Introduction of Site Investigation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    1/48

    Site Investigation for CivilEngineering Projects

    By Ir. Neoh Cheng Aik

    E-Geo Consultant Sdn Bhd

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    2/48

    SCOPE OF DISCUSSION

    1. INTRODUCTION General

    What is SI

    Role of SI in Geotechnical Design

    2. WORK PROCEDURE FOR SI

    3. PLANNING SCOPE OF SI

    What needs to be known

    SI Methods Criteria to determine depth core length

    Examples

    4. INTERPRETATION

    Field & reported borelogs

    Property correlations

    Groundwater

    Miscellaneous5. CONCLUSIONS

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    3/48

    GENERAL

    1. Geotechnical Engineering (3 major areas) Geotechnical Engineering is a science, but its practice is an art

    SI & soil properties (Significance?)

    Basic, index & chemical properties

    Engineering properties

    Typical properties of typical formations

    Planning of SI & methods

    Soil Mechanics Principles Applications Design & Construction

    2. Difference between geotechnical & structural design

    3. Learning curve (easy to learn & slow to master)4. Inadequate SI & poor interpretation main causes for

    failure? Examples? Liabilities?

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    4/48

    WHAT IS SI?

    Scientific exploration with predeterminedobjectives

    Know something first through desk studies &

    site visit about the site & project before we can

    determine the purpose of SI & identify the

    possible geotechnical problems

    Subsequently, we plan scope of SI to obtain the

    necessary parameters to verify, assess &

    quantify the geotechnical problems identified Prerequisites to qualify to plan SI?

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    5/48

    WHAT NEEDS TO BE KNOWN?

    What is known; what is not known; & what needs tobe known?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    What is not known

    about the site

    Circle of what is known

    What needs to

    be known

    Circle of

    KNOW ALL

    * Those who know NUT and know not that they know NUT will

    not know what Needs to be known.

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    6/48

    EXTENT & SCOPE OF SI REQUIRED

    FOR A PROJECT DEPEND ON: Experience & knowledge of designer about

    the anticipated geotechnical problems, the

    project brief & available SI facilities &

    methods

    Local geology & typical problems Historical use of the site: Why significant?

    Treacherous Grounds: uncontrolled fill,

    limestone formation, boulders & corestone

    abutment ground, etc. (significance?)

    Relevant information about the project, etc.

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    7/48

    EXAMPLE 1:A 4-Storey JKR Standard RC School Block in

    Klang District

    Do you know the column loads & characters

    of RC framed structures?

    Do you know the site & layout

    conditions/constraints? Do you know the site geology & typical

    geotechnical problems?

    Do you know what parameters are required?

    Do you know what SI methods & tests to

    procure the required parameters

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    8/48

    EXAMPLE 2:

    A hill is to be cut to a depth of about 24m

    SCOPE OF SI?

    Answer 3 questions: what known; what unknown &

    what needs to be known?

    Influencing factors affecting FOS?

    Geological information of the hill?

    Weathering profile (discontinuities, relict joint,

    suitable minerals, shear strength & deformation,

    permeability)

    Groundwater conditions?

    Other critical information?

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    9/48

    PLANNING SCOPE OF SI

    How many BH or other SI methods; locations?

    Criteria of terminating BH?

    Field test: type, criteria & frequency? Sampling: type, criteria & frequency?

    Reference notes: for building & road projects

    Documentation: Drawings, BQ, Spec, etc.

    Examples

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    10/48

    BASIC SCOPE OF SI WORKS

    SI

    DESK

    STUDIES

    & SITE

    VISIT

    BORING SAMPLING FIELD

    TESTING

    LAB.

    TESTING

    PURPOSE & IMPORTANCE OF EACH ACTIVITY?

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    11/48

    BORING

    TYPES OF BORING: Auger boring

    Percussion Wash boring

    Rotary boring

    Foam drilling SPECIFICATIONS & STANDARDS

    Tools & equipments; flushing medium?

    PURPOSE, APPLICATIONS &LIMITATIONS?

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    12/48

    SAMPLING

    DISTURBED

    SAMPLES

    WASH

    SPT

    BULK

    UNDISTURBED

    SAMPLES

    CONTINUOUS

    SAMPLES

    WATER

    SAMPLES

    ROCKSAMPLES

    THIN-WALL

    PISTON

    MAZIER

    BLOCK

    FROZEN

    PURPOSE, APPLICATIONS & LIMITATIONS?

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    13/48

    COMMON SAMPLERS

    TYPE OF SAMPLERS (Purposes?)1. Open drive samplers

    Split-spoon for SPT

    Thin-wall sampler

    Thick wall sampler(50mm, 75mm, 100mm, 150mm)

    2. Thin-wall sampler with stationary piston

    (50mm, 75mm, 100mm, 150mm)

    3. Denison Sampler

    (double tube with thin-wall tube)

    4. Mazier Sampler (74mm)

    5. FOIL CONTINUOUS SAMPLERS

    6. BLOCK SAMPLING

    7. ROTARY ROCK CORE SAMPLERS

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    14/48

    FIELD TESTING

    SPT

    VANE SHEAR

    PACKER

    PERMEABILITY

    PRESSUREMETER

    DUTCH CONE

    PIEZOCONE

    MACKINTOSH

    PROBE

    JKR PROBE

    TEST PIT

    CBR

    PLATE BEARING

    FIELD DENSITY

    GEO PHYSICAL

    SURVEYS SPECIAL TESTS

    SPEC. & STANDARD

    PURPOSE, APPLICATION

    & LIMITATION?

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    15/48

    FIELD TESTS Soil Soil Rock SOIL TYPE SOIL PARAMETERS

    type Profile H.Rock S.Rock Gr Sand Silt Clay Peat Cu Mv Cv K

    1. Penetrometer

    1.1 JKR Probe

    1.2 SPT

    1.3 DS (CPT)

    1.4 Piezocone (CPTU)

    1.5 Flat Dilatometer

    1.6 Resistivity Probe

    X

    A

    B

    A

    B

    C

    C

    B

    A

    A

    A

    C

    X

    X

    X

    X

    X

    X

    X

    B

    X

    X

    X

    X

    C

    B

    B

    A

    C

    C

    B

    A

    A

    A

    A

    A

    B

    A

    A

    A

    A

    A

    B

    A

    A

    A

    A

    A

    B

    A

    A

    A

    A

    A

    X

    B

    C

    B

    B

    B

    B

    B

    B

    B

    B

    C

    X

    X

    C

    A

    C

    X

    X

    X

    C

    A

    C

    X

    X

    X

    X

    B

    X

    X

    2

    3

    4

    5.

    Vane Shear

    PB Pressuremeter

    SB Pressuremeter

    Continuous Soil Sampling

    B

    B

    B

    A

    C

    B

    B

    A

    X

    C

    C

    X

    X

    A

    B

    B

    X

    B

    B

    B

    X

    B

    B

    A

    B

    B

    B

    A

    A

    A

    A

    A

    B

    B

    B

    A

    X

    X

    B

    C

    A

    B

    B

    B

    X

    B

    B

    B

    X

    C

    B

    B

    X

    X

    B

    C

    Legends:-

    A = suitable/useful

    = effective frictional angle K = coef. Of permeabilityB = moderate Cu = undrained strength

    C = doubtful Mv = coef. of volume compressibility

    X = not suitable Cv = coef. of consolidation

    APPLICABILITY OF COMMON FIELD OR INSITU TESTS

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    16/48

    LABPRATORY TESTING

    BASIC INDEX

    PROPERTIES

    SHEAR

    STRENGTH

    OTHER

    TESTS

    UU, CIU, CD

    Shear box

    Compressibility Compaction

    CBR

    CHEMICAL

    PROPERTIES

    Organic, SO3-

    & Cl-

    PH value, etc.

    1-D Oedometer

    Rowe cell

    Compaction Permeability

    Dispersibility

    Hydraulic cell

    PURPOSE, APPLICATIONS & LIMITATIONS?

    Colour, S.G.,

    density, LL,

    PL, PI, SL,

    PSD, etc.

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    17/48

    ROLE OF SI IN GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING DESIGN

    SISOIL

    PROPERTIES

    GROUND

    CHARACTERISATION

    GROUNDBEHAVIOUR

    ENGINEERING

    PERFORMANCE

    ENGINEERING PROPERTIES

    CHEMICAL PROPERTIES

    BASIC & INDEX PROPERTIES

    MASS PROPERTIES

    TYPICAL & GENERALISED SUBSOIL

    PROFILE & PROPERTIES OF TYPICAL

    GEOLOGICAL FORMATIONS; MAN-MADE FILL, etc.

    ENGINEERING GEOLOGY

    SOIL & ROCK MECHANICS

    EFFECTIVE STRESS THEORY SEEPAGE THEORY

    STRESS DISTRIBUTION

    LATERAL PRESSURE

    BEARING CAPACITY

    COMPRESSIBILITY

    COMPACTION, etc.

    INSTRUMENTATION FOR

    PORE WATER PRESSURE

    EARTH PRESSURE

    DISPLACEMENT (SURFACE &

    SUBSURFACE)

    INTERNAL STRESSES

    VIBRATION

    CODES OF PRACTICE

    FOUNDATIONS, BS 8004

    ANCHORS, BS 8081

    EARTHWORKS, BS6031

    REINFORCED FILLS, BS 8006

    GEOGUIDES OF GEO HONG

    KONG

    GROUND IMPROVEMENT

    DEFORMATION

    DISPLACEMENT

    STABILITY

    MODELLING

    PREDICT

    ION

    INTERPRETATION

    JUDGEMENT

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    18/48

    GROUNDWATER MEASUREMENT

    1. TYPES OF GROUNDWATER Static WT/phreatic level/main

    WT

    Perched WT

    Artesian water

    2. SIGNIFICANCE FOR

    Pile installation

    Deep excavation

    Slope stability

    Tunnelling, etc.

    3. METHODS

    Observation well Simple Standpipe

    Casagrande standpipe

    Pneumatic piezometer

    Hydraulic piezometer, etc.4. CASE HISTORIES

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    19/48

    ARTESIAN WATER

    FREE WATER SURFACE

    MEASURED WT

    ACQUICLUDE

    AQUIFIER

    RAIN

    STREAM

    (FREE WATER)

    UNCONFINED AQUIFIER

    AQUICLUDE

    ACQUICLUDE

    PERCED WT

    LEGEND:

    RUNOFF

    INFILTRATION

    PERCOLATION

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    20/48

    APPLICATION OF GEOTECHNICAL INSTRUMENTATION

    13

    101

    3

    4

    6

    5

    15

    2

    9

    8

    6

    15

    15

    1

    2

    3 Electrical piezometers

    Stress gauges

    Inclinometer casings

    Casagrande piezometers4

    In-place inclinometers5

    Load cells6

    Flow meters7

    Surface clinometers8

    9 Borehole extensometers

    10 Wire crackmeters

    13 Rain gauges

    15 Total pressure cells

    Monitoring of earth lateral movements in sliding areas

    Measurements of soil stress and pressure on ground or retaining walls or piles

    Drainage flow control

    Measurement of anchor tensioning or loading at the head of tie-back

    Monitoring of landslide areas and stability of natural slopes

    Measurement of water table level

    Monitoring strain and stress development in the stressed member of piles

    Monitoring of soi l pore pressure and control of over pressure

    Monitoring cracks and movements in rock masses

    Monitoring of rain falls

    Monitoring of retaining wall stability

    Moni tor ing of rock mass inclina tion movements and block tilting

    ApplicationInstrumentation

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    21/48

    SPT1. SPEC. & STD. (BS, ASTM)

    Equipment set

    Hammer, drop, rod

    Split spoon sampler

    Records & procedure

    2. APPLICATIONS & LIMITATIONS

    Soil types

    Correlations

    Shortfalls

    3. SPACING/INTERVALS OF TESTING Type of investigation & purposes

    Criteria & procedure

    4. CASE HISTORIES

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    22/48

    COMMON MALPRACTICE IN SPT/SI

    * SPT taken without adequate & proper cleaning by clean water

    * SPT taken constantly at 1.5m intervals; not at change of soil strata

    * SPT hammer weight not within 63.5+_ 0.5 kg; hammer not fully made of steel;drop height less than 76+_ 2 cm after repair/retread.

    * Drilling in sandy soils without quality bentonite

    * Use casing and not proper drilling rods to advance boreholes

    * Samples from SPT split sampler not sealed in container with proper labels &storage

    * Use blunt SPT drive shoe

    * Mark SPT penetration on rod without ruler or chalk

    * Soil description & record of SPT blow counts on palm/shirt/casing & not proper

    paper *Drive rod for SPT not straight or inadequate stiffness; for depth>20m, BWNW

    rods shall be used

    * Untrained supervisor or foreigner supervisor who cannot communicate well

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    23/48

    ROCK CORING

    1. PURPOSE & APPLICATIONS:

    Identification, description & correlations

    2. CORE BARREL: single, double & triple

    3. CORE BITS: tungsten, surface/impregnated diamond

    4. CORE RECOVERY RATIO, RR = (Total core obtained)/(length of run)

    5. RQD = (summation of rock core > 100mm)/(length of run)

    RQD < 25% VERY POOR

    RQD = 25 50% FAIR RQD = 50 75% GOOD

    RQD = 75 100% EXCELLENT

    6. ROCK DESCRIPTION: STRENGTH & WEATHERING GRADE

    UCS < 5 N/mm2 Weak

    UCS = 5 12.5 N/mm2 Moderately Weak

    UCS = 12.5 50 N/mm2 Moderately Strong

    UCS = 50 100 N/mm2 Strong

    UCS = > 100 N/mm2 Very Strong

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    24/48

    A & B

    ZONES

    VI

    V

    IV

    III

    II

    I

    1. Implication of Location of WT

    & slope stability2. Usual location of groundwater

    3. Discontinuities & relict joints

    4. What relevant soil/rock

    properties (tests) are necessary

    for slope stability analysis?

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    25/48

    Weathered granite showing well defined relict jointing

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    26/48

    Weathered volcanic rock showing well defined relict jointing

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    27/48

    Granite showing intense weathering along joints

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    28/48

    Volcanic rock with staining along joints: Zone D

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    29/48

    Completely decomposed seam (Grade V) in slightly decomposedvolcanic rock (Grade II)

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    30/48

    Moderately decomposed seam (Grade III) in slightly decomposedvolcanic rock (Grade II)

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    31/48

    Moderately decomposed granite rock (Grade III), 4.65 to 5.55 mHighly decomposed granite rock (Grade IV), 5.55 to 10.71 m

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    32/48

    Moderately decomposed granite rock (Grade III), 21.48 to 22.00 mSlightly decomposed granite rock (Grade II), 22.00 to 24.48 m

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    33/48

    Purpose & significance Field & lab. techniques

    BS5930 description of soil

    Consistency or relative density, fabric if

    distinguishable, colour, subsidiary, grading, principal

    soil type & more detailed comments

    e.g. very stiff dark grey silty CLAY with traces of sand

    e.g. sandy silty CLAY

    e.g. silty sandy CLAY (Wrong!)

    SOIL IDENTIFICATION & DESCRIPTION

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    34/48

    SOIL CLASSIFICATION

    BSCS, USCS, AASHTO

    Based on grading & index properties

    Coarse grained soil = PSD; fine grained soil =plasticity; How & what properties are

    influenced by moisture?

    Purposes & application?

    Design guides based on soil classification

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    35/48

    SI RESULTS INTERPRETATIONS

    Scope of factual report: JKR Spec.

    Scope of interpretation report

    Field & reported borelog Check borelogs & summary of lab. Test results

    Discrepancies/compliance with Std/Spec

    Interpretations: Atterberg limits, compaction test, etc.

    Typical geological formations; typical geotechnical

    problems to various types of foundations, etc.

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    36/48

    JOB NO PE/SI/21/93 BOREHOLE B6PROJECT S b f I i i d T i f P d W P (Ph II) P l L P Kl

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    37/48

    DEPTH(m)

    TESTING

    SAMPLINGCORING

    5

    7

    6

    4

    3

    2

    1

    P2/D4

    (Rods Weight)

    R=35/45cm

    UP2/D3

    R=66/80cm

    UP1/D1R=80/80cm

    DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL

    Very SoftGrey fine sandy silty CLAY wi th tracesof shell fragment and thin layers oforganic matter

    Very Soft

    Grey silty CLAY wi th trace of fine sand,

    shell fragment and organic matter

    SYMBOL

    CONTENT

    (%)

    CHLORIDE

    CONTENT

    (%)

    SULPHATE

    CONTENT

    (%)

    ORGANIC

    PHVALUE

    COMPRESSION

    UNCON

    FINED

    GRAVITY

    SPEC

    IFIC

    (Mg/m

    )

    BULKDENSITY

    CLASSIFICATION

    SO

    IL

    CONSOLIDATIONTEST TEST

    CHEMICALTRIAXIALTESTDISTRIBUTION

    PARTICLE SIZE

    GRAVEL

    (%)

    (%)

    SAND

    (%)

    SILT

    (%)

    CLAY

    STRENGTH(kPa

    )

    3

    (kPa)

    C

    () (kPa)

    P C eC C O

    ATTERBERG LIMITS

    MCPL LL

    20 40 60 80 100

    (%)

    10 20 30 40 50SPT N

    P1/D2(Rods Weight)R=30/45cm

    Very SoftGrey very clayey fine SAND wi thsome shell fragment and trace oforganic matter

    Very Soft becoming soft

    Grey s ilty CLAY with lenses of fine sand

    and organic matter; with occassional

    shell fragment between 5 .0m - 9.0m

    8

    9

    10

    UP3/D5

    R=80/80cm

    P3/D6

    (Hammer

    Weight)

    R=37/45cm

    UP4/D7

    R=65/80cm

    P4/D8

    (Hammer

    Weight)

    R=29/45cm

    UP5/D9

    R=78/80cm

    P5/D10

    (Hammer

    Weight)

    R=25/45cm

    WATER LEVEL:

    REDUCED LEVEL:

    TYPE OF BORING:

    JOB NO: PE/SI/21/93

    Seabed Level (ACD) - 14.50m

    Rotary

    Depth of water 16.70m a.s.l.# (19/12/92)

    BOREHOLE: B6

    LOCATION: Pulau Lumut, Port K lang

    17/12/92 - 19/12/92DATE DRILLED:

    CLIENT:

    CONSULTANT:

    Lembaga Pelabuhan Klang

    Sepakat Setia Perunding

    PROJECT: Subsurface Investigation and Testing for Proposed West Port (Phase II) Pulau Lumut, Post Klang

    0 50 24 26 CHS 0.42515 1.472

    110 3554 CI 1.557 27.39 23 0

    60 4945 1.565CE 19.312.12 1.4701.089160

    1.492CI 31.03 31 0

    50 5045 1.568CE 83.28 0.778180 1.494

    SOILS SYMBOL P=STANDARD PENETRATION TEST

    CR=CORE RECOVERYC=CORING

    V=VANE SHEAR TEST

    UP=UNDISTURBED SAMPLE

    D=DISTURBED SAMPLE

    N=NO. OF BLOW PER 30cm UNDISTURBED

    REMOULDED

    VANE SHEAR:REMARKS:

    1. R - - Denotes Recovery

    # -- above seabed level2.

    ENGINEERINGBORELOG

    SIGNIFICANCE OF ATTERBERG LIMITS

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    38/48

    SIGNIFICANCE OF ATTERBERG LIMITS

    Shrinkage

    limit WS

    Plastic

    limit WP

    Liquid

    limit WL

    Plasticity

    Moisture, MC

    WL & WP = f(amount & type of clay)

    PI = f(clay content)

    High PI = high clay content

    PI < 30% = sandy/silty soils

    Soils of high PI cant be stabilized unless MC is

    dissipated, very slow due to low K

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    39/48

    -

    -

    1.0

    CI

    0

    0.25

    0.75

    0.5

    WS W WP N

    LW=CI

    WL

    V. SOFT

    SOFT

    FIRM

    STIFF

    WL

    20 - 40

    < 20

    75 - 100

    40 - 75

    CONSISTENCY

    HARD

    V. STIFF

    WP

    WN C (kN/m )

    > 200

    100 - 200

    U2

    WP

    WS

    VS VA

    COMPACTION TESTS

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    40/48

    COMPACTION TESTS

    Purposes & applications

    Interpretation & appreciation

    1.6

    1.7

    1.8

    1.9

    2.0

    2.1

    2.2

    2.3

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22

    Water content (%)

    Dry

    dens

    ity

    (Mg/m

    )3

    10% 5% 0%Air content

    Saturation line

    4.5 kg rammer

    2.5 kg rammer

    1.6

    1.7

    0

    Water content (%)

    Dry

    dens

    ity

    (Mg/m

    )3

    2.1

    1.8

    1.9

    2.0

    2.2

    5%Air content10% 0%

    30

    1.4

    1.5

    5 10 15 20 25

    GW

    SW

    ML

    CL

    CH

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    41/48

    Soa

    ke

    dCBR

    Moisture content

    Moisture content

    Dry

    dens

    ity

    Soil A

    Soil B

    Soil C

    Z.A.V.

    Soil A

    Soil B

    Soil C

    OTHER INTERPRETATIONS

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    42/48

    OTHER INTERPRETATIONS

    SG = 2.6 2.7, usually

    Soils with SG < 2.6, soil type?

    Soils with SG > 2.7, soil type?

    PI < 30%, soil type?

    Activity, A = PI/(% of clay)

    Kaolinite, A = 0.3 0.5

    Illite, A = 0.9

    Montmorillonite, A > 1.5 Soils with high A can absorb more water; more swelling

    & shrinkage problems; applications?

    TYPICAL GEOLOGICAL FORMATION & TYPICAL

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    43/48

    TYPICAL GEOLOGICAL FORMATION & TYPICAL

    PROPERTIES

    1. Residual soils of granite:

    % of sand/gravel is high

    WL < 60 %, PI < 30% generally

    Density = 18 20 kN/m3 , NMC = 10 30%

    C = 0 20 kPa, = 30 42

    Weathering profile & boulder problems

    dmax = 15 20 kN/m3, OMC = 10 18% (Std. Comp.).

    Relict joints are preferred water path; have lower shearstrength; Significance? How to identify?

    Common Geo Problems to piling, deep excavation, slopes?

    Important properties sought in SI?

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    44/48

    2. Residual Soil of Meta Sedimentary Rocks:

    Generally WL < 80 %, PI < 40%

    Density = 16 22 kN/m3

    C = 0 25 kPa, = 25 38

    dmax = 15 19 kN/m3, OMC = 12 24% (Std. Comp.)

    Relict discontinuities/beddings/foliations are preferredwater path; have lower shear strength; significance? How

    to identify?

    Common Geo Problems to piling, deep excavation, slopes?

    Important properties sought in SI?

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    45/48

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    46/48

    3. Soft Alluvial Clay:

    Generally WL = 40 140%

    PI = 20 90%, NMC = 40 130%

    Sensitivity = 2.5 8, OCR = 1 4 (

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    47/48

    CONCLUSION

    SI is part of Geotechnical Design. Why?

    Scope & definition of Proper SI: properly planned, supervised,

    monitored, directed & reported

    Important to understand & to identify possible geo problems of the

    ground to the project before planning scope of SI

    Important to learn typical subsoil profiles for various typical geological

    formations/grounds, their typical properties and their usual problems to

    various types of construction

    SI soil properties Mass properties & ground characterization

    Behaviour prediction Performance

    Scope of SI planned by different engineers tends to be varied. Why?

  • 8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation

    48/48

    The End

    Thank you for your attention