Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2012 – 2014 Missouri Structures Project
Lindlie HaithcoatGeographic Resources CenterGeographic Information System [email protected]
Chris StephensGeographic Resources CenterGeographic Information System [email protected]
Project Background» Three previous project iterations:• Two cooperatively funded by the FGDC/USGS Cooperative Agreement
Program (CAP) funding and the Missouri Office of Homeland Security (New Madrid Seismic)…
– SEMO/Bootheel 2007-2008 – Boonslick RPC 2008-2009
• Third funded by FGDC/USGS Partnership funding …– Mid-Missouri 2010-2011
19 RPC’s or Councils of Government in MissouriDeliver a variety of federal, state, and local programs, while continuing its function as a planning organization, technical assistance provider and resource to its member local governments.
Voluntary association of local governments. The organization’s guiding principles are to serve as an advocate for the region, to provide a professional staff to serve as a resource for member governments, to provide a forum for local officials to discuss regional issues and concerns, and to promote community and economic development.
Board of Directors representing all counties in the region are responsible for organizational oversight.
Goals» Data sharing partnerships – Designed to be easily
maintained by each county so that it can stay current and relevant across Missouri’s landscape.
» Enhanced regional working relationships - Promoting geospatial decision support for emergency events and disasters.
» Prove the premise to state and federal entities that:
A) Local government data is not only usually the most accurate but also the most timely, and
B) The best data are those that are maintained locally
Structures – Year 1 – Proposed…
Structures – Year 2 – Proposed…
Current Status» Point (Locations) and Polygon (Building Footprints)
generation workforce - 23 student interns and 2 managers.
USGS Classification
Structure Extraction
Accuracy is incredibly important.
Points should be placed in the center of the structures.
Structure’s should be labeled as accurately as possible.
Structure FootprintOutline of building
Follow as closely as possiblePoint must be placed on structure Category should be same for footprint and point
Helpful tricks:•Zoom in to draw footprint•Make polygon clear when drawing to ensure outline is followed closely•Buildings connected by walkway or awning should be drawn as one footprint
Structures bigger than 1 inch on screen @ 1:2000 scale.
Roughly 170 feet
What doesn’t get a footprint?• Baseball Fields• Cemeteries• Parks
Columbia Mall
Value?» Current iteration was created for:• Broadband assessment of access and adoption – aid in
validating maps.• Broadband community planning and business case
development.• Monitoring of broadband adoption at Community
Anchor Institutions.
»Other planning uses as well as emergency use include…
Other Values…Emergency Response Value • Emergency events-
Particularly events with large scale building destruction/damage.˃ Powerful in the hands of local
responders but will almost certainly be the best data available to state and federal first responders who are arriving on the scene.
˃ Other uses…˃ Response planning˃ Decision support˃ Evacuations˃ Search & Recovery ˃ Damage assessment and remediation
Regional Value » Urban/Rural planning
+ Zoning+ Ordinances+ Floodplain Management+ Transportation Planning
» Economic Development+ State/Federal Grants+ Parks and Recreation
» Public Safety+ Shelters+ Evaluating Access+ Emergency Preparedness
» Service Delivery Analysis+ Education and Schools+ Utilities
MethodologyRegionalized local review – 2 Phases
1. Community Anchor Points2. Structures
Elements˃ Parallel roles – transportation plans, homeland security plans,
economic development plans, etc. (multipurpose)˃ Targeted layers and attributes derived from ARRA broadband
requirements, local review, and homeland security input ˃ Incentives – data, standards, tools, and $$$˃ Tie-in with FirstNet development ˃ Foundation of existing RTPT relationships and data
development partnering from prior FGDC, CAP and USGS Partnership grants
Methods» Schema
˃ Developed during the New Madrid Seismic Zone Structures Project˃ USGS Classification System˃ 1 Point per building (centered)˃ Building Footprints - Outline traced around building for polygons
» Scale˃ Extraction of points at a 1:2000 ˃ Extraction of polygons when buildings are 1 inch on screen at a 1:2000 ˃ All corrections are done at a 1:2000
» U.S. National Grid coordinates, Lat. + Long.
» Imagery˃ State 2ft Imagery from MSDIS
+ 2007-2008 data˃ ESRI Basemap & NAIP2012
+ More current/sharper images+ More detailed data added
Review ProcessCheck completed county using NAIP 2012 imagery.
If structure is not in 2008 imagery but is in 2012 imagery, add date to PT_DATE field. If structure is not in 2012 but is in 2008, put 2008 in PT_DATE field.
2008 Imagery NAIP 2012
Some of the Community Anchor Institution Layers Reviewed…
Educational˃ Public Schools ˃ Private Schools˃ Higher Education Institutions
Emergency Response / Law Enforcement˃ Correctional Facilities˃ EOCs˃ EMS separate from Fire Stations˃ Fire Stations˃ Law Enforcement Agencies˃ Shelters
Community Anchor Institution Layers Reviewed (cont.)
Health / Medical˃ Hospitals ˃ Nursing Homes˃ Public Health Clinics
Other Public / Government˃ Courthouses˃ Libraries
Mid-MO Structures Database• Creation of structure database for all visible structures in the
Mid-MO RPC area• The area consists of 6 counties and 44 incorporated communities• Review of points and polygons using RPC data and other state/federal
sources
• Existing data was collected from local and state partners and used in conjunction with the most up-to-date aerial imagery to identify structures
• Polygons were created for those structures estimated to enclose 50,000 square feet or more
• Data made available to local participants, SEMA, and USGS
Database DevelopmentOriginal database – new geodatabase – response
database
Thank YouAny Questions?
Lindlie HaithcoatGeographic Resources Center
Geographic Information System [email protected]
Chris StephensGeographic Resources Center
Geographic Information System [email protected]
