Upload
danghuong
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors, L.P.
www.kaynecapital.com Confidential
KAYNE ANDERSON ENERGY FUNDS AUGUST 2017
2 Common Philosophy | Shared Resources | Niche Expertise
Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors, L.P.
Overview Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors
A Leading Alternative Investment Manager Since 1984
• Approximately $26 billion in assets under management
• Diversified investor base
• Over 300 employees (approximately 140 investment professionals)
• Substantial principal commitment; employee capital represents ~6% of firm assets
ATTACK NICHES • Identify underserved investment classes and unique opportunities where inefficiencies exist
• Field best-in-class teams to focus on market segments whose size or complexity serve as a barrier to entry
KNOWLEDGE AND SOURCING
ADVANTAGE
• Develop knowledge and sourcing advantages to mitigate and reduce risk
• Extensive network of deep relationships within industries alongside a strong reputation
FOCUS ON ENERGY
INVESTING
• $19 billion (over 75%) of firm assets invested in energy companies
• One of the largest MLP investors in the industry
• Large and seasoned, 60-person investment team dedicated to energy
• Energy investments throughout capital structure including debt, public equity and private equity
Differentiated Investment Philosophy
As of March 31, 2017.
3 Common Philosophy | Shared Resources | Niche Expertise
Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors, L.P.
Kayne Anderson Energy Funds Investment approach
Note: As of July 2017. % distributed represents total distributions / total contributed capital. The target IRR set forth herein is provided as an indicator as to how KAEF VIII will be managed and is not intended to be viewed as an indicator of likely performance returns to investors. The target return is based on estimates and assumptions that potential investments will yield a return equal to or greater than the General Partner’s return targets, however, there can be no assurance that KAEF VIII’s return objectives will be realized or that the General Partner will be successful in finding investment opportunities that meet these anticipated return parameters.
• Early stage middle-market investments in private North American oil and gas companies
• Engineering centric approach to capital allocation, value creation
• Growth equity model; 15-20 companies per fund
• High concentration of successful repeat management teams
• Value-added partner to management through knowledge integration and technology transfer
STRATEGY STRUCTURE
• Investment size of $50 to $300 million
• Returns from capital appreciation
• Targeted gross ROI of 2.0x+ and gross IRR of 25%+
• Typical holding period of three to five years
• Active investor (with majority control)
• Typically common equity investments through LLCs
Kayne Anderson
Capital Advisors, L.P.
Energy Fund I $112,500,000
Realized August 1998
Energy Fund V $820,000,000 Fully Invested
96% Distributed May 2009
Energy Fund II $240,000,000
Realized December 2002
Energy Fund VI $1,600,000,000
83% Invested 88% Distributed December 2012
Energy Fund III $550,000,000
Realized November 2004
Energy Fund VII $2,051,450,000
63% Invested 31% Distributed
September 2016
Energy Fund IV $950,000,000
Realized November 2006
Energy Fund VIII $2,000,000,000
Targeting Q4 2017 First Close
Kayne Anderson
Capital Advisors, L.P.
Kayne Anderson
Capital Advisors, L.P.
Kayne Anderson
Capital Advisors, L.P.
Kayne Anderson
Capital Advisors, L.P.
Kayne Anderson
Capital Advisors, L.P.
Kayne Anderson
Capital Advisors, L.P.
Kayne Anderson
Capital Advisors, L.P.
4 Common Philosophy | Shared Resources | Niche Expertise
Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors, L.P.
Kayne Anderson Energy Funds Capitalizing on engineering technology transfer
Ability to Quickly and Effectively Apply New Technology Across Basins is KAEF’s Main Competitive Advantages • Focus on early-stage assets in the middle market
• Utilize technical expertise to corroborate both current and historical learnings from over 100 resource plays
UNIQUE INSIGHTS PROVIDE COMPELLING OPPORTUNITIES
EXPLORATORY WELLS
ENHANCED COMPLETIONS
CORE EXPANSION FULL DEVELOPMENT
Limited success
Unknown type curve
Infancy Phase Delineation Proven Maturity Phase
Acreage Multiples
Information
Producing asset
Type curves are de-risked
Acquire assets for development
Wall Street fully values potential
Typical KAEF Investment
Typical KAEF Sale
Apply knowledge from analogous plays
Process initial results
Prove up type curve
Exploit efficiencies
Expand economic / geologic limits
Delineate key locations
Prove - Up Development
5 Common Philosophy | Shared Resources | Niche Expertise
Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors, L.P.
POWDER RIVER BASIN
BALIDOR
Kayne Anderson Energy Funds Transferring engineering technology across basins
SCOOP / STACK CASILLAS TRIUMPH
CORLENA III BEACON II CANYON II
LEARNINGS FROM 25+ CURRENT AND
80+ PRIOR PORTFOLIO COMPANIES
We see the industry and technology evolving in
“real time”
DELAWARE BASIN SILVER HILL I & II
PANTHER INVICTUS BEACON II
IN-HOUSE ENGINEERS WITH EXPERIENCE IN OVER 100 RESOURCE
PLAYS
KAYNE ANDERSON ENERGY FUNDS
INDUSTRY ACTIVITY
Constantly monitoring industry activity in
established and emerging plays
Significant knowledge and experience across
multiple basins to identify calling cards of
resource plays
WILLISTON BASIN KRAKEN I & II
Leveraged experience in the Midland Basin to
identify potential in the Delaware
KAEF continues to identify new areas
that can benefit from new technology
Recognized the impact of new technology to
underwrite transactions in STACK & SCOOP
6 Common Philosophy | Shared Resources | Niche Expertise
Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors, L.P.
Kayne Anderson Energy Funds Significant presence in core areas of the STACK & SCOOP plays
KEY STACK & SCOOP HIGHLIGHTS KAEF STACK / SCOOP MAP
KAEF VII portfolio companies have acquired nearly 100,000 net acres in the STACK and SCOOP to date
• The STACK/SCOOP play is now the second most actively developed play with 82 active rigs, behind only the Permian with 296 active rigs
• Characterized by multiple stacked-pay zones with attractive drilling economics at current commodity prices
• Significant potential upside through further optimized completions, down-spacing, extended laterals and additional prospective formations
• Large public operators continue to consolidate smaller operators to high-grade and grow inventory
• Canyon Midstream II recently announced plans to build a midstream system to provide capacity for the significant resource potential of the STACK
• Anchored by two KAEF portfolio company acreage dedications
STACK (55,000 NET ACRES)
BEACON II CORLENA OIL COMPANY III
TRIUMPH ENERGY
SCOOP (45,000 NET ACRES)
CASILLAS PETROLEUM
STACK MIDSTREAM SYSTEM
CANYON MIDSTREAM II
7 Common Philosophy | Shared Resources | Niche Expertise
Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors, L.P.
Kayne Anderson Energy Funds Expanding the core of the Williston Basin
WILLISTON BASIN MAP
WILLISTON BASIN (85,000+ NET ACRES)
KRAKEN OIL & GAS I & II
INVESTMENT THEMES
In September 2016, Kraken II acquired 80,000 net acres and 2,800 boe/d of net production for $222 million
• Negotiated middle-market acquisition from capital-constrained public company
• Knowledge and technology transfer through enhanced completions proven at Kraken I
• Expanding the core of a major basin
• Engineering data indicating well-measured downside and competitive economics
• Asset with appeal to broad buyer universe due to scale and attractive single well returns
• Unique engineering insights framed underwriting thesis
UNDERWRITING THESIS
- 5
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95
100 105
- 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600
EUR
bbl/
ft
Proppant lb/ft
Open Hole Completion
Cemented Liner Only
Leading-Edge Design
Gen 1 Completions
Gen 2 Completions Base Case
Gen 3 Completions Upside Case
OPPORTUNITY SET
Any projections, targets, or estimates used in this presentation are forward looking statements and are based on KAEF’s research, analysis, and assumptions. Due to rapidly changing market conditions and the complexity of investment decisions, supplemental information and other sources may be required to make informed investment decisions based on your individual investment objectives and suitability specifications. All expressions of opinions are subject to change without notice. Investors should seek financial advice regarding the appropriateness of an investment in the Fund.
9 Common Philosophy | Shared Resources | Niche Expertise
Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors, L.P.
Kayne Anderson Energy Funds Technology impact
Source: RS Energy Group.
The technical innovations experienced over the past two years will continue to expand the economic limits of today’s plays
MIDLAND BASIN (2011-2012) MIDLAND BASIN (2012-2013) MIDLAND BASIN (2014-2016)
• Initial development in the Midland Basin was focused in the southeastern portion of the basin in 2011 and 2012
• EURs averaged 70 boe/1,000 ft
• During 2012 and 2013, operators moved north into the heart of the Midland Basin
• EURs averaged >100 boe/1,000 ft
• From 2014 to 2016 the existing core of the Midland Basin was rapidly expanded by the use of laterals >7,500 ft and proppant >1,500 lbs/ft
• EURs averaged >150 boe/1,000 ft
Expanded Core
New Core
Original Core
0% 50% 100%
Change in EUR% (2014-2016)
10 Common Philosophy | Shared Resources | Niche Expertise
Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors, L.P.
$5.0 $5.5 $7.1
$4.9 $4.4 $2.9
$1.7
$7.8 $7.0 $5.3
$1.7 $1.6
$0.6 $0.5
$0.0
$2.0
$4.0
$6.0
$8.0
$10.0
$12.0
$14.0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
$B
Total Proved Capital Total Unproved Capital (Early Stage Assets)
Divested $2.5B of Assets
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CAPITAL BUDGET
Kayne Anderson Energy Funds Compelling market for early stage oil and gas assets
Large number of assets currently in market or expected to come to market in near-term
• Industry participants continue to sell assets to fund development capital budgets
• Over 100 assets across North American basins
• Does not include off-market transactions
Public company budgets remained focused on delineated assets with minimal capacity for early stage assets
• Limited competition for early stage assets
• Industry remains largely capital constrained
Permian Deals: 23
Mid-Continent: 20
Eagle Ford: 11
Rockies: 13 Appalachia: 15
ARK-LA-TEX: 6
Bakken: 8
ASSETS IN MARKET
Source: BMO Capital Markets, Chesapeake Energy public filings – Total Proved Capital represents proved property acquisitions and development costs. Total Unproved Capital represents unproved property acquisitions and exploratory costs.
Other Areas: 17
11 Common Philosophy | Shared Resources | Niche Expertise
Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors, L.P.
Kayne Anderson Energy Funds Compelling market for early stage oil and gas assets
Highest potential for value creation and equity returns
• Asymmetric risk/return through application of engineering technology transfer
• Measured approach limits capital exposure during prove-up phase
• Investments resilient to downward moves in commodities prices
Limited competition
• Industry is largely capital constrained
• Focus and capital investment limited to more delineated plays
• Industry participants continue to sell existing early stage assets rather than incubate new project areas
Vast opportunity set
• Oil field technical innovation has grown exponentially since the downturn creating new tools to develop assets
• Other factors beyond “rock quality” drove the concentration of investment
• Substantial high-quality resource exists beyond the “15 counties”
12 Common Philosophy | Shared Resources | Niche Expertise
Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors, L.P.
Kayne Anderson Energy Funds Early stage assets are resilient to commodity price movements
Early stage assets are resilient to movements in commodities prices • Production weighted investment outcomes often correlated to changes in commodity prices
REDUCTION IN SERVICE COSTS
REDUCTION IN SERVICE COSTS AND
IMPROVED EUR
2014 Single Well Economics ($50/bbl & $2.75/mmbtu)
2016 Single Well Economics ($50/bbl & $2.75/mmbtu)
2014 Single Well Economics ($85/bbl & $4.00/mmbtu)
Hz Wolfcamp A - Single Well Economics
EUR (mbo): 720
D&C Cost ($mm): $9.0
IRR: 76%
Hz Wolfcamp A - Single Well Economics
EUR (mbo): 720
D&C Cost ($mm): $6.5
IRR: 38%
Hz Wolfcamp A - Single Well Economics
EUR (mbo): 986
D&C Cost ($mm): $6.5
IRR: 65%
Throughout KAEF’s experience, resource plays continue to improve over time with operational efficiencies, optimizations and improved reserve recoveries
Note: Based on Silver Hill’s lower Wolfcamp A type curve estimates. Does not represent a guaranteed investment return to investors.
13 Common Philosophy | Shared Resources | Niche Expertise
Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors, L.P.
Kayne Anderson Energy Funds KAEF activity map
Source: RS Energy Group research. Note: * recent exit or under PSA.
Bakken Kraken I (EF V)
Kraken II (EF VII)
Powder River Balidor (EF VII)
SCOOP/STACK Beacon II (EF VII) Casillas (EF VI/VII) Corlena III (EF VII) Triumph (EF VII)
DJ *HRM II (EF VI)
East Texas Treadstone II (EF VI)
Canada Newton (EF IV/V)
Delaware Basin Beacon II (EF VII) Invictus (EF VII)
*Panther II (EF VI) *Silver Hill I (EF VI) *Silver Hill II (EF VII)
Other Permian Basin Adventure III (EF V) *KA Henry I (EF V) Monadnock (EF VII)
PAK (EF VI)
Diversified Canyon I (EF V/VI) Canyon II (EF VII) Haymaker (EF VI)
Haymaker II (EF VII) :Historical KAEF portfolio company activity
Midland Basin Adventure III (EF VII)
Amistad (EF VII) Grenadier II (EF VI) KA Henry II (EF VI)
PT Petroleum (EF VI) *RB Permian (EF VI) RB Permian II (EF VII)
APPENDIX CASE STUDIES
The following case studies have been included to illustrate the opportunity-rich environment within the onshore North American middle-market and the competitive strengths of the Kayne Anderson Energy Funds team. Any projected returns provided herein should not be considered as a guarantee of returns to limited partners.
15 Common Philosophy | Shared Resources | Niche Expertise
Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors, L.P.
KAEF Portfolio Update Case study: Silver Hill Energy Partners I (KAEF VI)
Leased ~25,000 net acres in Loving and
Winkler Counties, TX at ~$3,000/acre
Drilled 20 horizontal wells across multiple horizons (total of 47
producing wells including Silver Hill II, KAEF VII company)
Sold upstream assets to RSP
Permian for $2.4B
Initial Single Well Economics (2014)EUR (Mbo): 530D&C Costs ($MM): $9.0IRR 1 : 33%(1) Assumes $85/bbl and $4.00/MMbtu pricing.
Optimized Single Well Economics EUR (Mbo): 980D&C Costs ($MM): $7.0IRR 1 : 35%(1) Assumes strip pricing as of 2/5/16.
Premium valuation received in sales process reflects Silver Hill I’s contiguous, core acreage position with multiple prospective horizons within one of the most highly economic basins in North America
16 Common Philosophy | Shared Resources | Niche Expertise
Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors, L.P.
KAEF Portfolio Update Case study: Panther Energy Company II (KAEF VI)
Leased ~15,000 net acres in Reeves and Culberson Counties, TX for
~$3,000/acre before selling down a 49% non-op WI at a promoted price
Sold assets to WPX and a private
company for $863mm
Premium valuation achieved is a direct reflection of Panther II’s ability to identify, assemble and delineate a core Delaware Basin acreage position with highly economic drilling locations throughout multiple benches
Drilled 17 horizontal wells across multiple horizons and grew production to 7,500 boe/d. Grew position to ~18,000 net acres through bolt-on acquisitions
primarily in Reeves and Loving Counties
Initial Single Well Economics (2014)Reeves WCA EUR (Mboe): 533D&C Costs ($MM): $8.4IRR 1 : 31%(1) Assumes strip capped at $85/bbl flat pricing.
Optimized Single Well Economics (2016)Reeves WCA EUR (Mboe): 1,174D&C Costs ($MM): $6.5IRR 1 : 49%(1) Assumes strip pricing as of 4/28/16.
17 Common Philosophy | Shared Resources | Niche Expertise
Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors, L.P.
Disclosures and Legal Disclaimer
Investment in Kayne Anderson Energy Funds (together, the “Partnerships” or the “Funds”, and each individually, the “Partnership” or “Fund”) involves a high degree of risk. There can be no assurance that the Partnership’s investment objectives can be achieved, or that a Limited Partner will receive a return of capital. In addition, there may be occasions when the General Partner of the respective Partnership and its affiliates encounter potential conflicts of interest in connection with the Partnership. For a more detailed explanation of the risks of the Partnerships, please review the Partnership’s Confidential Private Placement Memorandum.
In addition to historical information, this presentation contains "forward-looking statements". The words "forecast", "estimate", "project", "intend", "expect", "should", "believe" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors, including those discussed in the Memorandum, which may cause the Fund’s actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. In addition, new risks and uncertainties may arise from time to time. Accordingly, all forward-looking statements should be evaluated with an understanding of their inherent uncertainty. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to publicly update or revise these forward-looking statements for any reason, or to update the reasons actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the future.
Certain economic and market information contained herein has been obtained from published sources prepared by third parties or KACALP and in certain cases has not been updated through the date hereof. While such sources are believed to be reliable, neither the Fund, nor its respective affiliates or employees assume any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of such information.
Information contained herein may include information respecting prior investment performance including gross and net returns. Information respecting prior performance, while a useful tool in evaluating an investment, is not necessarily indicative of actual results to be achieved for unrealized investments, the realization of which is dependent upon many factors, many of which are beyond the control of the Fund or KACALP.
No representation or warranty, express or implied, is given by or on behalf of the Fund, KACALP, or any of such persons' directors, officers or employees or any other person as to (a) the accuracy or completeness of the information or (b) the opinions contained in this document and no liability is accepted for any such information or opinions. Unless otherwise stated in this document, the information contained herein is based on the Fund's information and estimates. The information and opinions contained in this presentation are provided as of the date of this document and are subject to change without notice.
This confidential presentation (this “Presentation”) is qualified in its entirety by reference to the respective Memorandum and the Limited Partnership Agreement of each of the Funds, as may be amended and/or modified from time to time and the subscription agreement related thereto, copies of which will be made available upon request and should be reviewed before purchasing a limited partnership interest in the Funds. The purchase of interests in the Funds will be suitable only for sophisticated investors for whom an investment in the Fund does not constitute a complete investment program and who fully understand and are willing to assume the risks involved in the Funds’ investment program. Statements in this Presentation are made as of December 2016 unless stated otherwise, and neither the delivery of this Presentation at any time nor any sale of the limited partnership interests described herein shall under any circumstances create an implication that the information contained herein is correct as of any time after such date. This Presentation is not intended to be relied upon as the basis for an investment decision, and is not, and should not be assumed to be, complete. The contents herein are not to be construed as legal, business, or tax advice, and each prospective investor should consult its own attorney, business advisor, and tax advisor as to legal, business, and tax advice. In considering any performance information contained herein, prospective investors should bear in mind that past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results, and there can be no assurance that the Fund will achieve comparable results.
Any investment in the Funds is subject to various risks, some of which are outlined herein. A complete description of certain risks involved with an investment in the Funds can be found in the respective Memorandum; such risks should be carefully considered by prospective investors before they make any investment decision.
This Presentation does not constitute an offer or solicitation in any state or other jurisdiction to subscribe for or purchase any limited partnership interests described herein. KACALP and its affiliates reserve the right to modify any of the terms of the offering and the limited partnership interests described herein.
Recipients of this Presentation agree that KACALP, its affiliates and their respective partners, members, employees, officers, directors, agents, and representatives shall have no liability for any misstatement or omission of fact or any opinion expressed herein. The Presentation is not intended for any general distribution or publication and is strictly confidential. This Presentation and the information contained herein consists of confidential proprietary information and is the sole property of the Funds. Each recipient further agrees that it will (i) not copy, reproduce, or distribute this Presentation, in whole or in part, to any person or party (including any employee of the recipient other than an employee directly involved in evaluating an investment in the Fund) without the prior written consent of KACALP; and (ii) keep permanently confidential all information contained herein that is not already public.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. An investment in the Partnership could suffer loss.
8/10/2017
Tailwater Capital
2
• Middle-market private equity focused exclusively on the energy industry
• History of creating solutions oriented, value-added partnerships
• Well-established track record, having executed more than 65 transactions
representing $16.6 billion in value over the last 19 years
• Invest growth equity across the midstream and upstream sectors
• Currently manage over $2.1 billion across five distinct funds of capital
Growth Mindset, Partnership Oriented
Tailwater Capital EnerCom Oil and Gas Conference – August 2017
Midstream Strategy
3
Partnership Alignment
Vast Midstream Industry
Transaction Structure Creativity
• Most critical element of our strategy
• Focused on developing long-term, repeat partnerships
• Diversify through projects, not teams
• Recognize and trust team’s industry expertise
• Interest / experience across midstream industry
- Gathering
- Disposal
- Treating
- Compression
- Processing
- Transportation
- Storage
- Fractionation
• Interest / experience across transaction structures
- Anchored greenfield
- Acquisitions
- Joint ventures
• Flexible in terms of project size
• Differentiated upstream investing promotes midstream investing
Tailwater Capital EnerCom Oil and Gas Conference – August 2017
Midstream Strategy in Practice
4Tailwater Capital
• Gas gathering & processing
• East Texas, North Louisiana
• CEO: Fritz Brinkman
• Solids waste disposal
• Permian and Eagle Ford
• CEO: George Wommack
• Crude oil transportation
• South Texas• CEO: Phil
Mezey
• Spent lubes processing
• Baytown, TX• CEO: Jim Lelio
• Integrated Midstream
• Eagle Ford and Mississippi / Alabama
• CEO: Bruce Williamson
• Water gathering and disposal
• Bakken, Permian
• CEO: Patrick Walker
• Gas gathering & processing
• Permian• CEO: Jim Bryant
• Gas gathering & processing
• DJ Basin• CEO: Charlie
Beecherl
• Oil / gas gathering & gas processing
• Mid-Continent• CEO: Brandon
Webster
• Gas gathering, compression & treating
• Appalachia• CEO: Robert
Stiles
EnerCom Oil and Gas Conference – August 2017
Upstream Strategy
5
Proven Operators in the Core of Proven
BasinsBasins of Interest
Transaction Structure Creativity
• Emphasize operator expertise and track-record
• Delineated basins in the “core”
• Tailwater currently has positions in the following basins
- Anadarko
- Appalachian
- DJ
- Delaware
- Williston
• Interest/ experience across non-operated structures
- Primary leasing
- Acreage acquisitions
- Wellbore purchases
- Joint ventures
Tailwater Capital EnerCom Oil and Gas Conference – August 2017
Upstream Strategy in Practice
6Tailwater Capital
Tailwater UpstreamBasins of Interest
EnerCom Oil and Gas Conference – August 2017
Current Market Perspectives and Tailwater Approach
8Tailwater Capital
• High competition in certain basins across the United States (ex. Permian Basin)
• Reinvigorated transaction volume in certain basins, but large deals are expensive
• Ability to purchase non-core assets from poorly capitalized MLPs and upstream operators still
exists
• Opportunities outside of the Permian and SCOOP / STACK still exist
Current Market Perspectives
• Middle-market approach to midstream lessens competitive intensity
• Open to non-traditional midstream opportunities such as water, landfills, and downstream
adjacent projects
• Focus on a variety of basins by using both anchored greenfield and non-core acquisition
transaction structures
• Back new management teams and invest growth capital in established platforms or joint ventures
Tailwater Approach
EnerCom Oil and Gas Conference – August 2017
Contact Details
9
Jason DownieManaging Partner
Edward HerringManaging Partner
David CecerePrincipal
Billy DeArmanPrincipalUpstream
Joel FryPrincipal
2021 McKinney Ave | Suite 1250 |Dallas, TX 75201
Tailwater Capital EnerCom Oil and Gas Conference – August 2017
OFS Energy Fund Introduction
Formed the team in October 2008 to make investments in lower middle market energy service companies
OFS seeks to provide creative solutions for business owners in the form of buyouts, recapitalizations, and growth equity investments
First fund (“Fund I”) managed by the OFS principals at a predecessor entity named Dorado Energy Partners was closed in October 2008 with $46.5 million in total commitments
– 4.2x gross cash-on-cash and 200.0% gross IRR
Second fund (“Fund II”) was closed in September 2012 with $90.0 million in total commitments and had an add-on closing in November 2014 that raised total commitments to $130.0 million
– OFS principals and industry advisors personally committed $15.0 million
– To date, $96.6 million capital called relating to investments in eight platform companies
– Total capital called of $109.0 million
• Two exits, both completed in March 2014, represented returns of 4.1x gross cash-on-cash and 84.5% gross IRR
Third fund (“Fund III”) was closed in April 2014 with $175.0 million in total commitments
– To date, $85.7 million capital called related to investments in five portfolio companies
– Total capital called of $99.8 million
• One exit in August 2017, represented return of 3.6x gross cash-on-cash and the potential to increase to 4.6x with the earn-out
– Fund III targets investments of $15.0 million to $30.0 million in each portfolio company, but has the ability to invest larger amounts with co-investment from Fund III investors
Private and Confidential 2
EnerCom Presentation
Investment Focus
Investment strategy and objectives are as follows:
Generate returns in the form of capital appreciation via equity interests held in operating companies
Target 25 - 30%+ gross IRR for its portfolio of investments
Employ an opportunistic approach when evaluating and qualifying potential investments
Focus primarily on “control” positions in companies with enterprise values of $100 million or less
OFS seeks opportunities with the following characteristics:
Products or services across the energy industry
Strong market position
Meaningful value proposition evidenced by strong margins
Longstanding, loyal customer relationships
History of, or potential for, growth in revenue and profitability
Identified niche / underserved market strategy
Motivated management team with high integrity and equity participation
Identifiable exit strategy
Private and Confidential 3
Investment Parameters
Revenue $20.0 million – $100.0 million
Profitability $5.0 million – $20.0 million in EBITDA
Structure Buyout, recapitalization, growth equity (including minority positions)
Seniority Common stock or preferred equity
Ownership Private, control securities, board-level participation
Investment Horizon
2 – 7 years
EnerCom Presentation
OFS Investment Criteria
Energy Service and Midstream Focused
Upstream Services and Equipment (examples include)
– Aftermarket service and repair of “must-run” drilling, completion and production equipment
– Specialty manufacturing
– Downhole tool rental and repair
– Well service / production services
– Well testing / completion services
– Offshore services
– Corrosion control and specialty coatings
– Inspection and Testing NDE
– Drilling services
– Chemicals
Midstream opportunities
– Treating and processing equipment
– Gas gathering and field infrastructure services
– New well connections
– Right of way maintenance
– Compression-related equipment and aftermarket services
– Oilfield construction
– Chemicals
Downstream services
– Power and Plant related services and equipment
The Fund will not invest in pre-commercial technologies or make E&P investments
Early, Growth or Late Stage Event-Driven Opportunities
Buyouts and recapitalizations of seasoned companies with history of profitability
Equity investments in high-growth, less mature companies
Partnerships with proven management teams / executives to pursue “restart” opportunities
Business owners seeking liquidity for estate planning or wealth diversification
Generational transition for family-owned businesses
Partner / family buyout or recapitalization
Expansion opportunities with limited access to capital
Investing with the “Right” Partners
Emphasis placed on partnering with management teams and entrepreneurs with successful track records
Willing to consider minority position investments with the right partners
EnerCom Presentation
Private and Confidential 4
OFS Difference
Small Professionally-Managed Fund
One of few professionally-managed private equity funds focused exclusively on lower middle market energy service companies
Experienced and consistent team – investment professionals have worked together over the course of three funds since 2008
Ability to act quickly – small investment committee consisting of day-to-day investment professionals
Flexibility with regard to structuring transactions allows for opportunistic investing
History of developing strong working relationships with management teams as reflected by the fact that management from every realized investment has invested in subsequent funds
Significant Strategic Support
Principals have extensive financial and operational experience acquiring and growing energy service companies and a proven history of developing and implementing successful exit strategies
Investment team with its own industry relationships from previous funds, work experiences, and participation in numerous industry trade groups
Limited Partners include owners and executives of E&P and energy service companies as well as commercial banking executives who help provide support to portfolio company growth initiatives and deal referrals
Private and Confidential 5
EnerCom Presentation
OFS Market Position
Focus on transactions less than $100 million in Enterprise Value for the following reasons:
Increased market competition for transactions above $100 million
Traditional energy / oilfield service funds, now managing several hundred million to billions in equity, are focused on acquiring larger companies that are often competitively auctioned
Investment Banks primarily focused on advising larger clients with auction processes and not interested in smaller fees – limiting organized competition for smaller transactions
Large public strategic buyers searching for acquisitions that “move the needle”
Underserved market below $100 million with many appealing targets
Few professionally managed small energy service funds – competition is limited to small generalist funds and individual investors
Family offices may review investment opportunities in the $1 - $3 million range with traditional energy private equity firms reviewing opportunities greater than $20 million
Large funds and strategic buyers focus on consolidating large privately-owned companies
Recent and continuing public company consolidation will create additional new opportunities
Smaller companies are better suited for buy-and-build platforms
Commercial banks are hesitant to lend to small oil & gas services companies without equity sponsors
Principals provide unique capabilities to lower middle market investments
Operational experience growing and acquiring companies as well as extensive financial expertise
Pull through relationships to augment sales and sourcing / procurement opportunities
Maintain “bench” of oilfield professionals with focused knowledge and interested in new opportunities
Proven history of developing and implementing successful exit strategies
EnerCom Presentation
Private and Confidential 6
Market Dynamics
Growth in onshore activity driven by increased commodity prices and more efficient E&P operations
Oilfield service companies are starved for capital having survived 2015 and 2016
– Exhausted working capital levels
– Equipment fleets are in substantial state of deferred maintenance
No / very limited access to bank financing
Equity is the solution
Seller psychology shifting to more reasonable valuations and emphasis on “support for growth”
Capital markets activity – IPOs, 144A transactions, etc. based on forward EBITDA valuations for equity raises
Offshore energy service market is in fourth year of downcycle and has not hit bottom yet; may present interesting investment opportunities
Private and Confidential 7
EnerCom Presentation
Fund II Portfolio Summary – Active Investments
Private and Confidential 8
$ in millions EnerCom Presentation
Active InvestmentsOnshore /
OffshoreProducts/Services
Date of
Investment
Total
Investment
Fund
Ownership
2016 Rev.
2017(E) Rev.
Fund II
OnshoreManufacturer of production
equipment and meter runsSep-2012 $23.1 37%
$55.6
$87.1
OnshoreWorkover rigs, wireline,
chemical salesOct-2013 $21.3 65%
$13.5
$21.5
OffshoreHighly engineered handling
equipmentOct-2013 $2.5 50%
$0.3
$1.7
Onshore
Water transfer, water
recycling, water treatment,
and solids control
Oct-2013 $13.3 60%$23.6
$42.2
Onshore Production equipment rental Dec-2013 $11.3 75%$5.0
$9.3
Fund III Portfolio Summary – Active Investments
Private and Confidential 9
$ in millions EnerCom Presentation
Active InvestmentsOnshore /
OffshoreProducts/Services
Date of
Investment
Total
Investment
Fund
Ownership
2016 Rev.
2017(E) Rev.
Fund III
Onshore Coiled tubing services Aug-2014 $25.8 72%$66.5
$125.7
Onshore
Frac stack, wireline, surface
drilling, solids control, mixing
plant, torque and test
Sep-2014$34.5 (Fund)
$14.9 (Co-Inv)
1.7%
+ Profits
Interest
$42.1
$72.9
Onshore
Provides parts, repairs, and
services for industrial gas
turbines
Oct-2015 $10.9 80%$35.3
$43.4
Onshore Nitrogen services Mar-2017 $8.5 85%$0.5
$8.1
VanZandt Controls
Onshore Valve distribution and services May-2017 $6.0 69%$6.0
$12.8
Fund I Track Record
Private and Confidential 10
$ in millions
Fund I Investment Summary:
– Commenced operations in October 2008 with $46.5 million in Committed Capital
– Called a total of $16.7 million of which $13.8 was invested into 4 portfolio companies
– Fund I returned $47.3 million and was liquidated in August 2012 achieving a 4.2x cash-on-cash return and an IRR of 199%
Realized
Investments
Onshore /
OffshoreProducts/Services
Date of
Investment
Total
Investment
Fund
OwnershipDate of Exit Realized Value Multiple IRR
Fund II
OnshoreProvider of natural gas treating
equipmentAug-2009 $3.8 14% Sep-2010 $19.3 5.0x 263%
Offshore
Provider of riser repair and
inspection and industrial
coatings
Jul-2009 $8.0 100.0% Aug-2009 $26.3 3.3x 175.0%
Onshore Manufacture and rent IBCs May-2010 $0.3 6.0% Jan-2015 $11.1 36.1x 126.0%
Onshore
Develop gathering systems
and pipelines Jun-2010 $1.7 Mar-2011 $1.7 1.0x 2.0%
EnerCom Presentation
Past Deals: Lone Star Fasteners, LP
Company: Lone Star Fasteners, LP – fasteners and related parts to energy equipment OEMs
Investment Highlights:
– Bruce Ross and Beau Ross (with other shareholders) purchased operating subsidiaries of T3 Energy Services in February 2004 for $7.0 million; at the time Lone Star had approximately 300 employees
– Immediately reduced headcount by 50 people, selectively increased sale prices and expanded international supply chain
– Instituted lean manufacturing techniques and brought in new operating management
– For the years ended December 2003 and December 2005, respectively, Lone Star increased revenue from $20 million to $35 million and EBITDA from $1 million to $6 million
– Recapitalized in November 2005 with Trinity Hunt Partners – share value had increased over 20 times from 2004 to 2005
– After the recap, Lone Star acquired 5 operating companies and grew sales from $35 million to $140 million, and EBITDA from $7 million to $25 million during 2006 and 2007
EnerCom Presentation
$36,000,000(1)
recapitalized by
November 2005
Investment Summary
Investment $ 1.0 million Feb-04
Ownership 100%
Equity Value at Recap $ 28.0 million Nov-05
Gross IRR 571%
Cash-on-cash Return 28.0x
(1) – Includes sale price and working capital true-up
Private and Confidential 11