Upload
don-rogers
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/12/2019 Land Tenure Regimes and Land Conservation in the African Drylands: the Case of northern Ghana
1/22
This article was downloaded by: [197.251.171.52]On: 25 January 2014, At: 10:53Publisher: Taylor & FrancisInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registeredoffice: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Journal of Land Use SciencePublication details, including instructions for authors and
subscription information:
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tlus20
Land tenure regimes and land
conservation in the African drylands:
the case of northern GhanaEmmanuel Joseph Mensah
ab
aPolicy Fellow, Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA),Accra, GhanabExecutive Member, lOasis Development Group, Accra, Ghana
Accepted author version posted online: 06 Jan 2014.Published
online: 21 Jan 2014.
To cite this article:Emmanuel Joseph Mensah , Journal of Land Use Science (2014): Land tenure
regimes and land conservation in the African drylands: the case of northern Ghana, Journal of Land
Use Science, DOI: 10.1080/1747423X.2013.878765
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2013.878765
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (theContent) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis,our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as tothe accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions
and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors,and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Contentshould not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sourcesof information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims,proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever orhowsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arisingout of the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Anysubstantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing,
systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms &Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditionshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2013.878765http://www.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1080/1747423X.2013.878765http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tlus20http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditionshttp://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditionshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2013.878765http://www.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1080/1747423X.2013.878765http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tlus208/12/2019 Land Tenure Regimes and Land Conservation in the African Drylands: the Case of northern Ghana
2/22
Land tenure regimes and land conservation in the African drylands:the case of northern Ghana
Emmanuel Joseph Mensaha,b*
aPolicy Fellow, Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA), Accra, Ghana; bExecutiveMember, lOasis Development Group, Accra, Ghana
(Received 23 January 2013; final version received 17 December 2013)
In Africas drylands, threats to economic livelihood from climate change are exacer-bated by a low rate of investments in land conservation. The existing literatureidentifies land tenure insecurity as a major contributory factor. To help better under-stand this challenge, this paper investigated, empirically, the impact of land tenureregimes on investment in land conservation, focusing on northern Ghana. The study sfindings identified three dominant traditional institutions of land administration, viz.,tendana, chieftaincy and family. These institutions in turn define three broad categoriesof tenure regimes, namely, freehold, leasehold and lineage. It further finds that theseregimes exhibit a continuum of tenure security that impact differentially on investmentin land conservation. This is buttressed by the quantitative analysis, which reveals thatwhereas freehold (relative to lineage) significantly engenders investment in conserva-tion, leasehold shows no important impact. Among others, the paper recommends theinstitution of reform processes that promote durable and individualized land tenuresecurity.
Keywords:land tenure; land conservation; dryland; farm household; northern Ghana;Africa
1. Introduction
Contemporary adverse changes in global climate and land productivity continue to
threaten farm-based production and livelihood worldwide (UN WCED, 1987). As noted
by IFAD (2009), climate change and variability is unequivocal, accelerating and consti-
tutes a major threat to sustainable livelihood. In the drylands of Africa, this trend is
exacerbated by a relatively low rate of investment in land conservation in these regions.The existing literature hypothesizes land tenure insecurity as a major contributory factor.
In this paper, a quantitative assessment of the extent of impact of land tenure regimes on
household decision to make major investment in land conservation is provided. The aim is
to help enhance understanding of this challenge and distil the appropriate policy inter-
ventions necessary for stimulating investment in land conservation, thereby contributing
to existing knowledge and discourse on how derivatives of institutional arrangements such
as land tenure regimes influence household decisions on land productivity and resource
management.
Whereas the vulnerability of agro-ecological systems in arid and semi-arid regions of
Africa is attributable to the state of the environment and the increasing extremity in
weather patterns, investment in land conservation is endogenous and driven by factors
*Email:[email protected];[email protected]
Journal of Land Use Science, 2014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2013.878765
2014 Taylor & Francis
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]8/12/2019 Land Tenure Regimes and Land Conservation in the African Drylands: the Case of northern Ghana
3/22
inherent in the behaviour and decisions of farm households. As discussed in Adams
(1974) and recounted by Goldstein and Udry (2006), key derivatives of institutional
arrangements that underlie access to and use of economic resources such as lands are
important in engendering their sustainable management.
In particular, land as an economic resource is important for agricultural production.
Investment in land conservation to help sustain their productive capacity is therefore a
non-trivial economic decision for all farm households. Like all economic actors, these
households require sufficient incentives to justify major investment in landholdings
(AGRA, 2012). Among such incentives is the extent and duration of control over the
given land resource. Indeed, such control, as defined by the prevailing land tenure regime,
provides the basis for capturing and internalizing the benefits arising from investment in a
given conservation practice (Deininger & Binswanger, 1999).
Hence, land tenure is hypothesized in the literature as critical for determining the rate
of investment in land conservation. However, empirical understanding of the structure of
such impact remains limited. Specifically, plural systems of land tenure administration in
most parts of Africa (including Ghana) tend to exhibit a continuum of user rights, whichranges from very strong to relatively weaker tenure security. To what extent then do such
different tenure regimes influence decisions on major investment in land conservation and
related productivity-enhancing practices? How could development policy properly opti-
mize such leverage to engender greater investments in land conservation, especially in one
of the worlds increasingly vulnerable agro-ecological zones Africas drylands (Deressa,
Hassan, & Ringler, 2009; Downing,1992; UNCCD, UNEP, & UNDP,2009)? These are
the core research questions underlining this paper.
The primary objective of the paper is therefore to establish the differential impact of
land tenure regimes on major investment in land conservation, focusing on the semi-arid
agro-ecological zone of Ghana. The specific objectives are to
(1) identify the dominant institutional arrangements for land administration in the
study area and the tenure regimes arising as key derivatives of these institu-
tions; and
(2) quantify the differential impact of land tenure regimes on the incidence of major
investment in land conservation by farm households in the study area.
Justification for this study is founded on several grounds. First, land rights and their
influence on agricultural production and conservation practices will remain an important
global development issue for the twenty-first century (Asabere, 1994; De Soto, 2000;
Maxwell & Wiebe, 1999). By focusing on investigating the nature of such nexus and
within the context of a typical semi-arid agro-ecological zone in Africa, this paper
responds to an important policy issue.
Second, for Africa generally and Ghana in particular, the strategic importance of
agriculture to sustainable development makes a better and thorough understanding of
the link between land rights and the adoption of land conservation and productivity-
enhancing practices extremely necessary. Also, the dominance of agriculture and the
espousal of the private sector as the engine of growth imply that policies that specifically
address bottlenecks to private investment in the sector needs to be urgently identified and
deployed. Obviously, this will involve policy initiatives that are sufficiently informed by
the results of studies of this nature.Third, some districts in the focal area already benefiting from major development
investments such as the Millennium Village Project1 and various national agricultural
2 E.J. Mensah
8/12/2019 Land Tenure Regimes and Land Conservation in the African Drylands: the Case of northern Ghana
4/22
development programmes. With the strategic objective of increasing agricultural produc-
tion, productivity and competitiveness, the results of the study should prove useful and
timely.
Lastly, economic livelihoods in northern Ghana, like most of Africas drylands, are
identified to be systematically vulnerable to endemic poverty. GoG (2006) indicates that
overall poverty incidence in Ghana is highest in these regions, with relatively more fragile
environment for agro-based production. Thus, by exploring the extent of influence of land
tenure regimes, among other factors, on the adoption of major conservation measures by
landholders, the study contributes to knowledge on the subject while informing policy
strategies appropriate for promoting efficient land use and resource management in this
zone. This paper is therefore very relevant and timely.
The paper is organized into five sections. Section 2 provides a review of the focal
country, the literature on the nexus between land tenure and investment in land conserva-
tion and the study area. Section 3 discusses the analytical framework, methodology, data
source and definition of variables. Section 4 then discusses the results of the analyses,
with Section 5 concluding.
2. Literature review
This section provides a brief overview of the economic and policy background of the
focal country (Ghana), review of the existing literature on land tenure and land conserva-
tion with special reference to Ghana and an introductory note on the study area (northern
Ghana).
2.1. Ghana: a country backgroundGhana is a West African economy, located on the southern coast of the sub-region,
between latitude 444 N and 1111 N and longitudes 311 W and 111 E (FAO,
2006). A recent population and housing census in 2010 estimated the population of the
country at over 24.6 million, with an intercensal growth rate of 2.4% (GSS, 2012).
Economic development policy in Ghana since the post-independence era identifies pov-
erty as a major development problem requiring direct and methodical response. Towards
this end, economic policy in Ghana over that period has focused on accelerating growth in
income towards improved livelihood and significant reduction in poverty. Aside the
adoption of the global agenda of drastically reducing poverty and hunger by 2015 (as
specified in the United Nations Millennium Development Goals), major policy pro-
grammes have been implemented in more recent decades to specifically address poverty
and its associated challenges to the Ghanaian society.
Some of these programmes are marked out in the Human Development Strategy Plan
(NDPC, 1991) and the National Development Policy Framework (NDPC, 1994) of the
country. The latter formed the basis for the development of the various phases of the
Vision 2020 policy programme, which was implemented from 1995 to 2000 (NDPC,
2003). Succeeding these programmes has been the Interim Poverty Reduction Strategy
Paper (I-PRSP) and the Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs), the Millennium
Challenge Programme of the United States, the Ghana Shared Growth and Development
Agenda (GSGDA) and the Savanna Agricultural Development Programme.
Significantly, a key strategy cutting across all of these programmes has been thetargeting of agriculture as the primary sector to drive up income growth and thereby
improve living standards in the country. This is based on the view that an agro-based
Journal of Land Use Science 3
8/12/2019 Land Tenure Regimes and Land Conservation in the African Drylands: the Case of northern Ghana
5/22
industrial development strategy, in the context of the countrys economy, has greater
potential to impact immensely on employment and wealth creation.
Ghanas agricultural sector has accounted for over 36% of national income and
employed more than two-thirds of the countrys labour force in the periods preceding
the export of crude oil in 2011. In terms of growth, the sector has grown at an average rate
of 6.1% since 2002, representing over 1 and 1.3 percentage points more than that reported
for industry and service sectors, respectively (BOG, 2008; CEPA,2007; ISSER, 2006).
Even more crucial is the fact that traditionally growth in the sector tends to have stronger
leverage on other sectors of the economy, especially on the basis of its contribution to
food security and raw material supply, foreign exchange earnings and savings, food prices
and improved household incomes. Furthermore, improved farm incomes create significant
demand for domestic manufactures and services, more so given the sheer size and
structure of demand of the rural sector.
However, agriculture in Ghana confronts major debilitating challenges that consider-
ably constrain the capacity of the sector to respond to the growing market opportunities
and policy initiatives. Dominant among these factors is the issue of land access and tenuresecurity.
Quite consistent with a sector characterized by the dominance of traditional production
practices, land constitutes a principal factor of production for the agricultural sector in
Ghana. In many instances, access to land alone determines to a large extent the poverty
status and degree of vulnerability of farm households to hunger. Beyond access however,
the right to use land and benefit from investments made in it constitute a defining factor
for production decisions and the very survival of most farm households. Underlining this
state is especially the trend in population growth and the ever-growing demand for land,
land productivity losses through degradation, overuse and extremities in precipitation and
other weather patterns.
2.2. Land rights and land conservation in Ghana
As noted by Goldstein and Udry (2006) in a study on land rights and agricultural
productivity in Akwapim (a farming community in southern Ghana), political influence
and social network significantly influence a households ability to exercise right to a piece
of land. Such rights then provide the incentive to invest in improving farm productivity
and income. The livelihood implication of this phenomenon is what the paper aptly
describes as the profits of power. This is very much consistent with the global view
expressed by Lappe (1998) thataround the world, the poorest of the poor are the landless
in rural areas, followed closely by the land-poor; those whose poor quality plots are too
small to support a family (FAO, 2005, p. 2). And, it is such global concerns that have
generated the intense policy debate and varied programmes on land tenure reforms in
most parts of the developing world, Africa not excluded.
For Ghana specifically, the debate on land has centred mainly on the plural2 land
tenure systems prevailing in the country and how they could be reformed and adminis-
tered to foster economic growth and development. For instance, theNational Land Policy
(GLAPS,2003) clearly articulates a general focus on stimulating economic development
through improving land markets, security of tenure and effective administration.
Nevertheless, an obvious trend in the policy debate seems to favour market-based
access and private entitlement to land. This is based on the notion that private ownershipof land, as expressed in well-documented and enforceable title, tends to engender greater
security of ownership and, in some cases, serve as useful certificate for accessing
4 E.J. Mensah
8/12/2019 Land Tenure Regimes and Land Conservation in the African Drylands: the Case of northern Ghana
6/22
investable resources such as credit. Consequently, individuals with secured land title are
found to be better incentivized to invest in and optimally use existing land resources than
those without it (Cleaver & Schreiber, 1994; De Soto, 2000; Hitchcock,1981; Picardi &
Seifert, 1976).
A contrary perspective to the foregoing argument is provided by another strand of
literature led by Besley (1995). This literature posits that privatization of land cannot
constitute the primary solution to the complexities associated with land tenure problems in
Africa, and for that matter Ghana. Indeed, it argues that typical of most African societies,
goodwill and social bonds tend to provide sufficient protection for rights to land and
therefore the motivation to invest, not only for the individual concerned but for the
community and posterity. As illustrated by Besley (1995), since community-based risk
sharing forms an important feature of most African societies, it is quite outside expecta-
tion that the incentive to invest in land necessarily increase with formal rights to land as
against a communal (or the indigenous) tenure system. The paper further points out that
such formal right in land do not necessarily correspond with the rights that a farmer may
desire in planning to invest in that land.Additionally, beyond the matter of ensuring efficient land use administration, some
literature also express greater confidence in the ability of traditional institutions in readily
responding to local needs and the changing exogenous conditions that preserve efficient
use of land resources. This argument is best articulated in Dasgupta and Maler (1990).
Another dimension to the argument is the view that even where communal tenure
systems are alleged to have failed in providing sufficient protection to rights in land,
individuals have been able to enhance such rights by making long-term investments in the
land, such as tree planting. Bruce (1988), in a review of the African land tenure systems,
summarizes this view as follows:
Some observers have suggested that indigenous tenure systems pose a degree of insecuritythat destroys incentives to plant tree crops. This may be true in some cases, but the literatureis also replete with examples in which holders with temporary or fragile titles, havingsucceeded in planting trees, enhanced their tenure. The establishment of tree farms can bea critical step in the transition from shifting to stabilized cultivation, with trees definingpermanent holdings. Tree planting may initially be discouraged by insecurity of tenure, buttree planting can actually produce greater security of tenure and act as a way of claimingland. (Bruce, 1988, p. 41, in Besley, 1995)
In Uganda, Place and Otsuka (2002) also find that in enhancing tenure security farmers in
their study also tended to engage in coffee cultivation on the land.
Obviously, these varying perspectives provide important reflection of the conflicting
views associated with the nexus between land tenure systems, land use forms and
decisions regarding investments in land conservation by landholders. Empirical insights
to reinforce the fitting perspective, deepen evidence-based discourse and better inform
policy actions for efficient administration of land resources are sorely needed. For most
parts of Africa, the significance of this debate is already manifested by the increasing
vulnerability of food production systems to the rising trends in land degradation, soil
productivity losses and declining food security.
In fact, recent projections by Scherr and Yadav (1997) indicate that by the year 2020
land degradation may pose a serious threat to food production and rural livelihoods,
particularly in poor and densely populated areas like the arid and semi-arid regions of thedeveloping world. The paper further predicts that if accelerated erosion continues una-
bated, yield reductions by 2020 may reach 16.5%. Already, the AU Commission (2010)
Journal of Land Use Science 5
8/12/2019 Land Tenure Regimes and Land Conservation in the African Drylands: the Case of northern Ghana
7/22
observes that decades of nutrient mining has rendered farmlands in Africa the poorest in
the world. The Commission further estimates US$4 billion as the equivalent value of
nutrient lost on the continent annually.
In Ghana, the situation is even more pertinent in the semi-arid regions where pro-
ductivity losses of farmlands are accelerated by the increasing population pressure, limited
investment in external inputs like fertilizer, limited land cover and extensive exposure of
the top soils to rain and wind erosion, extreme rainfall patterns and high-temperature
conditions, obsolete land management know-how and poor land use practices. Some
notable land use practices that directly compromise the productivity and sustainable
management of these land resources include short-fallow shifting cultivation practices,
intensive farming on limited pieces of land, indiscriminate felling of trees for fuel wood
and charcoal production, bush burning and overgrazing. Certainly, these developments
pose significant challenge to the national agenda of agricultural transformation for
improved incomes and poverty reduction. At the household level, it also deepens the
vulnerability of households to hunger and chronic poverty.
2.3. Background to the study area: northern Ghana
The focal study area is the semi-arid agro-ecological zone of Ghana, which is made up
entirely of the landmasses of the Upper East, Upper West and Northern Regions of the
country. Together, these regions also constitute the northern corridor of Ghana.
On account of the distribution of the agricultural and climatic conditions in the
country, Ghana is organized into six agro-ecological zones. These zones exhibit different
attributes of vegetative cover, geological structure, natural resources and climatic condi-
tions. They are, from the north to south:
(1) Sudan Savannah
(2) Guinea Savannah
(3) Forest Savannah Transition
(4) Semi-Deciduous Rainforest
(5) Rainforest
(6) Coastal Savannah
The Sudan and Guinea Savannah agro-ecological zones of the country therefore constitute
the semi-arid (or the dryland) region of Ghana. Figure 1 is the map of the six agro-
ecological zones, showing the key administrative towns and cities as well as the range of
annual rainfall amounts for the respective zones. The zone covers a total area of about
97,702 km2 and an estimated population of 4.23 million, representing about 41% and
17.1% of the national landmass and population, respectively (GSS, 2012). This population
is dominated by two major ethnic groups. These are the Mole Dagbani and the Grunsi
ethnic groups.
The vegetative cover of this zone is characterized by the savannah grassland, thinly
interspersed with some thickets and drought-resistant trees such as the shea, dawadawa,
baobabs or acacias. The zone experiences unimodal rainfall distribution. This occurs
during the months of May to September. This period constitutes the wet or the principal
production season in this zone. The mean annual rainfall over the entire zone is
1000 mm, with a minimum of about 700 to a maximum of 1200 mm. The temperaturelevels vary significantly across the seasons, peaking at about 41C during the season
especially.
6 E.J. Mensah
8/12/2019 Land Tenure Regimes and Land Conservation in the African Drylands: the Case of northern Ghana
8/22
3. Analytical framework
The evaluation of the extent of impact of land tenure regimes on farmer decision to
implement major land conservation measures has been the subject of both theoretical andempirical research. According to de Janvry and Sadoulet (2001), contentions over issues
of land access and user rights are now even more acute, driven especially by two principal
Figure 1. Map of the six agro-ecological zones of Ghana.
Source: www.ehs.cdu.edu.au/chromolaena/proceedings/third/3tim1b.html (Accessed 14 December2013).
Journal of Land Use Science 7
http://www.ehs.cdu.edu.au/chromolaena/proceedings/third/3tim1b.htmlhttp://www.ehs.cdu.edu.au/chromolaena/proceedings/third/3tim1b.html8/12/2019 Land Tenure Regimes and Land Conservation in the African Drylands: the Case of northern Ghana
9/22
factors: the growth in human population and the rate of integration of markets for
agro-products.
In respect of population growth, this argument is bolstered by Boserup ( 1965). In
analysing the relationship between population growth and changes in agricultural produc-
tion systems, that paper contends that within traditional agrarian production systems the
scarcity of farmlands and the consequent reduction in fallow periods arising from popula-
tion explosion necessitates a shift from extensive to more intensive production systems.
Farmers thus compensate for the increased pressure on the available lands with the
deployment of more labour resources and investment in land conservation practices. By
this argument, Boserup contradicts Malthus (1998) that growth in human population
largely determines growth in agricultural production.
Considered within the context of land tenure and its relation to land use and produc-
tivity, Kabubo-Mariaria (2006) also notes that some studies provide further impetus to the
Boserup thesis by asserting that the increase in the relative price of food, arising especially
from increased demand, necessitates reforms in land tenure arrangements towards
improved incentives for increased investment in land conservation. Platteau (1996,2000) are cited as typical examples. Accordingly, arising from Boserups argument is
the consideration that rights in land could be endogenous; that is, derived on the basis of
previous investments in the land.3 From this conceptual premise, this paper proceeds with
the analysis of the factors influencing farmers decision to invest in land conservation by
evaluating the relationship between the expected right in land and previous investments in
conservation on the given land.
However, since the expected right in land is not directly observable but still dependent
on the prevailing tenure regime and the investment in conservation made on that land, a
relationship could be specified to measure the expected land right, following the metho-
dology of Otsuka, Quisumbing, Payongayong, and Aidoo (2003) and adapted by Kabubo-Mariara (2006) such that
Re 0 1X 2C (1)
whereRe refers to the expected land right;Xis a dummy that refers to the prevailing land
tenure regime;Crefers to investment in land conservation;0is the value of the land right
without any investment in conservation; 1is the marginal effect of the land tenure regime
on the expected land right; and 2 is the marginal effect of the incidence of investment in
land conservation on land right.
Following the conceptual arguments preceding Equation (1), 2 is hypothesized to bepositive,a priori; that is, as investment in land conservation increases, the expected right
increases,ceteris paribus. The relative effect ofX (i.e.1) however depends on the tenure
regime.
As noted earlier, a thesis spearheaded by the neoclassical school provides another
important basis for conceptualizing the relationship between land tenure and conservation.
From that perspective, the incentive to invest in land increases as the right to appropriate
and internalize the benefits of those investments rise (Adam, 1974). In the expression of
Uma (1992, p. 37), assured land rights ensure incentives to invest in land . Thus,
following the argument of Otsuka et al. (2003), a simplified linear expression of this
relationship could be specified such that
C 0 1Re (2)
8 E.J. Mensah
8/12/2019 Land Tenure Regimes and Land Conservation in the African Drylands: the Case of northern Ghana
10/22
where 0 is the intercept term in the model and 1 is the marginal effect of the expected
right in land on the adoption of a land-conserving practice.
The dependent variable, C, is measured as a binary variable assuming the value 1
when a major land conservation practice is adopted, and 0 otherwise, while 1 is
hypothesized to be positive.
To make the two models tractable for empirical estimation, the unobserved variable Re
is eliminated by substitution such that
C 0 1 0 1X 2C (3)
Solving forC in Equation (3) yields a reduced form function, given as
C 0 1X (4)
where 0 010111
and
11=111
Equation (4) therefore constitutes the basic model of the study.
3.1. Methodology
Following standard practice in econometric analysis, the functional form of the model
above is estimated taking into account other factors that the existing literature identifies tohave potential effect on the dependent variable. Thus, at the level of a farm household i,
the model to be estimated is specified in matrix formulation as
Ci 0 1Xi 2Zi ei (5)
where Ci defines the adoption (incidence of investment) in land-conserving measure; Xidefines a vector of the prevailing tenure regimes, as a measure of right in the land; Zi is a
vector of factors other than the land tenure regime influencing the decision to adopt a
conservation practice by farm household i; S are the parameters (or coefficients) of the
model; and ei is the random error term of the model.
Factors represented in the vector Zi include the socioeconomic characteristics of the
household. These include the educational attainment of the head of the household,
household size and assets, the sex of household head, age and marital status of the
household head, proximity to major market centre, population density, land use form
and the extent of presence of public/private institutions in land conservation-related
interventions. As the availability and definition of these variables depend entirely on the
empirical data available, Section 3.3 provides extensive discussion of the definition and
construction of these variables.
In the empirical estimation of Equation (5), the binary adoption approach is employed.
Soule, Tegene, and Wiebe (2000), for example, have used this approach in modelling the
relationship between land tenure and adoption of conservation practices among a sampleof U.S. corn producers. The dependent variable in the model is assumed to be generated
by a latent variable,C, such that the incidence of a conservation measure on a farmers
Journal of Land Use Science 9
8/12/2019 Land Tenure Regimes and Land Conservation in the African Drylands: the Case of northern Ghana
11/22
field implies C is positive, generating the observation, C 1, in Equation (5).Otherwise, the conservation practice is not observed and thus C 0.
In Long (1997), the structural model is specified such that
C
i f0W
i 2
i i 1; :::; N (6)
where Wi is a vector of land tenure regime and other characteristics specific to the farm
householdi, f is a vector of coefficients while 2i is a random disturbance term. In effect,the relationship between Ci and Ci is stated as follows:
Ci 1 if Ci > 0;
0 if Ci 0:
(7)
and 2i ,NID 0; 2 .
As a result, for a farmer i, the latent variable Ci > 0 if the farmer adopts the
conservation practice on the field, which also implies Ci 1. The probability thatCi 1 is therefore given in Equation (8) as
PrCi 1 PrCi > 0
Prf0Wi 2i > 0
1 Ff0Wi
Ff0
Wi (8)
where Pr and F is the probability distribution and cumulative distribution functionsof the model, respectively. To ensure that 0 Ci 1, the cumulative distributionfunction F of the error term in the model is assumed to follow the logistic distributionin this study. For comparison purposes, the model will also be estimated under the
assumption of the cumulative standard normal distribution.
3.2. Source of data
Data for the analysis were drawn from a household sample survey carried out under the
ISSER/USAID4 project on Land Tenure and Land Policy Research in Ghana. The survey
was designed and conducted by ISSER. The overall survey covered 2690 households
nationwide. The data for the present analysis were therefore extracted from the national
database using the regional identification code for Upper West, Upper East and Northern
regions. As explained earlier, these regions constitute the northern corridor of Ghana and
makes up the semi-arid agro-ecological zone of the country. This sub-sample therefore
contained a total of 695 households, from 10 enumeration areas in 10 districts of the three
regions.
Key sections of the structured questionnaire included questions on household compo-
sition and characteristics, landholding, land use and land tenure regimes, evidence ofmajor investment in landholdings, land prices, land markets and institutional issues,
among others. Survey enumerators were trained with the aim of enabling them retain
10 E.J. Mensah
8/12/2019 Land Tenure Regimes and Land Conservation in the African Drylands: the Case of northern Ghana
12/22
the same understanding of the concepts and questions as the researchers, communicate the
intent of each question to the respondents and elicit the appropriate responses.
As part of the overall project, key informant and focus group discussions were also
designed to generate additional information on land rights and land use practices, land
administration and other institutional issues. These data were organized and reported as
two other independent levels of analysis, namely, reports on statutory land institutions (or
institutional analysis) and key informant interviews (or community-level analysis).
However, as explained above, the data at the core of the present paper were based
primarily on the sub-sample data obtained exclusively from the quantitative survey. The
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences(SPSS) was used for processing the data, while
STATAwas used for the estimation of the models.
3.3. Definition of variables and hypotheses
Land conservation in the current analysis is measured as the incidence of major invest-
ment in conservation on the principal farmland of the household since the past 5 years.These measures are defined to mean those on-farm investments undertaken to help protect
or even enhance the productive capacity of farmlands, especially in relation to soil and
water conservation. Among such practices identified by the respondents are tree planting
and contour bands that are created to prevent soil erosion. Other practices such as ridges,
mounds, stone lines, basins rectangular mounds, contour stripping and the use of cover
crops are also reported to be in use in the area although these are noted to be short-term
conservation measures. Giving the long-term nature of investments in tree planting and
contour bands, widespread adoption of these measures is particularly constrained by land
tenure insecurity and limited resources.
Indeed, across the broad spectrum of respondents in the survey, the notion of majorinvestment in land conservation is well understood to be relative. That is, given the
differences in resource endowment among farmers, what constitutes a major outlay for
one farmer might be minor for the other. This is more so since the opportunity cost of
investing a specified amount of resources in land conservation is expected to be lower for
a resource-rich respondent, relative to her resource-poor counterpart, ceteris paribus.
Thus, for the purposes of the study, what constitutes a major investment in land
conservation is permitted to be self-evaluated by the farmholder during the interview.
Here, it is hypothesized that the stronger the security of tenure of a farmholder, the more
likely that such a holder will undertake what she evaluates (relative to her resource
endowment) to be a major investment towards the conservation of that land. The
variable is assigned the value 1 when respondents indicate they made such investment,
0 otherwise. Based on this methodology, only 15.5% of the respondents identified to have
made major investment in land conservation in the past 5 years.
Whereas the initial assessment of the study had considered the state of land market
(and prices) as important for consideration in the model, preliminary evaluation of the
empirical data suggested an absence of such dynamics within the focal area. For instance,
the difference between the price of migrant lands for farming in 1995 and 2005 was
considered a useful proxy for estimating the extent of vibrancy in the local land market.
Unfortunately, this variable was found to be highly collinear, as it showed little change.
The response rate on land price (values) was also very poor. This factor was therefore
excluded from the empirical model.For the tenure regime, three broad dummy variables are defined in the study, based on
the regime under which the land is operated. These are the freehold, lineage and leasehold
Journal of Land Use Science 11
8/12/2019 Land Tenure Regimes and Land Conservation in the African Drylands: the Case of northern Ghana
13/22
tenure regimes. By definition, the freehold regime involves cases where the landholder
expresses the right to own and use the land for unlimited period of time. In the sample
data, this regime was found to arise mainly from outright purchase of land by the
respondent or when the land is passed on to the holder as gift. Under such regimes, the
holder exercised full right to the use of the land and had no obligation to an institution or
person(s) regarding the form of use the land is applied, the payment of rent and duration
of access to the land.
The leasehold land tenure arises where the respondent exercised right to the use of the
land only for some period (whether such period is explicitly specified or not). In such
instances, the respondent acknowledged the fact that right to the use of the land is subject
to the discretion of the landlord or upon the fulfilment of some known obligations. Such
obligations were noted to include cash payments (occasional) assistance offered to the
owner and other forms of payment in-kind. In other instances where no specific obligation
is reported, respondents clearly acknowledged that the land will be returned to the land-
lord over time or on demand.
The last tenure regime is the lineage. This form of tenure arrangement involved rightsto use the land on the basis of family ties (lineage) or inheritance. Underlying this
arrangement is the fact that though no known restriction apply in the form and duration
for the use of the land (which could be for even unlimited time period), the land is still
regarded as a resource belonging to the family or the lineage. Any transfer or even
continued use is dependent on the state of association with the lineage. Thus, unlike the
freehold, the right to bequeath the land resource is limited but the form and duration of
use by the occupant is usually unrestricted.
Arising from these three different tenure regimes, the leasehold tenure regime is
hypothesized in this study to be inferior (in terms of tenure security and user rights) to
freehold and lineage regimes, in that order. This is more so as the choice of land use ishighly limited and may even involve restrictions on the type of crops to cultivate or even
the degree of transformation that is allowed on the land. Indeed, unlike the latter two, any
major investment on the land (and outside the original terms) may require prior and
explicit approval of the principal landowner. The order of tenure security and user right
for the three regimes is thus illustrated as follows:
In the estimation of the model, the relative strengths of these three tenure regimes in
influencing the decision to undertake major investment in land conservation are empiri-
cally investigated using the lineage regime as reference.
Among other independent variables, the marital status, age, gender and educational
attainment of the head of the household, location and size of the household were
investigated. The variable age is defined as the number of complete years of the head
of the household. This variable is introduced in the model to measure the cumulative
experience and hands-on skills in farm-based production of the household. Size is used
to measure the amount of labour resources available to the household, whereas genderis
defined as the sex of the head of household, assuming the value 1 if the head of the
household is male, 0 otherwise. For a typically patriarchal society like the communities inthe focal areas, the gender of the head of household could make considerable difference in
determining the quality and size of farmlands that the household could hold and operate. It
Land Tenure Security Very Strong Very Weak
Land Tenure Regime Freehold >> Lineage >> Leasehold
12 E.J. Mensah
8/12/2019 Land Tenure Regimes and Land Conservation in the African Drylands: the Case of northern Ghana
14/22
could also influence the extent to which the household could assert its right in the use of
the land and the range of choices to which the land could be applied (Goldstein & Udry,
2006). All these variables are postulated to have positive impact on household decision to
invest in land conservation, ceteris paribus.
The level of educational attainment of the household head, as a measure of the
households knowledge frontier, capacity to properly analyse trends in the productivity
of their land, absorb new knowledge and implement major conservation measures, was
constructed as follows:
None, if household head had no formal education.
Basic, if the head had had at least primary, junior secondary, middle school or
Koranic education.
Secondary, if the head had received at least senior secondary, technical, vocational
training, ordinary level or advanced level schooling.
Post-secondary, if the head has attained at least teacher training, technical, profes-
sional or other forms of tertiary education.
These variables are constructed as mutually exclusive dummy variables (i.e. assuming
value 1 if applicable, and 0 otherwise), with none serving as the base or reference
variable. The variable on location is defined as the rural/urban location of the place of
residence of the household, which is assigned a unit value if household reside in rural
location and zero otherwise.Table 1summarizes the definition and descriptive statistics of
these variables.
According to Kabubo-Mariara (2006), though most household characteristics do not
significantly impact on the adoption of conservation practices in Kenya, the educational
attainment of the head of the household has significant positive effect. This is contrary tothe observation made by Mwakubo (2002) that educational level of the household head
reduces the likelihood of adoption of conservation practices by reducing the intensity of
terracing among farmers in Machakos and Kitui Districts. The paper explains that the
Table 1. Definition, measurement and summary statistics of the key variables.
Variable Basic definition and measurement Mean SD
Conservation Major investment in land conservation since the past5 years (1 = yes, 0 otherwise)
0.155 0.362
Lineage Using principal farmland from lineage/inheritance(1 = yes, 0 otherwise)
0.043 0.204
Freehold Using principal farmland under freehold terms (1 = yes,0 otherwise)
0.262 0.440
Leasehold Using principal farmland under leasehold terms (1 = yes,0 otherwise)
0.255 0.436
Married Marital status of head (1 = yes, 0 otherwise) 0.872 0.334Age Age of respondent (range 20100) 48.249 15.383Household Size Size of the household (range: 115) 6.436 2.843Male Sex of respondent (1 = yes, 0 otherwise) 0.901 0.299Rural Location of household (1 = rural, 0 otherwise) 0.458 0.499None No formal education (1 = yes, 0 otherwise) 0.550 0.498
Basic Educated up to basic level (1 = yes, 0 otherwise) 0.308 0.462Secondary Educated up to secondary level (1 = yes, 0 otherwise) 0.085 0.279
Post-secondary Educated beyond secondary level (1 = yes, 0 otherwise) 0.033 0.179
Source: Authors computation from the survey data.
Journal of Land Use Science 13
8/12/2019 Land Tenure Regimes and Land Conservation in the African Drylands: the Case of northern Ghana
15/22
existence of off-farm income generation opportunities for the relatively better educated
household heads accounts for that result. In this paper, it is postulated that younger and
more educated household heads adopt land-conserving measures than the older and less
literate heads.
In relation to education, it is further argued that the level of awareness of a farm
household about issues of environmental degradation and fertility loss could also influ-
ence a landholders decision to employ on-farm conservation practices. For instance,
relative to a farmer who confronts limited knowledge on sustainable land use and
conservation methods, the one with good exposure to such practices is likely to adopt
the most appropriate and cost-effective conservation method in response to actual or
perceived reduction in crop harvest. As a proxy of landholders exposure and knowledge
frontier, formal education is used here to provide an empirical test of this hypothesis.
4. Discussion of results
Preliminary analysis of the survey data shows that ownership and administration of landin the focal area is governed by three dominant institutions. These are tendana, chief-
taincy and family institutions. Thus, although private and public entities may declare
ownership of land in these areas, these three institutions constitute the principal source of
such access or ownership.
Unlike the other two, tendana is a traditional land administration authority which is
peculiar to northern Ghana. This authority is constituted by religious figures identified by
the people as representing the earth god. They are suggested to be the immediate
descendants of the early settlers on the land and thus exercise jurisdiction over a generally
agreed landmass, made up of a village or villages and its surrounding land area. Among
others, the tendana performs specific traditional and religious functions in their area ofjurisdiction, which reinforces their control and influence within the respective societies.
Some of these include the responsibility to allocate land and resolve land disputes, impose
sanctions in respect of infringements of land rights and abuses and perform religious rites
towards maintaining the sanctity and overall productivity of the land. As religious figures,
thetendanaalso acts as the intermediary between the people and the gods (or the supreme
spiritual authorities of the land).
Among the respondents, about 36% suggested the tendana as the principal institution
of land administration. Another 33% of the respondents have their lands owned and
administered by the family, whereas 24% reported administration by the relevant chief-
taincy institution. Ownership by individuals was marginal, forming only about 7%.
The focus group discussion revealed that cases of individual ownerships arise from
transfers from heads or representatives of these three institutions to individuals as gift
rather than on the basis of any commercial transaction. Indeed, as custodians of these
lands, these representatives are enjoined to administer the lands for the larger interest
of the people. Profiteering or commercial transactions in land is therefore rare in these
areas. Access to land by both indigenes and migrants therefore follows a basic procedure
of placing a request with the appropriate institution and the payment of a token of
appreciation. For indigenes or members of the same family, such requests are granted
mostly for free.
Inherently, these three systems give rise to the three distinct tenure regimes. As
discussed earlier, these regimes are hypothesized to exhibit a continuum of tenure security,with potentially significant implications for the incentive to invest in land conservation.
Among others, Table 2reports the result of the empirical test of these hypotheses.
14 E.J. Mensah
8/12/2019 Land Tenure Regimes and Land Conservation in the African Drylands: the Case of northern Ghana
16/22
The probit model was estimated alongside the logit model to achieve some compar-ison of the appropriateness of the assumptions on the distribution of the error term. That
is, whereas the probit model assumes that the dependent variable of the model follows the
standard normal cumulative distribution function, the logit model assumes the logistic
function. The Wald 2 test statistic indicates that the coefficients of the independent
variables in the model are jointly significant in explaining the incidence of major invest-
ment in land conservation by landholders in northern Ghana. The result of the RESET test
also rejects the null hypothesis that the model is functionally misspecified. The results are
also shown to be homoscedastic in the standard error. There is therefore sufficient
statistical basis to assess the estimated models as well fitted, correctly specified and
good for the present analysis.Indeed, the probit model predicts the probability of a household making a major
investment in land to be 14.05%, which is comparable with the observed adoption rate of
15.52%. These test statistics also suggests the probit model has relative superiority over
the logit model. Results of the probit model are therefore selected for discussion, along-
side estimates of its partial effects.
Among the tenure regimes investigated, the freehold (relative to lineage) was found to
have a positive and significant impact on the probability of a household making a major
investment in the land. The result shows that farm households using land under freehold
tenure are 6.7% more likely to make major investment in the land than those under
lineage. In the case of leasehold tenure regime, the variable shows a positive but
statistically insignificant impact, even at the 10% significance level. The results suggest
that as far as major investment in land is concerned, whereas tenure security under the
Table 2. Results of the estimated models (logit, probit and the marginal effects).
Logit model Probit modelProbit model
(marginal effects)
Number of observations =683 =683Wald2(10) =30.98*** =32.56***
Pseudo R2 =0.051 =0.052
Conservation Coefficient Robust SE Coefficient Robust SE dy/dx Robust SE
Freehold 0.503* 0.263 0.281* 0.147 0.067 0.037Leasehold 0.314 0.272 0.174 0.148 0.041 0.036Married 0.438 0.344 0.263 0.190 0.065 0.051Age 0.008 0.008 0.005 0.004 0.001 0.001Size 0.117*** 0.042 0.066*** 0.023 0.015 0.005Gender 1.472** 0.598 0.784*** 0.277 0.122 0.027
Rural 0.425* 0.228 0.237* 0.126 0.053 0.029
Basic 0.019 0.264 0.004 0.143 0.001 0.032Secondary 0.879** 0.392 0.514** 0.221 0.141 0.071Post-Secondary 0.655 0.774 0.335 0.390 0.063 0.059Constant 3.595 0.766 2.014 0.391
Ramsey RESET:2 (1) =2.16 =2.62Observed probability =0.1552 =0.1552
Predicted probability =0.13850 =0.14047
Notes: *, ** and *** indicate significance at 10%, 5% and 1% levels, respectively.dy/dx is the discrete change in the dummy variable (Conservation) from 0 to 1.
Journal of Land Use Science 15
8/12/2019 Land Tenure Regimes and Land Conservation in the African Drylands: the Case of northern Ghana
17/22
leasehold regime (relative to the lineage) does not induce statistically significant differ-
ential impact on the decision by households to investment in land conservation, the
freehold regime does.
These observations reveal a very interesting aspect of the incentive structure of land
tenure security in northern Ghana. Given the perspective that freehold land rights offer
occupants much longer and stronger right to the land and the benefits accruing from any
investment made in it, this finding is consistent with the longstanding argument that
assured rights ensure greater incentive to invest in improving the productive capacity of
the land by farmers (Uma, 1992). Furthermore, in view of the fact that families or
communities tend to maintain ownership of (or at least, some interest in) lands used
under lineage tenure regimes, the incentive to make major investment in such lands by the
occupant is limited and not too different from the situation of landholdings under
leasehold regimes.
Thus, though lineage arrangements grant landholders considerable right to the land,
the fact that ownership is not individualized but remains largely a common property of the
larger family (or community) curtails the incentive to undertake major investments in landconservation. To the extent that the long-term use of that land is guaranteed only for as
long as the circumstances of the family or lineage permit, tenure security is in reality not
durable. As shown by the results, the incentive to undertake major investments in
conservation under lineage regimes is therefore still limited and akin to that found
under leasehold, statistically.
A related explanation provided by Bekele and Alemu (2010) in their study of the
Ethiopian Highlands observes that whereas a farmers decision to invest in land conserva-
tion depends generally on the immediate or shorter-term risk he faces, the intensity of
such investment rather depends on the longer-term risk. The paper further establishes that
intense or major investment in land conservation occurs when tenure security is assuredfor at least the next 5 years. Similarly, in the context of engendering greater investment in
land conservation by households in northern Ghana, the present findings suggest that
assured right to access and use farmlands even under lineage tenure regimes is not
enough. Durability of such rights in terms of stable access and use over predictably
much longer time is fundamental for engendering significant and non-random major
investment in land conservation. Following the expression of Uma, one could state that
only durable and assured individualized5 right to land ensures major investment in land
conservation in the study area.
Again, this finding is similar to the results of other studies. In most of these studies,
the general conclusion drawn has been that where the tenure security is strong, farm
owners are more disposed to undertake investment in land conservation. For instance, a
study by Kabubo-Mariara (2006) in Kenya reports that bequest right (which is synon-
ymous to rights under freehold) is important in determining whether a farmer invests in
land conservation practices or not, as against cases where the ownership of the land is
retained by other person(s), community or the state (like those lands obtained from public
schemes for enhancing land access). A meta-analysis of 46 cases studies provided in
Raquez and Lambin (2006) further supports this finding.
In the case of the household characteristics, the size and gender of the head of
household are found to be significant in explaining investment decisions in land.
Notably, both variables are positive and significant at the 1% level. In explaining the
result for the household size variable, it is relevant to note that smallholder farming in thefocal zone also tends to depend less on external inputs and more on family labour and
local resources. Thus, the larger the household, the more hands it is able to mobilize in
16 E.J. Mensah
8/12/2019 Land Tenure Regimes and Land Conservation in the African Drylands: the Case of northern Ghana
18/22
working on the farm and implement investments in land conservation. It is therefore
consistent with general expectation that the larger the size of the household, the more
likely the incidence of major investment in land. This observation also provides empirical
support to the Boserups thesis, that within traditional agrarian production systems (as is
the case of the study area), population growth and declining access to land for extensive
farming engender intensification through the increased use of farm labour to compensate
for the declining sizes and productivity of farmlands.
This observation is also consistent with many others reported in the literature. In
Kabubo-Mariaria (2006), except for investments in the construction of soil bunds (as a
specific example of conservation investment), the variable was found significant in
explaining the adoption of other forms of investment in land, which are terracing, the
planting of drought-resistant vegetation and a combination of these methods.
In relation to the gender of the household head, the estimated model unravels the
gender dimension of the argument. In particular, the result indicates that relative to
female-headed households, male-headed households are 12.2% more likely to make
major investment in land conservation. Though this result is not consistent with theobserved non-significance of gender in farm-level investment in land conservation in
Kenya (as reported by Kabubo-Mariaria,2006), it supports assertions in various literature
on Ghana that female-headed households are more resource-poor and tend to lack capacity
to make major investment in livelihood support strategies than male-headed households.
It also supports the earlier argument that given the labour-intensive nature of farming
in the focal area, the capacity to invest in land conservation is enhanced when households
possess significant labour resources. This is found more with male landholders than their
female counterparts. For example, in discussing the gender dimension of household
poverty and capacity to invest in land conservation across African societies, Barbier
(1998) makes similar assertion and argues that labour market discrimination againstwomen as well as large labour demand on women in catering for the needs of their
households plays a very important role in constraining females from investing in land
conservation. To a large extent, such circumstances contribute to the well-noted gender
disparities in especially rural livelihood settings in Ghana (GSS,2000; NDPC,2005).
On the contrary, the marital status (i.e. married respondents as against never married,
divorced, widowed or other state of non-marriage) and the age of the household head were
found to be statistically insignificant in explaining farmer investment in land, not even at
10% significance level. In the study, it had been hypothesized that relatively younger
landholders would show higher probability of investing in farmland as compared with the
older ones. This result, as well as that for the marital status, is found to be similar to the
observation made by Kabubo-Mariaria (2006) in Kenya that both marital status and age of
the household head are not significant, statistically, in explaining investment in land
conservation.
In the case of the location dummy, households in rural locations are found more likely
to invest in improving the productivity of their farmlands than households in urban
locations. Given the similarity in the topography and climate of the communities in the
three northern regions, a possible explanation for this result is that the livelihood sources
of farm households in rural locations are less diverse and tend to depend more on farming
on these lands compared with those in urban areas who tend to have better access to non-
farm livelihood sources. Farmers in rural locations therefore have better motivation to
make major investment in conserving these lands than those in urban areas.The result on education was mixed, as some of the variables were significant and
showed the expected sign while others did not. Specifically, it is noted that whereas
Journal of Land Use Science 17
8/12/2019 Land Tenure Regimes and Land Conservation in the African Drylands: the Case of northern Ghana
19/22
landholders with basic education, relative to those with no education, showed no statis-
tically significant probability to make major investment in land conservation, those with
up to secondary level education were 14% more likely to invest in land conservation.
Similar effect was expected for even a higher level of educational training (i.e. post-
secondary education) but the variable was found to be insignificant, statistically. A
plausible explanation for this result is that landholders with at least post-secondary
education are more likely to be active in off-farm incoming-generation activities and
even more dependent on external inputs than those with limited education. Thus, major
investments in conservation may not occur as critical for sustaining production and
livelihood generally, unlike the less literate counterparts.
5. Conclusion and policy recommendations
The importance of agriculture is well noted in the pursuit of sustainable and pro-poor
economic development. For Ghana in particular, the growth of the sector is identified to
have significant leverage on enhancing household income and living standards. Thesenotwithstanding, major challenges confront the sector. A dominant one is the issue of land
tenure insecurity.
In arid and semi-arid agro-ecological zones such as northern Ghana, contemporary
trends in population growth, land degradation, productivity losses and extremities in
weather patterns make the subject of land tenure regimes and their implications on
investment in land conservation all the more important. In this study, this nexus was
investigated using data from a structured household survey obtained from the ISSER/
USAID Land Tenure Policy project.
Among others, the study reveals that land in the focal area is administered under three
dominant traditional institutions of land administration in Ghana. These are the tendana,chieftaincy and family institutions. Arising from these, three tenure regimes are identified
in the area, namely, freehold, leasehold and lineage. It is further found that only 15.5% of
landholders have made major investment in land conservation since the past 5 years. In
explaining the trend, the study finds a continuum of land tenure security exhibited by
these three tenure regimes, which then impact differentially on the decision to invest in
land conservation by the holders. In particular, the results of the quantitative analysis
reveal that whereas freehold tenure regime, relative to lineage, significantly increased the
likelihood of major investment in land conservation by households, leasehold shows no
important differential impact.
Thus, while the existing literature theorizes assured rights to land as important in
engendering increased investment in land conservation, these findings reveal that such
rights must be durable and individualized to help realize such investments in the focal
area. Development policy must therefore move beyond improving access and promote
durable and private (individualized) land tenure security to help sustain the incentive for
significant investments in land conservation. In other jurisdictions such as Ethiopia,
Deninger, Ali, and Alemu (2009) and Tsegaye, Adgo, and Selassie (2012) provide
evidence of the effectiveness of low-cost land certification systems in attaining similar
purpose. In the latter paper, land certification is identified to account for over 15%
increment in the adoption of land management practices among households in the dry-
lands of the Amhara region of that country.
The findings also reveal the gender dimension of this subject; which is, male-headedhouseholds are systematically more likely to make major investment in land conservation
than their female-headed counterparts. It is recommended for policy to institute support
18 E.J. Mensah
8/12/2019 Land Tenure Regimes and Land Conservation in the African Drylands: the Case of northern Ghana
20/22
mechanisms targeted at female-headed households to enable them implement land con-
servation as a livelihood support intervention.
Consistent with the Boserup thesis, it is also found that the incidence of investment in
land conservation is significantly associated with households with more labour resources.
It is further found that rural-based farm units show greater tendency to make major
investment in land conservation than their urban-based counterparts. However, contrary
to expectation, age and marital status are not important determinants of the incidence of
major investment in land conservation by households.
In relation to education, a minimum threshold of formal training is required to
significantly engender a positive and significant impact on the probability of major
investment in land conservation by households. In promoting sustainable agriculture
and investment in land conservation, development policy must regard educational attain-
ment of up to such threshold as an important driver. Below such threshold, households
might require more specialized training and education to create awareness and incentives
for greater investments in land conservation.
5.1. Recommendations for future research
As the opportunity did not exist for the current study to evaluate the role of extension and
related training interventions in enhancing the capacity of landholders in investing in land
conservation, future studies could explicitly measure the impact of such training activities.
Also, notwithstanding the rigour of the test statistics of the estimated models and the
general trend of extensive dependence on own labour for such major investments in land
conservation by farm households in the study area, it is still conceivable that income or
wealth could influence the propensity to invest in land conservation. This is because even
in the face of weak tenure security, resource-rich smallholder households are likely to facedisproportionately lower opportunity cost of capital to undertake such major investments
in land conservation than their resource-poor counterparts. It is recommended for future
research to investigate this factor.
Acknowledgements
My sincere appreciation to the lOasis Development Group of the Global Youth Alliance forthe earnest support leading to this paper. Funding from the ISSER/USAID Land TenureReform Project for the original study underlying this paper is also appreciated as well as thecontribution of Mrs. Freda Asem to the same. Nonetheless, all errors and omissions herein are
entirely mine.
Notes
1. The MDP is a flagship project of the Earth Institute at the Columbia University, USA. Theproject adopts a community-led, integrated rural development model to fast-track the realizationof the UNs millennium development goals in selected rural communities in Sub-Sahara Africa.Recent models have included Haiti, Cambodia and Jordan.
2. Pluralis used in this context to refer to the coexistence of different systems derived especiallyfrom both formal and informal institutions and rules for land use and administration in thecountry.
3. Besley (1995) provides an extensive treatment of this argument with an application to Ghana.4. ISSER is the Institute for Statistical, Social and Economic Research, a research institute basedat the University of Ghana, Legon, Accra. USAID is the United States Agency for InternationalDevelopment, which also maintains a country office in Accra, Ghana.
Journal of Land Use Science 19
8/12/2019 Land Tenure Regimes and Land Conservation in the African Drylands: the Case of northern Ghana
21/22
5. Individualized in this context is used to emphasize exclusivity of ownership to an individual,which then allows the land to be applied and the benefits captured more as a private rather thana common resource.
References
AGRA. (2012). The policy and partnership programs of the alliance for a green revolution inAfrica. Nairobi: Author.
Adam, S. (1974).An inquiry into the nature and causes of wealth of nations (1). Book III, Chapter 2.London: Penguin Books.
Asabere, P. (1994). Public policy and the emergent African land tenure system: The case of Ghana.Journal of Black Studies, 24(3), 281289.
AU Commission. (2010).The Abuja declaration on fertilizer for African green revolution: Status ofimplementation at regional and national levels. Policy Briefs. Abuja: Author.
Barbier, E. B. (1998). The economics of land degradation and rural poverty linkages in Africa.UNU/INRA 1998 Annual Lecture. Japan: United Nations Institute for Natural Resources in
Africa, United Nations University.Bekele, G., & Alemu, M. (2010). Investment in land conservation in the Ethiopian Highlands: A
household plot-level analysis of the roles of poverty, tenure security, and market incentives.Discussion Paper Series EfD DP 10-09. Addis Ababa: Environment for Development.
Besley, T. (1995). Property rights and investment incentives: Theory and evidence from Ghana. TheJournal of Political Economy, 103(5), 903937.
BOG. (2008). Statistical bulletin 2008. Accra: Author.Boserup, E. (1965). The conditions of agricultural growth: The economics of agrarian change
under population pressure. New York, NY: Aldine Press.CEPA. (2007). Review and analysis of government economic policy for 2007. Accra: Author.Cleaver, K. M., & Schreiber, G. A. (1994). Reversing the spiral: The population agriculture, and
environment nexus in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Dasgupta, P., & Maler, K. (1990). The environment and emerging development issues. Annual bankconference on development economics. Washington, DC: The World Bank.de Janvry, A., & Sadoulet, E. (2001). Access to land and land policy reforms A policy brief. UNU
World Institute for Development Economics Research. Helsinki: UNU/WIDER.De Soto, H. (2000).The mystery of capital: Why capitalism triumph in the west and fails everywhere
else. New York, NY: Basic Books.Deininger, K., & Binswanger, H. (1999). The evolution of the World Banks land policy:
Principles, experience and future challenges. The World Bank Research Observer, 14(2),247276.
Deninger, K., Ali, D. A., & Alemu, T. (2009). Impact of Land Certification on Tenure Security,Investment and Land Markets: Evidence from Ethiopia. Discussion Paper Series EfD DP 0911.Addis Ababa: Environment for Development.
Deressa, T. T., Hassan, R. M., & Ringler, C. (2009). Assessing household vulnerability to climatechange: The case of farmers in the Nile Basin of Ethiopia. IFPRI Discussion Paper 00935.Addis Ababa: International Food Policy Research Institute.
Downing, T. E. (1992). Climate change and vulnerable places: Global food security and countrystudies in Zimbabwe, Kenya, Senegal, and Chile. Oxford: Environmental Change Unit,University of Oxford.
FAO. (2005).Concept note International conference on agrarian reforms and rural development:New challenges and options for revitalizing rural communities. 128 Session, CL 128/9Supplement 1. Rome: Author.
FAO. (2006). Fertilizer use by crop in Ghana. Land and Water Division. Rome: Author.GLAPS. (2003).Review of studies conducted on gender and land in Ghana for LAP and support for
developing gender policy on land matters Draft final report. Accra: Author.GSS. (2000). Poverty trends in Ghana in the 1990s. Accra: Author.
GSS. (2012). Ghana 2010 population and housing census Final results. Accra: Author.GoG. (2006).Reducing poverty through agricultural transformation Millennium challenge Ghana
programme. Accra: Author.
20 E.J. Mensah
8/12/2019 Land Tenure Regimes and Land Conservation in the African Drylands: the Case of northern Ghana
22/22
Goldstein, M., & Udry, C. (2006).The profits of power: Land rights and agricultural investment inGhana. Discussion Paper Number 32. Accra: Institute of Statistical, Social and EconomicResearch, University of Ghana.
Hitchcock, R. K. (1981). Traditional systems of land tenure and agrarian reform.Journal of AfricanLaw, 24, 2433.
IFAD. (2009). IFADs response to climate change through support to adaptation and relatedactions. Rome: Author.
ISSER. (2006). The state of the Ghanaian economy in 2005. Accra: Author.Kabubo-Mariara, J. (2006). Land Conservation in Kenya: The Role of Property Rights. AERC
Research Paper 153. Nairobi: African Economic Research Consortium.Lapp, F. M. (1998). World hunger: Twelve myths (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Grove Press.Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Advanced
quantitative techniques in the social sciences, number 7. Thousands Oak, CA: SagePublications.
Malthus, T. R. (1998). An essay on the principle of population. London: Electronic ScholarlyPublishing Project (Original work published 1798).
Maxwell, D., & Wiebe, K. (1999). Land tenure and food security: Exploring dynamic linkages.Development and Change, 30, 825849.
Mwakubo, S. M. (2002).Land tenure and natural resource management in Semi-Arid Areas, Kenya.Kenya: Agricultural Economics Department, Egerton University.
NDPC. (1991).Making people matter: A human development strategy for Ghana. Accra: Author.NDPC. (1994).National development policy framework. Accra: Author.NDPC. (2003). Ghana poverty reduction strategy (20032005): An agenda for growth and prosper-
ity. Accra: Author.NDPC. (2005).Growth and poverty reduction strategy (GPRS II), 20062009. Accra: Author.Otuska, K., Quisumbing, A. R., Payongayong, E., & Aidoo, J. B. (2003). Land tenure and the
management of land and trees: The case of customary land tenure Areas of Ghana. Environmentand Development, 8, 77104.
Picardi, A. C., & Seifert, W. W. (1976). A tragedy of the commons in the Sahel. Technology Review,78, 4251.
Place, F., & Otsuka, K. (2002). Land tenure systems and their impacts on agricultural investmentsand productivity in Uganda. The Journal of Development Studies, 38(6), 105128.Platteau, J. P. (1996). The evolutionary theory of land rights as applied to SUB-Saharan Africa: A
critical assessment. Development and Change, 27(1), 2986.Platteau, J. P. (2000). Institutions, social norms, and economic development. Amsterdam: Harwood
Academic.Raquez, P., & Lambin, E. F. (2006). Conditions for sustainable land use: Case study evidence.
Journal of Land Use, 1(24), 109125.Scherr, S., & Yadav, S. (1997). Land degradation in the developing world. Issues and policy options
for 2020. 2020 Brief 44. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.Soule, M. J., Tegene, A., & Wiebe, K. D. (2000). Land tenure and the adoption of conservation
practices. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82(4), 9931005.Tsegaye, A., Adgo, E., & Selassie, Y. G. (2012). Impact of land certification on sustainable land
resource management in Dryland Areas of Eastern Amhara Region, Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Science, 4(12). doi:10.5539/jas.v4n12p261
UN WCED. (1987). Our common future. A Report of the UN World Commission for Environmentand Development. New York, NY: United Nations.
UNCCD, UNEP & UNDP. (2009). Climate change in the African drylands: Options and opportu-nities for adaptation and mitigation. A joint publication of the United Nations Convention toCombat Desertification (UNCCD), United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and theUnited Nations Development Programme (UNDP). New York, NY: UNCCD.
Uma, L. (1992). Structural adjustment and agriculture: A comparative perspective of performancein Africa, Asia and Latin America. IW92-30r, International Working Paper Series. Gainesville:Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida.
Journal of Land Use Science 21