King County 1200 King County 516 Third Avenue Seattle, WA … · 2020-02-03 · Sponsors: Mr. Dembowski and Ms. Balducci Clifton Curry, Council staff King County Page 1 Printed on

Community, Health and Housing

Services Committee

King County

Meeting Agenda

1200 King County Courthouse

516 Third Avenue Seattle, WA 98104

Councilmembers: Kathy Lambert, Chair; Jeanne Kohl-Welles, Vice Chair;

Reagan Dunn, Joe McDermott, Dave Upthegrove, Girmay Zahilay

Staff: Clifton Curry, Lead Staff (206-477-0877)

Marka Steadman: Committee Clerk (206-477-0887)

Room 1001 9:30 AM Wednesday, February 5, 2020

Pursuant to K.C.C. 1.24.035 A. and F., this meeting is also noticed as a meeting of the Metropolitan King County Council, whose agenda is limited to the committee business. In this meeting only the rules and procedures applicable to committees apply and not those applicable to full council

meetings.

Call to Order1.

Roll Call2.

Approval of Minutes3.

December 3, 2019 meeting pp. 3-4

Discussion and Possible Action

4. Proposed Motion No. 2020-0027 pp. 5-9

A MOTION confirming the executive's appointment of Joe Cunningham, who resides in council districtone, to the King County board for developmental disabilities.

Sponsors: Mr. Dembowski and Ms. Balducci

Clifton Curry, Council staff

Printed on 1/31/2020 Page 1 King County

To show a PDF of the written materials for an

agenda item, click on the agenda item below.

CHHS Meeting Materials Page 1 February 5, 2020

February 5, 2020 Community, Health and Housing

Services Committee Meeting Agenda


A MOTION confirming the executive's appointment of Steven Andrews, who resides in council district six,to the King County board for developmental disabilities.

Sponsors: Ms. Balducci

Clifton Curry, Council staff


A MOTION acknowledging receipt of the district court community court outcomes report, in compliancewith the 2019-2020 Biennial Budget Ordinance, Ordinance 18835, Section 70, Proviso P1.

Sponsors: Mr. Gossett and Ms. Lambert

Contingent upon referral to the Community, Health and Housing Services Committee

Sam Porter, Council staff

Briefing

7. Briefing No. 2020-B0015 pp. 75

Overview of Issues and Potential Legislation from the Department of Community and Human Services in2020

Leo Flor, Director, Department of Community and Human Services

Public Comment8.

Other Business

Adjournment

Printed on 1/31/2020 Page 2 King County



516 Third Avenue Seattle, WA 98104

King County

Meeting Minutes

Health, Housing and Human Services

Committee Councilmembers: Jeanne Kohl-Welles, Chair;

Dave Upthegrove, Vice Chair; Claudia Balducci, Rod Dembowski, Larry Gossett, Kathy

Lambert

Staff: Clifton Curry, Lead Staff (206-477-0877)

Angelica Calderon, Committee Assistant (206-477-0874)

9:30 AM Room 1001 Tuesday, December 3, 2019

DRAFT MINUTES

Pursuant to K.C.C. 1.24.035 A. and F., this meeting is also noticed as a meeting of the Metropolitan King County Council, whose agenda is limited to the committee business. In this meeting only the rules and procedures applicable to committees apply and not those applicable to full council

meetings.

Call to Order 1.

The Chair called the meeting to order at 9:36 a.m.

Roll Call 2.

Ms. Balducci, Mr. Dembowski, Ms. Kohl-Welles and Ms. Lambert Present: 4 -

Mr. Gossett and Mr. Upthegrove Excused: 2 -

Public Comment 3.

The following people were present to offer public comment: 1. Antony Roberson 2. Alex Tsimerman 3. Emily Harris-Shears 4. Liza Burell 5. Mandy Amanda Wolff 6. Mary Flowers 7. Marguerite Richard 8. Marvin Blackwisol 9. Juanita Spotted Elk 10. Trina Vary 11. Joseph Seier 12. Miranda Hunter 13. Harold Odam

Page 1 King County


December 3, 2019 Health, Housing and Human Services

Committee Meeting Minutes

Approval of Minutes 4.

Councilmember Lambert moved approval of the November 19, 2019 meeting minutes. Seeing no objections, the minutes were approved.

Discussion and Possible Action

5. Proposed Motion No. 2019-0463

A MOTION confirming the executiveʹs appointment of the members of the King County children and families strategy task force in accordance with Motion 15521.

Erica Newman, Council Staff, briefed the Committee on the legislation and answered questions from the members. Sarah Reyneveld, John Bancroft, Nela Cumming, Susan Yang, Patricia Bailey, Nancy Ashley, Natalia Lente, and Denise Pruitt, appointees of the King County children and family strategy task force were present to offer comment and answer questions from the members. Jessica Tollenaar Cafferty, Child Care Policy Lead, Executive Staff, was present to answer questions from the members. Councilmember Dembowski moved amendment 1. The amendment was adopted.

A motion was made by Councilmember Dembowski that this Motion be Recommended Do Pass Substitute Consent. The motion carried by the following

vote:

Yes: Ms. Balducci, Mr. Dembowski, Ms. Kohl-Welles and Ms. Lambert 4 -

Excused: Mr. Gossett and Mr. Upthegrove 2 -

Other Business

There was no other business to come before the Committee.

Adjournment

The meeting was adjourned at 11:14 a.m.

Approved this _____________ day of _________________

Clerk's Signature

Page 2 King County


Metropolitan King County Council Community, Health, and Housing Services Committee

STAFF REPORT

Agenda Item: 4 Name: Clifton Curry

Proposed No.: 2020-0027 Date: February 5, 2020 SUBJECT A MOTION confirming the executive's appointment of Joe Cunningham, who resides in council district one, to the King County board for developmental disabilities. BACKGROUND The 15-member Board for Developmental Disabilities is a citizen advisory board that provides oversight of community services for children with developmental delays, adults with developmental disabilities and the families of these individuals. The board is established under state law (RCW 71.A.14.020)1 and King County Code 2.32.020. The board develops plans for developmental disability services, advises on funding priorities, and advocates for increases in funding and improvement in services. Board members include family advocates, self-advocates, professionals, and interested citizens. APPOINTEE INFORMATION This Motion would appoint Mr. Joe Cunningham, who resides in Council District 1, to the King County Board for Developmental Disabilities, for a partial term expiring June 30, 2020. Mr. Cunningham’s application materials note that he is the parent of child with autism and has extensive experience advocating for his son and others with disabilities with agencies that serve this population. Mr. Cunningham is currently the Capital Campaign Director for the Imagine Children’s Museum. Mr. Cunningham has a bachelor’s degree from the University of Portland and is an MPA candidate. Mr. Cunningham serves on the Children’s Campaign Fund and has been a member of the Governor’s Committee on Employment and Disabilities, Community Advocacy Coalition, and the Washington state CASA Association Board of Directors. 1 RCW 71.A.14.020 allows that “The county governing authority of any county may appoint a developmental disability board to plan services for persons with developmental disabilities, to provide directly or indirectly a continuum of care and services to persons with developmental disabilities within the county or counties served by the community board.” Boards established pursuant to this RCW can have up to 15 members.


ANALYSIS Staff has not identified any issues with the proposed appointment. It appears to be consistent with state law and King County Code requirements. INVITED • Joe Cunningham, Appointee to Board for Developmental Disabilities • Jim Ott, Department of Community and Human Services ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proposed Motion 2020-0027 2. Executive’s Transmittal Letter (attachments available upon request)


KING COUNTY

Signature Report

ATTACHMENT 1


516 Third Avenue

Seattle, WA 98104

Motion

Proposed No. 2020-0027.1 Sponsors Dembowski and Balducci

1

A MOTION confirming the executive's appointment of Joe 1

Cunningham, who resides in council district one, to the 2

King County board for developmental disabilities. 3

BE IT MOVED by the Council of King County: 4

The county executive's appointment of Joe Cunningham, who resides in council 5

district one, to the King County board for developmental disabilities, for a partial term to 6


Motion

2

expire on September 30, 2020, is hereby confirmed. 7

8

KING COUNTY COUNCIL

KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON

________________________________________

Claudia Balducci, Chair

ATTEST:

________________________________________

Melani Pedroza, Clerk of the Council

APPROVED this _____ day of _______________, ______.

________________________________________

Dow Constantine, County Executive

Attachments: None


ATTACHMENT 2


[Blank Page]


Metropolitan King County Council Community, Health, and Housing Services Committee

STAFF REPORT

Agenda Item: 5 Name: Clifton Curry

Proposed No.: 2020-0031 Date: February 5, 2020 SUBJECT A MOTION confirming the executive's appointment of Steven Andrews, who resides in council district six, to the King County board for developmental disabilities. BACKGROUND The 15-member Board for Developmental Disabilities is a citizen advisory board that provides oversight of community services for children with developmental delays, adults with developmental disabilities and the families of these individuals. The board is established under state law (RCW 71.A.14.020)1 and King County Code 2.32.020. The board develops plans for developmental disability services, advises on funding priorities, and advocates for increases in funding and improvement in services. Board members include family advocates, self-advocates, professionals, and interested citizens. APPOINTEE INFORMATION This Motion would appoint Mr. Andrews, who resides in Council District 6, to the King County Board for Developmental Disabilities, for a term expiring September 30, 2022. Mr. Andrew’s application materials note that he was diagnosed with a disability in 2012 and he has since “dedicated my life to creating understanding, acceptance, inclusion, and opportunity for disabled people.” Mr. Andrew is self-employed and reports that he has over 20 years of experience in the tech industry. He reports that he now works “in the disability space as a speaker, writer, and trainer on disability and mental health issues. I regularly engage with varied audiences including individuals and families, educators, business leaders, faith leaders, and the United States military.” He also notes that he is responsible for weekly group meetings for disabled adults in the City of Redmond and serves on the advisory board for several disability-related non-profits 1 RCW 71.A.14.020 allows that “The county governing authority of any county may appoint a developmental disability board to plan services for persons with developmental disabilities, to provide directly or indirectly a continuum of care and services to persons with developmental disabilities within the county or counties served by the community board.” Boards established pursuant to this RCW can have up to 15 members.


ANALYSIS Staff has not identified any issues with the proposed appointment. It appears to be consistent with state law and King County Code requirements. INVITED • Steven Andrews, Appointee to Board for Developmental Disabilities • Jim Ott, Department of Community and Human Services ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proposed Motion 2020-0031 2. Executive’s Transmittal Letter (attachments available upon request)


KING COUNTY

Signature Report

ATTACHMENT 1


516 Third Avenue

Seattle, WA 98104

Motion

Proposed No. 2020-0031.1 Sponsors Balducci

1

A MOTION confirming the executive's appointment of 1

Steven Andrews, who resides in council district six, to the 2

King County board for developmental disabilities. 3

BE IT MOVED by the Council of King County: 4

The county executive's appointment of Steven Andrews, who resides in council 5

district six, to the King County board for developmental disabilities, for a three-year term 6


Motion

2

to expire on September 30, 2022, is hereby confirmed. 7

8

KING COUNTY COUNCIL


________________________________________


ATTEST:

________________________________________



________________________________________


Attachments: None


ti King County

Dow Constantine King County Executive 401 Fifth Avenue, Suite 800 Seattle, WA 98104-1818

206-263-9600 Fax 206-296-0194 TTY Relay: 711 www.kingcounty.gov

December 18, 2019

The Honorable Rod Dembowski Chair, King County Council Room 1200 COURTHOUSE

Dear Councilmember Dembowski:

Enclosed for consideration and approval by the King County Council is a motion confirming the appointment of Steven Andrews, who resides in council district six, to the King County board for developmental disabilities, for a three-year term expiring September 30, 2022.

Enclosed with this transmittal is Mr. Andrews's application, financial disclosure, board profile; and appointment letter. This appointment request supports the King County Strategic Plan goal of public engagement by expanding opportunities to seek input, listen, and respond to residents.

If you have any questions about this appointment, please have your staff call Rick Ybarra, liaison for boards & commissions, at 206-263-9651.

Sincerely,

~ .- · Dow Constantine King County Executive

Enclosures

cc: King County Councilmembers AT1N: Carolyn Busch, Chief of Staff

Melani Pedroza, Clerk of the Council Dwight Dively, Director, Office of Performance, Strategy and Budget Rick Ybarra, Liaison for Boards & Commissions Michaelle Monday, Staff Liaison Steven Andrews

King County is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer and complies with the Americans with Disabilitites Act

ATTACHMENT 2


[Blank Page]


Metropolitan King County Council Community, Health and Housing Services Committee

STAFF REPORT

Agenda Item: 6 Name: Sam Porter

Proposed No.: 2019-0406 Date: February 5, 2019 SUBJECT Proposed Motion 2019-0406 would acknowledge receipt of the King County District Court Community Court Outcomes Report, in compliance with the 2019-2020 Biennial Budget1 Section 70, Proviso P1. Passage of this motion would release $50,000 of appropriation authority to the District Court Mental Illness and Drug Dependency fund. SUMMARY Attachment A to Proposed Motion 2019-0406 contains the Community Court Outcomes Report, dated September 2019, as requested in Section 70, Proviso P1 of Ordinance 18835 that held $50,000 of expenditure authority until the District Court transmitted a report on community court outcomes. The report transmitted with Proposed Motion 2019-0406 was received prior to the September 30, 2019 deadline and includes the following as required:

A. A description of the community court operations at each location, including a description of in-kind or other support provided by the city and other organizations in which each community court is located; B. For each community court location in 2019, the number of participants as of July 30, 2019, and the number of participants who have graduated, been removed or are still participating as of July 30, 2019; and C. A plan for potential expansion in 2020, including the number of additional community courts, potential locations and information on the in-kind or other support that would be provided by the cities or other organizations in which the additional community courts would be located.

The report in Attachment A is responsive to the proviso. Passage of this motion would release $50,000 of appropriation authority to the District Court Mental Illness and Drug Dependency (MIDD) fund.

1 Ordinance 18835


BACKGROUND Community courts are a type of problem-solving court that seek to address the underlying problems contributing to public safety and quality of life issues that result in crime. Unlike other problem-solving or treatment courts such as drug, mental health, or domestic violence courts, community courts do not specialize in one particular problem. Rather, the goal of community courts is to address the multiple problems and needs that contribute to social disorganization. Community courts promote the use of community service and social service sentences in an effort to have individuals pay back the community. Community courts make connections between resources and participants to address their needs in a way that helps them from re-offending. By providing alternative sentences, community courts seek to decrease both jail time and “walks” (sentences such as a fine or “time served”) in which offenders receive no ongoing sanction despite pleading guilty to criminal conduct.2 King County Community Court works with individuals charged with “quality of life” crimes such as possession of alcohol in a park, theft, trespass, or disorderly conduct.3 According to the Court, the State is in the process of beginning to file low-level out-of-custody felony drug cases (expedited cases), filed as misdemeanors into both Redmond and Burien Community Courts. Driving-related cases currently are not eligible to be addressed in community court.4 Community court participants must not have been convicted of a violent felony in the last five years; any pending violent felony charges; or a sex offender history. Planning for community court in King County began in the fall of 2016 when King County District Court (KCDC) Presiding Judge Donna Tucker contacted the Center for Court Innovation and received technical assistance for the planning of Community Courts at no cost. The subsequent efforts resulted in the current operation of three Community Courts in Redmond, Burien, and Shoreline,5 all of which receive funding through the MIDD sales tax and in-kind support through community partnerships. ANALYSIS The Community Court Outcomes Report in Attachment A to Proposed Motion 2019-0406 includes a description of the community court operations, in-kind or other support, participant statistics, and a plan for expansion in 2020 as required by the proviso. Community Court Operations and Support King County Community Court was first established in conjunction with the City of Redmond in 2018, located at the Redmond Library. The second court location opened in February 2019 at the Burien Community Center in coordination with the City of Burien.6 According to the Court, the practice of 2 Henry, K., D. Kralstein (2011) Community Courts: The Research Literature A Review of Findings. New York, NY: Center for Court Innovation 3 Community Court Outcomes Report, Page 21 4 King County District Court, Community Court FAQ, https://www.kingcounty.gov/courts/district-court/Community%20Courts.aspx 5 The Shoreline Community Court opened in January 2020, after the Community Court Outcomes Report was finalized and transmitted. 6 The third Community Court opened in Shoreline January 7, 2020. The proviso response was received September 20, 2019, prior to Shoreline being operational.


https://www.kingcounty.gov/courts/district-court/Community%20Courts.aspx


holding proceedings in a, "community-centered location (such as a library or community center) encourages the participants to stay engaged and removes the stigma associated with the courthouse. Additionally, as community resource centers co-located with the courts are crucial to providing services that participants and other community members need, it is important to house the resource centers in places that are easily accessible to everyone."7 As such, the King County Community Courts are co-located with a pop-up community resource center available to individuals involved in the Court as well as community members who are not. These resource centers are open in conjunction with the hours of operation of the court and have served more than 4,000 King County residents according to KCDC. The resource centers in Burien and Redmond have more than 30 service providers at each that can facilitate access to the following:

• Substance Use Disorder Assessment/Support • Mental Health Assessment/Support • Public Assistance Support • Housing Assistance • Employment Assistance • GED/Education/Training Programs • Food Banks/Food Assistance Programs • Civil Legal Aid • Dispute Resolution & Mediation Services

Community Court functions with many different partners including staff from KCDC, prosecutors, police, public defense, social service professionals, and volunteers. KCDC provides the judge for Community Court, the Court Clerk, Court Coordinator, and Court Manager. The local City Attorney and the King County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office assigns one or more specific attorneys to Community Court. Each court operates weekly with Redmond open on Wednesdays from 1:30 p.m. – 3:30 p.m. and Burien on Mondays from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. with pre-court occurring about 45 minutes prior to each opening. Court staff hold the pre-court meeting to discuss the calendar with the judge, speak to participant's experience (including Urine Analysis Reports) and provide the judge with information necessary to make decisions. According to the report, the pre-court meeting "creates a space to talk through background information and activities that would be harmful if on records. By keeping mental health and substance use information within the context of this meeting, the court team maintains discretion in sentencing and response while respecting participant's privacy."8 Court staff monitor participant compliance with alternative sentences and determines whether there is reasonable cause for an absence and take appropriate actions. The Court can send a bench warrant for a participant if it is deemed appropriate. Each hosting city provides police officers to serve as security for each Community Court. The City of Burien also provides space for Court and Resource Center operations at the Burien Community Center. Both courts receive in-kind donations from

7 King County District Court, Community Court FAQ, https://www.kingcounty.gov/courts/district-court/Community%20Courts.aspx 8 Community Court Outcomes Report, Page 23




local businesses, churches, and nonprofit organizations. A breakdown of support for both Community Courts can be seen in Table 1 below.

Table 1. Community Court Support.

Support Redmond Burien

Space King County Library Systems Burien Community Center (City of Burien)

Lunch for Court

Participants

Sodexo and Redmond United Methodist Church

Coffee provided by Starbucks

Conscious Eatery for participants

Highline Food Bank for community members

Graduation Cupcakes QFC Safeway

Community Volunteers 600+ volunteer hours 532+ volunteer hours

Service Providers 32 providers (3,600+ people served) 42 providers (369+ people served)

Community Court Participants As of July 30, 2019 the Community Courts have served 144 court participants. A breakdown of the status of these participants as requested by the proviso can be seen in Table 2 below.

Table 2. Community Court Participant Status as of July 30, 2019.

Graduates Removals In Program Total Participants

Redmond (est. Apr 2018) 65 7 55 1299

Burien (est. Feb 2019) 1 2 12 15

Community Court Expansion Plans District Court indicated in their report that they a working with city partners in Shoreline, Auburn, and Bellevue with a goal of opening community courts in these locations in 2020. The Shoreline location launched January 7, 2020 at Shoreline City Hall and operates on Tuesdays from 1:30 – 3:30 p.m. The Court indicates that its plans to open a Bellevue location have been placed on hold. The Court indicates that as additional community courts are brought online staff will frame their efforts using a trauma informed approach, motivational interviewing, and onboarding for newly admitted participants. Each location requires staff from KCDC (judge, clerk, coordinator, and manager), prosecutors, police, public defense, social service professionals, and volunteers for the court and associated community resource center to operate. The sites provided for the existing community court operations have been provided at no cost to the courts. Additional details about the current and planned community courts can be seen in Table 3 below. 9 According to the Court, two participant cases were dismissed by the prosecuting attorney prior to completion of the community court requirements.


Table 3. Community Court Data in King County.

City Launch Date Court

Participants as of 7/30/19

Resource Center Users

Appropriation

Ordinance MIDD

Appropriation

Redmond April 2018 129 3,600+ 2017 2nd Omnibus10 $102,000

Burien February 2019 15 369+ 2019-2020 Adopted Budget11

$943,000 Shoreline January 2020 - -

Auburn Estimated Summer 2020 - - 2019 2nd

Omnibus12 $202,000

Bellevue On hold - - - -

INVITED

• Honorable Donna Tucker, Presiding Judge, King County District Court • Callista Welbaum, Regional Mental Health Court Manager, King County District

Court ATTACHMENTS

1. Proposed Motion 2019-0406 (and its attachment) 2. Transmittal Letter 3. District Court PowerPoint dated 2-5-20

10 Ordinance 18602 11 Ordinance 18835 12 This supplemental appropriation of $202,000 and 1.0 FTE was provided in Ordinance 19021 to implement a community court in the City of Auburn. This is intended to support start-up costs and costs for a coordinator, judge, and clerk staff that also support other community courts and District Court activities.


[Blank Page]


KING COUNTY

Signature Report

ATTACHMENT 1


516 Third Avenue

Seattle, WA 98104

Motion

Proposed No. 2019-0406.1 Sponsors Gossett and Lambert

1

A MOTION acknowledging receipt of the district court 1

community court outcomes report, in compliance with the 2

2019-2020 Biennial Budget Ordinance, Ordinance 18835, 3

Section 70, Proviso P1. 4

WHEREAS, the 2019-2020 Biennial Budget, Ordinance 18835, Section 70, 5

Proviso P1, of the appropriation, $50,000 shall not be expended or encumbered until the 6

district court transmits a community court outcomes report by September 30, 2019, in the 7

form of a paper original and an electronic copy, and 8

WHEREAS, the report includes the following: 9

A description of the community court operations at each location, including a 10

description of in-kind or other support provided by the city and other organizations in 11

which each community court is located; 12

For each community court location in 2019, the number of participants as of July 13

30, 2019, and the number of participants who have graduated, been removed or are still 14

participating as of July 30, 2019; and 15

A plan for potential expansion in 2020, including the number of additional 16

community courts, potential locations and information on the in-kind or other support 17

that would be provided by the cities or other organizations in which the additional 18

community courts would be located, and 19


Motion

2

WHEREAS, the clerk of the council, shall retain the original of the report and 20

provide an electronic copy to all councilmembers, the council chief of staff and the lead 21

staff for the law justice committee, or its successor; 22

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT MOVED by the Council of King County: 23

The receipt of the community court outcomes report, which is Attachment A to 24


Motion

3

this motion, in compliance with the 2019-2020 Biennial Budget Ordinance, Ordinance 25

18835, Section 70, Proviso P1, is hereby acknowledged. 26

27

KING COUNTY COUNCIL


________________________________________


ATTEST:

________________________________________



________________________________________


Attachments: A. Community Court Outcomes Report September 2019


[Blank Page]


KingCountyDistrict Court

Attachment ACommunity Court Outcomes Report

September 2019

PurposeThis report is prepared in fulfillment of Proviso P1 under Section 70, District Court Mental lllness and Drug

Dependency, of King County Ordinance 18835, adopting the 201-9-2020 Biennial Budget. lt is organized

according to the three specific sections (4, B, C) called for in the Proviso.

A) "A description of the community court operations at each location, including a description of in-kind or

other support provided by the city and other organizations in which each community court is located."

As of July 30,2019, King County District Court is operating two community courts, and associated community

resource centers, in conjunction with our partners at the Cities of Redmond and Burien and with the support

of other public agencies, non-profits and local businesses. Both courts are well-established and are accepting

and graduating participants (Redmond launched April 2018; Burien launched February 2019).

The community resource centers are open to everyone in the community (not just community courtparticipants), and provide easy access to a wide range of essential services, including healthcare/insurance,

education, job training, behavioral health, housing, substance use disorder treatment, etc. ln total, the

Redmond and Burien Community Resource Centers have served nearly 4,000 King County residents.

Locotion In-kind or other supportBy cîties other orgonizations

Redmond ¡ KinB County Library System: Space for community court and

community resource center in the Redmond Libraryo 32 service providers: Have served 3,600+ people in the

community resource center at tables staffed by their expertso Sodexo: Lunches for community court part¡cipants. Open Kitchen at Redmond United Methodist Church:

Lunches for community court participantso QFC: Cupcakes for community court graduates

¡ Community members: 600+ volunteer hours assisting visitorsin the communi court and the commun resource center

Burien ¡ 42 service providers: Have served 369+ people in thecommunity resource center at tables staffed by their experts

o Conscious Eatery: Lunches for community court participantso Highline Food Bank: Emergency food for community

members¡ Safeway: Cupcakes for community court graduates

¡ Starbucks: Coffee and related supplies for communityresource center

1

. C¡ty of Redmond:Security for communitycourt provided byRedmond police officers

o City of Burien:- Space for community

court and communityresource center in theBurien CommunityCenter

- Security forcommunity court artici nts


provided by Burienpolice officers

o Community members: 532+ volunteer hours assisting visitorsin the comm court and the commun resource center

B) "For each community court location in 2019, the number of participants as of July 30,20t9, and the

number of participants who have graduated, been removed or are still participating as of July 30,2OL9."

Court Totols from launch døte through luly 30, 2079

PartÍcipants Grdduates Removals Pdrticipants stilltn

Redmond 55

Burien t2

Beyond the raw numbers of people served, we know that community court is helping people improve their

lives. Here are several representative testimonials from anonymous surveys we ask each graduate to

complete, and from TV interviews of community court graduates:

"My experience here has saved my life. Not only am I off the drugs and staying clean by taking the

healthy steps to live life clean, I also have been able to get myself back in a healthy structured living

situation. lam so blessed to have the honorto be a part of this program."

a

a "l am so glad I ended up in this program. lt was really great getting encouragement every week

checking in and feeling like everyone here really cared how I was doing. I feel like things are much

better than they were, and the changes I made in my life will stay this time."

"lf you look at the traditional court system, it's just judgment and sentence. Here they actually want

you to succeed and help you do better with your life, so you don't make the same mistakes."

"This is such a positive program and it really helped. lt was good to have to be accountable each

week to a judge, and to work with folks who were encouraging and caring."

"l really loved the resource center, and l'm really happy they had that. Those people at the

community court will tell you to go to that one table to talk to them and get you the help you need."

C) "A plan for potential expansion in2O2O, including the number of additional community courts, potential

locations and information on the in-kind or other support that would be provided by the cities or other

organizations in which the additional community courts would be located."

Based on an evaluation of demographics and a vision of providing access to community courts and community

resource centers to all residents of King County, King County District Court is working with city partners to have

three additional community cou rts operating in 2020:

Location Sføtus

lmplementation actively underway to

a

a

a

2

Løunchdate

7Apr.2018

r29 65

7 2Feb.

201915

In-kind supportTargetlaunch ddte

Dec.

2019- Location for community court and

resource centerShoreline

meet ta launch Decision on


- Security for community court

Jul

2020- Location for community court and

resource center- Security for community court- Location for community court and

resource center- Security for community court

Dec.

2020

location and time/day of week for courtend of month; Secu d

Auburn Planning phase pending funding in the

Q2 Omnibus

Bellevue District court and City of Bellevue in

discussions

ln addition to opening new community courts, King County District Court is working to expand the types ofcases that are referred to community court - in order to benefit a wider range of people within the criminaljustice system. Of note:

An agreement with the King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office (PAO) will allow state cases to be filed

into Redmond. Additional mainstream cases can be referred to Community County in Burien in lieu ofsanctions, including jail time. This action may include driving cases.

a

a Eligible expedited felony Violation of Uniform Controlled Substances Act (VUCSA) cases will be referred toCommunity Courts in Redmond and Burien by the end of 2019. lf persons are compliant with the court

contract, their case can be dismissed.

3


Needs Assessment and Implementation RecommendationsCommunity fustice in Redmond

Harm Reduction Research and Treatment (HaRRT) Center Team

University of Washington - Harborview Medical Center

fuly 3 2019

This report was prepared by the University of Washington HaRRT Center Team with important

contributions from the King County Community Court and other acknowledged on the back page.

Report prepared by:Courtney Jackson, MPH

Harm Reduction Research and Treatment (HaRRT) Center


Practicum Supervisor: Seema L. Clifasefi, PhD

Harm Reduction Research and Treatment (HaRRT) Center


Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences

AgencyKing County District Courts

Callista Welbaum, Court Manager


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction and Background......

King County

Community Court Model

Gathering Information...,,,......

Creating Project Team

Choosing Location

Engaging CommunityDeveloping Steering Teams

Measuring Success

Program Elements........

Location & Hours of Operation

Staffing & Roles

Court Procedures

Next Steps

References

Appendices.........,..,.,..

Stipulated Order of Continuance

Provider Check List

Community Service Opportunities

Meeting and Group Log Sheet

Community Service Log Sheet

Education for Community Service Hours Credit Options

4

..7

.......10

......1L

20

23

.25

CC

ccIccP

CCPD

ccPl

KCCCR

KCDCMI

RPD

Table of AbbreviationsCommunity CourtCenter for Court InnovationCommunity Court ProsecutorCommunity Court PublicDefenderCommunity Court Presiding

fudgeKing County Community Court inRedmondKing County District CourtMotivati onal InterviewingRedmond Police Department


Community Court and Resource Center in Redmond WashingtonMission Statement, Goals and Principlesl

Mission:To use public resources more productively in reducing crime through service provision and

increased community engagement and connection.

Vision:The King County Community Court in Redmond seeks to go beyond punitive actions to identify and

address the underlying challenges of Court participants that may contribute to further criminal

activity.

Guiding Principles:King County Community Courts believe that many who interact with the justice system are influenced

by social environments that facilitate criminal behavior. Giving defendants access to services and

assisting them in connecting with providers is a more effective means ol reducing crime then

traditional approaches to criminal justice. By addressing these life situations and treating

participants in ways that promote accountability and belonging, we aim to better reduce recidivism

and ultimately save sociaì and financial capital within our communities.


INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND

Although Washington is by no means a national leader in mass incarceration, the state's rate of

detainment - 482 people per 100,000 residentsz - remains higher than most other countries in the

world. This is not an isplated phenomenon, but instead parallels social and political changes

throughout the country. Although the US has experienced an overall state of economic growth in the

last thirty years, national poverty rates remain high.a Tellingìy, incarceration rates have

correspondingìy risen by more than 300%, illuminating a clear relationship between poverty and

criminal behavior.+ Irrespective of the type of crime committed, the U.S. justice system continuously

relies on incarceration as the "single blunt instrument in their toolbox" - irrespective of any

indication of its rehabilitative efficacy.s

In Washington State, 65.90/o of men and 53.6% of women detained have a criminal history containing

a prior felony. Recidivism rates for those who have previously interacted with the criminal justice

system have formed what is commonly known of as a revolving door, trapping people in

circumstances similar to those that facilitated criminal behavior in the first place.6 This experience is

not reserved for those behind bars. Due to the restrictions associated with criminal records, the cost

of interacting with the justice system, and the economic and emotional toll of losing a primary

caretaker - families that have interacted with the criminal justice system are also confined to a cycle

of lagging opportunity and resources.s,T

Community-led courts have emerged as a way of redirecting low-risk, high-need defendants away

from the traditional court system and towards the systems and resources they need to avoid criminal

behavior. By addressing the underlying determinants of crime, studies have found that adult

misdemeanor offenders processed at Community Courts (CCs) were significantly less likely torecidivate than those processed traditionalìy.a,e

This report documents King County District Court's (KCDC) process, efforts, and recommendations

around the development of the Redmond Community Court (CC), with the goal of facilitating the

continued development of CCs throughout King County and contracted cities, The first section of this

report focuses on the context of the program, illuminating the state of criminal justice in King County

and providing a working definition and explanation for CCs. The next section, titled "Gathering

Information" focuses on the logistical development of the courts and the decision-making around

location. Finally, "Next Steps" will offer feasible future steps for the expansion of the community court

system throughout the county and beyond.

Context

King County: King County is the largest county in Washington State with a population of over two

million people. It encompasses 39 cities and in many ways constitutes a great place to live'ro

Compared to the rest of the country, King County residents have increased rates of highly educated

and healthy adults, a more diverse and global community, reduced unemployment rates, higher life

expectancy, and high household incomes.ll However, with the unprecedented growth facilitating


these statistics, many have been left behind. Communities within King County struggle with "on time

graduation rates, unemployment, poverty, poor access to health-care, and lower life expectancy."rr ¡¡

is well documented that these interlocking systems of oppression correlate with increased

interaction with the criminal justice system.4,l2

King County Court System: As of March 20\9,79,361 people are being confined in Washington

State,ls many of which reside in King County. The County has both a Superior Court and a District

Courtwhich contracts with 12 of King County's 39 cities to provide legal'services at the municipal

level. The other 27 cities have their own separate municipal courts, meaning that citizens of our

county can have multiple cases, criminal and/or civil, filed and processed in multiple courts, with

different prosecutors and public defenders in each jurisdiction.

To address this complicated judicial landscape and its correspondingly extensive criminal justice

concerns, King County has begun to focus on systems strengthening and simplification. In 2014 the

Familiar Faces initiative was launched to target repeat-offenders with mental health and/or

substance use conditions in providing wrap-around care and access to substance use treatment,

housing, transportation, and other social services.la

ln20L7, King Countywas awarded a grant to plan two CCs within the King County District Court

system. To undertake this effort, the team spent significant time gathering information from a broad

range of stakeholders about how communityled justice could be operationalized in King County's

district court system before launching the pilot court in Redmond, Washington. Information was

gathered through:

r Stakeholder meetings with city/state/criminal justice officials

. Crime and demographic data collection

. Site visits to Spokane Community Court by members of the project team

KCDC proposed to establish CC programs at two different locations, based on the behavioral court

model, to provide services and supervision for high-need/low-risk individuals thathave encountered

the criminal justice system. KCDC chose the City of Redmond and the City of Burien for the first two

courts. The Community Court and Resource Center in Redmond opened in April 201B and in Burien

in February 2019. KCDC has solicited additional funding from the King County Council for

implementation of a court in Shoreline to open in fall/early winter 2019 and plan for 2-3 more courts

to open by 2020, most likely in Auburn and Bellevue. The focus of this concept paper is on the

Redmond Court.

Community Court Model: Community Courts differ most from traditional courts in that they

address the underlying problems contributing to the likelihood of engaging in further criminal

activity.B CCs target individuals who have committed misdemeanors that are often related to their

life circumstances, such as homelessness, addiction or mental illness and apply a problem solving

approach emphasizing community partnership and collaboration.


The basic premise of the community court model is implied within its name, that it not be an outside

actor on, but an integral part of the community. By focusing on community collaboration paired with

defendant accountability and access to services, CCs seek to move beyond addressing individuated

behavioral problems, to a broader focus on the racial-, structural-, and socioeconomic-drivers of

crime.15 This model, in conjunction with service provision, relies on community service as a way to

be accountable to the community that has been harmed.

While behavioral heatth services and other social services are relatively available in the Seattle urban

core, such services and diversion opportunities are similarly needed yet less accessible in other parts

of the county. By developing CCs in collaboration with outlying cities, KCDC expects to improve court-

based diversion outcomes and strengthen housing and social service options throughout the county.

As per CCI recommendations, distinguishing characteristics of the community court model are

1l Individualized iustice - Through detailed assessment of defendant needs, the court offers a

form of individually-tailored justice, appropriate for each person's specific situation.re

2) Expanded sentencing options - CCs allow judge's discretion through a diversity ofsentencing options, enabling the court to effectively link defendants to individualizedservices in the community (e.g. SUH treatmen! mental health counseling, housing, job skills,education, etc.).17

3] Varying mandate length - Sentencing lengths vary based on the needs of the defendant.

4) Offender accountability - AII sanctions and services are rigorously monitored to encourage

individual responsibility and accountability.

5) Community engagement - Processes are established through which the community can be

involved both in decision-making and in the development of indicators of success.

The effectiveness of these principles and practices has been well documented. A survey of CCs from

around the country reviewed that interaction with community courts commonly manifests in

significant reductions in jail sentences and days from case filing to disposition, and increases in

community service compliance.rs Economically, CCs exhibit significant reductions in criminal justice

spending. For exampìe in Manhattan the introduction of community-led justice amounted to an

estimated savings of 51,270,000-$1,418,000 annually from system cost savings and community

service value.le

GATHERING INFORMATION


Creating Project Team:

In April of 2016 KCDC Chief Presiding f udge, Donna Tucker and Chief Administrative Officer

Othniel Palomino attended the Community fustice Summit in Chicago where they began

exploring the implementation of CCs around the country, including less than 300 miles East

in Spokane, Washington, The following month, Chief Administrative 0fficer Palomino led the

District Court Management Team on a trip to Spokane to learn about their efforts and assess

aspects that could be useful in developing similar courts in King County.

fudge Tucker, in partnership with the Behavioral Health and. Recovery Division [BHRDJ of

the Department of Community and Human Services IDCHS] of King County co-wrote an

extensive and robust proposal for funding through the Mental lllness and Drug Dependency

(MIDDJ to support the implementation of a CC in South King County. Though the proposal

was not accepted by the MIDD Oversight Committee, County leadership allocated $100,000

to be used to planning two courts,

fudge Tucker contacted CCI in the Fall of 201,6 to inquire about assistance in planningand

implementation. CCI agreed to provide no-cost technical assistance to KCDC for the planning

of a CC from f anuary - September 2077.

In the summer o12017 King County created the position of Community Court Planner to

assist in the development of the two pilot sites funded through council earlier in the year.

Multiple applicants were reviewed and interviewed, but the position became an augmented

promotion in August 201-7 lor the current Therapeutic Court Manager, Callista Welbaum,

who had been assisting with the development of the CCs,

Choosine Location:

KCDC, along with court demographers, conducted a needs assessment utilizing community

demographics, crime and court data. With this information, the team was able to define

which cities in King County would be logistically feasible for the implementation of the firstpilot court. Locations were chosen from the cities in which KCDC currently contracts with toprovide legal services at the municipal level: Redmond, Burien, Bellevue, Shoreline, and

Auburn.

Starting in Spring 201"7, KCDC invited interested stakeholders from different jurisdictions to

visit Spokane's CC and learn about what KCDC was envisioning to build, Six separate trips

occurred in fune and fuly during which judges, law enforcement, prosecution, defense, and

city/county leadership were invited to participate, In the end, representatives from King


County and the cities of Beìlevue, Redmond, Burien, Auburn and Shoreline, visited Spokane's

cc.

Redmond: The work Redmond had already completed around community engagement

made it a natural location for the pilot court, The city had completed a comprehensive

homelessness task force in 2017 [see below) during which they inadvertently completed

much of the CCI recommended groundwork [i,e, community engagement, stakeholder

assessment, resource center development). The task force illuminated challenges that the

city faced due to deepening poverty, increased homelessness, and a lack of adequate care for

those with addiction and mental health issues. Therefore, community court was a natural

extension of the approach already being taken to identify and address the root causes of

crime.

Redmond staff were actively working in partnership with the Redmond Library to make

critical services more available to the populations most in need. Known at the Next Steps

Resource Center, this space operated two days a week connecting people with appropriate

organizations and service providers throughout the city.

Task Force on Homelessness

March of 2015, the City of Redmond hosted an open meeting in response to increased public

concern about the issue of homelessness. Over one hundred people participated, sharing

their questions and concerns about the increasing visibility of the issue. From this meeting,

the Task Force developed as a means of addressing the needs to both the community and

those experiencing homelessness. The task force met from April 2015 through August 2015,

producing a final report with significant recommendations centered around how the city could

best support individuals in accessing the resources needed them get on the path to housing.

To view the final report, go to: www.redmond.gov/homelessness

Although conversations concerning Redmond's interest in hosting the pilot court began

early, the fiscal decision to launch KCCCR corresponded with receiving implementation

funds from MIDD in November 2077.

Engaging Community


Community justice is predicated on the belief that in order to solve local problems, local

voices and perspectives are necessary. This means that visible community engagement is

crucial to identifying issues and crafting sustainable solutions. In Redmond, the bulk of that

work had been completed in advance by way of the 2017 Homelessness Task Force.

In Redmond stakeholder identification and engagement was streamlined by the related

work that had been completed. Typically, as part of the need's assessment process, the

project team would conduct a series of interviews with stakeholders, For example in Burien,

the site of the second CC, interviews were conducted to solicit feedback on public safety

concerns, jurisdictional/community context, and the concept of community-led justice.20

Through the Task Force, Redmond had aìready built relationships with critical partners such

as businesses, and community-members, both housed and unhoused. This enabled court

staff to launch the pilot court six months post preliminary discussions began; however, such

a timeline is a situational anomaly.

Traditionally, a formal needs assessment

process is warranted to engage k"ystakeholders in conversations around

specific problems, opportunities forchange, and innovative strategies toimprove safety. These may include

stakeholder interviews, focus groups,

community forums, community surveys,

and typically end with the delivery of a

final needs assessment report.2o

Before launching the pilot court in April201,8, court staff hosted an open house

which served as an open forum

opportunity, officially introducing the

court to the community of Redmond.

People were invited to ask questions,

submit feedback, and offer criticism,

Enhance the quality of life in Redmondthrough expeditious and targetedprocesslng of select misdemeanor offensesin order to reduce overreliance on jail andprobation serv¡ces and shorten the lengthof time that members of the targetpopulation are court-involved.

tmprove participants' lives andaccountability by linking participants withneeded social services (i.e. substanceabuse counseling, mental health services,job skills training)and requ¡ring completioncommunity services of res.torative justiceprograms

Forge and strengthen collaboration acrossinteragency departments and comm u nitynon-profit organizations to solve Redmondarea crime and homelessness problems

KCCCR GOALS

Developing Steering Teams


Beginning in December and continuing monthly, the CC Team began steering committee

meetings including key stakeholders such as; Redmond library leadership, city leadership,

court leadership, communications stafl municipal/state prosecution, municipal/state

defense, law enforcement, and social service leadership. The team actively sought

representatives of local businesses, but in the end none participated. All meetings were

facilitated by the Court Manager, Callista Welbaum.

MEASURING SUCCESS


REDMONDCOMMUNITY

COURT

In community court, imPact and

success are defined as increases inpublic safety through reduced criminalinvolvement and connection tocommunity, In Redmond indicators

include improved health and wellness

of participants, participation in CC,

community connectivity/engagement,

and jail diversion.

KCCCR collects detailed records ofparticipant demograPhics and

histories related to their cases as well

as any information deemed

instructional for system improvement.

A list of data solicited can be

summarized as follows:

Improved health and wellness ofparticipants: Tracking of indicators

related to housing, financial stability,

employment, health (behavioral and

physical) and connections to services.

Participation in Communit]¡ Court:

Tracking the percentage of people

referred to community court and the

percentage of people who complete the

program.

Community Connection/Engagement:

Tracking of services provided to

participants, hours of communitY

service compìeted, and the number ofinvolved

agencies/p artnerships/volunteers.

Jail Diversion: Tracking bookings and

days of incarceration as well as timebetween booking and program

completion.

defendants havediverted from the

tradit¡onãl criminaldocket into a lternative

scntcncing optiong

COMMUNITYSERV¡CE

partic¡pants hâvecornpleted the program

and had associatedcriminal chargcs

dismisscd

CENTER VISITS

PARTICIPANTS

*xwwf,*K*t++t+tfrti;:ii]::ii1 i: i,:

hours of volunteeringand other forms ofcommunity servicehave been completedin Redmond

GRADUATIONS

çwtotal visits, an averageof 53 per u¡eek, havebecn paid to 15-20providers at theResource Center

,.::,iWffi

stNcE lTs LAUNCH|

CHANGE THE FACE OF JUSTICELearn Morel Visit wi¡¡w.kcls.org/redmond

call us at 425-885-'1861


PROGRAM ELEMENTS

Location & Hours of Operation

KCCCR operates every Wednesday from 1":30-3:3Opm with pre-court meetings taking place

directly before. The Court is located within the Redmond Regional Library at 1"5990 NE Bsth

St, Redmond, WA 98052.

Staffins and Roles

Community Court involves a team of court, prosecution, police, public defense and social

service professionals dedicated to collaborating on cases to reach practical and targeted

solutions. At KCCCR, the Redmond Regional Library and associated volunteers are

considered critical components of that team,

Team members are charged with the education of peer professionals around the program

and with developing community linkages that enhance the effectiveness of the program. In

creating this partnership, King County is committed to enhancing communication between

the courts, law enforcement and social service agencies. Through this linkage of services,

King County expects wider participation and greater effectiveness in addressing the

problems of individuals involved in the criminal justice system, as well as those in the widercommunity.

fudge: KCDC is responsible for the provision of a judge to preside over KCCCR. The

Community Court Presiding fudge [CCP]) is responsible for adhering to CC Rules, Policies

and Procedures as well as all revisions to the rules. This position presides over court

proceedings and monitors appropriate applications of mandates, sanctions, and incentives,

while maintaining the integrity of the court.

In keeping with the tenets of all therapeutic courts, the CCPf is prepared and trained inmotivational interviewing, trauma informed care, and procedural/restorative justice

principles and applications. The CCPf wears many hats - several of which are outside of the

traditional precepts of being a "judge." This involves the incorporation of procedural justice

concepts, such as treating participants with dignity and respect; allowing participants to tell

their side of the story; demonstrating neutrality; thoroughly explaining courtroom

procedures and decision-making; and showing genuine interest in participants' success and

overall well-being. The CCPJ interacts with participants in an explicitly personal manner,

influenced by their knowledge of the unique challenges faced by the participants. The CCPJ


is prepared to note the progress and regress of the participant, offering a 4:L praise to

sanction ratio to support efforts made to achieve goals. If a participant is struggling, the

utilization of Motivational Interviewing [MI) techniques is invoked by the court to assist

them in refocusing their direction.

Court Clerk: The designated Court Clerk is responsible for the advanced dissemination of

the weekly calendar to all court staff, volunteers, police, and resource providers, allowing

them to prepare for staffing that occurs prior to court each week. The provisional docket text

is emailed to providers no later than24 hours prior to the commencement of CC [e'g. docket

to be sent out no later than Friday morning if court is held on Monday) to allow providers

ample time for preparation. The clerk is also responsible for arriving early on CC days to set

up the courtroom [computers, flags, microphones, calendar, etc,) and to put away/secure the

equipment at the end of court. The clerk also maintains an ongoing list of total community

service hours performed by participants, as they are the ones who file proof of completion.

The clerk will report total hours each month to the Court Coordinator, The clerk will assist

participants and other KCCCR team members as needed.

Court Coordinator: The Court Coordinator is responsible for compiling statistical data,

managing volunteer programs, managing the resource center, and soliciting community

support through education and linkages to enhance services available to all participants' The

Coordinator is generally responsible for the functioning and maintenance of the resource

center and its service providers. Additionally, the Coordinator recruits service providers and

community volunteers to aid in the functioning of court sessions and the resource center. As

well, they engage in activities that increase the commitment and affinity of service providers

and volunteers to the program. This includes being communicative and available, holding

appreciation events intermittently, and respecting partnership.

The Court Coordinator and Manager are jointly responsible for increasing community

awareness of CC through various forms of outreach [presentations, newsletters, attendance

at community meetings, press releases, etc.J. They serve as agency liaisons with the City of

Redmond, King County Public Library System, King County District Court, service providers,

and CCI.

Court Manager: The Court Manager is responsible for the researching of applying to, and

managing of grants relevant to CC. The organization, coordination, and oversight of the

Community Steering Teams is also the responsibility of the Coordinator. They contribute to

designing and implementing new initiatives, updated the Policy and Procedure Manual, and

develop Memoranda of Understanding among various partners, The Coordinator also helps

manage the multiagency representatives involved in the CC core team with the goal of


reducing conflicts, as well as managing the community advisory board and providing

support for policy formulation.

Prosecuting Attorney(s): The City and State Prosecutors office assign one or more specific

Prosecutor(s) to CC. That role is referred to as the Community Court Prosecutor [CCP)' The

CCP is responsible for reviewing cases charged to community court to determine eligibility

for participation and participating in

staffing of cases, They also interact with the

Court and Defense in a collaborative

manner to address disposition, revocation,

and application of sanctions and incentives

as applies to the participant,

The CCP utilizes the information about the

participant's risks and needs, collected by

an assessment, to address the root causes

of criminal behavior. This information is

communicated through the Stipulated

Order of Continuance [SOC), see side bar.

The CCP works with Public Defenders in

deciding the obligations of the proposed

SOC for each participant. Together they use

the knowledge gained by the assessment,

as weìl as their pre-existing knowledge of

the participant, to make an order withappropriate service referrals and

community service hours. The CCP attends

all pre-court meetings, during which

individual cases are discussed with court

staff and service providers. The CCP

provides their input as to how toappropriately praise and sanction a

participant based on what the group knows

about the person and their compliance withcourt orders.

STIPUTÁTED ORDER OF CONTINUANCE

See Appendix A for example

The Stipulated }rder ofCantinuance ISAC) is a form ofindividualized sentencíng based on the context ofthecrime and the o¡stions availablewíthin the community'

ln Redntonel, sentencing and diversion programs

range from contntunity-service to continued

education. Most defendants receive short-term social

service or connruni\ service sqnctions ol 8-12 weeks,

with appropriate time fratnes of treatment for those

whose crimes involves substence use.

An important aspect of CC is the use ol commurtiqt

seruice as an essentiol component of diversion. CCs

hold firmly to the notion that. ¡:articipsnt who rtre

adversely affecting the qualiQt of life of a commwtiqt

should give back ta the community by providirtg

community service. The court htts collaborsted with.

several local non-profit agencies to find enriching and

productive community service opportunities forparticipants, Becquse the emphasis in CC ís upon

empowerment and prohlern solving, pctrtiøl credit forcommunity service hours may be ¡¡ranted forattending meetings and cllsses that the judge deents

Iikely to encourage positive growth of participarts.

lf a participant has multiple cqses beþre the CC, the

Court Team may utilize discret:ion and enter a S}C formore thsn one case.

By addressing these core concerns, King County aims to connect the participant to services

and limit future interactions with the criminal justice system. The overarching theme of the

CCP is accountability in the form of jail alternatives and connections to service providers that

are co-located at the Redmond Regional Library.


The CCP attempts to release participants, pre- and post-adjudication, on their own

recognizance, The CCP actively conducts outreach with the community and with the

Redmond Police Department [RPD) to discuss the program. Additionally, the CCP works with

RPD and the greater community to identify problems occurring in the Redmond area that

can be addressed within the community court.

Public Defenders: Because community court deals with criminal matters, the accused's

Constitutional rights, including the right to trial, must be recognized and protected. No

person will appear before the court without the assistance of counsel. The Public Defender

fulfills this role of constitutional guardian by acting as a buffer between the accused and both

the Court and the Prosecutor. One or more Public Defender(s) are permanently assigned to

the court and are known as the Community Court Public Defender [CCPD). The CCPD

diligently reviews police reports and charging documents to ensure compliance with all

extant laws and the constitution

Depending on the nature of the case and associated beneficial opportunities that community-

led justice provides, CCPDs advise their clients on whether to pursue community-led justice

or to keep their case in traditional court. When deciding to give such advice, the goal is to

identify a resolution that addresses the participant's challenges including any substance use

concerns, mental health issues and unemployment. However, the defense attorney's

constitutional and ethical duty is to represent their client. Thus, it might be the case that,

despite the client's challenges, the attorney will advise their client to exercise their

constitutional right to trial. If the client makes such an election, the case will be transferred

to a traditional criminal docket.

The CCPD also speaks with family and friends who appear in support of a participant. They

obtain or verify information that may assist in the disposition of the participant's case. They

play an important role in ensuring that just and proper resolutions of cases are efficiently

achieved. The assigned public defender will, however, interact with other team members in

a collaborative manner to address the needs of their client. This includes collaborating with

the CCP in creating new participants' SOCs after assessment has been completed, attending

all pre-court staffing meetings, and providing their input as to how to appropriately praise

or sanction a participant based on what the group knows about the person and their

compliance with court orders. CCPD also propose graduation dates when a participant has

completed their service provider connections and community service obligations described

in their SOC.

Private/Conflict Attorneys: Instead of being assigned a Public Defense Attorney, some

participants with private means will opt to hire their own attorneys, Private Attorneys


advocate for participants but operate externally to the CC structure. In addition to private

attorneys, the court is also served by conflict attornéys. Conflict attorneys are needed when

CCPDs are unable to provide legal representation due to personal or professional conflicts.

Conflict attorneys, like private attorneys, advocate for clients and operate externally to the

CC structure.

Redmond Regional Library: The Redmond branch of the King County Library System hosts

KCCCR. The library provides space for the Resource Center, Court Room, and three private

meeting spaces for assessments and other court needs. These spaces are specifically

reserved for KCCCR from noon to Spm each Wednesday.

The library and its volunteers facilitate the set up and tear down of the rooms used for court

and the resource center each week. Additionally, the library has been mostly responsible for

organizing the space and making signage, such as for participant navigation of the Resource

Center,

Redmond Police Departmenü The Redmond Police Department [RPD) serves as the

primary law enforcement agency for the city of Redmond, responding to calls for service,

investigating, and arresting individuals suspected of committing criminal offenses in the city.

RPD officers on the High Visibility Team, who primarily patrol on bicycles or on foot, are the

main officers operating in the community court. These officers are familiar with people who

might be appropriate for the program due to their needs and offenses. RPD officers are

responsible for the dissemination of information to other offices and potential or current CC

participants about the program. When appropriate, they also share information about

current participants with the court or service providers as part of case management efforts.

RPD also provides security at our Library Courtroom. They set up a security area each week

with a designated line up area for security check and places for people's belongings. These

officers check those entering the courtroom for items that are prohibited using a metal

detecting wand.

One of the underlying goals of CC is to change the tone and perception of the criminal justice

system. Often judges and police officers are perceived as uncaring agents by those who have

regular contact with law enforcement, At KCCCR, these officers not only screen individuals,

but use this time to compassionately connect with participants and show genuine regard for

them as valuable parts of the community.

Volunteers: KCCCR currently has volunteers in the following roles:

L Watching the belongings of participants while they are in the courtroom and

distributing free lunches [donated by Redmond public schoolJ to participants.


2. Greeting participants and the public at the Resource Center door whiÌe counting the

number of visitors and keeping track of what providers are in attendance.

3. Serving as navigators for participants in the resource room, escorting them to the

providers they have been ordered to check in with and advising them on community

service options.

The third role is of increased importance as it significantly improves the participant's

experience at KCCCR. Newly referred participants are oftentimes overwhelmed by the

process and can have difficulty adjusting to a community court model. To ease participants'

anxiety and uncertainty, volunteers dedicate their time to assisting participants in

connecting with providers and advise them upon community service options.

Resource Center: A Community Resource Center operates at the same time and place as the

community court calendar, The Center consists of community partners who provide a wide

array of services, including: mental health and substance use disorder assessments, housing

referral, public health services, free/reduced cost medical service referrals, local food banks,

shelter and emergency services information, worker retraining services, temporary work

referrals, continued education opportunities, referral services, library services, city of

Redmond Outreach Services, YWCA services, as well as dispute resolution and civil legal

assistance. The Community Resource Center is available to all members of the public in

addition to community court participants.

In the case that court participants are ordered as part of their SOC to connectwith specific

providers, the court asks for communication from said providers that this has been

completed and for any clinical/specialized recommendations. This informs the judge as to

whether the participant is in compliance with orders from week to week and what to expect

in subsequent weeks.

Court Participants: Eligibility for participation in community court is limited to individuals

who are charged with misdemeanor crimes within the city of Redmond and nearby

unincorporated areas of King County, and have no prior criminal sex related crimes, nor any

violent felony charges in the last 5 years. KCCCR does not hear driving violation cases.

Eligibility standards are verified by a review of police reports and criminal history by the

prosecuting attorney, further verified by PRINS 1 initial client assessment. Enrollment in CC

requires the consent ofthe accused, defense counsel, prosecutor and judge'


Redmond City prosecution and defense consider the appropriateness of all eligible cases forcommunity court. If eligible misdemeanor charges are filed when the defendant is in the

arraignment or pre-trial phase, the prosecution and defense discuss the possibility of a CC

referral. This discussion can happen off- or on-record. Since the CC fudge presides over CC

as well as the majority of Redmond City misdemeanor cases, the discussion of a defendant's

appropriateness or the possible benefits to him/her of community vs. mainstream court

happens at hearings in some cases. For cases originating in the State Court System, supportis

providedto theassociatedjudge so

that theycan make

Table 2

RCW 9.66.050RCW 94.52.070RÖw 9A.52.080RCW 66.44.100

RCW 66.44.270

Resisting anest

Redmond Municipal Code Section 9.42.010Redmond Municipal Code Section 9.31.430Redmond Municipal Code Section 9.31 .440

Redmond Municipal Code Section 9.10.020

Redmond Municipal Code Section 9.14.020Redmond Municipal Code Section 9.38.020Redmond Municipal Code Section 9.31.280

Disorderly conductPossession of alcohol ín a parkPossession of intoxicating drugs in aparkContributing to the delinquency of aminorPossession of paraphernaliaUnlawful public exposurePresence in parks during hours the parkis closed.Deposit of unwholesome substanceCriminal trespass in the first degreeCriminal lrespass in the second degreeOpening or consuming liquor in publicspacesFurnishing liquor to minors, minors inpossession or consumption of liquor, orpublic intoxication by minorsObstructing a law enforcement officer

Malicious mischief in the third degreeAssault in the fourth degree

RCW 9A.76.020RCW9A.76.040RCW 94.48.090RCW 9A.36.041RCW9A. Theft in third

appropriate referrals. For eligible cases, the state creates their own stipulated order of

continuance. If it is deemed that a defendant may benefit from CC, and prosecution approves,

they are set on the calendar for the next session to observe.

ELIGIBLE OFFENSES

A Note on Disability:As an inclusive system, the presumption is neverto deny individuals with disabilities an

opportunity to give back. Instead, court staff make every effort to find ways for them tocontribute without jeopardizing their health and well-being. People with disabiìities areprovided with an SOC including alternative community selice options that mayìnclude; enrollment ill education or job training programs, participation in skill-buildingcourses, and/or connection with local service that offer needed resources


mu5tProvider¡ ênd

o

www.kclc.org/red mond

thsy.\so',%:


KCCCR serves as a calendar court, adjudicating eligible misdemeanor cases. The program is

voluntary but involves the accused person abdicating their right to trial in order toparticipate. Prior to enrollment, if the defendant decides to forfeit their opportunity toparticipate in CC, their case is transferred back to mainstream court, However once someone

has signed their Stipulated Order of Continuance, indicating that they have forfeited their

right to trial in interest of working within the community court system, their case will be

judged solely based on the associated police record,

Pre-Court Meeting: Beginning at'1.2:45 and lasting for about 45 minutes, court staff gathers

to discuss the days calendar. Court staff take the opportunity to contextualize participants

and speak in support of their experience. This provides the judge with information necessary

for passing sound judgement, such as charges of Failure to Appear [FTA) and results of Urine

Analysis Reports (UA).

The judge finds out if participants are in compliance with their orders to visit providers or

engage in recommended treatment. In cases where the participant is not in compliance, there

is a discussion about what sanctions or motivations might be used to get the them back on

track, Providers can also report on compliance via email or phone to the court coordinator,

and they will report that information to the staff at the pre-court meeting.

An important aspect of the pre-court meeting is that it creates a space to talk through

background information and activities that would be harmful if on record. By keeping mental

health and substance use information within the context of this meeting, the court team

maintains discretion in sentencing and response while respecting participant's privacy.

Case Flow: Upon arriving to Redmond Library, participants are immediately greeted by

KCCCR volunteers who check their bags, These volunteers keep participant belongings safe

during court proceedings, and hand out free lunches afterwards for interested individuals'

After passing through a police screening, they enter the library courtroom and are seated in

a gallery facing court staff. At L:30pm the fudge begins calling names to survey those who

are in the room. Cases are stacked in such a way as to give early preference to those who

have demonstrated compliance with their individualized SOC. When their name is called,

participants move to the front of the room and sit next to the CCPD. The f udge will ask for an

update from both the participant and the attorney on progress being made towards the SOC.

It is important to note that not all persons in the crowd are participants. Many are famiìy

members, purposely invited into the space to support their loved ones. Other's may be

prospective participants on a court visit, observing whether community-led justice is a good

fit for their needs. If the answer is yes, defendants have the opportunity to speak with their


attorney and confirm their desire to participate. The next week they are invited back for a

need's assessment, also known as an intake assessment. This is completed by intake staff at

King County jails. The needs assessment results are then sent to the prosecution and defense

team and are are utilized in the creation of the SOC.

After the SOC is signed, participants are officially admitted into court and given a folder

including a provider list check off [see Appendix AJ, community service opportunities

[Appendix B), log sheets for meetings and community service [Appendix C and D), as well

as information on how continued education can service as community service hours

[Appendix E). When approved by the court, alternative community service options weigh as

equal to and not less than regular community service and recognition.

Compliance: Court staff monitor compliance with alternative sentences closely. If a

defendant fails to report for service, the court determines whether there is reasonable cause

for their absence and if they are complying with the stipulations of their case, After repeated

engagement attempts, KCCCR will send a bench warrant effectively pausing the case. If the

participant continues not to meet their individual Stipulation of Continuity, their case will be

removed from the calendar and judgement on guiltiness will be passed based solely on the

police report.Graduation: Our graduation, on the first Wednesday of each month, is an enthusiastic affair.

The local grocery store (QFCJ donates two dozen cupcakes and loved ones are invited to

celebrate, It is conducted in front of as many other participants as possible as an opportunity

to center success and create community.

When a participant is to graduate, the judge will discuss the benefits of the program, as well

as any criticism the participant may express. The participant receives verbal affirmation


from the prosecutor, defense, and judge as well as a certificate of completion signed by the

Court Team.

NEXT STEPS

The major goal of King County District Court is to expand the implementation of community

courts to all corners of the county. In February 201,9 the second court was launched in

Burien. A third is being planned for Shoreline to launch in fall/early winter of 20L9. King

County would like to see 2-3 additional courts launched in2020 and are considering Auburn

and Bellevue as likely locations.

Considering this, it will be important to expand on the implementation guidelines above in

ways that were not necessary for the development of KCCCR. Specifically, this relates to the

development of selection criteria and means of preparation for interested cities. Although

these steps were completed preemptively through the Homelessness Task Force in

Redmond, going forward King Countywill need to invest in conducting these steps ourselves.

In addition, King County hopes to serve as consultants for cities outside of the county as they

develop their own community court systems. As the courts expand, quality will be centered

through regular workshops for CC team members on trauma informed service and

motivational interviewing. Furthermore, King County plans to have volunteers create and

facilitate brief orientation sessions for newly admitted participants to KCCCR.

In addition to expanded access to community courts, King County aims to expand the

population that can be served. In Burien state cases are not served by our court, limiting our

ability to provide equitable access to justice. With additional funding, King County

Community Courts aim to expand to different jurisdictions in 2020. Similarly, we aim to

expand inclusion criteria to low level assault and civil matters.

Community-led justice is inherently interdisciplinary as it addresses the multiplicity of ways

in which our built and social environment influence criminal behavior. King County is taking

steps to ensure that our courts reflect this complexity by actively pursuing collaboration with

related sectors such as the Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion program in Burien.

At the root of the problems surrounding our criminal justice system is the disparate impact

on, and lack of representation of, black and brown people. We see this narrative continued

within our court model as the majority of our staff continues to be white, while our

participants disproportionately represent minority populations. Community-led justice

aims to create an environment of accountability to the community, by the community. This


leads us to center our future endeavors around developing leadership in court staff that

better represent the defendants they are working for.

Courts around the country are building on traditional Native American approaches to justice.

In New York City, the Center for Court Innovation has launched two such "peacemaking"

programs with the goal of creating enduring and meaningful responses to neighborhood

conflict.z1 Trained peacemakers from the community form harm circles and create space for

those affected by dispute to have conversation about restitution and repair. King County is

open to beginning dialogue concerning how programs such as this can be integrated into

future and existing courts.

ACKNOWTEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to acknowledge the on-going support and help of our partners at the

Redmond Library and King County; our funders at MIDD; and Callista Welbaum and Ericka

Cooley of King County Community Courts,


REFERENCES

1-. King County District Court. Community Court and Resource Center in Redmond.

Presented at the: 2018.https://www.kingcounty .gov / - /media/courts/DistrictCourt/CommunityCourt /Brochure.ashx?la=en.

2. Initiative PP. States of Incarceration: The Global Context 2018.https://www,prisonpolicy.org/glob al / 20t8.html. Accessed f une 28, 20L9.

3, Chaudry A, Wimer C, Macartney S, et al. Poverty in the United States: SO-Year Trendsand Safety Net Impacts.:47.

4. DeFina R, Hannon L, The Impact of Mass Incarceration on Poverty. Crime Delinquency.

20L3 ;59 (4) : 5 6 2 - 5 B 6. doi : 1 0. 1 1" 7 7 / 001'1"1287 083288 6 4

5. Sered D.Ilntit We Reckon: Violence, Mass Incarceration, and a Road to Repair. The NewPress; 20L9.

6. Criminal fustice Facts. The Sentencing Project.https://www.sentencingproject,org/criminal-justice-facts/. Accessed May 9, 2019.

7. Incarceration's Impact on Kids and Families. The Human Toll of fail.http://humantollofjail.vera.org/the-family-jail-cycle. Published fanuary 78,20L5.Accessed May t7,2079.

8. Lee CG, Cheesman FL, Bottman DB, et al. Red Hook Evaluation Final Report. NationalCEnter for State Courts; 20L3,


9. Kilmer B, Sussell f. Does San Francisco's Community fustice Center Reduce CriminalRecidivism? https : //www.rand. org/pubs/research-reports/RR73 5,html. Published20L4. Accessed May 77,20L9.

10. Buílding EquiQt ønd Opportunifii in King County. King County Equity and Social fusticehttps://www.kingcounty.gov / - / media/elected/executive/equity-social-j ustice/2 0 14/ESf -lnfographic-Feb-2 0 L4.ashx?la=en.

7t. Hairston WT, Thompson K, Consulting KT, Rosen B. Puget Sound TaxpayerAccountability Account: N eeds Assessment Report.; 201'8:25.

1,2. DMin LCJ. Homelessness, Poverty, and Incarceration: The Criminalization of Despair./Forensic Psychol Pract.201,2;t2(5):439-456. doi:10.1080 /15228932.2012.7L3835

13. Alper M. 2018 Update on Prisoner Recidivism: A 9-year Follow-up Period [2005-20L4).2018:24.

L4. Familiar Faces Initiative - King County.https ://www.kingcounty.gov/elected/executive/health-human-services-transformation/familiar-faces.aspx#about. Accessed May L7, 20L9'

15. Gal T, Dancig-Rosenberg H. Characterizing community courts. Behav Sci Law.20 17 ;3 5(5 -6) : 5 2 3 - 5 3 9, doi : 1, 0. 1 0 0 2 / bsl231'0

16. Sviridoff M, Rottman DB, Weidner R, et al. Dispensing fustice Locally: The ImpactCosts and Benefits of The Midtown Community Court' :361.

L7. Lee E, Community Courts: An Evolving Model. :29.

18. Henry K, Kralstein D. Community Courts: The Research Literature, Center for CourtInnovation;20L7.http:/ /wvvw.courtinnovation,org/sites/default/files/documents/ccresearch.pdf.

79. Hakuta I, Soroushian V, Kralstein D. Do Communi\t Courts Transþrm the JusticeResponse to Misdemeanor Crime? Center for Court Innovationl'2008:L4.

20. Communtgt Needs Assessment and Community Court Planning. Center for CourtInnovation

2t. Peacemaking Program, Center for Court Innovation.https://www.courtinnovation,org/programs/peacemaking-program/more-info.Accessed fune 7, 201,9.


Appendix A


tËing tosrttyCorrrnunity Court. io Redmond

CITY OF RET}IOHã.frìn¡itr

v9

Pali8¡ÞerÌL

1{o::

Ë0Iß.lutfTY ËUURT $OTI0I{ A}lÛOfiIER FOft SNFUTåTEÍ} SEÛERoF cot{nNu*ÞtcË

1. Etrslg

COMES I{OltJ üre parfies and bea$r r-nor¡e lhe Csitt lo cilr¡inrx tx above aeptioned

cause fur e peird dl Úweeþ or E rv¡onfrrs, ttren and there to bedsril¡Esed ¡füe te¡errlelt has oompiied ûilh tlre Dondlliorc set furù in this docrmenlOefendant ia drarged *iür lhe kf,oilirq oãEnse{E} !,lÙh ecõompenyiq pendties:

The crime[ç] r¡ifi lrlridl I arn drarged canks a mar*nwn,senbnoe of

-

døys in iail end a

$-tue^It. Ftilgncs

Sfrer revieuríng lhe cese ftpord, fhë DefEridånt's prior crinúoal hislory. and {he bæis forlhe ¡no'tion, ihe court fnde fia {t¡ê Fãrlieø harie apced. and !hê g€fÊnder¡t bf his/her.sþnatue€onsEñt3 tB lhe corúinú¡nce scs{eined in the ¡notion sed*n sf *ris order, *rd çrairæs any speedyûial rhinrE the Ocfendarrt t!¡o4jd oór€fl,¡ise haue been eñtrEd tû a€se¡t óß !o suú detay, and

thãt suó dispqsition is apptopti#.

The Def€rrdãnt trdergÈnds th¡e* he.rgl¡e ïEs ihefie rl¡fitte aþry trial. Tl* Oefendant hereåy waiueshíslher €å¡e be dec¡led by a judge.

ri$Êt'oafbl byitll rmless helshe ûaiv,egbJher right lo jury Ubl and requests thãl

The Defãrdãñt w¡derstã¡rde lhãtãlståffmeEtingç{hå jì¡dg*, coeirf ¡,esonnel. pmseouhradelerse allnmeys, a¡d ùee8r¡en{/so¿ial sewic* prooilers uúi private}y discuss he*his ca:e{=} oSlhe recÐrd end rti*¡o{t the Dek¡dffi{ be¡rç paase*f Tte OeÞndBnt ãAteesi that 5uú disct¡s¡i:çlsmay take place o.rfsitle o{ lærlhís pr*e*ne.

The Befendsot risåe¡ !o sr.¡knit lhe case sn üe rucnrd in ihe evenl {his agre*rne*t isr¿troled. Ttre tefe¡rþni agrees rrd urdøstendE úús ûp¡ans lhãt if a judge frds *æ Û*tdanib h btrsh of t*s egreeff¡efil and ¡Etrokês iL lhe judge $fl tead lhe police rçons :ubnútled- b1the p¡ospnut¡cr dld riiñ re*iar any oúrer nderid¡. reÍersnced lherch cr atbúed, and Þse*dsolely,ç.ñ lhEt eeideflice. the þdge *ill nute a linding of guilty or ttol guilry to lh€ cdmeþlcharged heæin.

PÀ.ÍTlCgAffI lrrfl{L¡:--¡Tr¡t LÀfEg ndl¡En oF c{rHTlrguÁficÉfflffirfil]Y ËûÚFf - Pã!¿ { 4l û

Rô¡ dl:ùlç


III. ORDÊR

lT ¡g HEREBV ÐRflEREÐ tÍat the ¡å'qYecaptianed cause be, and hereby is. continuedlor tl¡e lirne perfud specnñed abose, þ be dismbs,ed Ðtlõr befçe ihe erq*atio* of raid períod

provirkdlheeondtionleler ¡nd¡uated belñrðèffiel.lf lhe b!ø*irq oondÎfiø{s} are not rne{, ihPiase ¡hall be sel fur hÀàiç tõ de{ern ¡ne nheher lhe oder of codinuaBce shall be rÈì¿okÊd

tT l3 FUHTIER ÛEüEREB thal upon ents¡ inio the Siipulded Orde¡ af Ëontinrs¡ce. lheÐefendant sfuA be kûürn æ fre *Parlicipør*i' fut the gurpcøe of the ¡hc*e-caplirned cas,es

úring suclr lime aç he or ghe remáns in lhe tflnrrun¡ly Ðourt pro¡ram.

[ 1*CII{-TREÁT|åEIUÍ R€Iå]IEO ÐOütfrÏIoll 9:

E*s pert of ycur successful conrpleúion st tfie CorT¡tïurÛ}t' Oaort Frøgram, it isn¡endstÞrï tf¡at, såttfhee¡0cEdúQnÄf fedÈrd holid'å1¡s, yoü Bfrerd CosrnurÛty tou¡{e'rery trtrtdnedey eå 'Ìjgo p-m. {nlEss Ëxcus€d fr€rñ .gtlendsn€Ê by Fçior order cf theeourt FÅILURE T0 ÂTTENn nAY RESIJLT llil TllË lSSuåNtE OF A tVARRAt'fTFÐR Y0tn ÅRREgrAtü ElErËh¡Tlo{\l-

g Fartici¡*rt stipulaÍes fß lhÊ ãrcurðsy aut adnùssibility d fte ptl'lcÊ rèpffq5l.

6 Parlicina* sh¡lf eoçmnit no cú¡¡lh¡l latr violatio¡¡s.

fl lf Participant r*siles in ily lu?ptrtir¡Ê h€d¡sing hsJshe ehaÍl ¡bìdn by aãl hæse- ndes znd direetio{rs sf staF:

m Ferticipglt shdf ðpFeú at dl s'dteú¡led court dãtel unlesr epperrnee is-speciñc¡llf *aivcd by fhe cou¡t Far{icipanl ¡5 incðrser#, os F¡¡ticiF¡nt is in

hospihl or ftua*aËr* fÐc¡lify"

n Farti{¡anf shall pay rcstitrlion in lhe er¡oürit Ef Í . þa speciñed by atlachedfiestiuänûrder),

I Partic{nøl etral be r'pleasÈd to lTglþrit tr'esùfieíd

tr odæc

B, Tfi E¡4l?dEltfjC{lllä-ll¡llTY SERIITCE RELÊTEII CUf{ÐfTIOilS:

ALr- CûrfotÐgtts íAFT(ED sEl-oltr sttÀLl ÈE EttlEffio ltrro ttln{${ 7 DAIß üFSt6raIllË trÊtls OROtr ÁLt IRFI¡ItiEl¡r S¡{Â¿L €E tOflPLETEÐ r{S fIffiCfËO ATHE lflt{Ë âÕ{.WTr EfSÍRtCr ËõX¡tt!.FrlV COUñI tOfiE IEAI{ ArlI} 7}¡ErfiËAff El'IråGElf cìHi t/lñd{El} ag-o¡g.

n P¡¡ticiæ¡t sH romde{e any requircd falaera¡ tea&nenl

PAfiTICPÐÌ'å fiITTAL I:

-_

trrP{rLÁTE lxlûÉñ óF öðl¡ïD¿uå,llt}ËC{l&*l}ljllY CÕUnt - FÌlß ? rt !&þì {,4ü19


r-'r FsrfrEip¡¡¡t shell ë04íplÊûe

-

fiorrs of Ûomrw,rnis Seçci€e, ifi R€*flor¡d, nift poød of" hours brçleùed pmi¡i*e¿-¡o ûìe C¡urt lf eðsrÍturfty ¡.xlitê b not ømplefed ar l*deæd

B lhe Court t¡e Farl¡c¡pant ñTãf hë stiÉ'st b súdi.''ts bf lhÊ court t**Ct cot¡ld ¡estü inrEvocetioo 0f lhis ð!¡ëêrn€rd.

E FErlicipãrrt sh¡ü {onpkfe

-days

of ttfodcËnan [cürgh ü€ Kirq tounty Connnunityllt&ftFrograrr.

E PãrtiriÈr{ *tslcoÍækte-hoursflf ,l-ife S&¡lþ ürmr4h an rçroæd plcadder.

f-l lto pers¿ss¡sr or c*lnsurption of ãlcohol. iltsri¡ue$rtre{¡ted THC prþduc{tr ût nm'pniscdbed ùugs. Â: a jart of this ,cmdtbn þu rna¡r be reqrired te subrn¡t to ¡furinaþis rbrealtr amlyrir lf nrdered by*üeofrneld pro*lerorft*ærrt

tr GeqrapticatErshiet¡üF: Sta¡offpreerke*of:-

e Frdicipanf sàall lmned¡ieiÊly sÕÍbtt ãnd cmtínue óo iolb.r-r¡P {Yü ttË gö{iãl$ewieel Tr¡¡bnes* F¡t¡riler¡ ¡¡s¡ied helk¡s

Eelesre Clåhnuse

Ëeso¡ü¡ 0ocwnu nitT toleûpGon¡¡nrüy HealñPlen

SoorffidEn$tþçtâ¡tg¡0ispfe Resohdion CarhrOSHS {Oepadhættd of Soobl t t*åi#, Sèni*re4

_ Furdkq

-€mployrne¡úÊastside Legd tC.*islan.€ Prsgratn

Friendg of You6¡ (urder2ã}

lleel$ R*dliopdi¡* {emÉoynrst" fi nancial. hourhg. fan$oúatbn eduøti¡'¡}

IKROil

_ *lcot¡offiíq ¡g¡easm¡nt&te¡|rcnt

_ llenÞl Health €tralualiofl & ùeeûfiËnt

_ ta.seldanagernent

- *n Rolfor-

Job Coqe {under25}lûrderìng

trFutattr þñDËR tF êü}ttl}¡uÀLcESOUðù|ÌY(}ðU¡tT - P¿g! ld $

Rr. {13019


l-ãle llkhirlglofl H.S. [tcl$nney-Vinb

l-alçÊ V$æhiûgfûfl Tsdll'lAMI Easfside ü¡l¡fiffii ¡ql¡tflee on tiþ¡¡fål ü¡ês$)

ftûüc Flealh (Orcattt, FlealhcãrË, EET;tãLsl

Redmond Ílomeless û¡ùEøcl¡ sercfues

ße$g: BeffirnctÞopft ü¡*tïÊe¡lmend ft¡Hic Libræl¡ E0 Resour¡ea

SmertTsleíf {tcrnpor¡ry ffi l*}

$omdGeætaüons {sø*re}S¡: Vs¡entde Faul

Tena Strftq &ury {terry,orary mk}UniÞd He¡lthc*e (frr üosÊ fiíüt l¡{edüsrydli{éditå*I}

TÍJod6ourc*

Yt¡t6A tshelte¡, es#¡ent educdhnl

c. ffc€üI}rtE3 FoR TtitELY F*OGFE5 3 SIIGEË$SFUL trlFLETKlil:Õonmunity 6out *s offers oû¡er irc€rilis€s &ç yolf ti¡ndf progeøE tld suco€ãdulcolnpleti¡Ìr h lhe Oorrrruníty Cout pcograq inchdhg:

- RdJurd ãüÊrdrrce requirenwnù;. Â¡*r¡øwlEdcnÊnt of Xoortuccerslbslf, prwftier¡, elrd oüc* gedi*eak;. gugFæ¡ea;

" EarlyúsnÈsalof chrflee; ¡nd. ûtle¡g es ¡FF op.¡ale.

f]. ÍþclcEssFrü. cmFr.Erpr¡:DiE¡¡issalrflh pæju*x of the csininal drarges rtrall Ele plac* so !of{ ¡e lhe Farlicixrúoaanpletes s[ igr.ûifed mrfliom eorËinÊd in üús agæeneù Â graduat*n shall bepeesenkd ar eläence of eoÍrrriiùrnarúttd suocess.

PAÍÎt?rulr I tHlllAL lr -*__trtFt L tff ÞñtrÉRêF cåfl:ltlulLcË$OXiürYËüUñr-P.9!adbñrr {,?tt$

{

{

{{((

{(

(

(

t{

{

{

{(


I ãrn srwe lhËt I hã€ ltæ rþht b lrülr,*rin 60 da¡s ol Fre oxmnenceneú &le I I xr it id onüÈ cas. or niüÈl 90 ders of the aanmnc¿r¡re*ri dEÞ tr I am not h, þil cn ihiE cese. I rtisft hÐirrs tp fhþ rigtrt ã¡d I açec the txr o.rwiuifiDÉmest dE¡Ê $5 turderstfld üe r¡err Ê,q*ã{on dãk iE +I hel*y auürori¿e mf corÍËelio fiir¡e nry 4gearanoa ad eor{irn¡e lhe case{s) r*en I 'rn inbedÉneìL hanpefatÈd h ¡no'$rer irþrldi¡n ry em¡sed fiDm ú€nùÍæ by he court

YrAlUEn Of 0'sJEÊIr0il T0finL s€f'nilÊ- trRLJ s.4dHsl

ÐeÞdthir-d¡y 2û_

JUD6FJ0trilfråS5lOl€fi

ËITY OF REÍ*IOIW FROEEË1JTSR lqEfrÅ Nþ.

l'At{ll{.rFÆ{l I

ÁTTÐR'{EY FCR FÃñTIçIT,qXT lrllsË¡r fio-

twt¡LÀfEg oñoËR od ÊûllFlxut¡lcÉÞ03mTY OOIJXÍ - F.!! I ùl tRr{{tol9


Appendix BProvider Check List

Fr,or¡ider Vis¡t Chedli üÍf

{åorBnñ¡n¡ty couft FartiEüpxrt

]trbisyoø'remrdofcheckinginwirhprøiidenintherE5ourEe€eütÊr. lnülefirstb#!dFt*raùoTounÊedto see ¡5 ¡*€d on Írur üorÍt cdrttrðcç arid then heve d!É provid€r or a navigamr inilid for you when ¡wuspeektû t nm. tf r¡urvish prorîders who ãrë,r¡dt rsqgired on ìrour soc, to ¡&r€sd end l¡eræ tl¡ern initial as uell-

Pl€€Ee ßtrrn dl¡s tflrm tú the bor mãr*éd 'bheÉk off t€ilEr aÈ thê îesourËe cÉrit€r door eadr rw¿k.

5€rcRef¡ Prlil€r

ChÊc¡( llrflofle ¡secilic sÊrríre llf ilsùedll

Eêllen¡€,tdlegF

€eËf.¡et$ ft.€etrouñd

Cå€fãd¡B {ommurTrq ca[eÉe

cftY st RÊdmond Ðutreâdn fKeff,üoñuffÍ¡tïfleÈlttr FlxraB¡¡rfÉ t$r Feop{e rvlÐrsæilEr€É

û5Ht lo\¡ordlêr finãnciËl ErídolF¡Êdtgästgid e ¡,Egðl Assirt¡[¡Ee

Fr¡ènrlç stYssth Traa8nÊrß S¡dter EúrEat*rn

Emolovment Cã5êh4ilraFrû¡eotflêÊrlttr FöinI

iropd¡nk EBSDymef¡t flnãnf¡ãl ttouSlng

rrarrpottation EúJcif¡on fdodIKROI'¡ 5À.t MerúEl fierkh cõse ålEoql Rol

lgnde¡ina

ï¡ng countÏ DisPUtE hesolr¡tion

Ë€gltËr

ßing cÐu[rty Librãry system fthf*ycafd onEfie Rt lilûLel€ wåsh¡ngtÐn Te¡h

ü¡At4l s{rppdrt€rürFg tromnnrm$tserYre

fi.rbl¡c fteeltr ofca lfüElrE MÊdie¡wtteslg¡ lf,ti Ë8î

f€con ne€t to oF!6ru,,rúry

srxJrd eEfief,¡t{¡ns

Stvinentdë PillTeú¿ SFan¡nE/5mãrl Tersf*LrnÊed lieelth c¡f€wA $3ne l)èft ÕÌ \rEt atrårrsr

M¡li¡ãrf F¡rfl ily üfi r€¡Eh

worl€õurEÊ

YWC& $ouirlg Efrdsyfneft Fc'oal¡cþtnescÐrfiüútr/ Servi¿?


Appendix C

Community Service Opportunities

buuuuoitv 5¡rr¡ice Ogpdrtüsities

&rluiøäirÍ Caútftf¡&øltd

Î*s hôndor* h6Ë h{¡ o{ euggnatiom fo gd yoo e{erkd in lindir4 coørouniS *rrice oppoeluilio+

*rl-GaørruniþËourtFarfciFrd¡ ãrs rnponrihkûo raae*r ordb 6r organizCimr and rrang*tlxlûommr¡dttr¡¡rçics.

tf pl ¡ro& fte heþanEnqi4,l$¡*E ostür€tinìêsfÉoê5,8rd¡a*tegdhtref c€o¡TFrritysanix, spe*loeüær€¡srtlb, Jare orÅùiat in ie rero*te cerbr, c ronhd Eri*a Coole¡ Cwrrnn*y €uurt Ëturdhdat, dä16*4ß20få øt

siJø.oa4p6lhaowtv.¡sV:

üont kcg'ët ûr fõåe a þg s¡l€é( l?*efi }¡eu gdl

O*Íin* Lisrs øf Yol¿'¡uet,Owørunítics:

'nx¡e t¡¿h¡E lrar,e hlrs af lirtlqd Yor¡ csn uee hE lb¡nf mrplhre þ úec* úern s¡t . .

ã¡dle V/orta: This sih hæ lstirqs Íor yd¡naeÊr ryçnihl*s" nìd k p{ fillar so you ot*¡ see oq*rizatiæ ìrlw *iü

*rdr *i0r ou¡t+deæd *dk¡. H€dç hotrb seüdì:€õûüeÉ cñinsuû¡nG€f 6€twr*,{lls¡llÊs!ÞrËrEJq¡€ãþffi. ckfiü€grEÉr? pârs ggftrH*lÞæþ3€Ë¡d1üll5€slütgÊiofie.cfic¡aÀtüûsrd FilÈl:¡ cheirhffil€ftb'csriorTreGt\4lufrþer5 ür! cløÌÊ!þû{t llc ryfdllfli&ãüetsiq}ryütþÉ {s€ntff rflil rsa F 0l* !rËÈ llrÊt r!Ærl ¡ü¡ Ë0u+olr'Èruf \$tnÊÈrs. YdJ çd} liïdt ry þtlion aE lE[

lJnilrd lTrç:tlfed *ny kb aT0il of vo¡¡barse¡el*q dldfÈrcr*ud ¡nalydin'l reçlile a ryfliorlirn.€rfo,fhb pðEqãfid ürm¡tu cansod by locfrt:hü¡g:ß{lrl¡tieer.nk*'otullxed¡

t/¡{rflôÐsr Uddr: lft6dånn!¡dãnè€nÉldro.qlC¡ed*lttäGoo* ltlpôfriññ.pt€ikftdfiod.nu¡åt &r ßoo* lfrelàrs.*oouûout

Lacal Valvnte cF Ðø portr¿nili¿s :

âaefi l{itM ¡¡rd 6reea kdmsild: P¡rß ft¡dsrd¡on lr¡{ort

tÊefifi¡*hrdflld G¡çÉn Rednrod har*æg¡¡l¡,nor&lirnp3Él ehtrpnrtsr.l*ieln*cenhdpæ¡b1qdörtetdtêcp t+

ñrepãls.

!&rre b rtrrre lr ge &rfirre inh: HbsdHgn.oohË*fi conparycded Fortenenruuges a*rrùerof*y ?eef gtogtütu.l

BBtoodwgksllCp aarre liver of ñoc* arm pafixf* $ beoming a $¡rgûg$bt thnor üff*türtli{urhsrl


gñor f*¡ñlqrldtnbeË rre lre füd h* h a lørg lÞÐ{ng ú¿ia Thi: pos'rûon inolv*a gëdi"E domrs så ütel Ltidt

6ë úñ¡hn FEsesE pravidiñg üæm r¡ih rc€ded reiesha*rb, rrunilrrùE üræxn ht dverse reedhæ, xåedditg ll*an for

fr€i nÉdãppl*nart ard ndinl ðst¡ ftdræt¡¡re. Tni¡hg b ps¡ideå

\folwrþr¡e r,s¡* al our Hood CrfiùÊ*e ad d Ðorflüåity rnctih il{od drives ã*d 5lþß €tity t¡É*iE üih trÈ Ë.Hrc, bÊ

ora$fr€, erd €rirf lro*irg ln rlr aie*c}angåq regsl*Ed er¡vi¡er¡srt l¿dnnbe¡s *ill be åle b:it if needed. cr can

*an¿ *riE frelr iliË '[I!¡s. positim b peftcl fü lE]6,e rfsk¡ry lð* q€riEícÊ h HdlcålÊ" Fwi:cs expetiance riÜt

Sre ñlood Cetrhr r ha¡if{ dutd€d blood h ütë' pasl k rct teq'iÉd.

t¡{drnbrg are needed day{læ síd euerùUs, *eekdap ad nek€nd!' Esnhst*¡rd rlËël ril be tqlæled.

Crrþct

8¡ilsìn¡e 0onfl-C$tbrl8t¡7 {3:hd A¡en¡e î{EtuleíË, WA98ß5P[üe( f4ã¡453,{{Hl

JuHæ R¡ech:ßelte*ræbaaed rw+ffiütãt$odtttü sch.diandoer.lrmrnityolgsbrlrdþ peqlenü ava,þtïrf ñ€É*ls, ütt{ãk0hg1æ¡¡rrfrsbrc. Tieysee¡nbbelctEtireahodmtirq¡ìifroçÞãtihiråilbÉrdiete.abþiopt¡iJe¡goodelta¡ttofhot¡rs nihod.a htd l¡gh {di¿díartÊFF+ltd titr€.t**r Offte: {42tr} SË t3U¡ Flsae, B#r¡e ItiA !60t7 (415} 74ä{*FThriñ Sme: ã0t {if{ür rhrre Ì#. Þeilewe,ITA, W:tlhfu 't8ì¡¡ltti¡¡ilcmkontlr*¡úer

Irøgrem fhallh: üffiee Srypodfor ilor¡iw l&in Officsin t{ì¡l¡h¡dI lÉ0û t{E lzåh Sùeetrfidild, $ft S8{X4{25.{tqt-1ü40hüos/furw"frreüsellhei¡ü.c€ml$Erte{Ðe

Fo 1ou lurea pesinthrilntrylretud d$ú fta¡etlr* Ênelo ri:äpet€ñG?ìfut hdpffidd bege*y agpecirÞd Þyüe

sffià9ttñàr,K¡fdãrdltlÞkaeen mgcirg neÊdftrhdppdürg kg€ffrÈrüre hùEfirE harùao*tkt is ¡irut b'FeliÊtfrafdüEhßtgirrtm'

lhkpr*öm is ffie - yor eerdrm:Ê riranb õ6me,ißåËËz.h&islËireñdãf üïrr¡É FriJryb€û,rÊa? ð:€$Ailetd5:ffi Pit). litk *e bc*irq ful¿,¡dr&lteer$dre hdegerd*Þatd ateeú|.Tlr* t{tcpi:e BEdr aggeíÉly cxtsisls oltltë fÈlmirS...

l" Ãs:aldde susmental l{ßt¡ÞË åttn¡t Paøld {Cuthùirg apçrox. 2Ë ikíE iÉ a clþ}¿ lb,libr pri*d krrq dErt eû&istIsli¡e Êrsis.lad fitlët lnrå thgãckpi'ed Hccti*ÂúTútEhd€ü4. lnset*rpplem*el l{Ëdr€A¡tn¡tFectditubrdipocletof Slder5. lnåstErTxg'errcf Ptepalelf*srPa*a hh n6td PD*dE- Rg¡*t¡ildelshbtflé¡

ftaçivmol* &tomø&nalúr ãalçøtdÊhr*e lå¡d be d þæl ltr üienHi¡trorTni¡Èrg¡ 2lfirtp€rr*ek&roæleæ


Itle aæ tooliag hc ronmræ rtrs È qq*,riæd, ddã¡l-oia¡H *rd drynd*þ- Thds it! Y,ou rill te 4¡ædaáed al,|d yon

çill Ed tÉ lor* ronÊ au,€sßË FBD*!

Eveqram thalth: Eilurgarcy tryerûflottt 8up¡ot't Re*llnnd

\d*qrtes n€€# io Frc*le sqpçol tn pefiara ard visibr i* ãrapreræ1 ÛEøttl*rt Sbc* sttppIÊs, brìspût påfut*,ord È nieeldri*, rn lab emrds, nçpci tuË.irq sffi. Lltd he trËhrE lE '€ go€d r¡a*hç tt*ttistdtþ sltilb :*ch as

ælrür¡ri¡etiolr skits and aùiüty io tata irdudkrs eld ¡l€iü¡ils. h{ìE{ fia¡g srr¡rd jt¡&EnE#Jf ilir{ te 4 lå dtd Ëldþr.'the Eü b a gysirdf #nxrdrq ntd snnetirnes sùrÉsûll Ënirfinsrl Vd¡nþe*: should u¡tdsttudl hd l!æy lrt see

saÈr¡¡¡ ild irkuå fi€di:¡l sihãtinrs rhle vdrøùaerirg, etÆí tilt{h üey r,rnt be didy iwoltæd h palie{ me.lf,olüþse ¡€Éd h wÌtrútb e ome c ¡reek¡lüd4 fÌarrg.

RËqrúsîÊd5¿{ffiBæ¡Fnr*Cle*frienHiatorTr*ùqft e 4 ltar sldñ pet wdt þ F nr¡ürs

FEE¡lii.r b:'ir$îo teft ind. ¿r.Jwli*

!{ lr¡roe in t¡loodinrtle: 2f ecres is ã fuÍr ürd doeç gI }td¡ o'f corrn¡rity rc* p¡omolir4 f*rn b trble sustaiøHe

ãgri.å¡lt¡€ Ëdiutt, læåds clãsses ttrlr paidard tee, erd,:npporis a nrnterof otltrlrcd otgani¡etþñåbf tñsitq frEe

FqFÐE.lleEe:efie lhktoürev!¡¡rþëÌ rydi"ldlar. r*úrh¡ccCl æedb ùm hfitd: t*¡rf?1¡ctç",qdæ{.¡ttxtàæd¡bemr¡**ltl¡ide€#

t"?Éag o&,rerereds, üæyc,fur lne s*adaymdt prlies, nÌftlrunl# bepøbctfot *æeQiÉg bfitt!Êhffifirnåityseni;æ hq¡r aq*d gdrc$|,.T¡rk l&i/flæ.ûq,hyert$rd¿çåql¡r*Êfreû#ttÈõlþ?"t-2+2{-2-}2-2{4ã

Tlre bsÊ. s6,lçdy {60ç r*øty as ælll 137{11 fG lTlst lfiocdirsle. llR güfz

Hd Fri¡ndrt}lt Á¡k ltÂdirdtv Vol¡nt¡*fur E¡nh¡t wilh Dsflfldia in Ki¡ldilrd

*& in i'r ¡cfvitiÉË Erd fteþ grilÉ serfurø när ilhheiIÏËrb ardrer atlilo+rdede æEttrre is¡es lB hã/r aÍÉåt*rqfr¿daÏh *€sEsdËr#i'ñ¿ilglt. tveha¡e çerrirggfurnieldttlðllrrhÊ*Eott€**eekb læþotrmerÈas

=taysrocially erq¡gËd ¡ñd edi$Ê Ffi¡e üìsh trTtt/ caregirer qet a breakJ ltlrle påay rush .ad Ëds, üy {\¡t ar{ P+tiæ, drdgërs€lly h¡{ltsrd þãyrätd b¡*tþe **ú5nm-æa*fe¡¡tddAåænarcypngvnhrÐl&raú*l&e* lirxo ftr paretls *ltr kids in sdraol. ltJÞ ndc*rc rslunkeiq #rib of ar¡ aqe orskleet . Rxlited, :fuder{ ctÍsdficerrü fiÊ¡åËtÍ,üsseÊwlurrcrilE rlra$€yot"trcÊk ildãr*tfsonraryo&relu..hrii Þing1u**rñe ad*ilhgnassfuen¡age.Choore tonday*,T:rx¡d¡yr.orïhr¡d¡yt ih ff¡eBo,re $lf arsã of lf¡ilen4fr¡m0:rlllamto*30r9.¡n.$lhfiare alaqe nxelirq roorn ina ndcc*ningdnñh.V/e ueus¡lyftost *ot¡t beû,*e* &l?senio+s,

=onrdirres a k*vtaoe

orlesç. Yorrüåe*iûrùrohrøn@eal*ed#ddyardlsualyanoderwlunke. lf yørrø Eni$eat gam h helpsstryódrs, gg æsisl niür lhe a#¡ite of fie day. sarn ard share lffidl, ard læþ lidf rp et hÊ erd û{llæ 6ey, Þren lli¡ i¡ egrêd fit A &lssr stifr

'b prrefeæd. 9ro+h* shiñs. ee dsa rwy heþti.tøe k*þ usarede a*furillg sw¡ttnt€t*dfrrt,

'€Epedendfirf. Eãch¡rpi¡tdcùe**tlhe tqte$ed

f525 f g¡rrd Í!e ¡E Jû¡*fe.rd l,tÍ{ 980Ël ,ËFAgl- g¡Iõ

Wtll fo toangct *ith olh€r ¡rtirtt? B*sns a ìrÁLÂ ¡q¡t üfldn. Yolur{err-

VAIÄ b sÊÊ[h! lEft¡dEff ¡o dåeÀ¡{Ceüåerskr,e'd5. åk$rer*are üreliþllaoJ ofVÁu{"ì}leaanlepeno*doe:nithor*pv!Asaræårrbeì yct úhevÊü*eop@nitylo ræe ynrslds, cø*rect*ithadisb *tdôeprùlic*i.*efi$ütgope,raktril vtry specid DxlîrÍåùt besd f,¡Hia*t Gil: ¡B fiedwxnd. Toudo¡'l harç þ Þan a*¡. ürÞ ¿e hakiq trrnå¡deærdr ¡epasrdøSe*onta(xrþÍrCersctiq¡tr ûren¡tftald æcutt¡itad h aisþ auarercss *out*t


h anræenrr*iþ Tlis b.an ongoingpoøtor*æquiúB e ðfft rånêrrt of *ud6l*nr perar¡ür ærd i¡cådtsoppc*àritÞa b dsfy p* ad"

F¡sc¡*ilÍeç h*¡rle:. hedru addo:iUü€Èer{er. C*etùçgrægþ¡süryiliee. Di*ik¡liq infumafur *antllBl¡{ ¡nd q¡rF ?gtãtrÍútu. FrnÍeizlrg presef *iü üre aå,nu* sr* diqilry ild dÊctitq !i*¡¡s b EÉd:{ordt{ ilfcmdim. tther€#rü¡dÈ¡ãehr,fãiself yur w*rt b beøne nne corneded nilh {l¡e Rd¡o¡d ar{ soeæ *rd ae ä{etded in wlütäírg, ÉesËe ftr ,q, ctrbm hettr lÞJ¡¡alae¡¡bide,ooflxle¡¡l¡ivol¡nùeed

f5?5lFtrrá¡æltEEednmd Tiftu¡ Ceilërllleerlå¿r/sJ höu"ÏrÉ¡¿dri!.srl

V¿lûltÊerryih l&dõd Tå€ít li¡ttrn*ianrl

H4 r¡E lrÉFra,e cmnxdicd and treøl{r pro*rrt úoæl}ms fur stftrent þ wrte {Ët 100 oürthþs!Fy \6rr*eedng i{ ü!e Distibdiur GenÞ yur ae diredy l@irg toür äe d¡dats .srd pd¡Êrrþ Fffedêd *f disãsùt *tdpo+,ert¡ lnr6*äle. !k*n#*æ *illg*r bdtr bra@e of nred&al supplþ shfutinq, &fiMiffi ËæeE, ¡s rællæ agenerd lotsledge of r*ty üor*þq ararnd $Ðdrc¡le Êq¡iïÌÊttt {9 ftt+tfi.6etÈnl l¡ÈrEhølse: EsE€filid: ÐúeE ffd REÐonsibf,lkr* 8ø!ng adh*ttl*yhgpoúæt r h*-swtiq r*fr* supplesr fddrq ard *Él}*nappiq pa|ee 'frnpletiq oarytutw+ tdded k Pdlel=r Loailr,ig sli{¡ir4 tð.ltiltië?s $[r ËEdtdr Jado*af hduûry säfrëf¡ûq äd ísçÉtu fi€orgi AsEis't in otheialtsã r.ürh ôe *sd'I*¡Ee ss heÊded

Todç ãd Ëar&r¡mnl l}sEdlr tl¡¡d tn¡cldFalþt Je* r T,ape ¡rn t Shrirkmap nrdrhe t &q û¡lÞ-r

&egied l¡üinÍ¡ Cþ¡ffia¡ünñs¡Ptty¡i:ãl Bërrtilds:i 8ai[ ar¡arenes of r*ueforse safely t lfu5t bã moHe1Âble krlñ 30 üE t å*b gl¡ndiedürã*torskrded pe*:ds of 6mË

CwnúÍrær*; Flodùþ såäñs ar¡Ël¡le oa tftnd¡yr {l)66$ftq Teresdrys lû0{bm.5fX}pttç lr¡edæsdefå er8ar¡'3û0pm.

'trtr lS3d¡ft¡gtue tlFEedn¡nd,ilill$lil52 F?tæe l,f35j.f5+-ð3ã6 llÈbsflÞ' idþrtl¡$,$írÌËõTcsllËflns"cr

Gord;ål R¡*mnd: SS by orcCl úudvdlnÞetitg

Tã3S{ tç fiûStftedmotd, ltIA9{053{4251 ð4S2û80

Yiluatser Qor,ørøil¡iries *ith,4 nù¡r¡.ls:

1lh¡* ã¡ccut; Íaiá liatør ft*l¡cl0{d71fl?trd¡trc iiEne¡¡ns.rd, W¿ CeHttïe ae lcckitç br ererge{ic rrdnksrs k }re{p rñfr dãûf drl.fÊ ãt geÞ HaÉor Stebåeû l€cdêd h R€ùtñd. Âs a baYl

Irfsde€r, t ot¡ *ill h€þ leed and rr*r tre lrc*e, cþrr üre lrsrs€É' sHs eld paddnçtu, cle¡t g*I p€nç, atd ile€p üË


berais{g. You*ifidsohcìr€ nsFat¡rit!hFnilenr.¡*r æsfèdbr¡ea¡d*clicnbil¡B SAFE nssnlssE¡.1rÞhave ùæprinaryoture slflseærydagof treæk 9 *rh rron.*rd,if:iXlptnhTgrn Á3.lrfi¡rotÞ¡*atiüísæqúed ftrd berr t¡slu¡beø' Olixbdoæ rte Eråell¡kd æ$¡nly m Saû@p. Fedffi rtrt lnreu i5 læt{l btf t!¡f reç.üÊd.

Ittüksr^FÉdliom tüe:ihnû.ræti¡ftÊ.0Ëmlg0boÉa.iltp?ffi$*1fi

.lldte*leslfF

. tli:nHororTrd*rç@irdo å3$å¡r¡rrveeHyslüo Àlgq$oomihÊ,lt

ffs*Zo+: hbr:lh¡sw¡¡olþr¡¡oc¡¡h¡lmc¡e"sd

Ën* i¡$ol@tco¡c¡rg2ÍllE tG Reùtrrd Fd {X$ Fd {E?å

RÊdmüdïlAüÉ0ü:ltrt*xmd:(ffi1a5$8'{80

br*¡rd *niød8¡rvlxrot lfi¡s C¡qÍklE lE*Sllüæte b a'ltbkbttlSlæter,)

hful¡lnrr¡lir¡ror¡rlv¡o$lile¡Eilesi¡¡*ÐinÉEsvi{FsJoëFhït*Edlrd¡l*s€F ltoilrãffttrr¡¡bErQ¡*rc? Emdl uE dt @ ¡r ¡sl 2ffi{2$48tr8

lkoûtdftsrcnå:fiHlotC€gh.St¡eFHd¡ìd,ïnSü83{F}12ã.æ¿Ëlsstrlb:ûhrrmeqm**rre-onipf¡berûtds.ltr

I¿øÈ i¡tø P¿ûulrøg¡i.ns iri¡tr Ædtøûtø fcflfw Srr¿ni¡{rittlt--

Frigãrh ofTo¡lütFdeilds oûTrilúr lns ¡ rrflilyof udçtbÊropOorùnilies h læþ¿tüleir}grftstxlh¡. T*;lh ütäÍh hen*uteoeder"æihur¡la¡eanf qË6¡o6or¡*rúsåfoþ øngndlli$furydebso¡srrarl¡çltübsthryøiqs,catHorldrÍrleËcúddr*r NõIu¡úestos¡lin¡tsrf{tü¡ü&û{Itrá00

TltEÂfnr{.{hdeçcd Ganrrmily Eervico ügporánitím:

'Iha'Ìl|¡EÀhæa rmúero{pr¡iecÈ a¡d'¡o¡¡*ear¡úrflfus- IHEkF€drãord rtd iøsüerl¡cdirtn

loø*raysperk hün1,TlrEA æp i*ñerøuæaeder*rqrHTl!ÆA\¡hl¡¡*eerSewfuesäd bÉtMbclb.elq¡begfu grwluùerhctrr" torú*{ rn.d Î{F,l&l.3tlløw!¡tcdEb¡ca¡¡t*ln¡9.

Ilsrþcp+Stú¡Sr$ERÊûrstdlræapçorenüe¡fcnOørn¡*yeo*prti*tctUhhdf rq'¡ndfteofroehrCSHcreft l*þri& ütg, :fueeç oopyiq. ùetofioe b*aTofird or¡tmotq üJlcbüp Re¡q¡ne Ðshr, ac¡t ¡+äi-88{-1Ire

*Atrhi¡i¡fs:lk* üÈ ãll sdüe€r otgräætt8ñ thd ilù/üates frr medC t€ür ï¡lr offiee ad oqarizrfut, åds. ÅE& h rerü¡rc1e

o¡r{erccd4ll88+6¿9+


Appendix D

Meeting and Group Log Sheet

Firg Coüd]. Côwiry CqqÉ iq A¡dmriMÈ€tiegs ù Csuf6 1Eg sheÊt

lstue¡r tW tuøt1y Swi¿Ê tlrc M)

Næof CCPaft¡ctFÉh co#-tlmtÊËq¡ptäit !ñirslåËq.ffi *hÊrtM.thitE¡wlçititsdgatlisho lÀ¡Elwers¡ÊdkrÊßüü¡si[æ*&.1 sÊsffialtoËifyFu¡tt@d$

GlrqlNü a kIT MiIHTÉ8ffi siE¡¡&dËKnñ)*rg lÉ¡


Appendix E

Community Service Log Sheet

þng County Comm*n'rty {surt ir¡ Redmond

Co**munîty Service Log Sheet Case #

Make:sure vou get th¡' signed ñor e¿ch shift completÉd. lf yûu are doing a lõnE term valunteer position, yo¡l

may have the p€rson in charge justlr[f¡te a, lettEr Etat¡ng ysu've dûne all of tf¡e hours et the end of your

csmm¡tnnent,

l\tame of CC Participan*

Comm sen ¡f.€Sit€lrlame/Place;

Oate¡fræ.e ileme/Pl¡sne# øl 9eron SiEnãtur€ ûf il€rson uerif¡inEh{ri.¡rEr

T.rtãl HourE


Appendix F

Education for Community Service Hours Credit Options

þnrmu.nity Caurt i¿.Reón*oud

Educntiqu fo* Coûünüity Sêf,eice ll.oril¡ Credit tptions

foruruurþ'CxütparticilErt¡c¡n rcqueçtto fulfill ro¡üe ûftll¿ircorrmnoityrervicthot¡¡: vie educatis¡s

Yo$ dny be ¡He¡ñ tale tulinr ûi¡ in person tlæeg in nry subiec*s,you &el ltlþnld he¡p yçu itr fuRr6f{ t¿

ütEw, EE4¡ jobõrbeb¡dthip¡Êxppin¡ethoma

Ts ¡¡5e ttis ,0otbn ?onr¡ill. néêd to ¡æloie tfte cou!*¡ ¡r¡¿¡ h¡w m¿Év Csmnurnit? Sen'i,ÕÈ hosr! erÉifit Tou

rdsh to ætrr?dit fu[, Tm e*n gel help Þom úÊlibrely, tht cB!otdhãto¡ Erifle, vdbnÈêets ¡Ê ü¡e Re'1ruf,cs

C€Þt¡Byourtttr¡r¡ey crEbrra.t¡'*aff{eiËrierduriugl{I*tlnesÉay resoume centerm¡ttl¡ebrrncft lnfo detldu¡ir€lihã¡Tnûurs] tß Fn tdtrdlér â lhh bri0gtd F4ð P, YFut'illln¡nt tolettúei¡tdE€bls?¡houlfl¡gyou th;irk tfie,murxswi[ tah/hownnrarb tinx you n'ørldli]e¿Tp¡lit fúr,åDú tïån ü¿lie¡ure täeæ !sso¡il*

$ãry e ¡ffiñrü¡ y!'n hðve ñofi#l€tEd üÊ mul5ec,

HerE ûrËstnriÉidm5 up¡r ütr l¿ok itrtð¡

L 0slin¿{oq$E¡rYourliba-rrycmilgivesyou¡cessçt0alårgÞnu¡nberoff¡t¡a¡¡li¡*aoüså*Thisli{tì{illÌa&eru¡ Ûere l{tos://Ldroa:1¡tçcu¡ees,tvo!5lrt-sül9ërg"ini!ãlsr f is:l gl€ R€dmond Librery lwnep¡å¿, clid: on'ordine lÊrã4tr ãr üE bp ¿d tf e pryn and. the:r clíc* on "Èdffetion ¡¡d F¡inirq."

" There a:tnreuyoFtissshÉlu,thébestonx.is eanrd"l4nfle'ì Thitprqremh&¡¡onsfdiffer?nt das¡eE¡nd tedr one te,lls¡rou bolflqng itwi¡l t¡¡íÁ Tduvi[ nêëd tÕbila erÊstiarãtß uf üEIeagih of tilm hìviü ttlG yûu tû do thëse dð$€* "*r 1r€ll' X.$tdã ge'na,ites Â

ÈoÈrpletira eefiiãräe wtrm ¡'oc fiaisir. full li* of*bþets oa Lyada:

httos: //www@¡co¡n/s¡lie*fdl. lftrourhmse¡F$ÊrFrqr¡s! ¡€¡illlnakÉ sureftEeneãt¡¡ ss$Ètürçitharwillpravr yrn

oorde!Èd tfte $ou!se"* Ta¡¡ ur¡yhok¡l!{¡¡l fü'otlËr{¡EÊ onliB* cr,uHÈã fi r¿}.e ¡ûwE¡l' }.ou dö mt helE Èo do

Lyndr, Here artalerrpossibilitierrc ,*lisøt Épe online mutxs ha¡s l/åLi¡on*omjo htt¡c: /lw¡t'w;o€en2sþËçÉað leÐut5ã5

o thishasli*iagssf¡bü¡l'trufd:ft,r"nt*nlireli:rextoobeãdcl¡issrtåãtmtrBlrjthcertif icred htt¡e J/ry$ì'r,kgÊe- rcbm h n*/if tidþç/ft F€'ml¡rÞ'eô{tsåsã:tr|

o åko con¡itlertú&ingcotrr¡ut*rsbillsêo{¡rlÊt thffë¡r.Etürshee ordim, just xa:tltfur ll* pnogrtm {f skill :¿Bu $'ish to le¡ra!

2. fn Ferçon ËhsseslÞl€€tings/s¡rspoÉ 6¡1ouEs: Tru cxr also go tr clarses/roeetingt in persott Itlât yol¡

be[swr¡orddbeneñtyøt Thlsníglrtbeptr:ntingcour:es,v¡pnmgmuprforuylucHrurmrklilsue¡rou.mi¿lrtbe erperiier*irg or i*lena *aliilgchssto ifrpr.âre yrou oryctr kmili/s hËü&ü,.qÊaitr iu*rnikn ru:t Ëo gr* pmof of¡ttandänff" Tou¿¡nu¡e the C¡mrmmity $erqirl ¡Ifis:løg rheet{heræ fbe

krder dûre gmup sþ), oe pnrride a fiier or dr€Êt luu lrere ghen at tlx sesrion'

fleæ orEJÀnEgruups/dE¡seJ t t¡¡t iltð¡tdú€ qpPtepri¿Þctrdyou m{¡út.äe interestnduz

ËåSÌAIüE g{Ilh l$¿tiouetr lllliance on F{ental msess

Rrdtnond ferr Suûpõrt tr?wît¡¿lll t|ft¡klc fc¡rlu¡¡xrtùorqrr*mnlìú¡ûttål ¡[d nti flrpport¡roupr for¡¡lulti listr{wilh ñrntrl lll¡rs.'Tl*¡eBn¡r4rs!Ét{r*llvflúrKHTy tñ¡Rd lndleldm* Hl¡hll[$l rrf,rrlldt{i of ltüt¡l¡llacs iltgroupr am

røSrhndaI lorl arc prvidcd fie aú tårrgt. ]lr ¡l$vl¡ rquu¡d,


$"vaallcfiurb1* 0À1Tl:$Ër2ìð0 Ftn * l"ât} pn md ßlltllll{ô6:1ß ¡m -t*ù ¡m'lù(TÞ8Ërls{!núrr, Å&ürRosp tóål$ lPå?l¡Sl. R.dmn¿WÁ9Êa¡ÊÈ

140¡n$LT F0RIJÌi{S

NÂtilt Ësb¡d! hffitr mtr¡h¡Ï.duÊtlsnC É,nrru th¡t(w ! EñclT 0f l!$ls lhútrÉ lmf,ú lÉ¡lù. l¡r rugblntlm l¡ßlltrc{ ¡nd dl ÌnÉ ñrum ¡Ë Èæ lú ¡ttãï¡ ,

Álllb¡uw¡æ m tll tilrd'lürndelrolxc¡l nnrrth Êm?íf)pn-*:00fn ¡nd mhclilrh

Ívct¡rrq llsbfr lfud*d C.f,tr¡. S¡ltr TþB t ûû141û* ltÉ 130ú l¿mþtdüd l8rr 9Étâ4

ûÌ{¡ r#ê#ffi ñlfi ¡ün6Ërl rryÞûrr tnqr il¡rnqlFlìltl¡f,HF dãlgncd brnnfh*rtblo/¡¡ldFltF/tu*rpreûrrËd kfotd¡lFpruvdffi)ûf ywth &Iûurç¡dúrs/rffitd tðdtù ¡trd¡rrnbcu*x rbe ¡nùlÈm. Owr tNrc rlFrk ¡tEs ot.¡ñßh'inF oÍfo rndrml*¡ thE

an¡lKCs hcrÅ! rod wg.bc!¡&'l'asr.th¡r m ft¡d sE}: !o àüfü¡ r¿rc lr rlmlwe lilç dor't lk! h drn¡¡l *ost tlËdEllngLrflJllÞlbtr* *e âo uvlry dr¡^ lìll'w lúù .l(dd.d * wst lD lÊú¡ hdt to .h¡cé ln thc at¡ lÈtÞd {fadt¡trg fur ùhr nlã rù rto} b.&Ë s rnþy tlyh8 {E thËd ûru!$ rE!I} ñË&6th br'Ínl!:,Cs¡ S¡¡unþS.'Cdllktnd¡ &r mw f¡¡6- Frd¡ Iì¡. lF FFill' k'üpfieu r&Êr É¡< ¡r'¡¡ w <alÌ , üåûf,1,åúlú3

l¡dmrxl Ish¡¡r Uhnr¡r . {¡{rlLram færl lSlO ¡¡S *5{t¡ SrËtnÊdmrd $rlûglmgB05?{.2{J álq"f,}å1

t¡y't*& itd¡¡rrü&, tr t¡ahË Sqqpó¡t GrutotIf *lr ñIt¡rordãûûn üfrtrc¡rlmrpmfHmF{oårc¡ S¡rtõf Jrumryfrt(ëdltlor c}ù.¡dnßsfcr*upgffiltrotÍãr¡dúl!¡md4ptûgmlE Hffi k ¡ l¡¡a ottsil¡tdâ 'll mcÊtingr. yûs s¡ ll¡d olårn onl¡¡¡u, orthee lr unlþmÀÂfli¡ArF k ñr ltãwM Crntlrl¡üsn A.alotDÈ{Et!tf¡rrf/M sxt!ålËldËIroq¡r-mJ6utñç"sh¡¡rþlll¡Ëh'ffos*'Hrdûmfq:Herf mEtûIl{.¡qf¡qPortüãbc6ð¡dtbrul¡hura4.m.'lÞ6!:ru${cr¡ðr¡notH hf pnecùE¡i"bú¡E jEr{tül¡r6lh ¡{{rtrylqrfàãlDr!¡prtûncs!{b{r. tou rtll¡tlñ hTr lq üh¡mÐtr lq mrl fú'ru th ¡t F0û ¡ltñücd,hft¡ró¡/w 'Éï,ñ/hFqfrE!?oñ"dqrl¡q¡tr4¡drH!¡dl

Wort sourrËllf ø&wm hntil¡ clrru rnd mrtrls¡r ¡¡l ocff tlÈ t¡W ftlltäl to lìh *.rjll!ìß, milæ¡. ud Lllcßisln& lH €rrfnk þ rhÈ {trorisorro nF ln thc årilmc CeúÊr {wfiÉ çltl liÍll¡. bro r huuloul ,wilh ilE n!ùtrüd Élum lheilJûr ¡o ffiltrF ¡ìrln to¡õ{k¡tllÃkfn f.td oú ü¡.ft/wtH ild sh¡f l!*lc lc brgr6mrsrod.fitgql¡rw.wÈ*<s|,trffi/tüiwh.#Mht,TriryFad¡wÂ$¡$lìRçt{ôf'SAf!ùgrt}TðÞdBÉ!Ån'wrùl'¡er

oËrl¡kê.dlrlrtl& l'¡ü.Ëh cm!|Ë49ûi}VAllw¡8¡lllÉ, lþdwnd, $å {S$â / [¿â$]?ùâ.û1û¡Ow¡l¡tÊ fl¡FFORf Cftn pS ¡m hÊn .t h4t

'e ffikÊ ll thmgh ch¡¡t îftrç ¡6d mffdñr! úRËbt¡f,S tiffi ûf kfß.

W! knñ' tt¿t ËÉ sll trçme rlrau¡h dlr pcß srlru Chñrr #d *r rr¡rpwt od {th!ß wlhtlgrhr üûE mdrù8Êrks:lth ortH!vtlll¡¡lFtt¡ lsL &¡ll/¿lSå96SS¿frrûr+.*trWffiÀAlõltl I FmrcÞillsn g¡ppaìlh'o'anu-mmlc+l ffil{rÊôüXnÊù {cry¡l ì¡dtn¡¡ r¡øryryJfø¡{r¡ år¡ lla ¡l¡l llhw¡


tr¡l]elÀËfXggfS8ll¡Ãsdütu-?$!)ll!8u{.&U[.Nû¡Á¡d{ùå¡l¡r¡cllr¡P{}¡ånl , ¡Lqtr4È &çd lt* ' ${lr¡lxdæ ' T¡n}EllÃÂ8grt¡r¡r¡c¡.É¡tlqb¡Uu!Df¿It , úauûlrRcÀtrE flrl l¿tllcqðlnd !0 ¡t ehtldvn d¡mardarr¡drry â¿f b ûrìþEütmår Cf r¡pdÉ¿reF¡

IIso:linls¡lJþtr Kd ¡Me lì¡81¡â l¡rç¡!¡t lÉlF {¡dút .¿ßsotr [*t å ñ90 .t8r], {tt Þ¡ bâ$h stl¡ t¡nPrll¡k. f Eit rårm *rtàc l{Hl!ç fÈrkror ¡t @

F¡reptitrE O¡!s[E¡

Yû$$ rá$rldè srryktrr bttn*/lìrwr.,Bufu *iL*iliærorf,'t {ell fu r i¡& on.cl¡osea 125.f 4? 4lH'l

túÈñd3rf?r¡lfil

¡lËrpl&clt r lå.rÍtry; blt¡û /luqff;5iú¡¡li*r¡þsrûirEols/p¡¡r¡lÊot¡s¡r

É¡il8ËÍ¡fl E ûrlþvËfi ..hä.fl lr|

F¡rrenti¡e Plus P¡r¡¡t Eiluc¡¡i¡n ñI¡¡ss {Edhv¡¡e)

ft¡üdÉng F ü & ¡ 10.ffif gÞry rhs úälgr*d ¡o Í.4ltst ãd úÐgllEa f¡'ffi ¡[ lru¡¡ rtte ùhey Ë] b¿

ctsftn*ld,lûrà¡¡årg.

. Sdldi¡s ¡p¡sftf¡¿tÈ sifstr.ß er ïE {itlü

. fid(ífra mruruD¡stlþ

. x¡ü¡ßlngm¡rrtbùtn.yoüB*dytrd¡¡¡dïSta*¡Ê¡lwrh ¡.d ùeÊ¡o!õent of chlldmlLà*trml¡gmld

OÉ¡ir tof¡! õf tatäf t lnÊlqdt dE rrÊßt s{ nudl{ {o (h¡Urð ¡¡d d¡¡lût"n lÊßtriml¡û brtsffi B{ hffilnlt s trË c¡ÛâE !G r¡ü t¡ dl l¡ñl¡ {trd sEgh* qhû ¡ft trftHbd h rtrtugrlwlq rlur pwtldß *llk: :adsd¡ l{ST þ¡rìl tû h¡eê ¡ riÍú ffiûücd ¡r fhrHtg ln Füt¡*¡tc. ü!ffi ¡ü Swtil torwalr pemnB shû* Ëltt1dÈn cG¡36 1I ú}!ügnrt L*h si$ flú *{tl¡Nt r}úd¿l ftnd¡.

$¡s rdæd¡¡lc

fìrEÉdrß $lü* k, ùe¡d¡t 16lLKllifi fìür íffi.fH }æ¡r tscFlmh*t l¡{crmhcc llrnå øl ll4j Xh¡ltiirE¡l$ flfltBljrr$Bilt grralus &lg¡¡rtÅtb{d Ìr ftuslao hrt li¡¡d Pdrïstr ltr ü¡c f¡B tú.çñq9 8¡Eh ¡.slotr Þel¡ t$ tÈ[*õt*.t F Ndúr,' wr|ÉrylftwfelÈlpt!lùÊ4åpal{órÞrt r*ftr2018"19 ¡sim¡ $u nc*t hc*iB llg.pi.ñb.t.

l$r d¡o oû¡r ¡ ruF0ül lFsup ftr Br¡dEali rJ Ü¡! tf¡mürE Ph¡l.Frç8ñt¡. wtlrå nÈ.tr ¡t {l&¡rM*oe llF àdlvuilß¡r¡f of aü flflÌft lìeû 6:m¡n t! rl:ü0 lrr.

'f¡frtË¡qð Ðmrfi6 dfi*¡ a¡il¡o $wlrñr/ú É .llw f¡¡f !l&åt å. rd ,øf¿*tt rû{.1''æl iìc¡t mùrt?r'.'

å¡t¡*¿ed¡fu!41E*rg¡e€c¡ l¡€ãhlt in lfi¡{d¡ndrl{mr¡l!6 h¡r dì llrr& þ{frË üd Iñ md cl¡¡* t¡ut mhht b!18 Jq ,eg|ff iMe s[*t Èl-s¡sr lif." 'lïeG ¡É¡rmürg FuFet ha¡ltþ cooßnl*l8rç cwø6tr lDkca ts ¡Edll,rù., dm þ mfi¡SÈ l*drb Fuslmñbt¡t L&. mrt ottbsÊ¡mhå!.ìádt¡. ¡¿d hfè! hhf.f1¡sIË.t{s¡Ità hHlrh¡nÉ -¡¿8tP2/ll ¡st t I 13 6¿lål- I ö6tx !lÍd.t lt21 ?ülxt&

@


V¡luntc¡er¡ sfåu¿eicer Rënùe! C€ûtif Erti.ü Tr:lafucirg!

f{{ts C.rtùfr*rnr lru yuo tuw r pnblc*tk roøa¡ blrtw¡¿!¡ Àn }!u tx¡ry døh* borlrç ud. 1w'ñ no{ wE sb}r?. ¡1ñ

'rså{¡Ìll¡rs¡h!Þur d*hlr ü ¡. t{r¡niÎ

. Âft lrs ã n* mtrl ,peÈsim¡l Ëdùq m lcrm tfu holc?

. Àr'ru¡n c¡scrl(md mEI ¡mlÈslmal wúing lo q&t d8 dr*?

tlcûtm ûãliñc¡t or * }lllß t¡Ol¡tll¡C ft¡drtry!

hinffiigdgÊl¡Frw-thÈwB t6arúr mdbÞd¡bnk ¡rr Þntlùürlth thrl!rllfÈr ñd ffifmdùlllhË,rötHËlErttei8b¡ lw â{il¡ to ãtr¡utr tlErilRrk ¡ft trËt'f;¡qãtt àt !põ{tú&þ bt t¡¡rdlød"Îsut ¡rd P¡¡r lt{ulq$. ðr &retF{üllltl.:n on ¡& f¡¡r Houdng tniDlqE Ðlll lniF¡û$G.vm b lhÊ f{lhwla{l

r llrghrr md| ¡btr hou¡lr*}ffi ¡nr! tw dr.g ¡p¡lf rtr yHr lf h¡r l¡rulln¡dr lor¡ ñlr ln rb mmlng üd tf'flLãttm FffiÉr fql¡¡bll¡ IDlEþ ¡trba¡¡æ hüslaf aú ntudtrüæ wûcl¡E. emEuaitf süroü to ¡¡¡d¡l'l'flrrú¡ h Ku¡fully ûbd¿allt8hoBl¡n

fJ¡rticlFr¡E ffilrÈ ¡.rÉltlätr upütr ørlt dq É¡¡t ãutlð thm tÞ froe L¡ftdttrtl;tlf¡ilrd Esdirüffi end ho6Bilnlr rc¡td rswc.

ûo tr ¡åk åddtrs ¡n ræ upmll¡ deln* Lrfe/þw:w¡¡,lfrutardft¡*lm

Solid C*ound Fbse {ourses ia food,/AudgæFhiüs: tbese a¡s ia:Sealtle" if?sr¡ ¡¡e loc¡¡ed svEr lheæ

tlËv aÉ ¡ g! ¡t rt5ou¡Ee for¡dvicê ¡nd ãelg as udtsd¡ed¡¡le af Unmmine ãfrft¡: b¿ttßl/ffisllil-*rdrrur tr&/¡år{Hê¡s8vâKr&1

:5ðn¡Ê ûf n&lr {.br¡¡1ec*

Gcqtr Setri¡E1ll,sttsh0o-h&iæ c¡ini¡ñl of ftrãnnrs f* u¡rtsqlisl¡or ? b¡searrftl þSo$/Áq¡Fv.spliLgros¡rd,€ü[/ñ¡Pets/Eod**tiF@IShæ Sunn Cless: girking gmat grsreÈis$ l¡udgÞlin5, f¡Èdil€håtg¡¡Ei trsd¡ag ¡ebeb' bhus:flmlr.5ql¡d-gr!ü¡d.srri Eqe¡¡5/:bæsml*-suErú-&eJ

ËriefSffißstt Meetitres

et¡thlr¡d crürÞår¡lûlr!Ë Dilêöd¡r GñËf s[s$art fiúéüü9,

h{trc/y'r,wl(¡ftfÊasBideorr/üpme,etrn¿rhûûard sl¡rylrrûß tf 5ì¡¡cldé ¡ß

- Il¡dm¡d l.lh¡ryuhctc' t9q{ü }i.¡t osù í1. n ¡mtrdlvlutr nl¡iû¡ ls¡ilh.oì Tt¡l{ Lñd¡f' [fùû møth. ?.lk?0 ¡aÈìmt: lEn'faþrnj 4mc tolmeting{:Eateti Êrsllü¡tlrysxllls¡¡*3trf¡É¡¡¡blÉIågs¡¡.lE¡É


King CountyDistrict Court

Office of the Presiding JudgeW1034 King County Courthouse

516 Third AvenueSeattle, Washington 981 04Telephone: (206) 477-1720

Fax: (206) 296-0596

The Honorable Donna TuckerChief Presiding Judge

Othniel PalominoChief Adm i nistrative Officer

September 19,2019

The Honorable Rod DembowskiChair, King County CouncilRoom 1200King County Courthouse

Dear Councilmember Dembowski

This letter transmits the community court outcomes report requested in Ordinance 18835,

Section 70, Proviso Pl.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 206-477-0457.

Sincerely,

w,*Donna TuckerChief Presiding Judge

Enclosures

cc: King County CouncilmembersATTN: Carolyn Busch, Chief of Staff


ATTACHMENT 2


[Blank Page]


King CountyCommunity Courts

King CountyDistrict Court

JUDGE DONNA TUCKER, CHIEF PRESIDING JUDGEKING COUNTY DISTRICT COURT

KING COUNTY COUNCILCOMMUNITY, HEALTH & HOUSING SERVICES COMMITTEEFEBRUARY 5, 2020

ATTACHMENT 3


MissionTo use public resources more productively in reducing crime through service provision and increased community engagement and connection.


The problem•Individuals with personal challenges might cycle in and out of court◦ Homelessness◦ Poverty◦ Substance use disorders◦ Mental health issues

•Repeated punishment does not necessarily change behavior


What is a community court?


“My experience here has saved my life. Not only am I off the drugs and staying clean by taking the healthy steps to live life clean, I also have been able to get myself back in a healthy structured living situation. I am so blessed to have the honor to be a part of this program.”

~Community Court in Redmond graduateCHHS Meeting Materials Page 79 February 5, 2020

Community Court in RedmondJanuary – December 2019

67Total

Participants(on 12/31/19)

56Graduationsresulting indismissals

(for entire year)

1,320Lunchesprovided

900Community service

hours completed


Community Court in BurienFebruary – December 2019

26Total

Participants(on 12/31/19)

5Graduationsresulting indismissals

(for Feb - Dec)

345Lunchesprovided

28Community service

hours completed


Community Resource Centers•Redmond•Wednesdays 1:30 – 3:30• Co-located with community court at

Redmond Library• 32 service providers

•Burien•Mondays 10:00 – 12:00• Co-located with community court at

Burien Community Center• 36 service providers


RedmondCommunity Resource Center

15-20Service providers

on-siteeach week

1,065Volunteer hours

2,600Visits to the

resource center

January – December 2019


RedmondCommunity Resource Center• AA / NA• Alliance of People with DisAbilities• Bellevue College• CareNet of Puget Sound• Cascadia Community College• City of Redmond Outreach• Community Health Plan• Crisis Connections• Dispute Resolution Center of King County• DSHS• Eastside Legal Assistance• Friends of Youth• Health Point• Hopelink• IKRON• King County Library System

• Kindering• Lake Wa Tech• McKinney Vento• NAMI• Public Health• Reconnect to Opportunity• Smart Talent• Sound Generations• St Vincent de Paul• Terra Staffing• United Health Care• WDVA: Military Family Outreach• WorkSource• Youth Eastside Services• YWCA


BurienCommunity Resource CenterFebruary – December 2019

15Service providers

on-siteeach week

1,021Volunteer hours

696Visits to the

resource center


BurienCommunity Resource Center• Asian Counseling & Referral Service• CCS Mental Health Outreach• Career Pathways• Community Health Plan• Cowlitz Tribal Health• Crisis Connections• Dispute Resolution Center of King County• DSHS• Evergreen Reach Outreach• FareStart• Health Point Mobile Medical Services• Highline Support Center & Women’s Programs

& WorkFirst• Hospitality House• KC Family Support Division• King County Library System

• King County Elections• Multi-Service Center• NAMI South King County• Nature Stewards Program• NAVOS• NW Justice Project• ORCA-to-Go• ORION Industries• Pioneer Human Services• Public Health (ORCA Lift / Health Insurance )• Reconnect to Opportunity• Refugees NW (ORCA Lift / Health Insurance)• Safe Futures• Smart Talent• SoCo Culture

• Sound Generations• St. Vincent de Paul• United Health Care• WA Veterans Affairs• WorkSource Affiliate –

South Seattle College• YMCA Accelerator Program• Youth Source


Shoreline Community Court & Resource Center•Launched January 7, 2020

•At Shoreline City Hall

•Tuesdays 1:30 p.m. – 3:30 p.m.


Commission of new crimes

New charges within 12 months:16 percentage points (30% vs. 46%)

Reducing crime- Lower recidivism than traditional court

Spokane Community Court

New charges within 6 months:12 percentage points (20% vs. 32%)


Reducing crime- Lower recidivism than traditional court

Red Hook Community Justice Center, Brooklyn, New York

Commission of new crimes

Adults: 10%

Juveniles: 20%


Seattle (353)*

Burien (369)

Bellevue (1,385)

Redmond (928)*

Auburn (2,550)*

Issaquah (65)

Shoreline (316)*

MRJC (352)*

King County District CourtNon-traffic misdemeanors by courthouse (2018)

Data source:Washington Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)

* Courts servicing multiple jurisdictions

ShorelineShoreline (271)Kenmore (45)

RedmondRedmond (547)Duvall (29)Apportion 1/3 of state cases in county (352)

SeattleApportion 1/3 of state cases in county (353)

IssaquahIssaquah (0)Carnation (4)Sammamish (61)

MRJCApportion 1/3 of state cases in county (352)

AuburnAuburn (2,400)Covington (150)

Total cases = 6,320

Vashon Island (2)

Increase 2015 – 2018Decrease 2015 - 2018


Des Moines (374)*

Bothell (666)

Renton (1,690)

Enumclaw (187)

Black Diamond (58)Federal Way (1,491)

Kent (2,928)

Kirkland (688)*

Lake Forest Park (89)

Maple Valley (71)

Mercer Island (68)*

Pacific (159)

Tukwila (757)

Seattle (8,327)

Issaquah (947)*

SeaTac (277)

Data source:Washington Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)

* Courts servicing multiple cities

KirklandKirkland (607)Clyde Hill (4)Hunts Point (0)Medina (5)Woodinville (70)Yarrow Point (2)

Des MoinesDes Moines (329)Normandy Park (45)

Mercer IslandMercer Island (34)Newcastle (34)

IssaquahIssaquah (495)North Bend (263)

Snoqualmie (189)

Municipal courts within King CountyNon-traffic misdemeanors by court (2018)Total cases = 18,777

Increase 2015 – 2018Decrease 2015 - 2018


Thank you!CHHS Meeting Materials Page 92 February 5, 2020

Community, Health and Housing Services Committee

February 5, 2020

Agenda Item No. 7 Briefing No. 2020-B0015

Overview of Issues and Potential

Legislation from the Department of

Community and Human Services in

2020

Materials for this item will be available at

the meeting.


Documents

King County 1200 King County 516 Third Avenue Seattle, WA … · 2020-02-03 · Sponsors: Mr. Dembowski and Ms. Balducci Clifton Curry, Council staff King County Page 1 Printed on