99
Lower Dead River, Watershed Mgmt. Plan 2003 LOWER DEAD RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN July 2003 Lower Dead River Watershed Council: Maura Davenport Watershed Property Owner Kathy Peters Watershed Property Owner Lew Peters Watershed Property Owner Claire Twohey WeEnergies Jim Compton Marquette Hydrology Engineer Kurt Simandl Professional Engineer Sarah Cody Lower Dead River Watershed Council Pat Moyle Negaunee Township Kirk Page Marquette Township Dan Martell Trout Unlimited Mike Farrell Marquette County Drain Commissioner Lindsey Villa Department of Environmental Quality Technical Support Staff: Laurie Dhondt Marquette County Conservation District Carl Lindquist Central Lake Superior Watershed Partnership Mike LaPointe Natural Resources Conservation Service Christine Bonde Natural Resources Conservation Service Bob Sweet Department of Environmental Quality In Cooperation with the Marquette County Conservation District and Central Lake Superior Watershed Partnership

July 2003 LOWER DEAD RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLANsuperiorwatersheds.org/admin/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/past... · Watershed Mgmt. Plan 2003 LOWER DEAD RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT

  • Upload
    dothu

  • View
    215

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

LOW

ER

DE

AD

RIV

ER

WA

TER

SHE

D M

AN

AG

EM

EN

T P

LAN

July

200

3

Low

er

Dead

Riv

er

Wate

rsh

ed

Co

un

cil:

Mau

ra D

aven

port

Wat

ersh

ed P

rope

rty

Ow

ner

Kat

hy P

eter

sW

ater

shed

Pro

pert

y O

wne

rLe

w P

eter

sW

ater

shed

Pro

pert

y O

wne

rC

laire

Tw

ohey

WeE

nerg

ies

Jim C

ompt

onM

arqu

ette

Hyd

rolo

gy E

ngin

eer

Kur

t Si

man

dlPr

ofes

sion

al E

ngin

eer

Sara

h C

ody

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r W

ater

shed

Cou

ncil

Pat

Moy

leN

egau

nee

Tow

nshi

pK

irk P

age

Mar

quet

te T

owns

hip

Dan

Mar

tell

Trou

t U

nlim

ited

Mik

e Fa

rrel

lM

arqu

ette

Cou

nty

Dra

in C

omm

issi

oner

Lind

sey

Vill

aD

epar

tmen

t of

Env

ironm

enta

l Qua

lity

Tech

nic

al

Su

pp

ort

Sta

ff:

Laur

ie D

hond

tM

arqu

ette

Cou

nty

Con

serv

atio

n D

istr

ict

Car

l Lin

dqui

stC

entr

al L

ake

Supe

rior

Wat

ersh

ed P

artn

ersh

ipM

ike

LaPo

inte

Nat

ural

Res

ourc

es C

onse

rvat

ion

Serv

ice

Chr

istin

e Bo

nde

Nat

ural

Res

ourc

es C

onse

rvat

ion

Serv

ice

Bob

Swee

tD

epar

tmen

t of

Env

ironm

enta

l Qua

lity

In C

oo

per

atio

n w

ith

th

eM

arq

uet

te C

ou

nty

Co

nse

rvat

ion

Dis

tric

t an

dC

entr

al L

ake

Sup

erio

r W

ater

shed

Par

tner

ship

TAB

LE O

F C

ON

TEN

TS

Ch

apte

r O

ne

INTR

OD

UC

TIO

N 1

Goa

ls 1

Stak

ehol

ders

1

Ch

apte

r Tw

oA

NA

LYSIS

OF

THE N

ATU

RA

L EN

VIR

ON

MEN

T

3H

ydro

logy

5M

acro

inve

rteb

rate

Stu

dies

11To

pogr

aphy

13Ve

geta

tion

15Su

rfac

e G

eolo

gy17

Ch

apte

r Th

ree

AN

ALY

SIS

OF

THE B

UIL

T EN

VIR

ON

MEN

T19

Des

igna

ted

Use

s19

Exis

ting

Land

Use

23Fu

ture

Gro

wth

Are

as25

Ch

apte

r Fo

ur

AR

EA

S O

F C

ON

CER

NS

27

Alte

red

Hyd

rolo

gy29

Tran

spor

tatio

n Is

sues

31Im

pact

s of

Dev

elop

men

t33

Recr

eatio

nal

Act

iviti

es41

Ch

apte

r Fi

veM

AN

AG

EM

EN

T STR

ATE

GIE

S,

REC

OM

MEN

DA

TIO

NS &

WA

TER

SH

ED

PR

OTE

CTI

ON

GO

ALS

43

Stre

am M

onito

ring

43Ri

paria

n Bu

ffer

s45

Stor

mw

ater

Man

agem

ent

47Pu

blic

Par

ticip

atio

n &

Edu

catio

n51

Plan

ning

Str

ateg

ies

55

Ch

apte

r Si

xIM

PLE

ME

NTA

TIO

N5

9Th

e Pl

anni

ng P

roce

ss59

Prio

ritiz

ing

Are

as o

f C

once

rn61

Iden

tifyi

ng D

esire

d U

ses

61Id

entif

ying

Wat

ersh

ed E

nhan

cem

ent

Proj

ects

63Ev

alua

tion

Proc

ess

63

Ch

apte

r Se

ven

FLO

OD

UPD

ATE

- I

MPA

CTS

& O

PPO

RTU

NIT

IES

65

Ch

apte

r Ei

gh

tFU

ND

ING

SO

UR

CES

67

RE

FER

EN

CE

S7

3

APPEN

DIC

ES

App

endi

x A

- G

loss

ary

77A

ppen

dix

B -

Bric

kyar

d H

ydro

logi

c St

udy

79A

ppen

dix

C -

Rip

aria

n Bu

ffer

s O

rdin

ance

87

MA

PS

Map

1:

Reg

iona

l Con

text

2M

ap 2

: W

ater

shed

Hyd

rolo

gy 4

Map

3:

Dea

d Ri

ver

Bypa

ss 6

Map

4:

Sam

plin

g St

atio

ns10

Map

5:

Top

ogra

phy

12M

ap 6

: E

xist

ing

Vege

tatio

n14

Map

7:

Surf

ace

Geo

logy

16M

ap 8

: Ex

istin

g La

nd U

se22

Map

9:

Futu

re D

evel

opm

ent

Are

as24

Map

10:

A

reas

of

Stre

am D

egra

datio

n26

Map

11:

St

ream

Cro

ssin

gs30

FIG

UR

ES

Figu

re 2

.1:

Veg

etat

ed B

uffe

rs P

rote

ct S

teep

Slo

pes

13Fi

gure

4.1

: Im

pact

s of

Impe

rvio

us S

urfa

ces

33Fi

gure

4.2

: D

epic

tion

of S

torm

wat

er “

Flas

h”34

Figu

re 4

.3:

Hig

h Le

vel o

f C

onta

min

atio

n in

“Fi

rst

Flus

h”34

Figu

re 5

.1:

Tw

o-zo

ne R

ipar

ian

Buff

er44

Figu

re 5

.2:

Bio

rete

ntio

n Sy

stem

46Fi

gure

5.3

: E

xam

ple

of C

onse

rvat

ion

Subd

ivis

ion

Plan

ning

56

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

TAB

LES

Tabl

e 2.

1:

Des

crip

tion

of D

ead

Rive

r Tr

ibut

arie

s 5

Tabl

e 2.

2:

Hab

itat

Ratin

g 5

Tabl

e 2.

3:

Resu

lts o

f M

acro

inve

rteb

rate

Sam

plin

g11

Tabl

e 2.

4:

Exis

ting

Land

Use

15Ta

ble

2.5:

Ex

istin

g Ve

geta

tion

15Ta

ble

3.1:

Th

reat

ened

Use

s in

the

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r w

ater

shed

20Ta

ble

3.2:

Ex

istin

g La

nd U

se23

Tabl

e 3.

3:

Brea

kdow

n of

Urb

an L

and

Use

s23

Tabl

e 4.

1:

Prin

cipa

l Con

tam

inan

ts in

Sto

rmw

ater

35Ta

ble

5.1:

G

uide

lines

for

Tw

o-zo

ne B

uffe

r44

Tabl

e 5.

2:

Exce

ptio

ns t

o Bu

ffer

Wid

th44

Tabl

e 5.

3:

Publ

ic P

artic

ipat

ion

and

Educ

atio

n St

rate

gies

50Ta

ble

5.4:

Inf

orm

atio

n / E

duca

tion

Stra

tegi

es52

Tabl

e 5.

5 C

ompo

nent

s of

a W

ater

shed

Ove

rlay

Ord

inan

ce54

Tabl

e 6.

1: B

est

Man

agem

ent

Prac

tice

Stra

tegy

and

Sch

edul

e58

Tabl

e 6.

2: S

umm

ary

of W

ater

shed

Enh

ance

men

t Pr

ojec

ts60

Tabl

e 6.

3: P

roje

ct P

artn

er /

Tech

nica

l Ass

ista

nce

Stra

tegy

62Ta

ble

6.4:

Exp

endi

ture

s by

Prio

rity

63Ta

ble

6.5

Exp

endi

ture

s by

Pha

sing

Sch

edul

e63

Tabl

e 7.

1: A

sses

smen

t of

Are

as Im

pact

ed b

y D

ead

Rive

r Fl

ood

64

1111 1

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

The

prim

ary

goal

of

the

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r W

ater

shed

Man

agem

ent

Plan

is t

o de

velo

p a

stra

tegy

for t

he p

rote

ctio

n an

d en

hanc

emen

t of n

atur

al re

sour

ces

with

in th

e Lo

wer

Dea

d Ri

ver w

ater

shed

.Th

is m

anag

emen

t pla

n is

des

igne

d to

pro

vide

long

-ter

m w

ater

qua

lity

and

aqua

tic h

abita

t ben

efits

to t

he D

ead

Rive

r, its

trib

utar

ies,

and

Lak

e Su

perio

r. In

add

ition

to

the

envi

ronm

enta

l ben

efits

asso

ciat

ed w

ith p

rope

r wat

ersh

ed m

anag

emen

t, th

is a

ppro

ach

can

help

to s

hape

the

deve

lop-

men

t pa

tter

ns o

f an

are

a to

ens

ure

they

are

sus

tain

able

. Su

ch c

aref

ul d

evel

opm

ent

prac

tices

can

resu

lt in

not

onl

y th

e pr

otec

tion

of th

e en

viro

nmen

t, b

ut th

e qu

ality

of l

ife fo

r the

resi

dent

s of

the

wat

ersh

ed a

s w

ell.

Go

als

of

the L

ow

er

Dead

Riv

er

Man

ag

em

en

t Pla

n:

•Id

entif

y ar

eas

of s

edim

enta

tion,

ero

sion

, an

d st

orm

wat

er r

unof

f co

ntrib

utin

gto

the

dec

line

of w

ater

qua

lity

and

aqua

tic h

abita

t in

the

Low

er D

ead

Rive

rw

ater

shed

•C

reat

e st

ream

mon

itorin

g pr

ogra

ms,

impr

ove

rip

aria

n z

onin

g or

dina

nces

, an

dde

velo

p be

tter

sto

rmw

ater

man

agem

ent

tech

niqu

es t

hat

will

hel

p to

pro

tect

the

wat

er q

ualit

y an

d aq

uatic

hab

itat

in t

he L

ower

Dea

d Ri

ver

wat

ersh

ed•

Iden

tify

open

spa

ce p

lann

ing

and

low

impa

ct d

evel

opm

ent

prac

tices

in o

rder

to

prot

ect

ecol

ogic

al r

esou

rces

whi

le s

till s

uppo

rtin

g ec

onom

ic a

nd s

ocia

l gro

wth

with

in t

he c

omm

unity

•C

reat

e a

wat

ersh

ed m

anag

emen

t pl

an t

hat

assi

sts

in t

he r

ealiz

atio

n of

the

vis

ion

for

Lake

Sup

erio

r as

def

ined

by

the

Lake

Sup

erio

r Bi

natio

nal F

orum

This

man

agem

ent

plan

incl

udes

an

inve

ntor

y an

d an

alys

is o

f bo

th t

he n

atur

al a

nd b

uilt

feat

ures

of t

he w

ater

shed

. It

also

incl

udes

a d

iscu

ssio

n of

spe

cific

are

as o

f co

ncer

n an

d th

eir

effe

cts

onth

e he

alth

of

the

wat

ersh

ed.

From

the

inve

ntor

y co

nduc

ted

on t

he n

atur

al f

eatu

res,

the

wat

ersh

ed c

ounc

il pr

iorit

ized

the

se a

reas

bas

ed o

n hu

man

dis

turb

ance

s (a

ltere

d hy

drol

ogy,

tran

spor

tatio

n is

sues

, in

crea

sed

deve

lopm

ent,

and

rec

reat

iona

l act

iviti

es).

Fin

ally

, a

serie

s of

man

agem

ent

stra

tegi

es a

nd r

ecom

men

datio

ns a

re p

rese

nted

. T

hese

str

ateg

ies

are

desi

gned

to

allo

w lo

cal c

omm

uniti

es t

o co

ntin

ue t

heir

grow

th w

ithou

t co

mpr

omis

ing

the

envi

ronm

enta

lqu

ality

and

des

igna

ted

uses

of

the

wat

ersh

ed.

Sta

ke

ho

lde

rs:

•Ri

paria

n la

ndow

ners

•Lo

cal r

esid

ents

•M

arqu

ette

Tow

nshi

p•

Neg

aune

e To

wns

hip

•C

ity o

f M

arqu

ette

•M

arqu

ette

Cou

nty

Con

serv

atio

n D

istr

ict

•C

entr

al L

ake

Supe

rior

Wat

ersh

ed P

artn

ersh

ip•

Nor

ther

n M

ichi

gan

Uni

vers

ity

INTR

OD

UC

TIO

NC

hapt

er O

ne -

Intr

oduc

tion

•Pl

anni

ng C

omm

issi

oner

•M

arqu

ette

Cou

nty

Road

Com

mis

sion

er•

Mar

quet

te C

ount

y D

rain

Com

mis

sion

er•

Non

-pro

fit O

rgan

izat

ions

•M

ichi

gan

DEQ

•M

ichi

gan

DN

R•

Indu

stria

l and

Com

mer

ical

Dev

elop

ers

Up

per

Har

bo

r at

du

sk

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er

Ch

apte

r O

ne

2222 2

H a

r l

o w

C

r e

e k

W

a t

e r

s h

e d

C o

m p

e a

u

C r

e e

k

W

a t

e r

s h

e d

W h

e t

s t

o n

e

B r

o o

k

/

O r

i a

n n

a

C r

e e

k

W a

t e

r s

h e

d

C a

r p

R

i v

e r

W

a t

e r

s h

e d

D e

a d

R

i v

e r

W

a t

e r

s h

e d

L o

w e

r

D e

a d

R

i v

e r

W a

t e

r s

h e

dC

i t

y o

f

M a

r q

u e

t t

e

M a

r q

u e

t t

e

T w

p .

N e

g a

u n

e e

T

w p

.

N e

g a

u n

e e

IÀ?ì

IÀ?ì

IÀ?ì

%g550 %g492

%g492

?ó%g480

L a

k e

S u

p e

r i

o r 1

01

2M

iles

LOW

ER

DEA

D R

IVER

WA

TE

RSH

ED M

AN

AG

EM

ENT

PLA

N

Reg

ion

al C

on

text

3333 3

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

Cha

pter

Tw

o -

Nat

ural

Env

ironm

ent

The

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r W

ater

shed

cov

ers

a 22

squ

are

mile

are

a (1

4,08

0 ac

res)

with

in t

he L

ake

Supe

rior

Basi

n. T

he w

ater

shed

incl

udes

the

mai

n st

em o

f th

e D

ead

Rive

r as

wel

l as

seve

ral

trib

utar

ies,

a s

torm

dra

inag

e ou

tlet,

and

the

mou

th o

f the

rive

r, w

hich

em

ptie

s in

to L

ake

Supe

rior.

Alth

ough

the

entir

e D

ead

Rive

r Wat

ersh

ed fr

om h

eadw

ater

s to

mou

th c

over

s a

164

squa

re m

ilear

ea, t

he m

ost h

eavi

ly im

pact

ed re

gion

is fo

und

with

in th

e bo

unda

ries

of th

e Lo

wer

Dea

d Ri

ver

sub-

wat

ersh

ed.

This

sub

-wat

ersh

ed is

loca

ted

with

in th

e m

unic

ipal

ities

of N

egau

nee

Tow

nshi

p,M

arqu

ette

Tow

nshi

p, a

nd t

he C

ity o

f M

arqu

ette

. A

map

of

the

regi

onal

con

text

for

the

Low

erD

ead

Rive

r w

ater

shed

is s

how

n on

the

fac

ing

page

.

AN

ALY

SIS

OF

THE

NA

TUR

AL

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

AN

ALY

SIS

OF

THE

NA

TUR

AL

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

AN

ALY

SIS

OF

THE

NA

TUR

AL

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

AN

ALY

SIS

OF

THE

NA

TUR

AL

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

AN

ALY

SIS

OF

THE

NA

TUR

AL

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

Ch

apte

r Tw

o

4444 4

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er W

ater

shed

Road

way

Railr

oad

Pere

nnia

l Str

eam

Inte

rmitt

ent S

trea

m

Wet

lan

dsLa

ke, P

ond

Tour

ist P

ark

Dam

McC

lure

Dam

Fore

stvi

lle D

am# # #

LOW

ER

DE

AD

RIV

ER W

ATE

RSH

ED

MA

NA

GEM

ENT

PLA

N

Wat

ersh

ed H

ydro

logy

0.5

00.

51

Mile

s

%g550

%g492

?ìIÀ

Reany

Cre

e k

Hol

yoke

Cre

ek

Mid

way

Cre

ek

Dea

d River

Bric

ky a

rd C

reek

Badg

er C

reek

Wolner Creek#

Fore

stvi

lle B

asin

#

##

#

McC

lure

Bas

in

#

Dea

d R

iver

Bas

in

#

Tour

ist P

ark

Bas

in

Raney Creek

Back

yard

Cree

k

5555 5

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

HY

DR

OLO

GY

Eigh

t m

ain

trib

utar

ies,

alo

ng w

ith s

ever

al s

mal

ler,

unna

med

str

eam

s fe

ed in

to t

he m

ain

stem

of

the

Dea

d Ri

ver.

The

Wat

ersh

ed H

ydro

logy

map

(see

fac

ing

page

) sho

ws

the

loca

tion

of e

ach

ofth

ese

trib

utar

ies,

whi

le a

gen

eral

des

crip

tion

of e

ach

trib

utar

y is

giv

en in

Tab

le 2

.1.

As

the

Dea

dRi

ver

mak

es it

s w

ay t

owar

ds it

s fin

al o

utle

t in

to L

ake

Supe

rior,

it is

impo

unde

d th

ree

times

:M

cClu

re D

am, l

ocat

ed ju

st d

owns

trea

m o

f th

e M

cClu

re S

tora

ge B

asin

, For

estv

ille

Dam

, loc

ated

at

the

Fore

stvi

lle S

tora

ge B

asin

, and

Tou

rist

Park

Dam

, loc

ated

at

the

Tour

ist

Park

Sto

rage

Bas

in.

Inad

ditio

n to

the

se m

an-m

ade

impo

undm

ents

, st

ream

s ar

e af

fect

ed b

y va

rious

bea

ver

dam

s or

othe

r de

bris

tha

t in

terr

upt

the

natu

ral f

low

reg

ime.

In g

ener

al,

the

trib

utar

ies

loca

ted

with

in t

he L

ower

Dea

d Ri

ver

wat

ersh

ed a

re r

elat

ivel

y hi

ghqu

ality

. In

an

anal

ysis

of

coas

tal t

ribut

arie

s co

nduc

ted

in J

uly

of 2

001

by t

he M

DEQ

(God

by20

02),

five

of th

e m

ain

trib

utar

ies

in th

e w

ater

shed

wer

e gi

ven

a ha

bita

t rat

ing

of fa

ir or

goo

d(S

ee T

able

2.2

). T

he a

naly

sis

also

sho

wed

eac

h w

ere

mee

ting

the

requ

irem

ents

out

lined

in t

heM

ichi

gan

Wat

er Q

ualit

y St

anda

rds

(God

by 2

002)

.

Ther

e ar

e tw

o m

ajor

wat

er b

odie

s w

ithin

the

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r w

ater

shed

: For

estv

ille

Basi

n an

dth

e To

uris

t Pa

rk B

asin

. In

add

ition

to

thes

e la

rge

impo

undm

ents

, the

re a

re s

ever

al s

mal

ler

pond

san

d la

kes

scat

tere

d th

roug

hout

the

wat

ersh

ed in

clud

ing

Bish

op P

ond,

Lon

g La

ke, a

nd th

e Th

ree

Lake

s. I

n to

tal,

295

acre

s (2

%) o

f th

e w

ater

shed

is c

over

ed b

y w

ater

with

an

addi

tiona

l 130

acr

es(1

%) o

f ass

ocia

ted

wet

land

s. B

isho

p Po

nd is

con

side

red

the

head

wat

ers

of B

ricky

ard

Cre

ek a

ndbe

gins

as

a fla

t sy

stem

of

wet

land

dra

inag

e (S

iman

dl 2

002)

. The

se w

etla

nds

are

of p

artic

ular

sign

ifica

nce,

as

they

ser

ve t

o he

lp b

uffe

r Br

icky

ard

Cre

ek a

nd a

djac

ent

stre

ams

from

spi

kes

inw

ater

vol

ume

or v

eloc

ity, w

hile

usi

ng th

ese

natu

ral f

luct

uatio

ns in

wat

er le

vel t

o m

aint

ain

biol

ogi-

cal d

iver

sity

. A

ccor

ding

to

the

Lake

Sup

erio

r La

kew

ide

Man

agem

ent

Plan

upd

ated

in 2

002,

the

“gre

ates

t thr

eat t

o w

etla

nds

are

wat

er le

vel r

egul

atio

ns a

nd s

ite-s

peci

fic s

tres

ses

such

as

shor

elin

ede

velo

pmen

t” (L

aMP

2002

).

Cha

pter

Tw

o -

Nat

ural

Env

ironm

ent

Stre

am B

ran

chH

ead

wat

er L

oca

tio

n A

vg. S

trea

mSu

bst

rate

Mat

eria

lW

idth

Dep

thRe

any

Cre

ekT4

8N,

R26W

Sec

tion

065-

10’

1.5

– 4’

grav

elM

idw

ay C

reek

T48N

, R2

6W S

ectio

n 22

4’1-

2’gr

avel

ly s

and

Hol

yoke

Cre

ekT4

8N,

R26W

Sec

tion

021-

3’1-

2’sa

nd/g

rave

lly s

and

Bric

kyar

d C

reek

T48N

, R2

5W S

ectio

n 20

2.5

– 9’

1-2’

sand

/gra

velly

san

dW

olne

r C

reek

T48N

, R2

5W S

ectio

n 17

4’1-

1.5’

sand

/gra

vel

Back

yard

Cre

ekT4

8N,

R25W

Sec

tion

161-

2.5’

1-2’

sand

Badg

er C

reek

T48N

, R2

5W S

ectio

n 20

4-6’

1-2’

sand

Rane

y C

reek

T48N

, R2

5W S

ectio

n 15

1-3’

1-2’

sand

/gra

vel

Tab

le 2

.1: D

escr

ipti

on

of

Dea

d R

iver

Tri

bu

tari

es

Stre

am B

ran

chH

abit

atM

acro

inve

rteb

rate

Rat

ing

Rat

ing

Dea

d Ri

ver

(Byp

asse

d C

hann

el)

Goo

dA

ccep

tabl

eRe

any

Cre

ekG

ood

Exce

llent

Mid

way

Cre

ekFa

irEx

celle

ntBr

icky

ard

Cre

ekFa

irA

ccep

tabl

eBa

dger

Cre

ekFa

irA

ccep

tabl

e

Tab

le 2

.2: H

abit

at R

atin

g

Bri

ckyard

Hyd

rolo

gy S

tud

yIn

an

atte

mpt

to

furt

her

unde

rsta

nd t

hepo

tent

ial e

ffec

ts o

f U

.S.-

41 c

orrid

or d

evel

op-

men

t, t

he L

ower

Dea

d Ri

ver

Wat

ersh

edC

ounc

il so

ught

out

eng

inee

ring

serv

ices

fro

mST

S C

onsu

ltant

s to

com

plet

e a

deta

iled

anal

ysis

of

Bric

kyar

d C

reek

. Pl

ease

see

App

endi

x B

for

the

resu

lts o

f th

is r

epor

t,in

clud

ing

its f

ield

inve

stig

atio

n, h

ydro

logi

cm

odel

ing,

con

clus

ions

, an

d re

com

men

da-

tions

.

6666 6

0.5

00.

51

Mile

sLO

WE

R D

EAD

RIV

ER W

ATER

SHE

D M

AN

AG

EMEN

T P

LAN

Dea

d R

iver

Byp

ass

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r W

ater

shed

Road

way

Railr

oad

Pere

nnia

l Str

eam

Inte

rmitt

ent S

trea

m

Wet

land

sLa

ke, P

ond

Tour

ist P

ark

Dam

McC

lure

Dam

Fore

stvi

lle D

am# # #

Bypa

ssed

Rea

ch o

f Dea

d Ri

ver

%g550

%g492

%g480

#

McC

lure

Bas

in

#

Dea

d R

iver

Bas

in

#

Tour

ist P

ark

Bas

in

#

Tour

ist P

ark

Bas

in

#

Dea

d R

iver

Bas

in#

McC

lure

Bas

in

##

#

#

Fore

stvi

lle

Basi

n

Wolner Cre

ek Bad

ger C

reek

Bri c

kya

rd C

reek

Dea

d River

Mid

way

Cr e

ekHol

yoke

Cre

e kR ea

ny C

ree k

IÀ?ì

%g480

%g492

%g550

Raney Creek

Back

yard

Cre

ek

7777 7

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

Hig

h-r

isk A

reas

Are

as o

f th

e w

ater

shed

tha

t ha

ve s

uffe

red

degr

adat

ion

of h

abita

t or

wat

er q

ualit

y ar

e ge

nera

llybe

ing

impa

cted

by

hum

an c

hang

es m

ade

to t

he h

ydro

logy

, ei

ther

thr

ough

the

cre

atio

n of

impo

undm

ents

, or

sim

ply

due

to t

he a

dditi

onal

str

ess

that

exp

andi

ng d

evel

opm

ent

plac

es o

nw

ater

shed

res

ourc

es.

Dead

Riv

er

Byp

ass

One

are

a of

the

wat

ersh

ed w

here

hyd

rolo

gy a

nd a

quat

ic h

abita

t has

bee

n pa

rtic

ular

ly im

pact

edby

impo

undm

ents

is t

he D

ead

Rive

r be

twee

n th

e M

cClu

re D

am a

nd t

he F

ores

tvill

e St

orag

e Ba

sin.

In t

his

area

, the

mai

n flo

w o

f w

ater

is b

ypas

sed

for

6.1

mile

s th

roug

h a

pens

tock

whi

le t

he n

atur

alflo

w o

f th

e D

ead

Rive

r re

ceiv

es o

nly

dam

leak

age

and

trib

utar

y flo

w t

hat

is e

stim

ated

to

be 7

cubi

c fe

et p

er s

econ

d (c

fs) (

God

by a

nd S

uppn

ick

2001

). T

he m

ap o

n th

e fa

cing

pag

e id

entif

ies

the

loca

tion

of t

he b

ypas

s ch

anne

l in

the

Dea

d Ri

ver.

In A

ugus

t of

200

0, t

he M

ichi

gan

Dep

art-

men

t of E

nviro

nmen

tal Q

ualit

y co

nduc

ted

an a

naly

sis

of th

is b

ypas

sed

reac

h of

the

Dea

d Ri

ver t

oas

cert

ain

its e

ffec

t on

the

fish

com

mun

ity a

nd te

mpe

ratu

re o

f thi

s st

retc

h of

rive

r. R

esul

ts o

f the

iran

alys

is a

re s

umm

ariz

ed b

elow

(God

by a

nd S

uppn

ick

2001

).

Fish

Com

mun

ities

The

MD

EQ s

ampl

ed f

ish

popu

latio

ns in

thr

ee r

each

es o

f th

e D

ead

Rive

r by

pass

ed c

hann

el:

Reac

h A

(fro

m t

he L

S& I

railr

oad

trac

ks t

o th

e m

outh

of

Mid

way

Cre

ek),

Reac

h B

(fro

m M

idw

ayC

reek

to

the

mou

th o

f un

nam

ed t

ribut

ary)

, and

Rea

ch C

(fro

m u

nnam

ed t

ribut

ary

to t

he m

outh

of B

ricky

ard

Cre

ek).

Bro

ok t

rout

wer

e th

e m

ost

abun

dant

fis

h, h

owev

er, t

heir

size

was

sub

stan

-tia

lly s

mal

ler

than

wha

t w

ould

be

expe

cted

. O

nly

2.7%

of

the

fish

sam

pled

wer

e of

lega

l siz

e,w

hile

63%

of

all c

aptu

red

trou

t w

ere

the

youn

g of

the

yea

r. T

his

imba

lanc

e is

due

to

the

low

volu

me

of w

ater

tha

t ex

ists

in t

he b

ypas

sed

reac

h (a

vera

ge d

epth

= 1

.1 f

eet)

. Th

is s

hallo

wch

anne

l doe

s no

t pr

ovid

e su

itabl

e ha

bita

t fo

r la

rger

tro

ut.

Tem

pera

ture

sTe

mpe

ratu

res

in t

he b

ypas

sed

reac

h m

et M

ichi

gan’

s te

mpe

ratu

re s

tand

ard

for

cold

wat

er f

ishe

r-ie

s an

d w

ere

foun

d to

be

suita

ble

habi

tat

for

trou

t.

Acc

ordi

ng t

o th

e re

adin

gs t

aken

by

MD

EQ,

tem

pera

ture

s in

crea

sed

an a

vera

ge o

f 5.

2 de

gree

s ce

ntig

rade

fro

m t

he u

pstr

eam

sta

rt o

f th

eby

pass

to

the

dow

nstr

eam

end

.

Cha

pter

Tw

o -

Nat

ural

Env

ironm

ent

8888 8

Exp

and

ing

dev

elo

pm

ent

is c

on

trib

uti

ng

to

th

e re

du

ced

wat

er q

ual

ity

of

loca

l str

eam

s

9999 9

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

Flow

Aug

men

tatio

nPl

ans

have

bee

n m

ade

to a

ugm

ent

the

flow

in t

he b

ypas

sed

chan

nel b

y re

quiri

ng t

he U

pper

Peni

nsul

a Po

wer

Com

pany

to

rele

ase

a m

inim

um f

low

of

20 c

fs f

rom

the

McC

lure

Dam

to

the

bypa

ssed

riv

er c

hann

el in

the

200

4-20

05 t

imef

ram

e.

The

augm

ente

d flo

w is

exp

ecte

d to

incr

ease

the

vel

ocity

and

ave

rage

dep

th o

f th

e w

ater

in t

he b

ypas

s, r

esul

ting

in im

prov

edha

bita

t fo

r la

rger

tro

ut.

Ther

e m

ay b

e so

me

chan

ges

in t

he c

hann

el s

hape

in a

reas

tha

t ar

esu

scep

tible

to

scou

ring

due

to t

he in

crea

sed

velo

city

. Th

e te

mpe

ratu

re o

f th

e w

ater

is n

otex

pect

ed t

o be

aff

ecte

d, d

ue t

o th

e de

ep-w

ater

dra

w a

t th

e M

cClu

re D

am.

Exp

an

din

g D

evelo

pm

en

tA

sec

ond

pote

ntia

l cau

se fo

r wat

er q

ualit

y de

grad

atio

n is

the

influ

ence

of e

xpan

ding

dev

elop

-m

ent.

Be

caus

e m

ost

of t

his

deve

lopm

ent

is t

akin

g pl

ace

near

the

City

of

Mar

quet

te a

nd a

long

the

US4

1-M

28 c

orrid

or,

wat

er q

ualit

y in

the

sou

thea

ster

n po

rtio

n of

the

wat

ersh

ed is

mos

t at

risk.

Th

is in

crea

sed

deve

lopm

ent

prom

pted

the

Cen

tral

Lak

e Su

perio

r W

ater

shed

Par

tner

ship

to

cond

uct

a st

ream

mon

itorin

g st

udy

of t

hree

loca

l str

eam

s: R

eany

Cre

ek, B

ricky

ard

Cre

ek, a

ndW

hets

tone

Bro

ok.

Rese

arch

ers

used

wat

er q

ualit

y, a

quat

ic h

abita

t con

ditio

ns, a

nd fi

sh p

opul

atio

nsto

hel

p de

term

ine

the

gene

ral h

ealth

of

each

str

eam

. Th

eir

stud

y sh

owed

tha

t th

e re

ache

sdi

rect

ly a

ffec

ted

by d

evel

opm

ent

(Bric

kyar

d an

d W

hets

tone

) ha

d lo

wer

ove

rall

stre

am h

ealth

than

Rea

ny C

reek

, w

hich

is s

till i

n a

rela

tivel

y un

dist

urbe

d ar

ea o

f th

e w

ater

shed

. “

Alth

ough

thes

e st

ream

s ar

e le

ss t

han

thre

e m

iles

apar

t re

spec

tivel

y, t

hey

are

light

yea

rs a

part

in t

erm

s of

over

all s

trea

m h

ealth

. Mon

itorin

g sh

owed

that

an

incr

ease

in th

e am

ount

of d

evel

opm

ent a

ndim

per

vio

us

surf

aces

(roa

ds, p

arki

ng lo

ts, r

oofs

) dire

ctly

cor

rela

ted

with

a d

ecre

ase

in w

ater

qual

ity,

aqua

tic h

abita

t co

nditi

ons,

and

fis

h po

pula

tions

” (C

LSW

P 20

02).

Oth

er a

naly

ses

of t

his

area

hav

e fo

und

that

, w

hile

dev

elop

men

t ha

s no

t ye

t ha

d a

sign

ifica

ntim

pact

on

the

wat

er q

ualit

y, t

he p

oten

tial e

xist

s fo

r st

ream

s to

suf

fer

from

fut

ure

degr

adat

ion.

For

exam

ple,

in t

he a

reas

of

Bric

kyar

d an

d W

olne

r C

reek

s, e

rosi

on is

beg

inni

ng t

o af

fect

str

eam

bank

s, w

hile

poo

rly p

lace

d cu

lver

ts in

crea

se t

he s

cour

ing

of t

he s

trea

m c

hann

el d

ue t

o ex

cess

ive

velo

city

(A

LNM

200

2, S

iman

dl 2

002)

.

Cha

pter

Tw

o -

Nat

ural

Env

ironm

ent

Ero

sio

n a

lon

g t

he

Bri

ckya

rd C

reek

acc

ess

road

Sco

uri

ng

of

stre

am b

ank

alo

ng

Bri

ckya

rd C

reek

10

1010

10 10

0.5

00.

51

Mile

sLO

WE

R D

EAD

RIV

ER W

AT

ERSH

ED M

AN

AG

EM

ENT

PLA

N

Sam

pli

ng

Stat

ion

s#

Mac

roin

vert

ebra

te

Sam

plin

g St

atio

ns

Lake

, Pon

dW

etla

nds

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r Wat

ersh

edRo

adw

ayRa

ilroa

d

Pere

nnia

l Str

eam

Inte

rmitt

ent S

trea

m

%g550

%g492

%g480

#

McC

lure

Bas

in

#

Dea

d R

iver

Bas

in

#

Tour

ist P

ark

Bas

in

Back

yard

Cre

ek

Raney Creek#

Tour

ist P

ark

Bas

in

#

Dea

d R

iver

Bas

in#

McC

lure

Bas

in#

#

Fore

stvi

lle

Basi

n

Wolner Cre

ek

Bad

ger C

reek

Bri c

ky a

rd C

reek

Dea

d R

iver

Mid

way

Cr e

ekHol

yoke

Cr e

e kRea

ny C

r eek

IÀ?ì

%g480

%g492

%g550

##

#

##

##

#1

#7#8

#2

#5#3

#4

#6

11

1111

11 11

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

Cha

pter

Tw

o -

Nat

ural

Env

ironm

ent

MA

CR

OIN

VER

TEB

RA

TE S

TUD

IES

The

num

ber

and

dive

rsity

of

mac

roin

vert

ebra

tes

foun

d w

ithin

a s

trea

m s

yste

m c

an b

e an

indi

cato

r of

the

wat

ersh

ed’s

habi

tat

qual

ity.

In 2

002,

the

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r W

ater

shed

Pro

ject

cond

ucte

d a

field

stu

dy o

f the

mac

roin

vert

ebra

tes

at fi

ve o

f the

ir ei

ght s

ampl

ing

stat

ions

with

inth

e Lo

wer

Dea

d Ri

ver

wat

ersh

ed (s

ee m

ap o

n fa

cing

pag

e fo

r sa

mpl

ing

loca

tions

). T

he r

esul

ts o

fth

is s

tudy

are

pre

sent

ed in

Tab

le 2

.3.

All

stre

ams

stud

ied

rece

ived

a r

atin

g of

“Fa

ir” w

ith t

heex

cept

ion

of B

adge

r Cre

ek, w

hich

rece

ived

a ra

ting

of “

Poor

”.Ba

dger

Cre

ek c

onta

ined

a li

mite

dam

ount

of m

acro

inve

rteb

rate

activ

ity w

ith o

nly

eigh

t tax

apr

esen

t. O

f the

eig

ht ty

pes

ofor

gani

sms

foun

d, o

nly

thre

e w

ere

foun

d in

qua

ntiti

es g

reat

er th

an te

nor

gani

sms

per s

trea

m re

ach.

Badg

er C

reek

is a

des

igna

ted

stor

m d

rain

for t

he c

ity o

fM

arqu

ette

and

is lo

cate

d w

ithin

the

mos

t de

velo

ped

area

of

the

wat

ersh

ed.

This

wou

ld e

xpla

in t

here

duce

d aq

uatic

hab

itat t

hat o

ften

acco

mpa

nies

thi

s ty

pe o

f he

avy

deve

lopm

ent.

TAX

A

Stat

ion

1

Stat

ion

2

Stat

ion

4

Stat

ion

5

Stat

ion

7

Gro

up

1 (

Sen

siti

ve)

Mid

way

C

rk

Bri

ckya

rd

Crk

B

adg

er

Crk

W

oln

er

Crk

R

ean

y C

rk

Col

eopt

era

(Adu

lt be

etle

s)

R

R

C

oleo

pter

a (W

ater

pen

ny)

R R

D

ipte

ra (B

lack

fly

larv

ae)

R

Ep

hem

erop

tera

(May

fly

nym

phs)

R

C

R C

C

G

astr

opod

a (G

illed

sna

ils)

M

egal

opte

ra (H

ellg

ram

mite

s)

R

R

Pl

ecop

tera

(Sto

nefly

nym

phs)

R

R R

C

C

Tric

hopt

era

(Cad

disf

ly la

rvae

) C

C

C

C

C

G

rou

p 2

(S

om

ewh

at-s

ensi

tive

)

Am

phip

oda

(Scu

ds)

C

Col

eopt

era

(Bee

tle la

rvae

) R

R R

R

Dec

apod

a (C

rayf

ish)

Dip

tera

(Cra

ne F

ly la

rvae

) R

R R

Meg

alop

tera

(Ald

erfly

larv

ae)

R

R O

dona

ta (D

amse

lfly

nym

phs)

R

Odo

nata

(Dra

gonf

ly n

ymph

s)

R R

R R

R Pe

lecy

pda

(Cla

ms)

Gro

up

3 (

Tole

ran

t)

D

ipte

ra (M

idge

larv

ae)

R R

R D

ipte

ra (O

ther

) R

R

Gas

trop

oda

(Pou

ch s

nails

) R

Hem

ipte

ra (T

rue

bugs

)

Hiru

dina

(Lee

ches

)

R R

R

Isop

oda

(Sow

bugs

)

R

Olig

ocha

eta

(Aqu

atic

wor

ms)

C

C

C

C

C

Stre

am Q

ual

ity

Rat

ing

Fa

ir

Fair

Po

or

Fair

Fa

ir

NO

TE:

R =

1-1

0 or

gani

sms

in e

ach

taxa

fou

nd in

str

eam

rea

ch

C =

11+

org

anis

ms

in e

ach

taxa

fou

nd in

str

eam

rea

ch

Tab

le 2

.3:

Res

ult

s o

f M

acro

inve

rteb

rate

Sam

plin

g,

2002

Mac

roin

vert

ebra

tes,

su

ch a

s th

is d

rag

on

fly,

are

an

ind

icat

or

of

stre

am h

ealt

h(S

ou

rce:

NA

BS

1999

)

12

1212

12 12

0.5

00.

51

Mile

sLO

WER

DE

AD

RIV

ER W

AT

ERSH

ED

MA

NA

GE

MEN

T P

LAN

Top

ogr

aph

yLo

wer

Dea

d R

iver

Wat

ersh

ed

Inte

rmitt

ent S

trea

mPe

renn

ial S

trea

m

Wat

erCo

ntou

rs

Railr

oad

Road

way

%g550

%g492

IÀ?ì

%g492

%g550

13

1313

13 13

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

TOPO

GR

APH

Y

The

effe

cts

of t

he P

leis

toce

ne ic

e ag

e ca

n be

see

n in

the

var

ying

top

ogra

phy

thro

ugho

ut t

heLo

wer

Dea

d Ri

ver

wat

ersh

ed.

Thi

s va

riety

incl

udes

rel

ativ

ely

flat

area

s, g

ently

rol

ling

hills

, an

dve

ry s

teep

slo

pes,

par

ticul

arly

adj

acen

t to

str

eam

and

riv

er c

orrid

ors

(God

by a

nd S

uppn

ick

2001

,C

UPP

AD

199

8).

In M

arqu

ette

Tow

nshi

p ne

arly

25%

of

the

tow

nshi

p ha

s sl

opes

gre

ater

tha

n15

% (S

undb

erg

et a

l. 19

95).

The

map

on

the

faci

ng p

age

show

s th

e to

pogr

aphy

of

the

wat

ersh

ed a

rea.

This

var

ied

topo

grap

hy c

an b

e a

dete

rmin

ing

fact

or in

the

pat

tern

of

deve

lopm

ent

in t

hew

ater

shed

. C

urre

nt c

onst

ruct

ion

tech

niqu

es a

nd t

he m

arke

t’s s

tron

g de

sire

to

take

adv

anta

geof

long

vie

ws

and

attr

activ

e vi

stas

exe

rts

sign

ifica

nt d

evel

opm

ent

pres

sure

on

thes

e fr

agile

area

s.

How

ever

, whe

n de

velo

pmen

t oc

curs

nea

r st

eep

slop

es t

here

is a

n in

crea

sed

risk

ofer

osio

n, s

edim

enta

tion,

and

dam

age

to a

quat

ic h

abita

t.

In t

heir

com

preh

ensi

ve d

evel

opm

ent

plan

s, b

oth

Mar

quet

te a

nd N

egau

nee

Tow

nshi

ps d

isco

urag

e hi

gh-d

ensi

ty d

evel

opm

ent

onm

oder

ate

slop

es (

15%

-25%

), pr

efer

ring

such

dev

elop

men

t be

loca

ted

on a

reas

with

less

rel

ief

(Sun

dber

g et

al.

1995

, C

UPP

AD

199

8).

Acc

ordi

ng t

o M

arqu

ette

Tow

nshi

p’s

deve

lopm

ent

plan

,im

prop

er p

lann

ing

as it

rel

ates

to

the

area

’s to

pogr

aphy

can

res

ult

in n

ot o

nly

the

dest

ruct

ion

ofan

aes

thet

ic f

eatu

re,

but

also

“so

il st

abili

ty d

istu

rban

ces,

alte

ring

of e

stab

lishe

d dr

aina

gew

ays,

elim

inat

ion

of n

atur

al w

inds

cree

ns (

vege

tatio

n),

land

slip

page

, an

d ra

pid

eros

ion

whi

ch a

dds

silt

and

sedi

men

t to

dow

nstr

eam

wat

erw

ays”

(Su

ndbe

rg e

t al

. 19

95).

Cha

pter

Tw

o -

Nat

ural

Env

ironm

ent

Pro

tect

ing

Ste

ep

Slo

pes:

The

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r w

ater

shed

con

tain

sst

eepl

y sl

oped

are

as,

man

y of

whi

ch a

read

jace

nt t

o w

ater

way

s.

In o

rder

to

prot

ect

thes

e fr

agile

slo

pes,

it is

rec

omm

ende

d th

atve

geta

tion

alon

g th

e ed

ge o

f th

e st

ream

not

be d

istu

rbed

. T

his

vege

tatio

n he

lps

to c

ontr

oler

osio

n an

d pr

even

ts p

ollu

ted

stor

mw

ater

from

flo

win

g in

to t

he s

trea

m.

Figu

re 2

.1gi

ves

gene

ral g

uide

lines

for

how

larg

e th

isrip

aria

n bu

ffer

are

a sh

ould

be.

M

ore

info

r-m

atio

n on

rip

aria

n bu

ffer

s is

pre

sent

ed in

Cha

pter

Fiv

e -

Stra

tegi

es &

Rec

omm

enda

-tio

ns.

Fig

ure

2.1

: Veg

etat

ed B

uff

ers

Pro

tect

Ste

ep S

lop

es

14

1414

14 14

IÀ?ì

%g480

%g492

%g550

0.5

00.

51

Mile

sLO

WE

R D

EA

D R

IVER

WAT

ER

SHE

D M

AN

AG

EMEN

T P

LAN

Exis

tin

g V

eget

atio

nA

spen

, Bir

chCo

nife

rCr

opla

ndH

ardw

ood

Her

bace

ous O

penl

and

Shru

blan

d

Wat

erPe

renn

ial S

trea

mIn

term

itten

t Str

eam

Railr

oad

Road

way

15

1515

15 15

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

VEG

ETA

TIO

N

An

exam

inat

ion

of la

nd u

se t

hrou

ghou

t th

e w

ater

shed

sho

ws

that

the

maj

ority

(78

.5%

) of

the

wat

ersh

ed r

emai

ns f

ores

ted,

with

ano

ther

3%

cla

ssifi

ed a

s op

en f

ield

or

agric

ultu

re a

reas

. T

here

mai

ning

land

is d

esig

nate

d as

urb

an,

barr

en,

or w

ater

-rel

ated

land

use

s (S

ee T

able

2.4

).

Fore

sts

spec

ies

incl

ude

mat

ure

stan

ds o

f no

rthe

rn h

ardw

oods

suc

h as

oak

and

map

le a

ndst

ands

of

mat

ure

hem

lock

. Th

ere

are

also

low

er q

ualit

y sp

ecie

s su

ch a

s ta

g al

ders

, asp

en, a

ndbi

rch

(God

by a

nd S

uppn

ick

2001

, C

UPP

AD

199

8).

The

Exi

stin

g Ve

geta

tion

map

on

the

faci

ngpa

ge s

how

s a

deta

iled

map

ping

of

vege

tatio

n w

ithin

the

wat

ersh

ed,

whi

le T

able

2.5

sho

ws

the

brea

kdow

n by

acr

eage

.

Muc

h of

the

for

este

d ar

ea is

ow

ned

by la

rge

corp

orat

ions

and

is d

esig

nate

d as

Com

mer

cial

Fore

st R

eser

ve (

CFR

). O

wne

rs in

clud

e co

rpor

atio

ns s

uch

as E

scan

aba

Pape

r C

o.,

Bens

on F

ores

tLt

d.,

Long

year

Rea

lty,

and

the

Cle

vela

nd-C

liffs

Iron

Com

pany

(Su

nber

g et

al.

1995

, C

UPP

AD

1998

). A

reas

tha

t ar

e de

sign

ated

as

a C

omm

erci

al F

ores

t Re

serv

e m

ust

be m

aint

aine

d as

afo

rest

ed t

ract

of

land

and

allo

w p

ublic

acc

ess

for

dayt

ime

recr

eatio

n ac

tiviti

es s

uch

as h

untin

gor

fis

hing

(C

UPP

AD

199

8).

Cha

pter

Tw

o -

Nat

ural

Env

ironm

ent

Veg

etat

ion

Typ

e A

cres

%

of

To

tal

Asp

en, B

irch

5,00

8 43

%

Con

ifer

927

8%

Cro

plan

d 21

<

1%

Har

dwoo

d 5,

247

45%

O

penl

and

73

<1%

S

hrub

land

32

1 3%

T

ota

l Acr

eag

e 11

,597

10

0%

Tab

le 2

.5:

Exis

tin

g V

eget

atio

n

Lan

d U

se

Acr

es

% o

f T

ota

l F

ores

ted

11,1

83

78.5

%

Agr

icul

tura

l 21

0.

1%

Bar

ren

16

0.1%

O

pen

Fie

ld

394

2.8%

U

rban

2,

207

15.5

%

Wat

er

295

2.1%

W

etla

nd

130

0.9%

T

ota

l Acr

eag

e 14

,246

10

0%

Tab

le 2

.4: E

xist

ing

Lan

d U

se

16

1616

16 16

0.5

00.

51

Mile

sLO

WER

DEA

D R

IVER

WAT

ERSH

ED

MA

NA

GE

MEN

T P

LAN

Surf

ace

Geo

logy

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r Wat

ersh

edRo

adw

ayRa

ilroa

d

Pere

nnia

l Str

eam

Inte

rmitt

ent S

trea

mW

ater

Coar

se-t

extu

red

gla

cial

till

Glac

ial o

utw

ash

sand

and

grav

el a

nd p

ostg

laci

al a

lluvi

umLa

cust

rine

sand

and

grav

el

Thin

to d

iscon

tinuo

us g

laci

al ti

ll ov

er b

edro

ck

IÀ?ì

%g480

%g492

%g550

17

1717

17 17

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

SU

RFA

CE G

EO

LOG

Y

The

surf

ace

geol

ogy

and

soil

com

posi

tion

of a

wat

ersh

ed c

an b

e im

port

ant

fact

ors

whe

nse

ekin

g w

ays

to b

est

prot

ect

the

wat

er q

ualit

y of

an

area

. W

ithin

the

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r w

ater

-sh

ed th

e su

rfac

e ge

olog

y co

nsis

ts p

rimar

ily o

f fou

r cat

egor

ies

(as

show

n in

the

map

of S

urfa

ceG

eolo

gy o

n th

e fa

cing

pag

e):

•C

oars

e-te

xtur

ed g

laci

al t

ill•

Thin

till

ove

r be

droc

k•

Gla

cial

out

was

h sa

nd a

nd g

rave

l•

Lacu

stri

ne

sand

and

gra

vel

The

area

s of

gla

cial

out

was

h, s

and

and

grav

el a

re o

f pa

rtic

ular

impo

rtan

ce s

ince

the

y se

rve

asgr

ound

wat

er r

echa

rge

area

s.

Thes

e sa

ndy

soils

pro

vide

opp

ortu

nitie

s fo

r in

filtr

atio

n an

d se

rve

tore

plen

ish

loca

l wat

er s

yste

ms

thro

ugh

grou

ndw

ater

rec

harg

e (A

LMN

200

2).

Are

as w

here

bedr

ock

is n

ear

to t

he s

urfa

ce d

o no

t pr

ovid

e go

od s

ourc

es o

f gr

ound

wat

er.

Cha

pter

Tw

o -

Nat

ural

Env

ironm

ent

18

1818

18 18

New

dev

elo

pm

ent

alo

ng

th

e U

S41-

M28

co

rrid

or

19

1919

19 19

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

Alth

ough

a la

rge

port

ion

of th

e Lo

wer

Dea

d Ri

ver w

ater

shed

stil

l rem

ains

in it

s na

tura

l sta

te,

exis

ting

grow

th a

nd d

evel

opm

ent

are

alre

ady

havi

ng a

n ef

fect

on

the

qual

ity o

f th

e w

ater

shed

’sna

tura

l res

ourc

es.

In o

rder

to b

ette

r und

erst

and

the

patt

ern

of d

evel

opm

ent,

Cha

pter

3 w

ill fo

cus

on id

entif

ying

the

wat

ersh

ed’s

desi

gnat

ed u

ses,

the

patt

ern

of e

xist

ing

land

use

, and

are

as th

atar

e lik

ely

to e

xper

ienc

e fu

ture

gro

wth

.

DESIG

NA

TED

USES

Acc

ordi

ng t

o Br

own

et a

l. (2

000)

the

iden

tific

atio

n of

des

igna

ted

uses

with

in a

par

ticul

arw

ater

shed

is a

crit

ical

firs

t st

ep t

owar

d an

alyz

ing

thos

e us

es t

hat

are

not

bein

g m

et a

nd t

hose

that

are

bei

ng t

hrea

tene

d by

act

iviti

es o

n la

nd.

The

se “

desi

gnat

ed u

ses”

are

def

ined

as

the

prot

ecte

d us

es o

f w

ater

as

they

are

est

ablis

hed

by s

tate

and

fed

eral

wat

er q

ualit

y pr

ogra

ms

(Bro

wn

et a

l. 20

00).

The

sta

te o

f M

ichi

gan

prov

ides

a s

et o

f de

sign

ated

use

s th

at a

ll su

rfac

ew

ater

s in

the

sta

te a

re r

equi

red

to m

eet.

Th

e fo

llow

ing

list

iden

tifie

s th

e de

sign

ated

use

s th

atar

e cu

rren

tly b

eing

met

by

the

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r W

ater

shed

:

•In

dust

rial w

ater

sup

ply

- Th

e W

e En

ergi

es P

resq

ue Is

le P

ower

Pla

nt, l

ocat

ed a

t th

em

outh

of

the

Dea

d Ri

ver,

extr

acts

wat

er f

rom

Lak

e Su

perio

r to

coo

l the

ir ge

nera

ting

faci

lity.

The

wat

er is

the

n di

scha

rged

into

Lak

e Su

perio

r. U

nder

em

erge

ncy

cond

ition

s,th

e po

wer

pla

nt h

as t

he a

bilit

y to

use

the

Dea

d Ri

ver

as a

n in

dust

rial w

ater

sou

rce

and

disc

harg

e ou

tfal

l.

•Pu

blic

wat

er s

uppl

y at

the

poi

nt o

f in

take

– P

otab

le w

ater

is s

uppl

ied

to t

he C

ity o

fM

arqu

ette

by

the

city

wat

er s

yste

m. T

he m

unic

ipal

wat

er in

take

is lo

cate

d ne

ar L

ower

Har

bor.

Tow

nshi

ps w

ithin

the

wat

ersh

ed b

ound

arie

s ex

trac

t gro

undw

ater

as

thei

r mea

nsof

pot

able

wat

er.

•N

avig

atio

n –

The

Dea

d Ri

ver

syst

em is

con

side

red

navi

gabl

e w

ater

s w

ith p

ublic

acc

ess

site

s lo

cate

d at

the

McC

lure

Bas

in,

the

Fore

stvi

lle B

asin

, an

d th

e To

uris

t Pa

rk B

asin

.

•C

oldw

ater

fis

hery

– S

trea

ms

in t

he w

ater

shed

mee

t M

ichi

gan’

s te

mpe

ratu

re s

tand

ards

to

supp

ort c

oldw

ater

fish

hab

itat.

•In

dige

nous

aqu

atic

life

and

wild

life

– A

ccor

ding

to n

atur

al fe

atur

es in

vent

ory

the

Low

erD

ead

Rive

r W

ater

shed

is r

ecog

nize

d to

sup

port

a v

arie

ty o

f aq

uatic

and

wild

life

spec

ies.

Cha

pter

Thr

ee -

Bui

lt En

viro

nmen

t

AN

ALY

SIS

OF

THE

BU

ILT

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

AN

ALY

SIS

OF

THE

BU

ILT

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

AN

ALY

SIS

OF

THE

BU

ILT

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

AN

ALY

SIS

OF

THE

BU

ILT

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

AN

ALY

SIS

OF

THE

BU

ILT

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

Ch

apte

r Th

ree

20

2020

20 20

Tab

le 3

.1: T

hre

aten

ed U

ses

in t

he

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er W

ater

shed

Thre

aten

ed U

ses

Sou

rce

of

Imp

airm

ent

Pollu

tan

ts

Sou

rces

Pu

blic

Wat

er S

uppl

y In

crea

sed

stor

mw

ater

inpu

ts

Sedi

men

tatio

n O

ils, g

reas

e, a

nd m

etal

s U

rban

Run

off

Nav

igat

ion

Dam

impo

undm

ents

St

ream

cha

nnel

izat

ion

Sedi

men

t St

ream

ban

ks

Col

dwat

er f

ishe

ry

Sedi

men

tatio

n N

utrie

nt L

oadi

ng

Stre

am c

ross

ings

H

ydro

logi

c flo

w

Dam

impo

undm

ents

Sedi

men

t N

utrie

nts

Stre

am c

ross

ings

Fa

iling

sep

tic s

yste

ms

Resi

dent

ial f

ertil

izer

us

e

Indi

geno

us A

quat

ic

life/

Wild

life

Erod

ing

stre

am c

ross

ings

Ri

ver

flood

ing

Tran

spor

tatio

n/U

tility

cor

ridor

s In

crea

sed

deve

lopm

ent

Loss

of

ripar

ian

vege

tatio

n

Sedi

men

t H

ydro

logi

c flo

w

Stre

am c

ross

ings

St

ream

ban

ks

Hyd

rolo

gic

flow

U

rban

sto

rmw

ater

21

2121

21 21

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

•Pa

rtia

l bod

y co

ntac

t rec

reat

ion

– W

ater

s ar

e co

nsid

ered

sui

tabl

e fo

r par

tial b

ody

cont

act

recr

eatio

n, w

ith m

inim

al t

hrea

t to

pub

lic h

ealth

due

to

wat

er q

ualit

y.

•To

tal b

ody

cont

act

recr

eatio

n be

twee

n M

ay 1

and

Oct

ober

31

– A

ll w

ater

s w

ithin

the

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r wat

ersh

ed a

re c

onsi

dere

d su

itabl

e fo

r ful

l bod

y co

ntac

t dur

ing

the

recr

eatio

n se

ason

.

As

deve

lopm

ent

cont

inue

s an

d th

e ef

fect

s of

the

bui

lt en

viro

nmen

t ha

ve a

gre

ater

eff

ect

onth

e qu

ality

of

natu

ral r

esou

rces

, man

y of

the

se d

esig

nate

d us

es c

an b

e at

ris

k. P

ollu

tant

s,se

dim

ents

, sto

rmw

ater

runo

ff, a

nd o

ther

man

-mad

e im

pairm

ents

can

sig

nific

antly

redu

ce th

enu

mbe

r of

des

igna

ted

uses

tha

t a

part

icul

ar w

ater

bod

y ca

n su

ppor

t. T

he L

ower

Dea

d Ri

ver

wat

ersh

ed is

beg

inni

ng to

see

som

e of

thes

e de

sign

ated

use

s be

ing

thre

aten

ed d

ue to

impa

cts

from

the

bui

lt en

viro

nmen

t. T

able

3.1

iden

tifie

s th

ese

thre

aten

ed u

ses

alon

g w

ithpo

tent

ial s

ourc

es fo

r im

pact

with

in th

e w

ater

shed

.

Thre

ate

ne

d U

ses

The

next

ste

p in

a w

ater

shed

man

agem

ent

plan

is t

o id

entif

y th

e de

sign

ated

use

s th

at a

re b

eing

thre

aten

ed o

r im

paire

d. I

dent

ifyin

g th

reat

ened

use

s w

ill h

elp

deve

lop

a lis

t of

kno

wn

orsu

spec

ted

pollu

tant

s in

the

wat

ersh

ed a

nd c

reat

e a

serie

s of

con

trol

mea

sure

s fo

r ea

ch a

rea

ofco

ncer

n. I

nfor

mat

ion

rega

rdin

g th

e ca

uses

and

sou

rces

that

nee

d to

be

cont

rolle

d w

asex

trap

olat

ed fr

om th

e w

ater

shed

inve

ntor

y, s

trea

m c

ross

ing

inve

ntor

y, a

nd m

acro

inve

rteb

rate

mon

itorin

g. T

he fo

llow

ing

list i

dent

ifies

thre

aten

ed u

ses

of th

e Lo

wer

Dea

d Ri

ver w

ater

shed

:

•Pu

blic

wat

er s

uppl

y –

The

desi

gnat

ed u

se o

f pu

blic

wat

er s

uppl

y is

thr

eate

ned

due

to a

nin

crea

se in

hea

vy m

etal

s an

d or

gani

c co

mpo

unds

. Th

e on

ly k

now

n so

urce

of

thes

epo

lluta

nts

is u

rban

runo

ff.

•N

avig

atio

n –

The

desi

gnat

ed u

se o

f na

viga

tion

is im

paire

d du

e to

sed

imen

t in

the

stre

am. T

he k

now

n so

urce

of

this

pol

luta

nt is

str

eam

ban

ks t

hat

impa

irs d

amim

poun

dmen

ts a

nd n

atur

al s

trea

m h

ydro

logy

.•

Col

dwat

er f

ishe

ry –

The

des

igna

ted

use

of c

oldw

ater

fis

hery

is t

hrea

tene

d du

e to

an

incr

ease

in s

edim

ent

and

nutr

ient

s. T

he s

uspe

cted

sou

rce

of t

hese

pol

luta

nts

is s

trea

mcr

ossi

ngs,

faili

ng s

eptic

sys

tem

s, a

nd re

side

ntia

l fer

tiliz

er.

•In

dige

nous

aqu

atic

life

/wild

life

– Th

e de

sign

ated

use

of

indi

geno

us a

quat

ic li

fe/w

ildlif

e is

thre

aten

ed d

ue t

o in

crea

sed

sedi

men

t in

the

wat

erw

ay. T

he s

uspe

cted

sou

rce

ofse

dim

ent i

s fr

om s

trea

m c

ross

ings

, str

eam

ban

ks, a

nd u

rban

sto

rmw

ater

.

An

iden

tific

atio

n of

the

cau

ses

and

sour

ces

that

nee

d to

be

cont

rolle

d an

d es

timat

es o

f th

eex

tent

to w

hich

they

are

pre

sent

in th

e w

ater

shed

are

furt

her d

iscu

ssed

in C

hapt

er 6

:Im

plem

enta

tion.

22

2222

22 22

0.5

00.

51

Mile

sLO

WE

R D

EAD

RIV

ER W

AT

ER

SHE

D M

AN

AG

EM

ENT

PLA

N

Exis

tin

g La

nd

Use

Inte

rmitt

ent S

trea

mPe

renn

ial S

trea

m

Railr

oad

Road

way

s

Fore

sted

Com

mer

cial

Indu

stri

alIn

stitu

tiona

lM

ulti-

Fam

ily R

esid

entia

lSi

ngle

-Fam

ily R

esid

entia

l

Cro

plan

dEx

pose

d Ro

ckEx

trac

tive

Wat

er

Recr

eatio

nal

/ C

ultu

ral

Util

ities

/ T

rans

port

atio

n

Shru

b/ H

erba

ceou

s

IÀ?ì

%g492

%g550

23

2323

23 23

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

EX

ISTI

NG

LA

ND

USE

Und

erst

andi

ng t

he c

urre

nt p

atte

rn o

f de

velo

pmen

t w

ithin

the

wat

ersh

ed is

a c

ritic

al f

irst

step

tow

ard

iden

tifyi

ng k

ey a

reas

of

the

wat

ersh

ed t

hat

may

be

impa

cted

by

furt

her

urba

n de

velo

p-m

ent.

A

map

of

Exis

ting

Land

Use

is p

rese

nted

on

the

faci

ng p

age,

whi

le a

bre

akdo

wn

of t

hehi

gh-le

vel l

and

uses

is g

iven

in T

able

3.2

. A

ppro

xim

atel

y 2,

207

acre

s (1

5.5%

) of

the

tot

alw

ater

shed

is c

urre

ntly

dev

elop

ed f

or u

rban

use

s.

With

in t

his

“urb

an”

desi

gnat

ion,

the

land

use

can

be f

urth

er b

roke

n do

wn

into

a v

arie

ty o

f sp

ecifi

c us

es.

This

bre

akdo

wn

is g

iven

in T

able

3.3

.

As

is s

how

n on

the

land

use

map

, the

maj

ority

of

deve

lopm

ent

is lo

cate

d in

the

sou

thea

ster

npo

rtio

n of

the

wat

ersh

ed,

adja

cent

to

the

City

of

Mar

quet

te a

nd a

long

the

US4

1-M

28 t

rans

por-

tatio

n co

rrid

or in

Mar

quet

te T

owns

hip.

Cha

pter

Thr

ee -

Bui

lt En

viro

nmen

t

Tab

le 3

.3: B

reak

do

wn

of

Urb

an L

and

Use

s

Lan

d U

seA

cres

% o

f To

tal

Cem

eter

y26

1%

Com

mer

cial

130

6%

Extr

activ

e34

1.5%

Indu

stria

l17

17.

75%

Inst

itutio

nal

673%

Mul

ti-Fa

mily

14<

1%Re

side

ntia

l

Recr

eatio

n36

1.6%

Sing

le-F

amily

1,25

858

%Re

side

ntia

l

Util

ities

, W

aste

451

20%

Dis

posa

l

Tota

l A

crea

ge

2,20

710

0%

Lan

d U

se

Acr

es

% o

f T

ota

l F

ores

ted

11,1

83

78.5

%

Agr

icul

tura

l 21

0.

1%

Bar

ren

16

0.1%

O

pen

Fie

ld

394

2.8%

U

rban

2,

207

15.5

%

Wat

er

295

2.1%

W

etla

nd

130

0.9%

T

ota

l Acr

eag

e 14

,246

10

0%

Tab

le 3

.2: E

xist

ing

Lan

d U

se

24

2424

24 24

0.5

00.

51

Mile

sLO

WER

DEA

D R

IVER

WA

TER

SHED

MA

NA

GEM

ENT

PLA

N

Futu

re D

evel

opm

ent

Are

asIn

term

itten

t Str

eam

Pere

nnia

l Str

eam

Wat

er

Road

way

City

of M

arqu

ette

(Bui

lt O

ut)

Railr

oad

Indu

stria

l

Dev

elop

men

t Dist

rict

Resi

dent

ial

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er W

ater

shed

Com

mer

cial

Wolner Creek

Badg

er C

reek

Bric

kyar

d C

reek

Dea

d River

Mid

way

Cre

e kHol

yoke

Cre

ekRea

ny C

reek

IÀ?ì

%g480

%g492

%g550 Bac

kyar

d Cree

k

Raney Creek

25

2525

25 25

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

FUTU

RE G

RO

WTH

AR

EA

S

Beca

use

the

area

of

the

wat

ersh

ed t

hat

is w

ithin

the

City

of

Mar

quet

te is

ful

ly d

evel

oped

, mos

tof

the

fut

ure

grow

th w

ithin

the

wat

ersh

ed w

ill h

appe

n in

the

Mar

quet

te a

nd N

egau

nee

Tow

n-sh

ips.

Bo

th t

owns

hips

hav

e ex

perie

nced

rap

id g

row

th o

ver

the

last

50

year

s.

Mar

quet

teTo

wns

hip

saw

a 6

2% in

crea

se in

pop

ulat

ion

betw

een

1970

-199

0 (S

undb

erg

et a

l. 19

95),

whi

leN

egau

nee’

s po

pula

tion

incr

ease

d ov

er 3

00%

sin

ce 1

940

(CU

PPA

D 1

998)

. T

his

grow

th h

aspr

ompt

ed b

oth

tow

nshi

ps t

o de

velo

p co

mpr

ehen

sive

pla

ns t

o he

lp g

uide

fut

ure

grow

th a

nd t

oen

sure

the

pro

tect

ion

of t

heir

exis

ting

natu

ral r

esou

rces

. B

oth

tow

nshi

ps h

ave

plac

ed a

prio

rity

on p

rote

ctin

g th

eir

rura

l im

age

and

are

mak

ing

conc

erte

d ef

fort

s to

con

trol

the

pat

tern

of

deve

lopm

ent.

In

gen

eral

, fu

ture

gro

wth

will

be

dire

cted

tow

ards

infil

l are

as n

orth

and

sou

th o

fth

e U

S41-

M28

hig

hway

and

in a

reas

whe

re in

fras

truc

ture

and

ser

vice

s ar

e al

read

y av

aila

ble

(Sun

dber

g et

al.

1995

, C

UPP

AD

199

8).

The

se p

oten

tial d

evel

opm

ent

area

s ar

e in

dica

ted

on t

hem

ap o

f Fu

ture

Dev

elop

men

t A

reas

.

The

US4

1-M

28 h

ighw

ay s

erve

s as

the

bac

kbon

e fo

r m

uch

of t

he d

evel

opm

ent

in t

hese

tw

oto

wns

hips

. A

ccor

ding

to

the

Com

preh

ensi

ve P

lan

for

Mar

quet

te T

owns

hip,

the

com

mer

cial

deve

lopm

ent

and

regi

onal

sho

ppin

g m

alls

alo

ng t

he U

S41-

28 c

orrid

or s

erve

as

a “m

ajor

cor

efo

r a

varie

ty o

f fu

nctio

ns”

(Sun

dber

g et

al.

1995

). W

hile

thi

s de

velo

pmen

t ar

ea p

rovi

des

a se

tof

ret

ail a

men

ities

it is

not

with

out

issu

es.

Acc

ordi

ng t

o M

arqu

ette

’s C

ompr

ehen

sive

Pla

n, t

heco

st o

f de

velo

pmen

t ha

s in

clud

ed “

envi

ronm

enta

l deg

rada

tion,

tra

ffic

con

gest

ion,

hou

sing

shor

tage

s, c

hang

es in

the

rur

al la

ndsc

ape

and

the

skyr

ocke

ting

cost

s of

mun

icip

al s

ervi

ces”

(Sun

dber

g et

al.

1995

).

In a

dditi

on t

o th

e ne

w c

omm

erci

al d

evel

opm

ent

alon

g th

e U

S41-

M28

cor

ridor

, se

vera

l are

asw

ithin

Neg

aune

e an

d M

arqu

ette

Tow

nshi

ps a

re e

xper

ienc

ing

new

res

iden

tial d

evel

opm

ent

pres

sure

s in

the

ir ou

tlyin

g ru

ral a

reas

and

adj

acen

t to

the

larg

e st

orag

e ba

sins

, pa

rtic

ular

ly D

ead

Rive

r an

d M

cClu

re B

asin

s.

Unf

ortu

nate

ly, m

uch

of t

his

new

dev

elop

men

t is

not

ser

ved

bym

unic

ipal

ser

vice

s an

d re

side

nts

rely

on

sept

ic f

ield

s an

d pr

ivat

e w

ells

to

mee

t th

eir

infr

astr

uc-

ture

nee

ds (

CU

PPA

D 1

998)

. T

hese

out

lyin

g ar

eas

of r

esid

entia

l dev

elop

men

t ca

n be

a b

urde

non

mun

icip

aliti

es d

ue t

o th

e in

crea

sed

cost

of

serv

ices

to

thes

e ar

eas.

Th

ey c

an a

lso

have

ade

trim

enta

l im

pact

on

the

envi

ronm

ent,

par

ticul

arly

whe

re d

evel

opm

ent

exce

eds

the

capa

city

of

an a

rea

to s

uppo

rt s

eptic

sys

tem

s, t

hus

posi

ng a

ris

k fo

r gr

ound

wat

er c

onta

min

atio

n.

Thou

gh it

may

be

poss

ible

to

exte

nd t

he p

ublic

infr

astr

uctu

re,

plan

ning

for

add

ition

al s

ervi

ce a

reas

is a

diff

icul

t ta

sk.

Cur

rent

ly,

Mar

quet

te T

owns

hip

is e

xplo

ring

optio

ns t

o ex

tend

mun

icip

al w

aste

wa-

ter

in t

he T

row

brid

ge P

ark

area

. W

hile

util

ities

suc

h as

city

sew

er a

nd w

ater

can

allo

w f

or m

ore

dens

e de

velo

pmen

t, p

erha

ps h

altin

g th

e sp

raw

ling

tend

enci

es o

f la

rge

lot

deve

lopm

ent,

thi

sex

pans

ion

can

also

hav

e si

gnifi

cant

det

rimen

tal e

ffec

ts o

n th

e en

viro

nmen

tal r

esou

rces

of

thes

ene

wly

dev

elop

ed a

reas

.

Cha

pter

Thr

ee -

Bui

lt En

viro

nmen

t

26

2626

26 26

0.5

00.

51

Mile

sLO

WE

R D

EA

D R

IVER

WAT

ER

SHED

MA

NA

GE

MEN

T P

LAN

Are

as o

f St

ream

Deg

rad

atio

nLo

wer

Dea

d R

iver

Wat

ersh

edIn

term

itten

t Str

eam

Pere

nnia

l Str

eam

Road

way

Railr

oad

Wat

er

$TD

am# S

Eros

ion

% UPh

ysic

al H

azar

dW

ater

Qua

lity

ÊÚ

% U% U

# S $T

# S

$T

# S

% U

# S

ÊÚ

% U% U

ÊÚ

# S

ÊÚ # SÊÚ

% U

# S

# S

# S

# S# S

# S

# S ÊÚ

#

Tour

ist P

ark

Bas

in

#

Dea

d R

iver

Bas

in#

McC

lure

Bas

in$T

#

Fore

stvi

lle B

asin

Wolner Creek

Badg

er C

reek

Bric

kyar

d C

reek

Dea

d River

Mid

way

Cre

ekHol

yoke

Cre

ekRea

ny C

reek

IÀ?ì

%g492

%g550 $T$T

%g550

%g492

#

McC

lure

Bas

in

#

Dea

d R

iver

Bas

in

#

Tour

ist P

ark

Bas

in

Raney Creek

Back

yard

Cre

ek

27

2727

27 27

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

The

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r W

ater

shed

is im

pact

ed in

myr

iad

way

s fr

om h

uman

inte

ract

ion

with

the

wat

ersh

ed’s

natu

ral s

yste

ms.

In

its

2002

Pro

gres

s Re

port

, th

e La

ke S

uper

ior

Lake

wid

e M

anag

e-m

ent

Plan

iden

tifie

d a

num

ber

of s

tres

sors

tha

t ca

n ha

ve a

dire

ct e

ffec

t on

the

hea

lth o

f a

wat

ersh

ed.

The

se in

clud

ed it

ems

such

as

incr

ease

d le

vels

of

cont

amin

atio

n, d

am c

onst

ruct

ion,

habi

tat

frag

men

tatio

n, r

ecre

atio

n, r

oad

cons

truc

tion,

and

sho

relin

e re

side

ntia

l dev

elop

men

t(L

aMP

2002

) (S

ee m

ap o

n fa

cing

pag

e sh

owin

g ex

istin

g ar

eas

of s

trea

m d

egra

datio

n).

Whi

leth

eir

effe

cts

may

be

easi

ly d

emon

stra

ted,

it c

an s

omet

imes

be

diff

icul

t to

dia

gnos

e th

e so

urce

of

thes

e pr

oble

ms

due

to t

he v

arie

ty o

f w

ays

in w

hich

our

act

ions

can

aff

ect

the

heal

th a

nd v

italit

yof

the

wat

ersh

ed.

Evid

ence

of

hum

an im

pact

ran

ges

from

the

obv

ious

, suc

h as

dire

ct m

anip

ula-

tion

of t

he s

trea

m h

ydro

logy

, to

the

subt

le e

ffec

ts t

hat

even

sm

all p

erso

nal c

hoic

es c

an h

ave

onth

e he

alth

of

a st

ream

sys

tem

mile

s aw

ay.

In t

he f

ace

of in

crea

sing

dev

elop

men

t pr

essu

res,

esta

blis

hing

pro

tect

ive

mea

sure

s to

buf

fer

thes

e di

stur

banc

es is

par

amou

nt if

the

bio

tic in

tegr

ityof

the

riv

er s

yste

m is

to

be p

rote

cted

acc

ordi

ng t

o th

e es

tabl

ishe

d go

als

of t

his

stud

y.

Add

ition

-al

ly,

the

prot

ectio

n of

the

se w

ater

shed

s di

rect

ly a

ffec

ts t

he q

ualit

y of

the

aqu

atic

eco

syst

em in

Lake

Sup

erio

r.

In t

he L

ower

Dea

d Ri

ver

wat

ersh

ed s

yste

m,

the

follo

win

g hu

man

dis

turb

ance

s ha

ve le

d to

subs

tant

ial i

mpa

cts

on t

he w

ater

shed

’s he

alth

:

1)A

ltere

d H

ydro

logy

– d

am im

poun

dmen

ts a

nd s

trea

m c

hann

eliz

atio

n ha

sre

sulte

d in

dec

reas

ed s

trea

m le

ngth

and

sev

ere

loss

of

aqua

tic h

abita

t.

2)Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Issu

es –

cre

atio

n of

tra

nspo

rtat

ion

and

utili

ty c

orrid

ors

incl

udin

gst

ream

cro

ssin

gs a

nd t

he u

se o

f rip

aria

n co

rrid

ors

for

road

s an

d ut

ilitie

s, h

as le

dto

incr

ease

d se

dim

ent,

nut

rient

, an

d co

ntam

inan

t in

puts

, an

d th

e re

duct

ion

ofha

bita

t qu

ality

.

3)Im

pact

s of

Dev

elop

men

t –

incr

easi

ng u

rban

izat

ion

with

in t

he w

ater

shed

has

resu

lted

in in

crea

sed

impe

rvio

us s

urfa

ces,

incr

ease

d st

orm

wat

er in

puts

, po

int

and

non-

poin

t so

urce

pol

lutio

n, s

edim

enta

tion,

sur

face

wat

er d

rain

age,

nut

rient

inpu

ts,

and

loss

of

ripar

ian

vege

tatio

n.

4)Re

crea

tiona

l Act

iviti

es –

rec

reat

iona

l acc

ess

has

led

to t

he t

ram

plin

g of

vege

tatio

n, s

oil c

ompa

ctio

n, s

oil e

rosi

on,

and

othe

r di

stur

banc

es le

adin

g to

incr

ease

d se

dim

enta

tion

and

nutr

ient

inpu

ts in

to t

he s

trea

m s

yste

m.

Cha

pter

Fou

r -

Are

as o

f C

once

rn

AR

EA

S O

F C

ON

CE

RN

New

dev

elo

pm

ent

alo

ng

US4

1-M

28

Ch

apte

r Fo

ur

New

dev

elo

pm

ent

wit

hin

th

e w

ater

shed

28

2828

28 28

Mar

qu

ette

Val

ley

Mill

ing

Co

mp

any

His

tori

cal

Hig

hli

gh

t –

Rem

nan

ts o

f H

isto

ry A

lon

g t

he D

ead

Riv

er

Ther

e w

ere

seve

ral i

ndus

trie

s th

at o

nce

lined

the

ban

ks o

f th

e D

ead

Rive

r.

Are

as a

long

the

wat

erw

ay s

aw t

he e

stab

lishm

ent

of d

ams,

gene

ratin

g pl

ants

, bl

ast

furn

aces

, si

lver

and

gol

d m

ines

, flo

ur m

ills,

saw

mill

s, a

nd b

last

ing

furn

aces

. O

ne s

uch

indu

stry

’s re

mai

ns t

hat

can

still

be

foun

d in

the

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r w

ater

shed

is t

he f

ound

atio

n of

the

late

Mar

quet

te V

alle

y M

illin

g C

ompa

ny.

The

first

flo

ur m

ill in

the

U.P

. was

ow

ned

and

oper

ated

by

Alp

hons

e Be

rtra

nd in

188

7. T

he o

rigin

al s

ite w

as s

ituat

ed o

n a

smal

l cre

ek t

hat

empt

ied

into

the

Dea

d Ri

ver,

dow

nriv

er f

rom

the

tow

n of

Col

linsv

ille.

The

cre

ek w

as d

amm

ed a

nd s

erve

d as

an

abun

dant

wat

er s

uppl

y fo

rm

illin

g op

erat

ions

. 6

00 b

ushe

ls o

f lo

cally

rai

sed

whe

at w

ere

grou

nd in

the

fal

l in

addi

tion

to r

ye a

nd g

rain

for

fee

d.

Dur

ing

the

next

few

yea

rs,

the

mill

exp

erie

nced

insu

ffic

ient

wat

er s

uppl

y.

In M

arch

189

1, M

r. Be

rtra

nd s

old

the

mill

to

loca

l bus

ines

smen

and

the

Mar

quet

te V

alle

y M

illin

g C

ompa

ny w

as e

stab

lishe

d.

The

Mill

ing

Com

pany

neg

otia

ted

with

the

city

to

purc

hase

a n

ew s

ite a

long

the

Dea

d Ri

ver.

The

firs

t flo

ur w

as g

roun

d in

Mar

ch 1

892.

Th

e be

st g

rade

s of

flo

ur w

ere

sent

to

its U

.P. m

erch

ants

whi

le v

ario

us o

ther

grad

es w

ere

ship

ped

to N

ew Y

ork,

Geo

rgia

, and

as

far

as E

ngla

nd.

Aft

er t

he t

urn

of t

he c

entu

ry, t

he f

lour

mill

bus

ines

s be

gan

to w

ane.

C

ompe

titio

n fr

om b

igge

r m

ills,

hig

her

frei

ght

cost

s, a

nd t

he lo

ss o

fw

ater

pow

er f

rom

the

Dea

d Ri

ver

attr

ibut

ed t

o th

e M

arqu

ette

Val

ley

Mill

ing

Com

pany

clo

sing

its

door

s.

The

last

flo

ur w

as m

illed

in J

une

1904

and

soo

n th

erea

fter

the

mill

and

ele

vato

r bu

ildin

gs w

ere

torn

dow

n.

The

ruin

s of

the

old

sto

ne f

ound

atio

n ca

n st

ill b

e se

en o

n th

eso

uth

bank

of

the

Dea

d Ri

ver,

east

of

the

old

light

pla

nt o

n W

right

Str

eet.

29

2929

29 29

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

ALT

ER

ED

HY

DR

OLO

GY

Man

has

mod

ified

the

Dea

d Ri

ver

for

over

130

yea

rs.

Sinc

e th

e or

igin

al s

ettle

rs t

o M

arqu

ette

disc

over

ed t

he r

iver

, dam

s w

ere

cons

truc

ted

to a

id in

log

driv

es, a

ssis

t in

pow

er f

or s

awm

ills,

and

to c

reat

e hy

droe

lect

ricity

for

the

com

mun

ity.

Begi

nnin

g in

188

9 w

hen

the

city

bui

lt a

woo

den

dam

for

its

first

ele

ctric

al p

lant

(cur

rent

ly k

now

n as

the

Tou

rist

Park

dam

) the

re h

asbe

en a

ser

ies

of c

hang

es t

o th

e na

tura

l flo

w r

egim

e of

the

Dea

d Ri

ver

syst

em.

By 1

919

thre

em

ore

dam

s ha

d be

en b

uilt

on t

he L

ower

Dea

d Ri

ver

incl

udin

g th

e Fo

rest

ville

and

McC

lure

Dam

s.Th

ese

impo

undm

ents

con

trib

ute

to t

he 2

.5 m

illio

n da

ms

foun

d on

riv

ers

and

stre

ams

thro

ugh-

out

the

Uni

ted

Stat

es.

Whi

le d

ams

and

the

hydr

oele

ctric

fac

ilitie

s th

ey p

ower

can

be

impo

rtan

ten

ergy

pro

duce

rs f

or a

n ar

ea, t

hey

also

exa

ct a

tol

l on

the

heal

th o

f th

e riv

er s

yste

m t

hey

depe

nd o

n. A

lthou

gh th

e re

duct

ion

in th

e us

e of

coa

l-fire

d pl

ants

can

cur

b th

e am

ount

of t

oxic

outp

ut b

eing

em

itted

into

the

syst

em, t

he c

hang

e in

the

river

hyd

rolo

gy c

an le

ad to

deg

rade

daq

uatic

hab

itat.

By

hold

ing

the

wat

er, t

here

is p

oten

tial f

or lo

wer

ed s

trea

m d

epth

, inc

reas

edw

ater

tem

pera

ture

s, a

nd a

redu

ctio

n in

the

dis

solv

ed o

xyge

n le

vels

in t

he w

ater

, all

of w

hich

can

affe

ct a

quat

ic s

peci

es (L

aMP

2002

).

Alt

ere

d H

yd

rolo

gy Im

pact

sA

s da

ms

beco

me

deco

mm

issi

oned

and

dila

pida

ted,

ther

e ar

e co

mpe

lling

reas

ons

to c

onsi

der

rem

oval

of

thes

e st

ruct

ures

. A

side

fro

m t

he p

oten

tial c

ost

of d

am m

aint

enan

ce a

nd r

epai

r,th

ere

are

ecol

ogic

al r

easo

ns t

o co

nsid

er t

heir

rem

oval

:

•D

ams

frag

men

t riv

ers

and

bloc

k th

e m

ovem

ent

of f

ish

and

othe

r sp

ecie

s•

Dam

s ha

rm w

ater

qua

lity,

bot

h ab

ove

and

belo

w t

he s

truc

ture

•D

ams

impe

de t

he r

iver

’s na

tura

l “flu

shin

g” f

unct

ions

•D

am f

ailu

re c

an b

e de

vast

atin

g to

peo

ple,

ani

mal

s, p

rope

rty,

and

hab

itat

Cha

pter

Fou

r -

Are

as o

f C

once

rn

Fore

stvi

lle D

am

Smal

l re

sid

enti

al d

am a

lon

g B

rick

yard

Cre

ek

30

3030

30 30

0.5

00.

51

Mile

sLO

WER

DE

AD

RIV

ER W

ATE

RSH

ED

MA

NA

GE

MEN

T P

LAN

Stre

am C

ross

ings

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r W

ater

shed

Inte

rmitt

ent S

trea

mPe

renn

ial S

trea

mRo

adw

ayRa

ilroa

dW

ater

Ford

Brid

geCu

lver

t# S # S # S # S

Cros

sing

(ty

pe u

nkno

wn)

# S

# S# S

# S # S

# S# S

# S# S # S

# S

# S

# S# S

# S

# S# S

# S# S# S# S

# S# S

# S# S

# S# S

# S

# S

# S

# S

# S# S # S

# S# S# S# S# S# S

# S # S# S

# S

# S # S

# S

%g550

%g492

%g480

#

McC

lure

Bas

in

#

Dea

d R

iver

Bas

in

#

Tour

ist P

ark

Basi

n

#

Tour

ist P

ark

Basi

n

#

Dea

d R

iver

Bas

in#

McC

lure

Bas

in

%g480

%g492

%g550 %g550

%g492

%g480

?ìIÀ

Reany

Cre

ek

Holyo

ke C

reek

Mid

way

Cre

e k

Dea

d River

Bric

kyar

d C

reek

Badg

er C

reek

Wolner Cree

k#

Fore

stvi

lle

Basi

n

#

McC

lure

Bas

in

#

Dea

d R

iver

Bas

in

#

Tour

ist P

ark

Basi

n

Raney Creek

Back

yard

Cre

ek

31

3131

31 31

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

TRA

NSPO

RTA

TIO

N I

SSU

ES

For

any

deve

lopi

ng m

unic

ipal

ity,

a tr

ansp

orta

tion

syst

em t

hat

can

adeq

uate

ly s

erve

the

nee

ds o

fits

pop

ulat

ion

is c

ruci

al.

Acc

ordi

ng t

o M

arqu

ette

Tow

nshi

p’s

Com

preh

ensi

ve P

lan,

“to

a s

igni

fi-ca

nt d

egre

e, t

he s

ucce

ss o

f a

give

n la

nd u

se a

rea

is d

eter

min

ed b

y th

e ab

ility

of

stre

ets

to a

ffor

dve

hicu

lar

acce

ss”

(Sun

dber

g et

al.

1995

). W

hile

thi

s ne

twor

k of

roa

ds is

crit

ical

to

ensu

re t

hem

ovem

ent

of p

eopl

e an

d go

ods

thro

ugho

ut a

n ar

ea,

they

can

als

o ha

ve a

sig

nific

ant

effe

ct o

nth

e ec

olog

y of

the

are

a.

Spec

ifica

lly, t

he in

stal

latio

n of

cul

vert

s to

pro

vide

for

riv

er c

ross

ings

can

pote

ntia

lly r

educ

e th

e ha

bita

t qu

ality

of

stre

ams

and

may

dire

ctly

con

trib

ute

to t

he r

educ

tion

infis

h po

pula

tions

in s

ome

inst

ance

s.

The

map

on

the

faci

ng p

age

show

s th

e lo

catio

ns o

f ex

istin

gst

ream

cro

ssin

gs t

hat

may

be

cont

ribut

ing

to h

abita

t de

grad

atio

n.

Cul

vert

s ha

ve lo

ng b

een

used

in s

trea

m c

ross

ings

bec

ause

the

y ar

e m

uch

less

exp

ensi

ve t

han

brid

ges

and

are

easi

er t

o in

stal

l. H

owev

er u

sing

cul

vert

s ca

n re

duce

the

hab

itat

and

fishe

ries

pote

ntia

l of

stre

ams.

H

abita

t ca

n be

deg

rade

d th

roug

h in

crea

sed

sedi

men

tatio

n an

d pl

unge

pool

s, w

hich

cre

ate

wat

erfa

lls a

t th

e cu

lver

t ou

tlet

and

can

bloc

k fis

h m

igra

ting

upst

ream

.

Plun

ge p

ools

are

cau

sed

by t

he in

stal

latio

n of

cul

vert

s to

o sm

all i

n di

amet

er f

or t

he a

mou

nt o

fst

ream

flo

w.

As

wat

er c

olle

cts

upst

ream

of

the

culv

ert,

a h

ydra

ulic

“he

ad”

is c

reat

ed w

hich

caus

es t

he w

ater

to

shoo

t th

roug

h th

e cu

lver

t w

ith in

crea

sing

vel

ocity

. T

his

caus

es e

rosi

on o

nth

e do

wns

trea

m e

nd o

f th

e cu

lver

t as

soi

l is

scou

red

from

the

str

eam

bot

tom

and

tra

nspo

rted

dow

nstr

eam

. In

sev

ere

case

s, t

he d

owns

trea

m e

nd o

f th

e cu

lver

t is

left

han

ging

abo

ve t

hest

ream

, po

tent

ially

blo

ckin

g fis

h fr

om m

igra

ting

upst

ream

.

An

exam

ple

of ju

st s

uch

a si

tuat

ion

can

be f

ound

alo

ng B

ricky

ard

Cre

ek.

Acc

ordi

ng t

o a

hydr

olog

ic s

tudy

of

the

Bric

kyar

d C

reek

syst

em, S

TS C

onsu

ltant

s fo

und

the

stre

am w

as b

eing

rou

ted

thro

ugh

a 4’

cul

vert

to

acco

mm

o-da

te a

rai

lroad

gra

de (S

iman

dl 2

002)

. W

hen

it w

as o

rigin

ally

inst

alle

d, t

he c

ulve

rt w

as s

et t

oohi

gh a

nd r

esul

ted

in a

fre

e-fa

ll of

wat

er f

or 3

.5 f

eet

into

a p

ool t

hat

was

the

res

ult

of s

cour

ing

by t

he f

orce

of

the

wat

er.

In o

rder

to

help

red

uce

the

effe

ct o

f th

is in

crea

sed

velo

city

, thi

s ar

eaw

as s

tabi

lized

alo

ng th

e ba

nk w

ith la

rge

boul

ders

and

rip-

rap.

Tran

spo

rtati

on

Im

pact

sA

s ou

tline

d in

the

abo

ve s

ectio

n, p

lung

e po

ols

are

crea

ted

whe

n a

culv

ert

is im

prop

erly

inst

alle

d.Th

irtee

n pe

rcen

t (13

%) o

f the

wat

ersh

ed e

nhan

cem

ent p

roje

cts

deal

with

sta

biliz

ing

toe

eros

ion

and

crea

ting

a rif

fle c

ontr

ol s

truc

ture

to m

ake

fish

pass

age

poss

ible

at t

he d

owns

trea

m e

nd o

fth

e cu

lver

t. A

ccor

ding

to

the

Revi

sed

Uni

vers

al S

oil L

oss

Equa

tion

(RU

SLE)

, site

s 19

-21

iden

tifie

din

the

wat

ersh

ed m

anag

emen

t pla

n at

trib

ute

to 1

0.8

tons

/acr

e of

soi

l los

s. I

mpl

emen

ting

thes

epr

ojec

ts w

ill re

duce

sed

imen

tatio

n an

d in

crea

se a

quat

ic h

abita

t mig

ratio

n fu

rthe

r ups

trea

m.

Cha

pter

Fou

r -

Are

as o

f C

once

rn

Imp

rop

erly

in

stal

led

cu

lver

t

Cu

lver

t o

n B

rick

yard

Cre

ek

32

3232

32 32

The

imp

ervi

ou

s su

rfac

e as

soci

ated

wit

h n

ew d

evel

op

men

t ca

n h

ave

a d

etri

men

tal e

ffec

t o

n t

he

hea

lth

of

the

wat

ersh

ed

33

3333

33 33

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

IMPA

CTS

OF

DEV

ELO

PM

EN

T

Rese

arch

has

sho

wn

that

incr

ease

d de

velo

pmen

t ca

n ha

ve p

rofo

und

effe

cts

on t

he w

ater

qual

ity a

nd h

abita

t po

tent

ial w

ithin

a w

ater

shed

. M

ost

mun

icip

aliti

es,

how

ever

, re

cogn

ize

that

halti

ng a

ll de

velo

pmen

t is

not

a p

ract

ical

way

to

addr

ess

thes

e is

sues

. T

his

man

agem

ent

plan

iden

tifie

s so

me

of t

he m

ost

com

mon

fac

tors

tha

t co

ntrib

ute

to w

ater

shed

deg

rada

tion.

By

conc

entr

atin

g on

add

ress

ing

thes

e is

sues

, co

mm

uniti

es c

an p

rote

ct t

heir

natu

ral r

esou

rces

,w

hile

stil

l pro

tect

ing

thei

r co

mm

unity

’s qu

ality

of

life.

So

me

of t

he w

orst

off

ende

rs t

hat

con-

trib

ute

to t

he d

egra

datio

n of

hab

itat

and

wat

er q

ualit

y in

clud

e:•

Impe

rvio

us S

urfa

ces

•St

orm

wat

er•

Sedi

men

tatio

n /

Eros

ion

•Te

mpe

ratu

re F

luct

uatio

ns

Imp

erv

iou

s Su

rface

As

deve

lopm

ent i

n M

arqu

ette

Cou

nty

cont

inue

s, s

o do

es th

e am

ount

of l

and

clea

red

for i

mpe

rvi-

ous

surf

aces

. W

hile

the

upp

er r

each

es o

f th

e D

ead

Rive

r w

ater

shed

sys

tem

is m

ostly

for

este

d, t

hela

nd u

se w

ithin

the

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r w

ater

shed

incl

udes

2,2

07 a

cres

(15.

5%) o

f de

velo

ped

land

.St

ruct

ures

with

in th

is a

rea,

suc

h as

road

s an

d ro

ofto

ps, a

ll co

ntrib

ute

to th

e am

ount

of i

mpe

rvio

ussu

rfac

e fo

und

in th

e w

ater

shed

.

Whi

le s

ome

natu

rally

impe

rvio

us s

ourc

es,

such

as

rock

-out

crop

ping

s or

cla

y so

ils,

do e

xist

, th

em

ajor

ity o

f th

em a

re m

an-m

ade.

A

s m

ore

impe

rvio

us s

urfa

ces

are

crea

ted,

the

am

ount

of

wat

er r

unni

ng o

ff o

f th

ese

surf

aces

and

into

loca

l wat

er s

yste

ms

also

incr

ease

s (S

ee F

igur

e 4.

1).

Stud

ies

show

tha

t on

ave

rage

, a t

ypic

al c

ity b

lock

gen

erat

es n

ine

times

mor

e ru

noff

tha

n a

natu

ral w

oodl

and

area

of

the

sam

e si

ze (E

PA 1

996)

. A

ccor

ding

to

stud

ies

cond

ucte

d by

the

Mic

higa

n D

NR,

“hi

gher

run

off

corr

elat

es t

o de

crea

sed

grou

nd w

ater

rec

harg

e, d

ecre

ased

base

flow

, in

crea

sed

and

flash

ier

stre

am f

low

, in

crea

ses

in t

empe

ratu

re,

turb

idity

, po

lluta

nts,

eros

ion,

and

cha

nges

in a

quat

ic b

iota

” (P

rem

o et

al.

2001

). E

xper

ts g

ener

ally

con

side

r a

wat

ersh

ed t

hat

has

11%

-25%

impe

rvio

us s

urfa

ce t

o be

“im

pact

ed”,

whi

le a

reas

tha

t co

ntai

nm

ore

than

25%

impe

rvio

us s

urfa

ces

are

cons

ider

ed “

degr

aded

” (P

rem

o et

al.

2001

).

Fort

unat

ely,

the

re a

re s

teps

tha

t ca

n be

tak

en t

o re

duce

the

impa

ct o

f im

perv

ious

sur

face

s on

the

heal

th o

f th

e w

ater

shed

. D

evel

oper

s an

d st

akeh

olde

rs h

ave

show

n a

conc

ern

rega

rdin

gst

orm

wat

er a

nd r

elat

ed n

on-p

oint

sou

rce

pollu

tion,

and

are

look

ing

for

inno

vativ

e w

ays

to h

elp

miti

gate

som

e of

the

ir ef

fect

s.

Spec

ific

stra

tegi

es f

or r

educ

ing

the

impa

ct o

f im

perv

ious

sur

-fa

ces

will

be

addr

esse

d in

the

“M

anag

emen

t St

rate

gies

& R

ecom

men

datio

ns”

sect

ion

of t

his

wat

ersh

ed m

anag

emen

t pl

an.

Cha

pter

Fou

r -

Are

as o

f C

once

rn

Fig

ure

4.1

: Im

pac

ts o

f Im

per

vio

us

Surf

aces

(So

urc

e: S

chu

eler

199

4)

34

3434

34 34

Fig

ure

4.2

: D

epic

tio

n o

f St

orm

wat

er “

Flas

h”

(So

urc

e: F

erg

uso

n 1

998)

Fig

ure

4.3

: H

igh

Lev

el o

f C

on

tam

inat

ion

in

“Fi

rst

Flu

sh”

(So

urc

e: F

erg

uso

n 1

998)

35

3535

35 35

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

Sto

rmw

ate

rBe

caus

e th

e is

sue

of s

torm

wat

er is

clo

sely

rel

ated

to

that

of

impe

rvio

us s

urfa

ces,

sto

rmw

ater

issu

es a

re t

ypic

ally

ass

ocia

ted

with

bro

ad la

nd u

se c

ateg

orie

s, s

uch

as r

esid

entia

l, co

mm

erci

al,

orin

dust

rial u

ses.

A

s ra

inw

ater

fal

ls o

n an

impe

rvio

us s

urfa

ce,

it is

qui

ckly

col

lect

ed in

sto

rmw

ater

syst

ems

and

rele

ased

into

the

loca

l str

eam

sys

tem

, usu

ally

with

no

pre-

trea

tmen

t.

Whe

n th

era

te a

t w

hich

thi

s st

orm

wat

er is

rel

ease

d is

not

pro

perly

man

aged

, it

can

ente

r th

e st

ream

syst

em a

t a

muc

h hi

gher

vel

ocity

and

tem

pera

ture

tha

n w

ater

wou

ld n

atur

ally

ent

er (S

ee F

igur

e4.

2).

This

“fla

sh”

of w

ater

ent

erin

g th

e st

ream

can

ero

de s

trea

m b

anks

, dam

age

ripar

ian

vege

tatio

n, a

nd a

lter

the

shap

e of

str

eam

cha

nnel

s.

Sinc

e th

e st

orm

wat

er is

oft

en a

muc

hhi

gher

tem

pera

ture

tha

n th

e na

tura

l str

eam

wat

er,

it ca

n al

so c

ause

sig

nific

ant

fluct

uatio

ns in

the

tem

pera

ture

of

the

wat

erw

ay,

resu

lting

in d

amag

e to

aqu

atic

spe

cies

.

Stor

mw

ater

is a

lso

a tr

ansp

ort

mec

hani

sm f

or s

edim

ent

and

pollu

tant

s th

at c

an a

dver

sely

aff

ect

the

heal

th o

f a

stre

am s

yste

m.

Acc

ordi

ng t

o th

e EP

A, “

sedi

men

ts a

nd s

olid

s co

nstit

ute

the

larg

est

volu

me

of p

ollu

tant

load

s to

rec

eivi

ng w

ater

s in

urb

an a

reas

” (E

PA 1

996)

. T

hese

pol

lut-

ants

are

col

lect

ed f

rom

are

as s

uch

as c

onst

ruct

ion

site

s, p

arki

ng lo

ts,

road

way

s, a

nd r

esid

entia

lla

wns

, and

ent

er t

he s

trea

m s

yste

m w

ith t

he in

itial

run

off

(ref

erre

d to

as

“firs

t flu

sh”)

(See

Figu

re 4

.3).

Con

tam

inan

ts c

an in

clud

e “o

il, g

reas

e, a

nd t

oxic

che

mic

als

from

aut

omob

iles;

nutr

ient

s an

d pe

stic

ides

fro

m t

urf

man

agem

ent

and

gard

enin

g; v

iruse

s an

d ba

cter

ia f

rom

fai

ling

sept

ic s

yste

ms;

roa

d sa

lts; a

nd h

eavy

met

als”

(EPA

199

6).

See

Tabl

e 4.

1 fo

r a

list

of p

rinci

pal

cont

amin

ants

com

mon

ly f

ound

in s

torm

wat

er.

In 1

997,

Ste

uer

et a

l. (1

997)

con

duct

ed a

n an

alys

is o

f st

orm

wat

er r

unof

f fo

r 12

sto

rm e

vent

sw

ithin

a 3

00-a

cre

wat

ersh

ed in

the

Mar

quet

te a

rea.

A

lthou

gh t

hese

stu

dies

are

not

spe

cific

to

the

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r w

ater

shed

, the

se d

ata

may

ref

lect

sto

rmw

ater

tre

nds

in t

he M

arqu

ette

area

and

off

er id

eas

in b

ette

r m

anag

emen

t pr

actic

e.

Acc

ordi

ng t

o th

ese

stud

ies,

the

hig

hest

run

off

coef

ficie

nt w

as r

ecor

ded

for

com

mer

cial

par

king

lots

, fo

llow

ed b

y st

reet

s. P

arki

ng lo

ts p

rodu

ced

a di

spro

port

iona

tely

hig

h lo

ad o

f hy

droc

arbo

nsan

d m

etal

s co

mpa

red

to a

ll ot

her

sour

ce a

reas

(Pitt

, R. a

nd J

. Voo

rhee

s. 1

989)

. A

s su

ch, w

ater

-sh

ed m

anag

ers

can

just

ifiab

ly c

lass

ify m

any

park

ing

lots

as

stor

mw

ater

“ho

tspo

ts”.

With

dev

elop

-m

ent i

ncre

asin

g al

ong

the

US4

1-M

28 c

orrid

or, p

rope

r sto

rmw

ater

trea

tmen

t will

bec

ome

a cr

itica

lco

mpo

nent

of w

ater

shed

pro

tect

ion

as m

ore

road

way

s an

d pa

rkin

g lo

ts a

re c

onst

ruct

ed.

Cha

pter

Fou

r -

Are

as o

f C

once

rn

Pollu

tan

ts

Exam

ple

s M

etal

s zi

nc, c

adm

ium

, cop

per,

ch

rom

ium

, ars

enic

, lea

d O

rgan

ic c

ompo

unds

pe

stic

ides

, oil,

gas

olin

e, g

reas

e Pa

thog

ens

viru

ses,

bac

teria

, pro

tozo

a N

utrie

nts

nitr

ogen

, pho

spho

rus

Bioc

hem

ical

Oxy

gen

Dem

and

(BO

D)

gras

s cl

ippi

ngs,

fal

len

leav

es,

hydr

ocar

bons

, hum

an /

anim

al

was

te

Sedi

men

t sa

nd, s

oil,

silt

Salts

so

dium

chl

orid

e, c

alci

um c

hlor

ide

Tab

le 4

.1:

Pri

nci

pal

Co

nta

min

ants

in

Sto

rmw

ater

(So

urc

e: N

RD

C 2

001)

36

3636

36 36

Sed

imen

tati

on

in

Rea

ny

Cre

ek

37

3737

37 37

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

Sto

rmw

ate

r Im

pact

sTh

e ro

ad-s

trea

m c

ross

ing

inve

ntor

y id

entif

ied

seve

ral c

ulve

rts

in t

he r

esid

entia

l are

a of

Trow

brid

ge P

ark

as s

torm

wat

er “

hots

pots

.” T

houg

h th

e pr

actic

al s

olut

ion

wou

ld b

e to

inst

all

curb

, gut

ter,

and

stor

m s

ewer

in T

row

brid

ge it

is, h

owev

er, n

ot a

cos

t-ef

fect

ive

one.

The

re a

rese

vera

l reg

ions

with

in 0

.2 s

quar

e m

iles

(128

acr

es) o

f th

e Ba

ckya

rd C

reek

sub

wat

ersh

ed in

nee

dof

sto

rmw

ater

man

agem

ent.

Pra

ctic

es s

uch

as g

rass

ed s

wal

es w

ill b

e us

ed t

o co

nvey

sto

rmw

ater

at a

low

vel

ocity

in o

rder

to

avoi

d er

osio

n an

d m

aint

ain

the

natu

ral v

eget

atio

n ad

jace

nt t

o ro

ads

and

wat

erw

ays.

73,

000

squa

re f

eet

of t

he A

mer

ican

par

king

lot

has

also

bee

n si

ted

as a

n ar

ea in

need

of s

torm

wat

er m

anag

emen

t. R

unof

f and

sno

wpa

ck m

elt f

rom

the

sout

heas

t cor

ner f

low

sof

f the

par

king

lot a

nd o

nto

Broo

kton

Roa

d, c

reat

ing

a gr

eat d

eal o

f poo

ling

and

sedi

men

tde

posi

tion.

By

tran

spor

ting

snow

pack

off

site

and

inst

allin

g a

serie

s of

gra

ssed

sw

ales

, par

king

lot

runo

ff w

ill b

e co

ntro

lled.

Ero

sio

n a

nd

Sed

imen

tati

on

Sedi

men

t dep

ositi

on in

trou

t str

eam

s is

a c

hron

ic p

robl

em in

the

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r wat

ersh

ed. A

sst

ream

ban

ks e

rode

or a

s st

orm

wat

er w

ashe

s in

to s

trea

ms,

sed

imen

t is

depo

site

d in

to th

e w

ater

-w

ay.

Thes

e de

posi

ts c

an h

ave

a se

rious

eff

ect

on a

quat

ic s

peci

es, p

artic

ular

ly t

rout

. A

ccor

ding

to

Mic

higa

n D

NR

fishe

ries

biol

ogis

ts, t

he n

umbe

r one

pol

luta

nt a

ffec

ting

fishe

ries

in th

e ar

ea is

sedi

men

t (S

undb

erg

et a

l. 19

95).

The

se d

epos

its c

an f

ill t

he h

oles

and

spa

wni

ng a

reas

of

cold

-w

ater

str

eam

s, le

avin

g th

e tr

out w

ith in

adeq

uate

hab

itat f

or re

prod

uctio

n.

The

sour

ce o

f th

is s

edim

ent

is v

arie

d.

Road

way

s th

at h

ave

inad

equa

te d

itche

s, b

anks

, an

dve

geta

tion

can

all c

ontr

ibut

e to

the

rel

ease

of

sedi

men

t in

to w

ater

way

s.

Con

stru

ctio

n si

tes

can

also

rel

ease

ton

s of

sed

imen

t if

prev

enta

tive

mea

sure

s ar

e no

t ta

ken

to c

ontr

ol e

rosi

on.

Poo

rlypl

anne

d de

velo

pmen

t ad

jace

nt t

o la

kes

and

stre

ams

can

also

cre

ate

unst

able

con

ditio

ns,

part

icul

arly

if a

veg

etat

ed b

uffe

r is

not

mai

ntai

ned

alon

g th

e riv

er’s

cour

se.

Ero

sio

n a

nd

Sed

imen

tati

on

Im

pact

sTh

irty-

eigh

t per

cent

(38%

) of t

he 2

4 w

ater

shed

enh

ance

men

t pro

ject

s de

al w

ith s

tabi

lizin

ger

osio

n an

d co

ntro

lling

sed

imen

tatio

n. P

rivat

e ro

ads,

cul

vert

s, s

trea

mba

nks,

and

recr

eatio

nal

trai

ls a

re th

e so

urce

s of

som

e of

the

eros

ion

and

sedi

men

tatio

n oc

curr

ing

in th

e w

ater

shed

. In

tota

l, th

ese

site

s co

ntrib

ute

to 6

1.3

tons

/acr

e of

soi

l los

s. B

est m

anag

emen

t pra

ctic

es th

at w

ill b

eus

ed to

con

trol

thes

e si

tes

incl

ude

bank

sta

biliz

atio

n, c

ulve

rt s

tabi

lizat

ion,

wat

er d

iver

sion

s,se

dim

ent t

raps

, and

reve

geta

tion.

Cha

pter

Fou

r -

Are

as o

f C

once

rn

Seve

re e

rosi

on

ad

jace

nt

to B

rick

yard

acc

ess

road

Ero

sio

n a

lon

g B

rick

yard

Cre

ek

38

3838

38 38

Co

ldw

ater

str

eam

s in

th

e Lo

wer

Dea

d R

iver

wat

ersh

ed s

up

po

rt t

rou

t p

op

ula

tio

ns

like

the

Bro

ok

Tro

ut

sho

wn

her

e

39

3939

39 39

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

Tem

pera

ture

Flu

ctu

ati

on

sBa

sed

on c

urre

nt f

ish

com

mun

ity a

nd s

trea

m t

empe

ratu

re d

ata

colle

cted

by

the

Mic

higa

nD

epar

tmen

t of

Env

ironm

enta

l Qua

lity,

the

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r co

ntin

ues

to b

e cl

assi

fied

as a

cold

wat

er f

ishe

ry.

At

pres

ent,

how

ever

, the

tre

nd o

f th

e w

ater

shed

is le

adin

g to

war

ds a

war

mw

ater

fis

hery

due

to

envi

ronm

enta

l deg

rada

tion,

a d

eclin

e in

mat

ure

fish

popu

latio

n, a

ndex

istin

g da

m im

poun

dmen

ts.

The

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r W

ater

shed

Cou

ncil,

who

se m

issi

onin

clud

es a

com

mitm

ent

to s

usta

in t

he c

oldw

ater

fis

herie

s in

the

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r w

ater

shed

,is

see

king

way

s to

rev

erse

thi

s de

grad

atio

n an

d pr

otec

t th

e ex

istin

g co

ldw

ater

hab

itat

for

fish

popu

latio

ns in

the

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r.

Mos

t ty

pes

of e

nviro

nmen

tal d

egra

datio

n (e

.g.

disc

harg

es,

chan

neliz

atio

n, w

ater

shed

dev

elop

-m

ent)

incr

ease

sum

mer

tem

pera

ture

s in

str

eam

s (H

ynes

197

0; W

arre

n 19

71;

Kar

a an

dSc

hlos

ser

1978

). O

pen

cano

pies

, de

crea

sed

shad

ing,

and

wid

er,

shal

low

er s

trea

m c

hann

els

crea

te m

ore

effe

ctiv

e so

lar

radi

atio

n ab

sorp

tion

and

lead

to

war

mer

str

eam

tem

pera

ture

s.C

ulve

rts

and

pond

s in

tens

ify t

he p

robl

em b

y ba

ckin

g up

wat

er a

nd a

llow

ing

susp

ende

dse

dim

ents

to

sett

le t

o th

e bo

ttom

, th

us d

ecre

asin

g de

pth,

wid

enin

g th

e st

ream

, an

d in

crea

sing

wat

er t

empe

ratu

re.

Stor

mw

ater

run

off,

whi

ch is

gen

eral

ly a

t a

muc

h hi

gher

tem

pera

ture

, can

also

rai

se t

he a

vera

ge t

empe

ratu

re o

f lo

cal s

trea

m s

yste

ms

and

may

be

a so

urce

for

non

-poi

ntso

urce

pol

lutio

n.

In A

ugus

t 20

00, a

stu

dy w

as p

erfo

rmed

by

the

Mic

higa

n D

EQ t

o m

easu

re t

he t

empe

ratu

re o

fth

e D

ead

Rive

r al

ong

the

bypa

ssed

cha

nnel

bet

wee

n th

e M

cClu

re d

am a

nd t

he F

ores

tvill

eSt

orag

e Ba

sin

(God

by a

nd S

uppn

ick

2001

). T

his

stud

y do

cum

ente

d te

mpe

ratu

re t

rend

s in

thi

sby

pass

ed a

rea

and

com

pare

d th

em t

o re

adin

gs t

aken

fro

m R

eany

Cre

ek,

whi

ch is

onl

y af

fect

edby

nat

ural

wea

ther

pat

tern

s.

Resu

lts c

onfir

med

a g

ener

al p

atte

rn o

f in

crea

sing

tem

pera

ture

from

one

mon

itorin

g st

atio

n to

the

nex

t, w

ith a

n av

erag

e te

mpe

ratu

re in

crea

se o

f 5.

2° c

enti-

grad

e al

ong

the

entir

e by

pass

ed r

each

. W

hile

the

str

eam

seg

men

t st

ill m

eets

Mic

higa

n W

ater

Qua

lity

Stan

dard

s fo

r a

cold

wat

er s

trea

m,

the

fluct

uatio

n in

tem

pera

ture

may

poi

nt t

o po

ten-

tial f

utur

e pr

oble

ms.

Th

e ex

pans

ion

of d

evel

opm

ent

in t

he w

ater

shed

cou

pled

with

man

-mad

ean

d na

tura

l im

poun

dmen

ts a

re f

acto

rs in

war

min

g te

mpe

ratu

re t

rend

s re

sulti

ng in

deg

rada

tion

of c

oldw

ater

str

eam

s an

d a

decr

ease

in b

iotic

inte

grity

.

Cha

pter

Fou

r -

Are

as o

f C

once

rn

Sam

plin

g o

f lo

cal

fish

po

pu

lati

on

40

4040

40 40

Foo

tpat

hs

can

en

cou

rag

e er

osi

on

, par

ticu

larl

y o

n s

lop

esD

esig

nat

ed s

trea

m c

ross

ing

s sh

ou

ld b

e u

sed

to

pro

tect

fra

gile

str

eam

ban

ks

41

4141

41 41

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

REC

REA

TIO

NA

L A

CTI

VIT

IES

Act

iviti

es s

uch

as b

oatin

g an

d hi

king

can

oft

en le

ad t

o th

e gr

adua

l deg

rada

tion

of t

he w

ater

shed

.Th

e lo

adin

g an

d un

load

ing

of w

ater

craf

t can

impa

ct s

trea

m b

anks

by

tram

plin

g th

e ve

geta

tion,

crea

ting

a fo

otpa

th t

o th

e w

ater

’s ed

ge, a

nd e

ncou

ragi

ng e

rosi

on.

Thes

e th

reat

s ca

n be

elim

inat

ed b

y es

tabl

ishi

ng p

ublic

acc

ess

site

s an

d pe

rman

ent

dock

str

uctu

res

alon

g na

viga

ble

wat

er b

odie

s. A

s ne

w h

ikin

g tr

ails

are

cre

ated

, con

stan

t fo

ot t

raff

ic t

o th

ese

area

s ca

n le

ad t

oso

il co

mpa

ctio

n an

d er

osio

n. B

y di

rect

ing

hike

rs to

a d

esig

nate

d tr

ail o

r cre

atin

g pe

rman

ent

wal

kway

s in

are

as t

hat

are

susc

eptib

le t

o er

osio

n, t

hese

thr

eats

can

be

elim

inat

ed.

Re

cre

ati

on

al I

mp

act

sTh

ere

are

two

recr

eatio

nal a

reas

with

in t

he L

ower

Dea

d Ri

ver

wat

ersh

ed t

hat

have

bee

n si

ted

asar

eas

of c

once

rn.

The

loca

lly k

now

n hi

king

tra

il le

adin

g to

the

Dea

d Ri

ver

Falls

has

yie

lded

maj

or s

oil c

ompa

ctio

n, e

xpos

ure

of tr

ee ro

ots,

and

loss

of r

ipar

ian

vege

tatio

n. A

ppro

xim

atel

y3,

520

linea

r fe

et o

f st

ream

bank

has

bee

n id

entif

ied

as n

eedi

ng s

ome

sort

of

stab

iliza

tion

and

reve

geta

tion.

Ero

sion

was

acc

eler

ated

in t

his

area

as

the

surg

e of

flo

od w

ater

s to

re t

hrou

gh o

nM

ay 2

003

and

rem

oved

sev

eral

ton

s of

soi

l fro

m t

he t

rail.

In a

dditi

on t

o th

e D

ead

Rive

r fa

llsar

ea, a

pro

pose

d na

ture

trai

l with

in M

arqu

ette

Tow

nshi

p w

ill re

quire

ripa

rian

buff

er p

rote

ctio

nal

ong

Badg

er C

reek

. Th

e an

ticip

ated

tra

il w

ill p

rote

ct 2

,740

line

ar f

eet

of s

trea

mba

nk b

yre

stor

ing

nativ

e ve

geta

tion

and

crea

ting

wal

kway

s in

are

as t

hat

are

in n

eed

of s

tabi

lizat

ion.

42

4242

42 42

Stre

am m

on

ito

rin

g is

an

imp

ort

ant

too

l fo

r as

sess

ing

th

e h

ealt

h o

f a

wat

ersh

ed(S

ou

rce:

USD

A F

ore

st S

ervi

ce 2

003)

43

4343

43 43

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

It ca

n be

dis

cour

agin

g to

con

side

r th

at h

uman

act

ions

and

the

impa

ct o

f ou

r ex

pand

ing

deve

l-op

men

t re

mai

n th

e pr

imar

y so

urce

s of

env

ironm

enta

l deg

rada

tion

with

in t

he L

ower

Dea

d Ri

ver

wat

ersh

ed.

For

tuna

tely

, ou

r in

volv

emen

t ca

n al

so b

e th

e st

artin

g po

int

for

mea

ning

ful c

hang

eth

at r

esul

ts in

the

pro

tect

ion

of t

he in

tegr

ity o

f th

e Lo

wer

Dea

d Ri

ver

wat

ersh

ed.

In o

rder

to

affe

ct t

his

chan

ge,

the

sust

aine

d co

mm

itmen

t fr

om a

var

iety

of

invo

lved

par

ties

is r

equi

red.

Thes

e pa

rtic

ipan

ts in

clud

e lo

cal g

over

nmen

t, c

omm

unity

lead

ers,

city

and

tow

nshi

p pl

anne

rs,

deve

lope

rs,

busi

ness

ow

ners

, la

ndow

ners

, an

d lo

cal r

esid

ents

. T

his

chap

ter

focu

ses

on s

ever

alm

anag

emen

t st

rate

gies

par

ticip

ants

can

use

to

addr

ess

man

y of

the

issu

es d

escr

ibed

in C

hapt

erFo

ur a

s w

ell a

s a

wat

ersh

ed p

rote

ctio

n go

al f

or e

ach

reco

mm

enda

tion.

STR

EA

M M

ON

ITO

RIN

GIn

ord

er t

o cl

early

tra

ck t

he im

pact

of

deve

lopm

ent

on t

he h

ealth

of

the

wat

ersh

ed, a

tho

roug

hin

vent

ory

of r

esou

rces

and

per

iodi

c m

onito

ring

of lo

cal w

ater

way

s sh

ould

be

unde

rtak

en.

Alth

ough

sev

eral

stu

dies

hav

e be

en d

one

on in

divi

dual

rea

ches

of

the

wat

ersh

ed,

it is

nec

essa

ryto

com

pile

a c

ompl

ete

inve

ntor

y of

bas

elin

e da

ta f

rom

whi

ch f

utur

e pr

ogre

ss c

an b

e m

easu

red.

One

rec

omm

enda

tion

is t

o em

ploy

the

SW

QA

S Pr

oced

ure

#51

Surv

ey P

roto

cols

for

Wad

able

Rive

rs (

form

erly

kno

wn

as t

he G

LEA

S Pr

oced

ure

#51)

as

defin

ed b

y th

e M

ichi

gan

Dep

artm

ent

ofEn

viro

nmen

tal Q

ualit

y Su

rfac

e W

ater

Qua

lity

Div

isio

n (S

chne

ider

200

0).

Thi

s pr

otoc

ol in

volv

esth

e m

easu

rem

ent

of b

iolo

gica

l and

hab

itat

indi

cato

rs t

hat

resu

lt in

a r

atin

g of

the

rel

ativ

e he

alth

of a

str

eam

sys

tem

. Th

e su

rvey

con

sist

s of

3 p

arts

; eva

luat

ion

of t

he m

acro

inve

rteb

rate

com

mu-

nity

, ev

alua

tion

of t

he f

ish

com

mun

ity,

and

eval

uatio

n of

hab

itat

qual

ity.

(Sch

neid

er 2

000)

. A

serie

s of

met

rics

are

used

to

eval

uate

the

wat

er s

yste

m a

t a

num

ber

of s

ampl

ing

loca

tions

and

ara

ting

indi

catin

g th

e le

vel o

f st

ream

qua

lity

is a

ssig

ned

(exc

elle

nt,

good

, fa

ir, o

r po

or).

Thi

sra

ting

syst

em a

lso

inco

rpor

ates

an

anal

ysis

of

limiti

ng f

acto

rs t

hat

can

be a

use

ful d

iagn

ostic

too

lw

hen

a de

taile

d an

alys

is o

f th

e ca

use

for

stre

am im

pairm

ent

is r

equi

red.

St

ream

sur

veyo

rs n

ote

stre

am d

istu

rban

ces

such

as

impo

undm

ents

, ca

nopy

rem

oval

, or

the

pre

senc

e of

inva

sive

fis

h or

plan

t sp

ecie

s.

This

tho

roug

h co

llect

ion

of b

asel

ine

data

will

ser

ve a

s a

star

ting

poin

t fr

om w

hich

futu

re p

rogr

ess

can

be m

easu

red,

and

the

suc

cess

of

rem

edia

tion

stra

tegi

es c

an b

e ev

alua

ted.

WA

TER

SHED

PR

OTE

CTI

ON

GO

AL

It is

the

obj

ectiv

e of

the

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r W

ater

shed

Cou

ncil

to m

aint

ain

the

esta

blis

hed

stre

am m

onito

ring

prog

ram

. A

s w

ater

shed

enh

ance

men

t pr

ojec

ts a

re in

stal

led,

str

eam

s w

ill b

eas

sess

ed w

ith t

he g

oal o

f w

ater

qua

lity

ratin

gs t

o be

impr

oved

by

five

poin

ts o

n ea

ch t

ribut

ary.

Add

ition

al s

ites

will

be

crea

ted

as t

he n

eed

for

mon

itorin

g ar

ises

.

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

STR

ATE

GIE

S, R

EC

OM

ME

ND

ATI

ON

S, &

WA

TER

SHE

D P

RO

TEC

TIO

N G

OA

LS

Cha

pter

Fiv

e -

Stra

tegi

es,

Reco

mm

enda

tions

, an

d G

oals

SW

QA

S P

roce

du

re N

o.

51

:Fo

r a

mor

e de

taile

d de

scrip

tion

of t

he P

51pr

otoc

ol,

an o

utlin

e of

thi

s pr

oces

s is

pres

ente

d th

roug

h M

ichi

gan’

s D

epar

tmen

t of

Nat

ural

Res

ourc

es w

ebsi

te.

For

add

ition

alas

sist

ance

, co

ntac

t th

e Su

rfac

e W

ater

Qua

lity

Div

isio

n of

the

Mic

higa

n D

epar

tmen

t of

Envi

ronm

enta

l Qua

lity

or t

he M

ichi

gan

Dep

artm

ent

of N

atur

al R

esou

rces

.w

ww

.mic

higa

n.go

v/dn

r/w

ww

.mic

higa

n.go

v/de

q/

Ch

apte

r Fi

ve

44

4444

44 44

Tab

le 5

.1: G

uid

elin

es f

or

Two

-zo

ne

Bu

ffer

Tab

le 5

.2: E

xcep

tio

ns

to B

uff

er W

idth

S

ensi

tive

are

a A

dd

itio

nal

bu

ffer

wid

th

Ste

ep S

lop

es

15%

-17%

+

10

feet

18%

-20%

+

30

feet

21%

-23%

+

50

feet

24%

-25%

+

60

feet

> 2

5%

+ 7

0 fe

et

Wet

lan

ds

E

xten

d to

enc

ompa

ss w

etla

nd

+ 2

0 fe

et p

ast w

etla

nd e

dge

Wat

er P

ollu

tio

n

Haz

ard

s

Site

150

’-300

’ fro

m e

dge

of

wat

erw

ay

Fig

ure

5.1

: Tw

o-z

on

e R

ipar

ian

Bu

ffer

45

4545

45 45

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

RIP

AR

IAN

BU

FFER

SO

ne s

impl

e, y

et e

xtre

mel

y ef

fect

ive

tool

for

pro

tect

ing

the

heal

th a

nd in

tegr

ity o

f lo

cal w

ater

way

sis

the

use

of

vege

tate

d bu

ffer

s al

ong

ripar

ian

corr

idor

s.

Thes

e rip

aria

n bu

ffer

s ar

e ar

eas

ofve

geta

tion

loca

ted

imm

edia

tely

adj

acen

t to

a w

ater

bod

y or

str

eam

sys

tem

. A

ccor

ding

to

the

EPA

, th

ese

sim

ple

strip

s of

veg

etat

ed la

nd c

an o

ffer

eno

rmou

s en

viro

nmen

tal b

enef

its,

incl

udin

g:•

Rest

orin

g an

d m

aint

aini

ng t

he p

hysi

cal a

nd b

iolo

gica

l int

egrit

y of

the

wat

er r

esou

rces

•Re

mov

ing

pollu

tant

s fr

om u

rban

sto

rmw

ater

•St

abili

zing

str

eam

ban

ks r

esul

ting

in r

educ

ed e

rosi

on a

nd s

edim

enta

tion

•Pr

ovid

ing

infil

trat

ion

of s

torm

wat

er r

unof

f•

Mai

ntai

ning

bas

e flo

w o

f st

ream

s•

Con

trib

utin

g or

gani

c m

atte

r th

at s

erve

s as

a s

ourc

e of

foo

d an

d en

ergy

for

the

aqua

tic e

cosy

stem

•Pr

ovid

ing

tree

can

opy

to s

hade

str

eam

s an

d re

gula

te t

empe

ratu

re (

EPA

200

2)

To h

elp

esta

blis

h gu

idel

ines

for

per

mitt

ed a

nd r

estr

icte

d us

es,

the

EPA

and

the

Mic

higa

n D

epar

t-m

ent

of E

nviro

nmen

tal Q

ualit

y re

com

men

d us

ing

a m

ulti-

zone

app

roac

h to

diff

eren

tiate

app

ro-

pria

te le

vels

of

activ

ity w

ithin

diff

eren

t ar

eas

of t

he r

ipar

ian

corr

idor

. Th

e C

entr

al L

ake

Supe

rior

Wat

ersh

ed P

artn

ersh

ip is

cur

rent

ly w

orki

ng o

n a

draf

t rip

aria

n bu

ffer

ord

inan

ce in

hop

es th

at it

mig

ht b

e ap

plie

d to

wat

erw

ays

in M

arqu

ette

Cou

nty.

Suc

h an

ord

inan

ce w

ould

reco

mm

end

abu

ffer

of

50 f

eet

in t

otal

wid

th f

or b

oth

side

s of

the

str

eam

sys

tem

. W

ithin

thi

s 50

fee

t, t

hebu

ffer

wou

ld b

e di

vide

d in

to t

wo

dist

inct

zon

es, a

Str

eam

side

Zon

e an

d an

Out

er Z

one

(See

Figu

re 5

.1).

Cor

resp

ondi

ng t

o ea

ch z

one

wou

ld b

e a

set

of p

erm

itted

and

res

tric

ted

uses

tha

tw

ould

hel

p to

pro

tect

the

wat

er q

ualit

y an

d aq

uatic

hab

itat

in t

he a

djac

ent

stre

am (S

ee T

able

5.1

for

a su

mm

ary

of t

hese

gui

delin

es).

Whi

le t

he 5

0’ b

uffe

r is

con

side

red

the

gene

ral s

tand

ard,

the

re a

re s

ituat

ions

whe

re t

he p

rese

nce

of a

n ec

olog

ical

ly s

ensi

tive

area

req

uire

s a

mod

ifica

tion

to t

his

buff

er w

idth

. In

ord

er t

o en

sure

the

prot

ectio

n of

str

eam

inte

grity

, bu

ffer

exp

ansi

ons

wou

ld b

e re

quire

d fo

r w

etla

nds

and

area

s of

stee

p sl

ope.

Se

e Fi

gure

s 5.

2 fo

r a

sum

mar

y of

the

se b

uffe

r ex

tens

ions

.

WA

TER

SHED

PR

OTE

CTI

ON

GO

AL

It is

the

goa

l of

the

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r W

ater

shed

Cou

ncil

to w

ork

coop

erat

ivel

y w

ith t

he C

entr

alLa

ke S

uper

ior

Wat

ersh

ed P

artn

ersh

ip a

nd lo

cal c

ity a

nd t

owns

hip

offic

ials

to

esta

blis

h th

ere

com

men

ded

buff

er s

trip

and

set

back

gui

delin

es.

Spe

cial

are

as o

f co

ncer

n th

at n

eed

rem

edia

tion

incl

ude

appr

oxim

atel

y 5,

000

feet

of

erod

ed s

trea

mba

nk c

ause

d by

the

Dea

d Ri

ver

flood

. In

con

junc

tion

with

the

men

tione

d ag

enci

es,

the

Wat

ersh

ed C

ounc

il w

ill a

lso

supp

ort

the

mis

sion

of

the

Cen

tral

Lak

e Su

perio

r La

nd C

onse

rvan

cy b

y pr

omot

ing

cons

erva

tion

ease

men

tsw

ith r

ipar

ian

land

ow

ners

.

Cha

pter

Fiv

e -

Stra

tegi

es,

Reco

mm

enda

tions

, an

d G

oals

Mo

del

Ord

inan

ce:

To s

ee a

ful

l cop

y of

the

dra

ft r

ipar

ian

buff

eror

dina

nce

that

is b

eing

dev

elop

ed b

y th

eC

LSW

P, p

leas

e se

e A

ppen

dix

C.

Both

the

EPA

and

Mic

higa

n’s

Dep

artm

ent

of E

nviro

nmen

tal

Qua

lity

have

als

o sp

ecifi

ed b

est

man

agem

ent

prac

tices

for

the

impl

emen

tatio

n of

the

serip

aria

n bu

ffer

s an

d of

fer

addi

tiona

l inf

orm

a-tio

n re

gard

ing

thei

r us

e.

For

addi

tiona

las

sist

ance

with

thi

s pr

oces

s, c

onta

ct t

he E

PA’s

Off

ice

of W

etla

nds,

Oce

ans,

and

Wat

ersh

eds

or t

he M

ichi

gan

Dep

artm

ent

of E

nviro

nmen

-ta

l Qua

lity.

ww

w.e

pa.g

ov/o

wow

/w

ww

.mic

higa

n.go

v/de

q/

46

4646

46 46

Fig

ure

5.2

: B

iore

ten

tio

n S

yste

m

47

4747

47 47

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

STO

RM

WA

TER

MA

NA

GEM

EN

TTh

ere

are

seve

ral s

torm

wat

er m

anag

emen

t st

rate

gies

tha

t ca

n be

ado

pted

in a

reas

exp

erie

ncin

gin

crea

sed

deve

lopm

ent

in t

he L

ower

Dea

d Ri

ver

wat

ersh

ed.

The

se s

trat

egie

s ar

e de

sign

ed t

oad

dres

s th

e th

ree

mos

t cr

itica

l com

pone

nts

of a

suc

cess

ful s

torm

wat

er m

anag

emen

t pl

an:

trea

tmen

t of

con

tam

inan

ts,

man

agem

ent

of w

ater

rel

ease

rat

es,

and

tem

pera

ture

mod

erat

ion.

The

stra

tegi

es o

utlin

ed b

elow

are

des

igne

d to

add

ress

the

se is

sues

, ul

timat

ely

resu

lting

in t

hein

crea

sed

prot

ectio

n of

loca

l wat

erw

ays.

Infi

ltra

tio

n S

yst

em

sIn

filtr

atio

n sy

stem

s m

ost

clos

ely

rese

mbl

e na

tura

l hyd

rolo

gic

proc

esse

s.

Thes

e sy

stem

s al

low

stor

mw

ater

to

natu

rally

infil

trat

e ba

ck in

to g

roun

dwat

er a

quife

rs t

hat

even

tual

ly r

eple

nish

loca

lst

ream

s an

d w

ater

way

s.

Acc

ordi

ng t

o a

stud

y co

nduc

ted

by A

yres

, Lew

is, N

orris

, & M

ay, I

nc(2

002)

, st

rate

gies

“su

ch a

s in

filtr

atio

n tr

ench

es,

rain

gar

dens

, an

d bi

oret

entio

n ar

eas

shou

ld b

eut

ilize

d, s

ite p

erm

ittin

g”.

Unf

ortu

nate

ly,

the

succ

ess

of a

n in

filtr

atio

n sy

stem

is h

ighl

y de

pen-

dent

on

the

spec

ific

char

acte

ristic

s of

a s

ite,

such

as

soil

prop

ertie

s an

d po

tent

ial f

or g

roun

dwa-

ter

cont

amin

atio

n.

Gen

eral

ly, it

is a

lso

only

fea

sibl

e fo

r sm

all d

rain

age

area

s (B

obrin

200

0).

Beca

use

they

can

be

impl

emen

ted

on a

sm

alle

r sc

ale,

infil

trat

ion

syst

ems

may

be

a go

odal

tern

ativ

e fo

r re

trof

it pr

ojec

ts w

here

exi

stin

g de

velo

pmen

t do

es n

ot a

llow

for

the

nec

essa

rysp

ace

to in

stal

l a c

onve

ntio

nal d

eten

tion

basi

n.

For

exam

ple,

an

exis

ting

park

ing

lot

can

bem

odifi

ed t

o in

clud

e a

bior

eten

tion

swal

e th

at c

an p

roce

ss r

unof

f fr

om t

he lo

t an

d di

rect

it in

to a

smal

l inf

iltra

tion

syst

em.

Figu

re 5

.2 s

how

s ho

w s

uch

a sy

stem

cou

ld b

e im

plem

ente

d in

are

lativ

ely

smal

l are

a.

Gra

ssed

Sw

ale

sIn

a n

atur

al, u

ndev

elop

ed s

yste

m, w

ater

oft

en t

akes

a s

low

, circ

uito

us r

oute

tow

ard

its f

inal

dest

inat

ion.

To

day,

with

our

incr

ease

d at

tent

ion

tow

ard

effic

ienc

y an

d sa

fety

, ou

r us

e of

pip

esan

d en

gine

ered

sto

rmw

ater

sys

tem

s “f

ocus

on

dire

ctin

g an

d dr

aini

ng w

ater

off

of

pave

dsu

rfac

es a

s qu

ickl

y an

d ef

ficie

ntly

as

poss

ible

” (A

rnol

d an

d G

ibbo

ns 1

996)

. T

his

syst

em o

fco

nvey

ance

, w

hile

eff

icie

nt,

has

serio

us e

nviro

nmen

tal i

mpa

cts.

Th

e us

e of

gra

ssed

sw

ales

and

sedi

men

t fo

reba

ys a

ttem

pt t

o m

ore

clos

ely

mim

ic t

he n

atur

al s

yste

m o

f w

ater

con

veya

nce.

Gra

ssed

sw

ales

hel

p to

slo

w t

he w

ater

and

allo

w t

he w

ater

to

be “

clea

ned”

by

the

vege

tatio

nas

it m

oves

thr

ough

the

sys

tem

.

Dete

nti

on

/Rete

nti

on

Po

nd

sO

ne o

f th

e m

ost

com

mon

str

ateg

ies

for

addr

essi

ng o

n-si

te s

torm

wat

er t

reat

men

t is

the

use

of

stor

age

faci

litie

s su

ch a

s de

tent

ion

or r

eten

tion

pond

s.

Gen

eral

ly,

the

goal

of

thes

e sy

stem

s is

to

colle

ct s

torm

wat

er r

unof

f fr

om t

he d

evel

oped

are

a of

a s

ite, h

old

it fo

r a

pred

eter

min

ed p

erio

dof

tim

e, a

nd r

elea

se t

he w

ater

at

a ra

te t

hat

is s

imila

r to

pre

-dev

elop

men

t ra

tes.

By

hol

ding

the

Cha

pter

Fiv

e -

Stra

tegi

es,

Reco

mm

enda

tions

, an

d G

oals

48

4848

48 48

The

“day

ligh

tin

g”

of

a lo

cal s

trea

m d

emo

nst

rate

s h

ow

veg

etat

ion

can

hel

p e

nco

ura

ge

infi

ltra

tio

n o

f st

orm

wat

er r

un

-off

49

4949

49 49

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

Cha

pter

Fiv

e -

Stra

tegi

es,

Reco

mm

enda

tions

, an

d G

oals

A d

eten

tio

n b

asin

ret

ain

s an

d t

reat

s st

orm

wat

er

wat

er,

part

icul

ate

mat

ter

such

as

sedi

men

t, h

eavy

met

als,

and

oth

er p

ollu

tant

s ar

e al

low

ed t

ose

ttle

out

of

the

wat

er.

Thi

s pr

oces

s re

sults

in le

ss c

onta

min

atio

n be

ing

rele

ased

into

the

loca

lst

ream

sys

tem

. T

he e

ffec

tiven

ess

of t

his

syst

em c

an b

e in

crea

sed

by in

corp

orat

ing

sedi

men

tfo

reba

ys in

to t

he d

esig

n of

the

det

entio

n ba

sin

(Ayr

es, L

ewis

, Nor

ris, &

May

200

2).

Sedi

men

tfo

reba

ys a

re s

mal

l, sh

allo

w p

ools

loca

ted

near

the

inle

t of

the

sto

rage

bas

in.

Fore

bays

ser

ve a

s a

type

of

pre-

trea

tmen

t, a

llow

ing

coar

se s

edim

ents

to

drop

out

prio

r to

ent

erin

g th

e la

rger

stor

age

basi

n.

In a

reas

whe

re t

he b

asin

will

be

disc

harg

ing

to a

col

dwat

er s

trea

m, t

empe

ratu

re,

as w

ell a

s po

llutio

n co

ntro

l mus

t be

con

side

red.

In

thi

s ca

ses,

the

use

of

a bo

ttom

-dra

w d

is-

char

ge s

houl

d be

con

side

red

as a

way

to

ensu

re w

ater

ent

erin

g th

e lo

cal s

trea

m s

yste

m w

ill n

otca

use

sign

ifica

nt p

eaks

in w

ater

tem

pera

ture

.

Ma

inte

na

nce

Rega

rdle

ss o

f th

e ty

pe o

f st

orm

wat

er s

trat

egy

empl

oyed

, the

suc

cess

of

any

syst

em is

hig

hly

depe

nden

t on

reg

ular

mai

nten

ance

. M

aint

enan

ce m

ay in

clud

e in

spec

tion

of f

acili

ties,

rem

oval

of c

onta

min

ated

sed

imen

t, m

aint

enan

ce o

f ve

geta

tion,

and

rep

lace

men

t of

filt

ers

or o

ther

supp

ortin

g m

echa

nism

s.

Ho

meo

wn

er

Eff

ort

sH

omeo

wne

rs c

an a

lso

take

ste

ps t

o co

ntro

l the

sto

rmw

ater

on

thei

r ow

n pr

oper

ty.

Sig

nific

ant

amou

nts

of r

ainw

ater

and

sno

wm

elt

are

colle

cted

fro

m r

ooft

ops

and

driv

eway

s of

priv

ate

hom

es a

nd b

ecom

e pa

rt o

f th

e la

rger

vol

ume

of s

torm

wat

er t

hat

is d

irect

ed in

to lo

cal s

torm

sew

ers.

Th

e fo

llow

ing

is a

list

of

easy

ste

ps t

hat

loca

l hom

eow

ners

can

tak

e to

red

uce

the

amou

nt o

f st

orm

wat

er t

hat

flow

s of

f of

the

ir pr

oper

ty a

nd in

to t

he s

torm

wat

er s

yste

m:

•D

irect

dow

nspo

uts

to d

isch

arge

into

yar

ds o

r ot

her

vege

tate

d ar

eas

rath

erth

an o

nto

driv

eway

s or

oth

er im

perv

ious

sur

face

s.•

Redu

ce t

he a

mou

nt o

f fe

rtili

zer

or p

estic

ides

use

d.

Thes

e ca

n be

tra

nspo

rted

via

stor

mw

ater

into

loca

l wat

erw

ays.

•Pa

rk a

utom

obile

s on

law

ns b

efor

e w

ashi

ng t

hem

. L

awns

will

app

reci

ate

the

extr

a w

ater

and

will

hel

p br

eakd

own

the

soap

, kee

ping

it o

ut o

f ne

arby

str

eam

s.•

Use

nat

ive

vege

tatio

n w

hen

poss

ible

. T

hese

spe

cies

gen

eral

ly h

ave

deep

roo

tsy

stem

s th

at w

ill s

oak

up e

xces

s w

ater

, pre

vent

ing

it fr

om b

ecom

ing

runo

ff.

WA

TER

SHED

PR

OTE

CTI

ON

GO

AL

It is

the

goa

l of

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r W

ater

shed

Cou

ncil

to e

ncou

rage

alte

rnat

ive

stor

mw

ater

man

agem

ent

stra

tegi

es t

hat

will

res

ult

in in

crea

sed

prot

ectio

n of

the

trib

utar

ies

lead

ing

into

the

Dea

d Ri

ver.

The

coun

cil e

nvis

ions

a 2

0% lo

ad r

educ

tion

from

par

king

lots

and

impe

rvio

ussu

rfac

es o

ver

the

next

thr

ee y

ears

.

50

5050

50 50

Tab

le 5

.3:

Pub

lic P

arti

cip

atio

n a

nd

Ed

uca

tio

n S

trat

egie

s

The

follo

win

g m

ater

ials

an

d a

ctiv

itie

s ar

e an

ess

enti

al p

art

of

the

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er W

ater

shed

Pla

nn

ing

Pro

ject

:•

A r

egul

ar p

roje

ct n

ewsl

ette

r m

aile

d to

all

resi

dent

s an

d bu

sine

sses

of

the

wat

ersh

ed•

Ann

ual c

omm

unity

eve

nts

to r

aise

pub

lic a

war

enes

s:-

Con

serv

atio

n fe

stiv

al-

Wat

ersh

ed p

ublic

mee

tings

•Vo

lunt

eer

oppo

rtun

ities

:-

Ado

pt-A

-Str

eam

cle

anup

s-

Stre

am m

onito

ring

- N

ativ

e pl

ant

nurs

ery

volu

ntee

ring

•Yo

uth

educ

atio

n:-

Gra

de s

choo

l pro

gram

s-

Inte

rnsh

ip o

ppor

tuni

ties

•Re

gula

r ne

wsp

aper

art

icle

s an

d ne

ws

upda

tes

on lo

cal t

elev

isio

n an

d ra

dio

•Pu

blic

par

ticip

atio

n on

the

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r W

ater

shed

Cou

ncil

and

the

Cen

tral

Lak

e Su

perio

r W

ater

shed

Par

tner

ship

•Pu

blic

wor

ksho

ps o

n w

ater

shed

-rel

ated

issu

es:

- So

il er

osio

n co

ntro

l-

Ripa

rian

land

man

agem

ent

- Bu

ffer

str

ips

51

5151

51 51

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

PU

BLI

C P

AR

TIC

IPA

TIO

N &

ED

UC

ATI

ON

Invo

lvin

g th

e pu

blic

in w

ater

shed

pro

tect

ion

thro

ugh

educ

atio

n an

d st

ewar

dshi

p pr

actic

esm

aint

ains

the

inte

grity

of

our

loca

l str

eam

s an

d re

info

rces

a c

onne

ctio

n w

ith o

ur n

atur

al r

e-so

urce

s.

The

part

icip

atio

n of

loca

l res

iden

ts is

ext

rem

ely

impo

rtan

t to

the

suc

cess

of

a w

ater

shed

man

agem

ent

plan

, si

nce

the

“maj

ority

of

beha

vior

al c

hang

es t

hat

will

be

need

ed t

o ad

dres

s th

eso

urce

s an

d ca

uses

of

pollu

tion

in t

he w

ater

shed

will

be

volu

ntar

y, r

athe

r th

an b

e re

quire

d by

law

” (B

row

n et

al.

2000

). T

he p

ower

of

an e

ffec

tive

publ

ic e

duca

tion

com

pone

nt c

anno

t be

over

estim

ated

in a

wat

ersh

ed m

anag

emen

t pr

ojec

t.

The

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r W

ater

shed

Cou

ncil

cont

inua

lly r

ecog

nize

s th

is f

act

and

is w

orki

ng t

o en

sure

tha

t pu

blic

edu

catio

n op

port

uniti

esco

ntin

ue t

o be

ava

ilabl

e to

res

iden

ts o

f th

e Lo

wer

Dea

d Ri

ver

wat

ersh

ed.

The W

ate

rsh

ed

Man

ag

em

en

t Pla

nn

ing

Pro

cess

A c

ritic

al f

irst

step

in t

he p

ublic

par

ticip

atio

n an

d ed

ucat

ion

proc

ess

is t

he a

ctua

l dev

elop

men

tan

d im

plem

enta

tion

of t

he W

ater

shed

Man

agem

ent

Plan

. In

ord

er t

o en

sure

tha

t th

ere

are

oppo

rtun

ities

for

pub

ic in

put

and

educ

atio

n, T

he L

ower

Dea

d Ri

ver

Wat

ersh

ed C

ounc

il w

illpr

esen

t th

e pl

an f

or p

ublic

com

men

t at

the

Pet

er W

hite

Pub

lic L

ibra

ry.

Dur

ing

a tw

o-w

eek

perio

d, t

he m

anag

emen

t pl

an w

ill b

e av

aila

ble

for

the

publ

ic t

o re

ad a

nd m

ake

com

men

ts.

The

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r W

ater

shed

Cou

ncil

will

als

o ho

st a

pub

lic h

earin

g at

the

Mar

quet

te T

owns

hip

Hal

l as

an a

dditi

onal

mea

ns t

o so

licit

publ

ic c

omm

ent

and

disc

uss

issu

es r

elat

ive

to t

he w

ater

-sh

ed.

All

part

ners

, ag

enci

es,

and

wat

ersh

ed la

nd o

wne

rs w

ill b

e en

cour

aged

to

atte

nd.

In a

dditi

on t

o th

e ef

fort

s be

ing

cond

ucte

d by

the

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r W

ater

shed

Cou

ncil

as a

par

tof

the

wat

ersh

ed m

anag

emen

t pl

an e

ffor

t, t

here

are

num

erou

s ot

her

met

hods

of

outr

each

tha

tca

n be

use

d to

pro

mot

e in

volv

emen

t by

a v

arie

ty o

f co

mm

unity

mem

bers

.

Resi

den

t / L

an

d O

wn

er

Ed

uca

tio

n“P

oten

tially

uns

usta

inab

le a

ctiv

ities

are

not

con

duct

ed b

y la

rge,

indu

stria

l pol

lute

rs a

lone

.In

divi

dual

land

use

cho

ices

can

eith

er s

uppo

rt o

r un

derm

ine

sust

aina

bilit

y in

a g

iven

are

a” (

LaM

P20

02).

Bec

ause

of

the

impo

rtan

t ro

le w

ater

shed

res

iden

ts a

nd r

ipar

ian

hom

eow

ners

pla

y in

the

prot

ectio

n of

wat

er q

ualit

y, in

form

atio

n on

how

the

ir ac

tions

aro

und

the

hom

e im

pact

wat

erqu

ality

is a

key

mes

sage

to

addr

ess

in a

pub

lic e

duca

tion

effo

rt.

Bi-a

nnua

l new

slet

ters

and

publ

ic s

emin

ars

are

two

met

hods

of

info

rmin

g re

side

nts

on h

appe

ning

s in

the

wat

ersh

ed a

ndw

ill c

ontin

ually

kee

p th

e do

or o

pen

for

part

icip

atio

n.

Info

rmat

iona

l ins

erts

in r

egul

ar m

ailin

gssu

ch a

s re

side

ntia

l wat

er b

ills

can

aler

t pe

ople

as

to h

ow t

heir

actio

ns a

ffec

t th

e re

sour

ces

we

depe

nd o

n ev

eryd

ay.

Fie

ld d

ays

and

volu

ntee

r st

ream

cle

an-u

p pr

ojec

ts g

et w

ater

shed

mem

bers

activ

ely

invo

lved

whi

le in

crea

sing

the

ir aw

aren

ess

of t

heir

wat

ersh

ed s

urro

undi

ngs.

Ta

ble

5.3

pres

ents

a li

st o

f ac

tiviti

es t

hat

are

incl

uded

in t

he L

ower

Dea

d Ri

ver

wat

ersh

ed m

anag

emen

tef

fort

, th

at e

nabl

e re

side

nts

to b

ecom

e in

volv

ed.

Suc

h pa

rtic

ipat

ion

offe

rs p

eopl

e an

opp

ortu

-ni

ty t

o w

itnes

s fir

st-h

and

the

impa

cts

of p

rope

r st

orm

wat

er m

anag

emen

t an

d w

ater

shed

pro

tec-

tion.

Cha

pter

Fiv

e -

Stra

tegi

es,

Reco

mm

enda

tions

, an

d G

oals

Bo

y Sc

ou

t Tr

oo

p #

305

sten

cile

d d

rain

s to

hel

ped

uca

te r

esid

ents

ab

ou

t th

eir

sto

rmw

ater

sys

tem

52

5252

52 52

Tab

le 5

.4:

Info

rmat

ion

/ E

du

cati

on

Str

ateg

ies

Info

rmat

ion

/Ed

uca

tio

n S

trat

egy

Targ

etPo

lluta

nt

Au

die

nce

Mes

sag

eC

on

tro

lled

Del

iver

y M

ech

anis

ms

Pote

nti

al E

valu

atio

n

Resi

dent

Wat

er c

onse

rvat

ion

Ÿ P

ollu

ted

Dis

trib

ute

flyer

s w

ithSu

rvey

wat

ersh

ed r

esid

ents

;La

ndow

ner

Ÿ P

rope

r la

wn

care

s

torm

wat

erw

ater

con

serv

atio

n tip

s an

d tr

ack

hhw

col

lect

ion

num

bers

Sto

rm d

rain

aw

aren

ess

Ÿ O

ils, g

reas

e, a

ndhh

w in

form

atio

n;tr

ack

num

ber

of o

ne-o

n-on

Sep

tic s

yste

m m

aint

enan

ce

hea

vy m

etal

sim

plem

ent

stor

m d

rain

cont

acts

fro

m p

ublic

ser

vice

Ÿ P

rope

r ho

useh

old

haza

rdou

Sed

imen

tst

enci

ling

proj

ect

with

anno

unce

men

ts a

nd in

form

atio

nal

w

aste

(hhw

) dis

posa

lw

ater

shed

cou

ncil

or s

ervi

cebr

ochu

res

and

hand

outs

orga

niza

tion;

dev

elop

a p

ublic

serv

ice

anno

uncm

ent

for

loca

lra

dio

stat

ions

; ini

tiate

a v

olun

teer

mon

itorin

g pr

ogra

m

Dev

elop

ers

Ÿ L

ow im

pact

dev

elop

men

t (li

d)Ÿ

Sed

imen

tW

ork

with

Con

serv

atio

n D

istr

ict

Trac

k nu

mbe

r of

low

impa

ct

tec

hniq

ues

Ÿ P

ollu

ted

staf

f to

pro

vide

dev

elop

ers

with

deve

lopm

ent

tech

niqu

es a

nd

Ÿ R

ipar

ian

buff

ers

s

torm

wat

erin

form

atio

n re

gard

ing

lid t

echn

ique

srip

aria

n bu

ffer

s im

plem

ente

d;Ÿ

Ero

sion

con

trol

and

con

stru

ctio

nan

d rip

aria

n bu

ffer

s; h

ost

a su

rvey

of

wor

ksho

p at

tend

ees;

s

ite r

unof

fbi

enni

al d

evel

oper

wor

ksho

pon

e-on

-one

con

tact

s

You

th

Ÿ W

ater

shed

pro

tect

ion

Ÿ H

ydro

logi

c flo

wO

ffer

sch

ool p

rese

ntat

ions

tha

tTr

ack

num

ber

of p

rese

ntat

ions

Educ

atio

Hum

an im

pact

on

the

envi

ronm

ent

prom

ote

wat

er q

ualit

y an

d w

ater

shed

cond

ucte

d; s

urve

y te

ache

rs o

Env

ironm

enta

l ste

war

dshi

paw

aren

ess;

par

ticip

ate

in

pres

enta

tion

effe

ctiv

enes

s; t

rack

C

onse

rvat

ion

Dis

tric

t an

nual

num

ber

of s

tude

nts

at C

onse

rvat

ion

cons

erva

tion

fest

ival

Fest

ival

Gov

ernm

ent

Ÿ S

torm

wat

er m

anag

emen

Pol

lute

d Es

tabl

ish

a st

orm

wat

er t

ask

forc

eEv

alua

te e

ffec

tiven

ess

of s

torm

wat

erA

genc

ies

Ÿ Z

onin

g is

sues

s

torm

wat

eran

d pl

an f

or M

arqu

ette

Tow

nshi

p;ta

sk f

orce

; tra

ck n

umbe

r of

low

Ÿ

Rip

aria

n bu

ffer

Sed

imen

tho

st b

iann

ual u

pdat

es t

o m

unic

ipal

ities

impa

ct d

evel

opm

ent

tech

niqu

es a

ndŸ

Low

impa

ct d

evel

opm

ent

(lid)

Ÿ

Oils

, gre

ase,

and

rega

rdin

g w

ater

shed

issu

es; c

reat

erip

aria

n bu

ffer

s im

plem

ente

d by

t

echn

ique

s

hea

vy m

etal

sin

form

atio

nal h

ando

uts

that

pro

mot

elo

cal m

unic

ipal

ities

Ÿ H

ydro

logi

c flo

wrip

aria

n bu

ffer

s an

d lid

tec

hniq

ues

53

5353

53 53

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

Cha

pter

Fiv

e -

Stra

tegi

es,

Reco

mm

enda

tions

, an

d G

oals

You

th e

du

cati

on

at

Van

den

bo

om

Ele

men

tary

Sch

oo

l

Joe

Wag

ner

wo

rks

wit

h a

gro

up

of

sch

oo

l ch

ildre

nat

th

e an

nu

al C

on

serv

atio

n F

esti

val

Develo

per

Ed

uca

tio

nTh

roug

h co

ntac

t w

ith t

he S

oil E

rosi

on a

nd S

edim

ent

Con

trol

Pro

gram

, de

velo

pers

sho

uld

been

cour

aged

to

view

site

pla

nnin

g in

ter

ms

of w

ater

shed

-wid

e ef

fect

s an

d pr

omot

e lo

w im

pact

deve

lopm

ent

into

the

site

des

ign

proc

ess.

A

ssis

tanc

e w

ith r

ipar

ian

buff

ers,

bio

rete

ntio

n, a

ndin

filtr

atio

n m

etho

ds c

an b

e of

fere

d to

less

en t

he im

pact

of

stor

mw

ater

run

off

.

Yo

uth

Ed

uca

tio

nW

ater

shed

edu

catio

n to

are

a sc

hool

chi

ldre

n is

a f

unda

men

tal t

ool t

hat

enco

urag

es f

utur

est

ewar

ds o

f th

e en

viro

nmen

t.

Wat

ersh

ed e

duca

tion

in t

he c

lass

room

, fie

ld d

ay e

xerc

ises

, as

wel

l as

the

annu

al C

onse

rvat

ion

Fest

hos

ted

by t

he M

arqu

ette

Cou

nty

Con

serv

atio

n D

istr

ict

are

som

e w

ays

that

chi

ldre

n le

arn

of h

uman

impa

ct o

n th

e en

viro

nmen

t.

Such

edu

catio

nal

proj

ects

sho

uld

incl

ude

info

rmat

ion

on n

atur

al f

eatu

res

of t

he lo

cal a

rea,

ero

sion

, w

ater

shed

prot

ectio

n, a

nd t

ips

for

how

the

y ca

n in

divi

dual

ly m

ake

an im

pact

on

the

heal

th o

f th

eir

envi

ronm

ent.

Invo

lvem

en

t fr

om

Mu

nic

ipali

ties

Loca

l mun

icip

aliti

es a

re a

n in

tegr

al c

onne

ctio

n in

ove

rsee

ing

loca

l dev

elop

men

t w

ithou

tco

mpr

omis

ing

the

sust

aina

bilit

y of

the

wat

ersh

ed.

Invo

lvem

ent

of t

owns

hip

and

city

boa

rdm

embe

rs w

ith t

he L

ower

Dea

d Ri

ver

Wat

ersh

ed C

ounc

il w

ill h

elp

mai

ntai

n an

act

ive

rela

tion-

ship

and

enc

oura

ge a

dia

logu

e re

gard

ing

zoni

ng is

sues

, up

com

ing

deve

lopm

ent,

and

bes

tm

anag

emen

t pr

actic

es.

WA

TER

SHED

PR

OTE

CTI

ON

GO

AL

It is

the

goa

l of

the

coun

cil t

o co

ntin

uous

ly im

prov

e re

side

nt a

war

enes

s of

the

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r W

ater

shed

. O

utre

ach

activ

ities

suc

h as

pro

ject

new

slet

ters

, ne

wsp

aper

art

icle

s, a

ndpu

blic

wor

ksho

ps o

n w

ater

shed

-rel

ated

issu

es a

re w

ays

to in

crea

se t

his

awar

enes

s, w

ith t

heho

pes

of in

crea

sing

cou

ncil

part

icip

atio

n by

50%

.

54

5454

54 54

Co

mp

on

ent

Def

init

ion

Po

ten

tial

Exa

mp

les

Purp

ose

Goa

ls a

nd o

bjec

tives

for

the

ena

ctm

ent

of t

he o

verla

y zo

ne

D

efin

ition

s D

efin

ition

of

term

inol

ogy

W

ater

shed

Ove

rlay

Zone

Bou

ndar

y Ph

ysic

al b

ound

ary

defin

ed b

y th

e na

tura

l dra

inag

e ba

sin

of

the

wat

ersh

ed b

eing

pro

tect

ed

Revi

ew A

utho

rity

Iden

tific

atio

n of

par

ties

resp

onsi

ble

for

the

revi

ew a

nd

enfo

rcem

ent

of t

he o

verla

y zo

ne

App

licat

ion

Use

and

Pro

visi

ons

Spec

ifica

tions

of

rest

ricte

d an

d pe

rmitt

ed u

ses

with

in

envi

ronm

enta

lly s

ensi

tive

area

s Se

nsiti

ve a

reas

incl

ude:

-

Ripa

rian

corr

idor

s -

Rech

arge

are

as

- W

etla

nds

- C

ritic

al s

lope

s D

evel

opm

ent

Gui

delin

es

Spec

ifica

tion

of r

estr

icte

d an

d pe

rmitt

ed u

ses

durin

g si

te

deve

lopm

ent

May

incl

ude

rest

rictio

ns o

n:

- G

radi

ng a

nd f

illin

g -

Use

of

fert

ilize

r an

d pe

stic

ides

-

Road

s an

d in

fras

truc

ture

-

Trea

tmen

t of

exi

stin

g co

nditi

ons

Tab

le 5

.5:

Co

mp

on

ents

of

a W

ater

shed

Ove

rlay

Ord

inan

ce

55

5555

55 55

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

PLA

NN

ING

STR

ATE

GIE

SBe

caus

e w

ater

shed

bou

ndar

ies

typi

cally

spa

n m

ultip

le m

unic

ipal

juris

dict

ions

, the

suc

cess

ful

impl

emen

tatio

n of

a w

ater

shed

man

agem

ent

plan

dep

ends

on

the

coop

erat

ion

of a

num

ber

ofdi

ffer

ent

gove

rnm

enta

l or

gani

zatio

ns.

Cre

ati

ng

Lin

es

of

Co

mm

un

icati

on

An

impo

rtan

t fir

st s

tep

tow

ard

the

prot

ectio

n of

wat

ersh

ed r

esou

rces

is t

he c

reat

ion

of c

omm

u-ni

catio

n ch

anne

ls b

etw

een

the

thre

e m

unic

ipal

ities

loca

ted

with

in t

he L

ower

Dea

d Ri

ver

wat

er-

shed

. W

hile

mos

t of

the

new

dev

elop

men

t w

ill t

ake

plac

e w

ithin

the

tow

nshi

ps o

f M

arqu

ette

and

Neg

aune

e, t

he C

ity o

f M

arqu

ette

, as

the

com

mun

ity lo

cate

d in

the

low

est

reac

hes

of t

hew

ater

shed

, may

be

mos

t di

rect

ly a

ffec

ted

by t

he h

ealth

and

sta

bilit

y of

the

wat

ersh

ed.

The

inte

rcon

nect

edne

ss o

f al

l of

thes

e co

mm

uniti

es a

s th

ey r

elat

e to

the

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r w

ater

-sh

ed w

as m

ade

pain

fully

obv

ious

in t

he S

prin

g of

200

3, w

hen

the

City

of

Mar

quet

te s

uffe

red

seve

re f

lood

ing

due

to d

egra

ded

cond

ition

s fu

rthe

r up

stre

am in

the

wat

ersh

ed.

By

esta

blis

hing

regu

lar

com

mun

icat

ion

amon

g th

e go

vern

ing

and

plan

ning

boa

rds

in e

ach

of t

he m

unic

ipal

i-tie

s, e

ach

com

mun

ity w

ill b

e be

tter

info

rmed

and

pre

pare

d to

mak

e th

e ne

cess

ary

chan

ges

toen

sure

the

pro

tect

ion

of t

he e

ntire

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r w

ater

shed

.

Bu

ild

Ou

t A

naly

sis

In C

hapt

er T

hree

’s an

alys

is o

f ex

istin

g bu

ilt c

ondi

tions

, se

vera

l are

as w

ere

desi

gnat

ed a

s lik

ely

deve

lopm

ent

site

s ba

sed

on e

xist

ing

land

use

pla

ns a

nd z

onin

g.

To b

ette

r un

ders

tand

the

eff

ect

that

ful

ly b

uild

ing

thes

e de

velo

pmen

t ar

eas

wou

ld h

ave

on t

he h

ealth

of

the

wat

ersh

ed,

ade

taile

d bu

ild o

ut a

naly

sis

of t

hese

are

as s

houl

d be

con

duct

ed.

Thi

s pr

oces

s us

es e

xist

ing

zoni

ng a

nd la

nd u

se p

lans

to

iden

tify

the

fulle

st e

xten

t to

whi

ch d

evel

opm

ent

coul

d oc

cur.

Thi

san

alys

is t

akes

into

acc

ount

the

sco

pe o

f “b

uild

able

land

” ba

sed

on p

hysi

cal c

hara

cter

istic

s(s

lope

, sui

tabl

e so

ils, e

tc.)

as w

ell a

s th

e w

hat

impa

ct c

urre

nt o

wne

rshi

p pa

tter

ns m

ight

hav

e on

deve

lopm

ent.

Fo

r ex

ampl

e, if

the

larg

e tr

acts

of

CFR

for

est

land

cur

rent

ly h

eld

by p

rivat

eco

rpor

atio

ns w

ere

to b

ecom

e av

aila

ble

for

priv

ate

deve

lopm

ent,

the

eff

ect

on p

oten

tial b

uild

-ab

le a

reas

wou

ld b

e si

gnifi

cant

.

Wate

rsh

ed

Overl

ay O

rdin

an

ceBe

caus

e th

e Lo

wer

Dea

d Ri

ver

wat

ersh

ed c

ross

es s

ever

al ju

risdi

ctio

nal b

ound

arie

s, t

he im

ple-

men

tatio

n of

a w

ater

shed

ove

rlay

ordi

nanc

e ca

n be

a c

onve

nien

t w

ay t

o en

sure

the

sam

epr

otec

tion

mea

sure

s ar

e ap

plie

d in

mul

tiple

mun

icip

aliti

es.

An

over

lay

zone

is a

sep

arat

e zo

ning

desi

gnat

ion

that

is p

lace

d on

top

of

the

exis

ting

zoni

ng c

lass

ifica

tion.

O

verla

y zo

nes

are

rout

inel

y us

ed f

or t

he p

rote

ctio

n of

spe

cific

are

as s

uch

as f

lood

plai

ns,

wet

land

s, h

isto

rical

dist

ricts

, an

d st

ream

set

back

s.

Tabl

e 5.

4 sh

ows

info

rmat

ion

typi

cally

add

ress

ed in

a w

ater

shed

over

lay

ordi

nanc

e.

Cha

pter

Fiv

e -

Stra

tegi

es,

Reco

mm

enda

tions

, an

d G

oals

Co

mm

un

icat

ion

bet

wee

n i

nvo

lved

mu

nic

ipal

itie

s is

crit

ical

56

5656

56 56

Fig

ure

5.3

: Exa

mp

le o

f a

Co

nse

rvat

ion

Su

bd

ivis

ion

(So

urc

e: A

dap

ted

fro

m A

ren

dt

et a

l. 19

94)

Con

vent

iona

l Su

bdiv

isio

n D

esig

n

Con

serv

atio

n Su

bdiv

isio

n D

esig

n

Ballf

ield

Park

Nat

ural

Are

a

57

5757

57 57

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

PLA

NN

ING

STR

ATE

GIE

S (

CO

NTI

NU

ED

)

Op

en

Sp

ace

Pla

nn

ing

All

of t

he c

omm

uniti

es lo

cate

d w

ithin

the

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r w

ater

shed

hav

e ex

pres

sed

anin

tere

st in

mai

ntai

ning

the

nat

ural

qua

litie

s of

the

ir co

mm

uniti

es.

Thi

s no

t on

ly p

rote

cts

thei

rvi

tal n

atur

al r

esou

rces

, bu

t al

so t

he q

ualit

y of

life

for

loca

l res

iden

ts.

A n

umbe

r of

pla

nnin

g to

ols

can

be e

mpl

oyed

to

faci

litat

e th

is p

roce

ss.

Suc

h to

ols

incl

ude

the

use

of c

lust

er d

evel

opm

ent

and

cons

erva

tion

subd

ivis

ion

desi

gn f

or n

ew r

esid

entia

l dev

elop

men

t, g

reen

way

s an

d co

nser

va-

tion

corr

idor

s fo

r th

e pr

otec

tion

of o

pen

spac

e, a

nd P

lann

ed U

nit

Dev

elop

men

ts (

PUD

s) t

oco

ntro

l the

spe

ed a

nd p

atte

rn o

f ne

w c

omm

erci

al d

evel

opm

ent

with

in t

he w

ater

shed

.

Each

of

thes

e to

ols

atte

mpt

s to

miti

gate

the

eff

ects

of

deve

lopm

ent

by m

aint

aini

ng a

reas

of

open

spa

ce w

here

nat

ural

eco

logi

cal s

yste

ms

are

still

per

mitt

ed t

o fu

nctio

n (S

ee F

igur

e 5.

3).

Ope

n sp

ace

area

s of

ten

enco

mpa

ss e

nviro

nmen

tally

sen

sitiv

e ar

eas,

suc

h as

uni

que

fore

st s

tand

sor

larg

e w

etla

nd a

reas

. In

som

e ca

ses,

how

ever

, the

pur

pose

of

the

desi

gnat

ed o

pen

spac

e is

to

prom

ote

publ

ic a

cces

s an

d ap

prec

iatio

n of

the

se “

gree

n” s

pace

s.

City

par

ks,

gree

nway

cor

ri-do

rs,

or in

terp

retiv

e tr

ails

can

all

be u

sefu

l too

ls f

or p

rom

otin

g co

nser

vatio

n be

havi

or w

ithin

the

loca

l com

mun

ity.

It al

so h

elps

to

mai

ntai

n th

e ru

ral a

esth

etic

pre

ferr

ed b

y lo

cal r

esid

ents

. In

ast

udy

cond

ucte

d by

the

Cen

tral

Lak

e Su

perio

r W

ater

shed

Par

tner

ship

, lo

cal r

esid

ents

exp

ress

edth

eir

conc

ern

rega

rdin

g fr

agm

enta

tion

of f

ores

t ar

eas,

loss

of

gree

n sp

ace,

and

com

mer

cial

spra

wl w

ithou

t co

nsis

tent

land

use

pla

nnin

g am

ong

mun

icip

aliti

es.

The

y al

so e

xpre

ssed

a d

esire

to p

rote

ct t

he r

ural

cha

ract

er,

natu

ral v

iew

shed

, an

d pu

blic

acc

ess

to t

he e

xten

sive

nat

ural

reso

urce

s of

the

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r w

ater

shed

(Peo

ple

and

Land

).

Low

Im

pact

Develo

pm

en

tLo

w Im

pact

Dev

elop

men

t (L

ID) i

s de

fined

by

Ayr

es, L

ewis

, Nor

ris, &

May

, Inc

(200

2) a

s a

deve

lop-

men

t pr

oces

s th

at “

inte

grat

es s

ite h

ydro

logy

con

side

ratio

ns in

to t

he s

ite d

esig

n pr

oces

s in

ord

erto

ach

ieve

sto

rm w

ater

con

trol

thr

ough

the

dev

elop

men

t of

a la

ndsc

ape

that

mim

ics

the

natu

ral

hydr

olog

ic r

egim

e of

the

site

”.

This

typ

e of

dev

elop

men

t in

clud

es a

sui

te o

f to

ols

that

can

be

help

ful i

n pr

otec

ting

the

natu

ral h

ydro

logy

of

a ne

wly

dev

elop

ed s

ite.

The

se in

clud

e:•

Redu

cing

the

am

ount

of

impe

rvio

us s

urfa

ce•

Prot

ectin

g na

tura

l res

ourc

es a

nd e

cosy

stem

s•

Mai

ntai

ning

nat

ural

dra

inag

e co

urse

s•

Min

imiz

ing

the

amou

nt o

f gr

adin

g•

Spec

ifyin

g pr

oper

mai

nten

ance

of

stor

mw

ater

con

trol

mea

sure

s

Cha

pter

Fiv

e -

Stra

tegi

es,

Reco

mm

enda

tions

, an

d G

oals

58

5858

58 58

Tab

le 6

.1:

Bes

t M

anag

emen

t Pr

acti

ce S

trat

egy

and

Sch

edu

le # o

fR

esp

on

sib

leEs

tim

ated

Ob

ject

ive

Task

stru

ctu

res

par

tyB

MPs

Mile

sto

nes

Tim

elin

eco

st/s

ite

Redu

ce s

edim

ent

Stab

ilize

ero

ding

6

Priv

ate

land

owne

rRe

plac

e or

res

eat

Dev

elop

a p

lan

for

Yea

r 1

$8,8

34an

d ru

noff

fro

mro

ad-s

trea

m c

ross

ings

cu

lver

ts, r

esha

pe a

ndea

ch o

f th

e 6

site

sro

ad-s

trea

m c

ross

ings

need

ing

repl

acem

ent

Road

ve

geta

te s

lope

s, in

stal

lIm

plem

ent

plan

at

Yea

r 1

(Site

s 1-

2,8-

11)

or s

tabi

lizat

ion

Com

mis

sion

wat

er d

iver

sion

s to

site

s 2,

8,9,

&10

infil

trat

e ru

noff

, roc

kIm

plem

ent

plan

at

Yea

r 2

rip r

apsi

tes

1&11

Redu

ce s

edim

ent

from

Stab

ilize

ero

ding

roa

d-1

Priv

ate

Stab

ilize

cul

ver

ends

,D

evel

op a

pla

n fo

rY

ear

1$1

0,00

0on

e pr

ivat

ely

owne

dst

ream

cro

ssin

gs

land

owne

r(s)

inst

all s

edim

ent

trap

s th

e si

tero

ad (S

ite 3

)ne

edin

g st

abili

zatio

nan

d w

ater

div

ersi

ons,

cre

ate

Impl

emen

t pl

an

Yea

r 2

roa

d m

aint

enan

ce g

uide

lines

at s

ite 3

Redu

ce s

edim

ent

from

St

abili

ze e

rodi

ng4

Priv

ate

Rem

ove

a de

com

mis

sion

edD

evel

op a

pla

n fo

rY

ear

1$3

,000

erod

ing

stre

amba

nks

stre

amba

nks

land

owne

r cu

lver

t, s

tabi

lize

bank

s,ea

ch s

ite(S

ites

4-7)

rem

ove

sedi

men

t, v

eget

ate

Impl

emen

t pl

an

Yea

r 1

Road

at

site

s 4&

5C

omm

issi

onIm

plem

ent

plan

Y

ear

2at

site

6Im

plem

ent

plan

Y

ear

3at

site

7Re

duce

sed

imen

t fr

om

Stab

ilize

ero

ding

1

Priv

ate

Stab

ilize

str

eam

bank

s,D

evel

op a

pla

n fo

rY

ear

1$4

,500

criti

cal e

rosi

on s

itest

ream

bank

s an

d de

ter

land

owne

rre

vege

tate

, de

ter

trai

l acc

ess

each

site

(Site

12)

trai

l tra

ffic

in a

reas

of

soil

com

pact

ion

Impl

emen

t pl

anY

ear

2at

site

12

Redu

ce p

ollu

ted

stor

m-

Bypa

ss p

arki

ng lo

t/ro

ad2

Road

In

stal

l gra

ssed

sw

ales

,D

evel

op a

pla

n fo

rY

ear

3$2

0,00

0w

ater

run

off

from

roa

ds,

runo

ff in

to g

rass

ed

Com

mis

sion

asph

alt

turn

outs

each

site

park

ing

lots

(Site

s 13

&14

)sw

ales

,asp

halt

turn

outs

Impl

emen

t pl

an a

tY

ear

3Pr

ivat

e la

ndow

ner

site

s 13

&14

Redu

ce e

rosi

on f

rom

St

abili

ze s

trea

mba

nks

1C

ity o

f M

arqu

ette

Rem

ove

debr

is f

rom

str

eam

,D

evel

op a

pla

n fo

rY

ear

1$1

0,00

0st

orm

wat

er r

unof

f (S

ite 1

5)re

sulti

ng f

rom

fla

shy

flow

stab

ilize

ban

ks,

reve

geta

teea

ch s

iteIm

plem

ent

plan

Yea

r 1

at s

ite 1

5Im

prov

e hy

drol

ogic

flo

wRe

duce

vel

ocity

of

perc

hed

3LS

&I R

ailro

adC

reat

e rif

fle c

ontr

ol s

truc

ture

s,D

evel

op a

pla

n fo

rY

ear

1$2

,000

of r

oad-

stre

am c

ross

ings

culv

ert

impe

ding

fis

hst

abili

ze b

anks

at

outle

t,

each

site

(Site

s 19

-21)

pass

age

Priv

ate

land

owne

rre

mov

e ex

cess

deb

risIm

plem

ent

plan

Yea

r 3

Road

Com

mis

sion

at s

ites

19-2

1Im

prov

e hy

drol

ogic

flo

wFi

x co

llaps

ed c

ulve

rt e

nd1

LS&

I Rai

lroad

Rem

ove

debr

is a

t ou

tfal

l,D

evel

op a

pla

n fo

rY

ear

1$8

,000

of r

ailro

ad-s

trea

m c

ross

ing

impe

ding

str

eam

flo

wse

cure

foo

tings

, sta

biliz

eea

ch s

ite(S

ite 2

2)st

ream

bank

sIm

plem

ent

plan

Yea

r 2

at s

ite 2

2Im

prov

e hy

drol

ogic

flo

wRe

mov

e w

eir

used

to

1Pr

ivat

e la

ndow

ner

Rem

ove

wei

r, s

tabi

lize

Dev

elop

a p

lan

for

Yea

r 1

$2,0

00of

Bric

kyar

d C

reek

(Site

23)

impo

und

wat

erst

ream

bank

sea

ch s

iteD

evel

op a

pla

nY

ear

3at

site

23

Rest

ore

ripar

ian

buff

er a

long

Stab

ilize

str

eam

bank

s al

ong

1M

arqu

ette

Inst

all n

ativ

e pl

ans,

res

tore

Dev

elop

a p

lan

for

Yea

r 1

$7,5

00Ba

dger

Cre

ek n

atur

e tr

ail

Badg

er C

reek

Tow

nshi

prip

aria

n bu

ffer

each

site

Impl

emen

t pl

an a

tY

ear

2si

te 2

4

59

5959

59 59

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

Cha

pter

Six

- Im

plem

enta

tion

IMP

LEM

EN

TATI

ON

IMP

LEM

EN

TATI

ON

IMP

LEM

EN

TATI

ON

IMP

LEM

EN

TATI

ON

IMP

LEM

EN

TATI

ON

Ch

apte

r Si

x

THE P

LAN

NIN

G P

RO

CESS

The

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r W

ater

shed

Pla

nnin

g pr

ojec

t w

as d

evel

oped

with

the

ass

ista

nce

and

over

sigh

t of

sev

eral

loca

l age

ncie

s. M

embe

rs o

f th

e Lo

wer

Dea

d Ri

ver

Wat

ersh

ed C

ounc

il in

clud

ere

pres

enta

tives

from

:•

Mar

quet

te T

owns

hip

•N

egau

nee

Tow

nshi

p•

City

of

Mar

quet

te•

Mar

quet

te C

ount

y Bo

ard

of C

omm

issi

oner

sA

com

plet

e lis

t of

par

ticip

ants

by

nam

e an

d ag

ency

is in

clud

ed o

n th

e in

side

cov

er o

f th

isre

port

.

Thro

ugho

ut t

he c

ours

e of

thi

s pl

an,

the

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r W

ater

shed

Cou

ncil

will

hos

t pu

blic

info

rmat

ion

mee

tings

to

revi

ew t

he p

rogr

ess

of t

he s

tudy

and

dis

cuss

issu

es r

elat

ive

to t

hew

ater

shed

. A

s a

mea

ns t

o so

licit

publ

ic in

volv

emen

t, m

eetin

gs w

ill b

e ad

vert

ised

in t

he M

inin

gJo

urna

l, lo

cal r

adio

, an

d lo

cal t

elev

isio

n st

atio

ns.

In a

dditi

on t

o th

ese

publ

ic m

eetin

gs,

the

wat

ersh

ed c

ounc

il w

ill c

ontin

ue t

o pu

rsue

a n

umbe

r of

oth

er p

ublic

par

ticip

atio

n an

d ed

ucat

ion

oppo

rtun

ities

as

desc

ribed

in C

hapt

er F

ive’

s “P

ublic

Par

ticip

atio

n an

d Ed

ucat

ion”

sec

tion

(See

Tabl

e 5.

3 fo

r a

revi

ew o

f th

e m

ater

ials

and

act

iviti

es t

hat

will

be

incl

uded

in t

he c

ounc

il’s

publ

iced

ucat

ion

effo

rts)

. T

hrou

ghou

t th

e pl

anni

ng p

roce

ss,

the

wat

ersh

ed c

ounc

il w

ill c

ontin

ue t

ow

ork

with

the

loca

l med

ia t

o re

ach

a w

ider

wat

ersh

ed a

udie

nce.

It is

the

fun

ctio

n of

the

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r W

ater

shed

Cou

ncil

to a

dvis

e th

e pr

ojec

t m

anag

er in

the

plan

ning

pro

cess

and

to

help

coo

rdin

ate

the

impl

emen

tatio

n st

rate

gies

out

lined

in t

he p

lan.

•M

arqu

ette

Cou

nty

Dra

in C

omm

issi

on•

Mic

higa

n D

EQ•

Trou

t U

nlim

ited

•W

ater

shed

Pro

pert

y O

wne

rs

60

6060

60 60

Si

te

#

Wat

ersh

ed E

nh

ance

men

t Pr

oje

cts

Pr

ob

lem

Es

tim

ated

C

ost

Pr

iori

ty

Sug

ges

ted

BM

P 1

Rean

y C

reek

for

ds (2

)

Sedi

men

tatio

n

12,0

00

M

ediu

m

Stre

amba

nk s

tabi

lizat

ion;

Inst

all g

ate

to d

eter

veh

icul

ar t

raff

ic

2 Ex

pose

d cu

lver

t, H

olyo

ke C

reek

Se

dim

enta

tion

Hyd

rolo

gy

10

,000

Hig

h In

stal

l new

cul

vert

; str

eam

bank

sta

biliz

atio

n 3

Whi

te B

ear

Road

sed

imen

tatio

n si

te, R

eany

Cre

ek

Se

dim

enta

tion

12

,000

Hig

h

Inst

all s

edim

ent

trap

s an

d w

ater

div

ersi

ons;

Wor

k w

ith W

hite

Bea

r Ro

ad

Ass

ocia

tion

to c

reat

e ro

ad m

aint

enan

ce g

uide

lines

4

Sand

erso

n’s

culv

ert,

Bric

kyar

d C

reek

Er

osio

n H

ydro

logy

5,00

0

Low

Re

mov

e cu

lver

t, s

trea

mba

nk s

tabi

lizat

ion

5 W

right

Str

eet

eros

ion,

Ran

ey C

reek

Eros

ion

2,

000

Lo

w

Stab

ilize

ban

ks w

ith a

dditi

onal

roc

k rip

rap

6 U

S 41

/Bric

kyar

d C

reek

site

St

orm

wat

er

Runo

ff

2,

000

Lo

w

Gra

de s

tabi

lizat

ion

stru

ctur

e 7

Fore

stvi

lle R

oad

eros

ion

site

, Wol

ner

Cre

ek

Stor

mw

ater

Ru

noff

3,00

0

Low

Ex

tend

roc

k rip

rap

8 C

R510

Cul

vert

Impr

ovem

ents

, M

idw

ay C

reek

Stor

mw

ater

Run

off

Se

dim

enta

tion

15

,000

Hig

h C

reat

e se

ries

of c

heck

dam

s; G

rade

sta

biliz

atio

n st

ruct

ure;

Fix

rai

ling

supp

orts

9 Br

ookt

on R

oad

cros

sing

impr

ovem

ents

, Ba

dger

Cre

ek

Er

osio

n

2,50

0

Low

St

ream

bank

sta

biliz

atio

n 10

M

ontg

omer

y St

reet

cro

ssin

g im

prov

emen

ts, B

acky

ard

Cre

ek

Stor

mw

ater

Run

off

Sedi

men

tatio

n

7,50

0

Med

ium

G

rade

sta

biliz

atio

n st

ruct

ure;

Dre

dge

exce

ss s

edim

ent

from

toe

of

culv

ert

11

CR5

10 e

rosi

on s

ite, R

eany

Cre

ek

Er

osio

n

6,00

0

Hig

h St

ream

bank

sta

biliz

atio

n 12

D

ead

Rive

r Fa

lls e

rosi

on p

roje

ct

Er

osio

n

4,50

0

Hig

h St

abili

ze u

nder

cut

bank

s, W

ork

with

Lon

gyea

r C

orpo

ratio

n to

cre

ate

alte

rnat

ive

trai

l rou

te

13

Back

yard

Cre

ek D

rain

age

impr

ovem

ents

St

orm

wat

er R

unof

f

5,00

0

Hig

h In

stal

l gra

ssed

sw

ales

to

elim

inat

e fla

shy

stor

mw

ater

flo

w

14

Am

eric

an S

ite

Stor

mw

ater

Ru

noff

5,00

0

Med

ium

In

stal

l gra

ssed

sw

ale

to e

limin

ate

flash

y st

orm

wat

er f

low

15

Ra

ney

Cre

ek r

esid

entia

l ero

sion

site

St

orm

wat

er R

unof

f Er

osio

n

10,0

00

M

ediu

m

Bank

sta

biliz

atio

n 16

V

ehic

le r

emov

al, B

adge

r C

reek

H

ydro

logy

2,

000

Low

Re

mov

e ve

hicl

e; D

redg

e ex

cess

sed

imen

t 17

V

ehic

le r

emov

al, B

adge

r C

reek

H

ydro

logy

2,

000

Low

Re

mov

e ve

hicl

e; D

redg

e ex

cess

sed

imen

t

18

Veh

icle

rem

oval

, Ran

ey C

reek

H

ydro

logy

2,

000

Low

Re

mov

e ve

hicl

e; D

redg

e ex

cess

sed

imen

t 19

LS

&I P

erch

ed c

ulve

rt

Hyd

rolo

gy

8,50

0 M

ediu

m

Cre

ate

riffle

con

trol

str

uctu

re; S

trea

mba

nk s

tabi

lizat

ion

20

Pete

rs’ p

erch

ed c

ulve

rt, U

nnam

ed T

ribut

ary

Hyd

rolo

gy

8,50

0 M

ediu

m

Cre

ate

riffle

con

trol

str

uctu

re; S

trea

mba

nk s

tabi

lizat

ion

21

CR

510

perc

hed

culv

ert

Hyd

rolo

gy

10,0

00

Low

C

reat

e rif

fle c

ontr

ol s

truc

ture

; Str

eam

bank

sta

biliz

atio

n 22

Ra

ilroa

d cu

lver

t im

prov

emen

ts,

Mid

way

Cre

ek

H

ydro

logy

8,00

0

Low

M

ake

chan

nel i

mpr

ovem

ents

to

a

colla

psed

191

2 Ra

ilroa

d cu

lver

t 23

Re

side

ntia

l wei

r re

mov

al a

nd

educ

atio

n, B

ricky

ard

Cre

ek

Hyd

rolo

gy

Sedi

men

tatio

n

2,00

0

Low

Re

mov

e re

side

ntia

l wei

r; S

trea

mba

nk s

tabi

lizat

ion

24

Nat

ure

trai

l pro

posa

l, Ba

dger

Cre

ek

Info

rmat

ion/

Ed

ucat

ion

7,

500

H

igh

Nat

ive

plan

t in

stal

latio

n to

sta

biliz

e rip

aria

n bu

ffer

s w

alkw

ays

to e

limin

ate

soil

com

pact

ion;

I/E

com

pone

nt

Tab

le 6

.2:

Sum

mar

y o

f W

ater

shed

En

han

cem

ent

Pro

ject

s

61

6161

61 61

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

PR

IOR

ITIZ

ING

AR

EA

S O

F C

ON

CER

NIn

ord

er to

iden

tify

thre

aten

ed u

ses,

pol

luta

nts,

and

thei

r pot

entia

l sou

rces

, the

pro

ject

man

ager

cond

ucte

d a

phys

ical

inve

ntor

y an

d an

alys

is o

f the

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r wat

ersh

ed.

Met

hods

use

d to

inve

ntor

y th

e w

ater

shed

incl

ude:

•Ro

ad c

ross

ing

inve

ntor

y –

crea

te a

bas

elin

e in

vent

ory

of c

ulve

rts,

iden

tify

area

s w

here

stor

mw

ater

or

sedi

men

t m

ay b

e re

achi

ng t

he s

trea

m,

reco

gniz

e as

soci

ated

land

use

and

futu

re d

evel

opm

ent

that

may

occ

ur.

•M

acro

inve

rteb

rate

mon

itorin

g –

eval

uate

hab

itat

for

mac

roin

vert

ebra

te a

nd f

ish

com

mun

ity,

esta

blis

h ba

selin

e da

ta f

rom

whi

ch f

utur

e pr

ogre

ss c

an b

e m

easu

red,

iden

tify

sour

ces

or a

reas

tha

t m

ay b

e im

pact

ing

the

stre

am.

Usi

ng t

he id

entif

ied

“Are

as o

f C

once

rn”,

the

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r W

ater

shed

Cou

ncil

crea

ted

anov

eral

l prio

ritiz

atio

n m

etho

dolo

gy b

ased

on

the

follo

win

g w

ater

qua

lity

conc

erns

:co

ntam

inat

ed s

torm

wat

er r

unof

f, f

lash

y st

orm

wat

er f

low

, ob

stru

ctio

ns t

o fis

h m

igra

tion,

stre

am c

ross

ings

, la

ck o

f pu

blic

edu

catio

n, w

ater

qua

lity

impa

cts

to L

ake

Supe

rior,

and

pote

ntia

l im

pact

s to

drin

king

wat

er s

uppl

y.

Thes

e co

ncer

ns w

ere

orga

nize

d in

to g

ener

alca

tego

ries

– st

orm

wat

er, s

edim

enta

tion,

ero

sion

, hyd

rolo

gy, a

nd p

ublic

info

rmat

ion/

educ

atio

n –

and

rank

ed in

divi

dual

ly w

ithin

eac

h ca

tego

ry.

Each

pro

ject

was

ass

igne

d a

prio

rity

of “

high

,”“m

ediu

m,”

or “

low

.” T

he re

sults

of t

his

prio

ritiz

atio

n pr

oces

s w

as th

e id

entif

icat

ion

of th

ew

ater

shed

enh

ance

men

t pro

ject

s id

entif

ied

late

r in

this

cha

pter

.

IDEN

TIFY

ING

DESIR

ED

USES

In a

dditi

on t

o w

ater

qua

lity

conc

erns

, des

ired

uses

for

the

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r w

ater

shed

wer

e al

soid

entif

ied.

A d

esire

d us

e is

bas

ed o

n fa

ctor

s im

port

ant t

o th

e w

ater

shed

com

mun

ity, h

owre

side

nts

wan

t to

use

the

wat

ersh

ed, o

r ho

w t

hey

wan

t it

to lo

ok.

The

follo

win

g lis

t id

entif

ies

the

desi

red

uses

for t

he w

ater

shed

:•

Rest

orat

ion

of th

e de

sign

ated

use

s to

the

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r wat

ersh

ed th

at in

clud

esph

ysic

al im

prov

emen

ts a

nd q

uant

ifiab

le p

rote

ctio

n go

als

•Pr

otec

tion

of t

he D

ead

Rive

r sy

stem

thr

ough

enf

orce

men

t of

zon

ing

ordi

nanc

es,

buff

erst

rip a

nd s

etba

ck g

uide

lines

, an

d pe

rman

ent

cons

erva

tion

ease

men

ts•

Cre

atio

n of

bet

ter

stor

mw

ater

man

agem

ent

tech

niqu

es t

hrou

gh e

duca

tion/

dem

onst

ratio

n si

tes

and

stor

mw

ater

ord

inan

ces

impl

emen

ted

by lo

cal m

unic

ipal

ities

•C

ontin

uatio

n of

wat

ersh

ed o

utre

ach

thro

ugh

bi-a

nnua

l new

slet

ters

, co

mm

unity

wat

ersh

ed e

vent

s, y

outh

edu

catio

n, a

nd v

olun

teer

cle

an u

ps a

nd m

onito

ring

•Id

entif

icat

ion

of o

pen

spac

e pl

anni

ng a

nd lo

w im

pact

dev

elop

men

t pr

actic

es t

hat

will

prot

ect

the

ecol

ogic

al r

esou

rces

of

the

wat

ersh

ed.

62

6262

62 62

Tab

le 6

.3:

Pro

ject

Par

tner

/ T

ech

nic

al A

ssis

tan

ce I

mp

lem

enta

tio

n S

trat

egy

Pro

ject

Part

ner

/Tec

hn

ical

Ass

ista

nce

Imp

lem

enta

tio

n S

trat

egy

Key

Pla

yer

Do

llar

Val

ue

Task

Co

mm

itte

dM

arqu

ette

Cou

nty

Gra

nt a

dmin

istr

atio

n, f

inan

cial

rep

ortin

g,C

onse

rvat

ion

Dis

tric

t$3

1,36

7pr

ojec

t co

ordi

natio

nC

entr

al L

ake

Supe

rior

Gra

nt c

oord

inat

ion,

pro

ject

man

agem

ent

Wat

ersh

ed P

artn

ersh

ip$3

4,20

0an

d ov

ersi

ght,

pos

t-in

stal

latio

n m

onito

ring

Kur

t Si

man

dl,

prof

essi

onal

eng

inee

r$9

00Im

plem

enta

tion

engi

neer

ing

assi

stan

ceC

ity o

f M

arqu

ette

$20,

000

Hyd

rolo

gy e

ngin

eerin

g as

sist

ance

Redu

ce e

rosi

on f

rom

sto

rmw

ater

run

off

(Site

15)

Mar

quet

te T

owns

hip

$19,

583

Proj

ect

supp

ort;

loca

l mat

chRe

stor

e rip

aria

n bu

ffer

alo

ng B

adge

r C

reek

tra

il;In

form

atio

n/Ed

ucat

ion

outr

each

com

pone

net

(Site

24)

Neg

aune

e To

wns

hip

$5,0

00Pr

ojec

t su

ppor

t; lo

cal m

atch

Mar

quet

te C

ount

y$7

,374

Redu

ce s

edim

ent

from

ero

ding

str

eam

bank

s (S

ites

5-7)

Road

Com

mis

sion

Redu

ce s

edim

ent

and

runo

ff f

rom

roa

d-st

ream

cros

sing

s (S

ites

8-11

)Re

duce

pol

lute

d ru

noff

fro

m p

arki

ng lo

ts, r

oads

(Site

s 13

&14

)Im

prov

e hy

drol

ogic

flo

w o

f ro

ad-s

trea

m c

ross

ing

(Site

21)

LS&

I Rai

lroad

$2

,000

Impr

ove

hydr

olog

ic f

low

of

railr

oad-

stre

am c

ross

ing

(Site

22)

Long

year

Cor

pora

tion

$3,3

35En

gine

erin

g as

sist

ance

; loc

al c

ash

mat

chRe

duce

sed

imen

t fr

om c

ritic

al e

rosi

on s

ite (S

ite 1

2)Pr

ivat

e La

ndow

ners

$7,9

58Re

duce

sed

imen

t an

d ru

noff

fro

m r

oad-

stre

amcr

ossi

ngs

(Site

s 1&

2)Re

duce

sed

imen

t fr

om p

rivat

ely

owne

d ro

ad (S

ite 3

)Re

duce

sed

imen

t fr

om e

rodi

ng s

trea

mba

nks

(Site

4)

Impr

ove

hydr

olog

ic f

low

of

road

-str

eam

cro

ssin

g(S

ites

19&

20)

Rem

ove

wei

r to

impr

ove

hydr

olog

ic f

low

(Site

23)

63

6363

63 63

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

Cha

pter

Six

- Im

plem

enta

tion

IDEN

TIFY

ING

WA

TER

SH

ED

EN

HA

NC

EM

EN

T PR

OJE

CTS

The

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r W

ater

shed

Cou

ncil

com

pile

d a

list

of w

ater

shed

enh

ance

men

t pr

ojec

tsba

sed

on th

e fin

ding

s of

the

man

agem

ent p

lan.

In

tota

l, th

ey id

entif

ied

twen

ty-t

wo

proj

ects

with

an e

stim

ated

val

ue o

f $2

39,0

00 (S

ee T

able

6.2

). M

any

of t

he p

roje

cts

focu

s on

red

ucin

g po

llute

dst

orm

wat

er ru

noff

and

sed

imen

tatio

n, re

duci

ng e

rosi

on, a

nd le

ssen

ing

the

impa

cts

to fi

sh m

igra

-tio

n an

d hy

drol

ogic

flow

. The

cou

ncil

then

prio

ritiz

ed e

ach

proj

ect a

s “h

igh”

, “m

ediu

m”,

or

“low

”, e

stim

ated

the

cos

t of

eac

h pr

ojec

t, a

nd c

ompi

led

a ph

asin

g sc

hedu

le f

or e

ach.

Tabl

e 6.

4 pr

esen

ts a

sum

mar

y of

the

prio

ritiz

ed e

xpen

ditu

res

for

the

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r w

ater

-sh

ed.

Fort

y-fo

ur p

erce

nt (4

4%) o

f the

exp

endi

ture

s ar

e fo

r the

hig

h pr

iorit

y pr

ojec

ts in

the

wat

ersh

ed.

Som

e of

the

se p

roje

cts

incl

ude

drai

nage

impr

ovem

ents

for

Bac

kyar

d C

reek

, ins

talla

-tio

n of

a n

ew c

ulve

rt o

n H

olyo

ke C

reek

, ban

k st

abili

zatio

n on

the

Dea

d Ri

ver

Falls

tra

il, a

nd t

hein

stal

latio

n of

sed

imen

t tra

ps a

nd th

e cr

eatio

n of

road

mai

nten

ance

gui

delin

es fo

r the

Whi

te B

ear

Road

Ass

ocia

tion.

Thi

rty-

nine

per

cent

(39%

) of w

ater

shed

enh

ance

men

t exp

endi

ture

s ar

eco

nsid

ered

med

ium

prio

rity

whi

le s

even

teen

per

cent

(17%

) are

con

side

red

to b

e lo

w p

riorit

ypr

ojec

ts.

Base

d on

the

prio

rity

of e

ach

proj

ect,

a p

hasi

ng s

ched

ule

with

the

fore

cast

ed e

xpen

ditu

res

was

crea

ted.

Eac

h pr

ojec

t w

as r

anke

d “i

mm

edia

te”,

“m

id t

erm

”, o

r “l

ong

term

” w

ith a

ntic

ipat

edre

sults

for

all

wat

ersh

ed e

nhan

cem

ent

proj

ects

to

be c

ompl

eted

with

in t

en y

ears

. Ta

ble

6.5

high

light

s th

e ph

asin

g sc

hedu

le a

nd e

xpen

ditu

res.

App

roxi

mat

ely

31%

of t

he fo

reca

sted

exp

endi

ture

s ar

e de

sign

ated

as

“im

med

iate

” in

nat

ure.

Proj

ects

wer

e al

mos

t eve

nly

dist

ribut

ed a

mon

gst t

hese

cat

egor

ies,

with

all

enha

ncem

ent p

roje

cts

to b

e co

mpl

eted

with

in te

n ye

ars.

Thi

s ph

asin

g st

rate

gy w

ill a

llow

var

ious

uni

ts o

f gov

ernm

ent

suff

icie

nt ti

me

to b

udge

for t

he p

roje

cts

and

secu

re o

ther

fund

ing

sour

ces.

Pro

ject

Pa

rtn

ers

an

d T

ech

nic

al

Ass

ista

nce

In a

dditi

on t

o th

e Lo

wer

Dea

d Ri

ver

Wat

ersh

ed C

ounc

il, t

here

are

sev

eral

par

tner

s th

at w

ill b

eca

lled

upon

to

impl

emen

t th

e pl

an. T

echn

ical

ass

ista

nce

in t

he f

orm

of

engi

neer

ing,

site

pla

nre

view

, and

pro

ject

ove

rsig

ht w

ill b

e pr

ovid

ed b

y th

e C

entr

al L

ake

Supe

rior

Wat

ersh

ed P

artn

er-

ship

, Kur

t Sim

andl

(pro

fess

iona

l eng

inee

r and

wat

ersh

ed c

ounc

il m

embe

r), M

arqu

ette

Cou

nty

Road

Com

mis

sion

, LS&

I Rai

lroad

, and

the

Long

year

Cor

pora

tion.

Oth

er p

artn

ers

prov

idin

g th

eir

over

all s

uppo

rt to

the

plan

incl

ude

the

Mar

quet

te C

ount

y C

onse

rvat

ion

Dis

tric

t, th

e C

ity o

fM

arqu

ette

, Mar

quet

te a

nd N

egau

nee

Tow

nshi

p, a

nd p

rivat

e la

ndow

ners

. A t

able

sho

win

g co

stes

timat

es o

f te

chni

cal a

ssis

tanc

e is

pro

vide

d on

the

adj

acen

t pa

ge.

EV

ALU

ATI

ON

PR

OC

ESS

The

succ

ess

of th

e im

plem

enta

tion

prog

ram

out

lined

in th

e Lo

wer

Dea

d Ri

ver W

ater

shed

Man

age-

men

t Pl

an w

ill b

e m

easu

red

by a

n im

prov

emen

t in

wat

er q

ualit

y. B

ecau

se t

his

plan

incl

uded

an

asse

ssm

ent o

f str

eam

qua

lity

usin

g SW

QA

S Pr

oced

ure

51 it

wou

ld b

e su

gges

ted

that

this

ana

lysi

sw

as u

sed

as a

bas

elin

e fo

r fut

ure

asse

ssm

ents

. C

ondu

ctin

g a

SWQ

AS

Proc

edur

e 51

with

in th

esa

me

stre

am r

each

es o

n re

gula

r in

terv

als

(5 y

ears

) wou

ld p

rovi

de a

mea

sure

of

how

wel

l the

impl

emen

tatio

n pl

an is

pro

gres

sing

, and

if th

e go

al o

f the

pro

gram

is b

eing

ach

ieve

d.

Tab

le 6

.5:

Exp

end

itu

res

by

Phas

ing

Sch

edu

le

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er W

ater

shed

Tab

le 6

.4:

Exp

end

itu

res

by

Prio

rity

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er W

ater

shed

Hig

hM

ediu

mLo

wTo

tal

$105

,000

$93,

500

$40,

500

$239

,000

44%

39%

17%

100%

Imm

edia

teM

id T

erm

Lon

g T

erm

(Yea

r 1)

(Yea

r 2)

(Yea

r 3)

Tota

l$7

4,00

0$5

3,50

0$1

11,5

00$2

39,0

0031

%22

%47

%10

0%

64

6464

64 64

Tab

le 7

.1:

Ass

essm

ent

of

Are

as Im

pac

ted

by

the

Dea

d R

iver

Flo

od

Site

#

Are

a o

f C

on

cern

Li

nea

r fe

et

of

ero

sio

n

Sect

ion

3

Fro

m M

cClu

re D

am t

o M

cClu

re P

ow

er H

ou

se

1a

. Er

osio

n be

low

the

McC

lure

Dam

, cau

sed

by b

asin

ove

rflo

w

40 f

t 2a

. Sc

oure

d ba

nk

20 f

t 3a

. Ro

ck d

epos

its a

nd e

rode

d ba

nk

160

ft

4a.

Shor

elin

e er

osio

n 18

0 ft

5a

. U

nder

cut

river

ban

k 80

ft

6a.

Long

year

brid

ge w

asho

ut, d

amag

ed s

hore

line

50 f

t

Tota

l lin

ear

feet

of

ero

sio

n in

Sec

tio

n 3

53

0 fe

et

Se

ctio

n 4

Fo

rest

ville

Dam

to

up

per

en

d o

f To

uri

st P

ark

Bas

in

1b

. Ba

nk e

rosi

on n

ext

to F

ores

tvill

e D

am

250

ft

2b.

Scou

red

bank

20

0 ft

3b

. U

nder

cut

bank

30

ft

4b.

Larg

e de

bris

pile

5b.

Low

und

ercu

t ba

nk

200

ft

6b.

Low

und

ercu

t ba

nk

200

ft

7b.

Scou

ring

alon

g rip

rap

and

bed

rock

bel

ow d

am #

1

8b.

Scou

ring

unde

r w

ood

pens

tock

, ban

k fa

ilure

exp

osin

g ol

d fo

unda

tion

15 f

t 9b

. U

nder

cut

river

ban

k 15

0 ft

10

b.

Larg

e de

bris

pile

, str

eam

ban

k er

osio

n 30

ft

11b.

La

rge

debr

is p

ile, s

trea

m b

ank

eros

ion

30 f

t 12

b.

Bank

ero

sion

50

ft

13b.

Ba

nk e

rosi

on

20 f

t 14

b.

Slum

ping

ban

k 10

0 ft

15

b.

Bank

fai

lure

50

ft

To

tal l

inea

r fe

et o

f er

osi

on

in S

ecti

on

4

1,32

5 fe

et

Se

ctio

n 5

Fr

om

To

uri

st P

ark

Dam

to

Mo

uth

of

Dea

d R

iver

1c.

East

ban

k be

low

Tou

rist

Park

, ero

ded

bank

2,

100

ft

2c.

Wes

t ba

nk b

elow

Tou

rist

Park

, ero

ded

bank

2,

150

ft

3c.

Railr

oad

brid

ge, f

ootin

gs w

ashe

d ou

t, 4

0 ft

wid

e, 8

ft

tall

320

ft

4c.

Ver

tical

ban

k fa

ilure

, 40

ft lo

ng, 1

5 ft

tal

l 60

0 ft

Tota

l lin

ear

feet

of

ero

sio

n in

Sec

tio

n 5

5,

170

feet

To

tal l

inea

r fe

et o

f er

osi

on

in t

he

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er W

ater

shed

7,

025

feet

65

6565

65 65

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

Cha

pter

Sev

en -

Flo

od U

pdat

e

FLO

OD

UP

DA

TE -

IM

PA

CTS

& O

PP

OR

TUN

ITIE

SFL

OO

D U

PD

ATE

- I

MP

AC

TS &

OP

PO

RTU

NIT

IES

FLO

OD

UP

DA

TE -

IM

PA

CTS

& O

PP

OR

TUN

ITIE

SFL

OO

D U

PD

ATE

- I

MP

AC

TS &

OP

PO

RTU

NIT

IES

FLO

OD

UP

DA

TE -

IM

PA

CTS

& O

PP

OR

TUN

ITIE

SC

hap

ter

Seve

n

The

seve

re d

amag

e do

ne b

y th

e M

ay f

lood

ing

alon

g th

e Lo

wer

Dea

d Ri

ver

serv

es t

o hi

ghlig

htth

e im

port

ance

of

prot

ectiv

e m

easu

res

disc

usse

d in

the

man

agem

ent

plan

. Ru

shin

g w

ater

sfr

om a

n up

stre

am b

reac

h in

the

Silv

er L

ake

caus

ed t

he e

arth

en d

am a

t To

uris

t Pa

rk t

o gi

ve w

ay,

resu

lting

in t

he d

rain

ing

of t

he T

ouris

t Pa

rk B

asin

. In

add

ition

to

the

Silv

er L

ake

brea

ch,

imm

edia

te e

ffec

ts o

f th

e flo

od d

amag

e in

clud

ed:

Nin

e br

idge

s ei

ther

dam

age

or d

estr

oyed

Mon

th-lo

ng s

hutd

own

of a

maj

or c

oal-f

ired

pow

er p

lant

Two

park

s an

d th

ree

publ

ic a

cces

s si

tes

dam

aged

Maj

or r

iver

cha

nnel

sco

urin

g an

d re

alig

nmen

tM

ajor

soi

l ero

sion

and

veg

etat

ion

loss

alo

ng s

trea

m b

anks

Sign

ifica

nt a

mou

nts

of s

edim

ent

depo

site

d al

ong

the

river

and

into

Lak

e Su

perio

rD

amag

e to

Chi

nook

sal

mon

hat

cher

y fis

h-pe

ns,

stre

ssin

g or

kill

ing

130,

000

fish

Lim

ited

road

acc

ess

for

resi

dent

s an

d em

erge

ncy

vehi

cles

nor

th o

f th

e riv

erSi

gnifi

cant

eco

nom

ic im

pact

s to

doz

en o

f lo

cal b

usin

esse

sTe

mpo

rary

shu

t do

wn

of t

wo

iron-

min

es,

layi

ng o

ff o

ver

1,00

0 w

orke

rs

In t

he w

eeks

imm

edia

tely

fol

low

ing

the

flood

, nu

mer

ous

fede

ral,

stat

e, a

nd lo

cal o

ffic

ials

surv

eyed

and

ass

esse

d th

e flo

od d

amag

e by

hel

icop

ter,

boat

, an

d on

-gro

und

inve

ntor

ies.

The

Fede

ral E

mer

genc

y M

anag

emen

t A

dmin

istr

atio

n (F

EMA

) w

as r

eque

sted

to

eval

uate

the

dis

aste

rin

hop

e of

rec

eivi

ng f

eder

al a

id a

nd a

ssis

tanc

e. T

houg

h FE

MA

ref

used

to

decl

are

Mar

quet

te a

disa

ster

are

a, f

unds

wer

e se

cure

d th

roug

h th

e N

atur

al R

esou

rces

Con

serv

atio

n Se

rvic

e‘E

mer

genc

y W

ater

shed

Pro

tect

ion’

pro

gram

to

rem

edia

te s

ever

al s

ever

e ar

eas

of e

rosi

on a

ndse

dim

enta

tion.

To h

elp

rem

edia

te t

hese

dam

aged

are

as,

bank

s w

ere

regr

aded

and

sta

biliz

ed w

ith r

ock

rip-r

ap,

and

both

Silv

er L

ake

and

Tour

ist

Park

bas

in w

ere

hydr

osee

ded

to p

reve

nt f

urth

er e

rosi

on.

The

stat

us o

f re

build

ing

the

eart

hen

dike

at

Silv

er L

ake

Basi

n an

d th

e da

m a

t To

uris

t Pa

rk b

asin

rem

ains

unk

now

n as

opt

ions

are

inve

stig

ated

and

ana

lyze

d.

The

affe

cted

mun

icip

aliti

esco

ntin

ue t

o w

ork

toge

ther

to

seek

add

ition

al f

undi

ng s

ourc

es.

Site

of

the

dra

ined

To

uri

st P

ark

Bas

in(S

ou

rce:

Pet

erso

n 2

003)

Tou

rist

Par

k d

am g

ave

way

un

der

pre

ssu

re f

rom

flo

od

wat

ers

Rip

-rap

an

d n

ewly

see

ded

gra

ss h

elp

pre

ven

t er

osi

on

66

6666

66 66

67

6767

67 67

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

The

follo

win

g is

a p

artia

l lis

t of

som

e gr

ants

and

fun

ds t

hat

can

be u

sed

to h

elp

in t

he im

ple-

men

tatio

n of

the

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r w

ater

shed

man

agem

ent

plan

. F

undi

ng s

ourc

es a

re c

ontin

u-al

ly c

hang

ing

and

beco

min

g av

aila

ble.

In

form

atio

n on

new

sou

rces

of

fund

ing

can

be f

ound

thro

ugh

the

EPA

, M

ichi

gan’

s D

NR

and

DEQ

, an

d th

roug

h m

any

non-

prof

it or

gani

zatio

ns d

edi-

cate

d to

the

pro

tect

ion

of n

atur

al r

esou

rces

and

wat

er q

ualit

y.

Inla

nd

Fis

heri

es

Reso

urc

e G

ran

ts (

MD

NR

)Th

ese

fund

s ar

e in

tend

ed t

o en

cour

age

and

enha

nce

inla

nd f

ishi

ng o

ppor

tuni

ties

and

topr

otec

t, m

aint

ain,

or

rest

ore

inla

nd a

quat

ic e

nviro

nmen

ts.

Pro

ject

s m

ight

incl

ude

bank

sta

biliz

a-tio

n, p

iers

, er

osio

n co

ntro

l, an

d ac

cess

site

s.

App

lican

ts m

ust

dem

onst

rate

the

y ca

n co

ntrib

ute

at le

ast

50%

of

the

proj

ect’s

cos

t as

a m

atch

to

the

stat

e-sp

onso

red

gran

t.

Con

tact

Tod

dG

risch

ke,

DN

R, F

ishe

ries

Div

isio

n, a

t 51

7-37

3-67

62 f

or m

ore

appl

icat

ion

info

rmat

ion.

Urb

an

an

d C

om

mu

nit

y F

ore

stry

Pro

gra

m (

MD

NR

)Fu

nds

unde

r th

is p

rogr

am a

re u

sed

to p

rovi

de in

form

atio

n an

d te

chni

cal a

ssis

tanc

e to

mun

icip

algo

vern

men

ts a

nd v

olun

teer

gro

ups

for

urba

n an

d co

mm

unity

for

est

activ

ities

. A

ppro

pria

tepr

ojec

ts in

clud

e tr

ee in

vent

orie

s, la

nd m

anag

emen

t pl

ans,

pla

ntin

g, a

nd o

ther

mai

nten

ance

activ

ities

. T

hese

fun

ds a

re s

peci

fical

ly s

et a

side

for

loca

l gov

ernm

ents

and

non

prof

it de

velo

p-m

ent

in lo

cal c

omm

uniti

es.

App

ropr

iate

pro

ject

s w

ould

incl

ude

refo

rest

atio

n or

rev

eget

atio

n of

degr

aded

are

as,

com

mun

ity e

duca

tion

proj

ects

tha

t sp

ecifi

cally

add

ress

for

estr

y or

ref

ores

tatio

nis

sues

, and

tre

e pl

antin

gs.

The

dead

line

for

proj

ect

prop

osal

s is

May

of

each

yea

r.

Mic

hig

an

Natu

ral

Reso

urc

es

Tru

st F

un

dTh

is f

und

prov

ides

gra

nts

to lo

cal u

nits

of

gove

rnm

ent

for

acqu

isiti

on a

nd d

evel

opm

ent

of la

nds

and

faci

litie

s fo

r ou

tdoo

r re

crea

tion

or t

he p

rote

ctio

n of

Mic

higa

n’s

sign

ifica

nt n

atur

al r

esou

rces

.A

ppro

pria

te u

ses

incl

ude

the

crea

tion

or p

rote

ctio

n of

wild

life

or e

colo

gica

l cor

ridor

s th

roug

hth

e co

nnec

tion

or b

uffe

ring

of s

tate

or

loca

l nat

ural

are

as, f

ores

ts, o

r ga

me

area

s.

App

lican

tsm

ust

incl

ude

thei

r co

mm

unity

’s ad

opte

d re

crea

tion

plan

alo

ng w

ith t

heir

subm

issi

on.

The

dead

line

for

appl

icat

ion

is A

pril

1 of

each

yea

r.

Co

ast

al

Man

ag

em

en

t Pro

gra

m (

MD

NR

)Th

ese

fund

s ca

n be

use

d to

cre

ate

or e

nhan

ce p

ublic

acc

ess

to t

he g

reat

lake

s, r

edev

elop

men

tof

a d

eter

iora

ting

urba

n w

ater

fron

t, p

rote

ctio

n of

sen

sitiv

e co

asta

l fea

ture

s, e

rosi

on/h

azar

dco

ntro

l in

coas

tal a

reas

and

res

tora

tion

of h

isto

ric c

oast

al f

eatu

res.

No

n-P

oin

t So

urc

e P

oll

uti

on

Co

ntr

ol

Gra

nt

(MD

NR

)Th

e pu

rpos

e of

thi

s gr

ant

is t

o im

plem

ent

impr

ovem

ents

out

lined

in a

ppro

ved

wat

ersh

edm

anag

emen

t pl

ans.

Th

ese

impr

ovem

ents

can

be

used

to

addr

ess

sour

ces

of n

on-p

oint

sou

rce

pollu

tion.

A

pplic

ants

mus

t co

ntrib

ute

a 25

% m

atch

to

the

stat

e-sp

onso

red

gran

t.

Cha

pter

Eig

ht -

Fun

ding

Sou

rces

FUN

DIN

G S

OU

RC

ES

FUN

DIN

G S

OU

RC

ES

FUN

DIN

G S

OU

RC

ES

FUN

DIN

G S

OU

RC

ES

FUN

DIN

G S

OU

RC

ES

Ch

apte

r Ei

gh

t

68

6868

68 68

69

6969

69 69

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

FUN

DIN

G S

OU

RC

ES (

CO

NTI

NU

ED

)

Gre

at

Lakes

Pro

tect

ion

Fu

nd

This

fun

d se

eks

and

sele

cts

proj

ects

bas

ed o

n th

e an

ticip

ated

ben

efits

to

the

heal

th o

f th

e G

reat

Lake

s ec

osys

tem

. To

be

succ

essf

ul, t

ying

the

pro

ject

wor

k in

to a

larg

er, b

asin

-wid

e ef

fort

wou

ldth

eref

ore

be n

eces

sary

. P

roje

cts

shou

ld a

ntic

ipat

e an

d pr

even

t im

pact

s to

the

Gre

at L

akes

ecos

yste

m o

r th

e sp

ecifi

c co

mpo

nent

(lik

e a

deve

lope

d w

ater

shed

) of

the

Gre

at L

akes

eco

syst

emra

ther

tha

n at

tem

pt t

o co

rrec

t ar

eas

alre

ady

impa

cted

. A

pplic

atio

ns a

re a

ccep

ted

at a

ny t

ime.

EPA

Gra

nt

thro

ug

h G

reat

Lakes

Nati

on

al

Pro

gra

m O

ffic

e (

EPA

)Th

ese

fund

s ar

e di

strib

uted

to

actio

n-or

ient

ed,

colla

bora

tive

effo

rts,

leve

rage

d by

oth

er f

undi

ngso

urce

s.

Like

the

Gre

at L

akes

Pro

tect

ion

Fund

, thi

s pr

ogra

m s

elec

ts p

roje

cts

base

d on

the

irco

ntrib

utio

n to

the

hea

lth o

f th

e G

reat

Lak

es s

yste

m.

Wate

rsh

ed

Su

rveys

an

d P

lan

nin

gTh

is o

rgan

izat

ion

prov

ides

pla

nnin

g as

sist

ance

to

Fede

ral,

Stat

e, a

nd lo

cal a

genc

ies

for

the

deve

lopm

ent

of c

oord

inat

ed w

ater

and

rel

ated

land

res

ourc

es p

rogr

ams

in w

ater

shed

s an

d riv

erba

sins

. P

riorit

y w

ill b

e gi

ven

to s

tudi

es w

hich

: (1

) C

ontr

ibut

e to

ach

ievi

ng t

he N

atio

nal C

onse

r-va

tion

Prog

ram

hig

h pr

iorit

y ob

ject

ives

; (2

) ha

ve a

hig

h lik

elih

ood

of b

eing

impl

emen

ted;

(3)

will

be im

plem

ente

d w

ith n

o or

rel

ativ

ely

little

Fed

eral

ass

ista

nce;

(4)

hav

e St

ate

and

loca

l ass

ista

nce

in t

he s

tudy

; and

(5) a

re o

f sh

ort

dura

tion

(2 t

o 4

year

s) a

nd (6

) low

cos

t.

Spec

ial p

riorit

y is

give

n to

the

obj

ectiv

es o

f se

ttin

g pr

iorit

ies

in h

elpi

ng t

o so

lve

prob

lem

s of

ups

trea

m r

ural

com

mun

ity f

lood

ing,

wat

er q

ualit

y im

prov

emen

t co

min

g fr

om a

gric

ultu

ral n

on-p

oint

sou

rces

,w

etla

nd p

rese

rvat

ion

and

drou

ght

man

agem

ent

for

agric

ultu

re a

nd r

ural

com

mun

ities

. S

peci

alem

phas

is is

giv

en t

o as

sist

ing

com

mun

ities

whi

ch d

esire

to

adop

t flo

odpl

ain

man

agem

ent

regu

latio

ns t

o m

eet

the

requ

irem

ents

of

the

Nat

iona

l Flo

od In

sura

nce

Prog

ram

and

Sta

teag

enci

es in

dev

elop

ing

a st

rate

gic

wat

er r

esou

rce

plan

. T

ypes

of

assi

stan

ce in

clud

e pr

ovis

ion

ofsp

ecia

lized

ser

vice

s, a

dvis

ory

serv

ices

and

cou

nsel

ing.

Wate

rsh

ed

Pro

tect

ion

an

d F

loo

d P

reven

tio

nTh

is g

roup

pro

vide

s te

chni

cal a

nd f

inan

cial

ass

ista

nce

in c

arry

ing

out

wor

ks o

f im

prov

emen

t to

prot

ect,

dev

elop

, an

d ut

ilize

the

land

and

wat

er r

esou

rces

in s

mal

l wat

ersh

eds.

T

echn

ical

assi

stan

ce is

pro

vide

d in

des

igni

ng,

and

inst

allin

g w

ater

shed

wor

ks o

f im

prov

emen

t.

Fina

ncia

las

sist

ance

is p

rovi

ded

for

shar

ing

cost

s of

mea

sure

s fo

r w

ater

shed

pro

tect

ion,

flo

od p

reve

ntio

n,ag

ricul

tura

l wat

er m

anag

emen

t, s

edim

enta

tion

cont

rol,

publ

ic w

ater

-bas

ed f

ish,

wild

life,

and

recr

eatio

n; a

nd in

ext

endi

ng lo

ng t

erm

cre

dit

to h

elp

loca

l int

eres

ts w

ith t

heir

shar

e of

the

cos

ts.

Wat

ersh

ed a

reas

mus

t no

t ex

ceed

250

,000

acr

es.

Cap

acity

of

a si

ngle

str

uctu

re is

lim

ited

to25

,000

acr

e-fe

et o

f to

tal c

apac

ity a

nd 1

2,50

0 ac

re-f

eet

of f

lood

wat

er d

eten

tion

capa

city

. Ty

pes

of a

ssis

tanc

e in

clud

e pr

ovis

ion

of s

peci

aliz

ed s

ervi

ces,

adv

isor

y se

rvic

es a

nd c

ouns

elin

g.

Cha

pter

Eig

ht -

Fun

ding

Sou

rces

70

7070

70 70

71

7171

71 71

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

FUN

DIN

G S

OU

RC

ES (

CO

NTI

NU

ED

)

Co

nse

rvati

on

Rese

rve P

rog

ram

This

pro

gram

’s go

al is

to

prot

ect

the

Nat

ion’

s lo

ng-t

erm

cap

abili

ty t

o pr

oduc

e fo

od a

nd f

iber

; to

redu

ce s

oil e

rosi

on;

to r

educ

e se

dim

enta

tion;

to

impr

ove

wat

er q

ualit

y; t

o cr

eate

a b

ette

rha

bita

t fo

r w

ildlif

e.

Elig

ible

ow

ners

or

oper

ator

s m

ay p

lace

hig

hly

erod

ible

or

othe

r en

viro

n-m

enta

lly s

ensi

tive

land

into

a 1

0-15

yea

r co

ntra

ct.

The

part

icip

ant,

in r

etur

n fo

r an

nual

pay

-m

ents

, ag

rees

to

impl

emen

t a

cons

erva

tion

plan

app

rove

d by

the

loca

l con

serv

atio

n di

stric

t fo

rco

nver

ting

high

ly e

rodi

ble

crop

land

or

othe

r en

viro

nmen

tally

sen

sitiv

e la

nd t

o a

long

-ter

mre

sour

ce c

onse

rvin

g co

ver

i.e.,

elig

ible

land

mus

t be

pla

nted

with

a v

eget

ativ

e co

ver,

such

as,

pere

nnia

l gra

sses

, le

gum

es,

shru

bs,

or t

rees

. F

inan

cial

and

tec

hnic

al a

ssis

tanc

e ar

e av

aila

ble

topa

rtic

ipan

ts t

o as

sist

in t

he e

stab

lishm

ent

of a

long

-ter

m r

esou

rce

cons

ervi

ng c

over

.

An

ad

rom

ou

s Fi

sh C

on

serv

ati

on

Act

Pro

gra

mTh

is p

rogr

am a

ssis

ts o

rgan

izat

ions

in t

he c

onse

rvat

ion,

dev

elop

men

t, a

nd e

nhan

cem

ent

of t

hena

tion’

s A

nadr

omou

s fis

h st

ocks

and

the

fis

h in

the

Gre

at L

akes

tha

t as

cend

str

eam

s to

spa

wn.

Fund

s ca

n be

use

d fo

r sp

awni

ng a

rea

impr

ovem

ent,

inst

allm

ent

of f

ishw

ays,

dat

a co

llect

ion,

cons

truc

tion

of f

ish

prot

ectio

n de

vice

s an

d ha

tche

ries,

and

res

earc

h to

impr

ove

man

agem

ent

and

incr

ease

Ana

drom

ous

fish

reso

urce

s.

Fund

s ca

nnot

be

used

for

law

enf

orce

men

t, p

ublic

rela

tions

, or

con

stru

ctio

n of

fac

ilitie

s an

d ve

ssel

s, t

he p

rimar

y pu

rpos

e of

whi

ch is

to

com

mer

-ci

ally

har

vest

, ha

ndle

, an

d pr

oces

s fis

hery

pro

duct

s.

Cha

pter

Eig

ht -

Fun

ding

Sou

rces

72

7272

72 72

73

7373

73 73

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

Refe

renc

es

RE

FER

EN

CE

SR

EFE

RE

NC

ES

RE

FER

EN

CE

SR

EFE

RE

NC

ES

RE

FER

EN

CE

S

Are

ndt,

R.,

E. B

rabe

c, H

.L. D

odso

n, C

. Rei

d, a

nd R

. D. Y

aro.

199

4. R

ural

by

Des

ign:

Mai

ntai

ning

Smal

l Tow

n C

hara

cter

. C

hica

go:

Am

eric

an P

lann

ing

Ass

ocia

tion.

Arn

old

Jr., C

hest

er l.

and

C. J

ames

Gib

bons

. 199

6. Im

perv

ious

Sur

face

Cov

erag

e –

The

Emer

-ge

nce

of a

Key

Env

ironm

enta

l Ind

icat

or.

Jour

nal o

f th

e A

mer

ican

Pla

nnin

g A

ssoc

iatio

n. V

ol.

62N

o. 2

, Spr

ing.

Ayr

es, L

ewis

, Nor

ris, &

May

, Inc

. (A

LMN

). 20

02.

Mar

quet

te T

owns

hip

Wat

ersh

ed A

naly

sis.

Proj

ect

No.

734

18-0

4.

Bobr

in,

Jani

s A

. 20

00.

Rule

s of

the

Was

hten

aw C

ount

y D

rain

Com

mis

sion

er:

Proc

edur

es a

ndD

esig

n C

riter

ia f

or S

torm

Wat

er M

anag

emen

t Sy

stem

s. M

ay 2

000.

Brow

n, E

., A

. Pet

erso

n, R

. Klin

e-Ro

bach

, K. S

mith

and

L. W

olfs

on. 2

000.

Dev

elop

ing

a W

ater

-sh

ed M

anag

emen

t Pl

an f

or W

ater

Qua

lity:

An

Intr

oduc

tory

Gui

de.

Lans

ing:

Mill

broo

k Pr

intin

g.

Cen

tral

Lak

e Su

perio

r W

ater

shed

Par

tner

ship

(C

LSW

P).

2002

. Pe

ople

and

Lan

d. M

arqu

ette

, M

I.

CU

PPA

D R

egio

nal C

omm

issi

on.

1998

. N

egau

nee

Tow

nshi

p C

ompr

ehen

sive

Pla

n.

Envi

ronm

enta

l Pro

tect

ion

Age

ncy

(EPA

). 19

96.

Man

agin

g U

rban

Run

off.

Po

inte

r N

o. 7

, EP

A84

1-F-

96_0

04G

.

Ferg

uson

, Br

uce

K.

1998

. In

trod

uctio

n to

Sto

rmw

ater

: C

once

pt,

Purp

ose,

Des

ign.

Joh

n W

iley

&So

ns,

Inc.

God

by,

Nea

l and

Joh

n Su

ppni

ck.

2001

. C

hann

el M

orph

olog

y, F

ish

Com

mun

ity,

and

Tem

pera

ture

Con

ditio

ns o

f th

e D

ead

Rive

r By

pass

ed C

hann

el P

rior

to F

low

Aug

men

tatio

n. M

ichi

gan

Dep

art-

men

t of

Nat

ural

Res

ourc

es,

Surf

ace

Wat

er Q

ualit

y D

ivis

ion

Repo

rt:

MI/D

EQ/S

WQ

-00/

104.

God

by,

Nea

l. 20

02.

A B

iolo

gica

l Sur

vey

of L

ake

Supe

rior

Cos

tal T

ribut

arie

s in

Nor

ther

nM

arqu

ette

Cou

nty.

Mic

higa

n D

epar

tmen

t of

Env

ironm

enta

l Qua

lity,

Sur

face

Wat

er Q

ualit

yD

ivis

ion

Repo

rt M

I/DEQ

/SW

Q-0

2/01

7.

Hyn

es, H

.B.N

. 197

0.

The

ecol

ogy

of r

unni

ng w

ater

s.

Uni

vers

ity o

f To

ront

o Pr

ess.

Tor

onto

.

Kar

a, J

.R.,

and

I. J.

Sch

loss

er.

1978

. W

ater

Res

ourc

es a

nd t

he L

and-

wat

er In

terf

ace.

Sc

ienc

e20

1:22

9-23

4.

Lake

Sup

erio

r W

ork

Gro

up (

LaM

P).

2002

. La

ke S

uper

ior

Lake

wid

e M

anag

emen

t Pl

an -

LaM

P:20

02 P

rogr

ess

Repo

rt.

Lak

e Su

perio

r Bi

natio

nal P

rogr

am.

74

7474

74 74

75

7575

75 75

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

REFE

REN

CES (

CO

NTI

NU

ED

)

Nat

ural

Res

ourc

es D

efen

se C

ounc

il (N

RDC

). 20

01.

Sto

rmw

ater

Str

ateg

ies:

Com

mun

ity R

e-sp

onse

s to

Run

off

Pollu

tion.

CD

-RO

M.

Nor

th A

mer

ican

Ben

thol

ogic

al S

ocie

ty (

NA

BS).

1999

. Fr

eshw

ater

Alg

ae a

nd M

acro

inve

rteb

rate

Slid

e Li

brar

y [o

nlin

e].

[cite

d 25

Jul

y 20

03].

Ava

ilabl

e <

http

://w

ww

.ben

thos

.org

/info

/con

serv

/fr

eshw

slid

elib

.htm

>.

Pete

rson

, A

aron

. 20

03.

FEM

A A

sses

ses

Floo

d. T

he M

inin

g Jo

urna

l Onl

ine

[onl

ine]

. 21

May

[cite

d 30

May

200

3].

Ava

ilabl

e <

http

://w

ww

.min

ingj

ourn

al.n

et>

.

Pitt

, R. a

nd J

. Voo

rhee

s.

1989

. So

urce

load

and

man

agem

ent

mod

el (S

LAM

M) -

An

urba

nno

npoi

nt s

ourc

e w

ater

qua

lity

man

agem

ent

mod

el.

Wis

cons

in D

epar

tmen

t of

Nat

ural

Re-

sour

ces.

PU

BL-W

R-21

8-89

.

Prem

o, B

.J.,

D.T

. Lon

g, R

.J. H

ugge

tt, D

. Pre

mo,

W.W

. Tay

lor,

G.T

. Wol

ff a

nd K

.G. H

arris

on. 2

001.

Reco

mm

ende

d En

viro

nmen

tal I

ndic

ator

s Pr

ogra

m f

or t

he S

tate

of

Mic

higa

n, J

uly

2001

. M

ichi

-ga

n En

viro

nmen

tal S

cien

ce B

oard

, La

nsin

g.

Schu

eler

, To

m.

199

4.

The

Impo

rtan

ce o

f Im

perv

ious

ness

. W

ater

shed

Pro

tect

ion

Tech

niqu

es.

Vol.

1 N

o. 3

, Fal

l.

Schn

eide

r, Ja

mes

C.

(ed.

) 20

00.

Man

ual o

f Fi

sher

ies

Surv

ey M

etho

ds II

: With

Per

iodi

c U

pdat

es.

Mic

higa

n D

epar

tmen

t of

Nat

ural

Res

ourc

es,

Fish

erie

s Sp

ecia

l Rep

ort

25,

Ann

Arb

or.

Sim

andl

, Kur

t J.

200

2. B

ricky

ard

Cre

ek H

ydro

logi

c St

udy.

STS

Con

sulta

nts

Ltd,

Pro

ject

No.

2-

1025

1.

Steu

er, J

., W

. Sel

big,

N. H

orne

wer

, and

J. P

rey.

199

7.

Sour

ces

of C

onta

min

atio

n in

an

Urb

anBa

sin

in M

arqu

ette

, Mic

higa

n an

d an

Ana

lysi

s of

Con

cent

ratio

ns, L

oads

, and

Dat

a Q

ualit

y.

U.S

.G

eolo

gica

l Sur

vey,

Wat

er-R

esou

rces

Inve

stig

atio

ns R

epor

t 97

-424

2.

Sund

berg

, C

arls

on a

nd A

ssoc

iate

s, In

c. 1

995.

Cha

rter

Tow

nshi

p of

Mar

quet

te -

Com

preh

ensi

veD

evel

opm

ent

Plan

. P

roje

ct #

93-4

64.

USD

A F

ores

t Se

rvic

e. 2

003.

Fi

eld

Wor

k an

d Fo

rest

Inve

ntor

y an

d A

naly

sis

[onl

ine]

. [ci

ted

22 J

uly

2003

]. A

vaila

ble

<ht

tp://

ww

w.s

rs.f

s.us

da.g

ov/g

alle

ry/f

ield

_wor

k.ht

m>

.

War

ren,

C.E

. 19

71.

Bio

logy

and

wat

er p

ollu

tion

cont

rol.

Sau

nder

s, P

hila

delp

hia.

Refe

renc

es

76

App

endi

x A

AP

PE

ND

IX A

- G

loss

ary

AP

PE

ND

IX A

- G

loss

ary

AP

PE

ND

IX A

- G

loss

ary

AP

PE

ND

IX A

- G

loss

ary

AP

PE

ND

IX A

- G

loss

ary

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

Imp

ervi

ou

s su

rfac

e1

Har

d gr

ound

cov

er t

hat

prev

ents

or

reta

rds

the

entr

y of

wat

er in

to t

he s

oil a

nd in

crea

ses

runo

ff, s

uch

as a

spha

lt, c

oncr

ete,

or

roof

tops

.

Lacu

stri

ne2

Rela

ting

to,

form

ed in

, liv

ing

in,

or g

row

ing

in la

kes.

Rip

aria

n2

Rela

ting

to o

r lo

cate

d on

the

ban

k of

a n

atur

al w

ater

cour

se, s

uch

as a

riv

er, l

ake,

or

tidew

ater

.

Sto

rmw

ater

1

Prec

ipita

tion

that

acc

umul

ates

in n

atur

al a

nd/o

r co

nstr

ucte

d st

orag

e an

d st

orm

wat

er s

yste

ms

durin

g an

d im

med

iate

ly f

ollo

win

g a

stor

m e

vent

.

1 Fo

rest

er C

omm

unic

atio

ns,

Inc.

200

3. S

torm

wat

er [

onlin

e].

[cite

d 21

Jul

y 20

03].

Ava

ilabl

e <

http

://w

ww

.for

este

r.net

/sw

.htm

l>.

2 M

erria

m-W

ebst

er.

2003

. M

erria

m-W

ebst

er O

n-lin

e –

The

Lang

uage

Dic

tiona

ry [

onlin

e].

[cite

d 21

Jul

y 20

03].

Ava

ilabl

e <

http

://w

ww

.m-w

.com

/hom

e.ht

m>

77

78

App

endi

x B

AP

PE

ND

IX B

- B

rick

yard

Cre

ek H

ydro

logi

c St

ud

yA

PP

EN

DIX

B -

Bri

ckya

rd C

reek

Hyd

rolo

gic

Stu

dy

AP

PE

ND

IX B

- B

rick

yard

Cre

ek H

ydro

logi

c St

ud

yA

PP

EN

DIX

B -

Bri

ckya

rd C

reek

Hyd

rolo

gic

Stu

dy

AP

PE

ND

IX B

- B

rick

yard

Cre

ek H

ydro

logi

c St

ud

y

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

TAB

LE O

F C

ON

TEN

TS1.

Intr

oduc

tion

2.Su

mm

ary

3.D

escr

iptiv

e W

ater

shed

Nar

rativ

e4.

Des

ign

Stor

m R

unof

f A

naly

sis

5.C

oncl

usio

ns6.

Reco

mm

enda

tions

7.Ta

bles

a.TR

-55

Sum

mar

yb.

Base

Flo

w S

umm

ary

8.Fi

gure

sa.

Wat

ersh

ed M

ap (

USG

S)b.

Soils

Map

(U

SDA

/SC

S)9.

App

endi

ces

a.SC

S TR

-55

Dat

a Sh

eets

b.U

SDA

/SC

S So

ils C

lass

ifica

tion

INTR

OD

UC

TIO

N

The

Low

er D

ead

Rive

r W

ater

shed

Cou

ncil

was

for

med

as

one

of t

he w

ater

shed

gro

ups

unde

r th

e C

entr

al L

ake

Supe

rior

Wat

ersh

ed P

artn

ersh

ip f

or t

hepu

rpos

e of

obs

ervi

ng a

nd s

tudy

ing

the

Dea

d Ri

ver

and

its t

ribut

arie

s fr

om t

he M

cClu

re D

am t

o La

ke S

uper

ior.

Mem

bers

of

the

coun

cil i

nclu

de la

nd-

owne

rs a

nd o

ther

con

cern

ed c

itize

ns,

com

mer

cial

and

indu

stria

l rep

rese

ntat

ives

, en

viro

nmen

tal/e

ngin

eerin

g co

nsul

tant

s an

d st

uden

t in

tern

s.

The

coun

cil w

as f

orm

ed in

res

pons

e to

a r

eque

st f

rom

Mar

quet

te T

owns

hip

to o

bser

ve

the

exis

ting

and

furt

her

pote

ntia

l eff

ects

fro

m U

S 41

cor

ridor

deve

lopm

ent,

est

ablis

h a

basi

s fo

r fu

rthe

r st

udy,

rai

se p

ublic

aw

aren

ess,

and

mak

e re

com

men

datio

ns f

or c

orre

ctiv

e m

easu

res

thro

ugh

coop

erat

ive

effo

rt.

For

this

stu

dy,

the

Mar

quet

te C

ount

y C

onse

rvat

ion

Dis

tric

t is

sued

a R

eque

st f

or P

ropo

sals

for

eng

inee

ring

serv

ices

to

prov

ide

hydr

olog

ic a

naly

ses,

obse

rvat

ions

and

rec

omm

enda

tions

for

wat

ersh

ed a

nd s

trea

m s

tabi

lizat

ion

for

two

trib

utar

y st

ream

s of

the

low

er D

ead

Rive

r w

ater

shed

. T

he t

wo

stre

ams

desi

gnat

ed f

or s

tudy

wer

e Er

ie C

reek

, whi

ch is

a w

ater

shed

in T

row

brid

ge P

ark,

and

Bric

kyar

d C

reek

. D

ue t

o fu

ndin

g lim

itatio

ns, t

he s

tudy

was

rev

ised

to

only

one

wat

erco

urse

, and

bec

ause

of

its p

roxi

mity

to

curr

ent

com

mer

cial

dev

elop

men

t, B

ricky

ard

Cre

ek w

as s

elec

ted

as t

he m

ore

criti

cal o

f th

e tw

o st

ream

s.

This

rep

ort

pres

ents

the

res

ults

of

field

inve

stig

atio

n, h

ydro

logi

c m

odel

ling,

con

clus

ions

and

rec

omm

enda

tions

.

79

SU

MM

AR

Y

In p

artic

ular

, the

rea

ch e

xten

ding

fro

m t

he U

S 41

cro

ssin

g up

stre

am t

o th

e ou

tlet

from

the

Bis

hop

Pond

wet

land

s w

as d

esig

nate

d as

the

stu

dy a

rea.

This

rea

ch b

egin

s ad

jace

nt t

o th

e Bi

shop

Woo

ds r

esid

entia

l sub

divi

sion

and

flo

ws

by c

ulve

rt t

hrou

gh t

he r

ailro

ad g

rade

, N

orth

woo

ds R

oad,

Bric

kyar

dRo

ad a

nd U

S 41

. W

ithin

thi

s re

ach,

fou

r si

tes

wer

e se

lect

ed f

or m

easu

ring

base

flo

w a

nd d

esig

n st

orm

flo

w f

or t

he 2

4 ho

ur 2

yea

r, 10

yea

r an

d 10

0ye

ar e

vent

s.

Exce

pt f

or t

he B

isho

p Po

nd w

etla

nd o

utle

t, t

hese

poi

nts

are

loca

ted

at t

he d

owns

trea

m e

nds

of c

ulve

rt c

ross

ings

: at

the

rai

lroad

gra

de,

Bric

kyar

d Ro

ad a

nd U

S 41

.

Base

str

eam

flo

ws

wer

e ta

ken

at t

hese

poi

nts

by d

irect

mea

sure

men

t us

ing

chan

nel s

ectio

n/cu

lver

t ge

omet

ry,

grad

ient

and

str

eam

vel

ocity

. F

ield

verif

icat

ion

was

mad

e to

iden

tify

any

poin

ts o

f “s

igni

fican

t di

scha

rge”

to

the

stre

am,

with

sig

nific

ant

disc

harg

e de

fined

as

any

flow

gre

ater

tha

n 50

%of

bas

e flo

w f

or t

he s

trea

m a

t th

at p

oint

. D

esig

n st

orm

flo

w r

ates

at

thes

e po

ints

wer

e ca

lcul

ated

usi

ng t

he f

ollo

win

g so

urce

s:

USD

A S

oils

Con

serv

a-tio

n Se

rvic

e Te

chni

cal R

elea

se N

o 55

(TR

-55)

; th

e M

DEQ

Lan

d &

Wat

er M

anag

emen

t D

ivis

ion

publ

icat

ion,

“C

ompu

ting

Floo

d D

isch

arge

s fo

r Sm

all

Ung

auge

d W

ater

shed

s” b

y Ri

char

d So

rrel

l PE,

Hyd

rolo

gic

Stud

ies

Gro

up,

2000

; ae

rial m

appi

ng b

y A

erom

etric

for

Mar

quet

te C

hart

er T

owns

hip;

USG

S7.

5’ M

arqu

ette

qua

dran

gle;

and

USD

A S

oils

Con

serv

atio

n Se

rvic

e A

tlas

for

Mar

quet

te C

ount

y, M

ichi

gan

(she

et 4

7).

Fin

ding

s, c

oncl

usio

ns a

nd r

ecom

-m

enda

tions

mad

e in

thi

s re

port

are

bas

ed o

n th

e ab

ove

met

hods

and

info

rmat

iona

l sou

rces

.

NA

RR

ATI

VE

Whi

le b

ase

flow

s w

ere

mea

sure

d di

rect

ly f

rom

the

fou

r de

sign

ated

gau

ging

site

s, d

eter

min

atio

n of

des

ign

stor

m f

low

s re

quire

d ch

arac

teriz

atio

n an

dm

odel

ling

of t

he e

ntire

upp

er w

ater

shed

. Th

e w

ater

shed

whi

ch is

dra

ined

by

Bric

kyar

d C

reek

may

be

cons

ider

ed a

s co

nsis

ting

of t

wo

reac

hes:

fr

omth

e he

adw

ater

s to

Bis

hop

Pond

and

sur

roun

ding

wet

land

s, a

nd f

rom

the

Bis

hop

Pond

wet

land

s to

the

Dea

d Ri

ver.

In g

ener

al,

the

uppe

r w

ater

shed

is c

hara

cter

ized

by

area

s of

roc

k ou

tcro

p an

d in

term

itten

t w

etla

nd,

and

is h

eavi

ly w

oode

d by

a m

ixed

har

dwoo

d an

dco

nife

r fo

rest

in h

ighl

and

area

s an

d bo

real

con

ifero

us t

ypic

al o

f is

olat

ed w

etla

nds

in t

his

regi

on.

It is

app

roxi

mat

ely

1483

acr

es a

nd e

xten

ds s

outh

of

Cou

nty

Road

492

, wes

t to

the

LS&

I tre

stle

at

US

41, a

nd e

ast

to t

he B

isho

p W

oods

res

iden

tial s

ubdi

visi

on.

Elev

atio

ns in

the

upp

er w

ater

shed

ran

gefo

rm 1

320

ft in

the

wes

tern

hig

hlan

ds t

o 11

00 f

t in

the

Bis

hop

Pond

wet

land

s.

Belo

w 1

100

ft,

relie

f of

the

wat

ersh

ed b

ecom

es p

rogr

essi

vely

less

pro

noun

ced,

and

mak

es a

tra

nsiti

on t

o an

are

a pr

edom

inat

ed b

y op

en a

nd s

crub

wet

land

s w

hich

sur

roun

ds B

isho

p Po

nd.

Thi

s ar

ea,

incl

udin

g Bi

shop

Pon

d is

app

roxi

mat

ely

129

acre

s in

ext

ent.

It

is in

thi

s lo

wer

are

a, e

leva

tion

1100

to 1

060

ft, t

hat

the

two

trib

utar

ies

from

the

wes

tern

wat

ersh

ed f

orm

a c

onflu

ence

at

Bish

op P

ond.

A

s se

en in

the

wat

ersh

ed m

ap (F

igur

e a)

, the

drai

nage

pat

tern

shi

fts,

flo

win

g to

war

d th

e D

ead

Rive

r in

a n

orth

wes

terly

dire

ctio

n.

The

topo

grap

hy a

nd g

eom

orph

olog

y of

the

sou

thea

ster

n up

per

wat

ersh

ed a

rea

sugg

ests

tha

t th

e ar

ea w

est

of B

isho

p Po

nd in

late

r Pl

eist

ocen

e tim

es m

ay h

ave

serv

ed a

s he

adw

ater

s fo

r th

e Ba

dger

and

Whe

tsto

new

ater

shed

sys

tem

s, w

ith B

isho

p Po

nd a

nd s

urro

undi

ng w

etla

nds

the

head

wat

er f

or B

ricky

ard

Cre

ek.

Bish

op W

oods

is a

70

acre

res

iden

tial d

evel

opm

ent

loca

ted

imm

edia

tely

eas

t of

Bis

hop

Pond

, an

d is

ser

ved

by p

aved

roa

ds a

nd u

tiliti

es w

hich

incl

ude

ast

orm

wat

er c

olle

ctio

n an

d co

nvey

ance

sys

tem

. S

torm

wat

er o

utfa

lls f

rom

the

sys

tem

do

not

disc

harg

e di

rect

ly in

to t

he B

isho

p Po

nd w

etla

nds,

but

are

rout

ed t

o re

tent

ion/

dete

ntio

n ba

sins

con

stru

cted

with

ove

rflo

w d

isch

arge

str

uctu

res.

U

pon

insp

ectio

n of

the

se b

asin

s, it

is a

ppar

ent

that

the

y ha

vebe

en d

esig

ned

as “

dry”

bas

ins,

with

the

flo

or o

f th

e ba

sin

situ

ated

abo

ve t

he g

roun

dwat

er t

able

. In

add

ition

, th

e ov

erflo

w s

truc

ture

s do

not

sho

wev

iden

ce o

f flo

win

g w

ater

, w

hich

wou

ld in

dica

te t

hat

thes

e ba

sins

hav

e th

us f

ar o

pera

ted

by r

eten

tion

and

infil

trat

ion

to g

roun

dwat

er.

80

App

endi

x B

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

Loca

lly, t

he o

utle

t of

Bis

hop

Pond

is c

onsi

dere

d to

be

the

head

wat

er/b

egin

ning

of

Bric

kyar

d C

reek

. Ba

se f

low

was

det

erm

ined

to

be a

bout

2 t

o 3

cubi

c fe

et p

er s

econ

d (c

fs).

Fro

m t

he o

utle

t, t

he s

trea

m f

low

s th

roug

h ab

out

1,00

0 fe

et o

f an

inde

term

inat

e re

lativ

ely

flat

syst

em o

f w

etla

nd d

rain

age,

and

from

the

re b

egin

s to

dro

p at

an

aver

age

grad

ient

of

abou

t 1%

unt

il th

e gr

adie

nt a

gain

dec

reas

es n

orth

of

US

41.

It is

app

aren

t th

at t

he B

isho

p Po

nd/w

etla

nds

area

pro

vide

s a

very

sig

nific

ant

runo

ff s

tora

ge f

acto

r, an

d it

is t

his

wat

ersh

ed c

hara

cter

istic

whi

ch in

eff

ect

sepa

rate

s th

e up

per

and

low

er r

each

es o

f th

e w

ater

shed

.

As

Bric

kyar

d C

reek

flo

ws

out

of t

he B

isho

p Po

nd w

etla

nds,

it f

orm

s in

to a

wel

l-def

ined

per

man

ent

wat

erco

urse

. It

is a

t th

is p

oint

in t

he s

trea

m,

appr

oxim

atel

y 1,

000

feet

dow

nstr

eam

of

Bish

op P

ond,

tha

t th

e fir

st g

augi

ng p

oint

was

est

ablis

hed.

Be

ginn

ing

at t

he n

orth

end

of

the

wet

land

s, it

isev

iden

t th

at t

he b

ase

flow

of

the

cree

k as

it d

esce

nds

is m

aint

aine

d by

the

hyd

roge

olog

y of

the

san

d/gr

avel

aqu

ifer

driv

en b

y th

e so

urce

at

the

wet

-la

nds.

Th

e cr

eek

flow

s fr

om t

he w

etla

nds

thro

ugh

an u

ndev

elop

ed a

rea

to t

he r

ailro

ad g

rade

. Th

is a

rea

is h

eavi

ly w

oode

d w

ith t

hick

und

ergr

owth

.Th

e st

ream

cha

nnel

thr

ough

thi

s ar

ea is

3 t

o 4

feet

in w

idth

and

1 f

oot

in d

epth

, with

dep

th o

f flo

win

g w

ater

3 t

o 4

inch

es.

The

stre

am p

asse

s th

roug

h th

e ra

ilroa

d gr

ade

by m

eans

of

a 4

foot

dia

met

er c

ulve

rt s

et a

t a

grad

ient

whi

ch c

ondu

cts

flow

fro

m a

n up

stre

am p

ool a

t a

velo

city

vis

ibly

gre

ater

tha

n th

at o

f th

e ex

istin

g st

ream

. Ba

se f

low

was

det

erm

ined

to

be a

bout

3 t

o 4

cfs.

Thi

s flo

w d

isch

arge

s fr

om t

he c

ulve

rt b

yfr

ee-f

allin

g ab

out

3.5

feet

to

a po

ol 5

to

6 fe

et in

dia

met

er a

nd 3

to

4 fe

et d

eep,

whi

ch h

as e

vide

ntly

bee

n sc

oure

d fr

om t

he s

trea

mbe

d.

Back

wat

eran

d ta

ilwat

er c

ondi

tions

sug

gest

tha

t th

e cu

lver

t w

as s

et (c

irca

1910

) too

hig

h, a

nd v

eloc

ity s

ugge

sts

that

it w

as s

et a

t an

exc

essi

ve g

radi

ent

rela

tive

toth

e ex

istin

g st

ream

bed.

Th

e ou

tfal

l are

a ha

s be

en s

tabi

lized

by

the

plac

emen

t of

roc

k rip

rap

and

larg

er b

alla

st a

t th

e to

e of

the

slo

pe a

nd s

urro

undi

ngba

nk a

reas

.

From

thi

s po

int

the

stre

am p

asse

s th

roug

h a

rela

tivel

y fla

t w

etla

nds

flood

plai

n 40

to

50 f

eet

wid

e, w

ith t

he s

trea

m c

hann

el s

ectio

n ge

omet

ry r

emai

n-in

g fa

irly

cons

tant

at

3 to

4 f

eet

wid

e by

1 f

oot

in d

epth

fro

m s

trea

mbe

d to

ove

rban

k.

Base

flo

w t

hrou

gh t

his

sect

ion,

whi

ch r

uns

from

the

rai

lroad

grad

e cr

ossi

ng t

o th

e N

orth

woo

ds R

oad

cros

sing

at

a de

pth

of 3

to

4 in

ches

, app

ears

to

be v

aria

ble.

Th

ese

obse

rvat

ions

sug

gest

tha

t th

e st

ream

chan

nel i

s of

ade

quat

e de

pth

to a

ccom

mod

ate

som

e am

ount

of

stor

mw

ater

flo

w,

with

the

wet

land

/flo

odpl

ain

actin

g as

res

erve

sto

rage

/det

entio

n in

larg

er e

vent

s.

The

stre

am p

asse

s th

roug

h a

3 fo

ot d

iam

eter

cul

vert

und

er N

orth

woo

ds R

oad,

flo

ws

for

a sh

ort

dist

ance

alo

ng t

he n

orth

sid

e of

the

roa

d in

the

for

mof

a d

itch,

the

n pa

sses

und

er B

ricky

ard

Road

thr

ough

ano

ther

3 f

oot

diam

eter

cul

vert

. B

oth

the

Nor

thw

oods

Roa

d cu

lver

t an

d th

e Br

icky

ard

Road

culv

erts

are

wel

l situ

ated

, ha

ving

bee

n se

t w

ith u

pstr

eam

and

dow

nstr

eam

inve

rts

at o

r sl

ight

ly b

elow

the

exi

stin

g st

ream

bed.

Base

flo

w m

easu

rem

ent

at t

he d

owns

trea

m e

nd o

f th

e Br

icky

ard

Road

cul

vert

indi

cate

s a

flow

of

abou

t 3

cfs.

Th

is in

tur

n w

ould

indi

cate

tha

t th

ere

isa

degr

ee o

f lo

ss in

vol

ume

as t

he s

trea

m f

low

s th

roug

h th

e w

etla

nds

flood

plai

n ar

ea b

etw

een

the

railr

oad

grad

e an

d N

orth

woo

ds R

oad.

The

mos

t lik

ely

caus

e fo

r th

is lo

ss is

the

gro

undw

ater

div

ide

(of

the

Wol

lner

Cre

ek w

ater

shed

) loc

ated

imm

edia

tely

eas

t of

Bric

kyar

d C

reek

. Te

rrai

nel

evat

ions

onl

y 30

0 fe

et e

ast

of B

ricky

ard

Cre

ek a

re lo

wer

tha

n th

is s

ectio

n of

the

str

eam

. It

is o

f in

tere

st t

o no

te t

hat

grou

ndw

ater

fro

m t

he s

and/

grav

el a

quife

r in

thi

s ar

ea w

as e

ncou

nter

ed in

ver

y si

gnifi

cant

qua

ntiti

es d

urin

g th

e co

nstr

uctio

n of

fou

ndat

ions

for

Men

ards

. A

n ex

tens

ive

syst

em o

ffo

unda

tion

and

perim

eter

gra

de d

rain

s w

as c

onst

ruct

ed t

o al

levi

ate

the

high

gro

undw

ater

leve

ls.

The

out

fall

for

the

Men

ards

sub

grad

e dr

ain

syst

emis

loca

ted

at t

he h

ead

of t

he c

onst

ruct

ed m

itiga

tion

wet

land

s at

the

nor

thea

st c

orne

r of

the

pro

pert

y.

This

out

fall

is a

lway

s flo

win

g.

From

Bric

kyar

d Ro

ad,

the

stre

am b

egin

s flo

w in

a w

ell-d

efin

ed r

avin

e w

ith a

rel

ativ

ely

narr

ow f

lood

plai

n.

This

cha

ract

eris

tic s

ectio

n ge

omet

ry d

eepe

nsan

d w

iden

s as

the

str

eam

app

roac

hes

its c

onflu

ence

with

the

Dea

d Ri

ver.

Fro

m B

ricky

ard

Road

to

US

41 t

he s

trea

m d

rops

abo

ut 3

0 fe

et o

ver

a flo

wdi

stan

ce o

f ap

prox

imat

ely

1,20

0 fe

et a

t a

grad

ient

of

abou

t 3%

.

81

At

a di

stan

ce o

f 35

fee

t up

stre

am o

f U

S 41

are

the

rem

nant

s of

a lo

w h

ead

dam

whi

ch im

poun

ds a

sm

all p

ool.

The

bac

kwat

er d

isch

arge

s th

roug

h a

spill

way

/low

sec

tion

in t

he d

am a

nd f

low

s to

the

box

cul

vert

und

er U

S 41

. Th

e bo

x cu

lver

t co

nsis

ts o

f tw

o 6

ft d

eep

by 6

ft

wid

e ba

rrel

s w

ell s

ituat

edw

ith r

espe

ct t

o th

e ex

istin

g st

ream

bed.

A

s is

typ

ical

of

tand

em b

ox c

ulve

rts,

one

sid

e (in

thi

s ca

se t

he w

est

barr

el) t

akes

mos

t of

the

flo

w w

hile

the

othe

r be

com

es p

artia

lly o

bstr

ucte

d w

ith s

trea

m s

edim

ent.

The

bas

e flo

w m

easu

rem

ent

mad

e at

the

dow

nstr

eam

end

of

the

US

41 c

ulve

rt in

dica

ted

that

tw

o th

irds

of t

he v

olum

e flo

win

g th

roug

h th

e w

est

barr

el a

nd o

ne t

hird

flo

win

g th

roug

h th

e ea

st b

arre

l, to

talli

ng a

bout

3 t

o 4

cfs.

The

abov

e po

int

is t

he la

st d

esig

nate

d ga

ugin

g po

int.

Muc

h of

the

str

eam

fro

m t

his

poin

t do

wns

trea

m t

o th

e D

ead

Rive

r is

inac

cess

ible

, du

e to

prop

erty

ow

ners

hip

and

the

cons

ider

able

phy

sica

l bar

rier

pose

d by

the

flo

odpl

ain

wet

land

s w

hich

wid

en a

s th

e st

ream

app

roac

hes

its c

onflu

ence

with

the

Dea

d Ri

ver.

How

ever

, the

fol

low

ing

obse

rvat

ions

may

be

mad

e:

1) n

orth

of

US

41 a

nd w

est

of t

he p

ower

line

ser

vice

roa

d, t

he c

hann

el d

eepe

ns,

wid

ens

and

begi

ns t

o ex

hibi

t si

nuso

idal

mea

nder

ing

typi

cal o

f lo

w g

radi

ent

and

sedi

men

t lo

ad w

ith t

ailw

ater

con

trol

(at

the

Dea

d Ri

ver)

; 2)

the

rav

ine

wid

ens

with

pro

gres

sion

dow

nstr

eam

, en

com

pass

ing

incr

easi

ng a

reas

of

flood

plai

n w

etla

nds;

3)

the

Bric

kyar

d C

reek

/Dea

d Ri

ver

flood

plai

n co

nflu

ence

is c

ompl

ex a

nd c

onta

ins

a sy

stem

of

cuto

ff m

eand

er p

onds

and

mea

nder

sca

rs; 4

) the

ver

tical

dep

th o

f th

e ra

vine

, fro

m u

plan

d ed

ge t

o w

ater

sur

face

rang

es f

rom

35

to 4

0 fe

et, a

nd 5

) the

dep

th o

f flo

w in

Bric

kyar

d C

reek

incr

ease

s an

d th

e ve

loci

ty d

ecre

ases

pro

gres

sive

ly t

owar

d th

e co

nflu

ence

.Th

ese

obse

rvat

ions

indi

cate

tha

t th

e lo

wer

rea

ch o

f Br

icky

ard

Cre

ek f

rom

the

pow

er li

ne s

ervi

ce r

oad

to c

onflu

ence

with

Dea

d Ri

ver

prov

ides

a v

ery

sign

ifica

nt s

tora

ge o

f vo

lum

e an

d de

tent

ion

of s

torm

wat

er f

low

to

the

Dea

d Ri

ver.

CO

NC

LUSIO

NS

•Th

e st

orm

wat

er c

olle

ctio

n an

d re

tent

ion/

dete

ntio

n sy

stem

for

Bis

hop

Woo

ds r

esid

entia

l dev

elop

men

t is

obs

erve

d to

be

desi

gned

and

mai

ntai

ned

adeq

uate

ly.

Dire

ct o

r “s

igni

fican

t” f

low

to

the

Bish

op P

ond

wet

land

s is

not

evi

dent

.

•Th

e cu

lver

t pa

ssin

g un

der

the

railr

oad

grad

e is

set

hig

h an

d at

an

exce

ssiv

e gr

ade

rela

tive

to t

he e

xist

ing

stre

ambe

d.

•Th

e ar

ea w

est

of t

he s

trea

m b

etw

een

the

railr

oad

grad

e an

d N

orth

woo

ds R

oad

is t

he lo

catio

n of

a r

enta

l sto

rage

fac

ility

, and

itap

pear

s as

if t

he g

rave

l par

king

lot

for

this

fac

ility

has

dis

plac

ed s

ome

of t

he f

lood

plai

n w

etla

nds.

•By

dire

ct m

easu

rem

ent

the

stre

am a

ppea

rs t

o lo

se v

olum

e as

it f

low

s fr

om t

he r

ailro

ad g

rade

to

the

Bric

kyar

d Ro

ad c

ulve

rt,

prob

ably

fro

m e

xfilt

ratio

n to

the

Wol

lner

Cre

ek h

eadw

ater

s aq

uife

r im

med

iate

ly e

ast

of B

ricky

ard

Cre

ek.

•Fr

om t

he B

ricky

ard

Road

cul

vert

dow

nstr

eam

to

the

Dea

d Ri

ver,

the

wat

ersh

ed m

orph

olog

y is

unu

sual

in t

hat

it is

rel

ativ

ely

very

narr

ow a

nd a

s a

resu

lt flo

w in

crea

ses

very

litt

le w

ith p

rogr

essi

on d

owns

trea

m.

•Ru

noff

fro

m t

he c

omm

erci

al e

stab

lishm

ents

alo

ng N

orth

woo

ds a

nd B

ricky

ard

Road

s is

in t

he f

orm

of

shee

t flo

w w

hich

is a

non

-poi

ntdi

scha

rge,

and

the

refo

re d

oes

not

cons

titut

e a

“sig

nific

ant

flow

” of

any

deg

ree.

•Th

e ex

istin

g sm

all d

am im

med

iate

ly s

outh

of

the

high

way

is in

a d

eter

iora

ted

cond

ition

and

impo

unds

a s

mal

l bac

kwat

er.

•Ru

noff

fro

m U

S 41

, alth

ough

cau

sing

som

e er

osio

n im

med

iate

ly o

ff t

he s

houl

der

on t

he s

outh

sid

e of

the

roa

d, is

in t

he f

orm

of

shee

t flo

w/n

on-p

oint

dis

char

ge a

nd d

oes

not

cons

titut

e a

sign

ifica

nt f

low

.

82

App

endi

x B

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

•Th

e ac

cess

to

the

pow

erlin

e se

rvic

e ro

ad f

rom

Bric

kyar

d Ro

ad n

orth

of

US

41 is

sub

ject

to

repe

ated

was

hout

, ero

sion

and

str

eam

sedi

men

tatio

n.

•W

est

of t

he p

ower

line

serv

ice

road

, th

e st

ream

ent

ers

a de

eply

inci

sed

and

incr

easi

ngly

wid

e w

etla

nd f

lood

plai

n ca

pabl

e of

ade

tain

ing

a co

nsid

erab

le v

olum

e of

sto

rm r

unof

f fr

om im

med

iate

dis

char

ge t

o th

e D

ead

Rive

r.

•Th

e Bi

shop

Pon

d/w

etla

nds

com

plex

act

s as

a v

ery

sign

ifica

nt s

torm

wat

er r

unof

f de

tent

ion/

rete

ntio

n ar

ea o

f th

e up

per

wat

ersh

ed.

REC

OM

MEN

DA

TIO

NS

•O

ccas

iona

lly m

onito

r th

e Bi

shop

Woo

ds s

ubdi

visi

on r

eten

tion/

dete

ntio

n ba

sin

disc

harg

es.

•Si

nce

it w

ould

be

impr

actic

al t

o re

plac

e or

adj

ust

the

railr

oad

grad

e cu

lver

t, a

n en

ergy

dis

sipa

tion

stru

ctur

e sh

ould

be

desi

gned

and

con

stru

cted

to

furt

her

stab

ilize

the

out

fall

pool

are

a.

•Ru

noff

and

ero

sion

fro

m t

he r

enta

l sto

rage

fac

ility

par

king

are

a sh

ould

be

m

onito

red

for

sedi

men

tatio

n an

d/or

pol

luta

nts.

•Th

e gr

avel

sho

ulde

rs o

f N

orth

woo

ds a

nd B

ricky

ard

Road

s an

d an

y co

mm

erci

al o

r re

side

ntia

l est

ablis

hmen

ts a

djac

ent

to t

hecr

eek

shou

ld b

e m

onito

red

on o

ccas

ion

for

eros

ion.

•Fo

llow

ing

rem

oval

of

the

dete

riora

ted

dam

sou

th o

f U

S 41

, th

e st

ream

sho

uld

be r

esto

red

as n

early

as

poss

ible

to

its o

rigin

alco

nditi

on.

In t

he e

vent

of

sign

ifica

nt u

pstr

eam

dev

elop

men

t su

ch a

s th

e M

enar

ds N

o 3

outlo

t, t

his

area

cou

ld b

e co

nsid

ered

for

an o

ffse

t de

tent

ion/

sett

ling

basi

n.

•Th

e er

oded

ban

k of

f th

e so

uth

shou

lder

of

US

41 s

houl

d be

gra

ded

and

seed

ed/p

lant

ed w

ith a

n ap

prop

riate

gro

und

cove

r.

•Th

e ac

cess

fro

m B

ricky

ard

Road

nor

th o

f U

S 41

to

the

pow

erlin

e se

rvic

e ro

ad s

houl

d be

gra

ded

and

stab

ilize

d ag

ains

t er

osio

nan

d se

dim

enta

tion

to t

he s

trea

m.

A s

edim

enta

tion

trap

dow

nstr

eam

of

the

culv

ert

shou

ld b

e co

nsid

ered

in a

ny c

ase.

•In

ord

er t

o m

ore

accu

rate

ly d

eter

min

e th

e ex

istin

g st

orag

e/de

tent

ion

capa

city

and

gro

undw

ater

infil

trat

ion

char

acte

ristic

s of

the

Bish

op P

ond/

wet

land

s co

mpl

ex (

and

prop

osed

des

ign

enha

ncem

ents

), a

mor

e de

taile

d st

udy

of t

his

area

in t

he u

pper

wat

ersh

edsh

ould

be

unde

rtak

en.

83

Flow

cl

ass

(K)

coef

ficie

nt

(L)

Leng

th

(ft.

)

Elev

atio

n C

hang

e (f

t.)

(s)

Slop

e (%

)

v=K

(s)e

xp0.

5 ve

loci

ty

(ft/

sec)

T= L

/v

Trav

el t

ime

(hrs

)

head

wat

ers

shee

t 0.

48

2,00

0 50

2.

5 0.

76

0.73

w

ater

way

1.

2 20

0 20

10

.0

3.79

0.

02

“ “

600

20

3.33

2.

19

0.08

“ 2,

600

20

0,77

1.

05

0.69

“ 1,

200

20

1.67

1.

55

0.21

“ 1,

000

20

2.00

1.

70

0.16

“ 70

0 20

2.

86

2.03

0.

10

“ “

1,30

0 20

1.

54

1.49

0.

24

“ “

3,00

0 20

0.

67

0.98

0.

85

“ “

2,50

0 20

0.

80

1.07

0.

65

Trib

utar

y 2.

1 1,

900

2 0.

11

0.70

0.

75

“ “

160

2 1.

25

2.35

0.

02

Bish

op P

ond

Out

let

16

,620

23

4 1.

44

1.02

6 4.

50

Trib

utar

y 2.

1 80

0 18

2.

25

3.15

0.

07

Railr

oad

grad

e

17,4

20

252

1.45

1.

059

4.57

Trib

utar

y 2.

1 56

0 14

2.

50

3.32

0.

05

Bric

kyar

d Ro

ad

17

.980

26

6 1.

48

1.08

1 4.

62

Trib

utar

y 2.

1 1,

150

37

3.22

3.

37

0.08

U

.S.-

41

19

.130

30

3 1.

58

1.13

1 4.

70

Tab

le (

a): T

R-5

5 SU

MM

AR

Y

84

App

endi

x B

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

Alth

ough

a d

etai

led

stor

mw

ater

det

entio

n de

sign

and

ana

lysi

s ar

e be

yond

the

sco

pe a

nd in

tent

of

this

rep

ort,

the

fol

low

ing

obse

rvat

ions

and

con

clu-

sion

s m

ay b

e m

ade.

Th

e w

etla

nds

area

imm

edia

tely

ups

trea

m o

f Bi

shop

Pon

d is

abo

ut 1

5 ac

res

in e

xten

t an

d co

uld

stor

e ap

prox

imat

ely

30 a

cre-

feet

or m

ore

of r

unof

f fr

om a

sig

nific

ant

even

t.

The

rela

tivel

y sm

all o

utle

t fr

om B

isho

p Po

nd a

ppea

rs t

o ac

com

mod

ate

a m

ore

or le

ss c

onst

ant

flow

. In

addi

tion

to d

eten

tion

in t

he w

etla

nds,

the

re is

als

o ap

pare

ntly

con

side

rabl

e in

filtr

atio

n to

the

und

erly

ing

aqui

fer.

In t

his

anal

ysis

, w

e ha

ve u

sed

apo

ndin

g fa

ctor

(F(p

)) of

0.6

5 as

per

the

abo

ve m

etho

ds.

How

ever

, it

is s

uspe

cted

tha

t th

is f

acto

r sh

ould

be

less

, and

des

ign

stor

m f

low

s pa

rtic

ular

lyth

ose

for

the

100

year

eve

nt w

ill li

kely

be

30%

to

40%

less

tha

n as

giv

en a

bove

.

desi

gn s

torm

P(

in)

SRO

(in)

F(p)

2

yr

2.39

0.

03

0.59

10

yr

3.48

0.

24

0.62

10

0 yr

5.

32

0.95

0.

65

Gau

ging

po

int

(hrs

) Q

(bas

e)

(cfs

) Q

(u)*

(c

fs/in

/sqm

i) A

(m)

(sqm

i) Q

(2)

(cfs

) Q

(10)

(c

fs)

Q(1

00)

(cfs

)

Bi

shop

Po

nd

4.50

3

80.1

1 2.

32

3.29

27

.66

114.

8

Railr

oad

Gra

de

4.57

4

79.1

1 2.

39

3.35

28

.13

116.

7

Bric

kyar

d Ro

ad

4.62

3

78.4

2 2.

43

3.37

28

.36

117.

6

US

41

4.70

3

77.3

4 2.

48

3.39

28

.54

118.

3

Tab

le (

a) -

Co

nti

nu

e: T

R-5

5 SU

MM

AR

Y

Tab

le (

b):

BA

SE F

LOW

SU

MM

AR

Y

*Q(u

) =

270

.9 (

T© e

xp -

0.81

), by

loga

rithm

ic li

near

reg

ress

ion

anal

ysis

fro

m“C

ompu

ting

Floo

d D

isch

arge

s fo

r Sm

all

Ung

auge

d W

ater

shed

s” b

y Ri

char

dSo

rrel

l, PE

; M

DEQ

Lan

d &

Wat

erM

anag

emen

t D

ivis

ion

Hyd

rolo

gic

Stud

ies

Uni

t, 2

000.

85G

augi

ng

Site

C

hann

el

Slop

e (%

)+/-

O

bser

ved

Vel

ocity

(f

t/se

c)

d/D

q/

Q

Q(f

ull)

(cfs

) Q

(c

fs)

Bish

op

pond

3

ft x

4”

dept

h -

3 -

- -

3

Railr

oad

grad

e 4’

dia

cm

p 2.

5 -

0.08

3 0.

020

200

4

Bric

kyar

d ro

ad

3’ d

ia c

mp

1.0

- 0.

056

0.03

0 10

0 3

US

41

twin

6’x

6’

box

culv

erts

1.

0 -

0.02

1 0.

008

500

3

FIG

URE

(a) –

USG

S W

ATE

RSH

ED M

AP

(see

orig

inal

stu

dy f

or f

igur

es)

FIG

URE

(b) -

USD

A/S

CS

SOIL

S M

AP

(see

orig

inal

stu

dy f

or f

igur

es)

APP

END

IX (a

) - S

CS

TR-5

5 D

ATA

SH

EETS

(see

orig

inal

stu

dy f

or d

ata

shee

ts)

APP

END

IX (

b) -

USD

A S

OIL

S C

LASS

IFIC

ATI

ON

& H

YD

ROLO

GIC

GRO

UPS

(se

e be

low

)

Ap

pen

dix

(b

) -

USD

A S

OIL

S C

LASS

IFIC

ATI

ON

& H

YD

RO

LOG

IC G

RO

UPS

Soils

D

esig

natio

n D

escr

iptio

n H

ydro

logi

c G

roup

U

plan

d So

ils

125D

K

ewee

naw

/Kal

kask

a ro

ck o

utcr

op c

ompl

ex

A

125F

K

ewee

naw

/Kal

kask

a di

ssec

ted

com

plex

(m

orai

ne f

orm

atio

n)

A/B

40B

Wai

ska

cobb

ly/lo

amy

sand

B

13B

Kal

kask

a sa

nd

A

12B

Rubi

con

sand

(out

was

h pl

ains

& s

trea

m t

erra

ces)

A

W

etla

nds

Soils

93

Ta

was

/Def

ord

Muc

k/Sa

nd

D/A

57

C

arbo

ndal

e/Ta

was

Muc

k/Sa

nd

D/A

86

App

endi

x C

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

AP

PE

ND

IX C

- R

ipar

ian

Bu

ffer

Ord

inan

ce (

Dra

ft)

AP

PE

ND

IX C

- R

ipar

ian

Bu

ffer

Ord

inan

ce (

Dra

ft)

AP

PE

ND

IX C

- R

ipar

ian

Bu

ffer

Ord

inan

ce (

Dra

ft)

AP

PE

ND

IX C

- R

ipar

ian

Bu

ffer

Ord

inan

ce (

Dra

ft)

AP

PE

ND

IX C

- R

ipar

ian

Bu

ffer

Ord

inan

ce (

Dra

ft)

Rip

aria

n B

uff

er O

rdin

ance

- O

utl

ine

Rip

aria

n B

uff

er O

rdin

ance

- O

utl

ine

Rip

aria

n B

uff

er O

rdin

ance

- O

utl

ine

Rip

aria

n B

uff

er O

rdin

ance

- O

utl

ine

Rip

aria

n B

uff

er O

rdin

ance

- O

utl

ine

The

follo

win

g rip

aria

n bu

ffer

ord

inan

ce w

as a

dapt

ed f

rom

the

EPA

’s m

odel

buf

fer

ordi

nanc

e an

d de

sign

ed t

o su

it th

e sp

ecifi

c ne

eds

of M

arqu

ette

Cou

nty.

Pu

rpo

seTh

e pu

rpos

e of

a r

ipar

ian

buff

er o

rdin

ance

in M

arqu

ette

Cou

nty

is t

o en

sure

the

pro

tect

ion

of w

ater

qua

lity

and

aqua

tic h

abita

t w

ithin

the

loca

lst

ream

sys

tem

s.

The

prot

ectio

n of

the

nat

ural

veg

etat

ion

adja

cent

to

wat

erw

ays

is in

tend

ed t

o pr

otec

t th

e ph

ysic

al in

tegr

ity o

f th

e sy

stem

, red

uce

the

amou

nt o

f no

n-po

int

sour

ce p

ollu

tion

ente

ring

thes

e sy

stem

s, a

nd t

o pr

otec

t an

d en

hanc

e th

e aq

uatic

hab

itat

of t

he r

egio

n.

Ou

tlin

e o

f O

rdin

an

ceTh

e pr

opos

ed o

rdin

ance

incl

udes

the

fol

low

ing

info

rmat

ion:

Sect

ion

I -

Inte

nt

Out

lines

the

pur

pose

of

the

ordi

nanc

e

Sect

ion

II -

Bac

kgro

un

dRe

view

s th

e be

nefit

s su

ch a

n or

dina

nce

wou

ld h

ave

for

the

loca

l str

eam

sys

tem

Sect

ion

III -

Def

init

ion

sEs

tabl

ishe

s st

anda

rd d

efin

ition

s to

ens

ure

clea

r co

mm

unic

atio

n of

the

ord

inan

ce

Sect

ion

IV -

Des

ign

Sta

nd

ard

s fo

r R

ipar

ian

Bu

ffer

sD

escr

ibes

the

det

aile

d de

sign

of

the

ripar

ian

buff

er in

clud

ing

perm

itted

and

res

tric

ted

uses

Sect

ion

V -

Bu

ffer

Man

agem

ent

and

Mai

nte

nan

ceO

utlin

es p

erm

itted

and

res

tric

ted

activ

ities

rel

ated

to

buff

er m

anag

emen

t an

d m

aint

enan

ce

Sect

ion

VI -

En

forc

emen

t Pr

oce

du

res

Revi

ews

the

proc

edur

es f

or e

nfor

cem

ent

of t

he o

rdin

ance

Sect

ion

IX -

Wai

vers

/ V

aria

nce

sD

escr

ibes

the

pro

cess

for

obt

aini

ng a

wai

ver

or v

aria

nce

rela

ted

to t

he b

uffe

r or

dina

nce

87

88

Sect

ion

I. I

nte

nt

The

purp

ose

of t

his

ordi

nanc

e is

to

esta

blis

h m

inim

al a

ccep

tabl

e re

quire

men

ts f

or t

he d

esig

n of

buf

fers

to

prot

ect

the

stre

ams,

wet

land

s, a

nd f

lood

-pl

ains

of

____

____

____

____

___

[juris

dict

ion]

; to

pro

tect

the

wat

er q

ualit

y of

wat

erco

urse

s, r

eser

voirs

, la

kes,

and

oth

er s

igni

fican

t w

ater

res

ourc

esw

ithin

___

____

____

____

____

[juris

dict

ion]

; to

pro

tect

___

____

____

____

____

‘s

[Jur

isdi

ctio

n’s]

rip

aria

n an

d aq

uatic

eco

syst

ems;

and

to

prov

ide

for

the

envi

ronm

enta

lly s

ound

use

of

____

____

____

____

___

‘s [

juris

dict

ion’

s] la

nd r

esou

rces

.

Sect

ion

II.

Back

gro

un

dBu

ffer

s ad

jace

nt t

o st

ream

sys

tem

s an

d co

asta

l are

as p

rovi

de n

umer

ous

envi

ronm

enta

l pro

tect

ion

and

reso

urce

man

agem

ent

bene

fits

that

can

incl

ude

the

follo

win

g:1.

Rest

orin

g an

d m

aint

aini

ng t

he c

hem

ical

, ph

ysic

al,

and

biol

ogic

al in

tegr

ity o

f th

e w

ater

res

ourc

es2.

Rem

ovin

g po

lluta

nts

deliv

ered

fro

m u

rban

sto

rmw

ater

3.Re

duci

ng e

rosi

on a

nd s

edim

ent

ente

ring

the

stre

am4.

Stab

ilizi

ng s

trea

m b

anks

5.Pr

ovid

ing

infil

trat

ion

of s

torm

wat

er r

unof

f6.

Mai

ntai

ning

bas

e flo

w o

f st

ream

s7.

Con

trib

utin

g th

e or

gani

c m

atte

r th

at is

a s

ourc

e of

foo

d an

d en

ergy

for

the

aqu

atic

eco

syst

em8.

Prov

idin

g tr

ee c

anop

y to

sha

de s

trea

ms

and

prom

ote

desi

rabl

e aq

uatic

org

anis

ms

9.Pr

ovid

ing

ripar

ian

wild

life

habi

tat

10.

Furn

ishi

ng s

ceni

c va

lue

and

recr

eatio

nal o

ppor

tuni

tyIt

is t

he d

esire

of

the

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

[juris

dict

ion]

to

prot

ect

and

mai

ntai

n th

e na

tive

vege

tatio

n in

rip

aria

n an

d w

etla

nd a

reas

by

impl

emen

ting

spec

ifica

tions

for

the

est

ablis

hmen

t, p

rote

ctio

n, a

nd m

aint

enan

ce o

f ve

geta

tion

alon

g al

l str

eam

sys

tem

s an

d/or

coa

stal

zon

es w

ithin

our

juris

dict

iona

l aut

horit

y.

Sect

ion

III

. Defi

nit

ion

sA

ctiv

e C

han

nel

The

area

of

the

stre

am c

hann

el t

hat

is s

ubje

ct t

o fr

eque

nt f

low

s (a

ppro

xim

atel

y on

ce p

er o

ne a

nd a

hal

f ye

ars)

and

tha

t in

clud

es t

he p

ortio

n of

the

chan

nel b

elow

the

flo

odpl

ain.

Best

Man

ag

em

en

t Pra

ctic

es

(BM

Ps)

Con

serv

atio

n pr

actic

es o

r m

anag

emen

t m

easu

res

that

con

trol

soi

l los

s an

d re

duce

wat

er q

ualit

y de

grad

atio

n ca

used

by

nutr

ient

s, a

nim

al w

aste

s,to

xics

, se

dim

ent,

and

run

off.

Bu

ffer

A v

eget

ated

are

a, in

clud

ing

tree

s, s

hrub

s, a

nd h

erba

ceou

s ve

geta

tion,

tha

t ex

ists

or

is e

stab

lishe

d to

pro

tect

a s

trea

m s

yste

m,

lake

, res

ervo

ir, o

r co

asta

les

tuar

ine

area

. A

ltera

tion

of t

his

natu

ral a

rea

is s

tric

tly li

mite

d.

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

App

endi

x C

89

De

ve

lop

me

nt

1.Th

e im

prov

emen

t of

pro

pert

y fo

r an

y pu

rpos

e in

volv

ing

build

ing

2.Su

bdiv

isio

n or

the

div

isio

n of

a t

ract

or

parc

el o

f la

nd in

to t

wo

or m

ore

parc

els

3.Th

e co

mbi

natio

n of

any

tw

o or

mor

e lo

ts, t

ract

s, o

r pa

rcel

s of

pro

pert

y fo

r an

y pu

rpos

e4.

The

prep

arat

ion

of la

nd f

or a

ny o

f th

e ab

ove

purp

oses

No

nti

dal

Wetl

an

ds

Thos

e ar

eas

not

influ

ence

d by

tid

al f

luct

uatio

ns t

hat

are

inun

date

d or

sat

urat

ed b

y su

rfac

e w

ater

or

grou

ndw

ater

at

a fr

eque

ncy

and

dura

tion

suff

i-ci

ent

to s

uppo

rt,

and

that

und

er n

orm

al c

ircum

stan

ces

do s

uppo

rt,

a pr

eval

ence

of

vege

tatio

n ty

pica

lly a

dapt

ed f

or li

fe in

sat

urat

ed s

oil c

ondi

tions

.

No

np

oin

t So

urc

e P

oll

uti

on

Pollu

tion

that

is g

ener

ated

by

vario

us la

nd u

se a

ctiv

ities

rat

her

than

fro

m a

n id

entif

iabl

e or

dis

cret

e so

urce

and

is c

onve

yed

to w

ater

way

s th

roug

hna

tura

l pro

cess

es,

such

as

rain

fall,

sto

rmw

ater

run

off,

or

grou

ndw

ater

see

page

rat

her

than

dire

ct d

isch

arge

s.

Po

llu

tio

nA

ny c

onta

min

atio

n or

alte

ratio

n of

the

phy

sica

l, ch

emic

al,

or b

iolo

gica

l pro

pert

ies

of a

ny w

ater

s th

at w

ill r

ende

r th

e w

ater

s ha

rmfu

l or

detr

imen

tal t

o1.

Publ

ic h

ealth

, sa

fety

, or

wel

fare

2.D

omes

tic,

com

mer

cial

, in

dust

rial,

agric

ultu

ral,

recr

eatio

nal,

or o

ther

legi

timat

e be

nefic

ial u

ses

3.Li

vest

ock,

wild

ani

mal

s, o

r bi

rds

4.Fi

sh o

r ot

her

aqua

tic li

fe

Str

eam

Ch

an

nel

Part

of

a w

ater

cour

se e

ither

nat

ural

ly o

r ar

tific

ially

cre

ated

tha

t co

ntai

ns a

n in

term

itten

t or

per

enni

al b

ase

flow

of

grou

ndw

ater

orig

in.

Base

flo

ws

ofgr

ound

wat

er o

rigin

can

be

dist

ingu

ishe

d by

any

of

the

follo

win

g ph

ysic

al in

dica

tors

:1.

Hyd

roph

ytic

veg

etat

ion,

hyd

ric s

oil,

or o

ther

hyd

rolo

gic

indi

cato

rs in

the

are

a(s)

whe

re g

roun

dwat

er e

nter

s th

e st

ream

cha

nnel

in t

he v

icin

ityof

the

str

eam

hea

dwat

ers,

cha

nnel

bed

, or

cha

nnel

ban

ks2.

Flow

ing

wat

er n

ot d

irect

ly r

elat

ed t

o a

stor

m e

vent

3.H

isto

rical

rec

ords

of

a lo

cal h

igh

grou

ndw

ater

tab

le,

such

as

wel

l and

str

eam

gau

ge r

ecor

ds.

Str

eam

Syst

em

A s

trea

m c

hann

el t

oget

her

with

one

or

both

of

the

follo

win

g:1.

100-

year

flo

odpl

ain

2.H

ydro

logi

cally

rel

ated

non

tidal

wet

land

Str

eam

sPe

renn

ial a

nd in

term

itten

t w

ater

cour

ses

iden

tifie

d th

roug

h si

te in

spec

tion

and

US

Geo

logi

cal S

urve

y (U

SGS)

map

s. P

eren

nial

str

eam

s ar

e th

ose

whi

char

e de

pict

ed o

n a

USG

S m

ap w

ith a

sol

id b

lue

line.

Inte

rmitt

ent

stre

ams

are

thos

e w

hich

are

dep

icte

d on

a U

SGS

map

with

a d

otte

d bl

ue li

ne.

Wate

r Po

llu

tio

n H

aza

rdA

land

use

or

activ

ity t

hat

caus

es a

rel

ativ

ely

high

ris

k of

pot

entia

l wat

er p

ollu

tion.

90

Sect

ion

IV.

Desi

gn

Sta

nd

ard

s fo

r R

ipari

an

Bu

ffers

A.

A r

ipar

ian

buff

er f

or a

str

eam

sys

tem

sha

ll co

nsis

t of

a f

ores

ted

strip

of

land

ext

endi

ng a

long

bot

h si

des

of a

str

eam

and

its

adja

cent

wet

land

s or

ste

ep s

lope

s. T

he r

ipar

ian

buff

er w

idth

sha

ll be

adj

uste

d to

incl

ude

cont

iguo

us s

ensi

tive

area

s, s

uch

as s

teep

slo

pes

and

wet

land

s, w

here

dev

elop

men

t or

dis

turb

ance

may

adv

erse

ly a

ffec

t w

ater

qua

lity,

str

eam

s, w

etla

nds,

or

othe

r w

ater

bodi

es.

B.Th

e rip

aria

n bu

ffer

sha

ll be

gin

at t

he e

dge

of t

he s

trea

m b

ank

of t

he a

ctiv

e ch

anne

l.

C.

The

ripar

ian

buff

er s

hall

be c

ompo

sed

of t

wo

dist

inct

zon

es, w

ith e

ach

zone

hav

ing

its o

wn

set

of p

erm

itted

and

res

tric

ted

uses

(See

Fig

ure

1).

1.Zo

ne 1

- S

trea

msi

de Z

one

1.Pr

otec

ts t

he p

hysi

cal a

nd e

colo

gica

l int

egrit

y of

the

str

eam

eco

syst

em.

2.Be

gins

at

the

edge

of

the

stre

am b

ank

of t

he a

ctiv

e ch

anne

l and

ext

ends

25

feet

fro

m t

he t

op o

f th

e ba

nk p

lus

any

addi

tiona

lbu

ffer

wid

th a

s sp

ecifi

ed in

thi

s se

ctio

n.3.

Allo

wab

le u

ses

with

in t

his

zone

are

hig

hly

rest

ricte

d to

:1.

Floo

d co

ntro

l str

uctu

res

2.U

tility

rig

ht o

f w

ays

3.Fo

otpa

ths

4.Ro

ad c

ross

ings

, w

here

per

mitt

ed.

4.St

ream

side

Zon

e co

ntai

ns u

ndis

turb

ed n

atur

al v

eget

atio

n.

Fig

ure

1: T

wo

-zo

ne

Rip

aria

n B

uff

er

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

App

endi

x C

91

2.Zo

ne 2

- O

uter

Zon

e1.

Prot

ects

key

com

pone

nts

of t

he s

trea

m a

nd p

rovi

des

dist

ance

bet

wee

n up

land

dev

elop

men

t an

d th

e St

ream

side

Zon

e.2.

Begi

ns a

t th

e ou

ter

edge

of

the

Stre

amsi

de Z

one

and

exte

nds

25 f

eet.

3.A

llow

able

use

s w

ithin

the

Out

er Z

one

are

rest

ricte

d to

1.Bi

king

or

hiki

ng p

aths

2.St

orm

wat

er m

anag

emen

t fa

cilit

ies,

with

the

app

rova

l of

____

____

____

[ju

risdi

ctio

n].

3.Re

crea

tiona

l use

s as

app

rove

d by

___

____

____

__ [

juris

dict

ion]

.4.

Rem

oval

of

mat

ure

tree

cov

er4.

Mid

dle

Zone

req

uire

s th

e re

tent

ion

of t

he s

hrub

laye

r an

d he

rbac

eous

gro

und

cove

r to

allo

w in

filtr

atio

n of

run

off.

Exte

nsi

on

s to

Min

imu

m B

uff

er

Wid

thA

.Th

e re

quire

d w

idth

for

the

Rip

aria

n Bu

ffer

tot

als

50 f

eet

(Zon

e 1

= 2

5’, Z

one

2 =

25’

). Th

is b

uffe

r sh

all b

e ex

tend

ed if

wet

land

s or

ste

epsl

opes

are

pre

sent

.

1.W

etla

nds:

W

hen

wet

land

s ar

e pr

esen

t, t

he w

idth

of

the

Stre

amsi

de Z

one

shal

l be

adju

sted

so

that

the

Zon

e 1

buff

er w

ill c

onsi

stof

the

ext

ent

of t

he w

etla

nd p

lus

20-f

eet

beyo

nd t

he w

etla

nd e

dge.

2.Pe

rcen

t Sl

ope:

Th

e rip

aria

n bu

ffer

wid

th s

hall

be m

odifi

ed if

ste

ep s

lope

s ar

e w

ithin

clo

se p

roxi

mity

to

the

stre

am a

nd d

rain

into

the

stre

am s

yste

m.

The

fol

low

ing

exte

nsio

ns w

ill b

e ad

ded

to t

he s

tand

ard

50’

Ripa

rian

Buff

er in

rel

atio

n to

the

slo

peof

the

str

eam

ban

k.

The

exte

nsio

ns a

re c

alcu

late

d as

fol

low

s:Pe

rcen

t Sl

op

eB

uff

er E

xten

sio

nTo

tal W

idth

of

Rip

aria

n B

uff

er15

%-1

7%ad

d 10

fee

t60

fee

t18

%-2

0%ad

d 30

fee

t80

fee

t21

%-2

3%ad

d 50

fee

t10

0 fe

et24

%-2

5%ad

d 60

fee

t11

0 fe

et>

25%

add

70 f

eet

120

feet

B.W

ater

Pol

lutio

n H

azar

ds:

The

fol

low

ing

land

use

s an

d/or

act

iviti

es a

re d

esig

nate

d as

pot

entia

l wat

er p

ollu

tion

haza

rds,

and

mus

tbe

set

bac

kfr

om a

ny s

trea

m o

r w

ater

body

by

the

dist

ance

indi

cate

d be

low

:1.

Stor

age

of h

azar

dous

sub

stan

ces

- (1

50 f

eet)

2.A

bove

gro

und

or u

nder

grou

nd p

etro

leum

sto

rage

fac

ilitie

s -

(150

fee

t)3.

Dra

infie

lds

from

ons

ite s

ewag

e di

spos

al a

nd t

reat

men

t sy

stem

s (i.

e.,

sept

ic s

yste

ms)

- (

100

feet

)4.

Rais

ed s

eptic

sys

tem

s -

(250

fee

t)5.

Solid

was

te la

ndfil

ls o

r ju

nkya

rds

- (3

00 f

eet)

6.C

onfin

ed a

nim

al f

eedl

ot o

pera

tions

- (

250

feet

)7.

Subs

urfa

ce d

isch

arge

s fr

om a

was

tew

ater

tre

atm

ent

plan

t -

(100

fee

t)8.

Land

app

licat

ion

of b

ioso

lids

- (1

00 f

eet)

92

Sect

ion

V. B

uff

er

Man

ag

em

en

t an

d M

ain

ten

an

ceA

.Th

e rip

aria

n bu

ffer

, in

clud

ing

wet

land

s sh

all b

e m

anag

ed t

o en

hanc

e an

d m

axim

ize

the

uniq

ue v

alue

of

thes

e re

sour

ces.

Man

agem

ent

incl

udes

spe

cific

lim

itatio

ns o

n al

tera

tion

of t

he n

atur

al c

ondi

tions

of

thes

e re

sour

ces.

The

fol

low

ing

prac

tices

and

activ

ities

are

res

tric

ted

with

inbo

th z

ones

of

the

ripar

ian

buff

er,

exce

pt w

ith a

ppro

val b

y __

____

____

___

[juris

dict

ion]

:1.

Cle

arin

g of

exi

stin

g ve

geta

tion

(exc

ept

as n

oted

pre

viou

sly)

2.So

il di

stur

banc

e by

gra

ding

, st

rippi

ng,

or o

ther

pra

ctic

es3.

Filli

ng o

r du

mpi

ng4.

Dra

inag

e by

ditc

hing

, un

derd

rain

s, o

r ot

her

syst

ems

5.U

se,

stor

age,

or

appl

icat

ion

of p

estic

ides

, ex

cept

for

spo

t sp

rayi

ng o

f no

xiou

s w

eeds

or

non-

nativ

e sp

ecie

s co

nsis

tent

with

reco

mm

enda

tions

of

____

____

____

_ [ju

risdi

ctio

n]6.

Hou

sing

, gr

azin

g, o

r ot

her

mai

nten

ance

of

lives

tock

7.St

orag

e or

ope

ratio

n of

mot

oriz

ed v

ehic

les

with

in Z

one

1, e

xcep

t fo

r m

aint

enan

ce o

r em

erge

ncy

use.

B.Th

e fo

llow

ing

stru

ctur

es,

prac

tices

, an

d ac

tiviti

es a

re p

erm

itted

in t

he r

ipar

ian

buff

er,

with

spe

cific

des

ign

or m

aint

enan

ce f

eatu

res,

sub

ject

to t

he r

evie

w o

f __

____

____

___

[juris

dict

ion]

:1.

Road

s, b

ridge

s, p

aths

, an

d ut

ilitie

s:1.

An

anal

ysis

nee

ds t

o be

con

duct

ed t

o en

sure

tha

t no

eco

nom

ical

ly f

easi

ble

alte

rnat

ive

is a

vaila

ble.

2.Th

e rig

ht-o

f-w

ay s

houl

d be

the

min

imum

wid

th n

eede

d to

allo

w f

or m

aint

enan

ce a

cces

s an

d in

stal

latio

n.3.

The

angl

e of

the

cro

ssin

g sh

all b

e pe

rpen

dicu

lar

to t

he s

trea

m o

r bu

ffer

in o

rder

to

min

imiz

e cl

earin

g re

quire

men

ts.

4.Th

e m

inim

um n

umbe

r of

roa

d cr

ossi

ngs

shou

ld b

e us

ed w

ithin

eac

h su

bdiv

isio

n, a

nd n

o m

ore

than

one

fai

rway

cro

ssin

gis

allo

wed

for

eve

ry 1

,000

fee

t of

buf

fer.

2.St

orm

wat

er m

anag

emen

t:1.

An

anal

ysis

nee

ds t

o be

con

duct

ed t

o en

sure

tha

t no

eco

nom

ical

ly f

easi

ble

alte

rnat

ive

is a

vaila

ble

and

that

the

pro

ject

isei

ther

nec

essa

ry f

or f

lood

con

trol

, or

sig

nific

antly

impr

oves

the

wat

er q

ualit

y or

hab

itat

in t

he s

trea

m.

2.In

new

dev

elop

men

ts,

onsi

te a

nd n

onst

ruct

ural

alte

rnat

ives

will

be

pref

erre

d ov

er la

rger

fac

ilitie

s w

ithin

the

str

eam

buf

fer.

3.W

hen

cons

truc

ting

stor

mw

ater

man

agem

ent

faci

litie

s (i.

e.,

BMPs

), th

e ar

ea c

lear

ed w

ill b

e lim

ited

to t

he a

rea

requ

ired

for

cons

truc

tion

and

adeq

uate

mai

nten

ance

acc

ess,

as

outli

ned

in t

he m

ost

rece

nt e

ditio

n of

___

____

____

[ref

er t

o lo

cal

juris

dict

ion’

s st

orm

wat

er r

equi

rem

ents

].4.

Mat

eria

l dre

dged

or

othe

rwis

e re

mov

ed s

hall

be s

tore

d ou

tsid

e th

e bu

ffer

.

3.St

ream

res

tora

tion

proj

ects

, fa

cilit

ies

and

activ

ities

app

rove

d by

___

____

__ [j

uris

dict

ion]

ar

e pe

rmitt

ed w

ithin

the

rip

aria

n bu

ffer

.

4.W

ater

qua

lity

mon

itorin

g an

d st

ream

gau

ging

are

per

mitt

ed w

ithin

the

rip

aria

n bu

ffer

, as

app

rove

d by

___

____

____

[ju

risdi

ctio

n].

5.In

divi

dual

tre

es w

ithin

the

rip

aria

n bu

ffer

tha

t ar

e in

dan

ger

of f

allin

g, c

ausi

ng d

amag

e to

dw

ellin

gs o

r ot

her

stru

ctur

es,

orca

usin

g bl

ocka

ge o

f th

e st

ream

may

be

rem

oved

.

6.O

ther

tim

ber

cutt

ing

tech

niqu

es a

ppro

ved

by t

he a

genc

y m

ay b

e un

dert

aken

with

in t

he r

ipar

ian

buff

er u

nder

the

adv

ice

and

guid

ance

of

____

____

____

___

[juris

dict

ion]

if n

eces

sary

to

pres

erve

the

for

est

from

ext

ensi

ve p

est

infe

stat

ion,

dis

ease

infe

stat

ion,

or t

hrea

t fr

om f

ire.

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

App

endi

x C

93

C.

All

plan

s pr

epar

ed f

or r

ecor

ding

and

all

right

-of-

way

pla

ns s

hall

clea

rly:

1.Sh

ow t

he e

xten

t of

any

rip

aria

n bu

ffer

on

the

subj

ect

prop

erty

2.La

bel t

he r

ipar

ian

buff

er3.

Prov

ide

a no

te t

o re

fere

nce

each

zon

e of

the

rip

aria

n bu

ffer

sta

ting:

“Th

ere

shal

l be

no c

lear

ing,

gra

ding

, co

nstr

uctio

n or

dist

urba

nce

of v

eget

atio

n ex

cept

as

perm

itted

by

the

agen

cy”.

4.Pr

ovid

e a

note

to

refe

renc

e an

y pr

otec

tive

cove

nant

s go

vern

ing

all r

ipar

ian

buff

ers

area

s st

atin

g: “

Any

rip

aria

n bu

ffer

sho

wn

here

on is

sub

ject

to

prot

ectiv

e co

vena

nts

that

may

be

foun

d in

the

land

rec

ords

and

tha

t re

stric

t di

stur

banc

e an

d us

e of

the

se a

reas

.”

D.

All

ripar

ian

buff

er a

reas

sha

ll be

mai

ntai

ned

thro

ugh

a de

clar

atio

n of

pro

tect

ive

cove

nant

, w

hich

is r

equi

red

to b

e su

bmitt

ed f

or a

ppro

val

by _

____

____

___

[juris

dict

ion]

. Th

e co

vena

nt s

hall

be r

ecor

ded

in t

he la

nd r

ecor

ds a

nd s

hall

run

with

the

land

and

con

tinue

in p

erpe

tuity

.

E.A

ll le

ase

agre

emen

ts m

ust

cont

ain

a no

tatio

n re

gard

ing

the

pres

ence

and

loca

tion

of p

rote

ctiv

e co

vena

nts

for

ripar

ian

buff

er a

reas

and

shal

l con

tain

info

rmat

ion

on t

he m

anag

emen

t an

d m

aint

enan

ce r

equi

rem

ents

for

the

for

est

buff

er f

or t

he n

ew p

rope

rty

owne

r.

F.A

n of

fer

of d

edic

atio

n of

a r

ipar

ian

buff

er a

rea

to t

he a

genc

y sh

all n

ot b

e in

terp

rete

d to

mea

n th

at t

his

auto

mat

ical

ly c

onve

ys t

o th

ege

nera

l pub

lic t

he r

ight

of

acce

ss t

o th

is a

rea.

G.

____

____

__ [j

uris

dict

ion]

sha

ll in

spec

t th

e bu

ffer

ann

ually

and

imm

edia

tely

fol

low

ing

seve

re s

torm

s fo

r ev

iden

ce o

f se

dim

ent,

dep

ositi

on,

eros

ion,

or

conc

entr

ated

flo

w c

hann

els

and

corr

ectiv

e ac

tions

tak

en t

o en

sure

the

inte

grity

and

fun

ctio

ns o

f th

e rip

aria

n bu

ffer

.

H.

Ripa

rian

buff

er a

reas

may

be

allo

wed

to

grow

into

the

ir ve

geta

tive

targ

et s

tate

nat

ural

ly, b

ut m

etho

ds t

o en

hanc

e th

e su

cces

sion

alpr

oces

s su

ch a

s ac

tive

refo

rest

atio

n m

ay b

e us

ed w

hen

deem

ed n

eces

sary

by

____

____

____

__ [

juris

dict

ion]

to

ensu

re t

he p

rese

rvat

ion

and

prop

agat

ion

of t

he b

uffe

r ar

ea.

Ripa

rian

buff

er a

reas

may

als

o be

enh

ance

d th

roug

h re

fore

stat

ion

or o

ther

gro

wth

tec

hniq

ues

as a

form

of

miti

gatio

n fo

r ac

hiev

ing

buff

er p

rese

rvat

ion

requ

irem

ents

.

Sect

ion

VI.

En

forc

em

en

t Pro

ced

ure

sA

.__

____

____

___

[juris

dict

ion]

is a

utho

rized

and

em

pow

ered

to

enfo

rce

the

requ

irem

ents

of

this

ord

inan

ce in

acc

orda

nce

with

the

proc

edur

es o

f th

is s

ectio

n.

B.If,

upo

n in

spec

tion

or in

vest

igat

ion,

the

___

____

____

__ [

juris

dict

ion]

is o

f th

e op

inio

n th

at a

ny p

erso

n ha

s vi

olat

ed a

ny p

rovi

sion

of

this

ordi

nanc

e, h

e/sh

e sh

all w

ith r

easo

nabl

e pr

ompt

ness

issu

e a

corr

ectio

n no

tice

to t

he p

erso

n. E

ach

such

not

ice

shal

l be

in w

ritin

g an

d sh

all

desc

ribe

the

natu

re o

f th

e vi

olat

ion,

incl

udin

g a

refe

renc

e to

the

pro

visi

on w

ithin

thi

s or

dina

nce

that

has

bee

n vi

olat

ed.

In a

dditi

on,

the

notic

e sh

all s

et a

rea

sona

ble

time

for

the

abat

emen

t an

d co

rrec

tion

of t

he v

iola

tion.

C.

Vio

latio

ns o

f th

ese

prov

isio

ns a

re s

ubje

ct t

o th

e en

forc

emen

t pr

ovis

ions

of

____

____

____

__ [

juris

dict

ion’

s] z

onin

g or

dina

nce.

94

Sect

ion

VII

. Waiv

ers

/Vari

an

ces

A.

This

ord

inan

ce s

hall

appl

y to

all

prop

osed

dev

elop

men

t ex

cept

for

act

iviti

es t

hat

wer

e co

mpl

eted

prio

r to

the

eff

ectiv

e da

te o

f th

isor

dina

nce

and

had

rece

ived

the

fol

low

ing:

1.A

val

id,

unex

pire

d pe

rmit

in a

ccor

danc

e w

ith d

evel

opm

ent

regu

latio

ns2.

A c

urre

nt,

exec

uted

pub

lic w

orks

agr

eem

ent

3.A

val

id,

unex

pire

d bu

ildin

g pe

rmit

4.A

wai

ver

in a

ccor

danc

e w

ith c

urre

nt d

evel

opm

ent

regu

latio

ns.

B.Th

e __

____

____

____

___

[juris

dict

ion’

s] Z

onin

g Bo

ard

of A

ppea

ls m

ay g

rant

a v

aria

nce

for

the

follo

win

g:1.

Thos

e pr

ojec

ts o

r ac

tiviti

es f

or w

hich

it c

an b

e de

mon

stra

ted

that

str

ict

com

plia

nce

with

the

ord

inan

ce w

ould

res

ult

in a

pra

ctic

aldi

ffic

ulty

.2.

Thos

e pr

ojec

ts o

r ac

tiviti

es s

ervi

ng a

pub

lic n

eed

whe

re n

o fe

asib

le a

ltern

ativ

e is

ava

ilabl

e.3.

The

repa

ir an

d m

aint

enan

ce o

f pu

blic

impr

ovem

ents

whe

re a

void

ance

and

min

imiz

atio

n of

adv

erse

impa

cts

to n

ontid

al w

etla

nds

and

asso

ciat

ed a

quat

ic e

cosy

stem

s ha

ve b

een

addr

esse

d.4.

Thos

e de

velo

pmen

ts w

hich

hav

e ha

d bu

ffer

s ap

plie

d in

con

form

ance

with

pre

viou

sly

issu

ed r

equi

rem

ents

.

C.

Wai

vers

for

dev

elop

men

t m

ay a

lso

be g

rant

ed in

tw

o ad

ditio

nal f

orm

s, if

dee

med

app

ropr

iate

by

the

Zoni

ng B

oard

of

App

eals

:1.

The

buff

er w

idth

mad

e be

red

uced

at

som

e po

ints

as

long

as

the

aver

age

wid

th o

f th

e bu

ffer

mee

ts t

he m

inim

um r

equi

rem

ent.

This

ave

ragi

ng o

f th

e bu

ffer

may

be

used

to

allo

w f

or t

he p

rese

nce

of a

n ex

istin

g st

ruct

ure

or t

o re

cove

r a

lost

lot,

as

long

as

the

Stre

amsi

de Z

one

(Zon

e I)

is n

ot d

istu

rbed

by

the

redu

ctio

n an

d no

new

str

uctu

res

are

built

with

in t

he 1

00-y

ear

flood

plai

n.2.

____

____

____

____

_ [ju

risdi

ctio

n] m

ay o

ffer

cre

dit

for

addi

tiona

l den

sity

els

ewhe

re o

n th

e si

te in

com

pens

atio

n fo

r th

e lo

ss o

fde

velo

pabl

e la

nd d

ue t

o th

e re

quire

men

ts o

f th

is o

rdin

ance

. Th

is c

ompe

nsat

ion

may

incr

ease

the

tot

al n

umbe

r of

dw

ellin

gun

its o

n th

e si

te u

p to

the

am

ount

per

mitt

ed u

nder

the

bas

e zo

ning

.

D.

The

appl

ican

t sh

all s

ubm

it a

writ

ten

requ

est

for

a va

rianc

e to

the

___

____

____

____

__ [j

uris

dict

ion]

. T

he a

pplic

atio

n sh

all i

nclu

de s

peci

ficre

ason

s ju

stify

ing

the

varia

nce

and

any

othe

r in

form

atio

n ne

cess

ary

to e

valu

ate

the

prop

osed

var

ianc

e re

ques

t. T

he a

genc

y m

ay r

equi

re a

nal

tern

ativ

e an

alys

is t

hat

clea

rly d

emon

stra

tes

that

no

othe

r fe

asib

le a

ltern

ativ

es e

xist

and

tha

t m

inim

al im

pact

will

occ

ur a

s a

resu

lt of

the

proj

ect

or d

evel

opm

ent.

E.In

gra

ntin

g a

requ

est

for

a va

rianc

e, t

he

____

____

____

____

_ [ju

risdi

ctio

n] m

ay r

equi

re s

ite d

esig

n, la

ndsc

ape

plan

ting,

fen

cing

, si

gns,

and

wat

er q

ualit

y be

st m

anag

emen

t pr

actic

es t

o re

duce

adv

erse

impa

cts

on w

ater

qua

lity,

str

eam

s, w

etla

nds,

and

flo

odpl

ains

.

Sect

ion

VII

I. C

on

flic

t W

ith

Oth

er

Reg

ula

tio

ns

Whe

re t

he s

tand

ards

and

man

agem

ent

requ

irem

ents

of

this

ord

inan

ce a

re in

con

flict

with

oth

er la

ws,

reg

ulat

ions

, an

d po

licie

s re

gard

ing

stre

ams,

stee

p sl

opes

, er

odib

le s

oils

, w

etla

nds,

flo

odpl

ains

, tim

ber

harv

estin

g, la

nd d

istu

rban

ce a

ctiv

ities

, or

oth

er e

nviro

nmen

tal p

rote

ctiv

e m

easu

res,

the

mor

ere

stric

tive

shal

l app

ly.

Low

er D

ead

Riv

er, W

ater

shed

Mgm

t. P

lan

200

3

App

endi

x C

95

Foll

ow

-up

In

form

atio

nFo

llo

w-u

p I

nfo

rmat

ion

Foll

ow

-up

In

form

atio

nFo

llo

w-u

p I

nfo

rmat

ion

Foll

ow

-up

In

form

atio

nA

dditi

onal

info

rmat

ion

on t

he c

reat

ion

and

esta

blis

hmen

t of

rip

aria

n co

rrid

ors

can

be f

ound

at

the

EPA

or

the

Mic

higa

n D

EQ w

ebsi

tes.

Ex

ampl

es s

uch

as m

odel

ord

inan

ces

or b

est

man

agem

ent

prac

tices

for

the

impl

emen

tatio

n of

rip

aria

n bu

ffer

s ar

e pr

ovid

ed.

Vis

it:<

http

://w

ww

.epa

.gov

/ow

ow>

<ht

tp://

ww

w.m

ichi

gan.

gov/

deq>

Ref

eren

ces

Ref

eren

ces

Ref

eren

ces

Ref

eren

ces

Ref

eren

ces

Envi

ronm

enta

l Pro

tect

ion

Age

ncy

(EPA

). 19

96.

Man

agin

g U

rban

Run

off.

Po

inte

r N

o. 7

, EP

A84

1-F-

96_0

04G

.

Envi

ronm

enta

l Pro

tect

ion

Age

ncy

(EPA

). 20

02.

Mod

el O

rdin

ance

s to

Pro

tect

Loc

al R

esou

rces

[onl

ine]

. [c

ited

27 M

ay 2

003]

. A

vaila

ble

<ht

tp://

ww

w.e

pa.g

ov/o

wow

/nps

/ord

inan

ce/m

ol1.

htm

>.

Prem

o, B

.J.,

D.T

. Lon

g, R

.J. H

ugge

tt, D

. Pre

mo,

W.W

. Tay

lor,

G.T

. Wol

ff a

nd K

.G. H

arris

on. 2

001.

Rec

omm

ende

d En

viro

nmen

tal I

ndic

ator

s Pr

ogra

m f

orth

e St

ate

of M

ichi

gan,

Jul

y 20

01.

Mic

higa

n En

viro

nmen

tal S

cien

ce B

oard

, La

nsin

g.

Tone

llo,

M.,

C.

Frie

burg

er,

A.

Nuh

fer,

and

S. S

utto

n. R

ipar

ian

Zone

Man

agem

ent

and

Trou

t St

ream

s: 2

1st C

entu

ry a

nd B

eyon

d. M

ichi

gan

Dep

artm

ent

ofN

atur

al R

esou

rces

, Fi

sher

ies

Div

isio

n Re

port

.

Mic

higa

n D

epar

tmen

t of

Env

ironm

enta

l Qua

lity

(MD

EQ).

1997

. Be

st M

anag

emen

t Pr

actic

es –

Buf

fer/

Filte

r St

rips

[onl

ine]

. [c

ited

29 M

ay 2

003]

. A

vail-

able

<ht

tp://

ww

w.d

eq.s

tate

.mi.u

s/do

cum

ents

/deq

-sw

q-np

s-bf

s.pd

f>.

Wel

sch,

D.

1991

. Ri

paria

n fo

rest

buf

fers

. FS

Pub

. N

o. N

A-P

R-07

-91.

US

Dep

artm

ent

of A

gric

ultu

re,

Fore

st S

ervi

ce.

Fore

st R

esou

rces

Man

agem

ent,

Radn

or,

PA.