Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
How do Different Countries Respond to the Presence of Invasive Species?
Response to Non-Native Species
Ambria K. Lohaus
Global Studies and World Languages Academy
Tallwood High School
R e s p o n s e t o N o n - N a ti v e S p e c i e s | 2
Abstract
Invasive Species are species that are introduced, whether purposefully or not, to an
environment not native to them. The effect they have on their new environments can be
catastrophic. This paper digs into the different methods of response the people have to combat
the destruction these invasive cause through answering the questions: how do different countries
respond to the presence of invasive species? What are the most effective ways of eradicating the
presence of invasive species? What is the cost of having to solve the ecological damage they
bring? What is the exact process that goes into enacting a response? By using sources such as an
interview with their outside advisor who is a park worker at Back Bay Wildlife Refuge in
Virginia Beach, personal experience from everyday life and travel observations, databases, and
various online newspaper articles, the author will connect and compare accounts of the presence
of invasive species from two different countries other than the United States (those countries
being Northern Ireland and Costa Rica) and their methods of response to them.
R e s p o n s e t o N o n - N a ti v e S p e c i e s | 3
Table of Contents
Abstract 2
Table of Contents 3
Introduction 4
Limitations 5
Methodology 6
Literature Review 7
Body 10
How They Arrive 10
The Response 12
Conclusion 15
Bibliography 16
Appendix I 20
Appendix II 21
Appendix III 23
R e s p o n s e t o N o n - N a ti v e S p e c i e s | 4
Introduction
Invasive Species, also known as ‘non-native species’ or ‘alien species’, are species that
are introduced, whether purposefully or not, to an environment not native to them. They can have
varying effects on this new environment, both positive and negative depending on the species
and how the native species react to its presence. There are over six thousand five hundred
documented cases of Invasive Species in National Parks in the United States including species
like snakehead (Channidae), nutria (Myocastor coypus), and brown marmorated stink bug
(Halyomorpha halys). All of the species mentioned before have had a negative effect on the
environment by killing off native species and destroying native land.
Efforts to rid the native land of these negative invasive species are being made, usually
through eradication. An example being in Virginia, killing one nutria earns the hunter five
dollars. Other efforts including introducing species that kill off the species targeted for
eradication. Millions of dollars a year are put into a budget by the National Parks Services to
eliminate the presence of invasive species in the area.
The author of this paper has studied such effects and efforts to eliminate these species
through her travel with the Global Studies and World Languages Academy. From her trip in the
summer of 2013 to Costa Rica, the group was brought to a restoration site where they planted
native tree species to replace those lost during illegal logging back in the 1960s that were
replaced with pine trees (Pinus). Because the pine trees were not native to the area, they were not
adapted to the area and absorb up all of the sunlight, killing off lower hanging plants.
R e s p o n s e t o N o n - N a ti v e S p e c i e s | 5
With the introduction of non-native species whether purposeful or not, into new
environments, locals are finding themselves having to respond to the positive and negative
repercussions these species bring though either eradication or acceptance of their presence.
Limitations
While the study of invasive species on their host environments is a selective subject there
are limitations to it.
Primary Sources: The author of this paper will be using her own first hand experiences
from her travels to Costa Rica and Northern Ireland as a source. During these travels the author
observed the long lasting effects invasive species on the environments. The limitations with this
is that the information provided from this experience is from six months to three years ago and
not as current as other sources in this paper. Because the author of this paper is not a specialist or
an expert who has performed field studies for many years, she relies heavily on the work of other
people to gather her data.
Time: Because the author has such a short window to write this paper, she is unable to
work the preferred number of years of experience in the field actively observing the change in
the environment over time.
Inability to Travel: Throughout the paper multiple locations around the world will be
used as examples. Due to the expenses to travel to these places, the author cannot visit all said
locations referred in order to look at the damage caused by non-native species in their new
habitats. She is only able to view such things through photographs and what is written in news
articles.
R e s p o n s e t o N o n - N a ti v e S p e c i e s | 6
Methodology
For this research paper, the author used many primary and secondary sources to compile
her information. For primary sources the author turned towards interviewing her outside advisor
Walter Teege, an employee at Back Bay Wildlife Refuge in Sandbridge, in Virginia Beach. The
Refuge has a large feral pig (Sus scrofa) problem (feral being different than wild in that the pigs
use to be owned by farmers but were released after the farms closed down). They destroy acres
of swampland in only a few months, costing thousands of dollars in damage. She also used her
own experiences performing surveys in Northern Ireland during April 2014 with a school
delegation. Finally, she uses the information learned from attending a lecture in Costa Rica about
the effect of the introduced pine trees on the native plant life, in the summer of 2012.
Even every day observations the author has experienced were used for primary sources.
An example being the imported fire ants that were brought over with mulch from South America
that was implemented into local playgrounds in the neighborhood where the author of this paper
currently resides and are creating quite the disturbance for the children and parents who go to the
parks.
For her secondary sources, the author sorted through hundreds of articles, scientific
journals, videos, etc. to find reliable information for the paper.
A majority of the secondary sources will be newspaper articles from the United States,
including her home state Virginia and Florida, Northern Ireland, and Costa Rica. Other sources
include information found on government websites that are created specifically for the study of
invasive species in their select areas and ways to handle them.
R e s p o n s e t o N o n - N a ti v e S p e c i e s | 7
Literature Review
When people hear the word “alien species’ they picture an extraterrestrial creature
coming down from some type of flying object with the intent to kill all of mankind. In reality an
alien species, or invasive/non-native species, are plants, animals, or pathogens that are non-
native (or alien) to the ecosystem under consideration and whose introduction causes or is likely
to cause harm (Joyce).
There are over 6,500 documented cases of Invasive Species in National Parks in the
United States. Most of these documented cases describe a negative effect on the environment by
killing off native species and destroying native land.
Invasive Species are one of the top threats to native wildlife with 42% of
endangered/threatened species at risk due to the habitat loss or competition posed by invasive
species (Corporation). Directly, non-native species can pose a threat to native wildlife through
the carrying of diseases the native wildlife is not adapted to (for example feral pigs carry
brucellosis), they can outcompete them for food or territory, or killing their young. Indirectly,
they can pose a threat through altering the ecosystem and biodiversity, Aggressive plant species
like kudzu (Pueraria) can quickly replace a diverse ecosystem with a monoculture of just kudzu
(Corporation).
A lot of these species arrive through simple methods like transporting wood. A majority of the
invading insects we have now arrived here accidently through the wood trade, an example being
the Asian long-horned beetle (Anoplophora glabripennis) that was brought to New York
accidently when they stored away in a shipment of lumber and hardwood in 1996 (Haack).
R e s p o n s e t o N o n - N a ti v e S p e c i e s | 8
Other ways they are introduced is the illegal pet trade. Burmese pythons (Python
bivittatus) in Florida’s Everglades are a prime example of illegal pets being released into a non-
native habitat. The first Keys python was discovered alive in 2007 when researchers checking on
the status of a male Key Largo woodrat (Neotoma floridana smalli) wearing a radio transmitter
noticed it strangely had moved more than a mile from its original documented habitat. The signal
led the two researchers to a 7-1/2-foot Burmese python sunning itself. The contents of the
captured snake’s stomach included not only the collared woodrat but another one as well
(“Stopping”). Burmese pythons were brought here as pets but the people who bought them were
not prepared for the immense size these snakes would grow to and when they were too large for
their enclosures, people simply let them go. Since then the population has exploded and slowly
Burmese pythons are taking over the Everglades. It has been reported that they are out competing
the native alligators and in even some cases, eating them! To combat the growing population and
to decrease the damage done the U.S. enacted a ban in January 17, 2012 on the importing of four
snakes: the Burmese python, the yellow anaconda, and the northern and southern African python
(“Stopping”).
Organizations have been formed by the National Parks services such as Hawaii Invasive
Species Council, a government organization set up to deal with the non-native species that are
making a large presence on the Hawaiian Islands. The HISC was founded in 2003 under Chapter
194, Hawaii Revised Statutes to take control of the spreading of unwanted species and to prevent
any more from appearing on the islands. It currently holds projects to continue their research on
these invasive species and as of June the governor has granted more funding to continue their
programs (Hawaii).
R e s p o n s e t o N o n - N a ti v e S p e c i e s | 9
In an article from The Huffington Post, Carla Herreria reports the advances unwanted,
non-native species in the Hawaiian Islands. The biggest problem seems to be the Bingabing tree
(Macaranga grandifolia), which because of its big leaves will literally snuff other plants of light
and kill them. Other problem animals are apple snails (Ampullariidae), snakes (Serpentes),
mongoose (Herpestidae), and Africanized honey bees (A hybrid of the Western honey bee
species and African honey bees). These animals cause millions of dollars of damage each year
and some, like the snake, have driven native species to extinction (Herreria).
In Virginia we have the 2012 Virginia Invasive Species Management Plan which was
developed by the Virginia Invasive Species Advisory Committee for the Virginia Invasive
Species Working Group (Invasive). Virginia itself has an invasive species problem with species
ranging from nutria, a semi-aquatic mammal that has gone out and destroyed valuable wetlands
in the south, to kudzu, a plant that was introduced for its looks but quickly spread and eliminated
its competitors. The Management Plan was structured to budget money spent on active ways to
eliminate the non-natives in Virginia. For example in the case of Nutria, Virginia has permitted
hunters to shoot the rodents on the spot with a reward of five dollars per Nutria (Invasive).
Interestingly enough not all non-native species were introduced with negative
connotations. Cases such as the reintroduction of species to an environment where they were in
the past extinct is a member of such an area. In Yellowstone they are currently introducing gray
wolves (Canis lupus) back into the Park after so long of them being absent. The wolves were
reintroduced to combat the high elk (Cervus Canadensis) population that was killing off the
willows (Salix), a food source for elk (Gertz). In this case these introduced species are well
received by the public, unlike the others mentioned before.
R e s p o n s e t o N o n - N a ti v e S p e c i e s | 10
The Body
Invasive species can be introduced to a new area in a variety of ways. This research paper
will divulge into those ways, whether purposeful or not, to compare and contrast the different
reactions an environment and the society reacts to them. Some areas like western Virginia where
elk have begun to invade the forests have taken advantage of their presence for the economic
value they pose during hunting season. Other areas like Costa Rica are attempting at restoring the
damage done by non-native pine trees that have been killing off the native plant life for decades.
How They Arrive
Most invasive species are brought unintentionally. The major modes of transport are the
illegal pet trade, ships, wood/lumber import, etc. (“N.”). In the United States fire ants
(Solenopsis mandibularis) were brought to the United States through the importing of mulch
made in South America. The fire ants, or red ants, are well known for their painful sting they use
as a defense mechanism when they or their home is threatened.
Asian long-horned beetles were introduced in a similar way along with emerald ash borer
(Agrilus planipennis). While the emerald ash borer has only been introduced once to North
America, the Asian long-horned beetle has been introduced seven times. Emerald ash borer
populations have been established in fifteen of the states in the United States as well as Ontario
and Quebec in Canada (“Campbell”). Removing or treating trees threatened by either of these
beetles costs local governments over one billion dollars each year (“Campbell”).
Plant species such as Japanese knotweed (Fallopia japonica) in Northern Ireland in the
British Isles were introduced as decorative plants in the mid nineteenth century and have since
then have exploded all over and is extremely difficult to remove (“Attwood”). Giant hogweed
R e s p o n s e t o N o n - N a ti v e S p e c i e s | 11
(Heracleum mantegazzianum) was also introduced to Northern Ireland as a decorative plant in
the nineteenth century and it is hard to eradicate as well because it’s capable of producing
thousands of seeds which can remain viable for several years, but unlike Japanese knotweed it is
dangerous to humans with its phototoxic sap (“Attwood”).
Along with plant species, animal species are imported in the pet trade into our own
backyard. The green iguana (Iguana iguana) was introduced in 1966 (“Invasive Species n.d”).
While they do not cause any ecological damage, homeowners are forced to pay out of pocket for
the damage done to property in the Miami-Dade area (“Invasive Species n.d”).
Further north in the Mississippi River, locals are on the verge of an uprising of Asian
carp populations. Two species are the biggest culprits: bigheaded carp (Hypophthalmichthys
nobilis) and silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) (but seven other species of Asian carp
have been documented outside of their native habitat and thriving). The species was introduced
back in the 1960s as filter fish in fish farms but flooding allowed them to escape into the local
waterways (“N.”). These fish can reach almost 100 pounds, eating all of the plankton native fish
need. Besides causing harm to the native fish, the carp will leap from the water when they sense
a boat motor, sometimes colliding into people and boats causing injury. Recent surveys have
shown that the carp are moving towards the Great Lakes, threatening the delicate ecosystem
there.
Carp is an example of species that was accidently released into the ecosystem and
flourished because it became a dominant species. Florida currently has two distinctive troops of
vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus aethiops) with well over 120 members (“Invasive Species n.d”).
They have become quite the nuisance since their escape from a tourist attraction. They mainly
threaten humans because they carry diseases that are deadly to us.
R e s p o n s e t o N o n - N a ti v e S p e c i e s | 12
Invasive species are distinguished because they thrive in their new environment, no
matter the way they are introduced. They quickly become the dominant species, out competing
the native ones and threaten the biodiversity of the area.
The Response
With the destruction caused by these non-natives plans have been set up by national parks
to eradicate the problem through the budget that is set up by the Department of the Interior and
Congress.
“We have three major invasive species at Back Bay in Virginia Beach: the cattails
(Typha), the feral pigs, and the nutria. It is the cattails that are the most costly to get rid of and
the feral pigs that are the most costly in damage. We do not have a set budget for dealing with
invasive species. The money we get from the government is divided up between utilities, workers
salary, and whatever else needs to be done to keep the park running. But we do make sure a
portion goes to dealing with the problem. In the case of cattails we team up with the local fire
department to burn the cattails that grow here, and destroy the habitat to the local songbird
populations, letting native grasses to grow and take their place. It is a timely process dealing
with the cattails. It takes years to restore what was lost and incredibly expensive. We set traps
with cameras and have hunts for the huge feral pig population in the area and luckily that has
gotten the numbers down. The “opportunistic hunting policy” in the case of nutria has brought
down their threat level into a more manageable level for us. We have programs set up to restore
the land lost/destroyed by the invasives but as I said it is a costly effort and unfortunately we’ve
had to cut back some. ”
-Walter Teege (Visitor Services Manager, Back Bay National Wildlife Refuge)
R e s p o n s e t o N o n - N a ti v e S p e c i e s | 13
A majority of the invasive problems around the world are combated with hunting,
fishing, trapping, etc. A.K.A complete and total eradication
One combat strategy that is being used is introducing old predators that have since been
missing from the area. That was the case in Back Bay. According to the staff there a resident
coyote (Canis latrans) family was introduced there to hopefully control the feral pig populations.
Photographic evidence proved that the coyotes were indeed preying on the defenseless piglets,
thus decreasing their numbers.
In the case of animals brought in through the pet trade, legal or not, the government can,
and has in the past, put bans on the importing or exporting of certain species. They also can
create and enforce laws making it illegal to release exotic animals into the wild/
Perhaps the best way to respond to invasive species is to prevent them from entering the
environment in the first place. The National Invasive Council has set up guidelines and advice to
the public on how to keep unwanted species out:
- For those who like boating, jet skiing, kayaking, etc. it is best to always check and clean
the underside of your equipment to make sure you aren’t carrying any ‘aquatic hitchhikers’.
- When planting a garden it is preferred to plant native plant species in your area and to
take out ay non-native species. Most invasive plant species are introduced and spread through
gardens and plant decorations.
- If you go camping and are building a fire, use wood from the area, do not bring your
own. Damaging bug species hide out in lumber and will spread.
R e s p o n s e t o N o n - N a ti v e S p e c i e s | 14
- If you see signs of invasives in your area, report it to the nearest wildlife conservation
facility and/or Wildlife Park.
But as Mr. Tegge said, it is a timely and costly process. Some species are harder to
dispose of than others simply because they reproduce quickly like feral pigs. A sow (female pig)
is able to gestate at nine months and can have two litters a year ranging from eight to ten piglets
per litter. Take those numbers and multiply them tenfold and you can see how easy it is for a
threat to grow at such a rapid rate.
Some species adapt too quickly further response humans give in attempt to eradicate
them. A lot of plant and insect species have shown that over time they build a resistance to things
like pesticides. This tolerance is passed down through the generations and soon enough humans
are forced to have to figure out a new way to kill off the nuisances. Or some, like kudzu, are just
past the point of no return and the goal isn’t to exterminate but to have a handle on; to manage as
best as resources allow and to help repair what can be.
The process to exterminating non-native species takes time. It could take only a few
months or it could take decades. Dealing with a species the habitat has never experienced before
it tricky at best, it is a meticulous process that takes patience and clear, rational thinking to
handle. Most of all it takes the financing behind it. The way different countries respond to the
presence of invasive species in their environment is through the ways they deem fit; whether it
be through the introduction of a predator, pesticide, traps, hunting, or even leaving well enough
alone
R e s p o n s e t o N o n - N a ti v e S p e c i e s | 15
Conclusion
When it comes to the leading causes of ecological damage in the world, the normal
person doesn’t come up with the answer than invasive species are a real problem. They don’t
think about the risk that a wood eating beetle could be a stowaway with their brand new
hardwood floor they ordered from China. But the fact of the matter is that invasive species are a
severe problem to the ecological community all around the world and it rests in our hands to
keep things in balance. When we identify a foreign species in our community, we immediately
take up arms. Our number one mission is to eventually eradicate the problem. Whether it be
plants in Northern Ireland that outcompete native plants or feral hogs that eat up our wetlands in
southeastern Virginia, the government funds programs that are responsible for attempting to
dispel invasives from their area without causing further harm to the environment. But there is
always a cost. Someone has to pay for these programs and it becomes an arms race between the
cost of fighting back and the cost of not doing anything. So what do we, as a society, do to solve
this problem? The simplest answer is to prevent it from occurring in the first place by keeping a
close eye on what we put into our environment and knowing that even the smallest insect can
cause the most destruction.
R e s p o n s e t o N o n - N a ti v e S p e c i e s | 16
Bibliography
Primary Sources:
Author: Ambria K. Lohaus
Outside Advisor: Walt Tegge
Visitor Services Manager
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Back Bay National Wildlife Refuge
1324 Sandbridge Road
Virginia Beach, VA, 23456
Secondary Sources:
Attwood, A. (2013). An Invasive Alien Species Strategy for Northern Ireland. An Invasive Alien
Species Strategy for Northern Ireland, 1-64. Retrieved November 25, 2014, from
http://www.doeni.gov.uk/invasive_alien_species_strategy_2013.pdf
Bolton, Joyce. "National Invasive Species Information Center." National Invasive Species
Information Center. National Agricultural Library, n.d. Web. 27 Oct. 2014.
R e s p o n s e t o N o n - N a ti v e S p e c i e s | 17
Bonetti, T. (2010, September). Comprehensive Conservation Plan (United States of America,
Department of the Interior, U.S Fish and Wildlife Service). Retrieved November 25, 2014, from
<http://www.fws.gov/northeast/planning/back%20bay/pdf/FinalCCP/BACKBAYNWRFinalCC
P9_2010.pdf>
Campbell, F. (2011, November 9). The hidden cost of trade: Invasive species as a trade
“externality”. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. Retrieved November
25, 2014, from <http://www.ictsd.org/bridges-news/biores/news/the-hidden-cost-of-trade-
invasive-species-as-a-trade-%E2%80%9Cexternality%E2%80%9D>
Haack, R.A., F. H´erard, J. Sun, and J.J. Turgeon. 2009. Managing Invasive Populations of Asian
Long-horned Beetle and Citrus Long-horned Beetle: A Worldwide Perspective. Annu. Rev.
Entomol. 2010. 55:521–46
"Hawaii Invasive Species Council." Hawaii Invasive Species Council Home Comments. Hawaii
Invasive Species Council, 2014. Web. 29 Sept. 2014. <http://dlnr.hawaii.gov/hisc/>.
Herreria, Carla. "Hawaii's Invasive Species Might Be Cute, But They're A Huge Island Threat."
The Huffington Post. The Huffington Post, 11 Aug. 2013. Web. 29 Sept. 2014.
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/08/hawaii-invasive-species_n_4237315.html>.
Invasive Species. (n.d.). Retrieved November 25, 2014, from
<http://myfwc.com/wildlifehabitats/nonnatives/invasive-species/>
"Invasive Species in Virginia." Invasive Species in Virginia. Virginia Department of
Conservation and Recreation, 2010. Web. 29 Sept. 2014.
<http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/natural_heritage/vaisc/>.
R e s p o n s e t o N o n - N a ti v e S p e c i e s | 18
“Invasive Species”. U.S Fish & Wildlife Service (2012, October 17). Retrieved November 25,
2014, from <http://www.fws.gov/invasives/>
. "Invasive Species in Virginia." LandScope America. LandScope America, 2014. Web. 29 Sept.
2014. <http%3A%2F%2Fwww.landscope.org%2Fvirginia%2Fthreats%2FInvasive
%2520Species%2F>.
Kelly, J., Tosh, D., Dale, K. and Jackson, A. (2013) the economic cost of invasive and non-
native species in Ireland and Northern Ireland. Invasive Species Ireland.
Lovgren, S. (2004, June 3). Huge, freed pet pythons invade Florida Everglades. National
Geographic. Retrieved November 25, 2014, from
<http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/06/0603_040603_invasivespecies.html>
N. (n.d.). Invasive species. Retrieved November 25, 2014, from
<http://www.nwf.org/wildlife/threats-to-wildlife/invasive-species.aspx>
Rodenberg, C. (n.d.). Top 5 most damaging invasive species in the U.S. Popular Mechanics.
Retrieved November 25, 2014, from
<http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/environment/4344787#slide-1>
Stokes, K., O'Neill, K. & McDonald, R.A. (2004) Invasive species in Ireland. Unpublished
report to Environment & Heritage Service and National Parks & Wildlife Service. Quercus,
Queens University Belfast, Belfast.
<http://www.npws.ie/publications/archive/Stokes_et_al_2004_IAS_Ireland-1.pdf>
Stokes, K., O’Neill, K. & McDonald, R.A. (2006) Invasive species in Ireland. Report to
Environment & Heritage Service and National Parks & Wildlife Service by Quercus, Queens
R e s p o n s e t o N o n - N a ti v e S p e c i e s | 19
University Belfast. Environment & Heritage Service, Belfast and National Parks & Wildlife
Service, Dublin.
U. (2014, November 25). Status of invasive plants in Virginia. Retrieved November 25, 2014,
from <http://www.eddmaps.org/tools/statereport.cfm?id=us_va>
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. 1993. Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the
United States; Holmes, T.P., J.E. Aukema, B. van Holle, A. Liebhold, and E. Sills. 2009.
Economic Impacts of Invasive Species in Forests, Past, Present, and Future. The Year in Ecology
and Conservation Biology, 2009: Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1162: 18–38 (2009); Colunga-Garcia,
M., R.A. Haack, and A.O. Adelaja. 2009. Freight Transportation and the Potential for Invasions
of Exotic Insects in Urban and Periurban Forests of the United States. J. Econ. Entomol. 102(1):
237-246 (2009) ; Burgiel, S., G. Foote, A. Perrault, C. Williams. 2005. Invasive Alien Species
Prevention Strategies: Avoiding Conflicts with the International Trade Regime. Center for
International Environmental Law; Chiron, F. S.M. Shirley, S. Kark. 2010. Behind the Iron
Curtain: Socio-economic and political factors shaped exotic bird introductions into Europe.
Biological Conservation 143 (2010); Westphal, M.I., M. Browne, K. MacKinnon, I. Noble.
2007. Biological Invasions (2007) Volume: 10, Issue: 4.
United States. National Park Service. "Nonnative Species." National Parks Service. U.S.
Department of the Interior, 31 Aug. 2014. Web. 29 Sept. 2014.
<http://www.nps.gov/shen/naturescience/nonnativespecies.htm>.
R e s p o n s e t o N o n - N a ti v e S p e c i e s | 20
Appendix I. Delegation to N. Ireland in April of 2014 participating in an invasive species survey
on Groomsport Beach
R e s p o n s e t o N o n - N a ti v e S p e c i e s | 21
Appendix II. Costa Rica Delegation planting native tree species to restore damage done by pine
trees.
R e s p o n s e t o N o n - N a ti v e S p e c i e s | 22
R e s p o n s e t o N o n - N a ti v e S p e c i e s | 23
Appendix III. Asian Carp Populations 1975 vs 2011 (National Wildlife Federation)