1

KIC InnoEnergy Polygeneration

Poly GenerationInnoEnergy Light house drivers

• Introduction• EIT guidlines

Green Energy

EIT

eSociety

EIT

Knowledge Community

Climate Change

EIT

The EIT: Governing Board

Knowledge and Innovation Communities

Partner organizations

EIT

Knowledge Community

EIT structure

16 Dec. 2009 4

KIC InnoEnergy – A world class alliance of top European players with a proven track record

• 13 companies, 10 research institutes, 13 universities

• ~50% industry partners (incl. associated partners)

• >50% of key research players in Europe

• Covering the whole energy mix

• Knowledge triangle balanced along all dimensions

St ti WHO WHAT HOW WHENWHY

16 Dec. 2009 5

KIC InnoEnergy will bring innovation to the whole energy-mix coherent with the SET Plan

WHO WHAT HOW WHENWHY

6

Societas Europaea - SE

KIC InnoEnergy will be run like a business through a flexible and effective organizational structure

16 Dec. 2009 7WHO WHAT HOW WHENWHY

KICs-essential challengesfor impact

• CEO type leadership leading to drive and focus

• A monitored business plan around deliverables with targeted investment returns and drivers identified upfront leading to relentless focus on results/deliverables

• A ‘can do’ attitude, stipulating empowerment and enabling people

The EIT difference KIC s should be stakeholder owned and driven

Business style management for efficiency, impact and speed

Co-funding through – National /Regional– Other EU instruments (eg FP7)– Private resources (also in-kind)

EIT will then fund 100% of KIC value added activities up to max 25% of total funding.

Co-location of education, research, business and innovation actors is essential

9

key performance Indicators (kpi)

• Number of students in the labour market• Number of new products and services launched into

the market• Number of start ups/year• Number of European patents• Number of patents transferred to SMEs and ventures• Number of scientific publications

Consumer Perspective; Management Perspective, Financial Perspective

10

InnoEnergy- Innovation support

Innovation support for students, researchers, SME’s For the region Mälardalen (Stockholm- Uppsala- Västerås)

InnoEnergy will give support focused on the energy sector, coordinating

• KTH Innovation

• STING. Stockholm Innovation & Growth

• Uppsala University (UU) Innovation

• Uppsala Innovation Center AB

11

KPI’s Key Performance Index

450 students inserted in the labour place p.a. For cc Sweden ~ 75

25 new products and services launched into the market p.a. For cc Sweden ~ 4

20 new European patents registered p.a. For cc Sweden ~ 3

15 new companies (start ups and spin offs) p.a. For cc Sweden ~ 2,5

3 patents transferred to SME & ventures p.a. For cc Sweden ~ 0,5

300 scientific publications p.a. For cc Sweden ~ 50

12

EIT GUIDLINES

13

2. Background (1/2)

14

During the proposal phase and in the business plan submitted, the general number of projects per year were planned:

Business Plan (whole KIC):

2011 2012 2013 2014Large projects (average cost of EUR 2.8 m per year)

8 9 12 14

Small projects (average cost of EUR 0.8 m per year)

18 18 22 24

Criteria and selection of InnoEnergy projects

2. Background (2/2)

15

Criteria discussed during proposal stage:

• At least one patent/venture to be expected• Output / Results: Marketable new or improved solutions or processes• Transparency in KIC network (open to KIC and all the partners)• High visibility (e.g. large scale demonstration site)• Involvement of Industry• Linked to the innovation chain• Collaboration of ERI and in general through collaboration of at least 2 Partners of 2

different CC (geographically) or KIC level partner• Inclusion of PhD Students, Professors• Involve SME and aiming at resulting Business opportunities for SME• Public Acceptance• Duration 2-4 years

Criteria and selection of InnoEnergy projects

3. CriteriaIntroduction: 3 step approach

16

Step 1: Eligibility

Step 2: Selection (quality)

Step 2a: Additional criteria for ongoing projects

Step 3: Inclusion in Business Plan (final approval process)

Criteria and selection of InnoEnergy projects

3. CriteriaStep 1: Eligibility criteria (Must-haves)

17

Criterion Yes / No Comment1 Partners: Involvement of Education, Research and Industry

2 Partners: Minimum of 3 InnoEnergy partners (or Industry KIC level partner) from at least 2 CC

3 Transparency in KIC network

4 Duration 2-4 years

5 No basic research omit6 Aligned with SET plan and KIC strategy

7 Results within 1-3 years and easy to assess/with clear contribution to KPI:

At least one new product / service

or At least one new patent

or At least on spin-off / patent transferred to SME

And At least one scientific publication (after registration of patent)

Criteria and selection of InnoEnergy projects

3. CriteriaStep 2: Selection - Qualitative criteria

18

Criterion Weighting Score1 Technical criteria / Degree of innovation:

• Level of novelty• Alignment to InnoEnergy strategy• Level of technical risk

25% 10 Points

2 Market Criteria:• Time to market• Obtainment of results (timing)• Specific results detailed in exploitation plan:

− Potential to create start-ups or spin-offs− New products− New services− New patents− SME participation

35% 10 Points

3 Economic Viability• Total cost of the project• Requested % of EIT contribution• Value for money assessment• Level of financial risks

20% 10 Points

4 Internal Criteria:• Number of involved KIC InnoEnergy partners, CCs• High visibility / impact (e.g. large scale demonstration site)• Potential to integrate with Education programmes

20% 10 Points

Threshold 30 Points

Criteria and selection of InnoEnergy projects

Targets

• What: work packages-programmes• Who: Responsibles• When: Timeline – business plan• Target:

KIC InnoEnergy is the point of reference andis the global technology and system leader for solutions of smart grid and storage

4. Roadmap and guidance for Thematic Meetings (1/2)

20

Process: - Collection of ideas from all interested KIC partners Long list- Check eligibility criteria Short list - Discussion and prioritisation against selection criteria (moderated by responsible

CC)- Selection of suggested projects for BP 2010 and 2011/2012/2013- Iterative loop with Technology Development Unit and SB ???

For 2010Selection of ongoing project / upgrading to EIT / KIC projects:

1 large project per CC; 1-2 small projects per CC

For 2011/2012/2013 (TWP)Definition of new projects

For 2011: 1 new large project per CC, 1-2 new small project per CC*For 2012: 1 new large in 3 CCs, 1 new small project in 3 CCsFor 2013: 1 new large in 3 CCs, 1 new small project in 3 CCs

*optionally additional ongoing projects can be plannedCriteria and selection of InnoEnergy projects

4. Roadmap and guidance for Thematic Meetings (2/2)

21

State for each project:a) Responsible CC and all involved partners (also from other CC)b) Objectives, short work plan, start and duration, estimated costc) Results and contribution to KPI (per year)d) Suggested % of EIT fundinge) Other sources of funding (e.g. in kind of participating partners)f) Involved external partnersg) Any identifiable risks

Deadlines (to be confirmed):First Annual Grant Agreement: mid-June 2010Tri-Annual Work Programme: first draft mid-June 2010

Criteria and selection of InnoEnergy projects

3. CriteriaAdditional criteria for selection of on-going projects

22

For projects of partners or a group of partners which are ongoing, additional criteria have to be respected if they are supposed be receive “extra/add on” funding:

1. The part of project which shall be run within InnoEnergy should be easy to define without incurring in any complicated funding (e.g. double funding FP7 / EIT) or patent related issues

2. KIC external partners who are involved in the project must agree to • the possible labelling of the project as InnoEnergy project• the transparency rule within KIC InnoEnergy• the involvement of further InnoEnergy partners

Criteria and selection of InnoEnergy projects

5. General process for project selection and business planning Project selection process

23

Partner has an initial idea of the

project

He contacts the Thematic

Coordinator

Rejected project

Phase 1: Pre-Project

Longlist of projects Step 1: Eligibility

check

Shortlist of projects

Not eligible

Eligible

Step 2: Project

selection

Evaluation by Thematic Coordinator, Approval by CEO and directors

Invitation of possible

contributors

Meeting for pre-project design

For each

project

Analysis of real options: -Time to market-Risk -Value assessmentIPR Planning

rejected

Inclusion in Business Plan Kick-off Implementation

PMS and evaluation

Standardised template!

Further documentation

Positive

Negative

Criteria and selection of InnoEnergy projects

5. General process for project selection and business planningBusiness Planning Process

24

KIC level

KIC level (Executive Board)

CC level

CC level

Strategy development / programming

Idea

Design and CC coordination of

yearly BP

Alignment and adoption of CC and overall BP

Nomination project manager and information of other involved CC (at least 2)

Check with responsible development unit, risk assessment, involvement of CC / lead

/ funding

Execute

Execution of BP in coordi-nation with Development Units and

KIC level

Business Plan / Programming

„Project“inBP?

Go

No go

Governance &

R

esponsibility

Review, approval and oversight by Executive

and Steering Board

Subsidiarity&

Innovation

yes Detail objec-tives, delivera-bles,

resources

Con-firm

no Projectproposal

Change Requirements

Criteria and selection of InnoEnergy projects