Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Healthier food choices
against double burden of
malnutrition
Kigali, 27 August 2019
Rutger Schilpzand
In search for healthy solutions...
2
Nutrition transition:
Packaged food intake per capita
3
54
6166
7168
7174 77
0,0
20,0
40,0
60,0
80,0
100,0
120,0
140,0
160,0
180,0
200,0
2005200920132017 2005200920132017 2005200920132017 2005200920132017 2005200920132017 2005200920132017 2005200920132017
North America Latin America Europe Oceania Africa Asia Global
Kg p
er
capita
Source: Global Nutrition Report 2018
Baked goods Dried processed foods Procesed meat & seafood
Sauces, dressings & condiments Edible oils Ice cream and frozen desserts
Savoury snacks Confectionary Sweet biscuits, snack bars & fruit snacks
Ready meals Breakfast cereals
Proportion of healthy packaged foods
4
Recent scientific publication BMJ by group of leading UN
nutritionists:
• 71% of deaths in the world is caused by NCDs
• 422M people with diabetes (2014)
• 830M people chronically hungry
• 2.5 Billion people malnourished in any form
• In 2025 this will be half the world population, i.e. 4 Billion
“Poor diet is the leading cause of death”
5
Why?
Dietary transition
FROM
Diet
• Varied, nutrient dense diet
Nutrients
• High in fiber, fruits,
vegetables,
Sources of information
• Traditional knowledge
NOW
• Cheap, refined, energy
dense food
• High in fat, sugar, salt,
energy
• Label, marketing
6
(still according to the UN experts)
Food system changes are needed
Levers for change a.o.:
• Introduce nutrition standards
• Eliminate trans fatty acids
• Restrict food marketing to children
• Interpretive front-of-pack labelling
• School nutrition programs.
Note: these are among the most cost effective measures
How to find our way back?
7
• Global Foundation to foster healthier choices
• Addressing the double burden of malnutrition
• Global criteria on product group level
• Set by independent Scientific Committee
• To be applied in national nutrition policies
• Regional cooperation: East-Asia, Europe, Africa
• Global dialogue with organizations, food companies
Choices International
8
• Goal 2.2: End malnutrition
• Goal 3.4: decrease premature deaths from NCDs
• Goal 17: partnerships
• UN Secretary General report 2018: 50% of premature deaths from NCD
in LMICs. Need to accelerate in implementation. More political priority,
funding are needed
Choices commitments to SDGs
9
Healthier food options for all consumers
Science based criteria coherent with national nutrition policies
Innovation FOP logo Education
THE POSITIVE LOGO PROGRAMS
10
SingaporeThailand Brunei Malaysia China
?Vietnam Indonesia
Czech Rep.CroatiaSlovenia Finland Scandinavia Nigeria
Argentina
Zambia South Africa Zimbabwe
Abu Dhabi
The importance of specific criteria
11
• To realize policies on food & health, a differentiation is
needed between more and less healthy
• Dietary guidelines cover daily diet
• Translation is needed to assess products
• Creates a level playing field
• guidance of industry reformulation
• benchmark for industry commitments
• Interpretive labelling
• helps consumer education
• limitation for marketing to children
• taxation
Possible use
of criteria:
Choices criteria to identify healthier products
• To highlight 10-20% healthiest
products in each food group
• Raise nutrition quality, fiber
decrease fat, sugar, salt
• Covers all food and drinks
• Food group specific cut-offs
for key nutrients
• National adaptation to include
national context
• Stepwise tightening every 4 yr
12
When relevant
International Scientific Committee
13
Prof Madhavan Nair
Nutrition Society, India
Product groups
Based on dietary recommendations in >20 countriesNote: Should be adapted to national circumstances
Basic groups
• Fruits & vegetables
• Water
• Nuts & seeds
• Complex carbohydrates
• Meat, fish, insects
• Dairy
• Oils & fats
• Meals & soups
• Non-basic groups
• Sauces
• Sweet and savory snacks
• Fruit juices
• Milk substitutes
• Other beverages
• All other products
14
15
The Ten Choices Principles
16
Negative Positive
Com
ple
x
Sim
ple
Major existing FOP nutrition labels:
from complex to simple and from negative to
positive
Choices Programme: Healthy Choices Made Easy
Modeling studies: calculated
impact on nutrient intake
18
A. Roodenburg PLoS One 2011
Choices Programme: Healthy Choices Made Easy
Calculated impact on micro-
nutrient intake in young adults (NL)
Source: Roodenburg cs, PLOS One 8 (2013)
• Validation – criteria use leads to 10-50% lower fat, sugar, salt intake
in calculation studies (Keyhole, Finland, 10 Choices countries)
• Consumer awareness – 80-95% logo recognition (Singapore,
Malaysia, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland, Netherlands)
• Value – Consumers value logo products more, and this increases
over time (Malaysia, Netherlands, Denmark)
• Buying behaviour – Logo leads to healthier food purchases in all
population groups in market study (Netherlands)
• Reformulation – criteria drive product improvement (all countries)
• Sales – turn-over of logo products grows faster in certain categories
than non-logo products (Singapore, Sweden, Netherlands)
• See Choices Scientific Overview 2019 of Positive Labelling
Scientific evidence of impact
20
Choices Programme: Healthy Choices Made Easy
Dynamic criteria Singapore:
sugar in soft drinks
21
2006
2003
Choices Programme: Healthy Choices Made Easy
POSITIVE LABELS
Nigeria HF Zimbabwe HF S-Africa HSF Zambia SBN
FORTIFICATION LABELS
Ghana South-Africa
Food logos in Africa
22
Choices Programme: Healthy Choices Made Easy
the Nigerian Heart Foundation:
Heart Check Food Labelling Programme
➢Partnership between National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control
➢Nigerian Heart Foundation
➢Food Industry.
➢Approved food products carry the NHF Heart Mark Label for the consumer to make healthier food choices at the point of purchase.
Choices Programme: Healthy Choices Made Easy
“A mark or seal for eligible products that meet a set of defined
criteria across the various food groups to help consumers
identify nutritious foods in store
The Good Food Logo
Choices Programme: Healthy Choices Made Easy
How are international recommendations to fight the double
burden of malnutrition implemented nationally?
• Focus on Nigeria and Zambia
• Not yet fully implemented
• Due to lack of resoures, expertise, data
• Infrastructure is already available
What is most needed?
• ‘Paradigm shift’ from undernutrition to double burden
• Capacity building, awareness raising among stakeholders
• Adequate funding
• Collaboration with private sector, joint ambitions
• Standards for health, consumer education, labelling
Choices study on Double Burden
25
Choices Programme: Healthy Choices Made Easy
• Focus: double burden of malnutrition
• Nutrition goals:
o Sufficient intake of all nutrients
o Reduce overconsumption of SAFA, TFA, sugar, sodium
o Coherence with dietary recommendations
• Balanced stakeholder collaboration
• Implementation on national level
• Regional collaboration
How to foster healthier food choice?
26
Choices Programme: Healthy Choices Made Easy
Government
regulation,
education
Science
criteria, studies
NGOseducation
Industry
Implementation
Balanced stakeholder cooperation
27
Choices Programme: Healthy Choices Made Easy
National level
28
• National criteria to define ‘healthy’
o Determined by leading independent scientists
o Based on national analysis
o International Choices criteria as a starting point
o Integrated with national nutrition policy
• Commitment by national stakeholder platform
o Food industry involvement
• Actions:
o Consumer mobilization and education
o Nutrition panel and front-of-pack labelling
o Product innovation, promotion
o School feeding programs
Choices Programme: Healthy Choices Made Easy
• Training, capacity building, information sharing
• International scientific collaboration:
o data collection
o impact studies
• Support existing programs and new initiatives
• Donor interaction, fund raising
• Foster coherence to facilitate international trade
Founded on an international platform of strong and
committed African organizations and companies
Regional level
29
For IRI, 25-9-2017
Thank you for your interest!
30
www.choicesprogramme.org