8
July 2009 Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, Ralink Slide 1 Supporting Document for TGac Evaluation Methodology Authors : N am e A ffiliations A ddress Phone em ail M inho C heong ETRI 138 G ajeongno, Y useong-gu, D aejeon, 305-700, K orea +82-42-860- 5635 minho@ etri.re.kr PeterLoc Ralink Technology 20833 StevensCreek Blvd, Suite 200., Cupertino CA 95014 408 807-0868 [email protected] doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0838r0 Submission

July 2009 Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, RalinkSlide 1 Supporting Document for TGac Evaluation Methodology Authors: doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0838r0 Submission

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: July 2009 Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, RalinkSlide 1 Supporting Document for TGac Evaluation Methodology Authors: doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0838r0 Submission

July 2009

Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, RalinkSlide 1

Supporting Document for TGac Evaluation Methodology

Authors: Name Affiliations Address Phone email Minho Cheong ETRI 138 Gajeongno, Yuseong-gu,

Daejeon, 305-700, Korea +82-42-860-5635

[email protected]

Peter Loc Ralink Technology

20833 Stevens Creek Blvd, Suite 200., Cupertino CA 95014

408 807-0868 [email protected]

doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0838r0

Submission

Page 2: July 2009 Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, RalinkSlide 1 Supporting Document for TGac Evaluation Methodology Authors: doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0838r0 Submission

Scenario 3 in TGac Evaluation Methodology

• In-home entertainment application with multiple flows with varied QoS requirements including lightly-compressed video.

• This scenario is derived from scenario #1 defined in 802.11n usage model document and modified in order to consider usage model 2a and 2b (PVR’s in residential) defined in ‘11-09-0161-02-00ac-802.11ac-usage-model-document’.

Slide 2

July 2009

Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, Ralink

doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0838r0

Submission

Page 3: July 2009 Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, RalinkSlide 1 Supporting Document for TGac Evaluation Methodology Authors: doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0838r0 Submission

Logical Link in Scenario 3 (detail)(solid and dashed line means heavy and light traffic, respectively)

Slide 3

STA2

STA3

STA4

STA1

STA7

STA8

STA9

STA11 STA10

STA6 STA5

AP

LC video

VoDcontrol.

Blu-ray

MPEG2

Blu-rayMP3

Internet

control

controlMPEG2control

Blu-ray

control

Blu-ray

control

control

MPEG2video

console

consolecontrol

localfile transfer

video phone

video phone

July 2009

Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, Ralink

doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0838r0

STA12 STA13

STA14

VoIP

VoIP

VoIP

Submission

Page 4: July 2009 Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, RalinkSlide 1 Supporting Document for TGac Evaluation Methodology Authors: doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0838r0 Submission

Logical Link in Scenario 3 (conceptual)

Slide 4

STA2

STA3

STA4

STA1

STA7

STA8

STA9

STA11 STA10

STA6 STA5

AP

LC-video from AP

PVR to display via AP- PVR with blu-ray quality- PVR with MPEG2 quality

Merged entertainment - Internet-streaming video - MP3 audio,video gaming - control to console

Video-phone services

VoIP services Others - STA-to-STA file transfer

already defined in 11n scenario 1

July 2009

Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, Ralink

doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0838r0

STA12

STA13

STA14

Submission

Page 5: July 2009 Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, RalinkSlide 1 Supporting Document for TGac Evaluation Methodology Authors: doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0838r0 Submission

Service Description in Scenario 3

• STA1: Lightly-compressed video from AP• STA2: Display with HD MPEG2 quality, VoD control channel• STA3: Display with Blu-ray quality, VoD control channel• STA4: Display with Blu-ray quality, VoD control channel, Internet/local File

transfer• STA5: Video Phone• STA6: Video Phone• STA7: PVR with HD MPEG2 quality• STA8: PVR with Blu-ray quality• STA9: PVR with Blu-ray quality• STA10: Internet streaming video, MP3 Audio, Video gaming, console to internet,

local file transfer• STA11: Video gaming, controller to console• STA12: VoIP phone• STA13: VoIP phone• STA14: VoIP phone

Slide 5

July 2009

Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, Ralink

doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0838r0

Submission

Page 6: July 2009 Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, RalinkSlide 1 Supporting Document for TGac Evaluation Methodology Authors: doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0838r0 Submission

About Devices with 1-2 Antennas

• There is a proliferation of video/data traffic from small-form factor devices with 1-2 antennas. e.g., netbooks, smart-phones, camcorders, video-cams.

• There is need to ensure that 11ac standards proposals scales network throughputs in the presence of such devices.

• So, need to incorporate 1-2 antenna devices in simulation scenarios, to evaluate technology proposals.– In scenario 3, STA7, STA8 and STA9 may be PVR devices

(such as handheld camcorders with 1-2 antennas).– In scenario 4, some devices involved in local file transfers may

be netbooks or smartphones with 1-2 antennas. (e.g. STA11, STA12, STA 21, STA22)

July 2009

Submission

doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0838r0

Slide 6 Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, Ralink

Page 7: July 2009 Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, RalinkSlide 1 Supporting Document for TGac Evaluation Methodology Authors: doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0838r0 Submission

Appendix - Usage Model 2a: Lightly Compressed Video Streaming throughout the home

Traffic Conditions: Occasional interference from other homes because WLAN is on other channels. Data transfers consuming up to 20% of the total bandwidth, 2 additional video streams, and wireless display/controllers from a video game machine may be occurring during this use case. Microwave may be running for up to 5 minutes.

Use Case:1.User looks up a program on electronic program guide.2.User selects a video. 3.Lightly Compressed Video is delivered/uploaded over the wireless network for a period of two hours. 4.User may pause video during 2 hour period then resume watching.5.Task is complete when user stops watching the video.

Pre-Conditions: User has operational WLAN network which includes a TV with wireless capabilities, a PVR with wireless capabilities, and an AP associated with the WLAN that is not in the same room as the game machine and TV.

Application: User can display the output of the PVR wirelessly on the TV using a video codec like Motion 2000 JPEG that lightly compresses video.

Environment: Two story, three bedroom house with an AP in one corner in the den. Other homes in the area are also operating WLANs. Transmissions are mostly Non-LOS. Distance between far corners of the home are ~100 feet with as many as 8 walls (and one floor) between the video end points.

Slide 7

July 2009

Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, Ralink

doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0838r0

Submission

Page 8: July 2009 Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, RalinkSlide 1 Supporting Document for TGac Evaluation Methodology Authors: doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0838r0 Submission

Appendix - Usage Model 2b: Compressed video streaming in a room or throughout a home

Traffic Conditions: Severe interference from multiple streams in the house and other homes because WLAN is on other channels. High speed data transfers consuming up to 20% of the total bandwidth, many additional video streams, and wireless display/controllers from a video game machine may be occurring during this use case. Microwave may be running for up to 5 minutes.

Use Case:1.User looks up a program on electronic program guide.2.User selects a video. 3.Compressed Video is delivered/uploaded over the wireless network for a period of two hours. 4.User may pause video during 2 hour period then resume watching.5.Task is complete when user stops watching the video.

Pre-Conditions: User has operational WLAN network which includes a TV with wireless capabilities, a PVR with wireless capabilities, and an AP associated with the WLAN that is not in the same room as the game machine and TV.

Application: User can display the output of the PVR wirelessly on the TV using high definition compressed video with a codec like BluRay . Expect three or four simultaneous HD streams.

Environment: Two story, three bedroom house with an AP in one corner in the den. Other homes in the area are also operating WLANs. Transmissions are mostly Non-LOS. Distance between far corners of the home are ~100 feet with as many as 8 walls (and one floor) between the video end points.

Slide 8

July 2009

Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, Ralink

doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0838r0

SubmissionSubmission