Liberi v Taitz - Appellees Reply to Taitz's Response in Opposition to Appellees Motion to Strike Doc 46-1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 Liberi v Taitz - Appellees Reply to Taitz's Response in Opposition to Appellees Motion to Strike Doc 46-1

    1/19

    Cosl E|bhlxs> ??"

  • 7/31/2019 Liberi v Taitz - Appellees Reply to Taitz's Response in Opposition to Appellees Motion to Strike Doc 46-1

    2/19

    j

    VOHIL GA CGEVLEVS

    Pomls

    VOHIL GA CGEVLEVS%%%%%%%j

    VOHIL GA O\VDGXJVJLS%%%%%jj"q

    J% JESVLOF ga OFFXLSSJEM vdl JSS\LS je

    OPPLIILLS BGVJGE) VOJV^ \SLS VDLJX

    GPPGSJVJGE vg A\XVDLX IJVJMOVL VDLJX

    JSS\LS ge OPPLOI%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%?"3

    JJ% OPPLIIOVL CG\XVS GEIZ CGESJFLX vdl

    XLCGXF HLAGXL vdl FJSVXJCV CG\XV geOPPLOI%%3"1

    JJJ% VDL CG\XV GXFLXLF o CGESGIJFOVLF

    XLPIZ HXJLA) ja o XLPIZ }os AJILF1"4

    JQ% SOECVJGES OMOJESV NLAAXLZ C\EEJEMDOB)

    LS_\JXL oef djs CIJLEV) GXIZ VOJV^) LS_\JXL

    oxl ]OXXOEVLF4"?0

    Q% CGECI\SJGE%%%%%%%%%%%%?0

    Cosl> ??"

  • 7/31/2019 Liberi v Taitz - Appellees Reply to Taitz's Response in Opposition to Appellees Motion to Strike Doc 46-1

    3/19

    jj

    VOHIL GA O\VDGXJVJLS

    Cosls Poml$s*

    Oigl Qlxo ga Oblxjco) Jec% q% \ejvlf Svovls)

    H%K%H% q% Bo|j Pgijcl Flpv%)

    8=1 A%3f ?0:?) ??0="04 $:vd

    Cjx% 8008*%:

    Coxxjmoe q% Coi% Svovl Ilmjsiov|xl)813 A%8f

  • 7/31/2019 Liberi v Taitz - Appellees Reply to Taitz's Response in Opposition to Appellees Motion to Strike Doc 46-1

    4/19

    jjj

    VOHIL GA O\VDGXJVJLS " Cgevje|lf

    Cosls Poml$s*

    Kjxsdelx q% \ejfle Cgxp% Ga Oblxjco)

    468 A%8f ?0=6) ?0== $:vd

    Cjx%?:44*%%%6) 1

    Ilevjej q% Coi% Cvx% agx vdl Oxvs)3=0 A%3f 43=) 463 e%1 $:vd Cjx% 8006*%%%%%%%3

    BocFgeoif q% Mxocl Cd|xcd Slovvil)

    6

  • 7/31/2019 Liberi v Taitz - Appellees Reply to Taitz's Response in Opposition to Appellees Motion to Strike Doc 46-1

    5/19

    jq

    VOHIL GA O\VDGXJVJLS " Cgevje|lf

    Cosls Poml$s*

    Qlss q% Cjho"Mljmz Cgxp% \SO)

    3?= A%3f ?0:= $:vd

    Cjx% 8003*%?

    ]gisvge q% Xloflx-s Fjmlsv Osse) Jec%) $?:=:* 663 \%S% ?

  • 7/31/2019 Liberi v Taitz - Appellees Reply to Taitz's Response in Opposition to Appellees Motion to Strike Doc 46-1

    6/19

    q

    EJEVD CJXC\JV IGCOI X\ILS

    Poml$s*

    X|il 30"8%%%4

    X|il 30"?%%%4

    X|il 30"?%4$o*%%%%3

    Cosl> ??"

  • 7/31/2019 Liberi v Taitz - Appellees Reply to Taitz's Response in Opposition to Appellees Motion to Strike Doc 46-1

    7/19

    ?

    OPPLIILLS XLPIZ vg OPPLIIOEV GXIZ VOJV^S GPPGSJVJGE vg

    OPPLIILLS BGVJGE vg SVXJKL

    Oppliills Ijso Ijhlxj [IjhlxjR) Ijso Gsvliio [GsvliioR) Mg Ltcli Mighoi)

    Pdjijp N% Hlxm) Lsq|jxl [HlxmR) oef vdl Io} Gaajcls ga Pdjijp N% Hlxm)

    [OppliillsR ajil vdl }jvdje Xlpiz vg Oppliioev Gxiz Vojv~s [Vojv~R Gppgsjvjge

    vg Oppliills Bgvjge vg Svxjkl) agx Soecvjges) Ovvgxelz Alls oef Cgsvs%

    J% JESVLOF ga OFFXLSSJEM vdl JSS\LS je OPPLIILLS

    BGVJGE) VOJV^ \SLS VDLJX GPPGSJVJGE vg A\XVDLX

    IJVJMOVL VDLJX JSS\LS ge OPPLOI>

    Oppliills je vdljx Bgvjge bglf vg Svxjkl el} oxm|blevs oef Vojv~s

    S|ppilblevoi Ltclxpv ga Xlcgxf je }djcd Vojv~ aojilf vg xojsl hlagxl vdl Fjsvxjcv

    Cg|xv gx je dlx Oppliioevs Gplejem Hxjla%

    Jesvlof ga offxlssjem vdl el} oxm|blevs) Vojv~ a|xvdlx oxm|ls vdl Fjsvxjcv

    Cg|xvs Flejoi ga dlx Oevj"SIOPP Bgvjge oef vdl Oevj"SIOPP svov|vl% Vojv~ oisg

    xojsls oxm|blevs ohg|v Oppliills Oes}lxjem Hxjla oef vdl cosls Qlxj~ge

    Flio}oxl) Jec% q% Cgqof Cgbbs% Cg%) 3== A%3f ?04? $:vd Cjx% 8006*) Qlss q% Cjho"

    Mljmz Cgxp% \SO) 3?= A%3f ?0:= $:vd Cjx% 8003*) oef Mxllespxjems Hopvjsv

    Cdxjsvjoe Aliig}sdjp Vx|sv q% Cjiilz) 18: A%3f ?016 $:vd Cjx% 80?0* os vdl hosjs agx

    Oppliills Bgvjge vg Svxjkl?% Vdjs js egv }dov Oppliills osklf vdjs Cg|xv vg Svxjkl)

    egx js jv o s|aajcjlev hosjs vg oiig} oxm|blevs oef s|ppgslf ljflecl vdov }os

    ? Vojv~ ciojbs vdlsl vdxll [3R cosls coeegv hl jevxgf|clf hlco|sl Oppliills fjf egv pxlslev

    vdlb vg vdl Fjsvxjcv Cg|xv% Oppliills cjvlf vg vdlsl vdxll [3Rcosls plxvojejem vg vdl opploiohjijvz

    ga vdl Oevj"SIOPP Gxflx) }djcd js egv o ajeoi Gxflx) }dle Ilol vg Oblef js Mxoevlf%

    Cosl> ??"

  • 7/31/2019 Liberi v Taitz - Appellees Reply to Taitz's Response in Opposition to Appellees Motion to Strike Doc 46-1

    8/19

    8

    egv pxlslevlf vg vdl Fjsvxjcv Cg|xv xlmoxfjem Vojv~s Oevj"SIOPP Bgvjge gx je

    Vojv~s Gplejem Hxjla%

    Vojv~ ciojbs hlco|sl Oppliills Ovvgxelz bofl svovlblevs vg vdl N|fml je

    Pleeszioejo ohg|v djs hlijla xlmoxfjem Gxiz Vojv~ vdov Ijhlxj oef Gsvliio oxl

    Hjxvdlxs% Gsvliio }os Ossjsvoev ]lhbosvlx agx Vojv~ agx o sdgxv plxjgf ga vjbl;

    oef Ijhlxj jevlxelf os Bx% Hlxms Poxoilmoi% O svovlblev bofl hz gel jefjjf|oi)

    }dg xlpxlslevs Gsvliio oef Ijhlxj fgls egv bokl Gsvliio oef Ijhlxj Hjxvdlxs%

    Egel ga vdl Oppliills $Piojevjaas* hligemlf gx omxllf }jvd Vojv~s pgijvjcoi

    fjssjflev bglblev%Egel ga vdl Oppliills s|ppgxv glxvdxg}jem g|x mglxeblev

    gx poxvjcjpovlf je oez ga vdl ocvjjsbs Vojv~ dos dloflf |p vg doxb oezgel%

    Vdl aocv vdov Gsvliio oef Ijhlxj }lxl }gxkjem agx Ovvgxelzs fgls egv bokl

    Gsvliio oef Ijhlxj Hjxvdlxs gx bokl vdlb jegilf je oez vzpl ga Pgijvjcoi

    Bglblev% Gsvliio oef Ijhlxj oxl egv p|hijc jefjjf|ois oef vdlz oxl egv

    Hjxvdlxs% Svovlblevs hz Oppliills Gsvliio oef Ijhlxjs cg|esli fgls egv

    vxoesagxb Gsvliio oef Ijhlxj jevg p|hijc ajm|xls; oez vzpl ga pgijvjcoi bglblev;

    gx jevg Hjxvdlxs% ]gisvge q% Xloflx-s Fjmlsv Osse) Jec%) $?:=:* 663 \%S% ?

  • 7/31/2019 Liberi v Taitz - Appellees Reply to Taitz's Response in Opposition to Appellees Motion to Strike Doc 46-1

    9/19

    3

    A%3f ?03:) ?064 $:vd Cjx% 8003*% Jss|ls xojslf agx vdl ajxsv vjbl je oe Oppliioevs

    Xlpiz Hxjla oxl cgesjflxlf }ojlf) vdl Cg|xv xg|vjeliz xla|sls vg cgesjflx vdlb%

    Sll) l%m%) Ilevjej q% Coi% Cvx% agx vdl Oxvs) 3=0 A%3f 43=) 463 e%1 $:vd Cjx% 8006*;

    \ejvlf Svovls q% Xloxfle) 36: A%3f 104) 1?6 e%8 $:vd Cjx% 8003*; Clfoeg"Qjlxo q%

    Osdcxgav) 386 A%3f ?018) ?011 e%< $:vd Cjx% 8003*> Mxoqls q% Oxpojg) 183 A%3f

    ?063) ?064 $:vd Cjx% 80?0* $plx c|xjob*;Lhlxil q% Cjvz ga Oeodljb) :0? A%8f 4?6)

    4?4 $:vd Cjx%?::0*%

    Vdl xlosge agx vdjs js aojxelss% ]dle oe jss|l js xojslf agx vdl ajxsv vjbl je o

    Xlpiz Hxjla) jv bloes vdov vdl Oppliills dol egv dof oe gppgxv|ejvz vg xlspgef vg

    vdov jss|l% Sll Ilevjej) 3=0 A%3f ov 463 e%1%

    Agx vdlsl xlosges) vdl svovlblevs'jss|ls'oxm|blevs opploxjem ge pomls ?0"?8

    ga Oppliioevs Xlpiz; Oppliioevs el} xlq|lsvlf xlijla ge poml 8

    Vojv~ splefs o igv ga vjbl ovvlbpvjem vg cgejecl vdjs Cg|xv vdov vdljx el}

    oxm|blevs oef S|ppilblevoi Ltclxpv ga Xlcgxf ga oe O|m|sv =) 800: Vxoescxjpv je

    oegvdlx Cg|xv je Pleeszioejo js pxgplx je xlspgefjem vg Oppliills Oes}lxjem

    Hxjla% [Vojv~ Gpp% J"JJ) pp% ?"

  • 7/31/2019 Liberi v Taitz - Appellees Reply to Taitz's Response in Opposition to Appellees Motion to Strike Doc 46-1

    10/19

    6

    Fjsvxjcv Cg|xvs Xlcgxf xlmoxfjem Vojv~s Oevj"SIOPP Bgvjge) egx }os jv xojslf je

    vdljx Oppliioevs Gplejem Hxjla% [Vojv~s Gpp% p% 3R

    Vdl Oppliiovl Xlcgxf coeegv jeci|fl aocv|oi oiilmovjges gx s|ppgslf

    ljflecl |es|ppgxvlf hz vdl Fjsvxjcv Cg|xv Xlcgxf% Zejm|l~ q% Oxj~geoes agx

    Gaajcjoi Lemijsd) 68 A%3f ?8?=) ?88?) e% 3 $:vd Cjx% ?::6*% Vdl cxlovjge ga vdl

    xlcgxf ge opploi gcc|xs sgiliz je vdl Fjsvxjcv Cg|xv% Oppliiovl Cg|xvs cgesjflx

    geiz vdl xlcgxf hlagxl vdl vxjoi n|fml }dle djs flcjsjge }os bofl $lbpdosjs je

    gxjmjeoi* Kjxsdelx q% \ejfle Cgxp% Ga Oblxjco) 468 A%8f ?0=6) ?0== $:vd

    Cjx%?:44*%

    Eljvdlx vdl Oppliioev egx vdl Oppliill coe off vg gx leioxml vdl xlcgxf ge

    Opploi vg jeci|fl bovlxjoi vdov }os egvhlagxl vdl Fjsvxjcv Cg|xv%Bgxxjsge q% Doii)

    81? A%3f 4:1) :00) ae%6 $:vd Cjx% 800?*% Oppliiovl Cg|xvs boz cgesjflx geiz vdgsl

    bovvlxs vdov }lxl hlagxl vdl Fjsvxjcv Cg|xv }dle vdl flcjsjge) hljem opploilf) }os

    levlxlf% \ejvlf Svovls q% &88)6=6%00 je \%S% C|xxlecz) 861 A%3f ?8?8) ?8?4 $:vd

    Cjx% 800?*%

    Vdl x|il pxgdjhjvjem leioxmlblev ga vdl xlcgxf js svxjcviz cgesvx|lf% Vdl

    Ejevd Cjxc|jv }jii svxjkl ltvxoelg|s bovvlxs axgb vdl xlcgxf ge jvs g}e bgvjge)

    lle ja vdl poxvjls dol svjp|iovlf vg vdljx jeci|sjge je vdl Xlcgxf ge Opploi%

    Poeo}jl} Fggx q% ]jefg} Cg% q% Xlzegifs Blvoi Cg%) 8

  • 7/31/2019 Liberi v Taitz - Appellees Reply to Taitz's Response in Opposition to Appellees Motion to Strike Doc 46-1

    11/19

    ''fjcvjgeoxz%xlalxlecl%cgb'hxg}sl'cgesgijfovlf7s2v%

    Nlaaxlz C|eejemdob) Lsq|jxl oef djs cijlev) Oppliioev Gxiz Vojv~ oxl hgvd

    slosgelf ovvgxelzs) oef sdg|if keg} vdl bloejem ga o Cg|xv Gxflx% O Xlpiz

    Hxjla js oiig}lf =)000 }gxfs gx ajavlle [?

  • 7/31/2019 Liberi v Taitz - Appellees Reply to Taitz's Response in Opposition to Appellees Motion to Strike Doc 46-1

    14/19

    4

    ag|x [16R pomls os vdljx Cgesgijfovlf Xlpiz Hxjla) je jgiovjge gaAlf% X% Opp% P%

    38$o*$=*$H*$jj*%

    JQ% SOECVJGES OMOJESV NLAAXLZ C\EEJEMDOB) LS_\JXL

    oef djs CIJLEV) GXIZ VOJV^) LS_\JXL oxl ]OXXOEVLF>

    Vojv~ ciojbs vdov Oppliills aojilf vg cjvl }dov vdlz fjf vdov }oxxoevs

    soecvjges% Vdjs sjbpiz js egv vdl cosl%

    Oppliills a|iiz cjvlf vg vdl aocvs vdov Vojv~ oef dlx ovvgxelz) Nlaaxlz

    C|eejemdob) Lsq|jxl jeci|flf el} oxm|blevs oef fgc|blevs je o S|ppilblevoi

    Ltclxpv ga Xlcgxf vdov }lxl egv pxlslevlf vg vdl Fjsvxjcv Cg|xv je xlmoxfs vg

    Vojv~s Oevj"SIOPP Bgvjge) egx }lxl vdlz jeci|flf je Vojv~s Oppliioevs

    Gplejem Hxjla% Oppliills oisg osklf agx Soecvjges oef Ovvgxelz Alls agx Vojv~

    oef dlx Ovvgxelz) Nlaaxlz C|eejemdob) Lsq|jxls) aoji|xl vg ohjfl hz vdl Cg|xvs

    Alhx|oxz 3) 80?8 Gxflx% Oii ga vdl agxlmgjem }djcd js ltovjg|s) ovvlbpvjem vg

    pxln|fjcl vdjs Cg|xv omojesv Oppliills) oef dos |exlosgeohiz jecxloslf vdl cgsv ga

    ijvjmovjge hz vdljx jeci|sjge ga |eelclssoxz oef jeofbjssjhil bovlxjois%

    Soecvjges oxl pxgplx }dle o poxvz aojis vg Cgbpiz }jvd Cjxc|jv X|il 30"?)

    hz jeci|fjem jxxlilqoev bovlxjois je vdl Ltclxpvs ga Xlcgxfs gx Ltdjhjvs ajilf

    }jvd o Hxjla [lbpdosjs offlfR% Sll vdjs Cg|xvs Cjxc|jv X|il 30"88% Vdl Ejevd

    Cjxc|jv Igcoi X|il 30"8 oiig}s agx Soecvjges) Cgsvs oef Ovvgxelz Alls omojesv oe

    8Vdl Ejevd Cjxc|jv Cg|xv dos vdl jedlxlev pg}lx vg svxjkl jxxliloev bovlxjoi% Cjxc|jv X|il 30"?;

    Sll oisg ca% Coxxjmoe q% Coi% Svovl Ilmjsiov|xl) 813 A%8f

  • 7/31/2019 Liberi v Taitz - Appellees Reply to Taitz's Response in Opposition to Appellees Motion to Strike Doc 46-1

    15/19

    :

    Ovvgxelz }dg qltovjg|siz oef |exlosgeohiz jecxlosls vdl cgsv ga ijvjmovjge hz

    jeci|sjge ga |eelclssoxz bovlxjoi je vdl ltclxpvs ga xlcgxf) os Gxiz Vojv~) Lsq|jxl

    oef Nlaaxlz C|eejemdob) Lsq|jxl) Ovvgxelz agx Gxiz Vojv~ dol fgel vg vdl

    Oppliills dlxlje%

    84 \%S%C% ?:8= oiig}s vdjs Cjxc|jv vg Soecvjge oe Ovvgxelz }dg sg

    b|ivjpijls vdl pxgcllfjems je oez cosl |exlosgeohiz oef qltovjg|siz agx vdgsl

    ltclss cgsvs) ltplesls) oef ovvgxelzs alls xlosgeohiz jec|xxlf os o xls|iv ga

    ovvgxelzs cgef|cv% Xlckilsselss s|aajcls |eflx ?:8=) h|v vdl Cg|xv b|sv ajef

    vdlxl }os hof aojvd%H%K%H% q% Bo|j Pgijcl Flpv%) 8=1 A%3f ?0:?) ??0="04 $:vd Cjx%

    8008*% Vdlxl js eg q|lsvjge vdov Gxiz Vojv~) Lsq|jxl oef Nlaaxlz C|eejemdob)

    Lsq|jxl) }dg oxl hgvd slosgelf Ovvgxelzs ijcleslf vg pxocvjcl io} je vdl Svovl ga

    Coijagxejo) ocvjges ga jeci|fjem el} oxm|blevs oef ovvlbpvjem vg jeci|fl o

    vxoescxjpv ga oe O|m|sv =) 800: Cg|xv dloxjem vdov }os elqlx pxgjflf vg vdl

    Fjsvxjcv Cg|xv gx je Vojv~s Gplejem Hxjla) oii ga }djcd }os je hof aojvd oef jv js

    s|ppgxvlf hz vdljx ajijem ge Opxji ?:) 80?8) }djcd js cilox oef cgeqjecjem

    lqjflecl% Je xl Ildvjele)

  • 7/31/2019 Liberi v Taitz - Appellees Reply to Taitz's Response in Opposition to Appellees Motion to Strike Doc 46-1

    16/19

    ?0

    Nlaaxlz C|eejemdob) Lsq|jxl) cg|esli agx Gxiz Vojv~) Lsq|jxl jgiovlf vdl

    Cg|xvs Alhx|oxz 3) 80?8 Cgesgijfovjge Gxflx) hz ossjsvjem Gxiz Vojv~ je ajijem o

    slcgefoxz Xlpiz Hxjla ge hldoia ga FGAA) }djcd oigel }oxxoevs Soecvjges oef oe

    o}oxf ga Ovvgxelz Alls oef Cgsvs vg Oppliills) Oigl Qlxo ga Oblxjco) Jec% q%

    \ejvlf Svovls) 3=1 A%3f :10 $:vd Cjx% 8006* $Soecvjges oxl oppxgpxjovl }dle o

    poxvz p|xpgsliz jgiovls o Cg|xv Gxflx*Jf% ov :11%

    Q% CGECI\SJGES>

    Agx vdl xlosges g|vijelf dlxlje) Oppliioevs Gxiz Vojv~ oef Flalef g|x

    Axllfgbs Ag|efovjges) Jec%s Xlpiz Hxjla) FE 60"?) Cosl Eg% ??"

  • 7/31/2019 Liberi v Taitz - Appellees Reply to Taitz's Response in Opposition to Appellees Motion to Strike Doc 46-1

    17/19

  • 7/31/2019 Liberi v Taitz - Appellees Reply to Taitz's Response in Opposition to Appellees Motion to Strike Doc 46-1

    18/19

  • 7/31/2019 Liberi v Taitz - Appellees Reply to Taitz's Response in Opposition to Appellees Motion to Strike Doc 46-1

    19/19