27
© MariTerm i Höganäs AB Comparison of Cargo Securing according to Comparison of Cargo Securing according to Cargo Securing Cargo Securing IMO/ILO/UN ECE IMO/ILO/UN ECE (2001) (2001) EN 12195 EN 12195 - - 1 1 (Dec 2003) (Dec 2003) Rev Rev prEN prEN 12195 12195 - - 1 1 (Jan 2009) (Jan 2009)

IRU Comparasion IMO-CEN-rev CEN ver 2010-03-22 · • IMO/ILO/UN ECE Guidelines for packing of cargo transport units (CTU’s) with IMO Model Course 3.18 Guidelines and Standards

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    29

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

© MariTerm i Höganäs AB

Comparison of Cargo Securing according toComparison of Cargo Securing according to

Cargo SecuringCargo Securing

IMO/ILO/UN ECEIMO/ILO/UN ECE(2001)(2001)

EN 12195EN 12195--11(Dec 2003)(Dec 2003)

Rev Rev prENprEN 1219512195--1 1 (Jan 2009)(Jan 2009)

© MariTerm i Höganäs AB

Different Different requirements in requirements in guidelines and guidelines and standardsstandards

© MariTerm i Höganäs AB

•• IMO/ILO/UN ECEIMO/ILO/UN ECE

Guidelines for packing of cargo transport units (CTU’s)with IMO Model Course 3.18

Guidelines and Standards for Cargo Securing

•• Standard EN 12195Standard EN 12195--11

Load restraint assemblies on road vehicles – Safety –Part 1: Calculation of lashing forces

•• Updated version Standard Updated version Standard prENprEN 1219512195--1 (rev: 20091 (rev: 2009--1)1)

Load restraining on road vehicles – Safety – Part 1Calculation of securing forces

Cargo SecuringCargo Securing

•• European Best Practice Guidelines on Cargo Securing European Best Practice Guidelines on Cargo Securing

for Road Transportfor Road Transport

© MariTerm i Höganäs AB

IMO/ILO/UN ECE2001

Rev prEN 12195-1Jan 2009

EN 12195-1Dec 2003

Cargo securing guidelines

Cargo SecuringCargo Securing

© MariTerm i Höganäs AB

Cargo SecuringCargo SecuringDifferences in the basic principles in the

guidelines and standards

fs = 1.0

fs = 1.0

cx = 0.8

cy = 0.5

cy = 0.7 (FT=LC)

cy = 0.7 (FT=STF)

EN 12195-1

fs = 1.25

fs = 1.1

fs = 1.0

fs = 1.0

Safety factor in calculations of frictional

(top over) lashings

- Forward

- Sideways and backward

cx = 0.8

cy = 0.5

cy = 0.6 (FT=LC)

cy = 0.5 (FT=STF) or

cy = 0.6 (FT=LC/2)

cx = 1.0

cy = 0.5

cy = 0.5 (FT=LC)

cy = 0.5 (FT=STF)

Acceleration coefficients

(road transport)

- Forward

- Sliding sideways

- Tipping sideways

+ Direct lashings

+ Frictional lashings

Rev prEN 12195-1IMO/ILO/UN ECEItem

© MariTerm i Höganäs AB

Cargo SecuringCargo SecuringDifferences in the basic principles in the

guidelines and standards

fµ = µd/µs

0.75 < fµ < 1.0

fµ = 0,70fµ = 0,70Conversion factor fµ for

direct lashings

k = 2k =1.5k = 2Coefficient of transmission (k-factor)

IncludedNot includedIncludedInternal friction

Dynamic friction

µd = µs × 0.70

Dynamic friction

µd = µs × fµ

EN 12195-1

µ =µs × 0.925

µ × fµ

Static friction µs

Dynamic friction

µd = µs × fµ

Friction factor established by friction test

- Frictional lashings

- Direct lashings

Rev prEN 12195-1IMO/ILO/UN ECEItem

© MariTerm i Höganäs AB

Cargo SecuringCargo SecuringDifferences in the basic principles in the

guidelines and standards

IncludedNot includedIncludedLashing protocol

Calculations

Static inclining test

Dynamic driving test (road transport)

CalculationsCalculations

Static inclining test

Verification of the

efficiency of securing arrangement by

µ = 0.50

µ = 0.40

Not included

EN 12195-1

µ = 0.45

µ = 0.30

µ = 0.45

µ = 0.50

µ = 0.40

Not included

Some differences in table

of friction factors, e.g:- sawn wood against fabric base

laminate/plywood

- sawn wood against steel sheet

- steel crate against fabric base laminate/plywood

Rev prEN 12195-1IMO/ILO/UN ECEItem

© MariTerm i Höganäs AB

Cargo securing Cargo securing examplesexamples

© MariTerm i Höganäs AB

Wooden boxes

L

B

H

Quantity = 8 piecesH × B × L = 2 × 2 × 1.7 m

Weight = 3 000 kg/boxTotal cargo weight: 24.0 tonnes

Length = 13.6 m

Height = 2.55 mBreadth = 2.48 m

Web lashingsLC = 1 600 daN = 1.6 tonnes = 16 kNSTF = 400 daN = 0.4 tonnes = 4 kN

Friction between floor and cargo µ = µstatic = 0.4

Cargo securing example 1Cargo securing example 1Required number of top over lashings to prevent sideways sliding

Curtain sided trailer, aluminium floor and strong headboard

© MariTerm i Höganäs AB

Rev prEN 12195-1IMO/ILO/UN ECE

Cargo securing example 1Cargo securing example 1Required number of top over lashings to prevent sideways sliding

where

m = 3 tons

g = 9.81 m/s2

cy = 0.5 (table 2)

cz = 1.0 (table 2)

µd = µs × 0.7 = 0.28 (section 6.1)

k = 1.5 (section 6.2)

FT = 0.4 ton ≈ 4 kN

α = 84.3º

Answer

EN 12195-1

Td

zy

Fµk

gmµccn

⋅⋅⋅

⋅⋅−≥

αsin

)(s

T

zyf

gmµccn ⋅

⋅⋅

⋅⋅−≥

αsin2

)(

n = 3.9

where

m = 3 tons

g = 9.81 m/s2

cy = 0.5 (table 2)

cz = 1.0 (table 2)

µ = µest= 0.4 (table B.1)

α = 84.3º

FT = 0.4 ton ≈ 4 kN

fs = 1.1

n = 1.02n = 0.9

Equation (10)Equation (6)EU Best Practice Guidelines -Cargo Securing (p.108)

© MariTerm i Höganäs AB

9 top over lashings9 top over lashings(with supporting beam)

• Friction factor µ = 0.4• Lashing force FT = STF

• K-factor k = 2• Safety factor fs = 1.1

Rev prEN 12195-1IMO/ILO/UN ECE

8 top over lashings8 top over lashings(One lashing / section)

Cargo securing example 1Cargo securing example 1Required number of top over lashings to prevent sideways sliding

• Static friction µs = 0.4• Lashing force FT = STF

• K-factor k = 2• Safety factor fs = 1.0

• Dynamic friction µd = 0.7 × µs= 0.28• Lashing force FT = STF

• K-factor k = 1.5• Safety factor fs = 1.0

Reasons for the difference:

EN 12195-1

32 top over lashings32 top over lashings(Four lashings / section)

Rev prEN 12195-1

16 top over lashings16 top over lashings(Two lashing / section).

© MariTerm i Höganäs AB

Web lashingsLC = 1 600 daN = 1.6 tonnes = 16 kNSTF = 400 daN = 0.4 tonnes = 4 kN

Quantity = 99 pcs in 11 sections

Cargo section dimensions:H × B × L = 2.4 × 2.4 × 1.2 mWeight = 2 000 kg/sectionTotal cargo weight: 22.0 tonnesH/B = (2.4/2.4) =1

Number of rows = 3

Length = 13.6 m Height = 2.55 mBreadth = 2.48 m

Steel crates

B

H

Side bottomblocking

Blocking

Cargo securing example 2Cargo securing example 2Required number of top over lashings to prevent sideways tipping

Curtain sided trailer with strong headboard

© MariTerm i Höganäs AB

Rev prEN 12195-1IMO/ILO/UN ECE

Cargo securing example 2Cargo securing example 2Required number of top over lashings to prevent sideways tipping

where

m = 2 tons/section

g = 9.81 m/s2

cy = 0.7 (table 2)

cz = 1.0 (table 2)

h = 2.4

w = 2.4

k = 1.5 (section 6.2)

FT = 0.4 ton ≈ 4 kn

α = 90º

Answer

EN 12195-1

n = 5.4/section

where

m = 2 tons/section

g = 9.81 m/s2

cy = 0.5 or 0.6 (table 2)

cz = 1.0 (table 2)

d = 1.2

b = 0.4

w = 0.8

FT = STF or LC/2 ≈ 4 kN or 8kN

N = 3

fs = 1.1

α = 90º

n = 0.9/sectionn = 0.9/section

Equation (16)Equation (11)EU Best Practice Guidelines -Cargo Securing (p.108)

αα cos)2(sin)1(

)(

2

1

⋅−−⋅−

⋅−⋅⋅≥

hkwk

wchcgmnF

zy

T))1(25.0(sin

)(

−+⋅⋅

⋅−⋅⋅≥

NFw

bcdcgmfn

T

zy

© MariTerm i Höganäs AB

Cargo securing example 2Cargo securing example 2

IMO/ILO/UN ECE

11 top over lashings11 top over lashings(One lashing / section)

Required number of top over lashings to prevent sideways tipping

EN 12195-1

• Acceleration factor cy = 0.5

• Lashing force FT = STF

• K-factor k = 2• Safety factor fs = 1.0• Internal friction considered

• Acceleration factor cy = 0.7

• Lashing force FT = STF

• K-factor k = 1.5• Safety factor fs = 1.0• No instructions for internal friction

66 top over lashings66 top over lashings(Six lashings / section)

Reasons for the difference:

11 top over lashings11 top over lashings(One lashing / section)

Rev prEN 12195-1

• Acceleration factor cy = 0.5 or

cy = 0.6• Lashing force FT = STF or

FT = 0.5 × LC• K-factor k = 2• Safety factor fs = 1.1• Internal friction considered

© MariTerm i Höganäs AB

Paper reels

• Quantity = 36 reels in 12 sections• H × B = 1.3 × 1.1 m / reel• Weight = 650 kg / reel• Total cargo weight: 23.4 tonnes

• H1/B1= (1.3/2.2) ≈ 0.6• H2/B2= (2.6/2.2) ≈ 1.2• Number of rows = 2• Static friction between floor and

reel and between reels, µstatic = 0.5• Friction factor = 0.46 (0.5 × 0.925)

Length = 13.6 m

Height = 2.55 mBreadth = 2.48 m

Web lashingsLC = 1 600 daN = 1.6 tonnes = 16 kNSTF = 400 daN = 0.4 tonnes = 4 kN

One layer

B1

H1

Two layers

B2

H2

Cargo securing example 3Cargo securing example 3Required number of top over lashings to prevent sideways sliding and tipping

Curtain sided trailer with strong headboard

© MariTerm i Höganäs AB

Rev prEN 12195-1IMO/ILO/UN ECE

Cargo securing example 3Cargo securing example 3Required number of top over lashings to prevent sideways sliding

where

m1 = 1.3 tons (one layer)

m2 = 2.6 tons (two layers)

g = 9.81 m/s2

cy = 0.5 g (table 2)

cz = 1.0 g (table 2)

µd = µs × 0.7 = 0.35 (section 6.1)

k = 1.5 (section 6.2)

FT = 0.4 ton ≈ 4 kN

α1 = 85.6º

α2 = 87.8º

EN 12195-1

Td

zy

Fµk

gmµccn

⋅⋅⋅

⋅⋅−≥

αsin

)(

s

T

zyf

gmµccn ⋅

⋅⋅

⋅⋅−≥

αsin2

)(

n1 = 0.91/sectionn2 = 1.82/section

where

m1 = 1.3 tons (one layer)

m 2 = 2.6 tons (two layers)

g = 9.81 m/s2

cy = 0.5 g (table 2)

cz = 1.0 g (table 2)

µ = µest= 0.46 (Annex B)

α1 = 85.6º

α2 = 87.8º

FT = 0.4 ton ≈ 4 kN

fs = 1.1

No sliding

Equation (10)Equation (6)EU Best Practice Guidelines -Cargo Securing (p.108)

n1 = 0.20/sectionn2 = 0.39/section

Answer

© MariTerm i Höganäs AB

Rev prEN 12195-1IMO/ILO/UN ECE

Cargo securing example 3Cargo securing example 3Required number of top over lashings to prevent sideways tipping - one layer

where

m = 1.3 tons/section

g = 9.81 m/s2

cy = 0.7 g (table 2)

cz = 1.0 g (table 2)

h = 1.3

w = 1.1

k = 1.5 (section 6.2)

FT = 0.4 ton ≈ 4 kN

α = 85.6º

EN 12195-1

where

m = 1.3 tons/section

g = 9.81 m/s2

cy = 0.5 g or 0.6g (table 2)

cy = 1.0 g (table 2)

d = 0.65

b = 0.55

w = 1.1

FT = STF or LC/2 ≈ 4 kN or 8 kN

N = 2

fs = 1.1

α =85.6º

Equation (16)Equation (11)EU Best Practice Guidelines -Cargo Securing (p.108)

αα cos)2(sin)1(

)(

2

1

⋅−−⋅−

⋅−⋅⋅≥

hkwk

wchcgmnF

zy

Ts

T

zyf

NFw

bcdcgmn ⋅

−+⋅⋅

⋅−⋅⋅≥

))1(25.0(sin

)(

α

No tipping No tipping No tipping

Answer

© MariTerm i Höganäs AB

Rev prEN 12195-1IMO/ILO/UN ECE

Cargo securing example 3Cargo securing example 3Required number of top over lashings to prevent sideways tipping - two layers

where

m = 2.6 tons/section

g = 9.81 m/s2

cy = 0.7 g (table 2)

cz = 1.0 g (table 2)

h = 2.6

w = 1.1

k = 1.5 (section 6.2)

FT = 0.4 ton ≈ 4 kN

α = 87.8º

EN 12195-1

where

m = 2.6 tons/section

g = 9.81 m/s2

cy = 0.5 g or 0.6g (table 2)

cz = 1.0 g (table 2)

d = 1.3

b = 0.55

w = 1.1

FT = STF or LC/2 ≈ 4 kN or 8 kN

N = 2

fs = 1.1

α = 87.8º

Equation (16)Equation (11)EU Best Practice Guidelines -Cargo Securing (p.108)

αα cos)2(sin)1(

)(

2

1

⋅−−⋅−

⋅−⋅⋅≥

hkwk

wchcgmnF

zy

T s

T

zyf

NFw

bcdcgmn ⋅

−+⋅⋅

⋅−⋅⋅≥

))1(25.0(sin

)(

α

n2 = 0.5/section n2 = 4.6/section n2 = 0.7/section

Answer

© MariTerm i Höganäs AB

IMO/ILO/UN ECE

9 top over lashings9 top over lashings(One lashing / 4 tonnes of cargo to

prevent tipping and wandering)

Cargo securing example 3Cargo securing example 3Required number of top over lashings to prevent sideways sliding and tipping

• Static friction µs = 0.5• Acceleration factor cy = 0.5• Lashing force FT = STF

• K-factor k = 2• Safety factor fs = 1.0• Internal friction considered

EN 12195-1

• Dynamic friction µd = 0.7×µs= 0.35• Acceleration factor cy = 0.5 (sliding)

and cy = 0.7 (tipping)• Lashing force FT = STF

• K-factor k = 1.5• Safety factor fs = 1.0• No instructions for internal friction

Reasons for the difference:

36 top over lashings36 top over lashings(five lashings/section when loaded in

two layers to prevent sliding and tipping, and one lashing/section when loaded in one layer to prevent sliding)

Rev prEN 12195-1

• Friction factor µ = 0.45• Acceleration factor cy = 0.5 or cy = 0.6

• Lashing force FT = STF or FT = 0.5 ×LC

• K-factor k = 2• Safety factor fs= 1.1• Internal friction considered

10 top over lashings10 top over lashings(five lashings / six sections loaded in two layers to prevent tipping, and one lashing / 1-2 sections of cargo loaded

in one layer to prevent sliding)

© MariTerm i Höganäs AB

Truck with plyfa floor Heat exchanger with steel feet

• The heat exchanger is blocked in forward direction.

• H × B × L = 2.0 × 0.9 × 2.1 m• Centre of gravity: h × b × l =

1.35 × 0.45 × 1.05 m• Weight = 2000 kg = 2 tonnes • h/b= (1.35/0.45) = 3.0• Number of rows = 1• Static friction µstatic = 0.4 and friction factor

µ = 0.45

Length = 8. m

Height = 2.55 mBreadth = 2.48 mBreadth between lashing points = 2.36 m

Web lashingsLC = 1 600 daN = 1,6 tonnes = 16 kNSTF = 400 daN = 0.4 tonnes = 4 kN

H

L

h

l

b

B

H

L

h

l

b

B

Cargo securing example 4Cargo securing example 4Required number of top over lashings to prevent sideways sliding and tipping

© MariTerm i Höganäs AB

Rev prEN 12195-1IMO/ILO/UN ECE

Cargo securing example 4Cargo securing example 4Required number of top over lashings to prevent sideways sliding

where

m = 2 tons

g = 9.81 m/s2

cy = 0.5 g (table 2)

cz = 1.0 g (table 2)

µd = µs × 0.7 = 0.28 (section 6.1)

k = 1.5 (section 6.2)

FT = 0.4 ton ≈ 4 kN

α = 70º

EN 12195-1

Td

zy

Fµk

gmµccn

⋅⋅⋅

⋅⋅−≥

αsin

)(

s

T

zyf

gmµccn ⋅

⋅⋅

⋅⋅−≥

αsin2

)(

n = 2.7

where

m = 2 tons

g = 9.81 m/s2

cy = 0.5 g (table 2)

cz = 1.0 g (table 2)

µ = µest= 0.46 (Annex B)

α = 70º

FT = 0.4 ton ≈ 4 kN

fs = 1.1

Equation (10)Equation (6)EU Best Practice Guidelines -Cargo Securing (p.108)

n = 0.6 n = 0.7

Answer

© MariTerm i Höganäs AB

Rev prEN 12195-1IMO/ILO/UN ECE

Cargo securing example 4Cargo securing example 4Required number of top over lashings to prevent sideways tipping

where

m = 2 tons

g = 9.81 m/s2

cy = 0.7 g (table 2)

cz = 1.0 g (table 2)

d = 1.35

b = 0.45

h = 2.0

w = 0.9

k = 1.5 (section 6.2)

FT = 0.4 ton = 4 kN

α = 70º

Answer

EN 12195-1

where

m = 2 tons/section

g = 9.81 m/s2

cy = 0.5 g or 0.6g (table 2)

cz = 1.0 g (table 2)

d = 1.35

b = 0.45

w = 0.9

FT = STF or LC/2 = 4 kN or 6.5kN

N = 2

fs = 1.1

α = 70º

Equation (16)Equation (11) modified for centre of gravity off centre

EU Best Practice Guidelines -Cargo Securing (p.108)

αα cos)2(sin)1(

)(

⋅−−⋅−

⋅−⋅⋅≥

hkwk

bcdcgmnF

zy

T s

T

zyf

NFw

bcdcgmn ⋅

−+⋅⋅

⋅−⋅⋅≥

))1(25.0(sin

)(

α

n = 1.25 n = 30.0 n = 1.9

© MariTerm i Höganäs AB

IMO/ILO/UN ECE

2 top over lashings2 top over lashings

Cargo securing example 4Cargo securing example 4Required number of top over lashings to prevent sideways sliding and tipping

• Static friction µs = 0.4• Acceleration factor cy = 0.5• Lashing force FT = STF

• K-factor k = 2• Safety factor fs = 1.0

EN 12195-1

• Dynamic friction µd = 0.7 × µs= 0.28• Acceleration factor cy = 0.5 (sliding)

and cy = 0.7 (tipping)• Lashing force FT = STF

• K-factor 1.5• Safety factor fs = 1.0

30 top over lashings30 top over lashings

Reasons for the difference:

2 top over lashings2 top over lashings

Rev prEN 12195-1

• Friction factor µ = 0.45• Acceleration factor cy = 0.5 or cy = 0.6• Lashing force FT = STF or

FT = 0.5 × LC• K-factor k = 2• Safety factor fs = 1.1

© MariTerm i Höganäs AB

Cargo weight in ton prevented from

sliding by one Top-Over lashingSideways Forward Backwards

IMO/ILO/ EN Rev prEN IMO/ILO/ EN Rev prEN IMO/ILO/ EN Rev prEN

µ UN ECE 12195-1 12195-1 UN ECE 12195-1 12195-1 UN ECE 12195-1 12195-1

0,05 0,09 0,04 0,08 0,04 0,02 0,04 0,09 0,04 0,08

0,10 0,20 0,09 0,18 0,09 0,04 0,09 0,20 0,09 0,18

0,15 0,34 0,15 0,31 0,14 0,07 0,15 0,34 0,15 0,31

0,20 0,53 0,23 0,48 0,20 0,09 0,21 0,53 0,23 0,48

0,25 0,80 0,31 0,73 0,27 0,12 0,29 0,80 0,31 0,73

0,30 1,20 0,42 1,09 0,34 0,15 0,38 1,20 0,42 1,09

0,35 1,87 0,56 1,70 0,43 0,19 0,50 1,87 0,56 1,70

0,40 3,20 0,74 2,91 0,53 0,23 0,64 3,20 0,74 2,91

0,45 7,20 0,99 6,55 0,65 0,27 0,82 7,20 0,99 6,55

0,50 0,80 0,31 1,07

0,55 0,98 0,36 1,41

0,60 No sliding 1,20 0,42 1,92 No sliding

0,65 1,49 0,48 2,77

0,70 1,87 0,56 4,48

0,75 2,40 0,64 9,60

Cargo SecuringCargo SecuringComparison between the different guidelines for road transport

© MariTerm i Höganäs AB

Number of Top-Over lashings to prevent slidingSideways Forward Backwards

IMO/ILO/ EN Rev prEN IMO/ILO/ EN Rev prEN IMO/ILO/ EN Rev prEN

µ UN ECE 12195-1 12195-1 UN ECE 12195-1 12195-1 UN ECE 12195-1 12195-1

0,05 100% 204% 110% 100% 200% 99% 100% 204% 110%

0,10 100% 212% 110% 100% 204% 97% 100% 212% 110%

0,15 100% 223% 110% 100% 208% 96% 100% 223% 110%

0,20 100% 237% 110% 100% 212% 94% 100% 237% 110%

0,25 100% 256% 110% 100% 217% 92% 100% 256% 110%

0,30 100% 286% 110% 100% 223% 89% 100% 286% 110%

0,35 100% 335% 110% 100% 229% 87% 100% 335% 110%

0,40 100% 434% 110% 100% 237% 83% 100% 434% 110%

0,45 100% 730% 110% 100% 246% 80% 100% 730% 110%

0,50 100% 256% 75%

0,55 100% 270% 69%

0,60 No sliding 100% 286% 63% No sliding

0,65 100% 307% 54%

0,70 100% 335% 42%

0,75 100% 375% 25%

Cargo SecuringCargo SecuringComparison between the different guidelines for road transport

© MariTerm i Höganäs AB

SAFE IS ENOUGHSAFE IS ENOUGH!

Cargo SecuringCargo Securing

SAFE ENOUGHSAFE ENOUGH!

IMO/ILO/UN ECEIMO/ILO/UN ECE(2001)(2001) EN 12195EN 12195--11

(Dec 2003)(Dec 2003)

Rev Rev prENprEN 1219512195--1 1 (Jan 2009)(Jan 2009)

© MariTerm i Höganäs AB