46
7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 1/46 HH Horst Rademacher Lect 15: EQ Forecasting Fall Semester 2015 27 Oct 15

Lect 16 - 27 Oct

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 1/46

HHHorst Rademacher

Lect 15: EQ

Forecasting

Fall Semester

2015

27 Oct 15

Page 2: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 2/46

Class organization  Extra Credit

Choose any topic related toEarthquakes and Seismology

Be Creative

It doesn’t have to be a written report

 Add background stories, personal experiences,reflect on the issues

Page 3: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 3/46

Class organization  Extra Credit

Seismicity reports:Cut and paste from

USGS and news websites

is not enough

cite all relevant sources

add your name and GSI on front page 

Page 4: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 4/46

HHAnyquestions?

Page 5: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 5/46

Seismicity Report  Areas with the

largest Seismic Hazards

Hindukush AfghanistanTajikistan

Kyrgyzstan

M=7.5

26 Oct 1509:09:33 UTC

Page 6: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 6/46

Felt from Tashkent

to Kolkata = 1700 mi

Seismicity Report Hindukush, M=7.5

26 Oct 15

Page 7: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 7/46

215 kmdeep

Seismicity Report 

Page 8: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 8/46

Seismicity Report Hindukush, M=7.5

26 Oct 15, 215 km deep

Page 9: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 9/46

Seismicity Report Hindukush, M=7.5, 26 Oct 1

Recorded in Orinda

Page 10: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 10/46

Seismicity Report 

Low pass filter

Page 11: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 11/46

Seismicity Report 

High pass filter

Whatis this?

Page 12: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 12/46

Seismicity Report  San Ramon, M=2.6,riding on the Hindukush waves

Page 13: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 13/46

Seismicity Report Two EQ superimposed

in one recording

Page 14: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 14/46

HHAnyquestions?

Page 15: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 15/46

Definition of EQ prediction: 

To be useful , we have to pinpoint:

When

Where

How strong

These are scientifically

very stringent and challenging requirements

Recap from last lecture I:

Page 16: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 16/46

Why are we failing? 

We need to have at least one

measureable precursor , whichconsistently occurs before each EQ

- Foreshocks, Seismic swarms- Change in velocity of seismic waves- Ground uplift- Radon Gas- Electrical conductivity- Animal behavior

Recap from last lecture II:

Page 17: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 17/46

 Animal behavior

Circled number isthe number of

reported incidents

Recap from last lecture III:

Page 18: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 18/46

and then you wait………..

EQ Prediction was a failure!

28 Sep 2004

….but noprecursers

Recap from last lecture IV:

Page 19: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 19/46

HHAnyquestions?

Page 20: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 20/46

If EQ prediction is a failure,what can we do?

Prediction vs. Forecasting

Let’s lookelsewhere?

l d

Page 21: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 21/46

We can precisely predictthe phases of the moon

Prediction vs. Forecasting

Wi hi f

Page 22: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 22/46

Within a few cm, we canprecisely predict the tides

Prediction vs. Forecasting

Page 23: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 23/46

Falling objects in agravity field

G is the gravitational constant 

6.674×10−11 N · (m/kg)2 

Sir Isaac Newton, 1642-1726

Prediction vs. Forecasting

Page 24: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 24/46

Prediction vs. Forecasting

If we know the laws that govern a process,we can predict the outcome

This applies to all natural sciences:Physics, biology, chemistry, Earth science

So: Why can’t we predict EQ?

We don’t know all the laws

Page 25: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 25/46

Las Vegas gambling? very poor

Elections? in dictatorships: very goodin democracies: poor

Prediction

Stock Market? poor

How successful ispredictionelsewhere?

How long will a marriage last? poor

What about sports?

Page 26: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 26/46

Prediction

Page 27: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 27/46

Prediction

What about the weather?

Page 28: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 28/46

Not weather predictionbut weather forecast

Prediction vs. Forecasting

Page 29: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 29/46

Prediction Coin toss

Heads or Tails?

C i t

Page 30: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 30/46

PredictionCoin toss

Gaussian or Normal Distribution

Page 31: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 31/46

Prediction vs. Forecasting

If we know the laws that govern a process,we can predict the outcome

Prediction: Certainty

If we don’t know these laws,we can only forecast the outcome

Forecasting: ProbabilityOddsChances 

Page 32: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 32/46

HHAnyquestions?

Page 33: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 33/46

Forecast Difference:prediction vs. forecast

Prediction:

To be useful, we have

to exactly pinpoint:

WhereWhenHow strong

No false alarms

No missed EQ

Forecast:

Probabilistic

assessment of EQoccurance

Time window,Only estimate oflocation andmagnitude

Thi d

Page 34: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 34/46

Reading:USGS fact Sheet 2015-3009 (2015)

 A New Earthquake Forecast forCalifornia’s Complex Fault System

 An update to:USGS fact Sheet 039-03 (2003)Understanding Earthquake Hazards in the SanFrancisco Bay Region

ForecastThis we can do…

Page 35: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 35/46

Statewide:

99% chance of M ≥ 6.7 

San Francisco region:

63% chance of M ≥ 6.7 

Los Angeles region:

67% chance of M ≥ 6.7 

Forecast

www.wgcep.org/ucerf3 

P t EQ id d

Page 36: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 36/46

ForecastPast EQ considered

in UCERF-3

Page 37: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 37/46

Forecast

Whi h f lt d ?

Page 38: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 38/46

ForecastWhich faults are ready?

Page 39: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 39/46

Forecast

San Francisco

vs.Los Angeles

Page 40: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 40/46

Forecast

Probability

for each faultin the Bay area

Page 41: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 41/46

HHAnyquestions?

Page 42: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 42/46

Thursday:

Guest Lecture:Prof. Charles Scawthorn, Kyoto, PEER:

 Aftermaths of strong EQ

Homework #2 

Page 43: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 43/46

X

Page 44: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 44/46

HHAnyquestions?

Page 45: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 45/46

Page 46: Lect 16 - 27 Oct

7/23/2019 Lect 16 - 27 Oct

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lect-16-27-oct 46/46