6
Irwin/McGraw-Hill ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2000 Chapter 5 Managing Risk

Irwin/McGraw-Hill ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2000 Chapter 5 Managing Risk

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Irwin/McGraw-Hill ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2000 Chapter 5 Managing Risk

Irwin/McGraw-Hill ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2000

Chapter 5

Managing Risk

Page 2: Irwin/McGraw-Hill ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2000 Chapter 5 Managing Risk

Irwin/McGraw-Hill ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2000

Figure 5-1

Risk Event Graph

Risk

High

Cost

Low

Project life cycle

Chances of risksoccurring

Cost to fixrisk event

Page 3: Irwin/McGraw-Hill ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2000 Chapter 5 Managing Risk

Irwin/McGraw-Hill ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2000

Figure 5-2

Risk Assessment Matrix

Systemfreezing

Low High High Startup

Userbacklash

High Medium MediumPost

installation

Hadwaremalfunctioning

Medium High High Installation

Risk eventChance-

LMHSeverity-

LMH

Detectiondifficulty-

LMH When

Page 4: Irwin/McGraw-Hill ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2000 Chapter 5 Managing Risk

Irwin/McGraw-Hill ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2000

Figure 5-3

Risk Schedules

Best-case schedule

Baseline schedule

Worst-case schedule

Actual scheduleForecast completion

schedule

10%

50%

90%

470 days

500 days

590 days

550 days300 days

Actual tracking schedule

Page 5: Irwin/McGraw-Hill ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2000 Chapter 5 Managing Risk

Irwin/McGraw-Hill ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2000

Figure 5-4

Responses to Risk Matrix

Risk eventAccept, reduce,share, transfer

Contingencyplan Trigger

Systemfreezing

Reduce Reinstall OSStill frozenafter 1 hour

Userbacklash

ReduceIncrease staff

supportCall from topmanagement

Hadwaremalfunctioning

TransferOrder different

brandReplacementdoesn't work

Page 6: Irwin/McGraw-Hill ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2000 Chapter 5 Managing Risk

Irwin/McGraw-Hill ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2000

Figure 5-5

Change RequestProject _________________

Originator ________________

Description of change

Install Y2K compatible chip in six computer controlled milling machines

Date _________________

Phone ________________

Y2K-Machine Dept.

CEG

3/29/

Ext. 4942

Impact Areas Baseline Impact

Deliverable # __________

Work Package # __________Cost Account # __________

Organization Unit __________

1.3M

1.313M1.31M

IS-M Dept.

Scope

Budget

Schedule

Contingency

Staff

Equipment

X

X X

X

Justification (include impact if not implemented)

Reprogramming cost is higher than estimated, and risk of old chips failing is higherthan estimated. (Eliminating reprogramming cost is -$10,000. Cost of Y2K chipsinstalled is +$15,000)

Disposition

Approve

Approve as amended

Disapprove

Deferred

XPriority

Emergency

Urgent

Routine

X

Funding Source

Mgmt. Reserve $ _____________

Budget. Reserve $ _____________

Other $ _____________

5,000.

Authorized _________________

Date ______________________

Scheduled start _________________

Scheduled finish ________________

S.P

4/3/

4/7/

5/10/