Upload
abdullah-salem
View
223
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
business assignment
Citation preview
1.0Introduction:
In this era of developing information technology and communication, it’s difficult to
find people who are not familiar with Yahoo and Google. Nowadays, almost
everyone is using and relying on these two most popular and successful websites.
These websites are widely used for doing lots of different things such as research,
communication, entertainment, business purposes etc. however, each of them is
providing different services and products. This report is attempting to compare both
companies and clarify the differences between Yahoo and Google. Yahoo and
Google are basically different in background, number of employees, founders,
founding date, services provided and so much others but, this report would focus
more on the organizational structure and design, and organizational culture in these
two big companies.
Google was co-founded by Larry Page and Sergey Brin while they were doing their
P.h.D at Stanford University in 1996. At that time it was called Backrub and in
September 4th 1998 it was registered as Google Inc.Google is a web search engine
which allows users to find other sites by entering the keywords. Currently Google is
the world’s number one search engine. It can be said that Google gained its
popularity by offering this service. It also provides other products such as Youtube
video service, Gmail, Google maps, Google AdWords, Google Docs, Google
Chrome, Google books, Google earth and Google Scholar. Google also added a
social networking service called Google Plus (Google+) which is similar to facebook
and allows users to communicate with other members by posting pictures and
messages. Other than internet-related services, Google has services for mobile
devices as well.
Yahoo! Inc was incorporated by Jerry Yang and David Filo, two Stanford University
graduate students, in 1st of March 1995 and at first it was called "Jerry and David's
Guide to the World Wide Web". Yahoo is a search and communication tools provider
on the Web as well as mobile devices. Like Google, Yahoo also has a search engine
(Yahoo! Search) which finds websites and links that are related to the word or
phrase searched by the users. Yahoo also offers other services such as free e-mail
account with unlimited storage space (Yahoo! Mail), Flickr which is an image and
video hosting website that allows users to share their personal photographs, Yahoo!
News which provides up-to-date news, an instant messaging service (Yahoo!
Messenger), communication and social networking tools (Yahoo! 360°), and Yahoo!
Finance which offers financial data and information.
Both of these successful internet corporations may offer some similar services but
they are two different companies and each of them has their own goals, and
strategies to fulfill their target.
Each company has its own organizational structure, organizational culture,
management and leadership in order to achieve its goals and to improve their
organizational performance. Google and Yahoo’s organizational structure and
design, and their organizational culture will be discussed in more detail in this report
and both companies will be compared in relation to the mentioned topics.
Word Count: 492
2.0 Organizational culture:
Organizational culture is the set of beliefs, values and traditions that influence the
way employees in an organization think and act when facing opportunities or
problems. (Bratton, 2010)
Since the corporate culture would influence the employees’ morale, productivity,
unity, efficiency and loyalty, it is really important for the managers to develop the
right culture for the organization. A strong culture will also improve the workers’
motivation, communication and commitment and it helps the company to meet its
long term goals. (Fincham & Rhodes, 2005) Therefore there is a direct link between
companies’ growth and culture. (Gupta, 2007)
Founders Philosophy: Google was fond by Larry Page and Sergey Brin in 1996
and their goal was to provide much higher level of services to those who seek
information and their mission was to organize the world’s information and make it
universally accessible and useful. (Google Inc., n.d.)
Google is one of best companies in the world to work for and it has a strong and
interesting organizational culture. (Anon., 2010) It is also the world’s number one
search engine and in order to accomplish that, Google needs to hire smart, talented
and highly skilled employees who are the best in their technical field. In order to
maintain the employee’s health, Googlers are encouraged to take care of their minds
and bodies by providing facilities such as gym and free massage. (Hernandez, 2008)
Google hires people from different nationality backgrounds who speak dozens of
languages but share the same goals and visions for the company. (Google, n.d.)
This company focuses more on innovation and creativity and they have an open
culture in which everyone can contribute in solving the company issues. Googlers
are encouraged to interact with managers and share their ideas about work.
(Google, n.d.)
Google has tried to create the culture which is best for company, and the ones
working in the company. It has a very strong team-oriented and collaborative culture
and it increases the Googler’s creativity in problem solving. (Mills, 2007) Moreover
by creating such a culture, they allow employees to share their opinions freely and it
makes Google a fun place to work. (Hernandez, 2008) Googlers are encouraged to
work together with integrity in order to fulfill the Google’s overall mission which is
making information accessible to the world. (Mills, 2007) With this strong culture
Google managed to become such a successful and popular company. Overall, it can
be concluded that Google Inc has a combination of team oriented, people oriented
and innovation and risk-taking culture however, the main characteristic of Google’s
culture is team oriented.
Founders Philosophy: “Yahoo was found by Jerry Yang and David Filo, two
Stanford University graduate students who started their guide in February 1994 as a
way to keep track of their personal interest on the internet.” (Yahoo!, n.d.) They
prepared a list of their favourite links but their list was so long therefore, they divided
them into categories and subcategories and the core concept of Yahoo! was created.
(Yahoo!, n.d.) “Yahoo!’s mission is to be the most essential global Internet service for
consumers and businesses.” (Hamilton, 2011)
Yahoo is another popular internet service provider with a strong organizational
culture which has the largest data base in the world. (Schneider, n.d.) However,
some people believe that there are some shortages in the culture and Yahoo needs
to change its organizational culture to be more successful. Yahoo!’s organizational
culture needs help and they have to make their decisions faster. Salim Ismael, the
person who ran the Brickhouse project at Yahoo says that "Yahoo takes too long to
make decisions." (Needleman, 2012)
Despite this, it can’t be said that Yahoo is suffering from a weak organizational
culture. Yahoo is also trying to fulfil its goals and increase the users’ satisfaction by
providing new features. In order to be able to compete with other competitors, Yahoo
is hiring those skilful and expert people who have experience in this field. By offering
financial and non-financial benefits, Yahoo motivates its employees to work toward
the organizational goals. Some of these benefits are: medical, dental and vision
insurance, free food, back up care advantage program and fitness. (Yahoo!, n.d.)
Yahoo! Inc values excellence, teamwork, innovation, community, customer fixation
and fun. (Schneider, n.d.)
Yahoo! Is trying to provide so many different services and it is able to collect more
information about its users compared to other competitors and analyze the users
behaviour. Hence, it can be concluded that Yahoo! has an innovative culture.
Typologies to evaluate organizational culture:
Culture Framework: Based on Charles Handy’s model of organization culture, both
Google and Yahoo! can be classified as task culture since the firms have a strong
and clear mission, expertise and skill are two valuable things in these organizations
and lastly because they are team oriented companies so, team working is the basis
on which jobs are organized. (Fincham & Rhodes, 2005)
Four types of organizational culture:
According to Deal and Kennedy's Culture Types, it can be said that Yahoo and
Google both have Work-hard, play-hard culture because in both companies
employees are encouraged to take risk, be innovative and bring new ideas.
Moreover, both companies are providing facilities so that employees can have fun.
(Schneider, n.d.) (Flanagan, 2011) Having fun can reduce the stress level and
increase workers’ motivation and productivity. (Tarkan, 2012)
Interpretive Model
Google inc. and Yahoo! organizational culture can be analyzed through Edgar
Schein’s three levels of culture model and the following is the comparison between
the two companies’ culture.
Artifacts and creations
Google Inc Yahoo!
Newest technologies
Slogan: “Don`t be evil”
Highly skilled and motivated
employees
No special uniform for
employees (casual clothes)
Benefits and facilities
Slogan: “Do you Yahoo?”
Company events such as:
summer picnic and end of the
year parties
Trainings
Benefits for employees
Values and beliefs
Fun place to work
Creativity
Teamwork
Excellence
People and customers
satisfaction
Fast
Democracy on the web works
Fun
Teamwork
Excellence
Innovation
Community
Basic assumptions
Faith in employees
Innovation
Providing different services
Collect more information about
users
Analyze users behavior
Word Count: 978
3.0 Approach to Management and Leadership
Leadership is the action of influencing, motivating and enabling others to contribute
toward the effectiveness and success of the company of which they are members.
(Bratton, 2010) Some of the important roles of a leader are:
Sharing organization’s vision with people
Discovering talent
Building the culture of creativity and innovation
Training and retaining (Bratton, 2010)
Management is the process of organizing and coordinating activities of a business in
order to achieve organizational goals. (Anon., n.d.)
Management and Leadership are not the same things but they are linked and both of
them are and required and needed for the sustainable development and growth of
organization. (Zainal, 2009) Leadership plays an important role in enhancing or
retarding the interest and commitment of the individuals in the organization and it
also affects the effectiveness of the organization. (Obiwuru, et al., 2011)
Distinctions between Management and Leadership
While managers have the power within the organization, a leader is someone who
can influence others and has managerial authority. Leadership is about doing the
right things while, Management is about doing things right. Furthermore, Leaders
find the path and managers follow the path. Leadership is concerned about
establishing directions and Management is concerned about planning and budgeting.
Moreover, leadership is about motivating and inspiring whereas, management is
about controlling and problem solving. (Buchanan & Huczynski, 2010)
Larry Page is Google’s chief executive officer and he is responsible for leading the
company’s product development and technology strategy. (Google Inc., n.d.) He has
a clear vision and strategy for his team and he leads everyone in the company
toward that vision. He is transformational since he makes employees motivated and
empowered and they are interested to perform their mission. (Cogdell, 2010) Page is
also inspirational as he values education and trainings to improve knowledge and
skills of the staff. As a good leader, Page has an introvert personality and an intense
passion. (Cain, 2011) He focuses more on innovation and he encourages his team to
believe in audacious ideas. Page is against bureaucracy and he insists on teamwork
as it increases creativity, productivity and motivation in the workforce. He believes
that communicating with employees and listening to their ideas is one of the main
factors of success. (Elmer, 2011) Besides that Page is working to make everything
faster in Google Inc and being quick and concise but precise is one of his leadership
strategies. (Elmer, 2011) In Page’s opinion even small moves can make huge
differences and it’s essential to recognize the importance of small moves. Another
important thing for Page is the tolerance and perseverance and when he thinks that
something is possible, he keeps working on convincing others.
Google’s today success and growth is mainly because of Larry Page’s leadership
style. He made the environment in a way that all employees see Google as their
home and Googlers as their family.
Marissa Mayer is the new chief executive officer in Yahoo and her leadership style
plays an important role in company’s performance since Yahoo is struggling with
some strategy problems ant it has experienced five different CEOs in five years and
it wasn’t a good thing for the company. (McGregor, 2013) Although Yahoo is still one
of the top five most popular websites, it has experienced some difficulties and
leaders are trying to rebuild its good reputation. Mayer is more focused on
employees’ academic qualifications and skills and she is getting involved in all the
hires that the company makes. Mayer has a transactional leadership style and she
assumes that employees would respond to the given task according to their
expected reward or punishment. Workers would be rewarded if their task is well
done and they will be punished if they fail to perform the task effectively. (Cogdell,
2010) Employees in Yahoo! were used to working remotely from home but Mayer
made her decision that workers should come to office and collaborate with each
other and it increases their productivity. (Fiegerman, 2013) Mayer believes that by
hiring some high-tech innovators who can create a home-like environment in the
workplace, Yahoo! can build a team spirit and stronger relationships between
employees. By doing so they can also make the workplace so attractive that
employees would come willingly and enjoy their time while they are working although
they may prefer being at home. (Guthrie, 2013)
It seems that Google Inc. has followed Henri Fayol Managerial functions because
Larry Page has a clear vision of what he wants to achieve and everything is planned
and organized in order to reach those goals. He also tries to allocate resources in
the way that goals could be accomplished and meet the highest level of
performance. Whereas, Yahoo too has some of the fundamental principles of
management but at a weaker level. Marissa Mayer aims to concentrate more on
Mobile and she believes this is the key factor for Yahoo’s strategy to move forward.
She states that Yahoo has all the information that people want on their phones and
they only need to make it relevant and easy to use on mobile. (CNNMoney, 2013)
Mayer attempted to identify the company’s weaknesses and to overcome them by
making some changes in plans, policies and instructions. She also tries to motivate
the workforce to achieve the company’s target. (Guthrie, 2013)
Word Count: 841
5.0 Conclusion
Google and Yahoo are two companies in a similar industry which are providing some
same services; however, evidences show that Google was guided by stronger
leaders and their direction was a more successful path. They are also different in
some other key aspects such as structure, organizational culture and leadership
styles. According to Stacy Savides Sullivan -Google’s chief culture officer- Google
Inc has a team oriented culture where employees are encouraged to collaborate with
each other and think untraditionally and different from where they used to work.
(Mills, 2007) However they also value innovation and risk taking and they respect
their employees. Top executives arrange meetings in headquarters so that
employees can directly notify them about different matters in the workplace. It helps
managers to recognize the existing problems in the organization and it lets them to
plan and organize things to overcome the problem. Therefore Google’s culture is a
mixture of people oriented, team oriented and innovation culture while it is more
focused on team work. The strong culture in Google leads to increase in employees’
satisfaction, motivation, enthusiasm, harmonization and confidence. On the other
hand, Yahoo!’s culture is more focused on innovation and risk taking. They try to
provide lots of different services so that no business opportunity is left unexplored.
(Karmasnack, n.d.) Yahoo and Google are both trying to hire skilful people and use
their expertise to fulfil their organizational goals. Both companies are also providing
financial and nonfinancial benefits to their staff to keep them motivated. Furthermore,
a large proportion of both companies’ income is derived from advertising.
Company’s performance can be also affected by management and leadership
approach. Google now has more than 53,000 employees worldwide with the
management of Larry Page. (Cohan, 2013) Interacting with employees,
understanding their needs and working close with them are the key factors of
successful management and leadership in Google which results in high staff
employee motivation and low employee turnover. (Kedrosky, 2008) On the other
hand Yahoo! has around 14,500 employees under management of Marissa Mayer,
former Google Inc executive. (Cohan, 2013) Yahoo was struggling to find the right
managers for five years and Mayer, the new CEO, sounds the right leader for Yahoo.
She started her work in Yahoo in July 2012 and since then she tried to develop the
company’s strategies and management programs. Mayer has changed the work-
from-home policy to work-in-office as she believes that working in office and meeting
people can increase the quality of decisions and ideas. (Pimentel, 2013)
Overall by comparing different aspects of organizational effectiveness and both
companies’ stock prices (Google Inc has a stock price of $833.55 and Yahoo! Inc
has a stock price of $24.77 at 2 May 2013 (Yahoo! Finance, 2013)), it can be
concluded that both companies are successful in their ways whereas, Google is a
more effective and more successful company as they have a stronger corporate
culture and leadership styles.
Word Count: 470
Word Count: 2781