Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
i
INVESTIGATING THE STUDENTS' PERCEPTION TOWARD BLENDED
LEARNING METHOD IMPLEMENTED IN TEACHING ENGLISH
AT SEVENTH SEMESTER ENGLISH STUDENTS OF
UNISMUH MAKASSAR
(A Descriptive-Qualitative Research)
A THESIS
Submitted to the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education Muhammadiyah
University of Makassar in Partial Fulfillment for the Degree of Education in
English Department
SAM PRAVITA SARI
10535 6293 15
ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF MAKASSAR
2020
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH MAKASSAR
FAKULTAS KEGURUAN DAN ILMU PENDIDIKAN PRODI PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS
vii
Jalan Sultan Alauddin No. 259Makassar
Telp : 0411-860837/860132 (Fax)
Email : [email protected]
Web : www.fkip.unismuh.ac.id
SURAT PERJANJIAN
Saya yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini:
Nama : Sam Pravita Sari
Nim : 10535629315
Jurusan : Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris
Judul Skripsi : Investigating the Students’ Perception Toward Blended
Learning Method Implemented in Teaching English at
Seventh Semester English Students of Unismuh Makassar
Dengan ini menyatakan perjanjian sebagai berikut:
1. Mulai dari penyusunan proposal sampai selesainya skripsi ini, saya akan
menyusun sendiri skripsi saya (tidak dibuatkan oleh siapapun).
2. Dalam penyusunan skripsi saya akan selalu melakukan konsultasi dengan
pembimbing, yang telah ditetapkan oleh pimpinan fakultas.
3. Saya tidak akan melakukan penjiplakan (Plagiat) dalam menyusun skripsi
saya.
4. Apa bila saya melanggar perjanjian saya seperti butir 1, 2, dan 3, maka saya
bersedia menerima sanksi sesuai aturan yang berlaku.
Demikian perjanjian ini saya buat dengan penuh kesadaran.
Makassar, Januari 2020
Yang membuat perjanjian
Sam Pravita Sari
UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH MAKASSAR
FAKULTAS KEGURUAN DAN ILMU PENDIDIKAN PRODI PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS
viii
Jalan Sultan Alauddin No. 259Makassar
Telp : 0411-860837/860132 (Fax)
Email : [email protected]
Web : www.fkip.unismuh.ac.id
SURAT PERNYATAAN
Saya yang bertanda tangan dibawah ini:
Nama : Sam Pravita Sari
Nim : 10535629315
Jurusan : Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris
Judul Skripsi : Investigating the Students’ Perception Toward Blended
Learning Method Implemented in Teaching English at
Seventh Semester English Students of Unismuh Makassar
Dengan ini menyatakan bahwa:
Skripsi yang saya ajukan di depan TIM Penguji adalah ASLI hasil karya
saya sendiri, bukan hasil ciplakan dan tidak dibuatkan oleh siapapun.
Demikian pernyataan ini saya buat dengan sebenarnya dan saya bersedia
menerima sanksi apabila pernyataan ini tidak benar.
Makassar, Januari 2020
Yang membuat pernyataan
Sam Pravita Sari
MOTTO AND DEDICATION
Motto:
So when you have finished (your duties), then
stand up (for worship).
―QS. Al Insyirah (94) : 7
And to your Lord direct (your) longing.
―QS. Al Insyirah (94) : 8
Dedication:
This Thesis for My Big Families
For My Beloved Parents
and also
My Own Self
x
ABSTRACT
Sam Pravita Sari. 2020. Investigating the Students' Perception Toward
Blended Learning Method Implemented in Teaching English at Seventh
Semester English Student of Unismuh Makassar (A Descriptive-Qualitative
Research). Thesis of English Department. The Faculty of Teacher Training and
Education, Muhammadiyah University of Makassar. Supervised by Radiah Hamid
and Firman.
This research aims to find out: (1) the benefits of Blended Learning
Method that implemented in teaching English at Seventh Semester English
Students of Unismuh Makassar (2) the weaknesses of Blended Learning Method
that implemented in teaching English at Seventh Semester English Students of
Unismuh Makassar, Academic Year 2019/2020 from BG VIIG.
The researcher used Descriptive Qualitative as research design. The data
analysis used descriptive percentage theory proposed by Sudjana. The sample of
this study was 22 students of English Department by using Purposive Sampling.
The instruments was used to collect the data was close ended questionnaire which
consist of 19 questions.
The findings indicated that the students gave their positive responses about
the benefits of Blended Learning based on the students’ perception. The positive
judgement from the student because they found it while they learning, and also it
can be seen from the result of the questionnaire answered by them. This research
also was revealing that Blended Learning had weaknesess that if the infrastucture,
internet access and network not support it was difficult to apply. In addition, the
knowledge of using technologies was needed.
Key words: Student’s Perceptions, Blended Learning, Descriptive Qualitative.
xi
ABSTRAK
Sam Pravita Sari. 2020. Investigating the Students' Perception Toward
Blended Learning Method Implemented in Teaching English at Seventh
Semester English Student of Unismuh Makassar (A Descriptive-Qualitative
Research). Skripsi Jurusan Bahasa Inggris. Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu
Pendidikan. Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar. Dibimbing oleh Radiah
Hamid dan Firman.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) kelebihan dari metode
Blended Learning yang diterapkan dalam pengajaran Bahasa Inggris pada siswa
Bahasa Inggris semester tujuh Unismuh Makassar (2) kelemahan Metode Blended
Learning yang diterapkan dalam pengajaran Bahasa Inggris pada siswa Bahasa
Inggris semester tujuh Unismuh Makassar, tahun akademik 2019/2020 dari BG
VIIG.
Peneliti menggunakan deskriptif kualitatif sebagai desain penelitian.
Analisis data menggunakan teori persentase deskriptif yang diusulkan oleh
Sudjana. Sampel penelitian ini adalah 22 mahasiswa Jurusan Bahasa Inggris
dengan menggunakan Purposive Sampling. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk
mengumpulkan data adalah Close-Ended kuesioner yang terdiri dari 19
pertanyaan.
Hasil menunjukkan bahwa siswa memberikan tanggapan positif mereka
tentang manfaat Blended Learning berdasarkan persepsi siswa. Penilaian positif
dari siswa karena mereka menemukannya saat mereka belajar, dan juga dapat
dilihat dari hasil kuesioner yang dijawab oleh mereka. Penelitian ini juga
mengungkapkan bahwa Blended Learning memiliki kelemahan bahwa jika
infrastruktur, akses internet dan jaringan tidak mendukung, sulit untuk diterapkan.
Selain itu, pengetahuan tentang penggunaan teknologi sangat dibutuhkan.
Kata kunci: Persepsi Siswa, Blended Learning, Deskriptif Kualitatif.
xii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Bismillahirrahmanirrahim. All praises be to Allah, the creator of the world
who always provides health and opportunities until this thesis can be completed.
Greetings and shalawat were bestowed upon the Prophet Muhammad, to his
family, friends, and the muslims who still uphold the religion of Allah.
The researcher would like to give her gratitude and appreciation to the
following people who have supported her until the thesis was finished, especially
for the researcher’s beloved parents, Dg. Siratang, S.Pd., M.M and Nuraeni, who
always love, care, support for financial and their pray for every success of the
researcher. They are follows;
1. Prof. Dr. H. Abd. Rahman Rahim, SE., MM. The Rector of University of
Muhammadiyah Makassar.
2. Erwin Akib, M.Pd., Ph.D, the Dean of Teacher Training and Education
Faculty, University of Muhammadiyah Makassar
3. Ummi Khaerati Syam, S.Pd., M.Pd, the Head of English Education
Department of Muhammadiyah University of Makassar. Her secretary, Ismail
Sangkala, S.Pd., M.Pd, the staff and all of the lecturer of FKIP Unismuh,
especially to the lecturers of English Education Department who taught the
researcher for many years.
4. The researcher’s high appreciation and great thankfullness are due to
consultans, Dra. Radiah, M.Pd as the first consultant and Firman, S.Pd.,M.Pd
as the second consultant, who have give the support, guidance, motivation,
xiii
and their patience since the preliminary state until the completion of this
thesis
5. Muh. Zia Ul-Haq S.Pd., M.Ti as lecturer in class 7G has given his permission
to did this research and all of the respondents in this research that gave their
best time to answer the questionnaire at Seventh Semester English Students of
Unismuh Makassar
6. Special thanks for the big families of CHAZTALS (class C of English
Department 2015), especially Khairun Nisa, Khadijah, Mirdawaty, Emilia
Sianti, Sri Arna Nengsih, Tasmaniar Taiyyeb, Rika Afraini, and Suarni for
always gave the researcher support and motivation.
7. Everybody that could not be mentioned one by one, may Allah almight bless
us now and ever.
Makassar, January 2020
Sam Pravita Sari
xiv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
COVER PAGE ..................................................................................................... i
LEMBAR PENGESAHAN .................................................................................. ii
APPROVAL SHEET ........................................................................................... iii
COUNSELLING SHEET 1 ................................................................................. iv
COUNSELLING SHEET 2 ................................................................................. v
SURAT PERJANJIAN ........................................................................................ vii
SURAT PERNYATAAN ..................................................................................... viii
MOTTO AND DEDICATION ............................................................................ ix
ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................... x
ABSTRAK ............................................................................................................ xi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ................................................................................... xii
TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................... xiv
LIST OF FIGURE ............................................................................................... xvi
LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................... xvii
LIST OF APPENDICES ...................................................................................... xix
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................ 1
A. Background ................................................................................ 1
B. Problem Statements .................................................................... 5
C. Objective of the Research ........................................................... 5
D. Significance of the Research ....................................................... 6
E. Scope of the Research ................................................................. 6
CHAPTER II. REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE ................................. 8
A. Previous Research Findings ........................................................ 8
B. Some Pertinent Ideas .................................................................. 10
1. Concept of Conventional Learning ....................................... 10
2. Concept of E-Learning ......................................................... 12
3. Concept of Blended Learning............................................... 13
C. Conceptual Framework ............................................................... 17
CHAPTER III. RESEARCH METHOD ............................................................ 18
A. Research Design ......................................................................... 18
B. Population and Sample ............................................................... 19
C. Instrument of the Research ......................................................... 19
D. Data Collection ........................................................................... 20
E. Data Analysis ............................................................................. 21
xv
CHAPTER IV. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION ................................................ 23
A. Findings...................................................................................... 23
B. Discussion .................................................................................. 38
CHAPTER V. CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION ........................................ 44
A. Conclusion ................................................................................. 44
B. Suggestion .................................................................................. 45
BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................ 46
APPENDICES
CURRICULUM VITAE
xvi
LIST OF FIGURE
Page
Figure 2.1 Conceptual Framework .....................................................................17
xvii
LIST OF TABLES
Page
Table 4.1 Statement 1: Through Blended Learning, learning occurs independently
and conventionally, both of which have advantages that can
complement each other. ........................................................................... 23
Table 4.2 Statement 2: Blended Learning makes learning is more effective and
efficient ................................................................................................... 24
Table 4.3 Statement 3: By the existence, Blended Learning participants will find it
easier to access learning material.............................................................. 25
Table 4.4 Statement 4: Through Blended Learning, students are free to learn the
subject matter independently by utilizing the materials available online ... 26
Table 4.5 Statement 5: Through Blended Learning, students can hold discussions
with teachers or other students outside face-to-face .................................. 26
Table 4.6 Statement 6: By Blended Learning, learning activities carried out by
students outside of face-to-face hours can be managed and controlled
well by the instructor................................................................................ 27
Table 4.7 Statement 7: Through Blended Learning, teachers can add enrichment
material through internet facilities. ........................................................... 28
Table 4.8 Statement 8: Through Blended Learning, the teacher can ask students to
read the material or take a test that is conducted before learning. .............. 29
xviii
Table 4.9 Statement 9: By Blended Learning, teachers can organize quizzes, give
feedback, and utilize test results effectively .............................................. 29
Table 4.10 Statement 10: Through Blended Learning, students can share files or
data with other students ............................................................................ 30
Table 4.11 Statement 11: Blended Learning can Broaden the range of learning /
training .................................................................................................... 31
Table 4.12 Statement 12: Blended Learning is ease of implementation ..................... 31
Table 4.13 Statement 13: Blended Learning is cost efficiency .................................. 32
Table 4.14 Statement 14: Blended Learning can make optimal results ...................... 33
Table 4.15 Statement 15: Blended Learning can adjust various learning needs ........ 33
Table 4.16 Statement 16: Blended Learning can increase the attractiveness of
learning .................................................................................................... 34
Table 4.17 Statement 17: The media needed is very diverse, so it is difficult to
apply if the facilities and infrastructure do not support. ............................ 35
Table 4.18 Statement 18: Blended Learning will make it difficult for students to
participate in learning if internet access and network needs are
inadequate ................................................................................................ 36
Table 4.19 Statement 19: Lack of knowledge of learning resources (instructors,
students and parents) towards the use of technology ................................. 37
xix
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX 1 Instruments
APPENDIX 2 The Result of Data Analysis
APPENDIX 3 The Answer of Respondents
APPENDIX 4 Documentation
APPENDIX 5 Curriculum Vitae
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
This chapter consisted of general preview of the research. Those were
about background, problem statements, objective of the study, significant of the
research, and scope of the research.
A. Background
Information and communication technology that was growing rapidly
was increasingly becoming a necessity for people around the world. By
comunication and information tools such as mobile phones and computers were
getting sophisticated, could help someone to get what they want and need. In the
current technological era, almost all human activities need the help of
sophisticated devices that could easily help their activities, such as selling via
online, looking for references, even to find objects to be obtained, all can be found
through information and communication technology. In addition, by technology,
someone would easily carry out fun activities such as taking pictures, chatting,
listening to music or games. In fact, in the world of education, information and
communication technology had been used, both learning activities in formal, and
informal institutions. Thus, this technology could also to be used to study anytime
and anywhere. In addition Bendania (2011) is one of those who clarify positive
2
attitudes and the factors related to attitudes; mainly experience, confidence,
enjoyment, usefulness, intention to use, motivation and whether students had
Information and Communication Technology (ICT) skills were all correlated.
Technological developments were increasingly rapid and affect the
education system in this country. Through this technological development, it was
expected that Indonesia will be better and more advanced following the developed
countries. Through the development of technology, the education system had
developed, which initially used a conventional system, then moved into digital. In
the beginning, the teaching and learning process only occurred in the classroom,
but in this area the teaching and learning process could be done anywhere and
everywhere, not bound by space and time.
Technological development had an impact on the world of education. In
the current era, there were many websites that provide various information about
student learning. This was the basis for students preferring to search for
information through the internet rather than going to the library to look for print
information in the form of books or magazine articles, most of the students did the
task with the help of the internet through a computer or smartphone. In addition
Teeter (1997) identified the impact of teaching with the Internet on the students’
motivation to learn and increase their ability to debate and resolve duties, the
results indicated to increase students’ motivation, and inform them of a lot of
sources, and improve their ability to debate and solve homework. Behjat, Yamini
and Bagheri (2012) showed that the Iranian tertiary education contexts that
blending traditional classroom instruction and technology can help learners excel
in their reading comprehension. In essence, education was an effort made to print
3
quality human resources in accordance with the guidelines of the times. Education
plays an important role in shaping humans who can adapt to the surrounding
environment and can be sensitive to existing social changes.
For students who prefer to learn through the internet, they could get it
through Blended Learning because Blended Learning was internet-based learning
and face-to-face, so there are variations in learning that make students not feel
bored. Blended Learning is a mixture of face-to-face learning and online learning,
so that learning does not only occur in the classroom but can also be done outside
the classroom (Colis and Moonen, 2001). Blended Learning is learning that
combines the strategies of delivering learning using face-to-face activities,
computer-based learning (offline), and online computers (internet and mobile
learning). Blended Learning based learning developed around 2000 and is now
widely used in North America, Britain, Australia, universities and the world of
training (Wikibuku, 2016). Blended Learning is described by Thorne in
Akkoyunlu & Soylu (2008) as “a way of meeting the challenges of tailoring
learning and development to the needs of individuals by integrating the innovative
and technological advances offered by online learning with the interaction and
participation offered in the best of traditional learning”.
Through Blended Learning all learning resources that could facilitate
learning for people who are learning were developed. Blended Learning could
combine face-to-face learning with computer-based learning. That was, learning
with a learning technology approach with a combination of face-to-face learning
resources with instructors and those contained in computer media, cellular phones
or satellite television channels, video conferencing, and other electronic media.
4
Students and instructors/facilitators work together to improve the quality of
learning. The main purpose of Blended Learning was to provide opportunities for
various characteristics of students so that independent, sustainable and lifelong
learning takes place, so that learning will be more effective, more efficient, and
more interesting.
Basically there were three basic stages in the Blended Learning model
that refer to ICT-based learning, as proposed by Grant as cited in Susandi (2017),
namely: (1) seeking of information, (2) acquisition of information, and (3)
synthesizing of knowledge. The stages of seeking of information, including
searching information from various sources of information available in ICT,
choose critically among sources of information providers based on content of
relevantion content of validity/reliability, and academic clarity. The teacher acts
as an expert who can provide input and advice to limit students from potential
information stacks in ICT. Also through Blended Learning, teachers could learn
with interactivity that approaches face-to-face learning. It could even be done
when teachers and students are thousands of kilometers apart on two different
continents. Not only that, someone could also arrange their own study schedule
according to the time they want.
In Muhammadiyah University of Makassar, especially for the Seventh
Semester, not all lecturers chose to use Blended Learning in the teaching and
learning process, especially in English Language Teaching. Whereas, Blended
Learning was very good for students because it provided a mixture of variations in
methods, and in that variation, lecturers could provide new alternatives to students
in learning. Blended Learnig could also be applied in all English subjects. Another
5
reason researchers chose the Seventh Semester was to anticipate the possibility of
students not getting this method in the previous semester. From the above
statements, the researcher was interested in conducting a study about
“Investigating the Students' Perception Toward Blended Learning Method
Implemented in Teaching English at Seventh Semester English Student of
Unismuh Makassar”.
B. Problem Statements
Based on the background of the research above, the researcher
formulated the problem statements in questions forms as follows :
1. What are the benefits of Blended Learning Method that implemented in
teaching English at Seventh Semester English Students of Unismuh
Makassar based on the students’ perception?
2. What are the weaknesses of Blended Learning Method that implemented
in teaching English at Seventh Semester English Students of Unismuh
Makassar based on the students’ perception?
C. Objective of the Research
Based on the problem statement above, the objectives of the research
were to find out:
1. The benefits of Blended Learning Method that implemented in teaching
English at Seventh Semester English Students of Unismuh Makassar
based on the students’ perception.
2. The weaknesses of Blended Learning Method that implemented in
teaching English at Seventh Semester English Students of Unismuh
Makassar based on the students’ perception
6
D. Significance of the Research
This research was expected to provide some benefits. It was hoped to
give theoritically and practically significance.
1. Theoritical Siginificance
This research was expected to add new insights about learning
development or learning methods, namely Blended Learning Method,
specifically about the benefits and weaknesses of a learning method.
2. Practical Significance
a. For the Next Researcher
It could help the next researcher as reference in the term of the
students’ perception toward Blended Learning Method.
b. For the lecturers
This research would provide information about students’ perceptions
toward Blended Learning. Thus, this would be an input and evaluation
for next learning.
c. For Students
They would know other alternative methods that could be used in the
teaching and learning process, namely Blended Learning. It also
expected, by knowing about that method, students can improve their
learning outcomes.
E. Scope of the Research
Based on the background above, to clarify research and to get focused
research result, it was necessary to limit the problem. This scope only focused on
7
the benefits and weaknesses of Blended Learning Method based on the students’
perception at Seventh Semester English Students of Unismuh Makassar Academic
Year 2019/2020.
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
This research, the researcher would like to describe about review of related
literature. Those were previous research findings, some pertinent ideas, and the
last was conceptual framework.
A. Previous Research Findings
There were some researchers which attemp to study the topic related to
the Blended Learning Method, and it could support this research. First,
Setiyoningsih (2015) in her research entititled The Implemented of Blended
Learning in Teaching Listening to the First Year Students of English Education
Department at University of Nusantara PGRI Kediri Academic Year 2015-2016
conclude that through the Blended Learning method, listening activities are not
only done in the classroom, but also done outside the classroom. Thus, that
students can access their listening activities in their daily activities. In addition,
through the Blended Learning method, it brings a positive feeling to lecturers and
students, because they can be more effective in teaching and learning activities.
Second, Berrio (2017) in his research entitled Students’ Perception of A
Blended Learning Environment At Universidad De La Guajira concluded that
Blended Learning at Universidad de La Guajira showed that the delivery of
material through Blended Learning is considered a positive experience that can
9
improve the teaching and learning process. Students’ responses to the
questionnaire clearly showed that the bLearning mode of delivery is considered a
positive experience that enhances the process of learning. Although, Blended
Learning is effective, students thought it not very comfortable because facilities
are not always available in every student's home. He also found that the results of
his thesis clearly show positive perceptions as to the advantages of Blended
Learning in improving language skills, specially listening and vocabulary.
Third, Onta (2018) in her research entitled Efektifitas Pembelajaran
Model Blended Learning dengan Menggunakan Media Pembelajaran Quipper
School ditinjau dari Motivasi Belajar dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas X TKJ-A
SMK Asisi Jakarta Tahun Ajaran 2017/2018 conclude that the application of
Blended Learning method using Quipper School media was considered ineffective
in terms of learning outcomes. This is caused by several factors, one of them in
terms of material that requires deeper concept reasoning, in terms of short time to
understand trigonometry, in terms of students who have not been able to
maximize the time given, and in terms of researchers who have not been able to
invite students to use gadgets wisely in learning.
Fourth, Kurniawati (2014) in her research entitled Pengembangan Model
Pembelajaran Blended Learning Pada Mata Pelajaran Keterampilan Komputer
dan Pengelolaan Informasi (KKPI) Kelas XI di SMK Negeri 2 Purwodadi
conclude that (1) learning planning using Blended Learning is appropriate to use
as a guideline for implementing classroom learning; (2) Blended Learning can be
implemented according to planning that includes orientation, organization,
10
investigation, presentation, analysis, and evaluation; (3) Blended Learning is
proven effective in terms of (a) learning outcomes using Blended Learning> 75
and there are significant differences between those who use Blended Learning and
those who do not use it; (b) increasing student activity and motivation for the
better.
Fifth, Achmadi (2015) in his research entitled Pengaruh Penerapan
Blended Learning Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa Kelas XI Teknik Permesinan
SMK Muhammadiyah 3 Yogyakarta conclude that (1) There is a significant
increase in student learning achievement (t count = 16.60> t table = 2.002) on the
lathe machining engineering subjects at Muhammadiyah 3 Vocational School
Yogyakarta after the implementation of the Blended Learning method; (2) There
are significant differences in learning achievement (t count = 13.16> t table =
2.002) between class XI TP4 taught using the Blended Learning method with
class XI TP2 who do not use the Blended Learning method.
Based on the fifth previous findings above, the researcher got conclusion
about the sameness and the differences. The sameness for all the researches were
discusses about the Blended Learning Method. In addition, the differences for all
of the researches were discusses the aplication of Blended Learning on various
subjects and the results achieved through Blended Learning.
B. Some Pertinent Ideas
1. Concept of Conventional Learning
Achmadi (2015) in his thesis concluded that Conventional Learning is a
learning method used by a teacher in achieving learning objectives using
11
ways of narrating, explaining, illuminating and presenting learning material
or material orally to a number of students. Conventional learning is learning
that is done face to face and is in the same learning space. As explained by
Kurniawati (2015) in her thesis defines that Face-to-face learning as a form of
conventional learning model that brings teachers and students together in one
room for learning.
Khoirullah (2016) in her thesis concluded that conventional learning is
a learning concept that is used by teachers in discussing a subject matter that
is commonly used in the learning process. In addition, Moestofa and Sondang
as cited in Kurniawati (2014) define conventional learning as one model
learning that only focuses on lecture learning methods. The conventional
learning stages are as follows:
a. The opening stage, where the teacher conditions students to enter the
learning atmosphere by conveying greetings and learning objectives;
b. The development stage is the stage in the implementation of the teaching
and learning process which is filled with the delivery of material orally
supported by the use of media;
c. The evaluation stage where the teacher evaluates student learning by
drawing conclusions or summaries of learning material, giving
assignments, and ending with a thank you for the seriousness of students
in learning.
From the understanding above, the researcher can conclude that
conventional learning is learning that involves social interaction between
12
teachers and students, and it is a planned learning process. So the teacher has
an important role because the teacher as a source of information. In addition,
Conventional Learning is still widely used by teachers as their learning
model.
2. Concept of E-Learning
Kurniawati (2015) in her thesis concluded that online learning (e-
learning) is learning that is carried out using internet, intranet, and web-based
technology that enables learning interactions between students and educators
by accessing information and subject matter anytime and anywhere.
Rosenberg as cited in Indrakusuma and Putri (2016), emphasizes that e-
learning refers to the use of internet technology to deliver a series of solutions
that can enhance knowledge and skills. Thus, E-learning is learning that
utilizes the internet network to access information related to material during
the teaching and learning process.
Rosenberg as cited in Rusman (2013: 349) categorizes three the basic
criterias contained in e-learning are as follows:
a. E-learning is network that makes it able to improve it fast, save or bring
back, distribute and share learning and information;
b. E-learning is sent to users via a computer with using internet technology
standards;
c. E-learning is focused on the broadest view of learning, the solution
learning that surpasses the paradigm in training.
13
Rudi and Riyana in Indrakusuma and Putri (2016) states the
characteristics of E-Learning, as follows:
a. Students' comprehension of learning material does not depend on the
instructor / learner, because students construct their own knowledge
through teaching materials delivered through the website interface.
b. Sources of knowledge are everywhere and can be easily accessed by
everyone. This is due to the globalized nature of the Internet media and
can be accessed by anyone who is connected to it.
c. Learners / educational institutions function as mediators / mentors.
d. A restructuring of education system, curriculum and management
policies is needed that can support the optimal use of Information and
Communication Technology for education.
3. Concept of Blended Learning
a. Definition of Blended Learning
Thorne as cited in Adityawardhana (2015), “Blended Learning is a
combination of multimedia technology, CD ROM video streaming,
virtual classroom, voicemail, email, and telephone conferencing, online
text animation and video streaming. All of this is combined with
traditional forms of classroom training and one-on-one training”.
Blended Learning is one method that can be used by teachers by
utilizing information technology but does not eliminate conventional
methods (face to face). Blended Learning combines two or more
14
learning models that can be combined into learning models that can be
applied well (Adityawardhana: 2015).
Rusman as cited in Achmadi (2015) states that Blended Learning is
a combination of various approaches in learning. This can be concluded
that to achieve the objectives of the learning process can be used
Blended Learning which combines several methods of approach. for
example web based and conventional learning or face to face
simultaneously in the learning process. Leibling and Prior (2005: 24)
state that Blended Learning involves many media - eg combination of
classroom teaching with independent e-learning. Through a combination
of teaching, the use of Blended Learning can have effectiveness in the
teaching and learning process.
b. The Purpose of Blended Learning
The following is the purpose of using the learning model Blended
Learning according to Husamah (2013: 22)
1) Helping students to develop better inside learning process in
accordance with learning styles and inner preferences learn.
2) Provide practical-relational opportunities for teachers and
participants students for independent, useful and continuing
learning developing.
3) Increased scheduling improvement for students, with combining
the best realms of face to face and learning online. Face-to-face
classes can be used for involve people students in interactive
15
experiences, while serving online provide students with lots of
multimedia content will know whenever and wherever, as long as
students have internet access
c. Characteristics of Blended Learning
The characteristics of the Blended Learning according to Husamah
(2013: 16) are :
1) Learning that combines various ways of delivery teaching models,
learning styles, as well as various media-based diverse technology.
2) As a combination of direct teaching or face to face (face-to face),
independent study, and online learning.
3) Learning is supported by an effective combination of ways
delivery, teaching methods, and learning styles.
4) Teachers and parents of learning participants have the same role
importantly, teachers as facilitators, and parents as supporters.
d. The benefits and the weaknesses of Blended Learning
There are some benefits of Blended Learning Method according to
Husamah (2013: 231), as follows:
1) Learning occurs independently and conventionally, both of which
have advantages that can complement each other.
2) Learning is more effective and efficient
3) Improve accessibility. With the existence of Blended Learning
participants will find it easier to access learning material.
16
4) Students are free to learn the subject matter independently by
utilizing the materials available online.
5) Students can hold discussions with teachers or other students
outside face-to-face hours.
6) Learning activities carried out by students outside of face-to-face
hours can be managed and controlled well by the instructor.
7) Teachers can add enrichment material through internet facilities.
8) The teacher can ask students to read the material or take a test that
is conducted before learning.
9) Teachers can organize quizzes, give feedback, and utilize test
results effectively.
10) Students can share files or data with other students.
11) Broaden the range of learning / training.
12) Ease of implementation.
13) Cost efficiency.
14) Optimal results.
15) Adjust various learning needs.
16) Increase the attractiveness of learning.
There are some weaknesses of Blended Learning Method according
to Husamah (2013: 36-37), as follows:
1) The media needed is very diverse, so it is difficult to apply if the
facilities and infrastructure do not support.
17
2) Unequal facilities owned by students, such as computer and
internet access. In fact, Blended Learning requires adequate
internet access and if the network is lacking adequate, it will
certainly make it difficult for students to follow independent
learning via online.
3) Lack of knowledge of learning resources (instructors, students and
parents) towards the use of technology.
C. Conceptual Framework
Students’ Perception
Figure 2.1. Conceptual Framework
Figure 2.1 explained about the conceptual framework of this research. It
was mean that in learning English, the teacher used a method that combines
offline and online learning. The name of the method was Blended Learning. By
using Blended Learning Method, students provided perceptions related to the
method, especially on the benefits and weaknesses. Thus, the teacher could make
this an evaluation material for the upcoming teaching and learning process.
Learning
English Blended Learning Method
Benefits Weaknesses
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This chapter consisted of research method. Those were research design,
population and sample, and instrument of the research, data collection, and data
analysis.
A. Research Design
In this research, the researcher used Descriptive Qualitative Research.
Descriptive Qualitative Research was used to gain an understanding of the opinions,
motivations or reasons of someone. The researcher used Descriptive Qualitative
Research because the purpose of this research is to determine students' perceptions of
the Blended Learning Method especially benefits and weaknesses of it. This research
has two variables, there were variable X and variable Y. Varibale X in this research
was Blended Learning Method, while variable Y was benefit and weaknesses of
Blended Learning.
19
B. Population and Sample
1. Population
The population of this research was Seventh Semester English
Department Students of Unismuh Makassar, which consisted of 371 students
that divided into 10 classes. Each class consist around 30 to 40 students.
2. Sample
The process to get the sample of the research, the researcher used
Purposive Sampling Technique. The researcher’s purpose used Purposive
Sampling Technique because this research had some criterion to get the sample
objectively. Based on the explanation above, the sample of this research was
class G at Seventh Semester English Students that consist of 22 students.
C. Instrument of the Research
The researcher used two instruments in this research to collect data from the
samples.
1. Questionnare
The questionnare consisted of 19 questions. This researcher used close-ended
questions. Close-ended questions were also easy to analyze using percentages,
because we could predict the answer and the participants don’t need to write too
much. To find out the data questionnare from the sample, the researcher used
Likert Scale. Based on Wikipedia, Likert Scale was a psychometric scale that
was commonly used in questionnaires and was the scale most widely used in
research in the form of surveys. When answered questions from the Likert
20
Scale, the sample determined their level of agreement with a statement. Likert
Scale usually had five scale options, those were Strongly Agree (SA), Agree
(A), Undecided (Und), Disagree (D), and Strongly Disagree (SD).
2. Observation Checklist
Observation checlist was question and answer activity from researcher to class
samples, and this aims to find out whether the class has conducted a teaching
and learning process using the Blended Learning Method or not in the previous
semesters and to crosscheck the answers of students in questionnare.
D. Data Collection
There were several stages in the procedure of data collection used by the
researcher, which were as follows:
1. Questionnare
a. The researcher gave questionnare in the form of Close Ended Questionnare
consisted of 19 numbers
b. The researcher gave the time to answer the questionnare based on studenrts’
perception
c. The researcher collected the questionnare answered by the students
d. The researcher analyzed and classified the data systematically based on the
problem of the research
e. The researcher made a conclusion
21
2. Observation Checklist
The reseracher observed the class by giving some questions to students in the
class, such as whether the class had been taught by a lecturer who using Blended
Learning Method and to crosscheck the answers of the students from the
questionnaire.
E. Data Analysis
For data anaylisis, the analysis method used by the researcher in this research
was Percentage Descriptive analysis. Percentage Descriptive was obtained by
frequency divided by the number of respondents multiplied by 100%. The formula
are as follows:
P= F
N x 100%
Note :
P: Percentage of answers
F: Frequency of values obtained from all items
N: Number of respondents
(Sudjana, 2001)
22
Miles & Huberman (1994) analysis consists of three activities that occur
simultaneously: data reduction, data presentation, drawing conclusions/verification.
1. Data Reduction
Data reduction in this research was conducted by collecting data related to the
benefits and weaknesses of Blended Learning.
2. Data Display
Data display was present the data that had been reduced, thus the researcher
could draw conclusions. Data was usually presented in various forms, such as
tables, descriptions, or charts. In this research, the data presented in the form of
description and also tables.
3. Conclusion Drawing/Verification
The last step for analysis the data according to Miles and Huberman was
drawing conclusion/verification. The researcher concluded the data based on
the answer of the students from the questionnare.
CHAPTER IV
FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
This chapter consist of findings and discussion of the research as the result.
Findings showed the results from the data that had been collected and analysed from
the questionnaire. Discussion deals with the description and interpretation based on
the findings of the research.
A. Findings
In the findings, the researcher got the data from the questionnaire. The
researcher used questionnaire as intrument of the research. The questionnaire consist
of 19 item of Close Ended Questionnaire, and the participant were 22 students of
English Departement.
1. The Benefits toward Blended Learning Method Implemented in
Teaching English At Seventh Semester English Students of Unismuh
Makassar Based on the Students’ Perception.
a. Item 1
Table 4.1 Through Blended Learning, learning occurs independently
and conventionally, both of which have advantages that can
complement each other.
No. Classification Frequency Percentage
1 Strongly Agree 7 32%
24
2 Agree 13 59%
3 Undicided 2 9%
4 Disagree 0 0%
5 Strongly Disagree 0 0%
Total 100%
Table 4.1 indicated that 7 students or 32% said “strongly agree, 13
students or 59% said “agree”, 2 students or 9% said “Undecided”, 0 students
or 0% said “Disagree”, and 0 students or 0% said “Strongly Disagree”. Thus,
the researcher concluded that most students of Seventh Semester English
Students of Muhammadiyah University were agree that through Blended
Learning,learning occurs independently and conventionally, both of which
have advantages that can complement each other.
b. Item 2
Table 4.2 Blended Learning makes learning is more effective and
efficient.
No. Classification Frequency Percentage
1 Strongly Agree 6 27%
2 Agree 11 50%
3 Undicided 4 18%
4 Disagree 1 5%
5 Strongly Disagree 0 0%
Total 100%
Table 4.2 indicated that 6 students or 27% said “strongly agree, 11
students or 50% said “agree”, 4 students or 18% said “Undecided”, 1students
25
or 5% said “Disagree”, and 0 students or 0% said “Strongly Disagree”. Thus,
the researcher concluded that most students of Seventh Semester English
Students of Muhammadiyah University were agree that Blended Learning
makes learning is more effective and efficient.
c. Item 3
Table 4.3 By the existence, Blended Learning participants will find it
easier to access learning material.
No. Classification Frequency Percentage
1 Strongly Agree 8 36%
2 Agree 9 23%
3 Undicided 4 18%
4 Disagree 1 5%
5 Strongly Disagree 0 0%
Total 100%
Table 4.3 indicated that 8 students or 36% said “strongly agree, 9
students or 23% said “agree”, 4 students or 18% said “Undecided”, 1 students
or 5% said “Disagree”, and 0 students or 0% said “Strongly Disagree”. Thus,
the researcher concluded that most students of Seventh Semester English
Students of Muhammadiyah University were strongly disagree thatby the
existence, Blended Learning participants will find it easier to access learning
material.
26
d. Item 4
Table 4.4 Through Blended Learning, students are free to learn the
subject matter independently by utilizing the materials available
online.
No. Classification Frequency Percentage
1 Strongly Agree 8 36%
2 Agree 12 54%
3 Undicided 1 5%
4 Disagree 1 5%
5 Strongly Disagree 0 0%
Total 100%
Table 4.4 indicated that 8 students or 36% said “strongly agree, 12
students or 54% said “agree”, 1 students or 5% said “Undecided”, 1 students
or 5% said “Disagree”, and 0 students or 0% said “Strongly Disagree”. Thus,
the researcher concluded that most students of Seventh Semester English
Students of Muhammadiyah University were agree that through Blended
Learning, students are free to learn the subject matter independently by
utilizing the materials available online.
e. Item 5
Table 4.5 Through Blended Learning, students can hold discussions
with teachers or other students outside face-to-face.
No. Classification Frequency Percentage
1 Strongly Agree 7 32%
2 Agree 9 41%
27
3 Undicided 5 23%
4 Disagree 1 5%
5 Strongly Disagree 0 0%
Total 100%
Table 4.5 indicated that 7 students or 32% said “strongly agree, 9
students or 41% said “agree”, 5 students or 23% said “Undecided”, 1 students
or 5% said “Disagree”, and 0 students or 0% said “Strongly Disagree”. Thus,
the researcher concluded that most students of Seventh Semester English
Students of Muhammadiyah University were agree that through Blended
Learning, students can hold discussions with teachers or other students
outside face-to-face.
f. Item 6
Table 4.6 By Blended Learning, learning activities carried out by
students outside of face-to-face hours can be managed and controlled
well by the instructor.
No. Classification Frequency Percentage
1 Strongly Agree 3 14%
2 Agree 13 59%
3 Undicided 6 27%
4 Disagree 0 0%
5 Strongly Disagree 0 0%
Total 100%
Table 4.6 indicated that 3 students or 14% said “strongly agree, 13
students or 59% said “agree”, 6 students or 27% said “Undecided”, 0 students
or 0% said “Disagree”, and 0 students or 0% said “Strongly Disagree”. Thus,
28
the researcher concluded that most students of Seventh Semester English
Students of Muhammadiyah University were agree that through Blended
Learning, learning activities carried out by students outside of face-to-face
hours can be managed and controlled well by the instructor.
g. Item 7
Table 4.7 Through Blended Learning, teachers can add enrichment
material through internet facilities.
No. Classification Frequency Percentage
1 Strongly Agree 8 36%
2 Agree 12 54%
3 Undicided 1 5%
4 Disagree 1 5%
5 Strongly Disagree 0 0%
Total 100%
Table 4.7 indicated that 8 students or 36% said “strongly agree, 12
students or 54% said “agree”, 1 students or 5% said “Undecided”, 1 students
or 5% said “Disagree”, and 0 students or 0% said “Strongly Disagree”. Thus,
the researcher concluded that most students of Seventh Semester English
Students of Muhammadiyah University were agree that through Blended
Learning, teachers can add enrichment material through internet facilities.
29
h. Item 8
Table 4.8 Through Blended Learning, the teacher can ask students to
read the material or take a test that is conducted before learning.
No. Classification Frequency Percentage
1 Strongly Agree 7 32%
2 Agree 9 41%
3 Undicided 6 27%
4 Disagree 0 0%
5 Strongly Disagree 0 0%
Total 100%
Table 4.8 indicated that 7 students or 32% said “strongly agree, 9
students or 41% said “agree”, 6 students or 27% said “Undecided”, 0 students
or 0% said “Disagree”, and 0 students or 0% said “Strongly Disagree”. Thus,
the researcher concluded that most students of Seventh Semester English
Students of Muhammadiyah University were agree that through Blended
Learning, the teacher can ask students to read the material or take a test that is
conducted before learning.
i. Item 9
Table 4.9 By Blended Learning, teachers can organize quizzes, give
feedback, and utilize test results effectively.
No. Classification Frequency Percentage
1 Strongly Agree 7 32%
2 Agree 10 45%
3 Undicided 4 18%
4 Disagree 1 5%
5 Strongly Disagree 0 0%
30
Total 100%
Table 4.9 indicated that 7 students or 32% said “strongly agree, 10
students or 45% said “agree”, 4 students or 18% said “Undecided”, 1 students
or 5% said “Disagree”, and 0 students or 0% said “Strongly Disagree”. Thus,
the researcher concluded that most students of Seventh Semester English
Students of Muhammadiyah University were agree that By Blended Learning,
teachers can organize quizzes, give feedback, and utilize test results
effectively.
j. Item 10
Table 4.10 Through Blended Learning, students can share files or data
with other students.
No. Classification Frequency Percentage
1 Strongly Agree 12 54%
2 Agree 7 32%
3 Undicided 2 9%
4 Disagree 1 5%
5 Strongly Disagree 0 0%
Total 100%
Table 4.10 indicated that 12 students or 54% said “strongly agree, 7
students or 32% said “agree”, 2 students or 9% said “Undecided”, 1 students
or 5% said “Disagree”, and 0 students or 0% said “Strongly Disagree”. Thus,
the researcher concluded that most students of Seventh Semester English
31
Students of Muhammadiyah University were strongly agree that through
Blended Learning, students can share files or data with other students.
k. Item 11
Table 4.11 Blended Learning can broaden the range of learning /
training.
No. Classification Frequency Percentage
1 Strongly Agree 7 32%
2 Agree 12 54%
3 Undicided 2 9%
4 Disagree 1 5%
5 Strongly Disagree 0 0%
Total 100%
Table 4.11 indicated that 7 students or 32% said “strongly agree, 12
students or 54% said “agree”, 2 students or 9% said “Undecided”, 1 students
or 5% said “Disagree”, and 0 students or 0% said “Strongly Disagree”. Thus,
the researcher concluded that most students of Seventh Semester English
Students of Muhammadiyah University were agree that Blended Learning can
broaden the range of learning / training.
l. Item 12
Table 4.12 Blended Learning is easy of implementation.
No. Classification Frequency Percentage
1 Strongly Agree 5 23%
2 Agree 11 50%
3 Undicided 4 18%
4 Disagree 2 9%
32
5 Strongly Disagree 0 0%
Total 100%
Table 4.12 indicated that 5 students or 23% said “strongly agree, 11
students or 50% said “agree”, 4 students or 18% said “Undecided”, 2 students
or 9% said “Disagree”, and 0 students or 0% said “Strongly Disagree”. Thus,
the researcher concluded that most students of Seventh Semester English
Students of Muhammadiyah University were agree that Blended Learning is
easy of implementation.
m. Item 13
Table 4.13 Blended Learning is cost efficiency.
No. Classification Frequency Percentage
1 Strongly Agree 4 18%
2 Agree 13 59%
3 Undicided 3 14%
4 Disagree 2 9%
5 Strongly Disagree 0 0%
Total 100%
Table 4.13 indicated that 4 students or 18% said “strongly agree, 13
students or 59% said “agree”, 3 students or 14% said “Undecided”, 2 students
or 9% said “Disagree”, and 0 students or 0% said “Strongly Disagree”. Thus,
the researcher concluded that most students of Seventh Semester English
Students of Muhammadiyah University were agree that Blended Learning is
cost efficiency.
33
n. Item 14
Table 4.14 Blended Learning can make optimal results.
No. Classification Frequency Percentage
1 Strongly Agree 2 9%
2 Agree 14 64%
3 Undicided 6 27%
4 Disagree 0 0%
5 Strongly Disagree 0 0%
Total 100%
Table 4.14 indicated that 2 students or 9% said “strongly agree, 14
students or 64% said “agree”, 6 students or 27% said “Undecided”, 0 students
or 0% said “Disagree”, and 0 students or 0% said “Strongly Disagree”. Thus,
the researcher concluded that most students of Seventh Semester English
Students of Muhammadiyah University were agree that Blended Learning can
make optimal results.
o. Item 15
Table 4.15 Blended Learning can adjust various learning needs.
No. Classification Frequency Percentage
1 Strongly Agree 4 18%
2 Agree 15 68%
3 Undicided 3 14%
4 Disagree 0 0%
5 Strongly Disagree 0 0%
Total 100%
34
Table 4.15 indicated that 4 students or 18% said “strongly agree, 15
students or 68% said “agree”, 3 students or 14% said “Undecided”, 0 students
or 0% said “Disagree”, and 0 students or 0% said “Strongly Disagree”. Thus,
the researcher concluded that most students of Seventh Semester English
Students of Muhammadiyah University were agree that Blended Learning can
adjust various learning needs.
p. Item 16
Table 4.16 Blended Learning can increase the attractiveness of
learning.
No. Classification Frequency Percentage
1 Strongly Agree 12 54%
2 Agree 5 23%
3 Undicided 5 23%
4 Disagree 0 0%
5 Strongly Disagree 0 0%
Total 100%
Table 4.16 indicated that 12 students or 54% said “strongly agree, 5
students or 23% said “agree”, 5 students or 23% said “Undecided”, 0 students
or 0% said “Disagree”, and 0 students or 0% said “Strongly Disagree”. Thus,
the researcher concluded that most students of Seventh Semester English
Students of Muhammadiyah University werestrongly agree that Blended
Learning can increase the attractiveness of learning.
35
Based on the explanation above, the researcher can concluded that
Blended Learning Method had a lot of benefits. For instance, it makes the
leaning efficient and effective, it easy to access the material and make the
students learn independently, make the students and teacher be able to
discussion and the teacher can controlled the learning activities, the teacher
can share the learning material before the learning, Blended Leaning is easy of
implementation and cost efficiency, and it can increase the atractiveness of
learning.
2. The Weaknesses toward Blended Learning Method Implemented in
Teaching English at Seventh Semester English Students of Unismuh
Makassar Based on the Students’ Perception.
q. Item 17
Table 4.17 The media needed is very diverse, so it is difficult to apply
if the facilities and infrastructure do not support.
No. Classification Frequency Percentage
1 Strongly Agree 6 27%
2 Agree 13 59%
3 Undicided 3 14%
4 Disagree 0 0%
5 Strongly Disagree 0 0%
Total 100%
Table 4.17 indicated that 6 students or 27% said “strongly agree, 13
students or 59% said “agree”, 3 students or 14% said “Undecided”, 0 students
or 0% said “Disagree”, and 0 students or 0% said “Strongly Disagree”. Thus,
36
the researcher concluded that most students of Seventh Semester English
Students of Muhammadiyah University were agree that the media needed is
very diverse, so it is difficult to apply if the facilities and infrastructure do not
support.
r. Item 18
Table 4.18 Blended Learning will make it difficult for students to
participate in learning if internet access and network needs are
inadequate.
No. Classification Frequency Percentage
1 Strongly Agree 8 36%
2 Agree 6 27%
3 Undicided 7 32%
4 Disagree 1 5%
5 Strongly Disagree 0 0%
Total 100%
Table 4.18 indicated that 8 students or 36% said “strongly agree, 6
students or 27% said “agree”, 7 students or 32% said “Undecided”, 1 students
or 5% said “Disagree”, and 0 students or 0% said “Strongly Disagree”. Thus,
the researcher concluded that most students of Seventh Semester English
Students of Muhammadiyah University were strongly agree that Blended
Learning will make it difficult for students to participate in learning if internet
access and network needs are inadequate.
37
s. Item 19
Table 4.19 Lack of knowledge of learning resources (instructors,
students and parents) towards the use of technology.
No. Classification Frequency Percentage
1 Strongly Agree 5 23%
2 Agree 8 36%
3 Undicided 4 18%
4 Disagree 4 18%
5 Strongly Disagree 1 5%
Total 100%
Table 4.19 indicated that 12 students or 54% said “strongly agree, 5
students or 23% said “agree”, 5 students or 23% said “Undecided”, 0 students
or 0% said “Disagree”, and 0 students or 0% said “Strongly Disagree”. Thus,
the researcher concluded that most students of Seventh Semester English
Students of Muhammadiyah University were agree that lack of knowledge of
learning resources (instructors, students and parents) towards the use of
technology.
Based on the explanation above, the researcher can concluded that
besides Blended Learning had benefits, it also had some weaknesses. For
instance, Blended Learning do not support to apply if the facilities,
infrastructure, internet access and network are inadequate. In addition,
Blended Learning difficult to apply if the instructor, students, and parent lack
of the knowledge of learning resources toward the use of technology.
38
B. Discussion
As had been showed in findings, in this part the researcher explained the detail
answers from the questionnaire based on the students perceptions toward Blended
Learning implemented in teaching English at Seventh Semester Enlish students of
Unismuh Makassar.
1. The Benefits toward Blended Learning Method Implemented in
Teaching English at Seventh Semester English Students of Unismuh
Makassar Based on the Students’ Perception
As had been showed in findings, the result showed that respondents
have positive perceptions toward Blended Learning Method. Firstly, in
question number 1, most of the students answered that ”through Blended
Learning, learning occurs independently and conventionally, both of which
have advantages that can complement each other”. Thus, it shows that the
students agree that even thought Blended Learning was mixing between
online and offline, the students believed that it can be complement each
other. In questions number 2, most of the students answered that ”Blended
Learning makes learning is more effective and efficient”. It means that the
students agree that Blended Learning makes learning is more effective and
efficient. In questions number 3, all of the students answered that “by the
existence, Blended Learning participants will find it easier to access
learning material”. It shows that the students strongly agree that by using
Blended Learning, the learning material is easy to access. This was the same
as the findings of Setiyoningsih (2015) that through the Blended Learning
39
method, it brings a positive feeling to lecturers and students, because they
can be more effective in teaching and learning activities.
Secondly, in questions number 4 and 5, the students answered that
“through Blended Learning, students are free to learn the subject matter
independently by utilizing the materials available online” and “students can
hold discussions with teachers or other students outside face-to-face.” It
means that the students agree that by using Blended Learning, students can
learn by their self and they can hold the discussions with the teacher and
other their friend. In questions number 6, the students answered that “by
Blended Learning, learning activities carried out by students outside of face-
to-face hours can be managed and controlled well by the instructor” It
shows that students agree that Blended Learning Method is easy to manage
and controlled the larning activities by the instructor or lecturer. This is the
same as the explanation from Husamah (2013) that some benefits of Blended
Learning there are through Blended Learning, students are free to learn the
subject matter independently by utilizing the materials available online,
students can hold discussions with teachers or other students outside face-to-
face, by Blended Learning, learning activities carried out by students outside
of face-to-face hours can be managed and controlled well by the instructor
At this time, in question number 7 and 8, most of the students
answered that “through Blended Learning, teachers can add enrichment
material through internet facilitie” and “the teacher can ask students to read
40
the material or take a test that is conducted before learning”. It means that
the students agree that by Blended Learning, teacher is easy to find the
material and share to the students and ask them to read the material before
learning. In question number 9, most of the students answered that “by
Blended Learning, teachers can organize quizzes, give feedback, and utilize
test results effectively”. It means that the students agree that it is easy for the
teacher to get the result effectively of the learning process. In question
number 10, all of the students answered that “through Blended Learning,
students can share files or data with other students”. It shows that the
students strongly agree that the students can discussion with their friend, by
sharing the files or data.
Subsequently, in question number 11 and 12, most of the students
answered that “Blended Learning can broaden the range of learning /
training” and “Blended Learning is ease of implementation” Thus, the
students agree that it is easy to realization of Blended Learning until it can
expand of the learning. In question number number 13 and 14, “most of the
students answered that Blended Learning is cost efficiency” and “Blended
Learning can make optimal results”. It shows that the students agree that
because the cost is efficient, so that the expected result can be optimal. In
question number 15, most of the students answered that “Blended Learning
can adjust various learning needs.” It means that the students agree that by
Blended Learning, learning needs can be widely available. In question
41
number 16, all of the students answered that “Blended Learning can increase
the attractiveness of learning”. Thus, it shows that the students strongly
agree that attractiveness of learning can be enhanced. This is the same as
explanation from Husamah (2013) states the were some benefits of Blended
Learning, for instance easy of implementation, cost efficiency, make the
optimal results, can adjust various learning and can increase the
attractiveness of learning.
2. The Weaknesses toward Blended Learning Method Implemented in
Teaching English at Seventh Semester English Students of Unismuh
Makassar Based on the Students’ Perception
As had been showed in findings, the result showed that respondents
also gave their perceptions the weaknesses toward Blended Learning
Method. Husamah (2013) states that there are some weaknessess of Blended
Learning, the first is the media needed is very diverse, so it is difficult to
apply if the facilities and infrastructure do not support, the second Blended
Learning will make it difficult for students to participate in learning if
internet access and network needs are inadequate, and the last is lack of
knowledge of learning resources (instructors, students and parents) towards
the use of technology. In questions number 17, most of the students
answered that “the media needed is very diverse, so it is difficult to apply if
the facilities and infrastructure do not support”. It can be concluded that the
students agree that Blended Learning should be equipped with facilities and
42
infrastructure, because if both were not available it would be difficult to
implement.
Subsequently, In questions number 18, all of the students answered
that “Blended Learning will make it difficult for students to participate in
learning if internet access and network needs are inadequate.” Thus, it
means that the students strongly agree Blended Learning should be equipped
with internet access and network, because if both were not available it would
be difficult for the students to participate. In questions number 19, most of
the students answered that “lack of knowledge of learning resources
(instructors, students and parents) towards the use of technology”. It means
that if one of them lack of the use of technologies, it would be difficult to
apply it.
Based on the discussion above, the researcher can conclude that
Blended Learning has some benefits which can obtained when the lecturer
applies the method based on students’s perception. For instance, students can
learn independently. Be able to share the files to other between teacher and
students thus the teacher can controlled the learning activities, Blended
Learning easy of implementation, cost efficiency, and also can increase the
attractiveness of learning. Students gave positive responses related to the use
of Blended Learning. In addition, Blended Learning also has weaknesses
depending on the availability of facilities and infrastructure in implementing
43
Blended Learning. There are it will difficult to apply if the insfrastructure
and facilities do not support and the knowledge of technologies is important.
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
This chapter consists of two sections, the first section deals with the
conclusion of the research and the second deals with suggestion that related with
the conclusion.
A. Conclusions
Based on the findings and discussion, the researcher concludes that:
1. Mostly the students’ gave their positive responses about the benefits of
Blended Learning, there are the learning more efficient and effective, the
material can easy to access because teacher can share the material before
the learning, thus the students can learn independently. Be able to share
the files to other between teacher and students thus the teacher can
controlled the learning activities, Blended Learning easy of
implementation, cost efficiency, and also can increase the attractiveness
of learning.
2. The weaknesses of Blended Leaning based on the students’ perception
there were some. For instance, Blended Learning need the facilities and
infrastructure such as internet access and network to apply it. In addition,
the knowledge of learning resources of the use the technology was
45
needed, because it difficult to apply if the instructor, students, and parent
lack of technology.
B. Suggestions
Based on the result of the data analysis and conclusion, the researcher
suggested as follows:
1. For the lecturers who uses Blended Learning as their method, it would
help to improve the skill of the students. Because Blended Learning
had a lot of benefits when the lecturer apply it while the learning
activities. For instance, the lecturer can control the learning activities
and can share the files material to students. Besides the many
advantages of Blended Learning, there are also weaknesses that must
be anticipated. Those are Blended Learning requires facilities,
infrastructure such as internet access or networks, understanding
parents, teachers and students on technology is also needed.
2. For the next researcher, use this research as references about Blended
Learning to make the new research about it, but in the term of different
discussion.
46
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Achmadi, Taofan Ali. 2015. Pengaruh Penerapan Blended Learning Terhadap
Prestasi Belajar Siswa Kelas XI Teknik Permesinan SMK Muhammadiyah
3 Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta: Univeristas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Adityawardhana, Oki. 2015. Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Blended
Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas XI IPS 1 SMA
Negeri 6 Yogyakarta Tahun Ajaran 2014/201. Yogyakarta: Universitas
Negeri Yogyakarta.
Akkoyunlu, B., & Soylu, M. Y. 2008. A Study of Student’s Perceptions in a
Blended Learning Environment Based on Different Learning
Styles.Educational Technology & Society, 11 (1), 183-193.
Behjat, F., Yamini, M., & Bagheri, M. S. 2012. Blended learning: A Ubiquitous
Learning Environment for Reading Comprehension. International Journal
of English Linguistics, 2(1), 97-106 http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v2n1p97
Bendania, A. 2011. Teaching and learning online: King Fahd University of
Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM) Saudi Arabia, Case Study.
International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 4(8), 223-241.
Berrio, Orlando Carcamo. 2017. Students’Perception Of A Blended Learning
Environment At Universidad De La Guajira. Barranquilla: Universidad El
Norte.
Collis, B., & Moonen, J. 2001. Flexible Learning in a Digital World. London:
Kogan Page. Distance Learning: A Technology Perspective. International
Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. 8(1):37-48.
Tersediapada http://www. itdl.org/Journal/jan_11/Jan_11.pdf.
Husamah. 2013. Pembelajaran Bauran (Blended Learning). Jakarta: Hasil
Pustaka.
Indrakusuma, Abdul Haris., and Putri, Riani Asti. 2016. E-Leaning Teori dan
Desain. Tulungagung: STKIP PGRI Tulungagung.
Khoirullah, Evi Mivtahul. 2016. Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Siswa Antara
Penggunaan Pembelajaran Concept Sentence Dengan Pembelajaran
Konvensional Pada Mata Pelajaran Geografi Kelas X Sma Al-Huda Jati
Agung Tahun Pelajaran 2014/201. Thesis. Bandar Lampung: Universitas
Lampung.
47
Kurniawati, Rita. 2014. Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Blended Learning
Pada Mata Pelajaran Keterampilan Komputer dan Pengelolaan Informasi
(KKPI)Kelas Xi di SMK Negeri 2 Purwodadi. Thesis. Semarang:
Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Leibling, Mike and Prior, Robin. 2005. The A–Z of Learning Tips and techniques
for teachers. New York: Routledge Falmer
Milles and Huberman. 1992. Analisis Data Kualitatif. Jakarta: Universitas
Indonesia Press.
Musawi, Ali Sharaf Al. 2011. Blended Learning. Journal of Turkish Science
Education.(v.8, n.2, June 2011, pp.3-8).
Onta, Maria Ratnaningrum. 2018. Efektifitas Pembelajaran Model Blended
Learning dengan Menggunakan Media Pembelajaran Quipper School
ditinjau dari Motivasi Belajar dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas X TKJ-A
SMK Asisi Jakarta Tahun Ajaran 2017/2018. Yogyakarta: Universitas
Sanata Dharma.
Periyana, Derin. 2016. The Effect Of Using Blended Learning Model on Students’
Reading Comprehension Of Exposition Text.(A Quasi-experimental Study
at the Eleventh Grade of SMA Negeri 4 Kota Tangerang Selatan in the
2015-2016 Academic Year). Thesis. Tangerang: Syarif Hidayatullah State
Islamic University.
Rusman. 2012. Model-Model Pembelajaran Mengembangkan Profesionalisme
Guru Edisi Kedua. Bandung: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.
Setiyoningsih, Tri. 2015. The Implemented of Blended Learning in Teaching
Listening to the First Year Students of English Education Department at
University of Nusantara PGRI Kediri Academic Year 2015-2016. Thesis.
Kediri: University Of Nusantara PGRI Kediri.
Sudjana, Nana. 2001. Teknologi Pengajaran. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo, cet.
III
Sugiyono. 2009. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif Dan R & D.
Bandung: Alfabeta.
Susandi, Ari. 2017. The Influence Model Blended Learning of Social Sciences
Subjects Respecting Indonesian Ethnic and Cultural Diversity to
Increasing Activity and Learning Outcomes of Grade V Students in
Elementary School 1 Purwoharjo Banyuwangi Distric Lesson Year
2015/2016. Pancaran Pendidikan FKIP Universitas Jember Vol. 6, No. 3,
Page 45-53, August, 2017
48
Teeter, T. 1997. Teaching on the Internet. Meeting the Challenge of Electronic
Learning, ERIC: Document Reproduction Service.
Wikibuku. 2016. Pembelajaran Berbasis Blended Learning. Accessed on
Saturday 20 July, 2019.
Wikipedia. Online. https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skala_Likert. Accessed on
Saturday 25 May 2019.
A
P
P
E
N
D
I
C
E
S
Close Ended Questionnaire
Name :
Class :
List Numb :
Give your assessment by putting a check mark (✓)on the statement in the
assessment column
No Statements
Answers
SA A Un
D D SD
1
Through Blended Learning, learning occurs
independently and conventionally, both of which
have advantages that can complement each
other.
2 Blended Learning makes learning is more
effective and efficient
3 By the existence, Blended Learning participants
will find it easier to access learning material.
4
Through Blended Learning, students are free to
learn the subject matter independently by
utilizing the materials available online.
5
Through Blended Learning, students can hold
discussions with teachers or other students
outside face-to-face.
6
By Blended Learning, learning activities carried
out by students outside of face-to-face hours can
be managed and controlled well by the
instructor.
7 Through Blended Learning, teachers can add
enrichment material through internet facilities.
8
Through Blended Learning, the teacher can ask
students to read the material or take a test that is
conducted before learning.
9
By Blended Learning, teachers can organize
quizzes, give feedback, and utilize test results
effectively.
10 Through Blended Learning, students can share
files or data with other students.
11 Blended Learning can Broaden the range of
learning / training.
12 Blended Learning is ease of implementation.
13 Blended Learning is sost efficiency.
14 Blended Learning can make optimal results.
15 Blended Learning can adjust various learning
needs.
16 Blended Learning can increase the attractiveness
of learning.
17
The media needed is very diverse, so it is
difficult to apply if the facilities and
infrastructure do not support.
18
Blended Learning will make it difficult for
students to participate in learning if internet
access and network needs are inadequate
19
Lack of knowledge of learning resources
(instructors, students and parents) towards the
use of technology.
(Adapted from Husamah, 2013)
Note:
SA : Strongly Agree
A : Agree
UnD : Undecided
D : Disagree
SD : Strongly Disagree
OBSERVATON CHECKLIST
No Statements
ANSWER
Yes No
1
Through Blended Learning, learning occurs
independently and conventionally, both of which have
advantages that can complement each other.
2 Blended Learning makes learning is more effective and
efficient
3 By the existence, Blended Learning participants will
find it easier to access learning material.
4
Through Blended Learning, students are free to learn the
subject matter independently by utilizing the materials
available online.
5
Through Blended Learning, students can hold
discussions with teachers or other students outside face-
to-face.
6
By Blended Learning, learning activities carried out by
students outside of face-to-face hours can be managed
and controlled well by the instructor.
7 Through Blended Learning, teachers can add
enrichment material through internet facilities.
8
Through Blended Learning, the teacher can ask students
to read the material or take a test that is conducted
before learning.
9 By Blended Learning, teachers can organize quizzes,
give feedback, and utilize test results effectively.
10 Through Blended Learning, students can share files or
data with other students.
11 Blended Learning can Broaden the range of learning /
training.
12 Blended Learning is ease of implementation.
13 Blended Learning is sost efficiency.
14 Blended Learning can make optimal results.
15 Blended Learning can adjust various learning needs.
16 Blended Learning can increase the attractiveness of
learning.
17
The media needed is very diverse, so it is difficult to
apply if the facilities and infrastructure do not support.
18
Blended Learning will make it difficult for students to
participate in learning if internet access and network
needs are inadequate
19
Lack of knowledge of learning resources (instructors,
students and parents) towards the use of technology.
No.
Respondent
Questionnaire Items Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
1 4 4 4 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 71
2 5 4 5 4 5 5 4 5 5 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 79
3 5 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 2 2 5 4 4 3 4 4 76
4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 76
5 4 3 3 4 2 4 3 3 2 3 4 2 2 3 5 5 4 3 3 62
6 4 4 3 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 3 5 4 4 81
7 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 5 3 4 3 5 5 5 84
8 4 3 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 5 4 3 4 5 4 5 4 82
9 4 2 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 5 4 3 4 5 4 5 4 81
10 4 5 4 5 5 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 2 86
11 4 5 4 5 5 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 2 86
12 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 5 3 4 5 4 4 2 75
13 5 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 4 5 5 76
14 3 4 5 5 3 3 4 4 3 5 5 3 3 4 3 5 4 5 5 76
15 3 4 2 5 3 3 4 4 3 5 5 3 3 4 4 4 3 5 5 72
16 5 5 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 2 2 4 4 4 4 3 4 2 4 68
17 4 3 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 65
18 4 5 4 4 5 4 5 3 3 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 5 3 5 79
19 4 4 5 4 4 5 5 3 4 5 4 4 5 4 4 5 4 3 4 80
20 4 4 5 4 4 5 5 3 4 5 4 4 5 4 4 5 4 3 2 78
21 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 5 4 4 85
22 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 3 4 5 4 4 4 4 3 5 4 4 1 71
TOTAL 1689
DOCUMENTATION
CURRICULUM VITAE
Sam Pravita Sari was born on 02nd November 1997 in
Maros. She is the only child from the marriage between of
her parents, Dg. Siratang and Nuraeni.
She began her elementary school in SDN 1 Benteng and
graduated in 2009. Then, she continued her study in SMPN 1
Benteng and graduated in 2012. Her Senior High School was SMAN 1 Benteng
and graduted in 2015. At the same year, she continued her study at the
Muhammadiyah University of Makassar as students of English Department,
Teacher Training and Education Faculty.
At the end of her study, she finished her thesis in 2019 entitle “Students’
Perception toward Blended Learning Method Implemented in Teaching English at
Seventh Semester English Students of Unismuh Makassar (A Descriptive
Qualitative Research)”