Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Joanne L. Becker, MDChief, Laboratory Medicine,
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center
Adjunct faculty, Department of Pathology and Anatomic Science,
University of Buffalo School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences
Didactic Lectures to cover the curriculum • Staff
• Resident directed
Service
Technical• Validation
• QC
• PT
Clinical Correlation
Regulatory
Coding
Financial
Surprise
Fun
Joy
Suspense
Responsibility
Ownership
Curiosity
Problem
Ideas
KnowledgeLearning Issues
Course of Action
Increase motivation for self-directed learning by providing engagement in independent reading and research.
In a study of whether using PBL increases self-directed learning in residents, the finding was that they were very willing to report low levels of self-directed learning behaviors while a resident.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001; 155:669-672
Preparation for Life Long Learning
Format for approaching questions
Increased exposure to relationships
between departments, facilities, and
institutions
Cognitive load theory says that novice
learners require explicit instruction that
explains the targeted concepts and
procedures without a need for learners to
infer anything on their own.
PBL wants the learner to begin with their
knowledge, identify what is not known,
and develop new knowledge that can be
applied to the problem
In studies of medical students, those who
were involved in PBL curriculum had
higher meaningful learning experience
scores than those with a traditional
curriculum. Unfortunately, these scores
did not continue into the clerkship years
Academic Medicine 2001;76(10):S84-S86
PBL
Understand the Problem
• Meet the Problem
• Define the Problem Statement
Patients
Correlations
Technical Issues
Abnormal Values
Critical Values
New Requests
Understand the Problem
• Meet the Problem
• Define the Problem Statement
Explore
• Gather Information /Share Information
• Generate Solutions
Who
What
Where
When
Why
How
Understand the Problem
• Meet the Problem
• Define the Problem Statement
Explore
• Gather Information /Share Information
• Generate Solutions
Resolve the Problem
• Determine the Best Fit Solution
• Present the Solution
Statement of problem
Background
What they found out
How the problem was resolved
The same problem to an intern vs 4th year
resident should not have the same
presentation.
Ask questions for which an answer should
be known
AND
Ask questions which will require more
investigation to find an answer
Anything missed in analysis
Facts for board preparedness
Patient issues
Care team issues
Coordination issues
Regulatory issues
Always bring an
additional case or two
from the previous
week ….just in case.
Be prepared to say
that you don’t know.
Have fun
Thinking is good
Learning is a process
Providing education in
different ways means
that everyone will
learn something
somewhere.
Every Case Can Teach:
Problem Based Learning (PBL) and Entrustable
Professional Activities (EPA)
Objective #3: Define EPAs and create an EPA
Gay Wehrli, MD, MBA, MSEd
University of Virginia Health SystemMonday, October 15, 2018 at 0830-1000
BCEC 252AB
Faculty Disclosure(In compliance with ACCME policy, AABB requires the following disclosures to the session audience)
• Nothing to disclose
www.aabb.org 2
Acronyms and Definitions
• ACGME: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education
accrediting body for trainees
• CCC: Clinical Competency Committee
in-house committee
evaluates each trainee twice yearly on 6 core competencies set by ACGME
• EPA: Entrustable Professional Activity
documentable activity to evaluate competency in area of training
learner proficiency and educational outcomes
3
Background: We’ve come a long wayYear Advancement
1981 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)
1999 Six (6) General [Core] Competencies endorsed by ACGME & ABMS
2001 The Outcomes Project formally launched (start using competencies)
2009 ACGME approves structure of Next Accreditation System (NAS) including Milestones
2013 Seven (7) specialties enter NAS including Milestone reporting
2014 Remaining accredited specialties & subspecialties enter NAS, including Milestone reporting (& CCC)
2015 All specialties and subspecialties begin to report Milestones data
2017 College of American Pathology publishes Entrustable Professional Activities (EPA)
2018 AABB Annual Meeting presentation on EPA
Accessed 8/11/2018: https://www.acgme.org/What-We-Do/Accreditation/Milestones/ResourcesABMS: American Board of Medical Specialties CCC: Clinical Competency CommitteeSeven Specialties: EM, IM, Neuro Surgery, Ortho Surgery, Peds, Diagnostic Radiology, Urology
Competency Based Education (CBE)
• Outcomes focus
accountability without compensatory abilities
• Emphasize ability
synthesis of knowledge, skills, and attitudes
• Progression flexibility
de-emphasize time-based training
progression on abilities and performance
• Learner centeredness
engagement
www.aabb.org 51. ten Cate O. Entrustability of professional activities and competency-based training. Med Educ. 2005;39:1176-11772. Frank JR, Snell LS, Cate OT, et al. Competency-based medical education: theory to practice. Med Teach. 2010;32:638-645.
COMPETENCY
Entrustable Professional Activity• Faculty & staff observe and evaluate trainee
Milestones• Set by ACGME Committee • Observable steps on continuum of clinical, professional development• Skills and knowledge development• Behaviors, attributes, or outcomes demonstrated• Benchmarks with feedback
ACGME Six Core Competencies• Across all ACGME-accredited programs
MILESTONEMILESTONE
MILESTONE
MILESTONE
MILESTONE
Let’s get Competent
EPAEPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
6
ACGME 6 Core Competencies and the CCC
Patient Care
(PC 1-7)
Practice-based Learning &
Improvement
(PBLI 1-2)
Medical Knowledge
(MK 1-3)
Professionalism
(PROF 1-6)
Systems-based Practice
(SBP 1-7)
Interpersonal & Communication
Skills
(ICS 1-2)
1. PC = Patient Care
2. MK = Medical Knowledge
3. SBP = Systems-based Practice
4. PBLI = Practice-based Learning & Improvement
5. PROF = Professionalism
6. ICS = Interpersonal & Communication Skills
7
• Milestones• EPAs• Evaluations• Observation• In-services
CCC
PC1: Consultation: Analyzes, appraises, formulates, generates, and effectively reports consultation (AP and CP) Has not
Achieved Level 1
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Understands the implications of and the need for a consultation
Observes and assists in the consultation
Understands the concept of a critical value and the read-back procedure
Understands and applies Electronic Medical Record (EMR) to obtain added clinical information
Understands that advanced precision diagnostics and personalized medicine (e.g., molecular diagnostic testing) may be applied to patient care for genetic, neoplastic and infectious disorders, and population health
Prepares a draft consultative report (verbal or written)
Performs timely, clinically useful consultation for requests for products or additional testing
Understands rationale for the critical value list
Knows the critical value list and participates in the critical value call-back of results
Understands the importance of accurate, timely, and complete reporting of laboratory test results
Understands the role of specific advanced precision diagnostics and personalized medicine assays, and how results affect patient diagnosis and prognosis, and overall patient care
Prepares a full consultative report with a written opinion for common diseases
Prioritizes and presents patient care issues for report after call
Answers routine pathology questions, drawing upon appropriate resources
Applies the escalation procedure for failed critical value call-backs
Effectively communicates preliminary results on cases in progress
Understands pre-analytic issues and quality control for advanced precision diagnostics and personalized medicine
Independently prepares a full consultative written report with comprehensive review of medical records on common and uncommon diseases
Runs report conference after call
Develops a portfolio of clinical consultation experience Recommends new or alternate escalation procedures for failed critical value call-backs as needed
Suggests evidence-based management, prognosis, and therapeutic recommendations based on the consultation
Provides consultation, as needed, to clinicians about utilization and interpretation of advanced precision diagnostics and personalized medicine
Proficient in pathology consultations with comprehensive review of medical records
Demonstrates an expanded portfolio of clinical and patient care experience with pathology consultation
Participates in intuitional processes of generating the critical value list
Is proficient in consultation regarding test utilization and treatment decisions based on advanced precision diagnostics and personalized medicine
Comments:
Suggested Evaluation Methods: Direct observation, Retrospective peer review, Portfolio, Feedback from clinical colleagues (360 evaluations), Peer review, HIPAA training documentation provided
Milestone:Applies EMR
Sub-competency PC1: Consultation
Developmental Progression Levels 1-5:
Sets of Milestones
Core Competency: PC = Patient Care
8https://www.acgme.org/Specialties/Milestones/pfcatid/17undefined/Specialties Accessed 8/21/2018
Why Create Entrustable Professional Activities?
• Resident comfort level with:
Daytime coverage
Night & weekend coverage
• Do we know?
www.aabb.org 9
Resident Comfort Level Covering the BBTMS
Daytime Comfort LevelN = 14 (PGY2-4)
Extremely Confident Very Confident Slightly Confident Not at all confident
Taking call for BBTMS 0 8 (57.1%) 6 (42.9%) 0
Taking a TxRx call 2 (14.3%) 5 (35.7%) 5 (35.7%) 2 (14.3%)
Calling BBTMS Attending 2 (14.3%) 9 (64.3%) 3 (21.4%) 0
UVA IRB for Health Sciences Research BBTMS = Blood Bank and Transfusion Medicine Services TxRx = Transfusion Reaction
Night/Weekend Comfort LevelN = 8 (PGY3-4)
Extremely Confident Very Confident Slightly Confident Not at all confident
Taking call for BBTMS 0 6 (75.0%) 2 (25.0%) 0
Taking a TxRx call 1 (12.5%) 6 (75.0%) 1 (12.5%) 0
Calling BBTMS Attending 1 (12.5%) 3 (37.5%) 4 (50.0%) 0
10
• PGY1-4 Residents Surveyed
• Responses from 18 of 21 (85.7%)
CAP: EPAs for Clinical Pathology
1. Compose a diagnostic report for clinical laboratory testing
requiring pathologist interpretation
2. Evaluate and report adverse events involving the transfusion of
blood components
3. Evaluate and report critical values in the clinical laboratory
4. Perform other procedures (e.g., bone marrow aspiration and
biopsy, apheresis)
McCloskey CB, Domen RE, Conran RM, et al. Entrustable Professional Activities for Pathology: Recommendations From the CAP GME Committee. Academic Pathology. 2017;4:1-9. Supplementary Materials: EntrustableProfessional Activities (EPAs) for Pathology GME: Recommendations from the CAP GME Committee.
12
CAP EPA: Evaluate and report adverse events involving the transfusion of
blood components (CP)
Description& Tasks
Pathologists are able to diagnose and manage adverse reactions related to blood component transfusion.Knowledge and skills required include the ability to:1. Provide direction for laboratory evaluation of adverse reaction related to blood component transfusion2. Assess and evaluate patient clinical history, signs and symptoms, radiology findings, and laboratory testing to
determine the cause of the adverse reaction3. Provide recommendations for treatment interventions to manage adverse reactions if indicated4. Compose a written report documenting the adverse event and workup, classifying the reaction, providing guidance
for additional transfusions, and documenting communication with clinical providers regarding the adverse reaction5. Effectively communicate handoff information for unresolved issues (e.g., pending testing) with fellow pathologists,
clinicians, or laboratory technologists6. Determine the need to report adverse events to the appropriate regulatory authority
Relevant CoreCompetencies& Milestones
1. Patient Care: PC1, PC22. Medical Knowledge: MK1, MK23. Systems‐based Practice: SBP1, SBP24. Practice‐based Learning & Improvement: PBLI15. Professionalism: PROF2, PROF3, PROF56. Interpersonal & Communication Skills: ICS1, ICS2
AssessmentMethods
1. Direct observation2. Record review of written reports/chart audits3. Portfolio
13
Developing the University of Virginia EPA for
Transfusion Reactions (TxRx)
• Develop an Acute TxRx intake form
• Develop the TxRx EPA process and form
• One hour didactic lecture introducing the above
• Response from residents
14
15BBTMS = Blood Bank and Transfusion Medicine Services
Acute Transfusion Reaction (TxRx) Intake Form
Acute Transfusion
Reaction (TxRx)
Intake Form
BBTMS = Blood Bank and Transfusion Medicine Services
EPA: Transfusion Reactions
BBTMS = Blood Bank and Transfusion Medicine Services
17
EPA: Transfusion Reactions
EPA #1 for Transfusion Reactions (to be completed during PGY 1 block)ACGME
Competency Present all of the following to the attending
o Obtain transfusion reaction history from clinical team ordering the transfusion reaction work-up (e.g., physician, LIP or nurse)
o Review clinical history and BBTM historyo Create initial differential diagnosis including why or why not each diagnosis is in the
differential
PC2 & MK1
Communicate to the primary team additional testing needed (e.g., Chest x-ray, blood cultures, urinalysis, BNP, etc)
ICS1 & ICS2
Communicate to the BBTM staff additional testing needed (e.g., culture unit) ICS1 & ICS2 Complete and fax to VBS/ARC an initial transfusion reaction report (e.g., TRALI, septic
reaction)ICS1 & ICS2
Initiate Beaker transfusion reaction report and send to attending for initial review SBP7
Observe a transfusion reaction work-up with the BBTMS technologist (including clerical check, serologic testing, documentation in Sunquest and on BB: 67 form and additional work such as ordering culture and/or VBS/ARC notification)
SBP6, ICS1 &ICS2
18
EPA: Transfusion Reactions
EPA #2 for Transfusion Reactions (to be completed during PGY 1 block or PGY 2 first block)
ACGME Competency
Present all of the following to the attendingo Review the BBTMS’s Transfusion Reaction Evaluation Form (BB: 67), after completed by
the BBTMS technologists (including all line items on the form)o Review 24-hour clinical history post-transfusion reaction o Refine differential diagnosis including how to rule in or out each differential
PC2
Communicate to the primary team additional testing needed ICS1 & ICS2
Communicate to the BBTM staff additional testing needed ICS1 & ICS2
Update Beaker transfusion reaction report and pend final to attending for review and sign-off
SBP7
Fax to VBS/ARC the final verify transfusion reaction report ICS2 & ICS2
19
EPA: Transfusion Reactions
EPA#3 for Transfusion Reactions(to be completed prior to taking overnight CP/LM call)
ACGME Competency
Independently perform an entire transfusion reaction review and complete the report in Beaker. Send to the attending for review and final verify sign-off.
PC2 & SBP7
20
EPA: Transfusion Reactions
Supporting Documents for Review and Guidance
1. Primer on transfusion reactions
2. Transfusion reaction report templates PDF
3. Writing a transfusion TxRx report in Epic Beaker: BBTM Reporting Basics
4. More about transfusion reactions: UVA Clinical Practice Guidelines for Transfusion (Transfusion Guidelines desktop icon)
5. Blood Center transfusion reaction forms
6. Acute TxRx Intake Form
7. Paradigm, Blood Bank SOP F29: Evaluation of Adverse Reaction to Blood Transfusion
8. Blood Bank BB:067 – Transfusion Reaction Evaluation Form
BBTMS = Blood Bank and Transfusion Medicine Services21
www.aabb.org 22
EPA Bystander Effect:
Transfusion Reaction Order Set
Summary
• EPAs will effectively ensure trainees achieve desired outcomes on
their pathway to become independent professionals
• EPAs are an objective method for evaluating progression and
achievement
Everyone evaluated with the same criteria
Alleviate evaluator bias
• Plan ahead! EPAs will take time to create and implement.
Stay tuned for updates from the UVA experience
www.aabb.org 23
www.aabb.org 24
What’s next in the alphabet soup of education?
Every Case Can Teach: Problem Based
Learning and Entrustable Professional
Activities
10/15/2018
Faculty Disclosures
The following faculty have no
relevant financial relationships
to disclose:
– Joanne Becker MD
– Gay Wehrli MD, MBA,
MSEd
The following faculty have a
relevant financial relationship:
– Laura Cooling MD, MS
Ortho Clinical
Diagnostics:
Consultant
www.aabb.org 2
Learning Objectives
• Describe the problem based learning models and list
learner skills attained through PBL
• Propose real-life examples for integrating PBL into a
resident rotations
• Define entrustable professional activities (EPA) and
create an EPA
www.aabb.org 3
EVERY CASE CAN TEACH! PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING & ENTRUSTABLE PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES
DIRECTOR: JOANNE BECKER
AABB 2018 ANNUAL MEETING
HOW MEDICAL STUDENTS MADE ME FLIP
Laura Cooling MD, MS
Professor, Pathology
Michigan Medicine
University of Michigan
CONFLICTS
Past consultant for Ortho Clinical Diagnostics
I am a student (not an expert) on medical education
LECTURE OUTLINE
Brief, broad overview of active and problem-based learning (PBL)
Flipped PBL classroom model
Experience of PBL-teaching in the new medical school curriculum
Pre-work
Classroom PBL
Identifying student weaknesses
CHALLENGES IN MEDICAL TEACHING
Expert vs Novice Learning
Passive vs Active Learning
Superficial vs Deep Learning
PROGRESSION IN MEDICAL COMPETENCY DURING GME
NOVICE ADVANCED BEGINNER COMPETENT EXPERT PROFICIENT
PATHOLOGY RESIDENCY
FELLOWSHIP
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
4TH Year
EXPERT VS NOVICE LEARNING
https://www.searlesgraphics.com/technology/database-design
EXPERT
Broad Foundation
• Knowledge
• Experience
• Problem-Solving
Clinically proficient
Holistic perspective
Recognize deviations (exceptions of the rule)
Excellent problem-solving
• Experience & pattern recognition
Practice skills
EXPERT PROBLEM-SOLVING
Forward or Linear Reasoning Skills
chief complaint
positive symptoms
negative symptoms
physical exam
laboratory studies
other studies
Possible Diagnosis
Possible Diagnosis
Possible Diagnosis
Possible Diagnosis
More diagnostic studies
FACTS
Diagnosis
ANSWER
NOVICE LEARNING
NOVICE
Foundation Under Construction
• Gathering material
• Learning how things ‘connect’
Know little of the subject
Little situational perception
Narrow focus
Rigid adherence to rules
NOVICE PROBLEM-SOLVING IS BACKWORD REASONING
https://www.dfir.training/dfir-training-categories-k2/item/124-stop-forcing-the-square-dfir-peg-into-the-round-hole
Disease
symptoms
physical findings
laboratory studies
history
radiology
Diagnosis
What fits for this disease
• History
• Symptoms
• Physical findings
• Laboratories
• Radiology
TRADITIONAL CLASSROOM
Instructor
Content expert
Broad foundational
knowledge base
Material is taught in linear fashion
LEARNING CONCEPTS
Expert vs Novice Learning
Passive vs Active Learning
Superficial vs Deep Learning
PROBLEM BASED LEARNING: ACTIVE VS PASSIVE LEARNING
Passive Learning
Teacher-centric
Teacher Student
Superficial learning
Rote memorization
IMPACT ON LEARNING, RETENTION AND COMPETENCY
https://www.t1v.com/blog/active-learning-vs-passive-learning-and-the-differences-in-classroom-technology/
DEEP LEARNING : ACTIVE LEARNING
Deep Learning: Genuine understanding of the topic
Goals for students:
Engage with topic
Elaborate on the topic
Relate the topic to the other ideas (analogy)
IMPACT ON LEARNING, RETENTION AND COMPETENCY
https://www.t1v.com/blog/active-learning-vs-passive-learning-and-the-differences-in-classroom-technology/
ACTIVE LEARNING: DEEP LEARNING
Simple Methods
Complex Methods
University of Michigan Center on Learning and Teaching (CRLT)
Problem – based
learning
WHAT IS PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL)
“The best way of learning about anything is by doing” Richard Branson
PBL Guiding Principles
Adult Learning Theory
Learning builds on prior knowledge / personal experience
Applicable to life / work
Self-directed
Problem-solving
Active learning
PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING: ACTIVE LEARNING
Instructor
facilitator and
coach
Student-centric
Problem-based learning• Problem-solving
• Self-directed learning
• Peer – peer instruction
• Conflict of opinion
• Idea exchange
• Self-correction
• Communication skills
PROBLEM – BASED LEARNING IS DEEP LEARNING
DEEP LEARNING TECHNIQUES
Good questions
Analogy
Construct Mechanism / Concept Maps
Apply knowledge to new problems
Critical Thinking Skills
Peer - Peer Teaching
Feedback
Learn by doing
Practice of cognitive skills
PROBLEM – BASED LEARNING
Problem-solving
Self-directed learning
Peer – peer instruction
Idea exchange
Conflict of opinion
Self-correction
Communication skills
PBL IN MEDICAL EDUCATIONBASIC SCIENCE
Anatomy
Physiology
Pathology
CLINICAL
SCIENCE
Problem – Based Case
“virtual practice experience”
BASIC SCIENCE
Anatomy
Physiology
Pathology
CLINICAL
SCIENCEConcept Integration
Feedback Loop
• Re-inforce concepts
• New Knowledge
Pattern Recognition
• Improved recall facts
• Problem-solving skills
Two 1 hour
didactic lectures
ABO + blood components
Adverse reactions
1.5 hoursSame content
Historically 2016 2017
1 hour
2018
1 hour
M1+M2 year
(13 months total)
Transition to new curriculum
WHEN NECESSITY SPEAKS, IT DEMANDS
RUSSIAN PROVERB
FIRST REACTION WAS…..FRUSTRATION (#$%&*)
CONSIDERED SEVERAL OPTIONS……..
http://luciaandcompany.blogspot.com/2007/10/stressed-out-maxine.html
I DECIDED TO JOIN THE “FLIPPERS”
“It’s called flipping, and it almost ought to be illegal.”Donald J Trump
The New York Times
FLIPPED CLASSROOM
Didactic
Lecture
Homework
Traditional
ClassroomVideo Lecture
+/- Pre-work
Homework
Flipped
Classroom
Faculty available
Flipped Classroom Strengths
• Self-paced, personalized study
• Active learning
• Longer engagement
• Personal responsibility
The Post-Lecture Classroom: How Will Students Fare?
A new study finds moderate student gains in courses where lectures take place at home and
"homework" happens in the classroom. Robinson Meyer 9/13/2013
The Atlantic
https://www.natcom.org/communication-
currents/making-sense-students%E2%80%99-
complaints-criticisms-and-protests
The Post-Lecture Classroom: How Will Students Fare?
A new study finds moderate student gains in courses where lectures take place at home and
"homework" happens in the classroom. Robinson Meyer 9/13/2013
The Atlantic
Observational Study
University of North Carolina
Required Foundational Pharmacy Course
Historical Cohort (2011) Flipped Classroom (2012, 2013)
Homework: Textbook readings Pre-Work: Video lecture
Study questions Textbook readings
Classroom: Traditional Lectures Classroom: audience response quizzes
+ “Paired Learning” problems (2013)
5.1% increase in final exam scores using flipped classroom
FLIPPED CLASSROOM IN OPTHALOMOLOGYTANG F, ET AL: RANDOMIZED COMPARISON BETWEEN FLIPPED AND LECTURE BASED CLASSROOM
Traditional Lecture Based Instruction
2 hour didactic lecture on Ocular Trauma
30 minute question & answer
Post-class homework assignment
Due one week post-lecture
Flipped Classroom Instruction
On-line video lecture on Ocular Trauma
Pre-class homework assignment
Small group project
10 minute powerpoint presentation
Major points lecture
Specific clinical question
Classroom
10 minute summary of material by instructor
Student presentations with discussion
Wrap-up summary by instructor
Student Impression / Self - Assessment Traditional Flipped P
Course improved my motivation to learn 15% 71% 0.012
Course helped my understanding of the material 26% 51% 0.03
Course helpful for the final exam 14% 49% 0.001
The course improved my clinical thinking ability 26% 71% 0.05
I like this teaching method 43% 56% 0.25
I am satisfied with the course 51% 56% 0.61
This course is too much of a burden 6% 24% 0.007
This course takes too much time 7% 20% 0.17
FLIPPED CLASSROOM IN OPTHALOMOLOGYTANG F, ET AL: RANDOMIZED COMPARISON BETWEEN FLIPPED AND LECTURE BASED CLASSROOM
>3.5 hours pre-work
FLIPPING TRANSFUSION MEDICINE
Flipping Transfusion Medicine
a Winning idea
https://www.businessinsider.com/mcdonalds-flips-arches-upside-down-2018-3
MY FLIPPED CLASSROOM
Pre-Work (homework)
Video podcast lectures
Patient case scenarios
Open-ended questions
Step-wise progression
Patient assessment
Transfusion need, order
Evaluation transfusion reaction
Classroom teaching
3 patient cases
Multiple choice questions
Facilitated class discussion
Q & A
“pearls”
MY FLIPPED CLASSROOM: HOMEWORK
10 – 20 minutes each
Narrated
Animation where possible
Case-based examples
YouTube video links (end)
‘Pearls’
Specimen requirements
Turn-around times
Podcast Topics
ABO/Rh typing
Antibody screen, identification, DAT
Blood product overview
Blood product indications
Adverse Events to Transfusion (1&2)
Part 1) Hemolytic reactions
Part 2) Nonhemolytic and TTD
STRESSED MAKING SHORT, FOCUSED LECTURES
20 minute maximum
Step 1: RBC Grouping1. Washed, patient RBC
2. Commercial anti-A and anti-B reagents
3. RBC agglutination (Hemagglutination)
Patient RBC
Anti-A Anti-B
centrifugationHemagglutination
Example 1
Anti-A Anti-B
RBC Grouping (Forward Type)
0 0Agglutination
Score
RBC are negative for: • Group A antigen• Group B antigen
Blood Group O
Plasma Grouping (Reverse Type)
+ +
Plasma is positive for:• Anti-A antibody• Anti-B antibody
Blood Group O
A RBC B RBC
Agree
VALID Group O Blood Type
Long or IAT crossmatch
Donor RBCABO/Rh-compatibleNegative for minor RBC antigen
Patient Plasma
Incubation
37C
Wash x 3
centrifuge
Anti-human IgG
Centrifuge
Crossmatch
Incompatible
Compatible
Suitable for transfusion
MY FLIPPED CLASSROOM: HOMEWORK
Podcast Topics
ABO/Rh typing
Antibody screen, identification,
DAT
Blood product overview
Blood product indications
Adverse Events to Transfusion (1&2)
Part 1) Hemolytic reactions
Part 2) Nonhemolytic and TTD
Foundation Concepts
• ABO type
• ABO compatibility
ABO/Rh Typing
Blood Components
Transfusion Indications
PRE-WORK CLINICAL CASES
THE SESSION WILL COVER 3 PATIENTS WITH TRANSFUSION NEEDS AND
COMPLICATIONS. THE FORMAT IS TO EMPHASIZE THAT TRANSFUSION IS A
MULTI-STEP PROCESS THAT REQUIRES MEDICAL DECISION MAKING,
LABORATORY INTERPRETATION AND RISKS. THE CASES WILL GIVE A SERIES
OF CLINICAL AND LABORATORY DATA, FOLLOWED BY OPEN ENDED
QUESTION TO CONSIDER.
Topic review/competence:
ABO interpretation
ABO compatibility
Anticoagulation lectures
Pre-Work Example: Case with open ended questions
Case 2 Continued
Topic review
ABO
T&S
Sample labeling (WBIT)
CLASS INSTRUCTION
1st year
Prework
6 podcast lectures
3 multi-part cases
Classroom
Audience response technology
Optional class attendance
Lecture videotaped
Pro’s
Concentrated learning with podcasts
Spontaneous peer-peer and work groups
Disparate answers-> teaching opportunities
Discussion between students and faculty
Overall positive feedback from students
Con’s
Attendance low (33, better than most classes)
Inconsistent wifi for ART
ART prolonged lecture
• 2 cases (60’)
• 3 cases (90’)
Student complaints “time to prepare”
CLASS INSTRUCTION
2016-17
M2 year
Prework
6 podcast lectures
3 multi-part cases
Classroom
Audience response technology
Optional class attendance
Lecture videotaped
Hematology sequence
• Removed 2.5 days!
• Reduce content
• Deletion lectures
2017-18
M1 year
Prework
6 podcast lectures
3 multi-part cases
Classroom
LOST the ART presentation!!
(digital purgatory)
Old school powerpoint
Volunteer student
Optional class attendance
Freebies to participants
2018-19
M1 year
CLASS INSTRUCTION
2016
M2 year
Pre-work
6 podcast lectures
3 multi-part cases
Classroom
Audience response technology
Optional class attendance
Lecture videotaped
Hematology sequence
• Removed 2.5 days!
• Reduce content
• Deletion lectures
2017
M2 year
Pre-work
6 podcast lectures
3 multi-part cases
2018
M1 year
Pre-work
4 podcast lectures
• ABO/Rh
• Antibody screen, ID, DAT
• Blood Products
• Transfusion Indications
Removed Adverse Events
Clinical Case Studies
3 new clinical cases
1 extra credit case
Transition Legacy Class New Curriculum
Classroom
Powerpoint / student discussion
New
Option to upload pre-work online
Graded/student feedback
Identify/discuss problems
Old Curriculum
June 2018: Questions on Medical School Site
Student Responses: 3 options
Type in the site
Upload word document
Scan document
Upload pdf
Pre-Work Evaluation 179 students = 19 hours
Student/faculty chat room
STUDENT PRE-WORK
Identified areas for further discussion
ABO interpretation
Irradiation
Type and Screen specimen
Specimen labeling / WBIT
Review coagulation lectures (xtra credit case)
ABO INTERPRETATIONS
Cutting corners with pre-work
ABO INTERPRETATIONS
1) Trying to cut corners with pre-work
2) Confusion how you can test both RBC and plasma
a. Didn’t appreciate samples are centrifuged
b. Add a slide to ABO and ABID podcasts
IRRADIATION
Irradiation for RA common theme
Stated Logic/reasons:
• Autoimmune disease
• Immunosuppressive medications
• Old age (!)
Student Answer
Over 50% of the class got irradiation correct:
T&S AND SPECIMEN LABELING
75% - T&S before every surgery
25% - correct answer, > 3 days
Case 2 (2 parts / 6 questions
T&S AND SPECIMEN LABELINGCase 2 (2 parts / 6 questions )
Audience Participation:
What is the ABO on sample 1
What is the ABO on sample 2
What happened: WBIT
SPECIMEN LABELING: STUDENT ANSWERS
50-60% Sample / Labeling error
Laboratory (most frequent)
Mixed up the samples in the lab
Testing error
Mislabeled sample
Educational Opportunity
SPECIMEN LABELING: STUDENT ANSWERS
50-60% Sample / Labeling error
25% (“you can’t make this s#$t up” J. Becker)
ABO-incompatible bone marrow transplant (?!)
POTENTIAL WEAKNESS OF PEER – PEER TEACHING
LC: How much time did GY spend on BMT, let alone ABOi-BMT?
Laura, they haven’t had any lectures on leukemia yet. :AA
Peer – Peer Teaching GONE WRONG
https://www.theifod.com/do-lemmings-really-engage-in-mass-suicide/
NEW CURRICULUM:
MORE THAN 1 BITE OF THE APPLE
M1 year
Hematology Sequence
Introduction to Clerkships
‘Fatigue’ PBL small group
Mandatory attendance
Patient H&P
Workup of anemia
DX: WAIHA
• Review DAT, IAT
• Add eluate findings
• Treatment WAIHA
• Transfusion triggers
Surgery Rotation (3 mo)
• 1 week pathology
• Blood bank
• 3 hr small group / week
Pre-work
• Review podcasts 1-4
• Adverse events 1+2
• Video blood administration
Class: 3-4 PBL cases
Tour of blood bank & apheresis
M2 year (old M3 year)
M3/M4 YEARS: SELECT DIAGNOSTIC
PATHWAY (INCLUDES PATHOLOGY, RADIOLOGY, PHARMACOLOGY)
We are here
Curriculum in progress
THANK - YOU