Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Leonid Grigorenko
Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research
Dubna, Russia
Theoretical basics and modern status of radioactivity studies
Lecture 5: Nonresonant phenomena. Astrophysical applications
Halo and excitation modes
Excitation MODES idea is introduced to describe strong enhancements of various cross sections connected ONLY with initial structure and reaction mechanism. This is in sharp contrast with RESONANCE phenomena, which should be, by definition, insensitive to initial conditions and method of population.
Nucleon halo
8Li H = 1.55
6Li H = 1.62
8B H = 1.77
6He H = 1.81
11Li H = 2.27
< RN-CM(core) >
< RN-CM(halo) >
11Be H = 2.41
H =
"Haloism coefficient"
Nuclei near driplines can form kind of planetary system consisting of compact “core” and “valence” nucleons remotely orbiting it and residing mainly in classically forbidden region
G.N. Flerov, A.S. Ilyinov (1982)
Nucleon halo. Borromean nuclei
Major example: soft dipole mode Proposed by Ikeda in 1988
There is a strong low energy peak even without any final state interaction
- Photodissociation - Coulex
Yg.s.
D Yg.s.
| < Plane wave | D | Yg.s.> |2
Normal WF Weakly bound (halo) WF
Estimate of soft dipole mode in on-neutron halo system
corehalo/skin
E1
str
en
gth
fu
ncti
on
E
Giant dipole resonancePigmy resonance/
soft dipole mode
np
Soft dipole mode in two-body and three-body continuum
Well understood in two-body systems
Poorly understood in two-body systems
strong
p-wave
1
0+
p-wave
strong
core
strong
p-wave
s-wave
weak
core
E1
11Be 11Li
Soft dipole mode in 17Ne
L.V.Grigorenko, K.Langanke, N.B.Shul’gina,
M.V.Zhukov, PLB 641 (2006) 254.
Very expressed soft dipole peak has been
predicted for 17Ne
For the recent results on GSI S318 experiment
0 2 4 6 8 10 120.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
Grigorenko and Zhukov,
NPA 713 (2003) 372.
W(s2) = 50 %
W(s2) = 93 %
W(s2) = 25 %
W(s2) = 5 %
dB
E1(E
)/d
E
(e2 fm
2 M
eV
)
E (MeV)
T. Oishi, K. Hagino, and H. Sagawa PRC 84, 057301 (2011)
“Effect of proton-proton Coulomb repulsion on soft dipole excitations of light
proton-rich nuclei”
Soft dipole mode in 8He
Large uncertainty in the 2+ 8He state energy E(2+) = 2.7 - 3.6 MeV D.R. Tilley et al. NPA 745 (2004) 155
“Standard” R-matrix: energy ~3.6 MeV and Wigner limit width ~0.6 MeV
Low-energy events are not reproduced in any of the cases
E1 contribution can modify the positions of 2+ state up to about 3.9 MeV
M.S.Golovkov et al., PLB 672 (2009) 22 L.V. Grigorenko et al., Part. Nucl. Lett. 6 (2009) 118
0 5 10 150
5
10
15
20
1+ ?
2+1 ?
8He coincid.
6He coincid.
E1 strength
function
Nu
mb
er o
f ev
ents
E8He (MeV)
0+ g.s.
0
5
10
15
0
20
40
60 (c)
Nu
mb
er o
f ev
ents
polynomial "background"
Bohlen et al.
Num
ber
of
even
ts
0 2 4 6 8
(d)
6He+n+n
threshold
E* (MeV)
2+, no E1
1
2+, with E1
1 + 2+
0
50
100 (b)Meister et al.
(m
b/M
eV)
0
5
10
15Markemroth et al.
(mb/M
eV)
(a)
Corrected first 2+ states position in 8He
IsoVector Soft Dipole Mode in 6Be
Large cross section above
2+ and no resonance
DL = 1 identification –
some kind of dipole
response
No particle stable g.s. –
can not be built on
spatially extended g.s. WF
Built on the spatially
extended 6Li g.s.
A.S.Fomichev et al., PLB 708 (2012) 6.
Experimentally observed and theoretically discussed: IVSDM as a specific form of SDM
Astrophysical applications
For astrophysical application knowledge of BOTH resonant and nonresonant radiative capture cross sections can be needed depending on specific situation. While RESONANT radiative capture requires the knowledge of resonance properties only, for understanding of nonresonant capture studies of excitation modes are required
Modes of (2р) radioactive capture
A
A
A
Direct
nonresonant
capture
EW(E)
Sequential
nonresonant
capture
Direct
resonant
capture
AA
AA
AA
A
A
E
W(E)
AProton threshold
Sequential
resonant
capture
rp-process at high density and temperature.
15O, 18Ne, 38Ca : J.Gorres, M.Wiescher, and F.-K.Thielemann,
PRC 51 (1995) 392.
68Se, 72Kr, … ,96Cd : H.Schatz et al., Phys. Rep. 294 (1998) 167.
rp-process waiting
points
True 2p resonance
Proton resonance15
F
18Na
2p
p
2p
p
12O
16Ne
19Mg 21
Mg
19Na
19Ne
16F
15O
14O
16O
17Ne 18
Ne
17F
20Na
20Mg2p
13O
Halo
Reverse to soft dipole mode
Reverse to true 2р decay
Reverse to sequential 2р
decay
Resonant radiative capture Nucleosynthesis: Saha (chemical
balance) equations
Proton capture Two-Proton capture
Need to know ONLY particle and gamma
widths
Problem of resonant radiative capture is just time-reversed problem of
radioactive decay
Nonresonant radiative capture
For nonresonant radiative capture to halo nucleus we need to understand soft dipole
excitations
0.1 1 10
Görres et al.
PRC 51 (1995) 392
Grigorenko et al.
PLB 641 (2006) 254
0.02
N 2 A
v
(
cm6/s
)
T (GK)
p
p
2p
p
13O
16Ne
19Mg 21
Mg
19Na
19Ne
16F
15O
14O
16O
17Ne 18
Ne
17F
20Na
20Mg2p
2p radiative capture 15O(2p,)17Ne
competes with 15O(a,)19Ne
«waiting point» 15O T1/2 = 122 s
Resonant radiative
capture on 3/2-
Nonresonant radiative
capture on 1/2+, 3/2+
Application to nuclear astrophysics
Competition between a and 2p capture
15O(2p,)17Ne versus 15O(a,)19Ne
Densities (in g/ccm) at which the production rate of 17Ne by 2p-capture on 15O equals the production rate of 19Ne by α capture as function of temperature and α-particle mass abundance Xa = 4 Ya.
1E2
1E4
1E6
1E8
1E10
1E12
1E14
1E41E6
1E8
1E10
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6
T
(GK
)
Xa
Upper
(a)
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6
(c)
Gorres, et al.
Xa
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6
(b)
Median
10.0
7.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.15
0.1
Xa
Democratic decay
10He. Extreme importance of reaction mechanism
The resonance is, by definition, something insensitive to population conditions. However, when resonances become sufficiently broad, their OBSERVABLE properties may become sensitive to initial state properties and reaction mechanism details. Thus, such broad resonances may obtain properties characteristioc for excitation modes. Broad ground state resonances are typical for democratic 2n decays of nuclei beyond the neutron dripline.
Origins of ideas
Two-proton radioactivity: Predicted theoretically
Democratic decay concept: Inspired by experimental data
Bochkarev et al., NPA 215 (1989) 215 (1989)
Goldansky, NPA 19 482 (1960)
Geesaman et al., PRC 15 1835 (1977)
p-p scatering
length a ~ 30 fm
Geesaman et al.:
10He populated from 11Li in a sudden removal model
Removal of a deeply bound proton from 11Li
Large center-of-mass recoil effects, population of
different Jp
Abnormal radial extents for formfactors of excited states
10He populated in transfer and in
knockout from 11Li
10He spectrum from transfer
10He spectrum from 11Li
Fourier transform of 11Li source function
(no 10He FSI)
10He spectrum from 11Li is a pileup of
different Jp
10He data calculation with FSI calculation
“no FSI”
10He spectrum from 11Li is dominated by
the initial state contribution
Recently studied true 2n emitters: 10He: Golovkov et al., PLB 672, 22 (2009),
Johansson et al., NPA 842, 15 (2010), Sidorchuk et al., PRL 108, 202502 (2012),
Z. Kohley et al., PRL 109, 232501 (2012).
13Li: Aksyutina et al., PLB 666, 430 (2008),
Z. Kohley et al., PRC 87, 011304(R) (2013).
16Be: Spyrou et al., PRL 108, 102501 (2012).
26O: Lunderberg et al., PRL 108, 142503 (2012), Caesar et al., PRC 88, 034313 (2013), Z. Kohley et al., PRL 110, 152501 (2013).
10He populated in transfer and alpha removal from 14Be
14Be has extreme halo configuration
1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 26000.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0 6Be
Sum 0+ (bins 1-3)
Sum 2+ (bins 4-7)
bin8 2.99 < E* < 4.50 MeV
bin9 4.50 < E* < 7.69 MeV
bin10 7.69 < E* < 11. MeV
No
rmal
ized
dis
trib
uti
on
K|| (MeV)
7Be(9Be,6Be)X
MSU, 2010
Charity et al.
6Be example from MSU