Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
KA R E N C O N R OY
RESULTS OF NYSTP :ELA AND MATH PROFICIENCY 2015
SUBURBAN COHORT
•Niskayuna Central School District
• Bethlehem Central School District
•Guilderland Central School District
•North Colonie Central School District
ELA PROFICIENCY 2015
3 4 5 6 7 80
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
V'villeG'landN.ColonieBethlehemNisky
MATH PROFICIENCY 2015
3 4 5 6 7 80
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
V'villeG'landN.ColonieBethlehemNisky
MOVING TO MASTERYA LOOK AT LEVEL 4
Grade 3-5 ELA Level 4 Comparison
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 50
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
NYSVCSDSub Cohort
Grades 6-8 ELA Level 4 Comparison
Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 80
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
NYSVCSDSub Cohort
Grades 3-5 Math Level 4 Comparison
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 50
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
NYSVCSDSub Cohort
Grades 6-8 Math Level 4 Comparison
Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 80
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
NYSVCSDSub Cohort
TREND DATA
• A look at how we have performed over the past 7 years
• How that trend data compares with the suburban cohort
• Since the test has evolved during the years, the trend data comparison will give us a clearer picture of student performance.
ELA GRADE 3
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-150
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
VCSDSub
ELA GRADE 4
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-150
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
VCSDSub
ELA GRADE 5
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-150
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
VCSDSub
ELA GRADE 6
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-150
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
VCSDSub
ELA GRADE 7
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-150
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
VCSDSub
ELA GRADE 8
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-150
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
VCSDSub
ELA TRENDS SUMMARY
• Grades 4, 5, 7, & 8 have recently increased performance and moved ahead of the suburban cohort• For each of those grades, 10 points or higher
• Grades 3 & 6 both showed a decline• Gr 6 – 1 year • Gr 3 - 2 year decline
MATH GRADE 3
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-150
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
VCSDSub
MATH GRADE 4
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-150
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
VCSDSub
MATH GRADE 5
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-150
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
VCSDSub
MATH GRADE 6
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-150
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
VCSDSub
MATH GRADE 7
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-150
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
VCSDSub
MATH GRADE 8
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-150
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
VCSDSub
MATH TRENDS SUMMARY
• With the exception of 1 grade level, all have improved proficiency since the onset of the CC exams
• With the exception of one grade level, all are out performing the average of the suburban cohort
• Grades 4, 5, 6 are 5 points or higher
THANK YOUK A R E N C O N R OY
D I R E C T O R O F C U R R I C U LU M
ELA CC COHORTS
2013 2014 20150
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Cohort 3rdCohort 4thCohort 5thCohort 6th
MATH CC COHORTS
2013 2014 20150
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Cohort 3rdCohort 4thCohort 5th
