IV HALF YEARLY MONITORING REPORT OF …rmsaindia.gov.in/administrator/components/com_monitoring/files/bd8...Surguja 2. Kanker 3. Dantewada 4. Bastar 5. ... c) Schools having more than

IV Half-Yearly Report of RMSA of Chhattisgarh Page 1

IV HALF YEARLY MONITORING REPORT

OF Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan

FOR THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

FOR THE PERIOD OF 1st October, 2014 to 31st March, 2015

DISTRICTS MONITORED:

1. Surguja

2. Kanker

3. Dantewada

4. Bastar

5. Bijapur

Monitoring Institute: REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION Nodal Officer: Dr. B. Ramesh Babu

Professor, RIE, (NCERT) - Bhopal Monitoring Officer


IV Half Yearly Monitoring Report of Regional Institute of Education, Bhopal (Monitoring Institution) of RMSA for the State of Chhattisgarh for the period

of 1st October, 2014 to 31st March, 2015**

Introduction:-

1. General Information

Sl. No.

Information Details

1. Period of the report 1st October, 2014 to 31st March, 2015 2. No. of Districts allotted 5

3. Districts’ name Surguja, Kanker, Dantewada, Bastar and

Bijapur

4. Month of visit to the Districts / Schools (Information is to be given district wise i.e. District 1, District 2 and District 3 etc.)

Surguja: 12/1/2015 to 9/2/2015 Kanker : 12/1/2015 to 23/1/2015 Dantewada: 24/1/2015 to 7/2/2015 Bastar : 12/1/2015 to 24/1/2015 Bijapur : 23/1/2015 to 3/2/2015

5.

Total number of Schools ( sampled secondary and higher secondary) existing in the District (Information is to be given district wise i.e. District 1, District 2 and District 3etc.)

Surguja : Kanker :

Dantewada : Bastar :

Bijapur :

6.

Number of Sec./Hr. secondary schools monitored (Secondary and Hr. Sec. to be counted separately) Information is to be given for district wise i.e. District 1, District 2 and District 3etc.)

Surguja : 25 Kanker : 25

Dantewada : 25 Bastar : 25

Bijapur : 19

7. Types of schools visited Surguja Kanker Dantewada Bastar Bijapur a) Urban Area schools 3 4 4 3 2 b) Urban Deprived/Slum Area Schools --- --- --- --- --- c) Schools having more than three CWSN 2 4 4 3 1 d) School sanctioned with Civil Works 2 --- 2 3 2 e) School with Higher Gender Gap 1 2 --- 2 2 f) Higher Population of SC/ST children 5 3 2 3 2 g) Low retention/high dropout rate 5 1 3 4 2 h) Schools in forest and far flung areas 3 2 2 2 3 i) Flood Area Schools --- --- --- 2 1 j) Poor Result 1 5 4 --- 1 k) Others 3 4 4 3 3

Total 25 25 25 25 19

8. Number of schools visited by Nodal Officer of the Monitoring Institute

--- --- --- --- ---

9. Whether the draft report has been shared with the Commissioner : YES / NO

YES


Consolidated Report of Surguja, Kanker, Dantewada, Bastar and Bijapur districts of Chhattisgarh for the period of 1st October, 2014 to 31st March, 2015

Selection of Schools: Twenty Five schools in the district were selected for assessment and analysis of the

implementation of RMSA keeping in view the goals of the RMSA. Criteria for the selection of schools as sample:

(a) Schools with Urban Deprived students (b) School sanctioned with Civil Works (c) Schools having more than three CWSN (d) Out of School Student (e) School with higher gender-gap (f) SC/ST/Minority as major habitants (g) Low academic achievement (h) Seasonal Migration (i) Forest/Mountain, desert area School (j) Disaster Effected Schools (k) School with low retention/higher drop out (l) School with hostel etc. Analytical report of the district on the different desired aspects of the programme implementation

based on empirical evidences is as under:

10. After submission of the draft report to the Commissioner, whether the MI has received any comments: YES / NO

NO

11. Before sending the reports to the GOI whether the MI has shared the report with Commissioner RMSA: YES / NO

Simultaneously shared

12. Selection criteria for Schools.

As provided by the MHRD


District – 1 Surguja

1. Planning & Implementation

At School Level

1. Perspective Plan for the School –

No. of Schools :- 25

Plan developed Not developed Yes No

0 25 100% 0% 100%

If not reasons thereof As per above table, no perspective plan have been found in any of the 25 sampled schools.

Comments:- This is neglected area in schools. Attention is required towards this all-important aspect of the programme.

2. Data base/sources adopted/taken for Planning and Plan preparation at School level other than SEMIS


Other Data base/sourced adopted If yes names of other sources Yes No

0 25 No 100% 0% 100%

Comments: - This needs to be initiated on urgent basis. This is required for the decentralization of planning.

3. Whether disadvantaged groups have been appropriately factored in the Plan.


Developed Planning strategy for disadvantaged groups Yes No

0 25 100% 0% 100%

Comments:- As planning is predominantly absent the question of appropriate representation of some or the other sections of the society does not arise.

4. Adoption of Convergence approach with schemes/resources of other Departments in School Plan -


Convergence approach adopted Yes No

2 23 100% 8% 92%

Convergence Approach Convergence not adopted S.

No. Departments No. of

Schools % Reasons thereof


1 Water & Sanitation - - Planning process has not been institutionalized at grassroots level

2 Social Welfare - -

3 Tribal Development 2 8% 4 Minority Department - -

5 Rural Development - -

6 Urban Development - -

7 Health, Medical and Family welfare - -

8 Electricity department - -

9 Transport (Roadways) - -

10 Public Works Department - -

As per above table, adoption of convergence approach found in 2 schools with Tribal development department out of sampled 25 schools. During discussion, field investigator was told in two schools that there were discussions for convergence with tribal development department.

Problem areas are of restructuring on convergence and coordination

Comments:- Convergence of different departments needs to be strengthened while making the perspective plans.

5. Incorporation of SMDC recommendations in the School Development Plan

No. of

Schools :- 25

School Development Plan Prepared Recommendations incorporated in School Development Plan

Yes No Yes No 2 23 2 23

100% 8% 92% 8% 92% If not reasons thereof

Lack of awareness

If not reasons thereof

As per above table that there is School Development Plan in 2 schools out of sampled 25 schools. This is undermining the devolution of powers to schools.

Comments:- Democratization of planning needs to be given priority.

6. Roles assigned to the SMDCs for implementing the scheme and to seek help & cooperation in ensuring the execution of following in sampled Schools:

Sl. No. Roles Responses regarding assigning roles (No. of Schools)

%

1 Filling of DCF of U-DISE - - 2 Preparation & Implementation of Annual Plan - - 3 Admission of Students to Class-9 4 16% 4 Regular attendance and retention of students 3 12% 5 Regularity & Punctuality in teachers’

attendance - -

6 Civil work - -


7 Providing resources Physical - - Human 1 4%

8 Organizing cultural, sports events, functions 16 64% 9 Mid-day-meal - -

10 Preparing annual accounts of income & expenditure of SMDC

16 64%

11 Any other (Active participation in the SMDC meetings)

- -

Above table shows the involvement of SMDCs in various activities of schools. It shows that SMDC members were assigned the job of admission of students to Class - 9th in four (4) schools; regular attendance and retention of students in three (3) schools; providing resources by human in one (1) school; organizing cultural, sports events, and functions in sixteen (16) schools; and preparing annual accounts of income & expenditure in sixteen (16) schools out of sampled 25 schools. Comments:- Huge gap is apparent in formulating SMDCs and making them functional.

7. Clarity amongst SMDC members about their roles. If yes, detail of steps taken by them accordingly.

No. of Schools :- 25 SMDC members are clear about their roles Not clear 16 9

100% 64% 36% Non-participation in school development processes primarily due to their lack of awareness and among members of SMDC. The above table reveals this fact. The table, tell us the story of absence of awareness among SMDC members. Out of sampled 25 schools, SMDC members’ of 16 schools are aware about their roles and responsibilities. S.N. Steps taken by SMDC members accordingly Number of

Schools %

1 Ensuring education facility to dropout Students - - 2 Making society aware of child rights & duties of teachers& parents - - 3 Organizing parents teachers meetings, distribution of report card and

reviewing C.W./H.W. 1 4%

4 Keeping check on private tuitions by teachers, paying attention to academic progress of students

- -

5 Identification of CWSN & taking care of availability of facilities to CWSN students

- -

6 Paying attention to improvement in regular teaching learning activities. - - 7 Distribution of free text books 16 64% 8 Availability of scholarships on time to students 3 12% 9 Preparing three years’ perspective Plan - -

10 Proper use of funds i.e. SAG & other grants as per norms 5 20% 11 Monitoring of minor & major repair work and maintenance of physical

infrastructure - -

12 Seeking knowledge and information about income and expenditure of SMDC and supervising the accounts thereof.

- -


Reasons of ignorance of SMDC members regarding their roles

Comments:- Lack of awareness about their roles in schooling. Lack of time could be one of the reasons. Lack democratic norms in the wider society and in the school could also be one of the reasons.

8.1 Meetings of General Body of School Management and Development Committee-

Meetings of General body held Number of Schools:- 25

Quarterly Half Yearly Annually No meeting held till date

11 5 3 6

100% 44% 20% 12% 24%

Above table shows that meetings of SMDC are conducted in 11 schools on quarterly basis, on half yearly basis in 5 schools, 3 schools on annually and no meeting was held till the date of visit in 6 schools out of sampled 25 schools.

Comments:- On the probing into the nature of meetings, the field investigators largely found that the meeting were formal in nature. Substance of the discussions is open for doubt.

8.2 Reasons for not holding last meetings and whether the same has been recorded –

Number of Schools :- 6

Mentioned Not Mentioned

- 6

100 % - 100%

Comments:- No reason is sighted

2. At District level – Name of District – Surguja

1. District level Plan has been prepared or not.

Yes Prepared 2(a) Whether District Plan has adopted a convergence approach with following department.

(1. Yes 2. No)

a. Water & Sanitation 1

b. Social Welfare 1

c. Tribal Development 1

d. Minority Department 2

e. Rural Development 1

f. Urban Development 1


g. Medical Health & Family welfare 1

h. PWD 1

i. Transportation (Roadways) 2

j. Others 2

2(b). Any problem areas of restructuring on convergence and co-ordination

Reasons were not mentioned by DPO

Comments:- Not specified.

3. Methods adopted for regular monitoring of Perspective Plan and AWP&B

No methods adopted for regular monitoring of Perspective Plan and AWP&B

At State level

1. Involvement of State Level Planning team in the preparation and finalization of District Level Plans

1. Yes 2. No

Does the State Plan reflect the Planning needs at School and District Level?

It does reflect

2(a) State Plan has adopted a convergence approach with following department or not.

(1. Yes 2. No)


b. Social Welfare 1






h. PWD 1


j. Others 2

1


2(b) Any problem areas of restructuring on convergence and co-ordination

Not Specified

Comments:- At state level convergence is taken care off.

3. Regular monitoring of Planning & implementation of the programme at State level, if not reasons thereof.

Monitoring tools are prepared but scheduled of monitoring is not in place. Therefore, it can be said that monitoring work is yet to be institutionalized.

Comments:- Monitoring mechanism needs to be created.

4. Any separate strategies for naxalite/extremist affected districts prepared at the State/district level in consultation with the district authority?

1. Yes 2. No

If not, why?

Comments:- Residential Schools, teachers quarters and POTA cabins are in operation in naxalite effected areas.

2. ACCESS

I. Physical Access – At School and Habitation’s

1. Names Category of the Schools visited

S.N. Categories Number of Schools

%

1 EBB - - Urban 3 12 3 CWSN (Minimum 3 CWSN) 2 8 4 Higher Gender gap 1 4 5 SC/ST/Minority students abundance 5 20 6 Low retention rate/Higher dropout rate 5 20 7 Schools situated in habitation with large number of OoSC 1 4 8 Low academic achievements 1 4 9 Schools situated in habitation of seasonal migrants - - 10 Urban Schools with most students of deprived sections - - 11 Forest/Mountain/Remote/Desert area 3 12 12 Flood/natural calamity prone area - - 13 Ongoing civil work 2 8 14 School with girls hostel 2 8 15 None - -

1


Comments:- 1. Criteria provided by the MHRD are followed while selecting the sample schools.

2. For geographical representation of all parts of the district, schools from every block were selected as sample.

Schools visited in the district Surguja

Sl. No.

Block UDISE Code Name of Schools Category of the School

Dates of visits First Second

1 Ambikapur 22020110872 H.S.S. Police Line Urban 12.1.15 13.1.15 2 Ambikapur 22020110876 H.S.S. Kedarpur Urban 13.1.15 14.1.15 3 Batauli 22020204109 H.S.S. Mangari Urban 30.1.15 31.1.15 4 Udaipur 22020705609 H.S.S. Dandgaon Civil Work 6.2.15 7.2.15 5 Lakhanpur 22020608803 H.S. Andla Civil Work 2.2.15 3.2.15 6 Ambikapur 22020106402 H.S. Bouripara Gender Gap 14.1.15 15.1.15 7 Batauli 22020201601 H.S. Bilaspur SC/ST 28.1.15 29.1.15 8 Manpot 22020402402 H.S. Jamkani SC/ST 23.1.15 24.1.15 9 Sitapur 22020300140 H.S.S. Sitapur SC/ST 19.1.15 20.1.15 10 Lakhanpur 22020600129 H.S.S. Lakhanpur SC/ST 4.2.15 5.2.15 11 Lundra 22020505204 H.S.S. Raghunathpur SC/ST 15.1.15 16.1.15 12 Manpot 22020405621 H.S.S. Narmadapur CWSN 26.1.15 27.1.15 13 Batauli 22020200112 H.S.S. Batauli CWSN 28.1.15 19.1.15 14 Udaipur 22020704302 H.S. Chakari Drop Out 6.2.15 7.2.15 15 Manpot 22020400306 H.S.S. Rajapur Drop Out 23.1.15 24.1.15 16 Batauli 22020202408 H.S.S. Boda Drop Out 30.1.15 31.1.15 17 Lundra 22020503309 H.S.S. Lamgaon Drop Out 16.1.15 17.1.15 18 Lakhanpur 22020604607 H.S. Katinda Drop Out 4.2.15 5.2.15 19 Sitapur 22020304807 H.S. Biljora Poor Result 21.1.15 22.1.15 20 Sitapur 22020300709 H.S.S. Bhusu OoSC 19.1.15 20.1.15 21 Udaipur 22020700118 H.S.S. Girls Udaipur Girls Hostel 8.2.15 9.2.15 22 Lundra 22020508412 H.S.S. Girls Lundra Girls Hostel 17.1.15 18.1.15 23 Sitapur 22020301605 H.S.S. Giruhildih Forest Area 21.1.15 22.1.15 24 Lakhanpur 22020605604 H.S.S. Jamgaon Forest Area 2.2.15 3.2.15 25 Manpot 22020401001 H.S.S. Kamleshwarpur Forest Area 26.1.15 27.1.15

DPO Visit :- 10/2/2015

2. Location of the School adjacent to or within any of the following sensitive areas.

S. N. Area Number of Schools Situated %

1 Protected area (National Park, Wild life sanctuary) - - 2 Flood prone /flood plain area - - 3 Earthquake prone zone - - 4 Unstable slope - - 5 Landslide prone Area - - 6 Cyclone prone Area - - 7 Storm surge prone Area - - 8 Drought prone Area - -


9 Polluting Industrial Area - - 10 Mining Area - - 11 Arsenic /fluoride contaminated ground water area 1 4 12 Busy National/State Highway 2 8 13 Congested urban/market/commercial area 2 8 14 Any particular disturbance faced by School due to its

location - -

15 None 20 80 Comments:- As per the above table, there are different kinds of threats in the way to 5 schools. One is natural and four are manmade.

3. Names and categories of the feeder primary and upper primary Schools in sampled district.

School Level No. of Schools managed by Govt. % Private %

PS - - - - UPS - - - - Total - - - -

4. Number of Students enrolled in School from habitations coming from a distance greater than what is prescribed for a neighborhood School.

S.N. Distance of School from habitation

Number of students %

1 0-1 km. 1365 25.08% 2 1-2 km. 1115 20.49% 3 2-3 km. 957 17.60% 4 3-5 km. 1235 22.70% 5 More than 5 km. 769 14.13%

Total 5441 100% As per above table, out of 5441 enrolled students in sampled 25 schools 769 students are coming to schools from the distance more than 5 km. This is around 14.13%.

Reasons for students coming from a distance of more than 5 km

Comments:- (1) No High Schools within 5 km. of the habitations.

5. Presence of any natural or man-made barrier that poses any problem for the Students in accessing the School.

No. of Schools :- 25 Yes No 6 19

100% 24% 76%

If yes mention them 1. National highway 2. Small river (Eria river)


3. Bear effected area (2 schools) 4. Elephant effected area (2 schools)

Above table shows that 6 schools are perceived to be facing man-made and natural barriers that could pose problems to the Students is observed in 6 Schools out of sampled 25 schools.

Comments:-

6. Name and Distance of the nearest secondary School (Govt./Pvt.) from the habitation the School is located at, and catchment area of the School.

Table showing the nearby secondary schools to the sampled schools

Distance from School/Catchment area Total No. of Schools :- 25 Less than 1 km. 1-3 km. 3-5 km. More than 5 km.

10 13 19 39 81 100% 12.34% 16.05% 23.46% 48.15% 100%

Above table shows that total no. of nearest schools are 81 (10 schools are in less than 1 km. distance, 13 schools are within 1-3 km., 19 schools are within 3-5 km. and 39 schools are within more than 5 km. distance).

Comments:- Majority schools are under Government Schools.

7. Any special arrangement like transportation facility or residential facility made available for the benefit of students.

Facility Provided by number of Schools % Transport facility - -

Residential facility 10 40% Comments:- Above table shows that residential facilities are available in 10 schools out of 25 sampled schools.

II Social Access

1. Pattern of population of the habitation and enrollment in the School – 1. (a) Social category-wise population of Students of age group 14-16 years in the habitation.

Population Pattern of Habitation

Category 14-16 Age Boys % Girls % Total %

SC

This is too ambitious and no school has this data.

ST Minority General Total


1. (b) If data of category-wise population of Students of age group 14-16 years is not available then approximation of families of various categories residing in habitation of Schools –

Category No. of Schools responded % SC

Not Available with the schools

ST Minority General All Categories Comments:- Data is not available at the school level.

(c) Share of SC, ST, Minority, and BPL families’ Girls-boys in enrollment is proportionate to their share in population of the habitation/neighborhood or not.


Proportionate Yes No

Every school is enrolled with deprived sections.

100% If not, reasons thereof: Not Applicable

Comments:- Though ascertaining the exact number is difficult, it can be inferred through the registers that the students who are absolutely left outs from all aspects are attending these sampled schools in the district.


2. (a) Class wise, Social Category wise enrollment and attendance (on the day of field visit)

*B-Boy, G-Girl, E-enrolled, P-present

As per the above comprehensive table, total presentees on the visit day are about 69.38%. Percentage of attendance of Students of all the social categories on the given day is more or less equal with little variations. Relatively high percentage of attendance could be due the examination season.

2. (b) Enrollment and attendance of students of economically backward background on the day of field visit (based on BPL Card)

Class

SC ST

Minority Gen & Others Total

CWSN

B G Total B G Total B G Total B G Total B G Total B G Total

E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P

9th 76 45 11

2

78 18

8

12

3

77

2

51

7

11

67

90

1

193

9

141

8

29 16 72 57 10

1

73 287 17

9

444 27

3

731 452 117

2

762 180

3

131

4

297

5

207

6

8 5 8 5 1

6

1

0

10th 39 27 61 46 10

0

73 51

2

35

6

89

4

64

2

140

6

998 18 11 74 53 92 64 173 10

5

303 27

2

476 377 747 536 133

6

101

6

208

3

155

2

5 3 4 3 9 6

Total 11

5

72 17

3

12

4

28

8

19

6

12

84

87

3

20

61

15

43

334

5

241

6

47 27 14

6

11

0

19

3

13

7

460 28

4

747 54

5

120

7

829 191

9

129

8

313

9

233

0

505

8

362

8

1

3

8 1

2

8 2

5

1

6

% 2.27 1.42 3.24 2.45 5.70 3.87 25.39 17.26 40.75 30.51 66.13 47.77 0.93 0.53 2.89 2.17 3.82 2.71 9.09 5.61 14.77 10.78 23.86 16.39 37.94 25.67 62.06 46.06 100 71.73 0.26 0.16 0.24 0.16 0.49 0.32

As all most all the students fall under the category of BPL, the attendance pattern explained above stands valid here also.

2. (c) Any major variation in the pattern of attendance in respect of SC, ST, Minority, Girls Students and Students from BPL background and reasons thereof

Comments:- Students who are enrolled in these schools are almost homogeneous group, in spite of social differences. Hence, no

major various are observed in their attendance patterns.

Class SC ST Minority Gen & Others Total CWSN



9th 84 44 11

0

65 19

4

10

9

875 53

5

124

1

873 2116 14

08

52 20 81 64 133 84 306 207 53

6

35

9

84

2

56

6

132

5

813 19

81

13

68

33

06

218

1

8 7 13 7 15 12

10th 42 25 31 39 73 64 492 39

1

885 652 137

7

10

43

32 15 75 57 107 72 213 127 35

7

28

2

57

0

40

9

783 561 13

52

10

33

21

35

159

4

4 3 4 3 5 5

Total 12

6

69 14

1

10

4

26

7

17

3

136

7

92

6

212

6

152

5

3493 24

51

84 35 15

6

121 240 15

6

519 334 89

3

64

1

14

12

97

5

210

8

1374 33

33

24

01

54

41

377

5

12 10 17 10 20 17

% 2.31 12.68 2.59 1.91 4.91 3.18 25.12 17.01 39.07 28.02 64.20 45.05 1.54 0.64 2.87 2.22 4.41 2.89 9.54 6.14 16.41 11.78 25.95 17.92 38.74 25.25 61.26 44.13 100 69.38 0.22 0.18 0.31 0.18 0.37 0.31


3. Whether above schemes ensure convergence with provisions of RMSA?

1. Yes 2. No

Picture 1: Showing school attendance on the day of field visit

H.S.S. Dandgaon, Block- Udaipur

Comments:-

4. Any overt or covert, manifest or subtle discrimination against Students of any social group or community by the teachers or peers is observed in School and the efforts made to minimize it.


Discrimination

No discrimination By teachers By peers

0 0 25

100% 0% 0% 100%

Comments:- Since students are homogeneous in their social background, there is little scope for structural discrimination. Hence, discrimination was not observed in any school.

Comments:- Discrimination was not observed but indifference is noticed.

Efforts made to minimize discrimination

Discrimination has not been observed

1


5. Do the overall conditions prevalent in Schools facilitating access of CWSN to secondary Schools. If not, the details of obstructions and barriers.

Number of Schools providing following facilities for access of CWSN –

Facility Number of Schools %

Proper ramps with hand rail 5 20

Western toilet seat 3 12

Special furniture in classroom - -

Tricycle 1 4

Escort - -

Other (Specify) - -

As per above table – out of 25 sampled schools 5 schools are having proper ramps with hand rails, 3 school having western toilet seat and 1 school having tricycle.

If the prevailing conditions in School do not facilitate access of CWSN to School State the obstructions and barriers.

Obstructions:- No special facilities like – desks, benches, western toilet, drinking water taps etc. are found in most of the schools.

Barriers:- No ramp, no tricycle in most of the schools.

Comments:- Awareness in this area is required.

III. Open Schooling

3. At State level

1. Whether the State open School is established at the State level? 1. Yes 2. No

2. Whether the State open School has its own district regional centers and study centers?

1. Yes 2. No

3. (a) Admission and Re-admission procedure in the State open School. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) Examination & assessment pattern.

Examinations are held in the month of June and January every year

(c) Student support services.

Learning material and e-books are made available to students.

Comments:-

1

1


4. Advocacy programme for out of School Students for bringing them back to the School Is done.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

5. Methods for identification of the number of out of School Students in the State (household survey etc.)

Through house hold survey and advertisement in the news paper. Comments:-

6. Identification procedure of out of School Students.

Comments:-

IV. Out of School Students (OoSC)/Dropout Students of Age Group 14-16 years. (At School level)

1. The number, gender and category-wise (SC/ST/Minorities/CWSN) profile of out of School Students (OoSC)/Dropout Students of age group14-16 years in preceding session (2014-15).

Category Class

Enrolled Boys

OoSC/Dropout of age group 14-16 years Total

drop out % Boys drop out

% Enrolled Girls

Girls drop out

% Total Enrolled

SC IX 84 8 0.60 110 8 0.40 194 16 0.48

X 42 1 0.13 31 7 0.51 73 8 0.37

ST IX 875 121 9.13 1241 85 4.29 2116 206 6.23

X 392 82 10.47 885 102 7.54 1277 184 8.61

Minority IX 52 1 0.07 81 0 0 133 1 0.03

X 32 1 0.12 75 0 0 107 1 0.05

Gen & OBC

IX 306 42 3.16 536 28 1.41 842 70 2.11

X 313 24 3.06 357 47 3.47 670 71 3.32

Total IX 1325 172 12.98 1981 121 6.10 3306 293 8.86

X 783 108 13.79 1352 156 11.53 2135 264 12.36

CWSN IX 8 0 0 13 0 0 21 0 0

X 4 0 0 4 0 0 8 0 0 The separate number of CWSN is included in all categories.

Name of category with higher dropout:- ST

Gender with higher dropout:- Male in 9th Std. and Female in10th Std.

Class with higher dropout:- 9th Std.

Reasons for dropout:- (1) Poverty

(2) Poverty of culture

(3) Household responsibilities etc.

(4) Seasonal Migration

Comments:- Drop out is a phenomenon for which above mentioned factors are responsible with varying degree in different cases.


2(a) Efforts being made by School management to bring them back to School and, results thereof during the past one year.

Efforts made:– Awareness programmes were taken. However, the problem lies beyond school domain.

2(b) Results of efforts made:

Class- 9th Class- 10th No. of drop out students

No. of drop out brought back to

School

% No. of drop out students


School

%

293 264 As per above table, in all the 25 schools, drop out students are found to be 293 in standard 9th and 264 students in standard 10th. Since no accurate data is available regarding their re joining of the school, it is assumed that no drop out student was brought back to the school.

Comments:- No adequate efforts.

3. Arrangements made to hold back Students of seasonal migrant families in School.

Arrangement Number of Schools %

Seasonal Hostels -- --

Any other arrangement -- --

No arrangement -- --


4. If no such arrangement made, whether migration/transfer certificate is issued to such Students by the Schools?

No. of Schools issuing TC Nil Yes No

Not Available - % - -

Comments:- Not found

5. Information about any special training interventions meant for the OoSC.

No. of Schools:-25

Special trainings started Yes No

3 22 100% 12% 88%

Name of Trainings Open centre for OoSC (SIOS)


5. (a) Number of enrolled and present students in training programme on the day of visit.

Boys Girls Total Enrolled

----

Present %

5 (b) Training programme is imparted through –

Total No. of School conducting training

Trainers No. of School %

Regular teachers 3 12% NIOS -- -- SIOS 3 12%

(c). Average duration of training programme in days and achievement level of students (on the basis of School record)

Class Enrolled in Training

Programme

Appeared in Exam

Achievement level Above 60% 45-59% 33-44%

B G B G B G B G B G 9 - - - - - - - - - - 10 - - - - - - - - - -

Total - - - - - - - - - - % - - - - - - - - - -

Comments: - Special training intervention is found in 3 schools out of 25 sampled schools.

3. Equity

I. General Information

At School Level

Category-wise profile of attendance and achievement of students category-wise (SC/ST/Minority/CWSN) Profiling of attendance and achievement (School result) of School Students in the age group of 14-16 years.

Class

2011-12

SC ST MINO. CWSN

B G B G B G B G

Enrolled 48 77 826 828 19 25 3 3

Avg. % of Attend. 75 80 70 75 80 78 75 80

Nil


9th

Appeared in Exam 45 66 556 817 7 23 3 2

% 93.75 85.71 67.31 98.67 36.84 92 100 66.66

Above 60% 7 3 35 109 0 2 0 0

% 15.55 4.54 6.29 13.34 0 8.69 0 0

Below 60% 33 61 356 582 2 19 3 1

% 73.33 92.42 64.02 71.23 28.57 82.60 100 50

10th

Enrolled 45 64 623 1166 5 22 0 1

Avg. % Attend. 80 82 70 75 63 62 65 78

Appeared in Exam 43 44 611 905 5 20 0 1

% 95.55 68.75 98.07 77.61 100 90.90 0 100

Above 60% 3 1 10 24 0 3 0 0

% 6.97 2.27 1.63 2.66 0 15 0 0

Below 60% 26 33 357 585 3 12 0 0

% 60.46 75 58.43 64.64 60 60 0 0

Class

2012-13

SC ST MINO. CWSN

B G B G B G B G

9th

Enrolled 64 141 889 900 19 24 2 13

Avg. % of Attend. 75 80 70 76 72 74 78 81

Appeared in Exam 48 128 625 898 18 19 2 8

% 75 90.78 70.30 99.77 94.73 79.16 100 61.5

Above 60% 1 12 60 140 4 6 0 0

% 2.08 9.37 9.60 15.59 22.22 31.57 0 0

Below 60% 28 70 428 599 6 11 2 6

% 58.33 54.68 68.48 66.70 33.33 57.89 100 75

Enrolled 40 85 569 1110 5 24 0 3

Avg. % Attend. 70 82 70 78 70 74 78 81

Appeared in Exam 37 83 551 1099 5 24 0 3

% 92.50 100 96.83 99.00 100 100 0 100


10th Above 60% 9 5 21 39 0 3 0 0

% 24.32 6.02 3.81 3.54 0 12.50 0 0

Below 60% 26 48 268 572 5 12 0 1

% 70.27 57.83 48.63 52.04 100 50.00 0 33.33

Class

2013-14

SC ST MINO. CWSN

B G B G B G B G

9th

Enrolled 74 149 978 912 17 19 3 4

Avg. % of Attend. 81 76 75 76 70 75 69 82

Appeared in Exam 61 139 769 902 13 17 1 2

% 82.43 93.28 78.62 98.90 76.47 89.47 33.33 50.00

Above 60% 9 7 53 139 1 6 0 0

% 14.75 5.03 6.89 15.41 7.69 35.29 0 0

Below 60% 30 71 452 629 11 10 1 2

% 49.18 51.07 58.77 69.73 84.61 58.82 100 100

10th

Enrolled 34 67 625 999 11 16 3 3

Avg. % Attend. 75 80 76 74 79 81 73 74

Appeared in Exam 33 64 573 906 11 16 3 3

% 97.05 95.52 91.68 90.69 100 100 100 100

Above 60% 5 4 38 54 2 1 0 0

% 15.15 6.25 6.63 5.96 18.18 6.25 0 0

Below 60% 19 43 333 556 7 10 2 2

% 57.57 67.18 58.11 61.36 63.63 62.50 66.66 66.66

Comments:- Above three tables inform us about enrollment, attendance and achievement levels of

students of different social categories in classes IX and X classes of three years. Attendance and

Achievement levels are twin areas of concern that need attention.

Details of specific schemes available in the State for ensuring enrollment of special category Students

along with the assistance provided there under?


Name of schemes

Name of schemes

Name of schemes

Name of schemes

Name of schemes

Comments: - No specific schemes available in the State for ensuring enrollment of special category Students along with the assistance provided there under except Girls.

Category-wise (SC/ST/Minority/CWSN) dropout students in past one year i.e. 2013-14

Drop out students in past one year i. e. 2013-14

Category No. of Students

SC 27

ST 164

Minority 6

CWSN -

OBC 88

SC

1. 2. 3.

4. 5. 6.

7. 8. 9.

ST

1. 2. 3.

4. 5. 6.

Minority 1. 2.

Girls

1. Saraswati Yojana Free cycles to all the girls

2. Incentive scholarship yojana to all the girls

3.

4. 5. 6.

7. 8. 9.

CWSN

1. 2. 3.

4. 5. 6.

7. 8. 9.


General 15

Total 300

As per above table, the total no. of drop out students in last year are 300. Category wise are given in the table. They are (SC- 27, ST- 164, Minority- 6, CWSN- 0, OBC- 88 and General- 15 students are found)

II. Girls Education:-

At School/DPO and SPO level

Gender Gap

1. Gender gap in enrollment, attendance, learning achievement and reasons thereof. Enrollment, Attendance, Achievement level

Class

9th

Boys % Girls % Total % Gap % Enrollment 2108 51.55 1981 48.44 4089 100 939.75 -6.41

Attendance on visit day 813 19.88 1386 63.02 2199 53.77 1704.79 41.34

Appeared in Exam 1383 33.82 2189 53.53 3572 87.35 1582.79 36.82

Learning Achievement (Quarterly/half yearly/yearly)

Above 60%

138 3.86 171 4.78 309 8.65 1239.13 19.30

Below 60%

524 14.66 759 21.24 1283 35.91 1448.47 30.96

Class

10th

Boys % Girls % Total % Gap % Enrollment 783 36.67 1352 63.32 2135 100 1726.69 42.08


Appeared in Exam 719 33.67 1305 61.12 2024 94.80 1815.02 44.90


Above 60%

52 2.56 104 5.13 156 7.70 2000.00 50

Below 60%

365 18.03 494 24.40 859 42.44 1353.42 26.11

Gender gap = (GX1000/B) G=No. of Girls B=No. of Boys

Above two tables, inform us about gender-wise enrollment, attendance on the day of the visit. It also shows, appearing in examinations and their achievement of two classes- 9th and 10th.

i. Girl’s representation in both the classes in comparison with their counterparts-boys- is high.


ii. The gender gap in enrollment stands at -6.41 and 42.08 in classes 9th and 10th respectively.

The gender gap in enrollments needs to be located against the total population of both the sexes of feeder habitations. Then only the gap that is calculated can realistically be considered as gender gap in schooling. This data of population of that age group is not available with the schools.

However, the real cause of concern that one can draw from the above tables is the achievement levels of both the sexes. It is very low in both the sexes.

Comments:- Girls enrollment is found more than the boy`s enrollment in std. 10th.

Reasons for gaps in enrollment (if)

Reasons Respondent /districts %

A Socio Cultural/Reasons 2 8

B Economic Reasons 14 56

C Linguistic Reasons 1 4

Total 17 -

This aspect needs thorough investigation.

Reasons for absenteeism (Gap in attendance)

Reasons Respondents (School/district)

%

A Health (own or family members) 20 80 B Social cultural issues 2 8 C Sibling Care 1 4 D Household responsibilities 22 88 E Family issues / Gone to relatives 12 48 F Earning for livelihood 12 48 G Migration - - H Any other - -

Total 69 - Looking for isolated reasons for absenteeism take us nowhere. There is a need to view all these socio-economic and cultural reasons together impact absenteeism.

2. Efforts made to address the gender gap attitudinal and physical.

Barriers No. of Schools

% Efforts made to address barriers

(a) Physical barriers - - - (b) Attitudinal - - Awareness

programmes (c) Linguistic barriers - - - (d) Economical barriers 14 56 Providing

bicycles


Comments:- The problem of gender gap is addressed when the enrollment rates of girls are less than boys. In this case the situation is other way round where, enrollment and dropout problem lies with boys. This could be reason why the problem is not receiving adequate attention.

3. Any reduction in enrollment, attendance, learning achievement, and reasons thereof

(b)(i) Reduction in enrollment and reasons thereof

Social Group

SC ST MINORITY OBC & GEN TOTAL CWSN

Year B G T B G T B G T B G T B G T B G T

2011-12 93 141 234 1449 1994 3443 24 45 69 687 821 1508 2256 3005 5261 3 4 7

2012-13 104 184 288 1458 2010 3468 24 43 67 805 746 1551 2393 2999 5402 2 16 18

Gap 11 43 54 9 16 25 0 -2 -2 118 -75 43 137 -6 141 -1 12 11

2012-13 104 184 288 1458 2010 3468 24 43 67 805 746 1551 2393 2999 5402 2 16 18

2013-14 107 206 313 1551 1912 3463 28 33 61 824 839 1663 2516 2992 5508 6 2 8

Gap 3 22 25 93 -98 -6 4 -10 -4 19 93 112 123 -7 106 4 -14 -10

Above table very clearly shows pattern of enrollment of boys and girls of various social categories. Two conclusions can be drawn from the above table:

The above table indicates increasing trend of enrollment in the year 2013-14.

There is reduction in girls enrollment particularly girls belonging to ST category in the year 2013-14.

(b)(ii) Reduction in attendance and reasons thereof.

Social Group



2011-12 75 80 77.50 70 75 72.50 80 78 79.00 75 78 76.50 75 78.2 76.70 75 80 77.50

2012-13 75 80 77.50 70 76 73.00 72 74 73.00 77 80 78.50 74.4 78.2 76.30 78 81 79.50

Gap 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 -8 -4 -6 2 2 2 0.6 0 -0.4 3 1 -2

2012-13 75 80 77.50 70 76 73.00 72 74 73.00 77 80 78.50 74.4 78.2 76.30 78 81 79.50

2013-14 81 76 78.50 75 76 75.50 70 75 72.50 78 81 79.50 74.6 78 76.30 69 82 75.50

Gap 6 -4 1 5 0 2.5 -2 1 -0.5 1 1 1 0.2 0.2 0 -9 1 -4

(b)(iii) Reduction in achievement level and reasons thereof.

Social Group



2011-12 69 98 167 756 1300 2056 5 53 58 398 659 1057 1231 2115 3346 3 5 8

2012-13 124 175 299 777 1350 2127 15 41 56 462 665 1127 1380 2237 3617 2 6 8

Gap 55 77 132 21 50 99 10 12 2 64 6 70 149 142 271 -1 1 0

2012-13 124 175 299 777 1350 2127 15 41 56 462 665 1127 1380 2237 3617 2 6 8


2013-14 76 125 201 876 1378 2254 22 38 60 486 730 1216 1463 2275 3738 3 4 7

Gap -48 -50 -98 99 28 127 7 -3 4 24 65 89 83 38 111 1 -2 -1

Comments:- Reasons need to be explored.

4. Efforts are made to address the gender gap and removing the physical barriers. Introducing the Saraswati Yojana

Comments:-

5. Any efforts being made for the counseling of parents to handle the problem of girls. If not why?

No. of Schools:- 25

Counseling of percent’s done Yes No

0 25 100% 0% 100%

If counseling is not done, reasons thereof:- Lack of awareness and lack of trained personnel awareness programmes.

Comments:-

6. Impact of separate hostel and other physical facilities and availability of security on

enrollment, attendance and learning achievement of girls.

i. Number of Schools having facility of separate girls’ hostel in campus or in nearby area.

ii. Number of girls residing in girls’ hostel in sample Schools.

iii. Any physical barrier faced by hostellers in their access to School

Comments:- No barriers

4. Guidance and Counseling

At School level:-

1. Guidance and Counseling Cell been constituted by the School or not.

2. If yes, the available student counselor ratio: NIL

No. of Schools:- 25

Guidance & Counseling Cell Constituted Yes No

0 25 100% 0% 100%

Avg. SCR - SCR: Student Counselor Ratio

5

Not aware

il

NnnnnnnnnNoil


Comments:- No Guidance and Counseling Cell. Awareness programmes are required; recruitment of trained personnel needs to be done immediately.

3. Number of Students being assisted by the cell.

Total Enrollment of Class IX, X in sampled Schools

in district

No. of students assisted by the Cell in total sampled Schools in district

%

- Nil -

Comments:- Guidance and counseling centers are yet to take place in schools.

4. The frequent problem areas of the students for which guidance and counseling is being sought.

Sl. No. Problem areas Responses % 1 Selection of optional subjects after sec. No information is available - 2 To opt scout/guide/NCC - - 3 In choosing career - - 4 Seeking information about entrance exams

to various professional streams - -

5. Quality

I. Enabling Conditions : At School level

Availability of following enabling conditions

1-(a)

S. No.

Physical Aspects Total Number of rooms

Number of equipped rooms

%

1 Natural light 72 72 100 2 Ventilation 72 72 100 3 Black Board appropriately located in

classroom 72 72 100

4 Bulb/Tube light /CFL 56 25 44.62 5 Fan 44 24 54.55 6 Teaching aids 35 30 85.71

As per above table, out of 25 sampled schools most of the schools have enabling conditions. Following are the classroom-wise availability of enabling conditions. (Natural lights 72, Ventilation 72, Black board appropriately located in class rooms 72, Bulb/Tube light/CFL 56, Fan 44 and Teaching aids in 35 classrooms out of 25 sampled schools)


Picture 2: Showing the availability of enabling conditions

H.S.S. Narbadapur, Block- Mainpat

Comments:- Considerable work is being done in this area; Lot of work is coming up; in rural schools the first two aspects are available in plenty; in urban areas this is problem.

1(b) Availability & workability of following material/equipment’s –

S. No.

Name of Material/Equipment Availability in Number of Schools

Functional in Number of Schools

Number % Number % 1 Teaching aids 12 48 11 91.66 2 Desk-chairs/stools for students (Adequate) 20 80 20 100 3 Integrated science lab with equipment’s and

material 23 92 23 100

4 Math kit 5 20 5 100 5 Science kit 25 100 25 100 6 Computer lab with computers and supportive

devices and internet connection 8 32 5 15.65

7 Art and Craft room 2 8 0 0 8 Library with age appropriate books and

seating arrangement 12 48 10 83.33

9 TV 0 0 0 0 10 Separate Activity room for girls This is cause of concern 11 Audio Equipment’s 5 20 3 60 12 Video Equipment’s 0 0 0 0 13 LCD Projector 5 20 3 60 14 Overhead projector 0 0 0 0


15 Purified/ Safe Drinking Water 3 12 3 100 16 Fire Extinguisher 10 40 7 70 17 Auditorium 0 0 0 0 18 Staff room 20 80 20 100 19 Indoor games room 6 24 5 83.33 20 N.S.S./NCC/Scout & Guides room 0 0 0 0 21 Counselor room 0 0 0 0 22 First-aid room 0 0 0 0

Comments:- The above table reveals many interesting aspects of physical and cognitive apparatus available in school and their use. Critical assessment is required for further policy interventions.

Art, craft and sports provisions are neglected areas;

Lack of adequate library;

Utilization of cognitive apparatus that is available in schools is not up to the mark.

2. The number of days, the School functioned during the last academic year? Give reasons for the closure, if any of the School remains closed for long gaps during last year. Suggestions to avoid repetition of such instances;

No. of Schools remained closed ---

Average No. of days, School(s) remained closed in last year ---

Reasons for the closure: Unusual closure of the school was not observed.

Comments:- Schools were functional for 220 to 230 days during the last academic year. No school remains closed for long gaps during last year.

3. Number of teachers present in the School (Male & Female, vacancies against sanctioned posts. (In total sampled Schools in district)

Sanctioned Posts (subject-wise)

Number of teachers placed

Total Number of teachers present in School on visit day

Vacancies against sanctioned posts

M F M F

346 145 165 310 138 156 36

100% 41.90 47.69 89.59 44.52 50.32 10.40

Comments:- Table informs us about the position of sanctioned and vacant positions of teachers. Vacancies stand at 36.

4. In case of teacher’s vacancy, the alternative arrangements being made by the head of the institution to complete the course curriculum.

1. Adhoc teachers are appointed

Nil

Nil


2. Available teachers engaged extra periods 3. Middle school teachers engaged high school classes where ever both the school were

working under the same roof.

Comments:-

5. Availability of teachers for each class and for teaching science, mathematics and language.

Number of Schools:- 25

Sufficient teachers available to teach

Science

Math

Language

English Hindi Sanskrit

24 15 17 22 20

100% 96% 60% 68% 88% 80%

Above table shows that availability of teachers for each class and for teaching science,

mathematics and language.

Following is the description of the school wise availability of teachers.

Science 24 schools, Math 15 schools and Language (English 17 schools, Hindi 22 schools and

Sanskrit 20 schools) out of sampled 25 schools.

Comments:- Availability of subject –wise teachers is still a major problem felt by students.

6. Number of teachers possessing professional training qualifications (subject-wise) as mandated and number of untrained teachers.

Number of Schools:- 25 No. of trained teachers

No. of untrained teachers in sampled Schools

Total teachers – 310 196 114

100% 63.22% 36.77%

Comments:- Situation appears to be little better in terms of number of trained teacher in the district. However, training in pedagogy is essential; therefore, plan must address this.

7. Practice of truancy, i.e. absenteeism/classes bunking by students/teachers being reported in the School, if so, the reasons thereof, steps taken by the School management to curb the practice.


Class bunking/Truancy No. of Schools

Yes No Student 11 14

% 44% 56% Teachers 5 20

% 20% 80%


Comments:- Reasons are to be explored.

8. Policy of teacher recruitment, deployment, training, remuneration and career advancement (At State level) SPO

Agency for Recruitment

Authority for

Deployment

Agency for imparting training

Remuneration for training/day

Any provision of study leave for career advancement

Provision of Incentives after career

advancement Residential Non-

Residential

KRP MT RP Trainee

Comments:- It is with State Govt.

II. Teaching Learning Process

1. Maintenance of teacher’s diary including curriculum delivery and lesson Plan etc. by teachers & countersigned by the Head of the institution regularly.

No. of Schools:- 25

Teachers diary maintained Counter sign

Yes No Yes No

25 0 23 2

100% 100% 0% 92% 8%

As per above table, teachers of 25 schools maintained the diary. However, countersignature by the Head of the institution was observed in 23 schools out of 25 schools.

Observation & Comments:- Though ‘diaries’ are in place, the comments are neither reflective

nor critical; they are just formal observations.

2. Availability of timetable prescribed by the School and followed by the teachers.

No. of Schools:- 25

Prescribed time table available Time table followed by teachers Yes No Yes No 25 0 19 6

100% 100% 0% 76% 24% Comments: - Formalities are observed.

3. Are discussions and group team works encouraged as a methodology of teaching for involvement of Students/students in teaching learning process?

No. of Schools:- 25

Discussion and group team work encouraged Yes No

0 25 100% 0% 100%


Above table shows that this kind of collaborative methodology/ activities were not observed in all 25 sampled schools.

Comments:- This is the important gray area in the schools; culture of collective sharing and reflection is absent in schools.

4. A-c Classroom management with reference to seating arrangement of Students.

No. of Schools:- 25

Students made to sit in small groups Students of disadvantaged groups and Students with

disabilities sit separately or on back benches

Students have role in classroom

management

Yes No Yes No Yes No 20 5 0 25 15 10

100% 80% 20% 0% 100% 60% 40% Groups made

of Different Same class

No. of Schools:- 25

0 20

100% 0% 80%

There are not different aspects of seating arrangement of students present in the above table.

a. Students are made to sit in small groups in classrooms to make classroom-learning process a collaborative process. Table informs us that this kind of classroom management is happening in only twenty schools. This is only 80%.

b. Second aspect is about students’ participation in classroom management. As far as this

aspect of management is concerned, the practices are not so discouraging. Students’

participation stands at 60%.

Comments:- Student participation in classroom management needs to be improved; focus needs to be given to group work.

5. On site academic support by resource teachers in year 2014-15

Average frequency of visits of resource

teachers /Schools

Average time spent by resource teacher/School

Nature of support provided

1.

2.

3.

Comments:- No resource teacher


6. Special Teaching for Learning Enhancement:-

Number of Schools, which arranged zero periods, extra classes etc. for academically weaker students –

No. of Schools who arranged zero period, extra class

No. of Schools:- 25

Yes No 0 25

0% 100% Extra classes ran

Throughout year Only for one month before exam - -

100% - - Average days of zero period in a weak

- Results thereof

1. 2 Comments:- It is the neglected area;

7. Method/s of Assessment & Evaluation being followed in the School/classroom.

Method/s Response Marking & grading Average

Comments:- Paper pencil tests are the predominant mode of testing; marks are converted into grades.

8. Participation level of the CWSN in classroom processes and efforts made to optimize it.

No. of Schools with CWSN % 13 52

Participation level in class All CWSN participate actively 12 92.31 Few CWSN participate 1 7.69 No participation - -

As per above table, participation level of the CWSN students are as follows- (All CWSN participate actively in12 schools and Few CWSN participate in 1 school)

Efforts made to optimize participation of CWSN in class 1 2 No separate efforts 3 4

Comments:- An area where urgent institutional intervention at state, district and school level are to be initiated.


9. Nature of peer interaction with CWSN.

Peer Interaction Number of Schools % Neutral 13 100%

Taunting - - Teasing - - Bullying - -

Comments:- CWSN students were identified in 13 schools; no bullying and teasing are observed or reported any school. 10. Individualized Educational Plan (IEPs) prepared for CWSN.

No. of Schools:- 25

No. of Schools with CWSN 13

IEP Prepared Not prepared

0 13 100% 0% 100%

Comments:- This appears to be too idealistic to expect for two reasons namely, crowded classrooms and lack of training.

11. Availability of adequate facilities for seating CWSN –

No. of Schools:- 25 Total No. of sampled Schools No. of Schools with CWSN in samples 25 13

100% 100% 52%

No. of Schools:- 13 No. of Schools with CWSN seating facilities

Yes No 0 13

100% 0% 100% Comments:- Special focus is needed to make classrooms inclusive at least physically.

12. Extent and nature of use of ICT devices for teaching and learning of the CWSN.

Equipment’s No. of Schools having Facilities

No. of Schools with CWSN having these facilities

No. of Schools making use of ICT

%

LCD Projector 5 5 2 40 Overhead projector - - - - Computer & Accessories with net connection

8 8 2 25

Others - - - -

Comments:- The data in the table speaks about availability of ICT in school. It does not necessarily talks about the availability of ICT devices that are EXCLUSIVELY meant for CWSN children. They are meant for all. No special ICT materials are found in any school. Huge gap is found between availability of computers and their educational use.


III. Teachers’ Training

1. Provisions for Training of Teachers

S. No.

Provisions for In-service training Schedule Duration

1 Induction training (Science, Maths, English, Social Science, Hindi & Sanskrit)

For newly recruited teachers

10 days training programme based on NCF. 2005, Content, Pedagogy and classroom activities.

2 In-service training –need based 5 days’

training programme in workshop mode in Maths, English, Social Science and Science

From July to December (50% of existing teachers from each district to be covered)

5 days

3 Orientation programme for Head Master/ Principal

As per SPO calendar 3 days

4 Training for newly recruited Head Masters As per SPO calendar 10 days 5 Management training for Head Masters/

Principals From Aug. to January 14 days

6 Workshop for Development of different modules for training


7 Training of Resource Persons for H.M.’s

training As per SPO calendar

8 Block head-quarters and girls hostels As per SPO calendar 2 hrs. daily after School for 15 days

9 Development and Life skills for girls As per SPO calendar 5 days

10 Sensitization programme (legal literacy workshop)

As per SPO calendar 1 day

1(a) Targeted annual Plan prepared by the State for in-service teachers’ training to improve

quality and skills – ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments:- Mechanism needs to evolve to ascertain that to what extent the training is put to use in actual classrooms. What is the rate of transfer of training? A research study may be undertaken.

2. Inclusion of trainings for dealing with CWSN, in training programme

Details of in-service training in subjects received by teachers -

No. of Schools:- 25

No. of Schools whose teachers received training under RMSA 25

100% 100% Sl. No. Subjects Number of teachers,

received training under RMSA

Average teachers per School who received training

Average Duration

1 Science 54 1-2 5-10 days 2 Maths 21 1-2 5-10 days 3 English 34 1-2 5-10 days 4 Social Science 51 1-2 5-10 days 5 Sanskrit 28 1-2 5-10 days


6 Hindi 36 1-2 5-10 days Total 244 8-9 5-10 days

Inclusion of training to deal with CWSN

- - -

Comments:- (1) All subject – total 244 teachers received training under RMSA; 5-10 days in- service training.

(2) Training to deal with CWSN is very minimal. 2 (i)

Need of various trainings expressed by teachers S.

No. Name of Training Number of Schools

expressed the need Frequency Duration

1 Subject based training 25 Annual 2 Orientation Programme 18 Annual 5 days 3 Innovations’ training 16 Annual 5 days 4 Training for Development of

life skills 25 Annual 5 days

5 Computer training 10 Annual 11 days 6 Scout Masters’ training 17 Annual 7 Disaster Management Training 19 Annual 11 days 8 CWSN 22 9 Any other (mention) 0

Comments:- Institutionalization of training is being happened.

3. Impact of training on the confidence level of the teacher in handling a class with CWSN:

No training to deal with CWSN

Comments:-

4. Physical availability of adequate and good quality facilities for in-service training with reference to –

Facilities Adequate % Inadequate % Space 23 92 2 8 Projection 16 64 9 36 Tools/Modules 22 88 3 12 Equipments (LCD, projector, computer etc.)

11 44 14 56

Above table shows the status of availability of quality facilities for in-service training. (Space- (adequate 23, inadequate 2), Projection - (adequate 16, inadequate 9), Tools/Modules - (adequate 22, inadequate 3) and Equipment’s (LCD, Projector, Computer etc.) - (adequate 11, inadequate 14).

Comments:-


5. Whether training modules are need based or not?

No. of Schools:- 25

Yes No

22 3

100% 88% 12%

Comments:- Needs in general sense are kept in view at state level in structuring modules. 6. Impact:- Use of new technologies like Computer Assisted Learning (CAL), LCD Projector etc. for imparting lessons in the classroom by teachers.

Total No. of teachers received training No. of teachers using CAL, LCD, etc. teaching

%

244 1 school teachers 4% Comments:- Huge gap; need to think and reflect on the situation. Competencies along with culture of using technology in classrooms are absent. 7. Trainers/Resource persons from following institutions who imparted trainings –

N = (No. of Schools) whose teachers received training from RMSA

Sl. No.

Institutes Number of Respondents

% of respondents

1 Secondary Schools

2 Higher Secondary Schools

3 DIET

4 College/University

5 SIERT

6 IASE

7 CTE

8 NIC

9 Any other institution (mention)

10 Total

Comments:- This information cannot be elicited form the data capturing format.

8. Any other issue related with teachers’ training of secondary education.

1. Training in latest alternative constructivist pedagogy is required;

2. Training in CCE with suitable subject wise exemplars is required;

3. Training in creating inclusive classroom is required.

4. Training in ICT in using them for effective classroom interaction is needed.

Comments:-

25


6. CIVIL WORKS

I. General Information At School Level

(1-2)

Sl. No. Name of the School Year of establishment

Year of construction Remarks

1 H.S.S. Police Line 1969 2013 2 H.S.S. Kedarpur 1985 2011 3 H.S.S. Mangari 1998 1998 4 H.S.S. Dandgaon 2006 2008 5 H.S. Andla 2011 - M.S. Building 6 H.S. Bouripara 2011 2014 7 H.S. Bilaspur 2005 2009 8 H.S. Jamkani 2012 2012 9 H.S.S. Sitapur 1963 1963

10 H.S.S. Lakhanpur 1972 -- 11 H.S.S. Raghunathpur 2008 -- M.S. Building 12 H.S.S. Narmadapur 1964 1965 13 H.S.S. Batauli 1966 -- 14 H.S. Chakari 2010 2014 15 H.S.S. Rajapur 1995 2005 16 H.S.S. Boda 1957 2008 17 H.S.S. Lamgaon 1981 2010 18 H.S. Katinda 2010 2014 19 H.S. Biljora 2010 2014 20 H.S.S. Bhusu 1967 1997 21 H.S.S. Girls Udaipur 1999 2013 22 H.S.S. Girls Lundra 1978 -- 23 H.S.S. Giruhildih 2010 -- M.S. Building 24 H.S.S. Jamgaon 2008 -- 25 H.S.S. Kamleshwarpur 1998 --

Comments:-

3. Availability of class rooms for Class IX & X (Std. Size 20’x24’)

Class Sections Available no. of rooms % Deficit %

9th 40 40 100% 1 2.5

10th 32 32 100% 2 6.25

Above table show us; that 40 sections (40 classrooms) are available for standard 9th and 32 sections (32 classrooms) are available for standard 10th in visited 25 sampled schools.

Comments:-


4. Area of the School

No. of Schools:- 25

School Campus School Building Open Space Play Ground Other

22 19 8 3 M.S. Building 100% 88% 76% 32% 12%

Total area (sq. ft)of sampled Schools

- - - -

Avg. (sq. ft) Area - - - -

Picture 3: Showing area of the school campus

H.S. Biljora, Block- Sitapur

Above table show us that school building found in 22 schools, open space having in 19 schools and playground available in 8 schools out of sampled 25 schools. Availability of open space/ground and the judicious use of that space/ground for students’ activities need meticulous

planning. Untapped space/ground is plenty in many schools located in the rural area.

Comments:- (1) 3 schools are operating from middle school building.

(2) Sq. Ft. or Sq. Mt.-wise details are not with the sampled schools. II. Design

1. Type of Building –

No. of Schools:- 25 Pucca Semi Pucca Kutcha Rented 23 2 - -

100 % 92% 8% - - Comments:-


2. Physical Condition of building -

No. of Schools:- 25

Cracks Damp Seepages Damages in Plaster

None

20 2 13 8 5 100% 80% 8% 52% 32% 20%

As per above table, cracks in the school building found in 22 schools, damp in 2 schools, seepage in 13 schools, damage in plaster in 8 schools and 5 school buildings are found in good condition out of sampled 25 schools.

Comments:- School buildings unlike buildings of other activities need to treated differently. They are to be conceived and treated as cognitive structures/spaces not simply physical structures. There is a need to work in this direction.

3. Any local innovative approaches in School building design

No. of Schools - 25 Yes % No %

100% 0 0% 25 100%

Kind of Innovation -

Comments:- Whether policy allows that innovativeness?

4. Availability of Natural Light & Cross ventilation; if not, reasons thereof, and the steps taken by School authorities to rectify it.

No. of Schools:- 25

Natural light Cross ventilation If no, Reasons Steps taken to rectifies

Yes No Yes No 1.

2.

3.

24 1 24 1

100% 96% 4% 96% 4%

Comments:- This is not a problem in all the rural schools.

5. Lighting Facility in Classrooms

No. of Schools:- 25

Arrangement of lighting facility

Yes No

20 5

100% 80% 20%

No. of Schools:- 20

Functional Not functional

Yes No

18 2 -


100% 90% 10% -

If not functioned, Reasons 1. No information 2.

Steps taken 1. No steps taken 2.

Supply of electricity

No. of Schools:- 20

Continuous Intermittent

19 1

100% 95% 5%

Average duration of availability

-

Comments:- Electricity connectivity and uninterrupted supply during school hours is necessary in order to bring ICT into classrooms in a big way.

6. Availability and usability of following provision of alternative electric power supply -

Generator Inverter Gobar Gas Plant

Solar Panels

Wind Electricity

Other

No. of Schools - 25 Availability - 1 - - - -

% - 4% - - - -

No. of School - 1 In working condition

- 1 - - - -

% - 100% - - - -

No. of School - 1 Usability - 1 - - - -

% - 100% - - - -

As per above table, alternative electric power supply is found in 1 school out of 25 sampled schools

Comments:-

7. (a-b) Library Design- Availability of the Following -

No. of

Schools:- 25

Sufficient Seating Space

Proper Light Ventilation Regular Pest Control

Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No 12 13 12 13 12 13 0 25

100% 48% 52% 48% 52% 48% 52% 0% 100%


Comments:- 12 sampled schools have separate library room out of 25 schools. Indeed functional and effective library is almost absent in many schools where separate library room is available.

Library in secondary school is very important learning space for exploration of ideas. In absence of this learning becomes, confined to textbook.

8. (a-d) Laboratory Design

Laboratory Number of Schools

(a) Adequate space for Physics, Chemistry, Biology and other subjects

Yes % No %

4 16 21 84

(b) Proper height (3 ft.) of Lab. Table 11 68 14 56

(c) (i) Cross Ventilation 14 56 11 44

(ii) Exhaust Fan 6 24 19 76

(d) Availability of Running Water 2 8 23 92

Picture 4: Showing laboratory room

H.S.S. Dandgaon, Block- Udaipur Comments:- Laboratory facilities are very meager. Their use in actual learning purpose needs to be encouraged.


9. Facilities for Physically Challenged:

(a) Availability of Ramps to access the following

Sl. No. Ramps to Number of Schools

Yes % No %

(i) Entrance of School 5 20 20 80

(ii) Drinking Water Facility 1 4 24 96

(iii) Toilet Facility 2 8 23 92

(iv) Science lab - - - -

(v) Computer Lab - - - -

(vi) Mathematic Lab - - - -

(vii) Library - - - -

(viii) Auditorium - - - -

(ix) Play Ground - - - -

Comments:- Above table show us regarding facilities for the physically challenged students in the school. Facilities for CWSN are as follows:-

(Entrance of School – 5, Drinking water facility – 1 and Toilet facility – 2 schools) instead of these schools there are no other facilities for CWSN in any school out of 25 sampled schools. The table informs how our schools are yet to become CWSN friendly physical structures.

(b) Availability of benches of different height in classrooms –

No. of Schools:- 25

Bench Availability

Yes No

0 25

100% 0% 100%

(c) Ramp’s Condition

Adequate Slope:- 5

Number of Schools with ramps

Yes No

5 20

100% 20% 80%

Hand rails available 2 3

% 40% 60%

Comments:- As per above table, ramp with hand rails available in 2 schools out of 25 sampled schools. This is in a sorry state of affairs.


10. Drinking Water Facility

(a) Source of drinking water

Source Number of Schools %

Supply Water 4 16

Tube well 10 40

Dug Well - -

Hand Pump 14 56

Other 2 8

No source 1 4

Availability of sufficient water across all the seasons

No. of Schools:- 25

Water Available

Yes No

24 1

100% 96% 4%

Picture 5: Showing source of drinking water

H.S.S. Boda, Block- Batauli

Above table shows us the status of drinking water facility available in 24 schools out of sampled 25 schools. Source of drinking water are as follows:- (Supply water - 4, Tube well- 10, Hand pump - 14 schools, others -2 schools and no source - 1 school)

Comments:- Schools are doing well in this area.


(b) Water Storage Facility & its condition & cleaning schedule

Type of Facility

No. of

Schools

Condition Cleaning Schedule

No. of Schools

%

Good & Usable

Damaged not usable

Weekly 1 4

Steel drum 20 20 - Fortnightly - - % 80 80 - Monthly 2 8

Covered tank - - - Six Monthly - - % - - - Not Definite 2 8

Underground tank

- - - Regularly 20 80

% - - - - - - Overhead tank 5 5 - - - -

% 20 20 - - - -

Comments:- Water storage facility available in all sampled 25 schools.

(c) Quality of drinking water

No. of Schools:- 25

Quality

Satisfactory Not satisfactory

22 3

100% 88% 12%

As per above table, quality of drinking water satisfactory in 22 schools out of 25 sampled schools.

(i) Measures taken by Schools authority to ensure clean drinking water -

No. of Schools:- 25

Aqua guard R/o Water Filter Other None

1 - 1 - 23

100% 4% - 4% - 92%

(ii) Measures adopted for treatment & testing of water –

No. of Schools:- 25

Bleaching Powder

Chlorine Alum Powder

None Testing of water done

Yes No

- - - 25 0 25

100% - - - 100% 0% 100%

Comments:-


(d) Availability of sufficient numbers of drinking water taps –

No. of Schools:- 25

Availability of drinking water taps

Yes No

8 17

100% 32% 68%

As per above table, availability of sufficient drinking water taps are found in 8 schools out of sampled 25 schools.

Comments:- Problems requires immediate attention

11. Sanitation Facility –

(a) Availability of adequate numbers of urinals/lavatories students, teachers and others

Users Facility of urinals/lavatories available in Schools

Adequate Number % Inadequate Number %

Boys 20 80 5 20

Girls 22 88 3 12

CWSN 2 8 23 92

Teachers 11 44 14 56

Other workers 6 24 19 76

Comments:-

(b) Maintenance/Cleanliness of toilets and supply of water

No. of Schools:- 25

Maintenance Cleanliness Supply of running water

Yes No Yes No Yes No

15 10 15 10 8 17

100% 60% 40% 60% 40% 32% 78%


Picture 6: Showing the maintenance and cleanliness of toilets

H.S. Bouripara, Block- Ambikapur

Above table shows that the proper maintenance of toilets is found in 15 schools, cleanliness of toilets in 15 schools and supply of water available in 8 schools out of 25 sampled schools. Though efforts in proper maintenance and cleanliness are on due to lack of supply of running water, the problem of cleanliness still persists.

Comments:- This is most urgent task to be addressed.

(c) Availability of Separate Toilets for Girls –

No. of Schools:- 25

Separate toilet availability Yes No 22 3

100% 88% 12% Safer location of Girls’ toilets

No. of Schools:- 22 Yes No 20 2

100% 90.91% 9.09% Availability of Napkins & Dustbins

No. of Schools:- 22

Sanitary Napkins Dustbins Yes No Yes No

1 21 4 18 100% 4.55% 95.45% 18.18% 81.82%

Comments:- Though progress is registered, this issues needs to be addressed on priority basis.


(d) Provision in toilets for physically challenged students -

No. of Schools:- 25

Availability of Provision Yes No

2 23 100% 8% 92%

Above table shows, the provisions of toilets for physically challenged. It reveals the sorry state in this regard.

(e) Lavatories’ single pits/double pits attached with septic tank and cleaning of septic tank

No. of Schools:- 25

Connectivity of lavatories with Single Pit/Double Pit Lavatories with Septic Tank

Regular cleaning of septic tank


100% 92% 8% 0% 100%

Comments:- Cleanliness is a problem.

12. Drainage System

(A-c) Availability of drainage facility

No. of Schools:- 25

Drainage System available Yes No

7 18 100% 28% 72%

Type of Drains Under ground Pucca Covered Pucca & Open Kutcha & Open No. of Schools:- 7 1 2 2 2

100% 14.29% 28.57% 28.57% 28.57% Structural Condition

Good Bad Damaged Regular Cleaning of drains done in Schools

No. of Schools:- 7 2 4 1 1 100% 28.57% 57.14% 14.29% 14.29%

Any instance of Water Logging No. of

Schools:-7 Yes No

4 3 100% 57.14% 42.86%

No. of

Schools:- 4

If, yes, location of Water Logging Wrecked Drains

Entrance Gate

Open Space

Playground Near Toilets

Outside Classrooms/Lab/Lib/Kitchen

- - 1 - 3 - 100% - - 25% - 75% -

Above table show us, the availability of drainage system. The system is in place in 7 schools out of

sampled 25 schools. School- wise availability of drainage system is as follows-

(Underground – 1 school, Pucca Covered – 2, Pucca & Open – 2 and Kutcha & Open- 2 schools)

Comments:-


13. (a-c) Waste Water treatment/discharge/disposal of solid waste

No. of Schools:- 25

Waste Water Treatment & Discharge Arrangement Yes No 20 5

100% 80% 20%

No. of Schools:- 20 If yes, Type of drainage system

Septic Tank Municipal drain Open field Any other 19 - 1 -

100% 95% - 5% -

No. of Schools:- 25

Availability of waste Collection facility Yes No 12 13

100% 48% 52%

No. of Schools:- 12

If yes, Adequate No. of dustbins Yes No 10 2

100% 83.33% 16.67%

No. of Schools:- 12

If yes, Condition of dustbins Usable Not usable

12 0 100% 100% 0%

No. of Schools:- 12

Availability of facility for treatment of waste Yes No

6 6 100% 50% 50%

No. of Schools:- 25

Facility for composting of organic waste Yes No

0 25 100% 0% 100%

As per above table, waste water treatment and discharge arrangement are available in 20 schools and waste collection facility are available in 12 schools out of sampled 25 schools.

Comments:-

14. (A-b) Water & Energy Conservation

No. of Schools:-25

Availability of Water Conservation Measures Yes No

1 24 100% 4% 96% No. of

Schools:-25 Availability of Rain water harvesting system Yes No

1 24 100% 4% 96% No. of

Schools:- 1

Condition of Rainwater harvesting system Working Not Working

1 0 100% 100% 0% No. of

Schools:-1

Stored water consumable Yes No

1 0 100% 100% 0% No. of Lighting facility available


Schools:-25

Yes No 20 5

100% 80% 20% Type Ordinary bulb Ordinary tube CFL None No. of

Schools:-20 7 15 13 0

100% 35% 75% 65% 0% No. of

Schools:-25

Teacher’s School management’s awareness about use of renewable sources of energy Yes No

2 23 100% 8% 92%

Type of source

Gobar gas Plant Solar energy Wind energy

No. of Schools using

2 2 - -

% 8% 8% - -

Comments:-

15. (i) (a-b) Safety aspect of Building Design

No. of Schools:-25

Govt. Building Rented 25 -

100% 100% - (Condition) Good 19

% 76% Bad 6 % 24% No. of Schools with special structural facility to cope with

natural hazards Flood -

% - Cyclone -

% - Earthquake -

% - Type of building in no. of Schools

Ground floor 17 % 68%

Double storied 8 % 32%

Triple storied 0 % 0%

Alternative exit gates for emergency evacuation in double/triple storied building (no. of Schools)

One gate 12 % 48%

Two gates 13 % 52%

Three gates - % -

Stare-case width sufficient

18

% 72% Not sufficient 7

% 28%


Comments:-

15 (ii) (c-e)

Disaster Preparedness Plan Available Emergency Evacuation Plan No. of

Schools:-25 Yes No Yes No

0 25 0 25 100% 0% 100% 0% 100%

Awareness about disaster among No. of

Schools:-25 Students Teachers No

- 2 23 100 % - 8% 92%

Received training to handle disaster No. of


- - 25 100% - - 100% No. of

Schools:-25 Fire extinguishers available in

Office Laboratory No 6 4 15

100% 24% 16% 60% No. of

Schools:-10

In working condition In working condition Yes No Yes No

6 0 4 0 100% 100% 0% 100% 0%

Trained to handle fire extinguisher No. of

Schools:-25 Teachers Students


100% 0% 100% 0% 100% Availability of Contact Numbers of

No. of Schools:-25

Ambulance Fire brigade Nearest hospital Yes No Yes No Yes No

8 17 8 17 8 17 100% 32% 68% 32% 68% 32% 68%

Display of Numbers

3 5 3 5 3 5

% 37.50% 62.50% 37.50% 62.50% 37.50% 62.50%

Comments:-

III. Schools with ongoing construction activity

1. (a-d) sufficient measures being taken by School authorities to ensure that it does not hamper academic activities vitiate air, water, land quality etc. in School.

No. of

Schools:- 25

Ongoing construction activities Yes No

4 21 100% 16% 84% Type New School building Strengthening of

existing School Repair works

No. of Schools:- 4

3 1 -

100% 75% 25% -


Picture 7: Showing the status of work progress

H.S.S. Rajapur, Block- Mainpat

Above table shows us, that the ongoing construction activity is found in four schools out of 25 sampled schools. The construction does disturb the academic activity.

Measures being taken by School authorities

a. Measures being taken to ensure

No. of Schools:- 4

Academic activities not hampered due

to construction

Construction activity does not vitiate quality of Noise pollution in permissible limit Air Water Land

Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No

4 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 4 0

100% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 100% 0%

b. Construction material stored appropriately

No. of Schools:-4

Yes No

0 4

100% 0% 100%

c. Temporary fencing of construction area done

No. of Schools:-4

Yes No

1 3

100% 25% 75%

Comments:-


2. (a-b) Procurement aspects

No. of Schools:- 4

Same contractor whom the work was awarded is doing work (a)

Stage of construction work Construction work being done

according to layout Plan

Yes Subleted to other

Foundation level

Plinth level/ DPC

Lintel Roof level

Flooring/plastering

Finishing level

Yes No

4 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 3 1 100% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 25% 50% 75% 25%

Comments:- Construction works are conducting by PWD department; sampled schools have no data about ongoing construction work.


2(c-g)

h. Number of visits per School of Technical persons and authentication done or instructions given on construction site –

Total Number of Schools with ongoing civil work in district –

Construction level No. of

Schools

Number of

visits

Average No. of

visit/School

No. of Authentications

made

Average No. of

Authentication

Instructions given

in No. of Schools

Recorded Not recorded

Foundation - - - - - - - -

Plinth - - - - - - - -

Lintel - - - - - - - -

Roof level - - - - - - - -

Flooring - - - - - - - -

Finishing - - - - - - - -

Comments:-

No. of

Schools:- 4

Community

members through

SMDC involved

in procurement

process

Sub Committee

(Construction

Committee)

Constituted

A/c Books Civil

Work

(Construction)

maintained/

updated

MB for Civil

Work

Maintained

Payment made

to contractor in

accordance

with MB

Material

stocked is in

line with stock

register

Cheque issue

register

maintained

Quality up to the mark Physical existence of

construction material

matches with entry

made in stock register

Construction

Material

Construction

work

Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No

0 4 0 4 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0

100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0%

52


(i) System of fund flow from District to the accounts of SMDC

Mode of transfer Cheque Draft E-transfer Dates of receipt of fund No. of Schools – 4 - - 4 -

100% - - 100% -

Comments:- Construction works are conducting by PWD department; sampled schools have no data about ongoing construction work. (j) Any good practices in civil works that can be replicated in other places/in other States.

Comments:- Nil

7. Community Mobilization / Participation -

Total number of SMDC members in sampled Schools of the District

1. (a-c) Familiarity of SMDC members with their roles as notified by the State Government –

No. of Schools:-25

Level Familiarity with their

roles

% SEMIS DCF

% School Report Card

% SDMC Register

% Guidelines of School Development Plan

%

No. of Schools:- 25

Training received by SMDC Members

Printed copy of guidelines of SMDC

made available to members

Better 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes No Yes No

Good 2 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 25

Average 22 88 0 0 0 0 24 96 0 0 100% 0 100 0 100

Not familiar 1 4 25 100 25 100 1 4 25 100

Comments:-

2. (i) Frequency of SMDC meetings held, issues discussed thereof and average attendance of the SMDC members-

No. of Schools:-25

Meetings held Average Attendance of SMDC members

Monthly Quarterly Six monthly Annually Whenever needed Never 3 – 6 SMDC Members 1 10 5 3 6 0

100% 4% 40% 20% 12% 24% 0%

465


Picture 8: Showing the SMDC meeting

H.S.S. Bhusu, Block- Sitapur

Above table show us, the frequency of SMDC meetings out of sampled 25 schools are as follows-

(Monthly-1, Quarterly-10, six monthly-5, annualy-3 and whenever needed-6 schools)


Issues discussed –

1. About water facility 2. The construction of toilets 3. The construction of extra room by SMDC 4. About guest faculty appointment 5. Buying books and stationary 6. Buying stock like chairs, cupboard etc. 8. About the celebration national festivals 9. Distribution of bicycles etc. Comments:- 2(ii) Description of SMDC members –

Members Number Average no. of members per School Average Attendance in recent meeting

Total members 465 17-18 4-5 Women members 153 6-7 1-2 SC/ST members 308 12-13 2-3 Selected members 332 13-14 3-4 Nominated members 133 4-5 1-2 Comments:-

3. (i) Roles of SMDC members in monitoring attendance of teachers and students –

No. of

Schools:-25

Monitoring Attendance of Monitoring Academic Progress of Students Teachers Students


100% 0% 100% 8% 92 % 8% 92%

Comments:- (1) Most of the SMDC are not made according to their guidance.

(2) Most of the SMDC members are not aware about their roles and responsibilities.


(i) Level of participation of SMDC members in helping School authorities to conduct following activities

No.

of

Scho

ols

Lev

el o

f Pa

rtic

ipat

ion

RM

SA &

MD

M

Impl

emen

tatio

n

%

Con

stru

ctio

n w

ork

unde

r R

MSA

%

SAG

Uti

lizat

ion

%

Free

Tex

t Boo

ks d

istr

ibut

ion

%

Scho

lars

hips

dis

trib

utio

n

%

Prep

arin

g A

WP

& B

%

Stud

ents

Enr

ollm

ent,

Atte

ndan

ce

%

Reg

ular

ity o

f te

ache

rs

%

Run

ning

of

day

to d

ay a

ctiv

ities

orga

nizi

ng S

choo

l& c

ultu

ral

even

ts

%

Hel

p in

pro

vide

sch

ool f

acili

ties

%

Filli

ng o

f D

CF

%

Good - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Average 0 0 0 0 11 44 20 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 12 5 20 4 16 0 0

Bad 25 100 25 100 14 56 5 20 25 100 25 100 25 100 22 88 20 80 21 84 25 100

Comments:- Table is self explanatory. Their participation is minimal.

4. Participation of SMDC members in preparation of AWP&B –

No. of Schools:- 25

Preparation of AWP & B Yes No

0 25 100% 0% 100%

Comments:- No participation of SMDC members in preparation of AWP&B. This indicates status of decentralization in planning.


5. Training received by SMDC members and duration thereof –

No. of Schools:-25

SMDC members received training

Total No. of SMDC members

No. of members who received training

Average of training duration in days

Yes No 465

-

-

0 25 -

100% 0% 100% - - -

Comments:- No orientation programmes are conducted.

6. Schedule of trainings, received by SMDC members, name agency who conducted the trainings, and perception of SMDC members about trainings.

Month and year of training held

Trainings conducted by

Responses about perception of SMDC members regarding trainings Topic, Content, Methodology projection

Nil 1. No. of Schools

Good & Useful Average Not Good - 2. - 3. - - - - 4. % - - - - 5.

Comments:- No training for SMDC members was organized.

8. MIS (Management Information System) at SPO, DPO and School level

1. Preparation of Master List of all Schools including private in District/State

Name of

District visited:-

Surguja

Master List of govt. and Pvt. Schools Prepared If master list not prepared reasons

thereof

Yes No 1.

√ - 2. Name of State:-Chhattisgarh

√ - 3.

Total No. of govt.

Schools

No. of govt. Schools of

which list is prepared

% Total No. of Pvt. Schools

No. of Pvt. Schools of which list is prepared

% 4.

District 155 155 100 59 59 100 5.

State 4148 4148 100 1877 1877 100

Comments:-


Distribution of DCF for the current year to all Schools in the District

No. of School:- 214 DCF distributed to all DPOs from SPO Yes No

100% √ -- No. of School:- 214 DCF distributed all Schools from DPO

Yes No 100% √ --

Reasons for not distributing the DCF to Schools:- Distributed

Comments:-

3. Training received by teachers /head Master /Principal for filling up of DCF in sampled Schools and district

At district level At School level Total No. of govt. & Pvt. Schools in district

214 No. of School:- 25

Training received by teachers of sampled Schools

No. of teachers who received DCF training

214 Yes No

Average No. of teachers who received DCF training

214 25 0

100% 100% 0% Overall, kind of training received to fill up DCF Yes, average training found in session 2014-15

Reasons for not receiving training:-

Comments:- District level information has been given by DPO.

4. Status of receiving of DCF duly filled up from all Schools in the district for the last year i.e. 2014-15 (At district level)

Total no. of Schools in

the district:-

214

No. of Schools to which DCF distributed through

nodal Schools

No. of Schools from which filled up DCF

received

No. of Schools from which filled DCF not

received

Reasons for not delay

Govt. Pvt. Total Govt. Pvt. Total Govt. Pvt. Total 1.

2.

3.

4.

155 59 214 155 59 214 -- -- -- Govt. Pvt.

155 59

100% 72.43 27.57 100 72.43 27.57 100 -- -- --

Comments:-


5. Availability of Copy of filled up DCF with School for record and reference (At School level)

No. of Schools:- 25

Copy of filled up DCF available Reasons of Non-availability of o/c of DCF

Yes No 1.

25 0 2.

100% 100% 0% 3.

Comments:- Yes, current academic year filled copy of DCF is available in the school. 6-7 School report card and sample checks

Data entry done School report card generated

Sample checking being done


√ - √ - √ -

School report card distributed to no. of Schools Finding of sample check 1. Mistakes are found regarding the infrastructure data. 2. Mismatch between actual numbers and records regarding enrollments are observed. 3. Incorrect CWSN data is observed.

25

% 100%

Data entry done

School report cards

Sample checking School report cards distributors all School

Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Name of district:-

Surguja √ - √ - √ - √ -

Name of State:- Chhattisgarh

- - - - - - - -

Overall finding of sampled checking

1. Formalities are fulfilled. Substance needs to be brought in. Comments:-

8. Has the data been submitted to State level as per time schedule?

1. Yes 2. No

9. At which level the data is being analyzed and disseminated?

Block and district level.

Yes


10. Awareness of School authorities regarding importance of data collected under MIS and if so, are they using it

Awareness about data’s information Use of data being made

No. of Schools:- 25

Yes No Yes No

25 0 25 0

100% 100% 0% 100% 0%

11. Is SEMIS/ UDISE data used for Planning and budgeting? DPO level

1. Yes 2. No

12. Is the backup of the data supplied under SEMIS/UDISE properly maintained?

1. Yes 2. No

9. Financial Management (At School, DPO & SPO level) –

1. Nature of financial records and their maintenance and Bank reconciliation –

No. of Schools:- 25

Records maintained & updated on daily basis Bank reconciliation done on monthly basis Cash Book

Yes No Yes No

25 0 6 19

100% 100% 0% 24% 76%

DPO √ - √ -

SPO √ - √ -

Above table, show the cashbook maintained and updated on regular basis in 25 schools and bank

reconciliation done on monthly basis in 6 schools out of sampled 25 schools.

Comments:- Bringing promptness in financial matters needs emphasis.

2. Mode of transfer of funds to the SMDC from State/District level –

From DPO to SMDC Mode of Transfer

Cheque Draft E-transfer

No. of Schools:- 25 0 0 25

100% 0% 0% 100%

From SPO to DPO - - √

Comments:- Modernization in the process of money transfer is satisfactory.

Yes

Yes


3(i) Type of funds/grants received by the sampled Schools and details thereof (financial year 2013-14) –

S. NO. Type of funds/grants No. of Schools As recorded in cash book Amount Received Total Month of receipt

1. School Annual Grant (SAG) 25 50,000 12,50,000 4.9.13

2. Minor Repair Grant 15 25,000 3,75,000 4.10.13

3. New School Building Grant (Major grant)

- - - - - - -

4. Additional classroom /lab etc. construction grant

- - - - - - -

5. Major repair grant - - - - - - - - -

6. Educational tour grant - - - - - - -

7. Others (coaching) 11 9800 1,07,800 10.6.13 - - -

Comments:- New school building and additional classroom grants are not distributed to the school directly, this type of contract is given to the PWD department.

At District Level

3. (ii). Type of funds /grants allocated by the district to Schools

Sl. No. Name of grant allocated No. of Schools Month of allocation

1 Annual Grant 25 4.9.13

2 Minor Repair Grant 15 4.10.13

3 Major Repair Grant -- --

At State Level

3. (iii). Type of funds /grants allocated by the State to district

Sl. No. Name of grant allocated No. of districts Month of allocation 1 School Grants 27 With different time intervals 2 MMER 3 Model School 4 Girls Hostel 5 Teachers Salary 6 DPO Office Payment 7 Teacher Training 8 Vocational Education 9 Excursion Tour for students

10 Fixed Assets created/purchased during the year


4. System for drawl and payment of fund from SMDC account –

No. of Schools:- 25 Cash Cheque Both

3 22 3

100% 12% 88% 12%

As per above table, system for drawl and payment of fund from SMDC account by cash 19 school, cheque 22 schools and both in 3 schools out of 25 sampled schools.

Comments:-

5. Sharing of proposal for expenditure and expenditure Statements with community

No. of Schools:- 25

Sharing of If yes, details of objections Proposal for

expenditure Expenditure Statements

Any objection raised by community about any

transaction

Yes No Yes No Yes No 1. No objection

8 17 8 17 0 25 2.

100% 32% 68% 32% 68% 0% 100% 3.

4.

Comments:- Objections are not observed

6. Audit of SMDCs

All SDMCs in State/District are covered by audit 1. Yes 2.No

No. of Schools:- 25

Audit carried out

Yes No

25 0

100% 100% 0%

D.P.O. √ -

No. of Schools:- 25

If yes, Audit carried out by

Education Dept. A.G. C.A. Social Audit None

- - 25 - -

100% - - 100% - -

Comments:-

Yes


7. Social Auditing

Display of financial Information on notice board/wall of the School/office for the purpose of social audit-

No. of Schools:- 25

Display of financial information (receipts & payments) and timely entered Yes No

0 25

100% 0% 100% D.P.O. -- --

Comments:- This idea has not been translated into practice. Orientation programmes to develop awareness are required.

8. Any instance of community mobilizing resources for the School.

No. of Schools:- 25

Instance of community mobilizing resources Yes No

5 20 100% 20% 80%

If yes, details thereof- 1. Donate water cooler 2. Donate land 3. Donate fan etc.

Comments:-

9. (i). Status of utilization certification and period for which it has been

Submitted from SMDC to DPO

Sl. No. Name of School Month of submission

of UC Financial year for which UC

is submitted 1 H.S.S. Police Line April 2014 2013-14 2 H.S.S. Kedarpur - - 3 H.S.S. Mangari April 2014 2013-14 4 H.S.S. Dandgaon April 2014 2013-14 5 H.S. Andla - - 6 H.S. Bouripara April 2014 2013-14 7 H.S. Bilaspur April 2014 2013-14 8 H.S. Jamkani - - 9 H.S.S. Sitapur - - 10 H.S.S. Lakhanpur April 2014 2013-14 11 H.S.S. Raghunathpur April 2014 2013-14 12 H.S.S. Narmadapur April 2014 2013-14


13 H.S.S. Batauli April 2014 2013-14 14 H.S. Chakari - - 15 H.S.S. Rajapur April 2014 2013-14 16 H.S.S. Boda April 2014 2013-14 17 H.S.S. Lamgaon - - 18 H.S. Katinda April 2014 2013-14 19 H.S. Biljora April 2014 2013-14 20 H.S.S. Bhusu - - 21 H.S.S. Girls Udaipur April 2014 2013-14 22 H.S.S. Girls Lundra April 2014 2013-14 23 H.S.S. Giruhildih April 2014 2013-14 24 H.S.S. Jamgaon April 2014 2013-14 25 H.S.S. Kamleshwarpur April 2014 2013-14

Comments: - Satisfactory

9. (ii). Status of utilization certificates submitted by SMDCs to DPO (At District Level)

Total No. of Schools

No. of SMDCs from which U.C. is received

% Period for which U.C. submitted

No. of Schools

214 143 66.82 2012-13 142

2013-14 143

Comments:-

9(iii) Status of utilization certificates submitted to SPO from DPOs (from 1st April 2013 to 31st March, 2014) (At State Level)

No. of sampled DPOs

Name of Funds /Grants

No. of DPOS to which fund

released

Amount of fund released

Date of release

Amount for which U.C.

received


has not been received

School Annual Grant Minor repair work Major repair work

Civil work Education Tour

Comments:-


10. Process of settlement of advance and collection of utilization certificate by SPO and DPO.

(i) Process of settlement of advance and collection of utilization certificate.

(1) Different types of grants are received by DPO from SPO

(2) These grants are distributed to the schools by DPO level.

(3) Then DPO have to submit utilization certificate to the SPO after getting it from schools.

(ii) Communication to SMDCs after the settlement of advance has been done by DPO.

1. Yes 2. No

Mode of conveying SMDCs about settlement of advance

In the Principal Meeting

By telephonic and letter

Comments:- 11. Financial Statement for SMDC/DPO/SPO (From 1 April, 2013 to 31 March, 2014 (date /month of visit).

(i)

Name of Unit

A Opening Balance as on 1st April,

2013

B Funds

received

C=A+B Total Fund

available till

D Expenditure

E=C+D Closing balance including cash in

hand as on 31.3.2014

Balance in bank

passbook as on 31.3.2014

SMDC 1242360.50 1841941 3084301.50 1888136 1196165.50 1196165.50 DPO 215327757 45840843 261168570 220668161 40500409 40500409 SPO

Comments:-

Yes


11. (ii). Detail of expenditure of funds by SMDC in sampled (from 1 April, 2013 to 31 March, 2014) district.

Grant funds

Sl

No. Name of School

SAG Minor Repair Major repair grant Civil work Educational tour others

Receipt Spent Unspent

balance Receipt Spent

Unspent


Unspent


Unspent


Unspent


Unspent

balance

1 H.S.S. Police Line 50000 50000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

2 H.S.S. Kedarpur 50000 50000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

3 H.S.S. Mangari 50000 50000 - 25000 25000 - - - - - - - - - - 9800 9800 -

4 H.S.S. Dandgaon 50000 50000 - 25000 25000 - - - - - - - - - - 9800 9800 - 5 H.S. Andla 50000 48000 2000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

6 H.S. Bouripara 50000 50000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

7 H.S. Bilaspur 50000 48446 1554 25000 25000 - - - - - - - - - - - - -

8 H.S. Jamkani 50000 50000 - 25000 25000 - - - - - - - - - - - - -

9 H.S.S. Sitapur 50000 50000 - 25000 25000 - - - - - - - - - - 9800 9800 - 10 H.S.S. Lakhanpur 50000 48300 1700 25000 - 25000 - - - - - - - - - - - -

11 H.S.S. Raghunathpur 50000 49590 410 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

12 H.S.S. Narmadapur 50000 50000 - 25000 15628 9372 - - - - - - - - - 9800 9800

13 H.S.S. Batauli 50000 50000 - 25000 25000 - - - - - - - - - - 9800 9800 - 14 H.S. Chakari 50000 - 50000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

15 H.S.S. Rajapur 50000 50000 - 25000 25000 - - - - - - - - - - 9800 9800 -

16 H.S.S. Boda 50000 50000 - 25000 25000 - - - - - - - - - - 9800 9800 -

17 H.S.S. Lamgaon 50000 50000 - 25000 25000 - - - - - - - - - - 9800 9800 -

18 H.S. Katinda 50000 50000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 19 H.S. Biljora 50000 50000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

20 H.S.S. Bhusu 50000 49930 70 25000 25000 - - - - - - - - - - 9800 9800 -

21 H.S.S. Girls Udaipur 50000 40000 10000 25000 25000 - - - - - - - - - - 9800 9800 -

22 H.S.S. Girls Lundra 50000 50000 - 25000 25000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 23 H.S.S. Giruhildih 50000 50000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

24 H.S.S. Jamgaon 50000 50000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

25 H.S.S. Kamleshwarpur 50000 50000 - 25000 25000 - - - - - - - - - - 9800 9800 -

Comments:-


10. SCHOOL ANNUAL GRANT –

1. (i). Month of receiving School Annual Grant for the financial year 2013-14 in sampled Schools and status of utilization of funds

S.N. Month of receipt of SAG Number of Schools % 1 4.9.13 25 100% 2 3 4 Total 25 100%

2 (i) status of utilization of funds with % and expenditure done as per norms of the scheme

Sl. No.

Name of School Sanctioned amount

Month of receipt

Expenditure till date

% of expenditure

1 H.S.S. Police Line 50000 4.9.13 50000 100 2 H.S.S. Kedarpur 50000 4.9.13 50000 100 3 H.S.S. Mangari 50000 4.9.13 50000 100 4 H.S.S. Dandgaon 50000 4.9.13 50000 100 5 H.S. Andla 50000 4.9.13 48000 96 6 H.S. Bouripara 50000 4.9.13 50000 100 7 H.S. Bilaspur 50000 4.9.13 48446 96.89 8 H.S. Jamkani 50000 4.9.13 50000 100 9 H.S.S. Sitapur 50000 4.9.13 50000 100

10 H.S.S. Lakhanpur 50000 4.9.13 48300 96.6 11 H.S.S. Raghunathpur 50000 4.9.13 49590 99.18 12 H.S.S. Narmadapur 50000 4.9.13 50000 100 13 H.S.S. Batauli 50000 4.9.13 50000 100 14 H.S. Chakari 50000 4.9.13 - 0 15 H.S.S. Rajapur 50000 4.9.13 50000 100 16 H.S.S. Boda 50000 4.9.13 50000 100 17 H.S.S. Lamgaon 50000 4.9.13 50000 100 18 H.S. Katinda 50000 4.9.13 50000 100 19 H.S. Biljora 50000 4.9.13 50000 100 20 H.S.S. Bhusu 50000 4.9.13 49930 99.86 21 H.S.S. Girls Udaipur 50000 4.9.13 40000 80 22 H.S.S. Girls Lundra 50000 4.9.13 50000 100 23 H.S.S. Giruhildih 50000 4.9.13 50000 100 24 H.S.S. Jamgaon 50000 4.9.13 50000 100 25 H.S.S. Kamleshwarpur 50000 4.9.13 50000 100

Total 12,50,000 --- 11,48,266 ---


2. (ii) Status of Utilization of School Annual Grant

Details/No. of Schools Which were not sanctioned

SAGs Which were sanctioned but did

not receive SAGs Which received but did not

spend? All sanctioned All received 1 school found

2(iii) Utilization of SAG as per norms

SAG funds utilized on works

Number of Schools

%

Funds utilized as per norms in number of Schools

If not utilized as per norms, give reasons

Yes % No % 1. Stationary

material purchasing

25 100 24 96 1 4 1. No reason

2. Library books purchasing

25 100 23 96 2 8

3. Science material purchasing

25 100 25 100 0 0

4. Electric bill paid 25 100 20 80 5 20 5. White-wash 25 100 19 76 6 24

Comments:-

11. Minor Repair Grant

1. Receipt of Minor Repair Grant – (For Financial Year 2013-14)

S.N. Name of School Sanctioned amount

Month of receipt


% of expenditure

1 H.S.S. Police Line - - - - 2 H.S.S. Kedarpur - - - - 3 H.S.S. Mangari 25000 4.10.13 25000 100 4 H.S.S. Dandgaon 25000 4.10.13 25000 100 5 H.S. Andla - - - - 6 H.S. Bouripara - - - - 7 H.S. Bilaspur 25000 4.10.13 25000 100 8 H.S. Jamkani 25000 4.10.13 25000 100 9 H.S.S. Sitapur 25000 4.10.13 25000 100

10 H.S.S. Lakhanpur 25000 4.10.13 - 0 11 H.S.S. Raghunathpur - - - - 12 H.S.S. Narmadapur 25000 4.10.13 15628 62.51 13 H.S.S. Batauli 25000 4.10.13 25000 100 14 H.S. Chakari - - - - 15 H.S.S. Rajapur 25000 4.10.13 25000 100 16 H.S.S. Boda 25000 4.10.13 25000 100 17 H.S.S. Lamgaon 25000 4.10.13 25000 100


18 H.S. Katinda - - - - 19 H.S. Biljora - - - - 20 H.S.S. Bhusu 25000 4.10.13 25000 100 21 H.S.S. Girls Udaipur 25000 4.10.13 25000 100 22 H.S.S. Girls Lundra 25000 4.10.13 25000 100 23 H.S.S. Giruhildih - - - - 24 H.S.S. Jamgaon - - - - 25 H.S.S. Kamleshwarpur 25000 4.10.13 25000 100

Total 3,75,000 - 3,34,372 -

Comments:-

2(i) Utilization of minor repair grant on repair and white-wash of the School building –

Number of Schools Number % Total No. of Schools who received minor repair grant

15 60%

Number of Schools utilized the grant on repair and white wash

13 52%

Number of Schools who did not utilized fund as per norms

2 8%

Comments:-

2 (ii) Utilization of minor repair grants as per norms

Minor Repair Grant

utilized on works

Number of

Schools

%

Funds utilized as per norms If not utilized as per norms,

give reasons Yes % No %

1. Repairing 13 52 13 52 2 8

2. White wash 13 52 13 52 2 8

Comments:- Satisfactory

12. INNOVATIONS – At SPO/DPO level

1. Details of innovative proposals undertaken during the current financial year 2014-15

(At district level)

S. No.

Name of Innovative Proposals Amount of funds sanctioned/released

Stage of Implementation

1. Utakarsh yojna for quality improvement

- First implement in the month of December

2.


2. Details of innovative proposals undertaken during the financial year 1st April, 2014 to 31st March, 2015 (At State level)

S. No.

Name of District Name of Innovative Proposals

Amount of funds sanctioned/released


Nil

3 (a) If not, the mentions reasons thereof

Culture of centralization of Innovations could be responsible. Imposition of innovations coming from outside with rapid succession could be one of the reasons.

(b) Effective monitoring and evaluation mechanism for implementation of innovation proposals.

Nil

(c) The objectives of innovation proposals being met in districts

Nil --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(a) At district level --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) At State Level --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(d) Identified any successful elements in innovation proposals, to be scaled up under RMSA

There are no successful elements in innovation proposals that can be scaled up under RMSA.

13. INFORMATION ABOUT MMER At DPO and SPO level

1(i).The total number of staff sanctioned category wise in DPO under RMSA and the number in position.

Name of District:- Surguja

S. N. Name of Post Sanctioned In position Vacant

1 DPO 1 1 0

2 ADPO 1 1 0

3 APO 3 2 1

4 Asstt. Programmer 1 1 0

5 Accountant 1 0 1

6 Data Entry Operator 3 2 1

7 Peon 2 2 0

Total :- 12 9 3


Comments:- No circular to appoint the staff, category wise in DPO under RMSA.

1(ii) The total number of staff sanctioned category wise in SPO under RMSA and the number in position.

S. N. Name of Post Sanctioned In position Vacant 1 Director 1 1 0 2 Additional Director 1 0 1 3 Joint Director 1 1 0 4 Deputy Director 4 1 3 5 Assistant Director 7 4 3 6 Finance Officer 1 1 0 7 Programmer 2 1 1 8 Assistant Programmer 1 0 1 9 Assistant Programme

Coordinator 4 0 4

10 Ankekshak 2 0 2 11 Accountant 2 0 2 12 Steno 2 0 2 13 Assistant Grade-1 1 0 1 14 Assistant Grade-2 2 0 2 15 Assistant Grade-3 4 0 4 16 Civil Manager 1 0 1 17 Deputy Manager 1 0 1 18 Office Assistant with Data

Entry Operator 10 7 3

19 Office Boy 6 3 3 20 Sweeper 0 3 21 Watchman 1 0 1

Total:- 54 22 35 1. (iii) Action taken to fill up vacancies

At district level:- Yes, through advertisement …………………………………………………….

At State level:- Yes, proposal send to the State Govt. by SPO ………………………………….. Comments:- No circular to appoint the staff, category wise in SPO under RMSA.

2. Personnel’s working on deputation/contract and their nature of engagement

No. of Personnel on deputation No. of Personnel on contract At DPO SPO At DPO SPO

4 8 5 14 Nature of engagement

At DPO At SPO At DPO At SPO 4 8 5 14

Comments:-


3. Component-wise personnel at State and District level

Sl. No. Component wise personnel Position in Place

Working at State level Working at district level

1 Finance Assistant Director Accountant

2 Civil Work Assistant Director APO

3 Quality Additional Director APO

4 Equity Additional Director APO

5 Gender Assistant Director APO

6 Pedagogy Additional Director APO

7 Planning Deputy Director APO & Programmer

8 Training Deputy Director APO

Total

3(i) If component wise personnel’s are not in place the alternative arrangements made:- Yes

Comments:-

4. If the administrative staff is not in place alternative arrangement adopted

Yes, available staff does extra work

Comments:-

5. Clarity amongst officials and staff about the objectives, targets and goals of the programme and their role in the management structure.

Yes, Average

Comments:-

II. MONITORING STRATEGY

1(i). Use of monitoring tools/mechanism (reports, visits etc.) to ensure effective implementation of the scheme

Yes, average implementation

1(ii) Steps taken by DPO & SPO to ensure effective implementation of RMSA

Not adequate

1(iii) Details of visits made by officials of SPO and DPO to district/Schools along with time schedule (from 1st April, 2014 to 31st March, 2015)

At SPO level


S.

No.

Post of Officer No. of Visits made

No. of district/ School visited

Time schedule Average No. of visits per district

1. SPD No time scheduled

2. Additional Director Project

3 Others

At DPO Level

S.

No.


No. of School visited

Time schedule Average No. of visits per School

1 DPO/DEO 32 40 Monthly

2 ADPO - - -

3 APO 32 32 Quarterly

4 Others(LDC) 40 40 Weakly (Thursday)

Total 104 112

Comments:-

2. Details of guidelines laid down for monitoring.

No written tool in DPO level but written tool available in SPO level.

Comments:-

III. Management Systems –At District and State level.

Information about Academic Institutions (Details of SCERT & IASE/CTEs/DIETs)

1(i) Availability of Physical Infrastructural Facilities

Yes, teachers training venue facility provided to RMSA school teachers by DIET.

----------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1(ii) Facilities available in SCERT/SIERT

Staff Sanctioned In position Vacant %

1(iii) Availability of physical Infrastructural Facilities

Yes, teachers training venue facility provided to RMSA school teachers by SCERT.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments:-


1. Other essential facilities

In DIET In IASE/CTEs In SCERT/SIERT

1. Venue for teachers training

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1. Master Training by SCERT

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Comments:-

IV. INFORMATION ABOUT STATE DATABASE At SPO level updated by DPO.

1. (i) School mapping completed or not in respect of the visited district/s

Yes

1(ii) If not completed, then the basis used for developing the annual/perspective Plan for access

DCF format

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1(iii) Mechanism other than GIS mapping adopted by the State

Yes, MIS (Management Information System)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments:-

2. The database mechanism (MIS) at district level is in place or not

Yes ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yes/ No

2(i) If not, then name of other sources used for the Plan preparation at district level

Yes, found

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments:-


3. Major issues in collection and compilation of data at district and State level

S.N. District level issues State level issues

1 Mistakes are found regarding the infrastructure data

Data has not been compiled at state level, its compiled at district level.

2 Mismatch between in enrollment is observed

3 Incorrect CWSN data is observed

4 Mistakes found in upgraded school data. (DCF Format found same to the Middle and High School)

Comments:- Data capturing format ambitious and complex.

Ascertaining quality dimensions is the biggest difficulty. V. RESEARCH (At district and State level)

1. Details of research projects undertaken during the year (1st April, 2014 to 31st March, 2015) –

At District Level:- No research project and action plan. This needs much orientation and emphasis.

Sl. No. Title of research project Purpose Major findings 1

2

3

4

5

At State Level:- No research project and action plan. This needs much orientation and emphasis.

Sl. No. Title of research project Purpose Major findings

1

2

3

4

5


2. Research Advisory Committee being formed or not

(a) At State level:- No …………………………………………………………………………….

(b) At District level:- No …………………………………………………………………………. 3. (i) Identification of the kinds of research need was felt and at what level?

Nil --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

4. Action Research is being conducted or not, if yes it is conducted by the teachers or external agencies for finding out solutions to users pertaining to pedagogy and quality –

No --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yes/No

4(i) If Yes, Details of action research carried out at district level –

Areas of research

Problem No. of Action Research conducted in district

Solution Conducted by (Teachers /external

agencies)

Pedagogy

Quality

4(ii) If Yes, Details of action research carried out at State level –

Areas of

research

Problem No. of Action Research

conducted in district

Solution Conducted by

(Teachers /external

agencies)

Pedagogy

Quality


14. Any other issues relevant to RMSA implementation

MI may give a maximum 2 page note, on any other issues, relevant to RMSA implementation,

not covered above.

Critical aspects

Quality is the prime concern of RMSA as quantitative expansion is nearing its

success. One of the indicators of Quality access is the availability of physical space for the

children within school and classroom. Classes and classroom ratio and number of children

in each class and classroom space ration conditions the quality of learning. Seen in this

light, it is observed that there are many short comings in quality access in terms of enrolled

children and classrooms ratio is concerned.

1. Some of the High schools are functioning from Middle School building due to lack of High

School building in the Surguja district.

2. Most of the schools having inadequate teaching staff in the Surguja district.

3. In most of the schools, teacher-students ratio, classroom-students ratios are found

inadequate therefore students learning achievement are seen poor.

4. In most of the schools, ramps are not there for CWSN students. Even where they are

constructed, they do not serve the intended purpose.

5. Schools do have toilets but the maintenance of toilets is very poor.

6. TLM use in classroom transaction is found to be minimal and ineffective in most of the

schools.

7. Financial record like stock register, cashbook and passbook are not maintained regularly in

most of the schools.

8. Some of the schools having one or more than one CWSN students but they do not have

appropriate TLM; and also there is no individualized educational plan (IEP), resource

teacher, assistive device, special training to handle CWSN students.

9. Some schools failed to conduct SMDC meetings regularly.

10. In some of the High Schools and Higher Secondary Schools, computers are made available

but the computer teachers are not made available; and nobody has adequate knowledge


about computers, as they have not received any training about computer use. Therefore, it is

repeatedly observed that the computers are not being put to use in teaching learning

processes. Thus, it is also observed that in most cases they are kept in the rooms either in an

uninstalled state or in some cases unpacked mode.

11. Most of the schools have not received school annual grants within two months of the

commencement of school.

12. In most of the schools, library room, separate computer room and art/craft room are not

available.

13. Some schools do not have separate laboratory for science, mathematics, physics and biology

subject practical’s. Even some of the schools failed to conduct practical sessions at all.

14. Some of the schools do not have adequate sports materials and playground for regular

outdoor activities.

15. In most of the schools, SMDC members are not familiar with their roles and responsibilities.

16. H.S. Andla, Block- Lakhanpur: Classes are held in MS building. School has no room for

Science lab, Library room, Art and craft room, Computer room and no sufficient class room

for children. Head Master and his supporting teaching staff are found indifferent; Students

learning achievement are observed poor.

17. H.S.S. Narmadapur, Block- Mainpat: This school has semi pucca building. School has no

room for Science lab, Library room, Art and craft room, Computer room and no sufficient

class room for children. Head Master and his supporting teaching staff are found indifferent;

SMDC members are not interested in the school activity; students learning achievement are

observed poor.

18. H.S.S. Rajapur, Block- Mainpat: In this school, it is observed that the teachers don`t

observe punctuality and they do not follow time table. SMDC members are not interested in the

school activity. Practical works are not conducted by teachers of science, maths, physics,

chemistry and other subjects. Teacher’s quality appears to be poor and hence, it is observed

they are inactive with their work. Students learning achievement are very poor.


Positive aspects

1. Some schools having good quality of teaching staff. Teachers take active participation in

teaching process. They use appropriate TLM into the classroom activity. Teacher

motivate to students in reading, listening, speaking and writing skills.

2. Some schools maintain their school records regularly. They conduct SMDC meeting

regularly. They organized outdoor activities. They maintain cleanness.

3. H.S.S. Police Line, Block- Ambikapur: This is good quality school; Principal and

supporting teaching staff are very pro-active; students learning achievement are very

good; school records are being maintained and updated regularly.

4. H.S.S. Dandgaon, Block- Udaipur: This is one of the good quality schools in the

Surguja district; teachers are very pro-active. Laboratory, library, computer room,

adequate sports materials, playground, separate toilets for girls and boys, running water

in the toilets etc. facilities are available for the students. School premise is found neat and

clean, students learning achievement are very good.

5. H.S.S. Girls Sitapur, Block- Sitapur: This is good quality school in the Sitapur block.

Principal and supporting teaching staff is very pro-active; adequate sports materials,

laboratory, library, computer room, subject-wise teaching staff, playground, separate

toilets for girls, running water in the toilets etc. facilities are available for the students.

School premise is found neat and clean, students learning achievement are good. School

building observed well constructed, school records are being maintained and updated

regularly.


District – 2 Kanker


At School Level



Plan developed Not developed Yes No

0 25 100% 0% 100%

If not reasons thereof As per above table, no perspective plan have been found in any of the 25 sampled schools.




Other Data base/sourced adopted If yes names of other sources Yes No

0 25 No 100% 0% 100%




Developed Planning strategy for disadvantaged groups

Yes No 0 25

100% 0% 100%





0 25 100% 0% 100%

Convergence Approach Convergence not adopted


S. No.

Departments No. of Schools

% Reasons thereof



3 Tribal Development - -

4 Minority Department - -







As per above table, adoption of convergence approach is not found in any school out of sampled 25 schools.




No. of

Schools :- 25


Yes No Yes No

0 25 0 25

100% 0% 100% 0% 100%


Lack of awareness


As per above table that there is no School Development Plan in any school out of sampled 25 schools. This is undermining the devolution of powers to schools.




%

1 Filling of DCF of U-DISE - - 2 Preparation & Implementation of Annual Plan - -


3 Admission of Students to Class-9 8 32% 4 Regular attendance and retention of students 9 36% 5 Regularity & Punctuality in teachers’

attendance - -

6 Civil work - - 7 Providing resources Physical - -

Human - - 8 Organizing cultural, sports events, functions 2 8% 9 Mid-day-meal - -


16 64%


- -

Above table shows the involvement of SMDCs in various activities of schools. It shows that SMDC members were assigned the job of admission of students to Class - 9th in eight (8) schools; regular attendance and retention of students in nine (9) schools; organizing cultural, sports events, and functions in two (2) schools; and preparing annual accounts of income & expenditure in sixteen (16) schools out of sampled 25 schools.

Comments:- Huge gap is apparent in formulating SMDCs and making them functional.



100% 64% 36% Non participation in school development processes primarily due to their lack of awareness among members of SMDC. The above table reveals this fact. The table, tell us the story of absence of awareness among SMDC members. Out of sampled 25 schools only16 school SMDC members are aware about their roles and responsibilities. S.N. Steps taken by SMDC members accordingly Number of

Schools %


reviewing C.W./H.W. - -


- -


- -

6 Paying attention to improvement in regular teaching learning activities. 1 4% 7 Distribution of free text books 16 64% 8 Availability of scholarships on time to students 2 8%


9 Preparing three years’ perspective Plan - - 10 Proper use of funds i.e. SAG & other grants as per norms 4 16% 11 Monitoring of minor & major repair work and maintenance of physical

infrastructure - -


16 64%


Comments:- Lack of awareness about their roles in schooling. Lack of time could be one of the reasons. More importantly, absence of culture of participatory democracy in the community, village and in the school is prime reason.


Meetings of General body held Number of

Schools:- 25 Quarterly Half Yearly Annually No meeting held

till date 18 1 2 4

100% 72% 4% 8% 16%

Above table shows that meetings of SMDC are conducted in 18 schools on quarterly basis, on half yearly basis in 1 school, 2 schools on annually and no meeting was held till the date of visit in 4 schools out of sampled 25 schools.




Mentioned Not Mentioned 0 4

100% 0% 100% Comments:- No reason is sighted

2. At District level – Name of District – Kanker



(1. Yes 2. No)


b. Social Welfare 1







h. PWD 1


j. Others (CWSN, Girls Education) 2


Reasons were not mentioned by DPO.




At State level


1. Yes 2. No


It does reflect


(1. Yes 2. No)


b. Social Welfare 1






h. PWD 1


j. Others 2

1



Not Specified






1. Yes 2. No

If not, why?


2. ACCESS




%

1 EBB - - 2 Urban 4 16 3 CWSN (Minimum 3 CWSN) 4 16 4 Higher Gender gap 2 8 5 SC/ST/Minority students abundance 3 12 6 Low retention rate/Higher dropout rate 1 4 7 Schools situated in habitation with large number of OoSC - - 8 Low academic achievements 5 20 9 Schools situated in habitation of seasonal migrants - - 10 Urban Schools with most students of deprived sections - - 11 Forest/Mountain/Remote/Desert area 2 8 12 Flood/natural calamity prone area - - 13 Ongoing civil work - - 14 School with girls hostel 2 8 15 None (CAL) 2 8


1



Schools visited in the district Kanker

Sl. No.



1 Charama 22142700114 H.S. Charama Urban Area 14.1.15 15.1.15 2 Kanker 22143207501 H.S. Nathiya Navagaon Urban Area 12.1.15 13.1.15 3 Kanker 22143202103 H.S.(G) Kanker Urban Area 12.1.15 13.1.15 4 Koyalibeda 22140134603 H.S.S. Pakhanjore Urban Area 21.1.15 22.1.15 5 Kanker 22143210604 H.S. Aturgaon CWSN 12.1.15 13.1.15 6 Antagarh 22140316707 H.S.S. Amabeda CWSN 19.1.15 20.1.15 7 Koyalibeda 22140134402 H.S.S. Gondahur CWSN 21.1.15 22.1.15 8 Narharpur 22140708906 H.S.S. Dudhawa CWSN 16.1.15 17.1.15 9 Bhanupratappur 22141800421 H.S.S. Bhanupratappur Poor result 19.1.15 20.1.15 10 Narharpur 22140722804 H.S.S. Basanwahi Poor result 16.1.15 17.1.15 11 Bhanupratappur 22141803512 H.S. Korar Poor result 19.1.15 20.1.15 12 Charama 22142700115 H.S.S.(B) Charama Poor result 14.1.15 15.1.15 13 Koyalibeda 22140104313 H.S.S. Bande Poor result 21.1.15 22.1.15 14 Kanker 22143213209 H.S.(G) Singarbhat School With Hostel 22.1.15 23.1.15 15 Charama 22142700510 H.S.S. Lakhanpur School With Hostel 14.1.15 15.1.15 16 Charama 22142700206 H.S.S. Jepra CAL 14.1.15 15.1.15 17 Antagarh 22140315324 H.S.S.(G) Antagarh CAL 19.1.15 20.1.15 18 Narharpur 22140702919 H.S.S. Narharpur Gender Gap 16.1.15 17.1.15 19 Kanker 22143214008 H.S.S. Narhardev Gender Gap 12.1.15 13.1.15 20 Durgkondal 22142112108 H.S.S. Durgukondal ST/SC 21.1.15 22.1.15 21 Narharpur 22140719907 H.S. Karap ST/SC 16.1.15 17.1.15 22 Charama 22142705304 H.S. Girahola ST/SC 14.1.15 15.1.15 23 Antagarh 22140315323 H.S.S.(B) Antagarh Drop Out 19.1.15 20.1.15 24 Durgkondal 22142108603 H.S. Tarhul Forest Area 21.1.15 22.1.15 25 Narharpur 22140715402 H.S. Dhekuna Forest Area 16.1.15 17.1.15

DPO Visit :- 23/1/2015



1 Protected area (National Park, Wild life sanctuary) - - 2 Flood prone /flood plain area - - 3 Earthquake prone zone - - 4 Unstable slope - - 5 Landslide prone Area - - 6 Cyclone prone Area - - 7 Storm surge prone Area - - 8 Drought prone Area - - 9 Polluting Industrial Area - -


10 Mining Area - - 11 Arsenic /fluoride contaminated ground water area - - 12 Busy National/State Highway 5 20 13 Congested urban/market/commercial area 3 12 14 Any particular disturbance faced by School due to its

location (Naxalite Activity) 3 12

15 None 14 56 Comments:- As per the above table, there are different kinds of threats in the way to 11 schools.


School Level No. of Schools managed by Govt. % Private %

PS 1647 94.71 128 17.02 UPS 92 5.29 624 82.98 Total 1739 100 752 100

4. Number of Students enrolled in School from habitations coming from a distance greater than what is prescribed for a School.




Total 5945 100% As per above table, out of 5945 enrolled students in sampled 25 schools 707 students are coming to schools from the distance more than 5 km. This is around 11.89%.


Comments:- (1) No High Schools within 5 km. of the habitations. 5. Presence of any natural or man-made barrier that poses any problem for the Students in accessing the School.


100 % 44% 56%

If yes mention them 1. Busy National/State Highway (5 schools) 2. Market/Urban/Commercial area (3 schools) 3. Naxalite Area (3 schools))


Above table shows that 11 schools are perceived to be facing man-made barriers that could pose problems to the Students is observed in 11 Schools out of sampled 25 schools.

Comments:-




13 19 21 23 76 100% 17.11% 25% 27.63% 30.26% 100%




Facility Provided by number of Schools % Transport facility - -

Residential facility 16 64% Comments:- Above table shows that residential facilities are available in 16 schools out of 25 sampled schools.

II Social Access




SC





Category No. of Schools responded % SC


ST Minority General All Categories Comments:- Data is not available at the school level.












Class

SC ST


CWSN



9th 48 34

67 57 115

91 571

495

797

700

1368

1195

16 13 18 15 34 28 518 422

573 536

1091

958 1156

966 1462

131

5

261

8

228

1

3 2 48

34

1

0

9

10th 55 35

42 37 97 72 478

378

596

539

1074

917 16 12 16 15 32 27 428 361

400 359

828 720 979 787 1060

956 203

9

174

3

2 1 55

35

8 7

Total 103

69

109

94 212

163

1049

873

1393

1239

2442

2112

32 25 34 30 66 55 946 783

973 895

1919

1678

2135

1753

2522

227

1

465

7

402

4

5 3 103

69

1

8

1

6

% 2.21

1.48 2.34

2.01

4.55

3.50

22.52 18.74 29.91 26.60 52.44

45.35

0.69

0.54

0.73

0.64

1.42

1.18

20.32

16.81 20.89

19.22 41.21

36.03

45.84

37.64

54.16

48.

77

100 86.

41

0.12 0.06 2.21 1.48 0.38 0.34



Comments:- Students who are enrolled in these schools are almost homogeneous group, in spite of social differences. Hence, no major various are observed in their attendance patterns




9th 62 40 83 54 14

5

94 777 59

6

917 786 169

4

13

82

21 16 23 19 44 35 663 522 75

8

64

3

14

21

11

65

153

0

11

79

17

95

15

15

33

25

269

4

7 5 1

4

1

3

2

1

1

8

10th 64 47 62 49 12

6

96 592 47

3

727 637 131

9

11

10

21 12 24 19 45 31 517 441 59

1

48

6

11

08

92

7

120

2

98

0

14

18

12

04

26

20

218

4

8 7 1

4

1

3

2

2

2

0

Total 12

6

87 14

5

10

3

27

1

19

0

136

9

10

69

164

4

142

3

301

3

24

92

42 28 47 38 89 66 118

0

963 13

49

11

29

25

29

20

92

273

2

21

59

32

13

27

19

59

45

487

8

15 1

2

2

8

2

6

4

3

3

8

% 2.12 1.46 2.44 1.73 4.56 3.19 23.03 17.98 27.66 23.94 50.68 41.92 0.71 0.47 0.79 0.64 1.50 1.11 19.84 16.20 22.69 18.99 42.54 35.19 45.95 36.32 54.05 45.73 100 82.05 0.25 0.21 0.47 0.43 0.72 0.64


3. Whether above schemes ensure convergence with provisions of RMSA? 1. Yes 2. No


H.S.S. Bande, Block- Koyalibeda

Comments:-



Discrimination


0 0 25

100% 0% 0% 100%





1








Tricycle - -

Escort - -

Other (Specify) - -

As per above table – out of 25 sampled schools 9 schools are having proper ramps with hand rails and 2 schools having western toilet seat.





III. Open Schooling

3. At State level



1. Yes 2. No






1

1


Comments:-


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Comments:-



Category Class

Enrolled Boys


drop out % Boys

drop out % Enrolled

Girls Girls

drop out % Total

Enrolled SC IX 62 6 0.39 83 2 0.11 145 8 0.25

X 64 10 0.83 62 7 0.49 126 17 0.66

ST IX 777 57 3.73 917 46 2.56 1694 103 3.09

X 592 38 3.16 727 40 2.82 1319 78 2.97

Minority IX 21 0 0 23 0 0 44 0 0

X 21 0 0 24 0 0 45 0 0

Gen & OBC

IX 663 23 1.50 758 4 0.22 1421 27 0.81

X 517 17 1.41 591 18 1.27 1108 35 1.33

Total IX 1530 86 5.62 1795 52 2.89 3325 138 4.15

X 1202 65 5.40 1418 65 4.58 2620 130 4.96

CWSN IX 7 0 0 14 0 0 21 0 0



Gender with higher dropout:- Male










Class-9th Class-10th No. of drop out students


School



School

%




Arrangement Number of Schools % Seasonal Hostels -- -- Any other arrangement -- -- No arrangement -- --







No. of schools:-25 Yes No 8 17

100% 32% 68% Name of Trainings

Open centre for OoSC (SIOS)




---- Present %




Regular teachers 8 32% NIOS -- -- SIOS 8 32%



Programme

Appeared in Exam


B G B G B G B G B G 9 - - - - - - - - - - 10 - - - - - - - - - -

Total - - - - - - - - - - % - - - - - - - - - -

Comments: - Special training intervention is found in 8 schools out of 25 sampled schools.

3. Equity


At School Level


Class

2011-12

SC ST MINO. CWSN

B G B G B G B G

Enrolled 63 97 798 818 15 7 1 3

Avg. % of Attend. 76 78 75 79 74 76 75 77

Nil


9th

Appeared in Exam 59 92 740 770 8 7 1 3

% 93.65 94.84 92.73 94.13 53.33 100 100 100

Above 60% 8 16 124 139 0 1 0 0

% 13.55 17.39 16.76 18.05 0 14.28 0 0

Below 60% 41 68 511 540 8 5 1 0

% 69.49 73.91 69.05 70.12 100 71.42 100 0

10th

Enrolled 80 139 725 969 9 7 0 0

Avg. % Attend. 77 78 76 80 76 78 0 0

Appeared in Exam 76 108 712 960 7 7 0 0

% 95.00 77.69 98.20 99.07 77.77 100 0 0

Above 60% 4 8 30 86 0 1 0 0

% 5.26 7.40 4.21 8.95 0 14.28 0 0

Below 60% 46 57 426 557 3 4 0 0

% 60.52 52.77 59.83 58.02 42.85 57.14 0 0

Class

2012-13

SC ST MINO. CWSN

B G B G B G B G

9th

Enrolled 62 123 681 748 1 9 0 0

Avg. % of Attend. 80 78 79 81 78 77 0 0

Appeared in Exam 60 117 644 700 1 6 0 0

% 96.77 95.12 94.56 93.58 100 66.66 0 0

Above 60% 2 9 119 132 0 2 0 0

% 3.33 7.69 18.47 18.85 0 33.33 0 0

Below 60% 50 87 419 458 1 3 0 0

% 83.33 74.35 65.06 65.42 100 50.00 0 0

Enrolled 70 95 653 806 0 1 0 0

Avg. % Attend. 81 79 83 81 0 76 0 0

Appeared in Exam 65 89 649 795 0 1 0 0


10th

% 92.85 93.68 99.38 98.63 0 100 0 0

Above 60% 8 8 32 61 0 0 0 0

% 12.30 8.98 4.93 7.67 0 0 0 0

Below 60% 30 44 297 441 0 1 0 0

% 46.15 49.43 45.76 55.47 0 100 0 0

Class

2013-14

SC ST MINO. CWSN

B G B G B G B G

9th

Enrolled 68 87 660 846 4 14 2 3

Avg. % of Attend. 79 82 81 83 80 82 78 80

Appeared in Exam 60 84 595 778 3 12 2 3

% 88.23 96.55 90.15 91.96 75 85.71 100 100

Above 60% 2 16 141 180 1 3 0 1

% 3.33 19.04 23.69 23.13 33.33 25 0 33.33

Below 60% 48 57 385 505 1 6 2 1

% 80 67.85 64.70 64.91 33.33 50 100 33.33

10th

Enrolled 69 79 653 724 11 8 0 0

Avg. % Attend. 80 83 79 82 78 81 0 0

Appeared in Exam 65 70 640 666 10 7 0 0

% 94.20 88.60 98.01 91.98 90.90 87.5 0 0

Above 60% 8 7 24 24 0 1 0 0

% 12.30 10 3.75 3.60 0 14.28 0 0

Below 60% 32 39 307 357 6 4 0 0

% 49.23 55.71 47.96 53.60 60 57.14 0 0



Achievement levels are twin areas of concern those need attention.




Name of schemes

Name of schemes

Name of schemes

Name of schemes

Name of schemes


Category-wise (SC/ST/Minority/CWSN) dropout students in past one year i.e.2013-14


Category No. of Students SC 24 ST 228

Minority 5

SC

1. 2. 3.

4. 5. 6.

7. 8. 9.

ST

1. 2. 3.

4. 5. 6.

Minority 1. 2.

Girls



3.

4. 5. 6.

7. 8. 9.

CWSN

1. 2. 3.

4. 5. 6.

7. 8. 9.


CWSN - OBC 92

General 15 Total 364




Gender Gap


Class

9th

Boys % Girls % Total % Gap %

Enrollment 1530 46.02 1795 53.98 3325 100 1177.30 15.05


Appeared in Exam 1444 43.42 1743 52.42 3187 95.85 1207.06 17.15

Learning Achievement

(Quarterly/half yearly/yearly)

Above 60% 138 4.33 176 5.52 314 9.85 1275.36 21.59

Below 60% 690 21.65 685 21.49 1375 43.14 992.75 -0.73

Class

10th


Enrollment 1202 45.88 1418 54.12 2620 100 1179.70 15.23


Appeared in Exam 1137 43.39 1353 51.64 2490 95.03 1189.97 15.96



Above 60% 85 3.41 100 4.02 185 7.43 1176.47 14.99

Below 60% 536 21.53 531 21.32 1067 42.85 990.67 -0.01




i. Girl’s representation in both the classes in comparison with their counterparts-boys- is high. ii. The gender gap in enrollment stands at 15.05 and 15.23 in classes 9th and 10th respectively.

The gender gap in enrollments needs to be located against the total population of both the sexes of feeder habitations. Then only the gap that is calculated can realistically be considered as gender gap in schooling. This data of population of that age group is not available with the schools. However, the real cause of concern that one can draw from the above tables is the achievement levels of both the sexes. It is very low in both the sexes.

Comments:- Girls enrollment is found more than the boy`s enrollment in std. 9th and10th.





C Linguistic Reasons - -

Total 21 -




%

A Health (own or family members) 21 84

B Social cultural issues 6 24

C Sibling Care 6 24

D Household responsibilities 16 64

E Family issues / Gone to relatives 16 64

F Earning for livelihood 11 44

G Migration - -

H Any other - -

Total 76 -

Looking for isolated reasons for absenteeism take us nowhere. There is a need to view all these socio-economic and cultural reasons together impact absenteeism.



Barriers No. of Schools % Efforts made to address barriers


programmes (c) Linguistic barriers - - - (d) Economical barriers 20 80 Providing

bicycles Comments:- The problem of gender gap is addressed when the enrollment rates of girls are less than boys. In this case the situation is other way round where, enrollment and dropout problem lies with boys. This could be reason why the problem is not receiving adequate attention.



Social Group



2011-12 143 236 339 1523 1787 3310 24 14 38 1320 1427 2747 3011 3467 6478 1 3 4

2012-13 132 218 350 1334 1554 2888 1 10 11 1130 1263 2393 2597 3045 5642 0 0 0

Gap -11 -18 -11 -189 -233 -422 -23 -4 -27 -190 -164 -354 -414 -422 -836 -1 -3 -4

2012-13 132 218 350 1334 1554 2888 1 10 11 1130 1263 2393 2597 3467 5642 0 0 0

2013-14 137 166 303 1313 1570 2883 15 22 37 1216 1294 2510 2683 3055 5733 2 3 5

Gap 5 -52 -47 -21 16 -5 14 12 26 86 31 117 144 -412 -271 2 3 5


The above table indicates decreasing trend of enrollment in the year 2013-14.

There is reduction in girls enrollment particularly girls belonging to SC category in the year 2013-14.


Social Group



2011-12 76.50 78.00 77.25 75.50 79.50 77.50 75 77 76.00 78 80 79 76 78.30 77.15 75 77 76

2012-13 80.50 78.50 79.50 81.00 81.00 81.00 78 76.50 77.25 76 82 79 78.87 79.50 79.18 0 0 0

Gap - 4 0.50 2.25 5.50 2.50 4.50 3 -0.50 1.25 -2 2 0 2.87 1.20 -2.03 - - -

2012-13 80.50 78.50 79.50 81.00 81.00 81.00 78 76.50 77.25 76 82 79 78.87 79.50 79.18 0 0 0

2013-14 79.50 82.50 81.00 80.00 82.50 81.25 79 81.50 80.25 78 82 80 78.90 81.70 80.30 78 80 79

Gap -1 4 2.50 -1 1.50 0.25 1 5 3 2 0 1 0.13 2.20 1.12 - - -



Social Group



2011-12 99 149 248 1091 1322 2413 11 11 22 987 1267 2254 2189 2749 4938 1 0 1

2012-13 90 148 238 867 1092 1959 1 6 7 805 1176 1981 1763 2422 4185 0 0 0

Gap -9 -1 -10 -224 -230 -454 -10 -5 -15 -182 -91 -273 -426 -327 -753 -1 0 -1

2012-13 90 148 238 867 1092 1959 1 6 7 805 1176 1981 1763 2422 4185 0 0 0

2013-14 90 119 209 857 1016 1873 8 14 22 817 1112 1929 1774 2263 4037 2 2 4

Gap 0 -29 -29 -10 -76 -86 7 8 15 12 -46 -52 -11 -159 -148 2 2 4



Comments:-


No. of Schools:- 25

Counseling of percent’s done

Yes No

0 25

100% 0 % 100 %


Comments:-







3

Not aware

il

NnnnnnnnnNoil



At School level:-


If yes, the available student counselor ratio: NIL

No. of Schools:- 25


0 25 100% 0% 100%





in district


%

- Nil -





5. Quality



1-(a)

S. No.



%

1 Natural light 76 76 100 2 Ventilation 76 76 100 3 Black Board appropriately located in 76 76 100


classroom 4 Bulb/Tube light /CFL 59 45 76.27 5 Fan 55 39 70.90 6 Teaching aids 38 28 73.68



H.S.S. Girls Antagarh, Block- Antagarh



S. No.




material 13 52 11 84.61

4 Math kit 10 40 7 70


5 Science kit 17 68 16 94.11 6 Computer lab with computers and supportive

devices and internet connection 2 8 2 100


seating arrangement 4 16 4 100

9 TV 2 8 2 100 10 Separate Activity room for girls This is cause for concern 11 Audio Equipment’s 0 0 0 0 12 Video Equipment’s 0 0 0 0 13 LCD Projector 2 8 2 100 14 Overhead projector 2 8 2 100

15 Purified/ Safe Drinking Water 3 12 3 100 16 Fire Extinguisher 8 32 8 100 17 Auditorium 0 0 0 0 18 Staff room 20 80 20 100 19 Indoor games room 0 0 0 0 20 N.S.S./NCC/Scout & Guides room 10 40 7 70 21 Counselor room 0 0 0 0 22 First-aid room 0 0 0 0










Nil

Nil







M F M F

249 110 118 228 79 81 21

100% 44.18 47.39 91.57 34.65 35.53 8.43 Comments:- Table informs us about the position of sanctioned and vacant positions of teachers. Vacancies stand at 21.

4. In case of teacher’s vacancy, the alternative arrangements being made by the head of the

institution to complete the course curriculum.

1. Adhoc teachers are appointed 2. Available teachers engaged extra periods 3. Middle school teachers engaged high school classes where ever both the school were


Comments:-




Science

Math

Language


18 14 15 20 17

100% 72% 56% 60% 80% 68%




Science 18 schools, Math 14 schools, language (English -15 schools, Hindi -20 schools and

Sanskrit -17 schools) out of sampled 25 schools.






Total teachers - 228 150 78 100% 65.79% 34.21%


7. Practice of truancy, i.e. absenteeism/class bunking by students/teachers being reported in the School, if so, the reasons thereof, steps taken by the School management to curb the practice.


Class bunking/Truancy

No. of Schools

Yes No

Student 0 25

% 0% 100%

Teachers 0 25

% 0% 100%

Comments:-



Authority for

Deployment





advancement

Residential Non-Residential

KRP

MT

RP

Trainee




1. Maintenance of teacher’s diary including curriculum delivery and lesson Plan etc. by

teachers & countersigned by the Head of the institution regularly.

No. of Schools:- 25


Yes No Yes No

25 0 20 5

100% 100% 0% 80% 20%





No. of Schools:- 25

Prescribed time table available Time table followed by teachers

Yes No Yes No

25 0 22 3

100% 100% 0% 88% 12%

Comments:- Formalities are observed.


No. of Schools:- 25

Discussion and group team work encouraged

Yes No

5 20

100% 20% 80%

Above table, show that in 5 schools, it is found, discussions and team works were encouraged as a methodology of teaching for involvement of students in teaching learning process and in remaining 20 schools these processes were not seen.

Comments:- This is the important gray area in the schools; culture of collective sharing and reflection is absent in schools. Hence they are found to be in cognitive slumber.



No. of Schools:- 25




management


100 % 20% 80% 0% 100% 56% 44% Groups made


No. of Schools:- 5

0 5

100% 0% 100% There are not different aspects of seating arrangement of students present in the above table.

c. Students are made to sit in small groups in classrooms to make classroom-learning process a collaborative process. Table informs us that this kind of classroom management is happening in only five schools. This is only 20%.

d. Second aspect is about students’ participation in classroom management. As far as this





Average frequency of visits of resource teachers /Schools



1. 2. 3. Comments:- No resource teacher




Yes No 7 18

100% 28% 72%


Extra classes ran

Throughout year Only for one month before exam

0 7

% 0% 28%

Average days of zero period in a weak

Daily

Results thereof

1. Average result improved

2.

Comments:- It is the neglected area;


Method/s Response

Marking & grading Average



No. of Schools with CWSN %

4 21%

Participation level in class

All CWSN participate actively 4 100%

Few CWSN participate - -

No participation - -

As per above table, participation level of the CWSN students are as follows- (All CWSN participate actively in 4 schools)





Peer Interaction Number of Schools % Neutral 4 100% Taunting - - Teasing - - Bullying - - Comments:- CWSN students were identified in 4 schools ; no bullying and teasing are observed or reported any school. 10. Individualized Educational Plan (IEPs) prepared for CWSN.

No. of Schools:- 25



0 4 100% 0% 100%



No. of Schools:- 25 Total No. of sampled Schools No. of Schools with CWSN in samples 25 4

100% 100% 16%

No. of Schools:- 4 No. of Schools with CWSN seating facilities

Yes No 0 4

100% 0% 100% Comments:- Special focus is needed to make classrooms inclusive at least physically.





%

LCD Projector 2 2 2 100 Overhead projector 2 2 2 100 Computer & Accessories with net connection

2 2 2 100

Others - - - -





S. No.


1 Induction training (Science, Maths, English, `Social Science, Hindi & Sanskrit)


10 days training programme based on NCF. 2005, content, pedagogy and classroom activities.




5 days














quality and skills – --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comments:- Mechanism needs to evolve to ascertain that to what extent the training is put to use in actual classrooms. What is the rate of transfer of training? A research study may be undertaken.



No. of Schools:- 25


100 % 100% Subjects Number of teachers,



Average Duration

1 Science 26 1-2 5-10 days 2 Maths 19 1-2 5-10 days 3 English 22 1-2 5-10 days 4 Social Science 38 1-2 5-10 days


5 Sanskrit 24 1-2 5-10days 6 Hindi 31 1-2 5-10days

Total 160 5-6 5-10 days


- - -

Comments:- (1) All subject – total 160 teachers received training under RMSA; 5-10 days in service training.

(2) Training to deal with CWSN is very minimal. 2 (i)










Comments:-


Facilities Adequate % Inadequate %

Space 25 100 0 0

Projection 25 100 0 0

Tools/Modules 21 84 4 16

Equipment’s (LCD, Projector,

Computer etc.) 17 68 8 32

Above table shows the status of availability of quality facilities for in-service training.


(Space- (adequate 25), Projection - (adequate 25), Tools/Modules - (adequate 21, inadequate 4) and Equipment’s (LCD, Projector, Computer etc.) - (adequate 17, inadequate 8).

Comments:-


No. of Schools:- 25

Yes No

25 0

100 % 100% 0%

Comments:- Needs in general sense are kept in view at state level in structuring modules.

6. Impact:-Use of new technologies like Computer Assisted Learning (CAL), LCD Projector etc. for imparting lessons in the classroom by teachers.


%

160 0 0% Comments:- Huge gap; need to think and reflect on the situation. Competencies along with culture of using technology in classrooms are absent. 7. Trainers/Resource persons from following institutions who imparted trainings –


Sl. No.


% of respondents

1 Secondary Schools


3 DIET


5 SIERT

6 IASE

7 CTE

8 NIC


10 Total


25







Comments:-

6. CIVIL WORKS


(1-2)


Year of construction

Remarks

1 H.S. Charama 1984 2011-12 2 H.S. Nathiya Navagaon 2012 - 3 H.S.(G) Kanker 1967 - 4 H.S.S. Pakhanjore 1967 1986 5 H.S. Aturgaon 2012 2013 6 H.S.S. Amabeda 1988 2000 7 H.S.S. Gondahur 1997 2008 8 H.S.S. Dudhawa 1985 1993 9 H.S.S. Bhanupratappur 1956 2012 10 H.S.S. Basanwahi 1991 2000 11 H.S. Korar 1973 - 12 H.S.S.(B) Charama 1960 1964 13 H.S.S. Bande 1979 1980 14 H.S.(G) Singarbhat 1998 - 15 H.S.S. Lakhanpur 1973 1984 16 H.S.S. Jepra 1962 2002 17 H.S.S.(G) Antagarh 1996 1998 18 H.S.S. Narharpur 1979 2014-15 19 H.S.S. Narhardev 1932 1932 20 H.S.S. Durgukondal 1967 2014-15 21 H.S. Karap 2010 2013 22 H.S. Girahola 2006 2011 23 H.S.S.(B) Antagarh 1958 1967 24 H.S. Tarhul 2014 - 25 H.S. Dhekuna 1997 2011

Comments:-




9th 50 50 100% 5 10%

10th 48 48 100% 4 8.33%


Comments:-


No. of Schools:- 25


22 19 15 3 M.S. Building 100% 88% 76% 60% 12%

Total area (sq.ft)of sampled Schools

- - - -

Avg. (sq.ft) Area - - - -


H.S.S. Girls Antagarh, Block- Antagarh





(2) Sq. Ft. or Sq. Mt.-wise details are not with the sampled schools.

II. Design


No. of Schools:- 25 Pucca Semi Pucca Kutcha Rented 22 3 0 0

100 % 88% 12% 0% 0% Comments:-

2. Physical Condition of building –

No. of Schools:- 25


None

11 9 11 12 3 100% 44% 36% 44% 48% 12%

As per above table, cracks in the school building found in 11 schools, damp in 9 schools, seepage in 11 schools, damages in plaster in 12 schools and 3 schools building are found in good condition out of 25 sampled schools.



No. of Schools:- 25 Yes % No %

100% 0 0% 25 100 %




No. of Schools:- 25


Yes No Yes No 1.

2.

3.

25 0 25 0

100% 100% 0% 100% 0%




No. of Schools:- 25

Arrangement of lighting facility Yes No 25 0

100% 100% 0%

No. of Schools:- 25 Functional Not functional

Yes No 25 0

100% 100% 0% If not functioned, Reasons

1. 2.

Steps taken 1. 2.


No. of Schools:- 25 Continuous Intermittent

25 0 100% 100% 0%

Average duration of availability -




Solar Panels

Wind Electricity

Other

No. of Schools:- 25 Availability - - - - - - % - - - - - -

No. of School:- 25 In working condition

- - - - - -

% - - - - - - No. of School:- 25 Usability - - - - - -

% - - - - - -

Comments:- Alternative electric power supply is not found in the sampled schools.


No. of

Schools:- 25




100% 16% 84% 16% 84% 16% 84% 0% 100% Comments:- 4 sampled schools have separate library room out of 25 schools. Indeed functional and effective library is almost absent in many schools where separate library room is available.






Yes % No %

13 52 12 48






H.S. Girhola, Block- Charama

Comments:- Laboratory facilities are very meager. Their use in actual learning purpose needs to be encouraged.




Sl. No. Ramps to Number of Schools Yes % No %

(i) Entrance of School 9 36 16 64 (ii) Drinking Water Facility 0 0 25 100 (iii) Toilet Facility 2 8 23 92 (iv) Science lab - - - - (v) Computer Lab - - - - (vi) Mathematic Lab - - - - (vii) Library - - - - (viii) Auditorium - - - - (ix) Play Ground - - - -


(Entrance of School – 9 and Toilet facility – 2 schools) instead of these schools there are no other facilities for CWSN in any school out of 25 sampled schools. The table informs how our schools are yet to become CWSN friendly physical structures.


No. of Schools:- 25

Bench Availability

Yes No

0 25

100% 0% 100%


Adequate Slope:- 9


Yes No

9 16

100% 36% 64%


100% 88.89% 11.11%



Picture 5: Showing proper ramp with handrail

H.S.S. Gondahur, Block- Koyalibeda




Supply water 1 4

Tube well 12 48

Dug Well - -

Hand Pump 19 76

Other 1 4

No source 2 8


No. of Schools:- 25

Water Available

Yes No

23 2

100% 92% 8%



H.S.S. Dudhawa, Block- Narharpur

Above table shows that the drinking water facility available in 23 schools out of 25 sampled schools. Source of drinking water are as follows- (Supply water- 1, Tube well - 12, Hand Pump – 19, other-1 and no source – 2 schools)


(b) Water Storage Facility& its condition & cleaning schedule

Type of Facility

No. of

Schools


No. of Schools %

Good & Usable

Damaged not usable

Weekly 4 16

Steel drum 16 16 - Fortnightly 2 8 % 64 64 - Monthly 2 8

Covered tank 9 9 - Six Monthly 1 4 % 36% 36% - Not Definite 2 8

Underground tank


% - - - - - - Overhead

tank - - - - - -

% - - - - - -




No. of Schools:- 25

Quality


23 2

100% 92% 8%



No. of Schools:- 25


1 0 2 0 0

100% 4% 0% 8% 0% 0%


No. of Schools:- 25

Bleaching Powder



Yes No

0 0 0 25 0 25

100% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%

Comments:-

(d) Availability of sufficient numbers of drinking water taps -

No. of Schools:- 25


Yes No

7 18

100% 28% 72%


Comments:-




Users Facility of urinals/lavatories available in Schools Adequate Number % Inadequate Number %

Boys 20 80 5 20 Girls 14 56 11 44 CWSN 3 12 22 88 Teachers 7 28 18 72 Other workers - - - - Comments:-


No. of Schools:- 25



11 14 11 14 9 16

100% 44% 56% 44% 56% 36% 64%


H.S.S. Narhardev, Block- Kanker





No. of Schools:- 25




100% 75% 25% Availability of Napkins & Dustbins

No. of Schools:- 20


0 20 3 17 100% 0% 100% 15% 85%



No. of Schools:- 25

Availability of Provision

Yes No

3 22

100% 12% 88%



No. of Schools:- 25




100% 92% 8% 0% 100% Comments:- Cleanliness is a problem.


12. Drainage System


No. of Schools:- 25


9 16 100% 36% 64%

Type of Drains Under ground Pucca Covered Pucca & Open Kutcha & Open No. of Schools:- 9 2 1 2 4

100 % 22.22% 11.11% 22.22% 44.44% Structural Condition


No. of Schools:- 9 3 4 2 0 100 % 33.33% 44.44% 22.22% 0%


Schools:- 9 Yes No

2 7 100 % 22.22% 77.78%

No. of

Schools:- 2


Entrance Gate

Open Space



- - 1 - 1 - 100 % - - 50% - 50% -



(Underground – 2 schools, Pucca Covered – 1, Pucca & Open – 2 and Kutcha & Open- 4 schools)

Comments:-


No. of Schools:-25


100% 96% 4%

No. of Schools:-24 If yes, Type of drainage system

Septic Tank Municipal drain Open field Any other 20 4 - -

100 % 80% 16% - -

No. of Schools:-25

Availability of waste Collection facility Yes No

9 16 100 % 36% 64%

No. of Schools:-9

If yes, Adequate No. of dustbins Yes No

7 2 100 % 77.78% 22.22%

No. of Schools:-9


7 2 100 % 77.78% 22.22%


No. of Schools:- 9


7 2 100 % 77.78% 22.22%

No. of Schools:-25


0 25 100 % 0% 100%


Comments:-


No. of Schools:-25


0 25 100 % 0% 100% No. of

Schools:-25 Availability of Rain water harvesting system

Yes No 0 25

100 % 0% 100% No. of

Schools:-25


- - 100 % - - No. of

Schools:-25


- - 100 % - - No. of

Schools:-25

Lighting facility available Yes No 25 0

100 % 100% 0% Type Ordinary bulb Ordinary tube CFL None No. of

Schools:-25 13 17 15 3

100% 52% 68% 60% 12% No. of

Schools:-25


4 21 100 % 16% 84%

Type of source Gobar gas Plant Solar energy Wind energy No. of Schools

using - - - -

% - - - -

Comments:-



No. of Schools:-25


100 % 100% - (Condition) Good 22



% - Cyclone -

% - Earthquake -




Triple storied - % -


One gate 23 % 92%

Two gates 2 % 8%

Three gates - % -


22


% 12%

Comments:-

15 (ii) (c-e)



0 25 0 25 100% 0% 100% 0% 100%



0 0 25 100% 0% 0% 100%



0 0 25


100% 0% 0% 100% No. of


Kitchen Laboratory No 0 8 17

100% 0% 32% 68% No. of

Schools:-8


- - 6 2 100% - - 75% 25%





No. of Schools:-25


1 24 1 24 1 24 100% 4% 96% 4% 96% 4% 96%

Display of Numbers

1 0 0 1 0 1

% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%

Comments:-



No. of Schools:- 25

Ongoing construction activities

Yes No

3 22

100% 12% 88%

Type New School building Strengthening of existing School

Repair works

No. of Schools:- 3

0 3 0

100% 0% 100% 0%



H.S.S. Jepra, Block- Charama

Above table shows us, that the ongoing construction activity is found in three schools out of 25 sampled schools. The construction does disturb the academic activity



No. of Schools:- 3


to construction



3 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 3 0

100% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 100% 0%

b. Construction material stored appropriately No. of

Schools:- 3 Yes No

3 0

100% 100% 0%

c. Temporary fencing of construction area done No. of

Schools:- 3 Yes No

1 2

100% 33.33% 66.67%

Comments:-



No. of

Schools:- 3





Foundation level

Plinth level/ DPC

Lintel Roof level

Flooring/plastering

Finishing level

Yes No

3 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 3 0

100% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 33.33% 0% 66.67% 100% 0%



2(c-g)




Schools

Number of

visits

Average No. of

visit/School


made

Average No. of

Authentication

Instructions given

in No. of Schools


Foundation - - - - - - - -

Plinth - - - - - - - -

Lintel - - - - - - - -

Roof level - - - - - - - -

Flooring - - - - - - - -

Finishing - - - - - - - -

Comments:

No. of

Schools:- 3

Community

members through

SMDC involved

in procurement

process

Sub Committee

(Construction

Committee)

Constituted

A/c Books Civil

Work

(Construction)

maintained/

updated

MB for Civil

Work

Maintained

Payment made to

contractor in

accordance with

MB

Material

stocked is in line

with stock

register

Cheque issue

register

maintained



matches with entry


Construction

Material

Construction

work


0 3 0 3 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0

100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0%

86




100% - - 100% - Comments:- Construction works are conducting by PWD department; sampled schools have no data about ongoing construction work. (j) Any good practices in civil works which can be replicated in other places/in other States.

Comments:- Nil




No. of

Schools:-25

Level Familiarity

with their

roles

% SEMIS

DCF

% School

Report

Card

% SMDC

Register

% Guidelines

of School

Developme

nt Plan

%

No. of

Schools:-25

Training received

by SMDC

Members

Printed copy of

guidelines of

SMDC made

available to

members


Good 2 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 25

Average 10 40 2 8 0 0 20 80 0 0 100% 0 100 0 100

Not

familiar

13 52 23 92 25 100 5 20 25 100

Comments:-


No. of Schools:-25


Monthly Quarterly Six monthly Annually Whenever needed

Never

3 – 5 SMDC Members 0 18 1 2 0 4

100% 0% 72% 4% 8% 0% 16%

Above table, show us frequency of SMDC meetings out of sampled 25 schools are as follows- (Quarterly-18, six monthly- 1, annually -2 and never– 4 schools)

330



1. About water facility 2. The construction of toilets 3. The construction of extra room by SMDC 4. About guest faculty appointment 5. Buying books and stationary 6. Buying stock like chairs, cupboard etc. 8. About the celebration national festivals 9. Distribution of bicycles etc.

Comments:-

2(ii) Description of SMDC members –

Members Number Average no. of members per School

Average Attendance in recent meeting



No. of Schools:-25



100 % 0% 100% 20% 80% 20% 80%




3(ii) Level of participation of SMDC members in helping School authorities to conduct following activities

No.

of

Scho

ols:

-25

Lev

el o

f Pa

rtic

ipat

ion

RM

SA &

MD

M

Impl

emen

tatio

n

100%

Con

stru

ctio

n w

ork

unde

r R

MSA

100%

SAG

Uti

lizat

ion

100%

Free

Tex

t Boo

ks d

istr

ibut

ion

100%

Scho

lars

hips

dis

trib

utio

n

100%

Prep

arin

g A

WP

& B

100%

Stud

ents

Enr

ollm

ent,

Atte

ndan

ce

100%

Reg

ular

ity o

f te

ache

rs

100%

Run

ning

of

day

to d

ay a

ctiv

ities

orga

nizi

ng S

choo

l& c

ultu

ral

even

ts

100%

Hel

p in

pro

vide

sch

ool f

acili

ties

100%

Filli

ng o

f D

CF

100%

Good - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Average 10 40 0 0 2 8 16 64 2 8 0 0 0 0 2 8 3 12 2 8 0 0

Bad 15 60 25 100 23 92 9 36 23 92 25 100 25 100 23 92 22 88 23 92 25 100



No. of Schools:- 25


0 25 100 % 0% 100%




No. of Schools:-25


Total No. of SDMC members



Yes No 330 - -

0 25 -

100% 0% 100% - - -

Comments:- No orientation programmes are conducted. 6. Schedule of trainings, received by SMDC members, name agency who conducted the trainings, and perception of SMDC members about trainings.




Nil 1.

No. of Schools- 25

Good & Useful Average Not Good

- 2.

- 3. - - -

- 4. 100% - - -

- 5. Comments:- No training for SMDC members was organized.



Name of

District visited:-

Kanker


thereof

Yes No 1.

√ -- 2. Name of State:-Chhattisgarh

√ -- 3.

Total No. of govt.

Schools





% 4.

District 223 223 100 32 32 100 5.

State 4148 4148 100 1877 1877 100

Comments:-


2. Distribution of DCF for the current year to all Schools in the District


100 % √ -- No. of School:- 255 DCF distributed all Schools from DPO

Yes No 100% √ --


Comments:-


At district level At School level

Total No. of govt. & Pvt. Schools in district

255

No. of School:- 25



255 Yes No


255 25 0

100 % 100% 0%

Overall, kind of training received to fill up DCF

Yes, average training found in session 2014-15

Reasons for not receiving training


4. Status of receiving of DCF duly filled up from all Schools in the district for the current year i.e. 2014-15 (At district level)


the district:- 255


nodal Schools


received


received


Govt. Pvt. Total Govt. Pvt. Total Govt. Pvt. Total 1. 2. 3. 4.

223 32 255 223 32 255 Govt. Pvt. 223 32

% 87.45 12.55 100 87.45 12.55 100

Comments:-



No. of Schools:- 25


Yes No 1.

25 0 2.

100 % 100% 0% 3.

Comments:- Yes, current academic year filled copy of DCF is available in the school. 6-7 School report card and sample checks




√ - √ - √ -


25

% 100%

Data entry done

School report cards


Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No

Name of district:-Kanker

√ - √ - √ - √ -


- - - - - - - -


1. Formalities are fulfilled. Substance needs to be brought in.

Comments:-


1. Yes 2. No



Yes



No. of Schools:- 25

Awareness about data’s information Use of data being made Yes No Yes No 25 0 25 0

100 % 100% 0% 100% 0% 11. Is SEMIS/ UDISE data used for Planning and budgeting? DPO level

1. Yes 2. No


1. Yes 2. No



No. of

Schools:- 25



100% 92% 8% 44% 56% DPO √ - √ - SPO √ - √ -

Above table, show the cash book maintained and updated daily basis in 23 schools and bank reconciliation done on monthly basis in 11 schools out of sampled 25 schools.





No. of Schools:- 25 0 0 25 100 % 0% 0% 100%




S.NO. Type of funds/grants No. of Schools As recorded in cash book Amount Received Total Month of receipt

1. School Annual Grant (SAG) - - - - - - -

2. Minor Repair Grant - - - - - - -

3. New School Building Grant - - - -

Yes

Yes


(Major grant) - - - 4. Additional classroom /lab etc.

construction grant - - - - - - -

5. Major repair grant - - - -

- - - - - - -


7. Others - - - - - - -

No grants received by the sampled schools during current financial year 2014-15.

Comments:- New school building and additional classroom grants are not distributed to the school directly, this type contract given to the PWD department.

At District Level



1 Annual Grant - -

2 Minor Repair Grant - -

3 Major Repair Grant - -

At State Level


Sl. No. Name of grant allocated No. of districts Month of allocation 1 School Grants 27 2 MMER 3 Model School 4 Girls Hostel 5 Teachers Salary 6 DPO Office Payment 7 Teacher Training 8 Vocational Education 9 Excursion Tour for students

10 Fixed Assets created/purchased during the year 4. System for drawl and payment of fund from SMDC account –

No. of Schools:- 25 Cash Cheque Both 0 25 0

100% 0% 100% 0%


As per above table, system for drawl and payment of fund from SMDC account by cheque 25 schools out of 25 sampled schools.

Comments:-


No. of Schools:- 25




transaction Yes No Yes No Yes No 2. No objection 18 7 18 7 0 25 2

100% 72% 28% 72% 28% 0% 100% 3. 4.


6. Audit of SDMCs


No. of

Schools:- 25

Audit carried out Yes No 25 0

100% 100% 0% D.P.O. √ -

No. of

Schools:- 25

If yes, Audit carried out by Education Dept. A.G. C.A. Social Audit None

- - 25 - - 100% - - 100% - -

Comments:-

7. Social Auditing


No. of Schools:- 25

Display of financial information (receipts & payments) and timely entered

Yes No 0 25

100% 0% 100% D.P.O.


Yes



No. of Schools:- 25


0 25 100% 0% 100%

If yes, details thereof Comments:-





is submitted 1 H.S. Charama March-April 2013-14 2 H.S. Nathiya Navagaon March-April 2013-14 3 H.S.(G) Kanker March-April 2013-14 4 H.S.S. Pakhanjore March-April 2013-14 5 H.S. Aturgaon March-April 2013-14 6 H.S.S. Amabeda March-April 2013-14 7 H.S.S. Gondahur March-April 2013-14 8 H.S.S. Dudhawa March-April 2013-14 9 H.S.S. Bhanupratappur March-April 2013-14 10 H.S.S. Basanwahi March-April 2013-14 11 H.S. Korar March-April 2013-14 12 H.S.S.(B) Charama March-April 2013-14 13 H.S.S. Bande March-April 2013-14 14 H.S.(G) Singarbhat March-April 2013-14 15 H.S.S. Lakhanpur March-April 2013-14 16 H.S.S. Jepra March-April 2013-14 17 H.S.S.(G) Antagarh March-April 2013-14 18 H.S.S. Narharpur March-April 2013-14 19 H.S.S. Narhardev March-April 2013-14 20 H.S.S. Durgukondal March-April 2013-14 21 H.S. Karap March-April 2013-14 22 H.S. Girahola March-April 2013-14 23 H.S.S.(B) Antagarh March-April 2013-14 24 H.S. Tarhul March-April 2013-14 25 H.S. Dhekuna March-April 2013-14







No. of Schools

255 255 100% 2012-13 255 2013-14 255

Comments:-


No. of sampled DPOs



released


Date of release


received





Comments:-




(2) These grants are distributed to the school by DPO level.

(3) Then DPO have to submit utilization certificate to the SPO after getting it from school.


1. Yes 2. No




Comments:-

Yes


11. Financial Statement for SDMC/DPO/SPO (From 1 April, 2014 to date 25/09/2014/month of visit). (i)

Name of Unit


2014

B Funds

received

C=A+B Total Fund

available till 20.1.2015

D Expenditure



Balance in bank


SMDC 1514158 Nil 1514158 854390 659768 659768 DPO 42801848 147717470 190519318 120272491 70246827 70246827 SPO

Comments:-



Grant funds

Sl.

No. Name of School

SAG Minor Repair Major repair grant Civil work Educational tour Others



Unspent


Unspent


Unspent


Unspent


Unspent

balance

1 H.S. Charama - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

2 H.S. Nathiya Navagaon - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

3 H.S.(G) Kanker - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

4 H.S.S. Pakhanjore - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

5 H.S. Aturgaon - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

6 H.S.S. Amabeda - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

7 H.S.S. Gondahur - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

8 H.S.S. Dudhawa - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

9 H.S.S. Bhanupratappur - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

10 H.S.S. Basanwahi - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

11 H.S. Korar - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

12 H.S.S.(B) Charama - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

13 H.S.S. Bande - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

14 H.S.(G) Singarbhat - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

15 H.S.S. Lakhanpur - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

16 H.S.S. Jepra - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

17 H.S.S.(G) Antagarh - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

18 H.S.S. Narharpur - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

19 H.S.S. Narhardev - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

20 H.S.S. Durgukondal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

21 H.S. Karap - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

22 H.S. Girahola - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

23 H.S.S.(B) Antagarh - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

24 H.S. Tarhul - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

25 H.S. Dhekuna - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Comments:- No grants received by the sampled schools during current financial year 2014-15.




S.N. Month of receipt of SAG Number of Schools % 1 No grants received during current

financial year 2014-15 - -

2 3 4 Total - -


Sl. No.


Month of receipt


% of expenditure

1 H.S. Charama - - - -

2 H.S. Nathiya Navagaon - - - - 3 H.S.(G) Kanker - - - -

4 H.S.S. Pakhanjore - - - - 5 H.S. Aturgaon - - - - 6 H.S.S. Amabeda - - - -

7 H.S.S. Gondahur - - - - 8 H.S.S. Dudhawa - - - - 9 H.S.S. Bhanupratappur - - - -

10 H.S.S. Basanwahi - - - - 11 H.S. Korar - - - - 12 H.S.S.(B) Charama - - - -

13 H.S.S. Bande - - - - 14 H.S.(G) Singarbhat - - - -

15 H.S.S. Lakhanpur - - - - 16 H.S.S. Jepra - - - - 17 H.S.S.(G) Antagarh - - - -

18 H.S.S. Narharpur - - - - 19 H.S.S. Narhardev - - - - 20 H.S.S. Durgukondal - - - -

21 H.S. Karap - - - - 22 H.S. Girahola - - - -

23 H.S.S.(B) Antagarh - - - - 24 H.S. Tarhul - - - - 25 H.S. Dhekuna - - - -

Total - - - -






spend? - - - - - -



Number of Schools

%



Yes % No % 1. Stationary material purchasing

- - - - - - 1.


- - - - - -


- - - - - -

4. Electric bill paid - - - - - - 5. White-wash - - - - - -





Month of receipt


% of expenditure

1 H.S. Charama - - - -

2 H.S. Nathiya Navagaon - - - -

3 H.S.(G) Kanker - - - -

4 H.S.S. Pakhanjore - - - -

5 H.S. Aturgaon - - - -

6 H.S.S. Amabeda - - - -

7 H.S.S. Gondahur - - - -

8 H.S.S. Dudhawa - - - -

9 H.S.S. Bhanupratappur - - - -

10 H.S.S. Basanwahi - - - -

11 H.S. Korar - - - -

12 H.S.S.(B) Charama - - - -

13 H.S.S. Bande - - - -

14 H.S.(G) Singarbhat - - - -

15 H.S.S. Lakhanpur - - - -

16 H.S.S. Jepra - - - -

17 H.S.S.(G) Antagarh - - - -

18 H.S.S. Narharpur - - - -

19 H.S.S. Narhardev - - - -

20 H.S.S. Durgukondal - - - -


21 H.S. Karap - - - -

22 H.S. Girahola - - - -

23 H.S.S.(B) Antagarh - - - -

24 H.S. Tarhul - - - -

25 H.S. Dhekuna - - - -

Total - - - -




- -


- -


- -

Comments:-


Minor Repair Grant utilized on works

Number of Schools

%

Funds utilized as per norms If not utilized as per norms, give reasons Yes % No %

3. Repairing - - - - - -

4. White wash - - - - - -

Comments:-


3. Details of innovative proposals undertaken during the current financial year 2014-15 (At district level)

S. No.



1. No Innovative Proposals - -

2.


S. No.




Nil


3(a).If not, the mentions reasons thereof



Nil


Nil --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) At district level --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

At State Level --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


There are no successful elements in innovation proposals that can be scaled up under RMSA



Name of District:- Kanker


1 DPO 1 1 0

2 ADPO 1 1 0

3 APO 3 0 3


5 Accountant 1 0 1


7 Peon 2 1 1

Total :- 12 5 7



S. N. Name of Post Sanctioned In position Vacant 1 Director 1 1 0 2 Additional Director 1 0 1 3 Joint Director 1 1 0


4 Deputy Director 4 1 3 5 Assistant Director 7 4 3 6 Finance Officer 1 1 0 7 Programmer 2 1 1 8 Assistant Programmer 1 0 1 9 Assistant Programme

Coordinator 4 0 4

10 Ankekshak 2 0 2 11 Accountant 2 0 2 12 Steno 2 0 2 13 Assistant Grade-1 1 0 1 14 Assistant Grade-2 2 0 2 15 Assistant Grade-3 4 0 4 16 Civil Manager 1 0 1 17 Deputy Manager 1 0 1 18 Office Assistant with Data Entry

Operator 10 7 3


Total:- 54 22 35

1(iii) Action taken to fill up vacancies


At State level:- Yes, proposal send to the State Govt. by SPO ……………………………………. Comments:-

2. Personnels working on deputation/contract and their nature of engagement


2 8 3 14 Nature of engagement

At DPO At SPO At DPO At SPO 2 8 3 14

Comments:-



Working at State level Working at district level 1 Finance Assistant Director Data Entry Operator

2 Civil Work Assistant Director Data Entry Operator

3 Quality Additional Director ADPO

4 Equity Additional Director ADPO

5 Gender Assistant Director ADPO


6 Pedagogy Additional Director ADPO

7 Planning Deputy Director Assistant Programmer

8 Training Deputy Director ADPO

Total

3(i) If component wise personnel’s are not in place the alternative arrangements made:-Yes

Comments:-

4 If the administrative staff is not in place alternative arrangement adopted


Comments:-


Yes, Average

Comments:-


1(i).Use of monitoring tools/mechanism (reports, visits etc.) to ensure effective implementation of the scheme

No monitoring tool


Not adequate


At SPO level

S.

No.






3 Others


At DPO Level

S.

No.




1 DPO/DEO No time scheduled

2 ADPO

3 APO

4 Others

Total

Comments:-


Written tool available in SPO level but not in DPO level

Comments:-





----------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Staff Sanctioned In position Vacant % 1(iii) Availability of physical Infrastructural Facilities


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments:-




2

3

4

5

6

1

2

3

4

5

6

1. Master Training from SCERT

2

3

4

5

6


7

8

9

10

7

8

9

10

7

8

9

10

Comments:-

IV.INFORMATION ABOUT STATE DATABASE At SPO level updated by DPO.


Yes


DCF format

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments:-


Yes ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yes/ No

2(i)If not, then name of other sources used for the Plan preparation at district level

Yes, found

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments:-


S.N. District level issues State level issues 1 Mistakes are found regarding the infrastructure data Data has not been compiled at state level, its

compiled at district level.





Ascertaining quality dimensions is the biggest difficulty.


V. RESEARCH (At district and State level)




2

3

4

5



1

2

3

4

5


(a) At State level:- No………………………………………………………………………………….

(b) At District level:- No……………………………………………………………………………….

3. (i) Identification of the kinds of research need was felt and at what level?

Nil --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yes/No



Areas of research



agencies)

Pedagogy

Quality


Areas of research



agencies)

Pedagogy

Quality



not covered above.


Critical aspects







1. Some of the High schools are functionong from M.S. building due to lack of H.S. building

in the Kanker district.

2. Most of the schools having inadequate teaching staff in the Kanker district.



4. In most of the schools ramps are not there for CWSN students. Even they are constructed;

they do not serve intended purpose.



schools.

7. Financial record like stock register, cash book and pass book are not maintained regularly in



appropriate TLM; and also there is no individualized educational plan (IEP), resource

teacher, assistive device, special training to handle CWSN students.


10. In some of the HS and HSS schools, computers are made available but the computer

teachers are not made available; and nobody has knowledge about computers as they have

not received any training about computer use. Therefore, computers are not put to use.

Thus, it is found that they are kept in the rooms either in an uninstalled or in some cases

unpacked mode.





available.


subject practical’s. Even some of the schools failed to conduct the practical.

14. In some of the schools, they do not have adequate sports materials and playground for

regular outdoor activities.

15. In most of the school, SMDC members are not familiar with their roles and responsibilities.

16. H.S.S. Bande, Block- Koyalibeda: This is naxalite affected school; SMDC meetings are

not functioning regularly; practical works are not conducted by teachers of science, maths,

physics, chemistry and other subjects. Teacher’s quality appears to be poor and hence, it is

observed they are inactive with their work. Students learning achievement are very poor.

17. H.S.S. Girls Antagarh, Block- Antagarh: This is one of the poor quality school; students

learning achievement are very poor. School records are not updated regularly; inadequate

toilet facilities for girls students; lack of science lab; non-existence of library room and art

and craft room for students learning. 5 computer kits received by this school but all computers

are in damage condition and computer teaching is not going on since last 3 years; Principal and other

supportive teaching staff are observed inactive; SMDC members are not interested in the school

activity.

Positive aspects


teaching process. They use appropriate TLM into the class room activity. Teacher




3. H.S.S. Gondahur, Block- Koyalibeda: This is one of the good quality schools in the

Kanker district; teachers are very pro-active. Laboratory, library, playground, separate

toilets for girls and boys, running water in the toilets etc. facilities are available for the

students. School premise is found neat and clean, students learning achievement are very


good. School building observed well decorates and variety of trees plantation, vegetable

plantation, flower plantation etc. are well maintained by the school principal.

4. H.S.S. Dudhawa, Block- Narharpur: This is good quality school in the Narharpur

block. Principal and supporting teaching staff is very pro-active; adequate sports

materials, laboratory, library, playground, separate toilets for girls and boys, running

water in the toilets etc. facilities are available for the students. School premise is found

neat and clean, students learning achievement are good. School building observed well

constructed, school records are being maintained and updated regularly.

5. H.S. Girhola, Block- Charama: This is good quality school; teachers are very pro-

active. Laboratory, library, playground, separate toilets for girls and boys, running water

in the toilets etc. facilities are available for the students. School premise is found neat and

clean, students learning achievement are very good. 10th Std. board result is observed

100% since last 2 years.


District – 3 Dantewada


At School Level



Plan developed Not developed

Yes No

0 25

100% 0% 100%


As per above table, no perspective plan have been found in any of the 25 sampled schools.



No. of

Schools :- 25

Other Data base/sourced adopted If yes names of other sources

Yes No Group discussion, observation, and DCF

0 25 No

100% 0% 100%

Comments:- This needs to be initiated on urgent basis. This is required for the decentralization of planning.




Yes No

0 25

100% 0% 100%






2 23 100% 8% 92%

Convergence Approach Convergence not adopted

S. No.

Departments No. of Schools

% Reasons thereof



3 Tribal Development 1 4% 4 Minority Department - -



7 Health, Medical and Family welfare 1 4% 8 Electricity department - -



As per above table, adoption of convergence approach found in 2 schools with Tribal Development department and Health, Medical and Family welfare department out of sampled 25 schools. During discussion, field investigator was told in 2 schools that there were discussions for convergence with Tribal Development department and Health, Medical and Family welfare department.




No. of

Schools :- 25



100% 8% 92% 8% 92% If not reasons thereof Lack of awareness



As per above table that there is School Development Plan in 2 schools out of sampled 25 schools. This is undermining the devolution of powers to schools.




%

1 Filling of DCF of U-DISE 2 8% 2 Preparation & Implementation of Annual Plan - - 3 Admission of Students to Class-9 10 40% 4 Regular attendance and retention of students 1 4% 5 Regularity & Punctuality in teachers’

attendance - -


Human 5 20% 8 Organizing cultural, sports events, functions 12 48% 9 Mid-day-meal - -


8 32%


- -

Above table shows the involvement of SMDCs in various activities of schools. It shows that SMDC members were assigned the job of filling of DCF of U-DISE in two (2) schools; admission of students to Class - 9th in ten (10) schools; regular attendance and retention of students in one (1) school; providing resources by human in five (5) schools; organizing cultural, sports events, and functions in twelve (12) schools; and preparing annual accounts of income & expenditure in eight (8) schools out of sampled 25 schools.

Comments:- Huge gap is apparent in Formulating SMDCs and making them functional.



100% 32% 68% Non participation in school development processes primarily due to their lack of awareness among members of SMDC. The above table reveals this fact. The table, tell us the story of absence of awareness among SMDC members. Out of sampled 25 schools only 8 school SMDC members are aware about their roles and responsibilities.


S.N. Steps taken by SMDC members accordingly Number of Schools

%




- -


- -

6 Paying attention to improvement in regular teaching learning activities. 1 4% 7 Distribution of free text books 10 40% 8 Availability of scholarships on time to students 2 8% 9 Preparing three years’ perspective Plan - -

10 Proper use of funds i.e. SAG & other grants as per norms 1 4 11 Monitoring of minor & major repair work and maintenance of physical

infrastructure - -


12 48%




Meetings of General body held Number of Schools:- 25


7 8 4 6

100% 28% 32% 16% 24%

Above table shows that meetings of SMDC are conducted in 7 schools on quarterly basis, on half yearly basis in 8 schools, 4 schools on annually and no meeting was held till the date of visit in 6 schools out of sampled 25 schools.




Mentioned Not Mentioned 0 6

100% 0% 100% Comments:- No reason is sighted


2. At District level – Name of District – Dantewada



(1. Yes 2. No)


b. Social Welfare 1






h. PWD 2


j. Others (CWSN, Girls Education) 2






At State level


1. Yes 2. No


It does reflect

1



(1. Yes 2. No)


b. Social Welfare 1






h. PWD 1


j. Others 2


Not Specified




Comments:- Monitoring mechanism needs to be created


1. Yes 2. No

If not, why?


1


2. ACCESS




%

1 EBB - - Urban 4 16 3 CWSN (Minimum 3 CWSN) 4 16 4 Higher Gender gap - - 5 SC/ST/Minority students abundance 2 8 6 Low retention rate/Higher dropout rate 3 12 7 Schools situated in habitation with large number of OoSC - - 8 Low academic achievements 4 16 9 Schools situated in habitation of seasonal migrants - - 10 Urban Schools with most students of deprived sections - - 11 Forest/Mountain/Remote/Desert area 2 8 12 Flood/natural calamity prone area - - 13 Ongoing civil work 2 8 14 School with girls hostel 2 8 15 None 2 2



Schools visited in the district Dantewada

Sl. No.



1 Geedam 22160805730 H.S.S. (G) Shiksha Parisar Geedam Urban Area 29.1.15 30.1.15 2 Dantewada 22162200703 H.S.S. Girls Dantewada Urban Area 24.1.15 26.1.15 3 Geedam 22160805728 H.S.S. Geedma Urban Area 29.1.15 30.1.15 4 Dantewada 22162202319 H.S.S. Module Dantewada Urban Area 24.1.15 25.1.15 5 Kuakonda 22161917507 H.S.S. Girls Kuakonda CWSN 31.1.15 2.2.15 6 Kuakonda 22161917506 H.S.S. Kuakonda CWSN 31.1.15 2.2.15 7 Geedam 22160808035 H.S.S. Barsoor CWSN 27.1.15 28.1.15 8 Geedam 22160804511 H.S.S. Kasoli CWSN 27.1.15 28.1.15 9 Geedam 22160808034 H.S.S. Barsoor Poor Result 27.1.15 28.1.15 10 Kuakonda 22161910304 H.S.S. Kodenar No.-2 Poor Result 5.2.15 7.2.15 11 Kuakonda 22161905715 H.S. Kodenar No.-1 Gajraj Camp Poor Result 5.2.15 6.2.15 12 Geedam 22160802007 H.S.S. Karli Poor Result 29.1.15 30.1.15 13 Kuakonda 22161905714 H.S.S. Kirandul CAL 5.2.15 6.2.15 14 Katekalyan 22161507713 H.S.S. Katekalyan CAL 3.2.15 4.2.15 15 Dantewada 22162202318 H.S.S. Girls Dantewada School with Hostel 24.1.15 25.1.15


16 Dantewada 22162202320 H.S.S. Dantewada School with Hostel 24.1.15 25.1.15 17 Dantewada 22162204915 H.S.S. Bacheli Drop Out 5.2.15 6.2.15 18 Dantewada 22162202802 H.S. Balpet Drop Out 6.2.15 7.2.15 19 Geedam 22160807422 H.S.S. Ronje Drop Out 27.1.15 28.1.15 20 Dantewada 22162206004 H.S.S. Pondam Civil Work 3.2.15 4.2.15 21 Geedam 22160800414 H.S.S. Badetumnar Civil Work 29.1.15 30.1.15 22 Kuakonda 22161903203 H.S. Mailawada ST 31.1.5 2.2.15 23 Katekalyan 22161500605 H.S. Katekalyan ST 3.2.15 4.2.15 24 Katekalyan 22161501211 H.S. Badelehkapal Forest Area 3.2.15 4.2.15 25 Kuakonda 22161902115 H.S.S. Palnar Forest Area 31.1.15 2.2.15

DPO Visit :- 7/2/2015


S. N. Area Number of Schools

Situated %

1 Protected area (National Park, Wild life sanctuary) - - 2 Flood prone /flood plain area - - 3 Earthquake prone zone - - 4 Unstable slope - - 5 Landslide prone Area - - 6 Cyclone prone Area - - 7 Storm surge prone Area - - 8 Drought prone Area - - 9 Polluting Industrial Area - - 10 Mining Area - - 11 Arsenic /fluoride contaminated ground water area - - 12 Busy National/State Highway 1 4 13 Congested urban/market/commercial area - - 14 Any particular disturbance faced by School due to its location

(Forest area -1, Nala –1 and Naxalite area – 2 schools) 4 16

15 None 20 80

Comments:- As per the above table, there are different kinds of threats in the way to 5 schools. One is natural and four are manmade.


School Level No. of Schools managed by

Govt. % Private %

PS - - - -

UPS - - - -

Total - - - -






Total 3923 100%

As per above table, out of 3923 enrolled students in sampled 25 schools 519 students are coming to schools from the distance more than 5 km. This is around 13.23%.





100% 20% 80%

If yes mention them 1. National highway 2. Nala 3. Forest area 4. Naxilite (2 schools)


Comments:-




13 11 8 27 59

100% 22.03% 18.64% 13.56% 45.77% 100%



Comments:- Majority schools are Government Schools.


Facility Provided by number of Schools %

Transport facility 0 0

Residential facility 14 56%

Comments:- Above table shows that residential facilities are available in 14 schools out of 25 sampled schools. .

II Social Access

1. Pattern of population of the habitation and enrollment in the School –

1. (a) Social category-wise population of Students of age group 14-16 years in the habitation.


Category 14-16 Age

Boys % Girls % Total %

SC


ST

Minority

General

Total


Category No. of Schools responded %

SC


ST

Minority

General

All Categories

Comments:- Data is not available at the school level.




Proportionate

Yes No


100%

If not, reasons thereof: Not Applicable

Comments:-Though ascertaining the exact number is difficult, it can be inferred through the registers that the students who are absolutely left outs from all aspects are attending these sampled schools in the district.


2.(a) Class wise, Social Category wise enrollment and attendance (on the day of field visit)

*B-Boy, G-Girl, E-enrolled, P-presents

As per the above comprehensive table, total presentees on the visit day are about 70.83%. Percentage of attendance of Students of all the social

categories on the given day is more or less equal with little variations. Relatively high percentage of attendance could be due the examination

season.


Cla

Ss

SC ST Minority Gen & Others Total CWSN



9 39 24 49 24 88 48 63

2

40

8

65

9

35

9

12

91

76

7

9 9 9 7 18 16 23

0

15

9

25

6

15

4

48

6

31

3

91

7

60

4

95

0

592 18

67

11

96

7 4 3 3 10 7

10 16 12 21 20 37 32 43

2

33

7

46

2

35

3

89

4

69

0

3 2 4 4 7 6 15

6

11

3

24

1

15

1

39

7

26

4

61

0

46

6

73

3

533 13

43

99

9

3 2 5 5 8 7

Tot

Al

55 36 70 44 12

5

80 10

64

74

5

11

21

71

2

21

85

14

57

12 11 13 11 25 22 38

6

27

2

49

7

30

5

88

3

57

7

15

27

10

70

17

09

112

5

32

36

21

95

10 6 8 8 18 14

% 1.

70

1.

11

2.

16

1.

36

3.

86

2.

47

32.

88

23.

02

34.

64

22.

00

67.

52

45.

02

0.

37

0.

34

0.

40

0.

34

0.

77

0.

68

11.

93

8.

41

15.

36

9.

43

27.

29

17.

83

47.

19

33.

07

52.

81

34.7

6S

10

0

67.

83

0.

31

0.

19

0.

25

0.

25

0.

56

0.

43


2. (c) Any major variation in the pattern of attendance in respect of SC, ST, Minority, Girl Students and Students from BPL background and reasons thereof


major various are observed in their attendance patterns.




9th 56 33 65 35 121 68 757 50

7

704 487 146

1

99

4

11 8 15 11 26 19 356 238 32

5

23

2

68

1

47

0

119

0

79

6

11

14

76

9

2304 156

5

10 10 5 4 15 1

4

10th 28 22 40 31 68 53 517 36

3

477 383 994 74

6

10 5 7 6 17 11 238 181 29

1

21

4

52

9

39

5

799 57

5

82

0

63

9

16

19

121

4

6 4 5 5 11 9

Total 84 55 10

5

66 18

9

12

1

127

4

87

0

118

1

870 245

5

17

40

21 13 22 17 43 30 594 419 61

6

44

6

12

10

86

5

198

9

13

71

19

34

14

08

39

23

277

9

16 14 10 9 26 2

3

% 2.14 1.40 2.68 1.68 4.81 3.08 32.48 22.17 30.10 22.17 62.57 44.35 0.54 0.33 0.56 0.43 1.09 0.76 15.14 10.68 15.70 11.37 30.84 22.04 50.70 34.94 49.30 35.89 100 70.83 0.41 0.35 0.26 0.23 0.66 0.58



1. Yes 2. No

Picture 1: Showing class attendance on the day of field visit

H.S. Balpet, Block- Dantewada

Comments:-



Discrimination


0 0 25

100% 0% 0% 100%

Comments:- Since students are homogeneous group, the differences that existed within classroom do create conditions for discrimination. Hence, discrimination was not observed in any school.




1







Special furniture in classroom 2 8

Tricycle 1 4

Escort - -

Other (Specify) - -

As per above table – out of 25 sampled schools 11 schools are having proper ramps with hand rails, 1 school having western toilet seat, 4 schools having special furniture in class rooms and 1 school student received tricycle.





III. Open Schooling

3. At State level



1. Yes 2. No

3. (a) Admission and Re-admission procedure in the State open School.





Comments:-

1

1



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

5. Methods for identification of the number of out of School Students in the State

(household survey etc.)

Through house hold survey and advertisement in the news paper.

Comments:-


Comments:-



Category Class

Enrolled Boys



% Enrolled Girls

Girls drop out

% Total Enrolled

SC

IX 56 3 0.25 65 4 0.36 121 7 0.30

X 28 4 0.50 40 1 0.12 68 5 0.31

ST IX 757 78 6.55 704 45 4.03 1461 123 5.34

X 517 27 3.38 477 14 1.71 994 41 2.53

Minority IX 11 0 0 15 0 0 26 0 0

X 10 0 0 7 0 0 17 0 0

Gen & OBC

IX 356 21 1.76 325 3 0.27 681 24 1.04

X 238 10 1.25 291 7 0.85 529 17 1.05

Total IX 1190 102 8.57 1114 52 4.67 2304 154 6.68

X 799 42 5.25 819 22 2.69 1618 64 3.95

CWSN

IX 10 0 0 5 0 0 15 0 0

X 6 1 0.12 5 0 0 11 1 0.06 The separate number of CWSN is included in all categories.

The dropout phenomenon is widely prevalent among STs. It stands at 5.34%. There is an urgent need to probe into the matter.







Comments:-Drop out is a phenomenon for which above mentioned factors are responsible with varying degree in different cases.





Class-9th Class-10th No. of drop out students


School



School

%

154 - 64 - As per above table, in all the 25 schools, drop out students are found to be 154 in standard 9th and 64 students in standard 10th. Since no accurate data is available regarding their re joining of the school, it is assumed that no drop out student was brought back to the school.













No. of Schools:-25

Special trainings started

Yes No

1 24

100% 4% 96%

Name of Trainings

Open centre for OoSC (SIOS)



Boys Girls Total

Enrolled

----

Present

%




Regular teachers 1 4%

NIOS - -

SIOS 1 4%



Programme

Appeared in Exam


B G B G B G B G B G 9 - - - - - - - - - - 10 - - - - - - - - - -

Total - - - - - - - - - - % - - - - - - - - - -

Comments:- Special training intervention is found in 1 school out of 25 sampled schools.

3. Equity


At School Level


Class

2011-12

SC ST MINO. CWSN

B G B G B G B G

Enrolled 65 66 734 518 1 8 1 0

Avg. % of Attend. 73 76 74 77 72 73 69 0

Nil


9th

Appeared in Exam 61 62 627 476 1 8 0 0

% 93.84 93.93 85.42 91.89 100 100 0 0

Above 60% 3 4 25 16 0 1 0 0

% 4.91 6.45 3.98 3.36 0 12.5 0 0

Below 60% 31 30 407 321 0 7 0 0

% 50.81 48.38 64.91 67.43 0 87.5 0 0

10th

Enrolled 45 38 460 369 2 4 1 0

Avg. % Attend. 77 75 73 74 73 72 75 0

Appeared in Exam 44 38 443 367 2 2 1 0

% 97.77 100 96.30 99.45 100 50 100 0

Above 60% 2 0 11 4 0 0 0 0

% 4.44 0 2.39 1.08 0 0 0 0

Below 60% 32 25 217 168 2 0 1 0

% 71.11 65.78 47.17 45.52 100 0 100 0

Class

2012-13

SC ST MINO. CWSN

B G B G B G B G

9th

Enrolled 62 87 837 528 1 4 4 1

Avg. % of Attend. 74 76 75 78 73 76 75 72

Appeared in Exam 53 67 751 521 1 4 4 1

% 85.48 77.01 89.72 98.67 100 100 100 100

Above 60% 2 4 31 17 0 0 0 0

% 3.77 5.97 4.12 3.26 0 0 0 0

Below 60% 26 33 487 320 1 4 3 1

% 49.05 49.25 64.84 61.42 100 100 75 100

10th

Enrolled 52 65 559 528 1 3 2 0

Avg. % Attend. 76 78 77 79 76 77 75 0

Appeared in Exam 52 59 544 408 1 2 1 0

% 100 90.76 97.31 77.27 100 66.66 50 0

Above 60% 2 3 11 11 1 0 0 0


% 3.84 5.08 2.02 2.69 100 0 0 0

Below 60% 31 31 356 268 0 1 0 0

% 59.61 52.54 65.44 65.68 0 50 0 0

Class

2013-14

SC ST MINO. CWSN

B G B G B G B G

9th

Enrolled 44 71 693 707 16 3 2 0

Avg. % of Attend. 78 79 76 78 75 76 75 0

Appeared in Exam 43 65 677 614 13 3 2 0

% 97.72 91.54 97.69 86.84 81.25 100 100 0

Above 60% 3 5 21 30 0 0 0 0

% 6.97 7.69 3.10 4.88 0 0 0 0

Below 60% 20 33 370 395 13 3 1 0

% 46.51 50.76 54.65 64.33 100 100 50 0

10th

Enrolled 37 38 607 499 1 2 4 0

Avg. % Attend. 77 80 78 77 76 77 76 0

Appeared in Exam 37 37 575 490 1 1 4 0

% 100 97.36 94.72 98.19 100 100 100 0

Above 60% 2 3 11 31 0 0 0 0

% 5.40 8.10 1.91 6.32 0 0 0 0

Below 60% 18 24 401 217 1 0 2 0

% 48.64 64.86 69.73 44.28 100 0 50 0

Comments:- Above three tables inform us about enrollment, attendance and achievement levels of students of different social categories in classes IX and X classes of three years. Attendance and Achievement levels are twin areas of concern those need attention.



Name of schemes

SC

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.


Name of schemes

Name of schemes

Name of schemes

Name of schemes

Comments:- No specific schemes available in the State for ensuring enrollment of special category Students along with the assistance provided there under except Girls.




SC 7

ST 150

Minority 4

CWSN 1

OBC 32

General 6

Total 200


ST

1. 2. 3.

4. 5. 6.

Minority 1. 2.

Girls

1.Saraswati Yoganna Free cycles to all the girls

2. 3.

4. 5. 6.

7. 8. 9.

CWSN

1. 2. 3.

4. 5. 6.

7. 8. 9.




Gender Gap


Class

9th

Boys % Girls % Total % Gap % Enrollment 1190 51.52 1120 48.48 2310 100 941.17 - 6.25

Attendance on visit day 780 33.77 758 32.81 1538 66.58 971.79 - 2.97

Appeared in Exam 1013 43.85 973 42.12 1986 85.97 960.51 - 4.11


Above 60%

67 3.37 71 3.57 138 6.94 1059.70 5.63

Below 60%

245 12.34 256 12.89 501 25.23 1044.89 4.30


Above two tables inform us about gender-wise enrollment, attendance on the visit day, appearing in examinations and their achievement of two classes-9th and 10th

. Girl’s

representation in both the classes in comparison with their counterparts-boys- is high. The gender gap in enrollment stands at -6.25% and 2.31% in classes 9th and 10th respectively; the gender gap in enrollments needs to be located against the total population of both the sexes of feeder habitations. Then only the gap that is calculated can considered as gender gap in schooling. This data of population of that age group is not available with the schools.


Comments:- Girls enrollment is found more than the boy`s enrollment in std. 10th.

Class

10th



Appeared in Exam 714 43.94 730 44.92 1444 88.86 1022.40 2.19



Above 60%

43 2.98 56 3.88 99 6.86 1302.32 23.21

Below 60%

204 14.13 197 13.64 401 27.77 965.68 - 3.55







Total 23 -




%

A Health (own or family members) 12 48 B Social cultural issues - - C Sibling Care 7 28 D Household responsibilities 16 64 E Family issues / Gone to relatives - - F Earning for livelihood - - G Migration - - H Any other - -

Total 35 Looking for isolated reasons for absenteeism take us nowhere. There is a need to view all these socio-economic and cultural reasons together impact absenteeism.




programmes (c) Linguistic barriers - - - (d) Economical barriers - - -

Comments:- No adequate efforts were made to address the gender gap



Social Group



2011-12 110 104 214 1194 887 2081 3 12 15 672 602 1274 1309 1003 3596 2 0 2

2012-13 114 152 266 1396 1056 2452 2 7 9 636 673 1359 2204 1889 4093 6 1 7

Gap 4 48 52 202 169 371 -1 -5 -6 -36 71 85 895 886 497 4 1 5

2012-13 114 152 266 1396 1056 2452 2 7 9 686 673 1359 2204 1889 4093 6 1 7

2013-14 81 109 190 1300 1206 2506 17 5 22 607 661 1268 2011 1981 3992 6 0 6

Gap -33 -43 -76 -96 150 54 15 -2 13 -79 -12 -91 -193 92 -101 0 -1 -1




The reduction in enrollment, as per table, is registered in the case of SC, ST (boys) and OBC & GEN in the year 2013-14.


Social Group



2011-12 75 75.5 75.25 73.5 75.5 74.5 72.5 72.5 72.5 76.5 78.5 77.5 73.9 74.4 74.15 72 0 72

2012-13 75 77 76 76 78.5 77.25 74.5 76.5 75.5 77.5 76 76.75 75.6 76 75.8 75 72 73.5

Gap 0 1.5 0.75 2.5 3 2.75 2 4 3 1 -2.5 -0.75 1.7 1.6 1.65 3 0 1.5

2012-13 75 77 76 76 78.5 77.25 74.5 76.5 75.5 77.5 76 76.75 75.6 76 75.8 75 72 73.5

2013-14 77.5 79.5 78.5 77 77.5 77.25 75.5 76.5 76 78 78.5 78.25 76.7 78 77.35 75.5 0 75.5

Gap 2.5 2.5 2.5 1 -1 0 1 0 0.5 0.5 2.5 1.5 1.1 2 1.55 0.5 0 0.2


Social Group



2011-12 68 59 127 660 509 1169 0 8 8 328 355 683 1057 931 1988 1 0 1

2012-13 61 71 132 885 616 1501 2 5 7 400 418 818 1351 1111 2462 3 1 4

Gap -7 12 5 225 107 332 2 -3 -1 72 63 135 294 180 474 2 -1 3

2012-13 61 71 132 885 616 1501 2 5 7 400 418 818 1351 1111 2462 3 1 4

2013-14 43 65 108 803 673 1476 14 3 17 422 396 818 1285 1138 2423 3 1 4

Gap -18 -6 -24 -82 57 -25 12 -2 10 22 -22 0 -66 27 -39 0 0 0



Comments:-


No. of Schools:- 25


8 17 100% 32% 68%


If counseling is not done, reasons thereof:- Lack awareness and lack of trained personnel awareness programmes.

Comments:-








At School level :-



No. of Schools:- 25

Guidance & Counseling Cell Constituted

Yes No

0 25

100% 0 % 100 %

Avg. SCR -

SCR: Student Counselor Ratio




in district


%

- Nil -


14

Not aware

NnnnnnnnnNoil





5. Quality

II. Enabling Conditions : At School level


1-(a)

S. No.



%


classroom 73 73 100

4 Bulb/Tube light /CFL 69 65 94.20 5 Fan 69 61 88.40 6 Teaching aids 57 52 91.22

As per above table, out of 25 sampled schools most of the schools have enabling conditions. Following are the school wise availability of enabling conditions. (Natural lights 73, Ventilation 73, Black board appropriately located in class rooms 73, Bulb/Tube light/CFL 69, Fan 69 and Teaching aids in 57 classrooms out of 25 sampled schools)


H.S.S. Badetumnar, Block- Geedam




S. No.




material 15 60 10 66.66

4 Math kit 19 76 6 31.57 5 Science kit 22 88 19 86.36 6 Computer lab with computers and supportive

devices and internet connection 3 12 2 66.66


seating arrangement 8 32 5 62.5

9 TV 1 4 1 100 10 Separate Activity room for girls This is cause of concern 11 Audio Equipment’s 5 20 4 80 12 Video Equipment’s 4 16 3 75 13 LCD Projector 3 12 3 100 14 Overhead projector 7 28 5 71.4 15 Purified/ Safe Drinking Water 1 4 1 100 16 Fire Extinguisher 6 24 4 66.66 17 Auditorium 0 0 0 0 18 Staff room 21 84 20 95.23 19 Indoor games room 0 0 0 0 20 N.S.S./NCC/Scout & Guides room 3 12 2 66.66 21 Counselor room 0 0 0 0 22 First-aid room 0 0 0 0








Nil

Nil





Sanctioned Posts

(subject-wise)




M F M F

239 70 99 169 55 80 70

100% 41.42 58.57 70.71 32.54 47.34 29.29





2. Available teachers engaged extra periods

3. Middle school teachers engaged high school classes where ever both the school were working under the same roof.

Comments:-




Science Math Language


18 17 24 21 22

100% 72% 68% 96% 84% 88%



Following are the school wise availability of teachers.

(Science 18 schools, Math 17 schools, language (English- 24 schools, Hindi-21schools, Sanskrit-

22 schools)







100% 54.44 45.56





Yes No Student 5 20

% 20% 80% Teachers -- --

% -- -- Comments:- Reasons are to be explored.



Authority for

Deployment






Residential

KRP MT RP Trainee



1. Maintenance of teacher’s diary including curriculum delivery and lesson Plan etc. by teachers & countersigned by the Head of the institution regularly.

No. of Schools:- 25


Yes No Yes No

23 2 22 3

100% 92% 8% 88% 12%






No. of Schools:- 25


100% 100% 0% 100% 0% Comments:- Formalities are in place


No. of Schools:- 25

Discussion and group team work encouraged Yes No 17 8

100% 68% 32%

Above table, show that in17 schools, it is found, discussions and team works were encouraged as a methodology of teaching for involvement of students in teaching learning process and in remaining 8 schools these processes were not seen.

Comments:- This is the important gray area in the schools; culture of collective sharing and reflection is absent in most of the schools. Hence they are found to be in cognitive slumber.


No. of Schools:- 25




management


100% 44% 56% 0% 100% 72% 28% Groups made


No. of Schools:- 25

0 11

100% 0% 44%

There are not different aspects of seating arrangement of students present in the above table. a. Students are made to sit in small groups in classrooms to make classroom-learning process a collaborative process. Table informs us that this kind of classroom management is happening in only eleven schools. This is only 44%.


b. Second aspect is about students’ participation in classroom management. As far as this aspect

of management is concerned, the practices are not so discouraging. Students’ participation

stands at 72%.





Nature of support provided 1. 2. 3. Comments:-No resource teacher




No. of Schools:- 25

Yes No 2 23


Throughout year Only for one month before exam - 2

100% - 8% Average days of zero period in a weak

All days in a week Results thereof

1. Average 2.

Comments:- It is the neglected area;






No. of Schools with CWSN %

17 68

Participation level in class

All CWSN participate actively 10 58.82

Few CWSN participate 5 29.41

No participation 2 11.76

As per above table, participation level of the CWSN students are as follows- (All CWSN participate actively in 10 schools, Few CWSN participate in 5 schools and No participation in 2 schools)

Efforts made to optimize participation of CWSN in class 1 2 No adequate efforts made 3 4



Peer Interaction Number of Schools % Neutral 17 100% Taunting - - Teasing - - Bullying - -

Comments:- CWSN students were identified in 17 school; no bullying and teasing are observed or reported any school. 10. Individualized Educational Plan (IEPs) prepared for CWSN.

No. of Schools:- 25

No. of Schools with CWSN

17

IEP

Prepared Not prepared

0 17

100% 0% 100%




No. of Schools:- 25

Total No. of sampled Schools

No. of Schools with CWSN in samples

25 17 100% 100% 68%

No. of Schools:- 17

No. of Schools with CWSN seating facilities Yes No

2 15 100% 11.76% 88.24%

Comments:- Special focus is needed to make classrooms inclusive at least physically.





%

LCD Projector 3 3 2 66.66 Overhead projector 7 7 3 42.86 Computer & Accessories with net connection

3 3 2 66.66

Others - - - -




S. No.








5 days











S. No.










No. of Schools:- 25





Average Duration

1 Science 38 1-2 5-10 days 2 Maths 19 1-2 5-10 days 3 English 21 1-2 5-10 days 4 Social Science 25 1-2 5-10 days 5 Sanskrit 22 1-2 5-10 days 6 Hindi 29 1-2 5-10 days

Total 154 5-6 5-10 days


-- -- --

Comments:- (1) All subject – total 154 teachers received training under RMSA; 5-10 days in service training.

(2) Training to deal with CWSN is very minimal.

2 (i)




1 Subject based training 22 Annual 5 days 2 Orientation Programme 16 Annual 5 days 3 Innovations’ training 19 Annual 5 days 4 Training for Development of


5 Computer training 15 Annual 11 days


6 Scout Masters’ training 17 Annual 7 Disaster Management Training 19 Annual 11 days 8 CWSN 19 9 Any other (mention) 0




Comments:-


Facilities Adequate % Inadequate % Space 23 92 2 8 Projection 21 84 4 16 Tools/Modules 23 92 2 8 Equipment’s (LCD, Projector,



(Space- (adequate 23, inadequate 2), Projection - (adequate 21, inadequate 4), Tools/Modules - (adequate 23, inadequate 2) and Equipment’s (LCD, Projector, Computer etc.) - (adequate 21, inadequate 4).

Comments:-


No. of Schools:- 25

Yes No

23 2

100% 92% 8%


6. Impact:- Use of new technologies like Computer Assisted Learning (CAL), LCD Projector etc. for imparting lessons in the classroom by teachers.


%

154 0 0% Comments:- Huge gap; need to think and reflect on the situation. Competencies along with culture of using technology in classrooms are absent.


7. Trainers/Resource persons from following institutions who imparted trainings –


Sl. No.


% of respondents

1 Secondary Schools


3 DIET


5 SIERT

6 IASE

7 CTE

8 NIC


10 Total

Comments:-This information cannot be elicited form the data capturing format.




3. Training in creating inclusive classroom is required


Comments:-

6. CIVIL WORKS


(1-2)



1 H.S.S. (G) Shiksha Parisar Geedam 2001 2008 2 H.S.S. Girls Dantewada 2012-13 2013 3 H.S.S. Geedma 1971 1974 4 H.S.S. Module Dantewada 1996 2000 5 H.S.S. Girls Kuakonda 1996 1998 6 H.S.S. Kuakonda 1984 1985-86 7 H.S.S. Barsoor 1991 1997 8 H.S.S. Kasoli 2005 2012 9 H.S.S. Barsoor 2008 2013-14

10 H.S.S. Kodenar No.-2 1989 - 11 H.S. Kodenar No.-1 Gajraj Camp 2010 2010

23


12 H.S.S. Karli 2009 2013 13 H.S.S. Kirandul 1987 1992 14 H.S.S. Katekalyan 1996 1997 15 H.S.S. Girls Dantewada 1996 2004-05 16 H.S.S. Dantewada 1961 1962 17 H.S.S. Bacheli 1960 1980 18 H.S. Balpet 2010 2014-15 19 H.S.S. Ronje 2007 2008 20 H.S.S. Pondam 2006 2009 21 H.S.S. Badetumnar 2004 2005 22 H.S. Mailawada 2011-12 2012-13 23 H.S. Katekalyan 1996 2009 24 H.S. Badelehkapal 2012 2015 25 H.S.S. Palnar 1997 2013

Comments:-



9th 40 40 100% 2 5

10th 33 33 100% 1 3.03


Comments:-


No. of Schools:- 25

School Campus

School Building Open Space Play Ground Other

25 20 14 -

100% 100% 80% 56% -

Total area (sq.ft)of

sampled Schools

- - - -




H.S.S. Girls Kuakonda, Block- Kuakonda

Above table show us that school building found in 25 schools, open space having in 20 schools and playground available in 14 schools out of sampled 25 schools. Availability of open space/ground and the judicious use of that space/ground for students’ activities need meticulous planning. Untapped space/ground is plenty in many schools located in the rural area.

Comments:- Sq. Ft. or Sq. Mt.-wise details are not with the sampled schools.

II. Design



100% 84% 16% - - Comments:-


No. of Schools:- 25


None

15 4 11 4 6 100% 60% 16% 44% 16% 24%





No. of Schools - 25 Yes % No % 100% 0 0% 25 100%




No. of Schools:- 25


Yes No Yes No 1.

2.

3.

25 0 25 0

100% 100% 0% 100% 0%



No. of Schools:- 25


100% 84% 16%


Yes No 20 1 --

100% 95.24% 4.76% -- If not functioned, Reasons

1. No information 2. 3.

Steps taken 1. No steps taken 2. 3.


No. of Schools:- 21


20 1

100% 95.24% 4.76%






Solar Panels

Wind Electricity

Other

No. of Schools - 25 Availability - - - - - -

% - - - - - -

No. of Schools - 25

In working condition

- - - - - -

% - - - - - -

No. of Schools - 25 Usability - - - - - -

% - - - - - -

Comments:- Alternative electric power supply is not found in the sampled schools.


No. of

Schools:- 25




100% 20% 80% 20% 80% 20% 80% 0% 100% Comments:- Only 5 sampled schools have separate library room out of 25 schools. Library in secondary school is very important learning space for exploration of ideas. In absence of this learning becomes, confined to textbook.




Yes % No %

10 40 15 60












(i) Entrance of School 11 44 14 56 (ii) Drinking Water Facility - - - - (iii) Toilet Facility 1 4 24 96 (iv) Science lab - - - - (v) Computer Lab - - - - (vi) Mathematic Lab - - - - (vii) Library - - - - (viii) Auditorium - - - - (ix) Play Ground - - - -


(Entrance of School – 11 and Toilet facility – 1 school) instead of these schools there are no other facilities for CWSN in any school out of 25 sampled schools. The table informs how our schools are yet to become CWSN friendly physical structures.



No. of Schools:- 25

Bench Availability

Yes No

0 25

100% 0% 100%


Adequate Slope:- 25


Yes No

11 14

100% 44% 56%


% 81.82% 18.18%







Source Number of Schools % Supply water 2 8

Tube well 12 48 Dug Well - -

Hand Pump 10 40 Other - -

No source 1 4 Availability of sufficient water across all the seasons

No. of Schools:- 25

Water Available Yes No 24 1

100% 96% 4%


H.S.S. Kasoli, Block- Geedam

Above table shows us the status of drinking water facility available in 24 schools out of sampled 25 schools. Source of drinking water are as follows:- (Supply water - 2, Tube well- 12, Hand pump - 10 schools and no source - 1 school)



(b) Water Storage Facility& its condition & cleaning schedule

Type of Facility

No. of Schools

Condition Cleaning Schedule No. of Schools %

Good & Usable

Damaged not usable

Weekly - -

Steel drum 11 11 - Fortnightly 1 4

% 44 44 - Monthly 5 20

Covered tank 1 1 - Six Monthly 6 24

% 4 4 - Not Definite 7 28

Underground tank


% - - - - - -

Overhead tank

13 13 - - - -

% 52 52 - - - -



No. of Schools:- 25

Quality


24 1

100% 96% 4%



No. of Schools:- 25


1 - - - 24

100% 4% - - - 96%


No. of Schools:- 25

Bleaching Powder



Yes No

- - - 25 0 25

100% - - - 100% 0% 100%


Comments:-


No. of Schools:- 25


Yes No

6 19

100% 24% 76%







Boys 14 56 11 44

Girls 13 52 12 48

CWSN 1 4 24 96

Teachers 7 28 18 72


Comments:-


No. of Schools:- 25



10 15 10 15 9 16

100% 40% 60% 40% 60% 36% 64%



H.S.S. Kirandul, Block- Kuakonda




No. of Schools:- 25




100% 95.24% 4.76% Availability of Napkins & Dustbins

No. of Schools:- 21


0 21 0 21 100% 0% 100% 0% 100%




No. of Schools:- 25

Availability of Provision Yes No

1 24 100% 4% 96%



No. of

Schools:- 25




100% 96% 4% 0% 100%


12. Drainage System


No. of Schools:- 25

Drainage System available Yes No 12 13

100% 48% 52% Type of Drains Under ground Pucca Covered Pucca& Open Kutcha & Open No. of Schools:- 12 5 0 5 2

100 % 41.67% 0% 41.67% 16.66% Structural Condition


No. of Schools:- 12 6 3 3 0 100% 50% 25% 25% 0%


Schools:- 12 Yes No

5 7 100% 41.67% 58.33%

No. of

Schools:- 12


Entrance Gate

Open Space



- - - 3 2 - - 100% - - - 25% 16.66% - -



(Underground – 5 schools, Pucca & Open – 5 and Kutcha & Open- 2 schools)

Comments:-



No. of Schools:-25

Waste Water Treatment & Discharge Arrangement Yes No

9 16 100% 36% 64%

No. of Schools:-9

If yes, Type of drainage system Septic Tank Municipal drain Open field Any other

8 - 1 - - 100% 88.89% - 11.11% - -

No. of Schools:-25


2 23 100% 8% 92%

No. of Schools:-2


2 0 100% 100% 0%

No. of Schools:-2


2 0 100% 100% 0%

No. of Schools:-2


2 0 100% 100% 0%

No. of Schools:-25


0 25 100% 0% 100%


Comments:-


No. of Schools:-25


0 25 100% 0% 100% No. of

Schools:-25 Availability of Rain water harvesting system Yes No

- - 100% - - No. of

Schools:-25


- - 100% - - No. of

Schools:-25


- - 100% - - No. of

Schools:-25 Lighting facility available

Yes No


22 3 100% 88% 12% Type Ordinary bulb Ordinary tube CFL None No. of

Schools:-22 11 20 15 0

100% 50% 90.91% 68.18% 0% No. of

Schools:-25

Teacher’s School management’s awareness about use of renewable sources of energy Yes No 16 9

100% 64% 36% Type of source

Gobar gas Plant Solar energy Wind energy

No. of Schools using

- - -

% - - -

Comments:-


No. of Schools:-25





% - Cyclone -

% - Earthquake -




Triple storied 0 % 0%


One gate 21 % 84%

Two gates 4 % 16%

Three gates 0 % 0%


24


% 4%

Comments:-


15 (ii) (c-e)



0 25 0 25 100% 0% 100% 0% 100%



0 3 22 100% 0 12% 88%



- - 25 100% - - 100% No. of


Kitchen Laboratory No - 6 19

100% - 24% 76% No. of

Schools:-6


- - 6 0 100% - - 100% 0%





No. of Schools:-25


0 25 0 25 0 25 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100%

Display of Numbers

- - - - - -

% - - - - - -

Comments:-


1. (a-d) sufficient measures being taken by School authorities to ensure that it does not

hamper academic activities vitiate air, water, land quality etc. in School.

No. of

Schools:-25




No. of Schools:-5

1 2 2

100% 20% 40% 40%



H.S.S. Badetumnar, Block- Geedam

Above table shows us, that the ongoing construction activity is found in five schools out of 25 sampled schools. The construction does disturb the academic activity.



No. of Schools:- 5


to construction

Construction activity does not vitiate quality of Noise pollution in permissible limit

Air Water Land


5 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 5 0

100% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 100% 0%


No. of Schools:- 5

Yes No

2 3

100% 40% 60%


No. of Schools:- 5

Yes No

3 2

100% 60% 40%

Comments:-



No. of

Schools:- 5





Foundation level

Plinth level/ DPC

Lintel Roof level

Flooring/plastering

Finishing level

Yes No

5 0 1 1 2 1 5 0

100% 100% 0% 20% 20% - 40% - 20% 100% 0%



2(c-g)




Schools

Number of

visits

Average No. of

visit/School


made

Average No. of

Authentication

Instructions given

in No. of Schools


Foundation - - - - - - - -

Plinth - - - - - - - -

Lintel - - - - - - - -

Roof level - - - - - - - -

Flooring - - - - - - - -

Finishing - - - - - - - -

Comments: -

No. of

Schools:- 5

Community

members through

SMDC involved

in procurement

process

Sub Committee

(Construction

Committee)

Constituted

A/c Books Civil

Work

(Construction)

maintained/

updated

MB for Civil

Work

Maintained

Payment made

to contractor in

accordance

with MB

Material

stocked is in

line with

stock register

Cheque issue

register

maintained



matches with entry


Construction

Material

Construction

work


0 5 0 5 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0

100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0%

30



Mode of transfer Cheque Draft E-transfer Dates of receipt of fund No. of Schools -5 0 0 5 -

100% 0 0 100% -


Comments:- Nil




No. of

Schools:-25


roles

% SEMIS DCF


% SDMC Register


%

No. of Schools:- 25

Training received by

SMDC Members




Good 3 12 0 0 0 0 2 8 0 0 0 25 0 25

Average 10 40 2 8 2 8 23 92 0 0 100% 0 100 0 100

Not familiar 12 48 23 92 23 92 0 0 25 100

Comments:-


No. of

Schools:-25


Monthly Quarterly Six monthly Annually Whenever needed Never 3 - 4 SMDC Members 0 7 8 4 0 6

100% 0% 28% 32% 16% 0% 24%

401




Comments:- 2(ii) Description of SMDC members –

Members Number Average no. of members per School Average Attendance in recent meeting



No. of

Schools:-25



100% 8% 92 % 16% 84% 16% 84%





No.

of

Scho

ols

Lev

el o

f Pa

rtic

ipat

ion

RM

SA &

MD

M

Impl

emen

tatio

n

%

Con

stru

ctio

n w

ork

unde

r R

MSA

%

SAG

Uti

lizat

ion

%

Free

Tex

t Boo

ks d

istr

ibut

ion

%

Scho

lars

hips

dis

trib

utio

n

%

Prep

arin

g A

WP

& B

%

Stud

ents

Enr

ollm

ent,

Atte

ndan

ce

%

Reg

ular

ity o

f te

ache

rs

%

Run

ning

of

day

to d

ay a

ctiv

ities

orga

nizi

ng S

choo

l& c

ultu

ral

even

ts

%

Hel

p in

pro

vide

sch

ool f

acili

ties

%

Filli

ng o

f D

CF

%

Good - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Average 5 20 2 8 10 40 22 88 0 0 0 0 5 20 4 16 3 12 2 8 0 0

Bad 20 80 23 92 15 60 3 12 25 100 25 100 20 80 21 84 22 88 23 92 25 100



No. of Schools:- 25


0 25 100% 0% 100%




No. of Schools:-25





Yes No 401 - -

0 25 -

100% 0% 100% - - -





Nil 1. No. of Schools- 25


- 2. - 3. - - - - 4. 100% - - - - 5.

Comments:- No training for SMDC members was organized.



Name of

District visited:-

Dantewada


thereof

Yes No 1.

√ -- 2. Name of State:-Chhattisgarh

√ -- 3.

Total No. of govt.

Schools





% 4.

District 55 55 100 11 11 100 5.

State 4148 4148 100 1877 1877 100

Comments:-


2. Distribution of DCF for the current year to all Schools in the District



Yes No 100% √ --


Comments:- 3. Training received by teachers /head Master /Principal for filling up of DCF in sampled Schools and district



66

No. of School:- 25



66 Yes No


66 25 0

100% 100% 0%

Overall, kind of training received to fill up DCF

Yes, average training found in session 2014-15





the district:- 66


nodal Schools


received


received



55 11 66 55 11 66 -- -- -- Govt. Pvt.

55 11

% 83.33 16.67 100 83.33 16.67 100 -- -- --

Comments:-



No. of Schools:- 25


Yes No 1. 25 0 2.

100% 100% 0% 3. Comments:- Yes, current academic year filled copy of DCF is available in the school. 6-7 School report card and sample checks




√ - √ - √ -


25

% 100%

Data entry done

School report cards



Dantewada √ - √ - √ - √ -


- - - - - - - -




1. Yes 2. No



Yes



No. of Schools:- 25


100% 100% 0% 100% 0%


1. Yes 2. No


1. Yes 2. No



No. of

Schools:- 25



100% 100% 0% 76% 24% DPO √ - √ - SPO √ - √ -






No. of Schools:- 25 0 0 25 100% 0% 0% 100%





1. School Annual Grant (SAG) - - - - - - -

2. Minor Repair Grant - - - -

Yes

Yes


- - - 3. New School Building Grant

(Major grant) - - - - - - -


- - - - - - -


- - - - - - -


7. Others - - - - - - -



At District Level



1 Annual Grant - -


3 Major Repair Grant - -

At State Level





100% 0% 100% 0%


As per above table, system for drawl and payment of fund from SMDC account by cheque 25 schools out of 25 sampled schools.

Comments:-


No. of Schools:- 25




transaction Yes No Yes No Yes No 3. No objection

14 11 14 11 0 25 2.

100% 56% 44% 56% 44% 0% 100% 3.


6. Audit of SMDCs

All SMDCs in State/District are covered by audit 1. Yes 2.No

No. of

Schools:- 25


100% 80% 20% D.P.O. √ -

No. of

Schools:- 25

If yes, Audit carried out by Education Dept. A.G. C.A. Social Audit None

- - 20 - 5 100% - - 80% - 20%

Comments:-

7. Social Auditing


No. of Schools:- 25


0 25

100% 0% 100% D.P.O.


Yes



No. of Schools:- 25


0 25 100% 0% 100%

If yes, details thereof Comments:-



Sl. No. Name of School Month of submission of UC Financial year for

which UC is submitted 1 H.S.S. (G) Shiksha Parisar Geedam March-April 2013-14

2 H.S.S. Girls Dantewada March-April 2013-14 3 H.S.S. Geedma March-April 2013-14 4 H.S.S. Module Dantewada March-April 2013-14

5 H.S.S. Girls Kuakonda March-April 2013-14 6 H.S.S. Kuakonda March-April 2013-14

7 H.S.S. Barsoor March-April 2013-14 8 H.S.S. Kasoli March-April 2013-14 9 H.S.S. Barsoor March-April 2013-14

10 H.S.S. Kodenar No.-2 March-April 2013-14 11 H.S. Kodenar No.-1 Gajraj Camp March-April 2013-14 12 H.S.S. Karli March-April 2013-14

13 H.S.S. Kirandul March-April 2013-14 14 H.S.S. Katekalyan March-April 2013-14 15 H.S.S. Girls Dantewada March-April 2013-14

16 H.S.S. Dantewada March-April 2013-14 17 H.S.S. Bacheli March-April 2013-14

18 H.S. Balpet March-April 2013-14 19 H.S.S. Ronje March-April 2013-14 20 H.S.S. Pondam March-April 2013-14

21 H.S.S. Badetumnar March-April 2013-14 22 H.S. Mailawada March-April 2013-14 23 H.S. Katekalyan March-April 2013-14

24 H.S. Badelehkapal March-April 2013-14 25 H.S.S. Palnar March-April 2013-14







No. of Schools

66 66 100% 2012-13 66 2013-14 66

Comments:-


No. of sampled DPOs



released


Date of release


received





Comments:-







1. Yes 2. No




Comments:-

Yes


11. Financial Statement for SDMC/DPO/SPO (From 1 April, 2013 to 31 March, 2014 (date /month of visit).

(i)

Name of Unit


2014

B Funds

received

C=A+B Total Fund


D Expenditure



Balance in bank


SMDC 1692096 Nil 1692096 709653 982443 982443 DPO 16990614 10407128 27397742 16179694 11218048 11218048 SPO

Comments:-


11. (ii). Detail of expenditure of funds by SMDC in sampled (1 April, 2014 to 31 March, 2015) district.

Grant funds

Sl.

No. Name of School




Unspent


Unspent


Unspent


Unspent


Unspent

balance

1 H.S.S. (G) Shiksha Parisar Geedam

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

2 H.S.S. Girls Dantewada - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 H.S.S. Geedma - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 H.S.S. Module

Dantewada - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

5 H.S.S. Girls Kuakonda - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6 H.S.S. Kuakonda - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 H.S.S. Barsoor - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 H.S.S. Kasoli - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9 H.S.S. Barsoor - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

10 H.S.S. Kodenar No.-2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11 H.S. Kodenar No.-1

Gajraj Camp - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

12 H.S.S. Karli - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 13 H.S.S. Kirandul - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 14 H.S.S. Katekalyan - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15 H.S.S. Girls Dantewada - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16 H.S.S. Dantewada - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17 H.S.S. Bacheli - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 18 H.S. Balpet - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 19 H.S.S. Ronje - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 20 H.S.S. Pondam - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 21 H.S.S. Badetumnar - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 22 H.S. Mailawada - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 23 H.S. Katekalyan - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 24 H.S. Badelehkapal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 25 H.S.S. Palnar - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -







2 3 4 Total - -


Sl. No.


Month of receipt


% of expenditure

1 H.S.S. (G) Shiksha Parisar Geedam - - - -

2 H.S.S. Girls Dantewada - - - -

3 H.S.S. Geedma - - - -

4 H.S.S. Module Dantewada - - - -

5 H.S.S. Girls Kuakonda - - - -

6 H.S.S. Kuakonda - - - -

7 H.S.S. Barsoor - - - -

8 H.S.S. Kasoli - - - -

9 H.S.S. Barsoor - - - -

10 H.S.S. Kodenar No.-2 - - - -

11 H.S. Kodenar No.-1 Gajraj Camp - - - -

12 H.S.S. Karli - - - -

13 H.S.S. Kirandul - - - -

14 H.S.S. Katekalyan - - - -

15 H.S.S. Girls Dantewada - - - -

16 H.S.S. Dantewada - - - -

17 H.S.S. Bacheli - - - -

18 H.S. Balpet - - - -

19 H.S.S. Ronje - - - -

20 H.S.S. Pondam - - - -

21 H.S.S. Badetumnar - - - -

22 H.S. Mailawada - - - -

23 H.S. Katekalyan - - - -

24 H.S. Badelehkapal - - - -

25 H.S.S. Palnar - - - -

Total - - - -






spend? - - - - - -



Number of Schools

%



Yes % No % 6. Stationary material

purchasing - - - - - - 1.


- - - - - -


- - - - - -






Month of receipt


% of expenditure

1 H.S.S. (G) Shiksha Parisar Geedam - - - - 2 H.S.S. Girls Dantewada - - - - 3 H.S.S. Geedma - - - - 4 H.S.S. Module Dantewada - - - - 5 H.S.S. Girls Kuakonda - - - - 6 H.S.S. Kuakonda - - - - 7 H.S.S. Barsoor - - - - 8 H.S.S. Kasoli - - - - 9 H.S.S. Barsoor - - - - 10 H.S.S. Kodenar No.-2 - - - - 11 H.S. Kodenar No.-1 Gajraj Camp - - - - 12 H.S.S. Karli - - - - 13 H.S.S. Kirandul - - - - 14 H.S.S. Katekalyan - - - - 15 H.S.S. Girls Dantewada - - - - 16 H.S.S. Dantewada - - - - 17 H.S.S. Bacheli - - - - 18 H.S. Balpet - - - - 19 H.S.S. Ronje - - - - 20 H.S.S. Pondam - - - - 21 H.S.S. Badetumnar - - - - 22 H.S. Mailawada - - - -


23 H.S. Katekalyan - - - - 24 H.S. Badelehkapal - - - - 25 H.S.S. Palnar - - - - Total - - - -




- -


- -


- -

Comments:-



Number of Schools

%


5. Repairing - - - - - -

6. White wash - - - - - -

Comments:-



S. No.



1. Rangeela Bal Mahotsav - -

2.


S. No.




Nil





Nil


Nil --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(c) At district level --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

At State Level --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Name of District:- Dantewada


1 DPO 1 1 0

2 ADPO 1 1 0

3 APO 3 1 2


5 Accountant 1 1 0


7 Peon 2 0 2

Total :- 12 7 5



S. N. Name of Post Sanctioned In position Vacant 1 Director 1 1 0 2 Additional Director 1 0 1 3 Joint Director 1 1 0


4 Deputy Director 4 1 3 5 Assistant Director 7 4 3 6 Finance Officer 1 1 0 7 Programmer 2 1 1 8 Assistant Programmer 1 0 1 9 Assistant Programme

Coordinator 4 0 4

10 Ankekshak 2 0 2 11 Accountant 2 0 2 12 Steno 2 0 2 13 Assistant Grade-1 1 0 1 14 Assistant Grade-2 2 0 2 15 Assistant Grade-3 4 0 4 16 Civil Manager 1 0 1 17 Deputy Manager 1 0 1 18 Office Assistant with Data Entry

Operator 10 7 3


Total:- 54 22 35 1(iii) Action taken to fill up vacancies


At State level:- Yes, proposal send to the State Govt. by SPO ……………………………………. Comments:-



4 8 3 14

Nature of engagement At DPO At SPO At DPO At SPO

4 8 3 14

Comments:-





2 Civil Work Assistant Director APO

3 Quality Additional Director APO

4 Equity Additional Director APO


5 Gender Assistant Director APO

6 Pedagogy Additional Director APO

7 Planning Deputy Director APO & Programmer

8 Training Deputy Director APO

Total


Comments:-



Comments:-


Yes, Average

Comments:-





Not adequate


At SPO level

S.

No.






3 Others


At DPO Level

S.

No.





2 ADPO 10 20 Monthly

3 APO 10 15 Quarterly

4 Others - - -

Total 35 60

Comments:-


Written tool available in DPO and SPO level

Comments:-





----------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments:-




2

3

4

5

1

2

3

4

5


2

3

4

5


6

7

8

9

10

6

7

8

9

10

6

7

8

9

10

Comments:-



Yes


DCF format

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments:-


Yes ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yes/ No


Yes, found

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments:-


S.N. District level issues State level issues 1 Mistakes are found regarding the infrastructure data Data has not been compiled at state level, its












2

3

4

5



1

2

3

4

5





Nil --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yes/No



Areas of research



agencies)

Pedagogy

Quality


Areas of research



agencies)

Pedagogy

Quality



not covered above.


Critical aspects







1. Some of the High schools are functioning from M.S. building due to lack of H.S. building in

the Dantewada district.

2. Most of the schools having inadequate teaching staff in the Dantewada district.



4. In most of the schools, ramps are not there for CWSN students. Even they are constructed;




schools.




appropriate TLM; and there is no individualized educational plan (IEP), resource teacher,

assistive device, special training to handle CWSN students etc.






unpacked mode.





available.






16. H.S.S. Girls Shiksha Parisar, Block- Geedam: In this school, 123 students are enrolled in

Std. 10th and only 2 sections for all 10th Std. students. 196 students are enrolled in Std. 9th

and only 3 sections for all 196 students. This is inadequate classroom-students ratio. School

has no room for library, art and craft and computer.

17. H.S.S. Kasoli, Block- Geedam: This is one of the poor quality school; students learning

achievement are very poor. School records are not updated regularly; inadequate toilet

facilities for girls and boys students; lack of science lab; non-existence of library room and

art and craft room for students learning.

18. H.S. Kodenar No.-1 Gajraj Camp, Block- Kuakonda: This school is up graded in 2010-

11 from middle to high school but still classes are conducting in MS building. Construction

of their new building under RMSA has not been materialized. School has no room for

Science lab, Library room, Art and craft room, Computer room and no sufficient class room

for children. This school has no space to construct the school building, open space is very

congested observed, no play ground for out door activities.

19. H.S.S. Dantewada, Block- Dantewada: More than 20 computer kits received by this

school but only 4 computers are in functional condition and computer teaching is not going

on; Principal and other supportive teaching staff are observed inactive; SMDC members are

not interested in the school activity.

20. H.S.S. Ronje, Block- Geedam: In this school, toilets are not available for girls and boys

students; SMDC meetings are not conducted regularly; practical works are not conducted by

teachers of science, maths, physics, chemistry and other subjects. Teacher’s quality appears

to be poor and hence, it is observed they are inactive with their work. Students learning

achievement are very poor.


21. H.S. Badelehkapal, Block- Katekalyan: This is naxalite area school, Construction of their

new building under RMSA has been materialized; high school classes are functioning in

middle school building. School has no room for Science lab, Library room, Art and craft

room, Computer room and no sufficient class room for children. Head master and his

supporting teaching staff are found to be inactive; Students learning achievement are

observed poor.

Positive aspects






3. H.S.S. Boys Model Dantewada: Block- Dantewada: This is one of the good quality

schools in the Dantewada district; teachers are very pro-active. Laboratory, library, art

and craft room, playground, separate toilets for girls and boys, running water in the toilets

etc. facilities are available for the students. School premise is found neat and clean,

students learning achievement are very good.


District – 4 Bastar


At School Level




Yes No

0 25

100% 0% 100%





No. of

Schools :- 25


Yes No

0 25 No

100% 0% 100%





Yes No

0 25

100% 0% 100%



4. Adoption of Convergence approach with schemes/resources of other Departments in School Plan –



0 25 100 % 0% 100%






3 Tribal Development - -

4 Minority Department - -







As per above table, adoption of convergence approach is not found in any out of 25 sampled schools.




No. of

Schools :- 25



100% 0% 100% 0 100% If not reasons thereof Lack of awareness


As per above table that there is no School Development Plan in any school out of sampled 25 schools.

Comments:- Democratization of planning needs to be given priority




%

1 Filling of DCF of U-DISE - - 2 Preparation & Implementation of Annual Plan - - 3 Admission of Students to Class-9 2 8% 4 Regular attendance and retention of students - - 5 Regularity & Punctuality in teachers’

attendance - -

6 Civil work 1 4% 7 Providing resources Physical - -

Human - - 8 Organizing cultural, sports events, functions 18 72% 9 Mid-day-meal - -


15 60%


- -

Above table shows the involvement of SMDCs in various activities of schools. It shows that SMDC members were assigned the job of admission of students to Class - 9th in two (2) schools; civil work in one (1) school; organizing cultural, sports events, and functions in eighteen (18) schools; and preparing annual accounts of income & expenditure in fifteen (15) schools out of sampled 25 schools.

Comments:- Huge gap is apparent in formulating SMDCs and making them functional.



100% 16% 84% Non-participation in school development processes primarily due to their lack of awareness and among members of SMDC. The above table reveals this fact. The table, tell us the story of absence of awareness among SMDC members. Out of sampled 25 schools, SMDC members’ of 4 schools are aware about their roles and responsibilities.

S. N.

Steps taken by SMDC members accordingly Number of Schools

%


reviewing C.W./H.W. 2 8%

4 Keeping check on private tuitions by teachers, paying attention to - -


academic progress of students 5 Identification of CWSN & taking care of availability of facilities to

CWSN students - -

6 Paying attention to improvement in regular teaching learning activities. - - 7 Distribution of free text books 8 32% 8 Availability of scholarships on time to students 4 16% 9 Preparing three years’ perspective Plan - -

10 Proper use of funds i.e. SAG & other grants as per norms 7 28% 11 Monitoring of minor & major repair work and maintenance of physical

infrastructure - -


- -


Comments:- Lack of awareness about their roles in schooling. Lack of time could be one of the reasons. Lack democratic norms in the wider society and in the school could also be one of the reasons.


Meetings of General body held



12 6 7 -

100% 48% 24% 28% -

Above table shows that meetings of SMDC are conducted in 12 schools on quarterly basis, on half yearly basis in 6 schools and 7 schools on annually basis out of sampled 25 schools.





- -

100% - -

Comments:-


2. At District level – Name of District – Bastar


Yes Prepared

2(a) Whether District Plan has adopted a convergence approach with following department.

(1. Yes 2. No)


b. Social Welfare 1






h. PWD 1


j. Others 2






At State level


1. Yes 2. No


It does reflect

1



(1. Yes 2. No)


b. Social Welfare 1






h. PWD 1


j. Others 2


Not Specified






1. Yes 2. No

If not, why?


1


2. ACCESS




%

1 EBB - - 2 Urban 3 12 3 CWSN (Minimum 3 CWSN) 3 12 4 Higher Gender gap 2 8 5 SC/ST/Minority students abundance 3 12 6 Low retention rate/Higher dropout rate 4 16 7 Schools situated in habitation with large number of OoSC - - 8 Low academic achievements - - 9 Schools situated in habitation of seasonal migrants - - 10 Urban Schools with most students of deprived sections - - 11 Forest/Mountain/Remote/Desert area 2 8 12 Flood/natural calamity prone area 2 8 13 Ongoing civil work 3 12 14 School with girls hostel 3 12 15 None - -


2. For geographical representation of all parts of the district, schools from every

block were selected as sample.

Schools visited in the district Bastar

Sl. No.



1 Darbha 22150404708 H.S.S. Chingpal Drop Out 19.1.15 20.1.15 2 Jagdalpur 22153308647 H.S.S. Dharampur Drop Out 12.1.15 13.1.15 3 Bastar 22151701610 H.S.S. Chapka Drop Out 23.1.15 24.1.15 4 Jagdalpur 22153308602 H.S.S. Jagdalpur Urban 12.1.15 13.1.15 5 Tokapal 22152300701 H.S.S. Keshloor Urban 19.1.15. 20.1.15 6 Jagdalpur 22153308646 H.S. Kewaramunda Urban 12.1.15 13.1.15 7 Lohandiguda 22152410801 H.S. Gadiya ST 14.1.15 15.1.15 8 Bastanar 22153007501 H.S. Tirthum ST 16.1.15 17.1.15 9 Jagdalpur 22153302001 H.S.S. Padripani ST 12.1.15 13.1.15 10 Bastar 22151712107 H.S.S. Ghat Lohanga Gender Gap 23.1.15 24.1.15 11 Tokapal 22152300509 H.S.S. Tokapal Gender Gap 19.1.15 20.1.15 12 Bastanar 22153000410 H.S. Kilepal School With Hostel 16.1.15 17.1.15 13 Darbha 22150405306 H.S.S. Neganar School With Hostel 18.1.15 10.1.15 14 Bakawand 22152900111 H.S.S. Bakawand School With Hostel 21.1.15 22.1.15 15 Bakawand 22152902903 H.S.S. Dodrepal Forest Area 21.1.15 22.1.15


16 Darbha 22150406905 H.S.S. Chitapur Forest Area 19.1.15 20.1.15 17 Lohandiguda 22152404604 H.S.S. Badanji Civil Work 14.1.15 15.1.15 18 Bakawand 22152903506 H.S.S. Sargipal Civil Work 21.1.15 22.1.15 19 Lohandiguda 22152404702 H.S. Chitrakoot Civil Work 14.1.15 15.1.15 20 Bastanar 22153001606 H.S.S. Bagmudi Paneda Flood Prone Area 16.1.15 17.1.15 21 Bastanar 22153006207 H.S. Lalaguda Flood Prone Area 16.1.15 17.1.15 22 Bakawand 22152910408 H.S.S. Mooli CWSN 21.1.15 22.1.15 23 Bastar 22151702012 H.S.S. Sonarpal CWSN 23.1.15 24.1.15 24 Lohandiguda 22152402402 H.S.S. Lohandiguda CWSN 14.1.15 15.1.15 25 Lohandiguda 22152406009 H.S.S. Dharaur Drop Out 14.1.15 15.1.15

DPO Visit :- 20/1/2015



1 Protected area (National Park, Wild life sanctuary) - - 2 Flood prone /flood plain area 2 8 3 Earthquake prone zone - - 4 Unstable slope - - 5 Landslide prone Area - - 6 Cyclone prone Area - - 7 Storm surge prone Area - - 8 Drought prone Area - - 9 Polluting Industrial Area - -

10 Mining Area 1 4 11 Arsenic /fluoride contaminated ground water area - - 12 Busy National/State Highway 2 8 13 Congested urban/market/commercial area - - 14 Any particular disturbance faced by School due to its

location - -

15 None 20 80 Comments:- As per the above table, there are different kinds of threats in the way to 5 schools. Two are natural and three are manmade.



Govt. % Private %

PS 1713 72.86% 51 60.71%

UPS 638 27.14% 33 39.29%

Total 2351 100% 84 100%






Total 5251 100%






100% 12% 88%

If yes mention them 1. National highway 2. Nala (2 Schools)


Comments:-



Distance from School/Catchment area Total No. of

Schools :- 25 Less than 1 km. 1-3 km. 3-5 km. More than 5 km.

25 7 15 45 92 100% 27.17% 7.6% 16.31% 48.91% 100%






Transport facility - -

Residential facility 12 48%

Comments:- Above table shows that residential facilities are available in 12 schools out of 25 sampled schools.

II Social Access



Category 14-16 Age

Boys % Girls % Total %

SC


ST

Minority

General

Total



SC


ST

Minority

General

All Categories





Proportionate

Yes No


100%

If not, reasons thereof: Not Applicable







Class

SC ST


CWSN



9th 23 1

5

57 37 80 52 72

3

45

2

98

9

67

1

171

2

112

3

1 0 8 6 9 6 338 20

4

503 30

9

841 513 109

8

680 156

6

103

2

266

4

171

2

1

3

9 9 9 2

2

1

8

10th 13 9 15 8 28 17 45

5

29

6

61

8

45

8

107

3

754 3 3 3 3 6 6 265 16

3

349 25

2

614 415 750 480 991 726 174

1

120

6

1

4

9 6 5 2

0

1

4

Total 36 2

4

72 45 10

8

69 11

78

74

8

16

07

11

29

278

5

187

7

4 3 11 9 15 12 603 36

7

852 56

1

145

5

928 184

8

116

0

255

7

175

8

440

5

291

8

2

7

1

8

1

5

1

4

4

2

3

2

% 0.

82

0.54 1.63 1.

02

2.

45

1.

56

26.74 16.98 36.

48

25.

63

63.

22

42.

61

0.

09

0.

07

0.

25

0.

21

0.

35

0.

27

13.

69

8.

33

19.

34

12.

73

33.

03

21.

07

41.

95

26.

33

58.

05

39.

91

100 66.

24

0.

61

0.41 0.

35

0.3

2

0.95 0.73




major various are observed in their attendance patterns




9th 2

8

18 6

4

42 92 60 823 53

2

109

6

837 191

9

13

69

1 1 9 6 10 7 445 277 61

4

40

7

10

59

68

4

131

0

83

6

17

92

13

00

31

02

213

6

13 8 9 8 22 1

6

10th 1

7

12 2

4

15 41 27 546 34

5

747 573 129

3

91

8

5 4 4 4 9 8 337 226 45

4

37

3

79

1

59

9

913 59

5

12

36

97

1

21

49

156

6

8 8 7 6 15 1

4

Total 4

5

30 8

8

57 13

3

87 136

9

87

7

184

3

141

0

321

2

22

87

6 5 13 10 19 15 782 503 10

68

78

0

18

50

12

83

222

3

14

31

30

28

22

71

52

51

370

2

21 16 16 1

4

37 3

0

% 0.86 0.57 1.67 1.08 2.53 1.66 26.07 16.70 35.10 26.85 61.17 43.55 0.11 0.10 0.25 0.19 0.36 0.28 14.89 9.58 20.34 14.85 35.23 24.43 42.33 27.25 57.67 43.25 100 70.50 0.40 0.30 0.30 0.27 0.70 0.57



1. Yes 2. No


H.S.S. Negenar, Block- Darbha

Comments:-



Discrimination


0 0 25

100% 0% 0% 100%





1








Tricycle - -

Escort - -

Other (Specify) - -

As per above table – out of 25 sampled schools 8 schools are having proper ramps with hand rails and 1 school having western toilet seat.





III. Open Schooling

3. At State level



1. Yes 2. No






Comments:-

1

1



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Comments:-



Category Class

Enrolled Boys



% Enrolled Girls

Girls drop out

% Total Enrolled

SC

IX 28 1 0.08 64 1 0.06 92 2 0.07

X 17 0 0 24 1 0.08 41 1 0.04

ST IX 823 33 2.52 1096 17 0.95 1919 50 1.61

X 546 23 2.52 747 24 1.94 1293 47 2.19

Minority IX 1 1 0.08 9 0 0 10 1 0.03

X 5 0 0 4 0 0 9 0 0

Gen & OBC

IX 445 7 0.53 614 7 0.39 1059 14 0.45

X 337 4 0.44 454 2 0.16 791 6 0.28

Total IX 1310 42 3.21 1792 25 1.40 3102 67 2.16

X 913 27 2.96 1236 27 2.18 2149 54 2.51

CWSN

IX 13 0 0 9 0 0 22 0 0


Name of category with higher dropout:- SC

Gender with higher dropout:- Male in 9th Std.





(4) Seasonal Migration






Class- 9th Class- 10th No. of drop out students


School



School

%














No. of Schools:-25

Special trainings started Yes No

0 25 100% 0% 100%

Name of Trainings




----

Present %




Regular teachers -- -- NIOS -- -- SIOS -- --



Programme

Appeared in Exam

Achievement level

Above 60% 45-59% 33-44%

B G B G B G B G B G

9 - - - - - - - - - -

10 - - - - - - - - - -

Total - - - - - - - - - -

% - - - - - - - - - -

Comments: - Special training intervention is not found in any school out of 25 sampled schools.

3. Equity


At School Level


Class

2011-12

SC ST MINO. CWSN

B G B G B G B G

Enrolled 27 51 628 837 2 3 1 3

Avg. % of Attend. 77 79 76 78 73 76 75 78

Nil


9th

Appeared in Exam 27 47 534 750 2 3 1 2

% 100 92.12 85.03 89.60 100 100 100 66.66

Above 60% 4 1 32 21 0 0 0 0

% 14.81 2.12 5.99 28.00 0 0 0 0

Below 60% 14 34 334 524 2 2 0 1

% 51.85 72.34 62.55 69.86 100 66.66 0 50.00

10th

Enrolled 23 49 450 511 0 12 0 1

Avg. % Attend. 76 77 78 80 76 77 0 78

Appeared in Exam 23 41 450 511 0 12 0 1

% 100 83.67 100 100 0 100 0 100

Above 60% 4 1 10 2 0 0 0 0

% 17.39 2.44 2.22 0.39 0 0 0 0

Below 60% 15 31 275 312 0 8 0 1

% 65.21 75.60 61.11 61.05 0 66.66 0 100

Class

2012-13

SC ST MINO. CWSN

B G B G B G B G

9th

Enrolled 26 50 717 974 4 0 0 1

Avg. % of Attend. 77 79 78 81 76 0 0 76

Appeared in Exam 24 45 709 921 4 0 0 1

% 92.30 90 98.88 94.55 100 0 0 100

Above 60% 2 4 42 51 1 0 0 0

% 8.33 8.88 5.92 5.53 25 0 0 0

Below 60% 18 34 438 607 3 0 0 1

% 75 75.55 61.77 65.90 75 0 0 100

10th

Enrolled 18 30 520 621 2 7 1 0

Avg. % Attend. 75 78 76 78 79 76 76 0

Appeared in Exam 18 30 501 590 2 7 1 0

% 100 100 96.34 95.00 100 100 100 0

Above 60% 1 0 10 5 0 0 0 0


% 5.55 0 1.99 0.84 0 0 0 0

Below 60% 14 24 350 396 2 7 1 0

% 77.77 80 69.86 67.11 100 100 100 0

Class

2013-14

SC ST MINO. CWSN

B G B G B G B G

9th

Enrolled 19 46 744 1009 3 1 3 4

Avg. % of Attend. 75 79 78 82 77 79 76 78

Appeared in Exam 17 44 710 979 3 1 2 3

% 89.47 95.65 95.43 97.02 100 100 66.66 75

Above 60% 3 3 31 28 0 0 0 0

% 17.64 6.81 4.36 2.86 0 0 0 0

Below 60% 10 36 435 705 3 1 2 3

% 58.82 81.81 61.62 72.01 100 100 100 100

10th

Enrolled 27 39 602 585 1 4 1 0

Avg. % Attend. 77 78 76 79 78 80 78 0

Appeared in Exam 26 33 557 538 1 4 1 0

% 96.29 84.61 92.52 91.96 100 100 100 0

Above 60% 0 1 26 2 0 0 0 0

% 0 3.03 4.66 0.37 0 0 0 0

Below 60% 18 16 370 381 1 4 1 0

% 69.23 48.48 66.42 70.81 100 100 100 0



Achievement levels are twin areas of concern that need attention.




Name of schemes

Name of schemes

Name of schemes

Name of schemes

Name of schemes


Category-wise (SC/ST/Minority/CWSN) dropout students in past one year i.e. 2013-14



SC 11

ST 156

Minority -

CWSN 1

SC

1. 2. 3.

4. 5. 6.

7. 8. 9.

ST

1. 2. 3.

4. 5. 6.

Minority 1. 2.

Girls



3.

4. 5. 6.

7. 8. 9.

CWSN

1. 2. 3.

4. 5. 6.

7. 8. 9.


OBC 47

General 10

Total 225




Gender Gap


Class

9th


Enrollment 1310 42.23 1792 57.77 3102 100 1367.93 26.89


Appeared in Exam 1268 40.88 1767 56.96 3035 97.84 1393.53 28.23


Above 60%

128 4.22 154 5.07 282 9.29 1203.12 16.88

Below 60%

579 19.08 890 29.32 1469 48.40 1537.13 34.94


Class

10th


Enrollment 913 42.48 1236 57.52 2149 100 1353.77 26.13


Appeared in Exam 886 41.23 1209 56.26 2095 97.49 1364.55 26.71


Above 60%

109 5.20 105 5.01 214 10.21 963.30 -3.80

Below 60%

508 24.24 746 35.61 1254 59.85 1468.50 31.90



i. Girl’s representation in both the classes in comparison with their

counterparts-boys- is high. ii. The gender gap in enrollment stands at 26.89 and 26.13 in classes 9th and

10th respectively. The gender gap in enrollments needs to be located against the total population of both the sexes of feeder habitations. Then only the gap that is calculated can realistically be considered as gender gap in schooling. This data of population of that age group is not available with the schools. However, the real cause of concern that one can draw from the above tables is the achievement levels of both the sexes. It is very low in both the sexes.

Comments:- Girls enrollment is found more than the boy`s enrollment in std. 9th and 10th.






Total 9 -




%

A Health (own or family members) 9 36

B Social cultural issues 4 16

C Sibling Care - -

D Household responsibilities 10 40

E Family issues / Gone to relatives - -

F Earning for livelihood 3 12

G Migration - -

H Any other - -

Total 26 -

Looking for isolated reasons for absenteeism take us nowhere. There is a need to view all these socio-economic and cultural reasons together impact absenteeism.





Programmes (c) Linguistic barriers - - - (d) Economical barriers 11 44 Providing

Bicycles Comments:- The problem of gender gap is addressed when the enrollment rates of girls are less than boys. In this case the situation is other way round where, enrollment and dropout problem lies with boys. This could be reason why the problem is not receiving adequate attention.



Social Group



2011-12 50 100 150 1078 1348 2426 4 6 10 710 884 1594 1844 2342 4186 2 4 6

2012-13 44 80 124 1237 1595 2832 6 7 13 712 932 1644 2000 2615 4615 1 1 2

Gap -6 -20 -26 159 247 406 2 1 3 2 48 50 156 273 429 -1 -3 -4

2012-13 44 80 124 1237 1595 2832 6 7 13 712 932 1644 2000 2615 4615 1 1 2

2013-14 46 85 131 1346 1594 2940 4 5 9 1143 1078 2221 2543 2760 5309 4 4 8

Gap 2 5 7 109 -1 108 -2 -2 -4 413 146 577 543 145 694 3 3 6



There is increasing in girl’s enrollment particularly girls belonging to OBC and General category in the year 2013-14.


Social Group



2011-12 76.50 78 77.25 77 79 78 74.50 76.5 75.50 77 79 78 76 78.10 77.05 75 78 76.50

2012-13 76 78.50 77.25 77 79.50 78.25 77.50 76 76.75 78 80 79 76.90 78 77.45 76 76 76

Gap -0.50 -0.50 0 0 0.50 0.25 3 -0.50 -1.25 1 1 1 0.90 -0.10 0.40 1 -2 -0.50

2012-13 76 78.50 77.25 77 79.50 78.25 77.50 76 76.75 78 80 79 76.90 78 77.45 76 76 76

2013-14 76 78.50 77.25 78 80.50 79.25 77.50 79.50 78.5 79 82 80.5 77.50 79.70 78.60 77 78 77.50

Gap 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 3.50 2.25 1 2 1.50 1.50 1.70 -1.15 1 2 1.50



Social Group



2011-12 37 67 104 651 859 1510 2 10 12 428 496 924 1118 1434 2552 0 2 2

2012-13 35 62 117 840 1059 1899 6 18 24 465 704 1169 1347 1844 3191 1 1 2

Gap -2 -5 13 189 200 389 4 8 12 37 208 241 229 410 639 1 -1 0

2012-13 35 62 117 840 1059 1899 6 18 24 465 704 1169 1347 1844 3191 1 1 2

2013-14 31 100 131 862 1120 1982 4 5 9 515 783 1298 1415 2011 3426 3 3 6

Gap -4 38 14 22 61 83 -2 -13 -15 50 79 129 48 167 235 2 2 4



Comments:-


No. of Schools:- 25

Counseling of percent’s done

Yes No

0 25

100% 0% 100%


Comments:-







12

Not aware

il

NnnnnnnnnNoil



At School level:-



No. of Schools:- 25


0 25 100% 0% 100%





in district


%

- Nil -





5. Quality



1- (a)

S. No.



%


classroom 70 65 92.85

4 Bulb/Tube light /CFL 65 55 84.61


5 Fan 45 40 88.88 6 Teaching aids 24 18 75



H.S.S. Girls Lohandiguda, Block- Lohandiguda



S. No.



Number % Number % 1 Teaching aids 6 24 6 100 2 Desk-chairs/stools for students (Adequate) 20 80 20 100 3 Integrated science lab with equipment’s and

material 10 40 10 100

4 Math kit 13 52 13 100 5 Science kit 23 92 23 100 6 Computer lab with computers and supportive


7 Art and Craft room 0 0 0 0


8 Library with age appropriate books and seating arrangement

2 8 2 100

9 TV 7 28 6 85.71 10 Separate Activity room for girls This is cause of concern 11 Audio Equipment’s 2 8 2 100 12 Video Equipment’s 7 28 6 85.71 13 LCD Projector 2 8 2 100 14 Overhead projector 4 16 4 100 15 Purified/ Safe Drinking Water 8 32 3 37.5 16 Fire Extinguisher 17 68 17 100 17 Auditorium 2 8 2 100 18 Staff room 19 76 19 100 19 Indoor games room 0 0 0 0 20 N.S.S./NCC/Scout & Guides room 8 32 8 100 21 Counselor room 0 0 0 0 22 First-aid room 0 0 0 0











Sanctioned Posts

(subject-wise)




M F M F

347 114 137 251 102 120 96

100% 45.42% 54.81% 72.33% 40.64% 47.81% 27.67%

Nil

Nil





1. Adhoc teachers are appointed 2. Available teachers engaged extra periods 3. Middle school teachers engaged high school classes where ever both the school were


Comments:-




Science Math Language


18 16 14 22 19

100% 72% 64% 56% 88% 76%




Science 18 schools, Math 16 schools and Language (English 14 schools, Hindi 22 schools and

Sanskrit 19 schools) out of sampled 25 schools.



Number of Schools:- No. of trained teachers



100% 65.74% 34.26%






Yes No Student 6 19

% 24% 76% Teachers 7 18

% 28% 72% Comments:- Reasons are to be explored.



Authority for

Deployment






Residential

KRP MT RP Trainee





No. of Schools:- 25


Yes No Yes No

18 7 12 13

100% 72% 28% 48% 52%





No. of Schools:- 25


100% 100% 0% 80% 20%


Comments:- Formalities are observed.


No. of Schools:- 25

Discussion and group team work encouraged

Yes No

5 20

100% 20% 80%

Above table, shows that in 5 schools, it is found, discussions and team works were encouraged as a methodology of teaching for involvement of students in teaching learning process and in remaining 20 schools these processes were not seen.



No. of Schools:- 25




management


100% 20% 80% 0% 100% 28% 72%

Groups made of Different

Same class

No. of Schools:- 25

0 5

100% 0% 20%


a. Students are made to sit in small groups in classrooms to make classroom-learning process a collaborative process. Table informs us that this kind of classroom management is happening in only five schools. This is only 20%.

b. Second aspect is about students’ participation in classroom management. As far as this aspect of management is concerned, the practices are not so discouraging. Students’








1.

2.

3.

Comments:- No resource teacher




No. of Schools:- 25

Yes No 8 17


Throughout year Only for one month before exam - 8

100% - 32% Average days of zero period in a weak

Daily Results thereof

1. Average progress 2 Comments:- It is the neglected area;





No. of Schools with CWSN % 5 20%

Participation level in class All CWSN participate actively 4 100% Few CWSN participate - - No participation - -

As per above table, participation level of the CWSN students are as follows-


(All CWSN participate actively in 5 schools)




Peer Interaction Number of Schools % Neutral 5 100% Taunting - - Teasing - - Bullying - - Comments:- CWSN students were identified in 5 school; no bullying and teasing are observed or reported any school.

10. Individualized Educational Plan (IEPs) prepared for CWSN.

No. of Schools:- 25

No. of Schools with CWSN

5

IEP

Prepared Not prepared

0 5

100% 0% 100%



No. of Schools:- 25

Total No. of sampled Schools No. of Schools with CWSN in samples

25 5

100% 100% 20%

No. of Schools:- 5

No. of Schools with CWSN seating facilities

Yes No

0 5

100% 0% 100%







%

LCD Projector 2 2 2 100% Overhead projector 4 4 2 50% Computer & Accessories with net connection

4 4 2 50%

Others - - - - Comments:- The data in the table speaks about availability of ICT in school. It does not necessarily talks about the availability of ICT devices that are EXCLUSIVELY meant for CWSN children. They are meant for all. No special ICT materials are found in any school. Huge gap is found between availability of computers and their educational use.



S. No.








5 days



















No. of Schools:- 25


100 % 100% Sl. No. Subjects Number of teachers,



Average Duration

1 Science 46 1-2 5-10 days 2 Maths 20 1 5-10 days 3 English 32 1-2 5-10 days 4 Social Science 49 1-2 5-10 days 5 Sanskrit 17 1 5-10 days 6 Hindi 29 1-2 5-10 days

Total 193 7-8 5-10 days


- - -

Comments:- (1) All subject – total 193 teachers received training under RMSA; 5-10 days in- service training.

(2) Training to deal with CWSN is very minimal.

2 (i)










Comments:-



Facilities Adequate % Inadequate % Space 24 96 1 4 Projection 24 96 1 4 Tools/Modules 15 60 10 40 Equipment’s (LCD, Projector,




Comments:-


No. of Schools:- 25

Yes No

24 1

100% 96% 4%

Comments:- Needs in general sense are kept in view at state level in structuring modules. 6. Impact:-Use of new technologies like Computer Assisted Learning (CAL), LCD Projector etc. for imparting lessons in the classroom by teachers.


%

193 0 0% Comments:- Huge gap; need to think and reflect on the situation. Competencies along with culture of using technology in classrooms are absent. 7. Trainers/Resource persons from following institutions who imparted trainings –


Sl. No.


% of respondents

1 Secondary Schools


3 DIET


5 SIERT

6 IASE

25


7 CTE

8 NIC


10 Total







Comments:-

6. CIVIL WORKS


(1-2)



1 H.S.S. Chingpal 1991 2001 2 H.S.S. Dharampur 1988 - M.S. Building

3 H.S.S. Chapka 1997 1986

4 H.S.S. Jagdalpur 1939 1939 5 H.S.S. Keshloor 2008 - M.S. Building 6 H.S. Kewaramunda 2010 2013 7 H.S. Gadiya 2012 2012 8 H.S. Tirthum 2010 2013 9 H.S.S. Padripani 2001 2004

10 H.S.S. Ghat Lohanga 1994 - 11 H.S.S. Tokapal 1971 1971 12 H.S. Kilepal 1974 - 13 H.S.S. Neganar 1991 2007 14 H.S.S. Bakawand 1995 - 15 H.S.S. Dodrepal 1997 2006 16 H.S.S. Chitapur 2010 1998 M.S. Building 17 H.S.S. Badanji 1968 2013 18 H.S.S. Sargipal 1998 2006 19 H.S. Chitrakoot 2012 1987 M.S. Building 20 H.S.S. Bagmudi Paneda - - 21 H.S. Lalaguda 2011 2004 M.S. Building 22 H.S.S. Mooli 1991 2012 23 H.S.S. Sonarpal 1992 2000 24 H.S.S. Lohandiguda 2005 2010 25 H.S.S. Dharaur 2010 2014


Comments:-



9th 37 37 100% 5 13.51

10th 33 33 100% 3 9.09


Comments:-


No. of Schools:- 25


20 18 10 5 M.S. Building 100% 80% 72% 40% 20%


- - - -



H.S. Lalaguda, Block- Bastanar




Comments:- (1) 5schools are operating from middle school building.

(2) Sq. Ft. or Sq. Mt.-wise details are not with the sampled schools.

II. Design


No. of Schools:- 25 Pucca Semi Pucca Kutcha Rented

24 0 1 -

100% 96% 0% 4% -

Comments:-

2. Physical Condition of building –

No. of Schools:- 25


None

10 7 8 5 15

100% 40% 28% 32% 20% 60%





100% 0 0% 25 100%





No. of

Schools:- 25


Yes No Yes No 1. 2. 3.

24 1 24 1

100% 96% 4% 96% 4%



No. of Schools:- 25


100% 60% 40%


Yes No 14 1 -

100% 93.33% 6.67% - If not functioned, Reasons

1. No information 2.

Steps taken 1. No steps taken 2.


No. of Schools:- 15 Continuous Intermittent

12 3 100% 80% 20%

Average duration of availability -





Solar Panels

Wind Electricity

Other

No. of Schools - 25 Availability - - - - - -

% - - - - - -

No. of Schools - 25 In working condition

- - - - - -

% - - - - - -

No. of Schools - 25 Usability - - - - - -

% - - - - - -

As per above table, alternative electric power supply is not found in any school out of 25 sampled schools

Comments:-

7. (a-b) Library Design- Availability of the Following –

No. of

Schools:- 25




2 23 2 23 2 23 0 25

100% 8% 92% 8% 92% 8% 92% 0% 100%

Comments:- 2 sampled schools have separate library room out of 25 schools. Indeed functional and effective library is almost absent in many schools where separate library room is available.





Yes % No %

6 24 19 76




(d) Availability of Running Water - - - -



H.S.S. Chapka, Block- Bastar




Sl. No. Ramps to Number of Schools

Yes % No %

(i) Entrance of School 14 56 11 44

(ii) Drinking Water Facility - - - -

(iii) Toilet Facility - - - -

(iv) Science lab - - - -

(v) Computer Lab - - - -

(vi) Mathematic Lab - - - -

(vii) Library - - - -

(viii) Auditorium - - - -

(ix) Play Ground - - - -



(Entrance of School in 14 schools) instead of these schools there are no other facilities for CWSN in any school out of 25 sampled schools. The table informs how our schools are yet to become CWSN friendly physical structures.


No. of Schools:- 25

Bench Availability

Yes No

0 25

100% 0% 100%


Adequate Slope:- 14

Number of Schools with ramps Yes No 14 11

100% 56% 44% Hand rails available 8 6

% 57.14% 42.86%





Supply water 1 4

Tube well 14 56

Dug Well - -

Hand Pump 16 64

Other 1 4

No source 2 8


No. of Schools:- 25

Water Available

Yes No

23 2

100% 92% 8%



H.S. Kilepal, Block- Bastanar

Above table shows us the status of drinking water facility available in 23 schools out of sampled 25 schools. Source of drinking water are as follows:- (Supply water - 1, Tube well- 14, Hand pump - 16 schools, others -1 school and no source - 2 schools)

Comments:- Schools are doing well in this area. (b) Water Storage Facility& its condition & cleaning schedule

Type of Facility

No. of

Schools

Condition Cleaning Schedule No. of Schools % Good & Usable

Damaged not usable

Weekly 2 8

Steel drum 11 11 - Fortnightly - - % 44 44 - Monthly - -

Covered tank 10 10 - Six Monthly 8 32 % 40 40 - Not Definite 2 8

Underground tank


% - - - - - - Overhead

tank - - - - - -

% - - - - - - Not Storage 4 4

% 16 16 Comments:- Water storage facility available in 21 schools out of 25 sampled schools.



No. of Schools:- 25

Quality


19 6

100% 76% 24%



No. of Schools:- 25


5 - 3 - 17

100% 20% - 12% - 68%


No. of Schools:- 25

Bleaching Powder



Yes No

- - - 25 0 25

100% - - - 100% 0% 100%

Comments:-


No. of Schools:- 25


Yes No

3 22

100% 12% 88%







Adequate Number % Inadequate Number % Boys 13 52 12 48 Girls 20 80 5 20 CWSN 1 4 24 96 Teachers 2 8 23 92 Other workers 0 0 25 100 Comments:-


No. of Schools:- 25



2 23 1 24 2 23

100% 8% 92% 4% 96% 8% 92%


H.S.S. Girls Lohandiguda, Block- Lohandiguda

Above table shows that the proper maintenance of toilets is found in 2 schools, cleanliness of toilets in 1 school and supply of water available in 2 schools out of 25 sampled schools. Though


efforts in proper maintenance and cleanliness are on due to lack of supply of running water, the problem of cleanliness still persists.



No. of Schools:- 25




100% 60% 40% Availability of Napkins & Dustbins

No. of Schools:- 20


0 20 0 20 100% 0% 100% 0% 100%

Comments:- This issues needs to be addressed on priority basis.


No. of Schools:- 25

Availability of Provision

Yes No

1 24

100% 4% 96%



No. of Schools:- 25



Yes No Yes No

19 6 0 25

100% 76% 24% 0% 100%



12. Drainage System


No. of Schools:- 25

Drainage System available Yes No 21 4

100% 84% 16% Type of Drains Under ground Pucca Covered Pucca & Open Kutcha & Open No. of Schools:- 21 1 1 2 17

100% 4.76% 4.76% 9.52% 80.95% Structural Condition


No. of Schools:- 21 1 19 1 1 100% 4.76% 90.48% 4.76% 4.76%


Schools:- 21 Yes No

4 17 100% 19.05% 80.95%

No. of

Schools:- 21


Entrance Gate

Open Space



- - 3 - 1 - 100% - - 75% - 25% -



(Underground – 1 school, Pucca Covered – 1, Pucca & Open – 2 and Kutcha & Open- 17 schools)

Comments:-


No. of Schools:- 25


100% 76% 24%

No. of Schools:- 19 If yes, Type of drainage system

Septic Tank Municipal drain Open field Any other 19 - - -

100% 100% - - -

No. of Schools:-25


0 25 100% 0% 100%

No. of Schools:-25


0 25 100% 0% 100%

No. of Schools:-25


0 25 100% 0% 100%

No. of Schools:-25


0 25


100% 0% 100%

No. of Schools:-25


0 25 100% 0% 100%

As per above table, waste water treatment and discharge arrangement are available in 19 out of sampled 25 schools.

Comments:-


No. of Schools:- 25


1 24 100% 4% 96% No. of

Schools:- 25 Availability of Rain water harvesting system

Yes No 1 24

100% 4% 96% No. of

Schools:- 1


1 0 100% 100% 0% No. of

Schools:- 1


0 1 100% 0% 100% No. of

Schools:-25

Lighting facility available Yes No 15 10

100% 60% 40% Type Ordinary bulb Ordinary tube CFL None No. of

Schools:- 15 4 11 7 0

100% 16% 44% 28% 0% No. of

Schools:- 25


2 23 100% 8% 92%


using 2 2 - -

% 8% 8% - -

Comments:-


No. of Schools:-25

Govt. Building Rented 25 --

100% 100% -- (Condition) Good 21

% 84% Bad 4


% 16% No. of Schools with special structural facility to cope with


% - Cyclone -

% - Earthquake -






One gate 20 % 80%

Two gates 5 % 20%

Three gates - % -


20


% 20%

Comments:

15 (ii) (c-e)



0 25 0 25 100% 0% 100 % 0% 100 %



0 3 22 100% 0% 12% 88%



0 0 25 100% 0% 0% 100% No. of



100% 24% 44% 32% No. of

Schools:-17


6 0 11 0 100% 35.29% 0% 64.71% 0%

Trained to handle fire extinguisher


No. of Schools:-25

Teachers Students Yes No Yes No

0 25 0 25 100% 0% 100% 0% 100%

Availability of Contact Numbers of No. of

Schools:-25


0 25 0 25 0 25 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100%

Display of Numbers

0 25 0 25 0 25

100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100%

Comments:-



No. of

Schools:-25




No. of Schools:-8

6 2 - -

100% 75% 25% - -


H.S. Chitrakoot, Block- Lohandiguda


Above table shows us, that the ongoing construction activity is found in eight schools out of 25 sampled schools. The construction does disturb the academic activity.



No. of Schools:- 8


to construction



7 1 0 8 0 8 0 8 7 1

100% 87.50% 12.50% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 87.50% 12.50%


No. of Schools:- 8

Yes No

5 3

100% 62.50% 37.50%


No. of Schools:- 8

Yes No

0 8

100% 0% 100%

Comments:-


No. of

Schools:- 8





Foundation level

Plinth level/ DPC

Lintel Roof level

Flooring/plastering

Finishing level

Yes No

8 0 0 2 2 1 1 2 8 0

100% 100% 0% 0% 25% 25% 12.50% 12.50% 25% 100% 0%



2(c-g)




Schools

Number of

visits

Average No. of

visit/School


made

Average No. of

Authentication

Instructions given

in No. of Schools


Foundation - - - - - - -- -

Plinth - - - - - - - -

Lintel - - - - - - - -

Roof level - - - - - - - -

Flooring - - - - - - - -

Finishing - - - - - - - -

Comments:- -

No. of

Schools:- 8

Community

members through

SMDC involved in

procurement

process

Sub Committee

(Construction

Committee)

Constituted

A/c Books Civil

Work

(Construction)

maintained/

updated

MB for Civil Work

Maintained

Payment made to

contractor in

accordance with

MB

Material stocked

is in line with stock

register

Cheque issue

register maintained

Quality up to the mark Physical existence

of construction

material matches

with entry made in

stock register

Construction

Material

Construction work


0 8 0 8 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0

100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0%




100% - - 100% -


Comments:- Nil




No. of Schools:- 25


roles

% SEMIS DCF


% SDMC Register

% Guidelines of School

Development Plan

%

No. of Schools:-25

Training received by

SMDC Members




Good 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 25

Average 20 80 0 0 0 0 25 100 0 0 100% 0 100 0 100 Not familiar 5 20 25 100 25 100 0 0 25 100

Comments:-


No. of Schools:- 25


Monthly Quarterly Six monthly Annually Whenever needed Never

3 – 5 SMDC Members 0 12 6 7 0 0

100% 0% 48% 24% 28% 0% 0%


418


(Quarterly-12, six monthly-6 and annualy-7 schools)




Members Number Average no. of members per School Average Attendance in recent meeting Total members 418 16-17 3-5 Women members 162 5-6 1-2 SC/ST members 256 9-10 2-3 Selected members 336 13-14 3-4 Nominated members 82 3-4 1-2

Comments:-


No. of

Schools:-25



100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100%





No.

of

Scho

ols

Lev

el o

f Pa

rtic

ipat

ion

RM

SA &

MD

M

Impl

emen

tatio

n

%

Con

stru

ctio

n w

ork

unde

r R

MSA

%

SAG

Uti

lizat

ion

%

Free

Tex

t Boo

ks d

istr

ibut

ion

%

Scho

lars

hips

dis

trib

utio

n

%

Prep

arin

g A

WP

& B

%

Stud

ents

Enr

ollm

ent,

Atte

ndan

ce

%

Reg

ular

ity o

f te

ache

rs

%

Run

ning

of

day

to d

ay a

ctiv

ities

orga

nizi

ng S

choo

l& c

ultu

ral

even

ts

%

Hel

p in

pro

vide

sch

ool f

acili

ties

%

Filli

ng o

f D

CF

%

Good - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Average 0 0 0 0 20 80 20 80 15 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 20 0 0 0 0

Bad 25 100 25 100 5 20 5 20 10 40 25 100 25 100 25 100 20 80 25 100 25 100



No. of Schools:- 25


0 25 100% 0% 100%




No. of Schools:-25





Yes No 418 - -

0 25 -

100% 0% 100% - - -

Comments:- No orientation programmes are conducted.

6. Schedule of trainings, received by SMDC members, name agency who conducted the trainings, and perception of SMDC members about trainings.




Nil 1.

No. of Schools


- 2.

- 3. - - -

- 4. % - - -




Name of

District visited:-

Bastar


thereof

Yes No 1.


√ - 3.

Total No. of govt.

Schools



% Total No. of Pvt.

Schools


% 4.

District 158 158 100 33 33 100 5.

State 4148 4148 100 1877 1877 100

Comments:-





Yes No 100% √ --


Comments:-




191

No. of School:- 25



191 Yes No


191 25 0

100% 100% 0%

Overall, kind of training received to fill up DCF Yes, average training found in session 2014-15





the district:- 191


nodal Schools

No. of Schools from which filled up DCF received


received



158 33 191 158 33 191 -- -- --

Govt. Pvt.

158 33 100% 82.72% 17.28% 100% 82.72% 17.28% 100% -- -- --

Comments:-



No. of Schools:- 25


Yes No 1. 25 0 2.

100% 100% 0% 3. Comments:- Yes, current academic year filled copy of DCF is available in the school.

6-7 School report card and sample checks



Yes No Yes No Yes No √ - √ - √ -


25

% 100%

Data entry done

School report cards



Name of district:-Bastar

√ - √ - √ - √ -


- - - - - - - -




1. Yes 2. No



Yes



No. of

Schools:- 25

Awareness about data’s information Use of data being made

Yes No Yes No

25 0 25 0

100% 100% 0% 100% 0%


1. Yes 2. No


1. Yes 2. No



No. of Schools:- 25

Records maintained & updated on daily basis Bank reconciliation done on monthly basis

Cash Book

Yes No Yes No

5 20 18 7

100% 20% 80% 72% 28%

DPO √ - √ -

SPO √ - √ -

Above table, show the cashbook maintained and updated on regular basis in 5 schools and bank reconciliation done on monthly basis in 18 schools out of sampled 25 schools.





No. of Schools:- 25 0 0 25

100% 0% 0% 100%



Yes

Yes



S. NO. Type of funds/grants No. of Schools As recorded in cash book Amount Received Total Month of receipt

1. School Annual Grant (SAG) 23 50,000 11,50,000 4.9.13

2. Minor Repair Grant 10 25,000 2,50,000 4.10.13

3. New School Building Grant (Major grant)

- - - - - - -


- - - - - - -

5. Major repair grant - - - - - - - - - -


7. Others (coaching) 6 9800 58800 30.6.13 - - -


At District Level



1 Annual Grant 23 4.9.13

2 Minor Repair Grant 10 4.10.13

3 Major repair grant - --

At State Level


Sl. No. Name of grant allocated No. of districts Month of allocation 1 School Grants 27 With different time intervals 2 MMER 3 Model School 4 Girls Hostel 5 Teachers Salary 6 DPO Office Payment 7 Teacher Training 8 Vocational Education 9 Excursion Tour for students

10 Fixed Assets created/purchased during the year


4. System for drawl and payment of fund from SMDC account –


100% 20% 80% 20%

As per above table, system for drawl and payment of fund from SMDC account by cash 5 schools, cheque 20 schools and both in 5 schools out of 25 sampled schools.

Comments:-


No. of Schools:-

25

Sharing of If yes, details of objections

Proposal for expenditure

Expenditure Statements


transaction

Yes No Yes No Yes No 4. No objection

23 2 23 2 0 25 2.

100% 92% 8% 92% 8% 0% 100% 3.

4.


6. Audit of SMDCs


No. of Schools:- 25

Audit carried out

Yes No

25 0

100% 100% 0%

D.P.O. √ -

No. of Schools:- 25

If yes, Audit carried out by

Education Dept. A.G. C.A. Social Audit None

- - 25 - -

100% - - 100% - -

Comments:-

Yes


7. Social Auditing


No. of Schools:- 25


0 25

100% 0% 100% D.P.O. -- --



No. of Schools:- 25


5 20 100% 20% 80%

If yes, details thereof:

1. Scholarship by NMDC in 1 school 2. Donate water filter by SBI and gram panchayat in 2 schools 3. Donate computer kit by SBI in 1 school and 4. Toilet made by gram panchayat in 1 school. Comments:-





is submitted 1 H.S.S. Chingpal April 2014 2013-14 2 H.S.S. Dharampur April 2014 2013-14 3 H.S.S. Chapka April 2014 2013-14 4 H.S.S. Jagdalpur April 2014 2013-14 5 H.S.S. Keshloor April 2014 2013-14 6 H.S. Kewaramunda April 2014 2013-14 7 H.S. Gadiya April 2014 2013-14 8 H.S. Tirthum April 2014 2013-14 9 H.S.S. Padripani April 2014 2013-14 10 H.S.S. Ghat Lohanga April 2014 2013-14 11 H.S.S. Tokapal April 2014 2013-14 12 H.S. Kilepal April 2014 2013-14


13 H.S.S. Neganar April 2014 2013-14 14 H.S.S. Bakawand April 2014 2013-14 15 H.S.S. Dodrepal April 2014 2013-14 16 H.S.S. Chitapur April 2014 2013-14 17 H.S.S. Badanji - - 18 H.S.S. Sargipal - - 19 H.S. Chitrakoot April 2014 2013-14 20 H.S.S. Bagmudi Paneda April 2014 2013-14 21 H.S. Lalaguda April 2014 2013-14 22 H.S.S. Mooli April 2014 2013-14 23 H.S.S. Sonarpal April 2014 2013-14 24 H.S.S. Lohandiguda April 2014 2013-14 25 H.S.S. Dharaur April 2014 2013-14






No. of Schools

191 127 66.49 2012-13 127

2013-14 128

Comments:-


No. of sampled DPOs



released


Date of release


received





Comments:-





(2) These grants are distributed to the schools by DPO level.

(3) Then DPO have to submit utilization certificate to the SPO after getting it from schools.


1. Yes 2. No




Comments:-

11. Financial Statement for SMDC/DPO/SPO (From 1 April, 2013 to 31 March, 2014 (date /month of visit).

(i)

Name of Unit


2013

B Funds

received

C=A+B Total Fund

available till

D Expenditure



Balance in bank


SMDC 1202152 1468914 2671066 1394043 1277023 1277023 DPO 34248249 191675801 225924050 199388290 26535760 26535760 SPO

Comments:-

Yes



Grant funds

Sl.

No. Name of School

SAG Minor Repair Major repair grant Civil work Educational tour Others



Unspent


Unspent


Unspent


Unspent


Unspent

balance

1 H.S.S. Chingpal 50000 50000 - 25000 - 25000 - - - - - - - - - 9800 9800 -

2 H.S.S. Dharampur 50000 50000 - 25000 25000 - - - - - - - - - - - - -

3 H.S.S. Chapka 50000 50000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9800 9800 -

4 H.S.S. Jagdalpur 50000 35000 15000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

5 H.S.S. Keshloor 50000 32710 17290 - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -

6 H.S. Kewaramunda 50000 50000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

7 H.S. Gadiya 50000 50000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

8 H.S. Tirthum 50000 35000 15000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

9 H.S.S. Padripani 50000 34856 15144 25000 25000 - - - - - - - - - - 9800 9800 -

10 H.S.S. Ghat Lohanga 50000 36780 13220 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

11 H.S.S. Tokapal 50000 50000 - 25000 25000 - - - - - - - - - - 9800 9800 -

12 H.S. Kilepal 50000 46838 3162 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

13 H.S.S. Neganar 50000 15840 34160 25000 16270 8730 - - - - - - - - - - - -

14 H.S.S. Bakawand 50000 35000 15000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

15 H.S.S. Dodrepal 50000 50000 - 25000 25000 - - - - - - - - - - 9800 9800 -

16 H.S.S. Chitapur - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

17 H.S.S. Badanji - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

18 H.S.S. Sargipal 50000 50000 - 25000 25000 - - - - - - - - - - - - -

19 H.S. Chitrakoot 50000 50000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

20 H.S.S. Bagmudi Paneda 50000 50000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

21 H.S. Lalaguda 50000 50000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

22 H.S.S. Mooli 50000 18250 31750 25000 25000 - - - - - - - - - - 9800 9800 -

23 H.S.S. Sonarpal 50000 35000 15000 25000 22000 3000 - - - - - - - - - - - -

24 H.S.S. Lohandiguda 50000 35000 15000 25000 7700 17300 - - - - - - - - - - - -

25 H.S.S. Dharaur 50000 50000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Comments:-




S.N. Month of receipt of SAG Number of Schools % 1 4.9.13 23 92% 2 3 4 Total 23 92%


Sl. No.


Month of receipt


% of expenditure

1 H.S.S. Chingpal 50000 4.9.13 50000 100 2 H.S.S. Dharampur 50000 4.9.13 50000 100 3 H.S.S. Chapka 50000 4.9.13 50000 100 4 H.S.S. Jagdalpur 50000 4.9.13 35000 70 5 H.S.S. Keshloor 50000 4.9.13 32710 65.42 6 H.S. Kewaramunda 50000 4.9.13 50000 100 7 H.S. Gadiya 50000 4.9.13 50000 100 8 H.S. Tirthum 50000 4.9.13 35000 70 9 H.S.S. Padripani 50000 4.9.13 34856 69.71

10 H.S.S. Ghat Lohanga 50000 4.9.13 36780 73.56 11 H.S.S. Tokapal 50000 4.9.13 50000 100 12 H.S. Kilepal 50000 4.9.13 46838 93.67 13 H.S.S. Neganar 50000 4.9.13 15840 31.68 14 H.S.S. Bakawand 50000 4.9.13 35000 70 15 H.S.S. Dodrepal 50000 4.9.13 50000 100 16 H.S.S. Chitapur - - - - 17 H.S.S. Badanji - - - - 18 H.S.S. Sargipal 50000 4.9.13 50000 100 19 H.S. Chitrakoot 50000 4.9.13 50000 100 20 H.S.S. Bagmudi Paneda 50000 4.9.13 50000 100 21 H.S. Lalaguda 50000 4.9.13 50000 100 22 H.S.S. Mooli 50000 4.9.13 18250 36.50 23 H.S.S. Sonarpal 50000 4.9.13 35000 70 24 H.S.S. Lohandiguda 50000 4.9.13 35000 70 25 H.S.S. Dharaur 50000 4.9.13 50000 100

Total 11,50,000/- --- 960274 ---






spend? 2 Schools -- All spent



Number of Schools

%




material purchasing

23 92 19 82.61 4 17.39 1. No reason


23 92 20 86.96 3 13.04


23 92 21 91.30 2 8.70

14. Electric bill paid 23 92 10 43.48 13 56.52 15. White-wash 23 92 13 56.52 10 43.48

Comments:-




Month of receipt


% of expenditure

1 H.S.S. Chingpal 25000 4.10.13 - 0 2 H.S.S. Dharampur 25000 4.10.13 25000 100 3 H.S.S. Chapka - - - - 4 H.S.S. Jagdalpur - - - - 5 H.S.S. Keshloor - - - - 6 H.S. Kewaramunda - - - - 7 H.S. Gadiya - - - - 8 H.S. Tirthum - - - - 9 H.S.S. Padripani 25000 4.10.13 25000 100

10 H.S.S. Ghat Lohanga - - - 11 H.S.S. Tokapal 25000 4.10.13 25000 100 12 H.S. Kilepal - - - - 13 H.S.S. Neganar 25000 4.10.13 16270 65.08 14 H.S.S. Bakawand - - - - 15 H.S.S. Dodrepal 25000 4.10.13 25000 100 16 H.S.S. Chitapur - - - - 17 H.S.S. Badanji - - - -


18 H.S.S. Sargipal 25000 4.10.13 25000 100 19 H.S. Chitrakoot - - - - 20 H.S.S. Bagmudi Paneda - - - - 21 H.S. Lalaguda - - - - 22 H.S.S. Mooli 25000 4.10.13 25000 100 23 H.S.S. Sonarpal 25000 4.10.13 22000 88 24 H.S.S. Lohandiguda 25000 4.10.13 7700 30.8 25 H.S.S. Dharaur - - - -

Total 2,50,000 - 195970 -

Comments:-



10 40%


8 32%


2 8%

Comments:-



Number of Schools

%

Funds utilized as per norms If not utilized as per norms, give reasons

Yes % No %

1. Repairing 8 32 8 32 2 8

2. White wash 8 32 8 32 2 8



1. Details of innovative proposals undertaken during the current financial year 2014-15

(At district level)

S. No.



1. No innovative proposals - - 2.



S. No.




Nil

3 (a) If not, the mentions reasons thereof



Nil


Nil --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(d) At district level --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) At State Level --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


There are no successful elements in innovation proposals that can be scaled up under RMSA.



Name of District:- Bastar

S. N. Name of Post Sanctioned In position Vacant 1 DPO 1 1 -

2 ADPO 1 1 -

3 APO 3 2 1

4 Asstt. Programmer 1 1 -

5 Accountant 1 1 -


7 Peon 2 2 -

Total :- 12 10 2





Coordinator 4 0 4

10 Ankekshak 2 0 2 11 Accountant 2 0 2 12 Steno 2 0 2 13 Assistant Grade-1 1 0 1 14 Assistant Grade-2 2 0 2 15 Assistant Grade-3 4 0 4 16 Civil Manager 1 0 1 17 Deputy Manager 1 0 1 18 Office Assistant with Data

Entry Operator 10 7 3


Total:- 54 22 35 1. (iii) Action taken to fill up vacancies


At State level:- Yes, proposal send to the State Govt. by SPO ………………………………….. Comments:- No circular to appoint the staff, category wise in SPO under RMSA.



5 8 5 14

Nature of engagement At DPO At SPO At DPO At SPO

5 8 5 14

Comments:-






2 Civil Work Assistant Director ADPO & APO

3 Quality Additional Director ADPO & APO

4 Equity Additional Director ADPO & APO

5 Gender Assistant Director ADPO & APO

6 Pedagogy Additional Director ADPO & APO

7 Planning Deputy Director ADPO & APO

8 Training Deputy Director ADPO & APO

Total

3(i) If component wise personnel’s are not in place the alternative arrangements made:- Yes

Comments:-



Comments:-


Yes, Average

Comments:-





Not adequate 1(iii) Details of visits made by officials of SPO and DPO to district/Schools along with time schedule (from 1st April, 2014 to 31st March, 2015)


At SPO level

S.

No.






3 Others

At DPO Level

S.

No.





2 ADPO 10 15 Monthly

3 APO 10 15 Monthly

4 Others 20 30 Monthly

Total 55 80

Comments:-


Written tool available in DPO and SPO level

Comments:-





----------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments:-





2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1. Master Training by SCERT

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Comments:-

IV. INFORMATION ABOUT STATE DATABASE At SPO level updated by DPO.


Yes


DCF format

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments:-


Yes ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yes/ No

2(i) If not, then name of other sources used for the Plan preparation at district level

Yes, found

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments:-



S.N. District level issues State level issues

1 Mistakes are found regarding the infrastructure data

Data has not been compiled at state level, its compiled at district level.





Ascertaining quality dimensions is the biggest difficulty. V. RESEARCH (At district and State level)




2

3

4

5



1

2

3

4

5



(a) At State level:- No …………………………………………………………………………….

(b) At District level:- No …………………………………………………………………………. 3. (i) Identification of the kinds of research need was felt and at what level?

Nil --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yes/No


Areas of research



agencies)

Pedagogy

Quality


Areas of

research

Problem No. of Action Research

conducted in district

Solution Conducted by

(Teachers /external

agencies)

Pedagogy

Quality



not covered above.


Critical aspects








School building in the Bastar district.

2. Most of the schools having inadequate teaching staff in the Bastar district.







schools.





assistive device, special training to handle CWSN students etc.






unpacked mode.





available.






16. H.S.S. Chingpal, Block- Darbha: This is one of the poor quality school; students learning

achievement are very poor. School records are not updated regularly; inadequate toilet

facilities for girls and boys students; lack of science lab; non-existence of library room and

art and craft room for students learning.

17. H.S.S. Dodrepal, Block- Bakawand: This is forest area school; no drinking water facility

in the school campus; SMDC meetings are not functioning regularly; practical works are not

conducted by teachers of science, maths, physics, chemistry and other subjects. Teacher’s

quality appears to be poor and hence, it is observed they are inactive with their work.

Students learning achievement are very poor.

18. H.S.S. Bagmudi Paneda, Block- Bastanar: This school has no own school building.

Construction of their new building under RMSA has been materialized; HSS classes are

functioning in MS building. School has no room for Science lab, Library room, Art and craft

room, Computer room and no sufficient class room for children. Head master and his

supporting teaching staff are found to be inactive; students are bunking classes in the lunch

time but no steps taken by the school authority therefore their learning achievement are

observed poor.

19. H.S. Lalaguda, Block- Bastanar: Classes are held in MS building; Construction of their

new building under RMSA has been materialized; in this school only 3 teachers are

available. English, maths and science teachers are not observed in the school; therefore

practical works are not conducted of science, maths, physics, chemistry and other subjects.

Students learning achievement are very poor.


Positive aspects






3. H.S.S. Girls Lohandiguda, Block- Lohandiguda: This is one of the good quality

schools in the Bastar district; teachers are very pro-active. Laboratory, library, art and

craft room, playground, adequate toilets for girl’s etc. facilities are available for the

students. School premise is found neat and clean, students learning achievement are very

good.


District – 5 Bijapur


At School Level




Yes No

0 19

100% 0% 100%





No. of

Schools :- 19


Yes No

0 19 No

100% 0% 100%

Comments:- This needs to be initiated on urgent basis. This is required for the decentralization of planning.




Yes No

0 19

100% 0% 100%






0 19 100% 0% 100%




1 Water & Sanitation - -

Planning process has not been institutionalized at grassroots level


3 Tribal Development - - 4 Minority Department - -







As per above table, adoption of convergence approach is not in place in the sampled schools.






Yes No Yes No

0 19 - -

100% 0% 100% - -


Lack of awareness


As per above table that there is no School Development Plan in sampled 19 schools.





%

1 Filling of DCF of U-DISE - - 2 Preparation & Implementation of Annual Plan - - 3 Admission of Students to Class-9 2 10.52% 4 Regular attendance and retention of students - - 5 Regularity & Punctuality in teachers’

attendance - -


Human - - 8 Organizing cultural, sports events, functions 5 26.31% 9 Mid-day-meal - -


3 15.79%


- -

Above table shows the involvement of SMDCs in various activities of schools. It shows that SMDC members were assigned the job of admission of students to Class - 9th in two (2) schools; organizing cultural, sports events and functions in five (5) schools; and preparing annual accounts of income & expenditure in three (3) schools out of sampled 19 schools.

Comments:- Huge gap is apparent in Formulating SMDCs and making them functional.



100% 36.84% 63.16% Non participation in school development processes primarily due to their lack of awareness among members of SMDC. The above table reveals this fact. The table, tell us the story of absence of awareness among SMDC members. Out of sampled 19 schools, SMDC members’ of 7 schools are aware about their roles and responsibilities. S.N. Steps taken by SMDC members accordingly Number of

Schools %




- -



- -

6 Paying attention to improvement in regular teaching learning activities. - - 7 Distribution of free text books 4 21.05% 8 Availability of scholarships on time to students - - 9 Preparing three years’ perspective Plan - -

10 Proper use of funds i.e. SAG & other grants as per norms 7 36.84% 11 Monitoring of minor & major repair work and maintenance of physical

infrastructure - -


- -




Meetings of General body held



6 8 5 -

100% 31.58% 42.10% 26.32% -

Above table shows that meetings of SMDC are conducted in 6 schools on quarterly basis, on half yearly basis in 8 schools and 5 schools on annually basis out of sampled 19 schools.





- -

100% - -

Comments:- Nil


2. At District level – Name of District – Bijapur


2(a) Whether District Plan has adopted a convergence approach with following department.

(1. Yes 2. No)

a. Water & Sanitation -

b. Social Welfare -

c. Tribal Development -

d. Minority Department -

e. Rural Development -

f. Urban Development -

g. Medical Health & Family welfare -

h. PWD -

i. Transportation (Roadways) -

j. Others (CWSN, Girls Education) -


Comments:-


At State level


1. Yes 2. No


It does reflect


(1. Yes 2. No)


b. Social Welfare 1



1





h. PWD 1


j. Others 2


Not Specified






1. Yes 2. No

If not, why? Comments:- Residential Schools, teachers quarters and POTA cabins are in operation in naxalite effected areas.

2. ACCESS




%

1 EBB - - 2 Urban 2 10.52 3 CWSN (Minimum 3 CWSN) 1 5.26 4 Higher Gender gap 1 5.26 5 SC/ST/Minority students abundance 2 10.52 6 Low retention rate/Higher dropout rate 2 10.52 7 Schools situated in habitation with large number of OoSC - - 8 Low academic achievements 2 10.52

1


9 Schools situated in habitation of seasonal migrants - - 10 Urban Schools with most students of deprived sections - - 11 Forest/Mountain/Remote/Desert area 3 15.79 12 Flood/natural calamity prone area 1 5.26 13 Ongoing civil work 2 10.52 14 School with girls hostel 2 10.52 15 None (Boys hostel) 1 5.26



Schools visited in the district Bijapur

Sl. No.

Block UDISE Code Name of Schools Category of the School Dates of visits First Second

1 Bhopal Patnam 22203601028 H.S.S. Bhopalpatnm Urban 27.1.15 28.1.15 2 Bijapur 22200621209 H.S.S.(Girls).Bijapur Urban 4.2.15 3 Bhopal Patnam 22203602707 H.S. Rudraram Civil Work 26.1.15 27.1.15 4 Bhopal Patnam 22203605302 H.S. Pegrapalli Civil Work 28.1.15 29.1.15 5 Usoor 22201413307 H.S.S. Basaguda School with Hostel 31.1.15 6 Bhopal Patnam 22203601029 H.S.S.G. Bhopalpatnam School with Hostel 28.1.15 29.1.15 7 Bhopal Patnam 22203600520 H.S.S.(Boys) Madded School with Hostel 28.1.15 29.1.15 8 Bijapur 22200605028 H.S.S. Gangaluru Forest Area 24.1.15 9 Bhopal Patnam 22213606603 H.S.S. Saknapalli Forest Area 26.1.15 27.1.15 10 Usoor 22201403908 H.S.S. Usoor Forest Area 30.1.15 31.1.15 11 Bijapur 22200601301 H.S.S. Cherpal Flood Area 23.1.15 26.1.15 12 Bhopal Patnam 22203607605 H.S. Cherpalli Gender Gap 29.1.15 30.1.15 13 Usoor 22216145001 H.S.S. Awapalli Poor Result 30.1.15 31.1.15 14 Bijapur 22200604512 H.S.S. Toynar Poor Result 4.2.15 15 Bhopal Patnam 22203600516 H.S.G. Madded SC/ST 30.1.15 31.1.15 16 Usoor 22201406410 H.S.S. Murkinar ST 2.2.15 3.2.15 17 Bijapur 22200614912 H.S.S. (Girls) Naimed CWSN 26.1.15 27.1.15 18 Bhairamgarh 22163106303 H.S.S. Gudama Drop Out 2.2.15 3.2.15 19 Bhairamgarh 22203120902 H.S.S. Kutru Drop Out 2.2.15 3.2.15

DPO Visit :- No


S. N. Area Number of Schools

Situated %

1 Protected area (National Park, Wild life sanctuary) - - 2 Flood prone /flood plain area 1 5.26 3 Earthquake prone zone - - 4 Unstable slope 3 15.79


5 Landslide prone Area - - 6 Cyclone prone Area - - 7 Storm surge prone Area - - 8 Drought prone Area - - 9 Polluting Industrial Area - - 10 Mining Area - - 11 Arsenic /fluoride contaminated ground water area 2 10.52 12 Busy National/State Highway 1 5.26 13 Congested urban/market/commercial area - - 14 Any particular disturbance faced by School due to its location

(Human Activity) - -

15 None 12 63.15

Comments:- As per the above table, there are different kinds of threats in the way to 7 schools. One is manmade and six are natural.



Govt. % Private %

PS - - - -

UPS - - - -

Total - - - -




1 0-1 km. 1220 49.55%

2 1-2 km. 410 16.65%

3 2-3 km. 320 13%

4 3-5 km. 372 15.11%

5 More than 5 km. 140 5.69%

Total 2462 100%






No. of Schools :- 19 Yes No

5 14

100% 26.32% 73.68%

If yes mention them

1. State highway

2. Nala

3. Naxalite effected area (3 schools)


Comments:-



Distance from School/Catchment area

Total No. of

Schools :- 19

Less than 1 km. 1-3 km. 3-5 km. More than 5 km.

9 15 11 15 50

100% 18% 30% 22% 30% 100%





Transport facility - -

Residential facility 13 68.42%

Comments:- Above table shows that residential facilities are available in 13 schools out of 19 sampled schools.


II Social Access

1. Pattern of population of the habitation and enrollment in the School –

1. (a) Social category-wise population of Students of age group 14-16 years in the habitation.



SC





SC


ST

Minority

General

All Categories







Comments:-Though ascertaining the exact number is difficult, it can be inferred through the registers that the students who are absolutely left outs from all aspects are attending these sampled schools in the district.


2.(a) Class wise, Social Category wise enrollment and attendance (on the day of field visit)

Cla

ss

SC ST


CWSN



9 34 25 71 63 10

5

88 55

8

38

0

57

3

41

1

11

21

79

1

5 3 6 3 11 6 10

0

73 14

2

12

0

24

2

19

3

69

8

48

2

79

4

59

8

14

92

10

80

1 1 2 1 3 2

10 29 24 61 52 90 76 32

8

22

2

35

0

27

7

68

2

49

9

3 2 4 4 7 6 82 54 10

6

92 18

8

14

6

44

5

30

4

52

5

42

7

97

0

67

2

3 2 4 2 7 4

Tot

al

63 49 13

2

11

5

19

5

16

4

88

6

60

2

92

3

68

8

18

09

12

90

8 5 10 7 18 12 18

2

12

7

24

8

21

2

43

0

33

9

11

43

78

6

13

19

10

25

24

62

18

11

4 3 6 3 10 6

% 2.

56

1.

99

5.

36

4.

67

7.

92

6.

66

35.

99

24.

45

37.

49

27.

94

73.

48

52.

40

0.

32

0.

20

0.

41

0.

28

0.

73

0.

49

7.

39

5.

16

11.

54

8.

61

17.

47

13.

77

46.

43

31.

93

53.

57

41.

63

10

0

73.

56

0.

16

0.

12

0.

24

0.

12

0.

41

0.

24




Cla

ss

SC ST

Minority Gen & Others

Total

CWSN



9 31 23 51 45 72 66 51

2

40

5

40

5

34

8

92

0

73

0

5 3 4 2 9 5 86 68 10

4

92 19

0

16

2

63

4

49

9

56

6

48

9

12

00

98

8

0 0 2 2 2 2

10 25 21 44 39 69 60 30

4

21

7

27

5

23

4

57

9

44

9

2 2 1 1 3 3 76 49 79 69 14

9

11

1

40

9

29

0

41

3

34

4

82

2

63

4

2 1 4 1 6 2

Tot

al

56 44 95 84 14

1

12

6

81

6

62

2

68

0

58

2

14

99

11

79

7 5 5 3 12 8 16

2

11

7

18

3

16

1

33

9

27

3

10

43

78

9

97

9

83

3

20

22

16

22

2 1 4 3 8 4

% 2.

76

2.

18

4.

70

4.

15

6.

97

6.

23

40.

36

30.

76

33.

63

28.

78

74.

13

58.

31

0.

35

0.

25

0.

25

0.

15

0.

59

0.

39

8.

01

5.

79

9.

05

7.

96

16.

77

13.

50

51.

58

39.

02

48.

42

41.

19

10

0

80.

21

0.

09

0.

04

0.

20

0.

15

0.

40

0.

20


2. (c) Any major variation in the pattern of attendance in respect of SC, ST, Minority, Girl Students and Students from BPL background and reasons thereof

Comments:- Students who are enrolled in these schools are almost homogeneous group, in spite of social differences. Hence, no major various are observed in their attendance patterns.



1. Yes 2. No


H.S.S. Gudma, Block- Bhairamgarh

Comments:-



Discrimination


0 0 25

100% 0% 0% 100%

Comments:- Since students are homogeneous in their social background, there is little scope for structural discrimination. Hence, discrimination was not observed in any school




1





Proper ramps with hand rail 3 15.79

Western toilet seat - -


Tricycle - -

Escort - -

Other (Specify) - -

As per above table – out of 19 sampled schools 3 schools are having proper ramps with hand rails.





III. Open Schooling

3. At State level



1. Yes 2. No






Comments:-

1

1



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Comments:-



Category Class

Enrolled Boys



% Enrolled Girls

Girls drop out

% Total Enrolled

SC

IX 34 5 0.72 71 1 0.13 105 6 0.40

X 29 1 0.22 61 1 0.19 90 2 0.21

ST IX 558 52 7.45 573 14 1.76 1131 66 4.42

X 328 18 4.04 350 19 3.62 578 37 3.81

Minority IX 5 0 0 6 0 0 11 0 0

X 3 0 0 4 0 0 7 0 0

Gen & OBC

IX 100 6 0.86 142 0 0 242 6 0.40

X 82 6 1.35 106 3 0.57 188 9 0.93

Total IX 698 63 9.03 794 15 1.89 1492 78 5.23

X 445 25 5.62 525 23 4.38 970 48 4.95

CWSN

IX 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0













Class-9th Class-10th

No. of drop out students


School



School

%

78 48

As per above table, in all the 19 schools, drop out students are found to be 78 in standard 9th and 48 students in standard 10th. Since no accurate data is available regarding their re joining of the school, it is assumed that no drop out student was brought back to the school.













No. of Schools:- 19

Special trainings started

Yes No

0 19

100% 0% 100%

Name of Trainings Nil




NA Present %




Nil Regular teachers - - NIOS - - SIOS - -



Programme

Appeared in Exam

Achievement level

Above 60% 45-59% 33-44%

B G B G B G B G B G

9 - - - - - - - - - -

10 - - - - - - - - - -

Total - - - - - - - - - -

% - - - - - - - - - -

Comments:- Special training intervention is not found in the visited 19 sampled schools.

3. Equity


At School Level


Class

2011-12

SC ST MINO. CWSN

B G B G B G B G

Enrolled 52 79 514 507 6 5 0 0

Avg. % of Attend. 70 75 72 73 71 73 0 0

Nil


9th

Appeared in Exam 51 78 472 487 5 5 0 0

% 98.07 98.73 91.82 96.05 83.33 100 0 0

Above 60% 2 5 8 8 0 2 0 0

% 3.92 6.41 1.69 1.64 0 40.00 0 0

Below 60% 38 43 358 272 5 1 0 0

% 74.50 55.13 75.84 55.85 100 20.00 0 0

10th

Enrolled 71 72 533 473 2 3 1 1

Avg. % Attend. 72 76 73 77 70 69 68 70

Appeared in Exam 69 69 512 450 2 3 0 0

% 97.18 95.83 98.06 95.13 100 100 0 0

Above 60% 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 0

% 8.69 7.24 0 0 0 0 0 0

Below 60% 37 30 184 122 1 2 0 0

% 53.62 43.47 35.93 27.11 50.00 66.66 0 0

Class

2012-13

SC ST MINO. CWSN

B G B G B G B G

9th

Enrolled 45 59 514 519 1 7 0 0

Avg. % of Attend. 70 72 71 73 68 70 0 0

Appeared in Exam 44 59 427 508 1 7 0 0

% 97.77 100 83.07 97.88 100 100 0 0

Above 60% 2 3 15 9 0 0 0 0

% 4.54 5.08 3.51 1.77 0 0 0 0

Below 60% 27 44 285 298 1 7 0 0

% 61.36 74.57 66.74 58.66 100 100 0 0

10th

Enrolled 62 69 530 496 7 4 0 0

Avg. % Attend. 73 76 71 73 70 71 0 0

Appeared in Exam 61 66 519 476 7 4 0 0

% 98.38 95.65 97.92 95.96 100 100 0 0

Above 60% 1 1 9 11 0 1 0 0


% 1.63 1.51 1.73 2.31 0 25.00 0 0

Below 60% 31 47 224 157 0 2 0 0

% 50.81 71.21 43.15 32.98 0 50.00 0 0

Class

2013-14

SC ST MINO. CWSN

B G B G B G B G

9th

Enrolled 53 57 404 430 3 4 0 1

Avg. % of Attend. 75 76 73 75 71 73 0 75

Appeared in Exam 53 57 315 402 2 4 0 1

% 100 100 77.97 93.48 66.66 100 0 100

Above 60% 7 4 2 4 0 1 0 0

% 13.20 7.01 0.63 0.99 0 25.00 0 0

Below 60% 19 36 243 252 2 3 0 1

% 35.84 63.14 77.14 62.68 100 75 0 100

10th

Enrolled 42 77 380 611 0 15 0 0

Avg. % Attend. 74 75 72 76 0 70 0 0

Appeared in Exam 37 58 370 506 0 9 0 0

% 88.08 75.32 97.36 82.81 0 60.00 0 0

Above 60% 1 4 4 5 0 0 0 0

% 2.70 6.89 1.08 0.98 0 0 0 0

Below 60% 29 37 260 222 0 6 0 0

% 78.37 63.79 70.27 43.87 0 66.66 0 0



Achievement levels are twin areas of concern those need attention.




Name of schemes

Name of schemes

Name of schemes

Name of schemes

Name of schemes





SC 24

ST 232

Minority 7

CWSN 0

OBC 25

SC

1. 2. 3.

4. 5. 6.

7. 8. 9.

ST

1. 2. 3.

4. 5. 6.

Minority 1. 2.

Girls



3.

4. 5. 6.

7. 8. 9.

CWSN

1. 2. 3.

4. 5. 6.

7. 8. 9.


General 11

Total 299




Gender Gap


Class

9th



Appeared in Exam 635 42.56 771 51.67 1406 94.23 1214.17 17.64


Above 60%

81 5.76 111 7.89 192 13.65 1370.37 27.02

Below 60%

428 30.44 487 34.63 915 65.07 1137.85 12.11


Above two tables inform us about gender-wise enrollment, attendance on the visit day, appearing in examinations and their achievement of two classes-9th and 10th

. Girl’s

representation in both the classes in comparison with their counterparts-boys- is high. The gender gap in enrollment stands at 11.14 and 22.02% in classes 9th and 10th respectively. The gender gap in enrollments needs to be located against the total population of both the sexes of

Class

10th



Appeared in Exam 420 43.30 509 52.47 929 95.77 1211.90 17.48


Above 60%

75 8.07 132 14.21 207 22.28 1760.00 43.18

Below 60%

306 32.93 353 38.00 659 70.93 1153.59 13.31


feeder habitations. Then only the gap that is calculated can considered as gender gap in schooling. This data of population of that age group is not available with the schools.


Comments:- Girls enrollment is found more than the boys enrollment in std. 9th and std. 10th.



A Socio Cultural/Reasons - -

B Economic Reasons - -


Total - -




%

A Health (own or family members) 13 68.42% B Social cultural issues - - C Sibling Care - - D Household responsibilities 11 57.89% E Family issues / Gone to relatives 2 10.52% F Earning for livelihood 13 68.42% G Migration - - H Any other - -

Total 39 - Looking for isolated reasons for absenteeism take us nowhere. There is a need to view all these socio-economic and cultural reasons together impact absenteeism.




programmes (c) Linguistic barriers - - - (d) Economical barriers - - Providing

bicycles Comments:- The problem of gender gap is addressed when the enrollment rates of girls are less than boys. In this case the situation is other way round where, enrollment and dropout problem lies with boys. This could be reason why the problem is not receiving adequate attention.




Social Group



2011-12 123 151 274 1047 980 2027 8 8 16 282 341 623 1461 1481 2942 1 1 2

2012-13 107 128 235 1044 1015 2059 8 11 19 239 345 584 1398 1499 2897 0 0 0

Gap -16 -23 -39 -3 35 32 0 3 3 -43 4 -39 -63 18 -45 -1 -1 -2

2012-13 107 128 235 1044 1015 2059 8 11 19 239 345 584 1398 1499 2897 0 0 0

2013-14 77 134 211 774 1041 1815 3 19 22 191 299 490 1045 1493 2538 0 1 1

Gap -30 6 -24 -270 26 -244 -5 8 3 -48 -46 -94 -353 -6 -359 0 1 1


The above table indicates decreasing trend of enrollment in the year 2013-14.

There is reduction in boys enrollment particularly boys belonging to ST category in the year 2013-14.


Social Group



2011-12 71 73.50 72.25 72 75 73.50 70.50 71 70.75 75 76 75.50 72.12 73.50 72.81 0 0 0

2012-13 71.50 74 72.75 71 73 72.00 69 70.50 69.75 77 78 77.50 72.12 73.87 73.00 0 0 0

Gap 0.50 0.50 0.50 -1 -2 -1.50 -1.50 -0.50 -1 2 2 2 0 -0.37 -0.19 0 0 0

2012-13 71.50 74 72.75 71 73 72.00 69 70.5 69.75 77 78 77.50 72.12 73.87 73.00 0 0 0

2013-14 74.50 75.50 75.00 72.50 75.50 74.00 71 71.50 71.25 73 79 76.00 72.75 75.30 74.02 0 75 75

Gap 3 1.5 -2.25 1.5 2.5 2 2 1 -1.50 -4 1 -1.50 -0.65 1.43 1.02 0 - -


Social Group



2011-12 83 83 166 550 402 952 6 5 11 173 162 335 812 652 1464 0 0 0

2012-13 56 95 151 533 475 1008 1 10 11 132 185 317 722 765 1487 0 0 0

Gap -27 12 -15 -17 73 56 -5 5 0 -41 23 -18 -90 113 23 0 0 0

2012-13 56 95 151 533 475 1008 1 10 11 132 185 317 722 765 1487 0 0 0

2013-14 66 91 157 575 463 1038 4 10 14 160 177 337 805 741 1542 0 1 1

Gap 10 -4 6 42 -12 30 3 0 3 28 -8 20 83 -24 55 0 1 1




Comments:-


No. of Schools:- 19


0 19 100% 0% 100%


Comments:-








At School level:-



No. of Schools:- 19


0 19 100% 0% 100%


Comments:-No Guidance and Counseling Cell. Awareness programmes are required; recruitment of trained personnel needs to be done immediately.



in district


%

- Nil -

Not aware

il

NnnnnnnnnNoil

13


Comments:-Guidance and counseling centers are yet to take place in schools.


Sl. No. Problem areas Responses %

1 Selection of optional subjects after sec. No information is available -

2 To opt scout/guide/NCC - -

3 In choosing career - -

4 Seeking information about entrance exams to various professional streams

- -

5. Quality



1-(a)

S.

No.



%

1 Natural light 52 52 100

2 Ventilation 52 52 100

3 Black Board appropriately located in classroom

47 47 100

4 Bulb/Tube light /CFL 40 28 70

5 Fan 28 14 50

6 Teaching aids 22 8 36.36




H.S.S. Usoor, Block- Usoor

Comments:- Considerable work is being done in this area; Lot of work is coming up; in rural schools the first two aspects are available in plenty; in urban areas this is problem


S. No.



Number % Number % 1 Teaching aids 5 26.32 3 60 2 Desk-chairs/stools for students (Adequate) 19 100 19 100 3 Integrated science lab with equipment’s and

material 5 26.32 3 60

4 Math kit 3 15.79 2 66.66 5 Science kit 17 89.47 15 88.23 6 Computer lab with computers and supportive



seating arrangement 2 10.52 2 100

9 TV 1 5.26 1 100 10 Separate Activity room for girls This is cause of concern 11 Audio Equipment’s 1 5.26 1 100 12 Video Equipment’s 1 5.26 1 100 13 LCD Projector 1 5.26 1 100 14 Overhead projector 2 10.52 1 50 15 Purified/ Safe Drinking Water 2 10.52 2 100 16 Fire Extinguisher 7 36.84 4 57.14 17 Auditorium 0 0 0 0 18 Staff room 11 57.89 11 100


19 Indoor games room 0 0 0 0 20 N.S.S./NCC/Scout & Guides room 3 15.79 3 100 21 Counselor room 0 0 0 0 22 First-aid room 2 10.52 1 50





2. The number of days, the School functioned during the last academic year? Give reasons for the closure, if any of the School remains closed for long gaps during last year. Suggestions to avoid repetition of such instances

No. of Schools remained closed -

Average No. of days, School(s) remained closed in last year -



3. Number of teachers present in the School (Male & Female, vacancies against sanctioned posts.(In total sampled Schools in district)





M F M F

184 83 26 109 70 22 75

100% 45.11 14.13 59.24 64.22 20.18 40.76





2. Available teachers engaged extra periods

Nil

Nil


3. Middle school teachers engaged high school classes where ever both the school were working under the same roof.

Comments:-




Science

Math

Language


12 11 9 14 13

100% 63.16% 57.89% 47.36% 73.68% 68.42%



Following are the school wise availability of teachers.

(Science 12 schools, Math 11 schools and language (English-9 schools, Hindi-14 schools, and

Sanskrit- 13 schools)




No. of trained teachers


45 64

100% 41.28 58.72

Comments:- Training in pedagogy is essential; therefore, plan must address this.




Yes No Student 8 11

% 42.11% 57.89% Teachers 5 14

% 26.32% 73.68%


Comments:- Reasons are to be explored.



Authority for

Deployment






Residential

KRP MT RP Trainee





No. of Schools:- 19


Yes No Yes No

11 8 5 14

100% 57.89% 42.11% 26.32% 73.68%

As per above table, teachers diary maintained in 11 schools and countersigned by Head of the institution found in 5 schools out of 19 sampled schools.

Observation & Comments:- The comments are neither reflective nor critical; they are just formal observations.


No. of Schools:- 19


100% 84.21% 15.79% 73.68% 26.32% Comments: - Formalities are observed.


No. of Schools:- 19

Discussion and group team work encouraged Yes No

0 19 100% 0% 100%


Above table shows that this kind of collaborative methodology/ activities were not observed in all 19 sampled schools.



No. of Schools:- 19




management


6 13 0 19 11 8

100% 31.58% 68.42% 0% 100% 57.89% 42.11%

Groups made of Different

Same class

No. of Schools:- 19

- 6

100% - 31.58%


a. Students are made to sit in small groups in classrooms to make classroom-learning process a collaborative process. Table informs us that this kind of classroom management is happening in only six schools. This is only 31.58%.

b. Second aspect is about students’ participation in classroom management. As far as this


participation stands at 57.89%.





Nature of support provided 1. 2. 3. Comments:- No resource teacher





No. of Schools:- 19

Yes No 1 18

5.26% 94.74% Extra classes ran

Throughout year Only for one month before exam 1 -

100% 5.26% - Average days of zero period in a weak

Daily 1 hour Results thereof

1. Average improvement in quality of the students 2 Comments:- It is the neglected area;





No. of Schools with CWSN % 6 31.58

Participation level in class - All CWSN participate actively 4 66.67 Few CWSN participate 2 33.33 No participation - -

As per above table, participation level of the CWSN students are as follows- (All CWSN participate actively- 4 schools and Few CWSN participate – 2 schools)

Efforts made to optimize participation of CWSN in class

1 2 No separate efforts 3 4




Peer Interaction Number of Schools % Neutral 6 100% Taunting - - Teasing - - Bullying - - Comments:- CWSN students were identified in 6 schools; no bullying and teasing are observed or reported any school. 10. Individualized Educational Plan (IEPs) prepared for CWSN.

No. of Schools:- 19



0 6 100% 0% 100%



No. of Schools:- 19

Total No. of sampled Schools

No. of Schools with CWSN in samples

19 6 100% 100% 31.58%

No. of Schools:- 6

No. of Schools with CWSN seating facilities Yes No

0 6 100% 0% 100%






%

LCD Projector 1 1 - - Overhead projector 1 1 - - Computer & Accessories with net connection

- - - -

Others - - - -

Comments:- The data in the table speaks about availability of ICT in school. It does not necessarily talks about the availability of ICT devices that are EXCLUSIVELY meant for CWSN children. They are meant for all. No special ICT materials are found in any school. Huge gap is found between availability of ICT and their educational use.




S. No.








5 days












As per SPO calendar 1 day






No. of Schools:- 19





Average Duration

1 Science 12 1 5-10 days 2 Maths 11 1 5-10 days 3 English 9 1 5-10 days 4 Social Science 13 1 5-10 days 5 Sanskrit 13 1 5-10 days 6 Hindi 14 1 5-10 days


Total 72 3-4 5-10 days


- - -

Comments:- (1) All subject – total 72 teachers received training under RMSA; 5-10 days in service training. (2) Training to deal with CWSN is very minimal.

2 (i)




1 Subject based training 15 Annual 5 days 2 Orientation Programme 10 Annual 5 days 3 Innovations’ training 9 Annual 5 days 4 Training for Development of






Comments:-


Facilities Adequate % Inadequate %

Space 19 100 0 0

Projection 10 52.63 9 47.36

Tools/Modules 12 63.16 7 36.84

Equipment’s (LCD, Projector,

Computer etc.) 13 68.42 6 31.58



Comments:-



No. of Schools:- 19

Yes No

19 0

100% 100% 0%


6. Impact:-Use of new technologies like Computer Assisted Learning (CAL), LCD Projector etc. for imparting lessons in the classroom by teachers.


%

72 0 0%

Comments:- Huge gap; need to think and reflect on the situation. Competencies along with culture of using technology in classrooms are absent.

7. Trainers/Resource persons from following institutions who imparted trainings –








Comments:-

Sl. No.


% of respondents

1 Secondary Schools


3 DIET


5 SIERT

6 IASE

7 CTE

8 NIC


10 Total

19


6. CIVIL WORKS


(1-2)



1 H.S.S. Bhopalpatnm 1932 No information 2 H.S.S.(Girls).Bijapur 2002 2002 3 H.S. Rudraram 2011-12 2013-14 4 H.S. Pegrapalli 2011 2009-10 5 H.S.S. Basaguda 1990 2002-03 6 H.S.S.G. Bhopalpatnam 2003 2003 7 H.S.S.(Boys) Madded 1996 2001 8 H.S.S. Gangaluru 1994 2004 9 H.S.S. Saknapalli 2001 2004

10 H.S.S. Usoor 1987 1987 11 H.S.S. Cherpal 2001 2001 12 H.S. Cherpalli 2009-10 No information 13 H.S.S. Awapalli 1973 2002 14 H.S.S. Toynar 1997 2008 15 H.S.G. Madded 2011 2013 16 H.S.S. Murkinar 2010 2009 17 H.S.S. (Girls) Naimed 1995 2002 18 H.S.S. Gudama 2003 2005 19 H.S.S. Kutru 1979 2000

Comments:-



9th 34 30 88.24 4 11.76

10th 32 26 81.25 6 18.75


Comments:-


No. of Schools:- 19


17 15 4 2 M.S. Building 100% 89.47% 78.94% 21.05% 10.52%


- - - -




H.S.S. Saknapali, Block- Bhopal Patnam




(2) Sq. Ft. or Sq. Mt.-wise details are not with the sampled schools. II. Design



100% 68.42% 31.58% - - Comments:-


No. of Schools:- 19


None

7 3 12 5 2 100% 36.84% 15.79% 63.16% 26.32% 10.52%






100% 0 0% 19 100%




No. of Schools:- 19


Yes No Yes No 1.

2.

3.

18 1 13 6

100% 94.74% 5.26% 68.42% 31.58%



No. of Schools:- 19


100% 57.89% 42.11%


Yes No 8 3 -

100% 72.73% 27.27% - If not functioned, Reasons

1. No information 2.

Steps taken 1. No steps taken 2. 3.




No. of Schools:- 11 5 6

100% 45.45% 54.55%


-




Solar Panels

Wind Electricity

Other

No. of Schools Availability - - - - - -

% - - - - - -

No. of School In working condition

- - - - - -

% - - - - - -

No. of School Usability - - - - - -

% - - - - - -

As per above table, alternative electric power supply is not found in any school out of 19 sampled schools.

Comments:-


No. of

Schools:- 19




100% 10.52% 89.47% 10.52% 89.47% 10.52% 89.47% 0% 100% Comments:- 2 sampled schools have separate library room out of 19 schools. Indeed functional and effective library is almost absent in many schools where separate library room is available.





Yes % No %

5 26.32% 14 73.68%

(b) Proper height (3 ft.) of Lab. Table 4 21.05% 15 78.94%


(c) (i) Cross Ventilation 3 15.79% 16 84.21%

(ii) Exhaust Fan 0 0% 19 100%

(d) Availability of Running Water 0 0% 19 100%


H.S.S. Usoor, Block- Usoor





(i) Entrance of School 4 21.05 15 78.95 (ii) Drinking Water Facility - - - - (iii) Toilet Facility - - - - (iv) Science lab - - - - (v) Computer Lab - - - - (vi) Mathematic Lab - - - - (vii) Library - - - - (viii) Auditorium - - - - (ix) Play Ground - - - -



(Entrance of School – 4 schools) instead of these schools there are no other facilities for CWSN in any school out of 19 sampled schools. The table informs how our schools are yet to become CWSN friendly physical structures.


No. of Schools:- 19

Bench Availability

Yes No

0 19

100% 0% 100%


Adequate Slope:- 4


Yes No

4 15

100% 21.05% 78.95%


% 75% 25%


H.S.S. Gudma, Block- Bhairamgarh






Supply water 0 0

Tube well 10 52.63

Dug Well 0 0

Hand Pump 14 73.68

Other 0 0

No source 2 10.53


No. of Schools:- 19

Water Available

Yes No

17 2

100% 89.47 10.53


H.S.S. Kutru, Block- Bhairamgarh


Above table shows us the status of drinking water facility available in 17 schools out of sampled 19 schools. Source of drinking water are as follows:- (Tube well- 10 schools, Hand pump - 14 schools and no source - 2 schools)

Comments:- Schools are doing well in this area. (b) Water Storage Facility& its condition & cleaning schedule

Type of Facility

No. of

Schools


No. of Schools %

Good & Usable

Damaged not usable

Weekly - -

Steel drum 15 15 - Fortnightly - - % 78.95 78.95 - Monthly - -

Covered tank - - - Six Monthly - - % - - - Not Definite 2 10.52

Underground tank

- - - Regularly 15 78.95

% - - - - - - Overhead

tank 2 2 - - - -

% 10.52 10.52 - - - -

Comments:- Water storage facility available in 17 schools out of 19 sampled schools.


No. of Schools:- 19

Quality


14 5

100% 73.68% 26.32%



No. of Schools:- 19


0 0 0 0 19

100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%



No. of Schools:- 19

Bleaching Powder



Yes No

- - - 19 3 16

100% - - - 100% 15.79% 84.21%

Comments:-


No. of Schools:- 19


Yes No

0 19

100% 0% 100%

As per above table, availability of sufficient drinking water taps are not observed in the sampled 19 schools.

Comments:- Problems requires immediate attention.





Boys 7 36.84 12 63.16

Girls 6 31.58 13 68.42

CWSN 0 0 19 100

Teachers 3 15.79 16 84.21


Comments:-


No. of Schools:- 19



2 17 1 18 2 17

100% 10.52% 89.47% 5.26% 94.74% 10.52% 89.47%



H.S.S. Toynar, Block- Bijapur

Above table shows that the proper maintenance of toilets is found in 2 schools, cleanliness of toilets in 1 school and supply of water available in 2 schools out of 19 sampled schools. Though efforts in proper maintenance and cleanliness are on due to lack of supply of running water, the problem of cleanliness still persists.



No. of Schools:- 19

Separate toilet availability Yes No

9 10 100% 47.37% 52.63%

Safer location of Girls’ toilets No. of Schools:- 9 Yes No

8 1 100% 88.89% 11.11%

Availability of Napkins & Dustbins No. of Schools:- 9


0 9 0 9 100% 0% 100% 0% 100%



(d) Provision in toilets for physically challenged students –

No. of Schools:- 19 Availability of Provision

Yes No 0 19

100% 0% 100%

Above table shows, the provisions of toilets for physically challenged. It reveals the sorry state in this regard. (e) Lavatories’ single pits/double pits attached with septic tank and cleaning of septic tank

No. of

Schools:- 19



Yes No Yes No

13 6 0 13

100s% 68.42% 31.58% 0% 100%


12. Drainage System


No. of Schools:- 19


3 16 100% 15.79% 84.21%

Type of Drains Under ground Pucca Covered Pucca& Open Kutcha & Open No. of Schools:- 3 1 0 2 0

100% 33.33% 0% 66.67% 0% Structural Condition


No. of Schools:- 3 1 2 - - 100% 33.33% 66.67% - -


Schools:- 3 Yes No

1 2 100% 33.33% 66.67%

No. of

Schools:- 1


Entrance Gate

Open Space



- - 1 - - - - 100% - - 100% - - - -



(Underground – 1 school and Pucca & Open – 2 schools)

Comments:-



No. of Schools:-19


100% 68.42% 31.58%

No. of Schools:-13 If yes, Type of drainage system

Septic Tank Municipal drain Open field Any other 13 - - - -

100% 100% - - - -

No. of Schools:-19


0 19 100% 0% 100%

No. of Schools:-19


- - 100% - -

No. of Schools:-19


- - 100% - -

No. of Schools:-19


0 19 % 0 100

No. of Schools:-19


0 19 100% 0% 100%

As per above table, waste water treatment and discharge arrangement are available in 13 schools and waste collection facility are not available in any schools out of sampled 19 schools.

Comments:-


No. of Schools:-19


0 19 100% 0% 100% No. of

Schools:-19 Availability of Rain water harvesting system

Yes No 0 19

100% 0% 100% No. of

Schools:-19


- - 100% - - No. of

Schools:-19


- - 100% - - No. of

Schools:-19 Lighting facility available

Yes No


11 8 100% 57.89% 42.11% Type Ordinary bulb Ordinary tube CFL None No. of

Schools:-11 1 6 5 0

100% 9.09% 54.54% 45.45% 0% No. of

Schools:-19


0 19 100% 0% 100%


using - - -

% - - -

Comments:-


No. of Schools:-19



% 68.42% Bad 6 % 31.58% No. of Schools with special structural facility to cope with


% - Cyclone -

% - Earthquake -



Double storied - % -



One gate 17 % 89.47%

Two gates 2 % 10.53%

Three gates - % -


18

% 94.74% Not sufficient 1

% 5.26%

Comments:-


15 (ii) (c-e)



0 19 0 19 100% 0% 100% 0% 100%



- - 19 100% - - 100%



- - 19 100% - - 100% No. of



100% 15.79% 21.05% 63.16% No. of

Schools:-7


3 0 4 0 100% 100% 0% 100% 0%





No. of Schools:-19


0 19 0 19 0 19 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100%

Display of Numbers

0 19 0 19 0 19

% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100%

Comments:-


1. (a-d) sufficient measures being taken by School authorities to ensure that it does not

hamper academic activities vitiate air, water, land quality etc. in School.

No. of

Schools:-19


8 11 100% 42.11% 57.89%

Type New School building Strengthening of existing School

Repair works

No. of Schools:-8

7 1 - -

100% 87.50% 12.50% - -



H.S.S. Basaguda, Block- Usoor

Above table shows us, that the ongoing construction activity is found in seven schools out of 19 sampled schools. The construction does disturb the academic activity.



No. of Schools:- 8


to construction



8 0 0 8 1 7 1 7 7 1

100% 100% 0% 0% 100% 12.50% 87.50% 12.50% 87.50% 12.50% 87.50%


No. of Schools:- 8

Yes No

4 4

100% 50% 50%


No. of Schools:- 8

Yes No

0 8

100% 0% 100%

Comments:-



No. of

Schools:- 8





Foundation level

Plinth level/ DPC

Lintel Roof level

Flooring/plastering

Finishing level

Yes No

6 2 0 4 0 2 0 2 8 0

100% 75% 25% 0% 50% 0% 25% 0% 25% 100% 0%



2(c-g)




Schools

Number of

visits

Average No. of

visit/School


made

Average No. of

Authentication

Instructions given

in No. of Schools


Foundation - - - - - - - -

Plinth - - - - - - - -

Lintel - - - - - - - -

Roof level - - - - - - - -

Flooring - - - - - - - -

Finishing - - - - - - - -

Comments: -

No. of

Schools:- 8

Community

members through

SMDC involved

in procurement

process

Sub Committee

(Construction

Committee)

Constituted

A/c Books Civil

Work

(Construction)

maintained/

updated

MB for Civil

Work

Maintained

Payment made

to contractor in

accordance

with MB

Material

stocked is in

line with stock

register

Cheque issue

register

maintained



matches with entry


Construction

Material

Construction

work


0 8 2 6 0 8 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0

100% 0% 100% 25% 75% 0% 100% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0%

--




100% - - 100% -


(j) Any good practices in civil works that can be replicated in other places/in other States.

Comments:- Nil




No. of Schools:-19


roles

% SEMIS DCF


% SDMC Register


%

No. of Schools:-

19

Training received by SMDC Members



Better - - - - - - - - - - Yes No Yes No

Good - - - - - - - - - - 0 19 0 19

Average 14 73.68 2 10.53 0 0 15 78.95 0 0 100% 0 100 0 100

Not familiar 5 26.32 17 89.47 19 100 4 21.05 19 100

Comments:-


No. of

Schools:-19


Monthly Quarterly Six monthly Annually Whenever needed Never 3 – 4 SMDC Members 0 4 6 2 7 0

100% 0% 21.05% 31.58% 10.53% 36.84% 0%

297



(Quarterly-4, six monthly-6, annualy-2 and whenever needed-7 schools)




Members Number Average no. of members per School Average Attendance in recent meeting Total members 297 15-16 4-5 Women members 109 4-5 1-2 SC/ST members 188 9-10 2-3 Selected members 226 11-12 2-3 Nominated members 71 3-4 1-2 Comments:-


No. of

Schools:-19



100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100%



(2) Most of the SMDC members are not aware about their roles and responsibilities. (i) Level of participation of SMDC members in helping School authorities to conduct following activities

No.

of

Scho

ols

Lev

el o

f Pa

rtic

ipat

ion

RM

SA &

MD

M

Impl

emen

tatio

n

%

Con

stru

ctio

n w

ork

unde

r R

MSA

%

SAG

Uti

lizat

ion

%

Free

Tex

t Boo

ks d

istr

ibut

ion

%

Scho

lars

hips

dis

trib

utio

n

%

Prep

arin

g A

WP

& B

%

Stud

ents

Enr

ollm

ent,

Atte

ndan

ce

%

Reg

ular

ity o

f te

ache

rs

%

Run

ning

of

day

to d

ay a

ctiv

ities

orga

nizi

ng S

choo

l& c

ultu

ral

even

ts

%

Hel

p in

pro

vide

sch

ool f

acili

ties

%

Filli

ng o

f D

CF

%

Good - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Average 0 0 0 0 10 52.63 15 78.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 42.11 0 0 0 0

Bad 19 100 19 100 9 47.37 4 21.05 19 100 19 100 19 100 19 100 11 57.89 19 100 19 100



No. of Schools:- 19


0 19 100% 0% 100%

Comments:- No participation of SMDC members in preparation of AWP&B. This indicates status of decentralization in planning



No. of Schools:-19





Yes No 297

-

-

0 19 -

100% 0% 100 % - - -





Nil 1.

No. of Schools


- 2.

- 3. - - -

- 4. % - - -




Name of

District visited:-

Bijapur


thereof

Yes No 1.


√ - 3.

Total No. of govt.

Schools





% 4.

District - - - - - -

State 4148 4148 100 1877 1877 100

Comments:-



No. of School:- DCF distributed to all DPOs from SPO

Yes No

% √ --

No. of School:- DCF distributed all Schools from DPO

Yes No

% √ --


Comments:- 3. Training received by teachers /head Master /Principal for filling up of DCF in sampled Schools and district

At district level At School level Total No. of govt. & Pvt. Schools in district

-- No. of School:- 19



-- Yes No


-- 19 0

100% 100% 0% Overall, kind of training received to fill up DCF Yes, average training found in session 2014-15

Reasons for not receiving training Comments:-



the district:-


nodal Schools


received


received


Govt. Pvt. Total Govt. Pvt. Total Govt. Pvt. Total 1.

2.

3.

4.

- - - - - - - - -

Govt. Pvt.

% - - - - - - - - -

Comments:-


5. Availability of Copy of filled up DCF with School for record and reference

(At School level)

No. of Schools:- 19


Yes No 1. 14 5 2.

100% 73.68% 26.32% 3. Comments:- Yes, current academic year filled copy of DCF is available in most of the sampled schools. 6-7 School report card and sample checks




- - - - - -

School report card distributed to no. of Schools Finding of sample check

-

% -

Data entry done

School report cards



Bijapur - - - - - - - -


- - - - - - - -

Overall finding of sampled checking Comments:-


1. Yes 2. No



No. of Schools:-

19


100% 100% 0% 100% 0%

--



1. Yes 2. No


1. Yes 2. No



No. of Schools:- 19

Records maintained & updated on daily basis Bank reconciliation done on monthly basis

Cash Book

Yes No Yes No

17 2 9 10

100% 89.47% 10.53% 47.37% 52.63%

DPO - - - -

SPO √ - √ -






No. of Schools:- 19 0 0 19 100% 0% 0% 100%





1. School Annual Grant (SAG) - - - -

- - - 2. Minor Repair Grant - - - -

- - - 3. New School Building Grant

(Major grant) - - - - - - -


- - - - - - -


Yes

Yes


- - - - - - -


7. Others - - - - - - -


Comments:-New school building and additional classroom grants are not distributed to the school directly, this type contract given to the PWD department.

At District Level



1 Annual Grant - -


3 Major repair grant - -

At State Level




No. of Schools:- 19 Cash Cheque Both

6 13 6

100% 31.58% 68.42% 31.58%

As per above table, system for drawl and payment of fund from SMDC account by cash in 6 schools, cheque in 13 schools and both in 6 schools out of 19 sampled schools.

Comments:-



No. of Schools:- 19




transaction Yes No Yes No Yes No 5. No objection 15 4 11 8 0 19 2.

100% 78.95% 21.05% 57.89% 42.11% 0% 100% 3. 4.


6. Audit of SMDCs

All SMDCs in State/District are covered by audit 1. Yes 2.No

No. of

Schools:- 19


100% 89.47% 10.53% D.P.O. - - No. of

Schools:- 19 If yes, Audit carried out by

Education Dept. A.G. C.A. Social Audit None - - 17 - 2

100% - - 89.47% - 10.53% Comments:-

7. Social Auditing


No. of Schools:- 19

Display of financial information (receipts & payments) and timely entered

Yes No 0 19

100% 0% 100% D.P.O. - -


Yes



No. of Schools:- 19


0 19 100% 0% 100%

If yes, details thereof

Comments:-



Sl. No. Name of School Month of submission of UC Financial year for

which UC is submitted 1 H.S.S. Bhopalpatnm March-April 2013-14 2 H.S.S.(Girls).Bijapur March-April 2013-14 3 H.S. Rudraram March-April 2013-14 4 H.S. Pegrapalli March-April 2013-14 5 H.S.S. Basaguda March-April 2013-14 6 H.S.S.G. Bhopalpatnam March-April 2013-14 7 H.S.S.(Boys) Madded March-April 2013-14 8 H.S.S. Gangaluru March-April 2013-14 9 H.S.S. Saknapalli March-April 2013-14 10 H.S.S. Usoor March-April 2013-14 11 H.S.S. Cherpal March-April 2013-14 12 H.S. Cherpalli March-April 2013-14 13 H.S.S. Awapalli March-April 2013-14 14 H.S.S. Toynar March-April 2013-14 15 H.S.G. Madded March-April 2013-14 16 H.S.S. Murkinar March-April 2013-14 17 H.S.S. (Girls) Naimed March-April 2013-14 18 H.S.S. Gudama March-April 2013-14 19 H.S.S. Kutru March-April 2013-14







No. of Schools

- - - - - -

Comments:-


No. of sampled DPOs



released


Date of release


received





Comments:-







1. Yes 2. No




Comments:-

Yes


11. Financial Statement for SDMC/DPO/SPO (From 1 April, 2013 to 31 March, 2014 (date /month of visit).

(i)

Name of Unit


2014

B Funds

received

C=A+B Total Fund


D Expenditure



Balance in bank


SMDC 597735 Nil 597735 241982 355753 355753 DPO SPO

Comments:-


11 (ii).Detail of expenditure of funds by SMDC in sampled (from 1 April, 2014 to 31 March, 2015) district.

Grant funds

Sl.

No. Name of School




Unspent


Unspent


Unspent


Unspent


Unspent

balance

1 H.S.S. Bhopalpatnm - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

2 H.S.S.(Girls).Bijapur - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

3 H.S. Rudraram - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

4 H.S. Pegrapalli - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

5 H.S.S. Basaguda - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

6 H.S.S.G. Bhopalpatnam - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

7 H.S.S.(Boys) Madded - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

8 H.S.S. Gangaluru - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---

9 H.S.S. Saknapalli - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

10 H.S.S. Usoor - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

11 H.S.S. Cherpal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

12 H.S. Cherpalli - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

13 H.S.S. Awapalli - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

14 H.S.S. Toynar - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

15 H.S.G. Madded - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

16 H.S.S. Murkinar - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

17 H.S.S. (Girls) Naimed - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

18 H.S.S. Gudama - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

19 H.S.S. Kutru - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -







2 3 4 Total - -


Sl. No.


Month of receipt


% of expenditure

1 H.S.S. Bhopalpatnm - - - -

2 H.S.S.(Girls).Bijapur - - - - 3 H.S. Rudraram - - - - 4 H.S. Pegrapalli - - - -

5 H.S.S. Basaguda - - - - 6 H.S.S.G. Bhopalpatnam - - - - 7 H.S.S.(Boys) Madded - - - -

8 H.S.S. Gangaluru - - - - 9 H.S.S. Saknapalli - - - -

10 H.S.S. Usoor - - - - 11 H.S.S. Cherpal - - - - 12 H.S. Cherpalli - - - -

13 H.S.S. Awapalli - - - - 14 H.S.S. Toynar - - - - 15 H.S.G. Madded - - - -

16 H.S.S. Murkinar - - - - 17 H.S.S. (Girls) Naimed - - - - 18 H.S.S. Gudama - - - -

19 H.S.S. Kutru - - - - Total





spend? - - - - - -




Number of Schools

%




material purchasing

- - - - - - 1.


- - - - - -


- - - - - -






Month of receipt


% of expenditure

1 H.S.S. Bhopalpatnm - - - - 2 H.S.S.(Girls).Bijapur - - - - 3 H.S. Rudraram - - - - 4 H.S. Pegrapalli - - - - 0 H.S.S. Basaguda - - - - 6 H.S.S.G. Bhopalpatnam - - - - 7 H.S.S.(Boys) Madded - - - - 8 H.S.S. Gangaluru - - - - 9 H.S.S. Saknapalli - - - -

10 H.S.S. Usoor - - - - 11 H.S.S. Cherpal - - - - 12 H.S. Cherpalli - - - - 13 H.S.S. Awapalli - - - - 14 H.S.S. Toynar - - - - 15 H.S.G. Madded - - - - 16 H.S.S. Murkinar - - - - 17 H.S.S. (Girls) Naimed - - - - 18 H.S.S. Gudama - - - - 19 H.S.S. Kutru - - - -

Total - - - - Comments:- No grants received by the sampled schools during current financial year 2014-15.




- -


- -


- -

Comments:-



Number of Schools

%


7. Repairing - - - - - -

8. White wash - - - - - -

Comments:-



S. No.



1. - - -

2.


S. No.




Nil




Nil



Nil --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(e) At district level --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

At State Level --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Name of District:- Bijapur

S. N. Name of Post Sanctioned In position Vacant 1 DPO 1

2 ADPO 1

3 APO 3

4 Asstt. Programmer 1

5 Accountant 1

6 Data Entry Operator 3

7 Peon 2

Total :- 12




Coordinator 4 0 4

10 Ankekshak 2 0 2


11 Accountant 2 0 2 12 Steno 2 0 2 13 Assistant Grade-1 1 0 1 14 Assistant Grade-2 2 0 2 15 Assistant Grade-3 4 0 4 16 Civil Manager 1 0 1 17 Deputy Manager 1 0 1 18 Office Assistant with Data Entry

Operator 10 7 3


Total:- 54 22 35 1(iii) Action taken to fill up vacancies

At district level:- …………………………..…………………………………………………….

At State level Yes, proposal send to the State Govt. by SPO ……………………………………. Comments:-

2. Personnel`s working on deputation/contract and their nature of engagement


8 14 Nature of engagement

At DPO At SPO At DPO At SPO 8 14

Comments:-



Working at State level Working at district level 1 Finance Assistant Director

2 Civil Work Assistant Director

3 Quality Additional Director

4 Equity Additional Director

5 Gender Assistant Director

6 Pedagogy Additional Director

7 Planning Deputy Director

8 Training Deputy Director

Total


Comments:-


4 If the administrative staff is not in place alternative arrangement adopted


Comments:-


Yes, Average

Comments:-





Not adequate


At SPO level

S.

No.






3 Others

At DPO Level

S.

No.




1 DPO/DEO

2 ADPO

3 APO

4 Others

Total

Comments:-



Written tool available in SPO level

Comments:-





----------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments:-




2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10


2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Comments:-





------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments:-


Yes ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yes/ No


Yes, found

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments:-


S.N. District level issues State level issues 1 Data has not been compiled at state level, its


2

3

4







2

3


4

5



1

2

3

4

5





Nil --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yes/No


Areas of research



agencies)

Pedagogy


Quality


Areas of research



agencies)

Pedagogy

Quality



not covered above.


Critical aspects








School building in the Bijapur district.

2. Most of the schools having inadequate teaching staff in the Bijapur district.







schools.





assistive device, special training to handle CWSN students.






unpacked mode.





available.






16. H.S. Rudraram, Block- Bhopalpatnam: This is one of the poor quality school; School

records are not updated regularly; inadequate toilet facilities for girls and boys students; lack

of science lab; non-existence of library room and art and craft room; lack of subject teacher

for students learning. Teacher’s quality appears to be poor and hence, it is observed they are

inactive with their work. Students learning achievement are very poor. Principal and other

supportive teaching staff is observed inactive; SMDC members are not interested in the

school activity.

17. H.S. Pegrapalli, Block- Bhopalpatnam: This school has no room for Science lab, Library

room, Art and craft room, Computer room and no sufficient class room for children. Toilets

and urinals maintenance are poor; no electric facility in the school; non-existence of sport

materials. School building semi pucca observed.

18. H.S.S. Basaguda, Block- Usoor: This is naxalite affected area school, Construction of their

new building under RMSA has been materialized; HS classes are held in MS building.

School has no room for Science lab, Library room, Art and craft room, Computer room and

no sufficient class room for children. Head Master and his supporting teaching staff are

found to be inactive; Students learning achievement are observed poor.

19. H.S.S. Gangaluru, Block- Bijapur: This is naxalite affected area school, naxali celebrates

naxali sahid saptaha in many times in every year; that time students do not come to attend

the school. School has no room for Science lab, Library room, Art and craft room,

Computer room etc. Teachers do not maintain daily diary; drop out students are observed.


Positive aspects






3. H.S.S. Bhopalpatnam, Block- Bhopalpatnam: This is good quality school in the

Bijapur district. Principal and supporting teaching staff is very pro-active; adequate sports

materials, laboratory, computer room, subject-wise teaching staff, playground etc.

facilities are available for the students. School premise is found neat and clean, students

learning achievement are good. School records are being maintained and updated

regularly.

Documents

IV HALF YEARLY MONITORING REPORT OF …rmsaindia.gov.in/administrator/components/com_monitoring/files/bd8...Surguja 2. Kanker 3. Dantewada 4. Bastar 5. ... c) Schools having more than