

    ships between cities must be traceable in this large database. To

    trace these relationships, we make use of web search engines

    that draw on robots or spiders to index the huge amount of infor-

    mation. Spiders are computer systems that continuously download

    web pages and go through the published information. Depending

    on the search engine, all or a part of the published information,

    such as key words, links, and so on, is saved in a large database.

    The spiders continuously pursue the search drawing on the

    saved links. The final search result matching the query (i.e.,

    number of presented pages and rank order) depends on the index

    decisions. More than 150 criteria exist to determine the relevancy

    of pages. PageRank and link popularity are the most important

    techniques applied by Google. PageRank is a technique that,

    according to the web search engine Google.com, relies on the

    uniquely democratic nature of the web by using its vast link

    structure as an indicator of an individual pages value. In

    essence, Google interprets a hyperlink on a webpage as a vote,

    by this page, for the linked page. When the page that casts the

    vote is itself important, it weighs more heavily. Using these

    and other factors, Google provides its views on a pages relative

    importance. So far, we may conclude that the most trafficked

    parts of the Web are indexed by search engines. Querying

    the number of joint appearances of two city names will give

    us the relative proportions of actual intercity linkages according

    to the web search engine. For this empirical analysis (results are

    described in the second part of the next section), we base our

    search on the currently most popular search engine, Google.13

    Taken together, of the two possible methods, CP and CS,

    that can be applied to analyze the virtual intercity linkages,

    one might say that the CP approach analyzes the virtual intercity

    linkages via the real world, whereas the CS approach observes

    linkages in a parallel world. Although both approaches may

    seen similar at first sight, they start from completely different

    observations of virtual urban linkages and must, therefore, be

    analyzed separately.

    Thelwall11According to Park and Thelwall,

    little is known about the validity or

    correct interpretation of hyperlink

    analyses results except from

    academic domains; i.e.,

    bibliometrics (Tang and

    Thelwall).12The above-mentioned structure-

    based analysis (SBA) is not

    worked out in this paper. An

    empirical analysis based on the

    SBA-method calls for an extensive,

    paper-length discussion, and

    hence falls outside the scope of the

    present paper.

    Brin and Page

    Mostafa

    Google

    Austin

    Seopage.nl

    Marketshare.hitslink.com13We used

    www.googlebattle.com/

    godin.php, which enabled us to

    query several city pairs at a time.

    Cyberplace and Cyberspace 17

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    by [

    b-on

    : Bib

    liote

    ca d

    o co

    nhec

    imen

    to o

    nlin

    e IS

    CT

    E]

    at 1

    2:36

    10

    Mar

    ch 2

    015

  • Empirical Analyses

    The Cyberplace (CP) ApproachFigure 3a shows the upward trend in peak aggregated IXP traffic

    (in Gigabits per second, Gbps) per European city (based on the

    Euro-IX report). We compare this graph with Figure 3b, which

    presents the estimated bandwidth (in Gbps) per city.14 The

    digital bandwidth capacity data used in Figure 3b is based on

    the European Terrestrial Networks map.15

    FIGURE 3aThe Peak Aggregated IXP Traffic (in Gigabits per second)

    per European CityFIGURE 3b

    The Estimated Bandwidth (in Gigabits per second)per European City

    14Information on the amount of

    digital traffic through these

    infrastructures is generally

    unavailable (Kellerman).

    Telegeography.com15The European Terrestrial

    Networks map illustrates the total

    lit bandwidth traversing through

    145 European cities (above 0.5

    Gbps). The 145 cities exist as the

    top 60 European cities, as ranked

    by access to lit bandwidth, and 85

    other important localities (major

    city, capital city, etc.).

    (Telegeography.com)

    18 Journal of Urban Technology/August 2008

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    by [

    b-on

    : Bib

    liote

    ca d

    o co

    nhec

    imen

    to o

    nlin

    e IS

    CT

    E]

    at 1

    2:36

    10

    Mar

    ch 2

    015

  • Comparing both graphs gives an idea about the importance of

    European cities in the digital city network.16 One major feature is

    the divergent trend of the graphs. Whereas the bandwidth

    increases gradually per city, the exchange of Internet traffic is

    far more skewed towards a limited number of metropolitan

    areas, i.e., Amsterdam, London, Frankfurt, Madrid, and Stock-

    holm. These cities are responsible for 72.26 percent of the Euro-

    pean Internet exchange traffic. Amsterdam is the overall number

    one with 28.41 percent of total European IXP traffic. These

    cities function as key points in the digital intercity network.

    They significantly expand the reach of the virtual network.

    A large amount of exchange traffic in a city points to its

    important switching function between regional, national, and

    global information communication networks. One would therefore

    expect a large amount of IXP traffic to correspond to abundant

    bandwidth availability.17 An important switching point has to

    transfer its traffic to other places such as Frankfurt, London, or

    Amsterdam. A city such as Budapest exchanges much traffic but

    is less important in terms of bandwidth availability. This probably

    results from a high regional exchange of traffic and a lesser global

    traffic requirement.18 The IX point located in Budapest boosts the

    surrounding region in terms of Internet traffic possibilities. To con-

    sider this phenomenon in more detail, we look at Figure 4. This

    FIGURE 4The Relationships of Cities in Terms of Equal Service

    Providers

    16We have to bear in mind that we

    compare capacity with real traffic

    where the former represents long

    haul links and the latter local/

    national/international exchange

    traffic.

    17We expect that a large amount of

    bandwidth availability is related

    to a high amount of exchange

    traffic. The long haul links are

    market-based decisions and

    probably correspond the need to

    exchange a high amount of traffic

    (and vice versa).

    18As mentioned above, the IX point

    exchanges also traffic on the city/

    country level and prevent the use

    of expensive long haul links to

    other cities to switch from local

    ISP

    Cyberplace and Cyberspace 19

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    by [

    b-on

    : Bib

    liote

    ca d

    o co

    nhec

    imen

    to o

    nlin

    e IS

    CT

    E]

    at 1

    2:36

    10

    Mar

    ch 2

    015

  • presents the relationships that cities have in terms of equal service

    providers.19 The relationship between cities is seen as the number

    of ISPs that peer in both cities. This means that service providers

    are active in both the cities shown and are consequently more

    global in reach. The volume of the nodes is based on the

    number of ISPs peered at the IXP.20 The most important exchange

    cities also control the most jointly peered ISPs. The big three of

    Amsterdam, London, and Frankfurt, with London first, hold

    almost all the ISPs that peer in the European Internetwork.

    These exchange cities function as global switching points. Cities

    such as Lyon, Florence, Budapest, and Ljubljana on the other

    hand are more regional exchange points. A small number of

    global ISPs link these IXPs with a more global exchange point

    such as LyonParis, LjubljanaVienna, and FlorenceMilan.

    The difference between more global exchange points such as

    Amsterdam, Paris, Zurich, and Stockholm and the regional IXPs

    such as Ljubljana, Lisbon, and Florence can be observed by the

    number of shared ISPs as compared with their individual ISPs.

    The global exchange point of Amsterdam has 80 percent of

    its ISPs peering at other ISPs (Stockholm, 83 percent; Zurich, 82

    percent; Paris, 90 percent), whereas there are fewer ISPs peering

    at other IXPs for Ljubljana (17 percent), Lisbon (16 percent), and

    Florence (50 percent). Budapest, as mentioned above, is a more

    regional exchange point. Eighty-four percent of the ISPs in Buda-

    pest peer only at that city. This difference can also be observed

    from the position of the IXPs in Figure 4. Two cities situated

    on the edge of this figure are more regional exchange points

    linked with one or two more global exchange cities. There are,

    furthermore, internal differences between the regional IXPs.

    Warsaw and Athens are, for example, less linked to the global

    ISP network than Florence or Ljubljana. The three shared ISPs

    for Athens are the global service networks of AT&T Global

    Network Services, Viatel Global Communications B.V., and

    Verizon Business, whereas the shared ISPs for Florence and

    Ljubljana are more regional ISPs such as FlorenceMilan with

    Telecom Italy. It is interesting to note that Brussels has less

    IXP traffic but profits from its geographical position between

    the global exchange points of London, Paris, Frankfurt, and

    Amsterdam. Brussels is situated at the crossroads of European

    and global service providers AT&T, Deutsche Telekom (T-

    Online), France Telecom/Opentransit, United Global Com, andKPN Nederland. Building an IXP in such a city boosts its

    virtual network reach.

    19This figure is based on the peer-

    matrix of the Euro-IX report. Only

    the relationships of three or more

    equal-peered ISPs are drawn.

    20Figure 4 is constructed using the

    lay-out technique spring-

    embedding (UCINET (Borgatti

    et al.)).This technique is based on

    the concept of a system in which N

    cities are connected. According to

    the volume and the number of

    flows of a city, the intercity links

    have different strengths. From the

    initial arrangement of the city

    locations, the system oscillates

    until it stabilizes at a minimum-

    energy arrangement resulting in a

    dynamically balanced system.

    (Castillo and Sim)

    20 Journal of Urban Technology/August 2008

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    by [

    b-on

    : Bib

    liote

    ca d

    o co

    nhec

    imen

    to o

    nlin

    e IS

    CT

    E]

    at 1

    2:36

    10

    Mar

    ch 2

    015

  • The geographical position of Brussels results also in a high

    amount of bandwidth availability. (See Figure 3b.) The more

    regional exchange cities such as Budapest have low intercity band-

    width linkages. A further comparison between bandwidth capacity

    and exchange power can be observed in Figure 5. In this figure, we

    compare the logarithm of exchange traffic per city with the esti-

    mated digital bandwidth capacity.21 Four groups of cities can be

    discerned.22 The first group, with the most bandwidth and IXPs,

    are Amsterdam, Frankfurt, London, Brussels, Dusseldorf, and

    Paris. These centers receive a large amount of traffic from their

    feeding cities and transfer it to the global network (and vice

    versa). A second group, ranked slightly below, consists of

    Zurich, Munich, Madrid, Stockholm, Vienna, and Nurenberg. A

    third groupPrague, Malmo, Oslo, Torino, Bratislava, Dublin,

    Manchester, Barcelona, and Bilbaois important in terms of

    bandwidth but less important in terms of exchange traffic. A

    fourth groupBudapest, Helsinki, Gothenburg, Warsaw, Rome,

    Tallinn, Lisbon and Bucharestis more important in terms of

    IXP traffic than the available bandwidth capacity. These cities

    are regional IXP cities.

    Increasing the number of clusters to 10 puts the relative

    importance of IXP traffic versus bandwidth availability into the

    picture. The first group is, for example, split up in three groups:

    FIGURE 5The (Logarithm of) Exchange Traffic in Comparison with the

    Estimated Digital Bandwidth Capacity per European City

    21Note that there is a time

    difference between the two

    different CP datasets.

    Telegeographys data are from

    2002 while the IXPs data refer to

    2006. However, since there is a

    serious lack of data in the

    cyberplace literature, we argue

    that using (and comparing) these

    data sources outweighs the deficits

    due to the time difference.22The clusters are based on the

    hierarchical Ward and K-means

    method.

    Cyberplace and Cyberspace 21

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    by [

    b-on

    : Bib

    liote

    ca d

    o co

    nhec

    imen

    to o

    nlin

    e IS

    CT

    E]

    at 1

    2:36

    10

    Mar

    ch 2

    015

  • (1) Paris and London, which are the leaders in terms of exchange

    traffic and digital bandwidth availability; (2) Amsterdam and

    Frankfurt, which are foremost in terms of exchange traffic but

    less important in terms of bandwidth; and (3) Brussels and Dussel-

    dorf, which are important in terms of bandwidth but less important

    in terms of exchange traffic. The other groups can be split up simi-

    larly.23

    The empirical analyses indicate the importance of increasing

    the number of structural elements for a CP approach. Combining

    IXP data with information about the bandwidth capacity tells us

    a lot more than just the cable network information: it gives a

    more general picture of the network of intercity flows.

    The Cyberspace (CS) ApproachThe content-based analysis was set up in January 2008. We

    assembled the city-pair relationships between 40 European

    cities.24 For example, searching for (Google) web pages that

    jointly mention Amsterdam and Kiev resulted in 596,000

    different web pages with data on, for example, the transport,

    business, history, and governmental relationships between both

    cities. Figure 6 presents the most important of these relationships,

    with more than 1 million results in the 40 40 intercity matrix.25

    FIGURE 6The Digital Intercity Linkages According to Google.com

    (January 9, 2008)

    23The variation in IXP-traffic

    decreases at the tail of the

    distribution (see Figure 3a). This

    makes it difficult to make solid

    conclusions for cities such as

    Tallinn, Lisbon, and Bucharest.

    The expansion of IXPs in the

    future will probably lead to more

    transparency.

    24The 40 cities rely on the world

    city list of the Globalization and

    World Cities (GaWC) Study

    Group and Network.

    25Figure 6 is constructed using the

    lay-out technique spring-

    embedding. (Borgatti et al.)

    22 Journal of Urban Technology/August 2008

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    by [

    b-on

    : Bib

    liote

    ca d

    o co

    nhec

    imen

    to o

    nlin

    e IS

    CT

    E]

    at 1

    2:36

    10

    Mar

    ch 2

    015

  • The search was made without any preferences or specific

    language choice in Google (http://www.google.com/advanced_search). City names are spelled in English, which is an underesti-

    mation of regional city linkages. English is, however, not only the

    dominant language on the World Wide Web in and by itself, but

    especially for linking. Most web pages have next to their national

    language page an international page in English.

    The size of the nodes varies according to the total number of

    results. Paris, London, and Berlin are the most important cities on

    the Web. They have a high number of joint appearances on the

    Web and maintain thereupon their important relationships with

    almost all European cities. London represents the most dominant

    place on the Web. We can also observe some prominent national

    connections between cities; for example, HamburgBerlin,

    BirminghamManchester, MadridBarcelona. Furthermore, it is

    interesting to note the linkages of cities such as Bucharest, Dussel-

    dorf, and Bratislava. These places are highly linked with second-

    ary centers such as Copenhagen, Dublin, and Lyon. A strong

    link between these cities and London does not exist. They are

    located outside the strong central network of London, Paris, and

    Berlin and can be seen to be less digitally accessible.

    In order to compare the differences between two time

    periods/search engines, we did two other Google search queriesin April and November 2007, and a Google and AltaVista

    search query in November 2007. The continuous update of

    search engine databases results in a higher number of related docu-

    ments for all city linkages queried in November 2007 with 8.4

    percent more linkages found. There existed also a minimal rank

    difference with correlation between both searches being 86

    percent. To compare the difference between web search engines,

    we performed the same analysis based on the AltaVista web

    search engine. Here, we also observed a minimal difference.

    The CS analysis is the first investigation using the content-

    based analysis method. Using a so-called meta-search engine

    such as MetaCrawler, MetaFind, or SurfWax or a topic-based

    search engine such as, for example, business.com, news.google.

    com, or newslink.org, it may be possible to map more detailed

    digital intercity linkages. A meta-search engine transmits the

    search query simultaneously to several individual search engines

    such as Google, AltaVista, or Yahoo and their databases of

    web pages. Within a few seconds, the results from all the

    search engines queried are presented. A CBA based on this kind

    of search engine may, therefore, give more general results.

    Internetworldstatistics.com

    Cyberplace and Cyberspace 23

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    by [

    b-on

    : Bib

    liote

    ca d

    o co

    nhec

    imen

    to o

    nlin

    e IS

    CT

    E]

    at 1

    2:36

    10

    Mar

    ch 2

    015

  • Topic-based search engines, in contrast to the meta-search engines,

    may give us more accurate and relevant information.26

    Discussion and Main Conclusions

    This article has provided an overview of the dominant approaches

    for understanding intercity links through digital flows. Most ana-

    lyses to date on digital intercity relationships are based on what

    we have dubbed the CP or cyberplace approach. The World

    Wide Web that we have called the CS or cyberspace approach,

    however, equally transcribes digital relationships. With the

    growing importance of the Web for an ever-broadening spectrum

    of human activity, the World Wide Web increasingly contains

    digital linkages between people, cities, institutions, and other

    entities. Examination of the CP and the CS approaches together

    points out the dissimilarity between these methods. Although

    both approaches deal with digital intercity relationships, the CP

    and CS worlds or layers are derived from completely indepen-

    dent observations and must, therefore, be discussed separately.

    The CP approach is based on physical layer observations of

    cables, servers, interconnection points, and related apparatus.

    Although this approach is discussed in the literature at great

    length, a comprehensive analysis of the physical digital intercity

    flows is indispensable. The analysis presented here points out

    the lack of investigation into structural CP elements. The flows

    of bits are structured by different corporations and follow routes

    other than the direct, predictable connections between end users.

    In order to comprehend the cyberplace, it is important to study

    the entire Internet architecture. Airline hubs or gateways influence

    the way airline companies build up their networks, yet digital

    flows are structured by gateways or interconnection points. For

    instance, maps showing the network of undersea cables tell us

    something about the speed at which digital information is trans-

    mitted overseas. Being located at an appropriate place in this

    network means that you have the ability to download and upload

    information rapidly and to maintain strong digital communications

    across oceans. The existence of exchange points forces the import-

    ance of these linkages. Digital gateway cities are able to transfer

    regional traffic to other interconnection points overseas and to dis-

    tribute global traffic in their own region.

    A comparison of digital bandwidth capacity with IXP traffic

    has led so far to a more refined picture of intercity linkages. We

    observed that in the European context, Amsterdam, Frankfurt,

    26Additional difficulties of meta-

    search engines are the use of

    complex search terms based on

    Boolean logic (U.C. Berkeley

    library) and the information

    required (i.e., number of related

    documents). These are challenges

    for further research.

    Park and Thelwall

    24 Journal of Urban Technology/August 2008

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    by [

    b-on

    : Bib

    liote

    ca d

    o co

    nhec

    imen

    to o

    nlin

    e IS

    CT

    E]

    at 1

    2:36

    10

    Mar

    ch 2

    015

  • London, Brussels, Dusseldorf, and Paris share the highest digital

    bandwidth capacity. The digital weight of cities such as Paris,

    Brussels, Zurich, Munich, and Dusseldorf is, however, overesti-

    mated when only bandwidth capacity is observed. Amsterdam,

    London, and Frankfurt are far more important in their gateway

    functions than Paris, Brussels, and Dusseldorf. A combination of

    both CP data sources shows at a glance that Amsterdam,

    London, and Frankfurt are the top digital cities in Europe. It is

    likely that this hierarchy in digital importance will continue to

    shift, categorically and geographically, in the future. Continued

    infrastructure investment in cities such as Budapest will increase

    the digital possibilities of those regions and create significant

    regional gateways. Global gateways such as Amsterdam, Frank-

    furt, and London will increasingly serve at the global level.

    It is important to note that CP analyses rely on recent data.

    The market for interconnection is changing rapidly. In less than

    five years, the number of European interconnection points has

    more than doubled. The Euro-IX (23) report is the first account

    available online concerning European IXPs, and more research

    about these data is required. The Internet infrastructure is con-

    stantly growing, and although the boom in cable infrastructure is

    already past, some regions are just beginning to develop cable

    networks based on modern technology. Examination of the

    entire Internet architecture will broaden our knowledge of digital

    intercity linkages.

    The CS approach provides insights into intangible digital

    flows, which must be observed in the cyberlayer. Measurement

    of hyperlinks, e-mail contacts, or search results gives a notion

    of the existing relationships via the digital web. The CS exercise

    herein is a first investigation of a content-based analysis on

    intercity linkages. The measured relationships engage airline

    connections, governmental agreements, family ties, firm

    locations, and so on, in several different formats, for example

    PDF, TXT, and URL. It is one of the most up-to-date existing

    data queries. Although the World Wide Web is constantly chan-

    ging, search engines provide daily updates. At the end of

    January 2005, the indexed web contained more than 11.5

    billion pages.27 Querying this huge amount of information by

    web search engines is the most general search on digital

    linkages that can be made. It provides information that is not

    accessible by a traditional metrical approach.

    The content-based analysis (CBA) here shows that Paris,

    London, and Berlin collectively have the most important digital

    27Indexed means the part of the

    Web that is searchable through

    search engines. Estimating the

    size of the whole Web is quite

    difficult, because of its dynamic

    nature. Three sources for tracking

    the growth of the Internet are

    Search Engine Showdown,

    Search Engine Watch, and

    World Wide Web size.

    Gulli and Signorini

    Cyberplace and Cyberspace 25

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    by [

    b-on

    : Bib

    liote

    ca d

    o co

    nhec

    imen

    to o

    nlin

    e IS

    CT

    E]

    at 1

    2:36

    10

    Mar

    ch 2

    015

  • linkages on the Web. The dominance of North-west Europe on the

    Web is obvious. Amsterdam, Rome, and Frankfurt are secondary

    cities. Looking at the intercity relationships, we observe a number

    of strong regional linkages such as LyonParis, Rotterdam

    Amsterdam, and MadridBarcelona. However, we have to bear

    in mind that the CBA presented also has some shortcomings:

    First, in addition to the surface World Wide Web there is also

    an immeasurable private web accessible only to banks, firms, and

    confidential organizations and a deep web, publicly accessible but

    not reachable by search engines.28 Search engines index only a

    proportion of current web pages.

    Second, the applied search engine in a CBA has a great influ-

    ence on the results. Using meta-search engines or topic-based

    search engines, for instance, would give more detailed information.

    Third, we have to be aware that the CBA herein actually

    measures non-digital relationships saved in digital format. Under-

    taking a structure-based analysis is a next step in this context.

    Hyperlinks represent desired, existing, or obligatory relationships

    between website owners that are institutions, organizations, or

    firms. The SBA has already been widely examined in bibliometric

    studies. The investigation of structural intercity relationships on

    the Web is an avenue for further research.

    This paper shows that two approaches can be used to measure

    digital intercity linkages. Both methods analyze different relation-

    ships digitally. The broader exploration of both empirical analyses

    will probably cause us to arrive at more refined methods for the

    study of digital intercity linkages. In our future research, we

    intend to explore new techniques of applying the CS approach,

    and we will gather other CP components for this approach.

    Acknowledgements

    We would like to thank the editor and the anonymous referees for

    their useful comments on an earlier version of this paper. The

    usual disclaimers apply. This research work is funded by the

    Research FoundationFlanders.

    28Private networks account for

    around 14 percent of Internet

    traffic (McClelland). Besides the

    inaccessible private networks,

    there are also web pages that are

    publicly accessible but not

    reachable by search engines (i.e.,

    the deep or invisible web). This

    part of the web consists of web

    pages with no hypertext links to

    their content, pages you need to be

    registered for and logged-on to

    access, documents with a content

    that is dynamically generated

    (based on constantly changing

    databases) and other pages

    difficult to index by search

    engines.

    26 Journal of Urban Technology/August 2008

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    by [

    b-on

    : Bib

    liote

    ca d

    o co

    nhec

    imen

    to o

    nlin

    e IS

    CT

    E]

    at 1

    2:36

    10

    Mar

    ch 2

    015

  • Bibliography

    P. Adams, Cyberspace and Virtual Places, Geographical Review 87 (1997) 155171.

    Akamai Technologies. Akamais Technologies: Visualizing the Internet, 2008 Accessed January 21, 2008.

    A. Alderson and J. Beckfield, Power and Position in the World City System,American Journal of Sociology 109 (2004) 811851. Quotation from page 814.

    D. Austin, How Google Finds Your Needle in the Webs Haystack: As Well See,the Trick Is to Ask the Web Itself to Rank the Importance of Pages. . . 2006 Access April 25, 2007.

    J. Beaverstock, R. Smith, P. Taylor, D. Walker, and H. Lorimer, Globalization andWorld Cities: Some Measurement Methodologies, Applied Geography 20 (2000)4363.

    M. Benedikt, Introduction, in M. Benedikt, ed., Cyberspace: First Steps (Cam-bridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991). Quotation from page 15.

    S. Borgatti, M. Everett, and L. Freeman, Ucinet 6 for Windows: Software for SocialNetwork Analysis (Harvard: Analytic Technologies, 2002).

    S. Brin and L. Page, The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web SearchEngine, paper presented at the Seventh International World Wide Web Conference(Brisbane, Australia, 1998).

    M. Castells, The Rise of the Network Society (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996). Quotationfrom page 469.

    M. Castells, Internet Galaxy (Oxford: Blackwell, 2001).

    I. Castillo and T. Sim, A Spring-Embedding Approach for the Facility LayoutProblem, Journal of the Operational Research Society 55 (2003) 7381.

    L. Chapin and C. Owens, Interconnection and Peering among Internet ServiceProviders: A Historical Perspective (2005) ,ww.interisle.net. AccessedApril 23, 2007.

    J. Choi, B. Chon, G. Barnett, and Y. Choi, World Cities and Internet BackboneNetworks: A Network Approach, paper presented at the Digital Cities Conference(Chicago, 2001).

    J. Choi, G. Barnett, and G. Chon, Comparing World City Networks: A NetworkAnalysis of Internet Backbone and Air Transport Intercity Linkages, GlobalNetworks 6 (2006) 8199.

    B. Derudder, On Conceptual Confusion in Empirical Analyses of a TransnationalUrban Network, Urban Studies 43 (2006) 20272046.

    Cyberplace and Cyberspace 27

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    by [

    b-on

    : Bib

    liote

    ca d

    o co

    nhec

    imen

    to o

    nlin

    e IS

    CT

    E]

    at 1

    2:36

    10

    Mar

    ch 2

    015

  • B. Derudder and F. Witlox, An Appraisal of the Use of Airline Data in Assessmentsof the World City Network, Urban Studies 42 (2005) 23712388.

    B. Derudder, P. Taylor, F. Witlox, and G. Catalano, Hierarchical Tendencies andRegional Patterns in the World City Network: A Global Urban Analysis of 234Cities, Regional Studies 37 (2003) 875886.

    B. Derudder, L. Devriendt, and F. Witlox, Flying Where You Dont Want to Go: AnEmpirical Analysis of Hubs in the Global Airline Network, Tijdschrift voor Econ-omische en Sociale Geografie 98 (2007) 307324.

    M. Dodge, Accessibility to Information Within the Internet: How Can It BeMeasured and Mapped? paper prepared for the Varenius Meeting (1998) Accessed November 27, 2007

    M. Dodge and R. Kitchin, Atlas of Cyberspace (London: Pearson Education, 2001).

    M. Dodge and R. Kitchen, New Cartographies to Chart Cyberspace, Geoinfor-matics April/May 2002 (2002) 14. Quotation from page 1.

    P. Drewe, The Internet Infrastructure as a Location Factor for the Internet Industry,paper presented at TIC et Reorganisation Spatiale des Activites Economiques (ENS-Bretagne, Brest 2002).

    European Internet Exchange Association (Euro-IX), Euro-IX Report (2006) Accessed December 11, 2007.

    J. Friedmann, The World City Hypothesis, Development and Change 17 (1986)6383.

    J. Friedmann and G. Wolff, World City Formation: An Agenda for Research andAction, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 3 (1982) 309344.

    W. Gibson, Neuromancer (London: Harper and Collins, 1984). Quotation frompage 69.

    Google, Web Search Engine Google (2007) AccessedNovember 27, 2007.

    S. Gorman and E. Malecki, The Networks of the Internet: An Analysis of ProviderNetworks in the USA, Telecommunications Policy 24 (2000) 113134.

    S. Gorman and E. Malecki, Fixed and Fluid: Stability and Change in the Geographyof the Internet, Telecommunications Policy 26 (2002) 389413.

    S. Graham, The End of Geography or the Explosion of Place? ConceptualizingSpace, Place, and Information Technology, Progress in Human Geography 22(1998) 165185. Quotation from page 165.

    S. Graham, ed., The Cybercities Reader (London: Routledge, 2004).

    28 Journal of Urban Technology/August 2008

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    by [

    b-on

    : Bib

    liote

    ca d

    o co

    nhec

    imen

    to o

    nlin

    e IS

    CT

    E]

    at 1

    2:36

    10

    Mar

    ch 2

    015

  • S. Graham and S. Marvin, Splintering Urbanism (London and New York: Routledge,2001).

    W. Grossman, Get Linked, Information Age 1 (1997) 2122.

    T. Grubesic and M. OKelly, Using Points of Presence to Measure Accessibility tothe Commercial Internet, Professional Geographer 54 (2002) 259278.

    A. Gulli and A. Signorini, The Indexable Web is More than 11.5 Billion Pages,WWW 2005 (2005). Accessed January 15, 2008.

    D. Hackler, Invisible Infrastructure and the City: The Role of Telecommunicationsin Economic Development, American Behavioral Scientist 46 (2003) 10341055.

    R. Hanley, Moving People, Goods and Information in the 21st Century: The Cutting-Edge Infrastructures of Networked Cities (London-New York: Routledge, 2004).

    G. Heimeriks and P. Van den Besselaar, Analyzing Hyperlinks Networks: TheMeaning of Hyperlink Based Indicators of Knowledge Production, InternationalJournal of Scientometrics, Informetrics, and Bibliometrics 10 (2006) 117.

    K. Hillis, On the Margins: The Invisibility of Communications in Geography,Progress in Human Geography 22 (1998) 543566. Quotation from page 545.

    Internet World Statistics (2007) Accessed January11, 2008.

    M. Jackson, Assessing the Structure of Communication on the World Wide Web,Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 3 (1997) Accessed February 11, 2008.

    A. Kellerman, The Internet on Earth: A Geography of Information (West Sussex,England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2002). Quotation from page 31.

    M. Kende, The Digital Handshake: Connecting Internet Backbones, FCC Office ofPlans and Policy Working Paper 32 (2000).

    V. Krebs, Working in the Connected World Book Network, International Associ-ation for Human Resource Information Management Journal 4 (2000) 8790.

    P. Knox, Globalization and World City Formation, in S. Gravesteijn, ed., TimingGlobal Cities (Netherlands Geographical Studies, 1998).

    C. Leadbetter, Living on Thin Air: The New Economy (London: Sphere, 2000).

    E. Malecki, The Associational Economy: Firms, Regions, and Innovation, Growthand Change 30 (1999) 308310.

    Cyberplace and Cyberspace 29

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    by [

    b-on

    : Bib

    liote

    ca d

    o co

    nhec

    imen

    to o

    nlin

    e IS

    CT

    E]

    at 1

    2:36

    10

    Mar

    ch 2

    015

  • E. Malecki, The Economic Geography of the Internets Infrastructure, EconomicGeography 78 (2002) 399424.

    E. Malecki and C. Boush, Telecommunciations Infrastructure in the SoutheasternUnited States: Urban and Rural Variation, Growth and Change 34 (2003) 109129.

    E. Malecki and S. Gorman, Maybe the Death of Distance, but not the End ofGeography: The Internet as a Network, in T. Leinbach and S. Brunn, eds.,Worlds of E-Commerce: Economic, Geographical, and Social Dimensions(Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2001).

    E. Malecki and A. McIntee, Making the Connections: Interconnecting the Networksof the Internet, paper presented at the Digital Cities Conference (Chicago, 2001).

    Marketshare Hitslink (2007) Accessed January11, 2008.

    K. Matheison, Building Effective Marketing Web Sites, EDI Forum: The Journalof Electronic Commerce 11 (1998) 1421.

    S. McClelland, PTC 08: International Backbone Traffic Growth NighUnstoppable, Telecommunications Online (2008) Accessed July 15, 2008.

    Meta-Search Engines, U.C. Berkeley Library (1999) Accessed April 19, 2007.

    W. Mitchell, City of Bits: Space, Place, and the Infobahn (Cambridge, MA: MITPress, 1995).

    P. Mokhtarian, I. Salomon, and S. Handy, The Impacts of ICT on Leisure Activitiesand Travel: A Conceptual Exploration, Transportation 33 (2006) 263289.

    M. Moss, Technology and Cities, Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development andResearch 3 (1998) 107127.

    M. Moss and A. Townsend, The Internet Backbone and the American Metropolis,Information Society 16 (2000) 3547.

    J. Mostafa, Seeking Better Web Searches, Scientific American Magazine (February2005) 6674.

    W. Norton, A Business Case for Peering in 2004, paper presented at the GigabitPeering Forum IX (New York City, 2004).

    H. Park and M. Thelwall, Hyperlink Analysis of the World Wide Web: A Review,Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 8 (2003) Accessed February 20, 2008.

    30 Journal of Urban Technology/August 2008

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    by [

    b-on

    : Bib

    liote

    ca d

    o co

    nhec

    imen

    to o

    nlin

    e IS

    CT

    E]

    at 1

    2:36

    10

    Mar

    ch 2

    015

  • P. Pirolli and S. Card, Information Foraging, Psychological Review 106 (1999)643675.

    P. Rimmer, Transport and Telecommunications among World Cities, in F.-C. Loand Y.-M. Yeung, eds., Globalization and the World of Large Cities (Tokyo:United Nations University Press, 1998).

    R. Rogers and N. Marres, Landscaping Climate Change: A Mapping Technique forUnderstanding Science and Technology Debates on the World Wide Web, PublicUnderstanding of Science 9 (2000) 141163.

    C. Rozenblat and D. Pumain, Firm Linkages, Innovation and the Evolution of UrbanSystems, in P.J. Taylor, B. Derudder, P. Saey and F. Witlox, eds., Cities in Globa-lization: Practices, Policies, and Theories (London-New York: Routledge, 2007).

    J. Rutherford, Networks in Cities, Cities in Networks: Territory and GlobalisationIntertwined in Telecommunications Infrastructure Development in Europe, UrbanStudies 42 (2005) 23892406.

    J. Rutherford, A. Gillespie, and R. Richardson, The Territoriality of Pan-EuropeanTelecommunications Backbone Networks, Journal of Urban Technology 11 (2004)134.

    S. Sassen, The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo (Princeton, NJ: PrincetonUniversity Press, 1991).

    S. Sassen, The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo, second edition (Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press, 2001).

    S. Sassen, Towards a Sociology of Information Technology, Current Sociology 50(2002) 365388.

    Search Engine Showdown (2007) AccessedJanuary 11, 2008.

    Search Engine Watch (2007) Accessed January11, 2008.

    Seo Pagerank Search (2007) Accessed January 11, 2008.

    J. Short, Y. Kim, M. Kuss, and H. Wells, The Dirty Little Secret of World CityResearch, International Journal of Regional and Urban Research 20 (1996) 697717. Quotation from page 697.

    D. Siegel, Creating Killer Web Sites (Indianapolis: Hayden Books, 1997).

    A. Smith and M. Thelwall, Web Impact Factors for Australasian Universities,Scientometrics 54 (2002) 363380.

    Cyberplace and Cyberspace 31

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    by [

    b-on

    : Bib

    liote

    ca d

    o co

    nhec

    imen

    to o

    nlin

    e IS

    CT

    E]

    at 1

    2:36

    10

    Mar

    ch 2

    015

  • D. Smith and M. Timberlake, World City Networks and Hierarchies, 19771997:An Empirical Analysis of Global Air Travel Links, American Behavioral Scientist44 (2001) 16561678.

    P. Sommers and D. Carlson, What the IT Revolution Means for Regional EconomicDevelopment (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metro-politan Policy 2003).

    M. Stefik, Internet Dreams: Archetypes, Myths, and Metaphors (Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 1996).

    R. Tang and M. Thelwall, U.S. Academic Departmental Web-Site Interlinking in theUnited States: Disciplinary Differences, Library & Information Science Research25 (2003) 437458.

    P. Taylor, World City Network: A Global Urban Analysis (London: Routledge,2004).

    P. Taylor, New Political Geographies: Global Civil Society and Global Governancethrough World City Networks, Political Geography 24 (2005) 703730.

    Telegeography (2007) Accessed January 11, 2007.

    M. Thelwall, Commercial Web Site Links, Internet Research-Electronic Network-ing Applications and Policy 11 (2001) 114124.

    M. Thelwall and L. Vaughan, Scholarly Use of the Web: What Are the Key Inducersof Links to Journal Web Sites? Journal of the American Society for InformationScience and Technology 54 (2003) 2938.

    A. Townsend, The Internet Backbone and the American Metropolis, AcademicSearch Elite 16 (2000) 113.

    A. Townsend, Network Cities and the Global Structure of the Internet, AmericanBehavioral Scientist 44 (2001) 16971716. Quotation from page 1704.

    S. Walcott and J. Wheeler, Atlanta in the Telecommunications Age: The Fiber-Optic Information Network, Urban Geography 22 (2001) 316339.

    J. Weltevreden, Winkelen in het Internettijdperk (Shopping in the Internet Age)(Rotterdam: Nai Uitgevers & Ruimtelijk Planbureau, 2007).

    D. Wheeler and M. OKelly, Network Topology and City Accessibility of theCommercial Internet, Professional Geographer 51 (1999) 327339.

    World Wide Web Size (2007) Accessed January11, 2008.

    32 Journal of Urban Technology/August 2008

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    by [

    b-on

    : Bib

    liote

    ca d

    o co

    nhec

    imen

    to o

    nlin

    e IS

    CT

    E]

    at 1

    2:36

    10

    Mar

    ch 2

    015