Upload
claude-allison
View
216
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
JB Traversac, Cal-Med Meeting - Sonoma, oct 2007
Wine & Environment, salient caracters and first results
the French experience
Jean-Baptiste Traversac, French National Agronomy Research Institute (INRA SAD-APT Paris)
JB Traversac, Cal-Med Meeting - Sonoma, oct 2007
Wine and sustainability
works on economicsworks on economics
- Industrial organisation- Wine market regulation
(self-governance & public policyin the AOC)
- Local networks organisation
expertiseexpertise on Vine & Wine biotechnics on Vine & Wine biotechnics
~ coordination of 25 programs- - Vine & Environement
C. Compagnone- Integrated Pest Management
A. Pugin, G. Sentenac, & al- Virus Insect Vectors
E. Boudon-Padieu, X.Daire- Soil Research
G. Trouche
diverse reports for: the strategic planning of the research networks for the vineyard of the north-est of France (CRECEP/RVVS) a european project (FORESCENE)
first results of a work on the environmental policy in thefrench vineyard
JB Traversac, Cal-Med Meeting - Sonoma, oct 2007
• Focal issue and area of expertiseA biotechnic and Economic expertise
• Long terms sustainability goal and targetsThe Renewal of local Agro-Food Systems Network’s
• Key scenarios elements for a sustainable developementProspective Vines and Wines – Scenarios for Research and actors
• Key possible instruments and measuresA suggestion
An expertise for a european project FORESCENE : making scenario for the sustainable development of rural areain agriculture
JB Traversac, Cal-Med Meeting - Sonoma, oct 2007
Environnemental impacts
• The pest disease management probleminterogations about the viability of the pest dependant crop systems & healths consequences
• Viticulture use 50 % of the total weigth of pesticide for 3 % of the
crop area (25OOO tons/year)
Cultures % area % pest consumption
(in value)
Cereals 24% 40%
Corn 7% 10%
Colza 4% 9%
Vine 3% 20%
Total 38% 79%
data colected by the French agricultural departement & the industry union of pesticide producers
JB Traversac, Cal-Med Meeting - Sonoma, oct 2007
Dispersion of pest applications
Lucas P & al., INRA 2004
JB Traversac, Cal-Med Meeting - Sonoma, oct 2007
Consequences
• Health impact : for the producers, numerous studies about relation between use of pesticide (generaly wihtout care) and some severe deseases (e.g. on the children fertility, cancer rate, etc….)
• Water quality : difficulty to respect the directive EEC 80-778 & the directive cadre on water (2000/60/EC)
The problems are very localised due to the limited wine area
JB Traversac, Cal-Med Meeting - Sonoma, oct 2007
133 000 cepsmesurés
Root Unearthing Method = RUM
Quantification and spatialisation of erosionphenomenon on the burgundy coast
-0.3-0.28-0.26-0.24-0.22-0.2-0.18-0.16-0.14-0.12-0.1-0.08-0.06-0.04-0.02
RUM (m)100 m.
0.9 mm.an-
1
1.2 mm.an-1
0.9 mm.an-1
1 mm.an-1
1.2 mm.an-1
1.4 mm.an-1
2.2 mm.an-1
Scale - * 10 years
chemin
drainBrenot et al., 2004
JB Traversac, Cal-Med Meeting - Sonoma, oct 2007
Montainside dynamic
erosion/transit/sedimentation
key questions on the ability to preserve the soil patrimony
JB Traversac, Cal-Med Meeting - Sonoma, oct 2007
Environmental impact factor’s of the wine industry
• Farms sustainability index (IDEA):structural (AC) & financial survey (RICA)(IDERICA)
scale components Indicators numbers IDERICA
Indicators numbers IDEA
Edaphic Diversity 3 5
Space distribution 5 7
Agricultural pratices 5 7
Social Food quality & terroir 7 5
Employement & services 5
Ethic & sustainability 6
Economics Economic viability 2 2
Independance 2 2
Transmissibility 1 1
Efficiency 1 1
direct survey(IDEA)
Girardin P. & al., INRA 2004
JB Traversac, Cal-Med Meeting - Sonoma, oct 2007
Biodiversity: can we conclude with a structural index?
Girardin P. & al., INRA 2004
Score on the biodiversity of wine farms
JB Traversac, Cal-Med Meeting - Sonoma, oct 2007
Biodiversity in viticultural farms: a specific entry
• Random sexual reproduction→ exclusively by wood except for specific program creation of new variety is stoped (resistant variety or new table grappe variety)
low inter ~ 0, but high intra and studies show that - genetic varity in grape is in regression
- association with neighbours species could be rich of insect
• Quality signal based on variety → 8 major varieties (~ 45% french wineyard )
• Huge diversity in collection and in different vineyards in almost all EU
JB Traversac, Cal-Med Meeting - Sonoma, oct 2007
Pest management: pertinence of a financial index ?
Girardin P. & al., INRA 2004
Score on the use of pesticide of wine farms
JB Traversac, Cal-Med Meeting - Sonoma, oct 2007
Soil protection
Girardin P. & al., INRA 2004
Score on the soil protection of wine farms
JB Traversac, Cal-Med Meeting - Sonoma, oct 2007
Water use
Girardin P. & al., INRA 2004
Score on the use of water of wine farms
JB Traversac, Cal-Med Meeting - Sonoma, oct 2007
Social implication
Girardin P. & al., INRA 2004
Score on the social implication of wine farms
JB Traversac, Cal-Med Meeting - Sonoma, oct 2007
Collective work
Girardin P. & al., INRA 2004
Score on the job creation of wine farms
JB Traversac, Cal-Med Meeting - Sonoma, oct 2007
Subsidies sensibility
Girardin P. & al., INRA 2004
Score on the use of subsidies of wine farms
JB Traversac, Cal-Med Meeting - Sonoma, oct 2007
Sustainable development of agriculture: a place for a specific farm census
need of a european agricultural survey in four parts
- structure (ES): land, workers, crop, cattle, machine,…, - activity (EA): with more informations in backward and lateral activities - financial results (RICA): with a more detailed and reliable information - sustainable developement index (EDD): with edaphic and social index
(periodicity of 3 years)
IDERICA pertinent index
• edaphic & social index: significativity in question• economics index: a view of financial performances
JB Traversac, Cal-Med Meeting - Sonoma, oct 2007
• Discussion about the most efficient method to reduce pest treatmentpollution
public prescription vs private certification
certification and labelling efficiency
state efficiency of control of the producersor/and volontary approach
Goals and issues of Sust. Dev.Goals and issues of Sust. Dev.debates & perspectivesdebates & perspectives
JB Traversac, Cal-Med Meeting - Sonoma, oct 2007
Maria L. Loureiro (2001)
No 44 %
Yes 56 %
Would you willing to pay a premium for a Colorado wine,If it was grown and labeled using sustainable agriculturaland environmentally friendly techniques?
JB Traversac, Cal-Med Meeting - Sonoma, oct 2007
results on the hedonic prices of SD labels show that it is complicated to associate a SD label to GI (AOC)
• D. Boughedra, 2004• Giraud, 2005 ; Halawany, Giraud, 2007• Soler & al., 2007
efficiency of certification and labelling ~ 0
JB Traversac, Cal-Med Meeting - Sonoma, oct 2007
Evolution de la densité apparente du travail en viticulture dans les vignobles du septentrion
-34% -35% -51% -30% -19% -5%
-
0,50
1,00
1,50
2,00
2,50
3,00
3,50
4,00
4,50
5,00
Autre
s Vig
n. F
ranc
e
Beauj
olai
s
Alsace
Bourg
ogne
Jura
& S
avoi
e
Cham
pagn
e
ha
/ U
TA
-900%
100%
Evolution of the work intensity in the french vineyards
JB Traversac, Cal-Med Meeting - Sonoma, oct 2007
Dispersion of pest applications: a political choice
% product on target
% product dispersed
Lucas P & al., INRA 2004
rampes & buses vs soufflerie
JB Traversac, Cal-Med Meeting - Sonoma, oct 2007
Network of innovators and the grass management in Monthelie
C. Compagnone, 2007
JB Traversac, Cal-Med Meeting - Sonoma, oct 2007
Network of innovators and the use of spray machine in Monthelie
C. Compagnone, 2007
Law presssure spraying
High pressure spraying
JB Traversac, Cal-Med Meeting - Sonoma, oct 2007
Is the number of participant matter in the effectiveness of environment prescription ?
JB Traversac, Cal-Med Meeting - Sonoma, oct 2007
Main composants of the model
n : number of participant (constant in a short term)
i’ : level of environmental performance(voluntary approch requires i < i’)
I : overall level of pollution (I is a function of several parameters)
(α is the proportion of non participants)
' (1 )
( ' )
I ni ni
I i i ni
[ ,1]O
JB Traversac, Cal-Med Meeting - Sonoma, oct 2007
'
'
ai i
i
α is the switching cost from i’ to ia is the ease of adopting the integrated approach
JB Traversac, Cal-Med Meeting - Sonoma, oct 2007
11 1 '
1'a
a
In a i i
i
1'
'
a
a
i iI n i
i
we integrate α
1
1' 1
( 1)ai i
a
the extremum is:
JB Traversac, Cal-Med Meeting - Sonoma, oct 2007
2
20
I
i
To minimise I the second order condition has to be positive
21
2( 1) ( ' )
'a
a
I naa i i
i i
JB Traversac, Cal-Med Meeting - Sonoma, oct 2007
An application for i’=1 (worst score) and a=1 (high inertia to change)
REM: • for each n, there is 2 sub-optimal solutions• i = 0,5 is the optimal solution to optimise I
JB Traversac, Cal-Med Meeting - Sonoma, oct 2007
Overall environmental performance as a function of required level of pollution per participant and the total number of enterprise (i’=1, a=1)
JB Traversac, Cal-Med Meeting - Sonoma, oct 2007
Policy implication
1) How to determine the level of resistance to change a?
2) The solution for certain value of i are twice(if there is a cost of negociation C, the administration will preferthe smalest number)
3) An interest group can select a level of i in relation with it’s own interrest(what could be the good reaction to the constitution of such groups?)
JB Traversac, Cal-Med Meeting - Sonoma, oct 2007
Thank you for your attention