28
Lecture seven © copyright qinwang 2013 [email protected] SHUFE school of international business

Lecture seven © copyright : qinwang 2013 [email protected] SHUFE school of international business

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Lecture seven

© copyright : qinwang [email protected]  

SHUFE school of international business

Firm decision in monopoly

The reason for monopoly Price strategy

Short-run decision Long-run decision

Warfare loss in monopoly the Theory of Contestable Markets

Why to be monopoly

Resources monopoly: ALCOA (aluminum); DeBeers (diamond)

Natural monopoly: it is efficient for one firm to supply the whole market.

Government-authorized franchise: only one firm is approved by government.

Competition lead to monopoly Patent or copyright

Monopolist: price decision

Q0

P

SACSMC

MRD

0Q

0P

Q0

PSAC

SMC

MR D

0Q

0P

Q0

P

SACSMC

MR D

0Q

0P

Would Monopolist be in loss?

Super profit lossBreak even

Long-run decision in monopoly

Monopolist maximizes profit by choosing to produce output where MR = LMC, as long as P LAC Will exit industry if P < LAC Monopolist will adjust plant size to the optimal

levelOptimal plant is where the short-run average

cost curve is tangent to the long-run average cost at the profit-maximizing output level

MR

0P

1P

1AC

0AC

Q0

P

D

LMC

LAC

0SAC0SMC

1SAC1SMC

0Q 1Q

Monopolist’s decision in long-run

LACLMC

Q0

P

MRD

0Q

0P

Q0

P

LACLMC

MRD

0Q

0P

0AC

Monopolist will loss in long-run?

Optimal markup, contribution margin and gross profit margin.

Optimal markup MR=MC MR=P(1+1/Ep);so P=MC*Ep/(Ep+1)

Contribution margin: P-MC Contribution margin percentage: (P-

MC)/P

Gross profit margin: P-MC-FC

the Theory of Contestable Markets

In 1982, William . Baumol set up this theory.

a perfectly contestable market would have no barriers to entry or exit. Contestable markets are characterized by "hit and run" competition; if a firm in a contestable market raises its prices much beyond the average price level of the market, and thus begins to earn excess profits, potential rivals will enter the market, hoping to exploit the price level for easy profit. When the original incumbent firm(s) respond by returning prices to levels consistent with normal profits, the new firms will exit. Because of this, even a single-firm market can show highly competitive behavior.

Entry of new firms into a market erodes market power of existing firms by increasing the number of substitutes

A firm can possess a high degree of market power only when strong barriers to entry exist Conditions that make it difficult for new

firms to enter a market in which economic profits are being earned

Barriers to Entry

Common Entry Barriers

Economies of scale When long-run average cost declines

over a wide range of output relative to demand for the product, there may not be room for another large producer to enter market

Product differentiation Barriers created by government

Licenses, exclusive franchises

Essential input barriers One firm controls a crucial input in the

production process

Brand loyalties Strong customer allegiance to existing

firms may keep new firms from finding enough buyers to make entry worthwhile

Common Entry Barriers

Consumer lock-in Potential entrants can be deterred if they

believe high switching costs will keep them from inducing many consumers to change brands

Network externalities Occur when benefit or utility of a product

increases as more consumers buy & use it Make it difficult for new firms to enter

markets where firms have established a large base or network of buyers

Common Entry Barriers

Monopoly profit and limit pricing

A limit price is the price set by a monopolist to discourage entry into a market, and is illegal in many countries.

When MR=MC, monopolist may earn short-run profit maximization, that would inducing new entries. Monopolist falls its price to discourage entry, that may reduce its shout-rum profit but would gain more in long-run.

E.g: price strategy of Galanz

The sale of Galanz’s microwave (sales volume):

1993:10000 ; 1994:100000; 1995:250000,market share 25.1%(Xianhua

24.8%); 1996:600000,market share 34.7% ; 1997:1250000, market share 49.6% ; sales

profit rate 11% 1998:3150000(export),2130000(demestic),mar

ket share 61.43%,sales profit rate 9% 1999,price falled and reduce sales profit rate to

6%.

limit pricing

limit pricing

Short-runShort-run

Long-runLong-run

Natural monopoly and price regulation

A natural monopoly by contrast is a condition on the cost-technology of an industry whereby it is most efficient (involving the lowest long-run average cost) for production to be concentrated in a single form.

Examples: power grid companies, gas companies, electric power companies

price discrimination

Price discrimination or price differentiation exists when sales of identical goods or services are transacted at different prices from the same provider Doctors or lawyers charge for different fee

for the same service. Power plant differents its price to firm and

individual. Restaurant charges different price for old

and young person.

First-Degree (Perfect) Price Discrimination Every unit is sold for the maximum

price each consumer is willing to pay Allows the firm to capture entire consumer

surplus

Difficulties Requires precise knowledge about every

buyer’s demand for the good Seller must negotiate a different price for

every unit sold to every buyer

First-Degree (Perfect) Price Discrimination (Figure 14.2)

Second-Degree Price Discrimination

Lower prices are offered for larger quantities and buyers can self-select the price by choosing how much to buy

When the same consumer buys more than one unit of a good or service at a time, the marginal value placed on additional units declines as more units are consumed

Declining block pricingOffers quantity discounts over successive discrete blocks of quantities purchased

Block Pricing with Five Blocks

D

Two-part pricingCharges buyers a fixed access charge (A) to purchase as many units as they wish for a constant fee (f) per unitTotal expenditure (TE) for q units is:

TE A fq

Third-Degree Price Discrimination

If a firm sells in two markets, 1 & 2; ask for different price for each market.

How to allocate output?Allocate output (sales) so MR1 = MR2

Optimal total output is that for which MRT = MC

For profit-maximization, allocate sales of total output so that

MRT = MC = MR1 = MR2

Why choose price discrimination?

Different Demand elasticity? Different cost? Different time?