Upload
punithan-punithan
View
222
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
1/48
Site Investigation for CivilEngineering Projects
By Ir. Neoh Cheng Aik
E-Geo Consultant Sdn Bhd
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
2/48
SCOPE OF DISCUSSION
1. INTRODUCTION General
What is SI
Role of SI in Geotechnical Design
2. WORK PROCEDURE FOR SI
3. PLANNING SCOPE OF SI
What needs to be known
SI Methods Criteria to determine depth core length
Examples
4. INTERPRETATION
Field & reported borelogs
Property correlations
Groundwater
Miscellaneous5. CONCLUSIONS
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
3/48
GENERAL
1. Geotechnical Engineering (3 major areas) Geotechnical Engineering is a science, but its practice is an art
SI & soil properties (Significance?)
Basic, index & chemical properties
Engineering properties
Typical properties of typical formations
Planning of SI & methods
Soil Mechanics Principles Applications Design & Construction
2. Difference between geotechnical & structural design
3. Learning curve (easy to learn & slow to master)4. Inadequate SI & poor interpretation main causes for
failure? Examples? Liabilities?
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
4/48
WHAT IS SI?
Scientific exploration with predeterminedobjectives
Know something first through desk studies &
site visit about the site & project before we can
determine the purpose of SI & identify the
possible geotechnical problems
Subsequently, we plan scope of SI to obtain the
necessary parameters to verify, assess &
quantify the geotechnical problems identified Prerequisites to qualify to plan SI?
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
5/48
WHAT NEEDS TO BE KNOWN?
What is known; what is not known; & what needs tobe known?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
What is not known
about the site
Circle of what is known
What needs to
be known
Circle of
KNOW ALL
* Those who know NUT and know not that they know NUT will
not know what Needs to be known.
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
6/48
EXTENT & SCOPE OF SI REQUIRED
FOR A PROJECT DEPEND ON: Experience & knowledge of designer about
the anticipated geotechnical problems, the
project brief & available SI facilities &
methods
Local geology & typical problems Historical use of the site: Why significant?
Treacherous Grounds: uncontrolled fill,
limestone formation, boulders & corestone
abutment ground, etc. (significance?)
Relevant information about the project, etc.
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
7/48
EXAMPLE 1:A 4-Storey JKR Standard RC School Block in
Klang District
Do you know the column loads & characters
of RC framed structures?
Do you know the site & layout
conditions/constraints? Do you know the site geology & typical
geotechnical problems?
Do you know what parameters are required?
Do you know what SI methods & tests to
procure the required parameters
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
8/48
EXAMPLE 2:
A hill is to be cut to a depth of about 24m
SCOPE OF SI?
Answer 3 questions: what known; what unknown &
what needs to be known?
Influencing factors affecting FOS?
Geological information of the hill?
Weathering profile (discontinuities, relict joint,
suitable minerals, shear strength & deformation,
permeability)
Groundwater conditions?
Other critical information?
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
9/48
PLANNING SCOPE OF SI
How many BH or other SI methods; locations?
Criteria of terminating BH?
Field test: type, criteria & frequency? Sampling: type, criteria & frequency?
Reference notes: for building & road projects
Documentation: Drawings, BQ, Spec, etc.
Examples
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
10/48
BASIC SCOPE OF SI WORKS
SI
DESK
STUDIES
& SITE
VISIT
BORING SAMPLING FIELD
TESTING
LAB.
TESTING
PURPOSE & IMPORTANCE OF EACH ACTIVITY?
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
11/48
BORING
TYPES OF BORING: Auger boring
Percussion Wash boring
Rotary boring
Foam drilling SPECIFICATIONS & STANDARDS
Tools & equipments; flushing medium?
PURPOSE, APPLICATIONS &LIMITATIONS?
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
12/48
SAMPLING
DISTURBED
SAMPLES
WASH
SPT
BULK
UNDISTURBED
SAMPLES
CONTINUOUS
SAMPLES
WATER
SAMPLES
ROCKSAMPLES
THIN-WALL
PISTON
MAZIER
BLOCK
FROZEN
PURPOSE, APPLICATIONS & LIMITATIONS?
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
13/48
COMMON SAMPLERS
TYPE OF SAMPLERS (Purposes?)1. Open drive samplers
Split-spoon for SPT
Thin-wall sampler
Thick wall sampler(50mm, 75mm, 100mm, 150mm)
2. Thin-wall sampler with stationary piston
(50mm, 75mm, 100mm, 150mm)
3. Denison Sampler
(double tube with thin-wall tube)
4. Mazier Sampler (74mm)
5. FOIL CONTINUOUS SAMPLERS
6. BLOCK SAMPLING
7. ROTARY ROCK CORE SAMPLERS
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
14/48
FIELD TESTING
SPT
VANE SHEAR
PACKER
PERMEABILITY
PRESSUREMETER
DUTCH CONE
PIEZOCONE
MACKINTOSH
PROBE
JKR PROBE
TEST PIT
CBR
PLATE BEARING
FIELD DENSITY
GEO PHYSICAL
SURVEYS SPECIAL TESTS
SPEC. & STANDARD
PURPOSE, APPLICATION
& LIMITATION?
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
15/48
FIELD TESTS Soil Soil Rock SOIL TYPE SOIL PARAMETERS
type Profile H.Rock S.Rock Gr Sand Silt Clay Peat Cu Mv Cv K
1. Penetrometer
1.1 JKR Probe
1.2 SPT
1.3 DS (CPT)
1.4 Piezocone (CPTU)
1.5 Flat Dilatometer
1.6 Resistivity Probe
X
A
B
A
B
C
C
B
A
A
A
C
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
B
X
X
X
X
C
B
B
A
C
C
B
A
A
A
A
A
B
A
A
A
A
A
B
A
A
A
A
A
B
A
A
A
A
A
X
B
C
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
C
X
X
C
A
C
X
X
X
C
A
C
X
X
X
X
B
X
X
2
3
4
5.
Vane Shear
PB Pressuremeter
SB Pressuremeter
Continuous Soil Sampling
B
B
B
A
C
B
B
A
X
C
C
X
X
A
B
B
X
B
B
B
X
B
B
A
B
B
B
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
B
A
X
X
B
C
A
B
B
B
X
B
B
B
X
C
B
B
X
X
B
C
Legends:-
A = suitable/useful
= effective frictional angle K = coef. Of permeabilityB = moderate Cu = undrained strength
C = doubtful Mv = coef. of volume compressibility
X = not suitable Cv = coef. of consolidation
APPLICABILITY OF COMMON FIELD OR INSITU TESTS
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
16/48
LABPRATORY TESTING
BASIC INDEX
PROPERTIES
SHEAR
STRENGTH
OTHER
TESTS
UU, CIU, CD
Shear box
Compressibility Compaction
CBR
CHEMICAL
PROPERTIES
Organic, SO3-
& Cl-
PH value, etc.
1-D Oedometer
Rowe cell
Compaction Permeability
Dispersibility
Hydraulic cell
PURPOSE, APPLICATIONS & LIMITATIONS?
Colour, S.G.,
density, LL,
PL, PI, SL,
PSD, etc.
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
17/48
ROLE OF SI IN GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING DESIGN
SISOIL
PROPERTIES
GROUND
CHARACTERISATION
GROUNDBEHAVIOUR
ENGINEERING
PERFORMANCE
ENGINEERING PROPERTIES
CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
BASIC & INDEX PROPERTIES
MASS PROPERTIES
TYPICAL & GENERALISED SUBSOIL
PROFILE & PROPERTIES OF TYPICAL
GEOLOGICAL FORMATIONS; MAN-MADE FILL, etc.
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY
SOIL & ROCK MECHANICS
EFFECTIVE STRESS THEORY SEEPAGE THEORY
STRESS DISTRIBUTION
LATERAL PRESSURE
BEARING CAPACITY
COMPRESSIBILITY
COMPACTION, etc.
INSTRUMENTATION FOR
PORE WATER PRESSURE
EARTH PRESSURE
DISPLACEMENT (SURFACE &
SUBSURFACE)
INTERNAL STRESSES
VIBRATION
CODES OF PRACTICE
FOUNDATIONS, BS 8004
ANCHORS, BS 8081
EARTHWORKS, BS6031
REINFORCED FILLS, BS 8006
GEOGUIDES OF GEO HONG
KONG
GROUND IMPROVEMENT
DEFORMATION
DISPLACEMENT
STABILITY
MODELLING
PREDICT
ION
INTERPRETATION
JUDGEMENT
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
18/48
GROUNDWATER MEASUREMENT
1. TYPES OF GROUNDWATER Static WT/phreatic level/main
WT
Perched WT
Artesian water
2. SIGNIFICANCE FOR
Pile installation
Deep excavation
Slope stability
Tunnelling, etc.
3. METHODS
Observation well Simple Standpipe
Casagrande standpipe
Pneumatic piezometer
Hydraulic piezometer, etc.4. CASE HISTORIES
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
19/48
ARTESIAN WATER
FREE WATER SURFACE
MEASURED WT
ACQUICLUDE
AQUIFIER
RAIN
STREAM
(FREE WATER)
UNCONFINED AQUIFIER
AQUICLUDE
ACQUICLUDE
PERCED WT
LEGEND:
RUNOFF
INFILTRATION
PERCOLATION
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
20/48
APPLICATION OF GEOTECHNICAL INSTRUMENTATION
13
101
3
4
6
5
15
2
9
8
6
15
15
1
2
3 Electrical piezometers
Stress gauges
Inclinometer casings
Casagrande piezometers4
In-place inclinometers5
Load cells6
Flow meters7
Surface clinometers8
9 Borehole extensometers
10 Wire crackmeters
13 Rain gauges
15 Total pressure cells
Monitoring of earth lateral movements in sliding areas
Measurements of soil stress and pressure on ground or retaining walls or piles
Drainage flow control
Measurement of anchor tensioning or loading at the head of tie-back
Monitoring of landslide areas and stability of natural slopes
Measurement of water table level
Monitoring strain and stress development in the stressed member of piles
Monitoring of soi l pore pressure and control of over pressure
Monitoring cracks and movements in rock masses
Monitoring of rain falls
Monitoring of retaining wall stability
Moni tor ing of rock mass inclina tion movements and block tilting
ApplicationInstrumentation
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
21/48
SPT1. SPEC. & STD. (BS, ASTM)
Equipment set
Hammer, drop, rod
Split spoon sampler
Records & procedure
2. APPLICATIONS & LIMITATIONS
Soil types
Correlations
Shortfalls
3. SPACING/INTERVALS OF TESTING Type of investigation & purposes
Criteria & procedure
4. CASE HISTORIES
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
22/48
COMMON MALPRACTICE IN SPT/SI
* SPT taken without adequate & proper cleaning by clean water
* SPT taken constantly at 1.5m intervals; not at change of soil strata
* SPT hammer weight not within 63.5+_ 0.5 kg; hammer not fully made of steel;drop height less than 76+_ 2 cm after repair/retread.
* Drilling in sandy soils without quality bentonite
* Use casing and not proper drilling rods to advance boreholes
* Samples from SPT split sampler not sealed in container with proper labels &storage
* Use blunt SPT drive shoe
* Mark SPT penetration on rod without ruler or chalk
* Soil description & record of SPT blow counts on palm/shirt/casing & not proper
paper *Drive rod for SPT not straight or inadequate stiffness; for depth>20m, BWNW
rods shall be used
* Untrained supervisor or foreigner supervisor who cannot communicate well
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
23/48
ROCK CORING
1. PURPOSE & APPLICATIONS:
Identification, description & correlations
2. CORE BARREL: single, double & triple
3. CORE BITS: tungsten, surface/impregnated diamond
4. CORE RECOVERY RATIO, RR = (Total core obtained)/(length of run)
5. RQD = (summation of rock core > 100mm)/(length of run)
RQD < 25% VERY POOR
RQD = 25 50% FAIR RQD = 50 75% GOOD
RQD = 75 100% EXCELLENT
6. ROCK DESCRIPTION: STRENGTH & WEATHERING GRADE
UCS < 5 N/mm2 Weak
UCS = 5 12.5 N/mm2 Moderately Weak
UCS = 12.5 50 N/mm2 Moderately Strong
UCS = 50 100 N/mm2 Strong
UCS = > 100 N/mm2 Very Strong
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
24/48
A & B
ZONES
VI
V
IV
III
II
I
1. Implication of Location of WT
& slope stability2. Usual location of groundwater
3. Discontinuities & relict joints
4. What relevant soil/rock
properties (tests) are necessary
for slope stability analysis?
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
25/48
Weathered granite showing well defined relict jointing
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
26/48
Weathered volcanic rock showing well defined relict jointing
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
27/48
Granite showing intense weathering along joints
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
28/48
Volcanic rock with staining along joints: Zone D
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
29/48
Completely decomposed seam (Grade V) in slightly decomposedvolcanic rock (Grade II)
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
30/48
Moderately decomposed seam (Grade III) in slightly decomposedvolcanic rock (Grade II)
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
31/48
Moderately decomposed granite rock (Grade III), 4.65 to 5.55 mHighly decomposed granite rock (Grade IV), 5.55 to 10.71 m
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
32/48
Moderately decomposed granite rock (Grade III), 21.48 to 22.00 mSlightly decomposed granite rock (Grade II), 22.00 to 24.48 m
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
33/48
Purpose & significance Field & lab. techniques
BS5930 description of soil
Consistency or relative density, fabric if
distinguishable, colour, subsidiary, grading, principal
soil type & more detailed comments
e.g. very stiff dark grey silty CLAY with traces of sand
e.g. sandy silty CLAY
e.g. silty sandy CLAY (Wrong!)
SOIL IDENTIFICATION & DESCRIPTION
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
34/48
SOIL CLASSIFICATION
BSCS, USCS, AASHTO
Based on grading & index properties
Coarse grained soil = PSD; fine grained soil =plasticity; How & what properties are
influenced by moisture?
Purposes & application?
Design guides based on soil classification
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
35/48
SI RESULTS INTERPRETATIONS
Scope of factual report: JKR Spec.
Scope of interpretation report
Field & reported borelog Check borelogs & summary of lab. Test results
Discrepancies/compliance with Std/Spec
Interpretations: Atterberg limits, compaction test, etc.
Typical geological formations; typical geotechnical
problems to various types of foundations, etc.
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
36/48
JOB NO PE/SI/21/93 BOREHOLE B6PROJECT S b f I i i d T i f P d W P (Ph II) P l L P Kl
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
37/48
DEPTH(m)
TESTING
SAMPLINGCORING
5
7
6
4
3
2
1
P2/D4
(Rods Weight)
R=35/45cm
UP2/D3
R=66/80cm
UP1/D1R=80/80cm
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
Very SoftGrey fine sandy silty CLAY wi th tracesof shell fragment and thin layers oforganic matter
Very Soft
Grey silty CLAY wi th trace of fine sand,
shell fragment and organic matter
SYMBOL
CONTENT
(%)
CHLORIDE
CONTENT
(%)
SULPHATE
CONTENT
(%)
ORGANIC
PHVALUE
COMPRESSION
UNCON
FINED
GRAVITY
SPEC
IFIC
(Mg/m
)
BULKDENSITY
CLASSIFICATION
SO
IL
CONSOLIDATIONTEST TEST
CHEMICALTRIAXIALTESTDISTRIBUTION
PARTICLE SIZE
GRAVEL
(%)
(%)
SAND
(%)
SILT
(%)
CLAY
STRENGTH(kPa
)
3
(kPa)
C
() (kPa)
P C eC C O
ATTERBERG LIMITS
MCPL LL
20 40 60 80 100
(%)
10 20 30 40 50SPT N
P1/D2(Rods Weight)R=30/45cm
Very SoftGrey very clayey fine SAND wi thsome shell fragment and trace oforganic matter
Very Soft becoming soft
Grey s ilty CLAY with lenses of fine sand
and organic matter; with occassional
shell fragment between 5 .0m - 9.0m
8
9
10
UP3/D5
R=80/80cm
P3/D6
(Hammer
Weight)
R=37/45cm
UP4/D7
R=65/80cm
P4/D8
(Hammer
Weight)
R=29/45cm
UP5/D9
R=78/80cm
P5/D10
(Hammer
Weight)
R=25/45cm
WATER LEVEL:
REDUCED LEVEL:
TYPE OF BORING:
JOB NO: PE/SI/21/93
Seabed Level (ACD) - 14.50m
Rotary
Depth of water 16.70m a.s.l.# (19/12/92)
BOREHOLE: B6
LOCATION: Pulau Lumut, Port K lang
17/12/92 - 19/12/92DATE DRILLED:
CLIENT:
CONSULTANT:
Lembaga Pelabuhan Klang
Sepakat Setia Perunding
PROJECT: Subsurface Investigation and Testing for Proposed West Port (Phase II) Pulau Lumut, Post Klang
0 50 24 26 CHS 0.42515 1.472
110 3554 CI 1.557 27.39 23 0
60 4945 1.565CE 19.312.12 1.4701.089160
1.492CI 31.03 31 0
50 5045 1.568CE 83.28 0.778180 1.494
SOILS SYMBOL P=STANDARD PENETRATION TEST
CR=CORE RECOVERYC=CORING
V=VANE SHEAR TEST
UP=UNDISTURBED SAMPLE
D=DISTURBED SAMPLE
N=NO. OF BLOW PER 30cm UNDISTURBED
REMOULDED
VANE SHEAR:REMARKS:
1. R - - Denotes Recovery
# -- above seabed level2.
ENGINEERINGBORELOG
SIGNIFICANCE OF ATTERBERG LIMITS
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
38/48
SIGNIFICANCE OF ATTERBERG LIMITS
Shrinkage
limit WS
Plastic
limit WP
Liquid
limit WL
Plasticity
Moisture, MC
WL & WP = f(amount & type of clay)
PI = f(clay content)
High PI = high clay content
PI < 30% = sandy/silty soils
Soils of high PI cant be stabilized unless MC is
dissipated, very slow due to low K
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
39/48
-
-
1.0
CI
0
0.25
0.75
0.5
WS W WP N
LW=CI
WL
V. SOFT
SOFT
FIRM
STIFF
WL
20 - 40
< 20
75 - 100
40 - 75
CONSISTENCY
HARD
V. STIFF
WP
WN C (kN/m )
> 200
100 - 200
U2
WP
WS
VS VA
COMPACTION TESTS
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
40/48
COMPACTION TESTS
Purposes & applications
Interpretation & appreciation
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.3
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Water content (%)
Dry
dens
ity
(Mg/m
)3
10% 5% 0%Air content
Saturation line
4.5 kg rammer
2.5 kg rammer
1.6
1.7
0
Water content (%)
Dry
dens
ity
(Mg/m
)3
2.1
1.8
1.9
2.0
2.2
5%Air content10% 0%
30
1.4
1.5
5 10 15 20 25
GW
SW
ML
CL
CH
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
41/48
Soa
ke
dCBR
Moisture content
Moisture content
Dry
dens
ity
Soil A
Soil B
Soil C
Z.A.V.
Soil A
Soil B
Soil C
OTHER INTERPRETATIONS
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
42/48
OTHER INTERPRETATIONS
SG = 2.6 2.7, usually
Soils with SG < 2.6, soil type?
Soils with SG > 2.7, soil type?
PI < 30%, soil type?
Activity, A = PI/(% of clay)
Kaolinite, A = 0.3 0.5
Illite, A = 0.9
Montmorillonite, A > 1.5 Soils with high A can absorb more water; more swelling
& shrinkage problems; applications?
TYPICAL GEOLOGICAL FORMATION & TYPICAL
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
43/48
TYPICAL GEOLOGICAL FORMATION & TYPICAL
PROPERTIES
1. Residual soils of granite:
% of sand/gravel is high
WL < 60 %, PI < 30% generally
Density = 18 20 kN/m3 , NMC = 10 30%
C = 0 20 kPa, = 30 42
Weathering profile & boulder problems
dmax = 15 20 kN/m3, OMC = 10 18% (Std. Comp.).
Relict joints are preferred water path; have lower shearstrength; Significance? How to identify?
Common Geo Problems to piling, deep excavation, slopes?
Important properties sought in SI?
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
44/48
2. Residual Soil of Meta Sedimentary Rocks:
Generally WL < 80 %, PI < 40%
Density = 16 22 kN/m3
C = 0 25 kPa, = 25 38
dmax = 15 19 kN/m3, OMC = 12 24% (Std. Comp.)
Relict discontinuities/beddings/foliations are preferredwater path; have lower shear strength; significance? How
to identify?
Common Geo Problems to piling, deep excavation, slopes?
Important properties sought in SI?
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
45/48
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
46/48
3. Soft Alluvial Clay:
Generally WL = 40 140%
PI = 20 90%, NMC = 40 130%
Sensitivity = 2.5 8, OCR = 1 4 (
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
47/48
CONCLUSION
SI is part of Geotechnical Design. Why?
Scope & definition of Proper SI: properly planned, supervised,
monitored, directed & reported
Important to understand & to identify possible geo problems of the
ground to the project before planning scope of SI
Important to learn typical subsoil profiles for various typical geological
formations/grounds, their typical properties and their usual problems to
various types of construction
SI soil properties Mass properties & ground characterization
Behaviour prediction Performance
Scope of SI planned by different engineers tends to be varied. Why?
8/13/2019 Introduction of Site Investigation
48/48
The End
Thank you for your attention