View
225
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Introduction toIP Eurotrans - NUDATRA
Enrique M. González RomeroCIEMAT
7/06/2006
IP-EUROTRANS Internal Training Course ITC2:
“Nuclear data for transmutation: status, needs and methods”
Santiago deCompostela, Spain
Nuclear waste Partitioning and Transmutation (P&T)
6,448%
13,452%
24,960%
100,000%
4,352%0,062%
1,003% 0,097% 0,002%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Mas
s /
U
Steel O Zr-al U FF Np Pu Am Cm
4,352%
0,062%
1,003%
0,097% 0,002%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
Ma
ss
/ U
FF Np Pu Am Cm
Heterogeneity of Spent nuclear fuel ComponentsU + Activation wastes: Large volume and mass but low activity and heat.FF: 5% of the mass but most of the radioactivity and heat at discharge.
Highly radioactive but of short live (30 years).In particular Cs y Sr main heat source for the Geological repository at short term.
LLFF: 99Tc, 129I, 93Zr, ... long half-life (> 105 y) + soluble in repository (radiotoxicity concern)Transuranic actinides: Pu + MA (Np, Am, Cm,...):
1.5% in mass but most of radiotoxicity and heat after 100 y. for more than 105 y. Fissionable (proliferation and criticality concern) but can produce energy (Pu) !
P&T: Differentiated management for such heterogeneous components
Partitioning
LWR (+FR) Spent Fuel PUREX
U irrad
Pu irrad
M.A. + F.F.
Am
Resid. Sec.
Cm
Np
Cs / Sr
LLFF
Otros FF
Tra
nsm
utat
ion
Inter. Storage
Final Storage
n + 239Pu (24000 y) 134Cs (2 y)+ 104Ru (stable) + 2 n + 200 MeV (energy)
n + 241Am (432 y) 242Am (16 h) [capture]242Am (16 h) 242Cm (163 d) [- decay]
242Cm (163 d) 238Pu (88 y) [ decay]
n + 238Pu (88 y) 142Ce (stable)+ 95Zr (64 d) + 2 n + 200 MeV (energy)
Transmutation
AdvancedPartitioning
FR or Surface Storage
Reactor prod. Electricity
n + 99Tc (210000 y) 100Tc (16 s) + . 100Tc (16 s) 100Ru (stable) [-]
n + 129I (15.700.000 y) 130I (12 h) + . 130I (12 h) 130Xe (stable) [-]
Fast Spectrum Transmutation Scheme
Present in nuclear wastes Thermal and Fast FissionMedium Half-Life (<100 años) Fast FissiónShort Half-Life (< 30 dias) Low Fission Cross SectionHigh A actinides
Av. Flux Intensity (n/cm2/s)3,00E+15
Cm242 Cm243 Cm244 Cm245 Cm246 Cm247Second 1 Time Unit / SF / EC/ SF / SF / SF / SF
Hour 3600 31570560 100 / 6.2E-6 99.7/0.29/ 5.3E- 9 100 / 1.35E-4 100 / 6.1E-7 100 / 3E-2 100
Day 86400 0,446 29,068 18,080 8490,695 4724,813 15582935,494
Year 3E+07 18,130 2,798 6,257 2,922 16,459
64,7% 8,0% 65,2% 11,4% 44,6%
Am241 Am242 Am242m Am243 Am244 / SF /EC IT / / SF / SF / EC
100 / 3.77E-10 82.7 / 17.3 99.5/0.46/1E- 3 100 / 3.7E-9 100 / 4E-2
432,225 0,002 140,846 7361,922 0,001
3,652 17,792 1,844 4,892
44% : 44% 13,1% 8,4% 87,0%
Pu238 Pu239 Pu240 Pu241 Pu242 Pu243 / SF / SF / SF / / SF
100 / 1.9E-7 100 / 3.1E-10 100 / 5.7E-6 100 / 2.45E-3 100 / 5.5E-4 100
87,644 24083,608 6556,805 14,334 372891,707 0,001
4,220 3,477 9,033 2,688 11,354 6,775
37,5% 19,4% 54,8% 14,2% 61,1% 30,6%
Np237 Np238 Np239 Pu239 Symbol & Mass / SF / SF Decay modes
100 / 2E-12 100 100 100 / 3.1E-10 Branching ratios2137656,095 0,006 0,006 24083,608 Half-Life
4,332 15,928 3,477 Absorption-Half-Life81,5% 13,1% 19,4% (n,)/absoption
TRU Transmutation SchemeFast Spectrum
Ln(2)/()
Framework and Strategy of P&TGeological Disposal
Dedicated Fuel andLLFP target Fabrication
Pu, MA, LLFP
Direct Disposal
P & T
PartitioningSpent Fuelfrom LWRs
Transmutation
GeologicalDisposal
Dedicated Fueland
LLFP TargetReprocessing
Stable FP, TRU losses
Pu, MA, LLFP
Stable FP, TRU losses
Cs, Sr Temporary Storagefor heat decay
LLFP: Long lived fission products (Tc-99, I-129, Se-79, ...); MA: Minor Actinides (Am, Np, Cm)
Geological DisposalGeological Disposal
Dedicated Fuel andLLFP target Fabrication
Pu, MA, LLFP
Dedicated Fuel andLLFP target Fabrication
Pu, MA, LLFP
Direct Disposal
P & T
PartitioningSpent Fuelfrom LWRs
Transmutation
GeologicalDisposal
Dedicated Fueland
LLFP TargetReprocessing
Stable FP, TRU losses
Pu, MA, LLFP
Stable FP, TRU losses
Cs, Sr Temporary Storagefor heat decay
LLFP: Long lived fission products (Tc-99, I-129, Se-79, ...); MA: Minor Actinides (Am, Np, Cm)
Efficient High (fast) neutron flux Nuclear (Fast) Reactortransmutation High burnup Flexible
High Pu+MA and low U content Subcritical but very high safety standards
ADS
The most efficient transmutation would be a reactor of significant power (nx100 or 1000 MW), of fast neutron spectrum, with a fuel with very low Uranium content and high concentration of Pu and MA.
A reactor with these characteristics shows an important lack of intrinsic safety: Low delay neutron fractionSmall Doppler effectBad void coefficient
In addition the reactor needs a large operation flexibility, to be able to handle:Very high burn-up levels in each irradiation cycleLarge reactivity evolution within one irradiation cycle
Very difficult for critical reactors and strong limitation on their transuranium elements load.
Two types of solutions:
A large number of fast reactors with small regions dedicated to transmutation (countries with large park of nuclear power plants)
A small number of subcritical accelerator driven systems, ADS, dedicated to transmutation.
Transmutation device requirements
ADS = Accelerator Driven Subcritical System
•Flexible enough to accept fuel with high content on Pu and M.A.
•Low U content or pure Inert matrix to optimize the transmutation performance
ADS = Accelerator Driven System
también conocido como ADSS = Accelerator Driven Subcritical System
Un ADS es un conjunto nuclear multiplicativo subcrítico cuya operación está mantenidapor un acelerador de protones que genera una fuente externa de neutrones en unblanco de esplación.
protones
Aceleradorde
partículas
Blanco deespalación
Conjunto nuclearsubcrítico
neutrones
Fisiones
Barras con los residuos (actínidos)actuando como combustible
An ADS is a subcritical nuclear system (Keff = 0.95-0.98) whose power is sustained by a external high intensity neutron source. Usualy the neutrons are produced by spallation in heavy nuclides (Pb) by high energy neutrons (~1 GeV)
Los aceleradores de mayor intensidad en energías próximas a 1000 MeV
Acelerador del LANSCE de 800 MeV en Los Alamos National Laboratory, EEUU.
P&T will reduce the transuranic actinide inventory, allowing:
Reducing the radiotoxicity inventory and the volume of the High Level Wastes, HLW, of future reactors and fuel cycles, to improve their sustainability
Increasing the capacity of the Geological Repository for the waste already produced, and to be produced, by the present reactors
Facilitating the technical requirements and public acceptance of the Geological Repository
On the other hand P&T might:· Increase the exposure risk of new fuel cycle plants (fabric., reproces., ADS) operators· Increase the proliferation risk in the nuclear fuel cycle· Increase the cost of nuclear energy production
R&D to optimize advantages limiting new risks and costs to acceptable limits!.
• Reducing the radiotoxicity (1/100)
• Reducing the time to reach any radiotoxicity level (1/100 – 1/1000)
• No proliferation risk in the repository
• Reducing HLW volume at repository
• Simplifying repository requirements
• Utilizing the Pu+MA energy
R&D for P&T: 5th Framework Program of UE
Nuclear Data and Basic physics:nTOF-ND-ADS
HINDASMUSE
Materials:TECLASPIRE
MEGAPIEASCHLIM
Fuel:Thorium Cycle
CONFIRMFUTURE
Reprocessing:PYROREPPARTNEW
CALIXPART
Preliminary Design:
PDS-XADS
Network: ADOPT
ADS Design Concepts of PDS-XADS
0 . 0 0
80MWth Pb-Bi cooled XADS
Ansaldo
80MWth Gas-cooled XADS
Framatome ANP
50MWth Pb-Bi cooled MYRRHA
SCK·CEN
Development Scheme: FP5 to FP6
1999
2004
2005
2025
XADS (Gas)
80 MW(th)
250 W/cm
single batch loading
MYRRHA (Pb-Bi)
50 MW(th)
500 W/cm
multi batch loading
FP5
XADS (Pb-Bi)
80 MW(th)
110 W/cm
single batch loading
FP6
XADSDemonstration of technological
feasibility of
an ADS system
XT-ADSShort-term demonstration
of transmutation on a sizable scale
and of the ADS behaviour
Generic ETDLong-term
transmutation on an
industrial scale
FP ObjectivesDesign Concepts
Generic ETD
Several 100 MW(th)
250 - 300 W/cm
multi batch loading
European Transmutation Demonstration
advanced design
preliminary design, economics,
scalability to EFIT
ETD / XT-ADS
< 100 MW(th)
250 - 300 W/cm
multi batch loading
XADS (Gas)
80 MW(th)
250 W/cm
single batch loading
MYRRHA (Pb-Bi)
50 MW(th)
500 W/cm
multi batch loading
FP5
XADS (Pb-Bi)
80 MW(th)
110 W/cm
single batch loading
FP6
XADSDemonstration of technological
feasibility of
an ADS system
XT-ADSShort-term demonstration
of transmutation on a sizable scale
and of the ADS behaviour
Generic ETDLong-term
transmutation on an
industrial scale
FP ObjectivesDesign Concepts
Generic ETD
Several 100 MW(th)
250 - 300 W/cm
multi batch loading
European Transmutation Demonstration
advanced design
preliminary design, economics,
scalability to EFIT
ETD / XT-ADS
< 100 MW(th)
250 - 300 W/cm
multi batch loading
Generic ETD
Several 100 MW(th)
250 - 300 W/cm
multi batch loading
European Transmutation Demonstration
advanced design
preliminary design, economics,
scalability to EFIT
ETD / XT-ADS
< 100 MW(th)
250 - 300 W/cm
multi batch loading
FP6 XT-ADS
Integrated Project on European Transmutation:
EUROTRANS Steps towards a Demonstrator
Overall Objectives of EUROTRANS
EUROTRANS aims to the demonstration of the technical feasibility of transmutation using an ADS (3rd building block):
Advanced design of an eXperimental facility demonstrating the technical feasibility of Transmutation in an Accelerator Driven System (XT-ADS), and conceptual design of the European Facility for Industrial Transmutation (EFIT), DM1 DESIGN
Provide validated experimental input from relevant coupling experiments of accelerator / spallation target / sub-critical blanket, DM2 ECATS
Development and demonstration of the associated technologies, especially fuels DM3 AFTRA, heavy liquid metal technologies DM4 DEMETRA, and nuclear data DM5 NUDATRA,
To prove its overall technical feasibility, and
To carry out an economic assessment of the whole system.
Integrated Project EUROTRANS: EUROpean Research Programme for the TRANSmutation of High
Level Nuclear Waste in an Accelerator Driven System (ADS)
Partners: EUROTRANS integrates critical masses of resources and activities, including education and training (E&T) efforts, of 45 participants from 14 countries, being industry (10 participants), national research centres (18), and 17 universities within ENEN.
Overall budget: 23M€ EC contribution
Duration: 4 years
Start date: April 2005
Structure of EUROTRANS
DM2 ECATSCoupling
ExperimentsG. Granget, CEA
DM4 DEMETRAHLM Technologies
C. Fazio, FZK
DM1 DESIGNETD Design
H. A. Abderrahim, SCK-CEN
DM5 NUDATRANuclear Data
E. Gonzalez, CIEMAT
DM3 AFTRAFuels
F. Delage, CEA
IP Co-ordinatorJ.U. Knebel, FZK
DM0 ManagementProject Office
ECV. Bhatnagar
6.1M€ 5.5M€
3.3M€ 5.3M€ 1.1M€
Domain 1 DESIGN
Development of a detailed design of XT-ADS and a conceptual design of the European Facility for Industrial Transmutation EFIT
with heavy liquid metal cooling
DM1 DESIGN: Objectives
To carry out a detailed design of an experimental ADS called XT-ADS that construction can be started within the next 8 years.
The XT-ADS should be as much as possible serving as a technological test bench of the main components of an industrial scale transmutation facility called EFIT
To carry out a conceptual design of the industrial scale ADS Pb cooled EFIT and a gas cooled back up option of EFIT
To develop, construct and test the key components of the LINAC technology that will be serving for XT-ADS as well as for EFIT. The driving parameter in this work is the improvement of the beam reliability
To design the windowless spallation target module of the XT-ADS in terms of thermo-mechanical, thermal-hydraulic and vacuum
To reassess the global safety approach for ADS in presence of MA fuel and apply it to the XT-ADS for assessment of DBC and DEC transients for preparing the SAR for the XT-ADS
To assess the investment and operational costs of the XT-ADS and their scaling to EFIT and identify the needed R&D efforts
Domain DM1: DESIGN
Development of a reference DESIGN for the European Transmutation Demonstrator (ETD) with heavy liquid metal cooling
WP1.1 Reference Design Specifications
WP1.2 Development and Assessment of Generic ETD and XT- ADS Designs
WP1.3 High Power Proton Accelerator (HPPA) Development
WP1.4 Spallation Target Proof of Feasibility
WP1.5 Safety Assessment
WP1.6 Cost Estimates and Planning Issues for the Reference Design for the Generic ETD and XT-ADS
EUROTRANS: Design Domain
XT-ADS EFIT
Design level Advanced design Conceptual design
Coolant Pb-Bi Pure Lead
Primary System Integrated Integrated
Power 50 to 100 MWth ≥ 300 MWth
Core Inlet Temp 300°C (350°C) 400°C
Core Outlet Temp 400°C (430°C) 480°C
Target Unit interface Windowless Windowless (backup: window)
Target Unit geometry Off-center Centered
Fuel MOX (accept for a MA Fuel) (Pu, Am)O2 + MgO (or Mo)
Av. Fuel Power density 700 W/cm³ 450 to 650 W/cm³
Fuel pin spacer Grid Grid
Fuel Assembly type Wrapper Wrapper / Wrapperless
Fuel Assembly cross section
Hexagonal Square (based on BREST and PWR) or hexagonal (FBR)
Preliminary Design Characteristics of the XT-ADS and EFIT Designs (1/2)
Fuel loading Top / Bottom TBD Top
Fuel monitoring T and FF (per FA) T and FF (per regions)
External fuel handling RH oriented TBD
Primary coolant circulation in normal operation
Forced with mechanical pumps
Forced with mechanical pumps
Primary coolant circulation for DHR
Natural + Pony motor Natural + Pony motor
Secondary coolant Low pressure boiling water Superheated water cycle
Reactor building Below grade Below grade (partially)
Seismic design Mol Site seismic spectrum Antiseismic supports (horizontally)
Structural Material T91 and A316L TBD
Accelerator LINAC (power: 2 ~ 5 MW) LINAC (power: TBD)
Beam Ingress (1) Top Top
Preliminary Design Characteristics of the XT-ADS and EFIT Designs (2/2)
EFIT First « Remontage » proposed by ANSALDO
Domain 2 ECATS
Experimental activities on the Coupling of an Accelerator, a spallation Target and a Sub-critical
blanket
Special Situation: DM2 ECATS
The objective is to assist the design of XT-ADS and EFIT, provide validated experimental input from relevant experiments at sufficient power (20-100 kW) on the coupling of an accelerator, a spallation target and a sub-critical blanket. The work programme will be specified after the completion of a Feasibility Study.
Expected outcome of the Feasibility Study: Description of required input for the design of XT-ADS and EFIT, Description of salient features of relevant coupling experiments, Summary of recommendations, Structured proposal of work programme.
To perform ECATS requires collaboration with USA (RACE), Russian Federation (SAD) and Belarussia (YALINA).
Experimental activities on the Coupling of an Accelerator, a spallation Target and a Sub-critical blanket
Input Data Base Validation Required for the ADS Feasibility Study of DM2 ECATS
Qualification of sub-criticality monitoring,
Validation of generic dynamic behaviour of an ADS in a wide range of sub-critical levels, sub-criticality safety margins and thermal feedback effects,
Validation of the core power / beam current relationship,
Start-up and shut-down procedures, instrumentation validation and specific dedicated experimentation,
Interpretation and validation of experimental data, benchmarking and code validation activities etc.,
Safety and licensing issues of different component parts as well as that of the integrated system as a whole.
Experiments within DM2 ECATS
SAD Experiments (Russian Federation): Representative coupling of proton accelerator, spallation target
and fast subcritical core (k~0,95) at low power, Wide range of experiments, including shielding issues, Design of the facility to be consolidated soon, With appropriate funding, experiments could start in 2009.
YALINA Facility (Belarus): Subcritical thermal neutron blanket with external source.
RACE Experiments (USA) / GUINEVERE (Belgium)
Domain 3 AFTRA
Advanced Fuels for TRAnsmutation Systems
Objectives:
Design, development and qualification in representative conditions of a U-free fuel concept for the EFIT, compatible with the reference design studied in DM1 DESIGN.
Ranking of different fuel concepts according to their main out-of-pile properties, their in-pile behaviour and their predicted behaviour in normal and transient operating conditions, and their safety performance in accidental conditions.
Recommendations about fuel design and fuel performance of the most promising fuel candidate(s).
Fuel selection: Reference fuel (selected from FP5 / FUTURE):
Oxide composite : (Pu, MA, Zr)O2 ; (Pu, MA)O2+MgO or Mo Backup solution (selected from FP5 / CONFIRM)
Nitride inert matrix fuel : (Pu, MA, Zr)N
DM3 AFTRA: Nuclear Fuel Development
WP3.1 TRU-fuel Pre-design and Performance Assessment WP3.2 TRU-fuel Safety Assessment WP3.3 Irradiation Tests and Fuel Qualification WP3.4 Out-of-pile Property Measurements
Status of WP3.1: TRU-fuel pre-design and performance assessment
Difficulties to select the best fuel candidate! Very limited knowledge:
Experimental work remains difficult (poor availability of the facilities + overbooking)
PIE results are rare (especially on Mo) Choice is premature
The ADS fuel reprocessability has never been studied EUROPART does not address the ADS fuel reprocessing !
MgO-fuel, ranked higher in FUTURE, is recently suspected to be not stable enough under irradiation/temperature (volatilization risk)
Mo-fuel is proposed as the new reference for EUROTRANS But large uncertainties on the behaviour of Mo under irradiation Transmutation capability significantly reduced Enrichment in 92Mo required
Irradiations foreseen FUTURIX-FTA in Phénix (irradiation of U-free fuels repr. of EFIT fuels) HELIOS in HFR (irradiation of Am-bearing IMF/instrumented pins) BODEX in HFR (irradiation of inert matrix doped with 10B)
DM3 AFTRA: Status
Domain 4 DEMETRA
DEvelopment and assessment of structural materials and heavy liquid MEtal technologies for
TRAnsmutation systems
Improvement and assessment of the Heavy Liquid Metal (HLM) technologies and thermal-hydraulics for application in ADS, and in particular to EFIT and XT-ADS, where the HLM is both the spallation material and the primary coolant.
Characterisation of the reference structural materials in representative conditions (with and without irradiation environment) in order to provide the data base needed for design purposes, e.g. fuel cladding, in-vessel components, primary vessel, instrumentation, spallation target with or without beam window.
Challenges:Irradiation experiments in HLMLarge scale thermal-hydraulics tests (still to be defined) Long-term corrosion tests and mechanical tests in HLM Free surface characterisationSummary of the MEGAPIE experiment
DM4 DEMETRA: Objectives
DM4 DEMETRA: Test Facilities
In FP5, a complementary combination of test facilities was set up in Europe.
EUROTRANS is
fully using these test facilities.
STELLA LoopCEA
CIRCE LoopENEA
TALL LoopKTH
CIRCO LoopCIEMAT
CorrWett LoopPSI
VICE LoopSCK-CEN
CHEOPE LoopENEA
WP4.1 Specification and Fabricability of the Reference Materials and its Operation Conditions
WP4.2 Reference Materials Characterisation in HLM and technology development
WP4.3 Reference Materials Irradiation Studies
WP4.4 Advanced Thermal-hydraulics and Measurement Techniques
WP4.5 Large-scale Integral Tests
WP4.6 MEGAPIE Related Studies: PTA
DM4 DEMETRA: Activities
Domain 5 NUDATRA
NUclear DAta for TRAnsmutation
The isotopic composition of the equilibrium fuel, and correspondingly of the losses finally going to the storage, is defined by:
The isotopic composition of the LWR wastes feed into the transmutation reactor
the isotopes decay constants,
the neutron flux intensity (reactor power) and,
the effective cross sections of the activation reactions
Activation reaction Cross section Neutron flux Spectrum(n,), (n,)* of actinides with elastic, inelastic,(n,2n),…(n,2n) +… half-live > 100d fuel matrix, Struct. Materials, coolant
Nuclear data for Transmutation from the fuel cycle point of view
Transmutation takes place in a reactor: Critical or Subcritical (ADS)
Critical Reactors or ADS devoted to transmutation present new features:
In all casesNew fuels: High content on minor actinide and high mass Pu isotopes
Well adapted to Advanced reprocessing.
Very high Burn-up per irradiation cycle.
Most FrequentlyFast neutron flux spectrum.
Final objective: Long term radiotoxicity reduction
Subcritical configurations + Spallation sources
New Technologies: Coolant: Molten Lead or Pb/Bi, Fuel matrix: Inert matrix, Th matrix, ..
New isotopic composition of transmutation fuels
Contributions to capture of present and transmutation fuels
Contributions to fission of present and transmutation fuels
Integrated reaction capture and fission reaction rate versus energyin a FAST neutron energy spectrum
Nuclear data uncertaities final consecuencesCriteria for the Sensitivity Analysis:
Focusing the nuclear data on its final P&T application
The FP5 guidelines for measurement priorities: direct contributions to the reaction rates, availability of the samples, and differences observed between different nuclear data bases.
This simple sensitivity analysis has proven its merits within the nTOF-ADS program by indicating the isotope, reaction and required accuracy and served to reduce unnecessary efforts.
However a full systematic sensitivity analysis is missing and has been requested both in the meetings of the BASTRA cluster and in the WPPT of the NEA/OCDE.
Only this systematic sensitivity analysis can provide precise scientific arguments to properly define the impact of the data uncertainty and the priority of needs for new measurements.
This sensitivity analysis have to evaluate the impact of the uncertainties of the nuclear data on:
• the performance (power and operability), • safety (dynamic parameters, shielding, radioprotection, ...) and • cost (power, shielding, ...) of
- the transmutation device (ADS and critical reactors) and - the final inventory of the repository depending on the nuclear cycle options.
Parameters for the sensitivity analysis
Any detailed engineering design of a transmutation device or of fuel cycle will have to manage the consequences of the nuclear and other technical data uncertainties.However whereas some corrections (like the power level of an ADS) are easy to handle (beam intensity adjustment), others affect the viability or final result of the concept or may have large economical impact. The sensitivity analysis has to be concentrated on the effect of the nuclear data uncertainties on these second type of parameters. Some important parameters:
Keff : a) At construction -> overdesign of fuel and control system(rather than n-multiplication) b) Evolution with burn-up must be predictable
Dynamic parameters: eff, neutron lifetime, Doppler effect, Reactivity coefficients,... Critical transmuters, ADS in abnormal conditions, Evolution with burn-up, Reactivity control.
Shielding requirements: Related with the small part of the very energetic spallation neutrons.
Material damage: In particular in the window, gas releasing reactions.
The fuel cycle: Equilibrium composition of multiply-recycled fuels in closed fuel cycles.
The composition and amount of the different spent fuels and of the final disposal: Activation of the fuel, coolant, structures, accelerator,... + the fission & spallation products.
The spallation source performance: Production and transport of high energy neutrons, *.
CEA (France), CIEMAT (Spain), CNRS (France), CSIC (Spain), FZJ (Germany), FZK (Germany), GSI (Germany), INFN (Italy), INRNE (Bulgaria), NRG (Netherlands), PSI (Switzerland), SCK-CEN (Belgium), JRC-Geel (EC), Universities: AGH (Poland),TUW (Austria), KTH (Sweden), ULG (Belgium), UNED (Spain), USDC (Spain), USE (Spain), UU (Sweden), ZSR (Germany).
Improvement and assessment of the simulation tools and associated uncertainties for ADS transmuter core, its shielding and associated fuel cycle.
The activity is essentially focussed on the evaluated nuclear data libraries and reaction models for materials in transmutation fuels, coolants, spallation targets, internal structures, and reactor and accelerator shielding, relevant for the design and optimisation of the Generic ETD and XT-ADS.
DM5 NUclear DAta for TRAnsmutation: Objectives
NUDATRA Workpackages
WP5.1 Sensitivity Analysis and Validation of Nuclear Data and Simulation Tools
WP5.2 Low and Intermediate Energy Nuclear Data Measurements
WP5.3 Nuclear Data Libraries Evaluation and Low-intermediate Energy Models
WP5.4 High Energy Experiments and Modelling
NUDATRA Activities Concentrate on 4 Topics
Pb-Bi cross sections: inelastic, (n,xn), Po production (B.R.)
MA: Capture in 243Am + Fission on 244Cm
High energy codes improvement and measurements: Absolute Spallation product x-section, Gas and Light Charged Particles production
Sensitivity analysis of ETD fuel cycle
These topics are addressed from the different aspects required to be used on the ETDs analysis and design:
Measurements, Evaluation, Integration on standard tools, Validation and Sensitivity analysis.
Uncertainties propagation and Sensitivity analysisBasis for a quantitative assessment of the nuclear data precision requirements
For the transmutation reactor: Some although still few and generic analysis of ADS parameters sensitivity analysis available.A specific study will be performed within the EUROTRANS DM1 Design activities for the XT-ADS and the Generic-ETD.
For the the fuel cycle and the repository parameters:Very few analysis available.Specific methodologies required
Differential sensitivity coefficient determination Combination of random sampling of deviations
TopicsTransmutation performance Fuel characteristics at reprocessing, fabrication and repository Isotopic composition of the transmutation plant fuel at equilibrium (in
multi-recycling scenarios)Data for Actinides, FF and Activation products are concerned
Cross sections, Branching ratios, FF yields, Decay properties MC and Deterministic codes: EVOLCODE or KAPROS/KARBUS
Low and intermediate energy nuclear data measurements:Pb and Bi cross section and branching ratios
High resolution excitation functions for the inelastic scattering cross sections of Pb and BiCritical to model correctly the ADS core neutron spectra 206, 207, 208Pb and 209Bi, thr-20 MeV by (n,n’) at Gelina
Gamma-ray production cross sections are measured and total and level inelastic cross sections will be deduced
Bi capture branching ratioProduction of 210gBi is the mechanism leading to 210Po production. 210mBi decay to 206Tl.210Po is one of the main ADS target and coolant activation concerns 209Bi(n,)210m,gBi capture B.R. and energy dependence
The time-of-flight technique will be used at Gelina
Two HPGe detectors will be used to distinguish between capture events leading to the ground state and the meta-stable state
Compensation for angular dependence
Gelina @ Geel (UE)
Low and intermediate energy nuclear data measurements:Pb and Bi cross section and branching ratios
Measurements of Pb (n,xn’ ) cross section at 100 MeV Non existing data required for Pb based ADS high energy neutron shielding calculations and spallation n multiplicationPb (n,xn’) at Uppsala
The Scandal facility will be used at the neutron beam facility of The Svedberg Laboratory
Measurements of Pb and Bi (n,xn) cross sections Effects on the neutron multiplication and the source importance of ADS cooled with Pb/Bi or using Pb/Bi spallation target 206Pb,209Bi (n,xn)
Online HPGe detectors at Gelina, Uppsala? nTOF?
Basic feasibility of the method demonstrated in FP5
Gelina @ Geel (UE-Belgium)
Cyclotron @ Uppsala (Sweden)
Low and intermediate energy nuclear data measurements:MA Capture and Fission cross sections
Neutron capture cross section of MA.Better data required for Transmutation of MA.243Am is the path to 244,245,246,247Cm production243Am (n,) at nTOF-Ph2 (CERN)
From 0.1 eV -1 MeV
Time of flight + 4 TAC.
The methodology and setup tested in 2004 at the FP5 nTOF-ADS project.
New special target
Neutron 244Cm fission cross section Extremely difficult direct measurement (Short half-life 18.1y and high spontaneous fission)244Cm Elimination in ADS and fission model 244Cm(n,f) from 243Am(3He,pf)
Measurements of the transfer reactions 243Am(3He,pf) at Orsay +
Evaluations and models for the formation of the composite nucleus
nTOF @ CERN TAC calorimeter
Nuclear data libraries evaluation and low-intermediate energy models Measurements must be evaluated to become useful for simulations
Improvement of low and intermediate energy reaction models
Nuclear model code TALYS
Methods to generate covariance data
Evaluation of new MA data (results available from nTOF)
Optical model, pre-equilibrium, compound nucleus and fission model parameters will be fine-tuned
Priority to Americium isotopes in the fast neutron range
The resonance regions will also be analyzed
Re-evaluation of data libraries for Pb and Bi Using the data from the WP5.2 to complement the existing and FP5 data
(nTOF, IRMM…)
High energy experiments and modelingThe energy range (200-1000 MeV) specific of the ADS spallation targetCompleting the experimental database of the HINDAS FP5 project (Very big progress on H.E. models but still some weak points)
High energy experiments for Radioactivity, chemical modification and damage assessment
Total fission cross-section as a function of E between 200 MeV and 1 GeV for Pb and W
Production of long lived Intermediate mass fragments as 7Be and 10Be from Bi, W, Ni targets: 100-1000 MeV
Helium production in W or Ta and Fe or Ni, between E=100-800 MeV (NESSI/PISA experiment at FZJ)
GSI @ Darmstadt (Germany)
High energy experiments and modelingThe energy range (200-1000 MeV) specific of the ADS spallation target
High energy Nuclear model improvement
Extension of INCL4 to low energies and composite Light Charged Particle (LCP) production
Improvement of ABLA: Fission, Composite LCPIntermediate Mass Fragments
Quality assessment, validation and impact of the new models in ETD simulations
Implementation in High Energy transport codes (MCNPX, …)
Calculations of radiotoxicity, radioactivity due to residue production in the MEGAPIE
Calculations of DPA, chemical composition modifications, and activities in ETD with the new codes
Improvement of Transmutation plants simulation programs and Validation of Data, Models and programsThe final goal for applications is to improve precision on simulations
Simulation programs that will be developed: MCB, EVOLCODE and maybe KAPROS/KARBUS.
Validation Nuclear data and models for the spallation target:Residual nuclei production in SINQ targets.Measurements of absolute activities of residues (eg.: 194Hg, 207Bi) in
spallation target models (Dubna, PSI).
Minor actinide and Pb nuclear data validation in integral experimentsFission cross section from MASURCA (Cadarache) experiments
240,241,242Pu, 237Np and 241,243Am
Other Minor actinide and Pb nuclear data validation based on results from ISTC projects
Facilities: BFS, SAD, Yalina
Experiments completed and in preparation
Gelina @ Geel (UE-Belgium)
GSI @ Darmstadt (Germany)
Cyclotron @ Uppsala (Sweden)
nTOF @ CERN (Switzerland)and its TAS -calorimeter
Neutron capture (n,) resonances in one actinide