20
Jianchun Wang Marina Artuso Syracuse University 11/06/00 MC Simulation of Silicon Pixel Detector

Jianchun Wang Marina Artuso Syracuse University 11/06/00 MC Simulation of Silicon Pixel Detector

  • View
    248

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Jianchun WangMarina Artuso

Syracuse University11/06/00

MC Simulation ofSilicon Pixel Detector

Jianchun (JC) WangSyracuse University 2

Readout Signal Simulation

e

Track

E

Energy deposition by charged track along its path length, and production of electron/hole pairs

Electron clouds drifting towards readout pixel in electric field (corresponding to doping and bias voltage applied)

Electron cloud spread due to diffusion

Magnetic field deflection (our sensors will be in dipole field of 1.6 T)

Realistic front end electronics (noise, threshold, digitization accuracy)

Jianchun (JC) WangSyracuse University 3

Energy Deposition

Density effect:

At high , radiative losses need to be considered (+7%)

Thin material (280m silicon): = 5.0 keV, / I0 = 29

22

max222

e2

2e

2eAv 2

I

Tcm2ln

1

A

ZcmrN2

dx

dE

227 GeV/c x

1

A

ZcmrN2

22

e2eAv

Jianchun (JC) WangSyracuse University 4

Production of -ray

Number of -ray: <N> 0.5 (Tcut=10 keV, d=280 m)

Kinetic energy according to dN/dT

Polar angle is calculated

Azimuthal angle generated isotropically

max

222

2e

2eAv T

T1

T

11

A

ZcmrN2

dxdT

dN

max

emax

e

2

T

m2T

m2T

Tcos

Jianchun (JC) WangSyracuse University 5

Ionization of -ray

The -ray range is calculated The length of -ray Survival probability function Ionization uniformly -ray escape (only 1/4 of energy collected)

Jianchun (JC) WangSyracuse University 6

Excitation and Ionization

Urbán model (thin material: /I = 29 for 280m silicon) Excitations: E1 E2 Ionization: E3

Cross-sections

dE/dx: C· (1r) for excitation and C·r for ionization

max3

233

212

f1f21

22

EEI,E/1)E(g

f1f,Z2f,EIE

eVZ10E12

)1I/Eln()EI(I

ErC

)I/m2ln(

)E/m2ln(

E

f)r1(C

maxmax

max3

222

2i

22

i

ii

Jianchun (JC) WangSyracuse University 7

Total Charge

Total Charge (ke)

Landau function

Jianchun (JC) WangSyracuse University 8

Electric Field

2D

Z d

V)dZ2(

d

VE

n+

n

p+

-V

0 V

EZ

Z

n+ on n

p+ on n

p+

n

n+

+V

0 V

Jianchun (JC) WangSyracuse University 9

Mobility

T = 300 K

1

C0 E

E1

66.0n

55.1nC

242.2

n0

300

T109.1

m/V300

T698.0E

nsV/m300

T3.153

Vapplied = 140 VVdepletion = 85 V

d = 280 m

Jianchun (JC) WangSyracuse University 10

Magnetic Field

ZZYYXXZ eBeBeBB,eEE

hole72.0

electron15.1EE

B1

B1V {Heff22

H

2Z

2H

Z

2Z

2H

XH2HZY

Y2Z

2H

YH2HZX

X B1

BBBtan

B1

BBBtan

Jianchun (JC) WangSyracuse University 11

Charge Cloud Spread

• Radius of ionization trail:

R = hc / I (~2m)

• Diffusion:

D = kT/ q, X = Y = sqrt(2Dt)

Jianchun (JC) WangSyracuse University 12

Electronics

• Noise (preamplifier, ADC)

• Non-uniform threshold

• Gain uncertainty

• ADC precision

Jianchun (JC) WangSyracuse University 13

Cluster Algorithm

• Similar as test beam offline analysis

• Plan: study overlapped cluster

• This might also improve the resolution by reducing the effect of -ray

Jianchun (JC) WangSyracuse University 14

Charge Sharing

FPIX0 CiS p-stop Qth = 2500 e

Vbias= 140V Vdepl= 85V Angle Size

0 .665 .311 .012 .006 .006

5 .452 .518 .016 .006 .008

10 .099 .857 .028 .007 .009

15 .001 .658 .320 .010 .011

20 .000 .221 .746 .019 .014

30 .000 .000 .185 .775 .040

Angle Size

0 .684 .300 .009 .004 .003

5 .436 .547 .010 .004 .003

10 .087 .886 .017 .005 .005

15 .000 .676 .312 .006 .006

20 .000 .229 .754 .010 .007

30 .000 .000 .279 .704 .017

Sim

ulat

ion

Mea

sure

men

t

Fraction of Cluster (row) size

Jianchun (JC) WangSyracuse University 15

Large Size Cluster

Simulation has less large size cluster than

measurement

Source ?

FPIX0-pstop

Jianchun (JC) WangSyracuse University 16

Charge Sharing

FPIX1 Seiko p-stop Qth = 3780 e

Vbias= 75V Vdepl= 45V

Angle Size

0 .636 .346 .009 .004 .005

5 .456 .525 .011 .004 .004

10 .135 .838 .017 .005 .005

15 .002 .736 .250 .006 .006

20 .000 .328 .654 .010 .008

30 .001 .002 .320 .657 .020

Sim

ulat

ion

Angle Size

0 .660 .311 .016 .006 .007

5 .482 .486 .018 .007 .007

10 .183 .771 .028 .008 .009

15 .012 .756 .211 .010 .011

20 .006 .379 .582 .018 .015

30 .006 .011 .393 .558 .032

Mea

sure

men

t

Fraction of Cluster (row) size

Jianchun (JC) WangSyracuse University 17

Reconstruction

Linear correction applied

Xresidual = Xtrack - Xrecon

leftright

leftright

QQ

QQ

Jianchun (JC) WangSyracuse University 18

Resolution vs angle

No track projection error subtracted from the measurement Resolution distribution agrees with simulation Binary resolution degraded from 8-bit ADC

FPIX0 p-stop FPIX1 p-stop

Jianchun (JC) WangSyracuse University 19

Summary

• New version simulation program works quite well

• There are not much can be tuned

• Plug the code into BTeV simulation

• Two approaches need to be evaluated– Use GEANT simulation in energy deposition– Use the energy deposition simulation of this

program

Jianchun (JC) WangSyracuse University 20

Beam Test Track Angle

Angle( )

FPIX0p-stop

FPIX0p-spray

FPIX1p-stop

FPIX1p-spray

0 0.25 0.00 0.02 N/A5 6.00 5.33 5.42 5.33

10 10.99 10.24 10.49 10.2715 15.88 16.64 15.40 15.1920 21.06 21.57 20.40 N/A30 30.37 31.48 30.42 N/A

Precision of the alignment is about 0.1 (i.e. Four runs of FPIX1 P-spray at 15: 15.16, 15.22, 15.25, 15.16)