37
Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU [email protected]

Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU [email protected]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts

W. F. Fett and K. T. RajkowskiFood Safety Intervention Technologies RU

[email protected]

Page 2: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Overview

• Interventions for use on sprout seed – Overview of published data– Conclusions

• Interventions during sprouting and postharvest– Overview of published data– Conclusions

• Ongoing collaborative study with industry– Sprout seed (Dr. K. T. Rajkowski)

Page 3: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Sprout Seed

• Current guidance (FDA, 1999) – Seeds should be treated with one or more approved antimicrobial treatments such as 20,000 ppm calcium hypochlorite. At least one treatment should be applied immediately before sprouting

• Challenge is to obtain a 5 log reduction of human pathogens while maintaining seed vigor and sprout appearance and yield at acceptable levels (NACMCF 1999)

Page 4: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Sprout Seed

• Elimination of all pathogens is desirable due to the potential for outgrowth of any surviving pathogens during the sprouting process to levels sufficient to cause illness

Page 5: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Published Papers – Development of Interventions (Seed/Sprout)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

1996 1998 2000 2002 2004

Page 6: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Chemical Interventions - Seed• Aqueous sanitizers (along w/ heat, surfactants)

– Ca(OCl)2, NaOCl, ClO2, acidified ClO2, acidified NaClO2, Ca(OH)2, calcinated calcium, H2O2, acidic electrolyzed water, ethanol, sulfuric acid, lactic acid, citric acid, acetic acid, thyme oil, ozone, trisodium phosphate, colicin type E-2, TsunamiR, VortexxTM, Vegi-CleanTM, FitR, Calcifresh-STM, CitrobioTM, CitricidalTM, EnvironneTM, CitrexTM

Elevated temperature (42 to 50oC) usually beneficial, but leads to greater loss of seed germination. Effect of addition of surfactants variable.

Page 7: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Chemical Interventions - Seed

• Gas phase treatments– Acetic acid vapor, allyl isothiocyanate, trans-

anethole, carvacrol, cinnamic aldehyde, thymol, ammonia

Page 8: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Physical Interventions - Seed

• Dry heat

• Hot water

• Irradiation (gamma radiation, pulsed UV)

• Hydrostatic pressure

• Radio frequency dielectric heating

Page 9: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Biological Interventions - Seed

• Antagonistic bacteria– Lactic acid bacteria– Fluorescent pseudomonads– Whole bacterial communities

• Bacteriophage vs. Salmonella

Page 10: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Combination Treatments - Seed

• Combination of aqueous chemicals– Lactic acid followed by chlorine (2000 ppm)– Thyme oil followed by ozonated water and aqueous

ClO2

• Combination of physical treatments with aqueous chemicals– Ultrasound and heat in combination with Ca(OH)2,

Tween 80, TsunamiR 200 and FitR

– Ozonated water followed by dry heat (60oC, 3 h) – Dry heat (50oC, 1 h) followed by chlorine (200 ppm) or

acidic electrolyzed water and sonication• Combination of physical treatments

– Dry heat (50oC, 1 h) followed by gamma irradiation

Page 11: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Alfalfa Seed - Chlorine (20,000 ppm) • Method examined in several laboratories using artificially

inoculated seed

• Data highly variable – from approximately 2 to 7 log reductions reported for Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7 – Differences in inoculation methods and inoculum size, use of

seed rinses before and/or after treatment, and treatment methods (e.g., mechanical or hand mixing)

• Consistent finding - treatment does not consistently eliminate pathogens from inoculated seed

• Best to evaluate data for alternative chemical treatments with high levels of chlorine where directly compared in the same laboratory in the same set of experiments

Page 12: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Chlorine Treatments - Naturally Contaminated Alfalfa Seed

• 16,000 to 20,000 ppm, with or without buffering to neutral pH, 10-15 min w/ continuous mixing → eliminated Salmonella

(Suslow et al. 2002. J. Food Prot. 65: 452-458; Fett 2002. Food Microbiol. 19: 135-149)

• 20,000 ppm, no buffer, 10 min, intermittent mixing→ did not eliminate Salmonella

(Stewart et al. 2001. J. Food Prot. 64: 618-621)

Page 13: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Potential Alternatives to Chlorine – Alfalfa Seed

Page 14: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Chemical

• Ca(OH)2, 1%,10 min at RT • FitR, 15 to 30 min at RT• CitrexTM, 20,000 ppm, 10 min at RT• PangermexTM (concentrated CitrobioTM), 20,000

ppm, 10 min at RT

All directly compared with high levels of chlorine.All tested in a single laboratory, independentconfirmation required, scale up studies; safety/cost issues?

Page 15: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Biological

• Whole microbial communities from market sprouts added at seed soak stage → 5 log reduction of Salmonella at day 7 of sprouting for alfalfa

Matos and Garland. 2005. J. Food Prot. 68: 40-48.

Page 16: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Chlorine – Mung Bean Seed

• Ca(OCl)2 (16,000 ppm, pH 6.8, 15 min, constant agitation, rinses both before and after seed treatment)– Salmonella → 5.0 log reduction (survivors)– E. coli O157:H7 → 3.9 log reduction

(survivors)– No effect on % seed germination

Fett, W.F. 2002. J. Food Prot. 65: 848-852.

Page 17: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Potential Alternatives to Chlorine – Mung Bean Seed

Page 18: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Gaseous Acetic Acid – Mung Bean Seed

• Gaseous acetic acid (242 ul per liter of air, 12 h, 45oC)

– Salmonella → 5 log reduction, no survivors– E. coli O157:H7 → 6 log reduction, no survivors– L. monocytogenes → 5 log reduction, survivors– % germination reduced from 96 to 88% (not

statistically significant)

Note: Similar treatment of alfalfa seed was detrimental to seed germination (Delaquis, personal communication)

Delaquis et al. 1999. J. Food Prot. 62: 953-957.

Page 19: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Dry Heat – Mung Bean Seed

• Dry heat (55oC)– Salmonella → 5 days, 4 log reduction, no

survivors– E. coli O157:H7 → 4 days, 6 log reduction, no

survivors– No effect on seed germination

Note: Similar treatment of alfalfa seed reported to be detrimental to seed germination

Hu, et al. 2004. J. Food Prot. 67: 1257-1260.

Page 20: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Hot Water – Mung Bean Seed

• Hot water (5 g/250 ml) (inoc. load >108 cfu/g)– 55oC/20 min → 5 log reduction of Salmonella– 60oC/10 min → 5 log reduction of Salmonella– 70oC/5 min → 5 log reduction of Salmonella– 80oC/2 min) → 6 log reduction of Salmonella

– None of the treatments reduced seed germination below 95%. Thicker seed coat protects the embryo.

Weiss and Hammes. 2003. J. Appl. Bot. 77: 152-155.

Page 21: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Ammonia Gas – Mung Bean Seed

• Ammonia gas (300 mg/L of air), 22 h, RT– 5 log reduction of Salmonella (survivors)– 6 log reduction of E. coli O157:H7 (survivors)– No effect on germination

Note: Reported 2 to 3 log reductions with inoculated alfalfa seed using the same treatment. No effect on germination.

Himathongkham et al. 2001. J. Food Prot. 64: 1817-1819.

Page 22: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Combinations – Mung Bean Seed

• Dry heat (50oC, 1 h) followed by hot (50oC) acidic electrolyzed water with sonication→ 4.6 log reduction of E. coli O157:H7 (survivors), no

effect on germination and sprout growth rate

• Dry heat (50oC, 1 h) followed by gamma irradiation (2.0 kGy)→ 4.6 log reduction of E. coli O157:H7 (no survivors),

no effect on germination, reduced sprout growth rate

Bari et al. 2003. J. Food Prot. 66: 767-774.

Page 23: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Interventions – Other Seed Types

• Garden cress– High pressure (300 MPa, 15 min, 20oC) → 6 log

reduction of Salmonella, generic E. coli and L. innocua (survivors). Germination delayed by 1 day

(sesame, radish and mustard seed more pressure sensitive)

Wuytack et al. 2003. J. Food Prot. 66: 918-923.

• Radish– Dry heat (50oC, 1 h) followed by gamma irradiation at

2 kGy → 5 log reduction for E. coli O157:H7 (survivors)

Bari et al. 2003. J. Food Prot. 66: 767-774

Page 24: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Summary – Seed• No method is currently available which

eliminates pathogens from artificially inoculated alfalfa seed while maintaining seed vigor

• Laboratory data on the ability of high levels of chlorine to eliminate Salmonella from naturally contaminated seed is variable.

• Published investigations of outbreaks indicate use of high levels of chlorine may not always be 100% effective under common commercial practice, but may reduce risk.

Page 25: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Summary – Seed• Several potential alternative treatments (acetic

acid vapor, ammonia gas, dry heat, wet heat) reported for mung bean seed

• High pressure treatment may be an alternative treatment for some seed types (e.g., garden cress)

• Biological control with whole bacterial communities appears promising, but long-range R&D project

Page 26: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Summary – Seed

• Results need independent confirmation, scale-up studies need to be undertaken and any required regulatory approvals obtained before use of alternatives to chlorine are implemented.

Page 27: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Sprouts• Challenge is to significantly reduce or eliminate

pathogens on sprout surfaces during growth or postharvest without compromising sprout growth rate, appearance, yield, shelf-life and nutrient content

• Substantial laboratory evidence for internalization of Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7 during sprouting of inoculated seed (alfalfa, radish and mung bean)

Page 28: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Interventions – During Sprouting • Antimicrobial additives to the irrigation water

– Chlorine (up to 200 ppm)– Chlorine dioxide (100 ppm)– Calcinated calcium (0.4%, w/v)– Ozonated water (9 ppm)– Combination of ozonated water 0.3 to 0.5 pm) and

gaseous ozone (0.2 ppm)– Thyme oil alone or with chlorine dioxide and ozonated

water– Acidified sodium chlorite (1,200 ppm)

→ No intervention was highly effective

Page 29: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Interventions - Postharvest

• Acidic electrolyzed water

• Aqueous ozone (up to 21 ppm)

• Chlorous acid (268 ppm)

• Sodium hypochlorite (up to 2,000 ppm)

• Lactic acid (2%)

• Acetic acid vapor (up to 500 mg/L)

• Allyl isothiocyanate (up to 500 mg/L)

Page 30: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Interventions - Postharvest

• RT water rinses

• Hot water dips (100oC, 30 sec)

• Irradiation – gamma and electron beam

Page 31: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Effective Postharvest Interventions• Irradiation

– Gamma: elimination of Salmonella from alfalfa sprouts grown from naturally contaminated seed (0.5 kGy), and > 5 log reduction of Salmonella and generic E. coli from radish and mung bean sprouts (1.5 to 2.0 kGy); no detrimental effects on quality

Rajkowski and Thayer. 2000. J. Food Prot. 63: 871-875; Bari et al. 2004. J. Food Prot. 67: 2263-2268.

– Electron beam (beta) – elimination (6 logs) of L. monocytogenes from inoculated alfalfa sprouts (3.3 kGy). No change in appearance or odor.

Schoeller et al. 2002. J. Food Prot. 65: 1259-1266

Note: Regulatory approvals required

Page 32: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Effective Postharvest Interventions

• Chlorine (2000 ppm, 5 min, RT) → 5 log reduction of Salmonella on alfalfa sprouts

Gandhi et al. 2001. J. Food Prot. 64: 1891-1898

• Chlorous acid (HClO2) (268 ppm, 10 min)→ 5 log reductions of Salmonella and L.

monocytogenes on mung bean sprouts, no change in visual quality during storage at 4oC for 9 days

Lee et al. 2002. J. Food Prot. 65: 1088-1092

Note: Regulatory approvals required

Page 33: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Summary - Sprouts

• No effective way of eliminating Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7 during the sprouting process. Addition of antimicrobials to irrigation water would interfere with spent irrigation water testing.

• After harvest, only gamma or beta irradiation most likely to eliminate both surface-borne and internalized pathogens. Regulatory approval required for this use.

Page 34: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

ARS/Industry Collaborative Study

Page 35: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Table 1. Reduction of Salmonella on inoculated alfalfa seeds after gaseous ozone treatment

LOG CFU/G OF SALMONELLA ON TSA*

SAMPLE ID** BEFORE AFTER*** REDUCTION A 6.1 4.6 1.5 B 6.7 5.4 1.3 C 5.9 5.1 0.8 D 5.9 5.2 0.7 E 5.9 5.1 0.8- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - F**** 5.9 5.9

_________________________________________________________________

* Tryptic soy agar – a non selective agar for recovery. ** Samples processed in different packaging material. *** Processing conditions: 30,000 ppm ozone , 65 % RH for 24 hr. **** Processed with little to no RH.

Page 36: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Verification of Yield Ratio

a. Alfalfa seeds given gaseous ozone treatment of 30,000 ppm ozone, 65 % RH for 24 h.

b. Two sprouters given seed to determine germination and yield ratio.

c. Both sprout growers reported a 99% germination with good yield ratio.

d. One grower now using ozone treated seed for > 3 months.

Page 37: Intervention Technologies For Enhancing the Safety of Sprouts W. F. Fett and K. T. Rajkowski Food Safety Intervention Technologies RU wfett@arserrc.gov

Table 2. Peracetic acid/hydrogen peroxide sanitizing treatment of Salmonella inoculated

alfalfa seeds for 20 minutes. log CFU/g Recovered% Sanitizer (v/v) Non-Treated Ozone-Treated 0 6.05 3.64 1 4.30 2.00 2 4.19 1.50 3 3.40 NG*---------------------------------------------------------- hypochlorite 5.21________________________________________* NG after plating and MPN recovery.