Upload
others
View
9
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Inflation hedging with real assets
Laurens Swinkels, PhD
Quantitative Strategies
Dublin, 28 August 2009
© Laurens Swinkels
Inflation hedging with real assets 2
Inflation: Past, today, future…?
Inflation hedging with real assets 3
Inflation rate
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Dec
-70
Dec
-72
Dec
-74
Dec
-76
Dec
-78
Dec
-80
Dec
-82
Dec
-84
Dec
-86
Dec
-88
Dec
-90
Dec
-92
Dec
-94
Dec
-96
Dec
-98
Dec
-00
Dec
-02
Dec
-04
Dec
-06
Dec
-08
Ireland Ireland HICP Europe United States Netherlands
Inflation in a historical perspective
Inflation hedging with real assets 4
Inflation rate
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
Dec-99 Dec-00 Dec-01 Dec-02 Dec-03 Dec-04 Dec-05 Dec-06 Dec -07 Dec-08
Ireland Ireland HICP Europe United States Netherlands
Inflation in the recent past
Inflation hedging with real assets 5
Goal and setup of the presentation
– Indicate the relation between the asset side of the balance sheet of the pension fund with the inflation targets or ambitions of the pension fund
1. Link with traditional Asset Liability Management study
2. Modelling of real pension liabilities
3. Direct ways to hedge inflation risk
4. Indirect ways to hedge inflation risk
5. Summary
Inflation hedging with real assets 6
Link with traditional ALM study
Characteristics of a traditional ALM study
– Interaction of all policy instruments (contributions, indexation)
– Today: focus on investment policy only
– Long horizon (typically > 15 years)
– Today: focus on planning horizon (1-3 years)
– Addition of non-linear derivative instruments
(like options and swaptions)
– Today: focus on underlying asset classes
Dutch indexation label that indicates how likelyit is that pensions will be inflation protected
Inflation hedging with real assets 7
Modeling of inflation protected liabilities
Inflation compensation becomes a more important part of your pension onthe long run, as this liability profile of a pension fund indicates
2009
2011
2013
2015
2017
2019
2021
2023
2025
2027
2029
2031
2033
2035
2037
2039
2041
2043
2045
2047
2049
2051
2053
2055
2057
2059
2061
2063
2065
2067
2069
2071
2073
2075
2077
2079
2081
2083
2085
Inflation hedging with real assets 8
Modeling of inflation protected liabilities
t=0 t=15
€ 2079€ 10005% interest
€ 2798
€ 1154
€ 867
4% interest
6% interest + 2% inflation
€ 13465% interest
€ 15544% interest
6% interest€ 1167
mark-to-market
markt-to-market
‘mark-to-market’
Inflation hedging with real assets 9
Euro break-even inflation term
Term structure of break-even inflation
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Maturity
Infla
tion
(%)
08/26/2009 12/31/2008
Inflation hedging with real assets 10
Modeling of inflation protected liabilities
– Higher interest rate decreased value of nominal liabilities, but wheninflation rises the value of inflation protect liabilities increases
0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5%1438 1549 1668 1796 1933 2079 22361334 1334 1334 1334 1334 1334 13341337 1441 1551 1670 1797 1933 20791241 1241 1241 1241 1241 1241 12411244 1340 1443 1554 1672 1798 19341154 1154 1154 1154 1154 1154 11541158 1247 1343 1446 1556 1674 18001074 1074 1074 1074 1074 1074 10741078 1161 1250 1346 1448 1558 16751000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 10001004 1081 1164 1253 1349 1451 1560931 931 931 931 931 931 931935 1007 1085 1167 1256 1351 1453867 867 867 867 867 867 867
expected inflation
nom
inal
inte
rest
rat
e
3.0%
3.5%
4.0%
4.5%
5.0%
5.5%
6.0%
Inflation hedging with real assets 11
Modeling of inflation protected liabilities
– Expected inflation, break-even inflation, and expected return
Nominal rate
Break-eveninflatio
n
Real rate
Expected inflation
InflationRisk premium
Expectedreturn re
albond
Expectedreturn nominalbond
Inflation hedging with real assets 12
Euro break-even inflation (20yr)
Inflation hedging with real assets 13
Direct inflation protection
Source: Kerkhof en Swinkels (2008)
Total amount (billions) of principal outstanding per maturity on HICPxT
Inflation hedging with real assets 14
Direct inflation protection
– Inflation-linked bonds; inflation protection always in combinationwith credit risk on governments (e.g. Italy and Greece)
Break-eveninflation
Realizedinflation
At maturity, the pension fund pays the counterparty the break-even inflation and receives from the counterparty the realizedinflation over the period
To mitigate counterparty credit risk as a result of mark-to-market valuation during the life of the swap, a well-executed collateral management process should be in place
Inflation hedging with real assets 15
Direct inflation protection
Source: Kerkhof en Swinkels (2008)
Estimated trading volume (millions) in the inflation swap market
Inflation hedging with real assets 16
Indirect inflation protection
– Limited possibilities to buy direct inflation protection (certainly at the macro level)
– Analyzing inflation-protecting real asset classes by investigatingthe correlation with inflation-linked government bonds
– Useful to know whether current portfolio already contains asset withinflation-protection
– Problems for empirical research:
– No data series with long history available
– No availability at all for inflation of individual European countries(except for France); basis risk, also with respect to wage inflation
– Relatively little (recent) periods with high inflation
– At Robeco we investigated this in more detail last year – resultsof that research correspond to “non parametric model” (= lookingat pictures) in the next slides
Inflation hedging with real assets 17
Indirect inflation protection
Conclusion 1: Listed real estate and equities seem to benefit fromdecreasing inflation; so no inflation hedge
Conclusion 2: Inflation and commodities increase and decreasesimultaneously; so inflation hedge
Inflation hedging in the US in the '70s
3.4%
8.5%
11.6%
6.8%
4.7%
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
1972 1973 1974 1975 1976
Inve
stm
ent r
etur
n
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
Infla
tion
rate
Equities Real estate Commodities Oil & Gas Equities Inflation rate
Inflation hedging with real assets 18
Indirect inflation protection
Conclusion 1: Commodities are best indirect inflation hedge
Conclusion 2: In 2008, all asset classes were a good inflation hedgeInflation hedging in the US in the recent years
3.5%
4.1%
0.1%
2.5%
3.2%
1.9%
2.4%
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Inve
stm
ent r
etur
n
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
Infla
tion
rate
Equities Real estate Commodities Oil & Gas Equities Inflation rate
Inflation hedging with real assets 19
Summary
– Implicit or explicit ambition to compensate pensioners for priceincreases should be reflected in the investment portfolio
– Direct inflation protection is available in financial markets
– Not on a large scale, but for smaller funds it is possible
– Solutions with government bonds or inflation swaps
– Indirect inflation protection has historically been most clear byinvestments in commodities
– Indirect real estate and equities of commodity companies are lesssuitable as inflation hedge instruments
Inflation hedging with real assets 20
Appendix A: Allocation to commodities
Source: Nijman en Swinkels (2008)
Inflation hedging with real assets 21
Appendix B: Uncertainty on expected returns
Source: De Groot en Swinkels (2008)
Inflation hedging with real assets 22
Short resume
Laurens Swinkels, PhD Senior ResearcherRobeco Quantitative Strategies
Laurens is specialized in asset allocation and stock selection strategies. He advises institutional clients on investment portfolios tailored to new financial regulations. Prior to joining Robeco in 2004, he was Quantitative Analyst at Pension Factory and ABP Investments. Laurens is also assistant professor of Finance at Erasmus University Rotterdam and member of the board of PensioenfondsRobeco. Laurens obtained his MSc in Econometrics and PhD in Finance from Tilburg University, the Netherlands. He is registered with the Dutch Securities Institute
Contact: [email protected]
www.robeco.com/quantpeople.few.eur.nl/lswinkelswww.europeanpensionacademy.eu
Inflation hedging with real assets 23
Robeco Quantitative Strategies
The team
� Experience: team founded in early nineties
� Critical mass: 15-20 dedicated quant researchers
� Quality: strong academic credentials and links
� Focus: develop models that work in practice
� Synergy: close cooperation between different
research areasJoop Huij from QS wins the
2008 ERIM Dissertation Award
Quant products
� Equity enhanced indexing, 130/30 and long/short
strategies for developed and emerging markets
� Fixed income active duration strategies
� Conservative equity strategy
� Combined AuM € 12.5 bln
� Broad range of models for other decisions
Other research
� Asset liability management and strategic asset
allocation advisory for institutional investors
� Risk management quant support
� Knowledge sharing with papers and trainings
Robeco QS provides customized
trainings for clients around the world
Some highlights
� Long, exceptionally strong track-record for Lux-o-
rente fund based on quant duration strategy
� Highly prestigious clients such as PGGM and FRR
� More than 35 publications in peer-reviewed
academic journals
� Pioneer with launching a unique emerging
markets 130/30 fund in early 2008
Morningstar Rating
Robeco Lux-o-rente:
�����
Top-level publications can
be a spin-off of our research
David Blitz and Pim van Vliet from
Robeco QS win a 2008 Emerald
Citation of Excellence Award
Inflation hedging with real assets 24
Disclaimer
This document has been carefully prepared by Robeco Institutional Asset Management B.V. (RIAM). It is
intended to provide the reader with information on RIAM’s specific capabilities, but does not constitute a
recommendation to buy or sell certain securities or investment products. Investment decisions should only
be based on the relevant prospectus and on thorough financial, fiscal and legal advice.
The content of this document is based upon sources of information believed to be reliable, but no warranty
or declaration, either explicit or implicit, is given as to their accuracy or completeness. This document is not
intended for distribution to or use by any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such
distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.
Historical returns are provided for illustrative purposes only and do not necessarily reflect RIAM’s
expectations for the future. Past performances may not be representative for future results and actual
returns may differ significantly from expectations expressed in this document. The value of investments
may fluctuate. All copyrights, patents and other property in the information contained in this document are
held by Robeco Institutional Asset Management B.V. No rights whatsoever are licensed or assigned or shall
otherwise pass to persons accessing this information.
Robeco Institutional Asset Management B.V. is registered with the Autoriteit Financiële Markten in
Amsterdam.