Upload
iyanna-boggess
View
224
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Jeffersonian Republicanism
AntifederalistsDemocratic-RepublicansRepublicans
Ideology: Wanted a democratic government—power in the
hands of the people Did not want all white males to vote, only the
educated, but they thought any person could be educated (contrast with the Federalists)
Glorified the independent yeoman farmer Thought cities/industry made people dependent on
others Classical liberals—as little government involvement as
possible in order to prevent chaos/anarchy More power for the states, less for the federal govt
(states rights) Very narrow interpretation of the Constitution
Republican Voters and Policies Who would be a Republican?
Farmers/farming interests—South and the Westnew region
Generally the poor/middle class, but also wealthy people in the South
Republican Policies Strict construction of Constitution
No national bank Limited role for federal govt—no funding of roads for
example No standing army, small navy Low tariffs Friendship with France No alien or sedition acts No excise taxes on whiskey
Compare and Contrast: Republican vs Federalist
Republican Federalist
South and West New England, northern parts of the Middle States
Farmers, rural areas Merchants, factory owners, cities
Poor/middle class Middle class and upper class
Friendship with France Friendship with Britain
Narrow interpretation of Const. Broad Interpretation of Const.
No bank Yes bank
No standing army, small navy Standing army, larger navy
States rights National government power
Revolution of 1800 Jefferson wins a close election: defeats Adams 73-65
Aaron Burr vice president
Why a revolution? No blood or violence Major change in the philosophies of the governing party Also, 1st peaceful exchange of power between 2 rival
administrations
1st President to be inaugurated in Washington D.C. (1801)
After 1801 the Republicans controlled the Presidency, the House of Representatives, and the Senate, but not the federal courts, why?
Judiciary Act of 1801—Federalists “packed” the courts
Jefferson’s Policies: Really a Revolution?
No wholesale reversal of Federalist policies Jefferson realized he had a divided country, didn’t want to
totally alienate New England/other Federalist areas Federalist policies (debt payment, tariffs, etc) were pretty
effective
What stayed? Hamilton’s tariffs, and debt repayment policies Most federalists who worked for the government The national bank
What got reversed? Judiciary Act of 1801 Idea of a “permanent debt” to secure the loyalty of the
wealthy Excise Tax on Whiskey Alien and Sedition Acts Army pretty much eliminated, navy reduced in size
Jefferson’s 1st Term: 1800-1804 Largely successful
Barbary Pirates War 1801-1805 US refused to pay additional bribe to Barbary Pirates Jefferson sent Navy/Marines to attack Tripoli
Louisiana Purchase 1803 Western half of Louisiana Territory given to Spain after
French and Indian War Given from Spain to France during Napoleonic conquest of
Spain early 1800s France at first tried to colonize it again, gave up, sold land
to US for $15 million Lewis and Clark 1803-1805
Problems with the purchase Where in the Constitution does it say President or Congress
has the power to buy land and add it to the United States? People in New England not happy, why?
The Courts and Jefferson: Marbury v. Madison and the Aaron Burr Trial
Marbury v. Madison 1803—Judicial Review Judiciary Act of 1801 and the “Midnight Appointments” Marbury had his commission signed by Adams, but it was never
sealed and delivered by the Sec. of State Madison (Jefferson’s new Sec. of State) found the commission but
refused to deliver it Marbury sued Madison in the Supreme Court to force him to
deliver the commission (writ of mandamus) Court dominated by Federalists—Chief Justice=John Marshall Marbury deserved his commission, but the law that allowed him
to sue Madison in the Supreme Court violated the Constitution—a law that violated the Constitution was not valid—it was voided by the Court=Judicial Review
Aaron Burr Trial Tried to set up his own country in the southwest, arrested During trial there weren’t two people who witnessed Burr commit
an act of treason—found not guilty by the courts—a very strict interpretation of what treason was (high hurdle had to be cleared)
Jefferson’s 2nd Term: 1804-1808 Jefferson won reelection easily in 1804
2nd term dominated by problems with France and Britain
Background: Napoleonic Wars France and Britain at war, each wanted to stop trade with the
other, began to stop and seize US ships in the Atlantic Ocean British began to impress US sailors—Chesapeake incident
Jefferson’s problem: can’t go to war with France and/or Britain, but need to make them stop
Solution: Embargo Act 1807 All trade between the US and Europe prohibited Who was this designed to hurt? Who would be upset with this in the US? Unsuccessful: hurt the US more than Britain or France Repealed in 1809 just before Jefferson left office
War of 1812 James Madison (Jefferson’s Sec. of State, author of Const.)
elected President in 1808
Problems with France/Britain seizing US ships remained
Embargo Act replaced with: Non-Intercourse Act—no US trade with just Britain or France Macon’s Bill Number 2—whichever country dropped its trade
restrictions first the US would legalize trade only with that country
Other problems: British supplying Indians with money/weapons in Canada Impressment of US sailors by the British US settlers in the West wanted to take over British Canada (War
Hawks)
French repealed their trade restrictions Britain didn’t* US declared War on Britain in 1812 (1812-1814)
War of 1812: Problems US not prepared for war
Army had been slashed by Republicans—only 6,700 men
Navy well trained but only had 16 ocean-going ships Finances not good
No more excise taxes Embargo act had cut off trade so little revenue coming in
through tariffs No national bank (charter had expired in 1811 and was
not renewed by the Republican Congress) Major banks in New England/Northeast controlled by
Federalists who opposed the war and were reluctant to lend to the government
Very little US industry—Republicans had stressed farming—made it hard to produce wartime goods
No good roads to transport men/supplies around the country
War of 1812 Some early successes at Sea—USS Constitution defeated
the Guerriere
War went badly for the Americans especially at first Invasion of Canada a disastrous failure British blockade prevented US trade with foreign countries British took over Detroit, Chicago, large parts of the
Northwest, and captured and burned Washington DC
Some American successes Battle of Lake Erie, Battle of Lake Champlain, Battle of Fort
McHenry (Baltimore, Star Spangled Banner) Battle of the Thames (in Canada) Indian leader Tecumseh
killed Battle of New Orleans (1815)—Andrew Jackson defeated
the British, saved the city
Treaty of Ghent Christmas Eve 1814—War over “status quo ante bellum”—nothing resolved
Hartford Convention: the end of the Federalist Party
Federalists upset with the war, upset with 16 years of Republican rule
Met in Hartford 1814-1815 came up with a list of Constitutional Amendments that they wanted enacted: 2/3rds vote in Congress to declare war, or admit new states Elimination of the 3/5ths clause (slaves wouldn’t count at all) 1 term maximum for Presidents No back to back Presidents from the same state No more trade embargoes
If their demands weren’t met. . . . . secession?? During war time?
Came to Washington with their demands January of 1815 What two events did they hear about when they got there?
Hartford Convention mad the Federalists look like traitors, party lost a lot of support, died out soon thereafter
Significance of the War of 1812
Increase in American nationalism—”We beat the British again!”
Andrew Jackson became a hero—soon would become President (1828)
Federalist Party on the way out (Hartford Convention)
Republican Party/Madison had become “federalized” began to support: A new national bank A standing army and navy Tariffs to protect US industries Federal financing of roads and canals to ease
transportation
Was really only 1 political party—the Republicans
Era of Good Feelings: 1816-1824
Period of time after the War of 1812 during James Monroe’s Presidency when there was an increase in nationalism and essentially only one functioning political party—Republican
Nationalism in domestic policy: the American System Promote economic growth—a 2nd national bank (Bank of the
United States) 1816-1836 Protect US industries that had emerged during the War—
higher protective tariffs Help urge westward expansion and promote economic
activity inside the United States—build roads and canals using federal govt money—internal improvements
Nationalism in foreign policy Adams-Onis Treaty of 1819—treaty between US and Spain Joint occupation of Oregon with Britain 1818 Monroe Doctrine 1823 Peaceful resolution of US-Canada (Britain) border
Nationalism in the Courts: John Marshall
Supreme Court, led by John Marshall decided a number of cases during the Era of Good Feelings which helped to increase the power of the federal government and established a broad interpretation of the Constitution
Dartmouth College v. Woodward 1819—court ruled that contracts between the state and private individuals could not be undone by the state, even if a majority of people wanted that
McCulloch v. Maryland 1819—national bank ruled constitutional, broad interpretation of necessary and proper clause
Gibbons v. Ogden 1824—the national government was supreme in regulating interstate and international commerce not the states
Problems under the Surface
Sectional differences beginning to emerge Different sections had competing interests one section’s gain
was another’s loss North, South, West National Bank—North liked, South/West hated Tariffs—North liked, West split, South hated Internal improvements—North liked, West liked, South hated Slavery—North hated, West split, South in favor
Missouri Compromise (Compromise of 1820) 1820 Missouri wanted to join US as a slave state This would upset the free-slave balance in the Senate No other territory was ready to be admitted Also, Missouri=the first new state completely inside the
Louisiana Purchase territory—what precedent would that set? Missouri admitted as slave state, Maine broken off from Mass.
admitted as free state Line drawn across Missouri’s southern border—no slavery above
that line in the rest of the Louisiana Purchase (except for Missouri)