Republic of the PhilippinesDepartment of Education

Region IIISCHOOLS DIVISION OF AURORA

Sitio Hiwalayan, Brgy. Bacong, San Luis, Aurora

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: SONNY F. SOLIVEN Name of Rater: RAUL A. SORIANOPosition: Master Teacher I Position: Principal IBureau/Center/Service/Division: AURORA Date of Review:Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

MFOs KRAs Objectives TimelineWeight

Per KRAPerformance Indicator

(Quality Efficiency Timeliness)ACTUAL

RESULTS

RATINGSCORE

Q E T Ave.

I. PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT

1.1 Participated at least two seminar, workshop, trainings within a year

1.2 Participated in the district level competition within a year

Year Round

Year Round

35%

10%

10%

5 – Participated 4 seminars, workshops, trainings, within a year

4 – Participated 3 seminars, workshops, trainings, within a year

3 – Participated 2 seminars, workshops, trainings, within a year

5 – Received Division Award/Recognition, within a year

4 – Received District

II. INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE

1.3 Organized Homeroom PTCA, Class or other Organization

2.1 Performed 100% required teaching loads during the year

2.2 Completed 100% of the required competencies for the pupils in every grading period

Year Round

June to March

June to March

15%

45%

10%

15 %

Award/Recognition, within a year

3 – Received District Award/Recognition, within a year

5 – Organized and maintained functional homeroom PTCA

4 – Conducted at least 4 Homeroom PTCA meetings during the year

3 – Participates in the community projects and in civic organizations

5 – Performed required teaching loads and two or more other school activities or ancillary services

4 – Performed required teaching loads and 1 or more other school activities or ancillary services

3 – Performed 100% required teaching loads

5 – Increased more than 3% from the target pupils performance

4 – Increased 1% - 3% from the target pupils performance

3 - Achieved at least 75% of the pupils performance

III. INSTRUCTIONAL SUPERVISION

2.3 Increased at least 5 - 8 % Nat Performance of School

3.1 Observed at least 75% of the assigned teachers in the school with post conference every year

3.2 Conducted 2 teachers mentoring/coaching program in the school within a year

June to March

Year round

Year round

20 %

20%

5%

10%

5 – Increased at least 7 - 10% NAT Performance of school

4 – Increased at least 5 - 8 % Nat Performance of School

3 – Increased at least 2 - 7% NAT Performance of School

5 – Observed more than 100% of the assigned teachers with post conference

4 – Observed 85% of the assigned teachers during the year

3 – Observed -75% of the assigned teachers during the year

5 – Mentored/coached 100% of the assigned teachers during the year

4 – Mentored/coached 85% of the assigned teachers during the year

3 – Mentored/coached 75% of the assigned teachers during the year

3.3 Evaluated 85% of the assigned teacher performance following the RPMS framework cycle

Year round 5% 5 – Evaluated 100% of the assigned teacher performance following the RPMS framework cycle

4 – Evaluated 85% of the assigned teacher performance following the RPMS framework cycle

3 – Evaluated 75% of the assigned teacher performance following the RPMS framework cycle

OVERALLRATING FOR

ACCOMPLISHMENT

SONNY F. SOLIVEN RAUL A. SORIANO Ratee Rater

APPROVED:

ALBERTO P. SALUDEZ, Ph.D. Schools Division Superintendent