Jamie Leigh Harley - #112320 Not Eligible to Practice Law

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/6/2019 Jamie Leigh Harley - #112320 Not Eligible to Practice Law

    1/2

    Jamie Leigh Harley - #112320

    Current Status: Not eligible to practice law (Not Entitled)

    See below for more details.

    Profile Information

    Bar

    Number

    112320

    Address Bay Area Defense

    Associates350 W Julian St Bldg

    7

    San Jose, CA 95110

    Phone Number (408) 286-5000

    Fax Number (408) 286-6232

    e-mail [email protected]

    District District 6 UndergraduateSchool

    Reed Coll; Portland OR

    County Santa Clara Law School Santa Clara Univ SOL; Santa ClaraCA

    Sections None

    Status History

    Effective Date Status Change

    Present Not Eligible To Practice Law

    9/10/2010 Not Eligible To Practice Law

    12/12/1983 Admitted to The State Bar of California

    Explanation of member status

    Actions Affecting Eligibility to Practice Law

    Effective Date Description Case Number Resulting Status

    Disciplinary and Related Actions

    9/10/2010 Discipline w/actual suspension 05-O-03395 Not Eligible To Practice Law

    9/10/2010 Interim suspension after conviction 09-C-10076 Not Eligible To Practice Law

    Administrative ActionsThis member has no public record of administrative actions.

    Copies of official attorney discipline records areavailable upon request.

    Explanation of common actions

    State Bar Court Cases

    NOTE: The State Bar Court began posting public disciplinedocumentsonline in 2005. The format and pagination of documents posted on this site may vary fromthe originals in the case file as a result of their translation from the original format into Word and PDF. Copies of additional related documents in a caseareavailable upon request. OnlyOpinions designated for publication in theState Bar Court Reportermay be cited or relied on as precedent in State Bar Courtproceedings. For further information about a case that is displayed here, please refer to the State Bar Court's online docket, which can be foundat:http://apps.statebarcourt.ca.gov/dockets/dockets.aspx

    DISCLAIMER: Any posted Notice of Disciplinary Charges, Conviction Transmittal or other initiating document, contains only allegations of professionalmisconduct. The attorney is presumed to be innocent of any misconduct warranting discipline until the charges have been proven.

    Effective Date Case Number Description

    9/10/2010 09-C-10076 [PDF]

    Pending 05-O-3395 Opinion[PDF][WORD]

    Pending 09-C-10076 Initiating Document[PDF]

    California Bar Journal Discipline Summaries

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.calbar.ca.gov/AboutUs/BoardofGovernors/Districts.aspxhttp://www.calbar.ca.gov/AboutUs/BoardofGovernors/Districts.aspxhttp://sections.calbar.ca.gov/Sections.aspxhttp://sections.calbar.ca.gov/Sections.aspxhttp://wo%28%27http//www.calbar.ca.gov/Portals/0/documents/members/Status.html')http://wo%28%27http//www.calbar.ca.gov/Portals/0/documents/members/Status.html')http://www.statebarcourt.ca.gov/PublicRecordsInformation.aspxhttp://www.statebarcourt.ca.gov/PublicRecordsInformation.aspxhttp://www.statebarcourt.ca.gov/PublicRecordsInformation.aspxhttp://wo%28%27http//www.calbar.ca.gov/Portals/0/documents/members/DisciplineKey.html')http://wo%28%27http//www.calbar.ca.gov/Portals/0/documents/members/DisciplineKey.html')http://wo%28%27http//www.calbar.ca.gov/Portals/0/documents/members/DocumentTypes.html')http://wo%28%27http//www.calbar.ca.gov/Portals/0/documents/members/DocumentTypes.html')http://wo%28%27http//www.calbar.ca.gov/Portals/0/documents/members/DocumentTypes.html')http://www.statebarcourt.ca.gov/PublicRecordsInformation.aspxhttp://www.statebarcourt.ca.gov/PublicRecordsInformation.aspxhttp://www.statebarcourt.ca.gov/PublicRecordsInformation.aspxhttp://www.statebarcourt.ca.gov/FormsOpinionsandLegalResearch/PublishedOpinions.aspxhttp://www.statebarcourt.ca.gov/FormsOpinionsandLegalResearch/PublishedOpinions.aspxhttp://www.statebarcourt.ca.gov/FormsOpinionsandLegalResearch/PublishedOpinions.aspxhttp://www.statebarcourt.ca.gov/FormsOpinionsandLegalResearch/CaliforniaStateBarCourtReporter.aspxhttp://www.statebarcourt.ca.gov/FormsOpinionsandLegalResearch/CaliforniaStateBarCourtReporter.aspxhttp://www.statebarcourt.ca.gov/FormsOpinionsandLegalResearch/CaliforniaStateBarCourtReporter.aspxhttp://apps.statebarcourt.ca.gov/dockets/dockets.aspxhttp://apps.statebarcourt.ca.gov/dockets/dockets.aspxhttp://apps.statebarcourt.ca.gov/dockets/dockets.aspxhttp://members.calbar.ca.gov/courtDocs/09-C-10076-1.pdfhttp://members.calbar.ca.gov/courtDocs/09-C-10076-1.pdfhttp://wo%28%27http//calbar.ca.gov/calbar/pdfs/sbc/pendingLanguage.html')http://wo%28%27http//calbar.ca.gov/calbar/pdfs/sbc/pendingLanguage.html')http://members.calbar.ca.gov/courtDocs/05-O-03395-2.pdfhttp://members.calbar.ca.gov/courtDocs/05-O-03395-2.pdfhttp://members.calbar.ca.gov/courtDocs/05-O-03395.docxhttp://members.calbar.ca.gov/courtDocs/05-O-03395.docxhttp://members.calbar.ca.gov/courtDocs/05-O-03395.docxhttp://members.calbar.ca.gov/courtDocs/05-O-03395.docxhttp://wo%28%27http//calbar.ca.gov/calbar/pdfs/sbc/pendingLanguage.html')http://wo%28%27http//calbar.ca.gov/calbar/pdfs/sbc/pendingLanguage.html')http://members.calbar.ca.gov/courtDocs/09-C-10076.pdfhttp://members.calbar.ca.gov/courtDocs/09-C-10076.pdfhttp://members.calbar.ca.gov/courtDocs/09-C-10076.pdfhttp://members.calbar.ca.gov/courtDocs/09-C-10076.pdfhttp://wo%28%27http//calbar.ca.gov/calbar/pdfs/sbc/pendingLanguage.html')http://members.calbar.ca.gov/courtDocs/05-O-03395.docxhttp://members.calbar.ca.gov/courtDocs/05-O-03395-2.pdfhttp://wo%28%27http//calbar.ca.gov/calbar/pdfs/sbc/pendingLanguage.html')http://members.calbar.ca.gov/courtDocs/09-C-10076-1.pdfhttp://apps.statebarcourt.ca.gov/dockets/dockets.aspxhttp://www.statebarcourt.ca.gov/FormsOpinionsandLegalResearch/CaliforniaStateBarCourtReporter.aspxhttp://www.statebarcourt.ca.gov/FormsOpinionsandLegalResearch/PublishedOpinions.aspxhttp://www.statebarcourt.ca.gov/PublicRecordsInformation.aspxhttp://wo%28%27http//www.calbar.ca.gov/Portals/0/documents/members/DocumentTypes.html')http://wo%28%27http//www.calbar.ca.gov/Portals/0/documents/members/DisciplineKey.html')http://www.statebarcourt.ca.gov/PublicRecordsInformation.aspxhttp://wo%28%27http//www.calbar.ca.gov/Portals/0/documents/members/Status.html')http://sections.calbar.ca.gov/Sections.aspxhttp://www.calbar.ca.gov/AboutUs/BoardofGovernors/Districts.aspxmailto:[email protected]
  • 8/6/2019 Jamie Leigh Harley - #112320 Not Eligible to Practice Law

    2/2

    Summaries from the California Bar Journal are based on discipline orders but are not the official records. Not all discipline actions have associated CBJsummaries. Copies of official attorney discipline records areavailable upon request.

    September 10, 2010

    JAMIE LEIGH HARLEY [#112320], 53, of San Jose was suspended for two years, stayed, placed on two years of probation with a si x-month actual suspensionand until she makes restitution, and she was ordered to take the MPRE and comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court. If the actual suspensionexceeds two years, she must prove her rehabilitation. The order took effect Sept. 10, 2010.

    Harley also was placed on interim suspension Sept. 10 as a result of federal convictions on five counts of money laundering.

    The State Bar Court found that Harley, who also is known as Jamie Harmon, committed nine acts of misconduct in six matters. A former deputy district attorney,Harley handled a busy criminal law practice that often included 100 to 200 open files at a time. The courts review department found her misconduct primarilyinvolved mismanagement of her practice and did not involve dishonesty.

    She gave incorrect advice about the prison term one client would receive under a plea agreement and provided incorrect information about the consequences of aplea in a serious sex offense case. She forgot about one clients traffic trial and did not appear, and in three matters, she did not properly respond to the clientsrequests for information, for their files or for refunds of their fees.

    In mitigation, Harmon practiced for nearly two decades with no discipline and cooperated with the bars investigation.

    http://www.statebarcourt.ca.gov/PublicRecordsInformation.aspxhttp://www.statebarcourt.ca.gov/PublicRecordsInformation.aspxhttp://www.statebarcourt.ca.gov/PublicRecordsInformation.aspxhttp://www.statebarcourt.ca.gov/PublicRecordsInformation.aspxhttp://www.statebarcourt.ca.gov/PublicRecordsInformation.aspx