JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF C - California Courts · HON. MARSHA G. SLOUGH Chair, Technology Committee Hon. Marla O. Anderson Hon. Brian John Back ... 2016. The data presented in the tables

455 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102-3688 Tel 415-865-4200 TDD 415-865-4272 Fax 415-865-4205 www.courts.ca.gov

HON. TA NI G . CA NTIL -SA K AUYE Chief Justice of California Chair of the Judicial Council

HON. DOUG L AS P . MIL L ER Chair, Executive and Planning Committee

HON. DA VID M. RUBIN Chair, Litigation Management Committee

HON. K ENNETH K . SO Chair, Policy Coordination and Liaison Committee

HON. HA RRY E . HULL , JR . Chair, Rules and Projects Committee

HON. MA RSHA G. SL OUG H Chair, Technology Committee

Hon. Marla O. Anderson Hon. Brian John Back Hon. Richard Bloom Mr. Mark G. Bonino Hon. Stacy Boulware Eurie Hon. Kyle S. Brodie Hon. Daniel J. Buckley Hon. Ming W. Chin Hon. Samuel K. Feng Hon. James M. Humes Hon. Hannah-Beth Jackson Mr. Patrick M. Kelly Hon. Dalila C. Lyons Ms. Donna D. Melby Hon. Gary Nadler Ms. Debra Elaine Pole Hon. Dean T. Stout

A D V I S O R Y M E M B E R S Mr. Jake Chatters Mr. Richard D. Feldstein Ms. Kimberly Flener Hon. Scott M. Gordon Hon. David E. Gunn Hon. Brian L. McCabe Mr. Frank A. McGuire Hon. Eric C. Taylor Hon. Charles D. Wachob

MR. MA RTIN HOSHINO

Administrative Director, Judicial Council

JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA

August 12, 2016

Hon. Mark Leno Chair, Joint Legislative Budget Committee 1020 N Street, Room 553 Sacramento, California 95814

Mr. Michael Cohen Director, California Department of Finance 915 L Street Sacramento, California 95814

Ms. Linda Penner Chair, Board of State and Community Corrections 2590 Venture Oaks Way, Suite 200 Sacramento, California 95833

Re: Court Realignment Data (Calendar Year 2015), as required under Penal Code section 13155

Dear Senator Leno, Mr. Cohen, and Ms. Penner:

Attached is the Judicial Council report on implementation of the 2011 Criminal Justice Realignment Act, as required under Penal Code section 13155. This fourth annual report includes statistics from January 1 through December 31, 2015, for each county regarding the dispositions of felonies at sentencing and petitions to revoke probation, mandatory supervision, postrelease community supervision, and parole.

August 12, 2016 Page 2

If you have any questions related to this report, please contact Ms. Shelley Curran, Director, Criminal Justice Services, at 415-865-4013 or [email protected].

Sincerely,

Martin Hoshino Administrative Director Judicial Council

MH/SJ/SC/ts Attachment cc: Diane F. Boyer-Vine, Legislative Counsel

Daniel Alvarez, Secretary of the Senate E. Dotson Wilson, Chief Clerk of the Assembly Shaun Naidu, Policy Consultant, Office of Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de León Alf Brandt, Senior Counsel, Office of Speaker Anthony Rendon Anita Lee, Senior Fiscal and Policy Analyst, Legislative Analyst’s Office Tina McGee, Executive Secretary, Legislative Analyst’s Office Tiffany Garcia, Program Budget Analyst, Department of Finance Margie Estrada, Chief Counsel, Senate Judiciary Committee Julie Salley-Gray, Consultant, Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee Jolie Onodera, Consultant, Senate Appropriations Committee Matt Osterli, Consultant, Senate Republican Fiscal Office Mike Petersen, Consultant, Senate Republican Policy Office Alison Merrilees, Chief Counsel, Assembly Judiciary Committee Marvin Deon, Consultant, Assembly Budget Committee Chuck Nicol, Principal Consultant, Assembly Appropriations Committee Allan Cooper, Consultant, Assembly Republican Office of Policy & Budget Paul Dress, Consultant, Assembly Republican Office of Policy & Budget Peggy Collins, Principal Consultant, Joint Legislative Budget Committee Peter Allen, Director, Public Affairs, Judicial Council Cory T. Jasperson, Director, Governmental Affairs, Judicial Council Shelley Curran, Director, Criminal Justice Services, Judicial Council Laura Speed, Principal Manager, Governmental Affairs, Judicial Council Jay Fraser, Analyst, Criminal Justice Services, Judicial Council Yvette Casillas-Sarcos, Administrative Coordinator, Governmental Affairs, Judicial Council

mailto:[email protected]

JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA

455 Golden Gate Avenue . San Francisco, California 94102-3688

www.courts.ca.gov

R E P O R T T O T H E J U D I C I A L C O U N C I LFor business meeting on: August 25-26, 2016

Title

Trial Courts: 2015 Court Realignment Data

Rules, Forms, Standards, or Statutes Affected

None

Recommended by

Judicial Council Staff Shelley Curran, Director Criminal Justice Services

Agenda Item Type

Action Required

Effective Date

August 26, 2016

Date of Report

July 27, 2016

Contact

Jay Fraser, 415-865-7958 [email protected]

Executive Summary Penal Code section 13155 requires the Judicial Council, commencing January 1, 2013, to collect information from trial courts regarding the implementation of the 2011 [Criminal Justice] Realignment Legislation and make the data available annually to the California Department of Finance (DOF), Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC), and Joint Legislative Budget Committee (JLBC) by September 1. This is the fourth annual court realignment data report to the DOF, BSCC, and JLBC. The Court Realignment Data (Calendar Year 2015) is included as Attachment A to this report.

Recommendations

Staff to the Judicial Council, Criminal Justice Services office, recommends that the Judicial Council:

1. Receive the attached Trial Courts: Court Realignment Data (Calendar Year 2015)documenting information reported by the trial courts pursuant to Penal Code section 13155 and,

2

2. Direct staff to transmit the report to the California Department of Finance, the Board of State and Community Corrections, and the Joint Legislative Budget Committee by September 1.

Previous Council Action The first annual report of data collected from the trial courts on the implementation of the 2011 Realignment Legislation was provided to the Judicial Council by its staff at the council’s August 23, 2013, meeting. The annual reports for subsequent years were provided at the August 22, 2014, and August 21, 2015, meetings. Each report was then sent to the DOF, BSCC, and JLBC by September 1.

Methodology and Process Penal Code section 13155 (Sen. Bill 1021; Stats. 2012, ch. 41) states that trial courts shall provide to the Judicial Council not less frequently than twice a year data that includes “statistics for each county regarding the dispositions of felonies at sentencing and petitions to revoke probation, postrelease community supervision, mandatory supervision, and, commencing July 1, 2013, parole.” Criminal Justice Realignment Data Working Group To identify and define appropriate realignment-related data elements, an ad hoc working group of volunteers chosen by the Judicial Council’s Court Executives Advisory Committee was created. This working group, the Criminal Justice Realignment Data Working Group, was composed of representatives from the superior courts of Alameda, Fresno, Los Angeles, Napa, Orange, Shasta, and Ventura Counties. The working group implemented quarterly reporting requirements and identified 29 data points to track sentencing and disposition information and court workload. After receiving feedback from the trial courts, various data points were edited and new data elements created to better track outcomes and court workload. These changes were implemented in quarter four of 2013, and no changes have been made since then. A list of current data elements is included in Attachment B. Data collection and quality assurance Trial courts submit data quarterly to the Judicial Council’s Criminal Justice Services office using an online survey. The data reporting schedule for 2015 was as follows:

• Quarter 1 (January–March) data due April 30, 2015 • Quarter 2 (April–June) data due July 31, 2015 • Quarter 3 (July–September) data due October 31, 2015 • Quarter 4 (October–December) data due January 31, 2016

The Judicial Council staff conducts quality assurance to examine the accuracy and reliability of the data collected. Each quarter, the staff contacts trial courts to discuss data quality, provide technical assistance regarding data collection, and gather information about local court processes. Data are sometimes revised as a result of these checks. The data presented in the 2015

3

Court Realignment Data report may be amended in subsequent reports as courts amend previously submitted data in the event of initial data reporting errors. Data quality have continued to improve as a result of this cooperative effort and as the courts continue to refine their data reporting systems.

Policy and Cost Implications In addition to fulfilling a legislative mandate, data collected under Penal Code section 13155 are used to assist the Trial Court Budget Advisory Committee in determining realignment funding allocations. Approximately $27.6 million has been allocated since fiscal year 2013–2014. The current allocation formula is based on each courts’ proportion of the new workload associated with realignment, as measured by the total petitions filed to revoke and/or modify postrelease community supervision and parole. All courts are able to report the data elements currently used to establish funding allocations.

Attachments 1. Attachment A: Court Realignment Data (Calendar Year 2015) 2. Attachment B: List of Court Realignment Data Points (Felony Cases Only)

4

Attachment A

Court Realignment Data (Calendar Year 2015)

This report fulfills the requirement pursuant to Penal Code section 13155 that the Judicial Council submit data regarding the implementation of the 2011 Criminal Justice Realignment Legislation to the California Department of Finance (DOF), the Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC), and the Joint Legislative Budget Committee (JLBC). Please note the following:

1) Please see Attachment B for a full description of each data point reported below. 2) This report includes data for calendar year 2015. Many courts were implementing new case and data management systems in 2015 and

encountered significant barriers to reporting throughout much of the year. In spite of these challenges, approximately 84% of the courts were able to report most (70% or more) of the requested data.

3) This document includes data as reported to the Judicial Council as of June 30, 2016. The data presented in the tables below may be amended in subsequent reports to complete previously submitted reports or to correct initial data reporting errors.

4) Note that the “n” for each data elements is the total number of courts reporting any data for that item.

5

Table 1: Pre and Initial Sentencing

Court

1. Felony Filings (n=58)

2. Warrants issued for FTA -presentencing

(n=52)

3. Prison (n=52)

4. Probation (n=52)

5. Jail–straight sentence

(n=53)

6. Jail–split sentence

(n=53)

STATEWIDE 182,048 36,725 28,272 52,441 8,445 7,128

Alameda 6,959 961 912 2,718 146 34 Alpine1 8** Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Amador 395 95 118 46 10 0 Butte 1,668 875 313 483 79 64 Calaveras 242 20 14 14 1 3 Colusa 253 38 20 52 11 4 Contra Costa 3,938 637 412 1,121 2 141 Del Norte 278 211 60 91 9 7 El Dorado 824 270 167 343 23 46 Fresno 7,000 5,309 1,457 2,685 162 696 Glenn1 236 4*** 7*** 83*** 0*** 36*** Humboldt 1,269 463 118 294 9 28 Imperial 1,476 255 201 593 81 18 Inyo 208 57 19 107 7 3 Kern 6,504 493 1,536 1,616 167 361 Kings 2,053 Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Lake 835 211 131 208 22 13 Lassen 481 40 163 51 18 6 Los Angeles 37,981 4,068 6,032 12,465 3,287 772 Madera 1,111 633 284 332 22 30 Marin 801 17* 20 83** 13 21 Mariposa 217 0 25 94 1 18 Mendocino 957 163 142 256 21 29 Merced1 854** Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Modoc1 87 16** 4** 5** 1** 1** Mono 65 7 8 23 8 4 Monterey 2,338 554 508 602 84 60 Napa 926 216 103 272 14 41 Nevada 529 60 35 133 2 17 Orange 10,499 1,213 1,988 4,106 514 568

6

Court

1. Felony Filings (n=58)

2. Warrants issued for FTA -presentencing

(n=52)

3. Prison (n=52)

4. Probation (n=52)

5. Jail–straight sentence

(n=53)

6. Jail–split sentence

(n=53)

Placer 2,139 1,015 289 1,155 70 77 Plumas 82 16 21 35 5 0 Riverside 10,619 3,455 3,056 4,017 284 962 Sacramento 9,660 Data not available Data not available Data not available 226 352 San Benito 423 184 30 102 1 13 San Bernardino 14,209 5,833 4,058 4,714 2,165 1,143 San Diego 11,518 Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available San Francisco 3,255 0** 211 815 12 64 San Joaquin 3,295 469 860 357 43 128 San Luis Obispo1 828** Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available San Mateo 2,321 187 348 915 69 144 Santa Barbara 2,403 502 246 842 20 45 Santa Clara 6,867 2,193 1,041 2,594 255 321 Santa Cruz 1,304 81*** 90 564 26 21 Shasta 2,499 1,135 383 832 13 68 Sierra 5** 2** 0** 3** 0** 0** Siskiyou 409 275 77 206 1 3 Solano 2,518 610 216* 388* 42* 23* Sonoma 2,179 446 203 841 23 130 Stanislaus 3,835 1,025 463 1,624 65 94 Sutter1 732* 80** 70** 161** 6** 16** Tehama1 382** 33** 73** 78** 4** 8** Trinity 273 91 13 60 2 1 Tulare 3,602 517 612 1,222 80 128 Tuolumne 597 252 124 202 5 49 Ventura 3,000 720 562 993 112 136 Yolo 1,321 439 206 456 165 149 Yuba 781 279 223 389 37 32 * Number is based on one quarter of data. ** Number is based on two quarters of data. *** Number is based on three quarters of data. 1 Felony filings data obtained through JBSIS

7

Table 2: Felony Probation

Court

7. Petitions to revoke/modify

probation (n=52)

8. Felony probation cases revoked and reinstated (n=51)

9. Felony probation cases sentenced

to state prison (n=51)

10. Felony probation cases

sentenced to jail–straight sentence

(n=53)


sentenced to jail–split sentence

(n=53)

STATEWIDE 80,627 36,794 7,051 6,120 1,658

Alameda 4,378 2,395 13 23 0 Alpine Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Amador 148 87 11 29 6 Butte 818 835 80 137 54 Calaveras 204 43 25 4 1 Colusa 86 44 4 5 2 Contra Costa 1,991 394 7 0 5 Del Norte 59 94 12 7 3 El Dorado 310 281 34 28 10 Fresno 2,582 2,040 520 132 129 Glenn 28*** 25*** 8*** 0*** 11*** Humboldt 511 291 50 6 18 Imperial 637 330 52 35 4 Inyo 149 90 2 6 4 Kern 3,870 220 475 79 47 Kings Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Lake 173 59 41 10 11 Lassen 58 24 9 15** 0** Los Angeles 12,798 8,640 1,364 2,680 490 Madera 632 402 56 21 0 Marin 208*** 176** 2*** 2 3* Mariposa 92 79 6 0 0 Mendocino 353 222 52 36 16 Merced Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Modoc 37** 8** 4** 1** 0** Mono 32 24 1 0 0 Monterey 1,502 493 163 70 13 Napa 792 465 30 4 8 Nevada 237 205 5 1 4 Orange 6,884 3,888 493 523 11

8

Court


probation (n=52)

8. Felony probation cases revoked and reinstated (n=51)

9. Felony probation cases sentenced

to state prison (n=51)


sentenced to jail–straight sentence

(n=53)


sentenced to jail–split sentence

(n=53) Placer 1,516 438 64 22 14 Plumas 85 23 5 0 0 Riverside 573 2,811 107 188 129 Sacramento Data not available Data not available Data not available 21 12 San Benito 101 54 8 3 4 San Bernardino 16,391 1,645 1,898 1,378 256 San Diego Data not available Data not available 0* Data not available Data not available San Francisco 1,526 158 13 12 8 San Joaquin 573 1 123 5 8 San Luis Obispo Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available San Mateo 636 415 48 40 29 Santa Barbara 2,616 1,404 74 34 14 Santa Clara 1,468 800 204 237 16 Santa Cruz 776*** 196*** 23*** 12** 7*** Shasta 1,347 1,663 211 0 15 Sierra 3** 3** 0** 0** 0** Siskiyou 407 129 53 4 3 Solano 925*** 426*** 102*** 40 30 Sonoma 2,483 777 82 37 56 Stanislaus 1,713 858 34 5 6 Sutter 255** 184** 45** 12** 15** Tehama 146 0** 0** 1** 0* Trinity 58 46 6 1 0 Tulare 1,200 1,341 136 25 22 Tuolumne 251 99 17 10 17 Ventura 4,991 1,105 179 130 38 Yolo 782 290 33 26 105 Yuba 236 74 67 23 4 * Number is based on one quarter of data. ** Number is based on two quarters of data. *** Number is based on three quarters of data.

9

Table 3: Mandatory Supervision

Court


mandatory supervision (n=53)

13. Warrants issued (n=52)

14. Calendar events set on petitions to

revoke/modify mandatory

supervision (n=51)

15. Evidentiary hearings held on

petitions to revoke/modify


16. Mandatory supervision cases

revoked and reinstated (n=49)


revoked and terminated (n=51)

STATEWIDE 8,393 4,777 25,665 266 4,888 4,161

Alameda 7 6 13 Data not available 0 6 Alpine Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Amador 11 5 34 0 9 0 Butte 106 73 225 3 56 0 Calaveras 14 12 21 12 11 9 Colusa 19 7 46 0 5 6 Contra Costa 287 361 1,410 Data not available 56 - Del Norte 10 9 88 0 12 8 El Dorado 54 - 611 0 9 56 Fresno 971 555 2,615 34 595 148 Glenn 12*** 11*** 14*** 8*** 8*** 0*** Humboldt 108 86 562 0 54 56 Imperial 42 19 102 0 20 20 Inyo 5 - 13 0 4 2 Kern 546 338 465 9 286 184 Kings Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Lake 3 0 0 0 1 2 Lassen 0** 0** 0** 0 0*** 0 Los Angeles 136 95 7 Data not available Data not available 29 Madera 46 22 231 4 32 15 Marin 22 Data not available 128 Data not available 22 14 Mariposa 4 0 9 1 3 4 Mendocino 38 9 156 0 15 23 Merced Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Modoc 1** 1** 2** 0** 0** 0** Mono 2 2 0 0 0 0 Monterey 115 0 274 1 49 62 Napa 88 65 183 2 46 11 Nevada 28 10 57 1 16 2

10

Court




14. Calendar events set on petitions to

revoke/modify mandatory

supervision (n=51)

15. Evidentiary hearings held on

petitions to revoke/modify



revoked and reinstated (n=49)


revoked and terminated (n=51)

Orange 479 454 2,689 Data not available 516 270 Placer 30 34 85 1 0 0 Plumas 0 0 0 0 0 0 Riverside 55 648 583 1 920 564 Sacramento Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available San Benito 40 1 98 0 22 33 San Bernardino 2,069 252 2,413 6 593 1,759 San Diego 104 Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available San Francisco 128 0 1,610 0 112 0 San Joaquin 285 267 432 44 288 27 San Luis Obispo Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available San Mateo 86 35 89 1 24 22 Santa Barbara 307 102 874 22 Data not available 25 Santa Clara 332 285 1,582 0 239 177 Santa Cruz Data not available 2*** 232*** 11 19 5 Shasta 216 271 2,708 0 134 110 Sierra 0** 0** 0** 0** 0** 0** Siskiyou 22 21 62 38 16 3 Solano 60 43*** 399*** 18 34 27 Sonoma 356 124 737 0 136 88 Stanislaus 252 226 773 0 126 118 Sutter 26** 18** 76** 6** 6** 2** Tehama 8 2 Data not available 0** 0** 0** Trinity 2 3 4 0 1 3 Tulare 201** 46 1,192 4 162 137 Tuolumne 40 28 179 2 21 7 Ventura 398 94 1,054 0 171 98 Yolo 174 56 381 9 6 26 Yuba 48 79 147 28 33 3 * Number is based on one quarter of data. ** Number is based on two quarters of data. *** Number is based on three quarters of data.

11

Table 4: Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS)

Court

18. Petitions to

revoke/modify PRCS (n=56)


20. Calendar events set on

petitions to revoke/modify PRCS (n=55)

21. Evidentiary hearings held on petitions to revoke/modify PRCS (n=50)

22. PRCS cases revoked

& reinstated w/o custody time (n=54)

23. PRCS cases revoked & reinstated w/ custody time

(n=54)

24. PRCS cases referred

to reentry court (n=47)

25. PRCS cases revoked & terminated

(n=54)

STATEWIDE 24,942 18,625 62,074 897 2,711 15,859 123 1,672

Alameda 662 386 2,841 Data not available 151 276 31 4 Alpine Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Amador 29 35 96 5* 1 23 0 1 Butte 236 240 297 3 2 184 0 2 Calaveras 18 10 30 11 2 9 0 1 Colusa 18 18 40 1 0 11 0 2 Contra Costa 264 65 1,063 Data not available 64 149 Data not available Data not available Del Norte 28 21 145 0 0 25 0 4 El Dorado 62 35 329 1 8 48 1 9 Fresno 1,303 837 2,907 37 73 1,164 Data not available 176 Glenn 6*** 3*** 6*** 0*** 0*** 4*** 0*** 0*** Humboldt 185 156 910 0 4 132 0 18 Imperial 129 71 684 0 3 63 0 9 Inyo 6 5 15 0 0 6 0 0 Kern 1,267 698 2,045 2 85 1,003 0 154 Kings 63 88 251 Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Lake 49 25 244 4 1 10 0 8 Lassen 21 0 40 1 0 16 0 6 Los Angeles 7,795 6,857 23,154 547** 2 5,093 0 1 Madera 156 78 925 16 1 136 0 2 Marin 37 2 108 Data not available 9 17 0 2 Mariposa 9 0 13 15 8 91 2 0 Mendocino 105 51 308 0 5 106 0 10 Merced Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Modoc 1** 0** 1** 0** 0** 0** 0** 1** Mono 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monterey 87 219 417 4 0 38 0 36 Napa 50 34 145 5 1 44 0 1 Nevada 24 10 85 4 0 21 0 6 Orange 1,283 843 3,845 Data not available 26 990 Data not available 6 Placer 88 72 354 5 1 19 0 3

12

Court

18. Petitions to

revoke/modify PRCS (n=56)



petitions to revoke/modify PRCS (n=55)

21. Evidentiary hearings held on petitions to revoke/modify PRCS (n=50)

22. PRCS cases revoked

& reinstated w/o custody time (n=54)

23. PRCS cases revoked & reinstated w/ custody time

(n=54)

24. PRCS cases referred


25. PRCS cases revoked & terminated

(n=54)

Plumas 3 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 Riverside 1,860 1,419 1,700 1 0 1,643 0 84 Sacramento 242 1,371 348 9 86 203 0 0 San Benito 32 24 120 0 0 29 0 0 San Bernardino 2,036 1,280 3,092 0 1,260 1,411 0 217 San Diego 1,575 Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available San Francisco 188 55 1,820 2 13 175 Data not available 0 San Joaquin 733 723 1,292 11 0 383 47 59 San Luis Obispo 153 57 206 6 1 129 0 19 San Mateo 77 139 180 0 4 23 Data not available 19 Santa Barbara 249 205 596 19 2 204 0 17 Santa Clara 504 605 2,270 0 49 489 4 175 Santa Cruz 116 185 924 12 12 13 0 3 Shasta 202 170 1,294 0 27 123 6 51 Sierra 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Siskiyou 51 37 151 86 3 30 0 9 Solano 217 129 828 15 12 137 0 45 Sonoma 388 167 615 2 228 211 0 25 Stanislaus 299 295 964 0 18 167 0 68 Sutter 29 22 73 8 3 22 0 0 Tehama 31 15 39 0 0 0 0 0 Trinity 12 12 116 0 1 6 0 3 Tulare 306 210 1,233 2 8 174 0 52 Tuolumne 17 10 89 0 0 9 0 6 Ventura 1,394 447 2,239 6 390 351 32 350 Yolo 179 102 396 31 130 211 0 8 Yuba 67 85 188 26 17 38 0 0 * Number is based on one quarter of data. ** Number is based on two quarters of data. *** Number is based on three quarters of data.

Table 5: Parole

13

Court

26. Petitions to revoke/modify parole (n=56)



petitions to revoke/modify parole (n=55)

29. Evidentiary

hearings held on petitions to revoke/modify parole (n=51)

30. Parole cases revoked & reinstated w/o custody time (n=54)

31. Parole cases revoked & reinstated w/ custody time (n=54)

32. Parole cases referred


33. Parole cases

remanded to CDCR (n=53)

STATEWIDE 22,696 23,768 41,215 865 3,185 8,697 288 18

Alameda 580 105 2,880 Data not available 138 308 30 3 Alpine Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Amador 3 4 11*** 0* 0 1 0 0 Butte 136 221 162 7 0 112 0 0 Calaveras 2 2 5 1 2 1 0 0 Colusa 2 5 4 0 0 1 0 0 Contra Costa 175 338 572 26 22 153 Data not available 0 Del Norte 13 20 57 1 1 14 1 0 El Dorado 124 86 447 7 7 58 0 0 Fresno 641 1,189 1,031 25 15 524 Data not available 0 Glenn 5*** 3*** 2*** 0*** 0*** 1 0 0 Humboldt 20 120 93 4 0 15 0 0 Imperial 42 97 180 1 0 35 0 1 Inyo 3 10 6 0 0 3 0 0 Kern 346 1,305 453 0 3 319 0 0 Kings 241 228 260 Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Lake 17 33 28 1 0 7 0 0 Lassen 5 14 10 0 0 3 0 0 Los Angeles 10,374 7,580 22,707 436* 0 2,446 Data not available 6 Madera 63 161 266 7 1 47 0 0 Marin 43 33 256 0*** 10 32 0 0 Mariposa 4 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 Mendocino 49 42 141 0 16 33 0 0 Merced Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Modoc 1** 1** 10** 0** 0** 1 0 0 Mono 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monterey 134 406 357 11 24 103 0 0 Napa 19 34 68 2 2 14 0 0 Nevada 10 1 41 2 0 16 0 0 Orange 741 1,443 1,216 Data not available 1 645 Data not available 0 Placer 73 13 273 38 0 26 0 0 Plumas 7 5 6 0 0 0 0 0

14

Court

26. Petitions to revoke/modify parole (n=56)



petitions to revoke/modify parole (n=55)

29. Evidentiary

hearings held on petitions to revoke/modify parole (n=51)

30. Parole cases revoked & reinstated w/o custody time (n=54)

31. Parole cases revoked & reinstated w/ custody time (n=54)

32. Parole cases referred


33. Parole cases

remanded to CDCR (n=53)

Riverside 2,400 1,793 937 2 17 878 0 1 Sacramento 596 3,255 942 55 49 639 0 0 San Benito 16 0 25 0 0 17 0 0 San Bernardino 2,177 1,770 1,265 13 2,075 497 Data not available Data not available San Diego 1,003 Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available Data not available San Francisco 98 5 310 0*** 22 24 0 0 San Joaquin 141 11 381 64 29 55 111 0 San Luis Obispo 174 123 323 7 1 165 0 0 San Mateo 83 207 138 5 1 60 Data not available 0 Santa Barbara 155 199 279 10 0 123 0 0 Santa Clara 155 901 1,178 0 191 220 145 0 Santa Cruz 34 146 155 16 3 25 0 0 Shasta 244 197 280 0 171 58 0 0 Sierra 2** 4** 0** 1** 0** 1 0 0 Siskiyou 10 0 65 30 0 5 0 2 Solano 371 231*** 713*** 28* 23*** 241 Data not available Data not available Sonoma 160 2 684 5* 69*** 128 0 0 Stanislaus 166 411 250 0 22 129 0 0 Sutter 17** 34** 35** 3** 2** 13 0 0 Tehama 16** 31** 33** 0** 0** 0 0 0 Trinity 2 3 19 0 0 0 0 0 Tulare 103** 241* 199 2 1** 69 Data not available 4 Tuolumne 11 13 31 0 0 6 0 0 Ventura 504 326 967 24 242 245 1 0 Yolo 39 225 72 11 25 30 Data not available 0 Yuba 145 138 385 20 0 151 0 1 * Number is based on one quarter of data. ** Number is based on two quarters of data. *** Number is based on three quarters of data.

1

Court Realignment Data Points (Felony Cases Only)

PRE-SENTENCING

1. Number of new felony case filings A felony filing is defined as the beginning of a case by the court’s acceptance of the formal submission of a complaint or other document charging a defendant with a felony offense, or a transfer-in from another jurisdiction. Other documents, such as motions, are not counted as filings for caseload inventory purposes. • Each defendant named in the complaint is reported as one case filing. • Do not count a filing for defendants who are discharged prior to the filing of a complaint. • Do not count filings for Habeas Corpus. • Do not include violations of Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) or parole in this count.

2. Number of pre-sentence felony warrants issued for Failures to Appear (FTA)

INITIAL SENTENCING

3. Number of cases in which a defendant is sentenced to state prison at initial sentencing Do not include cases in which a defendant is sentenced to state prison on a violation of felony probation. These cases are counted in data point #9.

4. Number of cases in which a defendant is granted felony probation at initial sentencing Report all cases in which the defendant is placed on traditional felony probation at initial sentencing.

5. Number of cases in which a defendant is given a straight county jail sentence pursuant to PC 1170(h)(5)(A) at initial sentencing Report all cases in which the defendant is sentenced under PC 1170(h)(5)(A) at initial sentencing.

6. Number of cases in which a defendant is given a “split” sentence pursuant to PC 1170(h)(5)(B) at initial sentencing Report all cases in which the defendant is sentenced under PC 1170(h)(5)(B) at initial sentencing. • Include cases in which a defendant is sentenced directly to a term of mandatory supervision without

first serving a portion of the sentence in county jail.

VIOLATION/MODIFICATION OF FELONY PROBATION

7. Number of petitions filed or court motions made to revoke/modify felony probation Petition is defined as any filed instrument/document presented to the court that seeks revocation or modification of a defendant’s supervision status. This data element should also include cases where the court on its own motion seeks to modify or revoke supervision.

8. Number of cases in which a felony probationer is found in violation of conditions of felony probation and is reinstated on probation

9. Number of cases in which a felony probationer is sentenced to state prison for a violation of probation This is a count of all cases in which the defendant is placed on probation and after violating probation is sentenced to prison for the probation violation.

2

10. Number of cases in which a felony probationer receives a straight sentence to county jail under PC 1170(h)(5)(A) for a violation of probation This is a count of all cases in which the defendant is placed on probation for a PC 1170(h) felony and after violating probation is sentenced to county jail under PC 1170(h)(5)(A) for the probation violation.

11. Number of cases in which a felony probationer receives a “split” sentence under PC 1170(h)(5)(B) for a violation of probation This is a count of all cases in which the defendant is placed on probation for a PC 1170(h) felony and after violating probation is sentenced under PC 1170(h)(5)(B) for the probation violation. • Include cases in which a defendant is sentenced directly to a term of mandatory supervision without

first serving a portion of the sentence in county jail.

VIOLATION/MODIFICATION OF MANDATORY SUPERVISION

12. Number of petitions filed or court motions made to revoke/modify mandatory supervision Petition is defined as any filed instrument/document presented to the court that seeks revocation or modification of a defendant’s supervision status. This data element should also include cases where the court on its own motion seeks to modify or revoke supervision.

13. Number of warrants issued for persons on mandatory supervision Include both arrest and bench warrants.

14. Number of calendar events set on petitions or court motions to revoke/modify mandatory supervision A calendar event is defined as a court proceeding set in the course of a criminal matter.

15. Number of contested evidentiary hearings held on petitions or court motions to revoke/modify mandatory supervision A contested evidentiary hearing is defined as a hearing where the factual basis of the petition is contested, and where the parties present oral or documentary evidence in support of or in opposition to the factual allegations of the petition. • Contested evidentiary hearings that extend over more than one day are counted as separate hearings

for each hearing day. • Do not report contested evidentiary hearings that are not heard at all and are reset at the request of

the parties or on the court’s motion. Count these instances under ‘Number of calendar events’ (data point #14).

16. Number of cases in which an offender on mandatory supervision is found in violation of conditions of mandatory supervision and is reinstated on mandatory supervision

17. Number of cases in which an offender on mandatory supervision is found in violation of conditions of mandatory supervision and has the supervision term revoked and terminated Report all cases in which mandatory supervision is permanently revoked as a result of a violation.

VIOLATION/MODIFICATION OF POST RELEASE COMMUNITY SUPERVISON

18. Number of petitions filed or court motions made to revoke/modify Post-Release Community Supervision (PRCS) Petition is defined as any filed instrument/document presented to the court that seeks revocation or modification of a defendant’s supervision status. This data element should also include cases where the court on its own motion seeks to modify or revoke supervision.

3

19. Number of warrants issued for persons on PRCS Include both arrest and bench warrants.

20. Number of calendar events set on petitions or court motions to revoke/modify PRCS A calendar event is defined as a court proceeding set in the course of a criminal matter.

21. Number of contested evidentiary hearings held on petitions or court motions to revoke/modify PRCS A contested evidentiary hearing is defined as a hearing where the factual basis of the petition is contested, and where the parties present oral or documentary evidence in support of or in opposition to the factual allegations of the petition. • Contested evidentiary hearings that extend over more than one day are counted as separate hearings

for each hearing day. • Do not report contested evidentiary hearings that are not heard at all and are reset at the request of

the parties or on the court’s motion. Count these instances under ‘Number of calendar events’ (data point #20).

22. Number of cases in which an offender on PRCS is found by the court in violation of conditions of PRCS and is reinstated on PRCS with no custody time ordered

23. Number of cases in which an offender on PRCS is found by the court in violation of conditions of PRCS, is reinstated on PRCS, and is ordered to serve custody time Include cases where an offender on PRCS is given credit for time served.

24. Number of cases in which an offender on PRCS is found by the court in violation of conditions of PRCS, is reinstated on PRCS, and is referred to a reentry court, pursuant to PC 3015 Report all cases in which an offender is referred to a reentry court, as defined in PC 3015, upon a PRCS violation (see PC 3455(a)(3)).

25. Number of cases in which an offender on PRCS is found by the court in violation of conditions of PRCS, and has the PRCS term permanently terminated.

VIOLATION/MODIFICATION OF PAROLE (After July 1, 2013)

26. Number of petitions filed or court motions made to revoke/modify parole Petition is defined as any filed instrument/document presented to the court that seeks revocation or modification of a defendant’s supervision status. This data element should also include cases where the court on its own motion seeks to modify or revoke supervision.

27. Number of warrants issued for persons on parole Include both arrest and bench warrants.

28. Number of calendar events set on petitions or court motions to revoke/modify parole A calendar event is defined as a court proceeding set in the course of a criminal matter.

29. Number of contested evidentiary hearings held on petitions or court motions to revoke/modify parole A contested evidentiary hearing is defined as a hearing where the factual basis of the petition is contested, and where the parties present oral or documentary evidence in support of or in opposition to the factual allegations of the petition. • Contested evidentiary hearings that extend over more than one day are counted as separate hearings

for each hearing day.

4

• Do not report contested evidentiary hearings that are not heard at all and are reset at the request of the parties or on the court’s motion. Count these instances under ‘Number of calendar events’ (data point #28).

30. Number of cases in which a parolee is found by the court in violation of conditions of parole and is reinstated on parole with no custody time ordered

31. Number of cases in which a parolee is found by the court in violation of conditions of parole, is reinstated on parole, and is ordered to serve custody time Include cases where a parolee is given credit for time served.

32. Number of cases in which a parolee is found by the court in violation of conditions of parole, is reinstated on parole, and is referred to a reentry court, pursuant to PC 3015 Report all cases in which an offender is referred to a reentry court, as defined in PC 3015, upon a parole violation (see PC 3000.08(f)(3)).

33. Number of cases in which a parolee is found by the court in violation of law or conditions of parole and is remanded to the custody of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and the jurisdiction of the Board of Parole Hearings for the purpose of future parole consideration PC 3000.08(h) states: “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in any case where Section 3000.1 or paragraph (4) of subdivision (b) of Section 3000 applies to a to a person who is on parole and the court determines that the person has committed a violation of law or violated his or her conditions of parole, the person on parole shall be remanded to the custody of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and the jurisdiction of the Board of Parole Hearings for the purpose of future parole consideration.”

Documents

JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF C - California Courts · HON. MARSHA G. SLOUGH Chair, Technology Committee Hon. Marla O. Anderson Hon. Brian John Back ... 2016. The data presented in the tables