Italy Delivers SmashingDefeat to EU Oligarchy

Development of Genius is the Only SolutionOn November 9, 2016, the morning after the dramatic U.S. presidential election—when Trump’s victory left most analysts at home and abroad either babbling nonsense or in stunned silence— Lyndon LaRouche stated clearly that Trump’s victory was part of a global, not a local or national process, in which the entire edifice of globalization and free trade was crumbling. LaRouche said that nothing is yet a settled question, and that the process is being steered by Presidents Putin of Russia and Xi of China, and by the global alternative that they are presenting—an alternative based on poli-cies for which Lyndon and Helga LaRouche have long fought.

Today, that global process continues to unfold at an accelerating rate, to the point where the New Paradigm is the dominant dynamic in the world right now. In Italy, the country delivered a stunning 60%-40% defeat to Britain’s EU dictatorship. The Sunday referendum—following in the footsteps of the Brexit and Trump votes—may well be the final knock-out blow to the entire euro system.

As the trans-Atlantic system’s old para-digm implodes, Chinese President Xi Jin-ping is actively offering the entire world access to the “dream” of development which is working so stunningly in China. As Xinhua put it in a signature piece: “The Chinese dream is a dream for all.” And Xi, like his partner Putin, continues to extend

an offer of productive cooperation with the United States, to President-elect Trump. The potential is enormous—but yet to be realized.

Meanwhile, the voices of the has-beens of the old paradigm continue to act like there has been no change in the presiden-cy of the U.S., and that the New Paradigm doesn’t even exist. They continue pushing the world in the direction of nuclear war, with their outlandish and dangerous prov-ocations against Russia and China.

What we do in this global process, LaRouche emphasized back on November 9, and again this weekend in discussions with associates on both sides of the Atlantic, is absolutely crucial. We must keep pushing for the adoption of LaRouche’s Four Laws, and use the fact that there is an increased openness to discuss daring ideas, such as was found in LaRouche PAC organizing on Capitol Hill earlier this week. Many people for the first time were willing to discuss fu-sion power, space policy, and even the ideas of Einstein and Krafft Ehricke.

We must lay out for people the need for Glass-Steagall and a Hamiltonian system of credit to replace today’s bankrupt system, and show them how it will work. And above all we have to hone in on the central charac-

teristic of Man that makes such continuous development possible: his creativity.

We have to absolutely focus on the cre-ation of a better quality of the human mind, LaRouche stressed; we can’t leave out the need to create and generate genius, as the Einstein example emphatically demon-strates. That is the standard to be applied. We have to upgrade our own functioning as or-ganizers, he said, and seek out people who have at least, in a germ form, that quality of ge-nius and who are willing to build a new society and create a future for mankind.

We cannot compro-mise with the develop-ment of genius. This requires that we strive to develop the kind of quality which must at least have a taste of ge-nius, because we want

the population to be on that trajectory.This idea of appealing to people who have

at least an inkling of what it means to bring mankind forward, Helga Zepp-LaRouche stated, is also the key to recruitment. In such individuals we must light the spark to join this new revolution which is underway worldwide.

Lyndon LaRouche’s Four Laws for Productivity

By Tony Papert

LaRouche’s Four Laws constitute one uni-fied policy directed to the increase of hu-man productivity.

Consider, for one central example, the unified international space program of the near future, in which a revived NASA will integrate its efforts with the leading role of China; with a revived Russian pro-gram based on the needed revival of Rus-sian science; with Europe; and with many other countries just now beginning to look towards space. And soon, this world space-program will extend itself to incor-porate the industrialization of the Moon, as the great Krafft Ehricke had forecast. Soon, scientific, engineering, and industrial activ-ities on the Moon, will constitute a unique and irreplaceable part of the whole space program,— no longer only a world space program, but one already incorporating near-earth space as well.

Not only that: the crash program for fu-sion power which is LaRouche’s Fourth Law, will itself be integrated within the worldwide space program. Hu man explo-ration of the Solar system requires fusion power, which in turn means that fusion power must be designed into the whole ef-fort from the very beginning,—recall, for example, how all the features of the obsolete space system we have used up to this point, have all been shaped by the characteristics of the chemical propulsion systems used.

Study of the German, Russian, and U.S. ballistic-missile programs of the 20th Cen-tury, which preceded and laid the basis for the subsequent space programs, shows us history’s largest-scale vertical and horizon-tal integration of the efforts of many thou-sands of people across numerous scientific, engineering and industrial disciplines and areas. And the re quired seamlessly inte-grated de sign, engineering, production, and testing, were all fundamentally based on new physical principles. They all cul-minated in a unique system,—never before seen,—incredibly complex, consti tut ing thousands of parts, yet intolerant of even a single failure.

When the missile program transitioned over into the space program,— when man-kind first stepped out into space begin-ning with the Soviets’ launch of Sputnik in 1957,— the required scale and complexity required of the unified space effort, ex-panded beyond recognition, even when compared with the prior ballistic-missile revolution. For example, Boris Chertok, in his pioneering, first-person, four-volume history of the Soviet space program, wrote:

I dare say that Korolyov [S.P. Korolyov,

the greatest leader of the Soviet program] was perhaps the first to understand that space technology required a new organiza-tion.... For Korolyov, his deputies, and close associates, this gigantic new system came about because of a broad view of space technology, by combining fundamental research, applied science, specific design, production, launches, flight, and flight con-trol, rather than from specific spacecraft. This single-cycle setup began to operate in 1959 and 1960. The mastery of this cycle by hundreds and later by many thousands of scientists and specialists, made it possible for humankind to begin the Space Age in the 20th century.

Top engineers and designers were to be seen in deep discussions with machinists on many of the shop floors; those engineers, in turn, regularly deliberated in committees, and in more intimate settings, with the most renowned leaders of theoretical sci-ence. The horizontal integration through dozens of institutes and factories was just as intense. It is amazing that this could ever happen under the Soviets’ central-planning system,— that had required the hard school of World War II as a prerequisite,— but that is another story. But it all began to fall apart after a huge, tragic accident in 1960, and then the British Empire Thatcherite agents gutted everything that was left of Soviet sci-ence in the 1990s.

For the space program of the near future, what is needed is the Hamilton/LaRouche credit system, centered and steered by a National Bank, which is a flexible, univer-sal system which supports all parts of this massively intricate chain of production, from top to bottom and from end to end, and which incorporates within itself what the late Charles de Gaulle called “indica-tive planning.” And of course, we’re not just talking about space travel here, but every color and flavor of increased human pro-ductivity.

Our most recent experience of this, is the means by which Franklin Roosevelt’s application of Hamilton’s credit system made the United States the Arsenal of De-mocracy for World War II, and the greatest economic power, by far, ever seen in the world. Loaning instant, low-interest mon-ey on contracts from the top to the bottom of the hierarchy of defense production, Roosevelt’s system enabled this massive structure to “turn on a dime.” To “turn on a dime” towards brand-new, just-introduced higher levels of science and technology. Just what we need now,— and what we must get through LaRouche’s Four Laws.

LaRouchePAC.com

The HamiltonianDecember 9, 2016 Volume 1, Number 17The Voice of the LaRouche Political Movement

China Energy Expert to President.Elect Trump:

“U.S. Can Join China’s OBOR”Dr. Patrick Ho, a prominent Hong Kong political and medical figure who heads the China Energy Fund Committee and was the key organizer of the “Belt and Road Fo-rum” held in Washington on Wednesday, concluded the conference with a power-ful review of China’s historic connections with the world over the past millennia, and closed with five suggestions for President.elect Donald Trump on how to integrate the US into the One Belt One Road project:

1. Consider OBOR a platform to spear-head initiatives and programs to bring clos-er cooperation between the US and China;

2. Realign trade agreements with Asia.Pacific nations to accommodate the OBOR;

3. Adjust the US posture toward the in-ternational development banks and pro-mote their capacity to assist in support for infrastructure development;

4. Help secure security along the OBOR;5. Get the international institutions to

work with the OBOR.Dr. Ho said that the OBOR is not just

connections from one place to another, but connections of hearts and minds, con-necting souls, as a means to bring about

peaceful cooperation, connecting the Chi-nese Dream with the American Dream and other national dreams: freedom from want, freedom from fear, harmony with nature, and peace.

His survey of China’s history described three “Knocks On China’s Door” from the West and three “Knocks on the West’s Door” by China:

1. Matteo Ricci and the Jesuit missionar-ies who found an open door in the late 16th Century, bringing with them western reli-gion, philosophy and science. This was sub-verted and collapsed in the 18th Century;

2. The British Empire, which broke down the door with the Opium Wars, launching a century of subjugation and poverty;

3. Nixon’s visit to China in 1972, which began the economic coop-eration and China’s Rise.

As to China’s knocking on the West’s door:

1. The first Silk Road, as Zhang Qian in 139 BC traveled to Central Asia;

2. Zheng He’s Treasure Ships in

the 15th Century, which traveled through the Indian Ocean and the Persian Gulf, and to the African coast. He posted a picture of Ceasar, saying, “I came, I saw, I conquered” and of Zheng He saying, “I came, I saw, I made friends, I went home.”

3. The New Silk Road, announced by Xi Jinping in 2013, to which Obama refused to open the door. Now, he said, we are knock-ing on Trump’s door. “A big yell” that the OBOR is the institution to facilitate realign-ing our nations, an impetus to re-thinking policies.

Kissinger Responds to LaRouche InitiativeOn Monday night in Manhattan, 400 peo-ple gathered on the 89th floor of One World Trade Center to hear Henry Kissinger and Madeleine Albright speak about US-Chi-na relations, in a forum titled, “Leaders Speak: Secretaries of State.” During the Q & A, panelists responded to a question by LaRouchePAC attendee Daniel Burke, on the content of cooperation between China and the United States.

In the exchange that follows you have to wonder if Henry Kissinger was aware of the last person who tried to avoid a fundamen-tal policy question posed by Daniel Burke. He would merely have to ask Hillary Clin-ton how well it went for her:

D. Burke: My name is Daniel Burke, and I work with the American economist Lyndon LaRouche. My question is for Dr. Kissing-er. Mr. LaRouche is strongly in agreement with you that the US and China must co-operate. And he’s emphatic that the US and China can cooperate on the One Belt One Road policy. That this would be a clear way to rebuild the United States’s collapsing economy. Further he has said that we can work together on space science and on the development of thermonuclear fusion, and I wonder if you have any comments.

Five seconds of silence.Albright: I’ve never thought about Lyn-

don LaRouche in this particular context. [Moderator chuckles] But, let me just say that I do think there are ways that we can cooperate. I think one of the issues out there now also is cyber, and there are var-ious problems that are there and various possibilities. And the question is how our two great countries can in fact cooperate in a way that requires a certain amount of trust. So I hope very much that there is co-operation in a number of deals, but I don’t think we can underestimate what some of the difficulties are.

Kissinger: I think the One Road, One Belt [sic] concept is an important item. I think that China can and should find a way of talking about it. It’s one of the issues in which cooperation probably is possible. So... so, I think that’s my most useful con-tribution.

Tuesday, Kissinger met with Presi-dent-elect Donald Trump. The previous Friday, Kissinger met in Beijing with Pres-ident Xi Jinping. In a small blurb preview-ing today’s meeting between Trump and Kissinger in Townhall, an internet publica-tion, the columnist made a point of quoting Kissinger expressing satisfaction with Chi-na’s measured response to Trump speaking with the Taiwan President, and comment-ing on China. Townhall wrote, “Despite

concerns about the move [Trumps twitter remarks] causing friction between the U.S. and China, Kissinger said he was impressed by China’s reaction.

“At this moment I’ve been very impressed at the calm reaction of the Chinese leader-ship, which suggests a determination to see whether a calm dialogue can be developed.”

German-American space pioneer Krafft Ehricke typifies a stan-dard of genius all citizens should aspire to achieve.

Failed leaders of the old and dying British Empire. Photo taken April 25, 2016.

Xi Jinping’s offer to the United States to join the One Belt/One Road policy, which Obama foolishly rejeted, is still on the table.

Cover of the LaRouche movement’s publication “The Campaigner.” Lyndon LaRouche and for-mer Secretary of State (Nixon Administration) Henry Kissinger have been well aware of each other’s activity for many years.

Obama in the Bunker, Clings to Mustache in Final Days of his Administration

by Dennis Speed

With the German government’s December 5 release of an admission that, in support of the U.S. drone policy, it has allowed the carrying out of illegal acts of killing and murder within its borders—a practice specifically prohibited since immediate-ly following World War II by the German Constitution—Barack Obama has been forced to see, if not to read, the proverbial “handwriting” on the wall. Obama’s recent speeches, and some articles appearing in the trans-Atlantic neoliberal media, have tried to deflect from and cover-up for his

murders, perhaps in the hope that he not be subjected to investigation and even im-peachment prior to his leaving office. This is ultimately to no avail. The diaphanous, if not outrightly transparently self-serving “legal defenses” recall a school of law de-scended from a “beast man” conception of humanity, a legal code comparable at best to that of Hitler’s jurists Carl Schmidt, and Nazi Judge Roland Freisler.

Though Angela Merkel’s Germany was finally forced, as a result of a parliamenta-ry inquiry by the Die Linke party, to admit in August that it had in fact engaged in this criminal collusion, they managed to wait until after the American election to publicly state the truth. The American military base in Ramstein, Germany was the scene of the crime. It was the chief relay station of the entire United States drone warfare policy. Die Linke Parliamentarian Andrea Hunko said, “We have been asking about Ram-stein’s role in the U.S. drone war for two years. Because of statements from drone pilots the public has known for a long time that Ramstein is a major control center… Now, after many denials, there is finally an admission… Terrorists are targeted on the basis of lists created in the U.S. and released by the American President every Tuesday...”

Ramstein, an American military “city-base” of about 16,000 personnel, is the cen-tral relay and switching station for much of the entire global drone program. Routed through Ramstein are many, if not all of the 64 United States–based drone warfare

stations, and at least 25 international drone warfare stations. The concern for Germany is that since World War II, Germany, ac-cording to precedent from the Nuremburg trials up to today, must not either stray into, or be accomplice to, anything which smacks of mass-murder in the name of war, no matter how persuasive the reason. An-gela Merkel, recently called “the last bastion of democratic rule in Europe,” has betrayed that solemn commitment made by the Ger-man people, in order to give a green light to “Nobel Peace Prize Winner” Obama’s week-

ly atrocities. Such collusion is explicit-ly against the law in Germany, specifical-ly the German Code of Crimes against International Law, which became law in 2002.

Obama’s Administration, and Bush and Cheney before, have re-implicated, and re-involved Germany in international crimes against humanity.

Many dismiss Obama’s sponsorship by Union Bank of Switzerland and its Amer-ican representative Robert Wolf in the fall of 2006 as unrelated to that bank’s noto-rious history of safe-housing Nazi gold during the 1940s, as well as the wealth stolen from Holocaust victims. Wolf took over the Obama campaign’s fundraising immediately following a meeting between Obama and George Soros. As reported in a 1998 CBS {60 Minutes} interview, So-ros’ father “bribed a government official to take 14-year old George Soros in and swear that he was his Christian godson. But survival carried a heavy price tag. While hundreds of thousands of Hun-garian Jews were being shipped off to the death camps, George Soros accompanied his phoney godfather on his appoint-ed rounds—confiscating property from Jews.”

Soros was, however, a mere conduit. The UBS connection meant that Obama was also being officially blessed by Europe-an “old money” as well as by Wall Street. Obama’s April 1, 2009 obeisance to the Queen and Prince Phillip illustrated that. Obama was never an “American project.” He was understood to be a certifiable property that could be trusted to support “death policies,” whether in health care, or in war, or in his summary execution of the American manned space program. His Wall Street pedigree was especially clear in his firm opposition to any form of Hamiltonian banking measures to re-store the United States, especially when it came to his keeping the reinstatement of Glass-Steagall from happening at all costs.

Today, former UBS executive Robert Wolf, who left the Obama Administration in 2012, can be found at a new address: a company he formed called 32 Advisors, whose speciality is the promotion of the private commercial use of drones through Measure, the “drones arm” of his firm.

Will Obama, now soon to be out of a job, find employment with Wolf in selling drones to Blackwater and other private security companies, based on his “wealth of experience” honed each Tuesday for the past several years?

The Obama Administration’s “official figures” of civilian dead killed worldwide by drone attacks are by any account ab-surd. They claim that as few as 64 and at most 116 civilians have been killed in the 473 drone attacks that are admitted to have occurred in the years of his Presiden-cy. Various groups contradict that total, with estimates reaching as high as 1100. In addition, only one of the eight Ameri-cans known to have been killed by drones was an actual target. Obama has refused to allow scrutiny of specific drone strikes: “The Obama Administration has released only aggregate numbers, refusing to detail individual strikes. As a result, it’s impossi-ble for the public to assess the morality of the program,” says The Atlantic of August 18 of this year.

That is, of course, absurd. Assessing the morality of the drone program is quite straightforward. It is, as Germany knows, and is now proven, a crime against humanity. It is illegal under the Nuremburg standard established by Chief Justice Robert Jackson. It’s Obama’s true legacy—and that, by itself, means that it’s no damn good.

The Hamiltonian — December 9, 2016

Paid for by the Lyndon LaRouche Political Action Committee P. O. Box 6157, Leesburg, VA 20178 • LaRouchePAC.com

and Not Authorized by any Candidate or Candidate’s CommitteeGet Active: lpac.co/nyc-action Contact us — NYC Meetings every week: 551-237-5290

Visit sinycchorus.com to sign up

The Schiller Institute Chorus is committed to creating a renaissance in the United States based on principles of Classical Composition. In music this means Italian “bel canto” placement of the voice at the proper scientific tuning, as advocated by Guiseppe Verdi of Middle C = 256 Hz. (A no higher than 432 Hz).

In September 2016, the Schiller Institute NYC Chorus, joined by friends from NJ, Boston, and Virginia, was able to perform the entire Mozart Requiem with a chorus of over 80 members, and a professional orchestra and soloists, in living memorial for those lost on 9/11/2001.

The chorus has now expanded to Queens and Brooklyn over the past year, and has become a crucial part of Lyndon LaRouche’s “Manhattan Project,” to restore Manhattan as the intellectual and cultural capital of the United States, as it was during the time of Alexander Hamilton.

Create a Classical Renaissance with the Schiller Institute NYC Community Chorus

Contact Us! LaRouche Manhattan Project activities line:

(551) 237-5290

Frank Exposed, Never A Pretty Sight

In the midst of a major political transition, a battle is taking place as to what the fu-ture policy of the U.S. will be. Predictably, those who have benefited from the fascist degeneration over the course of the Bush and Obama regimes are still mobilizing to destroy any contrary direction.

And as the looming spectre of Glass-Stea-gall increasingly impresses itself upon the U.S. political dialogue—as exemplified by President-elect Trump’s calls for its rein-statement—those fascist networks have de-ployed their stooge, Barney Frank, to pre-vent that very reinstatement.

In response to the breakdown of the ideo-logical social-control system that has been dominant since the fall of the Berlin Wall, Barney’s tactic has been to create a false de-bate on financial policy, i.e. either you sup-port regulating Wall-Street with the Dodd-Frank Act, or you support deregulating Wall-Street by taking away Dodd-Frank.

Barney has participated in a broad range of bald face lying to this effect, and LaRouchePAC had the opportunity to con-front such an episode last Monday, 12/05/16 at the City University of New York.

Barney’s coadjutor in this Monday eve-ning ruse was interviewer Paul Krugman. Not once in the course of their interview did either Frank or Krugman mention the fact that the banks today are bigger, more dangerous, and more destructive to the

economy than ever before. Not once did these “leading experts” mention that the entire U.S. and European banking system is imploding, the effects of which have been masked by trillions of dollars of cover-up via stock buy-back’s, etc., and a massive in-flux of cartel drug money.

Four hundred plus audience members, who were attending what was to be a dis-cussion on economic policy, sat listlessly while Barney, a former pimp and alleged Franklin Coverup pedophile, pushed his Dodd-Frank Wall-Street protection fraud as a great success. A LaRouchePAC ac-tivist then stood up and called out “What about Glass-Steagall?!,” to which Barney immediately turned and replied: “I see the LaRouche people are here!” (Confirming that LaRouche is synonymous with the most important systemic reform of the banking system today, and hence then liter-ally terrifies the entire oligarchical financial class with the threat of physical bankrupt-cy.)

Krugman tried to calm down the situ-ation, but Barney had been provoked and started blurting out attacks on Glass-Stea-gall and Lyndon LaRouche.

Afterwards, we had a chance to say hello to both of the speakers, but unfortunate-ly for them, they have yet to recant their crimes. Thank God we have the chance to change.

Frankly, Barney, You Were Never KosherBy Rachel Brinkley

(Rachel Brinkley, née Brown, was the last Democratic challenger to Barney Frank, when she ran against him for Congress in 2010. She literally ended his political career, exposing him as the Wall St. whore he has always been.)

Open response to Barney Frank’s recent Boston Globe op-ed: “Trump’s financial plans promise another Great Recession”

Barney Frank has chosen to position him-self once again in the defense of untruths designed to mislead the American public. His claims regarding what would be the effects should his Dodd-Frank bill be re-pealed, are as full of loopholes as the bill itself. Barney must be assuming that the population is so stupid that they are unable to realize that the economy has continued to collapse for the last 16 years! The living standard has fallen, life expectancy is down, suicides and drug-related deaths have sky-rocketed. As an advisor to Hillary’s losing campaign, Barney should realize that stick-ing so close to Wall Street has failed. We must have a total change in policy, not more of the British-run policies of the recent two decades. There are two major aspects which he leaves out of consideration:

First, is the subject of physical economy; i.e., the increase of real wealth resulting from increased rates of physical productiv-ity. China’s “New Silk Road” policy is posi-tively affecting 70 countries and 4.4 billion people, through focusing on the construc-tion of new transportation routes and en-ergy development, including the building of high-speed rail and more efficient ports,

electrifying rural regions, and partnering in advanced scientific cooperation with other countries. This is a current, living demon-stration of how to positively affect net rates of physical growth. Monetary processes must always be subordinate to this physical science of increasing economic productiv-ity, as our great Treasury Secretary Alex-ander Hamilton detailed in his three most famous reports to Congress.

Second, Barney pretends there is not a mass social movement for the reinstatement of Glass-Steagall, as seen by the adoption of Glass-Steagall in both the Democratic and Republican party platforms this summer, and as was called for by President-elect Trump in the latter days of the campaign, in addition to Democratic presidential hope-fuls Martin O’Malley and Bernie Sanders. The adoption of Glass-Steagall would can-cel all of Barney’s peculiar arguments, al-lowing for a complete reorganization of the entire economy—joined with investments into science-driver economic projects like the space program and fusion energy.

Barney’s arguments for Dodd-Frank’s success are simply stupid. At-tempting to influence armed robbers by limiting the hours they can be out in public, does not amount to an ef-fective deterrent. Bailout Barney then claims, in regard to the Bush-Obama so-called rules which would sup-posedly prevent another 2008-style collapse, that “these rules evolved into the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Re-form and Consumer Protection Act, which was designed to prohibit abu-sive practices…,” i.e. that repealing

Dodd-Frank would allow abusive practices to come back! But, Barney, when did the abuse stop? Not one single banker has seen jail time for their known frauds affecting the lives of millions of people!

See a Wells Fargo agent for more details.Only a Glass-Steagall reorganization of

the economy with credit for new techno-logical economic platforms will work, as clearly laid out in Lyndon LaRouche’s Four Economic Laws. We need a full FDR-style approach to lift our nation out of collapse and into renewed prosperity. This means we have to take on Wall Street, and reorganize the banking sector to play a legitimately useful role in our national economy.

As Franklin Roosevelt said, “We know now that Government by organized money is just as dangerous as Government by or-ganized mob... They are unanimous in their hate for me—and I welcome their hatred.”

It is time to take FDR’s approach, and welcome their hatred. Barney Frank’s time is up.

Debate between MA Congressional candidate Ra-chel Brown and Bailout-Barney Frank, September 7, 2010.

The famous ‘Obama moustache’ poster commissioned by Lyndon LaRouche in 2009.