Upload
vanbao
View
213
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
LowTemperatureCracking• DevelopmentofSuperPave– OriginalMnROADTestSections(PG64-22,PG58-28)– 1999MnROADTestCells(PG58-28,PG58-34,PG58-40)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Line
ar F
eet
Cell 1Cell 2Cell 3Cell 4Cell 14Cell 15Cell 16Cell 17Cell 18Cell 19Cell 20Cell 21Cell 22Cell 23
= 5 Year (PG 58-28)= 10 Year (PG 64-22)= 10 Year (PG 58-28)
February 2, 1996-39.4 F
NationalPavementPreservationStudy
RP185.3
RumRiverBridgeRP189.9
US-169HighVolume
Road4milesection
CSAH8LowVolumeRoad2.5milesection
MilleLacsCounty
MnROAD
Pease
13
NorthernHighTrafficPreservationonUS-169
28 Control
27 Thinlay Overlay (ABR over Chip Seal (FA 2.5))
26 Thinlay Overlay (ABR)
25 Thinlay Overlay (HiMA)
24 Ultra Thin Bonded Wearing Coarse N23 Thinlay Overlay (Virgin)
22 Thinlay Overlay (ABR with Delta S) starts 1/2 mile from US-169
CSAH - 8 (WB) 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22
CSAH - 8 (EB) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
21 Control
20 Control - Low IRI
19 Convensional Fog Seal
18 Control
17 Rejuvenating Fog Seal
16 Control
15 Control
14 Control
13 Scrub Seal (FA 2.5)
12 Microsurfacing (Type II) over Scrub Seal (FA 2.5)
11 Microsurfacing (Type II) over Fibermat Chip Seal (FA 2.5)
10 Fibermat Chip Seal (FA 2.5)
9 Double Microsurfacing (Type II over Type II)
8 Microsurfacing (Type II w ith fibers))
7
6 Microsurfacing (Type-II) over Single Chip Seal (FA 2.5)
5 Triple Chip Seal (FA 2 over FA 2.5 over CA-50/70)
4 Double Chip Seal (FA 2 over FA 2.5)
3 Single Chip Seal (FA 2.5)
2 Construcited - 2010 Construcited - 2010
1 Crack Seal / Transverse Mastic Treatments - August 2016 Treatments - August 2016
0 Control - High IRI ABR - Asphalt Binderr Replacement
Pass
ing
Driv
ing
City
of M
ilaca
--->
(4 m
iles
Nor
th)
Rejovenating Fog Seal w
ith black diamond dust
Conventional Fog Seal w
ith black diamond dust
Microsurfacing (Type II) over crack seal and Transverse M
astic
Microsurfacing (Type III) over Scrub Seal (FA
2.5)
Microsurfacing (Type III) over Fiberm
at Chip Seal (FA
2.5)
US-169Northbound
CSAH-8
Open
MP 185.3
MP 186
MP 187
Double C
hip Seal (FA 2 over FA
2.5)
City
of P
ease
Microsurfacing (Type-III) over Single C
hip Seal (FA 2.5)
Single Chip Seal (FA
2.5) over Crack Seal / Transverse M
astic
Triple Chip Seal (FA
2 over FA 2.5 over C
A-70)
MP 188
Single Chip Seal (FA2.5) over Crack Seal / Transverse Mastic
Microsurfacing (Type II) over Crack Seal / Transverse Mastic
1/10 mille Test Sections
TrafficLayers7.5" HMAPG58-28
12" Granular
Base
Clay Subgrade
400 ADT
Double M
icrosurfacing (Type II over Type II)
Fibermat C
hip Seal (FA 2.5)
Scrub Seal (FA2.5)
Single Chip Seal (FA
2.5)
Crack Seal / Transverse M
astic
US-169Not to Scale
Each Section 528 feet long
Section Numbering 169000169001so on
80018002so on
Con
trol
Ultr
a Th
in B
onde
d W
earin
g C
oars
e
Thin
lay
Ove
rlay
(4.7
5 m
m w
ith R
AP
and
RA
S) D
elta
S
Con
trol
Con
trol
Con
trol
Microsurfacing (Type II)
Layers Traffic
Clay Subgrade
7.5" HMAPG58-28
12" Granular
Base
1800 ADT
Control
National Pavement Preservation Study (Northern Test Sections)Minnesota DOT Road Research Project (MnROAD)
National Center for Asphalt Technology (NCAT)
US-169 NB LaneCSAH-8 EB and WB Lanes
5 miles South of Milaca - Just East of Pease - Mille Lacs County
Control
Control
Thin
lay
Ove
rlay
(4.7
5 m
m w
ith R
AP
and
RA
S)
Thin
lay
Ove
rlay
(4.7
5 m
m)
Con
trol
Thinlay Overlay (A
BR
over Chip Seal (FA
2.5))
Thinlay Overlay (A
BR
over Scrub Seal (FA 2.5))
Thinlay Overlay (A
BR
over fibermat (FA
2.5))
NorthernLowTrafficPreservation
CSAH-8
NationalPavementPreservationStudy
• Goals–NationalStudy(Climaticzones)–Provideconsistentlycollecteddata/analysis–Quantifythelifeextendingbenefits• Improveand/orextendthepavementlife• Costeffectiveness
30.0040.0050.0060.0070.0080.0090.00
100.00110.00120.00130.00140.00150.00
Pre-Co
nstructio
nPo
st-Con
struction
10-Nov-16
11-Apr-17
8-May-17
31-M
ay-17
14-Ju
n-17
29
-Jun-17
14
-Jul-1
7 25
-Jul-1
7 8-Au
g-17
23
-Aug-17
7-Sep-17
20
-Sep
-17
5-Oct-17
19-Oct-17
6-Nov-17
16-Nov-17
30-Nov-17
AverageIRI(in/m
ile)
Microsurfacing,CSAH8 Sec.4- OverSingleChipSeal
Sec.8- OverFibermatChipSeal
Sec.9- OverScrubSeal
Sec.11- OverCrackSealandTransverseMasticSec.12- TypeII
Sec.13-Double(TypeIIoverTypeII)
OpenGradedFrictionCoarse“OGFC”
24
OGFC/PCCconventionaltackOGFC/PCCultrafusetack
OGFC/HMAultrafusetackOGFC/HMAconventionaltack
August2016– HardrivesContractor
October 24, 2013
“Itwasnotourwealththatmadeourhighwayspossible;ratheritwasourhighwaysthatmadeourwealthpossible”,
ThomasHarrisMcDonaldCommissionerofPublicRoads1939– 1953
ADT I US MN total %>2,000 - 866 4,314 5,180 43.6
2-5,000 - 1,084 2,059 3,143 26.4
5-10k 162 600 784 1,546 13.0
10-50k 521 693 571 1,785 15.050-100k 135 - - 135 1.1
>100k 96 - - 96 0.8
• CR 4. 58-28, 30% RAP. Cracked every 50’ during the 1st winter.
• CR 16. 58-34, 20% RAP. No cracking during the 1st winter.
St. Louis CR 4 & 16
Minnesota’s Story(about 20 years ago)
Design for the loads(and Hope to)
Survive the environment(thermal cracking)
MINNESOTA ALABAMATotalarea
12th 30th86,935sq.mi. 52,420
Population22nd 24th5,519,952 4,863,300
Lanemiles5th !! 17th285,180 213,068