26
INTRODUCTION Research Methods

INTRODUCTION Research Methods. Scientifically Investigating Phenomenon Normative vs. Empirical Evaluations Normative = questions of value: “what ought

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: INTRODUCTION Research Methods. Scientifically Investigating Phenomenon Normative vs. Empirical Evaluations  Normative = questions of value: “what ought

INTRODUCTION

Research Methods

Page 2: INTRODUCTION Research Methods. Scientifically Investigating Phenomenon Normative vs. Empirical Evaluations  Normative = questions of value: “what ought

Scientifically Investigating Phenomenon

Normative vs. Empirical Evaluations Normative = questions of value: “what ought to be” Empirical = questions of fact: “what is” Is there a grey area? How do we determine if it is an

‘ought’ or an ‘is’ question?

Principles of Scientific Inquiry Be open-minded Be skeptical Be objective Be creative Be informed

Page 3: INTRODUCTION Research Methods. Scientifically Investigating Phenomenon Normative vs. Empirical Evaluations  Normative = questions of value: “what ought

Political Science

The “Science” of “Politics”Political Science Methodology

Process & methods in using empirical research to achieve scientific knowledge about political phenomena

Why should we learn about the study of politics? Role as a citizen Learning to be a scientific researcher

Why conduct research? To accumulate and extend knowledge and understanding

of a phenomena that may be applicable to problems/solutions relevant to society.

To satisfy intellectual curiosity

Page 4: INTRODUCTION Research Methods. Scientifically Investigating Phenomenon Normative vs. Empirical Evaluations  Normative = questions of value: “what ought

Six Stages of the Research Process

1. Formulation of Theory2. Operationalization of Theory3. Selection of Appropriate Research

Techniques4. Observation of Behavior (Data Collection)5. Analysis of Data6. Interpretation of Results

Page 5: INTRODUCTION Research Methods. Scientifically Investigating Phenomenon Normative vs. Empirical Evaluations  Normative = questions of value: “what ought

Sub-fields in Political Science

American PoliticsComparative PoliticsInternational RelationsPublic Policy (Public Administration) Political TheoryPolitical Methodology

Page 6: INTRODUCTION Research Methods. Scientifically Investigating Phenomenon Normative vs. Empirical Evaluations  Normative = questions of value: “what ought

What is Political Science?

“Politics is not an exact science.” (Bismarck 1863)

Politics: art or science? The study of politics: art or science? How do we know what we know? Scientific research / BehavioralismResearch question

…and the search for an empirical answer

Page 7: INTRODUCTION Research Methods. Scientifically Investigating Phenomenon Normative vs. Empirical Evaluations  Normative = questions of value: “what ought

Types of Research Questions

There are three basic types of questions that research projects can address:

1.Descriptive.When a study is designed primarily to describe what is going on or what exists. Public opinion polls that seek only to describe the proportion of people who hold various opinions are primarily descriptive in nature. For instance, if we want to know what percent of the population would vote for a Democratic or a Republican in the next presidential election, we are simply interested in describing something.

Page 8: INTRODUCTION Research Methods. Scientifically Investigating Phenomenon Normative vs. Empirical Evaluations  Normative = questions of value: “what ought

Types of Research Questions (con’t)

2. Relational.When a study is designed to look at the relationships between two or more variables. A public opinion poll that compares what proportion of males and females say they would vote for a Democratic or a Republican candidate in the next presidential election is essentially studying the relationship between gender and voting preference.

Page 9: INTRODUCTION Research Methods. Scientifically Investigating Phenomenon Normative vs. Empirical Evaluations  Normative = questions of value: “what ought

Types of Research Questions (con’t)

3. Causal.When a study is designed to determine whether one or more variables (e.g., a program or treatment variable) causes or affects one or more outcome variables. If we did a public opinion poll to try to determine whether a recent political advertising campaign changed voter preferences, we would essentially be studying whether the campaign (cause) changed the proportion of voters who would vote Democratic or Republican (effect).

Page 10: INTRODUCTION Research Methods. Scientifically Investigating Phenomenon Normative vs. Empirical Evaluations  Normative = questions of value: “what ought

What is Theory?

“Theories are sets of logically related symbols that represent what we think happens in the world.” (Manheim, et al. 2006: 15)

A theory is “a possible explanation for events, often a set of logically related assumptions and propositions” (Manheim, et al. 2006: 415)

“…theories are no more or less than a priori reasoning about the relations among variables.” (Bueno de Mesquita 1981: 9)

Page 11: INTRODUCTION Research Methods. Scientifically Investigating Phenomenon Normative vs. Empirical Evaluations  Normative = questions of value: “what ought

2 Types of Theoretical Reasoning

Inductive specific to general search for uniformity

Deductive general to specific logically derived theoretical consequences

Page 12: INTRODUCTION Research Methods. Scientifically Investigating Phenomenon Normative vs. Empirical Evaluations  Normative = questions of value: “what ought

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive reasoning works the opposite of deduction moving from specific observations to broader generalizations and theories.

Informally, we sometimes call this a "bottom up" approach (please note that it's "bottom up" and not "bottoms up" which is the kind of thing the bartender says to customers when he's trying to close for the night!).

In inductive reasoning, we begin with specific observations and measures, begin to detect patterns and regularities, formulate some tentative hypotheses that we can explore, and finally end up developing some general conclusions or theories.

Page 13: INTRODUCTION Research Methods. Scientifically Investigating Phenomenon Normative vs. Empirical Evaluations  Normative = questions of value: “what ought

Deductive Reasoning

Deductive reasoning works from the more general to the more specific. Sometimes this is informally called a "top-down" approach.

We might begin with thinking up a theory about our topic of interest.

We then narrow that down into more specific hypotheses that we can test.

We narrow down even further when we collect observations to address the hypotheses.

This ultimately leads us to be able to test the hypotheses with specific data -- a confirmation (or not) of our original theories.

Page 14: INTRODUCTION Research Methods. Scientifically Investigating Phenomenon Normative vs. Empirical Evaluations  Normative = questions of value: “what ought

Both Types Necessary?

“Because a theory’s usefulness can only be judged empirically, while an empirical generalization’s truthfulness can only be judged logically, neither inductive nor deductive reasoning by itself is adequate.” (Bueno de Mesquita 1981: 9-10)

Page 15: INTRODUCTION Research Methods. Scientifically Investigating Phenomenon Normative vs. Empirical Evaluations  Normative = questions of value: “what ought

Characteristics of Useful Theories

Testable / FalsifiableLogically sound / ConsistentCommunicableGeneralParsimoniousAccurate

Page 16: INTRODUCTION Research Methods. Scientifically Investigating Phenomenon Normative vs. Empirical Evaluations  Normative = questions of value: “what ought

Components of a Theory

ConceptsAssumptionsVariables

Dependent Independent

Hypotheses Relationship between (among) variables Direction

Page 17: INTRODUCTION Research Methods. Scientifically Investigating Phenomenon Normative vs. Empirical Evaluations  Normative = questions of value: “what ought

Types of Variables

Dependent Variables A dependent variable is a variable dependent on

another variable: the independent variable. In simple terms, the independent variable is said to cause an apparent change in, or simply affect, the dependent variable

Independent Variables An independent variable is a hypothesized cause or

influence on a dependent variable. This might be a variable that you control, like a

treatment, or a variable not under your control, like an exposure. It also might represent a demographic factor like age or gender.

Page 18: INTRODUCTION Research Methods. Scientifically Investigating Phenomenon Normative vs. Empirical Evaluations  Normative = questions of value: “what ought

IVs & DVs: An Example

Example 1 The wages of an employee depend on the time

worked. Time is the independent variable that varies among employees, and the wages are calculated directly from the total time worked. Thus wages are dependent on time worked.

In a call centre, the number of customers serviced per hour, depends on the number of agents, and average service time per customer. In this case number of customers is a dependent variable, entirely dependent on the other two independent variables namely agents, and average service time.

Page 19: INTRODUCTION Research Methods. Scientifically Investigating Phenomenon Normative vs. Empirical Evaluations  Normative = questions of value: “what ought

Hypotheses

A hypothesis is a specific statement of prediction. It describes in concrete (rather than theoretical) terms what you expect will happen in your study.

A deductive research design should include a set of exhaustive hypotheses: i.e. your predictions should cover all possible conceivable outcomes related to your two variables. Null Hypothesis Research Hypothesis

Page 20: INTRODUCTION Research Methods. Scientifically Investigating Phenomenon Normative vs. Empirical Evaluations  Normative = questions of value: “what ought

Relationships Between Variables

Covariational relationship When X goes up, Y goes up

Causal relationship X Y

Spurious relationship a relationship that appears to exist at face value, but

that disappears when you control for another variable. Other causal relationships

Indirect causation: X Z Y Multiple causation: X Y; S Y; D Y Intervening variable(s): X Z Y

Page 21: INTRODUCTION Research Methods. Scientifically Investigating Phenomenon Normative vs. Empirical Evaluations  Normative = questions of value: “what ought

Spurious Relationships

Once a group of students decided to study empirically the causes of drunkenness.

They drank vodka and water. Got drunk. They drank rum and water. Got drunk. They drank scotch and water. Got drunk. They drank bourbon and water. Got drunk. They drank gin and water. Got drunk.

They looked at the patterns of their data and saw that water appeared in every instance in which they got drunk, while no other factor appeared to remain in every case. They concluded that water made them drunk. Further research indicated that each of the substances combined with the water contained alcohol.

The conclusion that water makes you drunk is spurious. By looking for other variables and other patterns we find that alcohol is the culprit variable.

Page 22: INTRODUCTION Research Methods. Scientifically Investigating Phenomenon Normative vs. Empirical Evaluations  Normative = questions of value: “what ought

Variables

A characteristic that takes on different values from one case to another (or, for a given case, from one time to another)

Dependent variableIndependent variableIntervening variableAntecedent variableControl variable (later)

Page 23: INTRODUCTION Research Methods. Scientifically Investigating Phenomenon Normative vs. Empirical Evaluations  Normative = questions of value: “what ought

Investigating Causality

Is there covariation?Does hypothesized cause precede effect?

(causal order)Is there a theoretical relationship between

cause and effect? (causal linkage)Can other explanations (simultaneous

relationships) be eliminated? (alternative causality)

Page 24: INTRODUCTION Research Methods. Scientifically Investigating Phenomenon Normative vs. Empirical Evaluations  Normative = questions of value: “what ought

Logical Relationships

Necessary conditions(if x then y)

Sufficient conditions(if y then x)

Necessary and sufficient conditions(iff x then y)

Page 25: INTRODUCTION Research Methods. Scientifically Investigating Phenomenon Normative vs. Empirical Evaluations  Normative = questions of value: “what ought

Some Examples

Free elections, DemocracyDemocracy, US interestsDemocratic states (2+), PeaceHigher levels of education, Higher levels of

political participationFlat (regressive) tax, Fairness

Page 26: INTRODUCTION Research Methods. Scientifically Investigating Phenomenon Normative vs. Empirical Evaluations  Normative = questions of value: “what ought