35
ANGELA VIDAL, ESQ. Attorney at Law 201 Strykers Road Suite 19-155 Phillipsburg, New Jersey 08865 (908)884-1841 telephone (908)859-3201 facsimile Attorney for Plaintiff, Kinekt Design, LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY KINEKT DESIGN, LLC, Plaintiff, vs. ARNOLD VAGTS, Defendants. CIVIL CASE NO. VERIFIED COMPLAINT COMPLAINT FOR PATENT, TRADEMARK AND COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiff, Kinekt Design, LLC, a New Jersey limited liability corporation, by and through its attorney, by way of Verified Complaint against the Defendant, Arnold Vagts, says as follows: JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. This i s an action for patent, trademark and copyright infringement, injunctive relief and damages pursuant t o 15 U.S.C. §1114, 15 U.S.C. §1125, 35 U.S.C. §271, et seq. and 17

Kinekt Design v. Vagts

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Kinekt Design v. Vagts

Citation preview

Page 1: Kinekt Design v. Vagts

ANGELA VIDAL, ESQ. A t t o r n e y a t Law 201 S t r y k e r s Road S u i t e 19-155 P h i l l i p s b u r g , New Jersey 08865 (908)884-1841 t e l e p h o n e (908)859-3201 f a c s i m i l e A t t o r n e y f o r P l a i n t i f f , K i n e k t Design, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

KINEKT DESIGN, LLC,

P l a i n t i f f ,

vs.

ARNOLD VAGTS,

Defendants.

CIVIL CASE NO.

VERIFIED COMPLAINT

COMPLAINT FOR PATENT, TRADEMARK AND COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT

P l a i n t i f f , K i n e k t Design, LLC, a New Jersey l i m i t e d

l i a b i l i t y c o r p o r a t i o n , by and t h r o u g h i t s a t t o r n e y , by way o f

V e r i f i e d Complaint a g a i n s t t h e Defendant, A r n o l d Vagts, says as

f o l l o w s :

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

1. T h i s i s an a c t i o n f o r p a t e n t , trademark and c o p y r i g h t

i n f r i n g e m e n t , i n j u n c t i v e r e l i e f and damages p u r s u a n t t o 15

U.S.C. §1114, 15 U.S.C. §1125, 35 U.S.C. §271, e t seq. and 17

Page 2: Kinekt Design v. Vagts

U.S.C. 501, e t seq. Su b j e c t m a t t e r j u r i s d i c t i o n i s t h e r e f o r e

c o n f e r r e d upon t h i s Court p u r s u a n t t o t h e p r o v i s i o n s o f 28

U.S.C. §1331 and 28 U.S.C. §1338.

2. T h i s Court has p e r s o n a l j u r i s d i c t i o n over t h e Defendant

because Defendant d i r e c t s h i s business a c t i v i t i e s t o w a r d s , and

conduct business w i t h , consumers w i t h i n t h i s j u d i c i a l d i s t r i c t

and t h e p r o d u c t s t h a t are t h e s u b j e c t o f t h i s a c t i o n were, and

c o n t i n u e t o be, s o l d t o consumers i n t h e S t a t e o f New Jersey.

3. Venue i s p r o p e r i n t h i s j u d i c i a l d i s t r i c t under 28

U.S.C. §1391, as a s u b s t a n t i a l p a r t o f t h e events g i v i n g r i s e t o

th e c l a i m s o c c u r r e d i n t h i s d i s t r i c t , Defendant has s o l d , and

c o n t i n u e s t o s e l l , p r o d u c t s t h a t i n f r i n g e upon P l a i n t i f f ' s

p a t e n t and trademark w i t h i n t h i s d i s t r i c t , Defendant conducts

i n f r i n g i n g a c t i v i t i e s and causes harm w i t h i n t h i s d i s t r i c t and

the p r o p e r t y t h a t i s t h e s u b j e c t o f t h i s a c t i o n , t h e p a t e n t , t h e

trademark and t h e c o p y r i g h t , are s i t u a t e d i n t h i s d i s t r i c t .

THE PATENT, TRADEMARK AND COPYRIGHT

4. On June 7, 2011, t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s Patent and Trademark

O f f i c e d u l y and l e g a l l y i s s u e d U n i t e d S t a t e s Patent No. D639,199

( h e r e i n a f t e r r e f e r r e d t o as t h e " P a t e n t " ) t o Glen Liberman and

Ben Hopson f o r t h e d e s i g n o f an ornamental gear r i n g

( h e r e i n a f t e r r e f e r r e d t o as t h e "Gear Ring®"). Mr. Hopson

assig n e d a l l r i g h t , t i t l e and i n t e r e s t t o t h e Patent t o K i n e k t

Page 3: Kinekt Design v. Vagts

Design, LLC. A p h o t o g r a p h i c exemplar o f t h e Gear Ring® i s

a t t a c h e d h e r e t o as " E x h i b i t A" and t h e Patent i s a t t a c h e d h e r e t o

as " E x h i b i t B."

5. P l a i n t i f f has p l a c e d a n o t i c e o f s a i d Patent on

m a r k e t i n g and o t h e r i n f o r m a t i o n a l m a t e r i a l r e l a t e d t o t h e Gear

Ring®.

6. P l a i n t i f f has an a d d i t i o n a l u t i l i t y p a t e n t pending f o r

th e Gear Ring® ( R o t a t i o n a l e d u c a t i o n e n t e r t a i n m e n t and

t h e r a p e u t i c d e v i c e ) , which has r e c e i v e d n o t i c e o f p u b l i c a t i o n o f

a p p l i c a t i o n f r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s Patent and Trademark O f f i c e .

7. On June 12, 2011, t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s Patent and

Trademark O f f i c e d u l y and l e g a l l y i s s u e d trademark R e g i s t r a t i o n

Number 4157820 t o K i n e k t Design, LLC f o r t h e Gear Ring®

( h e r e i n a f t e r r e f e r r e d t o as t h e "Trademark") . On May 1, 2012,

th e U n i t e d S t a t e s Patent and Trademark O f f i c e a l s o d u l y and

l e g a l l y i s s u e d trademark R e g i s t r a t i o n Number 4134362 t o K i n e k t

Design, LLC f o r "Kinekt®". " K i n e k t " has a l s o been s u b m i t t e d f o r

Customs and Border P a t r o l p r o t e c t i o n under CBP R e c o r d a t i o n

Number TMK 12-00693.

8. P l a i n t i f f has a l s o s u b m i t t e d t h e Gear Ring® r e g i s t e r e d

trademark t o t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s Customs and Border P r o t e c t i o n

("CBP"), I n t e l l e c t u a l P r o p e r t y R i g h t s Branch, and was as s i g n e d

CBP R e c o r d a t i o n Number TMK-12-00687 e f f e c t i v e J u l y 6, 2012, as

3

Page 4: Kinekt Design v. Vagts

w e l l as s u b m i t t e d t h e Gear Ring® mark and t h e Kinekt® mark

pur s u a n t t o t h e WIPO Ma d r i d P r o t o c o l .

9. On August 31, 2012, P l a i n t i f f o b t a i n e d a r e g i s t e r e d

c o p y r i g h t , R e g i s t r a t i o n Number TX0007566733, t h r o u g h t h e U n i t e d

S t a t e s C o p y r i g h t O f f i c e o f a l l t h e c o n t e n t c o n t a i n e d on

Kinektdesign.com ( h e r e i n a f t e r r e f e r r e d t o as t h e " C o p y r i g h t " ) ,

which i n c l u d e s images o f t h e Gear Ring®.

10. P l a i n t i f f has f o l l o w e d each and eve r y l e g a l avenue

a v a i l a b l e t o i t t o p r o t e c t i t s i n t e l l e c t u a l p r o p e r t y r i g h t s .

THE PARTIES

11. P l a i n t i f f , K i n e k t Design, LLC ( h e r e i n a f t e r r e f e r r e d t o

as " K i n e k t " o r t h e " P l a i n t i f f " ) i s a l i m i t e d l i a b i l i t y company

o f t h e S t a t e o f New Jersey w i t h i t s p r i n c i p a l p l a c e o f business

l o c a t e d a t 184 South L i v i n g s t o n Avenue, S u i t e 9-239, L i v i n g s t o n ,

New Jersey 07039.

12. Defendant, A r n o l d Vagts, i s an i n d i v i d u a l t h a t has

been p u r c h a s i n g c o u n t e r f e i t "gear r i n g " p r o d u c t s f r o m a f a c t o r y

i n China and t h e n a d v e r t i s i n g , m a r k e t i n g , o f f e r i n g f o r s a l e ,

s e l l i n g and d i s t r i b u t i n g t h e s e c o u n t e r f e i t p r o d u c t s i n t h e U n i t e d

S t a t e s and i n t h i s j u d i c i a l d i s t r i c t , i n v i o l a t i o n o f K i n e k t ' s

P a t e n t , Trademark and C o p y r i g h t .

FACTS COMMON TO ALL COUNTS

13. P l a i n t i f f has expended a s i g n i f i c a n t amount o f t i m e ,

money and o t h e r r e s o u r c e s t o develop, produce, a d v e r t i s e and

Page 5: Kinekt Design v. Vagts

o t h e r w i s e promote t h e Gear Ring® and has t a k e n any and a l l

steps necessary t o p r o t e c t i t s r i g h t s and i n t e r e s t s i n and t o

th e Gear Ring®, b o t h i n t h i s c o u n t r y and i n t e r n a t i o n a l l y .

P l a i n t i f f has e x t e n s i v e l y marketed and promoted t h e Gear Ring®

f o r many years and each and every Gear Ring® p r o d u c t , as w e l l as

a l l p r o m o t i o n a l m a t e r i a l s , advise- o f t h e f a c t t h a t t h e Gear Ring

i s p r o t e c t e d by t h e Patent and Trademark, and P l a i n t i f f ' s

w e b s i t e c l e a r l y i n d i c a t e s t h a t a l l Gear Ring® images are

p r o t e c t e d by t h e C o p y r i g h t .

14. P l a i n t i f f i s a s m a l l , s t a r t - u p company se e k i n g t o grow

i t s b u s i n e s s based on i t s i n g e n u i t y i n i n v e n t i n g t h e Gear Ring®,

as w e l l as i t s e x p e n d i t u r e o f s i g n i f i c a n t r e s o u r c e s t o p r o t e c t

i t s i n v e n t i o n , b u t has t h u s f a r , f a i l e d t o reach i t s f u l l

b u s i n e s s p r o f i t p o t e n t i a l because o f c o n s t a n t u n l a w f u l c o p y i n g

o f P l a i n t i f f ' s d e s i g n and name, m a n u f a c t u r i n g o f c o u n t e r f e i t

p r o d u c t s which d u p l i c a t e P l a i n t i f f s p a t e n t e d d e s i g n , and s a l e s

o f c o u n t e r f e i t p r o d u c t s .

15. P l a i n t i f f has been u s i n g t h e Gear Ring® mark i n

i n t e r s t a t e commerce t o i d e n t i f y and d i s t i n g u i s h P l a i n t i f f s

p r o d u c t and t h e mark has never been as s i g n e d o r l i c e n s e d t o any

t h i r d p a r t y . P l a i n t i f f p r i d e s i t s e l f on i t s use o f h i g h q u a l i t y

m a t e r i a l s and a t t e n t i o n t o d e t a i l i n t h e manufacture o f t h e Gear

Ring®, and because o f i t s uniqueness and t h e s u p e r i o r q u a l i t y o f

the m a t e r i a l s used t o c o n s t r u c t t h e Gear Ring®, P l a i n t i f f s e l l s

Page 6: Kinekt Design v. Vagts

t h e Gear Ring® a t a p r i c e o f One Hundred S i x t y - F i v e D o l l a r s

($165.00) per r i n g .

16. U n f o r t u n a t e l y , o t h e r i n d i v i d u a l s and e n t i t i e s have

d i s c o v e r e d what a unique and i n t e r e s t i n g p r o d u c t t h e Gear Ring®

i s and how much o f a demand t h e r e i s f o r t h e p r o d u c t and have

d e c i d e d t o c a p i t a l i z e on P l a i n t i f f ' s e f f o r t s i n i n v e n t i n g and

d e v e l o p i n g t h e Gear Ring®. I n p a r t i c u l a r , t h e r e are s e v e r a l

f a c t o r i e s i n China t h a t have found a way t o d u p l i c a t e

P l a i n t i f f ' s p a t e n t e d Gear Ring®, u s i n g i n f e r i o r m a t e r i a l s and

shoddy c o n s t r u c t i o n . These f a c t o r i e s s e l l t h ese c o u n t e r f e i t

"gear r i n g " p r o d u c t s on t h e I n t e r n e t , o f t e n t i m e s i n batches, f o r

o n e - t e n t h (1/10) t h e c o s t o f a genuine Gear Ring®. The m a j o r i t y

o f these s a l e s t a k e p l a c e t h r o u g h t h e w e b s i t e s known as

A l i e x p r e s s . c o m and/or Alibaba.com, which are o n l i n e m a r k e t p l a c e

o r e-commerce s i t e s c a t e r i n g t o p r e d o m i n a n t l y Chinese

m a n u f a c t u r e r s . T h i r d p a r t i e s , i n t h i s case, t h e Chinese

f a c t o r i e s , p o s t and a d v e r t i s e t h e i r p r o d u c t s on A l i e x p r e s s o r

A l i b a b a , and t h e s a l e s a r e processed by t h e o p e r a t o r s o f

A l i e x p r e s s o r A l i b a b a and/or t h e i r payment p r o c e s s o r , known as

A l i p a y . The o r d e r s are t h e n f u l f i l l e d and t h e p r o d u c t s

d e l i v e r e d by t h e t h i r d p a r t i e s a d v e r t i s i n g t h e p r o d u c t s .

17. Purchasers o f these c o u n t e r f e i t "gear r i n g " p r o d u c t s ,

which were manufactured by t h e Chinese f a c t o r i e s and a d v e r t i s e d

on, and purchased from, A l i e x p r e s s and A l i b a b a , t h e n r e - s e l l t h e

Page 7: Kinekt Design v. Vagts

c o u n t e r f e i t p r o d u c t s on U n i t e d States-based o n l i n e m a r k e t p l a c e

or e-commerce s i t e s , such as eBay, Google, C r a i g ' s L i s t , Amazon,

e t c . , f o r h a l f t h e p r i c e o f a genuine Gear Ring®. T h i s i s what

Defendant has done i n t h i s case.

18. Because o f t h e p r e v a l e n c e o f i n f r i n g e m e n t o f

P l a i n t i f f ' s p r o d u c t and t h e r e s u l t a n t damage b e i n g s u f f e r e d by

P l a i n t i f f , P l a i n t i f f i s v i g i l a n t i n s e a r c h i n g f o r u n l a w f u l

c o p y i n g o f i t s p r o d u c t d e s i g n and s a l e s o f these c o u n t e r f e i t

p r o d u c t s . P l a i n t i f f ' s f i r s t l i n e o f defense i n each i n s t a n c e i s

t o c o n t a c t t h e w e b s i t e where t h e a d v e r t i s e m e n t s o f these

c o u n t e r f e i t p r o d u c t s are l o c a t e d , prove i t i s t h e l a w f u l and

r i g h t f u l owner o f t h e P a t e n t , Trademark and C o p y r i g h t and

r e q u e s t removal o f t h e a d v e r t i s e m e n t s o f f e r i n g t h e i n f r i n g i n g

p r o d u c t s f o r s a l e . With each such r e q u e s t , P l a i n t i f f submits

p r o o f o f i t s P a t e n t , Trademark and/or C o p y r i g h t , as a p p l i c a b l e ,

and t h e w e b s i t e t y p i c a l l y i n v e s t i g a t e s t h e m a t t e r .

19. At t h e t i m e t h e w e b s i t e r e c e i v e s t h e i n f r i n g e m e n t

c o m p l a i n t f r o m P l a i n t i f f , t y p i c a l l y s u b m i t t e d t h r o u g h t h e

w e b s i t e ' s DMCA form, t h e w e b s i t e i n f o r m s t h e p a r t y t h a t i s

a l l e g e d l y c o m m i t t i n g t h e i n f r i n g e m e n t o f t h e c o m p l a i n t , t h e

b a s i s o f t h e c o m p l a i n t and by whom t h e c o m p l a i n t has been made.

The w e b s i t e g i v e s t h e o f f e n d i n g p a r t y t h e a b i l i t y t o defend

a g a i n s t t h e c l a i m e d i n f r i n g e m e n t and/or c o n t r i b u t e i n some o t h e r

manner t o t h e w e b s i t e ' s i n v e s t i g a t i o n o f t h e c o m p l a i n t .

Page 8: Kinekt Design v. Vagts

20. The w e b s i t e w i l l t h e n v e r i f y t h a t P l a i n t i f f i s , i n

f a c t , t h e l a w f u l and r i g h t f u l owner o f t h e i n t e l l e c t u a l p r o p e r t y

a t i s s u e and n o t i f i e s t h e user c o m m i t t i n g t h e i n f r i n g e m e n t t h a t

a f t e r c o n d u c t i n g i t s i n v e s t i g a t i o n , i t has d e t e r m i n e d t h a t

P l a i n t i f f ' s i n f r i n g e m e n t c l a i m i s v a l i d and t h a t t h e

a d v e r t i s e m e n t i s b e i n g removed because o f t h e user's v i o l a t i o n

o f P l a i n t i f f ' s i n t e l l e c t u a l p r o p e r t y r i g h t s . As such, on each

and every o c c a s i o n where P l a i n t i f f has s u b m i t t e d a c o m p l a i n t and

r e q u e s t e d removal o f an a d v e r t i s e m e n t , t h e i n f r i n g i n g p a r t y , i n

t h i s case, t h e Defendant, i s a d v i s e d o f t h e i n f r i n g e m e n t

c o m p l a i n t , t h e b a s i s f o r t h e i n f r i n g e m e n t c o m p l a i n t and t h e name

o f t h e p a r t y i n s t i t u t i n g t h e i n f r i n g e m e n t c o m p l a i n t .

21. There are t i m e s , however, when t h e w e b s i t e s r e f u s e t o

t a k e any a c t i o n w i t h r e s p e c t t o P l a i n t i f f s c o m p l a i n t s and/or

th e user d i s r e g a r d s P l a i n t i f f ' s r i g h t s and s i m p l y moves i t s

a d v e r t i s e m e n t t o a d i f f e r e n t w e b s i t e o r d i f f e r e n t URL on t h e

same w e b s i t e . On these o c c a s i o n s , P l a i n t i f f has been f o r c e d t o

f i l e l i t i g a t i o n t o e n f o r c e i t s r i g h t s . The f i r s t such a c t i o n

was f i l e d by P l a i n t i f f i n t h e summer o f 2011 and was c a p t i o n e d

" K i n e k t Design, LLC and Glen Liberman v. V e r l y n K e l l y Mason,"

Case No. 2 : l l - c v - 0 4 6 5 8 . P l a i n t i f f was g r a n t e d permanent

i n j u n c t i v e r e l i e f i n t h a t m a t t e r . The second case was f i l e d i n

J u l y 2012 and i s c a p t i o n e d " K i n e k t Design, LLC v. John Doe 1

a/k/a Kimber M. , e t a l s " , Case No. 2:12-cv-04549. That case i s

8

Page 9: Kinekt Design v. Vagts

c u r r e n t l y pending and has named t h e Chinese f a c t o r i e s r e f e r e n c e d

above as Defendants. The t h i r d case was f i l e d i n August 2012

and i s c a p t i o n e d " K i n e k t Design, LLC v. Kevin A i z i c , e t a l s . " ,

Case No. 2:12-cv-05942. That case i s a l s o c u r r e n t l y pending.

22. I n l a t e J u l y 2012, P l a i n t i f f d i s c o v e r e d t h a t a user

known as " a v a g t s " was a d v e r t i s i n g a "Gear Ring" on t h e w e b s i t e

known as C r a i g s l i s t . c o m . The r i n g b e i n g o f f e r e d f o r s a l e was an

exact d u p l i c a t e o f P l a i n t i f f s p a t e n t e d Gear Ring®, and t h e

image i n c l u d e d i n t h e a d v e r t i s e m e n t was t h e c o p y r i g h t e d image

from P l a i n t i f f s w e b s i t e . A copy o f t h e screen p r i n t o f t h i s

a d v e r t i s e m e n t i s a t t a c h e d h e r e t o as " E x h i b i t C."

23. The a d v e r t i s e m e n t was a t t e m p t i n g t o pass t h e p r o d u c t

o f f as a genuine Gear Ring®, d i r e c t e d t h e v i e w e r s t o "see

K i n e k t " and o f f e r e d two (2) d i f f e r e n t s i z e s f o r s a l e . The

r e f e r e n c e t o " K i n e k t " and use o f P l a i n t i f f s c o p y r i g h t e d image

from i t s w e b s i t e r e v e a l s t h a t t h e s e l l e r was w e l l aware o f

P l a i n t i f f s i n t e l l e c t u a l p r o p e r t y r i g h t s and h i s i n f r i n g e m e n t o f

such s i n c e P l a i n t i f f s w e b s i t e and a l l o t h e r m a r k e t i n g m a t e r i a l s

i n d i c a t e t h a t t h e Gear Ring® i s p r o t e c t e d by p a t e n t , trademark

and c o p y r i g h t .

24. P l a i n t i f f searched t h r o u g h i t s s a l e s r e c o r d s t o

d e t e r m i n e whether anyone w i t h t h e l a s t name "Avagts" o r "Vagts"

had ever purchased a Gear Ring® and c o u l d not f i n d any such

purchase.

9

Page 10: Kinekt Design v. Vagts

25. P l a i n t i f f t h e r e f o r e i n i t i a t e d a c o m p l a i n t w i t h

C r a i g s l i s t . c o m a d v i s i n g t h a t t h e a d v e r t i s e m e n t by " a v a g t s " was

i n f r i n g i n g upon P l a i n t i f f ' s P a t e n t , Trademark and C o p y r i g h t by

s e l l i n g a c o u n t e r f e i t p r o d u c t t h a t was an exact d u p l i c a t e o f

P l a i n t i f f ' s p a t e n t e d p r o d u c t , u s i n g P l a i n t i f f ' s trademarked name

t o s e l l t h e p r o d u c t , p a s s i n g t h e p r o d u c t o f f as a genuine K i n e k t

Gear Ring® and u s i n g P l a i n t i f f ' s c o p y r i g h t e d image t o do so. As

w i t h a l l such c o m p l a i n t s , C r a i g s l i s t n o t i f i e d " a v a g t s " t h a t a

c o m p l a i n t had been s u b m i t t e d by P l a i n t i f f a l l e g i n g t h a t " a v a g t s "

was i n f r i n g i n g upon P l a i n t i f f ' s P a t e n t , Trademark and C o p y r i g h t ,

and t h a t i t would be i n v e s t i g a t i n g t h e c l a i m . Upon i n f o r m a t i o n

and b e l i e f , " a v a g t s " d i d not respond i n any way t o C r a i g s l i s t ' s

n o t i f i c a t i o n .

26. C r a i g s l i s t . c o m i n v e s t i g a t e d P l a i n t i f f ' s c l a i m , found

i t t o be v a l i d and, as i s t h e p r o t o c o l when such c o m p l a i n t s are

f i l e d , a d v i s e d " a v a g t s " t h a t i t s i n v e s t i g a t i o n r e v e a l e d t h a t

" a v a g t s " was i n f r i n g i n g upon P l a i n t i f f ' s P a t e n t , Trademark

C o p y r i g h t and t h a t h i s a d v e r t i s e m e n t was b e i n g removed because

o f t h a t i n t e l l e c t u a l p r o p e r t y r i g h t s i n f r i n g e m e n t .

C r a i g s l i s t . c o m t h e n removed t h e a d v e r t i s e m e n t f r o m i t s w e b s i t e

and i n i t s p l a c e , p o s t e d a n o t i c e s t a t i n g t h a t " T h i s

a d v e r t i s e m e n t has been f l a g g e d f o r removal."

27. On o r about October 3, 2012, P l a i n t i f f d i s c o v e r e d

a n o t h e r a d v e r t i s e m e n t on C r a i g s l i s t . c o m f o r a " R o t a t i n g mech

10

Page 11: Kinekt Design v. Vagts

r i n g " . The a d v e r t i s e m e n t s t a t e d t h a t t h e r i n g was " s i m i l a r t o

www.kinektdesign.com", i n d i c a t e d t h a t t h e s e l l e r was fro m

Anaheim and i n c l u d e d a t e l e p h o n e number. The a d v e r t i s e m e n t was

s e l l i n g t h e " R o t a t i n g mech r i n g " f o r E i g h t y D o l l a r s ($80.00),

which i s l e s s t h a n h a l f t h e p r i c e o f a genuine Gear Ring®. A

copy o f the, screen p r i n t o f t h i s a d v e r t i s e m e n t i s a t t a c h e d

h e r e t o as " E k h i b i t D."

28. P l a i n t i f f keeps a r e c o r d o f a l l i n f r i n g e m e n t s and

compared t h i s t e l e p h o n e number w i t h p a s t i n s t a n c e s o f

infringement^ and d e t e r m i n e d t h a t i t was t h e same s e l l e r f r o m

J u l y 2012 /whose a d v e r t i s e m e n t was removed as a r e s u l t o f t h e

i n f r i n g e m e n t . A search o f t h e t e l e p h o n e number r e v e a l e d t h a t i t

belonged t o Defendant, A r n o l d Vagts.

29. The a d v e r t i s e m e n t ' s r e f e r e n c e t o P l a i n t i f f ' s w e b s i t e

and use o f P l a i n t i f f ' s c o p y r i g h t e d image, i n a d d i t i o n t o t h e

f a c t t h a t t h e p r i o r a d v e r t i s e m e n t had been removed due t o t h e

i n f r i n g e m e n t , evidences t h a t t h i s i n s t a n c e o f i n f r i n g e m e n t was

c l e a r l y w i l l f u l and i n t e n t i o n a l , and made w i t h f u l l knowledge o f

t h e i n t e l l e c t u a l p r o p e r t y r i g h t p r o t e c t i o n s a f f o r d e d t o

P l a i n t i f f .

30. P l a i n t i f f once a g a i n i n i t i a t e d a c o m p l a i n t w i t h

C r a i g s l i s t . c o m , t h e s e l l e r was n o t i f i e d o f t h e c o m p l a i n t as per

C r a i g s l i s t . c o m ' s p o l i c y and, a f t e r i n v e s t i g a t i o n , t h e

a d v e r t i s e m e n t was removed f o r i n f r i n g e m e n t .

11

Page 12: Kinekt Design v. Vagts

31. S h o r t l y t h e r e a f t e r , on o r about October 10, 2012,

P l a i n t i f f d i s c o v e r e d t h a t a user s e l l i n g under t h e name

"avagl427" was a d v e r t i s i n g a " R o t a t i n g Mechanical R i n g " on t h e

w e b s i t e known as Ebay.com. Ag a i n , t h e r i n g b e i n g o f f e r e d f o r

s a l e was an exact d u p l i c a t e o f P l a i n t i f f ' s p a t e n t e d Gear Ring®,

and t h e image i n c l u d e d i n t h e a d v e r t i s e m e n t was one o f t h e

c o p y r i g h t e d images f r o m P l a i n t i f f ' s w e b s i t e . A copy o f t h e

screen p r i n t o f t h i s a d v e r t i s e m e n t i s a t t a c h e d h e r e t o as

" E x h i b i t E."

32. P l a i n t i f f c o n t a c t e d Paypal, which i s eBay.com's

payment p r o c e s s o r and where i n f r i n g e m e n t r e p o r t s on eBay.com are

d i r e c t e d , and a d v i s e d t h a t t h e s e l l e r known as "avagl427" was

i n f r i n g i n g upon P l a i n t i f f ' s Patent and C o p y r i g h t by s e l l i n g a

p r o d u c t t h a t was an exact d u p l i c a t e o f P l a i n t i f f ' s p a t e n t e d

p r o d u c t and u s i n g an image t a k e n f r o m P l a i n t i f f ' s w e b s i t e t o do

so. Paypal/eBay.com n o t i f i e d "avagl427" t h a t a c o m p l a i n t had

been s u b m i t t e d by P l a i n t i f f a l l e g i n g t h a t he was i n f r i n g i n g upon

P l a i n t i f f ' s Patent and C o p y r i g h t , and t h a t i t would be

i n v e s t i g a t i n g t h e c l a i m . I n response t o t h e n o t i f i c a t i o n from

Paypal/ebay.com, "avagl427" removed t h e c o p y r i g h t e d image, b u t

c o n t i n u e d w i t h t h e a d v e r t i s e m e n t o f t h e i n f r i n g i n g p r o d u c t and

u l t i m a t e l y s o l d t h e i n f r i n g i n g p r o d u c t f o r Seventy-One D o l l a r s

($71.00), l e s s t h a n h a l f t h e p r i c e o f a genuine Gear Ring®.

EBay.com i s an a u c t i o n - t y p e w e b s i t e and t h e a d v e r t i s e m e n t s

12

Page 13: Kinekt Design v. Vagts

c o n t a i n e d t h e r e o n e x p i r e when t h e a u c t i o n e x p i r e s . "Avagl427"'s

a u c t i o n e x p i r e d on October 16, 2012.

33. Because eBay.com a l l o w s users t o i d e n t i f y t h e person

t o whom an account i s r e g i s t e r e d , P l a i n t i f f d i s c o v e r e d t h a t

"avagl427" was r e g i s t e r e d t o Defendant A r n o l d Vagts. P l a i n t i f f

once a g a i n r e s e a r c h e d whether any member o f t h e Vagts f a m i l y had

ever bought a Gear Ring®. P l a i n t i f f r e v i e w e d a l l i t s s a l e s

r e c o r d s s i n c e i t began s e l l i n g t h e Gear Ring® and found no

r e c o r d o f any purchase o f a Gear Ring® by A r n o l d Vagts o r anyone

e l s e w i t h t h e l a s t name o f Vagts. As such, t h e items b e i n g s o l d

i n t h e two (2) C r a i g s l i s t . c o m a d v e r t i s e m e n t s and t h e eBay.com

a d v e r t i s e m e n t were c o u n t e r f e i t "gear r i n g " p r o d u c t s .

34. At t h a t p o i n t , Defendant had been a d v i s e d on a t l e a s t

t h r e e (3) s e p a r a t e o c c a s i o n s t h a t he was i n f r i n g i n g upon

P l a i n t i f f ' s P a t e n t , Trademark and/or C o p y r i g h t , each o f h i s

C r a i g s l i s t . c o m a d v e r t i s e m e n t s had been removed as a r e s u l t o f

t h a t i n f r i n g e m e n t , he v o l u n t a r i l y removed t h e c o p y r i g h t e d image

as a r e s u l t o f t h e n o t i f i c a t i o n f r o m Paypal, b u t n e v e r t h e l e s s

c o n t i n u e d w i t h t h e s a l e o f t h e c o u n t e r f e i t p r o d u c t i n v i o l a t i o n

o f t h e P a t e n t . Defendant was v e r y o b v i o u s l y aware o f P l a n t i f f ' s

i n t e l l e c t u a l p r o p e r t y r i g h t p r o t e c t i o n s by v i r t u e o f h i s

r e f e r e n c e s t o P l a i n t i f f ' s w e b s i t e . Yet Defendant c o n t i n u e d t o

s e l l , o f f e r t o s e l l , d i s t r i b u t e , market and a d v e r t i s e h i s

13

Page 14: Kinekt Design v. Vagts

i n f r i n g i n g p r o d u c t s i n b l a t a n t d i s r e g a r d o f t h e law and

P l a i n t i f f ' s i n t e l l e c t u a l p r o p e r t y r i g h t s .

35. As a r e s u l t , on October 12, 2012, P l a i n t i f f ' s a t t o r n e y

sent a l e t t e r t o Defendant demanding t h a t he i m m e d i a t e l y cease

and d e s i s t h i s i n f r i n g i n g a c t i v i t i e s , p r o v i d e P l a i n t i f f w i t h an

a c c o u n t i n g o f any and a l l s a l e s o f t h e c o u n t e r f e i t "gear r i n g s " ,

p r o v i d e P l a i n t i f f w i t h a l l t h e "gear r i n g s " i n h i s po s s e s s i o n ,

remove a l l p o s t i n g s a d v e r t i s i n g any "gear r i n g " p r o d u c t s ,

c o n f i r m t h a t he would never a g a i n market, a d v e r t i s e , o f f e r f o r

s a l e o r o t h e r w i s e c o m m e r c i a l l y promote any "gear r i n g " p r o d u c t s

and p r o v i d e P l a i n t i f f w i t h t h e name and c o n t a c t i n f o r m a t i o n o f

th e i n d i v i d u a l o r e n t i t y f r o m whom he was p u r c h a s i n g t h e

c o u n t e r f e i t p r o d u c t s .

36. Defendant responded by s t a t i n g t h a t he was never made

aware o f any i n t e l l e c t u a l p r o p e r t y r i g h t s v i o l a t i o n s u n t i l eBay

c o n t a c t e d him and t h a t he was, i n f a c t , s e l l i n g genuine Gear

Rings®. He m a i n t a i n e d t h a t C r a i g s l i s t . c o m d i d n o t remove h i s

a d v e r t i s e m e n t , he s i m p l y f a i l e d t o r e - p o s t i t and, as f o r t h e

eBay a d v e r t i s e m e n t , r e i t e r a t e d t h a t he was a t t e m p t i n g t o s e l l

h i s own p e r s o n a l genuine Gear Ring® j e w e l r y .

37. Since P l a i n t i f f had res e a r c h e d on two (2) s e p a r a t e

occasions whether anyone w i t h t h e l a s t name "Vagts" had ever

purchased a Gear Ring® and c o u l d f i n d no such purchase,

Defendant's c l a i m t h a t he was s e l l i n g genuine Gear Ring® j e w e l r y

14

Page 15: Kinekt Design v. Vagts

was o b v i o u s l y f a l s e . Furthermore, Defendant's c l a i m t h a t

C r a i g s l i s t . c o m had not i n f o r m e d him o f t h e i n t e l l e c t u a l p r o p e r t y

r i g h t s v i o l a t i o n and t h a t he had s i m p l y n o t r e p o s t e d h i s

a d v e r t i s e m e n t was a l s o f a l s e s i n c e h i s a d v e r t i s e m e n t was removed

by C r a i g s l i s t . c o m and r e p l a c e d w i t h a n o t i c e t h a t " T h i s

a d v e r t i s e m e n t i s f l a g g e d f o r removal".

38. I t appeared t h a t Defendant had a l a r g e q u a n t i t y o f

c o u n t e r f e i t gear r i n g p r o d u c t s , and t h e r e f o r e , P l a i n t i f f assumed

t h a t he was e i t h e r m a n u f a c t u r i n g t h e r i n g s o r p u r c h a s i n g them

from somewhere i n b u l k . Knowing t h a t most r e - s e l l e r s o f

c o u n t e r f e i t "gear r i n g " p r o d u c t s purchase them f r o m t h e Chinese

f a c t o r i e s a d v e r t i s i n g on A l i e x p r e s s . c o m , P l a i n t i f f r e s e a r c h e d

whether Defendant had a p r o f i l e on A l i e x p r e s s . c o m o r Alibaba.com

and whether he had ever purchased a n y t h i n g f r o m those s i t e s .

P l a i n t i f f ' s "buyer s e a r c h " f o r A r n o l d Vagts on A l i e x p r e s s . c o m

r e v e a l e d t h a t a user known as " A r n o l d V" had made s e v e r a l

purchases f r o m one o f t h e Chinese f a c t o r i e s t h a t manufactures

c o u n t e r f e i t "gear r i n g " p r o d u c t s . S p e c i f i c a l l y , on June 6,

2012, " A r n o l d V." purchased one " s t a i n l e s s s t e e l gear r i n g

r o t a t a b l e " f r o m Hui J e w e l r y House, a f a c t o r y i n China, f o r

S i x t e e n D o l l a r s and Sixty-Seven Cents ($16.67), on June 27, 2012

" A r n o l d V." purchased f o u r (4) more r i n g s f r o m Hui J e w e l r y House

f o r t h e same p r i c e p er i t e m , and on September 22, 2012, " A r n o l d

V." purchased t e n (10) more r i n g s f o r F i f t e e n D o l l a r s and

15

Page 16: Kinekt Design v. Vagts

E i g h t y - F o u r Cents ($15.84) a p i e c e . As s t a t e d above,

Defendant's f i r s t a d v e r t i s e m e n t ( s ) f o r t h e "gear r i n g " p r o d u c t s

was on o r about J u l y 17, 2012, a l i t t l e more t h a n two (2) weeks

a f t e r " A r n o l d V." purchased f i v e (5) c o u n t e r f e i t r i n g s f r o m

A l i e x p r e s s . c o m , and Defendant's second C r a i g s l i s t . c o m

a d v e r t i s e m e n t and h i s eBay.com a d v e r t i s e m e n t f o r t h e "gear

r i n g s " were i n t h e b e g i n n i n g o f October 2012, a g a i n

a p p r o x i m a t e l y two (2) weeks a f t e r " A r n o l d V." had purchased t e n

(10) c o u n t e r f e i t "gear r i n g s " f r o m A l i e x p r e s s . c o m .

39. S h o r t l y a f t e r Defendant's a u c t i o n on eBay.com had ended

and t h e c o u n t e r f e i t p r o d u c t shipped t o t h e s u c c e s s f u l b i d d e r ,

P l a i n t i f f r e c e i v e d an e - m a i l f r o m t h a t b i d d e r . She had r e c e i v e d

t h e r i n g f r o m Defendant and w i t h i n a few days t h e r i n g b r o k e .

B e l i e v i n g i t t o be a genuine Gear Ring®, she e-mailed K i n e k t and

r e q u e s t e d r e p a i r o r replacement o f t h e r i n g i n accordance w i t h

P l a i n t i f f ' s w a r r a n t y p o l i c y . Since t h e r e was no r e c o r d o f t h e

b i d d e r ever p u r c h a s i n g a r i n g f r o m t h e P l a i n t i f f , P l a i n t i f f

asked where she g o t t h e r i n g f r o m and she s t a t e d she won an

a u c t i o n on eBay h e l d by "avagl427." She a l s o p r o v i d e d P l a i n t i f f

w i t h an e - m a i l t h a t had been sent t o her f r o m Defendant, a/k/a

"avagl427." The b i d d e r had i n q u i r e d as t o payment and d e l i v e r y ,

and t h e response sent by Defendant s t a t e d , i n p e r t i n e n t p a r t , as

f o l l o w s : " I am h a v i n g some problems w i t h PayPal so I hope t h i s

w i l l go t h r u . The co. t h a t s e l l s t h e gear r i n g i s c o m p l a i n i n g

16

Page 17: Kinekt Design v. Vagts

about my l i s t i n g ( I d i d not purchase them f r o m www, k i n e k t d e s i g n )

--my p r i c e i s over $100 l e s s ( c o u n t i n g t a x ) t h a n t h e i r s ! To t h e

b e s t o f my knowledge i t i s t h e i r r i n g . J u s t want t o be u p f r o n t

w i t h you on t h i s s i n c e PayPal may not accept payment."

40. Defendant t h e r e f o r e acknowledged t h a t he was s e l l i n g

t h e r i n g w i t h o u t P l a i n t i f f s a u t h o r i z a t i o n and consent and, i n

f a c t , d e s p i t e P l a i n t i f f s c o m p l a i n t r e g a r d i n g h i s i n f r i n g e m e n t .

Defendant a l s o f a l s e l y c l a i m e d t h a t " t o t h e b e s t o f h i s

knowledge", t h e r i n g was a genuine Gear Ring®, even though he

had purchased t h e r i n g f o r l e s s t h a n Twenty D o l l a r s ($20.00)

from a f a c t o r y i n China.

41. The s u c c e s s f u l b i d d e r f r o m Defendant's a u c t i o n i s a

r e s i d e n t o f t h e S t a t e o f New J e r s e y and t h e c o u n t e r f e i t "gear

r i n g " was s h i p p e d t o t h e b i d d e r i n New Jersey. Upon i n f o r m a t i o n

and b e l i e f , Defendant has s i n c e s o l d a t l e a s t one (1) more

c o u n t e r f e i t "gear r i n g " t o a buyer i n New Jersey.

42. Defendant has been i n f r i n g i n g , and i s c o n t i n u i n g t o

i n f r i n g e , upon P l a i n t i f f ' s P atent by p u r c h a s i n g c o u n t e r f e i t

"gear r i n g " p r o d u c t s f r o m China t h r o u g h A l i e x p r e s s . c o m f o r one-

t e n t h (1/10) t h e c o s t o f P l a i n t i f f ' s genuine Gear Ring® p r o d u c t ,

and t h e n m a r k e t i n g , a d v e r t i s i n g , o f f e r i n g f o r s a l e , s e l l i n g and

d i s t r i b u t i n g t h ese c o u n t e r f e i t p r o d u c t s t h r o u g h v a r i o u s shopping

or o n l i n e m a r k e t p l a c e w e b s i t e s t o customers i n t h e U n i t e d

S t a t e s . These c o u n t e r f e i t p r o d u c t s a r e exact d u p l i c a t e s o f

17

Page 18: Kinekt Design v. Vagts

P l a i n t i f f s p a t e n t e d Gear Ring®, and are b e i n g manufactured,

a d v e r t i s e d , marketed, s o l d and d i s t r i b u t e d w i t h o u t P l a i n t i f f s

a u t h o r i z a t i o n o r consent.

43. Defendant has a l s o been i n f r i n g i n g upon P l a i n t i f f s

Trademark by s e l l i n g , o f f e r i n g f o r s a l e , d i s t r i b u t i n g , m a r k e t i n g

and/or a d v e r t i s i n g "gear r i n g " p r o d u c t s u s i n g t h e r e g i s t e r e d

"Gear Ring®" name.

44. Defendant has a l s o been i n f r i n g i n g upon P l a i n t i f f s

C o p y r i g h t by s e l l i n g , o f f e r i n g f o r s a l e , d i s t r i b u t i n g , m a r k e t i n g

and/or a d v e r t i s i n g "gear r i n g " p r o d u c t s u s i n g c o p y r i g h t e d images

t a k e n f r o m P l a i n t i f f s w e b s i t e .

45. Defendant has engaged i n these i n f r i n g i n g a c t i v i t i e s

w i l l f u l l y , i n t e n t i o n a l l y and w i t h knowledge o f t h e e x i s t e n c e o f

P l a i n t i f f s P a t e n t , Trademark and C o p y r i g h t and t h e f a c t t h a t he

was c o m m i t t i n g i l l e g a l a c t s .

46. Defendant has r e c e i v e d r e p e a t e d w r i t t e n n o t i c e o f h i s

i n f r i n g e m e n t , t w i c e f r o m C r a i g ' s l i s t . c o m , once f r o m eBay.com and

once f r o m P l a i n t i f f s a t t o r n e y , and two (2) o f h i s

a d v e r t i s e m e n t s have been removed by t h e w e b s i t e s where t h e y were

p o s t e d because o f s a i d i n f r i n g e m e n t , y e t Defendant r e - p o s t e d h i s

a d v e r t i s e m e n t s and even completed a t l e a s t two (2) a d d i t i o n a l

s a l e s o f t h e c o u n t e r f e i t "gear r i n g " p r o d u c t s a f t e r h a v i n g

r e c e i v e d t h e cease and d e s i s t l e t t e r and f i n a l n o t i c e o f

i n f r i n g e m e n t f r o m P l a i n t i f f s a t t o r n e y . Defendant has

18

Page 19: Kinekt Design v. Vagts

r e p e a t e d l y i g n o r e d t h e c l a i m s o f i n f r i n g e m e n t and t h e

i n f r i n g e m e n t i s v e r y o b v i o u s l y w i l l f u l and i n t e n t i o n a l .

47. Defendant's i n f r i n g e m e n t o f t h e Patent i s i n v i o l a t i o n

o f 35 U.S.C. §271, i s w i l l f u l and d e l i b e r a t e , and upon

i n f o r m a t i o n and b e l i e f , Defendant w i l l c o n t i n u e t o i n f r i n g e on

s a i d Patent and c o n t i n u e t o cause P l a i n t i f f immediate,

c o n t i n u i n g and i r r e p a r a b l e harm u n l e s s permanently e n j o i n e d by

t h i s Court.

48. Defendant's i n f r i n g e m e n t o f t h e Trademark i s i n

v i o l a t i o n o f 15 U.S.C. §1114, i s w i l l f u l and d e l i b e r a t e , and

upon i n f o r m a t i o n and b e l i e f , Defendant w i l l c o n t i n u e t o i n f r i n g e

on s a i d Trademark and c o n t i n u e t o cause P l a i n t i f f immediate,

c o n t i n u i n g and i r r e p a r a b l e harm u n l e s s permanently e n j o i n e d by

t h i s C o u r t .

49. Defendant's i n f r i n g e m e n t o f t h e C o p y r i g h t i s i n

v i o l a t i o n o f 17U.S.C. §501, i s w i l l f u l and d e l i b e r a t e , and upon

i n f o r m a t i o n and b e l i e f , Defendant w i l l c o n t i n u e t o i n f r i n g e on

s a i d C o p y r i g h t and c o n t i n u e t o cause P l a i n t i f f immediate,

c o n t i n u i n g and i r r e p a r a b l e harm u n l e s s permanently e n j o i n e d by

t h i s C o u r t .

50. P l a i n t i f f has s u f f e r e d i n j u r y and damages t h a t have

been d i r e c t l y and p r o x i m a t e l y caused by Defendant's w r o n g f u l

s a l e , o f f e r o f s a l e , d i s t r i b u t i o n , m a r k e t i n g and a d v e r t i s e m e n t

19

Page 20: Kinekt Design v. Vagts

o f goods t h a t i n f r i n g e upon P l a i n t i f f ' s P a t e n t , Trademark and

C o p y r i g h t .

51. P l a i n t i f f has no adequate remedy a t law.

52. P l a i n t i f f has r e t a i n e d u n d e r s i g n e d counsel t o r e p r e s e n t

i t i n t h i s m a t t e r and i s o b l i g a t e d t o pay s a i d c o u n s e l a

reasonable f e e f o r such r e p r e s e n t a t i o n .

COUNT I

Patent Infringement

53. P l a i n t i f f r e p e a t s and r e a l l e g e s t h e a l l e g a t i o n s

c o n t a i n e d i n paragraphs 1 t h r o u g h 52 above and i n c o r p o r a t e s them

as i f f u l l y s e t f o r t h a t l e n g t h h e r e i n .

54. Defendant has marketed, a d v e r t i s e d , used, o f f e r e d t o

s e l l and s o l d P l a i n t i f f ' s p a t e n t e d i n v e n t i o n w i t h i n t h e U n i t e d

S t a t e s d u r i n g t h e t e r m o f t h e Patent w i t h o u t P l a i n t i f f s

a u t h o r i t y o r consent i n v i o l a t i o n o f 35 U.S.C. §271.

55. Defendant has been made aware o f h i s i n f r i n g e m e n t by

w r i t t e n n o t i c e , y e t c o n t i n u e s t o i n f r i n g e upon P l a i n t i f f ' s

P atent by p u r c h a s i n g c o u n t e r f e i t "gear r i n g s " f r o m China,

t h r o u g h t h e A l i e x p r e s s . c o m w e b s i t e , which are exact d u p l i c a t e s

o f P l a i n t i f f ' s p a t e n t e d i n v e n t i o n , and th e n m a r k e t i n g ,

a d v e r t i s i n g , u s i n g , o f f e r i n g f o r s a l e and s e l l i n g these

c o u n t e r f e i t p r o d u c t s i n t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s and i n t h i s j u d i c i a l

d i s t r i c t , w h i l e a t t e m p t i n g t o pass them o f f as genuine Gear

Ring® p r o d u c t s .

20

Page 21: Kinekt Design v. Vagts

56. Defendant's r e p e a t e d and c o n t i n u o u s v i o l a t i o n o f

P l a i n t i f f ' s P a t e n t , d e s p i t e n o t i c e o f t h e i n f r i n g e m e n t , i s

w i l l f u l and i n t e n t i o n a l .

57. Defendant's u n l a w f u l a c t i o n s have caused and are

c o n t i n u i n g t o cause u n q u a n t i f i a b l e damages t o P l a i n t i f f .

58. P l a i n t i f f has s u f f e r e d and w i l l c o n t i n u e t o s u f f e r

i r r e p a r a b l e i n j u r y due t o Defendant's i n f r i n g e m e n t o f

P l a i n t i f f s Patent i f t h e Defendant i s not p r e l i m i n a r i l y and

permanently e n j o i n e d f r o m such conduct.

COUNT I I

Trademark Infringement

59. P l a i n t i f f r e p e a t s and r e a l l e g e s t h e a l l e g a t i o n s

c o n t a i n e d i n paragraphs 1 t h r o u g h 58 above and i n c o r p o r a t e s them

as i f f u l l y s e t f o r t h a t l e n g t h h e r e i n .

60. P l a i n t i f f ' s Trademarksare f e d e r a l l y r e g i s t e r e d marks.

61. Defendant has used t h e name Gear Ring® t o d e s i g n a t e

h i s p r o d u c t i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e s a l e , o f f e r f o r s a l e ,

d i s t r i b u t i o n , m a r k e t i n g and a d v e r t i s i n g o f c o u n t e r f e i t goods f o r

h i s own f i n a n c i a l g a i n .

62. P l a i n t i f f has not a u t h o r i z e d Defendant's use o f

P l a i n t i f f ' s Trademark.

63. Defendant's u n a u t h o r i z e d use o f P l a i n t i f f ' s Trademark

i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e s a l e , o f f e r f o r s a l e , d i s t r i b u t i o n ,

21

Page 22: Kinekt Design v. Vagts

m a r k e t i n g and a d v e r t i s i n g o f c o u n t e r f e i t goods c o n s t i t u t e s

Defendant's use o f P l a i n t i f f ' s r e g i s t e r e d trademark i n commerce.

64. Defendant's u n a u t h o r i z e d use o f P l a i n t i f f ' s Trademark

i s l i k e l y t o cause and a c t u a l l y i s c a u s i n g c o n f u s i o n , m i s t a k e

and d e c e p t i o n among consumers and/or i s c a u s i n g consumers t o

b e l i e v e t h a t Defendant's c o u n t e r f e i t goods o r i g i n a t e from

P l a i n t i f f o r t h a t P l a i n t i f f has a u t h o r i z e d , approved o r

o t h e r w i s e a s s o c i a t e d i t s e l f w i t h Defendant's c o u n t e r f e i t goods

t h a t bear P l a i n t i f f ' s Trademarks.

65. The c o n f u s i o n among consumers as t o t h e o r i g i n o f

Defendant's c o u n t e r f e i t goods i s e v i d e n t as a purchaser o f these

c o u n t e r f e i t goods has a c t u a l l y c o n t a c t e d P l a i n t i f f f o r r e p a i r o r

replacement o f t h e c o u n t e r f e i t "gear r i n g " she had purchased

from Defendant because she b e l i e v e d she had purchased a genuine

Gear Ring® and t h a t t h e s a l e had been a u t h o r i z e d by P l a i n t i f f .

66. Defendant's u n a u t h o r i z e d use o f P l a i n t i f f ' s Trademark

has r e s u l t e d i n Defendant u n f a i r l y , i l l e g a l l y and i m p r o p e r l y

b e n e f i t t i n g f r o m P l a i n t i f f ' s name and g o o d w i l l .

67. Defendant has t h e r e f o r e i n f r i n g e d P l a i n t i f f ' s

Trademark i n v i o l a t i o n o f 15 U.S.C. §1114.

68. Defendant's r e p e a t e d and c o n t i n u o u s v i o l a t i o n o f

P l a i n t i f f ' s Trademark, d e s p i t e n o t i c e o f t h e i n f r i n g e m e n t , i s

w i l l f u l and i n t e n t i o n a l and t h e r e f o r e , t h i s c o n s t i t u t e s and

e x c e p t i o n a l case.

22

Page 23: Kinekt Design v. Vagts

69. Defendant's u n l a w f u l a c t i o n s have caused and are

c o n t i n u i n g t o cause u n q u a n t i f i a b l e damages t o P l a i n t i f f .

70. P l a i n t i f f has s u f f e r e d and w i l l c o n t i n u e t o s u f f e r

i r r e p a r a b l e i n j u r y due t o Defendant's i n f r i n g e m e n t o f

P l a i n t i f f ' s Trademark i f Defendant i s not p r e l i m i n a r i l y and

permanently e n j o i n e d f r o m such conduct.

COUNT I I I

Copyright Infringement

71. P l a i n t i f f r e p e a t s and r e a l l e g e s t h e a l l e g a t i o n s

c o n t a i n e d i n paragraphs 1 t h r o u g h 7 0 above and i n c o r p o r a t e s them

as i f f u l l y s e t f o r t h a t l e n g t h h e r e i n .

72. P l a i n t i f f ' s C o p y r i g h t i s a f e d e r a l l y r e g i s t e r e d mark.

73. Defendant has t a k e n a c o p y r i g h t e d image from

P l a i n t i f f ' s w e b s i t e and used i t t o a d v e r t i s e , market and promote

h i s c o u n t e r f e i t p r o d u c t s . Defendant has m i s a p p r o p r i a t e d t h i s

c o p y r i g h t e d c o n t e n t and i n t e r f e r e d w i t h P l a i n t i f f s e x c l u s i v e

r i g h t t o use t h e c o p y r i g h t e d c o n t e n t f o r i h i s own commercial

advantage and f i n a n c i a l g a i n .

74. P l a i n t i f f has not a u t h o r i z e d o r consented t o

Defendant's use o f P l a i n t i f f ' s C o p y r i g h t .

75. Defendant has t h e r e f o r e i n f r i n g e d P l a i n t i f f ' s

C o p y r i g h t i n v i o l a t i o n o f 17 U.S.C. §501, e t . seq.

23

Page 24: Kinekt Design v. Vagts

76. Defendant's r e p e a t e d and co n t i n u o u s v i o l a t i o n o f

P l a i n t i f f ' s C o p y r i g h t , d e s p i t e n o t i c e o f t h e i n f r i n g e m e n t , i s

w i l l f u l and i n t e n t i o n a l .

77. Defendant's u n l a w f u l a c t i o n s have caused and are

c o n t i n u i n g t o cause u n q u a n t i f i a b l e damages t o P l a i n t i f f .

78. P l a i n t i f f has s u f f e r e d and w i l l c o n t i n u e t o s u f f e r

i r r e p a r a b l e i n j u r y due t o Defendant's i n f r i n g e m e n t o f

P l a i n t i f f s C o p y r i g h t i f D e f e n d a n t i s n o t p r e l i m i n a r i l y and

permanently e n j o i n e d f r o m such conduct.

COUNT IV

F a l s e Designation of O r i g i n

79. P l a i n t i f f r e p e a t s and r e a l l e g e s t h e a l l e g a t i o n s

c o n t a i n e d i n paragraphs 1 t h r o u g h 7 8 above and i n c o r p o r a t e s them

as i f f u l l y s e t f o r t h a t l e n g t h h e r e i n .

80. Defendant's u n a u t h o r i z e d use i n i n t e r s t a t e commerce o f

P l a i n t i f f s Trademark c o n s t i t u t e s i n f r i n g e m e n t , as w e l l as t h e

use o f f a l s e d e s c r i p t i o n s and r e p r e s e n t a t i o n s and f a l s e

d e s i g n a t i o n o f o r i g i n i n v i o l a t i o n o f 15 U.S.C. §1125(a).

81. Defendant's use i n commerce o f such f a l s e d e s i g n a t i o n s

o f o r i g i n and f a l s e o r m i s l e a d i n g d e s c r i p t i o n s and

r e p r e s e n t a t i o n s i s l i k e l y t o cause c o n f u s i o n i n consumers as t o

th e c o n n e c t i o n o f Defendant w i t h P l a i n t i f f and t h e o r i g i n o f

Defendant's goods, and a c t u a l l y i s cau s i n g such c o n f u s i o n among

consumers.

24

Page 25: Kinekt Design v. Vagts

82. Defendant's r e p e a t e d and c o n t i n u o u s s a l e o f i n f r i n g i n g

and c o u n t e r f e i t g o o d s , d e s p i t e t h e f a c t t h a t he has been n o t i f i e d

o f t h e i n f r i n g e m e n t and h i s a d v e r t i s e m e n t s have been removed as

a r e s u l t o f t h e i n f r i n g e m e n t , i s w i l l f u l and i n t e n t i o n a l .

83. Defendant's u n l a w f u l a c t i o n s have caused and are

c o n t i n u i n g t o cause u n q u a n t i f i a b l e damages t o P l a i n t i f f .

84. P l a i n t i f f has s u f f e r e d and w i l l c o n t i n u e t o s u f f e r

i r r e p a r a b l e i n j u r y due t o t h e Defendant's f a l s e d e s i g n a t i o n o f

o r i g i n and h i s f a l s e d e s c r i p t i o n s and r e p r e s e n t a t i o n s i f

Defendant i s not p r e l i m i n a r i l y and permanently e n j o i n e d f r o m

such conduct.

COUNT V

Deceptive Trade P r a c t i c e s

85. P l a i n t i f f r e p e a t s and r e a l l e g e s t h e a l l e g a t i o n s

c o n t a i n e d i n paragraphs 1 t h r o u g h 84 above and i n c o r p o r a t e s them

as i f f u l l y s e t f o r t h a t l e n g t h h e r e i n .

86. Defendant's use o f t h e "Gear Ring®" name i n c o n n e c t i o n

w i t h t h e s a l e , o f f e r f o r s a l e , d i s t r i b u t i o n , m a r k e t i n g and

a d v e r t i s i n g o f h i s i n f r i n g i n g and c o u n t e r f e i t p r o d u c t s i s

f r a u d u l e n t , m i s l e a d i n g and d e c e p t i v e , and made w i t h t h e

i n t e n t i o n t h a t consumers r e l y on such m i s r e p r e s e n t a t i o n and

b e l i e v e t h a t t h e p r o d u c t b e i n g o f f e r e d f o r s a l e i s a t r u e "Gear

Ring®" p r o d u c t .

25

Page 26: Kinekt Design v. Vagts

87. Defendant's use o f t h e "Gear Ring®" name, as w e l l as

h i s m i s a p p r o p r i a t i o n o f P l a i n t i f f ' s c o p y r i g h t e d image, i n

c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e s a l e , o f f e r f o r s a l e , d i s t r i b u t i o n ,

m a r k e t i n g and a d v e r t i s i n g o f h i s i n f r i n g i n g and c o u n t e r f e i t

p r o d u c t c o n s t i t u t e s f r a u d i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e s a l e o r

a d v e r t i s e m e n t o f goods i n v i o l a t i o n o f N.J.S.A. 56:8-2.

88. Defendant's u n l a w f u l f r a u d and d e c e p t i o n has caused

and i s c o n t i n u i n g t o cause u n q u a n t i f i a b l e damages t o P l a i n t i f f .

89. P l a i n t i f f has s u f f e r e d and w i l l c o n t i n u e t o s u f f e r

i r r e p a r a b l e i n j u r y due t o t h e Defendant's d e c e p t i v e t r a d e

p r a c t i c e s i f Defendant i s not p r e l i m i n a r i l y and permanently

e n j o i n e d f r o m such conduct.

COUNT V I

U n f a i r Competition

90. P l a i n t i f f r e p e a t s and r e a l l e g e s t h e a l l e g a t i o n s

c o n t a i n e d i n paragraphs 1 t h r o u g h 8 9 above and i n c o r p o r a t e s them

as i f f u l l y s e t f o r t h a t l e n g t h h e r e i n .

91. Defendant has engaged i n f r a u d u l e n t , m i s l e a d i n g and

u n l a w f u l conduct i n a t t e m p t i n g t o pass o f f h i s c o u n t e r f e i t gear

r i n g p r o d u c t s as P l a i n t i f f ' s p r o d u c t s .

92. Defendant has committed these a c t s w i l l f u l l y and w i t h

conscious d i s r e g a r d o f P l a i n t i f f ' s r i g h t s .

93. Defendant has t h e r e f o r e engaged i n u n f a i r c o m p e t i t i o n

i n v i o l a t i o n o f t h e common law o f t h e S t a t e o f New Jersey.

26

Page 27: Kinekt Design v. Vagts

94. Defendant's u n l a w f u l f r a u d and d e c e p t i o n has caused

and i s c o n t i n u i n g t o cause u n q u a n t i f i a b l e damages t o P l a i n t i f f .

95. P l a i n t i f f has s u f f e r e d and w i l l c o n t i n u e t o s u f f e r

i r r e p a r a b l e i n j u r y due t o t h e Defendant's u n f a i r c o m p e t i t i o n i f

Defendant i s n o t p r e l i m i n a r i l y and p ermanently e n j o i n e d f r o m

such conduct.

COUNT V I I

I n t e r f e r e n c e With P r o s p e c t i v e Economic Advantage

96. P l a i n t i f f r e p e a t s and r e a l l e g e s t h e a l l e g a t i o n s

c o n t a i n e d i n paragraphs 1 t h r o u g h 95 above and i n c o r p o r a t e s them

as i f f u l l y s e t f o r t h a t l e n g t h h e r e i n .

97. P l a i n t i f f has expended a s i g n i f i c a n t amount o f t i m e ,

money and o t h e r r e s o u r c e s i n d e v e l o p i n g , p a t e n t i n g ,

t r a d e m a r k i n g , c o p y r i g h t i n g , a d v e r t i s i n g and m a r k e t i n g t h e Gear

Ring® and expects t o g a i n a s i g n i f i c a n t economic advantage fr o m

i t s e f f o r t s .

98. Defendant has i n t e r f e r e d w i t h t h i s economic advantage

by s e l l i n g , o f f e r i n g t o s e l l , d i s t r i b u t i n g , m a r k e t i n g and

a d v e r t i s i n g c o u n t e r f e i t gear r i n g p r o d u c t s t h a t he has purchased

f r o m China.

99. Defendant's s a l e and a d v e r t i s i n g o f c o u n t e r f e i t gear

r i n g p r o d u c t s and h i s i n t e r f e r e n c e w i t h P l a i n t i f f s p r o s p e c t i v e

economic advantage has been done w i t h o u t j u s t i f i c a t i o n o r

excuse.

27

Page 28: Kinekt Design v. Vagts

100. Defendant has purchased these c o u n t e r f e i t "gear r i n g "

p r o d u c t s f r o m a f a c t o r y i n China f o r l e s s t h a n o n e - t e n t h (1/10)

t h e c o s t o f an a c t u a l Gear Ring® and i s r e - s e l l i n g these

c o u n t e r f e i t p r o d u c t s t o consumers i n t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s f o r l e s s

t h a n h a l f t h e p r i c e o f a genuine Gear Ring®.

101. I f Defendant was n o t s e l l i n g c o u n t e r f e i t gear r i n g

p r o d u c t s , a l l consumers w i s h i n g t o purchase a Gear Ring® would

do so f r o m P l a i n t i f f , t h e r i g h t f u l and t r u e owner o f t h e Gear

Ring® Patent and Trademark, and P l a i n t i f f would t h e r e b y g a i n a l l

these customers and an economic advantage.

102. As a r e s u l t o f Defendant's i n t e r f e r e n c e w i t h

P l a i n t i f f ' s p r o s p e c t i v e economic advantage, P l a i n t i f f has

s u f f e r e d and w i l l c o n t i n u e t o s u f f e r u n q u a n t i f i a b l e damages.

103. P l a i n t i f f has s u f f e r e d and w i l l c o n t i n u e t o s u f f e r

i r r e p a r a b l e i n j u r y due t o t h e Defendant's i n t e r f e r e n c e w i t h

p r o s p e c t i v e economic advantage i f Defendant i s not p r e l i m i n a r i l y

and permanently e n j o i n e d f r o m such conduct.

COUNT V I I I

U n j u st Enrichment

104. P l a i n t i f f r e p e a t s and r e a l l e g e s t h e a l l e g a t i o n s

c o n t a i n e d i n paragraphs 1 t h r o u g h 103 above and i n c o r p o r a t e s

them as i f f u l l y s e t f o r t h a t l e n g t h h e r e i n .

105. Defendant p r o f i t s f r o m t h e s a l e , o f f e r f o r s a l e ,

d i s t r i b u t i o n , m a r k e t i n g and a d v e r t i s i n g o f c o u n t e r f e i t gear r i n g

28

Page 29: Kinekt Design v. Vagts

p r o d u c t s t h a t a r e e x a c t d u p l i c a t e s o f P l a i n t i f f s p a t e n t e d Gear

Ring®.

106. Defendant t h e r e f o r e r e c e i v e s a b e n e f i t f r o m t h e

d u p l i c a t i o n and s a l e o f P l a i n t i f f s p a t e n t e d p r o d u c t , use o f t h e

trademarked "Gear Ring®" name and m i s a p p r o p r i a t i o n o f

P l a i n t i f f s c o p y r i g h t e d images.

107. Defendant has been u n j u s t l y e n r i c h e d by h i s s a l e o f

c o u n t e r f e i t p r o d u c t s , use o f t h e Gear Ring® name and use o f

P l a i n t i f f s images, a l l t o t h e d e t r i m e n t o f P l a i n t i f f .

108. I t would be u n j u s t f o r Defendant t o r e t a i n t h i s

b e n e f i t and Defendant s h o u l d not be p e r m i t t e d t o reap t h e

b e n e f i t s o f t h i s w r o n g f u l conduct.

109. As a r e s u l t o f Defendant's conduct, P l a i n t i f f has

s u f f e r e d and w i l l c o n t i n u e t o s u f f e r u n q u a n t i f i a b l e damages.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF ON ALL COUNTS

WHEREFORE, P l a i n t i f f p r a y s f o r judgment and r e l i e f a g a i n s t

Defendant as f o l l o w s :

a. A d j u d g i n g t h e P l a i n t i f f ' s P a t e n t , Trademark and

C o p y r i g h t t o be v a l i d and e n f o r c e a b l e ;

b. A d j u d g i n g t h a t t h e Defendant has i n f r i n g e d P l a i n t i f f ' s

P a t e n t , Trademark and C o p y r i g h t and engaged i n t h e o t h e r

w r o n g f u l conduct s e t f o r t h above;

c. A d j u d g i n g t h a t Defendant's conduct was w i l l f u l and

i n t e n t i o n a l ;

29

Page 30: Kinekt Design v. Vagts

d. That Defendant, and a l l persons o r e n t i t i e s a c t i n g i n

p r i v i t y , c o n c e r t o r p a r t i c i p a t i o n w i t h Defendant, e i t h e r

d i r e c t l y o r i n d i r e c t l y , be permanently e n j o i n e d f r o m i n f r i n g i n g ,

c o n t r i b u t i n g t o t h e i n f r i n g e m e n t o f , and/or i n d u c i n g t h e

i n f r i n g e m e n t o f t h e P a t e n t , Trademark and C o p y r i g h t , and

s p e c i f i c a l l y f r o m d i r e c t l y o r i n d i r e c t l y m a n u f a c t u r i n g , making,

u s i n g , m a r k e t i n g , d i s t r i b u t i n g , s e l l i n g o r o f f e r i n g f o r s a l e any

p r o d u c t embodying t h e d e s i g n o f t h e Patent d u r i n g t h e l i f e o f

th e P a t e n t , r e g a r d l e s s o f t h e name b e i n g used f o r such p r o d u c t ,

w i t h o u t t h e express w r i t t e n a u t h o r i t y o f t h e P l a i n t i f f and from

u s i n g t h e name "Gear Ring," o r any s i m i l a r name, o r any o f

P l a i n t i f f ' s c o p y r i g h t e d images i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e

manufacture, s a l e , o f f e r f o r s a l e , m a r k e t i n g and/or a d v e r t i s i n g ;

e. That Defendant, and a l l persons o r e n t i t i e s a c t i n g i n

p r i v i t y , c o n c e r t o r p a r t i c i p a t i o n w i t h Defendant, e i t h e r

d i r e c t l y o r i n d i r e c t l y , be r e q u i r e d t o i m m e d i a t e l y remove a l l

uses o f , r e f e r e n c e s t o , d e p i c t i o n s o f , o f f e r s f o r s a l e and

a d v e r t i s i n g o f t h e Gear Ring® p r o d u c t , r e g a r d l e s s o f t h e name by

which i t i s c a l l e d , and a l l uses o f t h e Gear Ring®name fr o m any

and a l l w e b s i t e s and/or URLs where such may appear i n c l u d i n g ,

b u t n ot l i m i t e d t o , A l i e x p r e s s . c o m , Alibaba.com, C r a i g s l i s t . c o m

and eBay.com;

f . That any I n t e r n e t s e r v i c e p r o v i d e r s , merchant account

p r o v i d e r s , o n l i n e m a r k e t p l a c e and shopping search engines and

30

Page 31: Kinekt Design v. Vagts

w e b s i t e s , as w e l l as t h i r d - p a r t y p r o c e s s o r s and search engines,

i n c l u d i n g , b u t not l i m i t e d t o , A l i e x p r e s s . c o m , Alibaba.com,

C r a i g s l i s t . c o m and eBay.com, must, upon r e q u e s t o f P l a i n t i f f ,

i m m e d i a t e l y remove any and a l l l i s t i n g s by Defendant and/or

l i n k s t o h i s l i s t i n g s where c o u n t e r f e i t "gear r i n g " p r o d u c t s

and/or use o f t h e Gear Ring® name are b e i n g used, o f f e r e d f o r

s a l e , marketed and/or a d v e r t i s e d and t h a t a l l such l i s t i n g s be

de-indexed so t h a t t h e y no l o n g e r appear on any search and/or

removed fr o m any search r e s u l t s page; and t h a t a l l such I n t e r n e t

s e r v i c e p r o v i d e r s , merchant account p r o v i d e r s , o n l i n e

m a r k e t p l a c e and shopping search engines and w e b s i t e s , as w e l l as

t h i r d - p a r t y p r o c e s s o r s and search engines, must, upon r e q u e s t o f

P l a i n t i f f , i m m e d i a t e l y remove any and a l l l i s t i n g s by f u t u r e

i n f r i n g e r s and/or l i n k s t o t h e i r s i t e s where c o u n t e r f e i t "gear

r i n g " p r o d u c t s and/or use o f t h e Gear Ring®name are b e i n g used,

o f f e r e d f o r s a l e , marketed and/or a d v e r t i s e d , upon p r o o f by

P l a i n t i f f t h a t t h e f u t u r e i n f r i n g e r i s u s i n g , o f f e r i n g f o r s a l e ,

m a r k e t i n g and/or a d v e r t i s i n g a p r o d u c t t h a t i s an exact

d u p l i c a t e o f P l a i n t i f f ' s Gear Ring® and/or u s i n g t h e Gear Ring®

name;

g. That Defendant p r o v i d e an a c c o u n t i n g o f a l l p r o f i t s

d e r i v e d f r o m h i s p a t e n t , trademark and c o p y r i g h t i n f r i n g e m e n t

and s a l e s o f gear r i n g j e w e l r y , and t h a t Defendant pay such

31

Page 32: Kinekt Design v. Vagts

p r o f i t s t o P l a i n t i f f , a l o n g w i t h a c t u a l damages s u f f e r e d by-

P l a i n t i f f , t r e b l e d ;

h. A l t e r n a t i v e l y , t h a t P l a i n t i f f be awarded damages i n t h e

amount o f Two Hundred F i f t y Thousand D o l l a r s ($250,000.00);

i . That Defendant be p r o h i b i t e d f r o m d e s t r o y i n g , a l t e r i n g ,

removing, h i d i n g o r o t h e r w i s e t a m p e r i n g w i t h any books o r

r e c o r d s t h a t c o n t a i n any i n f o r m a t i o n r e l a t i n g t o t h e

i m p o r t a t i o n , d i s t r i b u t i o n , s a l e , m a r k e t i n g and/or a d v e r t i s i n g o f

a l l p r o d u c t s t h a t i n f r i n g e on P l a i n t i f f ' s P a t e n t , Trademark

and/or C o p y r i g h t ;

j . That any t h i r d p a r t y p r o v i d i n g payment and r e l a t e d

s e r v i c e s f o r Defendant's s a l e o f i n f r i n g i n g "gear r i n g "

p r o d u c t s , i n c l u d i n g merchant account p r o v i d e r s , c r e d i t c a r d

companies, payment p r o v i d e r s and/or t h i r d p a r t y payment

p r o c e s s o r s p r o v i d i n g such s e r v i c e s f o r eBay and A l i e x p r e s s , such

as Paypal, A l i p a y , V i s a , M a s t e r c a r d , moneybookers, Maestro,

Solo, Carte Bleue, C a r t a S i and PostePay, i m m e d i a t e l y cease

r e n d e r i n g such s e r v i c e s f o r purchase o r s a l e s o f gear r i n g

p r o d u c t s and s h a l l , upon r e c e i v i n g n o t i c e o f an a p p l i c a b l e

Order, d e l i v e r t o P l a i n t i f f , o r i t s r e p r e s e n t a t i v e , c o p i e s o f

a l l documents and r e c o r d s r e l a t i n g t o Defendant's purchase o r

s a l e o f "gear r i n g " p r o d u c t s ;

k. That Defendant pay P l a i n t i f f i t s reasonable a t t o r n e y s '

fees and c o s t s p u r s u a n t t o 15 U.S.C. §1117(a);

32

Page 33: Kinekt Design v. Vagts

1. A d j u d g i n g t h a t t h i s case be deemed e x c e p t i o n a l ;

m. A d j u d g i n g t h a t Defendant be o r d e r e d t o d e l i v e r t o

P l a i n t i f f , f o r d e s t r u c t i o n a t P l a i n t i f f ' s o p t i o n , a l l p r o d u c t s

t h a t i n f r i n g e t h e P a t e n t ; and,

n. Such o t h e r r e l i e f as t h e c o u r t deems j u s t and p r o p e r .

Dated: November 9, 2012 Angela V i d a l , Esq. A t t o r n e y f o r P l a i n t i f f , K i n e k t Design, LLC

/s Angela V i d a l By: Angela V i d a l , Esq. 201 S t r y k e r s Road S u i t e 19-155 P h i l l i p s b u r g , New Jersey 08865 Telephone (908)884-1841 F a c s i m i l e (908)859-3201

33

Page 34: Kinekt Design v. Vagts

LOCAL C I V I L RULE 11.2 CERTIFICATION

I c e r t i f y t h a t , t o t h e b e s t o f my knowledge, t h e m a t t e r i n

c o n t r o v e r s y i s not t h e s u b j e c t o f any o t h e r pending o r

a n t i c i p a t e d l i t i g a t i o n i n any c o u r t o r a r b i t r a t i o n p r o c e e d i n g ,

nor are t h e r e any n o n - p a r t i e s known t o P l a i n t i f f t h a t s h o u l d be

j o i n e d i n t h i s a c t i o n . I n a d d i t i o n , I r e c o g n i z e a c o n t i n u i n g

o b l i g a t i o n d u r i n g t h e course o f t h i s l i t i g a t i o n t o f i l e and t o

serve on a l l o t h e r p a r t i e s and w i t h t h e Court an amended

c e r t i f i c a t i o n i f t h e r e i s a change i n t h e f a c t s s t a t e d i n t h i s

o r i g i n a l c e r t i f i c a t i o n .

Dated: November 9, 2012 Angela V i d a l , Esq. A t t o r n e y f o r P l a i n t i f f , K i n e k t Design, LLC

/s Angela V i d a l ____ By: Angela V i d a l , Esq.

LOCAL C I V I L RULE 201.1 CERTIFICATION

I hereby c e r t i f y t h a t t h e above-captioned m a t t e r i s not

s u b j e c t t o compulsory a r b i t r a t i o n i n t h a t d e c l a r a t o r y and

i n j u n c t i v e r e l i e f i s sought.

Dated: November 9, 2012 Angela V i d a l , Esq. A t t o r n e y f o r P l a i n t i f f , K i n e k t Design, LLC

/s Angela V i d a l By: Angela V i d a l , Esq.

34

Page 35: Kinekt Design v. Vagts

V E R I F I C A T I O N

1. I , Glen Liberman, o f f u l l age, hereby v e r i f y and s t a t e

t h a t I am the i n v e n t o r and h o l d e r o f U n i t e d S t a t e s Patent Number

D639,199 and the s o l e member o f P l a i n t i f f , K i n e k t Design, LLC.

2. I have f u l l knowledge o f a l l the f a c t s and circumstances

r e g a r d i n g t h i s m a t t e r .

3. I have read the f o r e g o i n g V e r i f i e d Complaint and v e r i f y

t h a t the cont e n t s t h e r e o f are t r u e based on my own pe r s o n a l

knowledge, except as t o any m a t t e r s s t a t e d upon i n f o r m a t i o n and

b e l i e f , and as t o those m a t t e r s , I b e l i e v e them t o be t r u e based

on t he i n f o r m a t i o n a v a i l a b l e t o me.

4. 1 hereby v e r i f y under p e n a l t y o f p e r j u r y t h a t t he

f o r e g o i n g statements made by me are t r u e and c o r r e c t and I am

aware t h a t i f any o f the f o r e g o i n g statements made by me are

found t o be w i l l f u l l y f a l s e , I am s u b j e c t t o punishment.

Glen Liberman

Sworn and sub s c r i b e d b e f o r e me on t h i s |2-y~4ay ofNovember, 2012

My commission expires

AlAN W. PERLBERG NOIARY PU8UC0P NEW JERSEY My Commissi Expires Feb. 15,2015

ID #2071681

35