2
lazy people VS Active People Should sloppy people and neat people be compared? No, that comparison is in the English book. What if fat people and skinny people are compared? No, that is too much of a touchy subject. How about the young and the old be compared? No, that does not work either; a person would need to have enough of an opinion on both sides to compare the two. How about lazy people and active people? Now that is a good comparison. Lazy people are not bums, worthless, scum, or any of the other stereotypes that are usually associated with them. Lazy people are given a bad wrap, and deserve someone to tell people the truth about the lazy. Lazy people are not sloths, actually they are much different. Sloths are slow creatures at everything they do. The lazy on the other hand are only slow on the non important things, such as getting out of bed or eating lunch. When it comes to important matters though they, the lazy, will act efficiently and quickly, such as saving children from a burning bus or getting a cat from a tree (although dogs are better). Many well known and influential people are lazy. A few examples are Ben Affleck, Paris Hilton, Kevin Federline, and the Osbournes. None of these people, except Ozzy Osbourne, have actually done anything in lines of true “work”; instead they have become famous through only going after the specific goals that they want. Ben Affleck has achieved success in his work, although the majority of people view his work as horrible pieces of work, but he has still become famous from working with people who he knew would help him become famous. That quality shows how smart a lazy person can be that he or she does not actually have to work hard to achieve stardom. This quality is also shown in Kevin Federline’s life and his “achievements.” Active people on the other hand are overhyped and are viewed as the heroes of this world when that is not true. These people have so many goals and aspirations that they do not allow others to have a chance to get a job in a line of work that suits them. Active people are like a virus, they attack one area (take all the jobs in one line of work) and then go to the next area to repeat the same process. This process allows people to amass a

lazy people vs Active People

  • Upload
    spencer

  • View
    122

  • Download
    6

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

lazy people VS Active People Should sloppy people and neat people be compared? No, that comparison is in the English book. What if fat people and skinny people are compared? No, that is too much of a touchy subject. How about the young and the old be compared? No, that does not work either; a person would need to have enough of an opinion on both sides to compare the two. How about lazy people and active people? Now that is a good comparison. Lazy people are not bums, worthless, scum, or any of the other stereotypes that are usually associated with them. Lazy people are given a bad wrap, and deserve someone to tell people the truth about the lazy. Lazy people are not sloths, actually they are much different. Sloths are slow creatures at everything they do. The lazy on the other hand are only slow on the non important things, such as getting out of bed or eating lunch. When it comes to important matters though they, the lazy, will act efficiently and quickly, such as saving children from a burning bus or getting a cat from a tree (although dogs are better). Many well known and influential people are lazy. A few examples are Ben Affleck, Paris Hilton, Kevin Federline, and the Osbournes. None of these people, except Ozzy Osbourne, have actually done anything in lines of true work; instead they have become famous through only going after the specific goals that they want. Ben Affleck has achieved success in his work, although the majority of people view his work as horrible pieces of work, but he has still become famous from working with people who he knew would help him become famous. That quality shows how smart a lazy person can be that he or she does not actually have to work hard to achieve stardom. This quality is also shown in Kevin Federlines life and his achievements. Active people on the other hand are overhyped and are viewed as the heroes of this world when that is not true. These people have so many goals and aspirations that they do not allow others to have a chance to get a job in a line of work that suits them. Active people are like a virus, they attack one area (take all the jobs in one line of work) and then go to the next area to repeat the same process. This process allows people to amass a large amount of riches and accomplishments, but because of the large amount they do not feel any triumph from these achievements. A few examples of these horrifying people would be Donald Trump, Simon Cowell, Michael Jackson, Al Gore, and Bill Clinton. Look at the works of Donald Trump, all of the casinos, hotels, and his TV show The Apprentice. Along with The Apprentice, American Idol, which has Simon Cowell as one of the judges, is another terrible reality show that distorts the minds of our fellow humans and corrupts the youth of our nation. Our moral character has been destroyed through the actions of active people. The world needs more lazy people because through their works it can become a greater place.