Joint Position Paper to Improve the Implementation of the EPIRA

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 Joint Position Paper to Improve the Implementation of the EPIRA

    1/2

    Page 1 of 2

    Joint Position Paper to Improve the Implementation of theElectric Power Industry Reform Act (EPIRA)

    27 May 2014

    Amending or making changes in the Electric Power Industry Reform Act (EPIRA) orthe Republic Act No. 9136 will not solve the problems because EPIRA is not the problem,failure to implement it properly is.

    If EPIRA is sent back to Congress for review, the uncertainty it will introduce intothe regulatory regime of the power industry will lead to a potentially chaotic system, andworryingly put our future needs at risk at a time when our supply of power is marginal.Brownouts will be inevitable if we dont build new power plants. International and localinvestors and financial institutions wont invest in an industry where the rules are notknown and stable. The national government should announce now that EPIRA will not beamended, as amendment will not solve the present problem, and the government shouldincrease dialogue with industry participants to reduce key uncertainties or changingmaterial rules midstream.

    For instance, the basis for recent changes in the Wholesale Electricity Spot Market(WESM) prices was unclear. There were also changes in the rules, such as imposing acap (50%) on the level of output that a Retail Electricity Supplier (RES) can source from itsaffiliated power generators; and how to count maximum installed generation capacity,which now includes power controlled by RES and results in double counting. Theseshould not be done without full discussion.

    In view of the above, we urge the Department of Energy (DOE) to call a jointstakeholders meeting to address the following issues:

    1. Limits on open access2. Fiscal independence of the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC)3. A review of the WESM price cap4. What level of power distribution utilities should be required to contract on a

    continued basis5. How to better monitor and evaluate grid operations6. A review of the performance of electric cooperatives and how to improve it

    7. Studying the merits of demand side bidding in WESM and considering revisions tothe WESM rules

    8. Making the System Operator and Market Operator independent as a merged group

    Japanese

    Chamber ofCommerce and

    Industry of the

    Philippines, Inc.

  • 8/12/2019 Joint Position Paper to Improve the Implementation of the EPIRA

    2/2

    Page 2 of 2

    9. Deciding on what to do with the Malaya plant.10. Privatization of all power plants11. Looking for ways to improve bidding for new plants to encourage more participants,

    and reduce disputes.12. Review of the Transmission Development Plan13. A review of the taxes on the industry to consolidate them into a simpler system that

    may lead to lower prices

    This meeting should include reviewing the role of each entity involved in the powersector, whether it should retain the responsibilities it now has, whether these should bestrengthened, or amended or transferred elsewhere.

    Finally, we urge the national government to declare power plants as criticalinfrastructures or projects eligible for registration with the Philippine Economic ZoneAuthority (PEZA) to streamline acquisition of permits and approvals from all local andnational government agencies.

    We believe urgent attention to these and other issues is called for and we lookforward to working together with government towards an improved power sector.

    American Chamber of Commerce of the Philippines (AmCham)Employers Confederation of the Philippines (ECOP)

    European Chamber of Commerce of the Philippines (ECCP)Financial Executives Institute of the Philippines (FINEX)

    Japanese Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Philippines, Inc. (JCCIPI)Korean Chamber of Commerce of the Philippines (KCCP)

    Management Association of the Philippines (MAP)